Imprinted Cdkn1c genomic locus cell-autonomously promotes cell survival in cerebral cortex development

Abstract

The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p57KIP2 is encoded by the imprinted Cdkn1c locus, exhibits maternal expression, and is essential for cerebral cortex development. How Cdkn1c regulates corticogenesis is however not clear. To this end we employ Mosaic Analysis with Double Markers (MADM) technology to genetically dissect Cdkn1c gene function in corticogenesis at single cell resolution. We find that the previously described growth-inhibitory Cdkn1c function is a non-cell-autonomous one, acting on the whole organism. In contrast we reveal a growth-promoting cell-autonomous Cdkn1c function which at the mechanistic level mediates radial glial progenitor cell and nascent projection neuron survival. Strikingly, the growth-promoting function of Cdkn1c is highly dosage sensitive but not subject to genomic imprinting. Collectively, our results suggest that the Cdkn1c locus regulates cortical development through distinct cell-autonomous and non-cell-autonomous mechanisms. More generally, our study highlights the importance to probe the relative contributions of cell intrinsic gene function and tissue-wide mechanisms to the overall phenotype.

Introduction

The developmental programs regulating the generation of cortical projection neurons by radial glia progenitor (RGP) cells need to be precisely implemented and regulated1,2,3. Impairments in neuron production and maturation lead to alterations in the cortical cytoarchitecture which is thought to represent the major underlying cause for a range of neurodevelopmental disorders including microcephaly, megalencephaly, epilepsy and autism spectrum disorders4. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie concerted RGP lineage progression and the control of neuron output remain unclear3,5,6. Here we genetically dissect the ill-defined function of the essential Cdkn1c gene in corticogenesis. Previous studies indicate that Cdkn1c, encoding p57KIP2, acts as growth/tumor suppressor by directly inhibiting the activity of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs)7,8,9,10. The Cdkn1c genomic locus is subject to genomic imprinting resulting in the expression of the maternal and silencing of the paternal allele, respectively11,12. Genetic loss of function studies indicate an important role of p57KIP2 in regulating RGP lineage progression and cortical projection neuron genesis13,14. Mutant Cdkn1c−/− mice exhibit macrocephaly and cortical hyperplasia indicating a critical function in tuning RGP-mediated neuron output, supporting the concept of a growth-inhibitory Cdkn1c gene function14. However, whether and how Cdkn1c regulates RGP proliferation behavior cell-autonomously is not known. Interestingly, brain-specific conditional deletion of Cdkn1c using Nestin-Cre driver results in thinning of the cerebral cortex, a phenotype seemingly opposite to the one in global Cdkn1c knockout15. Thinning of the cortex however likely emerges as an indirect secondary effect due to severe hydrocephalus caused by a defect in the subcommissural organ (SCO) which is required for cerebrospinal fluid flow15,16. Thus the function of Cdkn1c in corticogenesis may involve substantial non-cell-autonomous components which could promote or inhibit RGP-mediated neuron output and/or neuronal maturation. Here we address this issue and analyze the cell-autonomous phenotypes upon genetic Cdkn1c gene ablation at single-cell level by capitalizing on mosaic analysis with double markers (MADM) technology. Our data from MADM-based analysis indicate that the well-established growth-inhibitory Cdkn1c function is a non-cell-autonomous effect of Cdkn1c knockout in the whole organism. In contrast, we reveal a growth-promoting cell-autonomous Cdkn1c function, which at the mechanistic level acts to protect cells from p53-mediated apoptosis. This cell-autonomous Cdkn1c survival function is dosage sensitive but not subject to genomic imprinting and is attributed to the genomic Cdkn1c genomic locus rather than the expressed Cdkn1c transcript.

Results

MADM-based analysis of Cdkn1c imprinting phenotypes

In order to determine the degree of cell-autonomy of imprinted Cdkn1c gene function in cortical development, we used genetic MADM paradigms17,18,19. To this end, we capitalize on two unique properties of the MADM system: (1) the cell-type-specific generation and visualization of uniparental chromosome disomy (UPD, somatic cells with two copies of the maternal or paternal chromosome) for the functional analysis of imprinted dosage-sensitive gene function; and (2) the sparseness of UPD generation for analyzing cell-autonomous phenotypes at single-cell resolution. Since the imprinted Cdkn1c locus, located on mouse chromosome 7 (Chr. 7), exhibits maternal expression11,12, MADM-labeled cells carrying maternal UPD (matUPD, two maternal chromosomes) are predicted to express two copies of Cdkn1c and cells with paternal UPD (patUPD, two paternal chromosomes) would not express Cdkn1c (Fig. 1a). Thus, the phenotypic consequences of Cdkn1c loss (patUPD) and gain (matUPD) of function can be assessed simultaneously in MADM-induced UPDs, which also express distinct fluorescent reporters (Fig. 1a). MADM-based generation of Chr. 7 UPD occurs only in a very small fraction of genetically defined cells18 and permits the analysis of postnatal stages since the sparseness of genetic mosaicism enables the bypassing of early lethality associated with loss of Cdkn1c function10,20.

Fig. 1: MADM-based analysis of imprinted Cdkn1c gene function at single-cell level.
figure1

a MADM recombination events result in distinct fluorescent labeling of cells containing uniparental disomy (UPD). Yellow cells are control cells, green cells carry maternal uniparental chromosome disomy (matUPD) and red cells contain paternal uniparental chromosome disomy (patUPD). Cdkn1c is expressed from the maternal allele in yellow cells, which resembles the wild-type situation. In green cells (matUPD) Cdkn1c is expressed from both maternal alleles and predicted to result in growth/proliferation disadvantage (expression of two doses of a growth inhibitor). Red cells (patUPD) lack Cdkn1c expression and are expected to show growth/proliferation advantage due to lack of expression of a growth suppressor. b Schematic depicts green (GFP+), red (tdT+), yellow (GFP+/tdT+) and unlabeled MADM cells with UPD (red, green) and control cells (yellow, unlabeled). Parental origin of chromosome is indicated (M, maternal; P, paternal). Imprinting status of Cdkn1c (arrow, expression; ball on stick, repression) and predicted expression (0×, 1×, 2×) is indicated. c Relative Cdkn1c expression in matUPD (red bars) and patUPD (blue bars) at E13 and E16. Bars represent mean. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 (Wald test). Data points indicate individual animals (n = 4–7). d MADM-labeling pattern in cerebral cortex of MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG;Emx1Cre/+) at P21. The parent from which the MADM cassettes were inherited is indicated in the respective genotypes in pink (mother) and blue (father). e Higher magnification of cortical cross-section (boxed area in (d)). f G/R ratio of single MADM-labeled cortical neurons is depicted as geometric mean. Note the equipotency of cells with matUPD and patUPD. Nuclei (d, e) were stained using 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, blue). Data points indicating individual animals (n = 3). Source data are provided as a Source Data file. Scale bar, 500 μm (d), 90 μm (e).

No cell-autonomous role for Cdkn1c in cortical neurogenesis

To generate mice with MADM-induced UPD of Chr. 7 (MADM-7) in proliferating cortical RGPs, we crossed female MADM-7TG/TG with male MADM-7GT/GT;Emx1Cre/+ (Supplementary Figs. 1a and 2a) to obtain experimental MADM-7GT/TG;Emx1Cre/+ mice. In MADM-7 mice, sparse green GFP+ cells carry matUPD (prediction: two copies of expressed Cdkn1c), red tdT+ patUPD (prediction: no Cdkn1c expression), yellow GFP+/tdT+ and unlabeled cells carry no UPD (prediction: 1× Cdkn1c expression) (Fig. 1b). In order to assess and validate whether the above MADM paradigm faithfully results in the predicted levels of Cdkn1c expression, we isolated cells carrying matUPD and patUPD, and control cells at embryonic day (E) 13 and E16 based on their fluorescence by FACS. Next the samples were processed for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and from the obtained sequences we quantified the relative levels of Cdkn1c expression in matUPD and patUPD, when compared to control (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Data 1, 2). As predicted from the MADM scheme the levels of Cdkn1c expression were (1) much lower in patUPD in comparison to matUPD; and (2) while Cdkn1c expression was nearly absent in patUPD at E16, the level in matUPD (two copies of Cdkn1c) reached approximately twofold of the level in control (one copy of Cdkn1c) (Fig. 1c). To further assess the experimental UPD paradigm and to corroborate the above results, we generated comprehensive coverage plots for the RNA reads in the Cdkn1c genomic locus (Supplementary Fig. 3a–c, f) and the larger Kcnq1 cluster region (Supplementary Fig. 4a–c, f). The in-depth analysis of these coverage plots revealed (1) no novel, previously unannotated, transcripts in the Cdkn1c locus; and (2) that the predicted Cdkn1c expression occurs faithfully in UPD as predicted from the MADM scheme (Fig. 1a). Specifically, cells with matUPD (two doses of Cdkn1c; red in Fig. 1c and Supplementary Figs. 3a and 4a) show about twofold higher Cdkn1c expression levels than control cells (one dose of Cdkn1c; yellow in Fig. 1a and dark yellow in Supplementary Figs. 3c and 4c) whereas cells with patUPD (zero dose of Cdkn1c; green in Fig. 1a and blue in Supplementary Figs. 3b and 4b) show a drastic reduction of Cdkn1c expression. Thus, these results conclusively validate the MADM approach resulting in distinct doses of expressed Cdkn1c transcripts depending on the UPD status.

Since Cdkn1c promotes growth inhibition and cell-cycle exit, and taking into consideration the imprinting and expression status of Cdkn1c, green matUPD (two doses of Cdkn1c) cells would be expected to show growth/proliferation disadvantage when compared to red patUPD (no Cdkn1c) cells (Fig. 1a). Perhaps surprisingly we however found a green/red (G/R), i.e. matUPD/patUPD ratio of ~1 and thus equal growth/proliferation potential of RGPs regardless of the UPD status (Fig. 1d–f). These results indicate that Cdkn1c has no prominent cell-autonomous role in cell-cycle regulation of proliferating cortical RGPs. To directly test this possibility, we first analyzed the expression levels of cell-cycle regulators in RNA-seq data. We could not find significant differences in the expression levels of a number of key cell-cycle regulators in cells with matUPD or patUPD, respectively (Fig. 2a, b, Supplementary Data 2). Next, we measured incorporation of EdU after 1 h of exposure at E13 in the embryonic neuroepithelium and found that MADM-labeled cells with matUPD, patUPD and control all displayed equal relative amounts with EdU label (Fig. 2c, d). Lastly, we monitored the fraction of proliferating cells that remained in cell-cycle (EdU+/Ki67+) in a 24-h time window. Again, we found similarly sized EdU+/Ki67+ fractions of MADM-labeled cells with matUPD, patUPD and control (Fig. 2e, f). Altogether these data indicate that individual RGPs with matUPD (two expressed doses of Cdkn1c) or patUPD (no expressed Cdkn1c), in an otherwise wild-type environment, exhibit similar proliferation behaviors. Based on the sparse induction of UPD in just very few cells (with a vastly normal background), these results show that Cdkn1c does not regulate RGP proliferation behavior cell-autonomously. This is also in agreement with the observed sparse expression pattern of p57KIP2 protein in RGPs (less than 12% of PAX6+ RGPs express p57KIP2)14. The results thus indicate that the observed cortical overgrowth observed in Cdkn1c−/− full knockout mice14 is mainly due to global non-cell-autonomous Cdkn1c function and/or community effects.

Fig. 2: Analysis of imprinted Cdkn1c cell-cycle properties based on MADM-UPD.
figure2

a Schematic depicts green (GFP+), red (tdT+), yellow (GFP+/tdT+) and unlabeled MADM cells with UPD (red, green) and control cells (yellow, unlabeled). Parental origin of chromosome is indicated (M, maternal; P, paternal). Imprinting status of Cdkn1c (arrow, expression; ball on stick, repression) and predicted expression (0×, 1×, 2×) is indicated. b Expression levels of two representative cell-cycle genes (Cdk1, Pcna) in matUPD (red bars) and patUPD (blue bars) at E13 and E16. Data points indicate individual animals (n = 5−7). c EdU labeling (1 h chase) in MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG;Emx1Cre/+) cerebral cortex at E13 with GFP+ matUPD (green) and tdT+ patUPD (red) (top) and colabeled with EdU in white (bottom) double-positive cells are indicated by yellow arrows. d Fraction (%) of MADM+/EdU+ colabeled cells (red bar, matUPD (GFP+ cells); blue bar, patUPD (tdT+ cells); gray bar, control cells (GFP+/tdT+ cells)). Data points indicate individual animals (n = 6). e EdU+/Ki67+ colabeling in MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG;Emx1Cre/+) cerebral cortex with EdU injection (24 h chase) at E13. MADM-labeled (matUPD, GFP+; patUPD, tdT+ in top) Ki67+ (blue in middle) and EdU+ (white in bottom) triple-positive cells are indicated by yellow arrows. f Fraction (%) of MADM+/Ki67+/EdU+ cells of total MADM+/EdU+ cells after 24 h EdU chase (red bar, matUPD (GFP+); blue bar, patUPD (tdT+); gray bar, control cells (GFP+tdT+ cells)). Data points indicate individual animals (n = 4). All bars represent mean. Error bars represent SEM (d, f). Nuclei (c) were stained using DAPI (blue). NCX neocortex, HC hippocampus. Scale bar, 15 μm (c), 10 μm (c top and bottom), 25 μm (e), 20 μm (e top, middle, bottom). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

No loss of imprinted Cdkn1c expression in cortical cells

An alternative explanation for our results indicating equipotency of Chr. 7 matUPD/patUPD could be the possible cell-type-specific loss of imprinting, a phenomenon which has been observed for imprinted Dlk1 in postnatal stem cells21. In other words, the paternal Cdkn1c allele would be de-repressed specifically in Emx1+ RGPs and/or their lineage. Thus cells with mat- and patUPD would both express similar doses of Cdkn1c and therefore show the same phenotype, i.e. the same number of projection neuron output from RGPs. To test this possibility we generated F1 C57BL/6J (B6)—CAST/EiJ (CAST) hybrids22 to qualitatively and quantitatively analyze allelic expression in RGPs and nascent neurons. We used two well-defined single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located in exon 2 and exon 4 of Cdkn1c (Supplementary Fig. 5a), and a SNP in Ndn (single exon gene which is paternally expressed) as control22. We first isolated genomic DNA from an individual B6/CAST hybrid embryo at E12 to confirm the presence of respective SNPs in Cdkn1c and Ndn. Sanger and deep sequencing of the genomic DNA confirmed the presence and ~50% abundance of each parental SNP as expected (Supplementary Fig. 5b–h, o). Next, we generated single-cell suspensions of E12 cortex from B6/CAST hybrids and used well-established FACS protocols23 to enrich for RGPs and projection neurons. From the obtained neuron and progenitor populations, we isolated RNA which we converted to cDNA, followed by Sanger and deep sequencing to determine allelic expression (Supplementary Fig. 5b–q). These experiments revealed highly skewed, almost exclusive allelic expression of paternally expressed Ndn, and maternally expressed Cdkn1c in both RGP and neuron cell populations. Importantly, paternal expression of Cdkn1c in neurons (<5%) and progenitors (<2%) was miniscule (Supplementary Fig. 5p, q). Thus imprinting and repression of the paternal Cdkn1c allele is intact in embryonic neurogenic RGPs and nascent neurons. In conclusion, the results from allelic expression experiments corroborate the above findings of MADM-based analysis of Chr. 7 UPD (Fig. 1). Together, these data demonstrate that Cdkn1c does not cell-autonomously control RGP-mediated neuron output and/or maturation, and that the observed macrocephaly in Cdkn1c−/− full knockout likely reflects global organism overgrowth.

Genetic Cdkn1c ablation results in microcephaly

To more directly assess Cdkn1c function in cortical RGPs at single-cell resolution, we next introduced a conditional Cdkn1c-flox allele24 into MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG,Cdkn1c-flox;Emx1Cre/+). When we introduced the Cdkn1c-flox allele from the mother, all cells (regardless of UPD status) of the Emx1+ lineage in F1 should in principle be equivalent to homozygous Cdkn1c−/− because of imprinting, i.e. deleted maternal expression and paternal silencing (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figs. 1b and 2b). Indeed, we found that control cells, and cells with matUPD and patUPD, all displayed nearly undetectable relative Cdkn1c expression levels (Fig. 3b). However, contrary to our expectation of a cortical overgrowth phenotype due to Cdkn1c loss of function, and RGP equipotency with G/R of 1, we observed a dramatic reduction of GFP+ Cdkn1c−/− matUPD cells when compared to tdT+ Cdkn1c+/+ patUPD (although with two copies of silenced Cdkn1c) and severe microcephaly (Fig. 3c–f). This Cdkn1c conditional deletion phenotype is in stark contradiction with a growth suppressive function of Cdkn1c. Next, we evaluated whether the suspected growth-promoting function of Cdkn1c is subject to regulation by genomic imprinting. To this end we introduced the Cdkn1c-flox allele from the father (Fig. 3g and Supplementary Figs. 1b and 2c) and generated GFP+ Cdkn1c−/− patUPD cells which we compared to tdT+ Cdkn1c+/+ matUPD. Analysis of the relative Cdkn1c expression confirmed that patUPD express very low levels of Cdkn1c while matUPD (with two copies of Cdkn1c) show about twofold higher Cdkn1c expression in comparison to control cells (one copy of Cdkn1c) (Fig. 3h). Strikingly we observed again dramatic reduction of mutant Cdkn1c−/− cells when compared to Cdkn1c+/+ cells (Fig. 3i–l). This is unexpected because the imprinting status of Cdkn1c in patUPD already shows no expression of Cdkn1c due to homozygosity and complete silencing of both paternal Cdkn1c alleles (Fig. 3g, h). To further support our finding of a Cdkn1c growth-promoting function independent of parental Chr. 7 UPD status, we introduced the Cdkn1c-flox allele from both parents and generated a true Cdkn1c conditional knockout (cKO) but with sparse MADM-labeling for single-cell analysis (MADM-7GT,Cdkn1c-flox/TG,Cdkn1c-flox;Emx1Cre/+) (Fig. 3m and Supplementary Figs. 1c and 2d). In these cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice control cells and cells with matUPD and patUPD all displayed nearly undetectable levels of Cdkn1c expression (Fig. 3n) similar to the paradigm with maternal Cdkn1c deletion (Fig. 3b). Consequently, the cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice exhibit very strong microcephaly (Fig. 3o–q), similar to Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice with maternal deletion (Fig. 3c–e), and slightly more severe than with paternal deletion (Fig. 3i–k). Importantly however, in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice we observed a G/R of ~1 unlike the very low G/R ratio in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with maternal or paternal deletion, respectively (Fig. 3f, l, r). A G/R ratio of ~1 in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 cortex indicates equipotency of mutant Cdkn1c−/− neurogenic RGP cells regardless of the disomy status (i.e. green GFP+ are patUPD and red tdT+ are matUPD) similar like in MADM-7 where all cells are Cdkn1c+/+ although with UPD (Fig. 1).

Fig. 3: Cell-autonomous growth-promoting Cdkn1c function is independent of genomic imprinting status.
figure3

Analysis of Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) with maternal deletion (af), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) with paternal deletion (gl), and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT,Cdkn1c/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) (mr). The parent from which the MADM cassettes with or without recombined Cdkn1c-flox allele (Cdkn1c) were inherited is indicated in the respective genotypes in pink (mother) and blue (father). Predicted Cdkn1c expression in GFP+ (green), tdT+ (red), GFP+/tdT+ (yellow) and unlabeled (gray) MADM-labeled cells (a, g, m); and true relative levels of Cdkn1c expression in GFP+ (green bar), tdT+, (red bar), GFP+/tdT+ (yellow bar) MADM-labeled cells (b, h, n) in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with maternal deletion (a, b), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with paternal deletion (g, h), and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (m, n) at E16 are indicated (MM, matUPD; PP, patUPD; MP, control). Data points indicate individual animals (n = 5–7).Outlier values are not shown (see Source Data File). Bars indicate median. Imprinting of Cdkn1c (arrow, expression; ball on stick, repression) and predicted expression (0×, 1×, 2×) is indicated. Parental origin of chromosome is indicated (M, maternal; P, paternal) and conditional deletion of Cdkn1c is marked with red cross. MADM-labeling (GFP+, green; tdT+, red; GFP+/tdT+, yellow) (c, d, i, j, o, p), cortical width (μm) is shown with an error bar representing SEM (e, k, q), and G/R ratio (geometric mean) of single MADM-labeled cortical projection neurons (f, l, r) in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with maternal deletion (cf), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with paternal deletion (il), and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (or) at P21 are indicated. Boxed areas in overview images (c, i, o) show representative images of the extent of microcephaly at higher resolution (d, j, p). Nuclei were stained using DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 500 μm (overview (c, i, o)) and 90 μm (inset (d, j, p)). Note the decreased numbers of Cdkn1c−/− cells when compared to Cdkn1c+/+ cells in (f) and (l) but equipotency/equal numbers of Cdkn1c−/− cells in (r) regardless of the UPD status. Data points (e, f, k, l, q, r) indicating individual animals (n = 3). NCX neocortex, HC hippocampus. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Next, we analyzed the emergence of the microcephaly phenotype during development in a time course analysis. We found that the microcephaly phenotype was already evident from E13 onwards in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with maternal and paternal deletion, respectively, and in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7. The severity of microcephaly increased until E16 (Supplementary Fig. 6), persisted until birth and in postnatal mice up to P21 (latest time point of analysis).

In summary, our MADM-based analysis of UPD and in combination with conditional deletion of Cdkn1c revealed a growth-promoting function of Cdkn1c which is dominant over the imprinting status of the genomic Cdkn1c locus. Given that mosaic Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice (all cells are Cdkn1cflox/+) with heterozygous Cdkn1c deletion in Emx1+ lineage show microcephaly similar like cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice, we conclude that the growth-promoting function of Cdkn1c is also highly dosage sensitive. In other words, removal of one copy of Cdkn1c leads to haploinsufficiency with nearly identical phenotype to that observed when both copies were ablated.

Gene expression profile upon genetic deletion of Cdkn1c

To gain better insight into the putative mechanism of the growth-promoting Cdkn1c function, we first profiled global gene expression in cKO and compared to control mice. To this end we purified cells of the Emx1+ lineage in E16 cortices from control MADM-7 and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice by FACS. Next, the samples were processed for RNA-seq and global gene expression profiles were established for further analysis (Fig. 4a, Supplementary Data 3) (see Methods for details). First, we reduced the dimensionality of our data and identified similarities and differences in global gene expression between control and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 by principal component analysis (PCA). We found that the samples with distinct genotypes (i.e. control vs. cKO) segregated from each other (Fig. 4b). Next, we confirmed the loss of Cdkn1c expression in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (Fig. 4c). To exclude the possibility of any remaining truncated partial Cdkn1c mRNA species and/or the residual presence of previously unannotated transcripts within the Cdkn1c genomic locus and broader Kcnq1 cluster region in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM, we generated coverage plots for the obtained RNA reads (Supplementary Figs. 3d–f and 4d–f). This analysis confirmed (1) the drastic reduction of Cdkn1c transcripts in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM and (2) did not reveal any novel unannotated transcripts that could hypothetically escape deletion in our conditional genetic experimental paradigm. These results thus conclusively validate our genetic deletion approach to conditionally ablate Cdkn1c expression in cortical Emx1+ lineage.

Fig. 4: Gene expression profile in cortex upon genetic deletion of Cdkn1c locus.
figure4

a Experimental paradigm. b Principal component analysis of all samples used for analysis. Data points indicate individual animals (n = 3–7). c Relative levels of Cdkn1c in cKO and controls cells. Bars represent mean. Data points indicate individual animals (n (controls) = 7, n (cKO) = 3). d Number of up-, and downregulated genes in cKO/control comparisons (adjusted p value < 0.05, Wald test). e Significance scores of all informative genes within 2 Mbp up-, and downstream of Cdkn1c are shown (y axis). Each dot represents one gene with the position given as the midpoint of its genomic locus (mega base-pairs (Mbp), x axis). Horizontal lines mark limits for significant differential expression (corresponding to an adjusted p value of 0.05, Wald test). Gray box marks the putative maximum size of the Kcnq1 imprinted gene cluster. f Curated list of significantly enriched gene ontology (GO) terms in the lists of up-, downregulated genes shown in (d). The full list of significantly enriched GO terms is available in Supplementary Data 5. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

To obtain a first pass measure of the extent of differential gene expression in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7, we plotted the number of up- and downregulated genes (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Data 4). Since imprinted Cdkn1c is embedded in a larger cluster, the Kcnq1-cluster of imprinted genes on Chr.7, we analyzed whether the expression of neighboring genes could be affected in the cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice with conditional Cdkn1c deletion (Fig. 4e). While the expression profile of Cdkn1c indicated drastically low, nearly absent, levels of expression, the genes flanking (2 Mbp up- and downstream) the Cdkn1c genomic locus displayed no significant differential expression (Fig. 4e). We next performed gene-ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes in cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7. This analysis revealed a very high probability of cellular phenotypes associated with the downregulation of genes related to neurogenesis in general and with the upregulation of genes involved in cell death in particular (Fig. 4f, Supplementary Data 5).

Cdkn1c is cell-autonomously required for cellular survival

Based upon our findings from gene expression profiling and since previous studies showed that the hydrocephalus phenotype in Cdkn1c cKO induced with Nestin-Cre can be rescued by concomitant p53 (Trp53) ablation15, we next analyzed cell death parameters upon conditional loss of Cdkn1c. We thus stained cortex at E13 in MADM-7, Cdkn1c-MADM-7 and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 embryos for apoptotic cells with antibodies against Caspase-3 (Fig. 5). While in MADM-7 almost no cortical cells showed signs of apoptosis (Fig. 5a–e), high numbers (up to 20% of all cells) of Caspase-3+ cells were detected in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (maternal and paternal deletion) and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (Fig. 5f–t).

Fig. 5: Cdkn1c function is required for nascent cortical projection neuron survival.
figure5

Analysis of developing cerebral cortex in MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG;Emx1Cre/+) (ae), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) with maternal deletion (fj), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) with paternal deletion (ko), and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT,Cdkn1c/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) (pt) at E13. The parent, from which the MADM cassettes and with recombined Cdkn1c-flox allele (Cdkn1c) (ft) was inherited, is indicated in the respective genotypes in pink (mother) and blue (father). Schematics (a, f, k, p) depict green (GFP+), red (tdT+), yellow (GFP+/tdT+) and unlabeled MADM cells with UPD (red, green) and control cells (yellow, unlabeled). Imprinting (arrow, expression; ball on stick, repression) and expression (0×, 1×, 2×) status is indicated. Conditional deletion of Cdkn1c is marked with red cross. Parental origin of chromosome is indicated (M maternal, P paternal). MADM-labeling in overview (GFP+, green; tdT+, red; GFP+/tdT+, yellow) (b, g, l, q) and G/R ratio (geometric mean) of single MADM-labeled cortical projection neurons (c, h, m, r) in MADM-7 (b, c), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with maternal deletion (g, h), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with paternal deletion (l, m), and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (q, r) at E13 indicate emerging microcephaly. Note the equipotency of cells with matUPD and patUPD in (c) and (r) but decreased numbers of Cdkn1c−/− cells when compared to Cdkn1c+/+ cells in (h) and (m) regardless of the UPD status. Labeling of apoptotic Caspase-3+ cells (white) in MADM tissue (GFP+, green; tdT+, red; GFP+/tdT+, yellow) (d, i, n, s); and quantification of Caspase-3+/DAPI+ coloc (%) (e, j, o, t) in MADM-7 (d, e), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with maternal deletion (i, j), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with paternal deletion (n, o), and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (s, t) at E13. Note that in MADM-7 almost no Caspase-3+ cells are detected. Yellow arrows indicate GFP+ remnants of Cdkn1c−/− mutant cells. All bars indicate mean. Error bars represent SEM (e, j, o, t). Data points indicate individual animals (n = 3). Nuclei were stained using DAPI (blue). NCX neocortex. Scale bar, 200 μm (b, g, l, q) and 20 μm (d, i, n, s). Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Interestingly, at E13 the relative number of homozygous mutant cells, i.e. green Cdkn1c−/− cells, in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (maternal and paternal deletion) was already reduced in comparison to red Cdkn1c+/+ wild-type cells (Fig. 5h, m). Note that again this reduction in cell number appeared irrespective of the chromosomal disomy status and thus independent of genomic imprinting. However, Cdkn1c-MADM-7 mice are genetic mosaics with green cells that show homozygous deletion of the Cdkn1c genomic locus, red cells with homozygous intact Cdkn1c locus and heterozygous yellow/unlabeled cells with one deleted copy of Cdkn1c locus. Therefore, we next analyzed whether the red cells (tdT+) with homozygous intact Cdkn1c locus in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (maternal and paternal deletion) mice would have a survival advantage or disadvantage when compared to the heterozygous yellow or unlabeled (DAPI+) cells. Strikingly, far fewer red cells with homozygous intact Cdkn1c genomic locus were positive for Caspase-3 than unlabeled (DAPI+) heterozygous cells, regardless of the imprinting status and thus expressed dose of Cdkn1c transcript (Supplementary Fig. 7). Collectively, these results demonstrate that the genetic deletion of Cdkn1c genomic locus results in an increased probability of cell death in a highly dosage-dependent manner. In other words, removal of one copy of Cdkn1c results in haploinsufficiency with increased apoptosis when compared to wild-type cells with two intact copies of Cdkn1c.

In the course of our analysis of cell death upon genetic deletion of Cdkn1c, we noticed that Caspase-3+ cells in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 at E13 seemed to appear less prominently in the ventricular zone (VZ) but more abundant in nascent neurons located in the emerging cortical plate (CP). To quantitatively assess the rate of cell death in ventricular RGPs and nascent neurons in the CP, we stained sections from MADM-7, Cdkn1c-MADM-7 and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 embryos with antibodies against Caspase-3 together with the RGP marker PAX6 or nascent neuron marker NEUROD2, respectively. Indeed, the absolute number of PAX6+/Caspase-3+ was significantly lower than the number of NEUROD2+/Caspase-3+ cells in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (Supplementary Fig. 8). Thus, not only nascent cortical projection neurons (NEUROD2+) show a higher incidence of cell death upon Cdkn1c ablation but also PAX6+ RGPs. Consequently, the overall number of actively proliferating RGPs is already reduced from early E13 embryonic stages onward (Supplementary Fig. 9). We also corroborated our findings by staining sections from MADM-7, Cdkn1c-MADM-7 and cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7 embryos with antibodies against p53 which marks cells that initiate the apoptotic pathway (Supplementary Fig. 10). Lastly, both upper layer callosal (SATB2+) and deep layer corticofugal (TBR1+) projection neuron populations were cell-autonomously prone to apoptosis and thus reduced in Cdkn1c-MADM-7 with maternal and paternal deletion, respectively (Fig. 6). Altogether, we conclude that the cell-autonomous growth-promoting Cdkn1c function discovered here is mainly acting to promote the survival of differentiating and maturing cortical projection neurons and (to a lesser extent) proliferating RGPs.

Fig. 6: Callosal and corticofugal projection neuron classes require Cdkn1c for survival.
figure6

Analysis of cortical layer marker expression (SATB2 and TBR1) in MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG;Emx1Cre/+) (af), Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) with maternal deletion (gl), and Cdkn1c-MADM-7 (MADM-7GT/TG,Cdkn1c;Emx1Cre/+) with paternal deletion (mr), in cerebral cortex at P0. The parent, from which the MADM cassette and with recombined Cdkn1c-flox allele (Cdkn1c) was inherited, is indicated in the respective genotypes in pink (mother) and blue (father). Schematics (a, g, m) depict green (GFP+), red (tdT+), yellow (GFP+/tdT+) and unlabeled MADM cells with UPD (red, green) and control cells (yellow, unlabeled). Imprinting (arrow, expression; ball on stick, repression) and expression (0×, 1×, 2×) status of Cdkn1c is indicated. Conditional deletion of Cdkn1c is marked with red cross. Parental origin of chromosome is indicated (M maternal, P paternal). G/R ratio (b, h, n) of single MADM-labeled cortical neurons is depicted as geometric mean. Data points indicate individual animals (n = 5–7). Labeling of upper layer callosal SATB2+ cells (white) (c, i, o) and lower layer corticofugal TBR1+ cells (white) (e, k, q) in MADM tissue (GFP+, green; tdT+, red; GFP+/tdT+, yellow); and quantification of SATB2+/MADM+ (d, j, p) and of TBR1+/MADM+ (f, l, r) cells. Red cell numbers are centered to 1 and green cell numbers are shown relative to red (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, two-tailed t test). All bars indicate mean. Error bars represent SEM (d, j, p and f, l, r). Note the decrease in GFP+ mutant double-positive neurons when compared to tdT+ wild-type cells. Data points indicate individual animals (n = 5–7) for G/R ratio; and individual sections (n = 15–22) for layer marker expression. Nuclei were stained using DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 µm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Discussion

Here we report that the Cdkn1c genomic locus, rather than the Cdkn1c transcript, is cell-autonomously required for the survival of RGPs and nascent projection neurons in the developing cerebral cortex. The reported cell-autonomous Cdkn1c survival function is dosage-sensitive but independent of genomic imprinting. Below we discuss the implications of our findings for cortical development but also more generally in the context of Cdkn1c imprinting and Cdkn1c/p57KIP2-mediated growth control at the individual cell- and systemic level.

The development of the cerebral cortex is highly orchestrated and regulated by diverse genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. RGPs are the main progenitor stem cells that produce all excitatory projection neurons1,3,25 and recent data indicate that cortical neurogenesis follows a relatively deterministic rule17,26. The genetic, molecular and cellular mechanisms that regulate RGP lineage progression and nascent projection neuron maturation are however not well understood. Furthermore, recent studies indicate that epigenetic regulatory cues at cellular and systemic levels play an important role as well5,27. One peculiar epigenetic regulatory mechanism is genomic imprinting, resulting in the selective silencing of one parental allele in a subset of genes28,29,30. Although many imprinted genes are prominently expressed during corticogenesis, their functional role in regulating cortical development is mostly unclear due to the lack of assays permitting single-cell phenotypic analysis. Here we employed MADM technology to genetically dissect the level of cell-autonomy of imprinted Cdkn1c gene function in corticogenesis (Fig. 7). We found that Cdkn1c regulates RGP proliferation and cortical neurogenesis predominantly non-cell-autonomously, a concept in agreement with previous studies14 that implicate Cdkn1c in whole organism growth suppression10 (Fig. 7a, b). In contrast, we also provide genetic evidence for a growth-promoting, rather than inhibiting, function of Cdkn1c in the developing cerebral cortex (Fig. 7c). Two possible scenarios could explain the seemingly opposite functions inferred from previous and our genetic loss of function analysis. First, the tissue-specific Cdkn1c growth-promoting function observed in the developing cortex (this study) could not be observed in full knockout10,20 because the p57KIP2-mediated growth inhibition acts in a dominant manner on the whole organism. Thus additional cell-type and/or tissue-specific Cdkn1c functions, such as the growth promotion (i.e. prevention of cell death) as revealed by our conditional Cdkn1c analysis, may not unfold. Alternatively, if we consider the architecture of the genomic Cdkn1c locus and deletion analysis comparatively, a small region of the 3′ genomic Cdkn1c locus could be essential for nascent projection neuron survival and cortical growth (Supplementary Fig. 11). The critical element in the genomic Cdkn1c locus can be narrowed down to approximately 500 bp by comparing the deletion10 leading to full Cdkn1c knockout and the conditional deletion of the allele analyzed in this study24 (Supplementary Fig. 11). Importantly, since Cdkn1c shows maternal specific expression, the silent paternal allele was, so far, considered nonfunctional. In stark contrast to this view, we have observed striking phenotypes upon maternal and paternal Cdkn1c deletion in cortical progenitors and neurons. A detailed analysis of allelic expression of Cdkn1c, using SNP- and UPD-based approaches, however detects strong maternal expression with minimal contribution from the paternal allele. Although we cannot formally rule out a function of the minimal paternal expression, our data indicate that the Cdkn1c locus carries the critical functional element which albeit is not under the control of genomic imprinting. While the global growth-inhibiting function of p57KIP2 protein may or may not be disrupted in the cKO-Cdkn1c-MADM-7, the loss of the growth-promoting function inherent to the 500 bp element likely acts in a dominant manner in the conditional- and single-cell MADM deletion paradigms. This interpretation is supported by the fact that Cdkn1c full knockout10 (where the 500 bp element is preserved) do not show any signs of apoptosis in the developing cortex and exhibit macrocephaly14, likely as a result of non-cell-autonomous mechanisms due to global loss of p57KIP2. The here identified cell-autonomous growth-promoting function of genomic Cdkn1c locus is highly dosage sensitive with heterozygous cells showing haploinsuffciency. Strikingly, the prevention of apoptosis by intact Cdkn1c locus is not subject to genomic imprinting, as mentioned above, in contrast to the growth-inhibitory p57KIP2 function. In the future it will be revealing to dissect the interplay of endogenous p57KIP2 protein and the here identified genetic element in the regulation of cortical stem cell behavior. Interestingly, it has been shown that the intracellular distribution and localization of p57KIP2 plays instructive roles in proliferation and differentiation of adult skeletal muscle stem cells31. Whether similar mechanisms and/or in combination with the 500 bp element are relevant for RGP proliferation, cortical neuron production and/or cellular survival represent critical open questions that should be clarified in further studies. Regardless of the precise mechanism, it will be also important to determine the cell-autonomous and non-autonomous downstream signaling components of the Cdkn1c locus which promote projection neuron survival and/or regulate global growth of the developing cerebral cortex. Finally, it is intriguing to note that while the intron−exon boundaries in the Cdkn1c genomic locus appear to be highly conserved from mouse to human, the exon sequences have diverged considerably in humans32,33. It will thus be revealing to determine the generality of our findings in other species than the mouse and in particular in human context. More generally, our study highlights the importance to probe the relative contributions of the cell intrinsic gene function and extrinsic tissue-wide mechanisms to the overall phenotype not only in health but also in neurodevelopmental disease conditions.

Fig. 7: Schematic of Cdkn1c locus functions in cerebral cortex growth and development.
figure7

a Previous studies41,42,43,44 have established that twofold or higher systemic (whole animal) expression of Cdkn1c (2×, dark gray) results in embryonic growth inhibition when compared to wild-type embryos with imprinted expression of Cdkn1c (1×, gray) whereas global knockout of Cdkn1c (0×, light gray) results in embryonic overgrowth14,45. b Analysis of single cells with MADM-induced uniparental chromosome disomy (UPD) (twofold overexpression (green cells) or no expression of Cdkn1c (red cells)) in an otherwise wild-type environment indicates no cell-autonomous function for Cdkn1c in cortical growth regulation. c Conditional Cdkn1c locus deletion and analysis at single-cell resolution revealed a putative survival element (SE) acting in a dosage-sensitive manner but which is not subject to genomic imprinting. Deletion of either the maternal or paternal Cdkn1c locus leads to p53-mediated apoptosis.

Methods

Mouse lines and maintenance

Mouse protocols were reviewed by institutional ethics committee and preclinical core facility (PCF) at IST Austria and all breeding and experimentation was performed under a license approved by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research in accordance with the Austrian and EU animal laws. Mice were maintained and housed in animal facilities with a 12-h day/night cycle and adequate food/water conditions according to IST Austria institutional regulations. Mouse lines with Chr. 7 MADM cassettes18 (MADM-7-GT JAX stock # 021457, MADM-7-TG JAX stock # 021458), Cdkn1c-flox allele24, Emx1-Cre34 (JAX stock # 005628) have been described previously. Calculation of recombination probability and recombination of Cdkn1c-flox allele onto chromosomes carrying the MADM cassettes was performed according to standard techniques. These are described in detail elsewhere17,35 and are summarized in Supplementary Fig. 1. All MADM-based analyses were carried out in a mixed C57BL/6J, CD1 genetic background, in male and female mice without sorting experimental cohorts according to sex. Based on genotype experimental groups were randomly assigned. For allelic expression analysis, we used the inbreed mouse lines CAST/EiJ (JAX stock # 000928) and C57BL/6J (JAX stock # 000664). Age of experimental animals is indicated in the respective figures, figure legends and source data file.

Tissue collection and immunohistochemistry

Mice were deeply anesthetized by injection of a ketamine/xylazine/acepromazine solution (65 mg, 13 mg and 2 mg/kg body weight, respectively) and unresponsiveness was confirmed through pinching the paw. The diaphragm of the mouse was opened from the abdominal side to expose the heart. Cardiac perfusion was performed with ice-cold PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) followed immediately by 4% PFA (paraformaldehyd) prepared in PB buffer (Sigma-Aldrich). Brains were removed and further fixed in 4% PFA O/N to ensure complete fixation. Brains were cryopreserved with 30% sucrose (Sigma-Aldrich) solution in PBS for approximately 48 h. Brains were then embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T. (Sakura). Pregnant females were sacrificed at the respective time points to obtain E13 and E16 embryonic brain tissue. Embryonic and P0 brains were directly transferred into ice-cold 4% PFA. Cryopreservation was performed in 30% sucrose in PBS and embedding was performed according to standard techniques.

For adult time points, 45 µm coronal sections were collected in 24 multi-well dishes (Greiner Bio-one) and stored at −20 °C in antifreeze solution (30% v/v ethyleneglycol, 30% v/v glycerol, 10% v/v 0.244 M PO4 buffer) until used. Adult brain sections were mounted onto superfrost glass-slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific), followed by three wash steps (5 min) with PBS. Tissue sections were blocked for 30 min in a buffer solution containing 5% normal donkey serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific), 1% Trition X-100 in PBS. Primary antibodies in blocking buffer were incubated overnight at 4 °C. Sections were washed three times for 5 min each with PBT (1% Triton X-100 in PBS) and incubated with corresponding secondary antibody diluted in PBT for 1 h. Sections were washed two times with PBT and once with PBS. Nuclear staining of brain sections was performed by 10 min incubation with PBS containing 2.5% DAPI (4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sections were embedded in mounting medium containing 1,4-diazabicyclooctane (DABCO; Roth) and Mowiol 4-88 (Roth) and stored at 4 °C until use. Embryonic brains and early postnatal brains (P0) were sectioned at 20 or 30 µm and directly mounted onto superfrost glass-slides (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Immunohistochemistry for embryonic brains was performed as described above. The M.O.M. Immunodetection Kit (Vector Laboratories) was used by following the instructions of the user manual whenever mouse primary antibody was needed for staining. For a detailed list of antibodies and respective dilutions, vendors and order numbers, see Supplementary Table 1.

EdU labeling experiments

Cell-cycle experiments were based on the use of the Click-iT Alexa Fluor 647 imaging kit (Thermo Fisher C10340). Reagents were reconstituted according to the user manual. Pregnant females were injected with EdU (1 mg/ml EdU stock solution; 50 µl/10 g mouse) at E13. Embryos were collected 1 h after EdU injection and 24 h after EdU injection. Tissue was fixed in 4% PFA and immunohistochemistry was performed as described above, except that the Click-iT imaging kit was used (according to the instruction manual) to visualize the EdU signal before performing the DAPI staining.

Imaging and analysis of MADM-labeled brains

Sections were imaged using an inverted LSM800 confocal microscope (Zeiss) and processed using Zeiss Zen Blue software. Confocal images were analyzed in Photoshop software (Adobe) by manually counting MADM-labeled cells based on respective marker expression. To determine cortical thickness solely DAPI images were used. Images were opened in Zen Blue software and measurements were performed using the “line”-tool of this software. Three different measurements in the somatosensory cortex were done per image and accordingly combined to one value by averaging the three measured parameters. Six replicates were measured per individual brain. Three different individuals were analyzed per genotype. Significance was determined using two-tailed t test in Graphpad Prism 7.0.

Single-cell suspension and FACS of MADM-labeled cells

Pregnant females were sacrificed and E13/E16 embryos were collected. Neocortex area was dissected. Single individuals were used as replicates. Single-cell suspensions were prepared by using Papain containing l-cysteine and EDTA (vial 2, Worthington), DNase I (vial 3, Worthington), Ovomucoid protease inhibitor (vial 4, Worthington), EBSS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), DMEM/F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific), FBS and HS. All vials from Worthington kit were reconstituted according to the manufacturer’s instructions using EBSS. The dissected brain area was directly placed into Papain-DNase solution (20 units/ml papain and 1000 units DNase). Enzymatic digestion was performed for 30 min at 37 °C in a shaking water bath. Next, solution 2 (EBSS containing 0.67 mg Ovomucoid protease inhibitor and 166.7 U/ml DNase I) was added, the whole suspension was thoroughly mixed and centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 rpm at RT. Supernatant was removed and cell pellet was resuspended in solution 2. Trituration with p1000 pipette was performed to mechanically dissolve any remaining tissue parts. DMEM/F12 was added to the cell suspension as a washing solution, followed by a centrifugation step of 5 min with 1500 rpm at RT. Cells were resuspended in media (DMEM/F12 containing 10% FBS and 10% HS) and kept on ice until sorted. Right before sorting, cell suspension was filtered using a 40 µm cell strainer. FACS was performed on a BD FACS Aria III using 100 nozzle and keeping sample and collection devices (0.8 ml PCR tubes) at 4 °C. Duplet exclusion was performed to ensure sorting of true single cells. Cells were sorted into 4 µl lysis buffer (0.2% Triton X-100, 2U/µl RNase Inhibitor (Clonetech)). Immediately after sorting was completed samples were transferred into a 96-well plate (Bio-Rad) that was kept on dry ice. Once the plate was full it was sealed and kept at −80 °C until further processing. For relative Cdkn1c expression experiments GFP+, tdT+ and GFP+/tdT+ cells (200−400 cells) were collected. For the WT-pool and cKO-pool, all MADM-labeled cells (GFP+, tdT+ and GFP+/tdT+) were sorted together in order to isolate only Emx1+ lineages (which express Cre and thus show deleted Cdkn1c locus), ensuring sufficient number of cells (400 cells) as starting material. Sequencing libraries were prepared following the Smart-Seq v2 protocol36 using custom reagents (VBCF GmbH) and libraries from a 96-well plate were pooled, diluted and sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) using v4 chemistry or NextSeq550 (Illumina).

Single-cell suspension and antibody-based FACS

Single-cell suspension was prepared using Neural Tissue Dissociation Kit (Miltenyi #130-092-628) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Pregnant females were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. E12 embryos were isolated and directly transferred into 1× PBS and kept on ice. Region of interest (neocortex) was dissected and used for single-cell suspension preparation. Enrichment for neurons and RGPs (progenitors) was performed according to a protocol described previously23. The following antibodies were used for FACS: Prominin-1-PEVio770 1:100 (Miltenyi, Clone: MB9-3G8, #130-102-891), CD15-BV421 (5 µl per sample) (BD, Clone: W6D3, #740086), CD11b-APCR700 1:100 (BD, Clone: m1/70, #564985), CD31-APCR700 1:100 (BD, Clone MEC13.3, #565509) and CD45-APCR700 1:100 (BD, Clone: 30-F11, #565478). In order to avoid contamination of nonneuronal and nonprogenitor cell populations an initial gating was performed where cells positive for CD11b, CD31 and CD45 were eliminated. The cell population negative for these markers was then used further. The progenitor cell population which was Prominin+/CD15+ was collected. The neuronal population was negative for both markers. Cell sorting was performed at 4 °C using the 100 nozzle and on an FACS Aria III, BD Biosciences. Cells were collected in a custom-made RNA extraction buffer (30 nM TRIS pH 8, 10 nM EDTA pH 8, 1% SDS and 200 µg/µl Proteinase K).

RNA extraction

Upon cell sorting, samples were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Total volume was adjusted to 250 µl using RNase-free H2O (Thermo Fisher Scientific) followed by addition of 750 µl Trizol LS (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were mixed by inverting five times. After a 5-min incubation step at RT, the entire solution was transferred into a MaXtract tube (Qiagen). Two hundred microliters chloroform (Sigma-Aldrich) was added, followed by three times 5-s vortexing and 2-min incubation at RT. Samples were centrifuged for 2 min with 12,000 rpm at 18 °C. Supernatant was transferred to a new tube and isopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich) was added in a 1:1 ratio. For better visibility of the RNA pellet, 1 µl GlycoBlue (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added and entire solution was mixed by vortexing (3 × 5 s). Samples were left for precipitation o/n at −20 °C. After precipitation samples were centrifuged for 20 min with 14,000 rpm at 4 °C. Supernatant was removed and RNA pellet was washed with 70% ethanol, followed by a 5-min centrifugation step (14,000 rpm at 4 °C). RNA pellet was resuspended in 12.5 µl RNase-free H2O. RNA quality was analyzed using Bioanalyzer RNA 6000 Pico kit (Agilent) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA samples were stored at −80 °C until further use.

Analysis of allelic expression by Sanger and deep sequencing

RNA was isolated from 10,000 cells (sorted as described above) using Trizol LS (Thermo Fisher Scientific), DNAse1 treated (DNA free KIT, Ambion) and converted to cDNA (SuperScript VILO, Invitrogen). Genomic DNA was prepared from the carcass of one embryo used for FACS sorting. For Sanger sequencing, regions of interest were amplified (Platinum Hot Start PCR Master Mix, Invitrogen) and sequenced using a nested primer (LGC Genomics GmbH, primers given below). Chromatograms were prepared using partly customized functions from R package sangerseqR37. For deep sequencing, regions of interest were amplified with different primers that produce fragments where the SNP of interest is located within 50 bp of one end, with a high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Q5 NEB, primer given below). PCR fragments were purified (Ampure XP, Beckman Coulter) and pooled per sample of origin. Each pool was prepared for deep sequencing (VBCF GmbH, Vienna) and sequenced on a HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) using v4 chemistry. Each sequencing produced a minimum of 700,000 uniquely aligned reads (>99% of total reads), using STAR v.2.5.0c38 and mouse genome build GRCm38. Samtools v1.3 was used to prepare pileups and the occurrences of high-quality nucleotides were counted at two positions (Cdkn1c: 143458858, Ndn: 62348457, GRCm38) using custom scripts and the relative abundance of each nucleotide at the SNP position plotted. Details on primers for Sanger sequencing: Cdkn1c (TC SNP), PCR: GGGACTTCAACTTCCAGCAG, CTCAGAGACCGGCTCAGTTC, sequencing: TCTGTGCCCGCCTTCTAC. Cdkn1c (AG SNP), PCR: TAGAGGCTAACGGCCAGAGA, GCTTTACACCTTGGGACCAG, sequencing: CTGGGACCTTTCGTTCATGT. Ndn (AG SNP), PCR: CACTTCCTCTGCTGGTCTCC, TGCTTCTGCACCATTTCTTG, sequencing: TCCTTCACCAACACGTACCA. Details on primers for deep sequencing: Ndn (AG SNP), PCR: CACTTCCTCTGCTGGTCTCC, GCTGTCCTGCATCTCACAGT. Cdkn1c (AG SNP), PCR: CCACGGTTTTGTGGAAATCT, GTGGGGGCTTTTACTCAACA. Note that the Ndn SNP is shown on the reverse strand.

Statistical analysis of RNA-seq data

Raw reads were delivered as unaligned BAM files and technical replicates were combined using samtools (v1.8). For alignment, BAM files were converted to fastq format using bamToFastq (bedtools suite v2.26.0). Reads within transcripts were counted using STAR (v2.5.0c) with an index prepared from GRCm38 and Gencode M16 gene annotation. Parameters used for STAR alignment: outFilterMultimapNmax 1, outSAMstrandField intronMotif, outFilterIntronMotifs RemoveNoncanonical and quantMode GeneCounts. All downstream analyses were performed in R (v3.4.4) using DESeq2 (v1.16.1).

For Fig. 1 we analyzed 39 samples and removed 7 samples with a low percentage of uniquely aligned reads (<40%) or consistently low correlation with other biological replicates to reduce noise (see Supplementary Data 1 for details on samples used in the analysis). For DESeq2 analyses genes with a mean coverage of less than ten reads, over all samples under investigation, were removed. Figure 1c: size factor normalized read counts (DESeq2) were used. Relative expression values for Cdkn1c gene were calculated by dividing the normalized read counts for each sample by the median of the normalized read counts of the respective control samples. Figure 2b: Relative expression values for indicated genes were calculated by dividing the normalized read counts for each matUPD and patUPD sample by the mean of the normalized read counts of the respective matUPD sample. Significance of differential expression between groups was calculated for each developmental time point using DESeq2 with the following parameters: design = ~sample + group. See Supplementary Data 1 for details on samples. Supplementary Data 2 provides full differential expression results. To identify changes in cell-cycle state between matUPD and patUPD cells, we compiled a list of 78 genes that were shown to indicate cell-cycle stages in RNA-seq data39. These genes are also indicated in Supplementary Data 2.

Figure 3: Relative expression of Cdkn1c was calculated as for Fig.1 using the mean normalized read count of control cells to calculate relative expression. Note that for the purpose of this manuscript only Cdkn1c read counts were used and the full dataset together with an in-depth analysis will be published at a later time.

Figure 4: Genes with a mean coverage of less than ten reads over all samples under investigation were removed. Figure 4b: Principal component analysis was performed on variance stabilized count data calculated by varianceStabilizingTransformation (DESeq2) using the top 500 most variable genes and parameter: blind = T. Figure 4c: relative expression of Cdkn1c was calculated and plotted as for Fig.1 using the mean normalized read count of control cells to calculate relative expression. Significance of differential expression between groups was calculated for each developmental time point using DESeq2 with parameter: design = ~group. Supplementary Data 3 provides details on samples and Supplementary Data 4 provides full results of differential expression analysis. Figure 4e: Significance scores were calculated as the log10 of the adjusted p value. Prefix of this score was adjusted to represent upregulation (positive) or downregulation (negative). The position of each gene was calculated as the midpoint of its annotated genomic locus. Only informative genes telomeric to position 141459694 (mm10) are shown. The putative maximum size of the Kcnq1 cluster is defined here as the region spanning from Ascl2 to Ano1 genes (chr7:142966829-144738543, mm10). Figure 4f: Gene Ontology term enrichment was performed using genes with an adjusted p value < 0.05, separately for upregulated genes (log2 fold-change > 0, higher in cKO) or downregulated genes (log2 fold-change < 0, higher in control) using enrichGO (clusterProfiler v3.4.4) with org.Mm.eg.db (v3.4.1) and parameters: keytype = “ENTREZID”, ont = “ALL”, pool = T, readable = T, pvalueCutoff = 0.05, qvalueCutoff = 0.1, maxGSSize = 2000. As the universe parameter, we used all informative genes used in this analysis. To reduce the number of enriched GO terms for display, we used a combination of manual curation and REVIGO (http://revigo.irb.hr/)40 with parameters: Allowed similarity: Tiny (0.4), similarity measure: Jiang and Conrath. Details on all enriched GO terms and manual/REVIGO curation are provided in Supplementary Data 5a, b. Supplementary Fig. 3, 4: Read coverages across the genome were calculated using bam2wig.py (RseQC v2.6.3) using parameter: -t 1000000. Resulting wiggle files were converted to BED format using convert2bed (bedops v2.4.14) and regions of interest were extracted using intersectBed (bedtools v2.25.0). Averaging of coverages and final wiggle file preparation was done in R. Wiggle files were displayed on the UCSC genome browser (https://genome.ucsc.edu/). Reference annotation-based transcript (RABT) assembly was performed for each replicate using cufflinks (v2.2.1) with Gencode M16 annotation using standard parameters. Merging of RABT assemblies was done using cuffmerge (v2.2.1) using standard parameters. No novel transcripts were identified in the Cdkn1c locus.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

Data that support the findings of this study have been deposited at the NCBI GEO data repository under accession number GSE138230. The source data underlying Figs. 1c, f, 2b, d, f, 3b, h, n, e, k q, f, l, r, 4c, 5c, h, m, r, e, j, o, t, 6b, h, n, d, j, p, f, l, r, Supplementary Figs. 5o, p, q, 6a, 7b, d, 8a-d, 9d, g, j and 10c, f, i, l are provided as a Source Data file.

References

  1. 1.

    Lodato, S. & Arlotta, P. Generating neuronal diversity in the mammalian cerebral cortex. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 31, 699–720 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Lui, J. H., Hansen, D. V. & Kriegstein, A. R. Development and evolution of the human neocortex. Cell 146, 18–36 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Taverna, E., Gotz, M. & Huttner, W. B. The cell biology of neurogenesis: toward an understanding of the development and evolution of the neocortex. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 30, 465–502 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Hu, W. F., Chahrour, M. H. & Walsh, C. A. The diverse genetic landscape of neurodevelopmental disorders. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 15, 195–213 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Amberg, N., Laukoter, S. & Hippenmeyer, S. Epigenetic cues modulating the generation of cell-type diversity in the cerebral cortex. J. Neurochem. 149, 12–26 (2019).

  6. 6.

    Beattie, R. & Hippenmeyer, S. Mechanisms of radial glia progenitor cell lineage progression. FEBS Lett. 591, 3993–4008 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Besson, A., Dowdy, S. F. & Roberts, J. M. CDK inhibitors: cell cycle regulators and beyond. Dev. Cell 14, 159–169 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Hatada, I. et al. Genomic imprinting of human p57KIP2 and its reduced expression in Wilms’ tumors. Hum. Mol. Genet. 5, 783–788 (1996).

  9. 9.

    Matsuoka, S. et al. p57KIP2, a structurally distinct member of the p21CIP1 Cdk inhibitor family, is a candidate tumor suppressor gene. Genes Dev. 9, 650–662 (1995).

  10. 10.

    Zhang, P. et al. Altered cell differentiation and proliferation in mice lacking p57KIP2 indicates a role in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Nature 387, 151–158 (1997).

  11. 11.

    Hatada, I. & Mukai, T. Genomic imprinting of p57KIP2, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, in mouse. Nat. Genet. 11, 204–206 (1995).

  12. 12.

    Matsuoka, S. et al. Imprinting of the gene encoding a human cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p57KIP2, on chromosome 11p15. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 3026–3030 (1996).

  13. 13.

    Furutachi, S. et al. Slowly dividing neural progenitors are an embryonic origin of adult neural stem cells. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 657–665 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Mairet-Coello, G. et al. p57(KIP2) regulates radial glia and intermediate precursor cell cycle dynamics and lower layer neurogenesis in developing cerebral cortex. Development 139, 475–487 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Matsumoto, A. et al. Deregulation of the p57-E2F1-p53 axis results in nonobstructive hydrocephalus and cerebellar malformation in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4176–4192 (2011).

  16. 16.

    Guerra, M. M. et al. Understanding how the subcommissural organ and other periventricular secretory structures contribute via the cerebrospinal fluid to neurogenesis. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 9, 480 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Beattie, R. et al. Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals distinct sequential functions of Lgl1 in neural stem cells. Neuron 94, 517–533 (2017). e513.

  18. 18.

    Hippenmeyer, S., Johnson, R. L. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with double markers reveals cell-type-specific paternal growth dominance. Cell Rep. 3, 960–967 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Zong, H., Espinosa, J. S., Su, H. H., Muzumdar, M. D. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with double markers in mice. Cell 121, 479–492 (2005).

  20. 20.

    Yan, Y., Frisen, J., Lee, M. H., Massague, J. & Barbacid, M. Ablation of the CDK inhibitor p57Kip2 results in increased apoptosis and delayed differentiation during mouse development. Genes Dev.elopment 11, 973–983 (1997).

  21. 21.

    Ferron, S. R. et al. Postnatal loss of Dlk1 imprinting in stem cells and niche astrocytes regulates neurogenesis. Nature 475, 381–385 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Andergassen, D. et al. Mapping the mouse Allelome reveals tissue-specific regulation of allelic expression. eLife. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.25125 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Johnson, M. B. et al. Single-cell analysis reveals transcriptional heterogeneity of neural progenitors in human cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 18, 637–646 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Matsumoto, A. et al. p57 is required for quiescence and maintenance of adult hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 9, 262–271 (2011).

  25. 25.

    Cadwell, C. R., Bhaduri, A., Mostajo-Radji, M. A., Keefe, M. G. & Nowakowski, T. J. Development and arealization of the cerebral cortex. Neuron 103, 980–1004 (2019).

  26. 26.

    Gao, P. et al. Deterministic progenitor behavior and unitary production of neurons in the neocortex. Cell 159, 775–788 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Telley, L. et al. Temporal patterning of apical progenitors and their daughter neurons in the developing neocortex. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav2522 (2019).

  28. 28.

    Kravitz, S. N. & Gregg, C. New subtypes of allele-specific epigenetic effects: implications for brain development, function and disease. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 59, 69–78 (2019).

  29. 29.

    Perez, J. D., Rubinstein, N. D. & Dulac, C. New perspectives on genomic imprinting, an essential and multifaceted mode of epigenetic control in the developing and adult brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 39, 347–384 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Tucci, V., Isles, A. R., Kelsey, G., Ferguson-Smith, A. C. & Erice Imprinting, G. Genomic imprinting and physiological processes in mammals. Cell 176, 952–965 (2019).

  31. 31.

    Mademtzoglou, D. et al. Cellular localization of the cell cycle inhibitor Cdkn1c controls growth arrest of adult skeletal muscle stem cells. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33337 (2018).

  32. 32.

    John, R. M., Hodges, M., Little, P., Barton, S. C. & Surani, M. A. A human p57(KIP2) transgene is not activated by passage through the maternal mouse germline. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8, 2211–2219 (1999).

  33. 33.

    Pateras, I. S., Apostolopoulou, K., Niforou, K., Kotsinas, A. & Gorgoulis, V. G. p57KIP2: “Kip”ing the cell under control. Mol. Cancer Res. 7, 1902–1919 (2009).

  34. 34.

    Gorski, J. A. et al. Cortical excitatory neurons and glia, but not GABAergic neurons, are produced in the Emx1-expressing lineage. J. Neurosci. 22, 6309–6314 (2002).

  35. 35.

    Hippenmeyer, S. et al. Genetic mosaic dissection of Lis1 and Ndel1 in neuronal migration. Neuron 68, 695–709 (2010).

  36. 36.

    Picelli, S. et al. Smart-seq2 for sensitive full-length transcriptome profiling in single cells. Nat. Methods 10, 1096–1098 (2013).

  37. 37.

    Hill, J. T. et al. Poly peak parser: method and software for identification of unknown indels using sanger sequencing of polymerase chain reaction products. Dev. Dyn. 243, 1632–1636 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Scialdone, A. et al. Computational assignment of cell-cycle stage from single-cell transcriptome data. Methods 85, 54–61 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Supek, F., Bosnjak, M., Skunca, N. & Smuc, T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE 6, e21800 (2011).

  41. 41.

    Andrews, S. C. et al. Cdkn1c (p57Kip2) is the major regulator of embryonic growth within its imprinted domain on mouse distal chromosome 7. BMC Dev. Biol. 7, 53 (2007).

  42. 42.

    Fitzpatrick, G. V., Soloway, P. D. & Higgins, M. J. Regional loss of imprinting and growth deficiency in mice with a targeted deletion of KvDMR1. Nat. Genet. 32, 426–431 (2002).

  43. 43.

    Mancini-Dinardo, D., Steele, S. J., Levorse, J. M., Ingram, R. S. & Tilghman, S. M. Elongation of the Kcnq1ot1 transcript is required for genomic imprinting of neighboring genes. Genes &. Genes Dev. 20, 1268–1282 (2006).

  44. 44.

    Shin, J. Y., Fitzpatrick, G. V. & Higgins, M. J. Two distinct mechanisms of silencing by the KvDMR1 imprinting control region. EMBO J. 27, 168–178 (2008).

  45. 45.

    Tunster, S. J., Van de Pette, M. & John, R. M. Fetal overgrowth in the Cdkn1c mouse model of Beckwith−Wiedemann syndrome. Dis. Models Mech. 4, 814–821 (2011).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Heger (IST Austria Preclinical Facility), A. Sommer and C. Czepe (VBCF GmbH, NGS Unit) and C. Streicher for mouse colony maintenance, assistance, and/or technical help with RNA-seq; Y. Gotoh and all members of the Hippenmeyer lab for discussion. N.A received support from Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Firnberg-Programm (T 1031). R.B. received support from Austrian Science Fund (FWF) Meitner-Programm (M 2416). This work was also supported by IST Austria institutional funds; a grant from NÖ Forschung und Bildung n[f + b] (C13-002) to S.H.; and the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 725780 LinPro) to S.H.

Author information

S.L., R.B., F.M.P. and S.H. conceived the research. S.L., R.B., F.M.P. and S.H. designed all experiments and interpreted the data. S.L., R.B., F.M.P. and N.A. performed all the experiments. K.I.N. provided reagents. S.H. wrote the manuscript with inputs from S.L., R.B. and F.M.P. All authors edited and proofread the manuscript.

Correspondence to Simon Hippenmeyer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laukoter, S., Beattie, R., Pauler, F.M. et al. Imprinted Cdkn1c genomic locus cell-autonomously promotes cell survival in cerebral cortex development. Nat Commun 11, 195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14077-2

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.