Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The European Space Agency’s Comet Interceptor lies in wait

The European Space Agency (ESA) recently selected Comet Interceptor as its first ‘fast’ (F-class) mission. It will be developed rapidly to share a launch with another mission and is unique, as it will wait in space for a yet-to-be-discovered comet.

A new comet mission

European Space Agency (ESA) has a remarkable history of successful missions to explore comets, despite the many challenges associated with visiting these unpredictable and active bodies on highly eccentric orbits. They are high value targets for scientific exploration, as they preserve, to a greater or lesser degree, the ices formed at the birth of our Solar System. The Giotto mission was ESA’s first deep-space mission1. It returned the most detailed images of the nucleus of comet 1P/Halley2, as part of the armada of spacecraft that encountered it in 1986. Although Giotto was damaged by dust grain impacts during its high-speed (68 km s−1) close (600 km) encounter, it returned data that set the framework for our understanding of comets ever since: proving the nucleus was small and dark, with ‘jets’ of activity from discrete areas. Three decades later, ESA again excelled itself with the Rosetta mission to comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko; the first spacecraft to orbit a comet, providing an unprecedented two year investigation of its evolution as it approached and receded from the Sun, and the first soft landing on a comet nucleus, delivering the Philae lander to perform experiments on the surface3. Rosetta has led to a revolution in cometary science, and the processes of planet formation, with more than 1000 papers already published; some of the key results are summarised in early review articles [e.g. refs. 4,5,6].

Work on the rich dataset from this mission will continue for many years, but already it has raised new questions that will require a future mission to answer. Some of these, such as how the smallest building blocks were originally assembled, and where the constituent particles formed, will require an even more ambitious (and large) future mission to return a sample of a comet for study in laboratories on Earth. The comet science community is already planning such a mission, but it is many decades away7. One of the surprising results from Rosetta was the extent to which the nucleus surface had been altered, by erosion or fall back of material, as a result of 67P’s repeated close perihelion passages8. This motivates study of more pristine comets that have not undergone multiple cycles of activity. Comet Interceptor will be the first mission to visit a Dynamically New Comet (DNC), i.e. one entering the inner Solar System for the first time since it formed, and only beginning to experience activity due to being close enough to the Sun to raise the temperature above the sublimation point of its constituent ices.

DNCs are a subset of the long period comets that come from the Oort cloud, at the very edge of our Solar System, reaching half-way to the next star. Most comet missions to date have visited short period comets, like 67P, which come from the less distant Kuiper Belt region, and have experienced heating on many orbits near to the Sun. Oort cloud objects were scattered to this distant reservoir during the formation and early evolution of our Solar System, and have been preserved there ever since. They are therefore some of the most pristine ‘building blocks’ from the era of planet formation, and, when finally scattered back into the inner Solar System to feel the warmth of the Sun, produce some of the most spectacular bright comets. The high activity levels, and therefore brightness, of such comets means that they have been popular telescopic targets over the years, but are difficult to explore with spacecraft. However, the primary reason they have yet to be visited is that their appearance is fleeting—they are typically discovered only a few months to a year before they pass perihelion, before returning to the distant outer Solar System, with orbital periods of tens of thousands of years, which mean they will be seen only once by humanity. This has always been incompatible with the timescales to design, build and launch a space mission, which can take decades.

ESA’s new fast approach

Comet Interceptor will be developed on a relatively rapid timescale for ESA, to take advantage of extra space available on the launcher of the medium (M-class) mission Ariel, which is due to launch in 20289. Such a timescale is still not fast enough to react to any comet we currently know, but the specific opportunity offered by the F-class call, i.e. a free launch to a halo orbit around the Sun-Earth L2 Lagrangian point, enables an unique approach: to design and launch a mission without a known target, that can wait in space for a suitable comet to be discovered. The L2 point is where the gravitational pull of the Sun and Earth balance to produce a stable point in space 1.5 million km away from Earth, on the planet’s night side. It is the favoured parking location for space observatories, as an orbit can be maintained there with little fuel, while keeping a constant distance from Earth and stable illumination. L2 is also the ideal parking location for Comet Interceptor, as both station keeping there and departure for the comet, once it is identified, take relatively little fuel (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1

Sketch of mission phases. The spacecraft launches from Earth and waits at L2 until a suitable comet is discovered, before departing on an interplanetary cruise to be in the right place at the right time to intercept the comet as it crosses the ecliptic plane. The smaller probes are released just before arriving at the comet. The trajectory of the spacecraft is in green, while the comet’s orbit is in red.

The F-class call also encouraged proposals that would employ a multiple spacecraft architecture, i.e., a small ‘swarm’ of similar craft, or a ‘mothership’ that releases smaller probes. Comet Interceptor follows the latter approach, which is also ideal for encountering a DNC: multiple spacecraft mean that the comet will be seen from different angles during the fly-by, building up a 3D picture of the nucleus, coma, and interaction with the solar wind. This will allow differences in time (e.g. due to the changing activity of the comet) and in space (e.g. due to inhomogeneities in the outgassing pattern) to be separated, which has not been possible in any previous fly-by mission, or even with Rosetta, which could only sample one area of the coma at a time. In addition, the mothership and probes architecture of Comet Interceptor solves one of the difficulties in visiting a DNC: the relatively high and unpredictable activity levels. The dust grains in the coma present a significant hazard as the spacecraft pass through at 10–80 km s−1. Comet Interceptor will be made up of a mothership (spacecraft A, Fig. 2) that will perform a relatively distant fly-by, at around 1000 km from the nucleus, where the dust flux will be manageable and the safety of the spacecraft can be assured, and two smaller probes (spacecraft B1 and B2), which will make closer approaches to perform high-risk/high-return measurements, but may not survive the whole encounter. This is a radically different approach to mission design, and the usual highly conservative approach of spacecraft engineering, that enables scientific measurements that could not previously be attempted. The approach builds on the many recent advances in small spacecraft technology, both in developments for easier access to Earth orbit in the ‘new space’ industry, and experience in deep space exploration, especially with the highly successful Japanese Hayabusa 2 mission to asteroid 162173 Ryugu10. One of Comet Interceptor’s small probes, B1, will be supplied by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), and will build directly on heritage from Hayabusa 2 (spacecraft A and B2 will be built by ESA).

Fig. 2

The proposed general encounter sequence for Comet Interceptor, not to scale. Green, blue and red lines are the trajectories of spacecraft (SC) A, B1 and B2, respectively. SC A passes farthest from the nucleus, performing remote sensing observations and receiving data from SC B1 and B2, which follow near-parallel trajectories nearer the nucleus. Post-encounter, SC A transmits stored data from all three platforms to Earth. The final SC, payload and precise flyby scenario may change as the mission development proceeds.

Intercepting an unknown target

The most unique aspect of Comet Interceptor is the fact that it must be designed without knowing its target, or the precise geometry of the fly-by encounter. The project is possible because large sky surveys are now finding incoming comets with greater warning times, of a few years at least, and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), currently under construction in Chile11, is expected to greatly increase our ability to discover comets years before they reach perihelion. Simulations of LSST performance, based on the best current understanding of the underlying population of Oort cloud comets from the Pan-STARRS survey12, suggest that ~5 years between discovery and interception is likely, and the target comet may be found before the mission is launched, but it still will not be known before the design must be fixed. This means that the mission must be designed to be as flexible as possible, and able to cope with a wide range of targets and encounter geometries.

Such an approach naturally enables a great deal of choice later in the project, and leaves open the exciting possibility of encountering an interstellar object (ISO) like 1I/‘Oumuamua. Comet Interceptor would be well equipped to characterise an ISO, as all indications from 1I/‘Oumuamua suggest that it is a comet-like body, albeit with a very low dust production13. However, the probability of a reachable ISO being discovered during the right period appears to be very low—the lack of observable dust coma around 1I/‘Oumuamua means that any similar body would not be discovered until very shortly before its closest approach, even with LSST. The recent discovery of the second ISO, 2I/Borisov, gives slightly more reason to be hopeful—this object looks like a typical comet14, and was discovered inbound.

In any case, Comet Interceptor will demonstrate the possibility of this approach, opening the possibility of a dedicated ISO mission to be proposed later in the coming decade, once LSST has provided better statistics on the true arrival rate of such objects. Such a mission would probably need to be of a larger class, with more mass allocated to fuel to enable a rapid response over a wider possible intercept range, but presents a scientifically compelling case—the only way to study material from another stellar system in situ. Additionally, Comet Interceptor will be a proof of concept for the use of a similar ‘rapid reaction’ spacecraft waiting in orbit for the discovery of close-approaching Near Earth Asteroids, which have been proposed for both planetary defence and commercial resource utilisation approaches.

More information about the mission, and updates on its development, can be found at Comet Interceptor Mission home:


  1. 1.

    Reinhard, R. The Giotto encounter with comet Halley. Nature 321, 313–318 (1986).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Keller, H. U. et al. First Halley multicolour camera imaging results from Giotto. Nature 321, 320–326 (1986).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Accomazzo, A. et al. Rosetta following a living comet. Acta Astronautica 126, 190–198 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Taylor, M. G. G. T., Altobelli, N., Buratti, B. J. & Choukroun, M. The Rosetta mission orbiter science overview: the comet phase. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20160262 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Filacchione, G. et al. Comet 67P/CG nucleus composition and comparison to other comets. Space Sci. Rev. 215, 19 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Groussin, O. et al. The thermal, mechanical, structural, and dielectric properties of cometary nuclei After Rosetta. Space Sci. Rev. 215, 29 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bockelée-Morvan, D. et al. AMBITION—Comet Nucleus Cryogenic Sample Return. White paper for ESA’s Voyage 2050 programme (ESA, 2019). arXiv: 1907.11081.

  8. 8.

    Keller, H. U. et al. Seasonal mass transfer on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 469, S357–S371 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Tinetti, G. et al. A chemical survey of exoplanets with ARIEL. Exp. Astron. 46, 135–209 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Watanabe, S.-i et al. Hayabusa2 mission overview. Space Sci. Rev. 208, 3–16 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ivezic, Z. et al. LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products. Astrophys. J. 873, 111 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Boe, B. et al. The orbit and size-frequency distribution of long period comets observed by Pan-STARRS1. Icarus 333, 252–272 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    The ‘Oumuamua ISSI team. The natural history of ‘Oumuamua. Nat. Astron. 3, 594–602 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fitzsimmons, A. et al. Detection of CN gas in Interstellar Object 2I/Borisov. ApJL 885, L9 (2019).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The Comet Interceptor team comprises over 130 scientists and engineers from 24 countries. We thank the whole team, and the study team at ESA, for their contributions to the mission.

Author information




G.J. and C.S. are, respectively, the lead and deputy lead proposers of Comet Interceptor. Both contributed to the writing of this article.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Colin Snodgrass or Geraint H Jones.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snodgrass, C., Jones, G.H. The European Space Agency’s Comet Interceptor lies in wait. Nat Commun 10, 5418 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing