Abstract
Optically driven spin transport is the fastest and most efficient process to manipulate macroscopic magnetization as it does not rely on secondary mechanisms to dissipate angular momentum. In the present work, we show that such an optical intersite spin transfer (OISTR) from Pt to Co emerges as a dominant mechanism governing the ultrafast magnetization dynamics of a CoPt alloy. To demonstrate this, we perform a joint theoretical and experimental investigation to determine the transient changes of the helicity dependent absorption in the extreme ultraviolet spectral range. We show that the helicity dependent absorption is directly related to changes of the transient spinsplit density of states, allowing us to link the origin of OISTR to the available minority states above the Fermi level. This makes OISTR a general phenomenon in optical manipulation of multicomponent magnetic systems.
Introduction
Ultrafast magnetism belongs to one of the most active fields in solidstate physics with frequent discoveries of new fundamental microscopic phenomena. Prominent examples include alloptical magnetization switching mediated by a transient ferromagnetic state^{1,2}, control of antiferromagnetic order^{3,4,5,6,7} and transfer of angular momentum via terahertz spin currents^{8,9,10,11,12,13}. Very recently it was shown theoretically, that in multicomponent magnetic systems laserdriven optical transitions can induce a spinselective charge flow between sublattices causing significant magnetization changes, including switching from antiferromagnetic to ferromagnetic order^{14,15,16,17,18}. Indeed, a first experiment employing attosecond spectroscopy in the extreme ultraviolet spectral range (XUV) was able to demonstrate how a lightfield driven coherent charge relocation leads to an ultrafast loss of magnetization^{19}. Since such optically induced spin transfer is most pronounced during the pulse, it represents the fastest mechanism to control magnetization with light, promising applications for future data storage and spintronic devices.
Nonetheless, the experimental detection of the presence of OISTR in a given material remains challenging, as it requires access to the elementspecific transient density of states (DOS) around the Fermi energy, E_{F}. While timeresolved photoelectron spectroscopy can access the valence band structure of magnetic solids in great detail^{20,21,22,23}, it is limited to surfaces and does not provide element specificity. To gain access to ultrafast changes of elementspecific magnetization, an increasing number of experiments have made use of the magnetic contrast at 3p resonances in the XUV spectral range. It was demonstrated that this technique gives access to the microscopic interplay of different elements in multicomponent magnetic systems in a single measurement^{24,25,26} and allows distinguishing laserdriven local and nonlocal magnetization dynamics^{12,27} as well as exchange^{28} and collective spin excitations^{29,30}. In particular, magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) in transmission geometry^{19,25} can be explained by a simple twostep model^{31}: absorption of circularly polarized photons in resonance with a core to valence state transition leads to spinpolarized photoelectrons via spinorbit (SO) interaction. The different number of available states in the majority and minority channels in the exchangesplit valence band then determines the energy and helicity dependent absorption strength in the magnetic material. The typical observable in such experiments is the magnetic asymmetry, defined as the normalized difference of the transmitted intensities for left and right circularly polarized photons, A = (I_{σ+} − I_{σ−})/(I_{σ+} + I_{σ−}). Hence, timeresolved XUV MCD does not give direct information about the energydependent electronic state distribution, which is required for monitoring OISTR as a function of time.
In this letter, we demonstrate that the analysis of the helicity and energydependent absorption, µ_{σ±} = 1 − I_{σ±}, as a function of delay between pump and probe pulses reveals detailed information on the transient spinsplit DOS, which we can directly compare to theoretical simulations. We employ helicity dependent absorption spectroscopy around the M_{2,3} resonance of Co and compare the response of a pure Co film and a CoPt alloy to demonstrate that optical intersite spin transfer (OISTR) between Pt and Co atoms in the twocomponent system CoPt dominates the early time dynamics leading to a more efficient and faster demagnetization. Furthermore, we highlight the importance of the dynamics of minority spins in physics of ultrafast demagnetization, a contribution usually ignored in most modernday descriptions of femtomagnetism^{15,16,32}.
Results
Experimental details
In the time, energy and spinresolved XUV measurements, we recorded the transmitted spectral intensity, I_{σ±}, of circularly polarized higher harmonic radiation through the magnetic sample as a function of the time delay, Δt, between the pump (center wavelength 800 nm, pulse duration 60 fs) and the higher harmonic probe pulses (cf. Fig. 1a). The higher harmonic radiation is generated by focusing intense laser pulses with an energy of 2.5 mJ, a pulse duration of 30 fs and a photon energy centered at E_{Ph} = 1.55 eV into a neonfilled gas cell leading to a spectrum of discrete harmonic emission peaks separated by 2E_{Ph} (cf. Fig. 1c). The width of one harmonic peak is approximately 200 meV. A 4mirror phase shifter^{25,33,34} is used to control the state of polarization. We switch the magnetization of the sample by an external magnetic field, equivalent to changing the helicity of the circularly polarized photons, σ_{±}^{35}. The full XUV spectrum transmitted through the sample is energetically dispersed and measured with an XUVsensitive chargecoupled device, CCD. We use a second spectrometer before the sample to measure the incoming higher harmonic spectrum and to normalize the intrinsic fluctuations in the higher harmonic intensities, which results in an increased signal to noise ratio. Both spectrometers are set to resolve the spectral range from 47 to 73 eV and we record nine harmonic emission peaks simultaneously. The joint exposure time is set between 100 ms and 500 ms. We repeat a delay scan measurement up to 100 times, resulting in a total measuring time of approximately 4 h for each sample. The resulting root mean square of the measured signals remains well below 5 × 10^{−4} allowing us resolving details of the ultrafast changes of small magnetic asymmetries below 1 × 10^{−2}.
The samples, elemental Co and a Co_{0.5}Pt_{0.5} alloy, were grown by DC magnetron sputtering with a thickness of 15 nm on freestanding 20 nm thick Si_{3}N_{4} and 200 nm thick Al membranes, respectively. In both cases, electronic conduction between the magnetic layer and the substrate can be excluded, as the surface of the Almembrane is oxidized before deposition. As we investigate the samples in transmission geometry, contributions to a local demagnetization by superdiffusive spin transport do not play any role. The samples are magnetized inplane and consequently mounted under a grazing angle of 45 degrees for a finite projection of the kvector of the circularly polarized XUV pulses onto the magnetization of the sample. Both samples were excited with the same incident fluence of 12 mJ/cm² in a collinear pumpprobe geometry.
Theoretical details
The simulations are performed by employing a twostep process: first, density functional theory (DFT) is used to obtain the electronic groundstate of the material. Second, we study the dynamics of the charge and the magnetization density under the influence of an external laser pulse by using the timedependent extension of density functional theory (TDDFT). The whole procedure is fully ab initio and at no point requires any input from experiments, except for the pumppulse parameters (fluence, pulse duration, and frequency). The simulations are performed using a fully noncollinear version of TDDFT as implemented within the Elk code^{46}, where the dynamics of the laserexcited charges and spins are treated beyond the linearresponse regime and by including relativistic effects (see Methods for further details).
Thus, the following mechanisms are included in the theoretical simulations: (i) spin and charge currents due to laser excitation; this term is responsible for the OISTR mechanism, (ii) SO induced spinflips, (iii) effect of these spinflips on the spincurrents^{16}, (iv) electronelectron scattering effects via the exchangecorrelation functional, and (v) coupling of the electrons to nuclear degrees of freedom; the change in charge density as a function of time (due to laser excitation) leads to large forces on the nuclei which are coupled to the spins via Coulomb and SO terms. Secondorder effects are missing in our simulations—these forces displace nuclei (generate phonons) and this, in turn, causes charge and spin density to change. However, we note that such secondorder effects start to cause significant changes to magnetization only after ~100 fs, and hence, we have focused on the early time physics in the present work.
Ultrafast demagnetization
In Fig. 2a, we show the temporal evolution of the relative magnetic asymmetry, A(t), for selected photon energies. For the Co film, we show the response at the Co M_{2,3} resonances at 60.3 eV, and for the CoPt alloy, the responses at the Co M_{2,3} (60.3 eV) as well as for the Pt O_{3} (54.1 eV) and Pt N_{7} (72.6 eV) resonances are shown. After ~400 fs the magnetic asymmetry of the Co film at the Co M_{2,3} edge is reduced by 20%. The maximal reduction of the asymmetry for the CoPt alloy is significantly larger and amounts to 80% for all probe photon energies. The solid lines are nonlinear least square fits (see the “Methods” section and Supplementary Information for details). Within the experimental uncertainty, the elementspecific demagnetization times in the CoPt alloy are comparable for both photon energies, in particular, we find a value of τ = (86 ± 3) fs and τ = (84 ± 7) fs at 60.3 eV and 54.1 eV, respectively. Note that because of a nonnegligible magnetic asymmetry of Co for photon energies well below its resonance^{36} and the broad spectral signature of the Pt O edges, we can only ascribe a predominant sensitivity for Co at 60.3 eV and a predominant sensitivity for Pt at 54.1 eV. However, data at the Pt N_{7} edge also exhibits—within the experimental uncertainty—an identical time constant of τ = (92 ± 11) fs as well as an equal demagnetization amplitude of 80%. A comparable demagnetization time and amplitude for Co and Pt in the CoPt alloy is also predicted by theoretical calculations as shown in Fig. 2b (a detailed discussion on the origin of the observed oscillation is given in the Methods section). However, comparison of the demagnetization amplitude and time constant at the Co M_{2,3} edges between the pure Co film and the CoPt alloy yields significant differences, both in experiment and theory. We measure (124 ± 4) fs in the Co film and (86 ± 3) fs in the CoPt alloy. Shorter demagnetization times in the presence of heavy elements like Pt or Pd have been observed previously^{37} and have been attributed to an increased spinflip probability during electron scattering events mediated by larger SO interaction^{38}.
What is novel in our work is that we can directly follow the elementspecific magnetization dynamics of the two constituents of the CoPt alloy. The experimental observation of identical demagnetization rates for Co and Pt is unexpected, given the difference in their respective SO coupling strengths; the SO coupling strength is approximately 10 times larger in Pt than Co^{39}. This can be qualitatively understood by recognizing that the SO coupling is proportional to the gradient of the localpotential (see Eq. 1 in “Methods” section). This implies that, first, it is only large in the region around each atom^{15} and, second, it should scale with the nuclear charge Z (it can be shown that for outer delectrons it scales according to Z²^{39}). In other words, a higher SO coupling should entail a larger local demagnetization rate for heavy elements as compared to transition metals in multicomponent magnets.
This is in contrast to our experimental observations and theoretical calculations. In the following, we will show that this unexpected behavior is due to the mechanism of OISTR, which plays an additional important role and leads to an equal demagnetization rate in both species. To corroborate this, we first look in detail at the measured and calculated energy and helicity dependent absorption.
Helicity dependent transient absorption
In Fig. 3a, we plot the experimental data for the normalized helicity dependent absorption, µ_{σ±}, as a function of pumpprobe delay for pure Co and the CoPt alloy at the Co M_{2,3} resonances at 60.3 eV. We observe that µ_{σ+} increases for both samples on a similar timescale after laser excitation. We attribute this to an increase of available states driven by laser excitation, predominantly in the majority channel. The dynamics of µ_{σ−}, however, show a strikingly different behavior: while for the CoPt sample, it decreases without delay, in the pure Co film the absorption remains constant for approximately 60 fs before it starts to drop as well. Analogously, we understand a decrease of µ_{σ−} by filling of previously available states, now mainly in the minority channel. Hence, the direct comparison of the transient absorption data between Co and CoPt data gives a strong indication that an intersite redistribution of minority spin electrons plays an essential role in the enhanced demagnetization in CoPt alloy at early times.
In order to understand the difference between Co and CoPt, we first theoretically calculate the same observable as in the experiment, namely the transient helicity dependent absorption. This is done by performing linearresponse calculations using the laserexcited state of the system at various times following the procedure detailed in Dewhurst et al.^{40}. Figure 3b displays the theoretical helicity dependent absorption at 60.3 eV for Co and CoPt. For both samples we observe an increase of µ_{σ+}, more pronounced for Co than for CoPt in very good agreement with the experimental data. The transient absorption, µ_{σ−}, for Co stays approximately constant before it starts to drop after about 60 fs. The calculation also reproduces the very pronounced decrease of µ_{σ−} for CoPt. Note that the calculations only give a reliable description of the underlying microscopic physics for early times after excitation (marked as a gray shaded area in Fig. 3a), as the theory does not contain the secondorder coupling to phonons and radiative effects (as discussed previously) which start to dominate after approximately 100 fs.
Transient density of states
To gain an indepth understanding of the distinct dynamics of the majority and minority spin as implied by the helicity dependent absorption, we calculate the transient DOS using TDDFT. The results are displayed in Fig. 3c where we plot the difference of occupied dstates between the groundstate and the excited system, Δn_{d}(t, E) = n_{d}(t < 0, E) − n_{d}(t, E), as a function of energy for a selected time (t = 41 fs) after optical excitation. The laser excitation results in an increase of available states below E_{F}, i.e., Δn_{d} (t > 0, E < E_{F}) > 0 and filling of previously empty states above E_{F}, i.e., Δn_{d}(t > 0, E > E_{F}) < 0. Closer inspection of majority spin electrons for Co as well as for CoPt reveals that the gain of available states below E_{F} does not correspond to the loss of available states above E_{F}, i.e., Δn_{d}(t = 41 fs, E < E_{F}) > Δn_{d}(t = 41 fs, E > E_{F}). This is equivalent to saying that there is a net loss of majority spin electrons, leading to an overall increase of µ_{σ+}. Since the total charge is conserved, spinflip processes from majority to minority states are a rational explanation for this observation^{15,38,41}.
However, surprisingly, we observe that the evolution of the minority states above E_{F} in Co and CoPt shows a qualitative difference despite identical laser excitation. In the Co film, the changes of available minority electrons below and above the Fermi energy are approximately equal resulting in an unchanged absorption µ_{σ−}. Only after about 60 fs with progressing electron redistribution, spinflip processes, i.e., an increase of minority electrons, are directly evidenced by a decrease of µ_{σ−}. Very differently, in CoPt the minority states above E_{F} are filled much more efficiently immediately with the laser excitation leading to a rapid decrease of available states and a corresponding reduction of µ_{σ−}.
One can appreciate the underlying microscopic origin by looking at the inset of Fig. 3c, where we plot the number of occupied spinsplit dstates, n_{d}, integrated in the energy range −13 eV to +13 eV. Minority electrons of Co in CoPt (solid blue line) show a large increase, significantly exceeding the loss of majority electrons for Co in CoPt (dotted blue line). In contrast, in the Co film, the increase in minority electrons is equal to the loss of majority electrons (dotted and solid yellow line respectively). This demonstrates that in CoPt the demagnetization is not only driven by an increased local spinflip rate, which would entail an equal change in the majority and minority spin electrons—i.e., a loss in majority is equal to the gain in minority for Co in CoPt. Instead, the integration over all energies shows that there is an additional source of minority electrons flowing to Co 3d states in CoPt. Since the total charge is conserved and the contribution of s and p states to the dynamics was found to be insignificant in our theoretical simulations, the net gain of minority electrons localized at Co must come from the Pt 5d states. This is corroborated by a detailed analysis of the Pt 5d charge dynamics shown in the Supplementary Fig. 2.
Hence, the analysis of the transient DOS gives strong evidence of an optically driven spin transfer (OISTR) from Pt 5d states to Co 3d states, responsible for very efficient demagnetization during the presence of the optical laser excitation pulse. Finally, the theoretical observation that the source of minority electrons are Pt 5d states is experimentally reaffirmed by helicity dependent absorption measurements at the Pt N_{7} edge at 72.6 eV shown in Fig. 4. Again, we ascribe relative changes in the absorption of σ_{−} and σ_{+} light to changes predominantly in the minority and majority state occupations, respectively. Accordingly, we interpret the strong increase of µ_{σ−} as a loss of minority electrons at the Pt site. This further supports our hypothesis that the source of additional minority electrons in Co in the CoPt alloys is indeed Pt.
We summarize the two essential processes that lead to enhanced demagnetization in CoPt in Fig. 1b: a large SO coupling on the Pt site causes an increased spinflip rate (black arrow) while laser excitation leads to an efficient transfer of minority electrons from Pt to Co via OISTR (colored arrow).
Our experimental data, together with the ab initio calculations, show that energy and helicity dependent transient absorption (HDXAS) gives access to spinresolved transient changes of the DOS around the Fermi level of a specific element. This observable gives clear evidence that in a CoPt alloy two processes lead to an increased demagnetization amplitude and rate: enhanced spinflips mediated by SO coupling and optically driven spin transport from Pt 5d minority electrons to the Co 3d states. The driver for the flow of minority carriers is found in the large phase space of unoccupied 3d minority states. We envision that careful DOSengineering in multicomponent magnetic samples will allow to control the magnitude and direction of such ultrafast spin flow and therefore expect OISTR to play a decisive role for future ultrafast spintronics.
Methods
Theory and computational details
The RungeGross theorem^{42} establishes that the timedependent external potential is a unique functional of the timedependent density, given the initial state. Based on this theorem, a system of noninteracting particles can be chosen such that the density of this noninteracting system is equal to that of the interacting system for all times^{43,44,45}. The wave function of this noninteracting system is represented as a Slater determinant of singleparticle orbitals. In what follows a fully noncollinear spindependent version of these theorems is employed^{15}. Then the timedependent KohnSham (KS) orbitals are Pauli spinors determined by the equations:
where A_{ext}(t) is a vector potential representing the applied laser field, and σ are the Pauli matrices. The KS effective potential \(v_s\left( {{\mathbf{r}},t} \right) = v_{{\mathrm{ext}}}\left( {{\mathbf{r}},t} \right) + v_H\left( {{\mathbf{r}},t} \right) + v_{{\mathrm{xc}}}\left( {{\mathbf{r}}, t} \right)\) is decomposed into the external potential v_{ext} (r, t), the classical electrostatic Hartree potential v_{H} (r, t) and the exchangecorrelation (XC) potential v_{xc} (r, t). Similarly, the KS magnetic field is written as \({\mathbf{B}}_{\mathrm{s}}\left( {{\mathbf{r}},t} \right) = {\mathbf{B}}_{{\mathrm{ext}}}\left( t \right) + {\mathbf{B}}_{{\mathrm{xc}}}\left( {{\mathbf{r}},t} \right)\) where B_{ext} (t) is the magnetic field of the applied laser pulse plus possibly an additional magnetic field and B_{xc} (r, t) is the XC magnetic field. The final term of Eq. (1) is the SO coupling term. All the implementations are done using the stateofthe art full potential linearized augmented plane wave (LAPW) method.
Time and energy resolved occupation of KohnSham states, shown in Fig. 3b, can be calculated as follows:
where n_{jk} is the occupation number of the j^{th} timeevolving orbital, ψ_{j} and
Here ϕ_{I} are the groundstate KohnSham orbitals. In absence of any timedependent perturbation \(\psi _{j\mathbf{k}}\left( {{\mathbf{r}},t = 0} \right) = \phi _{j{\mathbf{k}}}\left( {\mathbf{r}} \right)\) gives the groundstate DOS.
In the main text, we listed several mechanisms included in our simulations that can alter the magnetic moment. However, we wish to add that the much debated superdiffusive^{15,16,32} spin currents are in principle implicitly included in the theoretical description^{16}, where the effect of electronelectron scattering is reproduced by the XC potential. However, to produce such currents, one would also require a prohibitively large supercell. This was not necessary in the present case, as our experiments explicitly exclude the contribution from superdiffusive spin currents by probing the entire thickness of the magnetic sample in transmission geometry.
A fully noncollinear version of TDDFT as implemented within the Elk code^{46} is used for all calculations. A regular mesh in kspace of 8×8×8 is used and a time step of ∆t = 0.1 au is employed for the timepropagation algorithm^{47}. A smearing width of 0.027 eV is used. Laser pulses used in the present work are linearly polarized (inplane polarization) with a frequency of 1.55 eV, with a FWHM of 40 fs and incident fluence of 13 mJ/cm². The transient helicity dependent absorption is determined by performing linearresponse calculations using the laserexcited state of the system at various times following the procedure detailed in^{40}.
During the time propagation, we see that there are small oscillations in the magnetization (with a large period) around the final value of the moment (see Fig. 2b). These oscillations are numerical and get damped as one increases the number of kpoints. In contrast to this, the rapid oscillations are due to electrons moving back and forth with the frequency of the electric field (as well as higher harmonics). The local moments are extracted by integration of the magnetization within a sphere around each atom and this leads to a doubling of the frequency of any oscillation and hence the frequency in Fig. 2b is twice that of the pumppulse frequency.
Demagnetization time constants
The magnetic asymmetry data, shown in Fig. 2, is described with a nonlinear least square fit using the following formula:
where Θ(t−t_{0}) is the Heaviside function, τ_{D} and τ_{R} are the de and remagnetization time constants and t_{0} time delay zero, i.e., t_{0} = 0. The function is convoluted with a Gaussian function, G(t), with a full width half maximum of 60 fs, corresponding to the autocorrelation of the pump and probe pulses. The data was fitted between −2 ps < t < 2 ps to extract the correct time constants, as we observe an early onset of remagnetization, in particular in the Co film (see Supplementary Discussion as well as Supplementary Fig. 1 and Table 1 for more details). All stated errors correspond to an uncertainty interval of σ (68%).
Data availability
The data that supports the finding of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Code availability
The Elk code is released under GPL and is freely available. It can be downloaded from the webpage: elk.sourceforge.net.
References
Stanciu, C. D. et al. Alloptical magnetic recording with circularly polarized light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 1–4 (2007).
Radu, I. et al. Transient ferromagneticlike state mediating ultrafast reversal of antiferromagnetically coupled spins. Nature 472, 205–209 (2011).
ThielemannKühn, N. et al. Ultrafast and energyefficient quenching of spin order: antiferromagnetism beats ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 1–6 (2017).
Olejník, K. et al. Terahertz electrical writing speed in an antiferromagnetic memory. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar3566 (2018).
Selzer, S., Atxitia, U., Ritzmann, U., Hinzke, D. & Nowak, U. Inertiafree thermally driven domainwall motion in antiferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 2–6 (2016).
Carpene, E., Hedayat, H., Boschini, F. & Dallera, C. Ultrafast demagnetization of metals: Collapsed exchange versus collective excitations. Phys. Rev. B  Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 91, 1–8 (2015).
Bossini, D. et al. Macrospin dynamics in antiferromagnets triggered by sub20 femtosecond injection of nanomagnons. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–8 (2016).
Chen, J. et al. Competing Spin Transfer and Dissipation at Co/Cu(001) Interfaces on Femtosecond Timescales. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 067202 (2019).
Kimling, J. et al. Picosecond Spin Seebeck Effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 057201 (2017).
Seifert, T. et al. Terahertz spin currents and inverse spin Hall effect in thinfilm heterostructures containing complex magnetic compounds. SPIN 07, 1740010 (2017).
Schellekens, A. J., Kuiper, K. C., de Wit, R. R. J. C. & Koopmans, B. Ultrafast spintransfer torque driven by femtosecond pulsedlaser excitation. Nat. Commun. 5, 4333 (2014).
Rudolf, D. et al. Ultrafast magnetization enhancement in metallic multilayers driven by superdiffusive spin current. Nat. Commun. 3, 1037 (2012).
Malinowski, G. et al. Control of speed and efficiency of ultrafast demagnetization by direct transfer of spin angular momentum. Nat. Phys. 4, 855–858 (2008).
Dewhurst, J. K., Elliott, P., Shallcross, S., Gross, E. K. U. & Sharma, S. Laserinduced intersite spin transfer. Nano Lett. 18, 1842–1848 (2018).
Krieger, K., Dewhurst, J. K., Elliott, P., Sharma, S. & Gross, E. K. U. Laserinduced demagnetization at ultrashort time scales: predictions of TDDFT. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 4870–4874 (2015).
Krieger, K. et al. Ultrafast demagnetization in bulk versus thin films: an ab initio study. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 224001 (2017).
Elliott, P., Müller, T., Dewhurst, J. K., Sharma, S. & Gross, E. K. U. Ultrafast laser induced local magnetization dynamics in Heusler compounds. Sci. Rep. 6, 38911 (2016).
Dewhurst, J. K., Shallcross, S., Gross, E. K. U. & Sharma, S. Substratecontrolled ultrafast spin injection and demagnetization. Phys. Rev. Appl. 10, 044065 (2018).
Siegrist, F. et al. Lightwave dynamic control of magnetism. Nature 571, 240–244 (2019).
Rhie, H.S., Dürr, H. A. & Eberhardt, W. Femtosecond electron and spin dynamics in Ni/W(110) films. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 247201 (2003).
Gort, R. et al. Early stages of ultrafast spin dynamics in a 3d ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 087206 (2018).
Andres, B. et al. Separating exchange splitting from spin mixing in gadolinium by femtosecond laser excitation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 1–5 (2015).
Eich, S. et al. Band structure evolution during the ultrafast ferromagneticparamagnetic phase transition in cobalt. Sci. Adv. 3, 1–9 (2017).
LaOVorakiat, C. et al. Ultrafast demagnetization dynamics at the M edges of magnetic elements observed using a tabletop highharmonic soft Xray source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 257402 (2009).
Willems, F. et al. Probing ultrafast spin dynamics with highharmonic magnetic circular dichroism spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B  Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 92, 1–5 (2015).
Hofherr, M. et al. Induced versus intrinsic magnetic moments in ultrafast magnetization dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 98, 174419 (2018).
Turgut, E. et al. Controlling the competition between optically induced ultrafast spinflip scattering and spin transport in magnetic multilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 197201 (2013).
Mathias, S. et al. Probing the timescale of the exchange interaction in a ferromagnetic alloy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4792–4797 (2012).
LaOVorakiat, C. et al. Ultrafast demagnetization measurements using extreme ultraviolet light: comparison of electronic and magnetic contributions. Phys. Rev. X 2, 011005 (2012).
Zusin, D. et al. Direct measurement of the static and transient magnetooptical permittivity of cobalt across the entire M edge in reflection geometry by use of polarization scanning. Phys. Rev. B 97, 024433 (2018).
Stöhr, J. & Siegmann, H. C. Magnetism. Magnetism: From Fundamentals to Nanoscale Dynamics vol. 152 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006).
Battiato, M., Carva, K. & Oppeneer, P. M. Superdiffusive spin transport as a mechanism of ultrafast demagnetization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 1–4 (2010).
von Korff Schmising, C. et al. Generating circularly polarized radiation in the extreme ultraviolet spectral range at the freeelectron laser FLASH. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 88, 053903 (2017).
Vodungbo, B. et al. Polarization control of high order harmonics in the EUV photon energy range. Opt. Express 19, 4346 (2011).
Stöhr, J. & Siegmann, H. Magnetism. (Springer, 2006).
Willems, F. et al. Magnetooptical functions at the 3 p resonances of Fe, Co, and Ni: Ab initio description and experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 217202 (2019).
Kuiper, K. C. et al. Spinorbit enhanced demagnetization rate in Co/Ptmultilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 202402 (2014).
Koopmans, B. et al. Explaining the paradoxical diversity of ultrafast laserinduced demagnetization. Nat. Mater. 9, 259–265 (2010).
Shanavas, K. V., Popović, Z. S. & Satpathy, S. Theoretical model for Rashba spinorbit interaction in d electrons. Phys. Rev. B 90, 165108 (2014).
Dewhurst, J. K. et al. Element specificity of transient extreme ultraviolet magnetic dichroism. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.00199 (2019).
Zhang, G. P. & Hübner, W. Laserinduced ultrafast demagnetization in ferromagnetic metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3025–3028 (2000).
Runge, E. & Gross, E. K. U. Densityfunctional theory for timedependent systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997–1000 (1984).
Elliott, P., Burke, K. & Furche, F. Excited states from timedependent density functional theory. Rev. Comput. Chem. 26, 91–165 (2008).
Ullrich, C. A. in TimeDependent DensityFunctional Theory. (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Sharma, S., J. K. Dewhurst, J. K. & E. K. U. G. First Principles Approaches to Spectroscopic Properties of Complex Materials. (Springer Berlin, 2014).
K. Dewhurst, et al. The ELK Code (2018). (2018).
Dewhurst, J. K., Krieger, K., Sharma, S. & Gross, E. K. U. An efficient algorithm for time propagation as applied to linearized augmented plane wave method. Comput. Phys. Commun. 209, 92–95 (2016).
Acknowledgements
S.S., C.v.K.S., and S.E. would like to thank DFG for funding through TRR227 projects A02 and A04.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.E., S.S., F.W. and C.v.K.S. conceived the experiment, S.S., P.E. and J.K.D performed the ab initio calculations. F.W., D.S., C.S. and C.v.K.S. performed the experiment. D.E. grew the magnetic samples. F.W. analysed the experimental data. C.v.K.S., F.W. and S.S. wrote the manuscript with discussions and improvements from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Willems, F., von Korff Schmising, C., Strüber, C. et al. Optical intersite spin transfer probed by energy and spinresolved transient absorption spectroscopy. Nat Commun 11, 871 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467020146915
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467020146915
This article is cited by

Attosecond magnetization dynamics in nonmagnetic materials driven by intense femtosecond lasers
npj Computational Materials (2023)

Mechanism of femtosecond laser induced ultrafast demagnetization in ultrathin film magnetic multilayers
Journal of Materials Science (2022)

Ultrafast highharmonic nanoscopy of magnetization dynamics
Nature Communications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.