Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Unique hole-accepting carbon-dots promoting selective carbon dioxide reduction nearly 100% to methanol by pure water


Solar-driven CO2 reduction by abundant water to alcohols can supply sustainable liquid fuels and alleviate global warming. However, the sluggish water oxidation reaction has been hardly reported to be efficient and selective in CO2 conversion due to fast charge recombination. Here, using transient absorption spectroscopy, we demonstrate that microwave-synthesised carbon-dots (mCD) possess unique hole-accepting nature, prolonging the electron lifetime (t50%) of carbon nitride (CN) by six folds, favouring a six-electron product. mCD-decorated CN stably produces stoichiometric oxygen and methanol from water and CO2 with nearly 100% selectivity to methanol and internal quantum efficiency of 2.1% in the visible region, further confirmed by isotopic labelling. Such mCD rapidly extracts holes from CN and prevents the surface adsorption of methanol, favourably oxidising water over methanol and enhancing the selective CO2 reduction to alcohols. This work provides a unique strategy for efficient and highly selective CO2 reduction by water to high-value chemicals.


The consumption of fossil fuels has been increasing the level of atmospheric CO2 and consequently causing imminent climate change1,2,3. To mitigate energy and environmental issues as well as generate sustainable fuels, people have devoted continuous efforts to reproducing natural photosynthesis to fix CO2 to sugar since the 1970s4,5. In an ideal photocatalytic CO2 conversion system, a semiconductor is excited by photons of appropriate energy and generates pairs of electrons and holes. These then transfer to the surface to reduce CO2 and oxidise water, competing with the undesired electron-hole recombination. Such recombination occurs at < µs timescale, much faster than the water oxidation by holes, which proceeds at ~1 s timescale6. Therefore, it remains challenging to reduce CO2 by pure water and benchmark systems mostly use sacrificial hole acceptors, instead of water, to rapidly scavenge holes and prolong the lifetime of photoelectrons7,8. Although the efficiencies of CO2 reduction have been increased by a few orders of magnitude in recent years, the majority of these systems are uneconomical and unsustainable7,8. In order to replace those sacrificial regents by abundant water to achieve sustainable CO2 conversion, one has to develop satisfactory semiconductors with long-lived charge carriers as well as co-catalysts to extract the photoholes, thus favouring the water oxidation reaction instead of charge recombination.

Carbon nitrides, which always comprise carbon, nitrogen and hydrogen instead of ideal structure C3N4 when prepared in the laboratory9 (denoted CN herein), is an emerging group of easy-to-tune organic semiconductors10,11,12 and has demonstrated uncommonly-observed long-lived charge carriers owing to its unique defective structure13,14. In the presence of reduction co-catalysts and visible-light illumination, CN has shown promising activities in hydrogen production and CO2 reduction due to its negatively-positioned conduction band (CB)15,16,17,18,19. However, there are only a few reports on water oxidation using CN, because its valence band (VB) is too close to the water oxidation potential as well as the inherent kinetic challenge of water oxidation17,20. Hence, an active co-catalyst for water oxidation is crucial to take advantage of long-lived charge carriers in CN. Carbon-dots (CD, < 10 nm in diameter), another emerging class of carbon nanomaterials with unique electronic structures, have recently been used as co-catalysts to enhance light absorption, decompose peroxide and more importantly store electrons for reduction reactions17,21,22,23,24. Although an electron-accepting CD co-catalyst prolongs the lifetime of electrons, it is associated with a loss of electrochemical potential of photogenerated electrons without accelerating the sluggish water oxidation. A better solution is to apply a hole-accepting CD to tackle the difficult water oxidation since electron-accepting co-catalysts with a less negative CB waste a portion of the reductive potential of electrons photogenerated in CN and do not thermodynamically favour proton reduction. However, limited evidence has been reported on CD for its function of selective charge carriers acceptance. On the other hand, such hole-accepting CD co-catalyst, albeit decisive for improved water oxidation, has been rarely observed in experiments until now25,26,27,28,29,30.

Methanol, a useful liquid hydrogen source with the convenience of storage and transport for fuel cells31, is a more desirable reduction product from CO2 compared to CO, methane and formic acid. However, the generation of methanol is a 6-electron process, hence requiring an exceptionally prolonged lifetime of charge carriers to allow for electrons accumulation. Moreover, methanol traps holes in ~10 ns on TiO2, and its oxidation is thus kinetically much favoured over water oxidation (~1 s)6, making the continuous production of methanol a significant challenge. So far, stoichiometric production of methanol and oxygen from CO2 and water has hardly been reported with high selectivity (confirmed by isotopic labelling), long-term stability and satisfactory internal quantum yield (IQY) which is more reliable than product evolution rates (Supplementary Table 1)32, again due to the lack of suitable co-catalysts to selectively transfer holes towards water instead of methanol. Accordingly, in order to utilise water as a sustainable hole scavenger and selectively produce methanol from CO2, we need to design an ideal hole-accepting CD, which is mainly dependent upon our fundamental knowledge of photophysical processes13. Although transient absorption spectroscopy (TAS) plays an essential role in understanding the charge carrier dynamics of semiconductors for water splitting13, the spectroscopic characteristics in CO2 conversion processes are still unknown at ultrafast timescale, potentially hindering the rational development of target photocatalysts33.

Herein, using TAS investigation, we distinguish a unique species of CD as a hole acceptor in the mCD/CN composite when fabricated by a scalable microwave method (mCD, graphite phase). CDs could also behave as an electron acceptor in the sCD/CN composite where they are fabricated by a sonication-based method (sCD, amorphous). mCD prolongs the lifetime of electrons in CN by a factor of four compared to sCD, favouring the multi-electron reduction process. Remarkably, the mCD/CN nanocomposite stably produces stoichiometric oxygen and methanol with near-unity selectivity, confirmed by 13C labelling, with an IQY of 2.1% at 420 nm. On the other hand, the sCD/CN composite only generates CO, a two-electron product. Furthermore, the unique mCD captures holes from electrons and prevents the adsorption of the reduction product methanol, hence favourably oxidising water instead of methanol and enhancing the selectivity of CO2 reduction to alcohols.


Synthesis and characterisation of all photocatalysts

As discussed above, the widely reported electron-accepting co-catalysts with a less negative CB waste a portion of the reductive potential of electrons photogenerated in CN and do not promote the sluggish reaction between holes and water molecules. Hole-accepting co-catalysts can prolong the lifetime of photogenerated charges, preserve the reduction potential of photoelectrons on the CB and also turn water molecules to preferable products, e.g., O2, thus meeting our targeted ideal system for CO2 conversion. Therefore, an efficient hole-accepting co-catalyst is highly sought after for photon-driven CO2 reduction. We explored CD co-catalysts by synthesising two CD samples according to different recipes, and their properties were then investigated via extensive and thorough characterisations. Both carbon-dots were loaded to CN at their optimal concentrations: 3.5% for mCD/CN and 3% for sCD/CN, respectively.

The novel mCD were synthesised via a modified 10-minute microwave method from urea and citric acid precursors, much faster than other reported methods for high-quality CD17,24,28. Then the purified mCD were dissolved with dicyandiamide (DCDA, a precursor for CN) in DMF and stirred for ten hours at 60 °C before transferring into a ceramic crucible, followed by thermal polymerisation at 500 °C and exfoliation processes to obtain mCD/CN. For comparison, the other carbon-dots reported as reduction co-catalysts were fabricated via an alkali-assisted sonication treatment of glucose precursor (sCD) and loaded to carbon nitride to form sCD/CN30. Pristine CN was synthesised from a DCDA precursor followed by identical thermal oxidation etching34. Detailed nanocomposite photocatalyst preparation procedures and other characterisation methods are listed in the Method.

Powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were measured (Fig. 1a) to obtain the crystallinity information of CN, mCD/CN and sCD/CN. At first glance, both carbon-dots exhibit poor crystalline patterns. However, mCD shows a broadened (002) peak around 26.5° (3.36 Å), close to the graphite structure reported in the literature35,36. The weak and widened band of sCD is positioned around 21.5°, far from a graphite-like pattern and may be assigned to an amorphous carbon compared to the former34. The synthesised CN polymer exhibits the typical diffraction signals of (002) and (100) planes at 27.4° (3.26 Å) and 13.0° (6.82 Å), respectively, indicating the successful formation of a heptazine-based polymer37. The co-existence and details of the structures of both mCD and CN were examined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The as-prepared CN is graphene-like nanosheets (Fig. 1b) of several micrometres in diameter, with a very rough and crinkly surface due to the exfoliation of bulk CN (Supplementary Fig. 1a)34. High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images of CN (Fig. 1b) show hexagonal lattice fringes with a characteristic d-spacing of 0.63 nm, which matches well with the (110) planes of CN (a = 1.277, c = 0.649 nm) 34. The diameter of the mCD is 2–10 nm (Supplementary Fig. 1b). The CN matrix is coherently decorated by mCDs, suggesting a strong interaction between the two phases (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1d). The crystal structure of CN was relatively more sensitive to the electron beam irradiation and was therefore damaged after some irradiation, while that of mCD remained intact. The mCD synthesised here has a graphitic structure with characteristic d-spacing of about 0.23 nm (inset of Fig. 1c), which can be indexed to the (110) planes of a 2 × 2 × 1 hexagonal super unit cell of graphite (a = 0.46 and c = 0.67 nm). Notably, the high magnification images reveal that mCD concentrate around the CN edges and boundaries, which potentially enhances change transfer process to water during photocatalysis. The sCD synthesised from sonication of glucose under alkaline conditions are determined to be 15–20 nm in diameter, bigger compared to mCD (Supplementary Fig. 1c). No long-range pattern of atomic positions was found, indicating an amorphous structure in line with the PXRD results. After the formation of a junction with CN, the crystalline structure of sCD was again hardly found in TEM, likely due to its amorphous allotropic feature. Therefore, both XRD and TEM confirm the composite samples were successfully obtained, and the dominant structural difference between both carbon-dots is that mCD shows a relatively more crystallised graphite structure while sCD are not well crystallised, which might result in their different functions.

Fig. 1: Characterisation of CN, mCD/CN and sCD/CN.

a PXRD pattern of mCD, sCD and CN. b HRTEM images of CN. Scale bar: 10 nm. Inset: an enlarged image showing (110) crystal fringes of CN. c HRTEM images of mCD/CN nanocomposite. Scale bar: 5 nm. mCD are marked by circles. Inset: an enlarged image showing graphite superstructure of mCD. d Raman, e Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and f UV–vis spectra of mCD, sCD and CN. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Raman spectroscopy was used to examine the backbone of the materials further. Both carbon-dots show relatively weak D-band around 1350 cm−1 and G-band around 1600 cm−1. mCD have a smaller ID/IG height ratio (0.399) compared to sCD (0.495), indicative that sCD exhibits a more significant deviation from a graphitic structure38,39,40, in agreement with the XRD and TEM results. Characteristic vibrations of the heptazine-based structure were found on CN, with the typical peaks in the regions of 1200–1700, 980 and 690 cm−1 (Fig. 1d) corresponding to disordered graphitic carbon-nitrogen vibrations, the symmetric N-breathing mode of heptazine and the in-plane bending, respectively41,42. Therefore, sCD shows a more defective manner, likely amorphous carbon, while mCD shows a more crystalised doped-graphite feature.

Complementary FTIR spectroscopy was carried out to identify the surface functional groups on the carbon structures. The vibrations in sCD are mostly C–C vibrations at 1200 and 1450 cm−1 and show tiny C=O signals (Fig. 1e). In the absence of a significant amount of heteroatom dopants, sCD still contains many defects according to the D-band in the Raman spectrum, confirming its amorphous carbon morphology. In addition to C–C features, mCD also displayed stretching modes around 1250 and 1550 cm−1, attributable to C–N vibrations, and C=O stretching around 1730 cm−1, suggesting the existence of N and O moieties in graphite structure (Fig. 1e)40,43, consistent with the use of urea and citric acid precursors. The peaks around 2250–2550 cm−1 are attributed to adsorbed CO2 from the air. CN demonstrates a typical spectrum of carbon nitride15, exhibiting stretching and bending modes of nitrogen-containing heterocycles from 1000–1750 cm−1, and the broad feature at 3250 cm−1 is assigned to stretching modes of –NH– groups. X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS, Supplementary Fig. 2) again confirmed the co-existence of N (NHx, C–N–C) and O species (C=O, C–O) in mCD and mCD/CN. After loading of both carbon-dots, the colours of samples changed obviously from pale yellow (CN) to dark brown (mCD/CN) or orange (sCD/CN). UV-visible spectra confirmed that both carbon-dots have a generally stronger absorption than CN in the visible region to 600–700 nm (Fig. 1f), commonly observed on carbon nanomaterials38. Taking into account the graphite backbone confirmed by XRD, TEM, Raman and FTIR, we can conclude that mCD is N, O-doped graphite dots, which is more crystalline compared to the amorphous sCD, hence shows somewhat increased visible-light absorption.

Charge carrier dynamics of all samples

As discussed above, two major obstacles hindering sustainable light-driven CO2 reduction by water are (i) the intrinsic weak reduction potential of water and (ii) the lack of fundamental understandings of charge carrier dynamics of co-catalysts. Most of the reported CDs promote reduction process as an electron acceptor while very few are distinguished as an advantageous hole acceptor for efficient water oxidation. Therefore, to understand the role of different carbon-dots, we investigated the charge transfer kinetics of CN, mCD/CN and sCD/CN samples after synthesis and characterisation. TAS, a powerful technique to elucidate the charge carrier dynamics of photocatalysts, was used to experimentally determine the electron-hole dynamics of mCD/CN and sCD/CN nanocomposite at µs-s timescales. Photoexcitation of CN alone yields a broad absorption spanning from 450 to 1000 nm, which peaks near 700 nm (Fig. 2a, dashed line). In order to determine the nature of the excited states, we first measured the TAS spectra of CN with and without Ag+ ions, a well-known efficient electron scavenger which can yield long-lived holes. Kinetic traces probed at 510 and 700 nm (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b) show that in the presence of Ag+ electron scavenger the amplitude at 700 nm decreases but the 510 nm signal enhances and features a longer-lived species. Therefore, the signal observed at 510 nm is mainly assigned to photogenerated holes in CN and the broad photoinduced signal observed at 700 nm is assigned to photogenerated electrons in CN, similar to previous observations on CN13.

Fig. 2: TAS measurements of CN, mCD/CN and sCD/CN.

Diffuse reflectance TAS spectra for samples with (ac) and without (df) 10 mM AgNO3. CN (ad), mCD/CN (be) and sCD/CN (cf) were dispersed in aqueous solution. The change of signal amplitude at 700 nm indicates it should be mainly assigned to the electron signal in CN and mCD improves the charge separation on CN due to hole transfer from CN to mCD. g μs-TAS decay kinetics of CN, mCD/CN and sCD/CN in water monitored at 700 nm and excited by pulsed 355 nm excitation (460 μJ/cm2) and h fitted α parameters indicated in the same color as the associated trace. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Turning to the CD/CN nanocomposites, the TAS spectra of mCD/CN (Fig. 2b) resemble that of the CN rather than the isolated mCD (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Moreover, the change in collected probe light is on the order of 1% for both the mCD/CN and CN, while it is on the order of 0.005% for mCD. These considerations indicate that TAS predominantly probes CN, and the main feature observed for the mCD/CN nanocomposite remains that of electrons localised in CN. Compared to the results with CN, the amplitude of the 700 nm feature (electron signals in CN) is higher (increasing from 1.25 to 1.5%) in the case of mCD/CN (Fig. 2b), suggesting that more efficient charge separation increases the number of long-lived electrons localised on CN at these timescales. The increased electron signal in CN indicates that holes were efficiently extracted from CN to mCD. In contrast, sCD/CN shows a smaller signal amplitude than pure CN (decreasing from 1.25 to 0.95% at 700 nm) throughout the probed window, inferring electron transfer from CN to sCD. The addition of AgNO3 does not affect the signal (Fig. 2c,f), suggesting that electrons were already effectively extracted from CN by sCD.

The half-life time (for an initial time t0 = 2 µs) of the signal observed at 700 nm increases over 6-fold from 25 µs (CN) to 160 µs (mCD/CN) (Fig. 2g), indicating suppressed electron-hole recombination due to charge separation across the mCD/CN junction. A long-lived shoulder near 550 nm for sCD/CN was also noted, in line with the 510 nm feature of holes residing in CN. A slight increase in t50% (from 25 to 40 µs) compared to bare CN (Fig. 2g) was attributed to the separation of charges by sCD. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis of the extraction of electrons from CN by sCD. The μs-TAS decay at 700 nm is well represented by a power law of the form Itα, as evidenced by the linear decay on a log–log plot, indicating a trapping-detrapping dynamics (Fig. 2h)13. Briefly, we have identified the desired hole-accepting mCD co-catalyst in the mCD/CN composite. Different functions of two CDs could be seen for charge separation, and the specific CD/CN interaction can influence the direction of charge transfer.

Photocatalytic CO2 conversion to methanol

After identification of the different structures and physical functions of these junctions, the activity of the photocatalysts for reduction of CO2 in pure water was evaluated under 1 bar of CO2 at room temperature under visible-light irradiation (λ > 420 nm; see Supplementary Figs. 68 for raw data and calibration curve).

The mCD/CN nanocomposite, which contained hole-accepting mCD, exhibits a remarkably enhanced activity towards the production of methanol and oxygen from CO2 photoreduction with water as the only electron donor (Fig. 3a). The concentration of mCD was optimised to 3.5% wt (Supplementary Fig. 5a), presumably, to balance light absorption and reaction sites for water oxidation since further increases in the mCD concentration lowers the photoactivity. The yields of both methanol and CO on mCD (3.5)/CN increase nearly linearly over time (Supplementary Fig. 5b) and the average production rates are 13.9 and 0.05 µmol/g/h, showing a ~99.6 ± 0.2% (calculated from three consecutive runs) selectivity towards methanol. Moreover, O2 is evolved as the only oxidation product, and the evolved amount increases linearly with the reaction time, similar to the production profile of CO and methanol (Supplementary Fig. 5b). The ratio of O2 to methanol is about 1.45:1, very close to the expected stoichiometric ratio of 1.5:1 when assuming all generated electrons reduce CO2 to methanol and all holes oxidise water to O2. Neither H2 nor oxidation products other than O2 were detected. The evolution of stoichiometric O2 again confirms the significance of the unique function of hole-accepting mCD.

Fig. 3: Photocatalytic CO2 conversion to methanol.

The photocatalytic activity of a mCD/CN and b sCD/CN measured under visible light (λ > 420 nm). c Control experiments on mCD, sCD, CN, mCD/CN and sCD/CN. Error bar: mCD/CN 13.9 ± 1.7 µmol/g/h, sCD/CN 1.2 ± 0.2 µmol/g/h. d Mass spectra of the product 13CH3OH from 13CO2 photoconversion by the mCD/CN photocatalyst. Inset: the mass spectra of the 13CO from 13CO2 photoconversion over the mCD/CN photocatalyst. e Consecutive three runs of CO2 photoconversion to methanol on mCD/CN under visible light. f IQY of mCD/CN measured at atmospheric pressure under nearly one sun irradiation condition. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

On the contrary, sCD as a reduction co-catalyst was also optimised to a 3% loading on CN to form sCD/CN, which only produces the two-electron product CO instead of the six-electron product methanol, together with negligible O2 gas (Fig. 3b). This is not surprising because CN itself can hardly produce oxygen in the absence of hole-accepting co-catalysts and sCD here is an electron acceptor as proved by our TAS results, which facilitate CO2 reduction to CO. A similar CD/g-C3N4 junction was previously reported for CO2 reduction to CO and others30. A tiny amount of generated O2 might also be dissolved in water, consumed via back reactions or below the detection limit of GC. In total, the photocatalytic activity of mCD/CN is ca. 12 times higher than sCD/CN for CO2 reduction under identical experimental conditions.

Several control experiments were also performed (Fig. 3c): (i) without a CO2 feed (for mCD/CN nanocomposite), (ii) in the absence of a photocatalyst and (iii) with a lack of light. Under these conditions, the production of both CO and methanol were negligible, indicating that the CN and mCD could not be decomposed to the products under irradiation. Also, mCD or pure CN showed nearly zero activity. The physical mixture of mCD and CN was also tested and showed no evident activity compared to pure CN, which also supports that a strong interaction between mCD/CN was only prepared in situ by microwave heating and is crucial for CO2 photoreduction.

Isotopic measurement is crucial to avoid misleading information because inevitable organic impurities in carbon-based catalysts can possibly be oxidised to hydrocarbons (e.g., methanol or other organic products). To further confirm the conversion of CO2, the photoreduction of 13C-labeled CO2 was conducted over the mCD/CN photocatalyst. Dominant peaks of 13CO (m/z = 29) and 13CH3OH+ (m/z = 33) were observed at m/z = 29, 32 and 33, which were assigned to 13CO, 13CH3OH+ and fragments of 13CH3O+ produced during the MS measurement (Fig. 3d). The evidence indicates that the evolved products originate from the photoreduction of 13CO2.

Three consecutive runs were then carried out over the mCD/CN photocatalyst (Fig. 3e) to investigate its stability. The CO and methanol evolution rates did not show noticeable changes, indicating the excellent stability of the nanocomposite. For comparison with other reported systems, quantum yield (QY) is the more preferable and more reliable metric to evaluate one material’s property rather than activity, since the total production rate is highly dependent on the experimental conditions9. The IQY (Fig. 3f) of the optimised mCD/CN photocatalyst was measured to be 2.1% at λ = 420 nm, 0.7% at λ = 500 nm and 0.4% at even λ = 600 nm under 1 bar conditions at room temperature, which is over an order of magnitude higher than that recently reported for CN (0.076% at 420 nm)30. The IQYs at longer wavelengths might be due to the light absorption of mCD or mCD/CN interfacial states as CN could not harvest 500–600 nm photons by itself. Long-lived TAS signal attributed to charges is observed in the mCD/CN composite but not with CN alone under 600 nm excitation (Supplementary Fig. 4). Therefore, water has been successfully used as the sole electron source in the photoreduction of CO2, and for the first time, methanol was produced with nearly unity selectivity in one step under visible-light.

To further demonstrate the improved properties of the mCD/CN composite, we prepared and tested photoelectrodes. The photocurrent of mCD/CN photoanode is approximately twice higher than that of the CN photoanode (Supplementary Fig. 5c), demonstrating the improved separation efficiency of photoexcited charge carriers in mCD/CN and nature of hole acceptor of mCD, which agrees with the results of CO2 photoconversion. To better understand the photophysical characteristics of photoinduced charge carriers in photocatalysts, the ns-level time-resolved fluorescence of mCD/CN and CN were measured (Supplementary Fig. 5d). The mCD/CN presents slower decay kinetics compared with pure CN, namely, the photogenerated charge carriers in mCD/CN live longer than those generated by CN. The average lifetimes of the carriers (τavg) were determined to be ~15.3 and 13.3 ns for mCD/CN and CN according to the fitting calculation, respectively, supporting better electron transfer and higher charge separation efficiency in mCD/CN.

It seems ideal that methanol, a highly desirable product from CO2 conversion, has been produced with near-unity selectivity and remains intact. This is particularly remarkable because methanol is among the most commonly used holes scavengers for hydrogen production from water as it is easily and rapidly oxidised (~10 ns timescale), as mentioned above. How can methanol be conserved as an inert product in a photocatalytic system which generates holes continuously? To elucidate the high selectivity of the mCD/CN junction for H2O oxidation and methanol production, we employed theoretical calculations of adsorption energy based on Density Functional Theory (DFT). The calculations were carried out using the Vienna ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP)44. To mimic the structure of the mCD, the model (Supplementary Fig. 9c) consisting of a coronene (Supplementary Fig. 9a) with a pyrene (Supplementary Fig. 9b) on the top was placed in a 20 × 20 × 10 Å3 box. Two nano-flakes were symmetrically mass-centred with a relaxed interlayer distance of 3.37 Å, consistent with the XRD and HRTEM observation (Fig. 1a,c). This model has been proven effective to mimic the CD (Supplementary Fig. 9a–c)39. For the CN, we have adopted the structures used in the previous calculations (Supplementary Fig. 9d,e)22. Detailed computational settings are illustrated in the SI.

The adsorption energy, Ead, was calculated according to

$$E_{{\mathrm{ad}}} = E_{{\mathrm{total}}} - \left( {E_{{\mathrm{adsorbate}}} + E_{{\mathrm{adsorbent}}}} \right)$$

where Etotal, Eadsorbate and Eadsorbent represent the energies of the absorbing system, the adsorbate and the adsorbent at equilibrium configurations, respectively. According to the calculated adsorption energy of the most stable configurations (Supplementary Tables 3 and 5), both CO2 and more importantly CH3OH bind more favourably to CN rather than mCD (Fig. 4a left and middle). On the contrary, H2O molecules prefer to be absorbed on the surface of mCD instead of CN (Fig. 4a right). According to the TAS results and calculations of Ead on mCD/CN, CN maintains electrons and adsorb CO2, while mCD selectively accepts holes and absorbs H2O. Hence for the mCD/CN composite, CO2 is reduced by photoelectrons on CN and photoholes on mCD are preferably used to oxidise H2O instead of methanol. Based on the above results, a pathway of visible-light-driven CO2 photoconversion on mCD/CN has been proposed in Fig. 4b. Electron-hole pairs are generated in CN under visible-light excitation. Photoelectrons accumulate on the surface of CN where CO2 reduction to CH3OH occurs, while photoholes transfer from CN to the surface of mCD to oxidise H2O into O2. On the other hand, for sCD/CN, CO2 reduction takes place on electron-accepting sCD to produce CO while the holes on CN relatively slowly oxidise H2O molecules or oxidise methanol if produced. Thus, CO could come from both direct reduction of CO2 and the subsequent oxidation of methanol, which is difficult to distinguish in this case.

Fig. 4: The fundamental understanding of the high selectivity to methanol.

a Adsorption energies and the most stable configurations of CO2 and CH3OH on CN and H2O on mCD. b Schematic diagram of photocatalytic CO2 reduction by the mCD/CN and sCD/CN. The band bending between catalysts and water/CO2 is not drawn. c The CH3OH oxidation test on CN and mCD/CN under visible light. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To confirm the compatibility of methanol with mCD/CN to rationalise the high selectivity to methanol experimentally, we directly tested the oxidation of methanol by mCD/CN and CN. Figure 4c shows that under visible-light, methanol can be readily oxidised to CO by photoholes of pure CN, which might be the reason why there is no methanol produced by sCD/CN. Interestingly, in the mCD/CN system, no CO was detected, consistent with the theoretical calculations that methanol could not be readily adsorbed on the surface of mCD where holes accumulate, and photooxidation of water occurs. Therefore, the mCD possesses the unique functions of selectively accepting photoholes as well as selectively absorbing water instead of methanol. Hence, the desired hole-accepting carbon-dots co-catalysts have been successfully developed to utilise water as the only electron donor in CO2 conversion and guarantees near unity selectivity of methanol. The origin of its superior performance has been rationalised by modelling as well as experiments.


For sCD, its amorphous carbon nature indicates a mixture of sp2 and sp3 species45. Hence the charge transfer is less efficient than pure sp2 hybrid of the graphite structure (mCD), which partially explains why the mCD shows a larger enhancement of lifetime of charges. Holes on CN could not intrinsically oxidise water in the absence of co-catalysts. The activity of O2 production is thus negligible and CO2 reduction is not efficient due to fast charge recombination in sCD/CN and poor hole activity. On the other hand, mCD/CN favours electron accumulation on the surface of CN due to efficient hole transfer to mCD, which facilitates a multi-electron reduction process to produce methanol instead of CO. Therefore, this study demonstrates the superiority of the design of hole-accepting co-catalysts mCD to the widely reported electron acceptor sCD in promoting the reaction of CO2 reduction to higher-value chemicals.

To summarise, through TAS investigations over six orders of magnitude in time on carbon-based nano architectures, we observe that sCD work as an electron acceptor in sCD/CN, while mCD serves as a notable hole acceptor in mCD/CN after excitation. Charge separation across the CD/CN interface increases the lifetime of the charge carriers from 25 µs (CN) to 160 µs (mCD/CN) or only 40 µs (sCD/CN) and enhances participation in subsequent CO2 conversion. The differences in photophysical functions of CDs result in the differences in both conversion efficiency and more importantly, selectivity. sCD/CN junction converts CO2 into CO while the mCD/CN junction could unprecedentedly and selectively reduce CO2 to methanol, which has been further confirmed by 13C labelling with nearly unity selectivity. Furthermore, the mCD/CN composite is c.a. 12  times more active than sCD/CN for CO2 conversion observed under the same experimental conditions.

Such mCD show more favourable water adsorption yet unfavourable methanol adsorption compared to CN, thus facilitating selective oxidation of water to O2 while avoiding unproductive oxidation of the photoreduction product, methanol. Therefore, the uncommon mCD co-catalyst is a crucial reason for such high selectivity of CO2 reduction to methanol using water as the only reductant. Overall, electrons reach the surface of CN and possess enough chemical potential to reduce CO2, together with protons, to produce methanol with an exceptional 99.6 ± 0.2% selectivity and high IQY of 2.1% at 420 nm and benchmark IQY at 500 and 600 nm (0.7 and 0.4%, respectively). The unique function of hole-accepting carbon-dots should not only excite broad interest in selective photocatalytic oxidation in organic synthesis and environmental purification but also be potentially useful for promoting charge transfer in photovoltaics, photoelectrochemical devices and light-emitting diodes. This work paves a metal-free avenue to the sustainable production of methanol, which is among the most promising hydrogen sources for fuel cells.


Materials preparations

All chemical reagents were analytical grade and were used without further purification. Citric acid, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), urea, dicyandiamide, methanol, dichloromethane were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company Ltd. Deionised water used in all the experiments has a resistivity of 18.1 MΩ·cm.

CN Nanosheets

Dicyandiamide (2 g) in a closed crucible was heated at 500 °C for 4 h in static air with a ramp rate of 5 °C/min. The yellow solid agglomerates were milled into powders using an agate mortar. 0.5 g of this as-prepared powders were placed on a ceramic plate and heated at 500 °C for 4 h in air with a ramp rate of 10 °C/min. Then, the CN nanosheets with light yellow colour were finally obtained. This CN nanosheets sample was named CN.

Carbon-dots via microwave method (mCD)

The citric acid (3 g, 15.6 mmol) and urea (1 g, 16.7 mmol) were added into 8 ml deionised water in a beaker and vigorously stirred to form a transparent solution. This beaker containing solution was then moved into the microwave oven and heated for 10 min under the power mode of 600 W. During the reaction, the solution changed from a colourless liquid to a dark brown porous solid, which indicates the CD was finally produced46. The solid product was then put into an oven and dried at 80 °C for 10 h to remove the small residual molecules. The suspension of the crude CD was purified in a centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 1 h to remove large or agglomerated particles. The final brown aqueous solution was eluted with a mixture of methanol and dichloromethane at ratios of 1:2 and 1:1 (v/v) to obtain mCD. At last, the resulting mCD were dried into solid powders.

mCD/CN nanocomposite

Dicyandiamide (2 g) and x mg of mCD obtained above (x = 30, 50, 70 and 90, equal to w.t. 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5% to dicyandiamide precursor) were added to 10 mL of DMF and stirred for 1 h; then the liquid was dried at 60 °C for 10 h to completely evaporate DMF. The resulting mixture was placed into a crucible with a cover and annealed at 500 °C in the air for 4 h with a ramping rate of 5 °C/min. The brown solid was washed with DI water and dried at 80 °C, then milled into powders with an agate mortar. A concentration of 0.5 g of powders was placed on a ceramic plate and heated at 500 °C for 4 h in air with a ramp rate of 10 °C/min. Finally, the mCD/CN nanocomposite was obtained. The samples were denoted as mCD(n)/CN (n = 1.5, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5) by the weight percentage of carbon-dots in the precursor.

Carbon-dots via sonication method (sCD)

Glucose (18 g) was dissolved in 200 mL 0.5 M NaOH solution before ultrasonication for 2 h30. A dark brown solution was gradually formed, implying the successful production of the CD. The crude solution was neutralised to pH = 7 using 0.1 M HCl. The suspension of the crude CD was washed by deionised water and purified in a centrifuge at 8000 rpm for 1 h to remove large or agglomerated particles. At last, the resulting sCD were dried into solid powders.

sCD/CN nanocomposite

Pure CN (1 g) was dispersed in 200 mL of 0.5 M HCl and ultrasonicated for 4 h at room temperature before repeated wash with deionised water and centrifugation to remove excess HCl30. Lastly, the protonated CN was dried in an oven overnight at 70 °C and then ground into powder. Next, 1 g protonated CN and an optimal 3% w.t. of CD sample was dispersed in 100 mL of deionised water and sonicated for 15 min and stirred vigorously at room temperature for 30 min. The mixture was then subjected to hydrothermal treatment in a Teflon-sealed autoclave with stirring at 120 °C for 4 h to form the sCD/CN nanocomposite.


The morphologies and structures of the samples were characterised by HRTEM using an FEI Titan Themis microscope, operated at 200 kV. UV/Vis spectra were carried out on a Shimadzu UV/Vis 2550 spectrophotometer with an integrating sphere device at RT and transformed to the absorption spectra according to the Kubelka-Munk relation. XPS measurements were recorded by using a Thermo Scientific XPS spectrometer. Time-resolved fluorescence emission spectra were carried out at room temperature with a Fluorescence spectrophotometer (Edinburgh Instruments, FLSP-920) monitoring at 470 nm (excitation wavelength of 330 nm). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured by a PANalytical X’pert MPD Pro diffractometer operated at 40 kV and 40 mA using Ni-filtered Cu-Kα irradiation (Wavelength 1.5406 Å). ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was performed using a Perkin-Elmer 1605 FTIR spectrometer in the wavenumber range of 500–4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 0.5 cm−1. Raman spectroscopic measurements were performed on a Renishaw InVia Raman Microscope, using a 325 nm excitation laser and a wavenumber range of 100–2000 cm−1.

Photocatalysis measurement

Before the photocatalytic reduction of CO2, 10 mg photocatalyst and 10 mL water were added into a septum-sealed borosilicate glass reactor with a volume of 140 mL. Then, the reactor was purged with CO2 for the photoreduction experiment. A 300 W Xe lamp (Newport) was utilised as a light source, and the light output power was measured by a Newport 918-D calibrated photodetector. During the reaction, the products were analysed by GC (Varian GC-450) with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD, connected to a molecular sieve column) and a flame ionisation detector (FID, connected to a CP-SIL 5CB capillary column) containing a methanizer equipment. Ar gas was used as the GC carrier gas.

For the isotope-trace experiment, the same photocatalytic process was applied except 13CO2 (13C 99%, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as the feed gas. The products containing C-isotope were analysed by GC–MS (Shimadzu QP-2010SE) with a molecular sieve 5 Å capillary column (for CO) or a Rxi-624Sil MS capillary column (for methanol). He gas was used as a carrier gas during the measurement.

The CH3OH oxidation conditions: 10 ml H2O, 0.12 µmol MeOH, 10 mg mCD/CN photocatalyst, 300 W Xenon lamp irradiation with 420 nm long-pass filter in 1 bar Argon atmosphere.

Fabrication of film electrodes and electrochemical measurements

A total of 10 mg photocatalyst and 10 μL Nafion solution (5 wt%) were dispersed in a water/methanol mixture (1 mL, 1:1 v/v). After sonication treatment for at least 2 h, the mixture formed a homogeneous catalyst colloid. Before the measurements, the catalyst colloid (200 μL) was deposited on an FTO conductive glass with an area of ~1 cm2 to form the working electrode. The photocurrent was measured using three electrodes at 1 V bias voltage, of which Ag/AgCl and Pt net electrodes were used as the reference and counter electrodes, respectively. The electrolyte was 1 M NaSO4 aqueous solution degassed with Ar.

Calculation of internal quantum efficiency

The internal quantum yields for CD/CN photocatalyst was measured using the same experimental setup as the photocatalysis measurement, with a bandpass filter (λ = 420, 500, or 600 nm). The average intensity of irradiation after the 420, 500, and 600 nm bandpass filter was 221, 347, and 398 µW/cm2, respectively (calculated by five points measured in the beam).

$${\mathrm{Absorption}}_{\mathrm{t}} = 100{\mathrm{\% }} \times \frac{{ - \Delta T_{\mathrm{t}}}}{{T_0}} = 100{\mathrm{\% }} \times \frac{{ - \left( {T_{\mathrm{t}} - T_0} \right)}}{{T_0}} = - 100{\mathrm{\% }} \times \left( {10^{ - A} - 1} \right)$$

The absorbed light density is 110.9, 134.5, and 132.7 µW/cm2 (for λ=420, 500, or 600 nm, respectively). For the photocatalytic reaction, 10 mg CD/CN photocatalysts were dispersed into 10 ml DI water. The measurement was carried out under a 300 W Xe lamp with the bandpass filter for 4 h. The amount of CO and CH3OH is 0.00083 and 0.235, 0.00025, and 0.114 µmol, and 0.00010 and 0.074 µmol for 420, 500, and 600 nm bandpass filters, respectively. Also, the irradiation area of the reactor is ~12 cm2. Thus, the IQYs at 420, 500, and 600 nm is c.a. 2.1, 0.7, and 0.4%, respectively.

The internal quantum yields are defined by the following equation

$${\mathrm{IQY}} = \frac{{{\mathrm{number}}\,{\mathrm{of}}\,{\mathrm{reacted}}\,{\mathrm{electron}}}}{{{\mathrm{number}}\,{\mathrm{of}}\,{\mathrm{absorbed}}\,{\mathrm{photon}}}} \times 100{\mathrm{\% }}$$

Two electrons are consumed per CO molecule evolved, and six electrons are consumed per CH3OH molecule evolved according to reaction (3) or (4).

$${\mathrm{CO}}_2 + 2{\mathrm{e}}^ - + 2{\mathrm{H}}^ + \to {\mathrm{CO}} + {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$
$${\mathrm{CO}}_2 + 6{\mathrm{e}}^ - + 6{\mathrm{H}}^ + \to {\mathrm{CH}}_3{\mathrm{OH}} + {\mathrm{H}}_2{\mathrm{O}}$$

As a result, the internal quantum efficiency can be estimated by the equation:

$${\mathrm{IQY}} = \frac{{{{N}}_{{\mathrm{CO}}} \times 2 \times N_{\mathrm{A}} + {{N}}_{{\mathrm{MeOH}}} \times 6 \times N_{\mathrm{A}}}}{{{{H}}_{\mathrm{a}} \times {{A}} \times \frac{\lambda }{{hc}} \times t}}$$

where NCO is the amount of CO after 4 h reaction, NMeOH is the amount of CH3OH after 4 h reaction, NA is the Avogadro’s number, Ha is the average intensity of absorbed light, obtained by the subtraction of the transmitted intensity from the incident intensity. A is the irradiation area (12 cm2), h is the Planck’s constant, c is the speed of light, λ is the wavelength of the incident light, t is the time.

Data Availability

The source data underlying Figs. 1a,d–f, 2a–h, 3a–f and 4a,c and Supplementary Figs 2a–d, 3a–c, 4 and 5a–d are provided as a Source Data file.


  1. 1.

    Hansen, J. E. Scientific reticence and sea level rise. Environ. Res. Lett. 2, 024002 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Seneviratne, S. I., Donat, M. G., Pitman, A. J., Knutti, R. & Wilby, R. L. Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature 529, 477 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Forkel, M. et al. Enhanced seasonal CO2 exchange caused by amplified plant productivity in northern ecosystems. Science 351, 696–699 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Blankenship, R. E. et al. Comparing photosynthetic and photovoltaic efficiencies and recognizing the potential for improvement. Science 332, 805–809 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Inoue, T., Fujishima, A., Konishi, S. & Honda, K. Photoelectrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide in aqueous suspensions of semiconductor powders. Nature. 277, 637 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Tang, J., Durrant, J. R. & Klug, D. R. Mechanism of photocatalytic water splitting in TiO2. reaction of water with photoholes, importance of charge carrier dynamics, and evidence for four-hole chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 13885–13891 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sakimoto, K. K., Wong, A. B. & Yang, P. Self-photosensitization of nonphotosynthetic bacteria for solar-to-chemical production. Science. 351, 74–77 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Rao, H. L., Schmidt, C., Bonin, J. & Robert, M. Visible-light-driven methane formation from CO2 with a molecular iron catalyst. Nature. 548, 74–77 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wang, Y. et al. Current understanding and challenges of solar-driven hydrogen generation using polymeric photocatalysts. Nat. Energy 4, 746–760 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Huang, C. et al. Carbon-doped BN nanosheets for metal-free photoredox catalysis. Nat. Comm. 6, 7698 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Shi, L., Wang, T., Zhang, H., Chang, K. & Ye, J. Electrostatic self-assembly of nanosized carbon nitride nanosheet onto a zirconium metal–organic framework for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 5360–5367 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wei, J. et al. A controllable synthesis of rich nitrogen-doped ordered mesoporous carbon for CO2 capture and supercapacitors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 2322–2328 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Godin, R., Wang, Y., Zwijnenburg, M. A., Tang, J. & Durrant, J. R. Time-resolved spectroscopic investigation of charge trapping in carbon nitrides photocatalysts for hydrogen generation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5216–5224 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lau, V. W.-H et al. Urea-Modified carbon nitrides: enhancing photocatalytic hydrogen evolution by rational defect engineering. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1602251 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Martin, D. J. et al. Highly efficient photocatalytic H2 evolution from water using visible light and structure‐controlled graphitic carbon nitride. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 9240–9245 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kang, Y. et al. An amorphous carbon nitride photocatalyst with greatly extended visible‐light‐responsive range for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Adv. Mater. 27, 4572–4577 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu, J. et al. Metal-free efficient photocatalyst for stable visible water splitting via a two-electron pathway. Science 347, 970–974 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Chen, J., Shen, S., Guo, P., Wu, P. & Guo, L. Spatial engineering of photo-active sites on g-C3N4 for efficient solar hydrogen generation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 4605–4612 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Li, Q. et al. Facile synthesis of porous carbon nitride spheres with hierarchical three-dimensional mesostructures for CO2 capture. Nano Res. 3, 632–642 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang, Y. et al. Bandgap Engineering of Organic Semiconductors for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 1801084, (2018).

  21. 21.

    Li, H., Zhang, X. & MacFarlane, D. R. Carbon quantum dots/cu2o heterostructures for solar-light-driven conversion of CO2 to methanol. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401077 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Martindale, B. C. M. et al. Enhancing light absorption and charge transfer efficiency in carbon dots through graphitization and core nitrogen doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 6459–6463 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Iwase, A., Ng, Y. H., Ishiguro, Y., Kudo, A. & Amal, R. Reduced graphene oxide as a solid-state electron mediator in Z-scheme photocatalytic water splitting under visible light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11054–11057 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Wu, X. et al. Control strategy on two-/four-electron pathway of water splitting by multidoped carbon based catalysts. ACS Catal. 7, 1637–1645 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Li, H. et al. Water-soluble fluorescent carbon quantum dots and photocatalyst design. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 4430–4434 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gupta, V. et al. Luminscent graphene quantum dots for organic photovoltaic devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 9960–9963 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kwon, W., Lee, G., Do, S., Joo, T. & Rhee, S.-W. Size-controlled soft-template synthesis of carbon nanodots toward versatile photoactive materials. Small 10, 506–513 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Li, X., Rui, M., Song, J., Shen, Z. & Zeng, H. Carbon and graphene quantum dots for optoelectronic and energy devices: a review. Adv. Funct. Mater. 25, 4929–4947 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lim, S. Y., Shen, W. & Gao, Z. Carbon quantum dots and their applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 362–381 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ong, W.-J. et al. Unravelling charge carrier dynamics in protonated g-C3N4 interfaced with carbon nanodots as co-catalysts toward enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction: A combined experimental and first-principles DFT study. Nano Res. 10, 1673–1696 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lin, L. et al. Low-temperature hydrogen production from water and methanol using Pt/α-MoC catalysts. Nature 544, 80 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ohno, T., Murakami, N., Koyanagi, T. & Yang, Y. Photocatalytic reduction of CO2 over a hybrid photocatalyst composed of WO3 and graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) under visible light. J. CO2 Util. 6, 17–25 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Simon, T. et al. Redox shuttle mechanism enhances photocatalytic H2 generation on Ni-decorated CdS nanorods. Nat. Mater. 13, 1013 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li, Y. et al. Pitch-derived amorphous carbon as high performance anode for sodium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Mater. 2, 139–145 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Hu, C. et al. One-step preparation of nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots from oxidized debris of graphene oxide. J. Mater. Chem. B 1, 39–42 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Qu, L., Liu, Y., Baek, J.-B. & Dai, L. Nitrogen-doped graphene as efficient metal-free electrocatalyst for oxygen reduction in fuel cells. ACS Nano. 4, 1321–1326 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Wang, Y. et al. Linker-controlled polymeric photocatalyst for highly efficient hydrogen evolution from water. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 1643–1651 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Li, M. et al. Graphene with atomic-level in-plane decoration of h-BN domains for efficient photocatalysis. Chem. Mater. 29, 2769–2776 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Choi, C. H., Chung, M. W., Kwon, H. C., Park, S. H. & Woo, S. I. B, N- and P, N-doped graphene as highly active catalysts for oxygen reduction reactions in acidic media. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 3694–3699 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Gong, Y. et al. Direct chemical conversion of graphene to boron- and nitrogen- and carbon-containing atomic layers. Nat. Commun. 5, 3193 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ferrari, A. C., Rodil, S. E. & Robertson, J. Interpretation of infrared and Raman spectra of amorphous carbon nitrides. Phys. Rev. B 67, 155306 (2003).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Larkin, P. J., Makowski, M. P. & Colthup, N. B. The form of the normal modes of s-triazine: infrared and Raman spectral analysis and ab initio force field calculations. Spectrochim. Acta A 55, 1011–1020 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Yang, X. et al. Superparamagnetic graphene oxide-Fe3O4nanoparticles hybrid for controlled targeted drug carriers. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 2710–2714 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Putri, L. K., Ong, W.-J., Chang, W. S. & Chai, S.-P. Heteroatom doped graphene in photocatalysis: a review. Appl. Surf. Sci. 358, 2–14 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Qu, S., Wang, X., Lu, Q., Liu, X. & Wang, L. A biocompatible fluorescent ink based on water-soluble luminescent carbon nanodots. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 12215–12218 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


X.L., K.B.M., J.T. acknowledge EPSRC (EP/S018204/2/1), Leverhulme Trust (Grant No: RPG-2017-122) and Newton Advanced Fellowship grant ((NA170422 and NAF\R1\191163).). X.H., Z.X.G. and S.A.S. acknowledge UCL Grace High-Performance Computing Facility (Grace@UCL) and EPSRC (EP/K021192/1, EP/L018330/1). R.G. thanks the FRQNT for postdoctoral funding and NSERC for operational funding. Y.W., J.C. and C.J., acknowledge CSC Scholarship. R.G., J.F.T. and J.R.D. acknowledge ERC AdG Intersolar grant (291482). J.F.T. acknowledges EPSRC CDT (EP/L015277/1). W.Z. thanks EPSRC for Titan Themis S/TEM microscope (EP/L017008/01). We also thank Dr. Jijia Xie for constructive comments on experimental design.

Author information




J.T. conceived and supervised the entire project. Y.W and X.L. prepared the materials and carried out the photocatalytic activity tests and nano junctions’ characterisations. X.H., S.A.S. and Z.G. carried out the simulation and coordinated the whole version. R.G., J.F.T. and J.R.D. carried out the TAS measurements and analysis. C.J. repeated the nano junction synthesis and carried out the methanol oxidation test. K.B.M. did TEM and FTIR analysis. J.C. and W.Z. performed HRTEM characterisation. Y.W., X.L., X.H, R.G wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to discussion and revisions.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Robert Godin or Zhengxiao Guo or Junwang Tang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Liu, X., Han, X. et al. Unique hole-accepting carbon-dots promoting selective carbon dioxide reduction nearly 100% to methanol by pure water. Nat Commun 11, 2531 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing