# Oxygen induced promotion of electrochemical reduction of CO2 via co-electrolysis

## Abstract

Harnessing renewable electricity to drive the electrochemical reduction of CO2 is being intensely studied for sustainable fuel production and as a means for energy storage. Copper is the only monometallic electrocatalyst capable of converting CO2 to value-added products, e.g., hydrocarbons and oxygenates, but suffers from poor selectivity and mediocre activity. Multiple oxidative treatments have shown improvements in the performance of copper catalysts. However, the fundamental underpinning for such enhancement remains controversial. Here, we combine reactivity, in-situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, and computational investigations to demonstrate that the presence of surface hydroxyl species by co-electrolysis of CO2 with low concentrations of O2 can dramatically enhance the activity of copper catalyzed CO2 electroreduction. Our results indicate that co-electrolysis of CO2 with an oxidant is a promising strategy to introduce catalytically active species in electrocatalysis.

## Introduction

Among all electrocatalysts explored to date, copper (Cu) exhibits the unique capability in reducing CO2 to valuable hydrocarbons and oxygenates. However, significant enhancement in the rate and selectivity for valuable products and in energy efficiency for Cu-based electrocatalysis remains imperative for this strategy to become industrially viable1,2,3. Oxidative treatments of polycrystalline Cu surfaces have been shown to improve the activity and selectivity towards the production of value-added hydrocarbons and oxygenates, for example, thermal oxidation followed by reduction (so called oxide-derived Cu)4,5, oxygen plasma activation6, and anodic oxidation7,8,9. Although there is a general recognition of the beneficial effect of oxidative treatments on Cu-based catalysts in the CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), the mechanisms through which the enhancement is realized remain a topic of considerable discussion. A key point of debate is whether oxygen-containing species, e.g., CuOx, CuOx(OH)y, and Cu(OH)x, are present at the CO2RR conditions6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19. Multiple ex situ and in situ/operando characterizations lead to contradicting conclusions6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,19. As ex situ measurements have the potential of exposing the sample to the ambient condition, the origin of the oxygen-containing species on the Cu surface detected by these methods is uncertain. Another challenge in resolving this debate is the interfacial sensitivity. As the Pourbaix diagram of Cu shows that only metallic Cu should be present at the reducing environment of the CO2RR20, the Cu oxide and/or hydroxide species are expected to be present only at the electrode/electrolyte interface, if at all. Thus, the detection of these oxidized Cu species hinges upon the interfacial sensitivity of characterization methods. In this regard, recent in situ/operando surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic investigations provided initial evidence of the existence of oxidized Cu species at reducing potentials21. A much less discussed, but arguably more important, aspect is whether the oxidized Cu species, if they indeed exist at the CO2RR conditions, contribute to enhanced reactivity of Cu-based catalysts after oxidative treatments. It is conceivable that Cu oxide and/or hydroxide species are mere spectators during the CO2RR, while preferentially exposed facets or defects, e.g., located at the grain boundaries on the metallic Cu surface, induced by the treatment are the real cause of change in the catalytic performance22,23,24,25. This has been shown in our recent work in the CO-reduction reaction on Cu26. Thus, establishing a direct correlation between the surface speciation of Cu at reaction conditions and reactivity is a frontier in the CO2RR research.

In this work, we demonstrate that the production rate of oxygenates and hydrocarbons in the CO2RR is enhanced by up to 216-fold when coupled with the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) by co-feeding CO2 and O2 (up to 20%). In situ surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) shows that surface hydroxide species on micron-sized Cu particles are present at the CO2RR condition, which are likely formed by ORR. The correlation between the surface hydroxyl species and the enhanced reactivity is supported by additional experimental and computational evidence. The addition of low concentrations of H2O2, a known possible product of the ORR, in the electrolyte results in much less enhancement of catalytic performance as compared to the case of co-reduction of CO2 and O2. Importantly, the Raman feature of the surface hydroxyl group is absent, indicating that the presence of the surface hydroxyl group, rather than any oxidant such as H2O2, is central to the enhanced production rates. In addition, density functional theory (DFT) calculations show the beneficial role of the surface hydroxyl group in reducing the energy barriers in the formation of oxygenates and hydrocarbons. Results reported in this work demonstrate the promise of enhancing the CO2RR performance by leveraging coupled reactions via co-electrolysis. From a practical perspective, the strategy of coupling the CO2RR and the ORR could reduce the separation cost of trace amounts of O2 present in the CO2 stream from the flue gas or direct air capture.

## Results

### Co-reduction of CO2 with O2

The electrolysis experiments are conducted in an H-type electrochemical cell with a standard three-electrode setup (Supplementary Fig. 1). Cu electrodes are prepared by depositing commercial polycrystalline Cu powders (~1 μm) (Supplementary Fig. 2) onto a PTFE-treated carbon fiber paper. Compared to planar polycrystalline Cu foil electrodes, these electrodes can effectively improve the mass transport of dissolved gas molecules in H-cell configuration27,28,29. To establish the baseline for the co-reduction studies, the CO2RR with pure CO2 is conducted in 0.1 M KHCO3 (Supplementary Fig. 3a), and the results are consistent with the previous reports on polycrystalline Cu catalysts29,30. The major C2+ products are ethylene, ethanol, n-propanol, and acetate, and the major C1 products are methane, CO, and formate. The co-electrolysis is performed by feeding a mixture of CO2 and O2 with mole ratios of 9:1 and 8:2. The corresponding partial current densities (jpartial) of C2+ products, C1 products and H2 are color-coded in Figs. 1 and 2.

Remarkably, all C2+ product formation rates are significantly enhanced in the presence of O2 in the gas stream (Fig. 1). At −0.75 VRHE (Fig. 1a), the production rate of ethylene, ethanol and acetate shows a more than 20-fold increase with 10% O2 in the feed. With 20% O2, the enhancement for ethylene, ethanol and acetate exceeds 170-fold, 55-fold, and 35-fold, respectively. The formation of n-propanol is also observed at −0.75 VRHE with a partial current density of ~0.5 mA cm2 in the presence of O2, while no detectable amount of n-propanol is observed at this potential in the oxygen-free atmosphere. The onset potential of n-propanol in the oxygen-free atmosphere occurs at as negative as −0.90 VRHE (Fig. 1d), and to achieve a similar rate of ~0.5 mA cm2 requires an additional 250 mV overpotential, i.e., −1.00 VRHE (Fig. 1f). Unlike C2 products, the formation rate of n-propanol does not show a drastic further enhancement as the O2 ratio increases from 10 to 20%, suggesting its distinct chemistry in forming an additional carbon bond after their common rate-determining step of C–C coupling between two adsorbed CO molecules29,31,32. The oxygen induced enhancement of all C2+ products is more pronounced at −0.80 VRHE (Fig. 1b), with higher than 200-fold, 100-fold, and 70-fold increases for ethylene, ethanol and acetate, respectively. As the potential becomes more negative (Fig. 1c–f), these enhancements start to reduce. At −1.0 VRHE, the increases of C2+ product formation rates become less than ten times at 20% O2. This could be attributed to the enhanced ORR kinetics at higher overpotentials reducing the surface coverage of its intermediates that facilitate the C–C coupling chemistry in the CO2RR, as well as the reduced local CO2 concentration caused by the increased proton consumption rate33,34. These mechanistic aspects will be discussed in the following sections.

C1 product formation rates in the CO2RR are also enhanced in the presence of O2 (Fig. 2). The onset of methane production is improved to as early as −0.75 VRHE in an oxygen-containing atmosphere (Fig. 2a), while in the absence of O2, it is not observed until a much more negative potential of −0.95 VRHE (Fig. 2d). We emphasize that an increase in the onset potential of at least 200 mV for methane formation with oxygen indicates significantly accelerated reaction kinetics, because an increase in overpotential on this scale could lead to a significant rise in reaction rates (depending on the Tafel slope) assuming the reaction is kinetically controlled near the onset potential. At −0.75 VRHE, the CO formation shows a slightly greater than 5-fold increase and the formate formation shows an approximately two to three times increase with 10–20% oxygen in the reaction atmosphere (Fig. 2a). As the electrode potential becomes more negatively biased (Fig. 2b–f), the O2 induced enhancement in C1 product formation rates becomes increasingly marginal and turns negative for CO and formate at −0.90 VRHE and below. This trend is more pronounced at the higher (20%) O2 concentration. The competing hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is also improved in the presence of O2 (Fig. 2), however, its degree of enhancement is not as sensitive to the applied potential. It should be noted that such significant enhancement for CO2RR is not observed on Cu foil electrodes with the addition of 20% O2 (Supplementary Figs. 46). This could be due to the low solubility of O2 in the aqueous electrolyte compared with CO2 (by a factor of ~26)35, resulting in the sluggish mass transport of O2 to the planer electrode surface, and thus diminishing the impact of the ORR on promoting the CO2RR.

### In situ surface-enhanced Raman measurements

To understand the mechanism through which co-electrolysis of CO2 and O2 boosts the CO2RR activity, in situ SERS is employed to identify surface species presenting during the co-electrolysis36. The Cu microparticle catalysts employed in this work readily exhibit the surface enhancement of Raman signals, which alleviate the need to introduce SERS-inducing particles37,38, and is consistent with several recent studies36,37,39. In the Ar atmosphere (Fig. 3a), multiple peaks at 146, 219, 412, 528, and 619 cm−1 are observed at the open circuit potential (OCP) and can be attributed to the surface Cu2O (Cu2Osurf)21,40. These peaks decrease in intensity as the potential becomes more negative and disappear at 0 VRHE, due to the reduction of Cu2Osurf, and no other peak is observed at more negative potentials. An additional band at 360 cm−1 appears after the removal of Cu2Osurf at 0 VRHE in the CO2 atmosphere (Fig. 3b), whose assignment remains debated in the literature36,41, This band disappears at −0.4 VRHE, likely due to the conversion of adsorbed CO to other products at more negative potentials, and thus the corresponding species is unlikely to have a major impact on the CO2RR. A prominent band at 706 cm−1 appears at potentials below 0 VRHE in the O2 atmosphere (Fig. 3c), which has been assigned to the surface hydroxyl species21. Control experiment in D2O shows a redshift of this band to 668 cm−1 (Fig. 3c), which confirms the binding of a protonated atom. Although the isotopic shift when switching from H2O to D2O is larger than that estimated based on the reduced mass of a [Cu-]O-H(D) bending mode (~20 cm−1), this is likely due to the presence of solvent. It is reasonable to assume that there is substantial hydrogen bonding between Cu-OH and the H in the surrounding water molecules, which will impact on the frequency of the Cu-OH mode. When replacing H2O with D2O, we not only replace Cu-OH with Cu-OD, but also replacing the surrounding H2O with D2O, thus the change in the reduced mass is expected to be more significant than that without the hydrogen-bonded water. The possibility of this band at 706 cm−1 corresponding to an adsorbed C-containing species is ruled out by the observation that this band only appear in O2 contained electrolyte but not in pure CO2 or Ar saturated electrolyte (Fig. 3). Electrolysis using 13CO2 is helpful to further confirm this argument. However, we believe the current evidences are sufficient to support the assignment of the 706 cm−1 band to surface hydroxyl, rather than a C-containing species. Surface hydroxyl species in the O2 atmosphere is likely formed during the 4-electron pathway in the conversion of O2 to H2O (Supplementary Fig. 7), as it is a known intermediate in the ORR on multiple metal surfaces42. Interestingly, the Cu2Osurf appears to persist to lower potentials in the O2 atmosphere as the broad peak at 430–650 cm−1 corresponding to Cu2Osurf does not completely disappear until −0.5 VRHE21,36. In the atmosphere of 10% O2 + 90% CO2, the SER spectra exhibit features of those from in both O2 and CO2 atmospheres (Fig. 3d). Importantly, the key difference between the SER spectra in the CO2 and O2 + CO2 atmospheres is the presence of the band corresponding to the surface hydroxyl species. This is an indication that the presence of the surface hydroxyl group, corresponding to a Raman band at 706 cm−1, is responsible for the distinct reactivities in the CO2RR in the absence and presence of O2 in the reaction atmosphere (Fig. 3e). SER spectra with extended spectral windows are included in the Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9 and the related peaks are discussed in Supplementary Note 1.

The CO2RR activity and spectroscopic results show that the formation of H2O2 is unlikely the cause of the enhanced CO2RR performance during the co-electrolysis with O2. H2O2 is a possible product of the ORR via the 2-electron pathway43. If produced during the co-electrolysis of CO2 and O2 on Cu, H2O2 could potentially modify the surface speciation and impact of the rate and product distribution of the CO2RR. Introducing up to 10 mM of H2O2 in the electrolyte of the CO2RR (with a pure CO2 feed) leads to a relatively modest change, i.e., less than 10-fold increase, in the production rates of oxygenates and hydrocarbons (Supplementary Fig. 10), which is in stark contrast with the observation of co-electrolysis with O2 (Figs. 1b and 2b). This is consistent with the observation that the ORR occurs mainly through the 4-electron pathway on the Cu surface (Supplementary Fig. 7) and thus the production of H2O2 is expected to be negligible. Furthermore, in situ SER spectra using electrolyte (CO2 saturated 0.1 M KHCO3) with up to 10 mM of H2O2 do not show any detectable feature corresponding to the hydroxyl species (Supplementary Fig. 11), suggesting distinct reduction mechanisms and intermediates in the ORR and the H2O2 reduction on Cu. As the H2O2 concentration in the electrolyte increases, the Raman features corresponding to Cu2Osurf persists to more negative potentials (Supplementary Fig. 11), which is expected as H2O2 is a potent oxidant. Importantly, the lack of the surface hydroxyl group and the modest change in the CO2RR activity with added H2O2 support the hypothesis that the surface hydroxyl group formed during the co-electrolysis is responsible for the enhanced CO2RR performance.

### Density functional theory calculations

To further evaluate the hypothesized beneficial effect of the hydroxyl group on the CO2RR, potential energy landscapes of key reaction steps are estimated via density functional theory calculations. The free energy profiles of the rate-determining steps (RDS) in the formation of C2+ products, i.e., *CO dimerization29,31,44,45 and methane, i.e., *CO hydrogenation29,44,46, are calculated at different *OH coverage on the Cu(100) facet, with the representative model structures and results shown in Figs. 4 and 5, respectively31,45,46. −0.5 VSHE (i.e., equivalent to −0.9 VRHE) is chosen as the potential in our calculations. Cu(100) facet is employed for the computational study. Cu(100) and Cu(111) are the most exposed facets on polycrystalline Cu surface because of their low surface energies47. It has been shown that polycrystalline Cu surface undergoes surface reconstruction to form Cu(100) under the CO2RR conditions, which is also consistent with experiments showing that polycrystalline Cu leads to a product distribution similar to that on Cu(100)48. Therefore, Cu(100) facet is commonly used as a representative model surface for obtaining theoretical insights into experimental studies based on polycrystalline Cu46,49. Our computational model also consists hollow-site adsorbed *OH with different coverage. This is because *OH is most stable on hollow sites at the negative potentials described by the VASPsol model. The vibrational modes for hollow-site *OH in the vicinity of *CO were calculated at the initial states of *CO dimerization and *CO hydrogenation (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). We employ a well-established finite difference method to calculate the vibrational modes of the *OH adsorbate49,50. The calculated wavenumbers of vibration modes of *OH are compared with the Raman band observed experimentally. The results show good agreement with the observed Raman band of 706 cm−1 in the in situ SERS experiments, which supports the representativeness of the computational model employed in this work. Due to the limitations of DFT calculations, other characters such as band width and intensity, cannot be accurately predicted and thus are not discussed.

Both the activation barrier and the free energy change for *CO dimerization decrease as the *OH coverage increases from 0 to 3/9 but rebound with further increase in *OH coverage (Fig. 5a). Both the initial state and transition state become less stable as the *OH coverage increases. This could be attributed to the increase of oxidation state of surface Cu as revealed by Bader charge analysis (Supplementary Fig. 12), which weakens the π-back-donation from the Cu to the anti-bonding orbital of the C≡O bond51,52. The magnitude of destabilization of the initial state is greater than that of the transition state when the *OH coverage is at or below 3/9, leading to the decrease of the reaction barrier. This is consistent with the observed enhancement of C2+ product formation rate with ≤20% O2 in the gas feed (Fig. 1). As the *OH coverage increases beyond 3/9, both the activation barrier and the free energy change for *CO dimerization increase substantially, which is likely due to the repulsive interaction with the excess *OH groups nearby.

For *CO hydrogenation to *CHO, both activation barrier and free energy change decrease substantially when *OH coverage increases from 1/9 to 4/9 (Fig. 5b). Notably, these decreases are much more significant than those in *CO dimerization, which agrees with the significant anodic shift of methane onset potential in the presence of the concurrent ORR (Fig. 2). The energies of initial structures fluctuate slightly within an energy range of 0.2 eV when *OH coverage increases, however, the transition state of *CO hydrogenation is stabilized under same conditions. We speculate that this is likely due to the transition state forms additional hydrogen bonds with *OH groups at higher coverage. The stabilization of reactant by forming hydrogen bonds with *OH has been reported in a previous work53.

## Discussion

A key difficulty in elucidating the role of oxidized Cu species on the surface in promoting the CO2RR is their poor stability under the reducing condition, which renders their composition and structure ambiguous. This stems from the fact that these species are prepared at a more oxidizing atmosphere, thermochemically or electrochemically, and then brought to a reducing environment. This challenge is circumvented by providing a continuous supply of oxidant in the CO2RR, i.e., co-electrocatalysis of CO2 and O2, to stabilize the surface oxidized Cu species, i.e., surface hydroxyl group. Co-electrolysis could also be viewed as coupled reactions, with the ORR supplying reactive oxygen species to form and replenish the surface hydroxyl species vital to the enhancement of the CO2RR. Control experiments with H2O2 show that it is not H2O2 or intermediates of its reduction because neither the CO2RR activity nor the spectral feature with H2O2 resembles that in the co-electrolysis at otherwise identical conditions. The presence of H2O2 in the electrolyte makes Cu2Osurf more resistant to negative potentials (Supplementary Fig. 11), even to −0.8 VRHE at 10 mM of H2O2. The fact that H2O2 does not significantly promote the CO2RR shows that the CO2RR performance is highly sensitive to the nature of the surface species. As different oxidants lead to different surface species, results reported in this work establish a paradigm for enhancing the CO2RR by co-electrolyzing CO2 with an oxidant. The nature and concentration of oxidants could be designed to tune the nature and coverage of surface oxidized Cu species. This hypothesis is supported by the contrasting results of using H2O2 and O2 oxidant, as well as different partial pressure of O2. Higher partial pressure of O2 in the feed (up to 20%) is expected to increase the surface coverage of the adsorbed hydroxyl species, which is generally beneficial toward the improvement of production rates of oxygenates and hydrocarbons. The diminishing impact of O2 on the CO2RR at potentials below −0.9 VRHE could be attributed to at least two factors: (1) Reduction of surface coverage of the hydroxyl species due to its facile reduction at such negative potentials; unfortunately, excessive bubble formation prevents spectroscopic investigations at these potentials. (2) Reduction in the local CO2 concentration due to the accelerated CO2RR and increased alkalinity caused by the fast proton consumption from both the CO2RR and the HER33,34. The increase of electrolyte pH has been demonstrated to not affect C2+ product formations because the RDS does not involve any proton transfer28,44,54,55. However, higher pH is known to increase the hydrogen binding energy (HBE)56,57, which accelerates the HER on Cu58. This is consistent with the observed enhancement in the HER rate with the addition of O2 (Fig. 2). The enhancement of HER rate is relatively insensitive to the applied potential. This is likely due to the interfacial pH at the cathode does not change significantly with electrolysis potentials because the ORR is severely mass-transport limited at such large overpotentials (>1.8 V). In addition to enhancing the CO2RR rates, the introduction of O2 also significantly reduces the Faradaic efficiency (FE) of CO2RR products (Supplementary Fig. 3b, c), presumably by introducing a competing reaction, i.e., the ORR. We note that at higher O2 concentrations than 20%, a limited increase in the production rate of the CO2RR with elevated ORR activity and reduced Faradaic efficiency for the CO2RR are expected based on current results. Reliable measurements of electrolysis at higher O2 concentrations are challenging due to the instability of the electrode at high current densities (over 100 mA cm2) in an H-type electrochemical cell. Systematic investigations of the impact of O2 partial pressure on the CO2RR activity require enhanced mass transport which could be more easily accomplished in flow cell configurations59,60,61,62, and are outside the scope of this proof-of-concept work. It is important to note that any practical CO2 source contains large quantities of O2 can be utilized, e.g., flue gas from power plants or air, so CO2RR systems that are tolerant to or enhanced by a low concentration of O2 in the feed could significantly reduce the separation cost. In the meantime, co-electrolysis of other oxidants, e.g., peroxyacetic acid, ammonium persulfate, could be a fruitful strategy to further improve the rate and efficiency of CO2RR.

## Methods

### Materials

The polycrystalline Cu powder (−625 mesh, APS 0.50–1.5 micron, 99% metal basis) is purchased from Alfa Aesar. Cu foil (0.1 mm thick, 99.9999% metal basis) is purchased from Alfa Aesar. Potassium carbonate (99.997% trace metals basis) is purchased from Alfa Aesar. Chelex 100 sodium form is purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Isopropanol (99.999% trace metal basis) is purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Dimethyl sulfoxide (≥99.9%) is purchased from Alfa Aesar. Deuterium oxide (99.9 atom% D) is purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Nafion solution (5 wt%) is purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Phosphoric acid (ACS reagent, ≥85 wt% in H2O) is purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Graphite rod (99.995% trace metals basis) is purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sigracet 39 BC carbon fiber paper is purchased from Fuel Cell Store. Carbon Dioxide (99.999%), oxygen (99.999%), and argon (99.999%) are purchased from Air Liquide. All electrolyte solutions are prepared using Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩ cm).

### Electrode preparation

To prepare the polycrystalline Cu power electrode, an ink solution is first prepared by mixing 1 mg Cu powder and 1 mL isopropanol followed by sonicating for 20 min. 900 μL of ink solution is dropcasted onto the microporous layer of a 3 × 3 cm2 Sigracet 39 BC carbon fiber paper. After drying in air, 180 μL of 2.5 wt% Nafion solution (diluted with isopropanol) is uniformly deposited onto the catalyst surface. The catalyst is dried in the air again and transferred into a vacuum box to thoroughly remove the residual solvent. The catalyst is then cut into small pieces with a size of 0.6 × 1.5 cm2 and a nickel wire current collector is attached to a piece of the catalyst using silver epoxy. To prepare the electropolished Cu foil electrode, a nickel wire current collector is welded to a piece of Cu foil. The electrode is then electropolished in 85% phosphoric acid at 2.1 V versus a graphite rod electrode for 5 min followed by rinsing with Mill-Q water (18.2 MΩ cm). A fresh working electrode is used for each electrochemical measurement.

### Electrochemical measurements

All electrochemical measurements are conducted in a custom designed gastight two-compartment electrochemical cell fabricated by Adams & Chittenden Scientific Glass with three-electrode configuration. A graphite rod is used as counter electrode and a Ag/AgCl (3.0 M, BASi) electrode is used as reference electrode. The two chambers of the electrochemical cell are separated by anion-exchange membrane (Selemion AMV, AGC Inc.). The electrolyte used for all electrochemical measurements is CO2-saturated 0.1 M KHCO3 solution with a pH of 6.8, which is prepared by purging 0.05 M K2CO3 solution with CO2 overnight, and the electrolyte is purified with Chelex before electrolysis.

All electrochemical measurements are conducted using a Gamry Reference 600+ Potentiostat and the measured potential is converted to RHE scale using the following formula: ERHE = EAg/AgCl + 0.210 + 0.05916 × pH (in volts), where the standard value for the Ag/AgCl reference electrode is calibrated using a homemade standard hydrogen electrode. The uncompensated resistance (Ru) is measured by potentiostatic electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and 100% of Ru is compensated by the potentiostat during electrolysis. All electrodes are pretreated in Ar-purged electrolyte at −1 VRHE for 5 min to stabilize surface conditions. The gas flow is then switched to reactant gas (pure CO2 or 10% O2 + 90% CO2 or 20% O2 + 80% CO2) and the system is purged for 15 min prior to a 1 h electrolysis. All gases are directly delivered into electrolyte through a gas dispersion frit at a total flow rate of 10 mL/min. The flow rate is controlled by mass flow controllers (MKS Instruments Inc.) and calibrated by an ADM flow meter (Agilent Technologies). The O2 + CO2 mixture is prepared by mixing CO2 and O2 at desired ratio using mass flow controllers at a total flow rate of 10 mL/min. The outlet flow of the electrochemical cell is directly vented to the sample loop of a gas chromatograph (Agilent 7890B) for product quantification.

### Product quantification

The gaseous products are quantified every 20 min using a gas chromatograph (GC) (Agilent 7890B) equipped with a ShinCarbon ST column and a HayeSep Q column. A thermal conductivity detector is used to quantify H2 and a flame ionization detector with a methanizer is used to quantify CO, CH4, and C2H4. Ar is used as carrier gas. The analysis results of three GC analyses during the 1 h electrolysis are averaged. The liquid products are quantified using 1H NMR on a Bruker AVIII 400 MHz NMR spectrometer after the whole electrolysis process. The NMR sample is prepared by mixing 500 μL of the electrolyte collected after electrolysis with 100 μL of internal standard solution (1.67 ppm (m/m) dimethyl sulfoxide in D2O). The water signal is suppressed using the presaturation method.

### Determination of ORR electron transfer number

The ORR electron transfer number of polycrystalline Cu powder catalyst is determined using rotating disk electrode (RDE) measurement and Koutecký–Levich equation method. To prepare the electrode for RDE measurement, an ink solution is first prepared by mixing 5 mg Cu powder, 25 μL Nafion solution and 1 mL 2-propanol followed by sonicating for 30 min in an ice cold water bath. A 20 μL ink is then dropcasted onto a glassy carbon rotating disk electrode (0.5 cm diameter, Gamry). A graphite rod is used as counter electrode and a double junction Ag/AgCl electrode (3.0 M) is used as reference electrode. The experiments are conducted using a Gamry RDE 710 system and the electrolyte is 0.1 M KHCO3 solution. The cyclic voltammogram (CV) is firstly taken under Ar at a scan rate of 10 mV/s with a rotation speed of 2500 rpm prior to ORR measurement. The electrolyte is then bubbled with O2 for at least 20 min to saturate the electrolyte. CVs in O2 atmosphere are recorded at various rotation speed (400, 625, 900, 1225, 1600, 2025, and 2500 rpm) at a scan rate of 10 mV/s.

### In situ Raman spectroscopy measurements

In situ Raman spectroscopy measurements are conducted using a custom-made three-electrode electrochemical cell in H-cell configuration that consists two compartments and is separated by a piece of Nafion ion exchange membrane (IEM, Nafion 211, Fuel Cell Store) (Supplementary Fig. 13). The three-electrode system is made up of a Cu working electrode that is identical to the ones in reactivity measurement, a Ag/AgCl reference electrode (3.0 M NaCl, BASi) and a graphite counter electrode. A potentiostat (VersaSTAT, Princeton) is used to perform electrolysis. Electrolyte saturated with desired gas is delivered into the cell using a HPLC pump (GP50 Gradient Pump, Dionex) to achieve similar mass transport as in magnetically stirred reactivity cell. The Raman spectroscopy measurements are carried out using LabRAM HR Evolution microscope (Horiba Jobin Yvon) equipped with a 632.8 nm He-Ne laser, a ×50 objective (NA = 0.55), and a CCD detector. The filter is set to be 50% to keep a low laser intensity to avoid any irradiation-induced modifications of Cu surface. The acquisition time is 20 s for each spectrum with the accumulation times of 2.

### Computational details

The Cu(100) metal slab (3 × 3) consisting of three layers with the bottom layer fixed in its bulk position is employed to simulate the surface of Cu. The total energy of the slab with different adsorbates are calculated using DFT with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional in plane-wave pseudopotentials, as implemented in the Vienna ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)63. The empirical D2 approach as implemented in VASP is employed to describe the van der Waals interactions. All calculated energy values are extrapolated to kBT = 0. A Monkhorst–Pack k-point net of 3 × 3 × 1 is chosen to sample the reciprocal space. A vacuum of 25 Å is introduced to each side to avoid interactions between successive metal slabs.

VASPsol model is employed to establish the electrochemical interface64,65. In this model, the Fermi energy is adjusted to a target value by changing the number of electrons in the system during each step of the geometry optimization, which keeps the work function and electrode potential constant in the calculations. Then the linear Poisson–Boltzmann implicit solvation model with a Debye screening length of 3.0 Å is used to neutralize the non-zero charge in the simulation cell and simulate water and the electrolyte, allowing for a more realistic description of the electrochemical double layer. A detailed description of this approach has been provided in our previous work66,67,68.

The transition state for each reaction is first approached using the nudged elastic band (NEB) method in the neutral state. Forces on the climbing image are converged to <0.02 eV/Å. The plane-wave cutoff, smearing parameter and functional, and calculator parameters are the same as those used in slab geometry optimizations. Structures obtained from NEB are employed to generate the input structure and orientation for the dimer calculation. The force of the dimer calculation is converged to <0.1 eV/Å to accurately locate the saddle point, i.e., the transition state. After that, the free energy of transition state is calculated under constant potential. In the calculations for *CO hydrogenation, the required H+/e pair for reduction is assumed to originate from the aqueous solution and the electrode. Its free energy is estimated based on the computational hydrogen electrode model69. In addition to the implicit Poisson–Boltzmann solvation model, all the stationary points along the hydrogenation step are solvated by four explicit water molecules to provide a better description of the solvent. All possible structures, including different adsorption sites of *CO and *OH, relative position between *CO and *OH, etc., are investigated at all *OH coverage. The most stable structures are employed to investigate the impact of *OH adsorbate to the RDS of C2+ product formations and CH4 formation (Supplementary Figs. 1417).

The free energies of the slab systems were calculated as follows:

$$G = E_{{\mathrm{elec}}}^{{\mathrm{solv}}} + {\mathrm{ZPVE}} + H_{{\mathrm{vib}}} - {\mathrm{TS}}_{{\mathrm{vib}}},$$
(1)

where $$E_{{\mathrm{elec}}}^{{\mathrm{solv}}}$$ was the electronic energy of the system calculated from VASPsol. We treated all degrees of freedom of the adsorbates as vibrational and neglect the contribution of vibrations of the slab. The vibrational frequencies (ν) were evaluated by calculating the partial Hessian matrix through the finite difference method. Unusually low vibrational modes (<50 cm−1) were reset to 50 cm−1 to avoid unphysically large entropy contributions. Based on the calculated vibrational frequencies, we calculated the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE), vibrational contributions to the internal energy (Hvib) and entropy (Svib) at 298 K as follows:

$${\mathrm{ZPVE}} = \mathop {\sum}\limits_\nu {\frac{{h\nu }}{2}},$$
(2)
$$H_{{\mathrm{vib}}} = \mathop {\sum}\limits_\nu {\frac{{h\nu }}{{e^{h\nu /k_{\mathrm{B}}T} - 1}}},$$
(3)
$$S_{{\mathrm{vib}}} = k_{\mathrm{B}}\mathop {\sum}\limits_\nu {\left[ {\frac{{h\nu }}{{k_{\mathrm{B}}T\left( {e^{h\nu /k_{\mathrm{B}}T} - 1} \right)}} - {\mathrm{ln}}\left( {1 - e^{ - h\nu /k_{\mathrm{B}}T}} \right)} \right]}.$$
(4)

The free energies of the molecules were determined as follows:

$$G = E_{{\mathrm{elec}}}^{{\mathrm{solv}}} + {\mathrm{ZPVE}} + \left( {\frac{n}{2} + 1} \right)k_{\mathrm{B}}T + H_{{\mathrm{vib}}} - T(S_{{\mathrm{vib}}} + S_{{\mathrm{trans}}} + S_{{\mathrm{rot}}}),$$
(5)

where n is 6 for non-linear molecules and 5 for linear molecules. ZPVE was calculated as shown above. Hvib, Svib, Srot, and Strans were obtained from Jaguar using the PBE/6-31G* basis set. The correction terms of all free energies are provided in Supplementary Table 3.

For *CO dimerization, the adsorption free energy of each state was calculated as:

$$G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{Cu}} + {{n}}^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}}-2G_{^\ast {\mathrm{CO}}},$$
(6)
$$G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{Cu}} + {{n}}^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}}-2G_{^\ast {\mathrm{CO}}},$$
(7)
$$G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{FS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{FS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{Cu}} + {{n}}^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}}-2G_{^\ast {\mathrm{CO}}}.$$
(8)

For *CO hydrogenation, the adsorption free energy of each state was calculated as:

$$G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{Cu}} + {{n}}^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}}-G_{^\ast {\mathrm{CO}}}-4G_{{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}},$$
(9)
$$G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = \, G_{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{Cu}} + {{n}}^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}}\\ \,-\, G_{^\ast {\mathrm{CO}}}-4G_{{\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}}-1/2G_{{\mathrm{H}}_2},$$
(10)
$$G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{FS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = \, G_{{\mathrm{FS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right)\\ \,-\, G_{{\mathrm{Cu}} + {{n}}^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}}-G_{^\ast {\mathrm{CO}}}-4G_{{\mathrm{H}}2{\mathrm{O}}}-1/2G_{{\mathrm{H}}_2}.$$
(11)

For the results presented in Fig. 5:

$${\Delta}G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{\mathrm{zero}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right),$$
(12)
$${\Delta}G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{\mathrm{zero}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right),$$
(13)
$${\Delta}{\Delta}G = {\Delta}G\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - {\Delta}G\left( {{\mathrm{zero}}\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right),$$
(14)
$${\Delta}{\Delta}G^ \ne = {\Delta}G^ \ne \left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - {\Delta}G^ \ne \left( {{\mathrm{zero}}\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right),$$
(15)

where

$${\Delta}G\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{FS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right),$$
(16)
$${\Delta}G^ \ne \left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) = G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{TS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right) - G_{{\mathrm{abs}}}^{{\mathrm{IS}}}\left( {{{n}}/9\,^\ast {\mathrm{OH}}\,{\mathrm{coverage}}} \right),$$
(17)

are the free energy change and free energy barrier for the reaction (*CO dimerization or *CO hydrogenation) at certain *OH coverage, respectively.

### Physical characterization

The microstructure of the Cu catalyst is characterized by field emission scanning electron microscope (Merlin FE-SEM, Zeiss). Powder X-ray diffraction pattern is collected using a Rigaku MiniFlex 600 with Cu Kα radiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy measurements are conducted on a PHI Quantera II and CasaXPS software (Casa Software Ltd., UK) is used to analyze the resulting spectra.

## Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

## References

1. 1.

Nitopi, S. et al. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119, 7610–7672 (2019).

2. 2.

Ross, M. B. et al. Designing materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide recycling. Nat. Catal. 2, 648–658 (2019).

3. 3.

Kibria, M. G. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction into chemical feedstocks: from mechanistic electrocatalysis models to system design. Adv. Mater. 31, e1807166 (2019).

4. 4.

Raciti, D. et al. Low-overpotential electroreduction of carbon monoxide using copper nanowires. ACS Catal. 7, 4467–4472 (2017).

5. 5.

Li, C. W., Ciston, J. & Kanan, M. W. Electroreduction of carbon monoxide to liquid fuel on oxide-derived nanocrystalline copper. Nature 508, 504–507 (2014).

6. 6.

Mistry, H. et al. Highly selective plasma-activated copper catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene. Nat. Commun. 7, 12123 (2016).

7. 7.

Lum, Y. & Ager, J. W. Stability of residual oxides in oxide-derived copper catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction investigated with (18) O labeling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 551–554 (2018).

8. 8.

Roberts, F. S., Kuhl, K. P. & Nilsson, A. High selectivity for ethylene from carbon dioxide reduction over copper nanocube electrocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 5179–5182 (2015).

9. 9.

Jiang, K. et al. Metal ion cycling of Cu foil for selective C–C coupling in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Nat. Catal. 1, 111–119 (2018).

10. 10.

Lee, S., Kim, D. & Lee, J. Electrocatalytic production of C3-C4 compounds by conversion of CO2 on a chloride-induced bi-phasic Cu2O-Cu catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 14701–14705 (2015).

11. 11.

Kim, D. et al. Insights into an autonomously formed oxygen-evacuated Cu2O electrode for the selective production of C2H4 from CO2. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 824–830 (2015).

12. 12.

Mandal, L. et al. Investigating the role of copper oxide in electrochemical CO2 reduction in real time. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 8574–8584 (2018).

13. 13.

Scott, S. B. et al. Absence of oxidized phases in Cu under CO reduction conditions. ACS Energy Lett. 4, 803–804 (2019).

14. 14.

Cavalca, F. et al. Nature and distribution of stable subsurface oxygen in copper electrodes during electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 25003–25009 (2017).

15. 15.

Eilert, A. et al. Subsurface oxygen in oxide-derived copper electrocatalysts for carbon dioxide reduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 285–290 (2017).

16. 16.

Eilert, A., Roberts, F. S., Friebel, D. & Nilsson, A. Formation of copper catalysts for CO2 reduction with high ethylene/methane product ratio investigated with in situ X-ray absorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 1466–1470 (2016).

17. 17.

Ren, D. et al. Selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to ethylene and ethanol on copper(I) oxide catalysts. ACS Catal. 5, 2814–2821 (2015).

18. 18.

Liu, C. et al. Stability and effects of subsurface oxygen in oxide-derived Cu catalyst for CO2 reduction. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 25010–25017 (2017).

19. 19.

Jung, H. et al. Electrochemical fragmentation of Cu2O nanoparticles enhancing selective C-C coupling from CO2 reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 4624–4633 (2019).

20. 20.

Beverskog, B. Revised Pourbaix diagrams for copper at 25 to 300 °C. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144, 3476–3483 (1997).

21. 21.

Bodappa, N. et al. Early stages of electrochemical oxidation of Cu(111) and polycrystalline Cu surfaces revealed by in situ Raman spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12192–12196 (2019).

22. 22.

Feng, X., Jiang, K., Fan, S. & Kanan, M. W. A direct grain-boundary-activity correlation for CO electroreduction on Cu nanoparticles. ACS Cent. Sci. 2, 169–174 (2016).

23. 23.

Mariano, R. G., McKelvey, K., White, H. S. & Kanan, M. W. Selective increase in CO2 electroreduction activity at grain-boundary surface terminations. Science 358, 1187–1192 (2017).

24. 24.

Malkani, A. S., Dunwell, M. & Xu, B. Operando spectroscopic investigations of copper and oxide-derived copper catalysts for electrochemical CO reduction. ACS Catal. 9, 474–478 (2018).

25. 25.

Wang, L. et al. Electrochemically converting carbon monoxide to liquid fuels by directing selectivity with electrode surface area. Nat. Catal. 2, 702–708 (2019).

26. 26.

Zhao, Y. et al. Speciation of Cu surfaces during the electrochemical CO reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 9735–9743 (2020).

27. 27.

Chen, R. et al. Highly selective production of ethylene by the electroreduction of carbon monoxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 154–160 (2020).

28. 28.

Li, J. et al. Hydroxide is not a promoter of C2+ product formation in the electrochemical reduction of CO on copper. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 4464–4469 (2020).

29. 29.

Li, J. et al. Effectively increased efficiency for electroreduction of carbon monoxide using supported polycrystalline copper powder electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 9, 4709–4718 (2019).

30. 30.

Kuhl, K. P., Cave, E. R., Abram, D. N. & Jaramillo, T. F. New insights into the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on metallic copper surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7050–7059 (2012).

31. 31.

Xiao, H., Cheng, T., Goddard, W. A. III & Sundararaman, R. Mechanistic eplanation of the pH dependence and onset potentials for hydrocarbon products from electrochemical reduction of CO on Cu (111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 483–486 (2016).

32. 32.

Li, J. et al. Copper adparticle enabled selective electrosynthesis of n-propanol. Nat. Commun. 9, 4614 (2018).

33. 33.

Raciti, D., Mao, M., Park, J. H. & Wang, C. Local pH effect in the CO2 reduction reaction on high-surface-area copper electrocatalysts. J. Electrochem. Soc. 165, F799–F804 (2018).

34. 34.

Dunwell, M. et al. Examination of near-electrode concentration gradients and kinetic impacts on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 using surface-enhanced infrared spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 8, 3999–4008 (2018).

35. 35.

Lide D. R. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (CRC Press, 2004).

36. 36.

Jiang, S., Klingan, K., Pasquini, C. & Dau, H. New aspects of operando Raman spectroscopy applied to electrochemical CO2 reduction on Cu foams. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 041718 (2019).

37. 37.

Linic, S., Christopher, P. & Ingram, D. B. Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nat. Mater. 10, 911–921 (2011).

38. 38.

Linic, S., Aslam, U., Boerigter, C. & Morabito, M. Photochemical transformations on plasmonic metal nanoparticles. Nat. Mater. 14, 567–576 (2015).

39. 39.

Sardari, B. & Ozcan, M. Real-time and tunable substrate for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy by synthesis of copper oxide nanoparticles via electrolysis. Sci. Rep. 7, 7730 (2017).

40. 40.

Niaura, G. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopic observation of two kinds of adsorbed OH- ions at copper electrod. Electrochim. Acta 45, 3507–3519 (2000).

41. 41.

Chernyshova, I. V., Somasundaran, P. & Ponnurangam, S. On the origin of the elusive first intermediate of CO2 electroreduction. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E9261–E9270 (2018).

42. 42.

Dong, J.-C. et al. In situ Raman spectroscopic evidence for oxygen reduction reaction intermediates at platinum single-crystal surfaces. Nat. Energy 4, 60–67 (2018).

43. 43.

Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Cheng, M. J. & Lu, Q. Tailoring the electrochemical production of H2O2: strategies for the rational design of high-performance electrocatalysts. Small 16, e1902845 (2020).

44. 44.

Schreier, M., Yoon, Y., Jackson, M. N. & Surendranath, Y. Competition between H and CO for active sites governs copper-mediated electrosynthesis of hydrocarbon fuels. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 10221–10225 (2018).

45. 45.

Xiao, H., Goddard, W. A. III, Cheng, T. & Liu, Y. Cu metal embedded in oxidized matrix catalyst to promote CO2 activation and CO dimerization for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6685–6688 (2017).

46. 46.

Cheng, T., Xiao, H. & Goddard, W. A. III Free-energy barriers and reaction mechanisms for the electrochemical reduction of CO on the Cu(100) surface, including multiple layers of explicit solvent at pH 0. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 4767–4773 (2015).

47. 47.

Vitos, L., Ruban, A. V., Skriver, H. L. & Kollár, J. The surface energy of metals. Surf. Sci. 411, 186–202 (1998).

48. 48.

Kim, Y. G., Baricuatro, J. H., Javier, A., Gregoire, J. M. & Soriaga, M. P. The evolution of the polycrystalline copper surface, first to Cu(111) and then to Cu(100), at a fixed CO(2)RR potential: a study by operando EC-STM. Langmuir 30, 15053–15056 (2014).

49. 49.

Garza, A. J., Bell, A. T. & Head-Gordon, M. Mechanism of CO2 reduction at copper surfaces: pathways to C2 products. ACS Catal. 8, 1490–1499 (2018).

50. 50.

Xiao, H., Cheng, T. & Goddard, W. A. III Atomistic mechanisms underlying selectivities in C(1) and C(2) products from electrochemical reduction of CO on Cu(111). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 130–136 (2017).

51. 51.

Mihaylov, M., Knözinger, H., Hadjiivanov, K. & Gates, B. C. Characterization of the oxidation states of supported gold species by IR spectroscopy of adsorbed CO. Chem. Ing. Tech. 79, 795–806 (2007).

52. 52.

Jansson, J. et al. On the catalytic activity of Co3O4 in low-temperature CO oxidation. J. Catal. 211, 387–397 (2002).

53. 53.

Ramaswamy, N. & Mukerjee, S. Influence of inner- and outer-sphere electron transfer mechanisms during electrocatalysis of oxygen reduction in alkaline media. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 18015–18026 (2011).

54. 54.

Hori, Y., Takahashi, R., Yoshinami, Y. & Murata, A. Electrochemical reduction of CO at a copper electrode. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 7075–7081 (1997).

55. 55.

Wang, L. et al. Electrochemical carbon monoxide reduction on polycrystalline copper: effects of potential, pressure, and pH on selectivity toward multicarbon and oxygenated products. ACS Catal. 8, 7445–7454 (2018).

56. 56.

Durst, J. et al. New insights into the electrochemical hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction mechanism. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 2255–2260 (2014).

57. 57.

Zheng, J., Sheng, W., Zhuang, Z., Xu, B. & Yan, Y. Universal dependence of hydrogen oxidation and evolution reaction activity of platinum-group metals on pH and hydrogen binding energy. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501602 (2016).

58. 58.

Sheng W., Myint M., Chen J. G. & Yan Y. Correlating the hydrogen evolution reaction activity in alkaline electrolytes with the hydrogen binding energy on monometallic surfaces. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 1509–1512 (2013).

59. 59.

Garcia de Arquer, F. P. et al. CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm(-2). Science 367, 661–666 (2020).

60. 60.

Dinh, C. T. et al. CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360, 783–787 (2018).

61. 61.

Ma, S. et al. One-step electrosynthesis of ethylene and ethanol from CO2 in an alkaline electrolyzer. J. Power Sources 301, 219–228 (2016).

62. 62.

Jouny, M., Luc, W. & Jiao, F. High-rate electroreduction of carbon monoxide to multi-carbon products. Nat. Catal. 1, 748–755 (2018).

63. 63.

Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

64. 64.

Mathew, K., Sundararaman, R., Letchworth-Weaver, K., Arias, T. A. & Hennig, R. G. Implicit solvation model for density-functional study of nanocrystal surfaces and reaction pathways. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 084106 (2014).

65. 65.

Mathew, K., Kolluru, V. S. C., Mula, S., Steinmann, S. N. & Hennig, R. G. Implicit self-consistent electrolyte model in plane-wave density-functional theory. J. Chem. Phys. 151, 234101 (2019).

66. 66.

Zhang, H. et al. Computational and experimental demonstrations of one-pot tandem catalysis for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction to methane. Nat. Commun. 10, 3340 (2019).

67. 67.

Zhang, H., Goddard, W. A., Lu, Q. & Cheng, M. J. The importance of grand-canonical quantum mechanical methods to describe the effect of electrode potential on the stability of intermediates involved in both electrochemical CO2 reduction and hydrogen evolution. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 2549–2557 (2018).

68. 68.

Chang, K., Zhang, H., Chen, J. G., Lu, Q. & Cheng, M.-J. Constant electrode potential quantum mechanical study of CO2 electrochemical reduction catalyzed by N-doped graphene. ACS Catal. 9, 8197–8207 (2019).

69. 69.

Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B 108, 17886–17892 (2004).

## Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Number 2017YFA0208200) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 21872079). X.C. and B.X. acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation CAREER Program (Award No. CBET-1651625). W.A.G. is supported by the US National Science Foundation (CBET-1805022). M.-j.C. acknowledges financial support from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under Grant No. MOST 107-2113-M-006-008-MY2.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

Q.L. conceived and designed the project. M.H. and C.L. carried out the electrocatalytic tests and physical characterizations. X.C. and B.X. performed in situ SERS experiments. H.Z. and M.-j.C. performed DFT calculations. J.G.C. and W.A.G. contributed to data analysis and writing of this manuscript. These authors contributed equally: M.H. and C.L.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mu-jeng Cheng or Bingjun Xu or Qi Lu.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Holger Dau, Byoung Koun Min, and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

He, M., Li, C., Zhang, H. et al. Oxygen induced promotion of electrochemical reduction of CO2 via co-electrolysis. Nat Commun 11, 3844 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17690-8

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Active and Selective Ensembles in Oxide-Derived Copper Catalysts for CO2 Reduction

• Federico Dattila
• , Rodrigo Garcı́a-Muelas
•  & Núria López

ACS Energy Letters (2020)

• ### Bridging the Gap in the Mechanistic Understanding of Electrocatalysis via In Situ Characterizations

• Arnav S. Malkani
• , Jacob Anibal
• , Xiaoxia Chang
•  & Bingjun Xu

iScience (2020)