Introduction

Colours produced by the interference between phase-retarded components of transmitted light are so-called transmitted interference colours1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Comparing with its counterpart from chemical pigments or dyes, the interference colour features distinctive vivid, metallic, wide colour gamut appearance and photobleaching-free advantages, attracting great interests in practical applications3,4,9,10,11,12. Generally, when light transmits through a birefringent medium sandwiched between two crossed polarisers, the intensity of transmitted polarised light I is related to the wavelength as \(I = \sin ^2\frac{\delta }{2}\), where \(\delta = \frac{{2\pi \Delta nL}}{\lambda }\) is the phase retardation between two polarised light components, Δn the birefringence, λ the wavelength and L the length of the optical path through the medium. With a suitable combination of Δn and L, the wavelength-dependent intensity can be modulated to achieve different colours. Such spectral tuning has been achieved by electric-field-controlled birefringence effect in organic liquid crystals5,6,7,8, and recently been extended to material chirality and strain control3,4. To the best of our knowledge, no attempt has ever been made to use magneto-birefringence effect to achieve the spectral tuning by magnetic field control, which has the contactless, non-invasive and energy-free edge and is, therefore, more appealing in application aspects. Such a void is likely due to difficulties in achieving sufficiently large phase retardation δ, as a result of either weak magneto-optical response or ultra-low saturation magneto-birefringence of conventional transparent media13,14,15. Our analysis (see below) shows that, to observe colouration in a birefringent system, δ ≥ 3π is needed for λ in the visible range, which is not easily satisfied even in magnetically strongly responsive systems, such as ferrofluids, where the achievable δ is generally below π due to opacity (limited L) and small Δn due to the weak shape anisotropy of suspended ferromagnetic nanoparticles13,14,16,17,18. Two-dimensional (2D) crystals, on the other hand, offer excellent prospects for magneto-birefringent colouration, thanks to their large shape anisotropy, and a favourable combination of optical and magnetic anisotropies19,20,21,22,23,24.

Here we show that, in the case of aqueous suspensions of 2D cobalt-doped titanium oxide (CTO), their appreciable magnetic anisotropy (arising from anisotropy of Co atoms within the surrounding crystal lattice25,26,27,28) forces 2D crystals to rotate until their easy magnetisation axis aligns with the magnetic field H. The collective response of such suspended crystals induces finite birefringence because of optical anisotropy of individual 2D CTO flakes (see further and Supplementary Note 1). This magneto-birefringence tunability can be described by so-called Cotton–Mouton (CM) coefficient15 and, for our suspensions, the coefficient reaches up to 1400 T−2 m−1, three orders of magnitude larger than that of liquid crystals (cf. Supplementary Table 1). Moreover, the relatively large saturation magneto-birefringence (Δns ≈ 2 × 10−4, two orders of magnitude larger than for the known transparent materials exhibiting magnetic response13,14) results in a large δ ≈ 6π for 10 mm optical distance at μ0H = 800 mT, allowing magnetic colouration that covers more than two-wavelength cycles in the visible range.

Results

Sample preparation and characterisation

Suspensions of 2D CTO were prepared by exfoliation of bulk Co-doped TiOx crystals in water using mechanical agitation. Synthesis and characterisation of the bulk crystals is described in ‘Methods’ section and Supplementary Fig. 1. Briefly, bulk Co-TiOx was synthesised from a mixture of TiO2, CoO, K2CO3 and Li2CO3 using an annealing and ion-exchange method. 2D CTO crystals obtained after exfoliation have a lepidocrocite-type structure, where Co2+ ions substitute some of Ti4+ at the octahedral sites as schematically shown in Fig. 1a. The crystals have a large aspect ratio of >103 with a lateral size of ~1.5 μm and thickness of ~1 nm (Supplementary Fig. 1c–e). Most of the results presented below have been obtained on a 2D CTO suspension with a volume concentration of 0.02 vol%, exhibiting a high transmittance over visible λ (Supplementary Fig. 1f). Qualitatively similar results were also obtained on more dilute suspensions.

Fig. 1: Magneto-chromatic effect in a 2D CTO aqueous suspension.
figure 1

a Schematic setup of our magneto-optical experiments. A 5.5 cm tall cuvette with 1.0 × 0.5 cm rectangular cross section filled with a suspension of 2D CTO crystals is placed between two crossed polarisers, with the magnetic field applied along the z-direction, at 45° to the polariser/analyser. The top-right inset shows schematic atomic structure of 2D CTO. The light path is along the x-direction and the magnetic field is increasing vertically from bottom to top. b Real images of the cuvette filled with 0.02 vol% suspensions and illuminated with uniform white light. Left: no colours appear if the polariser/analyser are absent; right: a rainbow of colours is clearly seen in the presence of crossed polarisers. c Real images of the colours of the suspension in uniform magnetic field, as the field is tuned from μ0H = 325 mT to 750 mT with a 25 mT step.

Magneto-birefringent colouration in 2D CTO suspensions

Our optical setup is sketched in Fig. 1a: a quartz cuvette filled with a suspension of 2D crystals was placed between two crossed polarisers in a gradient magnetic field applied in the transverse direction, increasing from bottom to top (see ‘Methods’ section for details of optical measurements). When backlit with white light, a vertical rainbow of colours appeared in the cuvette, with different colours corresponding to different magnetic field strengths (Fig. 1b right, Supplementary Movie 1). To quantify the field-colour correspondence, the same suspension was placed between crossed polarisers in a uniform magnetic field. For low fields μ0H < 325 mT, as the magnetic field increased from μ0H = 0, the suspension gradually became more transparent, but no apparent colour was observed (Supplementary Fig. 2). As the field increased >325 mT, a colour appeared and started to evolve first from yellow to orange, then purple to blue and finally to green at the highest field of μ0H ≈ 800 mT (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Movie 1).

The observed colouration cannot be the result of the Bragg diffraction by a periodic pattern of suspended 2D crystals12, because the transmitted colour disappeared when the polarisers were removed but the field kept on (Fig. 1b, left). Instead, as we show below, colouration is the result of magnetically induced birefringence of the suspension. In the absence of magnetic field, 2D CTO crystals are randomly oriented in the water, exhibiting an isotropic optical response with zero birefringence, Δn = 0, and the suspension remains opaque. With the field applied, the crystals start to rotate and align parallel to H due to their magnetic anisotropy, collectively giving rise to a finite optical anisotropy (birefringence). The mechanism responsible for the magnetically induced birefringence is illustrated in Fig. 2a. Before passing through the suspension, the linearly polarised white source can be represented by three primary colours with wavelengths λ1, λ2 and λ3, of equal amplitudes. As the magnetic field is applied, 2D CTO crystals rotate and align parallel to the field, resulting in a finite birefringence of the suspension, such that the two polarised light components (parallel and perpendicular to H) experience a wavelength-dependent phase retardation δ = 2πΔnL/λ. When passing through the analyser, constructive interference between these two components occurs for δ = (2N − 1)π, leading to a transmission maximum (N = 1, 2, 3 etc. is an integer). Due to the wavelength dependence of δ, if the λ2 component transmits constructively, the λ1 and λ3 components are off resonance and have lower transmittance, resulting in a colour dominated by λ2.

Fig. 2: Alignment of suspended CTO crystals by magnetic field.
figure 2

a Schematic explanation of the colouration effect due to birefringence induced by alignment of 2D crystals (see text). b Transmittance of non-polarised laser light (650 nm) through the CTO suspension in the direction parallel () and perpendicular () to the field of 800 mT (views from z and from x, respectively; see the bottom insets of a). The field direction was switched between and once per minute. Scale bar, 50 s. The higher light transmission along the field indicates alignment of the 2D crystals parallel to it.

Quantitatively, the relation between Δn and H can be derived using a microscopic model analogous to the electro-birefringence (Kerr) effect29:

$$\Delta n\left( H \right) = \frac{{\Delta n_{\mathrm{s}}}}{2}\left[ {3L_2\left( {\frac{{\Delta \chi H^2}}{{2k_{\mathrm{B}}T}}} \right) - 1} \right],$$
(1)

where L2 (x) is the second-order generalised Langevin function

$$\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {L_2\left( x \right) \equiv \frac{{\mathop {\int}\nolimits_0^\pi {{\mathrm{cos}}^2\,\vartheta \,{\it{\mathrm{exp}}}\left( {x{\it{\mathrm{cos}}}^2\,\vartheta } \right){\it{\mathrm{sin}}}\,\vartheta\, d\vartheta } }}{{\mathop {\int}\nolimits_0^\pi {{\mathrm{exp}}\left( {x{\it{\mathrm{cos}}}^2\,\vartheta } \right){\it{\mathrm{sin}}}\,\vartheta \,d\vartheta } }}} \end{array}.$$
(2)

Δχ = χ – χ the anisotropy of the magnetic susceptibility, kB the Boltzmann constant and T the temperature (see Supplementary Note 1 for detail description of our model). It follows from Eq. (1) that the birefringence increases proportionally to H2 until saturation at Δns, corresponding to full alignment of all crystals in the suspension parallel to the magnetic field at a sufficiently high H. It follows that the wavelength-dependent condition for constructive interference \(\delta = \frac{{2\pi \Delta n(H)L}}{{\lambda _{\mathrm{c}}}} = \left( {2N - 1} \right)\pi\) also changes with H, and the colour of the transmitted light is determined by λc, the constructive interference wavelength.

Magnetic alignment of suspended CTO crystals

We have verified the magnetic alignment/rotation of suspended CTO crystals by comparison of the magneto-optical transmittance when viewed along and perpendicular to the applied field (in the direction of the z-axis and x-axis in Fig. 1a, respectively). As demonstrated in Fig. 2b, the transmittance is higher in the former case, in agreement with a higher in-plane magnetisation that aligns the flakes along the field direction, so that they are parallel to the light path and allow more light through. Conversely, when the light path is perpendicular to the magnetic field, the transmission reduces to its minimum (Supplementary Fig. 3) as it is blocked by the suspended crystals, similar to window blinds. The magnetic anisotropy concluded from the optical experiments is further verified by measurements of in-plane vs out-of-plane magnetisation of our CTO crystals, showing a notably higher magnetic susceptibility for H parallel to their surfaces (see Supplementary Note 2, Supplementary Fig. 4). Such magnetic anisotropy of 2D CTO is typical for paramagnetic crystals and comes from the single-ion anisotropy of Co atoms26,27,28, which tend to align their magnetic moments in specific crystallographic directions. In our case, some Ti atoms are substituted by Co atoms (Fig. 1a), and their interaction with neighbouring Ti and O atoms forces Co spins to align within the TiO plane as found experimentally (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Figs. 3 and 4c).

Tuneable spectra and CM coefficient

For a quantitative characterisation of the observed magneto-colouration effect, we recorded transmitted spectra for different wavelengths of the incident light at different magnetic fields. The resulting map of the transmitted intensity as a function of H and λ is shown in Fig. 3a for the cross-polariser measurement geometry. As expected from the model outlined above, the transmitted intensity shows oscillations as a function of both H and λ, with three transmittance maxima (white stripes in Fig. 3a) and minima (dark grey stripes) appearing alternately within the field range of 0–800 mT. Such a sinusoidal-like behaviour of the transmittance is in excellent agreement with the relation \(I \propto \sin ^2\frac{{\pi \Delta n(H)L}}{\lambda }\), where the intensity maxima correspond to the constructive interference condition described above, whereas the intensity minima correspond to destructive interference with \(\delta = \frac{{2\pi \Delta n(H)L}}{\lambda } = \left( {2N - 2} \right)\pi\). Here, N is the Nth order of the intensity maximum/minimum. Based on the transmittance mapping, the corresponding chromaticity diagram (Fig. 3d) shows quantitatively that the continuous colour transformation covers a wide range and forms a closed cycle within the field interval of 200–800 mT. Several individual spectra at different H are plotted in Fig. 3b, where the spectral red shift induced by the magnetic field is clearly seen. For clarity, only second-order maxima are shown, corresponding to the coloured dots in Fig. 3a. It is this field-induced red shift that is responsible for the tuneable colouration reported in Fig. 1. A typical dependence of the transmitted light intensity as a function of magnetic field is shown in Fig. 4a.

Fig. 3: Magnetic field-dependent transmission of light through the CTO suspension at different wavelengths.
figure 3

a Experimental map of the normalised transmittance as a function of λ and H. The light transmission was measured using the setup with crossed polarisers as shown in Fig. 1a. Grey scale: black for zero intensity and white for the maximum intensity. b Red shift of the constructive interference wavelength λc (corresponding to transmittance maxima) with H. The wavelength maxima for the colour-coded spectra correspond to the coloured dots in a. c Simulation of the transmitted light intensity based on our statistical model of magnetic-field-induced birefringence (see text). Grey scale: black for zero intensity and white for the maximum intensity. Bright and dark stripes correspond to δ(H, λ) = (2N − 1)π and (2N − 2)π, respectively (N = 1, 2, 3). d Coordinate evolution of transmittance spectrum in a during continuous increasing of magnetic field from 200 mT to 800 mT with a 25 mT step, presented at a standard CIE xy 1931 colour space (CIE, International Commission on Illumination).

Fig. 4: Analysis of magnetic field-induced birefringence of CTO suspensions.
figure 4

a Magnetic field dependence of the light transmission for λ = 450 nm. Symbols: experimental data. The solid red curve is the best fit using the model described in Supplementary Note 1. b Dispersion of the birefringence. Symbols show Δn(λ) calculated using Δn = λδ/2πL, where each value of λ corresponds to either minimum or maximum transmission intensity measured at μ0H = 1400 mT. Solid red line is a fit to the wavelength dependence of Δn derived in Supplementary Notes 1 and 3. c Magnetic-field dependence of the phase retardation and birefringence in the low-field range, 0–200 mT. Symbols: experimental data; solid red line: linear fit. Here, Δn is calculated from the measured δ(H) for λ = 450 nm as \({\mathrm{\Delta }}n\left( H \right) = \frac{\lambda }{{2{\uppi}L}}\delta \left( H \right)\).

Using Eq. (1) for Δn(H), intensity \(I \propto \sin ^2\frac{{\pi \Delta n(H)L}}{\lambda }\) and dispersion Δn(λ) for the visible range (Fig. 4b), we calculated the dependence I(λ, H) that is shown in Fig. 3c. Modelling details can be found in Supplementary Notes 1 and 3. The simulated intensity map is in good agreement with the corresponding experimental map of Fig. 3a, and the agreement is illustrated further by Fig. 4a, using a single wavelength λ = 450 nm as an example. Furthermore, we derived an intensity map from direct measurements of the phase retardation δ (H, λ) using spectroscopic ellipsometry, as \(I = \sin ^2\frac{\delta }{2}\). This yielded an identical transmitted intensity distribution to Fig. 3a (Supplementary Fig. 5). Using the data for Δn(H) extracted from the transmitted intensity measurements for low magnetic fields, 0–200 mT (Fig. 4c), we were able to evaluate the CM coefficient for our CTO suspensions, \(C = \frac{1}{\lambda }\frac{{\partial \Delta n}}{{\partial \left( {H^2} \right)}}\) (ref. 15). As is clear from the magnetic field dependence of the phase retardation δ (Supplementary Fig. 5b), at low magnetic fields the first term in Eq. (1) is linear with H2 (magnetic susceptibilities are constant at room temperature) and the CM coefficient can be found as \(\approx \frac{1}{\lambda }\frac{{\Delta n}}{{H^2}}\), yielding C as large as 1400 T−2 m−1 for λ = 450 nm, i.e., three orders of magnitude larger than, e.g., organic liquid crystals (cf. Supplementary Table 1). Such a large CM coefficient explains the particularly strong magnetic response of the CTO suspensions in our experiments, allowing tunability of the colouration by moderate magnetic fields.

Discussion

It is instructive to discuss the conditions required to observe magneto-colouration in a birefringent system. Detailed analysis (see Supplementary Note 4) shows that, to achieve magnetic tunability of the colour of transmitted light, one needs to drive the birefringent system to at least the second-order of the constructive interference condition, which corresponds to the phase retardation δ ≥ 3π (central white stripe in the intensity maps of Fig. 3a, c). This is because for the first-order spectral maxima (first white stripe on the left of Fig. 3a, c, where 150 mT < μ0H < 325 mT) the spectra of transmitted light at a single H is too weakly dependent with the wavelength (Supplementary Fig. 2b) to allow discrimination of colours, and one can only detect the change of brightness of the transmitted white light, as observed in our experiments at μ0H < 325 mT (Supplementary Fig. 2a). This also explains why in experiments with ferrofluids or magnetic liquid crystals16,17,18,30, the samples became brighter (more transparent) but no colour could be observed, despite their high magnetic responsivity. Furthermore, it follows from the expression for the phase retardation \(\delta = \frac{{2\pi \Delta nL}}{\lambda }\) that, to achieve δ ≥ 3π at visible wavelengths, requires a sufficiently large product ΔnL. This is difficult to achieve in transparent ferrofluids because of their typically small birefringence (two orders of magnitude smaller than our CTO suspensions with Δns ~ 2 × 10−4)13,14 and low transparency (optical path length L well <1 cm)16,17,18. We can therefore conclude that, to achieve magneto-colouration, a birefringent suspension must simultaneously meet three conditions: (1) sufficiently large magnetic anisotropy of the suspended crystals, to allow magnetic tunability of the birefringence at easily accessible fields, (2) sufficiently large birefringence Δn and (3) high transparency to visible light (sufficiently long L). This analysis shows that the effect demonstrated here can be readily extended through either an increased volume fraction of the suspended crystals (Supplementary Fig. 6) or a longer optical path length (Supplementary Fig. 7), and should also be possible to achieve in other 2D magnetic suspension systems, e.g., suspensions of 2D ferromagnetic crystals20,21,24, provided that they are sufficiently transparent to visible light.

The pronounced magneto-colouration effect exhibited by our CTO suspensions clearly demonstrates the feasibility of achieving magnetically controlled colouration using suspensions of 2D crystals as a birefringent platform. Note that magnetically controlled colouration has also been reported using light diffraction at periodic structures of suspended iron oxide nanoparticles (Bragg’s law)31. However, the latter magneto-colouration effect has limitations and works only in the reflection mode. The resultant reflected colour is generally nonuniform and unstable because of highly sensitivity to the viewing angle, difficulties with forming stable periodic structures of nanoparticles and sedimentation induced by magnetic field. In contrast, the reported effect of magnetically tuneable transmitted colours is found to be highly reproducible and robust. The transmitted light intensity did not change over 1000 cycles of turning the magnetic field on and off (Supplementary Fig. 8). No degradation in the properties was observed over weeks of observations, and our suspensions did not exhibit noticeable agglomeration during 2 years since the start of this work. In addition, the used long optical paths ensure enough tolerance against small variations in the optical length, which is important to achieve uniform colouration and wide viewing angles (Supplementary Fig. 8). Finally, our experiments (Supplementary Fig. 9) also showed that the colour change was fast, and the time needed to achieve a new colour did not exceed 30 ms.

In conclusion, we have observed a giant magneto-birefringence effect in transparent suspensions of 2D CTO crystals, which arises due to their large shape anisotropy, and an interplay between optical and magnetic anisotropies. The large CM coefficient together with high saturation in magneto-birefringence result in robust, uniform and reversible colouration that allows wide colour gamut controlled non-invasively by applied magnetic field. This magneto-optical effect can potentially be used in a variety of applications, including displays, magnetic field sensing, see-through printings, field-tuneable phase retarders, among many others.

Methods

Synthesis and characterisation of Co-TiOx

To prepare CTO monolayers, we followed a four-stage approach (Supplementary Fig. 1a), similar to previously reported but with some changes32,33. In stage I, TiO2 (0.25 mol, 20 g), CoO (0.03 mol, 2.25 g), K2CO3 (0.06 mol, 5.94 g) and Li2CO3 (0.01 mol, 0.67 g), all from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Co., Ltd., China, were mixed in a stoichiometric ratio by grinding in a corundum crucible and annealed at 1000 °C for 5 h. The obtained mixture was ground again at room temperature, followed by a second annealing at 1000 °C for 20 h. The resulting compound K0.8Ti(5.2−y)/3Li(0.8−2y)/3CoyO4 has a layered crystal structure and good crystallinity (Supplementary Fig. 1h). In stage II, K0.8Ti(5.2−y)/3Li(0.8−2y)/3CoyO4 (1 g) was mixed with 200 ml HCl (1 M) and agitated for 4 days, using a magnetic stirrer to allow sufficient ion exchange of Li+ and K+ ions with H+. The protonated sediment of H(3.2−2y)/3Ti(5.2−y)/3CoyO4 (Supplementary Fig. 1b) was collected after allowing the solution to settle, washed with DI water to remove acid residues and dried in the oven (80 °C for 12 h). In stage III, protons in H(3.2−2y)/3Ti(5.2−y)/3CoyO4 were exchanged with TBA+ by soaking the H(3.2−2y)/3Ti(5.2−y)/3CoyO4 powder in ~10 % (w/v) TBAOH aqueous solution (H+:TBA+ = 1:1 in molar ratio) for 5 h to produce TBAzH(3.2−2y)/3 − zTi(5.2−y)/3CoyO4. In stage IV, the bulk compound TBAzH(3.2−2y)/3−zTi(5.2−y)/3CoyO4 was exfoliated in DI water by mechanically shaking for 48 h to obtain a stable suspension of 2D CTO.

The morphology of the intermediate products was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM; Hitachi SU8010 SEM at 5 keV, Japan and Cyper ES AFM, Oxford Instruments, UK). To analyse the elemental composition and crystallinity of the samples, we used energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM, 300 kV, FEI Tecnai G2 F30, USA), powder X-ray diffraction analysis (λ = 0.15418 nm, Bruker D8 Advance, Germany) and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (Instrument, Arcos II MV, Germany). UV–VIS spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2600, Japan) was used to determine the transmittance of the suspensions.

Magnetisation measurements

Magnetisation measurements were carried out using commercial Quantum Design MPMS-XL7 SQUID magnetometer. To immobilise a powder sample during the measurements, the powder was loaded in a low-magnetic-background gelatin capsule, tightly squeezed inside and sealed with Kapton tape. Preparation of the laminate of CTO crystals for measurements of magnetic anisotropy is described below. As our 2D crystals showed paramagnetic behaviour, most measurements were done at low temperatures (2 K). All magnetisation curves shown in Supplementary Fig. 4 were obtained after subtracting the background diamagnetic contribution (gelatin capsule, Kapton tape, substrate of the laminate).

The measured magnetisation M(H) was analysed using standard expressions \(M = N_{{\mathrm{spin}}}gJ\mu _{\mathrm{B}}B_J\left( x \right)\), where \(B_J\left( x \right) = \frac{{2J \,+ \,1}}{{2J}}\coth \left( {\frac{{2J \,+ \,1}}{{2J}}x} \right) - \frac{1}{{2J}}\coth \left( {\frac{1}{{2J}}x} \right)\) is the Brillouin function, Nspin the total number of spins in the sample, J the total angular momentum, g the Landé g-factor (g = 2.002 for our paramagnetic crystals), μB Bohr magneton and x = gJμBH/kBT.

Magneto-optical measurements

As shown schematically in Fig. 1a in the main text, a white LED or a laser with a specific wavelength was used as the incident light source. The sample (suspension of 2D CTO in 0.5 cm × 1.0 cm cross section and 5.5 cm tall quartz cuvette) was placed between two crossed polarisers (extinction ratio 105:1, Glan-Laser Calcite Polarisers, GL10-A, Thorlabs Inc.), with a magnetic field supplied by a home-made electromagnet applied in a direction perpendicular to the optical path and at 45 degrees to the polariser/analyser. The magnetic field was measured using a Hall sensor. Transmitted light was detected by a spectroradiometer (PR-788, Photo Research) equipped with a MS-75 lens, allowing detection at longer distances in order to avoid the effect of magnetic field on spectroradiometer.