Cavity creation is a key to the origin of biological functions. Small cavities such as enzyme pockets are created simply through liner peptide folding. Nature can create much larger cavities by threading and entangling large peptide rings, as learned from gigantic virus capsids, where not only chemical structures but the topology of threaded rings must be controlled. Although interlocked molecules are a topic of current interest, they have for decades been explored merely as elements of molecular machines, or as a synthetic challenge. No research has specifically targeted them for, and succesfully achieved, cavity creation. Here we report the emergence of a huge capsular framework via multiple threading of metal–peptide rings. Six equivalent C4-propeller-shaped rings, each consisting of four oligopeptides and Ag+, are threaded by each other a total of twelve times (crossing number: 24) to assemble into a well-defined 4 nm-sized sphere, which acts as a huge molecular capsule.
The spherical shell structure of the HK97 virus capsid1 is made up of a large number of peptide entanglements and provides a lesson in the simplicity and elegance of design. A thin capsular shell provides the superstructure with mechanical stability and encloses its huge inner cavity. In this virus capsid, the essence of the shell formation process can be described as concomitant intra-strand (folding) and inter-strand (entwining) self-assembly processes, and this has inspired us to demonstrate the same using chemistry2,3,4,5,6,7. Previously, the self-assembly of Ag+ and ditopic oligopeptide 1 has resulted in peptide catenane 2 (Fig. 1a)4. The Pro-Gly-Pro-x-Gly-Pro-Pro sequence (Pro: l-proline, Gly: glycine, and x: imino-(1,3-phenylene)carbonyl spacer) of 1 adopted a loop conformation on coordination to Ag+ and assembled to form a simple link of two Ag1(1)1 macrocycles. In contrast, shorter peptide ligand 3 afforded peptide catenane 4, which is formed of four tetrahedrally linked macrocycles with 12 strand-crossing points3; this structure is described as the T2-tetrahedral link topology7 by the practical topological description method developed for DNA polyhedral catenanes8 in knot theory9 (Fig. 1b). The Ω-shaped loop of the Pro-Gly-Pro sequence is too short to connect the two terminal pyridines (py) of 3 through Ag+ coordination, and instead the C3-symmetrical Ag3(3)3 macrocycle is formed, which further assembles to give the tetrahedral link.
This result prompted us to explore Pro-rich peptide fragments for the construction of a more advanced polyhedral link. Here, we report that Ag+ and ditopic Pro-Pro-x-Ala-Pro-sequenced (Ala: l-alanine) peptide 5 self-assemble to form peptide catenane 6, which is a cubic structure formed of six interlocking C4-symmetrical Ag4(5)4 macrocycles (Fig. 1c). This structure corresponds to the T2-hexahedral link, which belongs to a family of polyhedra formed from double lines with two twist (T2) operations on each edge8 (Fig. 2). This unique topology provides a huge isolated cavity (ca 3200 Å3); thus, 6 can be considered a miniature mimic of the HK97 virus capsid.
Self-assembly of catenane 6
Ditopic peptide ligand 5 was synthesised by solution-phase peptide synthesis (Supplementary Methods), and peptide catenane 6 was obtained by simple mixing of 5 (14 μmol) and silver bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (AgTf2N, 14 μmol) in CD3NO2 (0.7 mL) at 60 °C for 10 min (Fig. 3a). The 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum of the resulting mixture clearly showed that the multiple conformers of flexible 5 converged to a single conformation (Fig. 3b, c). Diffusion-ordered NMR spectroscopy (DOSY) revealed that these symmetrical proton signals were derived from a large monodisperse assembly at diffusion coefficient D = 3.4 × 10–10 m2•s–1 (log D = −9.45), and could be clearly distinguished from those of building block 5 at D = 5.3 × 10–10 m2•s–1 (log D = −9.26) (Fig. 3d, e and Supplementary Fig. 31). The formation of a monodisperse assembly was also supported by dynamic light scattering (DLS) analysis (Supplementary Fig. 42) and ion-mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS)10 (Supplementary Figs. 43 and 44), and its framework showed good thermal stability at 50 °C; this was confirmed by variable temperature NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 30). The quantitative self-assembly of 6 was very fast; it was completed within 2 min by simply stirring the components at room temperature. This suggests that the folding and entwining are not stepwise, but simultaneous processes.
Distinct structural evidence for the formation of peptide catenane 6 was obtained by a single crystal X-ray diffraction study. Slow vapour diffusion of diisopropyl ether into a CH3NO2 solution of 6 (40 mM) at room temperature over 10 days afforded single crystals. Structural analysis carried out in the cubic I432 space group clearly revealed the molecular structure of 6 in high resolution (Fig. 4a). Another crystallographic data analysed in the monoclinic I2 showed the structural flexibility of 6: the molecular structure was identical except for the slightly flattened conformation from the spherical shape (Supplementary Fig. 36). Each peptide ligand adopts the same specific “S-curve” conformation to give a C4 propeller-shaped Ag4(5)4 macrocycle through linear coordination of Ag+ to the terminal py on 5 (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 41). Six of these macrocycles form a cubic assembly through ring threading at each peptide hairpin; this corresponds to the T2-hexahedral link. Although the linking of two directional (chiral) macrocycles can generate diastereomers in principle, the 1H NMR observation of the single product indicates the threading process takes place with complete diastereo-selectivity here as observed in the previous study on 24. Each vertex (three-way junction structure) of this topology is induced by six sets of inter-strand amide hydrogen bonds (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 40). Each edge (twisted double loops) is stabilised by four sets of amide hydrogen bonds in addition to two Ag–π interaction arrays (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 39). This is also observed in previous catenane 24. The crossing number of this topology is 24 (2 × 12 edges), and this was clearly confirmed by the reduced alternating link diagram9 shown in Fig. 4e. This crossing number is considerably higher than that of the T2-tetrahedral link in previous catenane 4 or that of its topological analogue (both have crossing numbers of 12)3,7. To the best of our knowledge, no discrete synthetic molecules have been synthesised with such a large crossing number to date 11,12,13,14.
Modification of inner cavity
Another special feature of 6 is its huge inner cavity. The exquisite entwining of peptide strands affords a capsular shell (Fig. 4f) with a highly isolated 1.6-nm-sized cavity (Fig. 4g). The framework contains only 0.4-nm-sized pinholes as the static form in the solid state. Engineering of the inner surface of 6 was achieved simply by replacing the Ala residue position (Z) on the ligand with other α-amino acids (Figs. 5 and 6a). We confirmed that the l-leucine (Leu) analogue, ligand 5L, showed the same 1H NMR signal pattern as 6 after coordination to Ag+ (Fig. 7ab), which indicates the formation of the catenane of the Ag24(5L)24 composite. Likewise, 1H NMR observation confirmed that analogous ligands, 5Q (Z: l-glutamine (Gln)), 5D (Z: l-aspartic acid β-benzyl ester (AspBzl)), and 5K (Z: Nε-benzyloxycarbonyl l-lysine (LysCbz)) also successfully assembled into the catenanes (Fig. 7c for 5K, Supplementary Fig. 27b–e). In sharp contrast, replacement of the Ala residue with Gly (ligand 5G) or Pro (ligand 5P) residues did not result in convergent spectra. This is ascribed to the high conformational flexibility of Gly and the rigidity of Pro, which prevented the stable formation of the S-shaped conformation (Fig. 7d for 5G, Supplementary Fig. 27h for 5P). Reaction of an equimolar mixture of ligands 5 (1 eq.) and 5L (1 eq.) with AgPF6 (2 eq.) gave a 1H NMR spectrum with six signals (integral ratio: 1:1:1:2:2:1) for the C-terminal amide proton at around 11 ppm (Fig. 7e), which indicates ligand swapping on the catenane framework. We suggest that one plausible structure that would provide this spectrum is a C3-symmetric catenane containing equimolar amounts of 5 and 5L ligands (Supplementary Table 5).
Inner modification with Lys residues enabled large guest loading within the cavity. Although molecular encapsulation in small spaces has gradually been reported15, guest confinements within huge cavities (>1000 Å3) are challenging because of the less efficient contacts between the guest and the cavity. To demonstrate this, lithocholic acid (LCA)-tethered peptide ligand 7 was prepared (Fig. 5, Supplementary Methods), and a mixture of ligands 5 (3 eq.) and 7 (1 eq.) was reacted with Ag+ (4 eq.). After complexation, the C-terminal amide proton signals were again observed in the downfield (11.2–10.9 ppm) region of the 1H NMR spectrum owing to severe desymmetrisation of the structure (Fig. 7f, Supplementary Fig. 49). With the support of DOSY NMR spectroscopy and modelling studies, we estimated that the cavity volume of the catenane framework was large enough to confine six LCA molecules (occupied volume by guests: 6 × 370 Å3 = 2220 Å3) (Supplementary Figs. 51a and 55). Likewise, incorporation of dehydrocholic acid (DHCA) within the cavity using ligand 8 was also successful (Supplementary Figs. 50 and 51b). These demonstrations show not only the strategy for guest loading within huge cavities but the potential applicability of various bioconjugation techniques16 for the inner modifications.
Furthermore, guest encapsulation in a non-covalent manner was also confirmed. To engineer guest-binding sites, the l-citrulline (Cit) analogue, ligand 9, was prepared (Fig. 5, Supplementary Methods). We expected that reversible encapsulation17,18 occurred even for this mechanically interlocked capsule if the inner surface of the cavity is modified by densely integrated urea groups and induce multiple H-bonds formation with a guest molecule. After the complexation of ligand 9 (24 eq.) and Ag+ (24 eq.) under the existence of 1,3,5-benzenetriacetic acid G (1 eq.) as a guest, the 1H NMR spectrum showed the signal pattern of the successful catenane formation (Ag24(9)24) in addition of the significant upfield shifts of the signals of G (Fig. 7g, h). In contrast, the unmodified framework 6 showed the weak interaction with G (Supplementary Figs. 52 and 53). The observation on downfield shifts of urea proton signals as increasing ratio of G indicates the H-bonds formation of the urea with the carboxyl groups on G (Supplementary Fig. 54). Significantly, the rapid guest exchange between the inside and outside of the capsular framework observed in DOSY NMR studies (Supplementary Fig. 53) suggests that the capsular framework is not keeping the closed shell conformation but relatively dynamic nature in the solution state: the structural flexibility based on the mechanical entanglements in addition of the labile nature of the py–Ag+ coordination bond enables guest G to pass through the framework. Figure 6b shows the modelling structure, which shows at least two molecules of G can be encapsulated even in the closed shell framework. Thus, the interlocked metal–peptide frameworks show unique structural flexibility and therefore function to encapsulate guest molecules.
Another aspect about the mechanical entanglements to be discussed is the efficiency of the cavity construction. In the case of compound 6, large cavity of ca 3200 Å3 volume (calculated by 3V19) was constructed by 120 amino acid building blocks (5 residues ×24 ligands) in total (Supplementary Fig. 58). This is quite small number of amino acid residues considering that natural or de novo proteins of around 120 residues possess at most 600–1200 Å3 volume cavities (Supplementary Table 6 and Supplementary Fig. 56). In other words, construction of a cavity comparable to 3000 Å3 volume generally requires polypeptides of 300–600 amino acid residues (Supplementary Table 7 and Supplementary Fig. 57). These facts suggest the rationality of the molecular entanglements for shaping the cavity.
In summary, we have succeeded in the chemical bottom-up construction of a metal–peptide capsule with multiple ring threadings. Although a single peptide strand or py–Ag+ bond is fragile even in non-coordinating solvents, its highly entwined structure, formed through self-assembly, forms a large hollow scaffold. In terms of topology, it is noteworthy that the metal-linked peptide rings select a single topology from an enormous number of possibilities; to date, the exact number of topologies for crossing number 24 cannot even be calculated by knot theory20,21. Furthermore, the emergence of the 24-crossing catenane here provides us an inspiration for the next topology of the T2-polyhedral links, that a C5 propeller-shaped design of a metal–peptide ring will give a T2-dodecahedral link, that is a 60-crossing catenane (Fig. 2). Including different types of topologies by a symmetry-based prediction22, it will bring growing attentions for chemical constructions of advanced polyhedral links. In terms of function, elaborate engineering of the inner surface of the cavity is possible in this capsular framework, unlike in most previous examples of molecular capsules17,18,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31, which will enable the future incorporation of various active centres and the creation of artificial enzymes. Thus, the results not only present the formation of a single chemical topology and its guest encapsulation behaviour, but are also expected to broadly inspire further work of great interest in the fields of both topology and encapsulation.
Boc-Pro-OH, Boc-Ala-OH, Boc-Leu-OH•H2O, Boc-Gln-OH, Boc-Lys(Cbz)-OH, Boc-Gly-OH, Boc-Asp(OBzl)-OH, Boc-Cit-OH, 4N HCl solution (in 1,4-dioxane), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI), 1-hydroxy-1H-benzotriazole monohydrate (HOBt), O-(7-aza-1H-benzotriazol-1-yl)-N,N,N’,N’-tetramethyluronium hexafluorophosphate (HATU), 1-hydroxy-7-azabenzotriazole (HOAt), and N,N-diisopropylethylamine (DIEA) were purchased from Watanabe Chemical Industries. 1,3,5-benzenetriacetic acid was purchased from Honeywell Fluka. Other reagents and solvents were purchased from TCI, FUJIFILM WAKO Pure Chemical Corporation, Sigma-Aldrich or Kanto Chemical. All the chemicals were of reagent grades and used without any further purification. All the NMR spectral data were recorded on a Bruker Avance 500 MHz spectrometer equipped with a CP-TCI cryoprobe, a Bruker Avance III HD 500 MHz spectrometer equipped with a PABBO probe or a JEOL 500 MHz spectrometer equipped with a ROYAL probe. Electrospray ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ESI-TOF-MS) data were recorded on a Bruker maXis. IM-MS data were recorded on a Bruker timsTOF Pro. The data analyses of mass spectra were processed on a Bruker DataAnalysis (Version 5.1) software. Recycling preparative size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) was carried out by using a LC-9260II NEXT (JAI) equipped with JAIGEL 1H and 2H columns (eluent: chloroform) or a JAIGEL W252 column (eluent: methanol or DMF/methanol) or a LABOACE (JAI) equipped with JAIGEL 2HR(×2) columns (eluent: chloroform). Analytical HPLC data were recorded on an EXTREMA (JASCO) equipped with an InertSustain NH2 column (GL Sciences). Melting points were determined on a Stanford Research Systems OptiMelt. Elemental analyses were performed at the Elemental Analysis Centre (School of Science, The University of Tokyo). DLS measurements were performed by using a Dynapro NanoStar (Wyatt Technology).
Synthesis of ligands
Pentapeptide ligands 5, 5L, 5Q, 5D, 5K, 5G, 5P, 7, 8 and 9 were synthesised by solution-phase peptide synthesis. Detailed procedures and characterisation data of all compounds are shown in the Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Figs. 1–22.
Formation of catenane (6)
Two solutions of ligand 5 (9.5 mg, 14 µmol) in CD3NO2 (600 µL) and AgTf2N (6.0 mg, 14 µmol) in CD3NO2 (100 µL) were mixed in a test tube, and the mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 10 min. Quantitative formation of 6 was confirmed by 1H NMR (Supplementary Figs. 23–26, 28–31). The same procedure was also applied for the catenanes formation from the other peptide ligands (Supplemantary Figs. 27 and 32).
Chemical shifts data of 6•(Tf2N)24: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3NO2, 300 K), δ10.94 (s, 1H, Py(C)NH), 10.16 (s, 1H, xNH), 9.38 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, AlaNH), 8.99 (d, 9 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H4′), 8.71 (d, 1 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H2′), 8.66 (dd, 5 Hz, 1 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H6′), 8.41 (dd, 7.5 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 1H, xH4′), 8.28 (d, 2 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H2′), 8.23 (dd, 7.5 Hz, 1.5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H4′), 8.20 (dd, 5 Hz, 1 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H6′), 8.10 (d, 7.5 Hz, 1H, xH6′), 7.95 (s, 1H, xH2′), 7.79 (dd, 7.5 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H5′), 7.61 (dd, 8 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H5′), 7.26 (t, 8 Hz, 1H, xH5′), 5.48 (m, 1H, AlaHα), 5.01 (t, 7 Hz, 1H, Pro(1)Hα), 4.97 (m, 1H, Pro(2)Hα), 4.82 (m, 1H, Pro(3)Hα), 4.44, 4.01 (m, 2H, ProHδ), 4.13, 3.93 (m, 2H, ProHδ), 3.64–3.54 (m, 2H, Pro(1)Hδ), 2.56, 2.4–1.9 (m, 12H, ProHβ, γ), 1.43 (d, 6.5 Hz, 3H, AlaHβ); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CD3NO2, 300 K), δ172.4 (AlaCO), 172.2 (Pro(3)CO), 171.8 (Pro(2)CO), 171.3 (Pro(1)CO), 167.0 (xCO), 165.0 (Py(N)CO), 152.5 (Py(N)C6′), 149.2 (Py(N)C2′), 145.4 (Py(C)C6′), 143.0 (Py(C)C2′), 139.7 (xC3′), 138.4 (Py(N)C4′), 137.7 (Py(C)C3′), 134.7 (Py(N)C3′), 133.0 (xC1′), 128.8 (xC5′), 128.4 (Py(C)C4′), 126.0 (Py(N)C5′), 125.5 (Py(C)C5′). 122.4 (xC4′), 121.8 (xC6′), 118.6 (xC2′), 61.5–61.0 (Pro(2)Cα, Pro(3)Cα), 58.2 (Pro(1)Cα), 50.2 (Pro(1)Cδ), 48.2, 47.6 (Pro(2)Cδ, Pro(3)Cδ), 46.8 (AlaCα), 29.9, 29.5, 29.1 (ProCβ), 25.3, 24.8 (ProCγ), 15.7 (AlaHβ).
Chemical shifts data of [Ag24(5L)24]•(Tf2N)24: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3NO2, 300 K), δ11.04 (s, 1H, Py(C)NH), 10.18 (s, 1H, xNH), 9.26 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, LeuNH), 8.96 (d, 9 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H4′), 8.73 (s, 1H, Py(N)H2′), 8.68 (dd, 5 Hz, 1 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H6′), 8.47 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, xH4′), 8.28 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H4′), 8.23 (d, 2 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H2′), 8.22 (d, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H6′), 7.99–7.98 (m, 2H, xH6′, xH2′), 7.81 (dd, 8 Hz, 5.5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H5′), 7.62 (dd, 8.5 Hz, 5.5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H5′), 7.29 (t, 8 Hz, 1H, xH5′), 5.50 (m, 1H, LeuHα), 5.15 (t, 7.5 Hz, 1H, Pro(1)Hα), 4.95 (m, 1H, Pro(2)Hα), 4.78 (m, 1H, Pro(3)Hα), 4.3, 4.15, 3.95 (m, 4H, ProHδ), 3.63–3.55 (m, 2H, Pro(1)Hδ), 2.56, 2.4–1.9 (m, 12H, ProHβ, γ), 1.96, 1.75 (m, 2H, LeuHβ), 1.43 (m, 1H, LeuHγ), 0.88 (d, 6.5 Hz, 3H, LeuHδ), 0.54 (d, 6.5 Hz, 3H, LeuHδ′).
Chemical shifts data of [Ag24(5Q)24]•(Tf2N)24: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3NO2, 300 K), δ10.96 (s, 1H, Py(C)NH), 10.10 (s, 1H, xNH), 9.23 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, GlnNαH), 9.00 (d, 8.5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H4′), 8.84 (s, 1H, Py(N)H2′), 8.63 (d, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H6′), 8.42 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, xH4′), 8.37 (s, 2 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H2′), 8.22–8.19 (m, 2H, Py(N)H4′, Py(C)H6′), 8.02 (d, 7.5 Hz, 1H, xH6′), 7.98 (s, 1H, xH2′), 7.74 (dd, 8.5 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H5′), 7.59 (dd, 8 Hz, 5.5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H5′), 7.22 (t, 8 Hz, 1H, xH5′), 6.54 (s, 1H, GlnNδH), 5.66 (s, 1H, GlnNδH′), 5.49 (m, 1H, GlnNHα), 5.05 (t, 7 Hz, 1H, Pro(1)Hα), 4.92 (m, 1H, Pro(2)Hα), 4.85 (m, 1H, Pro(3)Hα), 4.4, 4.09, 4.02, 3.93 (4H, ProHδ), 3.64–3.59 (m, 2H, Pro(1)Hδ), 2.56, 2.4–1.9 (m, 16H, ProHβ, γ, GlnHβ, γ).
Chemical shifts data of [Ag24(5D)24]•(PF6)24: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3NO2, 300 K), δ11.00 (s, 1H, Py(C)NH), 10.06 (s, 1H, xNH), 9.43 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, AspNH), 8.96 (d, 8.5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H4′), 8.67 (s, 1H, Py(N)H2′), 8.65 (d, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H6′), 8.45 (d, 1 Hz, 9 Hz, 1H, xH4′), 8.35 (s, 2 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H2′), 8.21–8.19 (m, 2H, Py(N)H4′, Py(C)H6′), 7.99 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, xH6′), 7.92 (s, 1H, xH2′), 7.77 (dd, 8 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H5′), 7.57 (dd, 8.5 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H5′), 7.33–7.30 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.26 (t, 8 Hz, 1H, xH5′), 5.80 (m, 1H, AspNHα), 5.12, 4.69 (abq, 12 Hz, 2H, CH2Ph), 5.03 (t, 7 Hz, 1H, Pro(1)Hα), 4.96 (m, 1H, Pro(2)Hα), 4.82 (m, 1H, Pro(3)Hα), 4.4, 4.15, 4.09, 3.91 (4H, ProHδ), 3.55–3.54 (m, 2H, Pro(1)Hδ), 3.18, 2.94 (m, AspHβ), 2.58, 2.4–1.8 (m, 12H, ProHβ, γ).
Chemical shifts data of [Ag24(5K)24]•(Tf2N)24: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3NO2, 300 K), δ10.95 (s, 1H, Py(C)NH), 10.21 (s, 1H, xNH), 9.09 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, LysNαH), 8.96 (d, 9 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H4′), 8.74 (s, 1H, Py(N)H2′), 8.60 (dd, 1 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H6′), 8.36 (d, 8.5 Hz, 1H, xH4′), 8.23 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H4′), 8.14–8.13 (m, 2H, Py(C)H6′, xH6′) 8.05 (s, 2 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H2′), 7.97 (s, 1H, xH2′), 7.75 (dd, 8 Hz, 5.5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H5′), 7.53 (dd, 8.5 Hz, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H5′), 7.4–7.24 (m, 5H, Ph), 7.21 (t, 8 Hz, 1H, xH5′), 5.80 (m, 1H, LysNεH), 5.49 (m, 1H, LysNHα), 5.04–4.84 (m, 5H, Pro(1)Hα, Pro(2)Hα, Pro(3)Hα, CH2Ph), 4.48, 4.13, 3.97–3.88 (4H, ProHδ), 3.70–3.60 (m, 2H, Pro(1)Hδ), 2.97, 2.87 (m, 2H, LysHε), 2.55, 2.4–1.8 (m, 14H, ProHβ, γ, LysHβ), 1.5–1.4 (m, 4H, LysHγ, δ).
Chemical shifts data of [Ag24(9)24]•(Tf2N)24: 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3NO2, 300 K), δ10.93 (s, 1H, Py(C)NH), 10.17 (s, 1H, xNH), 9.18 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, CitNαH), 8.98 (d, 8.5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H4′), 8.77 (s, 1H, Py(N)H2′), 8.68 (d, 5.5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H6′), 8.40 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, xH4′), 8.27 (d, 8 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H4′), 8.21 (s, 1H, Py(C)H2′), 8.19 (d, 5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H6′), 8.03 (d, 7.5 Hz, 1H, xH6′), 7.95 (s, 1H, xH2′), 7.81 (dd, 8 Hz, 5.5 Hz, 1H, Py(N)H5′), 7.60 (dd, 8.5 Hz, 5.5 Hz, 1H, Py(C)H5′), 7.25 (t, 8 Hz, 1H, xH5′), 5.80 (m, 1H, CitNδH), 5.42 (m, 1H, CitNHα), 5.07 (m, 1H, Pro(1)Hα), 4.98 (m, 1H, Pro(2)Hα), 4.83 (m, 1H, Pro(3)Hα), 4.56 (s, 2H, CitNH2), 4.48, 4.09, 4.02–3.93 (4H, ProHδ), 3.68–3.58 (m, 2H, Pro(1)Hδ), 3.10, 2.85 (m, 2H, CitHδ), 2.60, 2.4–2.0 (m, 12H, ProHβ, γ), 1.87, 1.75 (m, 2H, CitHβ), 1.57, 1.46 (m, 2H, CitHγ).
Crystallisation was carried out as follows: Two solutions of ligand 5 (15.0 mg, 22 µmol) in CD3NO2 (500 µL) and AgTf2N (8.5 mg, 22 µmol) in CD3NO2 (50 µL) were mixed in a test tube, and the mixture was stirred at 60 °C for 10 min. 150 µL of the obtained pale brown solution was taken in a microtube (φ = 6 mm). After diisopropyl ether vapour was slowly diffused into the microtube over 10 days at room temperature, colourless block crystals were obtained (Supplementary Fig. 33). Although two types of crystal morphologies were confirmed in the same batch, both structures refined in the I432 space group (crystal structure A) and the I2 space group (crystal structure B) were revealed as the same catenane framework topology. Crystal structure A: Crystallographic diffraction data of 6 refined in the I432 space group were measured on a Bruker APEX-II/CCD diffractometer equipped with a focusing mirror (Mo Kα radiation λ = 0.71073 Å) with a cryostat system equipped with a N2 generator (Japan Thermal Eng.). The crystals were removed from the solution, quickly attached to a loop of nylon fibre with the antifreeze reagent (parabar 10312, Hampton research), and mounted on a goniometer. The data collection was performed at 93 K. The structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS-2013)32. Crystal structure B: Crystallographic diffraction data of 6 refined in I2 space group were measured at the BL38B1 beamline at SPring-8 (Rayonix MX225H&E CCD detector). The crystals were transferred into a glass capillary and the mother liquor was roughly sucked out, which was mounted on a goniometer. The data collection was performed at room temperature (293 K) (radiation λ = 1.00 Å). The data reduction was performed with CrysAlisPro (2015, RIGAKU Oxford Diffraction). The structure was solved by dual space methods (SHELXT-2014)33. Both structures were refined by full-matrix least-squares calculations (SHELXL-2014)34 on F2. Hydrogen atoms were fixed at calculated positions and refined using a riding model. The thermal temperature factors except for Ag atoms were isotropically refined. Restraints were applied on the basis of the chemical geometries. Note that the Flack parameter of crystal structure B resulted in invalid values due to the data collection method at the synchrotron (phi-scan, oscillation range: 180°, oscillation angle: 1°). Graphics were generated with PyMOL 2.0. Detailed procedures and data on crystallographic diffraction study are shown in Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Tables 1–2, and Supplementary Figs. 34–41.
Dynamic light scattering study
Nitromethane solution of catenane 6•(PF6)24, [Ag24(5L)24](OTf)24, [Ag24(5Q)24](OTf)24, [Ag24(5D)24](PF6)24, or [Ag24(5K)24](OTf)24 (0.42 mM) was five times diluted with nitromethane and passed through a nylon membrane disc filter (pore size: 0.2 µm). Obtained data were shown in Supplementary Fig. 42. In Supplementary Fig. 42a, c–f, hydrodynamic radius r was consistent with the radius of the catenane framework of the crystal structure by considering the adjacent counter anions and solvents. In Supplementary Fig. 42b, the solution after complexation with 5G and AgOTf showed much smaller r value than that of the catenane, which is consistent with 1H NMR observation (Supplementary Fig. 27g). Some aggregation species were reflected in the distribution of r = 40–80 nm.
Ion mobility mass spectrometry measurements
Nitromethane solution of catenane [Ag24(5L)24](PF6)24 (0.42 mM) was passed through a nylon membrane disc filter (pore size: 0.2 µm). ESI-TOF-MS measurements assisted by trapped ion-mobility separation (TIMS) were then performed. Obtained data were shown in Supplementary Figs. 43–44 and Supplementary Tables 3–4. Measurement condition: dry gas 8 L•min–1, dry temperature 250 °C, Funnel 1 RF 300 Vpp, Funnel 2 RF 400 Vpp, isCID energy 0 eV, multipole RF 1200 Vpp, deflection delta –50 V, quadruple ion energy 7 eV, low mass m/z = 500, collision energy 15 eV, collision RF 4000 Vpp, transfer time 200 µs, pre pulse storage 10 µs, flow rate 140 µL•h–1.
Calculation of cavity volume
Cavity volumes of natural or de novo designed proteins reported in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) were studied. First, X-ray crystal or solution structures of proteins were searched with the keyword “cavity” on the website https://www.rcsb.org/ (756 hits as of May. 7th, 2019). The search results were then narrowed down by filling the search blanks with chain length [100–200] (479 structures, 117 citations). From the search results, over 30 PDB files were randomly extracted (Supplementary Table 6), and each cavity volume was calculated by using 3 V webserver19 with different probe radii depending on the cavity burial (outer probe radii of 6.0–8.0 Å and inner probe radii of 1.0–1.5 Å) and the grid size of 0.5 Å. As for larger proteins, the search results were narrowed down by the input of the chain length [300–600] (229 structures, 81 citations) and 16 PDB files were extracted (Supplementary Table 7). Graphical representations of calculated protein cavities were listed in Supplementary Figs. 56–57.
The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the Supplementary Information files and from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The X-ray crystallographic coordinates for structures reported in this study have been deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) under deposition numbers 1881307 and 1881308. These data can be obtained free of charge from the CCDC via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk
Wikoff, W. R. et al. Topologically linked protein rings in the bacteriophage HK97 capsid. Science 289, 2129–2133 (2000).
Sawada, T., Matsumoto, A. & Fujita, M. Coordination-driven folding and assembly of a short peptide into a protein-like two-nanometer-sized channel. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 7228–7232 (2014).
Sawada, T., Yamagami, M., Ohara, K., Yamaguchi, K. & Fujita, M. Peptide catenane by folding and assembly. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 4519–4522 (2016).
Sawada, T., Inomata, Y., Yamagami, M. & Fujita, M. Self-assembly of a peptide catenane through Ω-loop folding. Chem. Lett. 46, 1119–1121 (2017).
Sawada, T., Yamagami, M., Akinaga, S., Miyaji, T. & Fujita, M. Porous peptide complexes by a folding-and-assembly strategy. Chem. Asian J. 12, 1715–1718 (2017).
Yamagami, M., Sawada, T. & Fujita, M. Synthetic β-barrel by metal-induced folding and assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 8644–8647 (2018).
Sawada, T. et al. Metal–peptide rings form highly entangled topologically inequivalent frameworks with the same ring- and crossing-numbers. Nat. Commun. 10, 921 (2019).
Hu, G., Zhai, X.-D., Lu, D. & Qiu, W.-Y. The architecture of Platonic polyhedral links. J. Math. Chem. 46, 592–603 (2009).
Adams, C. C. The Knot Book. (W. H. Freeman & Company, New York, 1994).
Gabelica, V. & Marklund, E. Fundamentals of ion mobility spectrometry. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 42, 51–59 (2018).
Forgan, R. S., Sauvage, J.-P. & Stoddart, J. F. Chemical topology: complex molecular knots, links, and entanglements. Chem. Rev. 111, 5434–5464 (2011).
Gil-Ramírez, G., Leigh, D. A. & Stephens, A. J. Catenanes: fifty years of molecular links. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 6110–6150 (2015).
Bruns, C. J. and Stoddart, J. F. The Nature of the Mechanical Bond: From Molecules to Machines (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016).
Fielden, S. D. P., Leigh, D. A. & Woltering, S. L. Molecular knots. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 11166–11194 (2017).
Ballester, P., Fujita, M. & Rebek, J. Jr Molecular containers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 392–393 (2015).
Boutureira, O. & Bernardes, G. J. L. Advances in chemical protein modification. Chem. Rev. 115, 2174–2195 (2015).
Rebek, J. Jr Reversible encapsulation and its consequences in solution. Acc. Chem. Res. 32, 278–286 (1999).
Rebek, J. Jr Molecular behavior in small spaces. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 1660–1668 (2009).
Voss, N. R. & Gerstein, M. 3V: cavity, channel and cleft volume calculator and extractor. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W555–W562 (2010).
Hoste, J. Handbook of Knot Theory (eds Menasco, W. and Thistlethwaite, M.) Ch. 5, 209–232 (Elsevier, 2005).
Flint, O., Rankin, S., Furmaniak, R., & Fontaine, B. Knotilus. http://knotilus.math.uwo.ca (2006).
Liu, Y., O’Keeffe, M., Treacy, M. M. J. & Yaghi, O. M. The geometry of periodic knots, polycatenanes and weaving from a chemical perspective: a library for reticular chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 4642–4664 (2018).
Caulder, D. L., Powers, R. E., Parac, T. N. & Raymond, K. N. The self-assembly of a predesigned tetrahedral M4L6 supramolecular cluster. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37, 1840–1843 (1998).
Takeda, N., Umemoto, K., Yamaguchi, K. & Fujita, M. A nanometer-sized hexahedral coordination capsule assembled from 24 components. Nature 398, 794–796 (1999).
Dalgarno, S. J., Power, N. P. & Atwood, J. L. Metallo-supramolecular capsules. Coord. Chem. Rev. 252, 825–841 (2008).
Hiraoka, S., Harano, K., Shiro, M. & Shionoya, M. A self-assembled organic capsule formed from the union of six hexagram-shaped amphiphile molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 14368–14369 (2008).
Bilbeisi, R. A., Ronson, T. K. & Nitschke, J. R. A self-assembled [FeII 12L12] capsule with an icosahedral framework. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 9027–9030 (2013).
Yoshizawa, M. & Klosterman, J. K. Molecular architectures of multi-anthracene assemblies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 1885–1898 (2014).
Jordan, J. H. & Gibb, B. C. Molecular containers assembled through the hydrophobic effect. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 547–585 (2015).
Wang, S., Sawada, T., Ohara, K., Yamaguchi, K. & Fujita, M. Capsule–capsule conversion by guest encapsulation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2063–2066 (2016).
Ferrand, Y. & Huc, I. Designing helical molecular capsules based on folded aromatic amide oligomers. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 970–977 (2018).
Sheldrick, G. M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 64, 112–122 (2008).
Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXT – Integrated space-group and crystal-structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 71, 3–8 (2015).
Sheldrick, G. M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 71, 3–8 (2015).
This work was supported by JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research (JP24000009 and JP19H05461) for M.F., Young Scientists (A) (JP15H05481) and Scientific Research (B) (JP19H02697) for T.S., JSPS Research Fellows (JP19J21926) for Y.I. and in part by MEXT Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (JP17H06460 and JP17H06463) for K.S. The synchrotron X-ray crystallography was performed at the BL38B1 beamline at SPring-8 (2017B0120). We thank Bruker Japan K.K. for the IM-MS analysis.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Sawada, T., Inomata, Y., Shimokawa, K. et al. A metal–peptide capsule by multiple ring threading. Nat Commun 10, 5687 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13594-4