Molecular profiling of tissue biopsies reveals unique signatures associated with streptococcal necrotizing soft tissue infections


Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are devastating infections caused by either a single pathogen, predominantly Streptococcus pyogenes, or by multiple bacterial species. A better understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms underlying these different NSTI types could facilitate faster diagnostic and more effective therapeutic strategies. Here, we integrate microbial community profiling with host and pathogen(s) transcriptional analysis in patient biopsies to dissect the pathophysiology of streptococcal and polymicrobial NSTIs. We observe that the pathogenicity of polymicrobial communities is mediated by synergistic interactions between community members, fueling a cycle of bacterial colonization and inflammatory tissue destruction. In S. pyogenes NSTIs, expression of specialized virulence factors underlies infection pathophysiology. Furthermore, we identify a strong interferon-related response specific to S. pyogenes NSTIs that could be exploited as a potential diagnostic biomarker. Our study provides insights into the pathophysiology of mono- and polymicrobial NSTIs and highlights the potential of host-derived signatures for microbial diagnosis of NSTIs.


Necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs) are life-threatening bacterial infections characterized by rapidly spreading necrosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissues1. An immunonocompromised status, caused for example by chemotherapy, can predispose patients for NSTIs and diabetic ulcers, penetrating trauma, breach of the epithelial barrier, cirrhosis, or minor nonpenetrating traumas are risk factors for NSTIs1. Diagnosis and management of NSTIs can be challenging as initial signs and symptoms can be ambiguous2. Despite the advances of modern medicine, mortality associated with NSTIs remains as high as 30% and escalates up to 70% if the correct clinical diagnosis is delayed3,4.

The microbial etiology of NSTIs can either be monomicrobial, caused by a single bacterial species, or polymicrobial, caused by diverse microorganisms. While S. pyogenes is the most common pathogen associated with monomicrobial NSTIs1, other streptococcal species (S. dysgalactiae, S. agalactiae) and Staphylococcus aureus have also been reported to cause monomicrobial NSTIs5,6. Polymicrobial NSTIs are commonly associated with a mixture of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria7. Among these, Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroides spp., Porphyromonas spp., Prevotella spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., and Clostridium spp. have been most frequently isolated from infected tissue2,8. Whereas polymicrobial NSTIs are usually observed in older patients, or in individuals with underlying comorbidities such as diabetes, monomicrobial NSTIs are more commonly associated with trauma, surgery, or intravenous drug use1,9. The reported relative incidence of mono- and polymicrobial NSTIs varies substantially according to the geography and the specific characteristics of the patient cohort1.

The pathophysiology of monomicrobial NSTIs caused by S. pyogenes has been studied extensively and many of the virulence factors and toxins expressed by the bacterium to efficiently colonize the host tissue, escape the host immune defenses and rapidly spread to surrounding tissue have been very well characterized10. Neutralization of toxins by intravenous administration of human immunoglobulins has been proposed, in addition to surgical debriment and antimicrobial treatment, as an additional adjunct therapy to improve the outcome of NSTIs caused by S. pyogenes11. In contrast to S. pyogenes NSTIs, mechanistic studies addressing the pathogenic strategies and complex dynamics of bacterial communities in polymicrobial NSTIs are lacking. This may be due to the technical challenges associated with investigations of the composition, structure, and activity of polymicrobial communities. Similarly, knowledge on the host response to polymicrobial NSTIs is scarce and it is unknown if and how the host response in polymicrobial NSTIs differs from that during monomicrobial infections. A better understanding of these processes is, however, crucial as it could facilitate accurate identification of the infecting microorganism(s) and would enable to develop treatment strategies tailored toward the microbial etiology.

Currently, drastic surgical debridement of the affected tissue is essential for successful treatment of NSTIs and total or partial limb amputation may be required in cases of severe NSTIs with survivors facing substantial risk for long-term morbidity and reduced quality of life12. Besides rapid surgical intervention, antibiotic therapy constitutes the most important adjunct in NSTIs treatment13. Empiric antibiotic treatment commonly consists of a mixture of broad-spectrum ß-lactams and fluroquinolones with antimicrobials used to treat anaerobic infections, such as Clindamycin or Metronidazole4. Once the causative agent(s) has been identified, antibiotic treatment regimes are revised to more specifically target the bacteria present within the infected tissue. To date, clinical microbial diagnosis of NSTIs is mostly based on bacterial cultures of pre- and intraoperatively obtained tissue- and blood samples4. In clinical practice, one major challenge in treating severe NSTIs is the time required for diagnosis. Therefore, diagnostic tools for NSTIs need to be re-evaluated since the time effectiveness of the therapeutic intervention will increase the chances of survival of the patient. Conceptually, shortening the diagnostic time by the implementation of next-generation molecular tools that enable simultaneous identification of multiple microbes directly from clinical samples as well as easy to measure surrogate biomarkers of microbial etiology could accelerate and improve the management of this acute life-threatening infections. Importantly, such markers should be invariantly associated with specific microbial signatures and robust to fluctuations to allow reliable diagnosis at any phase of the infection. The realization of these diagnostic tools is hampered by a lack of basic knowledge of the microbial diversity associated with NSTIs, their pathological mechanisms as well as the host response in real time during infection.

In this study, we integrate microbial community profiling using 16S rRNA sequencing with transcriptional analysis of host and microbe using dual RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) in tissue biopsies from NSTI patients to unravel the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of mono- and polymicrobial NSTIs. Our results demonstrate that, despite the similar clinical presentation of NSTIs, the pathophysiology of mono- and polymicrobial etiology differs significantly and that these differences can potentially be exploited for diagnostic purposes.


Identification of bacteria present in NSTIs biopsies

To identify the microorganisms involved in NSTIs, 16S rRNA gene sequencing was performed in tissue biopsies obtained from 148 patients, collected at five clinical sites (Table 1). Consistent with previous reports8,14, NSTIs were either dominated by a single bacterial pathogen or associated with a diverse spectrum of phylotypes. Taking the alpha-diversity as a measure, 41 cases, which were dominated by a single phylotype (>85% relative abundance), showed a Gini–Simpson diversity index<0.25 (referred to as ‘monomicrobial’), whereas in 54 cases no single phylotype accumulated more than one third of sequences (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Data 1, 2, and 3). The majority of monomicrobial NSTIs were associated with S. pyogenes (29 of 41 cases), but other pathogens rarely reported in the context of NSTIs, such as Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, and Streptococcus agalactiae, were recovered from some of those biopsies (Supplementary Figure 1). Clostridium sensu stricto strains, historically considered major causes of tissue necrosis15, were only sparsely observed (Supplementary Data 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of patients cohort by infection type
Fig. 1

Single pathogens as well as complex bacterial communities can cause severe NSTIs. a Bacterial composition in tissue biopsies (n = 148) from patients with NSTIs. Bacterial genera with a mean relative abundance of ≥2.5% across all samples or a maximal relative abundance of ≥80% are depicted. The Gini–Simpson diversity index shows genus-level diversity. b Co-occurrence network of the 18 genera with the highest mean relative abundance across all samples. Dark edges illustrate co-occurrence, light edges mutual exclusion (Brown’s p-value ≤0.05). Outer lines represent distinct bacterial clusters (see Supplementary Figure 8). c Bacterial community diversity and structure in NSTI biopsies depicted against the affected body part. The bacterial community diversity is given to the top where each dot represents the Gini–Simpson diversity index from one specimen. Lines represent median values. Diversity indices across the five body parts (n = 14, 18, 12, 23, and 37, respectively from left to right) were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test with ***p < 0.001; *p < 0.05. The bacterial community structure is indicated to the bottom where bars depict the mean relative abundance of genera at each body site. The color code depicting the different genera is as given in a. For statistical evaluation of the relative abundance of genera at different body sites see Table 2. Source data are provided in Supplementary Data 1, 2, 3, and 4

The composition of bacterial communities in polymicrobial NSTIs was highly variable, but Prevotella spp., Porphyromonas spp., Parvimonas spp., Fusobacterium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp., and Bacteroides spp. were most frequently observed in high abundances (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Data 1, Supplementary Figures 27). Surprisingly, we observed extreme differences in the species level diversity within these highly abundant bacterial genera. Whereas the Bacteroides spp. abundance was dominated by B. fragilis, which was previously characterized as a keystone pathogen16 and accounted for 78.5% of the total genus abundance, no single key species was observed among the other genera, with seven species accounting for 80% of the Prevotella genus abundance (Supplementary Figure 1).

To characterize microbial interactions within NSTIs, we inferred bacterial co-occurrence patterns of bacterial genera using CoNet, an ensemble method of network analysis17. We observed significant negative associations between pathogens causing monomicrobial NSTIs such as Streptococcus spp. and the taxonomically diverse genera detected in polymicrobial NSTIs (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Data 4). Using divisive clustering of co-occurring genera (see Methods), highly interconnected clusters of bacterial genera associated with polymicrobial NSTIs were identified (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Figure 8a), suggesting that these microorganisms may act in concert to establish NSTIs.

Consistent with clinical reports18,19, the diversity and composition of the bacterial communities in the infected tissue were highly dependent on the affected anatomic location (Fig. 1c, Supplementary Table 1). Thus, the bacterial diversity in NSTIs of the upper and lower extremities was significantly lower than in NSTIs localized at the head/neck or anogenital region indicating a higher frequency of polymicrobial infections in the latter (Fig. 1c). Concomitantly, we observed significantly higher abundances of gastrointestinal Bacteroides spp. in anogenital infections than at the extremities, while the predominately oral genera Prevotella, Porphyromonas, and Fusobacterium exhibited significantly increased abundances in infections of the head/neck area (Table 2). These observations highlight a potential connection between bacterial community composition in NSTIs and natural niches-associated commensals.

Table 2 Genera are differently abundant at affected body sites

Pathogenicity of streptococcal and polymicrobial NSTIs differs

To characterize the mechanisms of bacterial pathogenicity in mono- and polymicrobial NSTIs, we performed simultaneous transcriptional profiling of infected human tissue and bacterial gene expression analysis via dual RNA-seq. Using hierarchical agglomerative clustering we classified patients in different clusters according to the pathogen(s) and microbial community composition associated with the obtained tissue biopsies (Fig. 2, Supplementary Data 3). Mortality rates did not differ between patients with either polymicrobial or streptococcal NSTIs (Table 1, Supplementary Figure 8b). As the frequency of monomicrobial NSTIs caused by bacteria other than Streptococcus spp. was too low to enable statistical analysis, we randomly selected a set of monomicrobial Streptococcus spp. NSTI biopsies (n = 17) as well as a set of polymicrobial NSTIs (n = 22) for in-depth transcriptional profiling (Supplementary Data 3 and Fig. 2). A strong correlation between the relative contribution of identified bacterial genera to the transcriptional activity and the relative abundance of these genera within the NSTIs microbial communities as identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing was observed (Supplementary Figure 9a, b). The bacterial transcriptional profile indicated expression of a broader spectrum of functionalities in polymicrobial than in monomicrobial NSTIs (Fig. 3, Supplementary Data 5). Analysis of highly transcribed functionalities indicated that specific pathways, such as purine ribonucleoside salvage or glycine catabolism, were only expressed by a fraction of the polymicrobial community, as evidenced by low associated alpha-diversity of the genus-level transcriptional contribution to these functionalities (Supplementary Figure 9c). This observation may indicate functional specialization of the co-occurring genera within the bacterial communities of polymicrobial NSTIs. Comparative analysis of streptococcal versus polymicrobial NSTIs indicated that carbohydrate metabolic pathways including lactose (GO:0005990), trehalose (GO:0005993), and galactose metabolism (Supplementary Figure 10) and carbohydrate transport (GO:0015771, GO:0008645, GO:0034219) were strongly expressed in monomicrobial NSTIs, while amino acid transport (GO:0006865, GO:0015813) and metabolism (Supplementary Figure 10), and protein processing (GO:0016485) predominated in the transcriptional profile of the bacteria associated with polymicrobial NSTIs (Fig. 3, Supplementary Data 5). Furthermore, lipopolysaccharide core region biosynthesis (GO:0009244), lipid A biosynthesis (GO:0009245), and polysaccharide transport (GO:0015774), all of which are involved in the synthesis and transport of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were significantly enriched in the functional profile of polymicrobial NSTIs (Fig. 3, Supplementary Data 5). This expression of LPS, the integral component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and powerful activator of a robust inflammatory response, may contribute to the inflammatory response observed in polymicrobial NSTIs.

Fig. 2

NSTIs can be grouped into distinct infection types based on the associated pathobiome. a Patient classification (n = 148) into different infection types based on their associated bacterial composition using hierarchical agglomerative clustering. Infection type definitions are assigned based on the genus-level distribution of the associated bacterial composition. b Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) of Bray–Curtis dissimilarities between the bacterial composition identified in all tissue biopsies (n = 148), colored by infection type. Source data are provided in Supplementary Data 2 and 3

Fig. 3

Streptococcus spp. and polymicrobial communities express different functionalities that facilitate nutrient acquisition and sustained inflammation. GO terms (root: biological process) with significantly higher associated gene expression in the transcriptional profile of Streptococcus spp. (red, n = 17) or polymicrobial communities (blue, n = 22) during NSTIs (Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05 Kruskal–Wallis test, log2 fold difference ≥ 2) are shown. The heat map depicts summed sample-wise transcript abundance (log2 TPM) of genes associated with each GO term. The dendrogram depicts the GO hierarchy of all visualized GO terms. GO term clusters (labeled below the graph) are based on common parent terms. Nodes are hierarchically arranged to reflect distance to the root and their color indicates the pathobiome with the higher associated average expression. Source data are provided in Supplementary Data 5

Due to their generally commensal lifestyle, the pathogenic mechanisms expressed by the bacterial species identified in polymicrobial NSTIs are severely understudied. To overcome this limitation, we assessed the pathogenic potential of pathobionts in polymicrobial NSTIs by querying the bacterial expression profiles for conserved virulence-associated protein domains, using the InterProScan tool (see Materials and Methods, Supplementary Data 6). To enable comparison between mono- and polymicrobial NSTIs, the same method was applied to characterized virulence factors expressed by Streptococcus spp. in monomicrobial NSTIs.

Using this approach, we observed that genes encoding prominent virulence factors with well-defined roles in the pathogenesis of Streptococcus spp. during NSTI were highly expressed during NSTI (Fig. 4a, b). In contrast, expression of a greater diversity of virulence-associated domains was evident in polymicrobial NSTIs, reflecting the underlying diversity of the bacterial community (Fig. 4a). Functional aggregation of the identified protein domains indicated that factors mediating adhesion/invasion, immune evasion, proteolysis, and toxin activities contribute to the pathogenicity of Streptococcus spp. in monomicrobial NSTIs, while only domains associated with factors mediating cellular adhesion and extracellular proteolytic activity were highly expressed by the bacterial communities associated with polymicrobial NSTIs (Fig. 4c, d).

Fig. 4

Different virulence functionalities contribute to the pathogenicity of Streptococcus spp. and polymicrobial communities during NSTIs. a Summed mean expression level (log2 TPM ± s.d.) of genes categorized based on their encoded InterPro (IPR) domains. The relative contribution of documented streptococcal virulence genes to IPR domain expression is depicted on the bars (left). The log2 differences in IPR expression between Streptococcus spp. (red, n = 17) and polymicrobial community (blue, n = 22) mediated NSTIs are depicted in the center. Gray bars mark IPR domains expressed by only one pathobiome and were calculated assuming one pseudo-TPM. b Streptococcal virulence factor expression (TPM) during NSTIs. The expression level is given for virulence-associated genes annotated using the virulence factor database (VFDB). c, d IPR domain expression associated with specific virulence categories. Average total abundances (TPM ± s.d.) (c) and relative expression levels of virulence categories (d) are given. e, f Relative proportion of InterPro domain expression in the functional categories ‘adhesion’ (e) and ‘proteolysis’ (f) associated with terms indicating target specificity (e) or protease class (f). Putative adhesins and unclassified proteases are depicted in gray. ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test (n = 39). g Contribution of the five genera with the highest average abundances in polymicrobial NSTIs to the total pathobiome expression of specific virulence categories. The relative amount of transcripts (TPM) expressed by each genus is plotted against the relative amount of transcripts encoding IPR domains involved in adhesion (top) or proteolysis (bottom). Squared correlation coefficients are depicted. Source data are available as a source data file

Interestingly, cellular adhesion, which facilitates tissue colonization and successful establishment of infection, was mediated by different mechanisms in monomicrobial Streptococcus spp. and polymicrobial NSTIs. For example, factors mediating adhesion to collagen and other extracellular matrix (ECM) components, known to be relevant for colonization of various host environments including commensal niches20, were highly expressed by the polymicrobial pathobiome (Fig. 4e). On the other hand, expression of genes encoding fibronectin-binding proteins (sfbII, prtF1, prtF2, fbp54), which mediate not only adherence to ECM but also bacterial invasion into host cells21, was pronounced in the transcriptional profile of Streptococcus spp. (Fig. 4a, b, e). Similarly, while genes encoding a broad array of proteolytic factors were strongly expressed in both types of NSTIs, differences in the relative abundance of the protease families indicate that different proteolytic activities are exploited by Streptococcus spp. in monomicrobial NSTIs and the human pathobionts in polymicrobial NSTIs (Fig. 4f).

Importantly, during polymicrobial NSTIs different members of the polymicrobial community contributed to the expression of specific virulence functionalities to a different extent (Fig. 4g). Thus, Porphyromonas spp., which has been shown to express potent proteases in the oral cavity22, contributed strongly to the proteolytic potential of the community, while Parvimonas spp., Fusobacterium spp., and Peptostreptococcus spp. were responsible for the majority of the expression mediating the adhesive properties of the pathobiome. These observations indicate that bacterial synergism may contribute to the pathogenicity in polymicrobial NSTIs.

Host response differs in streptococcal and polymicrobial NSTIs

The transcriptional analysis of infected tissue indicated that the gene expression profile differed significantly between monomicrobial Streptococcus spp. (n = 17) and polymicrobial (n = 22) NSTIs (PERMANOVA, p-value = 0.001), (Supplementary Figure 11, Supplementary Table 2). Nevertheless, a core acute inflammatory signature comprising genes encoding important inflammatory mediators, including cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8), complement components (C1q, C2, C3, C5), alarmins (S100A8/9), genes encoding a range of factors with broad proteolytic activities (ADAM8, 10, 12, 15, 17, 19, 28, ADAMTS2, 4, 5, 6, 9, 12, MMP2, 3, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 24, 25) and hypoxia responsive genes (HIF1A, ENO1, BHLHB2, BINP3, PHHA1, LDHA, GAPDH) was observed in both mono- and polymicrobial NSTIs (Supplementary Data 7, 8). Among the genes with significantly greater expression in polymicrobial compared to monomicrobial NSTIs were those encoding ECM components like collagen, fibronectin or lumican, as well as connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) (Fig. 5a, b, Supplementary Data 8), proteins which are commonly expressed by activated fibroblasts23. On the other hand, a set of genes encoding interferon-inducible mediators such as CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, MX1, and MX2 as well as the guanylate-binding GTP1 and GTP2 were most prominently higher expressed in monomicrobial NSTIs, in particular those caused by S. pyogenes (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Data 8).

Fig. 5

Functional profiling of infected patient tissue during streptococcal and polymicrobial NSTIs reveals distinct patterns of gene expression. a Network plot of gene ontology (GO) terms enriched within the genes differentially expressed between human tissue biopsies infected with Streptococcus spp. (red, n = 17) or the polymicrobial community (blue, n = 22) (Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05, Wald test). Nodes represent enriched GO terms, grouped into functional clusters. b Average expression level, fold change (upper panel) and inter-individual transcriptional variation (lower panel) of selected genes with significantly higher transcript abundances in human tissue infected by Streptococcus spp. (red) or by a polymicrobial community (blue). Source data are provided in Supplementary Data 5, 7, and 8

Potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of S. pyogenes NSTIs

To determine if the differences in interferon-inducible gene expression observed between streptococcal and polymicrobial NSTIs biopsies were also detectable at the protein level, a panel of interferon-related mediators including IFN-alpha, IFN-beta, IFN-gamma, IFN-lambda, IL-6, IL-8, IL-1beta, IL-10, TNF-alpha, GM-CSF, IL-28, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 was measured in plasma samples of a set of NSTIs patients (training cohort) at the time of hospital admission. This training cohort consisted of 12 monomicrobial S. pyogenes NSTI patients, 22 polymicrobial NSTI patients as well as five healthy control subjects (Supplementary Data 3). Of these proteins only CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 displayed statistically significant concentration differences between S. pyogenes and polymicrobial NSTIs (Fig. 6, Supplementary Figure 12).

Fig. 6

Plasma levels of interferon-inducible mediators that differ in NSTI patients. The levels of 15 interferon-inducible mediators were measured in the plasma of patients with S. pyogenes (n = 12) or polymicrobial (n = 22) NSTIs, or healthy controls (n = 5) by a multiplex beads array. The levels of those three mediators that differ between patients with polymicrobial and streptococcal NSTIs are shown whereas those of the 12 other mediators are given in Supplementary Figure 12. The mean value (±s.d.) is indicated by a horizontal line. Statistical significance was evaluated using ordinary one-way ANOVA with *p-value < 0.05; **p-value < 0.01; ***p-value < 0.001. Source data are available as a source data file

Prompt diagnosis of group A streptococcal NSTIs is of outmost clinical importance, as these infections are frequently associated with high systemic toxicity, requiring rapid intervention to halt disease progression. Therefore, we assessed the potential use of host-derived signatures for microbial diagnosis of NSTIs caused by S. pyogenes. We compared the ability of three different modeling techniques (logistic regression, linear support vector machine and random forest classifier) to discriminate between S. pyogenes and non-S. pyogenes NSTIs based on the plasma concentrations of the measured protein-panel. The random forest classifier outperformed the other two approaches in the training cohort, achieving a mean area under the receiver operatoring characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.954 (Fig. 7a) and was therefore adopted for further analysis. Because in clinical practice it is desirable to keep the number of parameters required for diagnosis to a minimum and a reduction of feature space can also reduce model overfitting and improve performance, we applied the BORUTA algorithm to identify the most relevant features in the classification model. The algorithm identified the plasma concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 as relevant for identification of the different types of NSTIs (Fig. 7b). The discriminatory power of a model trained only on these three parameters (3-feature model) was compared with that of the all-features model. The 3-feature model achieved a mean ROC curve AUC of 0.95 showing comparable performance to the full model (Fig. 7c). The potential of these plasma biomarkers for the identification of S. pyogenes NSTIs was then tested in an independent set of patients (n = 59), of which 27 were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequencing as monomicrobial S. pyogenes NSTIs and 32 as NSTIs caused by microorganism(s) other than S. pyogenes (Supplementary Data 3). We confirmed significantly higher plasma concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in S. pyogenes NSTI patients compared to NSTIs cases of other microbial etiology (Supplementary Figure 13). When tested in this independent cohort, the trained 3-feature random forest model achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.822 (Fig. 7d) and was able to correctly classify 21 of 32 non-S. pyogenes and 23 of 27 S. pyogenes NSTIs patients (Fig. 7e). Thus, while the model had a relatively high error rate in classifying non-streptococcal NSTIs, it exhibited promising performance in identifying S. pyogenes NSTIs (True Positive Rate 85%), highlighting the potential of a limited panel of host-derived biomarkers for rapid identification of S. pyogenes NSTIs allowing early therapeutical intervention.

Fig. 7

Identification of potential plasma biomarkers for microbial diagnosis of NSTIs. a ROC curves for the model comparison of Random Forest (RF, green), linear support vector machine (SVM, blue) and logistic regression (LR, red) on the training cohort (n = 12 S. pyogenes NSTIs, n = 22 non-S. pyogenes NSTIs) using the full panel of available measured variables. AUC values ± 95% CI are given. b Selection of relevant plasma markers for discrimination between S. pyogenes and non-S. pyogenes NSTIs in the training cohort using the Boruta algorithm. Boxplots of features are sorted by increasing importance according to the Z-scores. Features colored in green are those which were classified as relevant (exhibiting Z-scores higher than shadowMax). Features colored in red are unimportant for model performance. The blue boxes correspond to minimal (shadowMin), mean (shadowMean) and maximal (shadowMax) importance calculated from randomly permuted features. c ROC curves for a RF classifier trained on the full panel of features (red) and a 3-feature model trained solely on CXCL9, CXCL 10, and CXCL 11 (green) of the training dataset. AUC values ± 95% CI are given. d ROC curve showing the 3-feature RF classifier performance in the independent validation cohort (n = 27 S. pyogenes NSTIs, n = 32 non-S. pyogenes NSTIs). e Confusion matrix summarizing the performance of the 3-feature model in the independent validation cohort. Each row of the confusion matrix shows the number of samples in an actual class while each column shows the number of samples in a predicted class. Tiles showing the number of correctly classified cases are colored blue (non-S. pyogenes) or red (S. pyogenes). Source data are available as a source data file


It is well documented that NSTIs, besides being monomicrobial in nature and caused by professional pathogens, can also be caused by polymicrobial bacterial communities1,7. However, despite the fact that these polymicrobial infections often outnumber those of monomicrobial etiology, there is a lack of information regarding their bacterial composition and activities. Culture-dependent analysis of polymicrobial NSTIs remains generally restricted to the most abundant or easily culturable bacteria8. Amazingly, to date, only a single study has attempted to analyze the microbial composition in NSTIs using a 16S rRNA gene sequencing approach. This study, performed in a limited cohort of 10 volunteers, showed that standard cultivation methods underestimate the diversity of the complex bacterial communities in polymicrobial NSTIs24. In the study presented here, we used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to analyze the bacterial communities associated with NSTIs in a cohort of 148 patients and could demonstrate that polymicrobial communities in NSTIs are not randomly associated, but typically comprised of co-occurring bacteria forming a highly interconnected network. The bacterial genera dominating in polymicrobial NSTIs, which include Porphyromonas spp., Fusobacterium nucleatum and Prevotella spp. (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary Figure 8a) have been shown to synergistically interact in an in vitro model of chronic periodontitis25 as well as in suppurative apical periodontitis in a murine infection model26. Hence, their co-occurrence during NSTIs might suggest that similar interactions facilitate tissue colonization and drive disease progression. Overall, these analyses refute the statement of Rudkjøbing et al. that there are no specific combinations of species in polymicrobial NSTIs24. Although several of the species that we identified in polymicrobial NSTIs, such as Prevotella intermedia or Parvimonas micra, have previously been recovered from other bacterial infections27,28, they are also common members of the healthy human microbiota29. This observation indicates that the contribution of these microorganisms to the overall NSTIs burden is most probably still underestimated in the clinical setting as culture-based methods frequently fail in their detection24,30. Furthermore, the changing microbial epidemiology of NSTIs observed over the last decades31 is also apparent in our study. Clostridium sensu stricto were only observed in rare instances, a trend that has been linked to improvements in hygiene and sanitation conditions32.

The results of the community profiling support the previously reported prominent role of S. pyogenes in the microbiology of NSTIs7 as well as the high frequency of streptococcal NSTIs reported in Scandinavia5. The pathophysiology of S. pyogenes NSTIs has been extensively explored and many of the underlying pathogenic mechanisms previously described10,33 are supported by our results. Thus, robust expression of adhesion factors such as fibronectin-binding proteins34, of factors that enable the bacterium to circumvent the host immune response such as streptococcal inhibitor of complement (Sic), streptococcal C5a peptidase (ScpA)35, and streptolysin O36, as well as of important extracellular proteases such as SpeB37 were observed. Adjunct treatment strategies to neutralize some of these factors such as IVIG therapy, which consist of pooled immunoglobulins from human donors have been suggested to limit destructive hyperinflammatory responses in NSTIs2,38. Although IVIG may be beneficial for treatment of S. pyogenes NSTIs39, there is no evidence that it can provide therapeutic benefit for polymicrobial NSTIs40. Hence, there is a need for new therapeutic approaches that can be given as adjunct therapy for the treatment of polymicrobial NSTIs. In this study, we performed dual RNASeq analysis of human tissue biopsies to gain a more in-depth understanding of the microbial and molecular pathogenesis of NSTIs and to uncover targets for novel treatment strategies. While characterization of the metabolic activity and virulence of S. pyogenes in NSTIs was facilitated by the substantial existing knowledge about its pathogenicity mechanisms, the lack of a reference database of pathogenic factors for several bacteria identified in polymicrobial infections presented a significant limitation for this analysis. To overcome this limitation, we characterized the bacterial gene expression profile using conserved protein domains. We observed that, in contrast to Streptococcus spp. which rely on non-glucose carbohydrates metabolism as previously reported41,42, the expression of genes encoding factors that contribute to amino acid transport and metabolism, as well as peptidolysis were strongly expressed by the polymicrobial communities. This suggests that nutrient acquisition by these bacteria might heavily rely on proteolytic degradation of host proteins as shown for some of the most abundant bacterial genera in polymicrobial NSTIs, Fusobacterium spp., Prevotella spp., and Porphyromonas spp., during periodontitis in the oral cavity43. Interestingly, we observed that Porphyromonas spp. contributed disproportionately to the proteolytic potential of the microbial community. This observation supports the theory that synergistic complementation of specialized bacteria might be critical for establishment and progression of polymicrobial NSTIs. Additionally, a robust expression of genes coding for factors that contribute to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) synthesis was observed in polymicrobial NSTIs biopsies. This integral component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is a powerful activator of inflammation in the human skin and the underlying tissues44 and neutralization of LPS may provide an adjunct therapeutic strategy to decrease inflammation-induced pathology in polymicrobial NSTIs.

Because of the rapid disease progression, early diagnosis of NSTIs is critical to limit patient morbidity and mortality. Such a diagnosis, however, frequently proves to be challenging as symptoms can be ambiguous and frequently overlap with other clinical entities. Most prominently, the LRINEC score, comprising plasma concentrations of serum leukocytes, glucose, sodium, C-reactive protein (CRP), creatinine, and hemoglobin, has been developed to facilitate early diagnosis and limit time to surgical intervention45. Importantly, LRINEC scores did not differ between streptococcal and polymicrobial infections in our cohort and times from hospital admission to surgery were comparable (53 ± 114 (mean ± s.d, n = 73) for streptococcal and 33 ± 56 (n = 45) hours for polymicrobial infections, Table 1). As recent work has questioned the diagnostic value of frequently used clinical parameters46 and ultimate diagnosis can only be achieved by surgical exploration1, diagnostic uncertainty of disease onset frequently hampers accurate early detection of NSTIs. This can lead to patients with variable stages of the disease being admitted to intensive care units, making prompt and accurate microbial diagnosis crucial to effectively halt disease progression. Guidelines for the management and treatment of NSTIs involve surgical debridement of the affected area combined with empiric high-dose intravenous broad-spectrum antibiotics to cover all potential pathogens that can cause NSTIs11. Antibiotic coverage can be narrowed once the causative microorganism(s) have been identified. For this reason, many NSTIs patients receive unnecessary or inappropriate antibiotics, which could be prevented by earlier identification of the causative pathogen(s). Therefore, the use of biomarkers that can distinguish between different types of NSTIs has the potential to reduce the time of broad-spectrum empirical therapy and to improve the patient outcomes by early administration of effective antibiotics. The comparative transcriptional profiling of NSTI tissue biopsies performed in this study uncovered interferon-related mediators, in particular type I interferon, associated with S. pyogenes NSTIs. This type I interferon response has been reported to be expressed by the host in response to S. pyogenes in order to reduce tissue damage caused by hyper-inflammation47. We also observed significantly greater concentrations of the interferon-inducible chemokines CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 in the circulation of S. pyogenes NSTIs patients than in circulation of patients with polymicrobial NSTIs. The potential value of these chemokines as biomarkers of S. pyogenes NSTIs was shown by a random forest model trained on the plasma concentrations of these three chemokines followed by validation in an independent patient cohort. The results of this exploratory analysis identified plasma concentrations of CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11 as being potentially useful biomarkers for microbial diagnosis of S. pyogenes NSTIs (85.2% true positive rate). While the classifiers showed a relatively high error rate when classifying non-S. pyogenes NSTIs (34.4%), early differentiation of NSTIs caused by S. pyogenes from those of different bacterial etiology is of outmost clinical importance as S. pyogenes NSTIs are generally associated with high systemic toxicity and require prompt intervention. Thus, interferon-induced chemokines show specific promise for the identification of patients requiring rapid ajunct therapies such as IVIG treatment39. The classifier performance may be improved in future studies that test a broader panel of plasma markers. Genes identified as differentially expressed between streptococcal and polymicrobial NSTIs in this study might serve as a starting point to achieve higher classification accuracy via the inclusion of additional features in a classification model.

Following identification of a robust set of biomarkers, the challenge for the validation phase will be to develop suitable analytical methods capable for the fast quantification of the identified biomarkers. In this regard, microfluidic immunoassay systems in miniaturized devices that require small reagent volumes and very short analysis time may be a good option for generating such a NSTIs point-of-care diagnostic test. Several systems have been recently described combining microfluidics with detection of magnetic bead-based immunoassays for measurements in less than 1 h48,49. The multiplex microfluidic array designed by Malhotra et al.48, for example, was able to detect four biomarker proteins in patient serum with high sensitivity and accuracy. We envisage a similar device for detection of CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11 or other host-derived biomarkers that could provide a rapid point-of-care serum test for microbial diagnostic and personalized therapy of NSTIs patients.

Taken together, our results demonstrate that despite similar clinical presentation, the pathophysiology of NSTIs caused by S. pyogenes or by polymicrobial communities differs significantly and that these differences can be eventually exploited for treatment and diagnostic purposes.


Study design

This study was designed to identify the bacterial taxa associated with NSTIs, identify their functionalities that contribute to disease pathophysiology and identify host signatures of potential value for rapid microbial diagnosis at the time of hospital admission. Tissue biopsies and plasma samples were obtained from patients clinically diagnosed with NSTIs and enrolled in the EU-funded project INFECT ( Diagnosis of NSTIs was performed by the acting surgeon at primary operation or revision as described earlier50. Briefly, diagnosis was based on the presence of necrotic or deliquescent soft tissue with widespread undermining of the surrounding tissue. Following initial diagnosis, patient files and surgical descriptions were again scrutinized and patients were excluded from the study if reports of necrotic or deliquescent tissue were absent. All remaining patients were eligble to be included in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients or their surrogate. The INFECT study is registered at (NCT01790698). The INFECT study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and with the approval of the regional Ethical Review Board at the Karolinska Institutet in Stockholm, Sweden (Ethics permits: 2012/2110-31/2), the National Committee on Health Research Ethics in Copenhagen, Denmark (Ethics permits: 1151739), the regional Ethical Review Board in Gothenburg, Sweden (Ethics permits: 930-12) and Bergen, Norway (2012/2227/REC West). Specimens from patients admitted to five Scandinavian hospitals, Righospitalet (Copenhagen, Denmark), Karolinska University Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden), Blekingesjukhuset (Karlskrona, Sweden), Sahlgrenska University Hospital (Gothenburg, Sweden), and Haukeland University Hospital (Bergen, Norway), were included in this study. All experiments were performed in full accordance with the approved ethics applications specified above. Patient mortality was recorded for a period of 365 days following study enrollment. The level of hemoglobin, white blood cells, C-reactive protein, creatinine sodium, and glucose in blood, patient pulse and mean arterial pressure were determined at hospital admission. Time from hospital admission to surgery was recorded for all patients. Only tissue samples taken on the day of hospital admission (day 0) were included in this study to enable the identification of robust host signatures indicative of bacterial etiology irrespective of time since onset of initial symptoms. Specimens for 16S rRNA gene sequencing (148) were randomly selected from patients with available day 0 tissue biopsies. All tissue biopsies were obtained intraoperatively and stabilized with RNAlater™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Sample pre-processing

Stabilized tissue was transferred into 1 ml TRIzol™ (Invitrogen) reagent containing 50 µl of vanadyl ribonucleoside complex (VRC) and mechanically disrupted using a Polytron disperser (Kinematica). To achieve optimal bacterial lysis, samples were transferred into lysing matrices B (MP Biomedicals) and disrupted using a FastPrep-24® (MP Biomedicals). Tissue debris was removed by centrifugation and phase separation was achieved by addition of 200 µl Chloroform (Carl Roth) followed by centrifugation. The aqueous phase containing total RNA was separated for subsequent RNA purification, while the interphase and organic phase were used for further DNA purification.

16S rRNA gene preparation and sequencing

The DNA was purified following the manufacturer’s protocol for TRIzol™ DNA extraction (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Amplicon libraries of the V1-V2 region of the 16S rRNA gene were generated as previously described51. The target region was amplified by PCR following 20 cycles of PCR reaction using the 27F and 338R primers and sequenced on a MiSeq platform (2 × 250 bp)51.

Bioinformatic analysis of the NSTI-associated microorganisms

A total of 4,593,685 reads were generated, resulting in 31038 ± 18665 reads per sample. Bioinformatic processing was performed as previously described51. Raw reads were merged with the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) assembler. Sequences were aligned within MOTHUR (gotoh algorithm using the SILVA reference database) and subjected to preclustering (diffs = 2) yielding phylotypes that were filtered for an average abundance of ≥0.001% and a sequence length ≥250 bp before analysis (Supplementary Data 1). Phylotypes were assigned to a taxonomic affiliation based on naïve Bayesian classification with a pseudo-bootstrap threshold of 80%. Phylotypes were then manually analyzed against the RDP database using the Seqmatch function to define the discriminatory power of each sequence type. Species level annotations were assigned to a phylotype when only 16S rRNA gene fragments of previously described isolates of a single species were aligned with a maximum of two mismatches with a representative sequence read. Similarly, genus-level annotations were assigned to a phylotype when only the representative sequence aligned to isolates and uncultured representatives of a single genus with up to two mismatches.

For additional taxonomic characterization, the identified Streptococcus spp., Prevotella spp., Porphyromonas spp., Bacteroides spp., Fusobacterium spp., and Peptostreptococcus spp. sequences were compared to sequences of all isolates with species level annotation available in RDP (release 11 update 5). Isolate sequences were aligned with MUSCLE52 and edited using SEAVIEW53. Sequences were trimmed to the V1–V2 region and all sequences of poor quality (≥1 N per sequence) as well as those not completely covering the amplified region were deleted.

To reduce complexity, unique Streptococcus sequences assigned to only a single isolate with species level annotation were removed before phylogenetic analysis. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using the neighbor joining routine with Jukes–Cantor correction and pairwise deletion of gaps in MEGA754. Species names were assigned to phylotypes that clustered with sequences of only a single species, were supported by high bootstrap values >50% and exhibited >97.5% of sequence identity to a reported sequence of a species representative. Phylotype data were rarified to resemble the smallest library size using the R phyloseq package (Supplementary Data 2) and used to construct sample-similarity matrices using the Bray–Curtis algorithm (V.7.0.11, PRIMER-E, Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK). Bacterial alpha-diversity was calculated using the Gini–Simpson index (1-Λ) on rarified phylotype data.

NSTIs were classified according to the body part affected on admission into five categories: Head/neck, upper extremities, lower extremities, anogenital, and thorax/abdomen. Cases that had multiple body parts affected were excluded from the analysis. Significant differences between these five a priori defined groups of samples were evaluated using the permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), allowing for type III (partial) sum of squares, fixed effects sum to zero for mixed terms and the generation of Monte Carlo p-values using unrestricted permutation of raw data. Phylotype and genera abundance as well as diversity indices across the five body parts were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison post hoc test and were assumed to be significantly different if p-value ≤ 0.05.

Bacterial co-occurrence modeling and specimen classification

To identify patterns of bacterial co-occurrence an ensemble method implemented within the Cytoscape application CoNet, optimized for sparse datasets, was applied to column-wise normalized phylotype counts aggregated at the genus level17. To avoid misinterpretation resulting from sparse data, genera present in less than 25% of all samples were excluded prior to the modeling step. Two measurements of correlation between genera (Spearmen and Pearson) and two dissimilarity measurements (Kullback–Leibler and Bray–Curtis) were used to compute scores for genera interactions (network edges) ignoring parent-descendant relationships. Statistical significance was assigned to the resulting edge scores following measurement-specific permutation and bootstrapping with 999 iterations each. To counter the compositionality bias of correlation measures inferred from column-wise normalized data, a re-normalization approach that provides a null-distribution and captures the similarity introduced by compositionality was applied during the permutation step17. P-values of correlation measurements were calculated by z-scoring the permuted null and bootstrap confidence interval using pooled variance. In contrast, p-values of the dissimilarity measurements were computed by comparing the bootstrap confidence interval to a point null value computed by permutation, as they are inherently robust against compositionality55. The resulting measurement-specific networks were merged using Brown’s method for p-value combination56 and adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Benjamini–Hochberg correction. Phylotype interactions with adjusted p-values ≤ 0.05 and supported by at least two independent methods were retained in the final model (Supplementary Data 3). Distinct NSTI-associated bacterial communities were identified through divisive graph clustering of co-occuring genera using the Markov cluster algorithm (MCL)57 with an inflation of 1.5 retaining modest network granularity (Supplementary Figure 8a). The Markov clustering (MCL) algorithm was chosen as it has been successfully applied to a variety of biological datasets (microbiome data, gene networks, protein–protein interaction networks) and frequently outperforms other clustering algorithms58. Patients were classified into distinct types of NSTIs based on average-linkage hierarchical agglomerative clustering using the relative abundance of the identified bacterial communities (Fig. 2a). The optimal number of clusters in the resulting sample dendrogram was determined using the J-index59 and distinct specimen clusters were defined to represent different types of NSTIs.

RNA-seq sample preparation and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted using the TRIzol™(Thermo Fisher Scientific) reagent according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and DNA contamination was removed by DNase treatment using four U Turbo DNase™ (Ambion). RNA integrity was controlled on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). ERCC RNA Spike-In Mixes (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added to individual samples according to the manufacturer’s guidelines for later determination of the lower limit of detection and to control for technical derived errors in the datasets. Ribosomal RNA was depleted using the RiboZero epidemiology kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. cDNA libraries were prepared using the ScriptSeq v2 RNA-seq Library Preparation Kit (Illumina) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were size-selected between 250 and 1000 bp using BluePippin (Sage Science) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Library quality and size-selection was controlled using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). The cDNA libraries were sequenced (1 × 50 bp) on the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform to a maximum depth of 143.8 million reads using the TruSeq S.R. Cluster Kit, v3-cBot-HS (Illumina). Samples were exluded from further analysis if (1) the integrity of the isolated total RNA was low (RIN value < 4) or (2) the proportion of bacterial reads did not allow robust analysis of the generated dataset.

Bioinformatic analysis of RNA-seq data

Following demultiplexing and trimming, raw reads were pseudoaligned to the human genome assembly GRCh38.p10 using kallisto60 and unaligned reads were stored for further bacterial metatranscriptome analysis. Human transcript based pseudoalignments were summarized at the gene level for later differential gene expression analysis using the R package tximport61. To eliminate potential confounding effects associated with variability in sample collection in a multi-center cohort study, unsupervised surrogated variable analysis was used to identify potential nuisance factors uncorrelated with the experimental factor of interest using the R package SVA62. Identified nuisance factors were included as covariates in downstream analysis. The R package DESeq263 was used to identify human genes that were differentially expressed between tissue biopsies from patients infected with Streptococcus spp. monoinfections and biopsies from patients with polymicrobial NSTIs. Significant nuisance factors identified by surrogate variable analysis were included as covariates in the design formula of the differential gene expression analysis. A gene was considered significantly differentially expressed if the Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05. GO enrichment analysis was performed on all genes with significantly different transcript abundance using DAVID Informatics Resources64. Gene Ontology (GO) categories were considered significantly enriched in one infection type if the Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-value was ≤0.05. The functional relationship of significantly enriched GO terms was inferred from network analysis using EnrichmentMap65. Network edges were calculated using the overlap coefficient implemented in the package routine (threshold ≥0.4). Clusters of functionally related GO terms were identified by hierarchical clustering using the hierarchical clustering algorithm in protein interaction networks (HC-PIN, strong module definition, complex size threshold = 3) implemented in the CytoCluster package66. Absolute counts for each gene and each sample were then transformed into standard z-scores by subtracting the mean expression of a gene across all  samples from the absolute counts in an individual sample and dividing this value by the standard deviation of the absolute counts of this gene across all samples.

Guided by the 16S rDNA amplicon analysis, genus-specific transcriptomes were compiled for all genera with a relative abundance ≥ 2% in at least one of the analyzed samples. Genus specific metatransriptomes were compiled from all available assemblies in the RefSeq database up to a maximum of n = 250 and including assemblies in a quality dependent hierarchical order: first complete genomes, thereafter chromosomes, scaffolds, and contigs (assessed August 2017). For each genus, assemblies were randomly selected if more than 250 genomes were available and lower quality assemblies (chromosomes, scaffolds, contigs) were only considered if the number of available genus genomes was ≤200 (Supplementary Data 9). Based on the genus composition of each specimen, sample-specific reference databases were created by concatenating the metatranscriptomes of all genera present with a relative abundance ≥2%. Reads that did not align to the human genome were pseudoaligned to their respective indexed reference using kallisto. Genes with low expression level (<11 counts in any sample) were excluded before downstream analysis. Redundant genes from different genomes, which were identified by matching NCBI RefSeq protein IDs, gene lengths and pseudoaligned read counts, were considered for further analysis. Genes were annotated (KEGG, GO, PFAM and InterPro) using InterProScan 5 (RC 1). Genus-specific functionality profiles were constructed by clustering translated gene sequences applying the UniRef50 parameters using BLAST (e-value ≤ 1 × 10–6, sequence identity ≥ 50%, coverage ≥ 80%), obtaining clusters of homologous genes67. Estimated counts, InterPro and NCBI annotations were aggregated for each gene cluster. The expression of each cluster of homologous genes was expressed as transcripts per million (TPM) for downstream analysis (Supplementary Data 10). Bacterial alpha-diversity for genus-level transcriptional contribution to functionalities (GO categories) was expressed using the Gini–Simpson index (1-Λ).

Differential expression of functional categories was determined by statistical comparison of the calculated log2 fold change between bacterial communities using a Kruskal–Wallis test with Benjamini–Hochberg FDR correction for multiple comparisons. Functional categories were considered to be significantly differentially expressed if adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05 and log2 fold change was ≥2. GO network graphs were constructed using the Python3 Networkx module, considering all nodes and connecting edges along the longest path to the biological process root node (GO:0008150). For analysis of the bacterial metabolic profile, redundant KEGG pathway annotations were removed by selecting parsimonious KEGG pathway sets based on the KEGG link database (release 85.1) using MinPath 1.468.

Virulence factor gene level annotation

The majority of highly abundant genera associated with polymicrobial infections were underrepresented or non-existing in relevant virulence factor databases, hindering analysis of the virulence mechanisms contributing to disease pathogenesis. To mitigate this problem, a strategy was developed to analyze the virulence potential of the bacterial communities in NSTIs based on conserved protein domains of gene products. A library of InterPro domains associated with the terms ‘toxin’, ‘innate immune evasion’, ‘proteolysis’ and ‘adhesion’ was generated (Supplementary Data 6), where InterPro domains were sorted into one of these categories, if; (I) a relevant GO term was associated with the domain (GO terms ‘proteolysis’ (GO:0006508), ‘pathogenesis’ (GO:0009405), ‘adhesion’ (GO:0022610), ‘cell killing’ (GO:0001906), and their respective child terms), (II) a gene product associated with a respective domain had experimentally validated mechanistic relevance for one of the categories, (III) the InterPro domain description showed semantic association to one of these disease relevant processes (e.g. immune evasion). The InterPro domain architecture of all expressed gene clusters was queried for InterPro domains that were classified into one of the analyzed virulence-associated categories. The relevance of all identified features for host-pathogen interaction was further inferred by in silico prediction of their cellular export using SignalP 4.0, which identifies signal peptides for cellular export using neural networks (D-cutoff values ‘sensitive’)69, and SecretomeP 2.0, predicting non-signal peptide mediated protein secretion ab initio70. The validity of the above-mentioned strategy for identifying potential virulence features in bacterial communities was demonstrated using well-known virulence and virulence-associated gene clusters of S. pyogenes annotated by querying the Virulence Factor Database VFDB (December 2017)70. Virulence factors from S. pyogenes, S. dysgalactiae and S. agalactiae and their cognate locus tags were extracted from the VFDB and used to identify respective gene clusters.

Quantitative RT-PCR

The expression of a set of genes indicated by RNA-Seq as differentially expressed between monomicrobial and polymicrobial NSTIs was further evaluated by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Figure 14), Total RNA samples were reverse transcribed and amplified using the SensiFAST™ SYBR® No-ROX Kit (Bioline) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Primer sequences are provided in Supplementary Table 3. Thermal cycling conditions for all reactions were the following: reverse transcription for 20 min at 45 °C, initial denaturation for 5 min at 95 °C, 40 cycles of 20 s at 95 °C, 20 s at 60 °C and 20 s at 72 °C. Fold change values were calculated using Pfaffl’s method for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR71.

Determination of cytokines and chemokines concentrations

Plasma concentrations of cytokines/chemokines were determined using the bead-based multiplex immunoassay LegendplexTM (Biolegend) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Available plasma samples taken from all patients included in the RNA-seq analysis on day 0 were used in the multiplex imunnoassay.

Statistical analysis of plasma markers

The Student t test and One-way ANOVA were used to evaluate the significance of differences in plasma marker concentrations between the different patient groups. Model performance was evaluated based on a training cohort, not considering samples with missing values, through 10 × 2 repeated stratified K-fold crossvalidation to ensure representation of the minority class in each sample split. Model parameters were optimized through a grid search approach to maximize the correct classification of the positive class (streptococcal NSTIs), represented by recall and precision score. Based on grid search L2-regularized Logistic Regression classifier (C: 1.0) and SVM classifier (kernel: linear, C: 10.0, gamma: 1.0) for standard scaled data, as well as Random Forest classifier (number of trees: 250, max features at each split: sqrt(n_features), minimal terminal leaf size: 3) for unscaled data were included in model comparisons. Feature selection was conducted using the Boruta algorithm which works as a wrapper algorithm around random forests (RF), performs a test for statistical significance of variable importances compared to a permutated copy of the original dataset (shadow dataset) and outputs a distribution of Z-scores for each feature72. Only the features with Z-scores statistically higher than the maximum achieved distribution for the shadow dataset were considered important. The final model was trained on the whole training cohort considering only the most important features (CXCL9, CXCL 10, CXCL11) and was evaluated using an independent test cohort of NSTI patients (32 polymicrobial non-streptococcal and 27 S. pyogenes NSTIs, see Supplementary Data 3) that had been kept separate during model training. For evaluation of the classifier performance, receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) were built by plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against the false positive rate (1-specificity) for every likely cutoff between the 2 classes. Models were constructed, assessed and validated using the Python package ‘sklearn’. Statistical analysis and plotting were done using the Python package matplotlib and Graph Pad Prism (Graph Pad Software, Inc.).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The sequencing data supporting the findings of this study have been deposited in the NCBI BioProject database with accession number PRJNA479582. The source data underlying all main text and supplementary figures are provided as a Source Data file. All other relevant data are available as Supplementary Data or available from the corresponding author.

Code availability

The analysis underlying Figs. 3, 4b and 7 have been implemented in Python and R, and the source code can be downloaded from github [].


  1. 1.

    Stevens, D. L. & Bryant, A. E. Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. N. Eng. J. Med 377, 2253–2265 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Anaya, D. A. & Dellinger, E. P. Necrotizing soft-tissue infection: diagnosis and management. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44, 705–710 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Boyer, A. et al. Influence of surgical treatment timing on mortality from necrotizing soft tissue infections requiring intensive care management. Intensive Care Med. 35, 847–853 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Misiakos, E. P. et al. Current concepts in the management of necrotizing fasciitis. Front. Surg. 1, 36 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bruun, T. et al. Necrotizing soft tissue infections caused by Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis of groups C and G in western Norway. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 19, E545–E550 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Miller, L. G. et al. Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1445–1453 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cocanour, C. S. et al. Management and novel adjuncts of necrotizing soft tissue infections. Surg. Infect. (Larchmt.). 18, 250–272 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Elliott, D., Kufera, J. A. & Myers, R. A. The microbiology of necrotizing soft tissue infections. Am. J. Surg. 179, 361–366 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hasham, S., Matteucci, P., Stanley, P. R. & Hart, N. B. Necrotising fasciitis. BMJ 330, 830–833 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Johansson, L., Thulin, P., Low, D. E. & Norrby-Teglund, A. Getting under the skin: the immunopathogenesis of Streptococcus pyogenes deep tissue infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 51, 58–65 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stevens, D. L. et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 59, 147–159 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Stevens, D. L. et al. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft-tissue infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41, 1373–1406 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhao-Fleming, H., Dissanaike, S. & Rumbaugh, K. Are anaerobes a major, underappreciated cause of necrotizing infections? Anaerobe 45, 65–70 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Bernal, N. P., Latenser, B. A., Born, J. M. & Liao, J. Trends in 393 necrotizing acute soft tissue infection patients 2000–2008. Burns 38, 252–260 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stevens, D. L., Aldape, M. J. & Bryant, A. E. Life-threatening clostridial infections. Anaerobe 18, 254–259 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hajishengallis, G. & Lamont, R. J. Dancing with the stars: how choreographed bacterial interactions dictate nososymbiocity and give rise to keystone pathogens, accessory pathogens, and pathobionts. Trends Microbiol. 24, 477–489 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Faust, K. et al. Microbial co-occurrence relationships in the human microbiome. PLoS. Comput. Biol. 8, e1002606 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Brook, I. & Frazier, E. H. Clinical and microbiological features of necrotizing fasciitis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33, 2382–2387 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shiroff, A. M., Herlitz, G. N. & Gracias, V. H. Necrotizing soft tissue infections. J. Intensive Care. Med. 29, 138–144 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kalfas, S., Tigyi, Z., Wikström, M. & Naidu, A. Laminin binding to Prevotella intermedia. Oral Microbiol. Immunol. 7, 235–239 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Brouwer, S., Barnett, T. C., Rivera‐Hernandez, T., Rohde, M. & Walker, M. J. Streptococcus pyogenes adhesion and colonization. FEBS Lett. 590, 3739–3757 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Imamura, T. The role of gingipains in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J. Periodontol. 74, 111–118 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Igarashi, A., Okochi, H., Bradham, D. & Grotendorst, G. R. Regulation of connective tissue growth factor gene expression in human skin fibroblasts and during wound repair. Mol. Biol. Cell. 4, 637–645 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rudkjøbing, V. B. et al. Comparing culture and molecular methods for the identification of microorganisms involved in necrotizing soft tissue infections. BMC Infect. Dis. 16, 652 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Okuda, T. et al. Synergy in biofilm formation between Fusobacterium nucleatum and Prevotella species. Anaerobe 18, 110–116 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Metzger, Z. et al. Synergistic pathogenicity of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum in the mouse subcutaneous chamber model. J. Endod. 35, 86–94 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Uemura, H. et al. Parvimonas micra as a causative organism of spondylodiscitis: a report of two cases and a literature review. Int J. Infec Dis. 23, 53–55 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Boersma, C. et al. Prevotella intermedia infection causing acute and complicated aortitis—a case report. Int. J. Surg. Case Rep. 32, 58–61 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Huttenhower, C. et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 486, 207–214 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Zhao-Fleming, H. H. et al. Traditional culture methods fail to detect principle pathogens in necrotising soft tissue infection: a case report. J. Wound Care 27, S24–S28 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wong, C. H. et al. Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 85-A, 1454–1460 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Sarani, B., Strong, M., Pascual, J. & Schwab, C. W. Necrotizing fasciitis: current concepts and review of the literature. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 208, 279–288 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Olsen, R. J. & Musser, J. M. Molecular pathogenesis of necrotizing fasciitis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 5, 1–31 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Yamaguchi, M., Terao, Y. & Kawabata, S. Pleiotropic virulence factor—Streptococcus pyogenes fibronectin-binding proteins. Cell Microbiol. 15, 503–511 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ermert, D. & Laabei, M. Catch me if you can: Streptococcus pyogenes complement evasion strategies. J. Innate Immun. 11, 1-10 (2018).

  36. 36.

    Zhu, L. et al. Contribution of secreted NADase and streptolysin O to the pathogenesis of epidemic serotype M1 Streptococcus pyogenes infections. Am. J. Pathol. 187, 605–613 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Rasmussen, M. & Bjorck, L. Proteolysis and its regulation at the surface of Streptococcus pyogenes. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 537–544 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Norrby-Teglund, A. et al. Evidence for superantigen involvement in severe group a streptococcal tissue infections. J. Infect. Dis. 184, 853–860 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Babbar, A. et al. Pivotal role of preexisting pathogen-specific antibodies in the development of necrotizing soft-Ttssue infections. J. Infect. Dis. 218, 44–52 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Madsen, M. B. et al. Immunoglobulin G for patients with necrotising soft tissue infection (INSTINCT): a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 43, 1585–1593 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ferretti, J., Stevens, D. & Fischetti, V. Streptococcus pyogenes: Basic Biology to Clinical Manifestations, (The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma, 2016).

  42. 42.

    Shelburne, S. A. et al. A direct link between carbohydrate utilization and virulence in the major human pathogen group A Streptococcus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1698–1703 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Takahashi, N. Oral microbiome metabolism: from “who are they?” to “what are they doing?”. J. Dent. Res. 94, 1628–1637 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Raetz, C. R. & Whitfield, C. Lipopolysaccharide endotoxins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 635–700 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Wong, C. H., Khin, L. W., Heng, K. S., Tan, K. C. & Low, C. O. The LRINEC (Laboratory Risk Indicator for Necrotizing Fasciitis) score: a tool for distinguishing necrotizing fasciitis from other soft tissue infections. Crit. Care Med. 32, 1535–1541 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Neeki, M. M. et al. Evaluating the laboratory risk indicator to differentiate cellulitis from necrotizing fasciitis in the emergency department. West. J. Emerg. Med. 18, 684–689 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Castiglia, V. et al. Type I interferon signaling prevents IL-1β-driven lethal systemic hyperinflammation during invasive bacterial infection of soft tissue. Cell. Host. Microbe 19, 375–387 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Malhotra, R. et al. Ultrasensitive detection of cancer biomarkers in the clinic by use of a nanostructured microfluidic array. Anal. Chem. 84, 6249–6255 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Otieno, B. A. et al. On-line protein capture on magnetic beads for ultrasensitive microfluidic immunoassays of cancer biomarkers. Biosens. Bioelectron. 53, 268–274 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Madsen, M. B. et al. Necrotizing soft tissue infections—a multicentre, prospective observational study (INFECT): protocol and statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 62, 272–279 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Camarinha-Silva, A. et al. Comparing the anterior nare bacterial community of two discrete human populations using Illumina amplicon sequencing. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2939–2952 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–1797 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Gouy, M., Guindon, S. & Gascuel, O. SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 221–224 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Aitchison, J. The statistical analysis of compositional data. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 44, 139–177 (1982).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Brown, M. B. 400: A method for combining non-independent, one-sided tests of significance. Biometrics 31, 987–992 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Van Dongen, S. Graph clustering via a discrete uncoupling process. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl 30, 121–141 (2008).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Saelens, W., Cannoodt, R. & Saeys, Y. A comprehensive evaluation of module detection methods for gene expression data. Nat. Commun. 9, 1090 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E. & Stork, D.G. Pattern Classification (Wiley, New York, 1973).

  60. 60.

    Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525–527 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Soneson, C., Love, M.I. & Robinson, M.D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res 4 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.7563.1.(2015).

  62. 62.

    Leek, J. T. & Storey, J. D. Capturing heterogeneity in gene expression studies by surrogate variable analysis. PLoS. Genet. 3, e161 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Merico, D., Isserlin, R., Stueker, O., Emili, A. & Bader, G. D. Enrichment map: a network-based method for gene-set enrichment visualization and interpretation. PLoS. ONE. 5, e13984 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Li, M., Li, D., Tang, Y., Wu, F. & Wang, J. CytoCluster: a cytoscape plugin for cluster analysis and visualization of biological networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, E1880 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Suzek, B. E. et al. UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics 31, 926–932 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ye, Y. & Doak, T. G. A parsimony approach to biological pathway reconstruction/inference for genomes and metagenomes. PLoS. Comput. Biol. 5, e1000465 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Petersen, T. N., Brunak, S., von Heijne, G. & Nielsen, H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat. Methods 8, 785–786 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Bendtsen, J. D., Kiemer, L., Fausbøll, A. & Brunak, S. Non-classical protein secretion in bacteria. Bmc. Microbiol. 5, 58 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT–PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45–e45 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kursa, M. B. & Rudnicki, W. R. Feature selection with the Boruta package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–13 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank A. Dröge S. Kahl, I. Plumeier and K. Mummenbrauer for technical assistance. They also thank E. Keen, O. Goldmann and members of the Microbial Interactions and Processes Research Group for discussions and comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Program (grant 305340, Infect) and by iMed, the Helmholtz Association Initiative on Personalized Medicine.

Author information





D.H.P., R.T., A.I. and E. M. conceived and designed the study. R.T., A.I., E.M. and D.H.P. designed and supervised the experiments. R.T., E.M. D.H. and A.I. performed the experiments. R.T., A.I., E.M., J.H. and D.H.P. analyzed the data. All authors discussed the results. M.B.M., O.H., S.S., A.N.T., T.B. and the INFECT Study Group performed patient recruitment and patient sample collection. R.T., E.M., A.I. and D.H.P. prepared and wrote the manuscript. All authors commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dietmar H. Pieper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Dennis Stevens and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thänert, R., Itzek, A., Hoßmann, J. et al. Molecular profiling of tissue biopsies reveals unique signatures associated with streptococcal necrotizing soft tissue infections. Nat Commun 10, 3846 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing