Strong plasmon-molecule coupling at the nanoscale revealed by first-principles modeling


Strong light-matter interactions in both the single-emitter and collective strong coupling regimes attract significant attention due to emerging applications in quantum and nonlinear optics as well as opportunities for modifying material-related properties. Exploration of these phenomena is theoretically demanding, as polaritons exist at the intersection between quantum optics, solid state physics, and quantum chemistry. Fortunately, nanoscale polaritons can be realized in small plasmon-molecule systems, enabling treatment with ab initio methods. Here, we show that time-dependent density-functional theory calculations access the physics of nanoscale plasmon-molecule hybrids and predict vacuum Rabi splitting. By considering a system comprising a few-hundred-atom aluminum nanoparticle interacting with benzene molecules, we show that cavity quantum electrodynamics holds down to resonators of a few cubic nanometers in size, yielding a single-molecule coupling strength exceeding 200 meV due to a massive vacuum field of 4.5 V · nm−1. In a broader perspective, ab initio methods enable parameter-free in-depth studies of polaritonic systems for emerging applications.


Light-matter interaction between an optical mode and a quantum emitter is accurately described in terms of the cavity quantum electrodynamics (cQED) formalism1. The interaction can be weak or strong, depending on circumstances, leading to drastically different behavior. The regime of strong light-matter coupling, unlike its weak counterpart, leads to formation of hybrid cavity-emitter eigenmodes manifested in coherent energy exchange between the subsystems occurring on timescales that are much faster than the corresponding damping rates. Thus, the emitter and the cavity form a unified light-matter hybrid polariton, whose properties, including spontaneous emission and chemical potential, can be tuned2,3,4. Because of their compositional nature, polaritons are useful for photon–photon interactions, which lead to remarkable nonlinear and quantum optical phenomena, including photon blockade and Bose-Einstein condensation of exciton polaritons5,6,7. On the other hand, strong light-matter coupling may lead to changes in emitter properties, including photochemical rates8,9,10,11,12 and exciton transport13,14.

Traditionally cavity-exciton polaritons have been realized in atomic or solid state systems utilizing high quality-factor optical cavities at low temperatures15. Polaritonic behavior associated with “dressing” of the emitter by a cavity field is usually captured by traditional quantum optical approaches such as Jaynes–Cummings or Dicke models2,3,4,16,17. However, these quantum optical formalisms treat matter in an extremely simplified manner, that is, as a two-level system, leading to oversimplifications and inconsistencies in the description of the material subpart.

Advanced theoretical techniques developed recently allow for more sophisticated effects including, for example, multiple electronic resonances, accounting for atomic vibrations, and light-matter interactions beyond the point-dipole approximation. Significant progress along these lines has been achieved by several groups using various quantum optical and quantum chemistry methods9,10,11,18,19,20,21. However, typically either molecules or electromagnetic fields in these approaches are treated in a simplified manner.

Plasmon-molecule interactions can be modeled computationally using density-functional theory (DFT)22,23 and/or time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT)24 approaches, thanks to the relatively small number of atoms involved in these interactions. Here, we model the entire plasmon-exciton system by TDDFT, which allows the whole system to be treated on the same footing, enabling one to track effects related to modification of the matter subpart, which are inaccessible by purely quantum optical or classical electromagnetism methods. In fact, analytical and numerical quantum chemistry approaches, including DFT and TDDFT, have been successfully applied to study plasmon-molecule interactions, charge transfer, chemical enhancement and electromagnetic effects in surface-enhanced Raman scattering experiments25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33. However, vacuum Rabi splitting and strong plasmon-molecule coupling have not been in the focus. Yet, many recent experimental observations cannot be easily explained with current theories34,35,36.

In response to the above, quantum electrodynamics density-functional theory (QED-DFT) has been developed recently19, enabling the modeling of strong coupling between electromagnetic cavity modes and electronic excitations37,38. While the commonly-used TDDFT approaches with classical description of electric fields may not be able to describe the full range of quantum optical phenomena that QED-DFT aims at, we demonstrate in this paper that the cavity mode created by a localized surface plasmon resonance as well as its strong coupling with excitons can be described already within the standard TDDFT. In the following, we argue that theoretical predictions obtained at the nanometer scale may in fact be useful for understanding and modeling of more extended systems. We use TDDFT to study the optical response of aluminum (Al) nanoparticles composed of a few hundred atoms coupled with one to eight benzene molecules. Thereby we show that cavity quantum electrodynamics holds down to resonators on the order of a few cubic nanometers. In the case of an Al201 particle we observe a single-molecule coupling strength of 200 meV due to a very large vacuum field of 4.5 V · nm−1, while for a large number of molecules, the molecules perturb the system increasing the mode volume and decreasing the per-molecule coupling strength. For larger Al586 and Al1289 nanoparticles the coupling strengths are smaller and follow well the \(\sqrt N\) dependence of coherent coupling with the number N of molecules.


Modeling strong coupling with TDDFT

We model light-matter interactions by employing the real-time-propagation (RT) TDDFT approach39 based on the localized basis sets40,41 as implemented in the open-source GPAW package42,43. This RT-TDDFT code is combined with extensive analysis tools44 that are utilized for analyzing the electron-hole transition contributions to resonances and visualizing them as transition contribution maps (TCM)44,45. See Methods for detailed description. We consider a proof-of-principle plasmonic system based on idealized Al nanoparticles. The free-electron-like electronic structure of Al greatly simplifies the analysis in contrast to noble metals with d-electron-screened plasmons. In addition, Al has attracted recent interest as an alternative plasmonic material46.

Our model systems consist of Al nanoparticles (regular truncated octahedra with 201, 586, and 1289 atoms, approximate diameters of 1.8, 2.7, and 3.6 nm, respectively) and benzene molecules (see Supplementary Fig. 1). The Al201 nanoparticle exhibits a plasmon resonance at ωAl = 7.7 eV (Fig. 1a), the collective nature of which is recognizable in the TCM (Fig. 1b)44. The benzene molecule has a doubly-degenerate resonance at ωB = 7.1 eV with a transition dipole moment μ1 = 4.35 D (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2).

Fig. 1

Constituent elements of the strongly coupled system. a Strong interaction between a collective plasmon excitation of an Al201 nanoparticle and a molecular resonance of benzene results in the formation of lower and upper polariton states. Insets show the induced charge densities at resonances. The spectra are to scale but offset for clarity. be Transition contribution maps (TCMs) of the (b) plasmon and (c) molecular resonance show, respectively, the collective and discrete nature of these resonances. TCMs for d the lower polariton (6.9 eV) and e the upper polariton (7.7 eV) show the mixture of plasmonic and molecular transition contributions. The molecular transition (from about −2 to 3 eV) shows a clear symmetric and antisymmetric character with respect to the low-energy (2 eV) plasmonic transitions at the lower and upper polaritons, respectively, and the induced densities at the polariton energies visualize the corresponding in-phase and out-of-phase alignments (insets of panel a). In the density of states the red line marks the contribution from benzene, multiplied by 5 for visibility, and the vacuum level at around 4 eV is marked by a dashed line

When the nanoparticle and benzene molecules are placed in proximity (bottom part of Fig. 1a) their resonances couple and form two polaritons. The lower (at 6.9 eV) and upper (at 7.7 eV) polaritons are, respectively, mixed symmetric and antisymmetric plasmon-molecule states as apparent in the TCMs of the coupled system (Fig. 1d, e). A comparison with the TCMs of the uncoupled constituents (Fig. 1b, c) reveals the individual contributions to the polaritons. The low-energy (2 eV) transitions near the Fermi level form the plasmon, while the contribution from about −2 to 3 eV originates from the molecular exciton. Crucially, the two polaritonic states in Fig. 1d, e differ with respect to the sign of the molecular contributions. In case of the lower polariton (LP) plasmonic and molecular transitions are in-phase, while for the upper polariton (UP) they are out-of-phase. This, respectively, symmetric and antisymmetric combination is also clearly visible in the induced densities (Fig. 1a). At the LP the dipoles of both particle and molecules are parallel, while they are antiparallel at the UP. Such an arrangement is archetypal for a strongly coupled system. This observation is valid also for the other systems discussed below, indicating the presence of strong or near-strong coupling already in the case of a single molecule placed 3 Å away from the Al201 particle. We note here, that the density of states of the molecular elements in the coupled system does not significantly differ from its uncoupled counterpart (Supplementary Fig. 3).

To determine the fidelity of TDDFT for modeling strong coupling, we calculated the photoabsorption spectra of Al201, Al586, and Al1289 coupled to N benzene molecules, whose dipole moment is aligned collinearly with that of the plasmon vacuum field. The molecules are placed at the corners of two opposing {100} facets of the particles (Supplementary Fig. 1) and structural relaxation is neglected for simplicity. The coupled systems exhibit the LP and UP modes, the splitting of which increases with the number of molecules, see Fig. 2 (TCMs show similar symmetric/antisymmetric mixtures of plasmonic and molecular transitions, see Supplementary Fig. 4). The Rabi splitting of the absorption spectra for Al201 and one benzene molecule equals 730 meV, a value comparable to the plasmon width. A non-negligible part of the UP/LP separation originates, however, from the plasmon-exciton detuning and the coupling strength g is 200 meV for one benzene, a value smaller than the geometrical mean of the plasmon and exciton widths (300 meV). The strong coupling condition is, however, fulfilled for N ≥ 3 for Al201 and for larger N for larger particles.

Fig. 2

Strong coupling of plasmons in Al nanoparticles and excitations in benzene molecules. The calculated photoabsorption spectra of nanoparticle-molecule systems composed of (a) Al201, (b) Al586, and (c) Al1289 nanoparticles coupled with N benzene molecules at 3 Å separation (solid lines) show clearly separated lower and upper polaritons, the splitting of which increases with N. Spectra of the bare Al particles and benzene molecule are shown for reference (dotted lines)

Coherent coupling and mode volumes

One signature of collective coherent coupling is the square-root dependence of g on the number N of identical excitons with transition dipole moment μ1 interacting with an optical cavity in the standard QED expression,

$$g(N) = \sqrt N {\rm{\mu}} _1E_{{\mathrm{vac}}},$$

where \(E_{{\mathrm{vac}}} = \sqrt {\hbar \omega _{{\mathrm{Al}}}/(2\varepsilon _0V)}\) is the vacuum field and V is the volume of the electromagnetic mode15. Using the Al201 particle as an example, the expected scaling is shown in Fig. 3 by the black dotted line using μ1 of a benzene molecule and \(E_{{\mathrm{vac}}}^{(201)} = 4.5\,{\mathrm{V}}\, \cdot \,{\mathrm{nm}}^{ - 1}\) with ωAl = 7.7 eV and V = 3.3 nm3 corresponding to the volume of the Al201 particle, which is an adequate estimate for a nanometer-sized particle47. To estimate the coupling strengths g from our first-principles data, we fit the absorption spectra with a coupled harmonic oscillator model48 (see Supplementary Note 1), yielding the g values shown as symbols in Fig. 3. We notice that the coupling strength values obtained using the standard QED expression of Eq. (1), which is insensitive to spatial variations in the electric field, are larger than the ones derived from coupled oscillator fitting. A similar observation holds for the larger particles Al586 and Al1289, except, that due to larger volumes, their respective vacuum fields \((E_{{\mathrm{vac}}}^{(586)} = 2.6\,{\mathrm{V}} \cdot {\mathrm{nm}}^{ - 1},\,E_{{\mathrm{vac}}}^{(1289)} = 1.8\,{\mathrm{V}} \cdot {\mathrm{nm}}^{ - 1})\) and coupling strengths are reduced.

Fig. 3

Coupling strengths of the nanoparticle-molecule systems. Coupling strengths g for different numbers N of molecules placed 3 Å above the nanoparticle. The symbols denote fitted g values from the data of Fig. 2. The dotted lines mark the ideal theoretical coupling strengths \(g = \sqrt N {\rm{\mu}} _1E_{{\mathrm{vac}}}\), while the dashed lines mark the ideal dependence multiplied with efficiency factors η of η201 = 0.47, η586 = 0.61, and η1289 = 0.78 (see Fig. 4a and its in-text description for details)

Coupling efficiencies

Equation (1) is accurate under the condition that all excitonic modes are coherently coupled with the same, maximal rate to the cavity. This is true for structures such as Fabry-Pérot cavities, photonic crystal slabs, or micropillars, in which the anti-node of the mode is accessible to excitonic modes of molecules or semiconductors by precise placement via trapping or doping3,15. For isolated plasmonic particles the maximum of its mode is, however, typically inside the particle47, such as in the present case. Consequently, the molecular coherent dipole moment interacting with the cavity is smaller than its maximum value of 4.35 D, and it is estimated to be in the range from 2 to 4 D, increasing with the size of the nanoparticle. The reduction of the coherent dipole moment is typically expressed in terms of an efficiency factor η determined by the ratio of the mode energy density at the position of the exciton to its maximum value49.

Before extracting efficiency factors η from the TDDFT data, we estimate their values on the basis of classical electromagnetic calculations, which are acceptable at a semi-quantitative level for picocavities50, using a local Drude-permittivity tailored to match the TDDFT absorption spectrum for Al201. We find that in the spatial region occupied by the benzene molecule the efficiency η ranges from 0.3 to 0.5 (Fig. 4a), due to the rapid decrease of the plasmon-induced electric field. However, such a low value of η predicted by calculating the mode profile of a bare cavity might not hold in practice. It is known that the presence of a material with a refractive index greater than the background causes additional field localization, increasing the coupling strength49. While a single benzene molecule cannot be meaningfully described in terms of a refractive index, it causes a similar effect. This is supported by the electric near-field enhancements calculated with TDDFT (Fig. 4b–d). In comparison to the field of the plasmon in the bare nanoparticle, in the LP/UP of the coupled system the benzene molecule focuses the electric field, modifying the cavity and, consequently, its vacuum field49.

Fig. 4

Coupling efficiency and electric near-field enhancement in Al201. a Spatial map of the coupling efficiency (normalized mode energy density, calculated using classical electromagnetism) shows that maximum coupling occurs if the benzene molecule is inside the Al201 particle and decreases rapidly away from its surface. At the position of benzene the coupling efficiency is about 30–50% of the maximum value. The contours are spaced every 0.2. bd Field enhancement from time-dependent density-functional theory calculations at (b) the Al201 resonance and at the Al201-benzene (c) lower and (d) upper polaritons (with benzene located at the center of the facet). Benzene focuses the electric field, perturbing the nanoplasmonic cavity and increasing the coupling efficiency beyond the expectation based on the field at the bare resonance52

To estimate the coupling efficiencies η from the TDDFT-derived coupling strengths (Fig. 3), we extract their values as modifications of the slope predicted by Eq. (1). The resulting dependencies \(g = \eta \sqrt N {\rm{\mu}} _1E_{{\mathrm{vac}}}\) are shown as dashed lines in Fig. 3. For Al201, the corresponding value η201 = 0.47 gives a good agreement for N ≤ 3, but for N > 3 the coupling strengths fall below the slope set by η201. Such a deviation for large N is not observed for the two larger particles, which, respectively, have efficiency factors of η586 = 0.61 and η1289 = 0.78. These larger efficiencies imply that the plasmonic modes of the larger particles are used more efficiently than in the case of Al201. Minor deviations seen for the two larger nanoparticles for N < 3 are probably caused by inaccurate fitting of the absorption spectra as the LP and UP are not clearly separated.

To test the effect of a diminishing overlap between the vacuum field of the cavity and the molecular exciton, we calculated the dependence of coupling strength on the nanoparticle-molecule separation (Fig. 5). The Rabi splitting of LP and UP decreases with increasing separation and the reduction of the coupling efficiency49 leads to a decrease in the coupling strength (Fig. 5b).

Fig. 5

Dependence of coupling on nanoparticle-molecule separation. a Photoabsorption spectra for two benzene molecules coupled to the Al201 particle, showing weaker splitting with increasing separation from 3–8 Å. b Coupling strength for two benzene molecules as a function of distance from the Al201 particle, showing the expected decrease due to the decreasing overlap integral between exciton and mode


The coupling efficiencies estimated from classical electromagnetic and TDDFT calculations are consistent. The addition of molecules leads to a systematic red shift of the plasmon (Supplementary Fig. 5), which is largest for Al201 and scales approximately inversely with particle volume in agreement with earlier predictions51. The red shift happens simultaneously with strong coupling and complicates the analysis. While the calculations yield a \(\sqrt N\) dependence of the coupling strength for the larger particles (Al586, Al1289), for the smallest particle (Al201) the efficiency varies with the number of benzene molecules for N 3. In the Al201 case, the volume occupied by the molecules is non-negligible relative to the particle volume and every additional molecule changes the properties of the nanoscale cavity and subsequently modifies the coupling.

From the perspective of classical electromagnetism, the molecules can be represented as a polarizable background with excitons modelled by Lorentzians52. This background can be treated as part of the cavity and consequently modifies its local optical density of states (LDoS)49,53. This modification manifests itself as focusing of the electric field around the molecules, clearly visible for Al201 coupled with one benzene molecule (Fig. 4c, d), in comparison to the resonance of Al201 alone (Fig. 4b). These LDoS modifications increase the mode volume, decreasing (or at least not enhancing) the coupling strength per molecule. Such changes of the cavity induced by adding molecules are not visible for larger particles, as for Al586 and Al1289 the coupling strengths follow the \(\sqrt N\) dependence.

In conclusion, we demonstrated the suitability of first-principles TDDFT for studying strong coupling between plasmons and molecular excitons. This approach allows us to capture relevant interactions at the atomic level. This is important for studying coupling of molecules to picocavities slightly larger than the molecules themselves50,54 as well as ultrastrong coupling that leads to modification of the molecular ground state18,55. Furthermore, we have shown the degree to which the simple cQED description holds for small systems. For small single-particle cavities, such as the Al201 particle considered here, the presence of molecules modifies the cavity and, consequently, its mode volume. The mode volume, in turn, affects the coupling strength, whose value does not increase as quickly as predicted by QED. This slower increase of g is noticeable for the Al201 particle, but for larger sizes (Al586, Al1289) deviations from Eq. (1) become negligible. Despite the deviations between a simple cQED formula and TDDFT calculations, the order of magnitude agreement between them is quite remarkable. In particular, it is rather surprising that such a simple formula at all holds at such small scales. Based on the obtained coupling strengths, calculated mode volumes and field enhancements, reaching single/few-molecule ultrastrong coupling for single-particle cavities may prove challenging.


DFT and TDDFT calculations

The DFT and TDDFT calculations were carried out using the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE)56 exchange-correlation functional in the adiabatic limit. The spectra were calculated using the δ-kick technique39 in the linear-response regime and employing the dipole approximation for light-matter interaction. The default projector augmented-wave57 data sets and double-ζ polarized (dzp) basis sets provided in GPAW were used. The dzp basis set of Al includes diffuse 3p functions, which are important for describing plasmon resonances58. To minimize spurious effects due to the basis-set superposition error, the so-called ghost-atom approach was used separately for each nanoparticle size to keep the total system basis set as intact as possible despite the changing number of surrounding molecules. In general, while the used basis sets might not be adequate for yielding numerical values at the complete-basis-set limit, they are expected to be sufficient for the purposes of the present work. A grid spacing parameter of 0.3 Å was chosen to represent densities and potentials, and the molecules/particles were surrounded by a vacuum region of at least 6 Å. The Hartree potential was evaluated on a larger grid with at least 120 Å vacuum around the system and a coarser grid spacing of 1.2 Å, and subsequently refined to the original grid. For the time propagation, we used a time step of Δt = 15 as and total propagation time of at least T = 30 fs. The spectra were broadened using Lorentzian spectral broadening with η = 0.1 eV corresponding to a full width at half-maximum of 0.2 eV. Codes for reproducing the calculations are available (see Code availability).

Transition contribution map (TCM)

A TCM is used for visualizing the Kohn-Sham (KS) electron-hole transition contributions to photoabsorption. Briefly, the photoabsorption cross-section S(ω) is expressed in the basis of occupied (i) and unoccupied (a) KS states as \(S(\omega ) = \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{ia} S_{ia}(\omega )\)44. In TCM, the elements of the matrix Sia(ω) at a chosen resonance energy are plotted on a Gaussian-broadened two-dimensional plane spanned by the energy axes for occupied and unoccupied KS states. The color indicates the sign of the transition contribution: positive (red) or negative (blue), and the color intensity indicates the magnitude of the contribution. The maps are augmented with the corresponding densities of states, and a diagonal line is drawn to indicate the KS eigenvalue difference corresponding to ω. See ref. 44 for a detailed description of TCM construction.

Software used

DFT calculations were carried out using the GPAW package42,43 with localized basis sets (LCAO mode)41. TDDFT calculations were conducted using the LCAO-RT-TDDFT implementation in GPAW40 and analyzed using the TCM tools therein44. The ASE library59 was used for constructing the atomic structures. The NumPy60 and Matplotlib61 Python packages, the VMD software62,63, and Inkscape were used for processing data and generating figures.

Data availability

The atomic structures and the photoabsorption spectra are available at The coupling strengths and other fitting parameters are listed in Supplementary Tables 14. Other data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Code availability

Codes reproducing the data at are available at the same location.


  1. 1.

    Scully, M. O. & Zubairy, M. S. Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1997).

  2. 2.

    Törmä, P. & Barnes, W. L. Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and emitters: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 013901 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Baranov, D. G., Wersäll, M., Cuadra, J., Antosiewicz, T. J. & Shegai, T. Novel nanostructures and materials for strong light–matter interactions. ACS Photonics 5, 24–42 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kockum, A. F., Miranowicz, A., De Liberato, S., Savasta, S. & Nori, F. Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter. Nat. Rev. Phys. 1, 19–40 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yoshie, T. et al. Vacuum Rabi splitting with a single quantum dot in a photonic crystal nanocavity. Nature 432, 200–203 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Birnbaum, K. M. et al. Photon blockade in an optical cavity with one trapped atom. Nature 436, 87–90 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kasprzak, J. et al. Bose–einstein condensation of exciton polaritons. Nature 443, 409–414 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Hutchison, J. A., Schwartz, T., Genet, C., Devaux, E. & Ebbesen, T. W. Modifying chemical landscapes by coupling to vacuum fields. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 1592–1596 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Herrera, F. & Spano, F. C. Cavity-controlled chemistry in molecular ensembles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 238301 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Galego, J., Garcia-Vidal, F. J. & Feist, J. Suppressing photochemical reactions with quantized light fields. Nat. Commun. 7, 13841 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Martínez-Martínez, L. A., Ribeiro, R. F., Campos-González-Angulo, J. & Yuen-Zhou, J. Can ultrastrong coupling change ground-state chemical reactions? ACS Photonics 5, 167–176 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Munkhbat, B., Wersäll, M., Baranov, D. G., Antosiewicz, T. J. & Shegai, T. Suppression of photo-oxidation of organic chromophores by strong coupling to plasmonic nanoantennas. Sci. Adv. 4, eaas9552 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Feist, J. & Garcia-Vidal, F. J. Extraordinary exciton conductance induced by strong coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 196402 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhong, X. et al. Non-radiative energy transfer mediated by hybrid light-matter states. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 6202–6206 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Khitrova, G., Gibbs, M., Kira, M., Koch, S. W. & Scherer, A. Vacuum Rabi splitting in semiconductors. Nat. Phys. 2, 81–90 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jaynes, E. T. & Cummings, F. W. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proc. IEEE 51, 89–109 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Garraway, B. M. The dicke model in quantum optics: Dicke model revisited. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 369, 1137–1155 (2011).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Galego, J., Garcia-Vidal, F. J. & Feist, J. Cavity-induced modifications of molecular structure in the strong-coupling regime. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041022 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Ruggenthaler, M. et al. Quantum-electrodynamical density-functional theory: bridging quantum optics and electronic-structure theory. Phys. Rev. A. 90, 012508 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ling Luk, H., Feist, J., Toppari, J. J. & Groenhof, G. Multiscale molecular dynamics simulations of polaritonic chemistry. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 4324–4335 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Neuman, T., Esteban, R., Casanova, D., Garcia-Vidal, F. J. & Aizpurua, J. Coupling of molecular emitters and plasmonic cavities beyond the point-dipole approximation. Nano. Lett. 18, 2358–2364 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864–B871 (1964).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kohn, W. & Sham, L. J. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140, A1133–A1138 (1965).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Runge, E. & Gross, E. K. U. Density-functional theory for time-dependent systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 997–1000 (1984).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Arenas, J. F., Woolley, M. S., Otero, J. C. & Marcos, J. I. Charge-transfer processes in surface-enhanced raman scattering. franck-condon active vibrations of pyrazine. J. Phys. Chem. 100, 3199–3206 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Arenas, J. F. et al. The role of charge-transfer states of the metal-adsorbate complex in surface-enhanced raman scattering. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 7207–7216 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Bjerneld, E. J., Svedberg, F., Johansson, P. & Käll, M. Direct observation of heterogeneous photochemistry on aggregated ag nanocrystals using raman spectroscopy: The case of photoinduced degradation of aromatic amino acids. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 4187–4193 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Zhao, L. L., Jensen, L. & Schatz, G. C. Pyridine-ag-20 cluster: a model system for studying surface-enhanced raman scattering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 2911–2919 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jensen, L., Aikens, C. M. & Schatz, G. C. Electronic structure methods for studying surface-enhanced raman scattering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 37, 1061–1073 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Morton, S. M. & Jensen, L. A discrete interaction model/quantum mechanical method to describe the interaction of metal nanoparticles and molecular absorption. J. Chem. Phys. 135, 134103 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Corni, S. & Tomasi, J. Theoretical evaluation of raman spectra and enhancement factors for a molecule adsorbed on a complex-shaped metal particle. Chem. Phys. Lett. 342, 135–140 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lombardi, J. & Birke, R. A unified approach to surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C. 112, 5605–5617 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Shegai, T., Vaskevich, A., Rubinstein, I. & Haran, G. Raman spectroelectrochemistry of molecules within individual electromagnetic hot spots. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 14390–14398 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hutchison, J. A. et al. Tuning the work-function via strong coupling. Adv. Mater. 25, 2481–2485 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Orgiu, E. et al. Conductivity in organic semiconductors hybridized with the vacuum field. Nat. Mater. 14, 1123–1129 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Thomas, A. et al. Ground-state chemical reactivity under vibrational coupling to the vacuum electromagnetic field. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 11462–11466 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Flick, J., Ruggenthaler, M., Appel, H. & Rubio, A. Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (qed) chemistry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3026–3034 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Flick, J., Rivera, N. & Narang, P. Strong light-matter coupling in quantum chemistry and quantum photonics. Nanophotonics 7, 1479–1501 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Yabana, K. & Bertsch, G. F. Time-dependent local-density approximation in real time. Phys. Rev. B 54, 4484–4487 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kuisma, M. et al. Localized surface plasmon resonance in silver nanoparticles: atomistic first-principles time-dependent density-functional theory calculations. Phys. Rev. B 91, 115431 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Larsen, A. H., Vanin, M., Mortensen, J. J., Thygesen, K. S. & Jacobsen, K. W. Localized atomic basis set in the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 80, 195112 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mortensen, J. J., Hansen, L. B. & Jacobsen, K. W. Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035109 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Enkovaara, J. et al. Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 253202 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rossi, T. P., Kuisma, M., Puska, M. J., Nieminen, R. M. & Erhart, P. Kohn–sham decomposition in real-time time-dependent density-functional theory: an efficient tool for analyzing plasmonic excitations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 4779–4790 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Malola, S., Lehtovaara, L., Enkovaara, J. & Häkkinen, H. Birth of the localized surface plasmon resonance in monolayer-protected gold nanoclusters. ACS Nano 7, 10263–10270 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Knight, M. W. et al. Aluminum for plasmonics. ACS Nano 8, 834–840 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Koenderink, A. F. On the use of Purcell factors for plasmon antennas. Opt. Lett. 35, 4208–4210 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wu, X., Gray, S. K. & Pelton, M. Quantum-dot-induced transparency in a nanoscale plasmonic resonator. Opt. Express 18, 23633–23645 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Yang, Z.-J., Antosiewicz, T. J. & Shegai, T. Role of material loss and mode volume of plasmonic nanocavities for strong plasmon-exciton interactions. Opt. Express 24, 20373–20381 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Benz, F. et al. Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities”. Science 354, 726–729 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Antosiewicz, T. J., Apell, S. P., Claudio, V. & Käll, M. A simple model for the resonance shift of localized plasmons due to dielectric particle adhesion. Opt. Express 20, 524–533 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Antosiewicz, T. J., Apell, S. P. & Shegai, T. Plasmon–exciton interactions in a core-shell geometry: from enhanced absorption to strong coupling. ACS Photonics 1, 454–463 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zhang, C., Chen, B.-Q. & Li, Z.-Y. Optical origin of subnanometer resolution in tip-enhanced raman mapping. J. Phys. Chem. C. 119, 11858–11871 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Chikkaraddy, R. et al. Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities. Nature 535, 127–130 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    George, J. et al. Ultra-strong coupling of molecular materials: spectroscopy and dynamics. Faraday Discuss. 178, 281–294 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Rossi, T. P., Lehtola, S., Sakko, A., Puska, M. J. & Nieminen, R. M. Nanoplasmonics simulations at the basis set limit through completeness-optimized, local numerical basis sets. J. Chem. Phys. 142, 094114 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Larsen, A. et al. The Atomic Simulation Environment—A Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C. & Varoquaux, G. The NumPy Array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput. Sci. Eng. 13, 22 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hunter, J. D. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 90–95 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD—visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Stone, J. An Efficient Library for Parallel Ray Tracing and Animation. Master’s thesis, Computer Science Department, University of Missouri-Rolla (1998).

Download references


We acknowledge financial support from the Swedish Research Council (VR), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Polish National Science Center via project 2017/25/B/ST3/00744, and the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie grant agreement No 838996. T.J.A. acknowledges support from the Project HPC-EUROPA3 (INFRAIA-2016-1-730897), with the support of the EC Research Innovation Action under the H2020 Programme. We acknowledge the computational resources provided by the Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing at PDC, Stockholm, and by the ICM-UW (Grant #G55-6).

Author information




T.P.R. and T.J.A. performed the calculations and data analysis. T.S. and T.J.A. conceived the general approach. T.J.A. coordinated the project. T.P.R., T.S., P.E., and T.J.A. planned the research and wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz J. Antosiewicz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications would like to thank the Daniel Sanchez-Portal and other, anonymous, reviewers for their contributions to the peer review of this work. Peer review reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rossi, T.P., Shegai, T., Erhart, P. et al. Strong plasmon-molecule coupling at the nanoscale revealed by first-principles modeling. Nat Commun 10, 3336 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing