Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Endothelial E-selectin inhibition improves acute myeloid leukaemia therapy by disrupting vascular niche-mediated chemoresistance

Abstract

The endothelial cell adhesion molecule E-selectin is a key component of the bone marrow hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) vascular niche regulating balance between HSC self-renewal and commitment. We now report in contrast, E-selectin directly triggers signaling pathways that promote malignant cell survival and regeneration. Using acute myeloid leukemia (AML) mouse models, we show AML blasts release inflammatory mediators that upregulate endothelial niche E-selectin expression. Alterations in cell-surface glycosylation associated with oncogenesis enhances AML blast binding to E-selectin and enable promotion of pro-survival signaling through AKT/NF-κB pathways. In vivo AML blasts with highest E-selectin binding potential are 12-fold more likely to survive chemotherapy and main contributors to disease relapse. Absence (in Sele−/− hosts) or therapeutic blockade of E-selectin using small molecule mimetic GMI-1271/Uproleselan effectively inhibits this niche-mediated pro-survival signaling, dampens AML blast regeneration, and strongly synergizes with chemotherapy, doubling the duration of mouse survival over chemotherapy alone, whilst protecting endogenous HSC.

Introduction

Despite encouraging initial response, hematopoietic malignancies often relapse after therapy. Therapy resistance involves both cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic factors. Up to now most studies have focused on the cell intrinsic properties that enable therapy resistance1. Here, we describe a cell extrinsic niche-based pathway by which adhesion to vascular niche protein E-selectin directly mediates therapy-resistance, using acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as a model.

Malignant cells are known to have a greater survival advantage when lodged in peri-vascular locations2,3, however, the exact interactions mediating this survival advantage remain incompletely understood. The identification and targeting of such protective niche factors are critical to the development of novel strategies to eradicate residual resistant leukemia or cancer stem cells, to improve therapeutic outcomes.

In the bone marrow (BM), endothelial cells are known to form a vascular niche that plays a direct role in the support and regulation of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) quiescence, self-renewal, activation, and homing4,5. We have previously found endothelial (E)-selectin to be a key vascular niche factor involved6.

Selectins are an evolutionarily ancient family of three cell adhesion molecules with a known role in mediating leukocyte rolling and homing to tissues. Two selectins are expressed on activated or inflamed endothelium: E-(endothelial)-selectin and P (platelet and endothelial)-selectin, often together with integrin ligands7. We have reported that adhesion to the endothelial cell-exclusive E-selectin (CD62E) is unique among these adhesion molecules in the regulation of the switch between dormancy and proliferation of HSCs6. When expressed on the BM endothelial niche, HSC contact with E-selectin directly triggers HSC activation and proliferation and induces commitment6. Conversely, absence or therapeutic blockade of E-selectin promotes HSC quiescence, boosting HSC self-renewal potential and chemo-resistance6. Herein we report that in the context of malignancy, E-selectin interactions instead play a direct role in promoting malignant cell survival.

Niche hijack describes how malignant cells manipulate stem cell niches to facilitate their own regeneration and/or survival, at the expense of nonmalignant host stem cells. To investigate vascular niche hijack during malignancy, we took advantage of preclinical mouse models of AML that mimic clinical features of 11q23-gene rearranged mono-myelocytic AML8. These models are generated by retroviral-transduction of murine HSC with human MLL-AF9 (11q23-rearranged) fusion oncogene which are then adoptively transferred into mice8,9.

We demonstrate that adhesion to a single vascular molecule initiates pro-survival signaling in AML blasts and that this niche-mediated therapy-resistance is dependent on receptor fucosylation in AML blasts, which is altered in response to oncogenic transformation10. We find absence (in Sele−/− hosts), or therapeutic blockade of E-selectin (using small molecule antagonist GMI-1271/Uproleselan), at the same time as chemotherapy specifically sensitizes AML regenerating cells (LRC) and significantly improves overall treatment efficacy and mouse survival. These findings describe a potential role for the altered glycosylation, associated with oncogenesis10, and open a new strategy to significantly improve efficacy of therapy for AML and other malignancies by targeting a niche interaction (nichotherapy)11. Based on these data, clinical trials to determine the efficacy of E-selectin blockade (GMI-1271/Uproleselan) in combination with chemotherapy to treat adult AML are now in progress (NCT03701308 and NCT03616470).

Results

BM E-selectin expression increases during AML

E-selectin is a vascular adhesion molecule expressed by endothelial cells following inflammation or injury12. We found cell surface E-selectin expression significantly increased (~eightfold) on BM endothelial cells in mice with AML compared to non-leukemic mice (Fig. 1a–d) and compared to AML in matched Sele−/− hosts (Supplementary Fig. 1a–c). As endothelial E-selectin expression is induced by inflammatory cytokines via NF-κB response elements in the Sele gene promoter12,13,14, these data suggest AML generates inflammation in the BM which directly leads to increased E-selectin surface expression on endothelial cells. To confirm, fresh BM leukocytes from leukemic or healthy non-leukemic mice were cocultured in contact with BM endothelial cell line (BMEC-1) for 16 h, and expression of BMEC-1 cell surface E-selectin measured by flow cytometry. We found cocultures with BM cells from leukemic mice induced 2.5-fold higher E-selectin expression compared to cocultures with matched normal (non-leukemic) BM cells (Fig. 1e, f).

Fig. 1: AML is associated with increased E-selectin expression on BM endothelial cells.
figure1

ad Endosteal BM was collected from mice with advanced GFP+ AML (MLL-AF9 induced, n = 5/group), or no leukemia controls (n = 4/group), stained for E-selectin cell surface expression on viable endothelial cells (7AAD lineageCD45 CD31+ GFP) and analyzed by flow cytometry. a, b Gating strategy for BM endothelial cells from one representative mouse in each group: a Healthy non-leukemic control mouse, b leukemic mouse. c Overlay histogram comparing cell surface E-selectin expression on gated BM endothelial cells from mice with AML (blue line), non-leukemic mouse (black dashed line). Isotype negative control is gray filled. Bar shows E-selectin positive gate. d Histogram showing percent of endothelial cells that are positive for surface E-selectin expression. Each dot represents data from an individual mouse. Bars are mean ± S.D. Statistics: two-tailed t test. e, f BMEC-1 cells were cocultured with TNF-α (positive control for E-selectin activation), or with BM cells from healthy (non-leukemic) or leukemic mice ± TNF-α inhibitor etanercept for 16 h at 37 °C. Cocultured cells were then collected and stained for E-selectin expression on BMEC-1 cell surface and analyzed by flow cytometry. e Gating strategy for E-selectin expression on viable BMEC-1 cells. Shown are viable BMEC-1 gate (left) and surface E-selectin-APC expression (right). Representative dot plot from one well per group. f Histogram representing percentage of BMEC-1 expressing E-selectin after co-culture with medium alone, added BM cells from healthy and from leukemic AML mouse, or BMEC-1 with TNF-α, ± etanercept as indicated. Mean ± S.D. of pooled data from three independent experiments (n = 7,6,8,8,5,5,3,3,3,3 wells/group). Statistical significance calculated by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

AML cells are reported to secrete inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α15,16. TNF-α is known to directly induce E-selectin expression on endothelium12,13,14 (Fig. 1f). To confirm a role for AML-produced TNF-α in the upregulation of E-selectin, the effect of a TNF-α antagonist etanercept was tested in these co-cultures. We found addition of etanercept significantly reduced AML blast-mediated E-selectin expression on endothelial cells (by 41% ± 17%) over endothelial cell alone baseline (Fig. 1e, f). In contrast TNF-α blockade did not alter endothelial E-selectin expression levels in cocultures with non-leukemic BM cells. Together these data show AML produces inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α which activates endothelium resulting in increased E-selectin expression.

AML blasts show increased E-selectin-binding potential

A variety of cell surface glycoproteins and glycolipids may act as E-selectin receptors when appropriately glycosylated to form the sialyl Lewisx/a (sLex/a) carbohydrate structure. For E-selectin binding, putative receptors must be post-transcriptionally regulated via a variety of glycosyl transferases17,18, including α(1,3)-fucosylation of a terminal N-acetyl-d-glucosamine sugar by α(1,3) fucosyl-transferases (FUT), usually FUT7 and/or FUT4 (as well as FUT9 in humans)19,20. One of the hallmarks of malignant transformation is the alterations in cell surface glycosylation, including fucosylation, which often results in a de novo acquisition of E-selectin-binding potential21. De novo, or increased, expression of the FUTs by tumor cells is associated with poorer clinical outcomes22,23,24,25,26,27.

Using fluorescently labeled recombinant human E-selectin–IgM fusion protein6, we found that healthy human CD34+ CD38 HSC display a range of E-selectin binding potentials, whereas primary AML CD34+ CD38 blasts bind strongly (Fig. 2a). In mice, E-selectin binding was similarly heterogeneous on normal lineage-negative CD11b KIT+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) but strongly increased on GFP+ KIT+ MLL-AF9 AML blasts (Fig. 2b). To confirm the importance of fucosyl transferases FUT4 and FUT7 in this adhesive interaction, AML was generated from Fut4/Fut7 double gene-deleted mice. We found complete abrogation of E-selectin-binding-potential when both Fut4 and Fut7 were absent (Supplementary Fig. 2), confirming an absolute requirement of cell surface fucosylation for E-selectin binding.

Fig. 2: E-selectin binding-potential is increased in AML blasts and plays a role in BM retention.
figure2

a Representative Flow cytometry gating strategy for healthy lineage CD34+ CD38 cells (n = 2) compared to patient CD34+ CD38 AML blasts (n = 2) on left, and their E-selectin-binding potential after labell with fluorescent recombinant human E-selectin–IgM on right, b Left panel: Gating strategy for Murine BM HSPC (GFP Lineage CD11b KIT+) and MLL-AF9 AML blasts (GFP+ Lineageneg CD11b+ KIT+) with E-selectin-IgM binding potential (Right panel). Graph shows difference in median florescence intensity (MFI) of E-selectin binding in HSPC from healthy (non-leukemic) hosts, and between non-malignant HSPC and AML blasts within same host. Each linked pair of dots are data from same mouse (n = 5/group, two-tailed paired t test p = 0.0004). c Bolus administration of E-selectin antagonist GMI-1271 in vivo selectively mobilizes a small proportion of AML blasts into the peripheral blood. Left panel; time-course of relative change in GFP+ KIT+ AML blasts circulating in peripheral blood post GMI-1271 (red lines) or saline vehicle injection (gray lines). Each line represents data from an individual mouse (n = 5/group). Expressed as fold above starting (zero time) baseline. Statistics: two-tailed t test; 4 h p = 0.0153; 7 h p = 0.0230; 10 h p = 0.0063; 27 h p = 0.0153. Right panel; HSPC (GFPneg Lineageneg CD11b KIT+) or AML blasts (GFP+Lineageneg CD11b+ KIT+) in peripheral blood. Shown is fold-change at 10 h post injection of GMI-1271 (GMI, red circles) or saline vehicle (gray triangles) above baseline. Each dot represents data from an individual mouse. Mean ± S.D. (n = 5 mice/group). One way-ANOVA multiple comparisons with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Next the potential functional role for the increased E-selectin binding observed on AML blasts was investigated by administration of a single bolus dose of selective small-molecule E-selectin antagonist GMI-1271 to leukemic mice. GMI-1271/Uproleselan is highly specific for E-selectin with IC50 of 2.4 µM for E-selectin-binding compared to >10,000 µM for related P-selectin, 4516 µM for L-selectin and is function-blocking at plasma concentration of 38 µM in patients.

We found administration of GMI-1271 to leukemic mice induced some mobilization of leukemic blasts into peripheral blood to levels three to fourfold above starting levels, that persisted for 24 h when compared to saline injected leukemic controls (Fig. 2c, left). No similar mobilization of non-leukemic endogenous HSPCs was observed following GMI-1271 administration (Fig. 2c, right). These data suggest that E-selectin-mediated interactions may play some role in the retention of AML blasts within the BM niche, but not in HSPC retention. Despite this, when compared to the total number of AML blasts in the BM and spleen of a leukemic mouse, only ~1% of total body AML blast relocated to the peripheral blood following GMI-1271 administration, or in a Sele−/− host (Supplementary Fig. 3). These data suggest that the mobilization of AML blasts in blood following bolus GMI-1271 administration (observed in Fig. 2c) is minor compared to total body (BM/spleen) AML blast numbers, or to the overall variation between mice, and unlikely to significantly impact overall AML therapy response.

Blockade of E-selectin sensitizes AML LRC to chemotherapy

To investigate if E-selectin-mediated adhesion directly promotes therapy-resistance and survival, AML blasts were adhered to immobilized recombinant E- and P-selectin-human IgG1-Fc proteins, as well as to a range of other recombinant adhesion molecules involved in leukocyte homing. Other adhesion molecules tested, include CD31 (platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule, PECAM-1) and CD106 (vascular cell adhesion molecule 1, VCAM-1). We found that adhesion to E-selectin was unique in promoting 4.6-fold (p < 0.001) greater survival of AML blasts to cytarabine treatment in vitro (Fig. 3a). This enhanced chemoresistance was restricted to E-selectin adhesion only and not mediated by adhesion to any of the other leukocyte homing molecules tested, and also specific as it could be inhibited by addition of anti-E-selectin blocking monoclonal antibody RME-1 (Fig. 3a). Similar E-selectin-specific mediated chemoresistance was also observed using human CD34+ AML cell line KG1a (shown later), indicating that this endothelial niche-mediated pro-survival signaling pathway is common between human and mouse AML. In contrast, no similar E-selectin-mediated chemo-resistance was observed in normal BM KIT+ HSPC harvested from non-leukemic mice (Fig. 3b) confirming malignant AML blasts respond differently to E-selectin-adhesion compared to BM HPSC.

Fig. 3: Absence or therapeutic blockade of E-selectin sensitizes AML LRCs to chemotherapy and extends duration of disease-free survival in mice.
figure3

a, b AML cells or non-leukemic Kit+ HSPC from mouse BM were cultured for 3 days with Ara-C in wells precoated with adhesion molecules as indicated. In some wells, E-selectin blocking antibody RME-1 or isotype control added. a Plotted are percentage cell survival compared to matched non-chemotherapy-treated wells. Mean ± SD of pooled data from two experiments (n = 4,10,10,14,14,8,9,9 wells/condition). Statistics: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons Bonferroni correction. b Histogram showing survival of Kit+ AML cells (top panel) compared to healthy (non-leukemic) HSPC (bottom panel) after Ara-C treatment in vitro. Shown as fold-change compared to control (BSA) wells. Mean ± SEM of pooled data from 4 (HSPC) or 5 (AML blasts) independent experiments (n = 5 wells/condition/experiment). Statistics: one-way ANOVA multiple comparisons Bonferroni correction. ce Experimental outline. Mice with advanced MLL-AF9 AML were administered ±GMI-1271 40 mg kg−1 BiD, for 5 days prior to and during 24 h chemotherapy (900 mg kg−1 BiD Ara-C) in wildtype or Sele−/− hosts as indicated. The number of surviving leukemia repopulating cells (LRC) then measured by serial-dilution transplantation of 1%, 0.1%, 0.01% total BM from one femur (n = 5 donors, n = 5 recipients per cell dose). Surviving number of LRC per femur and statistical comparison analysis calculated by Poisson distribution statistics using L-calc software. Shown is calculated LRC per femur ±95% CI. Degrees Freedom 2. c LRC per femur in wildtype versus Sele−/− hosts ±95%CI. d LRC per femur in saline vs. GMI-1271-treated mice ±95%CI. e Frequency regression of AML-negative recipients from (d) as function of transplanted BM cell number. Vehicle injected (black line), GMI-1271-treated mice (red line). Non-chemotherapy treated-mice (blue line). Horizontal dotted gray line is 37.5% threshold used for determining LRC frequency. f Wildtype mice with AML were administered GMI-1271 40 mg kg−1 BiD or saline before and during 5-day induction chemotherapy regimen (doxorubicin 1 mg kg−1 3 d and Ara-C 100 mg kg−1 5 d) and monitored for duration of disease-free survival. Shown is Kaplan Meier curve (n = 8 mice/group). Statistics: Log Rank (Mandel–Cox) survival curve comparison. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

AML has a similar hierarchical structure to normal HSC, with only a small proportion of leukemic blasts (known as LRC) endowed with the functional capacity to regenerate leukemia in vivo28,29. It is only if these rare LRC survive chemotherapy that disease relapses30,31. To investigate whether functional LRC were among those protected by E-selectin-mediated interactions at the BM vascular niche, we developed a quantitative in vivo LRC chemo-sensitivity assay based on the principle of limiting-dilution transplantations, similar to the gold standard assays for enumerating functional HSCs32. Cohorts of E-selectin gene-deleted (Sele/) or GMI-1271-treated, wild-type mice with advanced AML were administered high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) or vehicle control. At 24 h post cytarabine, femoral BM cells were collected and transplanted into cohorts of wild-type recipient mice in limiting dilutions (1%, 0.1%, or 0.01% femoral content). The proportions of recipients that themselves developed leukemia by 4 weeks were then used to calculate frequency and number of chemotherapy-surviving LRCs using Poisson’s distribution statistics (Fig. 3c–e). These studies confirmed that although cytarabine administration reduces total AML burden, (Supplementary Fig. 4) virtually all LRC survive and re-establish the disease (Fig. 3c). However, when E-selectin was absent (in Sele−/− hosts, Fig. 3c) or therapeutically blocked with GMI-1271, (Fig. 3d, e) a four to tenfold reduction of LRC survival was observed. Together these data confirm that E-selectin alone provides significant niche-mediated pro-survival signaling for LRC in vivo.

To determine whether therapeutic E-selectin niche blockade synergized with chemotherapy to boost overall disease-free survival, leukemic mice were administered E-selectin antagonist together with a standard induction chemotherapy regimen (doxorubicin/cytarabine) then monitored for survival (Fig. 3f). Although induction chemotherapy alone significantly enhanced median disease-free survival of mice by 23% over no chemotherapy control (from 22 to 27 days), this further doubled when E-selectin antagonist was co-administered (to median 34 days). Together these data indicate that therapeutically blocking this vascular niche-mediated survival pathway strongly synergizes with conventional AML treatment regimens to improve therapeutic efficacy and extend overall survival.

To further investigate the differences between HSPC and AML response to E-selectin blockade, we investigated how loss of E-selectin binding affects cycling of non-malignant HSPC cells (GFP lineage Sca-1+ KIT+) compared to AML blasts (GFP+ lineage CD11b+ KIT+) within the same host. To this aim, cell cycle analysis was performed by BrdU incorporation and Ki-67 staining in cohorts of E-selectin gene-deleted (Sele/) or wild-type host mice ±GMI-1271 administration (Fig. 4a, b). This analysis confirmed that absence or blockade of E-selectin reduced the proportion of quiescent AML blasts (in G0 phase of cell cycle) by ~25% compared to saline-vehicle injected wildtype host controls (Fig. 4b, left panel). In regards to proliferation measured by 24 h 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation in vivo, blockade of E-selectin significantly dampened host LSK HSPC proliferation by ~50% (p = 0.0214), with a similar trend in Sele/ mice and consistent with our prior findings6. In contrast AML blasts within the same host showed no changes in, or a slight trend toward increased proliferation (Fig. 4b, right panel). Altogether, these data demonstrate the outcomes of E-selectin blockade to be different for LSK HSPC (dampens cycling) compared to AML with increased cell cycling (Fig. 4b) and chemo-sensitivity (Fig. 3c–f).

Fig. 4: Absence or blockade of E-selectin stimulates quiescent AML blasts to cycle, while HSPC remain dormant.
figure4

a Flow cytometry dot plots showing gating strategy for AML blasts (GFP+ LinKIT+CD11b+) and HSPC (GFP Lin KIT+ Sca1+, LSK) within the same leukemic host from mice administered 24 h BrdU. The cell cycle phases were defined as G0 (Ki-67, BrdU), G1 (Ki-67+, BrdU) and S-G2-M (Ki-67+, BrdU+). b Histograms show percentage of bone marrow LSK HSPC and AML blasts in quiescence (phase G0, left panel) and proliferative (BrdU+, right panel). Each dot represents data from an individual mouse. Shown are mean ± S.D., n = 4,5,4 mice/group. Statistical analysis performed by one-way ANOVA multiple comparison Bonferroni correction. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

E-selectin-binding associates with chemo-survival in AML

We next investigated the role of E-selectin-binding potential in mediating AML therapy relapse. Following chemotherapy administration, we observed a pronounced enrichment of AML blasts with higher E-selectin binding potential in the BM (Fig. 5a–c). Specifically, the brightest 7% of AML blasts for E-selectin-binding-potential were >12-fold more likely to survive post-chemotherapy in vivo compared to lowest 50% for E-selectin binding (Fig. 5c).

Fig. 5: High E-selectin-binding potential characterizes the AML blasts more likely to survive chemotherapy.
figure5

ac Mice with MLL-AF9 leukemia (n = 6/group) were administered 24 h high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) chemotherapy, or vehicle control, prior to harvest of BM cells for flow cytometry analyses. a Dot plots show gating strategy and altered distribution of E-selectin-binding potential among BM AML blasts (GFP+ KIT+) before (top panel) and after chemotherapy (bottom panel). Representative dot plot from one mouse per group. b Fluorescence histogram overlay showing E-selectin-binding intensity of BM AML blasts before (black line) and after (pink line) chemotherapy. Grey fill is no binding negative control (n = 6 mice/group). Representative mouse shown. c Percentage of surviving phenotypic AML blasts after 24 h cytarabine administration compared to starting numbers per femur for each E-selectin-binding category (low, medium (med), high gates, as defined in dot plot panel in (5a) above. Mean ± SD of n = 6 mice/group. Statistical analysis, one-way ANOVA multiple comparison Bonferroni correction. d Experimental outline, (n = 6) mice were separated by FACS and 1500 sorted AML blasts (GFP+ KIT+) with highest or lowest E-selectin-binding (using the gating strategy shown in top panel above) were transplanted into 2.5 Gy conditioned recipient mice (n = 8/recipients group). In one cohort of donors GMI-1271 was administered 200 mg kg−1 BiD for last 48 h prior to harvest and sort. (Bottom) Kaplan Meier disease-free survival of recipient mice transplanted with 1500 sorted AML blasts. Solid lines represent survival of recipients of high E-selectin-binding whereas dashed lines are recipients of low E-selectin-binding AML blasts. Grey curves indicate recipients of AML blasts from vehicle treated donors, while red/orange indicates recipients of AML blasts from GMI-1271-treated donors. Statistics, Log-Rank (Mantel–Cox) survival curve comparison. e Percentage of AML blasts able to efflux Rhodamine-derivative TMRM dye by flow cytometry, within lowest or highest E-selectin binding groups (gating strategy shown in Supplementary Fig. 5). Each pair of dots are data from same individual mouse (n = 7 mice/group). Statistical significance calculated by two-tailed paired t test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To determine whether high E-selectin-binding potential was a prospective marker of LRCs, AML blasts from murine BM were sorted based on E-selectin-binding potential (highest or lowest) and transplanted into recipients (at exactly 1500 AML blasts per recipient) (Fig. 5d). Analysis of the time to relapse in these recipient mice (Fig. 5d) suggests no significant intrinsic difference in regenerative potential between sorted AML blasts with highest or lowest E-selectin binding potential (compare grey lines). However, when E-selectin antagonist was administered for the last 48 h prior to BM harvest, median survival duration doubled in the recipients of high E-selectin-binding AML cells from 33 to 62.5 days (p = 0.012) (Fig. 5d, grey vs. red solid lines) indicating the blockade of E-selectin interactions significantly dampened LRC potential to initiate “relapse” under these conditions.

To determine whether E-selectin-binding potential correlates with other characteristics connected with intrinsic drug resistance in AML, we investigated cell potential to efflux rhodamine fluorescent dye (Tetramethylrhodamine, methyl ester; TMRM). Higher efflux potential is associated with greater intrinsic capacity to efflux (export) drugs33 and increased therapy-resistance34. We found that AML blasts with greatest rhodamine efflux were wholly contained within the highest E-selectin-binding cells (Fig. 5e, Supplementary Fig. 5). Overall, a 2.5-fold (p = 0.0030) increase in functional efflux potential was observed in AML blasts with high E-selectin-binding potential, compared to lower binding AML when corrected against same stain in presence of drug efflux blocker verapamil as “no efflux” control (Fig. 5e, Supplementary Fig. 5). Together these data suggest that high E-selectin-binding potential and greater intrinsic drug export potential correlate in AML blasts in our model. Interestingly, non-malignant LSK HSPC in the same host demonstrated overall higher potential to efflux TMRM compared to AML blasts, and efflux potential in HSPC did not correlate with E-selectin binding (Supplementary Fig. 5). These studies again demonstrate difference between HSPC and AML blasts in regards to cell surface glycosylation.

E-selectin activates pro-survival signaling in AML

Chemo-resistance in malignant cells is frequently mediated by intracellular signaling through PI3K/AKT/NF-κB or mTOR pathways35. To determine whether E-selectin-mediated adhesion directly induced pro-survival NF-κB signaling, a NF-κB-reporter murine leukemia cell line36,37 was incubated in pre-coated wells. Among the adhesion molecules tested, E-selectin was unique in its potential to activate NF-κB reporter activity in reporter cells at a level equivalent to 27 ng mL−1 recombinant TNF-α (Fig. 6a). Small synthetic PI3K/AKT antagonist LY29004 (Fig. 6b) or downstream IκB/NF-κB antagonist BMS-345541 (Fig. 6c) were then utilized to confirm the importance of these intracellular pathways to E-selectin-adhesion-mediated chemo-resistance. We found that addition of either NF-κB or AKT inhibitor could reverse the E-selectin-mediated chemoresistance of blasts in vitro (Fig. 6b, c). Together these data suggest that PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway is an important mediator of niche E-selectin-induced pro-survival signaling.

Fig. 6: E-selectin adhesion activates AML pro-survival NF-κB signaling in vitro whereas E-selectin blockade in vivo dampens AKT/NF-κB signaling.
figure6

All analyses one-way ANOVA multiple comparison Bonferroni correction. All plots mean ± SD. ac In vitro studies. a NF-κB GFP reporter Raw264.7 cell line cultured in wells pre-coated with mouse adhesion molecules ± TNF-α as indicated (concentrations in ng mL−1). Intracellular activation of NF-κB-mediated transcription after 3 h adhesion measured by flow cytometry as percentage of viable cells. Pooled data from three independent experiments (n = 3,3,5 wells/group/experiment). b, c E-selectin adhesion-mediated chemoresistance is abrogated by small synthetic PI3K (LY294002) or NF-κB (BMS-345541) inhibitors. AML blasts were seeded into pre-coated wells for 3 days ± cytarabine. Data show percentage of surviving AML cells. b Murine AML blasts cultured with 25 ng mL−1 cytarabine ± 2.5 µM LY294002 (n = 5 wells/condition; 3 independent experiments). c Human CD34+ AML cell line KG1a cultured in the presence of 10 μg mL−1 cytarabine ± 10 µM BMS-345541 (n = 5 wells/condition). d p-AKTSer473 phosphorylation in MLL-AF9 AML blasts generated from wildtype or Fut4/Fut7/ double gene-deleted BM cells, were seeded in pre-coated wells (25 min 37 °C) then lysed for quantitative immunoblotting (Li-Cor). Cell lysate from 30,000 adherent AML blasts from WT (upper blot) and from Fut4/Fut7−/− AML KIT+ GFP+ blasts (lower blot) loaded per lane. Histogram shows fold increase in p-AKTSer473 after total loaded protein normalization. Data pooled from two independent experiments, n = 2 wells/experiment. eg In vivo studies. e Outline of experimental plan and intracellular signaling pathways investigated. f Quantitative immunoblotting of BM lysates with indicated antibodies using linear Li-COR detection. Lysates were from wildtype leukemia mice administered GMI-1271 (24 h 200 mg kg−1, BiD) or vehicle control. Each lane contains 15 µg BM lysate protein from an individual mouse (n = 6 mice/group). g Quantitative band intensity analyses by Li-COR from blots in (6f, n = 6/group). Includes additional data from same experiment with AML transplanted into (n = 4) Sele−/− hosts loaded on parallel blot (Supplementary Fig. 6). Each dot represents data from a single mouse expressed as fold-change over average for saline vehicle injected controls. Source data (including full original scans of all blots) are provided as a Source Data file.

To further confirm the relationship between surface receptor fucosylation (E-selectin binding potential) and intracellular signaling, AML blasts generated by MLL-AF9 transduction of HSCs from Fut4−/− Fut7−/− double gene-deleted mice or matching wild-type control mice, were adhered to precoated wells for 25 min. Immunoblotting using the quantitative linear LI-COR system revealed E-selectin-mediated adhesion induced a threefold increase in Ser473 phosphorylation of AKT in WT AML blasts, but not in AML blasts deleted for Fut4 and Fut7 (Fig. 6d). Together these data demonstrate a critical link between AML cell surface α(1,3) fucosylation and E-selectin-mediated pro-survival signaling.

Finally, to confirm whether absence or therapeutic blockade of E-selectin dampens pro-survival PI3K/AKT/NF-κB and/or mTOR signaling in AML blasts in vivo, BM from mice with advanced AML (>80% AML blasts) were administered either E-selectin antagonist GMI-1271, or saline vehicle control (experimental outline Fig. 6e). Immunoblotting of BM lysates revealed that both AKTSer473 and NF-κB p65Ser536 phosphorylations were halved 24 h after GMI-1271 administration in vivo (Fig. 6f, g). A similar reduction was also observed with wildtype AML blasts in Sele−/− hosts (Fig. 6g; Supplementary Fig. 6). As mTOR signaling is also downstream of AKT, phosphorylation levels of p-S6K p70 (Ser371) and p-4E-BP1 (Thr37/46), both part of the mTOR signaling pathway, were also investigated. While a 40–50% reduction in the phosphorylation of p-S6K p70 in AML was observed with absence or blockade of E-selectin, no changes were observed for 4E-BP1 (Fig. 6f, g). Together, these data confirm that absence or blockade of E-selectin dampens pro-survival AKT and NF-kB signaling in BM AML in vivo.

Discussion

Niche hijack refers to how malignant cells alter their microenvironment to benefit their own expansion and survival at the detriment of host nonmalignant cells38,39. In this paper we show endothelial E-selectin to be a key target of niche hijack in AML. We find pro-inflammatory mediators released by AML blasts increases the expression of E-selectin on the BM endothelium thus generating the formation of a protective endothelial niche for AML cell survival.

E-selectin expression has previously been reported at the leading edge of solid tumors40 as well as at pre-metastatic sites41. This suggests the release of inflammatory mediators by malignant cells and induction of potentially protective E-selectin-expressing vascular niches may be wide-spread. Our data suggest the upregulation of E-selectin on tumor associated vasculature (in contrast to P-selectin) may be less about metastatic cell homing and more as a factor directly contributing to the survival and regeneration of malignant cells such as by the creation of a protective niche and induction of pro-survival (AKT/NF-kB/mTOR pathway) signaling thereby promoting therapy resistance. It has been recently reported that adhesion to E-selectin may induce mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in breast cancer cells42 both these mechanisms may contribute to BM metastasis for solid tumors.

Although we show absence or therapeutic blockade of E-selectin increased AML blast chemo-sensitivity, E-selectin blockade was only associated with a small (<1%) relocation of AML blasts from the BM to the blood. This lack of effect on AML blast re-localization is likely due to redundancy of E-selectin with the range of other adhesion molecules and chemokines involved in BM retention. Indeed P-selectin, as well as integrin ligands such as VCAM-1/CD106 are far more efficient mediators of leukocyte homing43,44,45. Surprisingly in our studies, neither alternative adhesion molecule appeared to mediate AML chemo-resistance, nor initiate intracellular AKT phosphorylation upon AML adhesion. Thus E-selectin appears to be unique among these adhesion molecules in playing a key role in mediating pro-survival signaling in malignant cells.

Under normal conditions only leukocytes have the potential to bind selectins. The generation of complex carbohydrates such as sLex/a requires the coordinated action of a series of glycosyl-transferases (including beta-galactoside alpha-2,3-sialyltransferase 4 [ST3GAL4] to generate α2-3 sialic acid linkages on position 3 of a galactose-containing glycoprotein or glycolipid) and the α(1,3)-fucosyl transferases to form the sLex/a lectin binding domain17,18,46. However, oncogenesis is often associated with alterations in cellular glycosylation10,46,47 leading to de novo, or an increased expression of functional selectin receptors on malignant cells, that are not normally observed on non-malignant counterparts. Herein, we show that acquisition of selectin-binding potential by AML blasts directly enables significant E-selectin-mediated intracellular survival signaling distinct from roles in AML cell homing or metastasis.

The changes in cell surface glycosylation observed with oncogenic transformation are likely mediated by epigenetic mechanisms. Inflammatory mediators (such as TNF-α48 and G-CSF49) have previously been reported to lead to increased ST3GAL4, FUT4, and FUT7 expression, which are largely regulated by repressive promoter methylation50,51. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that the altered glycosylation (and increase in E-selectin binding potential) on malignant cells is associated with the epigenetic changes in DNA methylation and histone modulation that occurs during oncogenesis, possibly re-enforced by tumor-associated inflammation. Interestingly, drug efflux transporter genes such as ABCG2 (BCRP) and MDR1 (P-gp) have also been reported to be regulated by promoter methylation together with histone modifications52,53. Thus, the correlation between E-selectin binding and drug efflux potential reported herein may reflect the underlying changes in the methylation status of a malignant cell.

Finally, our data suggest several striking differences between malignant AML blasts and the endogenous nonmalignant HSPC population from which they originated in response to E-selectin binding. These differences include: (i) E-selectin adhesion mediates AML chemo-resistance but not HSPC chemoresistance in vitro, (ii) absence or therapeutic blockade of E-selectin induces AML blasts to leave quiescence and engage in cell cycle whereas in contrast E-selectin blockade dampens HSPC cycling, (iii) AML blasts highest for E-selectin binding potential contain all drug efflux capacity whereas HSPC efflux equally well regardless of E-selectin binding potential, and (iv) E-selectin adhesion mediates pro-survival AKT/NF-κβ/mTOR signaling in AML blasts but not in HSPC nor in AML blasts unable to bind E-selectin due to fucosyl transferase FUT4/7 deletions.

In conclusion, we describe a form of niche hijack whereby release of inflammatory mediators induced by malignant cells leads to an upregulation of adhesion molecule expression on niche endothelium and E-selectin expression. Contact with E-selectin directly mediates malignant cell regeneration, survival and chemo-resistance via triggering of pro-survival intracellular signaling such as AKT/NF-κB/mTOR pathways well-known to mediate therapy resistance. We report therapeutic E-selectin blockade in vivo dampens this pro-survival signaling, effectively neutralizing the deleterious effects of this niche hijack leading to significantly improved therapeutic outcomes in mice. As de novo or increased E-selectin binding potential is reported in a wide variety of malignant cells21,54, as is the upregulation of endothelial E-selectin expression40,41, this form of niche hijack and E-selectin mediated therapy-resistance may be wide-spread among diverse tumors.

The data in this paper are experimental basis for a phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02306291) evaluating the use of GMI-1271/Uproselesan, adjunct to standard therapy in relapsed/refractory (r/r) adult AML. This trial reported administration of adjunct GMI-1271 therapy associated with higher rates of clinical remission and extended median patient survival compared to comparable historical cohorts and consistent with our preclinical mouse studies reported herein. Two Phase II/III clinical trials further evaluating the efficacy of GMI-1271/Uproselesan as adjunct therapy in newly diagnosed (NCT03701308) and relapsed/refractory (NCT03616470) adult AML are currently underway.

Methods

Mice, ethics, and tissue processing

All mouse experiments were approved by The University of Queensland animal ethics committee. C57BL/6 mice (CD45.2+) and congenic B6.SJL (CD45.1+) were purchased from Animal Resource Centre, Perth, Australia. Mice were housed in Tecniplast Greenline IVC caging in a room with controlled temperature (22–26 °C) and humidity (30–70%). All experimental groups were age- and sex-matched (10–16 weeks). Generally, donors were males and recipients females. Sele−/− mice were a kind gift from P. Frenette (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, NY) and Fut4−/− Fut7−/− double KO mice from J. Rasko. All strains had been backcrossed on C57BL/6 background at least ten generations.

Heparinized blood was collected from anaesthetized mice by cardiac puncture then spleens, leg bones, and occasionally spines collected. Femurs were generally flushed in 1 mL ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) plus 2% newborn calf serum (NCS) using needle and syringe for the isolation of whole BM cells (~25 × 106 cells per femur). For some experiments BM AML blasts were further enriched from BM using mouse CD117-conjugated Magnetic Activated Cell Sorting (MACs) beads and “POSSEL” positive selection on auto-MACS (Miltenyi, Germany) as previously described6.

For endothelial cell stains, endosteal cells were harvested from already flushed femurs as outlined above. After additional washing with PBS, these bones were gently flushed using a syringe and 23 G needle with 0.2 ml pre-warmed collagenase type 1 (Worthington, #CLS-1) diluted to 1 mg mL−1 in IMDM, for 20 min with agitation at 37 °C to release endosteal cells which were then collected by flush with PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry6.

Collection and staining of healthy patient BM HSC and leukemia cells were approved by the Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre ethics committee (Project 01/40) and Queensland Metro South Human Ethics Committee (HREC/2019/QMS/46799). All collections were from consenting adult patients that sequentially presented to clinic. Donor BM cells were collected from normal healthy BM donors (n = 2) or from BM associated with acetabulum reaming from patients undergoing arthroplasty (n = 2). AML cells were collected from blood or BM of patients at the same time as standard of care collection (n = 2). Mononuclear cells were enriched for CD34+ cells using anti-CD34 conjugated MACs beads and auto-MACs POSSEL separation following manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then stained for flow cytometry.

Calculation of whole body AML blast numbers in BM and blood for Supplementary Fig. 3 were performed as previously described55. In summary one femur represents 5.6% total BM, and total blood volume of a mouse calculated as 0.8 mL peripheral blood per 10 g body weight.

Reagents

Dulbecco-modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), Iscove-modified Dulbecco’s medium (IMDM), minimum essential medium (MEM)-α (without phenol red), Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS), and fetal calf serum (FCS) were purchased from ThermoFisher. X-VIVO-10 and X-VIVO-15 media were from Lonza. Polybrene and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 7-aminoactinomycin D (7AAD) was purchased from Molecular probes, Life technologies. PI3K inhibitor LY294002 and selective inhibitor of IκB kinase/NF-κB signaling BMS-345541 were from Selleckchem. Neutralizing rat anti-mouse E-selectin monoclonal antibody (clone RME-1) from BioLegend was used at 10 μg mL−1 for blocking. Recombinant mouse adhesion molecules E-selectin-huIgG1 Fc, P-selectin-huIgG1 Fc, CD31/PECAM1-huIgG1 Fc, VCAM1-huIgG1 Fc, ICAM1-huIgG1 Fc, and negative control CD14-huIgG1 Fc were all from R&D Systems. Recombinant mouse stem cell factor (SCF), human interleukin 6 (IL-6), and mouse IL-3 were from Peprotec. Cytarabine and doxorubicin were sourced from the Mater Hospital Pharmacy. Clinical grade GMI-1271 (Uproselesan) was provided by GlycoMimetics, Rockville, MA.

Initiation of AML in mice

Bicistronic MSCV retroviral vector carrying GFP and the human MLL-AF9, MLL-ENL, or AML1-ETO9a fusion oncogenes were kindly provided by Scott Lowe8. pMSCV-MLL-AF9-ires-GFP and empty vector control were transfected into GP + E86 ecotropic retrovirus packaging cells and 3 days later, GFP+ packaging cells were purified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and expanded. For murine HSPC transfection, packaging cells were first irradiated (15 Gy), then cocultured together with FACS sorted Lineage (CD3ε, CD5, Ter119, B220, and Gr-1)neg CD11b KIT+ Sca-1+ (LSK) cells collected from mouse BM 7 days post 5-fluorouracil induction (150 mg kg−1 intraperitoneal injection). Medium for transduction (DMEM) containing 10% FCS, 5 μg mL−1 polybrene plus cytokines, 50 ng mL−1 recombinant mouse (rmu) SCF, 10 ng mL−1 recombinant human (rhu) IL-ll, and 10 ng mL−1 rmu thrombopoietin (Peprotech). After 24–72 h, transduced HSPC were retrieved from the coculture by gentle washing, transferred to new cell culture flask for 2–4 h to ensure no adherent packaging cells remained, then washed in saline before retro-orbital intra-venous injection into conditioned (4 Gy) primary recipient mice for AML to develop. As a control for transduction efficiency, a portion of the transduced LSK cells were also cultured an additional 3 days and analyzed by flow cytometry for GFP expression. Typical transduction efficiency was 10%.

Emergence of AML in recipient mice was monitored by flow cytometry from regular tail vein test-bleeds for appearance of GFP+ KIT+ AML blasts. Once over 40% of peripheral blood CD45+ leukocytes were GFP+ KIT+ (typically 30–60 days post transplantation) mice were euthanized and ~104 BM cell aliquots (typically >80% AML blasts) used for transplantation via the retro-orbital sinus into large cohorts of matched 2.5 Gy conditioned recipient mice for experimental procedures.

Co-culture of BMEC-1 with murine whole BM cells

Human Bone Marrow Endothelial Cell line BMEC-1 (ATCC #CRL-3421) were seeded at 10,000 cells per well of a 96-well tissue culture plate in 100 μL of αMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 1× penicillin streptomycin glutamine (PSG, Gibco) and 10 ng mL−1 rmu epidermal growth factor (rmuEGF, Biolegend, cat#585606). After 7 h of incubation (37 °C, 5% CO2), fresh mouse whole BM cells were added to the wells and medium was replaced with fresh αMEM supplemented with 10% FCS, 1× PSG, 10 ng mL−1 rmuSCF and 10 ng mL−1 rmuEGF. In some wells, rmuTNF-α (Biolegend) was added at a final concentration of 10 or 30 ng mL−1 instead of whole BM cells as a positive control for E-selectin expression. In some wells, etanercept (Enbrel®, AMGEN) was added at a final concentration of 1 μg mL−1 as indicated. BM cells were cocultured with BMEC for 16 h (37 °C, 5% CO2), then collected by gentle pipetting on ice to retrieve cells and stained with APC-conjugated mouse anti-human E-selectin (Biolegend, cat# 336012). Cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry in the presence of 1.7 μg mL−1 7AAD for live/dead exclusion. Gating strategy and dot plots from viable cells are shown in Fig. 1e.

In vivo assays

GMI-1271 was administered to mice intraperitoneally at 40 mg kg−1 per injection bidaily (BiD) for 5 days or at higher doses for shorter 24 h readouts as indicated. For AML cell mobilization, mice were administered a single dose of 40 mg kg−1 GMI-1271 retro-orbitally followed by regular test bleeds (2 drops of blood from lateral tail vein into heparin) at indicated time points before and after injection. Twelve microlitre of whole blood was taken for leukocyte count (Hematology Analyzer Coulter Ac•T diff, Beckman Coulter) and the remainder subject to red cell lysis (NH4Cl) before staining for flow as described below.

Cytarabine was administered as single agent at high-dose (two injections each 900 mg kg−1 intraperitoneally 12 h apart, with euthanasia 24 h after first injection). Alternatively for disease-free survival studies, cytarabine was administered in combination with doxorubicin for a total of 5 days (cytarabine 100 mg kg−1 intravenous daily for 5 days and doxorubicin 1 mg kg−1 daily intravenous injections for first 3 days).

Flow cytometry

Supplementary Table 1 lists antibodies used for flow cytometry and immunoblotting studies. Endothelial cells from the BM endosteal region were identified by flow cytometry as negative for lineage markers (CD3ε, CD5, Ter119, B220, and Gr-1)-PerCPCy5.5, CD11bPerCPCy5.5, GFP, CD45dim to neg APCCy7, and CD31+ APC together with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated rat anti-mouse E-selectin (clone UZ6)6. Analysis of E-selectin binding potential was performed using recombinant human-E-selectin-human–IgM fusion protein (plasmid kind gift from Karen Snapp, University of Illinois, IL) pre-complexed with affinity purified donkey F(ab)2 anti-human IgM conjugated to CY5, AF647, or BV785 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, PA)6,56. This complex was incubated with the cells in 10 μL volume for 20 min on ice, then washed and resuspended in XVIVO-10 for flow cytometry analysis.

Human BM HSCs were identified as negative for lineage (CD3, CD19)-PacificBlue, CD33BV421, CD34+ PE, CD38PECy7 cells whereas murine HSPCs were defined as Lineage (CD3ε, B220, Ter119, Gr-1)-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD11bPacificBlue, KIT+APCCy7, Human AML blasts were identified as CD33+ BV421 CD34+ PE and murine AML blasts as GFP+ KIT+ APCCy7 CD11b+PacificBlue, Lineage (CD3ε, B220, Ter119, Gr-1)-PerCP-Cy5.5.

For Rhodamine-based dye efflux studies, 106 murine BM cells were resuspended in 400 μL of X-VIVO 15 serum-free medium containing 10 nM TMRM (Invitrogen), and incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Cells were washed twice in X-VIVO 15 medium, resuspended in fresh warm 400 μL X-VIVO 15 medium and incubated at 37 °C for a further 15 min to allow dye cellular efflux. After efflux, cells were pelleted, and stained on ice with antibodies to Kit-APCCy7, Sca1-BV510, Lineage (CD3ε, CD5, Ter119, B220, and Gr-1)-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD11b-PacificBlue, and FVS700 (Fixable Viability Stain) before addition of conjugated E-selectin-IgM-biotin-streptavidin-BV785 (to assess for E-selectin binding potential). For all samples a parallel stain exactly as described above was performed, but with addition of 25 µg mL−1 verapamil (Isoptin®, Abbott Australasia) throughout for “no efflux” control.

Data were collected using BD FACS ARIA III Fusion, CytoFLEX S Beckman Coulter and CYAN ADP Beckman Coulter. All data were imported as uncompensated files and re-compensated. Data were analyzed using softwares: Summit, FlowJo 7 (Cyan), CytExpert 2.2.0.97, FlowJo 10 (CytoFlex), and Diva 6, FlowJo 10 (Aria).

BrdU incorporation and cell cycle analysis

Sele−/− and age-matched, sex-matched C57BL/6 mice (CD45.2+) mice were transplanted with 104 BM KIT+ leukemic blasts generated from transduced B6.SJL (CD45.1+) murine HSC. The use of a CD45.1+ AML was required in this experiment as GFP fluorescence (our usual marker for transduced AML) is lost after fixation. Cohorts of mice were administered GMI-1271 (40 mg kg−1 BiD, intraperitoneally) or saline vehicle from day 16 to 20 post-transplant, and all mice were administered 0.5 mg BrdU intraperitoneally at day 20 post-transplant, exactly 24 h prior to euthanasia.

Two million whole-BM cells were stained with anti-CD45.1-FITC, Lineage (B220, CD3, CD5, Gr-1, and Ter119)-PerCP-Cy5.5, anti-Sca1-PE-CY7, anti-KIT-APC, and anti-CD11b-PacificBlue. Cells were then fixed and permeabilized using the BD Pharmingen BrdU kit (cat# 51-9000019AK) before staining with antibodies to anti-BrdU-PE and anti-Ki67-AF700 monoclonal antibodies6. Representative dotplots and gating strategy are shown in Fig. 4a.

In vitro chemosensitivity and reporter assays

Wells of 96-well tissue culture plates (NuncTM, ThermoFisher) were coated with 5 µg mL−1 recombinant adhesion molecules diluted in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) pH 8.0 overnight at 4 °C, then wells washed and blocked with 0.5% bovine serum albumin in PBS for 1 h at 37 °C as described previously56. KIT+ MACS-enriched BM AML blasts from MLL-AF9 or MLL-ENL transduced leukemic mice, or matching KIT+-enriched healthy BM cells (from non-leukemic mice), were cultured for 5–10 days in IMDM complete medium plus 10% FCS in the presence of cytokines (20 ng mL−1 rmuSCF, 10 ng mL−1 rhuIL-6, and 10 ng mL−1 rmuIL-3) then seeded into pre-coated 96-well plates (at 10,000 AML blasts per 100 µL well) in XIVO-10 medium (Lonza Bioscience) with cytokines as above. After 6 h incubation for cell adhesion, cytarabine (final 25 ng mL−1 as selected dose by limiting dilution), or saline vehicle control was added to wells then plates incubated a further 66 h at 37 °C. To count cells at endpoint, wells were washed gently with TBS and cells resuspended by vigorous pipetting in presence of cold EDTA (10 mM final). The number of viable GFP+ AML cells per well was then counted by volumetric flow cytometry on CytoFlex S flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter) in the presence of 1.7 μg mL−1 7AAD for viability gating. In some studies, LY294002 (final 2.5 μM) and BMS-345541 (final 10 μM) were added after initial 6 h incubation with adhesion molecules. A similar protocol was used with human CD34+ AML cell line KG1a but with an earlier readout (48 h) after addition of 10 μg ml−1 cytarabine.

The mouse monocytic cell line RAW264.7 (from ATCC) derived from a Murine Leukemia Virus injected mouse37 stably transfected with NF-κB response element from the SELE gene promotor driving GFP reporter expression36 was used to study NF-κB activation in live cells in response to cell adhesion. NF-κB reporter RAW264.7 cells were added to pre-coated wells of non-tissue culture treated 96-well plates (Iwaki, Japan) at 100,000 cells per 100 µL well on ice in the presence of 10 µM BMS-345541 or recombinant mouse TNF-α (Biolegend) dilutions. Following a brief centrifugation (200g, 1 min) to bring cells into contact with pre-coated surfaces, cells were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h in contact with pre-coated surface. Reporter cells were then resuspended by gentle pipetting and analyzed by flow cytometry for GFP fluorescence indicative of NF-κB mediated transcription in the viable 7AAD fraction.

In vivo leukemia stem cell survival assay

Mice with advancing AML (5–20% GFP+ KIT+ AML blasts in blood, typically ~3.5–4 weeks post-transplant) were administered two high dose rounds of cytarabine (900 mg kg−1 intraperitoneally) at 24 and 16 h prior to euthanasia. Femurs were collected and crushed in PBS with 2% NCS. Serial dilutions of BM cells (final 1%, 0.1%, 0.01% of one femur) were transplanted into 2.5 Gy conditioned C57BL/6 recipient mice. At 4 weeks post-transplant recipient mice with over 5% GFP+ KIT+ AML blasts in blood (corresponding to >40% GFP+ KIT+ in BM in post-mortem analyses) were considered AML ‘positive’. Poisson distribution statistics (L-calc software, Stem Cell Technologies, Canada) were then used to calculate frequency of LRC among femoral BM cells ±95% confidence interval. For figure generation, total LRC numbers per femur were calculated by multiplying frequency of LRC with total BM cell number. Comparative statistically analysis of calculated LRC frequency ±95% CI between the different experiment cohorts was also determined using Lcalc software.

Disease-free survival study

Cohorts of matched C57BL/6 (10-week-old males) mice transplanted with 104 BM KIT+ leukemic blasts were administered GMI-1271 (40 mg kg−1 BiD intraperitoneally) from day 6 to day 15 post-transplant. At day 10 post-transplant, mice received induction chemotherapy (5 days cytarabine at 100 mg kg−1 intraperitoneally plus doxorubicin 1 mg kg−1 intravenously for the first 3 days). Treated mice were monitored daily for recovery, wellbeing and time to relapse (defined as >50% GFP+ KIT+ leukemic blasts in blood; >80% in the BM).

Immunoblotting

In vitro adhesion: BM MLL-AF9 KIT+ blasts from advanced leukemia mice were washed in PBS, resuspended in X-VIVO medium and placed in 96-well tissue culture plate wells, pre-coated with recombinant cell adhesion molecules, on ice (200,000 cells per 100 µL well) followed by a quick one minute 200g centrifugation at 4 °C to bring cells into contact with pre-coated surface. Plates were then rapidly brought to 37 °C by placing on a pre-warmed heating block before transfer to a 37 °C incubator. After 25 min at 37 °C, plates were placed on ice to stop signaling, supernatant removed and adherent cells lysed in 100 µL of TBS with 1% NP-40 as lysis buffer supplemented with protease (#04693159001) and phosphatase (#04900837001) inhibitors PhosStop from Roche, Mannheim, Germany. After 10 min lysis on ice, cell lysates were transferred to microfuge tubes and centrifuged 12,000g for 5 min at 4 °C. Nuclei free supernatants were then mixed (4:1 ratio) with sample loading buffer containing 10 mM final dithiothreitol and heated (95 °C, 1 min). Twenty microlitre cell lysate (containing proteins derived from ~30,000 AML blasts) and pre-stained protein markers (Novex, Invitrogen) were loaded to each lane and proteins separated on a 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gel (#NW04125BOX) before transfer onto nitrocellulose membrane (IBC3002 Invitrogen, ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA). Quantification of total transferred protein per lane was performed by REVERT stain (TBS cat# 927-50000, Li-Cor, NE, USA) following manufacturer’s instructions. Membranes were blocked with Odyssey blocking buffer (Li-COR) and subsequently probed with various monoclonal rabbit antibodies (Supplementary Table 1) and murine pan anti-β-actin antibody (#NB600-501, Novus) for loading control. This was followed by secondary staining with IRD800-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) (#5151) together with DyLight680 conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (#5470 P) (both from Cell Signaling Technologies) for parallel detection of house-keeping mouse β-actin. Antibody binding was quantified on the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li-COR) equipped with 2 solid-phase lasers at 700 and 800 nm. Membranes were then stripped using Restore PLUS stripping buffer (#46428, ThermoFisher) for 10 min at room temperature and following a check that no primary antibody remained, the blots were restained with anti-pan AKT antibody. Final Image analysis and band quantifications were performed using Image Studio Lite software (version 5.2). For fold-change calculations, the readout intensity of each specific band was first corrected against matching (β-actin) house-keeping control.

In vivo signaling

Tibia were removed from leukemic mice, both ends cut with scalpel and BM flushed once into microfuge tubes using 1 mL syringe containing 500 µL urea lysis buffer (7 M urea, 10% glycerol, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 5 mM EDTA, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8) with complete protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Roche) and placed immediately on dry ice as previously described57. Following thawing, BM cell lysates were sonicated (3 pulses each 5 s) with probe tip on ice to break up genomic DNA, centrifuged 10,000g in 4 °C microfuge for 15 min to pellet debris then debris-free fraction collected. After protein concentration determination by Bradford protein assay (BCA, #23225 Pierce), BM lysates were mixed (4:1) with 5× electrophoresis loading buffer and 10 mM final dithiothreitol and boiled for 3 min. A total of 15 μg whole protein was loaded per lane for immunoblotting and bands separated using a 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to PVDF membrane. Transferred proteins were quantified using REVERT stain. Blocking, staining and analysis were same as described above using antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 1.

All unprocessed gel images are provided as a Source Data file.

Statistics

GraphPad Prism software version 7 was used for statistical analyses. Unless otherwise indicated, groups were compared using One-way ANOVA, multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Survival curves were analyzed using log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test. Limiting dilution analysis were performed using Poisson distribution statistics with L-calc software (Stem Cell Technologies). Two-tailed paired t test was used in Figs. 2b and 5e as indicated in Figure legend. All bars show mean with standard deviation unless otherwise indicated.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Full unprocessed scans of the gels and blots from Fig. 6 and Supplementary Fig. 6 are available in the Source data file. The source data underlying Figs. 1a, b, d–f, 2a–c, 3a–f, 4a, b, 5a, 5c–e, 6a–f, Supplementary Figs. 2, 3, 4, 5a, b, and 6, are provided as a Source data file. All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files and from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. A reporting summary for this article is available as a Supplementary Information file.

References

  1. 1.

    Pezeshkian, B., Donnelly, C., Tamburo, K., Geddes, T. & Madlambayan, G. J. Leukemia mediated endothelial cell activation modulates leukemia cell susceptibility to chemotherapy through a positive feedback loop mechanism. PLoS ONE 8, e60823 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ninomiya, M. et al. Homing, proliferation and survival sites of human leukemia cells in vivo in immunodeficient mice. Leukemia 21, 136–142 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Ishikawa, F. et al. Chemotherapy-resistant human AML stem cells home to and engraft within the bone-marrow endosteal region. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1315–1321 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ding, L. & Morrison, S. J. Haematopoietic stem cells and early lymphoid progenitors occupy distinct bone marrow niches. Nature 495, 231–235 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ding, L., Saunders, T. L., Enikolopov, G. & Morrison, S. J. Endothelial and perivascular cells maintain haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 481, 457–462 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Winkler, I. G. et al. Vascular niche E-selectin regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy, self renewal and chemoresistance. Nat. Med. 18, 1651–1657 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kansas, G. S. Selectins and their ligands: current concepts and controversies. Blood 88, 3259–3287 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zuber, J. et al. Mouse models of human AML accurately predict chemotherapy response. Genes Dev. 23, 877–889 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Pattabiraman, D. R. et al. Interaction of c-Myb with p300 is required for the induction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by human AML oncogenes. Blood 123, 2682–2690 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Vajaria, B. N. & Patel, P. S. Glycosylation: a hallmark of cancer. Glycoconj. J. 34, 147–156 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Levesque, J.-P., Winkler, I. G. & Rasko, J. E. J. Nichotherapy for stem cells: there goes the neighborhood. Bioessays 35, 183–190 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Henseleit, U. et al. E-selectin expression in experimental models of inflammation in mice. J. Pathol. 180, 317–325 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Montgomery, K. F. et al. Activation of endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 (ELAM-1) gene transcription. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 88, 6523–6527 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Weller, A., Isenmann, S. & Vestweber, D. Cloning of the mouse endothelial selectins. Expression of both E- and P−selectin is inducible by tumor necrosis factor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 15176–15183 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Binder, S., Luciano, M. & Horejs-Hoeck, J. The cytokine network in acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a focus on pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 43, 8–15 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Volk, A. et al. Co-inhibition of NF-kappaB and JNK is synergistic in TNF-expressing human AML. J. Exp. Med. 211, 1093–1108 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Mondal, N. et al. ST3Gal-4 is the primary sialyltransferase regulating the synthesis of E-, P-, and L-selectin ligands on human myeloid leukocytes. Blood 125, 687–696 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yang, W. H., Nussbaum, C., Grewal, P. K., Marth, J. D. & Sperandio, M. Coordinated roles of ST3Gal-VI and ST3Gal-IV sialyltransferases in the synthesis of selectin ligands. Blood 120, 1015–1026 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Buffone, A. Jr. et al. Silencing alpha1,3-fucosyltransferases in human leukocytes reveals a role for FUT9 enzyme during E-selectin-mediated cell adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 1620–1633 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Maly, P. et al. The alpha(1,3)fucosyltransferase Fuc-TVII controls leukocyte trafficking through an essential role in L-, E-, and P-selectin ligand biosynthesis. Cell 86, 643–653 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hakomori, S. Glycosylation defining cancer malignancy: new wine in an old bottle. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 10231–10233 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Liu, C. et al. FUT4 is involved in PD-1-related immunosuppression and leads to worse survival in patients with operable lung adenocarcinoma. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 145, 65–76 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Feng, X. et al. Increased fucosylation has a pivotal role in multidrug resistance of breast cancer cells through miR-224-3p targeting FUT4. Gene 578, 232–241 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yan, X., Lin, Y., Liu, S., Aziz, F. & Yan, Q. Fucosyltransferase IV (FUT4) as an effective biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother.70, 299–304 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Auslander, N. et al. An integrated computational and experimental study uncovers FUT9 as a metabolic driver of colorectal cancer. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 956 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Li, D. et al. alpha-1,3-Fucosyltransferase-VII siRNA inhibits the expression of SLex and hepatocarcinoma cell proliferation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 42, 2700–2708 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Liu, B. et al. MiR-29b/Sp1/FUT4 axis modulates the malignancy of leukemia stem cells by regulating fucosylation via Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 38, 200 (2019).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dick, J. E. Acute myeloid leukemia stem cells. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1044, 1–5 (2005).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Sarry, J. E. et al. Human acute myelogenous leukemia stem cells are rare and heterogeneous when assayed in NOD/SCID/IL2Rgammac-deficient mice. J. Clin. Invest. 121, 384–395 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Saito, Y. et al. Identification of therapeutic targets for quiescent, chemotherapy-resistant human leukemia stem cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 2, 17ra19 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Batlle, E. & Clevers, H. Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat. Med. 23, 1124–1134 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Purton, L. E. & Scadden, D. T. Limiting factors in murine hematopoietic stem cell assays. Cell Stem Cell 1, 262–270 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wulf, G. G. et al. A leukemic stem cell with intrinsic drug efflux capacity in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 98, 1166–1173 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hirschmann-Jax, C. et al. A distinct “side population” of cells with high drug efflux capacity in human tumor cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 14228–14233 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    de Castro Barbosa, M. L. et al. NF-kappaB signaling pathway inhibitors as anticancer drug candidates. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 17, 483–490 (2017).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Stacey, K. J. et al. The molecular basis for the lack of immunostimulatory activity of vertebrate DNA. J. Immunol. 170, 3614–3620 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Raschke, W. C., Baird, S., Ralph, P. & Nakoinz, I. Functional macrophage cell lines transformed by Abelson leukemia virus. Cell 15, 261–267 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Schepers, K. et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasia remodels the endosteal bone marrow niche into a self-reinforcing leukemic niche. Cell Stem Cell 13, 285–299 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pola, C. Leukemic cells hijack the niche. Nat. Med. 19, 1221 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ye, C. et al. Expression of E-selectin on endothelial cells of small veins in human colorectal cancer. Int J. Cancer 61, 455–460 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Shi, H. et al. Recruited monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells promote the arrest of tumor cells in the premetastatic niche through an IL-1beta-mediated increase in E-selectin expression. Int J. Cancer 140, 1370–1383 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Esposito, M. et al. Bone vascular niche E-selectin induces mesenchymal-epithelial transition and Wnt activation in cancer cells to promote bone metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 21, 627–639 (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Frenette, P. S., Subbarao, S., Mazo, I. B., von Andrian, U. H. & Wagner, D. D. Endothelial selectins and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 promote hematopoietic progenitor homing to bone marrow. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14423–14428 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Katayama, Y. et al. PSGL-1 participates in E-selectin-mediated progenitor homing to bone marrow: evidence for cooperation between E-selectin ligands and α4 integrin. Blood 102, 2060–2067 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Nabors, L. K., Wang, L. D., Wagers, A. J. & Kansas, G. S. Overlapping roles for endothelial selectins in murine hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell homing to bone marrow. Exp. Hematol. 41, 588–596 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pinho, S. S. & Reis, C. A. Glycosylation in cancer: mechanisms and clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 540–555 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Hakomori, S. I. & Cummings, R. D. Glycosylation effects on cancer development. Glycoconj. J. 29, 565–566 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Delmotte, P. et al. Tumor necrosis factor alpha increases the expression of glycosyltransferases and sulfotransferases responsible for the biosynthesis of sialylated and/or sulfated Lewis x epitopes in the human bronchial mucosa. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 424–431 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Dagia, N. M. et al. G-CSF induces E-selectin ligand expression on human myeloid cells. Nat. Med. 12, 1185–1190 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Pink, M. et al. Imprinting of skin/inflammation homing in CD4+ T cells is controlled by DNA methylation within the Fucosyltransferase 7 Gene. J. Immunol. 197, 3406–3414 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Syrbe, U. et al. Differential regulation of P-selectin ligand expression in naive versus memory CD4+ T cells: evidence for epigenetic regulation of involved glycosyltransferase genes. Blood 104, 3243–3248 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Turner, J. G. et al. ABCG2 expression, function, and promoter methylation in human multiple myeloma. Blood 108, 3881–3889 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Henrique, R. et al. Epigenetic regulation of MDR1 gene through post-translational histone modifications in prostate cancer. BMC Genomics 14, 898 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Carrascal, M. A. et al. Inhibition of fucosylation in human invasive ductal carcinoma reduces E-selectin ligand expression, cell proliferation, and ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK activation. Mol. Oncol. 12, 579–593 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Winkler, I. G. et al. B-lymphopoiesis is stopped by mobilizing doses of G-CSF and is rescued by overexpression of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl2. Haematologica 98, 325–333 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Winkler, I. G., Snapp, K. R., Simmons, P. J. & Levesque, J.-P. Adhesion to E-selectin promotes growth inhibition and apoptosis of human and murine hematopoietic progenitor cells independent of PSGL-1. Blood 103, 1685–1692 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Forristal, C. E. et al. Pharmacologic stabilization of HIF-1α increases hematopoietic stem cell quiescence in vivo and accelerates blood recovery after severe irradiation. Blood 121, 759–769 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. K, Snapp for human E-selectin-IgM plasmids. Dr. David Sester for NF-κb reporter cell line and helpful advice. Prof. Paula Marlton for support and leading the Australian arm of clinical trial. Dr. Anuj Sehgal for supportive helpful advice and imaging expertize, Dr. Louise Purton, Tom Gonda, and Allison Pettit for helpful discussions. This work was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) project grants (1083198, to I.G.W., J.P.L., and 1130273 to I.G.W., J.P.L., and J.E.J.R.), Career Development Fellowship 1033736 (I.G.W.); grants from the Cancer Council Queensland (1052400 and 1147317 to I.G.W. and J.P.L.), Queensland Smart State Fellowship funding-in-aid (MN127938 for I.G.W.) and Mater Foundation support. Salaries for I.G.W. and J.P.L. are supported by Senior Research Fellowships 1108352 and 1136130 from the NHMRC. J.E.J.R. was supported by NHMRC investigator (1177305) and project (1128175) grants.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.G.W. initiated, conceived, designed, and supervised the research, wrote the paper, performed some and supervised all the experiments, analyzed the data and generated the figures. V.B. performed most experiments, analyzed data, generated figures, and helped editing paper, J.E. designed and supervised research, performed experiments, analyzed the data, generated the figures, and helped write and review paper. C.F., J.T., J. Lo, J. Li, J.M.D. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. M.T., D.R.P., assisted analyzed the data or commented on the research direction. J.L.M. provided the critical reagents and helpful discussions. J.E.J.R. and A.C.P. provided helpful discussions and helped edit the paper. J.P.L. commented on research direction, helped analyze some of the data and the critically edited paper. All authors have discussed and commented on the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Johanna Erbani or Ingrid G. Winkler.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

GlycoMimetics provided funding for some parts of this project involving use of GMI-1271 and toward purchase of flow cytometer used in these studies. V.B., J.E., C.F., J.M.D., J.T., M.R.T., J. Lowe, J. Lisle., D.R.B., A.C.P, J.L., J.E.J.R. and I.G.W. declare no other competing interests. J.L.M. is employed by and owns shares in GlycoMimetics Inc. J.P.L. owns shares in GlycoMimetics Inc.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Anna Dimberg, Cristina Lo Celso and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barbier, V., Erbani, J., Fiveash, C. et al. Endothelial E-selectin inhibition improves acute myeloid leukaemia therapy by disrupting vascular niche-mediated chemoresistance. Nat Commun 11, 2042 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15817-5

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing