Atmospheric transport is a major pathway of microplastics to remote regions


In recent years, marine, freshwater and terrestrial pollution with microplastics has been discussed extensively, whereas atmospheric microplastic transport has been largely overlooked. Here, we present global simulations of atmospheric transport of microplastic particles produced by road traffic (TWPs – tire wear particles and BWPs – brake wear particles), a major source that can be quantified relatively well. We find a high transport efficiencies of these particles to remote regions. About 34% of the emitted coarse TWPs and 30% of the emitted coarse BWPs (100 kt yr−1 and 40 kt yr−1 respectively) were deposited in the World Ocean. These amounts are of similar magnitude as the total estimated direct and riverine transport of TWPs and fibres to the ocean (64 kt yr−1). We suggest that the Arctic may be a particularly sensitive receptor region, where the light-absorbing properties of TWPs and BWPs may also cause accelerated warming and melting of the cryosphere.


Global annual plastic production reached 359 million tonnes in 20181 and, consequently, plastic pollution in freshwater2, marine3 and terrestrial4 ecosystems has received a lot of attention recently. Plastics are released into the environment as macroplastic (>5 mm)5, microplastic (1 μm to 5 mm)6 and nanoplastic (<1 μm)7 particles that can fragment into smaller sizes via photodegradation, physical abrasion, hydrolysis and biodegradation8. Plastics can affect coral reefs9, marine10 and terrestrial animals11, as well as human health12,13.

An important source of plastics is road traffic emissions14,15. Kole et al.14 reported global average emissions of tyre wear particles (TWPs) of 0.81 kg year−1 per capita, about 6.1 million tonnes (~1.8% of total plastic production). Emissions of brake wear particles (BWPs) add another 0.5 million tonnes. TWPs and BWPs are produced via mechanical abrasion and corrosion16,17.

Tyres consist of a mix of elastomers such as rubber (natural and synthetic)18, carbon black, steel cord, fibres, and other organic and inorganic components used to improve their stability19; TWPs are produced by shear forces between the tread and the road pavement, generating coarse particles20, or by volatilization generating submicronic particles21. The wearing process depends on the type of tyre, road surface and vehicle characteristics, as well as on the vehicle’s state of operation22.

Most car braking systems consist of a disc or drum with either a pair of shoes or pads mounted in callipers. Brake linings consist of binders, fibres, fillers, frictional additives or lubricants and abrasives23,24,25. Thus, BWPs are a complicated mixture of metal and plastic. BWP emissions depend on the bulk friction material23,26, on the frequency and severity of braking27, speed, weight, condition and maintenance of the automobile28 and the environmental conditions23,29,30.

Transport of TWPs and BWPs via runoff and wash-out to marine and/or freshwater ecosystems has been studied31,32. However, very little is known about their dispersion in the atmosphere33,34,35 and where they are deposited, despite their health impacts in animals9,10,11,36 and humans12,37, possibly enhanced by adsorbed toxic organic compounds and heavy metals38. Greater use of plastics results in more extensive consumption of fossil fuels and, in turn, in larger emissions of greenhouse gases39 such as methane and ethylene40. Since TWPs and BWPs can be present at sizes <10 µm41, they can remain airborne for long periods of time; different types of microplastics have been detected already in remote areas42,43,44,45,46,47. Considering that they are colourful particles48, they also absorb light and thereby decrease the surface albedo of snow and ice accelerating melting, similar to black carbon (BC)49.

Here, we examine atmospheric transport and deposition of TWPs and BWPs on a global scale (see “Methods”). For simplicity we often refer to these particles jointly as road microplastics, although TWPs and BWPs are not the only microplastics that are emitted by traffic (other sources include polymer-modified bitumen used for road pavement or road marking paint). Even though TWPs and BWPs contain components other than plastics (e.g., metals), plastics are the dominant component, especially for TWPs. We also speak of microplastics50, since we only consider the particles of mean size 0.5–9.5 µm, which can remain airborne for long periods of time.


Annual global emissions of road microplastics

TWP emissions were calculated using two different approaches, (a) one based on detailed information of TWP emissions in Northern Europe and extrapolation using a CO2 ratio method51, and (b) one based on the GAINS (Greenhouse gas–Air pollution Interactions and Synergies) model52 (see “Methods”). The two methods were compared in detail (Supplementary Fig. 1) showing that TWP emissions are very similar (0.25–32 t (tonnes) year−1 per grid cell); therefore, we report the geometric average. Uncertainties were calculated based on different assumptions on the airborne fraction of total emissions (see “Methods”). The use of different methods in emission calculations was, in addition, a tool to cross-validate whether the emissions are realistic or not. As seen in “Methods”, the CO2 ratio method is based on country statistics of returned tyres. Unfortunately, similar statistics for brake wear do not exist, and therefore, only emissions from the GAINS model were used for BWPs.

Emissions of road microplastics are concentrated in the eastern US, Northern Europe and large urbanized areas of Eastern China, Middle East and Latin America where vehicle densities are highest (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 1). Annual total global TWP emissions were 2907 kt (kilotonnes) year−1 (3434 kt year−1 from the CO2 ratio method and 2380 kt year−1 from the GAINS model), while BWP were 175 kt year−1 (Fig. 1a, b). For the particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) and PM10 size fractions, TWP emissions were 29 kt year−1 (12–75 kt year−1) and 288 kt year−1 (113–826 kt year−1), respectively (Table 1). The highest emissions were calculated for Asia (excluding Russia) (PM2.5 4.8–30 kt year−1, mean 12 kt year−1; PM10 85.0–167 kt year−1, mean 113 kt year−1) and North America (PM2.5 2.6–16 kt year−1, mean 6.4 kt year−1; PM10 46–90 kt year−1, mean 64 kt year−1) (Fig. 1). The annual global emissions of BWP were 98.2 kt year−1 (63.4–152 kt year−1) for PM2.5 and 146 kt year−1 (85.8–248 kt year−1) for PM10 (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 2). BWP emissions were very similar in Europe and North America, for both PM2.5, but highest in Asia (Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 1: Annual gridded emissions of road microplastics.

Global annual emissions of total road microplastics (tyre wear particles, TWPs, in a, and brake wear particles, BWPs, in b). TWP emissions are the average of the calculated emissions using the CO2 ratio method and the GAINS model. Bold numbers at the left bottom of each panel represent the annual emissions of total TWPs and BWPs from road vehicles for 2014, which were estimated to be 2907 and 174.6 kt, respectively.

Table 1 Annual road microplastic emissions.

Atmospheric transport and deposition of road microplastics

Surface concentrations of TWPs range between a few ng m−3 and 20 ng m−3 for PM2.5 and up to 50 ng m−3 for PM10 (Supplementary Movie 1). BWP surface concentrations reach 50 ng m−3 at maximum (Supplementary Movie 1). The highest concentrations were calculated for eastern USA, Europe and South-eastern Asia. All concentrations (TWPs 0.4 μg m−3 for PM2.5, 1.8 μg m−3 for PM10; BWPs 0.8 μg m−3 for PM2.5, 1.4 μg m−3 for PM10) were far below air quality limits for PM (annual mean 10 μg m−3 for PM2.5, double for PM1053) and lower than typical BC concentrations in remote regions54. The annual mean modelled lifetime of PM2.5 TWPs was estimated to be 28 ± 2.7 days (range 18–37 days), while for PM10 it was equal to 8.3 ± 1.0 days (range 5.5–11 days). Accordingly, for BWPs, the annual mean modelled lifetime was calculated as 28 ± 2.8 days (range 17–37 days) for the PM2.5 size class and 1.3 ± 0.16 days (range 0.94–1.6 days) for PM10. The large calculated lifetimes for PM2.5 road microplastics are due to the small scavenging coefficients for in-cloud used in the model, as it was assumed that road microplastics should be rather hydrophobic (Methods). For comparison, a typical lifetime for atmospheric black carbon in the PM2.5 size mode is 3–11 days49.

Annual deposition maps (Fig. 2) show that smaller road microplastic particles (PM2.5) are dispersed more widely than larger ones (PM10). PM10 road microplastics are deposited mainly close to the hotspot emission regions (North America, Europe and South-eastern Asia) (Fig. 2). Of the annual global TWP PM2.5 emission of 29 kt year−1 (12–75 kt year−1), ~1.7 kt year−1 (0.60–4.8 kt year−1) were deposited over Europe, 4.3 kt year−1 (1.5–12 kt year−1) over Asia, 3.3 kt year−1 (1.1–9.6 kt year−1) in America, and much lower amounts in Africa and Oceania (<4% of the total deposited mass). Overall, ~43% (4.3–34 kt year−1, mean 12 kt year−1) of the total deposited mass of PM2.5 TWPs was deposited on land and ~57% (5.3–48 kt year−1, mean 16 kt year−1) in the ocean (Table 2). About 8.1 kt year−1 (2.8–23 kt year−1) of PM2.5 TWPs were deposited on ice and snow surfaces (polar regions, mountains, etc.). Accordingly, annual total deposition of PM10 TWPs was 284 kt year−1 (102–787 kt year−1) with ~65% (68.1–497 kt year−1, mean 184 kt year−1) deposited on land. Around 28 kt year−1 (10–76 kt year−1) of the TWPs were deposited on snow and ice. The vast majority (~60%) was deposited in Europe, America, Russia and Asia (Table 2). Although deposition of TWPs to Antarctica was very small compared to other regions (0.03 kt year−1 for PM2.5, 0.01 kt year−1 for PM10), other forms of microplastics have been determined there likely transported via sea and/or air55.

Fig. 2: Wet and dry deposition of road microplastics.

Annual total (wet and dry) deposition of tyre wear particles (TWPs) and brake wear particles (BWPs) in PM2.5 and PM10 size classes, respectively. The projected deposition has been calculated as the geometric mean of all simulations using TWP emissions estimated using the CO2 ratio method and the GAINS model and using BWP emissions calculated from the GAINS model, respectively. The simulations comprise 120 ensemble members with different assumption for the airborne fraction (five for each of the PM2.5 and PM10 fractions), particle size distribution (eight for each of the PM2.5 and PM10 fractions) and CCN/IN (cloud condensation nuclei/ice nuclei) efficiency (three different sets of scavenging coefficients per fraction) following a log-normal distribution (see “Methods”). Bold numbers at the left bottom of each panel represent the annual total deposition of TWPs and BWPs from road vehicles in PM2.5 and PM10 sizes for year 2014.

Table 2 Annual deposition of road microplastics.

Of the 97 kt year−1 (59.2–162 kt year−1) annual total deposition of PM2.5 BWPs, 45 kt year−1 (30–68 kt year−1) were deposited on land (~46%) and 52 kt year−1 (29–94 kt year−1) in the World Ocean (~54%) (Table 2). About 14 kt year−1 (11–18 kt year−1) were deposited in Asia, 12.9 kt year−1 (8.6–19 kt year−1) in America, 6.1 kt year−1 (4.7–7.9 kt year−1) over Europe and 7.2 kt year−1 (6.0–8.6 kt year−1) in Russia. A significant amount (~31%) of 30 kt year−1 (20–45 kt year−1) was deposited on snow and ice surfaces. As regards to PM10 BWPs, half of the deposition (~53%) occurred in Asia, Europe and North America. About 72% (78.4–133 kt year−1, mean 102 kt year−1) were deposited on the land and the rest in the ocean, and only 20 kt year−1 (11–36 kt year−1) on snow and ice surfaces (~14% of global deposited mass). Similar to TWPs, transport to Antarctica was small compared to other continents (0.04 kt year−1 for PM2.5, 0.01 kt year−1 for PM10). The slightly smaller relative deposition of BWPs over the ocean compared to TWPs in both particle sizes (Table 2) can be attributed to the higher particle density of BWPs (see “Methods”), which leads to more rapid deposition.

Road microplastics in snow-covered land and ice surfaces

TWP concentrations in the Arctic snow ranged between 1 and 10 ng kg−1 of snow for PM2.5 and between 4 and 80 ng kg−1 for PM10 (Fig. 3). Modelled concentrations of BWPs were 2–30 ng kg−1 for PM2.5 and 2–70 ng kg−1 for PM10 (Fig. 3). For comparison, note that these values are almost three orders of magnitude lower than those of BC in Arctic snow56,57. It is seen that Northern Europe (e.g. Scandinavia), on one side, and North America, on the other, present higher TWP/BWP snow concentrations than the Arctic. This is a combination of the proximity to source regions and the fact that the calculation was performed only for pixels with substantial snowfall as compared to total precipitation (Supplementary Movie 2). The largest Arctic snow concentrations were predicted on the sea ice between Northern Greenland and Europe. This area receives road microplastics emitted both in North America and Europe (Supplementary Movies 3 and 5). Transport of microplastics into the Arctic occurs particularly in winter and spring (Fig. 3e, f, Supplementary Fig. 3) and is likely enhanced during positive phases of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)58. It is known from previous work58 that pollution transport from North America and Europe is enhanced during positive phases of the NAO and that this effect is strongest in winter and spring. Since 1990, there have been 7 years with high NAO indexes, a negative phase around 2010 and again positive phase between 2014 and 201959. Another hotspot region, in terms of snow concentrations, is Northern Eurasia (Fig. 3). This region is affected by air transport from high-emission regions further south (Supplementary Movies 3 and 5).

Fig. 3: Road microplastics in snow and ice.

Annual average concentrations of road microplastics in Arctic snow (ad) in ng kg−1. Snow concentrations were calculated using daily fields of sea-ice area fraction and total snowfall from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) combined with daily modelled deposition. The latter includes results from 120 simulations that accounted for different airborne fractions (five members for each of the PM2.5 and PM10 fractions), particle size distribution (eight members for each of the PM2.5 and PM10 fractions) and CCN/IN (cloud condensation nuclei/ice nuclei) efficiency (three different sets of scavenging coefficients per fraction) following a log-normal distribution (see “Methods”). Monthly variation of concentrations of road microplastics in the Arctic snow in both sizes (PM2.5 and PM10) are presented in (e, f). For the latter, model results using emissions from both methods are presented. Tyre wear particles (TWPs) and brake wear particles (BWPs) uncertainties have been calculated as the geometric standard deviation of all the 120 simulations with different assumption (airborne fraction, size distribution and CCN/IN efficiency, see “Methods”). Note that the smallest concentrations occur in mid-summer (e, f).

The uncertainty of road microplastics deposition was calculated from 120 model ensemble members, each comprising different size distribution characteristics, different coefficients for in-cloud and below-cloud scavenging and variable airborne fraction with respect to total emissions (see “Methods”). The uncertainty was calculated as the geometric standard deviation of deposition resulting from all ensemble members (see “Methods”, Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2).

The relative uncertainties in deposition both for PM2.5 and PM10 road microplastics are high, with a geometric standard deviation of up to 3. This is mainly due to the great uncertainty in the size distributions of emitted TWPs and BWPs, which controls the fraction of the total mass that can become airborne and the removal properties within that fraction. Dannis60 found that the mean particle diameter of TWPs decreases, while vehicle speed increases, which may contribute to the large differences in reported size distributions. In an effort to explain the size distribution, Cadle and Williams61 suggested that the formation of sub-micron TWPs may be due to the thermal degradation of tyre polymer, with the larger particle mode being generated by mechanical abrasion. Deposition of PM2.5 road microplastics is more uncertain closer to the highest emitting continents (North-eastern USA, South-eastern China and Europe) and in tropical regions where precipitation is intense (Fig. 4a, c, e). On the contrary, the highest uncertainties for road microplastic deposition of PM10 occur in remote regions (Fig. 4b, d, e). This is related to the large sensitivity of long-range transport efficiency to gravitational settling and below-cloud scavenging of larger particles, which is relatively more important for PM10 than PM2.5.

Fig. 4: Model uncertainty.

Calculated model uncertainties of deposition. Uncertainties were calculated from a model ensemble of 120 members for each of the PM2.5 and PM10 sizes, both for tyre wear particles (TWPs) and brake wear particles (BWPs). The ensemble accounts for (a) airborne PM10 TWP fraction to be 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40% of the total TWP emissions, (b) PM2.5 TWP to be 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4% of the total TWP emissions, while (c) PM2.5 BWP fraction was assumed to be 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70% of total BWPs and (d) PM10 BWP fraction of 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100% of the total BWPs, different wet scavenging coefficients that define CCN/IN (cloud condensation nuclei/ice nuclei) efficiency, and different assumptions on the airborne fraction in the emissions (see “Methods”). Uncertainties are given as the geometric standard deviations, since sensitivity scenarios followed a largely log-normal distribution (see “Methods”).


To examine the susceptibility of different remote regions (e.g. oceans, Arctic, etc.) to TWP and BWP emissions, we computed the probability of road microplastics emitted globally to reach these remote regions via the atmosphere. We define the transport efficiency as the ratio between the mass of microplastics deposited in a remote area and the total mass of microplastics emitted globally. We calculate these efficiencies by masking several geographical regions (Table 3).

Table 3 Annual transport efficiencies of road microplastics.

About 15% of the PM2.5 road microplastics were transported to the Atlantic Ocean (Table 3), whereas coarse particles were less efficiently deposited there (TWPs 10%, BWPs 11%). Due to the smaller size of PM2.5, their transport efficiency to the Pacific Ocean was even more strongly enhanced relative to PM10 deposition (Table 3). The South China Sea receives ~2% of airborne road microplastics, at maximum, a large amount considering its relatively small surface. This is due to the fact that South-eastern Asian emissions of microplastics tend to travel towards the South China Sea and the Western Pacific before they turn to the north, all the way to the Arctic (Supplementary Movies 3 and 5). The calculated transport of PM10 road microplastics shows a relatively high efficiency over Greenland (TWPs 1.7%, BWPs 2.3%) and over the Arctic Ocean (TWPs 6.8%, BWPs 4.3%) and much smaller to the Southern Ocean (TWPs 1.4%, BWPs 0.5%). Negligible transport to Antarctica was simulated.

A notable point here is the fact that in areas surrounded by road microplastic emissions sources, PM10 particles are more efficiently deposited than PM2.5 particles. For instance, in the Alps, the Mediterranean, Baltic and South China Seas, transport efficiencies of coarse particles were up to twice of those of the fine particles. Short exposure to PM10 particles has been highlighted as a major cause of respiratory diseases (e.g. asthma), especially considering that such regions are heavily populated53. The opposite is the case in remote areas that are far from emission sources such as the Arctic and Greenland, where deposition of fine particles is greater than that of coarse ones (Table 3).

Another important receptor region of global microplastic emissions is the Arctic (Table 3). It is well known that aerosols can be transported efficiently to the Arctic, in particular during the Arctic Haze season in late winter and spring62. We find a transport efficiency of almost 3.6% for the Arctic (excluding Greenland) and a similar transport efficiency for Greenland. These transport patterns may potentially intensify the climatic risk of microplastic pollution with respect to their ability to decrease the albedo in the Arctic and enhance snow and ice melting. In addition, road microplastics may concentrate in Arctic melt pools, with unknown ecological consequences. TWPs and BWPs constitute ~1.8% of total plastic production14, hence the anticipated impact of all microplastics arriving to snow and ice surfaces might be greater.

One aspect that is missing from our simulations is potential re-suspension of road microplastics. Strong winds may re-mobilize deposited microplastic particles both from the land and the ocean surface, allowing secondary transport of these particles and thus enhancing efficiency of airborne transport to remote areas such as the Arctic, somewhat similar to the well-known grasshopper effect of persistent organic pollutants63. Another important aspect is the fact that emissions from non-road vehicles (tractors, mining trucks and equipment, construction and forestry machinery, and even military) have not been included in our emission inventories. While these vehicles are fewer, they work in difficult conditions, are heavier and carry heavy loads leading to enhanced tyre and brake wear.

There is a lack of measurement data that could be used to validate our results. However, Bergmann et al.43 reported that the mean number concentration of plastic fibres detected in snow from Svalbard were 1.38 ± 1.10 ml−1, while in Bavaria they were 1.43 ± 0.32 ml−1. Most particles identified were between 11 and 25 μm, while those <11 μm were not identified due to methodological limitations. According to Stylios64, a microfibre is a fibre with <1 decitex (dtex) per filament, with the most common types being from polyesters and polyamides (1 dtex = 1 mg per 10 m). Since the majority of the fibres was <25 μm size, these number concentrations can be converted to mass concentrations of 3.4 ± 2.8 and 3.6 ± 0.80 ng g−1 in Svalbard and Bavaria, respectively. Materić et al.65 reported PET (polyethylene terephthalate), PPC (polypropylene carbonate) and PVC (polyvinyl chloride) concentrations in Alpine snow of 5.6–23, 11–16 and 6.9 ± 0.2 ng g−1, respectively. These concentrations are ~100 times higher than those estimated here for TWPs and BWPs in snow (Fig. 3), which is likely realistic considering the larger usage of these polymers as compared to TWPs and BWPs. A measurement strategy for both atmospheric concentration and deposition (e.g. in snow samples) measurements is highly recommended at different distances to major source regions in order to facilitate validation of our model results.

We calculated that out of 102–787 kt (mean 284 kt) of PM10 TWPs emitted, 34.4–290 kt (mean 100 kt) were deposited in the World Ocean. In the most recent study on riverine transport from land to ocean, van Wijnen et al.66 reported a total annual global export of microplastics to the ocean of 47 kt, 80% (37.6 kt) of which was produced by macroplastic degradation, and 20% (9.4 kt) from direct discharges of TWP and laundry fibres. The total annual releases of TWP in their model were assumed to be 426 kt (Table 3 in van Wijnen et al.66). If we assume that all microplastics are transported from land to the World Ocean over time (wash-out and runoff processes) and scale the van Wijnen et al.66 TWP emissions to match ours (2907 kt, Fig. 1), we calculate that 64 kt of TWP may be washed out from the land in a year. This suggests that direct deposition of airborne road microplastics is likely the most important source for the ocean.


TWP emission calculations based on a CO2 ratio method

Top-down estimates of total annual tyre wear emissions of 5700 10,000 and 100,000 tonnes, respectively, have been reported for Norway67, Sweden68 and Germany69 based on measurements of lifetime weight loss of returned tyres. For the rest of the globe, we did not have access to such data. To obtain global emissions (Fig. 1), we assumed a constant ratio of TWP emissions to CO2 emissions from the road transport sector (0.49 mg TWP g−1 CO2), using CO2 emissions from the CMIP6 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6)70 inventory (0.5° × 0.5° resolution) for the year 2014. The TWP/CO2 emission ratio is the average value of the ratios obtained for Norway, Sweden, and Germany, which were all very similar: 0.43, 0.50 and 0.55 mg TWP g−1 CO2, respectively.

While the total TWP emission is relatively well constrained, the fraction of total TWP and BWP emissions that becomes airborne, assumed to be particles <10 µm (PM10), is highly uncertain. Values reported in the literature range from ~1 to 40%, while those for the PM2.5 fraction (particles <2.5 µm) are ~1%23,30,32,41,71,72,73,74 (Table 6 in Grigoratos and Martini75). We examined how sensitive the calculated concentrations of TWP are with respect to this fraction. For that, we created five scenarios that assumed that 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40% of the total TWP emitted are PM10 and 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4% are PM2.5 (Supplementary Table 1). We report TWP emissions as a range (geometric mean and geometric standard deviation) based on the derived emissions from the five ensemble members, each one with a different assumed fraction for the PM2.5 and PM10 mode.

TWP and BWP emission calculations with the GAINS model

The GAINS ( model76 is an integrated assessment model where emissions of air pollutants and Kyoto gases are estimated for nearly 200 regions globally considering key economic activities, environmental regulation policies and regionally specific emission factors. For emissions of PM, GAINS provides size speciated PM discriminating PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and total PM, as well as carbonaceous particles (BC, organic carbon); detailed description of the methodology can be found in Klimont et al.52. Emissions of non-exhaust PM in GAINS include TWPs, BWPs and road abrasion, and the calculation is based on region-specific data and estimates of distance-driven (km vehicle type−1 year−1) and vehicle-type-specific emission rates (mg km−1). Distinguished vehicle types for road transport include motorcycles, cars, light duty vehicles, buses and heavy-duty vehicles. The estimates of distance driven for 2015 are derived using data on fuel use in road transport (from supported by national data on vehicle numbers and assumptions of per-vehicle mileage travelled. Considering explicitly vehicle-type-specific emission rates and respective activity data allows for better reflection of often significant regional differences in fleet structure, that is, large number of motorcycles in South and South-East Asia and generally lower car ownership numbers in parts of the developing world. GAINS emissions are distributed globally (0.5° × 0.5°) using road network data, assumptions about road-type vehicle density and population data.

The vehicle-type-specific TWP and BWP emission factors draw on review of several measurement papers (Klimont et al.77) that were recently updated52 using primarily Denier van der Gon et al.78, EEA79 and Harrison et al.41. There are large uncertainties in emission factors including the PM size distribution. GAINS assumes that PM10 TWPs represent ~10% and PM2.5 ~1% of total TWPs, whereas PM10 BWPs is ~80% and PM2.5 is 40–50% of total BWPs independently on vehicle type77. Here, we assumed that 2.5, 5, 10, 20 and 40% of the total TWPs and 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100% of the total BWPs is PM10 (Supplementary Table 1) and then calculated the geometric mean and geometric standard deviation. Accordingly, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4% of total TWPs and 30, 40, 50, 60 and 70% of total BWPs were assumed PM2.5 (Supplementary Table 1), based on the range of values reported in the literature (Table 3.96 and 3.97 in Klimont et al.77 and references therein).

Atmospheric transport modelling of road microplastics

The gridded TWP emissions were adopted to the Lagrangian particle transport model FLEXPART (FLEXible PARTicle Dispersion Model) version 10.480,81,82,83. The model was set to run in forward mode for year 2014 with a spin-up period of 1 month (December 2013). Boundary layer turbulent mixing and convection processes affecting particle transport in clouds are parameterized in the model80,84. The model was driven by 3-hourly 1° × 1° operational analyses from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecast, the spatial output resolution of concentration and deposition fields was set to 0.5° × 0.5° in a global domain with a daily temporal resolution.

FLEXPART assumes a spherical shape of particles80 and, as such, the dispersion of road microplastics was modelled. One of the most uncertain aspects of the TWP and BWP emissions is their size distribution. It depends on different properties of the tyre, driving operation and composition and texture of the pavement21. Mathissen et al.85, Sanders et al.74 and Kumar et al.73 reported that TWP and BWP can be even emitted as ultrafine particles due to thermomechanical processes. A bimodal size distribution for TWP has been suggested with one maximum in the fine mode and another in the coarse mode86,87,88,89. On the contrary, an unimodal size distribution has been reported for BWP with maxima ranging between 1.0 and 6.0 μm23,30,41,74,90 (Supplementary Fig. 4).

Model simulations were carried out for each of the above emission scenarios (five). However, since also the size distribution within the PM10 and PM2.5 modes is uncertain, we simulated particle transport for three different particle sizes in the PM2.5 (0.5, 1.0 and 2.1 μm) and five in the PM10 mode (0.5, 2.1, 3.2, 6.0 and 9.5 μm) and applied a range of different a posteriori weightings of these size classes. The respective eight mass fractions for TWPs and BWPs used in FLEXPART are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4.

Yet another source of uncertainty is the efficiency with which particles are scavenged by precipitation. Plastics are generally hydrophobic and should therefore be rather inefficient cloud condensation nuclei (CCN)91,92. However, as known for BC, coatings may make the particles more hydrophilic with time in the atmosphere49. The efficiency of aerosols to serve as ice nuclei (IN) is also not well known. To bracket this type of uncertainty in our simulations, we accounted for three different in-cloud scavenging properties (low, medium and high CCN/IN efficiency, Supplementary Table 2) in each of the aforementioned particle sizes. We report simulated concentrations and deposition amounts as the geometric mean values of the 120 ensemble members (five assumptions of the airborne fraction, eight for the size distribution, three for the CCN/IN efficiency) and quantify their uncertainty as their geometric standard deviation.

The simulations also accounted for below-cloud scavenging and dry deposition, assuming a particle density for TWPs of 1234 kg m−3, which is in the middle of the densities of 945 kg m−3 for natural rubber and 1522 kg m−3 for synthetic rubber93,94. This density is within the reported range for microplastics (940–2400 kg m−3)95. For BWPs a higher density was assumed (2000 kg m−3) considering that BWP may also contain metals22. These values were held constant for all ensemble members.

Atmospheric lifetimes of road microplastics

The modelled lifetime (τ) of of road microplastic particles in each grid cell is identical to the lifetime due to transport (ttrans) in and out of the aforementioned grid cell, chemical loss (tchem) and deposition (tdepo)

$$\frac{1}{\tau } = \frac{1}{{{t}_{{\mathrm{trans}}}}} + \frac{1}{{{t}_{{\mathrm{chem}}}}} + \frac{1}{{{t}_{{\mathrm{depo}}}}}.$$

For road microplastics, we assume no chemical interactions of TWPs and BWPs. The modelled lifetime in FLEXPART can be written by the species mass balance equation of Croft et al.96 as follows:

$$\frac{{{\mathrm{d}}{\mathbf{C}}(t)}}{{{\mathrm{d}}t}} = {\mathbf{S}}\left( t \right) - \frac{{{\mathbf{C}}(t)}}{{\tau (t)}},$$

where C(t) is the atmospheric burden of road microplastics at time t, S(t) is the time-dependent source emission fluxes and τ(t) is the removal timescale. Assuming steady-state conditions and considering that emission fluxes are continuous, there is a quasi-equilibrium between sources and removals; hence, the modelled lifetime τmod can be defined as:

$$\tau _{\mathrm{mod}} = {\mathbf{C}}_{\mathrm{mp}}/{\mathbf{L}}_{\mathrm{mp}}^{{\mathrm{trans}},{\mathrm{chem}},{\mathrm{depo}}},$$

where Cmp is the atmospheric burden of road microplastics and \({\mathbf{L}}_{\mathrm{mp}}^{{\mathrm{trans}},{\mathrm{chem}},{\mathrm{depo}}}\) is the total loss due to any process affecting TWPs and BWPs in the model (transport, chemistry, deposition).

Statistics and uncertainty calculations

We plot the probability density functions (PDFs) for deposition of TWPs and BWPs that resulted from all the ensemble members of our sensitivity in Supplementary Fig. 5. In the present case, five ensemble members represented the uncertainty in the emissions (Supplementary Table 1), eight that are in the size distribution (Supplementary Fig. 4) and three members that are in the CCN/IN efficiency (Supplementary Table 2), which gives a total of 120 ensemble members for each size (PM2.5 and PM10). Supplementary Figure 5 shows that deposition follows a log-normal distribution with a PDF that can be expressed as follows:

$$f\left( {\chi ,\mu _{\mathrm{g}},\sigma _{\mathrm{g}}} \right) = \frac{1}{{\chi \sigma _{\mathrm{g}}\sqrt {2\pi } }}{\mathrm{exp}}\left( { - \frac{{(\ln\,x - \mu _{\mathrm{g}})^2}}{{2\sigma _{\mathrm{g}}^2}}} \right),$$

where χ is the random variable, and μg and σg are the mean and standard deviation of the distribution of ln χ. This relationship is true regardless of the base of the logarithmic or exponential function97. Thus, the results can be expressed by the geometric mean (μg) and the uncertainty by the geometric standard deviation (σg) of χ, which are given below:

$$\mu _{\mathrm{g}} = \root {N} \of {{{\mathbf{A}}_1{\mathbf{A}}_2 \ldots {\mathbf{A}}_{\mathbf{N}}}}\;{\mathrm{and}}\;\sigma _{\mathrm{g}} = {\mathrm{exp}}\left( {\sqrt {\frac{{\mathop {\sum }\nolimits_{i = 1}^N \left( {\ln \frac{{{\mathbf{A}}_{\mathbf{i}}}}{{\mu _{\mathrm{g}}}}} \right)^2}}{N}} } \right),$$

where \({\mathbf{A}}_1,{\mathbf{A}}_2, \ldots ,{\mathbf{A}}_{\mathbf{N}}\) are the results from each ensemble member and N the size of the ensemble (120 members for the PM2.5 and PM10 mode, respectively, for each of the TWP and BWP).

The geometric standard deviation is a dimensionless multiplicative factor, also called geometric SD factor98. We present resulting concentrations and deposition here with geometric SD factor in conjunction with geometric mean as “the range from “the geometric mean divided by the geometric SD factor” to “the geometric mean multiplied by the geometric SD factor”, rather add/subtract “geometric SD factor” to/from “geometric mean”99.

Data availability

All primary sources (TWP and BWP emission data) are publicly available in (temporary link: FLEXPART version 10.4 model is publicly available80. Operational meteorological data that were used in FLEXPART version 10.4 model can be downloaded directly from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF, following their rules and regulations. All FLEXPART version 10.4 simulation results can be found in or upon request to N.E. The same dataset also contains land–sea, ocean, continental and country masks (Supplementary Fig. 6) that were used in the calculations of continental emissions, oceanic deposition and transport efficiencies, together with the ECMWF data of sea-ice area fraction, snow depth (for the definition of mountains), snowfall and total precipitation that were used in the calculations of snow concentrations.

Code availability

The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART is open access and can be obtained from All figures were created using open access Python 3 programming language. The post-processing codes can be obtained from the corresponding author upon request.


  1. 1.

    PlasticsEurope. Plastics—the Facts 2019 (2019).

  2. 2.

    Blettler, M. C. M., Abrial, E., Khan, F. R., Sivri, N. & Espinola, L. A. Freshwater plastic pollution: recognizing research biases and identifying knowledge gaps. Water Res. 143, 416–424 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Haward, M. Plastic pollution of the world’s seas and oceans as a contemporary challenge in ocean governance. Nat. Commun. 9, 9–11 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Chae, Y. & An, Y. J. Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: a review. Environ. Pollut. 240, 387–395 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Lebreton, L., Egger, M. & Slat, B. A global mass budget for positively buoyant macroplastic debris in the ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Peeken, I. et al. Arctic sea ice is an important temporal sink and means of transport for microplastic. Nat. Commun. 9, 1505 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Wagner, S. & Reemtsma, T. Things we know and don’t know about nanoplastic in the environment. Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 300–301 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Gewert, B., Plassmann, M. M. & Macleod, M. Pathways for degradation of plastic polymers floating in the marine environment. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 17, 1513–1521 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lamb, J. B. et al. Plastic waste associated with disease on coral reefs. Science (80-) 359, 460–462 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wilcox, C., Puckridge, M., Schuyler, Q. A., Townsend, K. & Hardesty, B. D. A quantitative analysis linking sea turtle mortality and plastic debris ingestion. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Harne, R. et al. Studies on plastic bezoar ingestion in free range axis deer in summer. J. Anim. Res. 9, 383–386 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lehner, R., Weder, C., Petri-Fink, A. & Rothen-Rutishauser, B. Emergence of nanoplastic in the environment and possible impact on human health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1748–1765 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wright, S. L. & Kelly, F. J. Plastic and human health: a micro issue? Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 6634–6647 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jan Kole, P., Löhr, A. J., Van Belleghem, F. G. A. J. & Ragas, A. M. J. Wear and tear of tyres: a stealthy source of microplastics in the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 1–4 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Schwarz, A. E., Ligthart, T. N., Boukris, E. & van Harmelen, T. Sources, transport, and accumulation of different types of plastic litter in aquatic environments: a review study. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 143, 92–100 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Penkała, M., Ogrodnik, P. & Rogula-Kozłowska, W. Particulate matter from the road surface abrasion as a problem of non-exhaust emission control. Environments 5, 9 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sommer, F. et al. Tire abrasion as a major source of microplastics in the environment. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 18, 2014–2028 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sundt, P., Syversen, F., Skogesal, O. & Schulze, P.-E. Primary microplastic-pollution: measures and reduction potentials in Norway. Miljodirektoratet 117, (2016).

  19. 19.

    Landi, D., Vitali, S. & Germani, M. Environmental analysis of different end of life scenarios of tires textile fibers. Procedia CIRP 48, 508–513 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rogge, W. F., Hildemann, L. M., Mazurek, M. A., Cass, G. R. & Simoneit, B. R. T. Sources of fine organic aerosol. 3. Road dust, tire debris, and organometallic brake lining dust: roads as sources and Sinks. Environ. Sci. Technol. 27, 1892–1904 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Wagner, S. et al. Tire wear particles in the aquatic environment—a review on generation, analysis, occurrence, fate and effects. Water Res. 139, 83–100 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Grigoratos, T. & Martini, G. Non-Exhaust Traffic Related Emissions. Brake and Tyre Wear PM (Publications Office of the European Union, 2014).

  23. 23.

    Kukutschová, J. et al. On airborne nano/micro-sized wear particles released from low-metallic automotive brakes. Environ. Pollut. 159, 998–1006 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chan, D. & Stachowiak, G. W. Review of automotive brake friction materials. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D 218, 953–966 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Thorpe, A. & Harrison, R. M. Sources and properties of non-exhaust particulate matter from road traffic: q review. Sci. Total Environ. 400, 270–282 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Österle, W., Griepentrog, M., Gross, T. & Urban, I. Chemical and microstructural changes induced by friction and wear of brakes. Wear 250–251, 1469–1476 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kwak, J. H., Kim, H., Lee, J. & Lee, S. Characterization of non-exhaust coarse and fine particles from on-road driving and laboratory measurements. Sci. Total Environ. 458–460, 273–282 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mamakos, A., Arndt, M., Hesse, D. & Augsburg, K. Physical characterization of brake-wear particles in a PM dilution tunnel. Atmosphere 10, 639 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Olofsson, U. & Olander, L. On the identification of wear modes and transitions using airborne wear particles. Tribol. Int. 59, 104–113 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Mosleh, M., Blau, P. J. & Dumitrescu, D. Characteristics and morphology of wear particles from laboratory testing of disk brake materials. Wear 256, 1128–1134 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jan Kole, P., Löhr, A. J., Van Belleghem, F. G. A. J. & Ragas, Ad. M. J. Wear and tear of tyres: a stealthy source of microplastics in the environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 14, 1265 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wik, A. & Dave, G. Occurrence and effects of tire wear particles in the environment—a critical review and an initial risk assessment. Environ. Pollut. 157, 1–11 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Chen, G., Feng, Q. & Wang, J. Mini-review of microplastics in the atmosphere and their risks to humans. Sci. Total Environ. 703, 135504 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Enyoh, C. E., Verla, A. W., Verla, E. N., Ibe, F. C. & Amaobi, C. E. Airborne microplastics: a review study on method for analysis, occurrence, movement and risks. Environ. Monit. Assess. 191, 668 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Atmospheric microplastics: a review on current status and perspectives. Earth-Sci. Rev. 203, 103118 (2020).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Reynolds, C. & Ryan, P. G. Micro-plastic ingestion by waterbirds from contaminated wetlands in South Africa. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 126, 330–333 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Dorsey, T. F. et al. Correlations of asthma mortality with traffic-related factors: use of catalytic converters and radial tires. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 48, 1321–1327 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ashton, K., Holmes, L. & Turner, A. Association of metals with plastic production pellets in the marine environment. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 60, 2050–2055 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Höök, M. & Tang, X. Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change—a review. Energy Policy 52, 797–809 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Royer, S.-J., Ferron, S., Wilson, S. T. & Karl, D. M. Production of methane and ethylene from plastic in the environment. PLoS ONE 13, e0200574 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Harrison, R. M., Jones, A. M., Gietl, J., Yin, J. & Green, D. C. Estimation of the contributions of brake dust, tire wear, and resuspension to nonexhaust traffic particles derived from atmospheric measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 6523–6529 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Allen, S. et al. Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment. Nat. Geosci. 12, 339–344 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bergmann, M. et al. White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic. Sci. Adv. 5, 1–11 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Dris, R., Gasperi, J., Saad, M., Mirande, C. & Tassin, B. Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: a source of microplastics in the environment? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 104, 290–293 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kanhai, L. D. K., Gardfeldt, K., Krumpen, T., Thompson, R. C. & O’Connor, I. Microplastics in sea ice and seawater beneath ice floes from the Arctic Ocean. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–11 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kanhai, L. D. K. et al. Microplastics in sub-surface waters of the Arctic Central Basin. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 130, 8–18 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Obbard, R. W. et al. Earth’s Future. Global warming releases microplastic legacy frozen in Arctic Sea ice. Earth’s Future 2, 315–320 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Halle, L. L., Palmqvist, A., Kampmann, K. & Khan, F. R. Ecotoxicology of micronized tire rubber: past, present and future considerations. Sci. Total Environ. 706, 135694 (2020).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Bond, T. C. et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 5380–5552 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Hartmann, N. B. et al. Are we speaking the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categorization framework for plastic debris. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 1039–1047 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Andreae, M. O. & Merlet, P. Emissions of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 955–966 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Klimont, Z. et al. Global anthropogenic emissions of particulate matter including black carbon. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 8681–8723 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005. WHO/SDE/PHE/OEH/06.02, 1–21. (2005).

  54. 54.

    Eckhardt, S. et al. Current model capabilities for simulating black carbon and sulfate concentrations in the Arctic atmosphere: a multi-model evaluation using a comprehensive measurement data set. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15, 9413–9433 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Kelly, A., Lannuzel, D., Rodemann, T., Meiners, K. M. & Auman, H. J. Microplastic contamination in east Antarctic sea ice. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 154, 111130 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Doherty, S. J., Warren, S. G., Grenfell, T. C., Clarke, A. D. & Brandt, R. E. Light-absorbing impurities in Arctic snow. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11647–11680 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Evangeliou, N. et al. Origin of elemental carbon in snow from Western Siberia and northwestern European Russia during winter–spring. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 963–977 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Eckhardt, S. et al. The North Atlantic Oscillation controls air pollution transport to the Arctic. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 3, 1769–1778 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Hurrell, J. & the National Center for Atmospheric Research staff. The Climate Data Guide: Hurrell North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) Index (Station-Based). (2020).

  60. 60.

    Dannis, M. L. Rubber dust from the normal wear of tires. Rubber Chem. Technol. 47, 1011–1037 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Cadle, S. H. & Williams, R. L. Gas and particle emissions from automobile tires in laboratory and field studies. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 28, 502–507 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Stohl, A. Characteristics of atmospheric transport into the Arctic troposphere. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 111, 1–17 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Simonich, S. L. & Hites, R. A. Global distribution of persistent organochlorine compounds. Science (80-) 269, 1851–1854 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Stylios, G. K. The appearance of seams in non-iron shirts. Join. Text. Princ. Appl., 467–477 (2013).

  65. 65.

    Materić, D. et al. Micro- and nanoplastics in Alpine Snow: a new method for chemical identification and (semi)quantification in the nanogram range. Environ. Sci. Technol. (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    van Wijnen, J., Ragas, A. M. J. & Kroeze, C. Modelling global river export of microplastics to the marine environment: sources and future trends. Sci. Total Environ. 673, 392–401 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Sundt, P., Schultze, P. E. & Syversen, F. Sources of Microplastic—Pollution to the Marine Environment (Norwegian Environment Agency, Miljødirektoaret, 2014).

  68. 68.

    Norén, F. & Naustvoll, L. J. Survey of Microscopic Anthropogenic Particles in Skagerrak. Pilot study, 19 (Norwegian Climate and Pollution Agency (KLIF), Norway, 2010).

  69. 69.

    Essel, R., Engel, L., Carus, M. & Ahrens, R. H. Quellen für Mikroplastik mit Relevanz für den Meeresschutz in Deutschland 8 (Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßllau, 2015).

  70. 70.

    Simpkins, G. Progress in climate modelling. Nat. Clim. Chang 7, 684–685 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Panko, J. M., Chu, J., Kreider, M. L. & Unice, K. M. Measurement of airborne concentrations of tire and road wear particles in urban and rural areas of France, Japan, and the United States. Atmos. Environ. 72, 192–199 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Garg, B. D. et al. Brake wear particulate matter emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 4463–4469 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kumar, P., Pirjola, L., Ketzel, M. & Harrison, R. M. Nanoparticle emissions from 11 non-vehicle exhaust sources—a review. Atmos. Environ. 67, 252–277 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Sanders, P. G., Xu, N., Dalka, T. M. & Maricq, M. M. Airborne brake wear debris: size distributions, composition, and a comparison of dynamometer and vehicle tests. Environ. Sci. Technol. 37, 4060–4069 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Grigoratos, T. & Martini, G. Brake wear particle emissions: a review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 2491–2504 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Amann, M. et al. Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications. Environ. Model. Softw. 26, 1489–1501 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Klimont, Z. et al. Modelling Particulate Emissions in Europe. Interim Report IR-02-076 (IIASA, 2002).

  78. 78.

    Denier van der Gon, H. A. C. et al. The policy relevance of wear emissions from road transport, now and in the future—An International Workshop Report and Consensus Statement. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 63, 136–149 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    EEA. EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook 2013: technical guidance to prepare national emission inventories. EEA Tech. Rep. 23, (2013).

  80. 80.

    Pisso, I. et al. The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4. Geosci. Model. Dev. 12, 4955–4997 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Fang, X. et al. Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) emissions in East Asia determined by inverse modeling. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 4779–4791 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Thompson, R. L. et al. Methane emissions in East Asia for 2000–2011 estimated using an atmospheric Bayesian inversion. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 4352–4369 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Mühle, J. et al. Perfluorocyclobutane (PFC-318, <i>c</i>-C4F8) in the global atmosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 19, 10335–10359 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Forster, C., Stohl, A. & Seibert, P. Parameterization of convective transport in a Lagrangian particle dispersion model and its evaluation. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 46, 403–422 (2007).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Mathissen, M., Scheer, V., Vogt, R. & Benter, T. Investigation on the potential generation of ultrafine particles from the tire-road interface. Atmos. Environ. 45, 6172–6179 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Fukahori, Y. & Yamazaki, H. Mechanism of rubber abrasion. Part I: Abrasion pattern formation in natural rubber vulcanizate. Wear 171, 195–202 (1994).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Gustafsson, M. et al. Properties and toxicological effects of particles from the interaction between tyres, road pavement and winter traction material. Sci. Total Environ. 393, 226–240 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Wang, Q., Zhang, Q., Wu, Y. & Wang, X. C. Physicochemical conditions and properties of particles in urban runoff and rivers: Implications for runoff pollution. Chemosphere 173, 318–325 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Kreider, M. L., Panko, J. M., McAtee, B. L., Sweet, L. I. & Finley, B. L. Physical and chemical characterization of tire-related particles: comparison of particles generated using different methodologies. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 652–659 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Iijima, A. et al. Particle size and composition distribution analysis of automotive brake abrasion dusts for the evaluation of antimony sources of airborne particulate matter. Atmos. Environ. 41, 4908–4919 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Di Mundo, R., Petrella, A. & Notarnicola, M. Surface and bulk hydrophobic cement composites by tyre rubber addition. Constr. Build. Mater. 172, 176–184 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Ganguly, M. & Ariya, P. A. Ice nucleation of model nanoplastics and microplastics: a novel synthetic protocol and the influence of particle capping at diverse atmospheric. Environ. ACS Earth Space Chem. 3, 1729–1739 (2019).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Walker, R. The Mass of 300 Different ‘Dry’ Materials (2019).

  94. 94.

    User Guidelines for Waste and Byproduct Materials in Pavement Construction. Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology (2019).

  95. 95.

    Unice, K. M. et al. Characterizing export of land-based microplastics to the estuary—Part I: Application of integrated geospatial microplastic transport models to assess tire and road wear particles in the Seine watershed. Sci. Total Environ. 646, 1639–1649 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Croft, B., Pierce, J. R. & Martin, R. V. Interpreting aerosol lifetimes using the GEOS-Chem model and constraints from radionuclide measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 4313–4325 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Limpert, E., Stahel, W. A. & Abbt, M. Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues. Bioscience 51, 341–352 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Kirkwood, T. B. L. Geometric standard deviation—reply to bohidar. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 19, 395–396 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Kirkwood, T. B. L. Geometric means and measures of dispersion. Biometrics 35, 908–909 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by COMBAT (Quantification of Global Ammonia Sources constrained by a Bayesian Inversion Technique) funded by ROMFORSK—Program for romforskning of the Research Council of Norway (Project ID: 275407), website:

Author information




N.E. performed the simulations, analyses, wrote and coordinated the paper. H.G. and S.L.-A. made the calculations of TWP emissions with the CO2 ratio method, Z.K. and C.H. calculated TWP and BWP emissions with the GAINS model, S.E. helped in the FLEXPART version 10.4 simulations and A.S. wrote and commented on the manuscript. All authors contributed in the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Evangeliou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Deonie Allen, Sebastian Primpke, and other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evangeliou, N., Grythe, H., Klimont, Z. et al. Atmospheric transport is a major pathway of microplastics to remote regions. Nat Commun 11, 3381 (2020).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.