Engineering unsymmetrically coordinated Cu-S1N3 single atom sites with enhanced oxygen reduction activity


Atomic interface regulation is thought to be an efficient method to adjust the performance of single atom catalysts. Herein, a practical strategy was reported to rationally design single copper atoms coordinated with both sulfur and nitrogen atoms in metal-organic framework derived hierarchically porous carbon (S-Cu-ISA/SNC). The atomic interface configuration of the copper site in S-Cu-ISA/SNC is detected to be an unsymmetrically arranged Cu-S1N3 moiety. The catalyst exhibits excellent oxygen reduction reaction activity with a half-wave potential of 0.918 V vs. RHE. Additionally, through in situ X-ray absorption fine structure tests, we discover that the low-valent Cuprous-S1N3 moiety acts as an active center during the oxygen reduction process. Our discovery provides a universal scheme for the controllable synthesis and performance regulation of single metal atom catalysts toward energy applications.


The developing of advanced fuel cells and metal-air batteries equipped with oxygen electrodes provides new opportunities for the applications of future sustainable energy1,2,3. To realize energy conversion with highly efficiency, it’s crucial to improve the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) procedure, among these electrochemical devices4,5. Currently platinum-based materials have been widely used for ORR, but are unfortunately precluded by their rarity and high price6. Although the newly developed catalysts with earth-abundant elements exhibit some fancy properties, the overall performance including activity and durability is still far from satisfactory7,8,9,10. Hence, the rational design of ideal oxygen electrode materials with low-cost but high activity and good stability under applied conditions remains a formidable challenge.

Due to the high atomic utilization, single atom catalysts have gained great attention in heterogeneous catalysis, and significantly, they provide new horizons for the discovery of innovative materials to energy applications11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20. Especially, both theoretical and experimental explorations have suggested that isolated single metal-Nx (M-Nx) modified carbon-based materials can serve as desirable oxygen electrocatalysts with promising performance21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29. Particularly, density functional theory (DFT) calculations demonstrate the standard symmetrical planar four-coordinated structure (denoted as M-N4 moiety) might serve as the most favorable catalytic site for M-Nx catalysts, seemingly supported by plenty of experimental results30,31,32,33. But some recent researches also point out that for the M-N4 moiety, the large electronegativity of the symmetrical neighboring nitrogen atoms around the metal site would result in unsuitable free energy for adsorption the intermediate products34,35. Obviously, the non-optimal adsorption of the ORR intermediates badly decreases the kinetic activity and hampers the performance. As a solution to overcome the obstacles, the adsorption strength of ORR intermediates in the active sites could be modified by adjusting the interface configuration of the central metal atoms to reduce the potential barriers, which results in boosted catalytic activity36,37. Due to the comparative weak electronegativity, sulfur-permeating seems to be an attractive method to adjust the electronic structures of the active sites, realizing the improvement of ORR performance38,39. Conventionally, the alien sulfur atoms are anchored in the carbon matrix surrounded by C or N atoms, separated from the metal centers40,41,42,43. This regulation type of sulfur species can tune and enhance the kinetic activity of the M-N4 site by adjusting electron-withdrawing/donating properties. However, in this situation, the activity modification by the doped sulfur is indirect and limited. What about the direct engagement of metal and sulfur atoms? It means that at least one nitrogen atom in the symmetrical M-N4 moiety has to be kicked off by sulfur invaders. Will the adjacent pairs of metal and sulfur to construct an unsymmetrical atomic interface to produce boosted effects for ORR? As far as we know, few reports have addressed this question44,45,46.

Herein, we developed a hierarchically porous carbon based single copper atom catalyst toward ORR, by rationally controlling the unsymmetrical interface structure of central metal atoms, in which Cu was directly bonded with both sulfur and nitrogen atoms (denoted as S-Cu-ISA/SNC). The engineered S-Cu-ISA/SNC demonstrated a half-wave potential of 0.918 V vs. RHE in alkaline media, which reflected its boosted ORR performance. The activity of S-Cu-ISA/SNC compared to related materials follows the trend: S-Cu-ISA/SNC (single-atom Cu-S1N3 supported on N and S co-doped carbon polyhedron) >Cu-ISA/SNC (single-atom Cu-N4 supported on N and S co-doped carbon polyhedron) >Cu-ISA/NC (single-atom Cu-N4 supported on N doped carbon polyhedron) >Pt/C. Moreover, S-Cu-ISA/SNC displayed excellent stability with no obvious current decay after long-term ORR test. X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) revealed that the outstanding ORR activity originated from the formation of the unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 atomic interface in the carbon matrix, and we also discovered that low-valent Cu (+1) species worked as active sites for ORR. Furthermore, this strategy of atomic interface engineering could be used to other metals (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, etc.).


Synthesis and morphology characterizations of S-Cu-ISA/SNC

The sample was prepared through a three-step process (Supplementary Fig. 1). In step one, zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-8) were adopted as molecular-scale cages to absorb and encapsulate the copper precursor. Typically, Cu(acac)2 was mixed with the precursors of ZIF-8 (Zn2+ and 2-methylimidazole), and through a self-assembly process, Cu(acac)2 were committed to the ZIF-8 cages (Cu-ZIF-8). In the second step, Cu-ZIF-8 and sulfur powder were jointly dispersed in carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) and then dried by stirring, ensuring the sulfur was absorbed on the surface of Cu-ZIF-8 powder (labeled as S-Cu-ZIF-8, Supplementary Figs. 2 and 3). In the final step, S-Cu-ISA/SNC was obtained after the pyrolyzation of the S-Cu-ZIF-8 at 950 °C under Ar atmosphere. It was necessary to noted that the formed metallic zinc was evaporated (>907 °C) and meanwhile sulfur permeated in the ZIF-8 frameworks during pyrolysis47,48. Cu-ISA/SNC (S was separated from Cu), Cu-ISA/NC (S free), SNC (S, N co-modified carbon) and NC (N-modified carbon) were also prepared as comparison.

The synthetic samples were characterized by Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns and Raman spectra (Supplementary Fig. 4). The results indicated that the ZIF-8 derived carbon frameworks were poorly crystallized after pyrolysis and also implied that plenty of defects existed in the carbon substrate, which was favorable for the anchoring of isolated metal atoms49. The morphology of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Figure 1a showed that S-Cu-ISA/SNC roughly remained the polyhedral shape, but the surfaces became extremely bumpy. The TEM images (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 5a) indicated that the obtained sample possessed a highly open porous structure, meanwhile small Cu particles were not detected. The high-resolution transmission electron microscopy image (HRTEM) in Supplementary Fig. 5b told us that graphite carbon layers existed in the porous frameworks, which were beneficial for promoting the conductivity50. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Supplementary Fig. 6) demonstrated the fairly high specific surface area and the hierarchically porous characteristics of S-Cu-ISA/SNC. Our further in-situ environmental microscopic studies (Supplementary Figs. 7, 8, Supplementary Note. 1 and Supplementary Movies 1-2) suggested that the permeation of sulfur played an important role for etching the carbon frameworks. The hierarchically porous architecture could facilitate the charge and mass transportation for electrochemical reactions51. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 9) in the scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) indicated Cu, S and N on the support were distributed uniformly. The Cu content in S-Cu-ISA/SNC was 0.73 at%, according to the ICP-OES results. The monodispersion of Cu could be directly monitored by spherical aberration STEM (Fig. 1d, e and Supplementary Fig. 10). The Cu atoms were confirmed by isolated bright dots in the high-magnification HAADF-STEM image. The sizes of dots were below 2.0 Å as shown in Supplementary Fig. 11. As elucidated in Fig. 1f, the distance between Cu atoms was more than 0.38 nm, which confirmed that Cu existed in isolated feature in S-Cu-ISA/SNC. Furthermore, the SEM, TEM and HAADF-STEM characterizations of NC, SNC, Cu-ISA/NC and Cu-ISA/SNC were also exhibited, respectively (Supplementary Figs. 1215). We found that all the S-added samples (S-Cu-ISA/SNC, Cu-ISA/SNC and SNC) displayed etched porous feature, compared to those without sulfur participation (Cu-ISA/NC and NC). Additionally, the Zn content in S-Cu-ISA/SNC was as low as 0.028 at% according to the ICP-OES analysis, which excluded the possible influence to catalytic performance by the residue Zn species52.

Fig. 1: Morphology and composition characterizations of S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

a SEM, b TEM and c EDS images of S-Cu-ISA/SNC, C (pink), N (green), S (yellow) and Cu (red). d HAADF-STEM image and e the magnified image of S-Cu-ISA/SNC. f The corresponding intensity profiles along the line X-Y in e.

Chemical state and atomic structure analysis of S-Cu-ISA/SNC

To probe the electronic and atomic interplay of Cu, S, N and C in S-Cu-ISA/SNC, synchrotron-radiation-based soft XANES was carried out (Supplementary Note. 2)53. The L3 edge and L2 edge of Cu XANES in S-Cu-ISA/SNC located at 931.2 eV and 950.9 eV (Fig. 2a). The L-edge position of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was between those of CuPc and CuS, implying the possible formation of Cu-S and Cu-N bonds, which was consistent with the XPS results (Supplementary Fig. 16). The carbon K-edge spectrum of S-Cu-ISA/SNC (Fig. 2b) was dominated by four clearly peaks located at 285.5 eV (peak a), 287.4 eV (peak b1), 288.5 eV (peak b2) and 292.4 eV (peak c), which could be attributed to the dipole transition of the C 1 s core electron to the π*C = C, π*C-N/S-C, and σ*C-C orbitals54. The peak b1 and peak b2 suggested the existing of Cu–N/S bonds at carbon matrix55. In addition, the electronic state of N in S-Cu-ISA/SNC could also be detected by the N K-edge XANES spectrum (Fig. 2c). The peaks e1, e2 and f indicated the pyridinic and pyrrolic nitrogen; the peak g denoted graphitic nitrogen54. The Cu-N bond was also monitored by N 1s XPS spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 16e). Furthermore, the S L-edge XANES spectrum (Supplementary Fig. 17) of S-Cu-ISA/SNC showed obvious peaks (peak h-j) in the region of 163–167 eV corresponding to C-S-C coordination species, suggesting the anchor of S in the carbon skeleton56. The sulfur was further investigated by S K-edge XANES (Supplementary Fig. 18). In general, the valence of S was linear correlated to the K-edge position. We found that the sulfur in S-Cu-ISA/SNC was slightly positive charge, which might be attributed to the existence of S-N coordination, since N had higher electronegativity than S, as well as the existence of C-SOx species in the sample. The S K-edge EXAFS for S-Cu-ISA/SNC demonstrated the presence of S-C/N and S-Cu bonding, with FT peaks located at 1.3 Å and 2.1 Å, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 19).

Fig. 2: Chemical state and atomic local structure of S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

a Cu L-edge XANES spectra of S-Cu-ISA/SNC, CuS and CuPc. b C K-edge and c N K-edge XANES spectra of the S-Cu-ISA/SNC. d The experimental Cu K-edge XANES spectra of S-Cu-ISA/SNC and the references (Cu foil, CuS and CuPc). e FT k3-weighted Cu K-edge EXAFS spectra of S-Cu-ISA/SNC and the references. f WT-EXAFS plots of S-Cu-ISA/SNC, CuS and CuPc, respectively. g FT-EXAFS fitting curves of S-Cu-ISA/SNC at Cu K-edge. h Schematic atomic interface model of S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) was carried out to gain insight into the interface structure at atomic scale. The position of the Cu K-edge absorption threshold was the reflection of average oxidation state of Cu species57,58. As illustrated in Fig. 2d, the edge position of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was between CuS and CuPc, demonstrating the average oxidation state of Cu was between the two references. In supplementary Fig. 20, the fitted oxidation state of Cu in S-Cu-ISA/SNC from K-edge XANES spectra was 1.97, agreeing well with XPS and soft L-edge XANES analysis. The Fourier transform (FT) EXAFS spectra of S-Cu-ISA/SNC and the references (Cu foil, CuS and CuPc) were illustrated in Fig. 2e. We found that the sample exhibited one obvious FT peak located at 1.55 Å, which was mainly attributed to the scattering of Cu-N coordination. Surprisingly, a shoulder peak located at 1.81 Å was also detected. By contrast with other FT-EXAFS spectra, this signal in S-Cu-ISA/SNC was considered owing to Cu-S scattering (Supplementary Figs. 21 and 22), which indicated the formation of Cu-S bonding. Furthermore, there was no related peak corresponding to Cu-Cu coordination, compared with Cu foil. Due to the powerful resolution in both k and R spaces, the Cu K-edge wavelet transform (WT)-EXAFS was applied to investigated the atomic configuration of S-Cu-ISA/SNC (Fig. 2f)59. By comprehensive consideration of the Cu-N and Cu-S contributions, the WT contour plots in S-Cu-ISA/SNC exhibited the maximum peak at 3.9 Å−1. In addition, compared with the WT signals of Cu foil, no Cu-Cu coordination was observed in S-Cu-ISA/SNC (Supplementary Fig. 23). These further identified the isolated feature of Cu species in S-Cu-ISA/SNC60.

Quantitatively, the structural parameters at Cu K-edge was extracted by least-square EXAFS fitting. The results were exhibited in Fig. 2g, Supplementary Fig. 24 and Supplementary Table 1. It was observed that the fitting curves matched quite well with the experiment spectra. Depend on the results, the first shell of the central atom Cu displayed a coordination number of four, directly connected by one S atom and three N atoms, with the mean bond lengths of 2.32 Å and 1.98 Å, respectively (Fig. 2h). Furthermore, we investigated the simulated EXAFS spectra based on the models of Cu-S1N3, Cu-S2N2, Cu-S3N1 and Cu-N4, given in Supplementary Fig. 25a. We could find that when the atom number of sulfur increased from one to three, the FT peak intensity of Cu-S increased understandably, compared to that of Cu-N61. The relative intensity of Cu-S and Cu-N in the Cu-S1N3 curve accorded quite well with the experimental spectrum. The theoretical XANES spectrum was also calculated based on the Cu-S1N3 model (Supplementary Fig. 25b) as well as Cu-N4, Cu-S2N2 and Cu-S3N1 (Supplementary Fig. 26). We could see that the calculation result for Cu-S1N3 could best reproduce the main features of the experimental curve of S-Cu-ISA/SNC. Moreover, we also tried linear combination fitting (LCF) of the experimental spectrum with the calculated spectrum for Cu-N4 and experimental spectra for CuS and/or Cu2S, as shown in Supplementary Figs. 27–29. We found that although the fitted curves near the edge seemed coincide with the experimental spectrum in some way, the curves after the white line were quite different, suggesting the absence of copper sulfide species. Based on the EXAFS fittings and simulations together with XANES calculations, the unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 moiety in S-Cu-ISA/SNC was appropriately confirmed. The EXAFS results of Cu foil, CuS and CuPc were also exhibited in Supplementary Fig. 30 and Supplementary Table 1. By contrast, the EXAFS analysis of Cu-ISA/NC and Cu-ISA/SNC were showed in Supplementary Figs. 31, 32 and Supplementary Table 1, respectively. Both the Cu species in Cu-ISA/NC and Cu-ISA/SNC existed in the form of symmetrical Cu-N4, different from that of S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

Electrocatalytic performance of S-Cu-ISA/SNC on ORR

The ORR activity of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was then evaluated in a typical three-electrode system (Supplementary Figs. 33 and 34). As illustrated in Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 35 (the CV curves of S-Cu-ISA/SNC and Pt/C were exhibited in Supplementary Fig. 36), all the three single copper atom samples (S-Cu-ISA/SNC, Cu-ISA/SNC and Cu-ISA/NC) showed an optimistic performance. Especially, the S-Cu-ISA/SNC displayed an optimal activity with the highest kinetic current density (Jk = 35 mA cm−2), as well as the most positive onset potential (Eonset) at 1.05 V and half-wave potential (E1/2) at 0.918 V among the studied catalysts, and the catalytic activities of these catalysts followed the trend S-Cu-ISA/SNC > Cu-ISA/SNC > Cu-ISA/NC. The E1/2 of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was even 78 mV higher than that of commercial Pt/C (0.84 V). By contrast, NC and SNC frameworks derived from ZIF-8 demonstrated rather low Jk (0.024 mA cm−2 and 1.3 mA cm−2) and E1/2 (0.66 V and 0.79 V, respectively), which indicated that in single copper atom catalysts, the Cu-S/N or Cu-N sites might serve as the active sites during ORR instead of the N-C or S-N-C. Furthermore, S-Cu-ISA/SNC surpassed all the other listed Cu-based ORR catalysts including some recently reported single Cu atom catalysts with isolated symmetrical Cu-N4 centers62,63. The ORR activity of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was also compared with that of other nanostructured or single atom non-precious metal (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, etc.) catalysts, and we found that S-Cu-ISA/SNC still demonstrated superior activity than those of them (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Table 2).

Fig. 3: ORR activity of S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

a Polarization curves for S-Cu-ISA/SNC and the references. b The contrast between S-Cu-ISA/SNC and the references for Jk (0.85 V) and E1/2. c Contrasting the Eonset and E1/2 values for S-Cu-ISA/SNC and the catalysts in Supplementary Table 2. d The polarization curves of S-Cu-ISA/SNC at different rotating speeds. e The K-L plots for S-Cu-ISA/SNC. f The long-term durability tests of S-Cu-ISA/SNC, which was assessed by cycling the catalyst between 1.1 and 0.2 V vs. RHE at 50 mV s−1. g Schematic diagram of Zn-air battery. h Discharge polarization curves and power density plots of S-Cu-ISA/SNC and Pt/C-based Zn-air batteries.

Koutecky-Levich plots of S-Cu-ISA/SNC were obtained from linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) curves (Fig. 3d). The calculated electron transfer number of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was 4.0 (Fig. 3e), which was the same as the theoretical value for Pt/C. As shown in the Supplementary Fig. 37, from 0.2 to 0.9 V, the electron transfer number for S-Cu-ISA/SNC was in the range of 3.92-3.99 and the H2O2 yield remained below 4%, indicating that the catalytic process on the S-Cu-ISA/SNC electrode underwent a high efficiency four-electron ORR process. The Tafel slope for S-Cu-ISA/SNC (50 mV decade−1) was much lower than that of Pt/C (90 mV decade−1), further conforming the excellent ORR activity for S-Cu-ISA/SNC (Supplementary Fig. 38). Supplementary Figs. 39, 40 demonstrated that S-Cu-ISA/SNC exhibited excellent methanol tolerance. In Fig. 3f, after 5000 cycles, little change in E1/2 was observed for S-Cu-ISA/SNC. The chronoamperometry at 0.90 V vs. RHE of S-Cu-ISA/SNC catalyst showed that the ORR current remained 98% after 100 h test (Supplementary Fig. 41). The HAADF images and EXAFS spectra (Supplementary Figs. 42, 43) also proved that S-Cu-ISA/SNC had excellent stability for ORR. When tested in acidic media (0.5 M H2SO4 solution), the S-Cu-ISA/SNC catalyst also exhibited improved activity (Supplementary Fig. 44). The catalyst displayed E1/2 of 0.74 V. The Tafel slope was 106.9 mV decade−1. Furthermore, it showed comparable activity compared with other catalyst shown in Supplementary Table 3. In addition, S-Cu-ISA/SNC in acid possessed good stability as well (Supplementary Fig. 44f).

Additionally, we tested the potential application of S-Cu-ISA/SNC in a home-made Zn-air battery (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Fig. 45a). As exhibited in Fig. 3h, the Zn-air battery using S-Cu-ISA/SNC catalyst as the air cathode displayed good activity. The maximum power density was 225 mW cm−2, outperformed Pt/C (155 mW cm−2) as well as the listed catalysts in Supplementary Table 4. In Supplementary Fig. 45b, the specific capacity of the battery employing S-Cu-ISA/SNC as air-cathode was estimated to be 735 mAh g−1 at the discharge of 10 mA cm−2. Moreover, the S-Cu-ISA/SNC-based battery could robustly serve up to 50 h with little discharge voltage decrease (Supplementary Fig. 45c), which indicated the outstanding durability for S-Cu-ISA/SNC based device.

In situ XAS measurements of S-Cu-ISA/SNC

In order to monitor the structural evolution of the isolated copper sites during ORR, potential-dependent Cu K-edge XAS of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was carried out64,65. The in situ XAS tests were carried out using a home-made cell (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 46), and all the spectra were collected in fluorescence model by a common-used Lytle detector. The S-Cu-ISA/SNC sample was uniformly dropped on a carbon paper, ensuring that all the Cu species took part in the ORR reaction (Supplementary Fig. 47). Firstly, the possible X-ray radiation damage on S-Cu-ISA/SNC was examined (Supplementary Fig. 48a), and it was found that the XANES region at Cu K-edge was with no obvious change after a longtime irradiation (2 h), suggesting that the radiation damage was negligible. Then the sample-loaded carbon paper was immersed in 0.1 M KOH solution, without electricity and oxygen inpouring. The collected XANES spectra (Supplementary Fig. 48b) implied that the solution has little influence on the structure before ORR test. The Cu K-edge in situ XANES spectra for S-Cu-ISA/SNC was examined at different potentials (Supplementary Fig. 49). The results were displayed in Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 50, respectively. From 1.05 V to 0.75 V, the edge position was gradually moved to the lower energy, together with reduce of the white line intensity, which suggested a decrease of the valence of Cu in S-Cu-ISA/SNC during ORR. The trend could be reflected more clearly from the XANES difference curves (Fig. 4c). The average oxidation states (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Figs. 51 and 52) indicated that the valence of Cu species decreased from approximately +2 to +1, implying that Cu (+1) sites might work as the active centers for ORR66,67. When the applied potential returned from 0.75 V to 1.05 V, Cu XANES edge shifted back to higher energy along with increase of the white line peak (Supplementary Figs. 53 and 54). This provided unequivocal evidence that the XANES spectra as a function of applied potential were reversible, which might be due to the strong anchor effect of N and S atom to the Cu sites. The reversible change of Cu valence state was a reflection of its significant contribution to the outstanding catalytic activity for ORR.

Fig. 4: In situ XAFS characterization of S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

a Schematic of the in situ electrochemical cell set-up. CE, counter electrode; WE, working electrode; RE, reference electrode. b Cu K-edge XANES spectra of S-Cu-ISA/SNC at various potentials during ORR catalysis in O2-saturated 0.1 M KOH. c Differential Δµ XANES spectra obtained by subtracting the normalized spectrum at every potential to the spectrum recorded at 1.05 V vs. RHE. d Current density as a function of potential for S-Cu-ISA/SNC (left) and the average oxidation number of Cu species in S-Cu-ISA/SNC as a function of potential (right). e k3-weighted FT-EXAFS at ex-situ, 0.90 V and 0.75 V vs. RHE. The shaded region highlighted the variations in the peak position of the first coordination shell. f The proposed ORR mechanism for the S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

In addition, in situ EXAFS was conducted to monitor the atomic interface structure of the Cu sites during ORR (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 55). Figure 4e showed the corresponding k3-weighted FT-EXAFS spectra for S-Cu-ISA/SNC at 0.90 V and 0.75 V vs. RHE. Just like the ex situ data, the in situ FT-EXAFS curves still exhibited one main peak (Cu-N) along with a shoulder peak (Cu-S). However, under the realistic condition, the Cu-N peaks appeared an obvious low-R move from 1.55 Å to 1.49 Å. This implied that the local structure of the active site was changed, which was monitored through the shrinking of Cu-N bond length. The EXAFS curve-fitting results were exhibited in Supplementary Figs. 56, 57 and Supplementary Table 5, where three backscattering paths including Cu-N, Cu-O and Cu-S were considered. The ex situ spectrum indicated the Cu-N bond lengths of 1.98 Å, while the bond lengths were shortened to 1.94 Å (0.90 V vs. RHE) and 1.93 Å (0.75 V vs. RHE), respectively, at real-time working conditions. The most possible geometric configuration was considered as an isolated unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 moiety linked with the OOH*, O* and OH* intermediates as shown in Fig. 4f, which was also detected by our in situ Fourier Transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) test (Supplementary Fig. 58)68. At the same time, the Cu-S bond lengths were detected to be nearly unchanged and kept at about 2.32 Å. Moreover, Supplementary Fig. 59 showed the HAADF-STEM images at different areas of the S-Cu-ISA/SNC catalyst after in situ XAS tests, which suggested the absence of Cu clusters or small copper sulfide species. In short, the in situ spectroscopy analysis elucidated the electronic and atomic structure evolution of the Cu-S1N3 moiety in S-Cu-ISA/SNC and revealed that the low-valence (+1) Cu-N-bond-shrinking HOO-Cu-S1N3, O-Cu-S1N3 and HO-Cu-S1N3 species might contribute to the good ORR activity.

Theoretical study of S-Cu-ISA/SNC on ORR

To understand the observed enhancement of ORR activity for S-Cu-ISA/SNC, DFT calculations were conducted to analyze the whole process of the four-electron ORR reaction on different Cu-centered moieties embedding in carbon matrix. Considering that the atomic radius of S was much larger than that of N or C atoms (Supplementary Table 6), we substituted two adjacent atoms of C or N by the S atom to maintain the stability of sulfur-doped structures in our calculations (Supplementary Fig. 60 and Supplementary Note. 3). Meanwhile, as shown in Supplementary Table 7, the formation energy of S-doped moiety rapidly increased with the number of the coordinated sulfur atoms bonded with central Cu atom, suggesting that the moiety with multi-S coordinated atoms bonded with central Cu atom (symmetrical Cu-para-S2N2 or unsymmetrical Cu-ortho-S2N2) was much less stable than unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3. With this prediction of stability, we comparably investigated the ORR activities of S-Cu-ISA/SNC (S was coordinated with Cu), Cu-ISA/SNC (S was separated from Cu) and Cu-ISA/NC (S free), respectively, including the pristine graphene structures embedding with unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 for S-Cu-ISA/SNC, S-doped graphene structures embedding with Cu-N4 moieties (Cu-N4-S1-1 and Cu-N4-S1-2) for Cu-ISA/SNC, and the pristine graphene structures embedding with the Cu-N4 moiety for Cu-ISA/NC (Fig. 5a, b, Supplementary Figs. 61 and 62 and Supplementary Tables 7 and 8). According to the Sabatier principle, the best catalysts which located at the vertex of volcano-type plot should bind reaction intermediates neither too strongly nor too weakly69. In ORR reaction, for catalysts (such as Fe-N4 and Mn-N4) that strongly binded intermediates, locating at the left side of volcano-type plot, the potential-limiting step was the desorption of OH* intermediate. While for catalysts (such as Co-N4 and Ni-N4) that weakly binded intermediates, locating at the right side of volcano-type plot, the potential-limiting step was the adsorption of OOH* intermediate70. Fig. 5a showed that the ORR activity of Cu-N4 was far away from the vertex of the volcano-type plot and locates at the right side, suggesting that the Cu atom in Cu-N4 moiety binded ORR intermediates too weakly34,71. With the introduction of sulfur atoms, the ORR activities were improved greatly. Particularly, the Cu atom in unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 moiety had the best ORR activity among all Cu-centered moieties (Fig. 5a, b), with the overpotential of 0.39 V, which was even better than that of Fe-N4 moiety. Thus, we demonstrated that the formation of the unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 atomic interface in the carbon matrix benefited the improved ORR activity of the catalyst, which was consistent with the experimental results.

Fig. 5: Theoretical ORR activity of S-Cu-ISA/SNC.

a ORR overpotential (ηORR) as a function of O* adsorption free energy (∆GO*) on different Cu-centered moieties. Gray, blue, orange and yellow balls represent C, N, Cu and S atoms, respectively. b Free-energy diagram for different Cu-centered moieties. c Relationship between the number of Bader charge of Cu and ∆GO* for different Cu-centered moieties. Projected density of states of Cu and O* d before and e after O* adsorption for Cu-S1N3 in S-Cu-ISA/SNC. f Molecular orbitals of O* adsorbed on Cu-S1N3 in S-Cu-ISA/SNC. σ and σ* represent the bonding and antibonding between \(d_{z^2}\) orbital of Cu and p orbital of O, π1 and π1* represent the bonding and antibonding between dyz/dxz orbital of Cu and p orbital of O, π2 represents the bonding between \(d_{x^2 - y^2}\) orbital of Cu and p orbital of O.

To further investigate the physical origin of the superior ORR performance for S-Cu-ISA/SNC, we also analyzed the electronic structures feature of different Cu-center moieties. As the electronegativity of S was smaller than that of N (Supplementary Table 6), Cu in S-Cu-ISA/SNC was likely to lose less valence electron since one coordinated N was substituted by S than Cu in Cu-ISA/NC (Fig. 5c and Supplementary Table 8)72. However, as shown in Fig. 5c, there was no clear linear correlation between the number of Bader charge of Cu and the adsorption free energy of O* for different moieties, suggesting that the superior ORR performance of S-Cu-ISA/SNC was not directly determined by the number of valance electron of Cu atom. Figure 5d, e showed the projected density of states (PDOS) for d orbitals of Cu before and after O* adsorption on the Cu-S1N3 atomic interface of S-Cu-ISA/SNC, respectively. Clearly, due to the introduction of the coordinated S, the Cu atom in the Cu-S1N3 moiety had more electrons which occupied the \(d_{x^2 - y^2}\) orbital than that in the Cu-N4 moiety (Supplementary Fig. 63). After the O* adsorption, for the Cu-N4 moiety, the p orbital of O and the \(d_{z^2}\) orbital of Cu formed σ bond. Meanwhile, the p orbital of O and only dyz and dxz orbitals of Cu could form π bonds. For Cu-S1N3 moiety, the σ bond was also derived from the O p orbital and the Cu \(d_{z^2}\) orbital, while the π bonds originated from the O p orbital and the Cu dyz, dxz as well as \(d_{x^2 - y^2}\) orbitals, which was quite different from that of Cu-N4 (Fig. 5f, Supplementary Fig. 63). Dramatically, the additional π bonds contributed from the Cu \(d_{x^2 - y^2}\) orbitals strengthened the weak bonding of ORR intermediates, resulting in the boosted ORR performance of Cu centers. Furthermore, it was clearly shown in Supplementary Fig. 61, for the unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 atomic interface, the O* intermediates of ORR were not located exactly at the top site of Cu atom, so the O p orbital could interact with the Cu \(d_{x^2 - y^2}\) orbitals. While for the symmetrical Cu-N4 moiety, the O* intermediates of ORR were located at the top site of Cu due to the symmetry confinement, without the interaction of O p orbital and Cu \(d_{x^2 - y^2}\) orbitals. Based on the experimental and theoretical results, the activity trend of ORR was well-confirmed.

Synthesis and ORR performance of S-M-ISA/SNC (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni)

The synthetic method could expand to other 3d metal (Mn, Fe, Co and Ni, etc.) (Supplementary Table 9). HAADF-STEM images identified the isolated feature of Mn, Fe, Co and Ni in the obtained catalysts, which was further revealed by FT-EXAFS curves (Fig. 6 and Supplementary Figs. 6471). Quantitative EXAFS fittings were also carried out (Supplementary Table 10), which suggested the center metal coordinated directly with N and S atom to form M-S1N3 moiety at the atomic surface. The extended study identified the universal of the synthetic strategy.

Fig. 6: HAADF-STEM and FT-EXAFS characterization of S-M-ISA/SNC (M=Mn, Fe, Co, Ni).

HAADF-STEM images of a S-Mn-ISA/SNC, c S-Fe-ISA/SNC, e S-Co-ISA/SNC and g S-Ni-ISA/SNC. FT-EXAFS spectra of b S-Mn-ISA/SNC, d S-Fe-ISA/SNC, f S-Co-ISA/SNC and h S-Ni-ISA/SNC.

The ORR catalytic activities of S-M-ISA/SNC (Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) was then evaluated by electrochemical measurements in 0.1 M KOH. Supplementary Fig. 72 exhibited the LSV curves for S-Mn-ISA/SNC, S-Fe-ISA/SNC, S-Co-ISA/SNC and S-Ni-ISA/SNC. As we could see, the samples of S-M-ISA/SNC (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) showed optimistic performance. The half-wave potential (E1/2) of S-Mn-ISA/SNC, S-Fe-ISA/SNC, S-Co-ISA/SNC and S-Ni-ISA/SNC was 0.902 V, 0.917 V, 0.911 V and 0.851 V, respectively. The favorable ORR kinetics of S-Mn-ISA/SNC, S-Fe-ISA/SNC, S-Co-ISA/SNC and S-Ni-ISA/SNC was verified by kinetic current density (Jk) of 14.5, 40.0, 27.0 and 5.1 mA cm−2 (Supplementary Fig. 73). The Tafel slope of S-Mn-ISA/SNC, S-Fe-ISA/SNC, S-Co-ISA/SNC and S-Ni-ISA/SNC was calculated to be 83.8, 62.6, 72.5 and 91.7 mV dec−1 (Supplementary Fig. 74). These results further demonstrated the desirable ORR kinetics for S-M-ISA/SNC, originating from the unsymmetrical M-S1N3 atomic interface structure.


In summary, we developed an single Cu atom ORR electrocatalyst consisting of unsymmetrical Cu-S1N3 complexes anchored in MOF-derived hierarchically porous carbon frameworks through an atomic interface engineering strategy. Benefiting from the rational construction of the active sites, the S-Cu-ISA/SNC sample exhibited outstanding ORR activity in alkaline media. Our experimental explorations and theoretical analysis revealed the enhanced ORR performance owed to the optimized atomic arrangement and density-of-states distribution of the Cu-S1N3 centers. The proposed strategy of local structure regulation may promote the research of advanced oxygen-involved reactions, as well as other electrochemical process.



Cupric Acetate Monohydrate (Cu(acac)2, 99%, Alfa Aesar), 2-methylimidazole (Acros), sulfur powder (325 mesh, 99.5%, Alfa), commercial Pt/C (20 wt% metal, Alfa Aesar), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (98%, Alfa Aesar), KOH (analytical grade, Sinopharm Chemical), carbon tetrachloride (innochem), analytical grade methanol (Sinopharm Chemical), Nafion D-521 dispersion (Alfa Aesar), N, N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (Sinopharm Chemical) were used without any further purification. The distilled water with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm−1 was used in all experiments.

Preparation of S-Cu-ISA/SNC and the comparison samples

In a typical synthesis of S-Cu-ISA/SNC catalyst, firstly the precursors were prepared by mixing sulfur powder and Cu-ZIF-8 (Supplementary Note. 4) in 20 ml of mixture solution (carbon tetrachloride: ethanol = 4:1) under sonication. The mass ration of sulfur powder and Cu-ZIF-8 is 1: 10. Subsequently, the solution was heated at 60 °C under vigorous stirring until drying. Afterwards, the samples were pyrolyzed in quartz tube. The pyrolysis process was in the Ar atmosphere, maintaining 450 °C (2 h) and then 950 °C (4 h). The ramping rate during the heating process was 5 °C/min. For the comparison samples, SNC (without the addition of Cu(acac)2) was prepared as the same process. Cu-ISA/NC (single-atom Cu-N4 supported on N doped carbon polyhedron, without the addition of S) and NC (N doped carbon polyhedron, without the addition of S and Cu) were obtained by pyrolysis of Cu-ZIF-8 and pure ZIF-8, respectively. The preparation of Cu-ISA/SNC (single-atom Cu-N4 supported on N and S co-doped carbon polyhedron) was described in Supplementary Note. 5.


We used the SEM (JSM-6700F), TEM (JEOL-JEM-1200EX) and TEM (JEOR-2100F) to characterize the morphology. The in situ ETEM was carried out in Titan G2 60-300 microscope (FEI) equipped with a probe Cs-corrector, with voltage of 300 kV. Using JEOL JEM-ARM200F to gain the HAADF-STEM images, the accelerating voltage was 300 kV. The Bruker D8 ADVANCE X-ray Diffractometer was performed to characterize XRD patterns. HORIBA Jobin Yvon (LabRAM HR Evolution) was used to perform the Raman measurements with the laser of 532 nm. NOVA 4200e was used to obtain the BET surface area and the pore size distribution of the materials.

Electrochemical measurements for ORR

We used the three-electrode cell to perform the electrochemical tests. The working electrode was rotating disk electrode (glassy carbon), with a diameter of 5 mm. The counter electrode was graphite rod. The reference electrode was Ag/AgCl (filled with saturated KCl solution) electrode. The experiment was performed in 0.1 M KOH solution. All potentials have been converted to the RHE scale. Dispersing 1 mg catalyst to the mixture solution (0.75 ml isopropyl alcohol, 0.25 ml deionized water, 0.02 ml 5% Nafion), the catalyst ink was successfully prepared after sonication. The catalyst loading on the surface of the glassy carbon electrode was 0.102 mg cm−2. Before ORR tests, we bubbled N2/O2 to make the system saturated. The CV tests of the catalyst under N2- and O2-saturated alkaline electrolyte were performed at 50 mV s−1. LSV test was measured in different rotating rate from 400 to 2250 rpm. The electron selectivity was identified by rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) test (Supplementary Fig. 34). 1.23 V vs. RHE was applied as the ring electrode potential. At the same time, the disk electrode was performed at 10 mV s−1. The detail for the electrochemical data processing was displayed in Supplementary Note. 6.

Zinc-air battery measurements

The S-Cu-ISA/SNC ink was uniformly dispersed onto teflon-coated carbon fiber paper, the loading is 1.0 mg cm−2, then using 60 °C to make it dry. The Pt/C electrode was synthesized in the same way. Furthermore, the anode was commercial Zn foil (0.2 mm). And we polished it before use. The Zn–air device was constructed by placing electrodes in O2 saturated KOH solution (6M).

Ex situ XAFS measurements

The XAFS spectra (Cu, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni K-edge) were collected at 1W1B station in Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF, operated at 2.5 GeV with a maximum current of 250 mA), BL14W1 station in Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF, 3.5 GeV, 250 mA) and BL7-3 station in Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL, 3 GeV, ~500 mA), respectively. The XAFS data of the samples were collected at room temperature in fluorescence excitation mode using a Lytle detector. The samples were pelletized as disks of 13 mm diameter with 1 mm thickness using graphite powder as binder. The XAFS data processing was displayed in Supplementary Note. 7.

In situ synchrotron radiation XAFS and FTIR measurements

A catalyst modified carbon paper was used as working electrode, graphite rod as counter electrode and Ag/AgCl (KCl-saturated) electrode as reference electrode. A home-made electrochemical cell was used for in situ XAFS measurements (Fig. 4a and Supplementary Fig. 46). The experiments were performed at BL14W1 station in SSRF. The detail of in situ XAFS measurements was exhibited in Supplementary Note. 8. The in situ FTIR tests were performed at the BL01B at NSRL through a home-made set-up with a ZnSe crystal as the infrared transmission window. The detail for the in situ FTIR measurements is described in Supplementary Note. 9.

The detail of DFT calculations

Spin polarized DFT calculations were performed within the Vienna ab initio Simulation Package (VASP) with the projector augmented wave (PAW) scheme73,74,75. The exchange correlation energy was described by using the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) with the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional76 Hubbard corrected DFT (DFT + U) method was applied by considering on-site coulomb (U) and exchange (J) interaction, with the U-J values taken from the ones used by Xu et al.33. The cutoff energy was set to be 500 eV. The total energy and forces convergence thresholds were set to be 10−5 eV and 0.02 eV Å−1r, respectively. To prevent interaction between two neighboring surfaces, the vacuum layer thickness was set to 20 Å. The k-point sampling of the Brillouin zone was used by the 3 × 3 × 1 grid for structural relaxation and the 5 × 5 × 1 grid for electronic structure calculations. The empirical DFT-D3 correction was used to describe van der Waals (vdW) interactions77. Atomic charges were calculated by using the atom-in-molecule (AIM) scheme proposed by Bader78,79. Following the RHE model developed by Nørskov et al, the voltage-dependent ORR free energy pathway during electrocatalysis reaction were obtained80. The free energies of ORR intermediates are defined as G = EDFT + EZPE ̶ TS, where EDFT, EZPE, T and S represent the calculated ground state energy, zero-point energy, temperature (298 K) and the entropy, respectively.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information files. All other relevant source data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Chu, S. & Majumdar, A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Armand, M. & Tarascon, J. M. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Li, Y. & Dai, H. Recent advances in zinc-air batteries. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5257–5275 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kulkarni, A., Siahrostami, S., Patel, A. & Norskov, J. K. Understanding catalytic activity trends in the oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev. 118, 2302–2312 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Stamenkovic, V. R., Strmcnik, D., Lopes, P. P. & Markovic, N. M. Energy and fuels from electrochemical interfaces. Nat. Mater. 16, 57–69 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Shao, M., Chang, Q., Dodelet, J. & Chenitz, R. Recent advances in electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev. 116, 3594–3657 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Seh, Z. W. et al. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science. 355, eaad4998 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Chu, S., Cui, Y. & Liu, N. The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 16, 16–22 (2017).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Xia, W., Mahmood, A., Liang, Z., Zou, R. & Guo, S. Earth-abundant nanomaterials for oxygen reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2650–2676 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wu, G. & Zelenay, P. Nanostructured nonprecious metal catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 1878–1889 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wang, A., Li, J. & Zhang, T. Heterogeneous single-atom catalysis. Nat. Rev. Chem. 2, 65–81 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Liu, L. & Corma, A. Metal catalysts for heterogeneous catalysis: from single atoms to nanoclusters and nanoparticles. Chem. Rev. 118, 4981–5079 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Cui, X. et al. Bridging homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysis by heterogeneous single-metal-site catalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 385–397 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fan, L. et al. Atomically isolated nickel species anchored on graphitized carbon for efficient hydrogen evolution electrocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 7, 10667 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Zhang, L. et al. Graphene defects trap atomic Ni species for hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Chem 4, 285–297 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Weng, Z. et al. Electrochemical CO2 reduction to hydrocarbons on a heterogeneous molecular Cu catalyst in aqueous solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 8076–8079 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Copéret, C. et al. Surface organometallic and coordination chemistry toward single-site heterogeneous catalysts: strategies, methods, structures, and activities. Chem. Rev. 116, 323–421 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Elgrishi, N., Chambers, M. B., Wang, X. & Fontecave, M. Molecular polypyridine-based metal complexes as catalysts for the reduction of CO2. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 761–796 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Zhu, C., Fu, S., Shi, Q., Du, D. & Lin, Y. Single atom electrocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13944–13960 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Zhuang, Z., Kang, Q., Wang, D. & Li, Y. Single-atom catalysis enables long-life, high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Nano Res. (2020).

  21. 21.

    Li, X., Rong, H., Zhang, J., Wang, D. & Li, Y. Modulating the local coordination environment of single-atom catalysts for enhanced catalytic performance. Nano Res. (2020).

  22. 22.

    Sun, T., Xu, L., Wang, D. & Li, Y. Metal organic frameworks derived single atom catalysts for electrocatalytic energy conversion. Nano Res. 12, 2067–2080 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhang, X., Shao, J., Huang, W. & Dong, X. Three dimensional carbon substrate materials for electrolysis of water. Sci. China Mater. 61, 1143–1153 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yuan, K. et al. Boosting oxygen reduction of single iron active sites via geometric and electronic engineering: nitrogen and phosphorus dual-coordination. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 2404–2412 (2020).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lee, S. H. et al. Design principle of Fe-N-C electrocatalysts: how to optimize multimodal porous structures? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 2035–2045 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wagner, S. et al. Elucidating the structural composition of a Fe-N-C catalyst by nuclear- and electron-resonance techniques. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 10486–10492 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Cheng, C. et al. Atomic Fe-Nx coupled open-mesoporous carbon nanofibers for efficient and bioadaptable oxygen electrode in Mg-air batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1802669 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zitolo, A. et al. Identification of catalytic sites in cobalt-nitrogencarbon materials for the oxygen reduction reaction. Nat. Commun. 8, 957 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sa, Y. J. et al. A general approach to preferential formation of active Fe-Nx sites in Fe-N/C electrocatalysts for efficient oxygen reduction reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15046–15056 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Li, J. et al. Atomically dispersed manganese catalysts for oxygen reduction in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Catal. 1, 935–945 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wan, X. et al. Fe-N-C electrocatalyst with dense active sites and efficient mass transport for high-performance proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Nat. Catal. 2, 259–268 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Zitolo, A. et al. Identification of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction in iron- and nitrogen-doped graphene materials. Nat. Mater. 14, 937–942 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Xu, H., Cheng, D., Cao, D. & Zeng, X. C. A universal principle for a rational design of single-atom electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 339–348 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ramaswamy, N., Tylus, U., Jia, Q. & Mukerjee, S. Activity descriptor identification for oxygen reduction on nonprecious electrocatalysts: Linking surface science to coordination chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15443–15449 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Osmieri, L., Videla, A., Ocon, P. & Specchia, S. Kinetics of Oxygen electroreduction on Me-N-C (Me = Fe, Co, Cu) catalysts in acidic medium: Insights on the effect of the transition metal. J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 17796–17817 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yang, Y. et al. O-, N-atoms-coordinated Mn cofactors within a graphene framework as bioinspired oxygen reduction reaction electrocatalysts. Adv. Mater. 30, e1801732 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xu, Q. et al. Coordination structure dominated performance of single-atomic Pt catalyst for anti-Markovnikov hydroboration of alkenes. Sci. China Mater. (2020).

  38. 38.

    Yang, H. B. et al. Identification of catalytic sites for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution in N-doped graphene materials: development of highly efficient metal-free bifunctional electrocatalyst. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501122 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Qiao, Y. et al. Sulfuration of an Fe-N-C catalyst containing FexC/Fe species to enhance the catalysis of oxygen reduction in acidic media and for use in flexible Zn-Air batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1804504 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Chen, Y. et al. Enhanced oxygen reduction with single-atomic-site iron catalysts for a zinc-air battery and hydrogen-air fuel cell. Nat. Commun. 9, 5422 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shen, H. et al. Synergistic effects between atomically dispersed Fe-N-C and C-S-C for the oxygen reduction reaction in acidic media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13800–13804 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mun, Y. et al. Versatile strategy for tuning ORR activity of a single Fe-N4 site by controlling electron withdrawing/donating properties of carbon plane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 6254–6262 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Chen, P. et al. Atomically dispersed iron-nitrogen species as electrocatalysts for bifunctional oxygen evolution and reduction reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 610–614 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Zhuang, L. et al. Defect-induced Pt-Co-Se coordinated sites with highly asymmetrical electronic distribution for boosting oxygen-involving electrocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 31, 1805581 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Bakandritsos, A. et al. Mixed-valence single-atom catalyst derived from functionalized graphene. Adv. Mater. 31, 1900323 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Sun, Y. et al. Activity-selectivity trends in the electrochemical production of hydrogen peroxide over single-site metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12372–12381 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Jiang, H. L. et al. From metal-organic framework to nanoporous carbon: Toward a very high surface area and hydrogen uptake. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11854–11857 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, H. et al. Single atomic iron catalysts for oxygen reduction in acidic media: particle size control and thermal activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 14143–14149 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Jiang, R. et al. Edge-site engineering of atomically dispersed Fe-N4 by selective C–N bond cleavage for enhanced oxygen reduction reaction activities. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 11594–11598 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Chen, W. et al. Rational design of single molybdenum atoms anchored on N-doped carbon for effective hydrogen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 16086–16090 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Xia, B. Y. et al. A metal-organic framework-derived bifunctional oxygen electrocatalyst. Nat. Energy 1, 15006 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Li, F. et al. Identifying the structure of Zn-N2 active sites and structural activation. Nat. Commun. 10, 2623 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Chen, J. NEXAFS investigations of transition metal oxides, nitrides, carbides, sulfides and other interstitial compounds. Surf. Sci. Rep. 30, 1–152 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Chen, P. et al. Interfacial engineering of cobalt sulfide/graphene hybrids for highly efficient ammonia electrosynthesis. PNAS 116, 6635–6640 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Tong, Y. et al. A bifunctional hybrid electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction and evolution: cobalt oxide nanoparticles strongly coupled to B, N-decorated graphene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 7121–7125 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Zhao, Y. et al. Stereodefined codoping of sp-N and S atoms in few-layer graphdiyne for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 7240–7244 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Yang, H. et al. A highly stable copper-based catalyst for clarifying the catalytic roles of Cu0 and Cu+ species in methanol dehydrogenation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 1836–1840 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lee, B. et al. Reversible and cooperative photoactivation of single-atom Cu/TiO2 photocatalysts. Nat. Mater. 18, 620–626 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Funke, H., Scheinost, A. & Chukalina, M. Wavelet analysis of extended x-ray absorption fine structure data. Phys. Rev. B. 71, 094110 (2005).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Fei, H. et al. General synthesis and definitive structural identification of MN4C4 single-atom catalysts with tunable electrocatalytic activities. Nat. Catal. 1, 63–72 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. Theoretical approaches to X-ray absorption fine structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Qu, Y. et al. Direct transformation of bulk copper into copper single sites via emitting and trapping of atoms. Nat. Catal. 1, 781–786 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Li, F. et al. Boosting oxygen reduction catalysis with abundant copper single atom active. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 2263–2269 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Weng, Z. et al. Active sites of copper-complex catalytic materials for electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Nat. Commun. 9, 415 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Karapinar, D. et al. Electroreduction of CO2 on single-site copper-nitrogen-doped carbon material: selective formation of ethanol and reversible restructuration of the metal sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 15098–15103 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Iwase, K. et al. Copper-modified covalent triazine frameworks as non-noble-metal electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 11068–11072 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Gentil, S. et al. Electrocatalytic O2 reduction at a bio-inspired mononuclear copper phenolato complex immobilized on a carbon nanotube electrode. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2517–2520 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Cheng, W. et al. Lattice-strained metal-organic-framework arrays for bifunctional oxygen electrocatalysis. Nat. Energy 4, 115 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Che, M. Nobel prize in chemistry 1912 to Sabatier: Organic chemistry or catalysis? Catal. Today 218–219, 162–171 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bligaard, T. et al. The Brønsted-Evans-Polanyi relation and the volcano curve in heterogeneous catalysis. J. Catal. 224, 206–217 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Sun, Y. et al. Activity-selectivity trends in the electrochemical production of hydrogen peroxide over single-site metal-nitrogen-carbon catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 12372–12381 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Wu, H. et al. Highly doped and exposed Cu(i)-N active sites within graphene towards efficient oxygen reduction for zinc-air batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 3736–3745 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 54, 11169–11186 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Grimme, S. Semiempirical GGA-type density functional constructed with a long-range dispersion correction. J. Comput. Chem. 27, 1787–1799 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Tang, W., Sanville, E. & Henkelman, G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. J. Phys. Condens Matter 21, 084204 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Bader, R. F. W. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem. Rev. 91, 893–928 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. J. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 17886–17892 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFB0701600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51631001, 21801015, 51872030, 21643003, 51702016, 51501010, 11874036), the Guangdong Province Key Area R&D Program (2019B010940001), the Local Innovative and Research Teams Project of Guangdong Pearl River Talents Program (2017BT01N111), Basic Research Project of Shenzhen, China (JCYJ20170412171430026) and Beijing Institute of Technology Research Fund Program for Young Scholars (3090012221909), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities. This work was also supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0702003) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21890383, 21671117, 21871159). The authors thank the BL1W1B and BL4B7A in the Beijing Synchrotron Radiation Facility (BSRF), BL14W1 in the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), BL01B, BL10B and BL12B in the National Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (NSRL), BL11A in National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (NSRRC), BL7-3 in Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource (SSRL) for help with characterizations. Tianjin and Guangzhou Supercomputing Center are also acknowledged for allowing the use of computational resources.

Author information




W.C., D.W. and J.T.Z. conceived the idea, designed the study and wrote the paper. W.C. and H.S. carried out the sample synthesis, characterization and ORR measurement. W. C. carried out the XAFS characterizations and data analysis. J.D., Y.W., L.Z., R.C. and R.S. helped with the hard XAFS measurements and discussion. X.S.Z. helped with the XPS test. J.Z. and W.Y. helped with soft XAS test. A.L. performed the in-situ environmental microscopic measurements and analysis. Y.L. helped with the spherical aberration electron microscopy test and discussion. Z.Y. carried out the Zn-air battery measurements. Q.L. and X.Z. performed the in-situ IR test and analysis. X.Y.Z., X.Y. and J.L. performed the DFT calculations. J.P. and Z.Z. helped with the electrochemical tests and data analysis. Z.J., D.Z. T.S. and Z.L. helped with the modification of the paper. Y.D.L. gave very useful suggestions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jia Li or Wenxing Chen or Dingsheng Wang or Jiatao Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Frédéric Jaouen and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shang, H., Zhou, X., Dong, J. et al. Engineering unsymmetrically coordinated Cu-S1N3 single atom sites with enhanced oxygen reduction activity. Nat Commun 11, 3049 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing