Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A sister lineage of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex discovered in the African Great Lakes region


The human- and animal-adapted lineages of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) are thought to have expanded from a common progenitor in Africa. However, the molecular events that accompanied this emergence remain largely unknown. Here, we describe two MTBC strains isolated from patients with multidrug resistant tuberculosis, representing an as-yet-unknown lineage, named Lineage 8 (L8), seemingly restricted to the African Great Lakes region. Using genome-based phylogenetic reconstruction, we show that L8 is a sister clade to the known MTBC lineages. Comparison with other complete mycobacterial genomes indicate that the divergence of L8 preceded the loss of the cobF genome region - involved in the cobalamin/vitamin B12 synthesis - and gene interruptions in a subsequent common ancestor shared by all other known MTBC lineages. This discovery further supports an East African origin for the MTBC and provides additional molecular clues on the ancestral genome reduction associated with adaptation to a pathogenic lifestyle.


Tuberculosis (TB), caused by members of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC), is among the ancient scourges of humankind1, and remains the leading cause of mortality globally due to an infectious disease2. Intense research has been dedicated to decipher the evolutionary history of the MTBC and to understand the causes underlying the worldwide spread of TB3,4,5. Current genome data show that the MTBC is comprised of the five human-adapted lineages representing M. tuberculosis sensu stricto (L1–4 and L7), two other human-adapted lineages traditionally referred to as M. africanum (L5-6) and at least nine animal-adapted lineages6. Africa is the only continent where all MTBC lineages are present, suggesting that the MTBC emerged from a common ancestor therein and then expanded to the rest of the world following human migrations3,7,8,9,10. However, the genomic traits of this common ancestor and the region from which this expansion took place in Africa remain unknown. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) analyses showed that rare human TB bacilli with a smooth colony morphotype, highly restricted to the Horn of Africa and named Mycobacterium canettii (alias smooth tubercle bacilli or STB) represent early evolutionary branching lineages that predate the emergence of the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of the MTBC (or of the rest of the MTBC, if M. canettii is considered to be part of the complex)4,11,12. Indeed, whereas known MTBC strains differ by no more than ~2000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)13, M. canettii strains are 10- to 25-fold more genetically diverse and separated by at least 14,000 SNPs from the hitherto known MTBC MRCA4,12. Moreover, M. canettii strains are less virulent and possess highly mosaic genomes, possibly reflecting adaptation to an environmental reservoir favouring active lateral gene flow4,14,15,16. These biological differences support the existence of lineages that reflect intermediate stages in the evolution from M. canettii towards the obligate MTBC pathogens.

Here, we describe two exceptional strains representing a new clade, diverging before the MRCA of the other MTBC lineages. These two strains were discovered in two independent analyses and were both multidrug-resistant (MDR; i.e. resistant to at least rifampicin and isoniazid). One was isolated from a TB patient in Rwanda through an ongoing MDR-TB diagnostic trial in Africa. The second isolate came from a patient in Uganda, and was discovered upon screening publicly available draft genome datasets, where it was misclassified as an M. bovis strain. We used PacBio and Illumina WGS to reconstruct the full circular genome of the Rwandan strain. We used these data and the available Illumina sequencing data of the Ugandan strain to reconstitute the phylogeny of this novel lineage, which we named Lineage 8 (L8), and further investigate molecular and evolutionary events associated with the emergence of the MTBC.


Patient with the L8 MTBC strain in Rwanda

The Rwandan strain was isolated from a male patient, aged 77 years, HIV-negative, resident of Rulindo district bordering with the Southwest of Uganda, and who had lived in Uganda previously. The patient was diagnosed with rifampicin-resistant TB based on standard Xpert MTB/RIF testing (Xpert; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), which probes for mutations in the rifampicin resistance-determining region of the rpoB gene of the MTBC17. The results of the assay showed a rare delayed probe B reaction (~3% prevalence in Rwanda)18, presumed (and later confirmed; see below) to be due to the rifampicin resistance-associated Asp435Tyr mutation19.

Per routine practice, the patient was initiated on standard short-course MDR-TB treatment (i.e. 9-month WHO-endorsed MDR-TB regimen, including moxifloxacin, kanamycin, protionamide, ethambutol, clofazimine, high dose isoniazid and pyrazinamide)20. However, the patient developed hypotension, and eventually died due to probable cardiac failure, after 20 days of treatment. Phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing (DST) confirmed resistance to both rifampicin and isoniazid, and susceptibility to other anti-TB drugs including ethambutol, fluoroquinolones and second-line injectables.

Growth characteristics and biochemical properties of the Rwandan L8 strain

The Rwanda strain was grown in 12.5 days on Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tubes. Colonies were observed on the fifth week after initial inoculation on Löwenstein–Jensen medium, indicating a slow grower phenotype with rough colonies (Fig. 1). The strain also displayed archetypal biochemical characteristics of M. tuberculosis sensu stricto, including niacin production combined with urease hydrolysis (Table 1).

Fig. 1: Image of colonies from the Rwandan Lineage 8 strain.

Isolate grown on solid medium, with the typical rough morphotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Colonies grown on Dubos agar medium were visualized by microscopy. The scale bar represents ~2 mm.

Table 1 Standard biochemical characteristics of selected mycobacterial species and M. tuberculosis complex lineages/subspecies.

Genotypic resistance and SNP profile of the Rwandan L8 strain by Deeplex-MycTB

Following the MDR-TB diagnosis, the strain was included in the first set of tests for an ongoing MDR-TB diagnostic trial ‘DIAgnostics for MDR-TB in Africa (DIAMA), NCT03303963’, evaluating a new targeted deep sequencing assay, called Deeplex-MycTB. Deeplex-MycTB testing confirmed the presence of the rpoB Asp435Tyr mutation conferring rifampicin resistance, along with the inhA Ser94Ala mutation conferring isoniazid resistance, consistently with the MDR phenotype identified by phenotypic DST (Fig. 2). This strain also harboured two alleles in phylogenetic positions in embB (Ala378) and gidB (Ala205) not associated with resistance to ethambutol or streptomycin, which were both shared by several MTBC lineages (L1, 5, 6, 7 and animal lineages) and M. canettii21. In addition, eight other—so far uncharacterised non-synonymous SNPs were identified in six of the 18 gene targets interrogated by the assay (Fig. 2). Moreover, this test detected an atypical spoligotype pattern, 1111100000000000000000000000000001110000000 (Fig. 2), which was further confirmed by conventional membrane-based spoligotyping testing. This spoligotype pattern was unique in the global spoligotype database that comprises 111,637 MTBC isolates from 131 countries22.

Fig. 2: Deeplex-MycTB results identifying a MDR-TB strain from Rwanda with an atypical genotypic profile.

Deeplex-MycTB results identifying a MDR-TB strain from Rwanda with an atypical genotypic profile. Target gene regions are grouped within sectors in a circular map according to the tuberculous drug resistance with which they are associated. The two sectors in red indicate regions where rifampicin and isoniazid resistance-associated mutations are detected. The multiple sectors in blue refer to regions, where as yet uncharacterised mutations are detected, whereas sectors in green indicate regions where no mutation or only mutations not associated with resistance (shown in grey around the map) were detected. Green lines above gene names represent the reference sequences with coverage breadth above 95%. Limits of detection (LOD) of potential heteroresistance (reflected by subpopulations of reads bearing a mutation), depending on the coverage depths over target sequence positions, are represented by grey (LOD 3%) and orange zones (variable LOD > 3–80%; only seen in extremities of a few targets, such as the two rrs regions) above the reference sequences within the sectors. Information on an unrecognised spoligotype, an equivocal SNP-based phylogenetic lineage and on mycobacterial species identification, based on hsp65 sequence best match, are shown in the centre of the circle. AMI amikacin, BDQ bedaquiline, CAP capreomycin, CFZ clofazimine, EMB ethambutol, ETH ethionamide, FQ fluoroquinolones, KAN kanamycin, LIN linezolid, INH isoniazid, PZA pyrazinamide, RIF rifampin, SM streptomycin, SIT spoligotype international type.

WGS analysis and phylogenetic position of the Rwandan and Ugandan L8 strains

Results from WGS analysis of the Rwandan strain using Illumina sequencing confirmed all Deeplex-MycTB findings.

The strain isolated in Uganda was discovered independently upon screening global MTBC genome datasets publicly available on NCBI/EBI, comprising ~20,000 genomes in total. From subsequent processing with our WGS analysis pipeline, we found 1 genome that did not classify in any of the 7 human-adapted lineages or 9 animal-adapted ecotypes known at the time, but had been misclassified as M. bovis isolated from a human patient23. These WGS data revealed a similar spoligotype 1111100000000000000000000000000001111000111, with an overlapping signature characterised by the presence of spacers 1 to 5 and 34 to 37 (vs 34–36 in the Rwandan strain) with all intervening spacers missing. Moreover, the Ugandan strain also shared the same rpoB Asp435Tyr and inhA Ser94Ala mutations and the same sequence alleles in embB and gidB. The Ugandan strain contained an additional katG Ser315Thr mutation conferring high-level isoniazid resistance, as well as the embA C-11A and embB Asp328Tyr mutations predictive of ethambutol resistance and two pncA missense mutations, predictive of pyrazinamide resistance. Moreover, only three of the nine aforementioned uncharacterised SNPs detected by Deeplex-MycTB were shared between both strains.

To further assess the relationships between both strains and in comparison to other MTBC strains, a maximum likelihood phylogeny was inferred from 241 MTBC genomes, including representatives of all known human- and animal-adapted lineages6 and using an M. canettii strain as an outgroup. M. canettii represents the closest outgroup to the MTBC including L8, as shown by subsequent comparative analysis of a complete L8 genome (see below), and previous observations of ~2.0 Mb larger genomes and substantially lower average nucleotide identities of phylogenetically closest non-tuberculous mycobacterial species such as M. marinum and M. kansasii4,24,25. This reconstruction revealed a unique phylogenetic position of the two new genomes from Rwanda and Uganda (Fig. 3), representing a newly characterised monophyletic clade, in which none of the known MTBC genomes were contained. A core genome-based phylogeny was also constructed from representatives of the MTBC lineages as well as M. canettii, M. marinum and M. kansasii (Supplementary Fig. 1). This phylogeny confirmed the placement of the L8 Rwandan strain as being a new clade between M. canettii and the other lineages of the MTBC. Based on these phylogenies, this clade shares a MRCA with the rest of the MTBC, thus representing a new sister clade to the known MTBC, which we named Lineage 8 (L8). Comprehensive SNP analysis identified a total of 189 SNPs separating both L8 genomes, which is within the range of zero to 700 SNPs found between any two strains within any of the lineages 1 to 7 of the MTBC13. On average, two strains of the MTBC including L8 differed by 1443 SNPs (corresponding to 0.04% of the genome, excluding repetitive/‘problematic’ regions), thus at least an order of magnitude lower than the SNP distance separating any MTBC strain from M. canettii4,13.

Fig. 3: Maximum likelihood phylogeny of 241 MTBC genomes, inferred from 43,442 variable positions.

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of 241 MTBC genomes, inferred from 43,442 variable positions. The scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per polymorphic site. Branches corresponding to human-adapted strains are coloured and branches corresponding to animal-adapted strains are depicted in black. The phylogeny is rooted on M. canettii and bootstrap values are shown for the most important splits.

The absence of any matching pattern in the global spoligotype database, as well as the lack of detection of this clade in previous large WGS datasets of MTBC strains from global sources, suggests that L8 is rare and seemingly geographically restricted to the African Great Lakes region. Specifically, the L8 spoligotype signature and the three SNPs shared by both L8 strains were not detected in any of 115 MTBC genomes from a previous drug resistance survey in Uganda26, nor in 380 rifampicin-resistant strains from Rwanda collected between 1991 and 2018, from routine drug resistance surveillance as well as various drug resistance surveys27,28,29. Furthermore, among 14 other available isolates out of 27 from Uganda and Rwanda tested by Gene Xpert MTB/RIF that showed the same delayed probe B as L8, none displayed the L8 signatures when tested by Deeplex-MycTB or by classical spoligotyping. Likewise, none of >1500 clinical samples from TB patients tested by Deeplex-MycTB from a recent nationwide drug resistance survey performed in the Democratic Republic of the Congo displayed the L8 spoligotype signature or the specific SNPs.

Defining features of a complete L8 genome

To further assess the phylogenetic position of L8 and its split from the rest of the MTBC, the Rwandan strain was subjected to long read-based PacBio sequencing. Comparison of the obtained assembly with 36 available complete genomes of MTBC members, comprising L1-L4 (including H37Rv), M. africanum (L6) and M. bovis strains, showed a highly syntenic organisation, with no major structural rearrangement between both groups. Although the assembled L8 genome of 4,379,493 bp was within the 4.34–4.43 Mb size range of the other MTBC genomes, it was 30 kb smaller than the 4.41-Mb mean size of genomes of M. tuberculosis sensu stricto30. However, the largest part of this gap was accounted by the absence of three genomic regions in L8, corresponding to regions of difference (RDs) known to be variably present or absent in other MTBC (sub)lineages31,32 (Supplementary Data 1). These include a 9.3 kb PhiRv1 prophage region (RD3), as well as 10.0 kb and 8.5 kb segments corresponding to RD14 and RD5, comprising the plcD gene region and the plcABC gene cluster, respectively31. In L8, each of the two latter regions only contained one copy of the IS6110 insertion sequence, devoid of direct repeats (DRs) that normally flank IS6110 copies after transposition, indicating that these deletions in L8 resulted from recombination between two adjacent IS6110 copies with loss of the intervening sequences33. These mobile DNA-related deletions, which also arose independently in several other MTBC branches31,34, probably occurred after the divergence of L8 from the other MTBC lineages. Apart from these three deletions and two dozen repetitive/multicopy genes (IS6110-related, PE/PPE-, or Mce-encoding), we only found 5 non-repetitive genes, included in two small segments (3.4 kb and 4.4 kb), which were undetected in the complete L8 genome while being present in reference MTBC genomes (Supplementary Data 1).

Conversely, a 4.4 kb genome region was present in the genomes of both L8 strains and in M. canettii, but absent in the 36 available complete genomes of MTBC members (Supplementary Data 2). This region comprises the cobF gene (Fig. 4), encoding the precorrin 6A synthase involved in the cobalamin/vitamin B12 synthesis, along with two other genes, respectively encoding a PE-PGRS protein family member and a protein of unknown function. This region shared by the L8 and the M. canettii genomes is also present in the phylogenetically proximal non-tuberculous mycobacterial species M. marinum and M. kansasii (Fig. 4). Via BLAST analysis, we further confirmed the systematic absence of cobF in any of 6456 quality draft genome assemblies available as of January 2020 from the NCBI, from strains belonging to lineages 1–7 or the animal lineages of the MTBC. Moreover, we thereby determined that the junction between the sequences flanking the cobF deletion was at the same nucleotide position in all but 6 of these genomes, resulting in the truncation of rv0943c and rv0944 genes as seen in the complete MTBC genomes (Fig. 4). Consistent with the clonal evolution of the MTBC with negligible, if any, horizontal gene transfer between strains1,14,32,35, the perfect conservation of this sequence junction suggests that cobF was lost in the MRCA of the other MTBC lineages, after its divergence from L8. The 6 exceptions were 3 strains from lineage 4.3 and 3 strains from lineage 3 that showed slightly larger deletions, including the 5′ region of rv0943c or the 5′ region of rv0943c, rv0944 and the 5′ region of rv0945, respectively, suggesting probable additional deletion events in particular sub-branches of these lineages.

Fig. 4: Differential presence of the cobF region in specific Mycobacterium spp. genomes.

Aligned genome segments showing the cobF gene region in M. tuberculosis L8, M. canettii CIPT140010059 (alias STB-A), M. kansasii ATCC12478 and M. marinum M strains, and the corresponding deletion in M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M. bovis AF2122/97 and M. africanum GM041182. Coding sequences of this region are shown in green, and flanking coding sequences in red. Sequences flanking the deletion point in truncated genes in M. tuberculosis, M. africanum and M. bovis, and in the cobF region present in L8, M. canettii, M. kansasii and M. marinum are indicated in red and black, respectively. Dashed lines correspond to missing segment parts relatively to the longest segment found in M. marinum.

In contrast, none of the almost 900 other genes specifically identified in the M. canettii genomes, and absent in the other MTBC genomes, were found in the L8 genome. The latter finding thus supports the close relationship with the previously known MTBC lineages indicated by the SNP-based phylogeny, as well as the outgroup position of M. canettii relatively to the MTBC including L8.

Further evidence for the early branching of L8 relative to the rest of the MTBC comes from examination of interrupted coding sequences (ICDSs). These ICDSs correspond to frameshifts or in-frame stop codons detected in genes that are intact in a common progenitor, thus putatively representing so-called molecular scars inherited during progressive pseudogenisation of the MTBC genomes36,37. Four orthologues of MTBC ICDSs were previously found to be intact in the genomes of M. canettii strains, as well as in M. marinum and M. kansasii4. One of these four orthologues (pks8), which belongs to a multigene family encoding polyketide synthases involved in the biosynthesis of important cell envelope lipids38, was also intact in the genomes of both L8 strains (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Data 3). Moreover, we found an additional orthologue of MTBC ICDSs (i.e. rv3899c-rv3900c), coding for a conserved hypothetical protein, which was intact in the genomes of M. canettii, M. kansasii, M. marinum and both L8 strains (Supplementary Data 3). These two molecular scars were also likely acquired by the other MTBC lineages after their divergence from the common progenitor shared with L8.

Fig. 5: Architecture of the pks8/17 region of specific Mycobacterium spp. genomes.

Aligned genome segments showing the interrupted coding sequences pks8/17 in M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis AF2122/97, and complete pks8 genes in L8, M. canettii CIPT140010059 (alias STB-A) and M. kansasii ATCC12478. The coding sequences of pks8/17 and pks8 are shown in green, and flanking genes in red. Sequences flanking the 1-nucleotide deletion and resulting in a frameshift in M. tuberculosis complex strains are indicated.

The assembled L8 genome also included 35 of the 50 genes (the exceptions are rv3513c encoding the probable fatty-Acid-Coa ligase FadD18 and 14 genes in the PhiRv1 region; see above) present in MTBC members but not found in any of the M. canettii genomes, including a number of genes putatively acquired through horizontal gene transfer by the common ancestor of the MTBC after its separation from M. canettii4 (Supplementary Data 4). This observation additionally supports both the close relationship with the previously known MTBC lineages and the outgroup position of M. canettii relatively to the MTBC including L8. Likewise, consistent with the rough colony morphotype of the Rwandan strain, both L8 strains displayed the single polyketide-synthase-encoding pks5 gene configuration shared by all MTBC members, instead of the dual pks5 conformation found in M. canettii strains involved in the smooth colony phenotype of the latter strains15. Thus, the recombination between the two pks5 genes and the loss of the intervening pap gene, thought to have resulted in surface remodelling and incremental gain of virulence after the phylogenetic separation from M. canettii15, already existed in the common progenitor of L8 and the rest of the MTBC. Moreover, both L8 strains also contained the intact TbD1 and RD9 regions, shared by the other ‘ancestral’ M. tuberculosis lineages (L1, L7) but subsequently lost by the so-called ‘modern’ lineages of M. tuberculosis (TbD1 lost in L2-4), M. africanum (L5 and L6) and the animal lineages (RD9)31.

In contrast to the highly clonal population structure of the MTBC, M. canettii strains are highly recombinogenic, as apparent from mosaic sequence arrangements in their genomes and functional DNA transfer between M. canettii strains mediated by a distributive conjugal transfer (DCT)-like mechanism4,39. However, no significant genome-wide recombination signal was detected by ClonalFrameML analysis40 between L8 and other MTBC strains (Supplementary Fig. 2). In particular, and in contrast to the numerous recombination segments in M. canettii4, the complete L8 genome only contained 26 possible recombination segments, yet the longest of these was 607 bp and the average length was 142 bp.


The discovery of L8 provides unique insights into an ancestor of the MTBC that existed after the pks5-recombination-mediated surface remodelling, which occurred after separation of the MTBC MRCA from the M. canettii clade, but preceded the loss of the cobF region and gene interruptions in a later common ancestor of the other MTBC lineages. The seeming restriction of this lineage to the African Great Lakes region represents new evidence supporting an origin for the MTBC in the eastern part of the African continent. These findings reinforce results from previous work suggesting an East—rather than a West African origin of the MTBC3,4,9,11,41.

A distinct ecological niche, linked to a potential environmental reservoir, has been hypothesised to explain the marked geographic restriction of M. canettii strains to the Horn of Africa, the lower persistence of these strains in infection models as well as their genome mosaicism implying multiple DNA recombination events within the M. canettii strain pool4,12. However, although our analysis is limited to two genomes identified to date, our results suggest that L8 is as clonal as the rest of the MTBC3,14,34,42. Moreover, the observation that both L8 strains share two uncommon rifampicin- and isoniazid-resistance conferring mutations in rpoB and inhA suggests that multidrug resistance was already acquired in the common ancestor of these two strains. Isoniazid and rifampicin were introduced in TB treatments in the African Great Lakes region in the late fifties and 1983, respectively (Dr. Armand Van Deun, personal communication). These shared MDR-defining mutations, and the detection of these isolates in human patients in both cases (with reported absence of previous TB history for the Rwandan patient), suggest that these patients were infected with an already-resistant strain, which was exposed to drug selective pressure already decades ago and had been likely circulating in the community for some time. Overall, this pattern thus suggests human-to-human transmission rather than infection from a non-human source. Although based on only two initial strains, these results are consistent with the presumed scenario of a human rather than a zoonotic origin for the MTBC31,43.

Of note, given the above timeline of introduction of rifampicin and isoniazid in both countries, the ~100 SNPs distance separating these two strains from their MRCA would imply a rapid molecular clock for L8, in the range of the upper bound of 2.2 SNPs/genome/year most recently estimated for other MTBC clades44. However, this mutation rate cannot be confirmed until additional L8 samples are uncovered.

Remarkably, the absence of other L8 strains in datasets from Uganda, Rwanda and DRC, together comprising more than 2000 strains, suggests that L8 is rare even within the African Great Lakes region. Such scarcity is compatible with selective sweeps of later branching MTBC strains, introduced more recently into the region. Similar scenarios have also been proposed to explain the slow apparent replacement of MTBC L5 and L6 by L4 in West Africa45,46,47 and the restriction of L7 to Northern Ethiopia48.

Loss-of-function linked to the deletion of cobF is a plausible candidate molecular event involved in such a replacement scenario for L8. Indeed, loss-of-function appears to be an important mechanism driving the pathoadaptive evolution of the TB pathogen, as shown for the role of the loss of lipo-oligosaccharide production (via recombination in the pks5 locus)15 in the evolution towards increased virulence from M. canettii to MTBC strains. Likewise, loss of secretion of PPE-MPTR and PE_PGRS proteins by the type VII secretion system ESX-5 (via mutations of the ppe38 locus) has been involved in the hypervirulence of recent branches of L2 (alias ‘modern’ Beijing) strains49. The loss of the cobF region in the other MTBC lineages, inferred from comparative genomics with M. canettii and non-tuberculous mycobacteria4, was previously hypothesised to reflect enhanced adaptation to an intracellular parasitic lifestyle50. Indeed, the cobalamin/vitamin B12 synthesis pathway, of which the cobF-encoded precorring-6a synthase is a component, represents a highly complex and energy consuming process with about 30 enzymatic steps51. Although the absence of this component may not entirely ablate cobalamin biosynthesis52,53, its loss might have resulted in gain of fitness and reflect enhanced pathogenic professionalisation, by economical reliance upon the mammalian host environment as source of vitamin B12. As an additional plausible but not necessarily mutually exclusive hypothesis, such selective sweep of L8 might have been (further) enhanced by the loss of theTbD1 region in later branching MTBC strains. This region, which we also found intact in L8, as is the case in the ‘ancestral’ M. tuberculosis lineages L1 and L7, encodes members of the mycobacterial membrane protein families MmpL. Very recent findings indicate that the loss of this region in later branching MTBC strains was also associated with a gain of virulence, and the deletion of TbD1 at the origin of the ‘modern’ M. tuberculosis lineages L2/L3/L4 has therefore been suggested as a key driver for their global epidemic spread54. If true, more recently emerged or introduced cobF- and TbD1-deleted strains might conceivably have largely outcompeted L8 strains. This hypothesis could be explored by assessing the growth and the virulence/fitness in cellular and animal models, of recombinant cobF- and/or TbD1-knock-out, as well as cobF- and/or TbD1-knock-in strains, derived from the available Rwandan L8 strain and other MTBC strains, respectively.

In conclusion, our genomic data, on an as-yet-unknown ancestral stage between the MTBC and the putative progenitor pool of M. canettii-like mycobacteria, thus suggest further experiments to examine candidate molecular events potentially involved in the pathoadaptive evolution of M. tuberculosis. The discovery of such rare strains raises the possibility for the existence of further extant strains, especially in Eastern Africa, representing other clades further closing the biological gap between the MTBC and M. canettii.


Rwandan patient recruitment and ethics statement

The patient in Rwanda was recruited into, and gave informed consent for, the DIAMA study, which was approved by the Rwanda National Ethical committee (IRB 00001497 of IORG0001100; Ref No.0069/RNEC/2017). Consent to publish identifying information was obtained from the patient’s representative.

Phenotypic characterisation

We studied conventional mycobacterial growth and biochemical characteristics including colony morphology, niacin production, nitrate reduction, p-nitro benzoic acid growth inhibition, catalase production, urea hydrolysis, Tween 80 hydrolysis and thiophene carboxylic acid hydrazide growth inhibition55. For comparative purpose, a reference set of the seven known human-adapted MTBC lineages56, together with M. canettii (BCCM/ITM500199), M. bovis (BCCM/ITM500324), M. bovis BCG (BCCM/ITM500101) and M. orygis (BCCM/ITM501026) strains were processed with the novel strain isolated in Rwanda. Moreover, phenotypic drug-susceptibility testing to first- and second-line anti-TB drugs was done using the proportion method57. The strain isolated in Uganda was not available for phenotypic characterisation.

Targeted- and whole-genome sequencing of the Rwandan strain

Targeted sequencing was performed by using the Deeplex-MycTB assay58 (Genoscreen, France). Briefly, this assay relies on a 24-plexed PCR amplification of mycobacterial species identification (hsp65), genotyping (spoligotyping and phylogenetic single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)) and 18 M. tuberculosis complex drug resistance-associated gene targets. This test and short-read Illumina-based WGS were performed on the Rwandan strain as follows. A bead beating method was used to extract DNA from colonies as follows: a loopful colonies from LJ were suspended in Tris-EDTA buffer, and heat inactivated at 95 °C for 20 min. After cooling at room temperature, the suspension was centrifuged at 20,000×g for 30 min followed by discarding supernatant and 250 μl of 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.8 were added and briefly vortexed. Mixture was incubated at 95 °C for 15 min, then spun down briefly followed by transferring entire volume in a new microcentrifuge tube containing 0.5 g of zirconium beads (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). For destruction of the solid mycobacterial cell wall, the mixture was vortexed at high speed for at least 30 s followed by briefly spinning down and incubation at −20 °C for at least 30 min. After thawing at room temperature, the mixture was briefly spun down and 200 μl of supernatant was transferred to a new microcentrifuge tube. For gDNA concentration, 1 μl of glycogen solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) was added followed by 0.1 volume of 3 M sodium acetate at pH 5.2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA), then 3 volume of 100% pre- cooled ethanol were added and vigorously vortexed for 10 s. The mixture was incubated at −20 °C for 10 min. After thawing at room temperature, the mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 20 min followed by discarding supernatant, then 600 μl of freshly prepared pre-cooled 70% ethanol was added followed by centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 5 min. Supernatant was discarded and the tube was air dried. gDNA was resuspended in 20 μl of sterile molecular grade water. The yield was measured by Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA).

Libraries of Deeplex-MycTB amplicons or genome fragments were constructed using the Nextera XT kit and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq platform with paired end, 150-bp read lengths (Illumina, CA, USA). DNA extraction suitable for PacBio SMRT sequencing was performed using the Genomic DNA Buffer Set (Qiagen Inc, Germantown, Maryland, USA) as follows: colonies (70.3 ± 1.0 mg) from a one month old LJ were transferred into a 50 ml falcon tube containing 3.5 ml of the Qiagen buffer B1 and 70 μl of 10 mg/ml RNAse (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) solution followed by thoroughly vortex and heat inactivation of bacilli at 80 °C for 1 h. Vortexing at later stages was avoided to maintain high molecular weight DNA, by gently inverting or swirling instead. After cooling at room temperature, 100 μl of 100 mg/ml lysozyme (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) was added and the tube was incubated  at 37 °C for 60 min, followed by adding 1.2 ml of 2.5 mg/ml of Proteinase K (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, USA) and again incubated  at 37 °C for 60 min. For protein denaturation (nucleases and DNA- binding proteins), 1.2 ml of buffer B2 was added to the mixture and placed overnight in horizontal shaker at 50 °C (30 RPM) alongside with Qiagen buffer QF. On the next day, a Qiagen Genomic-tip 100/G tip was placed over a 50 ml falcon tube and equilibrated with 4 ml of buffer QBT allowing the column to empty by gravity flow. The overnight incubated mixture was centrifuged at 3700 × g, 4 °C for 10 min, followed by applying the supernatant to the equilibrated column allowing it to enter the resin by gravity flow. The column was washed by adding twice 7.5 ml of buffer QC and then placed over a new clean 50 ml falcon tube, and the DNA was eluted with  5 ml pre-warmed QF buffer. For DNA precipitation, 3.5 ml of isopropanol were added followed by centrifugation at 4500 × g, 4 °C for 20 min, then the supernatant was gently discarded. gDNA was then washed with  1.5 ml cold (4 °C) 70% ethanol, centrifuged at 10,000 × g, 4 °C for 15 min followed by discarding all supernatant and drying the pellet in the Speedvac for 5 min at the medium drying setting. Finally, 200 μl of 10 mM Tris-Cl, pH 8.0 buffer was added and mixed gently by tapping and refrigeration overnight. On the next day, gDNA pellet was resuspended in the horizontal shaker at 65 °C (250 RPM) for 15 min. The purity and integrity of the gDNA were examined through 0.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and yield was measured using the NanoDrop 1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA USA) and Qubit dsDNA BR Assay Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was performed on a PacBio RS II using the SMRT technology.

Deeplex-MycTB analysis and spoligotyping

Analysis of the Deeplex-MycTB sequencing data, including SNP calling and spoligotype identification, was performed by read mapping on M. tuberculosis H37Rv sequence references, using a parameterised web application (GenoScreen)58. Membrane-based spoligotyping was performed as described previously59.

Illumina whole-genome sequencing analysis

Raw genomic reads from the newly sequenced L8 genome from Rwanda and the L8 genome from Uganda (SAMN02567762) were processed as previously described60. Briefly, the reads were trimmed with Trimmomatic v0.33.2261 and reads larger than 20 bp were kept. The software SeqPrep ( was used to identify and merge any overlapping paired-end reads. The resulting reads were aligned to the reconstructed ancestral sequence of the MTBC62 using the mem algorithm of BWA v0.7.1363. Duplicated reads were marked using the MarkDuplicates module of Picard v2.9.1 ( and local realignment of reads around InDels was performed using the RealignerTargetCreator and IndelRealigner modules of GATK v3.4.064. SNPs were called with Samtools v1.2 mpileup65 and VarScan v2.4.166 using the following thresholds: minimum mapping quality of 20, minimum base quality at a position of 20, minimum read depth at a position of 7X, maximum strand bias for a position 90%.

The spoligotype pattern of the strain from Uganda was extracted in silico from the raw reads using KvarQ67.

Phylogenetic reconstruction

The maximum likelihood phylogeny was inferred with RAxML v.8.2.868 using an alignment containing only polymorphic sites and the branch lengths of the tree were rescaled using invariant sites44,69.

A position was considered polymorphic if at least one genome had a SNP at that position. Deletions and positions not called according to the minimum threshold of 7× were encoded as gaps. We excluded positions with more than 20% missing data, positions falling in PE-PGRS genes, phages, insertion sequences and in regions with at least 50 bp identity to other regions in the genome. We also excluded variable positions falling in drug resistance-related genes. The phylogeny was computed using the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution (-m GTRCAT -V options), 100 bootstrap inferences and M. canettii (SRR011186) were used as an outgroup to root the phylogeny.

Whole-genome de novo assembly, annotation and comparative genomics

Raw PacBio reads obtained from the Rwandan strain were assembled with Canu v1.670, using default settings and an expected genome size of 4.4 Mbp, typical of MTBC strains. After discarding 60,272 reads below minimal quality parameters, 106,681 reads were used for the assembly. On the basis of the expected genome size, the average coverage depth was estimated at 186× using raw reads, and 39× and 38× using corrected and trimmed reads, respectively. The obtained unique contig of 4,387,285 bp was circularised with Circlator v1.5.571 using default settings, resulting in an assembly of 4,379,493 bp. Additional sequence verification and correction was then performed by mapping Illumina reads obtained from the same strain, using pacbio-utils v0.272 ( and snippy v4.473 ( Alignments of the final assembly were performed against an ensemble of complete genome sequences available from 38 strains of tubercle bacilli. This set included 34 M. tuberculosis strains from lineages 1, 2, 3 and 4 (comprising H37Rv), M. africanum L6 GM041182, M. bovis AF2122/97, as well as the closest STB-A (CIPT140010059) and most distant (STB-K) M. canettii strains (Supplementary Data 5). Comparative alignments and genome annotation were performed based on BLAST searches and analysis of gene synteny, using Artemis and Artemis comparison tool74, as well as a custom Multiple Annotation of Genomes and Differential Analysis (MAGDA) software previously used for annotation of M. canettii and Helicobacter pylori genomes4,75. Comparisons with orthologues from M. canettii STB-D, -E, -G, -H, -I and -J in addition to STB-A and -K, and from M. marinum type strain M and M. kansasii genomes were additionally done using the Microscope platform v3.13.376. When applicable, annotations were transferred from those of M. tuberculosis or M. canettii orthologs in the TubercuList/Mycobrowser database, using BLAST matches of >90% protein sequence identity, an alignable region of >80% of the shortest protein length in pairwise comparisons and visual inspection of the gene synteny. Genome completeness was assessed using CheckM77 using the lineage-specific workflow and Mycobacterium as the genus. The PacBio assembled Rwandan strain was found to have 98.74% completeness and 0% contamination or strain heterogeneity, making it suitable for further analyses.

ACT comparison files were generated using MAUVE 2015-02-25 software to visualise the genome-wide distribution of SNP densities between the assembled L8 genome from Rwanda and M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. canettii STB-A and STB-K genomes. Recombination between L8 and other MTBC lineages or M. canettii was assessed from a progressive MAUVE alignment of the PacBio assembled L8 genome and previously published closed genomes73 using ClonalFrameML40. To further assess the phylogenetic placement of the Lineage 8 strain, a core gene alignment was constructed using the completed genomes of the Rwandan L8 strain, representatives of the MTBC lineages 1–4 and 6, M. canettii, M. bovis, M. marinum (accession GCF_000419315.1) and M. kansassii (accession GCF_000157895.3). The GFF files of each genome were input to roary78 with an 80% identity cut-off, as has been done for previous genus-level mycobacterial core alignments79. A phylogenetic tree was constructed from the core gene superalignment using RAxML-NG v0.9.080 under the GTR + Gamma model of evolution with 20 starting trees. Bootstrapping was run until autoMRE converged with a value of 0.03 (50 replicates).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The complete genome sequence of the L8 strain from Rwanda was deposited in the NCBI repository under project PRJNA598991 with SRR10828835 and SRR10828834 accession codes for Illumina- and PacBio-derived genome sequences, respectively. The strain can be requested from the BCCM/ITM [] collection with accession code ITM-500961.


  1. 1.

    Gagneux, S. Ecology and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 202–213 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2018 (WHO, 2018).

  3. 3.

    Comas, I. et al. Out-of-Africa migration and Neolithic coexpansion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis with modern humans. Nat. Genet. 45, 1176–1182 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Supply, P. et al. Genomic analysis of smooth tubercle bacilli provides insights into ancestry and pathoadaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Genet. 45, 172–179 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bos, K. I. et al. Pre-Columbian mycobacterial genomes reveal seals as a source of New World human tuberculosis. Nature 514, 494–497 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Brites, D. et al. A new phylogenetic framework for the animal-adapted Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2820 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Rutaihwa, L. K. et al. Multiple introductions of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineage 2-Beijing into Africa over centuries. Front. Ecol. Evolution 7, 112 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    O’Neill, M. B. et al. Lineage specific histories of Mycobacterium tuberculosis dispersal in Africa and Eurasia. Mol. Ecol. 28, 3241–3256 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wirth, T. et al. Origin, spread and demography of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. PLoS Pathog. 4, e1000160 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gagneux, S. et al. Variable host-pathogen compatibility in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 2869–2873 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Gutierrez, M. C. et al. Ancient origin and gene mosaicism of the progenitor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 1, e5 (2005).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Blouin, Y. et al. Progenitor “Mycobacterium canettii” clone responsible for lymph node tuberculosis epidemic, Djibouti. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 21–28 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Coscolla, M. & Gagneux, S. Consequences of genomic diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Semin. Immunol. 26, 431–444 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Boritsch, E. C. et al. Key experimental evidence of chromosomal DNA transfer among selected tuberculosis-causing mycobacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9876–9881 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Boritsch, E. C. et al. pks5-recombination-mediated surface remodelling in Mycobacterium tuberculosis emergence. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 15019 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mortimer, T. D. & Pepperell, C. S. Genomic signatures of distributive conjugal transfer among mycobacteria. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 2489–2500 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Helb, D. et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance by use of on-demand, near-patient technology. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 229–237 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ng, K. C. S. et al. Automated algorithm for early identification of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis transmission hotspots in Rwanda [abstract]. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 22, 605 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Torrea, G. et al. Variable ability of rapid tests to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis rpoB mutations conferring phenotypically occult rifampicin resistance. Sci. Rep. 9, 11826 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Trébucq, A. et al. Treatment outcome with a short multidrug-resistant tuberculosis regimen in nine African countries. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 22, 17–25 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Coll, F. et al. A robust SNP barcode for typing Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains. Nat. Commun. 5, 4812 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Couvin, D., David, A., Zozio, T. & Rastogi, N. Macro-geographical specificities of the prevailing tuberculosis epidemic as seen through SITVIT2, an updated version of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotyping database. Infect. Genet. Evol. (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wanzala, S. I. et al. Retrospective analysis of archived pyrazinamide resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates from Uganda-evidence of interspecies transmission. Microorganisms 7, 221 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stinear, T. P. et al. Insights from the complete genome sequence of Mycobacterium marinum on the evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Genome Res. 18, 729–741 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang, J. et al. Insights on the emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the analysis of Mycobacterium kansasii. Genome Biol. Evol. 7, 856–870 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ssengooba, W. et al. Whole genome sequencing to complement tuberculosis drug resistance surveys in Uganda. Infect. Genet. Evol. 40, 8–16 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Carpels, G. et al. Drug resistant tuberculosis in sub-Saharan Africa: an estimation of incidence and cost for the year 2000. Tuber. Lung Dis. 76, 480–486 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Umubyeyi, A. N. et al. Results of a national survey on drug resistance among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Rwanda. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 11, 189–194 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    World Health Organization. WHO | Global tuberculosis report 2016 (WHO, 2019).

  30. 30.

    Yang, T. et al. Pan-genomic study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis reflecting the primary/secondary genes, generality/individuality, and the interconversion through copy number variations. Front. Microbiol. 9, 1886 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Brosch, R. et al. A new evolutionary scenario for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3684–3689 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Tsolaki, A. G. et al. Functional and evolutionary genomics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: Insights from genomic deletions in 100 strains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4865–4870 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Brosch, R. et al. Genomic analysis reveals variation between Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv and the attenuated M. tuberculosis H37Ra strain. Infect. Immun. 67, 5768–5774 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hirsh, A. E., Tsolaki, A. G., DeRiemer, K., Feldman, M. W. & Small, P. M. Stable association between strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their human host populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4871–4876 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chiner-Oms, Á. Genomic determinants of speciation and spread of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw3307 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Deshayes, C. et al. Detecting the molecular scars of evolution in the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex by analyzing interrupted coding sequences. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 78 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Smith, N. H., Hewinson, R. G., Kremer, K., Brosch, R. & Gordon, S. V. Myths and misconceptions: the origin and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 7, 537–544 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Etienne, G. et al. Identification of the polyketide synthase involved in the biosynthesis of the surface-exposed lipooligosaccharides in mycobacteria. J. Bacteriol. 191, 2613–2621 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Boritsch, E. C. & Brosch, R. in Tuberculosis and the Tubercle Bacillus 2nd edn, Vol. 4 495–515 (American Society of Microbiology, 2016).

  40. 40.

    Didelot, X. & Wilson, D. J. ClonalFrameML: efficient inference of recombination in whole bacterial genomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004041 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hershberg, R. et al. High functional diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis driven by genetic drift and human demography. PLoS Biol. 6, e311 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Supply, P. et al. Linkage disequilibrium between minisatellite loci supports clonal evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a high tuberculosis incidence area. Mol. Microbiol. 47, 529–538 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Mostowy, S., Cousins, D., Brinkman, J., Aranaz, A. & Behr, M. A. Genomic deletions suggest a phylogeny for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex. J. Infect. Dis. 186, 74–80 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Menardo, F., Duchêne, S., Brites, D. & Gagneux, S. The molecular clock of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog. 15, e1008067 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Niobe-Eyangoh, S. N. et al. Genetic biodiversity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex strains from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Cameroon. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 2547–2553 (2003).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Godreuil, S. et al. First molecular epidemiology study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Burkina Faso. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 921–927 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Groenheit, R. et al. The Guinea-Bissau family of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex revisited. PLoS ONE 6, e18601 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Comas, I. et al. Population genomics of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Ethiopia contradicts the virgin soil hypothesis for human tuberculosis in Sub-Saharan Africa. Curr. Biol. 25, 3260–3266 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Ates, L. S. et al. Mutations in ppe38 block PE_PGRS secretion and increase virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 181–188 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Boritsch, E. C. et al. A glimpse into the past and predictions for the future: the molecular evolution of the tuberculosis agent. Mol. Microbiol. 93, 835–852 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Martens, J. H., Barg, H., Warren, M. & Jahn, D. Microbial production of vitamin B12. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58, 275–B285 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Gopinath, K. et al. A vitamin B12 transporter in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Open Biol. 3, 120175 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Minias, A., Minias, P., Czubat, B. & Dziadek, J. Purifying selective pressure suggests the functionality of a vitamin B12 biosynthesis pathway in a global population of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Genome Biol. Evol. 10, 2326–2337 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Bottai, D. et al. TbD1 deletion as a driver of the evolutionary success of modern epidemic Mycobacterium tuberculosis lineages. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–14 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    LEÃO, S. C. et al. Practical Handbook for the Phenotypic and Genotypic Identification of Mycobacteria, (Vanden Broele, Brugge, Belgium, 2004).

  56. 56.

    Borrell, S. et al. Reference set of Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical strains: a tool for research and product development. PLOS ONE 14, e0214088 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kent, P. & Kubica, G. Public Health Mycobacteriology: A Guide for the Level III Laboratory (US Department of Health and Human Services, Centres for Disease Control, 1985).

  58. 58.

    Makhado, N. A. et al. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa undetected by WHO-endorsed commercial tests: an observational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18, 1350–1359 (2018).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    van der Zanden, A. G. M. et al. Improvement of differentiation and interpretability of spoligotyping for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates by introduction of new spacer oligonucleotides. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 4628–4639 (2002).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Menardo, F. et al. Treemmer: a tool to reduce large phylogenetic datasets with minimal loss of diversity. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 164 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Comas, I. et al. Human T cell epitopes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis are evolutionarily hyperconserved. Nat. Genet. 42, 498–503 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Li, H. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27, 2987–2993 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Koboldt, D. C. et al. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 568–576 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Steiner, A., Stucki, D., Coscolla, M., Borrell, S. & Gagneux, S. KvarQ: targeted and direct variant calling from fastq reads of bacterial genomes. BMC Genomics 15, 881 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Duchene, S. et al. Inferring demographic parameters in bacterial genomic data using Bayesian and hybrid phylogenetic methods. BMC Evolut. Biol. 18, 95 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Koren, S. et al. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 27, 722–736 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hunt, M. et al. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol. 16, 294 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Scofield, D. G. GitHub - douglasgscofield/PacBio-utilities: collection of utilities for working with PacBio-based assemblies. (2015).

  73. 73.

    Seemann, T. GitHub - tseemann-snippy Rapid bacterial SNP calling and core genome alignments. (2015).

  74. 74.

    Carver, T. et al. Artemis and ACT: viewing, annotating and comparing sequences stored in a relational database. Bioinformatics 24, 2672–2676 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Li, H. et al. East-Asian Helicobacter pylori strains synthesize heptan-deficient lipopolysaccharide. PLoS Genet. 15, e1008497 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Médigue, C. et al. MicroScope-an integrated resource for community expertise of gene functions and comparative analysis of microbial genomic and metabolic data. Brief. Bioinformatics 20, 1071–1084 (2019).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P. & Tyson, G. W. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Page, A. J. et al. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31, 3691–3693 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Fedrizzi, T. et al. Genomic characterization of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria. Sci. Rep. 7, 45258 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Kozlov, A. M., Darriba, D., Flouri, T., Morel, B. & Stamatakis, A. RAxML-NG: a fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35, 4453–4455 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references


Calculations were partially performed at sciCORE ( scientific computing core facility at University of Basel. This work was supported by EDCTP2 grant DRIA2014-326—DIAMA of the European Union, the Belgian General Directorate for Development Cooperation (PhD fellowship to J.C.S.N.), Grant ANR-16-CE35-0009 from Agence Nationale de la Recherche, the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grants 310030_188888, IZRJZ3_164171, IZLSZ3_170834 and CRSII5_177163), and the European Research Council (309540-EVODRTB). The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of EDCTP. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information




S.G., P.S., C.M., B.C.d.J., L.R. and J.C.S.N. designed the study. P.S., J.C.S.N., C.L., M.M., C.M. and S.G. analysed data and wrote the manuscript, with comments from all authors. A.J. and C.M. performed the assembly of sequences. M.M. annotated the L8 genome. C.L., F.M., D.B. and A.J. performed SNP analyses and phylogenetic reconstruction. M.M., R.A. and P.S. conducted comparative analyses of complete mycobacterial genomes, with support from C.L. and O.T. J.C.S.N., E.B.N., Y.M.H., J.B.M., W.M., K.F. and M.D. performed and/or analysed data from mycobacterial isolation, growth assays, phenotypic characterisation and/or molecular tests. S.D., C.G., J.C.S.N., E.B.N., E.A., W.S. and M.K.K. conducted targeted deep sequencing analyses and/or provided Xpert data. B.C.d.J and D.A. run the DIAMA trial.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sebastien Gagneux, Conor Joseph Meehan or Philip Supply.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

P.S. was a consultant of Genoscreen; C.G. and S.D. were employees of the same company. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Prabhu Patil and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ngabonziza, J.C.S., Loiseau, C., Marceau, M. et al. A sister lineage of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex discovered in the African Great Lakes region. Nat Commun 11, 2917 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing