Solid-state laser refrigeration of a composite semiconductor Yb:YLiF4 optomechanical resonator

Abstract

Photothermal heating represents a major constraint that limits the performance of many nanoscale optoelectronic and optomechanical devices including nanolasers, quantum optomechanical resonators, and integrated photonic circuits. Here, we demonstrate the direct laser refrigeration of a semiconductor optomechanical resonator >20 K below room temperature based on the emission of upconverted, anti-Stokes photoluminescence of trivalent ytterbium ions doped within a yttrium-lithium-fluoride (YLF) host crystal. Optically-refrigerating the lattice of a dielectric resonator has the potential to impact several fields including scanning probe microscopy, the sensing of weak forces, the measurement of atomic masses, and the development of radiation-balanced solid-state lasers. In addition, optically refrigerated resonators may be used in the future as a promising starting point to perform motional cooling for exploration of quantum effects at mesoscopic length scales, temperature control within integrated photonic devices, and solid-state laser refrigeration of quantum materials.

Introduction

Photothermal heating is a perennial challenge in the development of advanced optical devices at nanometer length scales given that a material’s optical index of refraction, bandgap, and Young’s modulus all vary with temperature. For instance, reducing the mechanical motion of an optomechanical resonator to its quantum ground state requires that the temperature (T) must be much less than hν/kB, where ν is the mode frequency, h and kB are Planck and Boltzmann constants, respectively1. Critically, incident laser irradiances must be kept low enough to avoid photothermal heating of the resonator above cryogenic temperatures1,2,3,4,5. Here, we demonstrate an approach for the photothermal cooling of nanoscale optoelectronic devices through the emission of anti-Stokes photoluminescence. In particular, we used a micrometer-scale grain of 10% Yb3+-doped YLiF4 (Yb:YLF) located at the end of a semiconductor optomechanical resonator (CdS) to cool the resonator  >20 K below room temperature following excitation with a continuous wave laser source with wavelength λ0 = 1020 nm.

The idea of refrigerating metallic sodium vapors using anti-Stokes luminescence was first proposed by Pringsheim in 19296. Following the development of the laser, Doppler cooling of metallic vapors led to the first observation of Bose–Einstein condensates in 19957. The first experimental report of solid-state laser cooling came in 1995 using Yb3+-doped ZBLANP glass (Yb:ZBLANP)8. Since then, two decades of research in the area of solid-state laser refrigeration has culminated in the development of a solid-state optical cryo-cooler with bulk Yb:YLF single crystals grown using the Czochralski method9, which has cooled crystals to 91 K from room temperature. The primary advantage of using crystalline materials for solid-state laser cooling is the existence of well-defined crystal-field levels, which minimizes inhomogenous broadening of rare-earth (RE) absorption spectra. Recently, this has enabled the first experimental demonstrations of cold Brownian motion10 since Einstein’s seminal paper11 on Brownian motion in 1905. The increased optical entropy of the blue-shifted photons makes this cooling cycle consistent with the second law of thermodynamics12.

Recently, laser refrigeration of a macroscopic Czochralski grown Yb:YLF crystal was used to cool a semiconductor FTIR detector (HgCdTe) to 135 K13. In contrast, in this work the temperature of a nanoscale semiconductor optomechanical resonator (CdSNR) is reduced using laser refrigeration of a hydrothermally synthesized Yb:YLF microcrystal attached to it. The cooling of a load using a microscopic cooler enables local cooling. In addition, it also offers a route towards rapidly achieving a thermal steady (μs to ms scale) temperature state within nanoscale devices.

The device is suspended in vacuum from a silicon wafer to reduce the potential for photothermal heating of the adjacent silicon substrate. Van der Waals bonding is used to attach a low-cost, hydrothermal ceramic Yb:YLF microcrystal10 to the end of the resonator cavity. RE (Yb3+) point-defects within the YLF emit anti-Stokes photoluminescence, which cools both the YLF microcrystal, and also the underlying semiconductor optomechanical resonator. The YLF serves both as a local thermometer (discussed in more detail below) and also as a heat sink, which extracts thermal energy from the cantilever, increasing its Young’s modulus, and thereby blue-shifting the cantilever’s optomechanical eigenfrequency. The transmitted laser causes minimal heating of the cantilever, supporting the YLF crystal owing to its small thickness (150 nm) and extremely low absorption coefficient of CdS at 1020 nm14. The temperature of the source and the cantilever system are measured using two independent non-contact temperature measurement methods—differential luminescence thermometry15 and optomechanical thermometry16, respectively, which agree well with each other. The results below suggest several potential applications for using solid-state laser refrigeration to rapidly cool a wide range of materials used in scanning probe microscopy17,18,19, cavity optomechanics2,5,20,21, integrated photonics22,23,24, the sensing of small masses and weak forces25,26,27,28, quantum information science29, and radiation-balanced lasers30.

Results

Optomechanical thermometry

A CdSNR was placed at the end of a clean silicon substrate, and a hydrothermally grown 10% Yb:YLF crystal was placed at the free end of the CdSNR cantilever. CdS was chosen because of its wide bandgap and low-cost, though in principle any material with low near-infrared (NIR) absorption can be used. A bright-field optical image of a representative sample is shown in Fig. 1b. The silicon substrate was loaded inside a cryostat chamber such that the free end of the cantilever was suspended over the axial hole in the cryostat, and the system was pumped to  ~10−4  Torr. As shown in Fig. 1a, a 1020-nm laser was focused onto the Yb:YLF crystal at the end of the cantilever. The time-dependent intensity of the forward-scattered 1020 nm laser was measured by focusing it onto an avalanche photodiode (APD). To measure the cantilever’s eigenfrequencies the voltage vs. time signal was Fourier-transformed to obtain its thermomechanical noise spectrum31,32. A representative power spectrum measured on the sample at 300 K using a laser irradiance of 0.04 MW cm−2 is shown in Fig. 1c. A sharp peak, fitted using a standard Lorentzian with a peak position at 3648.9 Hz, was attributed to the first natural resonant frequency mode (“diving board mode”) of the fluorescence-cooled nanoribbon (FCNR) system (Supplementary Fig. 1). As shown in Fig. 1a, the backscattered photoluminescence was collected from the rear end of the objective, transmitted through a beamsplitter, was filtered using a 1000-nm short-pass filter and focused into the spectrometer slit. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded at different grating positions, with appropriate collection times to avoid saturating the detector, and they were stitched together. Ten spectra were collected using 0.04 MW cm−2 of laser irradiance for 0.1 s and averaged. The intense Yb3+ transitions33,34 in the range of 800–1000 nm, with major peaks at 960 (E6E1), 972 (E5E1), and 993 (E5E3) nm were observed (Fig. 1d). A longer acquisition time (50×) was used to collect the weaker luminescence signal from the other rare-earth (RE) impurities that were not explicitly added during synthesis. The up-converted green and red emission peaks at 520, 550, and 650 nm are attributed to the transitions from 2H11/2, 4S3/2 and 4F9/2, respectively, of trivalent erbium ions (Er3+)35,36. Other minor transitions are labeled.

Fig. 1: Experimental setup.
figure1

a The schematic of the eigenfrequency and up-converted fluorescence measurement setup. FL, M, SPF, DL, BS, VND, and APD stand for focusing lens, mirror, 1000 nm short-pass filter, diode laser, beamsplitter, variable neutral density filter, and avalanche photodiode, respectively. b A bright-field optical image of the CdSNR cantilever supported using a silicon substrate with a Yb3+:YLF crystal placed at the free end. c A peak in the thermomechanical noise spectrum originating from the fundamental eigenfrequency of the CdSNR with Yb3+:YLF sample obtained at the 0.04 MW cm−2 at 300 K. d A stitched, up-converted fluorescence spectrum obtained at room temperature using a 1020-nm excitation source (0.04 MW cm−2) focused on the suspended Yb3+:YLF crystal. A 1000-nm short-pass filter was used to cut off the laser line.

Power spectra normalized using the maximum value at different laser irradiances obtained from the sample are plotted in Fig. 2a. When fit to a standard Lorentzian, the peak values show a blue-shift in the eigenfrequency of the FCNR system as the laser power is increased. The fitted peak values of these power spectra are shown in Fig. 2b. As the laser irradiance was increased, the Yb:YLF source reached lower temperatures, thereby extracting more heat from the CdSNR cantilever and causing a blue-shift in the frequency owing to an increased Young’s modulus of the CdS at lower temperatures. Using a 980 nm laser with an irradiance of 0.5 MW cm−2 resulted in the irreversible photothermal melting of the cantilever device shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. When the Yb:YLF crystal was removed from the CdSNR cantilever in Fig. 2b, the fundamental frequency measured at 0.04 MW cm−2 increased to a higher value of 17384.3 Hz owing to the removal of mass from the system (~1.3 × 10−9 g, Supplementary Fig. 3). As a control experiment, the eigenfrequency of the CdSNR cantilever itself was measured after the removal of the Yb:YLF crystal. The eigenfrequency of the cantilever without the crystal was then measured as a function of the laser power and is shown in Fig. 2b. The eigenfrequency red-shifted as the laser irradiance was increased, suggesting greater heating of the cantilever at higher irradiances owing to the decreasing Young’s modulus at higher temperatures16. The temperature of the FCNR device was calibrated by increasing the temperature of the cryostat from 160 to 300 K, which showed a linear red-shift in the eigenfrequency of the cantilever. The slope of −0.389 Hz K−1 obtained using this calibration was used to measure the temperature change of the cantilever system during laser refrigeration experiments. The maximum blue-shift in the eigenfrequency as a function of laser irradiance of the was +20.6 Hz at an irradiance of 0.97 MW cm−2, compared with the lowest irradiance of 0.04 MW cm−2. Based on the isothermal temperature calibration, ignoring temperature gradients and other optomechanical effects on the cantilever owing to increased irradiance, this blue-shift of +20.6 Hz corresponds to a temperature change of 53 K below room temperature (assuming a negligible change in temperature at a laser irradiance of 0.04 MW cm−2).

Fig. 2: Eigenfrequency thermometry.
figure2

a Normalized power spectra for a representative laser refrigeration measurement at each laser irradiance with an ambient reference temperature of 295 K (f0 = 3632.2 Hz). b The frequency shift (f −f0) with laser power at 295 K for both a plain CdSNR (red) and CdSNR with Yb:YLF (blue). Each data point was obtained by taking the mean of peak position obtained from Lorentzian fits of six thermomechanical noise spectra and error bars represent one standard deviation. Note that for small standard deviations, the error bars overlap with the data point. f0 is 3632.2 Hz and 17384.4 Hz, respectively. c Temperature calibration of the CdSNR with Yb:YLF obtained by measuring the frequency shift f − f0 (f0 = 3653.6 Hz) as a function of the cryostat temperature. The data points take into account the uncertainties in measurement by averaging the frequency value obtained from six thermomechanical noise spectra recorded at the given temperature. The error bars represent one standard deviation. d Eigenfrequency measurements using co-focused 980 nm and 1020 nm lasers. The data points take into account the uncertainties in measurement by averaging the frequency value obtained from six thermomechanical noise spectra recorded at the given laser power. The error bars represent one standard deviation.

To evaluate the effect on the eigenfrequency at other wavelengths, we co-focused a 980 nm laser with the 1020 nm beam. The thermomechanical noise spectra of a representative device were measured using both wavelengths (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Note 1). Figure 2d shows that with increasing 1020 nm laser irradiance the eigenfrequency blue-shifts, indicating that the device cools. In contrast, using a 980 nm laser leads to a heating-induced red-shift of the cantilever’s eigenfrequency with increasing irradiance. To limit damage (Supplementary Fig. 2) to the device we maintained the 980 nm irradiance below 0.2 MW cm−2.

To obtain the absolute change in temperature it is important to consider the system using modified Euler–Bernoulli beam theory and include the effects of the laser-trapping forces37 on the Yb:YLF crystal, which acts as a spring at the end of the cantilever (Supplementary Fig. 5). The eigenfrequency of the cantilever increases with increasing laser irradiance, owing to the increased optical spring constant. Analytically the eigenfrequency (fi) in hertz, of a uniform rectangular beam is given by ref. 38:

$${f}_{i}=\frac{1}{2\pi }\frac{{\Omega }_{i}^{2}}{{L}^{2}}\sqrt{\frac{EI}{\rho }}.$$
(1)

Here L is the length, ρ is the linear density, E is the Young’s modulus, and I is the area moment inertia of the cross-section of the beam. The ith eigenvalue of the non-dimensional frequency coefficient Ωi satisfies the following equation for a uniform rectangular cantilever with a mass M0 and spring of spring constant K attached at the free end of the cantilever of mass m0.

$$-\left(\frac{K}{{\Omega }_{i}^{3}}-\frac{{\Omega }_{i}{M}_{0}}{{m}_{0}}\right)[\cos ({\Omega }_{i})\sinh ({\Omega }_{i})-\sin ({\Omega }_{i})\cosh ({\Omega }_{i})]\\ +\cos ({\Omega }_{i})\cosh ({\Omega }_{i})+1=0.$$
(2)

To experimentally probe the effects of the laser-trapping forces, the power-dependent eigenfrequency measurements were performed at a constant cryostat temperature of 77 K. At temperatures as low as 77 K, the cooling efficiency of the Yb:YLF crystal decreases owing to diminishing resonant absorption and red-shifting of the mean fluorescence wavelength15. Owing to negligible cooling with increased irradiance, and with the equilibrium temperature being maintained by the crysostat, it is assumed that any blue-shift in the eigenfrequency of the system was solely due to the greater laser-trapping force at higher irradiance (Supplementary Fig. 6). Therefore, the excessive blue-shift at room temperature (6 ± 2.2 Hz) can be attributed to the change in Young’s modulus due to cooling of the CdSNR cantilever (Supplementary Fig. 7). According to this calibration, the cantilever’s temperature is reduced 15.4 ± 5.6 K below room temperature (Supplementary Fig. 8). As cantilever eigenfrequencies are calibrated at isothermal conditions, the temperatures measured via cantilever eigenfrequencies during laser refrigeration do not directly measure the coldest point within the cantilever, but rather a lower bound of the absolute minimum achievable temperature decrease16. This is a consequence of temperature gradients within the cantilever that lead to gradients of the cantilever’s Young’s modulus. Based on finite element eigenfrequency modeling of the cantilever with a spatially varying Young’s modulus, the coldest point in the cantilever can be calculated (Supplementary Fig. 9). Below we present a steady-state, heat-transfer model of the laser-cooled cantilever system to quantify how thermal gradients within CdSNR cantilevers affect eigenfrequency measurements during laser cooling experiments.

Heat-transfer analysis

A cantilever of length ‘L’, width ‘W’, and thickness ‘H’ is modeled with a YLF crystal placed at the free end (see Fig. 3a). The YLF crystal is approximated as a cuboid with sides of HYLF = 6, LYLF = 7.5 and WYLF = 6 μm, such that the volume and aspect ratio were similar to the tetragonal bi-pyramidal YLF crystal used experimentally.

Fig. 3: Heat-transfer analysis.
figure3

a The geometry of FCNR system used for analytical and finite element heat-transfer modeling. b The steady-state temperature along the length of the CdSNR calculated using analytical one-dimensional solution obtained assuming all of the cooling power produced by the YLF crystal flows through the CdSNR cross-section at Lc.

At steady-state the temperature distribution in the nanoribbon satisfies the energy equation given by:

$$\frac{{\partial }^{2}T}{\partial {x}^{2}}+\frac{{\partial }^{2}T}{\partial {y}^{2}}+\frac{{\partial }^{2}T}{\partial {z}^{2}}=0.$$
(3)

Heat transfer to the surroundings by conduction and convection is absent owing to the vacuum surrounding the cantilever. Radiant (blackbody) energy transfer to or from the surroundings is negligible owing to the relatively low temperatures of the cantilever and its small surface area. Therefore, the heat flow within the cantilever is one-dimensional and Eq. (3) reduces to:

$$\frac{{d}^{2}T}{d{x}^{2}}=0,$$
(4)

which has the general solution:

$$T(x)={C}_{1}x+{C}_{2}.$$
(5)

Assuming negligible interfacial resistance between the cantilever and the underlying silicon substrate, the temperature at the silicon/CdS interface (x = 0) is the cryostat temperature T0. Consequently, the boundary condition at the base of the nanoribbon is T(0) = T0. If all of the heat generated in the YLF crystal is transferred to or from the CdSNR across the interface at x = Lc, the heat flux at the interface is given by:

$$\kappa \frac{dT}{dx}({L}_{{\rm{c}}})=\frac{{\dot{Q}}_{{\rm{c}}}}{HW},$$
(6)

in which \({\dot{Q}}_{c}\) is the rate of heat removal from the YLF crystal, and κ is the thermal conductivity of CdS.

Applying the boundary conditions, the temperature distribution in the CdSNR becomes:

$$T(x)=\frac{{\dot{Q}}_{{\rm{c}}}}{\kappa HW}x+{T}_{0}.$$
(7)

It is assumed that the relatively large thermal conductivity of the YLF crystal (~6 W m−1 K−1) will lead to a nearly uniform temperature in the crystal given by:

$$T({L}_{{\rm{c}}})=\frac{{\dot{Q}}_{{\rm{c}}}}{\kappa HW}{L}_{{\rm{c}}}+{T}_{0}.$$
(8)

The rate of laser energy absorbed per unit volume \(Q^{\prime\prime\prime}={Q}_{{\rm{abs}}}/V\) is given by:

$$Q^{\prime\prime\prime}=\frac{4\pi n^{\prime} n^{\prime\prime} }{{\lambda }_{0}{Z}_{0}}({\bf{E}}\cdot {{\bf{E}}}^{* }).$$
(9)

Here \(n=n^{\prime} -in^{\prime\prime}\) is the complex refractive index of the medium, λ0 is the wavelength in vacuum, Z0 is the free space impedance (Z0 = 376.73 Ω), and E* is the complex conjugate of the electric field vector within the YLF crystal. Up-converted, anti-Stokes luminescence follows laser absorption, cooling the crystal. We neglect the absorption of the incident laser by the underlying CdS cantilever due to its small thickness (154 nm) and low absorption coefficient at 1020 nm (6.7 × 10−13 cm −1) relative to what has been reported15 for YLF (~1 cm−1).

Discussion

Given that eigenfrequency measurements can only provide a lower bound of the cantilever’s temperature, a more direct approach must be used to measure the temperature at the end of the cantilever. Differential luminescence thermometry (DLT)9,34 was used to measure the temperature of the YLF at the end of the cantilever based on using a Boltzmann distribution to analyze emission from different crystal-field (Stark) levels. We obtained a temperature drop of 23.6 K below room temperature (\(\Delta {T}_{\max }\)) at an irradiance (I0) of 0.97 MW cm−2 corresponding to an incident power P0 = 40.1 mW and spot radius w0 = 1.15 μm (Supplementary Fig. 10). Using the measured value of T(Lc) − T0 = 23.6 K, H = 150 nm, W = 2.5 μm, Lc = 53 μm, and κ = 20 W m−1 K−1 39, we calculate a cooling power of \({\dot{Q}}_{{\rm{c}}}\) = 3.34 × 10−6 W (Supplementary Fig. 11). The resultant temperature gradient along the length of the device is shown in Fig. 3b. Based on the temperature gradient, by modeling a spatially varying Young’s modulus, the coldest point in the cantilever from eigenfrequency measurements was calculated to be between 26 and 58 K below room temperature (Supplementary Fig. 9). This agrees well with the coldest temperature measured using DLT.

An absorption coefficient and cooling efficiency of 0.61 cm−1 and 1.5%, respectively, have been reported previously for a bulk YLF crystal doped with 10% Yb-ions15. Based on this absorption coefficient, considering full illumination of the Yb:YLF crystal, a maximum cooling power of 2.2 μW would be generated when irradiated by a 40.1 mW pump laser. This cooling power is smaller than the experimental cooling power reported above. The discrepancy can be explained by two factors related to the symmetric morphology of the YLF microcrystals. First, the size of the YLF microcrystals is within the Mie-regime for light scattering and internal optical fields may be enhanced considerably owing to morphology dependent cavity resonances. Supplementary Fig. 12 presents two-dimensional finite-difference time-domain calculations showing that internal optical power within a YLF microcrystal can be twice as large as the incident power owing to internal cavity resonances. Consequently, first-order linear absorption calculations may underestimate the cooling power owing to an underestimation of the internal optical power of the pumping laser. Second, a combination of light-scattering and multiple internal reflections of the pump beam within the microcrystal can excite a larger volume of the crystal compared with the incident spot size. Supplementary Fig. 13 demonstrates that fluorescence is emitted throughout YLF microcrystal, including far from where the excitation laser is focused.

In conclusion, we demonstrate an approach to decrease the temperature of a nanoscale semiconductor optomechanical resonator by  >20 K below room temperature using solid-state laser refrigeration of a Yb:YLF crystal. Thermometry and calibration of the fabricated device are performed using two independent methods—optomechanical eigenfrequencies and differential luminescence thermometry, respectively—which compare well with each other. A modified Euler–Bernoulli model is used to account for the laser-trapping forces, and the measured temperatures are validated using heat-transfer theory. A maximum drop in temperature of 23.6 K below room temperature was measured near the tip of the cantilever. Among other applications in scanning probe microscopy and exploration of quantum effects at mesoscopic length scales28, optical refrigeration of a mechanical resonator could have significant implications for weak force and precision mass sensing applications26,27, in the development of composite materials for radiation-balanced lasers30, and local temperature control in integrated photonic devices23,24. In the future, solid-state laser refrigeration may also assist in the cooling of optomechanical devices by enabling the use of higher laser irradiances in the absence of detrimental laser heating.

Methods

Cadmium sulfide nanoribbon synthesis

The CdSNRs were synthesized using a chemical vapor transport method discussed in a previous publication16. A precursor cadmium sulfide (CdS) powder in an alumina boat, which was placed at the center of a quartz tube. The silicon (100) substrates were prepared by dropcasting gold nanocrystals in chloroform. The precursor was heated to 840 °C. A carrier gas consisting of argon and 5% hydrogen was used to transport the evaporated species over to a growth substrate placed at the cooler upstream region near the edge of the furnace.

Ytterbium-doped lithium yttrium fluoride synthesis

The hydrothermal method used to synthesize single crystals of 10% ytterbium-doped lithium yttrium fluoride (Yb:YLF) nanocrystals was performed following modifications to Roder et al.10. Yttrium chloride (YCl3) hexahydrate and ytterbium chloride hexahydrate (YbCl3) were of 99.999% and 99.998% purity, respectively. Lithium fluoride (LiF), lithium hydroxide monohydrate (LiOH H2O), ammonium bifluoride (NH4HF2), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were analytical grade and used directly in the synthesis without any purification. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. For the synthesis of Yb:YLF, 0.585 g (2 mmol) of EDTA and 0.168 g (4 mmol) LiOH H2O were dissolved in 10 mL Millipore DI water and heated to ~80 °C while stirring. After the EDTA was dissolved, 1.8 mL of 1.0 M YCl3 and 0.2 mL of 1.0 M YbCl3 were added and continually stirred for 1 hour. This mixture is denoted as solution A. Subsequently, 0.105 g (4 mmol) of LiF and 0.34 g (8 mmol) of NH4HF2 were separately dissolved in 5 mL Millipore DI water and heated to ~70 °C while stirring for 1 h. This solution is denoted as solution B. After stirring, solution B was then added dropwise into solution A while stirring to form a homogeneous white suspension. After 30 minutes, the combined mixture was then transferred to a 23 mL Teflon-lined autoclave (Parr 4747 Nickel Autoclave Teflon liner assembly) and heated to 180 °C for 72 h in an oven (Thermo Scientific Heratherm General Protocol Oven, 65 L). After the autoclave cooled naturally to room temperature, the Yb:YLF particles were sonicated and centrifuged at 4000 rpm with ethanol and Millipore DI water three times. The final white powder was then dried at 60 °C for 12 hours followed by calcination at 300 °C for 2 hours in a Lindberg blue furnace inside a quartz tube.

Device fabrication

Using a tungsten dissecting probe (World Precision Instruments) with a sufficiently small tip radius-of-curvature (<1 μm), mounted on to a nano-manipulator (Märzhäuser-Wetzlär), the CdSNRs were picked up and placed at the edge of a clean silicon substrate. Yb:YLF crystal was then placed at the free end of the cantilever using the same process.

Eigenfrequency measurement

The optomechanical thermometry setup consists of a 1020 nm diode laser (QPhotonics) focused, using a 50× long working distance objective, onto the sample placed inside a cryostat (Janis ST500) modified by drilling an axial hole through the sample stage. The forward-scattered light was collected through the axial hole and was focused onto an APD (Thorlabs APD430A). The time-domain voltage signal from the APD was then Fourier-transformed to obtain the thermomechancial noise spectrum with characteristic peaks from the fundamental eigenfrequency modes of the cantilever. For temperature calibration, the thermomechanical noise spectrum was recorded by varying the cryostat temperature and fitting the resulting peaks using a standard Lorentzian. Each data point represents the average of six measurements and the error bars represent the standard deviation.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Code availability

Code or algorithm used to generate results in this study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    O’Connell, A. D. et al. Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator. Nature 464, 697–703 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Teufel, J. et al. Sideband cooling of micromechanical motion to the quantum ground state. Nature 475, 359–363 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gröblacher, S. et al. Demonstration of an ultracold micro-optomechanical oscillator in a cryogenic cavity. Nat. Phys. 5, 485–488 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Park, Y.-S. & Wang, H. Resolved-sideband and cryogenic cooling of an optomechanical resonator. Nat. Phys. 5, 489–493 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Chan, J. et al. Laser cooling of a nanomechanical oscillator into its quantum ground state. Nature 478, 89–92 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pringsheim, P. Zwei bemerkungen über den unterschied von lumineszenz-und temperaturstrahlung. Z. für. Phys. 57, 739–746 (1929).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Anderson, M., Ensher, J., Matthews, M., Wieman, C. & Cornell, E. Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. Science 269, 198–201 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Epstein, R. I., Buchwald, M. I., Edwards, B. C., Gosnell, T. R. & Mungan, C. E. Observation of laser-induced fluorescent cooling of a solid. Nature 377, 500–503 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Melgaard, S. D., Albrecht, A. R., Hehlen, M. P. & Sheik-Bahae, M. Solid-state optical refrigeration to sub-100 kelvin regime. Sci. Rep. 6, 20380 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Roder, P. B., Smith, B. E., Zhou, X., Crane, M. J. & Pauzauskie, P. J. Laser refrigeration of hydrothermal nanocrystals in physiological media. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 15024–15029 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Einstein, A. Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. (German) [On the electrodynamics of moving bodies]. Ann. Der Phys. 322, 891–921 (1905).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Landau, L. On the thermodynamics of photoluminescence. J. Phys. 10, 503–506 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hehlen, M. P. et al. First demonstration of an all-solid-state optical cryocooler. Light. Sci. Appl. 7, 15 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Treharne, R. et al. Optical design and fabrication of fully sputtered CdTe/CdS solar cells. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 286, 012038 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Seletskiy, D. V. et al. Precise determination of minimum achievable temperature for solid-state optical refrigeration. J. Lumin. 133, 5–9 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Pant, A. et al. Optomechanical thermometry of nanoribbon cantilevers. J. Phys. Chem. C. 122, 7525–7532 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Meyer, G. A simple low-temperature ultrahigh-vacuum scanning tunneling microscope capable of atomic manipulation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67, 2960–2965 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kirk, M., Albrecht, T. & Quate, C. Low-temperature atomic force microscopy. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59, 833–835 (1988).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Hosseini, M., Guccione, G., Slatyer, H. J., Buchler, B. C. & Lam, P. K. Multimode laser cooling and ultra-high sensitivity force sensing with nanowires. Nat. Commun. 5, 4663 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chang, D. E. et al. Cavity opto-mechanics using an optically levitated nanosphere. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1005–1010 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Delić, U. et al. Cooling of a levitated nanoparticle to the motional quantum ground state. Science 367, 892–895 (2020).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Li, Y. et al. Room-temperature continuous-wave lasing from monolayer molybdenum ditelluride integrated with a silicon nanobeam cavity. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 987–992 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    García-Meca, C. et al. On-chip wireless silicon photonics: from reconfigurable interconnects to lab-on-chip devices. Light. Sci. Appl. 6, e17053 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Atatüre, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, N., Lee, S.-Y. & Wrachtrup, J. Material platforms for spin-based photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 38–51 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jensen, K., Kim, K. & Zettl, A. An atomic-resolution nanomechanical mass sensor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 533–537 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Braginskii, V. B. & Manukin, A. B. Measurement of weak forces in physics experiments. 161 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1977).

  27. 27.

    Abramovici, A. et al. Ligo: the laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory. Science 256, 325–333 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schwab, K. C. & Roukes, M. L. Putting mechanics into quantum mechanics. Phys. Today 58, 36–42 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Kolkowitz, S. et al. Coherent sensing of a mechanical resonator with a single-spin qubit. Science 335, 1603–1606 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Bowman, S. R., O’Connor, S. R. & Biswal, S. Ytterbium laser with reduced thermal loading. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 41, 1510–1517 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lee, J., Goericke, F. & King, W. P. Temperature-dependent thermomechanical noise spectra of doped silicon microcantilevers. Sens. Actuators, A 145, 37–43 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pini, V. et al. Shedding light on axial stress effect on resonance frequencies of nanocantilevers. ACS Nano 5, 4269–4275 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Bensalah, A. et al. Growth of Yb3+-doped YLiF4 laser crystal by the Czochralski method. attempt of Yb3+ energy level assignment and estimation of the laser potentiality. Opt. Mater. 26, 375–383 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rahman, A. A. & Barker, P. Laser refrigeration, alignment and rotation of levitated Yb 3+: YLF nanocrystals. Nat. Photonics 11, 634–638 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Reddy, B. & Venkateswarlu, P. Infrared to visible energy upconversion in Er3+-doped oxide glass. Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 1327–1329 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yeh, D., Sibley, W., Schneider, I., Afzal, R. & Aggarwal, I. Intensity-dependent upconversion efficiencies of Er3+ ions in heavy-metal fluoride glass. J. Appl. Phys. 69, 1648–1653 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ashkin, A. Optical trapping and manipulation of neutral particles using lasers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 4853–4860 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Balachandran, B. & Magrab, E. B. Vibrations (Cengage Learning: Toronto, Canada, 2008).

  39. 39.

    Moore Jr, G. E. & Klein, M. V. Thermal conductivity of doped and pure cadmium sulfide. Phys. Rev. 179, 722–730 (1969).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

A.P., X.X., and P.J.P. gratefully acknowledge financial support from the MURI:MARBLe project under the auspices of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (award no. FA9550-16-1-0362). Sample characterization was conducted at the University of Washington Molecular Analysis Facility, which is supported in part by the National Science Foundation (grant no. ECC-1542101), the University of Washington, the Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute, the Clean Energy Institute, and the National Institutes of Health. The authors gratefully acknowledge support from UW’s Institute for Nano-engineered Systems.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The Yb:YLF microcrystal materials were synthesized by X.X. The heat-transfer analysis was developed by E.J.D., A.P., and P.J.P. A.P. performed the experiments and also prepared final figures. All co-authors contributed to the writing and editing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Pauzauskie.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Zhou Yang and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pant, A., Xia, X., Davis, E.J. et al. Solid-state laser refrigeration of a composite semiconductor Yb:YLiF4 optomechanical resonator. Nat Commun 11, 3235 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16472-6

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.