Isotopic composition of oceanic dissolved black carbon reveals non-riverine source

Article metrics

Abstract

A portion of the charcoal and soot produced during combustion processes on land (e.g., wildfire, burning of fossil fuels) enters aquatic systems as dissolved black carbon (DBC). In terms of mass flux, rivers are the main identified source of DBC to the oceans. Since DBC is believed to be representative of the refractory carbon pool, constraining sources of marine DBC is key to understanding the long-term persistence of carbon in our global oceans. Here, we use compound-specific stable carbon isotopes (δ13C) to reveal that DBC in the oceans is ~6‰ enriched in 13C compared to DBC exported by major rivers. This isotopic discrepancy indicates most riverine DBC is sequestered and/or rapidly degraded before it reaches the open ocean. Thus, we suggest that oceanic DBC does not predominantly originate from rivers and instead may be derived from another source with an isotopic signature similar to that of marine phytoplankton.

Introduction

Fire regimes are increasingly influenced by human activity and anthropogenic climate change1. The incomplete combustion of organic matter during vegetation fires and the burning of fossil fuels generates fire-derived or pyrogenic carbon, here referred to as black carbon (BC). Vegetation fires are the predominant source of terrestrial BC (~260 Tg-C yr−1)2,3 where it is estimated that >90% of the BC produced remains on-site3,4. A relatively small portion of terrestrial BC is emitted to the atmosphere as pyrogenic aerosols (8–17 Tg-C yr−1) which are primarily derived from fossil fuel combustion5. Regardless of its formation conditions, BC is carbon-rich compared to its unburned organic precursor material6. Charring results in the thermal condensation of biomolecular structures, thereby altering the reactivity of the precursor organic material. Thermal alteration of biomass increases its recalcitrance, leading to longer environmental residence times which has implications when including BC in global carbon budgets5,7. BC deposited on the landscape becomes incorporated into soils to comprise ~14% of soil organic carbon stocks globally8. Soil BC is then mobilized to inland waters via wind, erosion, and/or leaching processes9, serving as a continuous source of fire-derived carbon to aquatic systems10. In natural waters, BC occurs in both dissolved and particulate forms10 and factors controlling the lateral transport of soil BC to inland waters are still being refined9. However, current estimates suggest roughly half of total BC entering waterways occurs as dissolved BC (DBC)11,12.

DBC is one of the most prevalent organic molecular classes that has been quantified in the global ocean, where it occurs at concentrations between 600 and 810 nM-C, equivalent to ~2% of total DOC13,14. In terms of mass flux, rivers are the largest identified source of DBC to the ocean10. The annual flux of riverine DBC to the oceans (27 Tg-C yr−1)11 would replace the standing stock of oceanic DBC (14 Pg-C)13,14 within ~500 years. This estimate is considerably shorter than the apparent age of DBC measured in either the surface or deep ocean (4800 and 23,000 14C years, respectively)14. Thus, assuming riverine DBC is of near-modern age14,15, significant removal of riverine DBC needs to occur in order for flux- and 14C-derived turnover times to match, even if rivers were the only source of oceanic DBC. The same discrepancy has been noted for bulk DOC, with riverine inputs capable of replacing the entire oceanic DOC pool within ~2600 years, yet radiocarbon analyses suggest the average age of oceanic DOC is 4000–6000 14C years16,17,18. Although riverine DOC could replace the oceanic DOC pool approximately two times over, biomarker and stable carbon isotope data indicate that oceanic DOC contains minimal amounts of terrestrial DOC and is instead dominated by autochthonous, marine DOC16,19. Stable carbon isotopic signatures of humics isolated from oceanic DOC are also consistent with a marine source20, further supporting the conclusion that terrestrial DOC is efficiently removed from the ocean. Compared to previous research on bulk DOC, isotopic studies of DBC are few. Previously reported DBC δ13C values include only one coastal sample (~−24‰) and two river samples (~−29‰)21. Although these data were limited, the observed isotopic discrepancy suggested coastal DBC may have a different source than, or be a degraded (altered) version of riverine DBC and raised the question as to whether this was a local or global phenomenon.

Thus, in the current study, we used compound-specific δ13C to probe the persistence of riverine DBC in the open ocean within a globally relevant sample set. If rivers were not the primary source of DBC in the ocean, then we would expect the δ13C signature of oceanic DBC to be different from that of rivers (~−29‰)21. If the null hypothesis was upheld, then oceanic DBC would exhibit δ13C signatures similar to that of riverine DBC. To test this hypothesis, water samples were collected from five major world rivers (Amazon, Congo, Northern Dvina, Kolyma, and Mississippi; total n = 12) and from the Pacific (n = 5) and Atlantic Oceans (n = 4) (Fig. 1). The sampled rivers deliver ~24% of freshwater discharge, ~17% of DOC17 and therefore ~17% of DBC11 to the oceans. The rivers vary in their DOC composition, land use, catchment area, geographical location, and climate, thereby capturing a wide range of potential terrestrial DBC sources and isotopic signatures22,23,24,25,26. Ocean samples were chosen to capture globally representative water masses and gradients in bulk DOC quality and source16. DOC was isolated by solid phase extraction (SPE-DOC)27. DBC was then measured in SPE-DOC by oxidizing condensed aromatics to individual benzenehexacarboxylic acid (B6CA) and benzenepentacarboxylic acid (B5CA) products28. Molecular markers B6CA and B5CA are the most dominant benzenepolycarboxylic acids (BPCAs) and are presumed to be exclusively of pyrogenic origin29. Individual BPCAs were then resolved, quantified, and isotopically characterized (BPCA-specific δ13C) to determine DBC δ13C values21. These data are presented and used to test the hypothesis that DBC found in the oceans is not isotopically consistent with DBC from rivers.

Fig. 1
figure1

Map showing sites sampled for the current study. Green shaded regions denote river catchment margins. Blue stars indicates Atlantic and Pacific Ocean sampling locations. Base map was drawn using the Ocean Data View software package72

Results and discussion

Riverine and oceanic DBC stable carbon isotopic signatures

The DOC and DBC concentrations captured by our riverine sample set varied by an order of magnitude (247–1310 and 19–115 μM-C, respectively; Table 1), spanning the range observed for large fluvial systems globally11. On average, riverine B6CA and B5CA were depleted in 13C and similar in isotopic composition to SPE-DOC (Table 1; Fig. 2), consistent with both DBC and DOC in rivers deriving from the same source2,7. Mean δ13C values for riverine B6CA and B5CA were −30.77 ± 1.51‰ and −29.44 ± 2.00‰, respectively. BPCA-specific δ13C values did not significantly vary among rivers (B6CA, p = 0.30; B5CA, p = 0.48; Table 1). However, SPE-DOC δ13C values were statistically different among some rivers (p = 0.0004). The significant result for SPE-DOC δ13C values and lack thereof for BPCA-specific δ13C values may have been driven by the increased precision of bulk (derived from elemental analysis) versus compound-specific (derived from liquid chromatography) isotopic measurements (Table 1). As previously observed for bulk DOC30, variations in SPE-DOC δ13C values among rivers could also be explained, in part, by considering the types of vegetation which serve as the source of DOC in each watershed. The δ13C composition of plants depends on its photosynthetic pathway for fixing atmospheric carbon. Plants utilizing the globally dominant C3 pathway (e.g., woody vegetation and most vascular plants) results in biomass that is relatively depleted in 13C (−22‰ to −30‰), whereas plants fixing carbon following the C4 pathways (e.g., corn, sugarcane, and some grasses) results in biomass that is more 13C-enriched (−10‰ to −14‰)31,32. The rainforest-dominated Amazon River catchment exported SPE-DOC that was most depleted in 13C, whereas the Mississippi, with increased proportions of grassland and agriculture33, exported SPE-DOC that was ~2‰ more enriched in 13C (Table 1). The Congo River watershed is roughly half forested and half grassland34, yielding intermediate SPE-DOC δ13C values (Table 1). SPE-DOC exported by the Northern Dvina River in the Arctic, which primarily drains peat lowlands35, had statistically similar δ13C values as the equatorial Congo River SPE-DOC (p = 0.09; Table 1). Although the reason for this was not specifically investigated, isotopic similarities between the Northern Dvina and Congo suggests SPE-DOC in each river derives from a 13C-depleted terrestrial organic matter source. Since differences in discharge could drive variations in DBC isotopic composition, we also compared multiple samples collected across the hydrograph from the Congo and Northern Dvina Rivers. The Congo River is a low latitude, tropical river with a relatively stable hydrological regime36. In contrast, the high latitude Northern Dvina River exhibits strong seasonal hydrology, where discharge peaks during the spring freshet and is accompanied by high DOC concentrations24. Throughout the sampling period, concentrations of DOC and DBC increased by a factor of two in the Congo River and by a factor of three in the Northern Dvina River (Table 1). However, δ13C values for SPE-DOC, B6CA, and B5CA were remarkably consistent (SD < 1‰; Table 1). These results suggest that the isotopic composition of DBC derived from global rivers is relatively constant, remaining consistently depleted in 13C regardless of land cover or hydrologic regime, and indicates that DBC is derived from similar source vegetation as SPE-DOC. Thus, the δ13C signature of BPCAs in rivers appear to be a faithful proxy for the source vegetation that presumably burnt to yield the DBC.

Table 1  Concentrations, qualitative ratios, and stable carbon isotopic values (δ13C) of DOC, DBC, and BPCA molecular markers in rivers the ocean
Fig. 2
figure2

Riverine and oceanic stable carbon isotopic signatures. Box plots show the maximum value, minimum value, median value, interquartile range, and outliers for benzenehexacarboxylic acid (B6CA), benzenepentacarboxylic acid (B5CA), and dissolved organic carbon (SPE-DOC). The stable carbon isotopic (δ13C) values are relative to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). Source data are provided as a Source Data file

At both the Atlantic and Pacific Ocean sites, DOC concentrations were highest in surface waters (63 and 81 μM-C, respectively), reached minima at depth (≥1000 m; ~42 μM-C; Fig. 3a), and were in line with profiles previously reported for these locations18. SPE-DOC δ13C values were similar among oceanic samples (average = −22.9 ± 0.4‰; Fig. 2; Table 1) and consistent with oceanic DOC being derived from a marine phytoplankton source16. The majority of DOC released from phytoplankton is termed labile as it is rapidly degraded before it can accumulate37. DOC that persists for weeks to years is termed semilabile and is observationally defined as the pool of DOC which accumulates in surface waters, but does not survive over the longer timeframes required to mix into the deep ocean18. Semilabile DOC is enriched in hydrolysable sugars and other products of recent biological production38, but depleted in aromatic components13. It is this semilabile DOC which contributes to the DBC-depleted, DOC-enriched surface waters observed here (Fig. 3a, c). In the deep ocean (>1000 m depth), DOC concentrations are low18 (Fig. 3a) and 14C-depleted relative to DOC in surface waters16. Thus, DOC in the deep ocean is termed refractory as it appears to persist for thousands of years, becoming mixed throughout the global ocean18. In contrast to bulk DOC, DBC concentrations did not vary with depth (Fig. 3b), consistent with the apparent refractory nature and long-term stability of DBC in the ocean14. The refractory DOC pool is one of the largest organic carbon stores on Earth and the largest in the ocean18, thus investigating its persistence is of major scientific interest and societal importance37. Since DBC appears to be representative of this refractory DOC13, a critical step in this endeavor is to constrain sources of oceanic DBC.

Fig. 3
figure3

Atlantic and Pacific Ocean depth trends. Depth versus a dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentration, b dissolved black carbon (DBC) concentration, c DBC:DOC ratio, and d ratio of benzenehexacarboxylic acid to pentacarboxylic acid (B6CA:B5CA) are shown for samples collected at Atlantic Ocean (light grey diamonds) and Pacific Ocean (dark grey triangles) sites. Source data are provided as a Source Data file

In contrast to bulk DOC, DBC concentrations did not vary with depth (Fig. 3b), but were higher, on average, in the Atlantic (0.76 ± 0.03 μM-C) than in the Pacific Ocean (0.61 ± 0.02 μM-C; p = 0.0001; Table 1). The Atlantic Ocean constitutes 24% of the global ocean volume but receives half of global freshwater discharge, while the Pacific Ocean constitutes 51% of the total ocean and receives only 20% of global freshwater discharge39. Lignin, an unambiguous molecular tracer for higher plant-derived material and terrestrial DOC, is also higher in the Atlantic Ocean compared to the Pacific Ocean40,41,42. Higher concentrations of lignin in the Atlantic Ocean have been ascribed to the greater relative proportion of river water received by this ocean basin40,41,42. Concentrations of DBC in rivers were roughly two orders of magnitude higher than in the ocean (Table 1). Consistent with previous studies11,14,43, DBC in rivers constituted a greater proportion of bulk DOC (6–9%) and exhibited a more condensed aromatic signature (higher B6CA:B5CA) than in the ocean samples, where DBC comprised <2% of DOC and had lower B6CA:B5CA values (Table 1).

BPCA-specific δ13C values revealed a stark contrast in the isotopic composition of DBC in global rivers and the ocean (Fig. 2). Mean δ13C values for ocean B6CA and B5CA were −24.28 ± 1.62‰ and −22.88 ± 2.19‰, respectively. Taken together, mean BPCA-specific δ13C values were statistically similar between Atlantic and Pacific Ocean sites (B6CA, p = 0.20; B5CA, p = 0.48; Table 1). On average, BPCAs derived from oceanic DBC were significantly more enriched in 13C (by ~6‰) than BPCAs derived from riverine DBC (p < 0.0001; Fig. 2). In rivers, B5CA- and B6CA-specific δ13C values were significantly correlated (R2 = 0.74, p = 0.0003) and B5CA was consistently more enriched in 13C than B6CA (Fig. 4). The isotopic offset between B5CA and B6CA in rivers ranged from 0.82 to 2.35‰ (Table 1). In contrast, δ13C values for oceanic B5CA and B6CA were not linearly related (R2 = 0.43, p > 0.05; Fig. 4), and the isotopic offset between B5CA and B6CA ranged from −2.11 to 4.95‰ (Table 1). The correlation between B5CA and B6CA δ13C values in rivers was expected, since we presume both molecular markers to be derived from the same pool of fire-derived condensed aromatics originating from soil BC. The observed difference between B5CA and B6CA δ13C values could be an intrinsic property of riverine DBC, thus providing further support for non-riverine sources of oceanic DBC. However, further research is required to elucidate specific biogeochemical mechanisms which control BPCA δ13C offset values in terrestrial and marine environments. Based upon our current results, hydrology and watershed land cover accounted for ~2‰ variability in riverine endmember DBC δ13C values (Table 1; Fig. 2). Oceanic BPCA-specific δ13C signatures were generally conserved with depth (Table 1), however B6CA was significantly depleted in 13C (~2‰ lower) at 110 m depth in the Pacific Ocean (p < 0.01) and B5CA was significantly depleted in 13C (~2‰ lower) at 2000 m depth in the Atlantic Ocean (p < 0.05). Overall, BPCA-specific δ13C values for different ocean water masses varied by only ~2‰ (Table 1; Fig. 2). Thus, endmember variability alone cannot account for the large isotopic discrepancy observed between BPCAs in rivers and the ocean. As such, our results indicate a non-riverine source for DBC quantified in the open ocean.

Fig. 4
figure4

Relationship between compound-specific isotopic values. The stable carbon isotopic composition (δ13C) of benzenepentacarboxylic acid (B5CA) was plotted against that of benzenehexacarboxylic acid (B6CA) for samples collected from rivers (green circles) and the ocean (blue diamonds). Linear regressions are denoted by dotted lines and were B5CA δ13C = 1.09 × B6CA δ13C + 4.21 (R2 = 0.74; p = 0.0003) for riverine samples and B5CA δ13C = −0.46 × B6CA δ13C − 34.05 (R2 = 0.43; p > 0.05) for oceanic samples. Error bars represent propagated error associated with isotopic calibration or replicate error (1 SD), whichever is larger. The δ13C values are relative to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). Source data are provided as a Source Data file

Riverine and oceanic DBC isotopic discrepancy implications

The application of BPCA-specific δ13C analysis for constraining sources of oceanic DBC assumes riverine BPCA-specific δ13C values are not fractionated (altered) as DBC transits coastal waters. Photochemical degradation has been shown to alter and remove DBC in natural waters44,45. Exposure to sunlight results in a photochemically processed DOC pool that is relatively enriched in 13C46,47, due to the preferential loss of aromatic, 13C-depleted DOC compound classes (e.g., lignin48). However, BPCA-specific isotopic analyses bypass the molecular heterogeneity of bulk DOC to target individual compound classes (e.g., condensed aromatics21). Therefore, exposure of DBC to sunlight is expected to degrade condensed aromatics similarly, where one carbon isotope is not preferentially photomineralized over another (12C versus 13C) within the same compound class. In the current study, lower DBC:DOC and B6CA:B5CA values observed for shallow ocean depths (Fig. 3c, d) is consistent with photodegradation of DBC in sunlit surface waters44. BPCA-specific δ13C signatures in sun-bleached surface waters and the dark abyssal ocean were statistically identical (Table 1; p > 0.05), suggesting photochemistry has minimal-to-no impact upon DBC δ13C values. However, the impact of sun exposure upon riverine BPCA-specific δ13C signatures must be directly tested to confirm isotopic stability during photodegradation of DBC. If the physical removal of DBC from the water column (e.g., sorption to sinking particles49), was primarily responsible for the observed offset between riverine and oceanic DBC δ13C values, then we would expect a gradient in δ13C values with depth in the ocean. However, the δ13C signature of oceanic DBC was fairly consistent with depth (Table 1). We look to Δ14C assessments for further insight on marine DBC cycling14,43. The apparent radiocarbon age of BPCAs increases in the deep ocean, suggesting the deep oceanic DBC pool is older (up to 23,000 14C-years) and more refractory than the younger DBC (4,800 14C-years) in the surface ocean14, mirroring trends observed for bulk DOC in the oceans18. The relative consistency of DBC δ13C signatures down-profile and similarity of BPCA-specific δ13C values between Atlantic and Pacific Ocean sites (Table 1) suggests a common source for modern DBC in the surface ocean and ancient DBC in the abyssal ocean. Assuming degradation processes do not result in a 13C-enriched DBC pool, then isotopic trends for DBC match those for bulk DOC, where δ13C signatures indicate oceanic DOC to be dominated by marine sources with minimal contributions from terrestrial DOC15,20,50.

Since our data are inconsistent with a riverine source for oceanic DBC (Fig. 2), we consider other sources of BPCAs to the open ocean. BPCA-specific δ13C values are similar to SPE-DOC δ13C values (Table 1), phytoplankton biomass, bulk marine DOC, and marine particulate organic carbon16. Based upon the isotopic signatures alone, a simple hypothesis is that the carbon in DBC, like bulk DOC, was originally fixed by phytoplanktonic production in the surface ocean. However, evidence for the autochthonous production of DBC in ocean waters does not exist and remains an area open for investigation. Biotic processes are proposed to alter the chemistry or diversity of freshly produced phytoplanktonic DOC, eventually resulting in the refractory pool of DOC observed in the ocean51. However, specific mechanisms which control the composition and reactivity of molecules which comprise the oceanic refractory DOC pool remain elusive52. Abiotic processes alter DOC, and likely also DBC, in the ocean. For instance, BPCAs could derive from organic material thermally processed or released by hydrothermal vents53. Hydrothermal vent conditions have also been shown to degrade refractory DOC in seawater54. Therefore, the net effect of these geothermally active hot spots on deep ocean DBC should be further investigated. The highly condensed (graphitic) BC contained in marine sediments is ancient (has a fossil Δ14C value), terrestrial in origin, and has a marine-like δ13C signature (−19 to −21‰), consistent with BC derived from bedrock erosion on land55. Petrogenic organic carbon constitutes ~20% of riverine particulate organic carbon exported globally56 and has been shown to produce BPCAs upon oxidation57. Therefore, the dissolution of petrogenic BC from sinking particles or resuspended marine sediments could be another, yet unidentified, source of 14C-depleted, 13C-enriched BPCAs in the abyssal ocean. The derivation of BPCAs from petrogenic material suggests that B5CA and B6CA may not be exclusively representative of fire-derived organics58. The nitric acid reaction which converts organic matter to BPCAs is complex and lacks a systematic pattern for the oxidation of condensed aromatics59. Thus, nonpyrogenic sources of marine DBC may be possible, but remain unproven.

Non-riverine, allochthonous sources of condensed organics which align with observed isotopic signatures may also contribute to the marine DBC pool. For instance, the atmospheric deposition of combustion-derived aerosols has recently been identified as the second-largest flux of DBC to marine surface waters (2 Tg-C per year)60. Globally, BC aerosols are derived roughly equally from both fossil fuel and biomass combustion processes61. However, contributions of fossil carbon to BC aerosols vary dramatically, ranging from ~10 to ~90% depending on geographic location and time of year62,63,64,65,66. While there is evidence that aerosol BC δ13C signatures are modulated by biomass type and combustion conditions, the isotopic composition of the charred precursor material is largely retained67. Global isotopic assessments of atmospheric BC do not exist, but δ13C values for BC aerosols over South Asia were shown to vary by up to ~4‰ and within the range observed for oceanic DBC62. In addition, BC in south Atlantic sediments exhibit a δ13C signature that is slightly enriched (−23 to −26‰)68 compared to riverine DBC measured here (Fig. 2). Based upon these limited data, it is possible that aerosol-derived DBC has enriched δ13C signatures that could balance the observed discrepancy between riverine and marine DBC pools. However, a globally representative sample set is needed to constrain the isotopic signature of oceanic DBC sourced from pyrogenic aerosols.

Rivers efficiently mobilize DBC from the land11, but mass balance estimates and our stable carbon isotopic signatures suggest most of this fire-derived material does not persist in the open ocean. Our findings are consistent with previous observations for the lack of bulk terrigenous dissolved organic matter in the ocean19. No information is available on the behavior of DBC as it transits estuarine and coastal zones, highlighting a critical area of research needed to fully understand connections between riverine and oceanic DBC pools. Further research is also needed to probe the stability of DBC δ13C signatures during photo-exposure and other processes, including sorption/desorption. Riverine export and atmospheric deposition deliver DBC to the ocean in excess of the apparent turnover of oceanic DBC11,14,60. Our isotopic data indicate additional, marine-derived sources are also likely. Thus, if BPCAs represent a biogeochemically coherent pool of compounds, then oceanic DBC turnover rates must be significantly faster than radiocarbon dating suggests14. Similarities between BPCA-specific and SPE-DOC δ13C values (Fig. 2) raise questions as to whether the BPCA method is capable of identifying sources of non-pyrogenic organic material. If δ13C fractionation during DBC removal processes is indeed negligible, then we will need to reexamine whether these condensed aromatic compounds truly represent the impact of fire upon the chemistry of the ocean, and search for new mechanisms which form this increasingly enigmatic molecular class.

Methods

Sample collection

Pacific Ocean samples were collected from Station ALOHA (22.45°N, 158.00°W) during the Hawaii Ocean Time-series (HOT) 301 cruise aboard the R/V Ka`imikai-O-Kanaloa. Samples from surface and mesopelagic depths (5, 110, 765, and 1000 m) were obtained from two casts on April 17, 2018 and the deep water sample (3500 m) was collected on April 18, 2018. Atlantic Ocean samples were collected from Hydrostation S (31.67°N, 64.17°W) during the Bermuda Atlantic Time Series (BATS) 358 cruise aboard the R/V Atlantic Explorer. Water samples were collected along a depth profile (1, 70, 2000, and 3000 m) on April 8, 2019. All seawater samples were collected using Niskin bottles mounted to the CTD rosette. For each sample, ~10 L was passed, by gravity, through a pre-cleaned in-line capsule filter (Whatman Polycap; 0.2 μm) into acid-cleaned Nalgene fluorinated HDPE carboys and pre-combusted glass vials and acidified to pH 2 using HCl prior to solid phase extraction and DOC analysis.

River samples were collected from the main stem of the Amazon, Congo, Northern Dvina, Kolyma, and Mississippi Rivers, upstream of the river mouth where marine inputs were not observed (salinity = 0). The Amazon River is the largest river on Earth, drains the world’s largest tropical rainforest, and represents a major link in the transfer of carbon between land and sea69,70. One surface water sample was collected from the Amazon River near Óbidos (Brazil; April 20, 2018; 1.92°S, 55.53°W). The Congo River, located in equatorial Africa, is the second largest river on Earth23,34 and was sampled from a site upstream of the cities of Kinshasa–Brazzaville on the main stem (DR Congo; 4.18°S, 15.21°E). Five samples were collected from the Congo River between August 2011 and April 2012, where discharge ranged from 23,740 to 54,120 m3 s−1, to account for potential hydrologically driven variations in DBC isotopic composition in a low latitude, subtropical river. The Northern Dvina River watershed is located in northwestern Russia, primarily drains low relief peatlands, is not underlain by permafrost35, and is a major contributor to pan-Arctic terrestrial DOC fluxes24. Four samples were collected from the Northern Dvina River in Arkhangelsk (64.55°N, 40.51°E) between October 2013 and May 2016, where discharge ranged from 637 to 13,380 m3 s−1, to capture isotopic variations in a high latitude river with extremely variable hydrology. The Kolyma River discharges into the Arctic Ocean and is a large, northern high-latitude river system that is, in contrast to the Northern Dvina, completely underlain by continuous permafrost25,35. One sample was collected from the Kolyma River, upstream of the city of Cherskiy (August 30, 2015; 68.75°N, 161.29°E). The Mississippi River drainage basin spans ~40% of the conterminous United States and contains one of the most productive agricultural regions in the world26,33. One sample was collected from the Belle Chase Ferry Landing on the Mississippi River, just south of New Orleans, LA (USA; February 23, 2016; 29.82°N, 90.00°W). All river samples were collected in situ using an oil-free pump equipped with a pre-cleaned, in-line capsule filter (Whatman Polycap, 0.2 μm) directly into acid-cleaned Nalgene bottles and pre-combusted glass vials. Samples were acidified to pH 2 using HCl prior to solid phase extraction and DOC analysis.

DOC analysis and solid phase extraction

Filtered and acidified samples were analyzed for DOC, measured as nonpurgable organic carbon using a Shimadzu TOC-L CPH analyzer equipped with an ASI-L autosampler. Sample DOC was quantified using a calibration curve made with a potassium hydrogen phthalate stock solution. Measurement accuracy and reproducibility was assessed by analyzing deep seawater and low carbon water reference materials obtained from the Consensus Reference Material (CRM) project (https://hansell-lab.rsmas.miami.edu/consensus-reference-material/index.html). Analyses of CRM were within 5% of reported values.

DOC was isolated from samples via solid phase extraction (SPE; Varian Bond Elut PPL cartridges, 1 g, 6 mL)27 prior to DBC analysis. Briefly, SPE cartridges were conditioned with methanol, ultrapure water, and acidified water. Filtered and acidified samples were passed through the SPE cartridges by gravity. Isolated DOC was then eluted from the SPE cartridges with methanol and stored at −20 °C until DBC analysis. Recovery of DOC by SPE was 74% for riverine and 48% for oceanic samples, on average (all data are provided in the Supplementary Dataset). DOC recoveries in the current study are consistent with those observed previously for fresh and marine waters27.

DBC quantification

Sample DBC was quantified using the BPCA method, which chemically degrades condensed aromatic compounds into benzenehexacarboxylic acid (B6CA) and benzenepentacarboxylic acid (B5CA) molecular markers28. BPCAs were oxidized and quantified following previously described methods21,28. Briefly, aliquots of SPE-DOC (~0.5 mg-C equivalents) were transferred to 2 mL glass ampules and dried under a stream of argon until complete evaporation of methanol. Concentrated HNO3 (0.5 mL) was added to each ampule, then ampules were flame-sealed and heated to 160 °C for 6 h. After oxidation, ampules were opened and HNO3 was dried at 60 °C under a stream of argon. The BPCA-containing residue was re-dissolved in dilute H3PO4 for subsequent analysis by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Quantification of BPCAs was performed using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC system equipped with an autosampler, pump, and diode array detector. B6CA and B5CA were separated on an Agilent Poroshell 120 phenyl-hexyl column (4.6 × 150 mm, 2.7 µm) using an aqueous gradient of H3PO4 (0.6 M; pH 1) and sodium phosphate (20 mM; pH 6) buffers21. BPCAs were quantified using calibration curves for commercially available B6CA and B5CA using a 5 mM BPCA-C stock solution. River samples were oxidized and analyzed in duplicate. Ocean samples were oxidized and analyzed in triplicate. The average coefficients of variation for replicate measurements of B6CA and B5CA were <5%. Sample DBC concentrations were calculated using the established power relationship between DBC (µM-C) and the sum of B6CA and B5CA (nM-BPCA) shown below (n = 352, R = 998, p < 0.0001): [DBC] = 0.0891 × ([B6CA + B5CA])0.917571. DBC concentrations calculated using this equation are directly comparable to those measured in previous studies10,11.

Stable carbon isotopic analyses

Riverine and oceanic SPE-DOC methanol extracts were transferred to smooth-walled tin capsules (~0.25 mg-C per capsule) and methanol evaporated to dryness in an oven set to 60 °C. Sample-containing tin capsules were folded and combusted using a Thermo Scientific Flash EA Isolink CNSOH interfaced with a Thermo Scientific Delta V Plus IRMS. The δ13C composition of each sample was calibrated against an internal lab organic matter reference material (chitin from shrimp shells), which was previously calibrated against NIST glutamic acid (RM 8573) and sucrose (RM 8542) primary isotope reference standards. The 13C content is expressed in δ13C per mil (‰) notation relative to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). River samples were measured in duplicate and ocean samples were measured in triplicate. The standard deviation of replicate EA-IRMS measurements was <0.1‰.

Compound-specific stable carbon isotopic values for individual BPCAs were measured using a Dionex Ultimate 3000 HPLC connected to a Delta V IRMS via an LC Isolink interface following methods detailed previously21. Online oxidation quantitatively converts baseline-separated BPCAs to CO2. BPCA-derived CO2 is then extracted from the mobile phase and dried prior to detection by IRMS. The δ13C values for B5CA and B6CA standards were measured by EA-IRMS following the same procedure described above to calculate and correct for offsets in HPLC-IRMS δ13C measurements21. River samples were analyzed in duplicate and ocean samples were analyzed in triplicate. Standard deviations applied to corrected sample δ13C values were propagated to account for errors associated with replicate EA-IRMS standard BPCA measurements, HPLC-IRMS standard BPCA measurements, and HPLC-IRMS sample BPCA measurements. The 13C content is expressed in δ13C per mil (‰) notation relative to Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite (VPDB). The error associated with corrected δ13C values was typically <0.5‰.

Statistical evaluations

Significant variations in BPCA-specific and SPE-DOC δ13C values among rivers were determined using a one-way ANOVA. Tukey’s HSD tests were used to probe whether two isotopic values were significantly different (e.g., Congo versus Northern Dvina River SPE-DOC δ13C values, comparing δ13C values between oceanic water masses). An unpaired t test was used to compare mean riverine and oceanic BPCA-specific and SPE-DOC δ13C values. The above-described statistical evaluations assume normal distributions among data subsets. Linear regressions were used to assess the relationship between B6CA- and B5CA-specific δ13C values in riverine and oceanic datasets.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Dataset. The source data underlying Figs. 24 are provided in Table 1, the Supplementary Dataset, and the Source Data file.

References

  1. 1.

    Bowman, D. M. J. S. et al. Fire in the Earth system. Science 324, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1163886 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Santín, C. et al. Towards a global assessment of pyrogenic carbon from vegetation fires. Global Change Biol. 22, https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12985 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Jones, M. W., Santín, C., van der Werf, G. R. & Doerr, S. H. Global fire emissions buffered by the production of pyrogenic carbon. Nat. Geosci. 12, 742–747 (2019).

  4. 4.

    Kuhlbusch, T. A. J. & Crutzen, P. J. Toward a global estimate of black carbon in residues of vegetation fires representing a sink of atmospheric CO2 and a source of O2. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 9, 491–501 (1995).

  5. 5.

    Bird, M. I., Wynn, J. G., Saiz, G., Wurster, C. M. & McBeath, A. The pyrogenic carbon cycle. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 43, 273–298 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Schneider, M. P. W., Hilf, M., Vogt, U. F. & Schmidt, M. W. I. The benzene polycarboxylic acid (BPCA) pattern of wood pyrolyzed between 200 °C and 1000 °C. Org. Geochem. 41, 1082–1088 (2010).

  7. 7.

    Landry, J. S. & Matthews, H. D. The global pyrogenic carbon cycle and its impact on the level of atmospheric CO2 over past and future centuries. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3205–3218 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Reisser, M., Purves, R. S., Schmidt, M. W. I. & Abiven, S. Pyrogenic carbon in soils: a literature-based inventory and a global estimation of its content in soil organic carbon and stocks. Front. Earth Sci. 4, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2016.00080 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Abney, R. B. & Berhe, A. A. Pyrogenic carbon erosion: implications for stock and persistence of pyrogenic carbon in soil. Front. Earth Sci. 6, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2018.00026 (2018).

  10. 10.

    Wagner, S., Jaffé, R. & Stubbins, A. Dissolved black carbon in aquatic ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. Lett. 3, https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10076 (2018).

  11. 11.

    Jaffé, R. et al. Global charcoal mobilization from soils via dissolution and riverine transport to the oceans. Science 340, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1231476 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Coppola, A. I. et al. Global-scale evidence for the refractory nature of riverine black carbon. Nat. Geosci. 11, 584–588 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Dittmar, T. & Paeng, J. A heat-induced molecular signature in marine dissolved organic matter. Nat. Geosci. 2, 175–179 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Coppola, A. I. & Druffel, E. R. M. Cycling of black carbon in the ocean. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL068574 (2016).

  15. 15.

    Coppola, A. I. et al. Marked isotopic variability within and between the Amazon River and marine dissolved black carbon pools. Nat. Commun. 10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11543-9 (2019).

  16. 16.

    Beaupré, S. R. The carbon isotopic composition of marine DOC. In (eds Hansell, D. A. & Carlson, C. A.) Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter pp. 335–364. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2015).

  17. 17.

    Raymond, P. A. & Spencer, R. G. M. Riverine DOM. In (eds Hansell, D. A. & Carlson, C. A.) Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter pp. 509–533. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2015).

  18. 18.

    Hansell, D. A., Carlson, C. A., Repeta, D. J. & Schlitzer, R. Dissolved organic matter in the ocean: a controversy stimulates new insights. Oceanography 22, 202–211 (2009).

  19. 19.

    Hedges, J. I., Keil, R. G. & Benner, R. What happens to terrestrial organic matter in the ocean? Org. Geochem. 27, 195–212 (1997).

  20. 20.

    Druffel, E. R. M., Williams, P. M., Bauer, J. E. & Ertel, J. R. Cycling of dissolved and particulate organic matter in the open ocean. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 15639–15659 (1992).

  21. 21.

    Wagner, S. et al Online quantification and compound-specific stable isotopic analysis of black carbon in environmental matrices via liquid chromatography-isotope ratio mass spectrometry. Limnol. Oceanogr. 15, https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10219 (2017).

  22. 22.

    Ward, N. D. et al. The compositional evolution of dissolved and particulate organic matter along the lower Amazon River—Óbidos to the ocean. Mar. Chem. 177, 244–256 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Spencer, R. G. M. et al. Origins, seasonality, and fluxes of organic matter in the Congo River. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 1105–1121 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Johnston, S. E. et al. Flux and seasonality of dissolved organic matter from the Northern Dvina (Severnaya Dvina) River, Russia. J. Geophys. Res. 123, 1041–1056 (2018).

  25. 25.

    Mann, P. J. et al. Controls on the composition and lability of dissolved organic matter in Siberia's Kolyma River basin. J. Geophys. Res. 117, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001798 (2012).

  26. 26.

    Bianchi, T. S., Filley, T., Dria, K. & Hatcher, P. G. Temporal variability in sources of dissolved organic carbon in the lower Mississippi River. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 68, 959–967 (2004).

  27. 27.

    Dittmar, T., Koch, B., Hertkorn, N. & Kattner, G. A simple and efficient method for the solid-phase extraction of dissolved organic matter (SPE-DOM) from seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. 6, 230–235 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Dittmar, T. The molecular level determination of black carbon in marine dissolved organic matter. Org. Geochem. 39, 396–407 (2008).

  29. 29.

    Kappenberg, A., Blasing, M., Lehndorff, E. & Amelung, W. Black carbon assessment using benzene polycarboxylic acids: Limitations for organic-rich matrices. Org. Geochem. 94, 47–51 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Butman, D., Raymond, P. A., Butler, K. & Aiken, G. Relationships between Δ14C and the molecular quality of dissolved organic carbon in rivers draining the coast from the continuous United States. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 26, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GB004361 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Kohn, M. J. Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C3 plants as indicators of (paleo) ecology and (paleo) climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19691–19695 (2010).

  32. 32.

    Cerling, T. E. et al. Global vegetation change through the Miocene/Pliocene boundary. Nature 389, 153–158 (1997).

  33. 33.

    Foley, J. A., Kucharik, C. J., Twine, T. E., Coe, M. T., Donner, S. D. Land use, land cover, and climate change across the Mississippi basin: impacts on selected land and water resources. In (eds Defries, R. S., Asner, G. P. & Houghton, R. A.) Ecosystems and Land Use Change, Volume 15 pp. 249–261 (American Geophysical Union, 2004).

  34. 34.

    Spencer, R. G. M., Stubbins, A. & Gaillardet, J. Geochemistry of the Congo River, estuary and plume. In (eds Bianchi, T. S., Allison, M. A. & Cai, W. J.), Biogeochemical Dynamics at Large River-Coastal Interfaces: Linkages with Global Climate Change pp. 554–584. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).

  35. 35.

    Holmes, R. M. et al. Climate change impacts on the hydrology and biogeochemistry of Arctic rivers. In (eds Goldman, C. R., Kumagai, M. & Robarts, R. D.), Climatic Change and Global Warming of Inland Waters: Impacts and Mitigation for Ecosystems and Societies pp. 3–26. (John Wiley, Chichester, 2013).

  36. 36.

    Spencer, R. G. M. et al. An initial investigation into the organic matter biogeochemistry of the Congo River. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 84, 614–627 (2012).

  37. 37.

    Moran, M. A. et al. Deciphering ocean carbon in a changing world. PNAS 113, 3143–3151 (2016).

  38. 38.

    Kaiser, K. & Benner, R. Major bacterial contribution to the ocean reservoir of detrital organic carbon and nitrogen. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 99–112 (2008).

  39. 39.

    Dai, A. & Trenberth, K. E. Estimates of freshwater discharge from continents: latitudinal and seasonal variations. J. Hydrometeorol. 3, 660–687 (2002).

  40. 40.

    Hernes, P. J. & Benner, R. Terrigenous organic matter sources and reactivity in the North Atlantic Ocean and a comparison to the Arctic and Pacific Oceans. Mar. Chem. 100, 66–79 (2006).

  41. 41.

    Hernes, P. J. & Benner, R. Transport and diagenesis of dissolved and particulate terrigenous organic matter in the North Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Res. Pt. I 49, 2119–2132 (2002).

  42. 42.

    Opsahl, S. & Benner, R. Distribution and cycling of terrigenous dissolved organic matter in the ocean. Nature 386, 480–482 (1997).

  43. 43.

    Ziolkowski, L. A. & Druffel, E. R. M. Aged black carbon identified in marine dissolved organic carbon. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043963 (2010).

  44. 44.

    Stubbins, A., Niggemann, J. & Dittmar, T. Photo-lability of deep ocean dissolved black carbon. Biogeosci 9, 1661–1670 (2012).

  45. 45.

    Wagner, S. & Jaffé, R. Effect of photodegradation on molecular size distribution and quality of dissolved black carbon. Org. Geochem. 86, 1–4 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Spencer, R. G. M. et al. Photochemical degradation of dissolved organic matter and dissolved lignin phenols from the Congo River. J. Geophys. Res. 114, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JG000968 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Lalonde, K., Vahatalo, A. V. & Gelinas, Y. Revisiting the disappearance of terrestrial dissolved organic matter in the ocean: a δ13C study. Biogeosci 11, 3707–3719 (2014).

  48. 48.

    Benner, R., Fogel, M. L., Sprague, E. K. & Hodson, R. E. Depletion of 13C in lignin and its implications for stable carbon isotope studies. Nature 329, 708–710 (1987).

  49. 49.

    Coppola, A. I., Ziolkowski, L. A., Masiello, C. A. & Druffel, E. R. M. Aged black carbon in marine sediments and sinking particles. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059068 (2014).

  50. 50.

    Bauer, J. E. Carbon Isotopic Composition of DOM. In: (eds Hansell, D. A., Carlson, C. A.), Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter. pp. 405–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012323841-2/50010-5 (Elsevier, 2002).

  51. 51.

    Jiao, N. et al. Microbial production of recalcitrant dissolved organic matter: long-term carbon storage in the global ocean. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 593–599 (2010).

  52. 52.

    Dittmar, T. Reasons behind the long-term stability of dissolved organic matter. In (eds Hansell, D. A. & Carlson, C. A.), Biogeochemistry of Marine Dissolved Organic Matter pp. 369–388. (Elsevier, Oxford, 2015).

  53. 53.

    Rossel, P. E. et al. Thermally altered marine dissolved organic matter in hydrothermal fluids. Org. Geochem. 110, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.05.003 (2017).

  54. 54.

    Hawkes, J. A. et al. Efficient removal of recalcitrant deep-ocean dissolved organic matter during hydrothermal circulation. Nat. Geosci. 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO2543 (2015).

  55. 55.

    Dickens, A. F., Gelinas, Y., Masiello, C. A., Wakeham, S. & Hedges, J. I. Reburial of fossil organic carbon in marine sediments. Nature 427, 336–339 (2004).

  56. 56.

    Galy, V., Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. & Eglinton, T. Global carbon export from the terrestrial biosphere. Nature 521, 204–207 (2015).

  57. 57.

    Hindersmann, B. & Achten, C. Accelerated benzene polycarboxylic acid analysis by liquid chromatography–time-of-flight–mass spectrometry for the determination of petrogenic and pyrogenic carbon. J. Chromatogr. A 1510, 57–65 (2017).

  58. 58.

    Chang, Z. et al. Benzenevpolycarboxylic acid—a useful biomarker for condensed organic matter, but not for only pyrogenic black carbon. Sci. Tot. Environ. 626, 660–667 (2018).

  59. 59.

    Ziolkowski, L. A., Chamberlin, A. R., Greaves, J. & Druffel, E. R. M. Quantification of black carbon in marine systems using the benzene polycarboxylic acid method: a mechanistic and yield study. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9, 140–149 (2011).

  60. 60.

    Bao, H., Niggemann, J., Luo, L., Dittmar, T. & Kao, S.-J. Aerosols as a source of dissolved black carbon to the ocean. Nat. Commun. 8, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00437-3 (2017).

  61. 61.

    Louisse, C., Penner, J. E., Walton, J. J., Eddleman, H. & Cachier, H. A global three-dimensional model study of carbonaceous aerosols. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 19411–19432 (1996).

  62. 62.

    Gustafsson, O. et al. Brown clouds over South Asia: Biomass or fossil fuel combustion? Science 323, 495–498 (2009).

  63. 63.

    Eglinton, T. I. et al. Composition, age, and provenance of organic matter in NW African dust over the Atlantic Ocean. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 3, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000269 (2002).

  64. 64.

    Zencak, Z., Elmquist, M. & Gustafsson, O. Quantification and radiocarbon source apportionment of black carbon in atmospheric aerosols using the CTO-375 method. Atmos. Environ. 41, 7895–7906 (2007).

  65. 65.

    Szidat, S. et al. Dominant impact of residential wood burning on particulate matter in Alpine valleys during winter. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL028325 (2007).

  66. 66.

    Mouteva, G. O. et al. Using radiocarbon to constrain black and organic carbon aerosol sources in Salt Lake City. J. Geophys. Res. 122, 9843–9857 https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026519 (2017).

  67. 67.

    Bird, M. I. & Ascough, P. Isotopes in pyrogenic carbon: a review. Org. Geochem. 42, 1529–1539 (2012).

  68. 68.

    Lohmann, R. et al. Fluxes of soot black carbon to South Atlantic sediments. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 23, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GB003253 (2009).

  69. 69.

    Moriera-Turcq, P., Seyler, P., Guyot, J. L. & Etcheber, H. Exportation of organic carbon from the Amazon River and its main tributaries. Hydrol. Process. 17, 1329–1344 (2003).

  70. 70.

    Mayorga, E. et al. Young organic matter as a source of carbon dioxide outgassing from Amazonian rivers. Nature 436, 538–541 (2005).

  71. 71.

    Stubbins, A. et al. Utilizing colored dissolved organic matter to derive dissolved black carbon export by arctic rivers. Front. Earth Sci. 3, https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2015.00063 (2015).

  72. 72.

    Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View, odv.awi.de (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (OCE #1756812, #1756733, and #1635618 and OPP #1500169). We thank the technicians and crew of the HOT-301 cruise aboard the R/V Ka`imikai-O-Kanaloa for their assistance at sea. Chief scientist R. Johnson, L. Powers, W. Miller, and the science crew are thanked for their assistance during the BATS-358 cruise aboard the R/V Atlantic Explorer. R. Muniz and A. Magalhães assisted with Amazon River sample collection.

Author information

S.W., A.S., and J.B. conceptualized and designed the study. S.W. collected Pacific Ocean and Mississippi River samples. R.G.M.S. collected Congo, Northern Dvina, and Kolyma River samples. K.M. collected and extracted the Atlantic Ocean samples. S.Z.R. and J.M.S.M. collected the Amazon River sample. S.W. prepared all collected samples for analysis and performed quantitative and isotopic analyses with assistance from J.B. S.W. processed and analyzed the data and wrote the paper with input from A.S. and J.B. All authors contributed to the final version of the paper.

Correspondence to Sasha Wagner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Cristina Santín and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, S., Brandes, J., Spencer, R.G.M. et al. Isotopic composition of oceanic dissolved black carbon reveals non-riverine source. Nat Commun 10, 5064 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13111-7

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.