# Northward drift of the Azores plume in the Earth’s mantle

## Abstract

Mantle plume fixity has long been a cornerstone assumption to reconstruct past tectonic plate motions. However, precise geochronological and paleomagnetic data along Pacific continuous hotspot tracks have revealed substantial drift of the Hawaiian plume. The question remains for evidence of drift for other mantle plumes. Here, we use plume-derived basalts from the Mid-Atlantic ridge to confirm that the upper-mantle thermal anomaly associated with the Azores plume is asymmetric, spreading over ~2,000 km southwards and ~600 km northwards. Using for the first time a 3D-spherical mantle convection where plumes, ridges and plates interact in a fully dynamic way, we suggest that the extent, shape and asymmetry of this anomaly is a consequence of the Azores plume moving northwards by 1–2 cm/yr during the past 85 Ma, independently from other Atlantic plumes. Our findings suggest redefining the Azores hotspot track and open the way for identifying how plumes drift within the mantle.

## Introduction

Although fixed hotspots1 have long been considered as a reference for plate reconstructions2, paleomagnetic record and age progression along hotspot tracks have suggested substantial drift of Pacific plumes, questioning our conception of static hotspots. Nevertheless, identifying the individual motion of a plume usually requires a long and continuous chain of seamounts, and precise geochronological and paleomagnetic data, which explains that Hawaii is the only plume with clear evidence of drift so far3,4. We propose in the following that defining the shape of upper-mantle temperature anomalies provides evidence for plume drift. We take the case of the Azores mantle plume as an ideal case.

The Azores plateau is an oceanic area of about 150,000 km25, with a magmatic center located about 100–200 km6,7 east from the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) axis (Fig. 1a). The spatial correlation between bathymetric highs7,8, anomalously thick crust9,10, gravity anomalies11, and geochemical signatures12 along the MAR (Fig. 2c–e) point to an interaction between the ridge and a deep mantle plume. Both upper-mantle13,14,15 and global seismic tomography studies16 describe the presence of a rather vertical low seismic velocity conduit beneath the Azores. This seismic anomaly extends in the lower mantle16 and the primitive 4He/3He ratios of the lavas17 further consolidate the deep origin of the Azores plume.

Symptoms of the plume-ridge interaction spread over a large region. The bathymetric high along the ridge forms an asymmetric bulge declining by 2.5 km over 500 km toward the north, and by 3 km over 2000 km toward the south7,8, consistent with Bouguer anomalies11 and plume geochemical fingerprints (key trace element ratios)12, (Fig. 2c–e). V-shaped gravity and topographic structures were detected only south of the Azores18, supporting the presence of a southward-elongated asymmetry. High resolution global19 (Fig. 1b–d) and regional15 tomographic models of the upper mantle show the asymmetric slow velocity region extends down to at least 150 km depth and spreads along the ridge over 3000 km. The estimates for the Azores plume volume flux vary between 51 m3/s, based on the spreading rate of the MAR20 to 90 m3/s, deduced from the topographic swell around the hotspot21. Theories for interactions between a ridge and a static plume22,23,24 fail to explain the extent of hot plume material spreading along the ridge (called waist) and its volume flux: accounting for a waist >2000 km consistent with bathymetry7, gravity11, geochemistry12 (Fig. 2c) and seismic tomography19 (Fig. 1) would lead to a volume flux of about 400 m3/s25, at least five times greater than current estimates for the Azores plume20,26. The presence of anomalously buoyant plume material more than 2000 km south of the plume cannot either be explained by the burst of plume activity 10 Ma ago18, suggested by the existence of V-shaped anomalies south of the Azores. This would only have led to a local increase of TP of about 70 °C, at about 600 km from the hotspot location and lasting only a few million years24.

Here we present first potential temperature (TP) estimates along the MAR using the PRIMELT method that confirms the extent of the thermal waist of the Azores plume. We then investigate the dynamic connection between the plume asymmetry and relative plate-plume motions with 3D-spherical models of convection with plate-like behavior at Earth’s-like convective vigor. Accounting for the kinematic context around the Azores, our model suggests that a northward motion of the plume >1 cm/yr explains the geometry of the observed asymmetry.

## Results

### New evidence for a thermal asymmetry below the Azores

MORBs are extracted from a partially melted region in the shallow ambient convective mantle. Their chemistry likely reflects the potential temperature (TP) of this region, corresponding to the temperature that the ambient mantle would reach, should it raise adiabatically to the Earth surface without melting25. Global systematics of the chemistry of MORBs suggest TP variations of 200–250 °C along, and immediately below, mid-oceanic ridges9,14, challenging some previous estimates (~100 °C27,28). However, whether or not these variations simply reflect plume-ridge interactions, chemical heterogeneities in the mantle source, inappropriate corrections for fractionation29 or the presence of fluids in the magmatic source30 remains a source of debate.

A more selective but secure approach relies on the chemical composition of primary magma formed by melting of dry, fertile peridotite, with limited fractional crystallization prior to magma emplacement in the crust, using the PRIMELT method31,32. Inferences, though limited, already suggest that MORBs often appear too differentiated to yield TP estimates with the PRIMELT method. Conversely, intraplate volcanism, which also gives birth to primary magmas through decompression melting of deeper and hotter sections of the mantle (e.g. mantle plume), can provide successful solutions of calculation with PRIMELT. It is therefore a powerful tool to study the extent of plume thermal imprint along ridges.

Geochemical data considered in this study come from Gale et al.33, who compiled an extensive chemical database of near zero-age (i.e. <ca. 300 kyr) MORBs collected along the axis of mid-oceanic ridges (Supplementary Figs. 1 to 7 and Supplementary Note 1). We focus on the northern sections of the MAR (Fig. 2), from latitude 0 to 90°N where data is the most abundant. Figure 2b illustrates the distribution of TP obtained with PRIMELT along the MAR in the Azores area. A temperature anomaly spreads over 2000 km southwards the Azores hotspot while it disappears about 600 km northwards of the hotspot. Figure 2a, b and Supplementary Fig. 8 show that the temperature decrease correlates with a chemical depletion in calcium in the studied MORBs. Calcium depletion is indicative of a colder lithospheric or asthenospheric mantle below the MAR since it can result either from increasing melting of pyroxenite in the mantle favored by its lower solidus relative to peridotites or from increasing fractionation of magmatic pyroxenes during the ascent of primary melts through the lithospheric column, their crystallization being primarily controlled by the temperature of the mantle or the crustal section crossed by the melts. Petrological equilibrium curves34 show that MORBs sampled away from the Azores crystallized pyroxenes at greater pressures and that the decrease in pressure correlates with the distance to the hotspot (Fig. 2a). This supports the idea of a temperature control on calcium depletion in MORBs and suggests that beneath the Azores, pyroxenes crystallize mainly in the oceanic crust due to the presence of anomalously hot mantle while further away, pyroxenes mostly crystallize in the mantle section (Supplementary Figs. 4 and 5).

### Thermal asymmetry caused by plume-ridge relative motions

We explore the hypothesis that the asymmetric thermal anomaly below the MAR corresponds to the thermal wake of the Azores plume, formed by shearing caused by the relative motion between the plate system around the ridge and the plume35. To do so, we analyze the uppermost mantle thermal signature of drifting mantle plumes naturally emerging from a 3D-spherical convection model with self-consistent plate-tectonics and interacting with ridges (see Methods). In such models, plumes interact in a fully dynamic fashion with surface tectonics and convection currents at all scales36. Hence, our model also takes into account in a fully dynamic way the effects of plume-ridge interactions described in previous regional models21,22,23. Instead of using multiple regional models and imposing potentially unphysical constraints to our system to generate relative motions below a ridge, we are able to study a large number of self-evolving interactions between ridges and plumes by computing a global numerical model producing surface velocities, heat flow and plate size distributions comparable to Earth. We detect about 25 plumes on average at each time step. These plumes have a 210 ± 45 °C average temperature excess with respect to the ambient mantle, an upper mantle vertical velocity of 41 ± 20 cm/yr, conduit diameters of 200 ± 150 km, and volume fluxes of 40 ± 15 m3/s (Supplementary Fig. 9). We identify a total of 76 distinct plumes over the 320 Myr of model duration, moving laterally relative to a no-net-rotation surface at 1.75 ± 0.38 cm/yr on average. Relative motions between hotspots are limited to 1.2 ± 0.4 cm/yr. We observe that 46 of them interact at some point with ridges, either ponding below them or contributing to their propagation.

In our models, the relative motion between a considered plume and plates around the ridge shears the plume and generates thermal asymmetry. We identify four kinematic cases. In case 1 (Fig. 3a), the plume moves along the ridge in the opposite direction to the average direction of plate motion. Hence shearing always occurs in the direction of plate motion, building up a highly asymmetric wake. In case 2, both the plates and the plume move in the same direction. Shearing depends on which of the plates or the plume moves faster. If the plume does, like in Fig. 3b, shearing is opposite to the direction of the plates. If the plates do, shearing is in the direction of plate motion. If both move at about the same velocity, there is no asymmetry. In case 3 (Fig. 3c.), the plume moves perpendicularly to the ridge. Shearing along the ridge is then negligible and there is no asymmetry in this direction, although it can exist in the direction of seafloor spreading. Finally, in case 4 (Fig. 3d), the plume lies below a ridge close to a ridge–ridge–ridge triple junction. The dominating effect causing thermal asymmetry is the channelization of the wake material toward the triple junction.

Figure 3f and Supplementary Fig. 10 show that temporal changes in the relative motion of the plate system and a plume can lead to a reversal of the asymmetry over a timescale of 50 Myr.

## Discussion

In the case of the Azores, the asymmetry of the thermal anomaly extends southwards. The south–westward orientation of the MAR south the Azores cannot explain by itself the much larger extent of the thermal anomaly of the plume to the south (Fig. 1a). Therefore, explaining the asymmetry of the Azores plume would either require that the African and the North-American plates move southwards relatively to the Azores (case 1, Fig. 3a), or that both the Azores plume and those plates move northward, the plume moving at a faster pace (case 2, Fig. 3b). Therefore, we compared the observed thermal asymmetry with the motion of the African, European, and North-American plates in several reference frames based on moving hotspots. A southward motion of Africa was proposed by the NUVEL 1A-HS3 reference frame37, based on Pacific hotspot tracks. However, this reference frame does not constrain the tracks of South-Atlantic hotspots. Using a global moving hotspot reference frame, Steinberger et al.38, Torsvik et al.39 and Doubrovine et al.40 proposed stable African and European plates and suggested a westward-drifting North-America by 2 cm/yr (corresponding to case 3, Fig. 3c). Accounting for a stationary or eastward-moving plume would generate a westward-oriented asymmetric wake which would result in a symmetric thermal anomaly along the MAR axis (Fig. 3e). Therefore, only a combination between a northward motion of the Azores plume and such plate motions would explain the observed southward asymmetry of its wake. In the moving hotspot reference accounting for Indo-Atlantic hotspot tracks, O’Neill41 and Torsvik et al.42 reconstructed a northward motion of Africa at a speed larger than 1 cm/yr in the vicinity of the Azores (Fig. 1a). In that case again, the Azores situation compares to modeled case 2 (Fig. 3b): the asymmetry results from a northward motion of the plume, at a faster rate than the plates (>1 cm/yr). Finally, the asymmetric motions of Africa and North-America predict a westward migration of the MAR axis during the last 50 Ma at a speed of about 1.5 cm/yr6. Although this would possibly result in a shift between the location of the wake of the Azores plume and the MAR, our model shows that the potential temperature along a ridge having interacted with a plume at least 40 Myr before still records the asymmetry related to the relative motion between the ridge and the plume (Supplementary Fig. 11). The northward motion of the Azores plume appears at odds with South-Atlantic hotspots (Supplementary Fig. 12), which are commonly viewed as stable, based on the geometry of their hotspot tracks43. This result differs from previous estimates of the Azores drift from numerical models of instantaneous flow induced by a density distribution based on seismic tomography44, which favor a southwestward motion of the plume. Although such models have matched the actual position of plumes on Earth, the predicted flow close to the core-mantle boundary where the plume moves is uncertain. Indeed, in the deepest mantle, tomographic models have relatively low resolution, show significant differences, and the conversion of seismic anomalies to density is ambiguous. Moreover, the computed flows do not consider lateral viscosity variations, which are dominant in this area where cold slabs and hot plumes potentially interact. Finally, the ascent of plumes is not computed self-consistently in the flow model contrarily to our models. These models fail to explain the southward-elongated asymmetry across the Azores since they would predict an asymmetry in the opposite direction.

Since the Azores wake is highly asymmetric (Figs. 2 and 3f), it also suggests that the direction of the relative motion between the plume and the plates has remained stable over a timescale longer than a few tens of Myr. A long-term northward motion of the Azores plume relative to the plate system is consistent with the proposed scenario of the Azores plume building up the Corner Rise and Great Meteor plateaus45 (located about 1000 km away from the present-day location of the plume, Fig. 1a). The direct K–Ar46 and indirect47 dating of these complexes were traditionally used to affiliate them to the New-England hotspot track mainly located on the North-American plate2, despite major uncertainties on the age determination of these seamounts (ranging from 11 to 65 Ma for Great Meteor). However, recent tectonic45, geochronological and geochemical48 studies bring complementary information for a genetic link with the Azores. A northward motion of the Azores plume at a rate of 1–2 cm/yr is consistent with such scenario of building a track from 85 to 20 Ma and the proposed migration of the plume away from the MAR at 10 ± 5 Ma45.

Our study shows that characterizing thermal anomalies linked with plume-ridge interactions has the potential to unravel absolute plume motions, questioning our knowledge of mantle plumes and their thermal imprint in the upper mantle and along ridge segments14,24,31. The proposed motion of the Azores plume is consistent with other evidence of moving mantle plumes4,49. Nevertheless, the causes for such motions are still unclear. The possible anchorage of the Azores plume on the edge of a dense and stable large low shear velocity province (LLSVP), as suggested in tomographic models50, is not accounted by our convection model. However, convection calculations do not show enhanced fixity of plumes with chemical anomalies at the core-mantle boundary51. Also, slow deformation of the edges of LLSVPs produce plume motions of the order of 1 cm/yr52, and plumes can propagate longitudinally along the edges of LLSVPs which undergo significant thermomechanical or thermochemical instabilities53.

## Method

### Primelt

Mantle TP calculation using PRIMELT is based on the MgO content of the primary magma, and MgO typically correlates with FeO. The calculations require that FeO be obtained from FeOT (total iron reported as a single oxide) and this can be estimated assuming Fe2O3/TiO2 = 0.5 or assuming a constant redox condition in the magmatic source (Fe2+/∑Fe = 0.9 or 0.8). We tested different hypotheses. Results are given in Supplementary Figure 1. Uncertainties that arise by calculating FeO using Fe2O3/TiO2 = 0.5 instead of FeO/FeOT = 0.9 propagate to uncertainties in mantle TP lower than 30°C for high-Ti type lavas (TiO2 > 1 wt%) up to 60 °C for low-Ti types (TiO2 < 0.5 wt%). MORBs are dominantly characterized by Ti content >1 wt% (Supplementary Fig. 1d). As such, alternative adoption of a Ti-dependent redox condition is unlikely to affect our calculation toward more elevated TP. Consistently, a more oxidizing ratio of Fe2+/∑Fe = 0.8 will decrease FeO in the primary magma, yielding lower MgO and lower mantle TP but such general decrease will not change our general conclusions because it involves the whole set of data.

The petrological software is calibrated by anhydrous melting experiments on fertile peridotite, and its application to lavas assumes a similar fertile and dry peridotite source. Uncertainties in fertile peridotite composition do not lead to significant errors in mantle TP54. Conversely, melting of wet peridotite is likely to result in MgO values that are too elevated. We excluded all samples that have undergone augite and/or plagioclase fractionation as indicated by depletion of CaO and Al2O3 or enrichment in FeO. Such discrepancies can be highlighted in a simple graph by plotting the chemistry of sample against its “liquid line of descent” (i.e. LLD, Supplementary Fig. 2c). Our calculations have been filtered according to a graphic procedure54 leading to reduced uncertainties that arise from pyroxenite source lithology, source volatile content from metasomatized peridotite, and clinopyroxene fractionation (Supplementary Fig. 3). We assume that the remaining samples (~11%) have been affected only by minor amounts of olivine addition and subtraction. Solutions of our calculation are provided in the supplementary material (Supplementary Data 1).

### Numerical modeling

We use the thermochemical convection code StagYY55 to model mantle convection in 3D-spherical geometry with continental lithospheric rafts and self-generation of plate-like tectonics at its surface. We solve the equations of mass, momentum and energy conservation under the Boussinesq approximation:

$${\bf{\nabla }}.{\bf{v}} = 0$$
$$\nabla p - {\bf{\nabla }}.\left\lceil {{\mathrm{\eta }}\left( {\underline {{\bf{\nabla }}{\mathbf{v}}} + \left( {\underline {{\bf{\nabla }}{\mathbf{v}}} } \right)^T} \right)} \right\rceil = {\mathrm{Ra}}\left( {\alpha (z)T + BC} \right){\boldsymbol{e}}_{\boldsymbol{r}}$$
$$\frac{{DT}}{{Dt}} = - {\bf{\nabla }}.\left( {{\bf{\nabla }}T} \right) + {\mathrm{H}}$$
$$\frac{{DC}}{{Dt}} = 0$$

where v is velocity, p is pressure, η is viscosity, T is temperature and C is composition. H is the mantle internal heat production rate, α is a depth-dependent thermal expansivity coefficient set as in Arnould et al. 201856, B is the chemical buoyancy ratio and er is the radial unit vector. The Rayleigh number of the system is:

$${\mathrm{Ra}} = \frac{{\alpha _0D^3{\mathrm{\Delta }}T\rho _0g}}{{\kappa \eta _0}}$$

where α0 is the surface thermal expansivity, D the mantle’s thickness, g the gravitational acceleration, ΔT the temperature gradient across the mantle, ρ0 the reference density, η0 the reference viscosity and κ the reference thermal diffusivity. In the studied model, Ra is 107, which results in a convective vigor comparable to the Earth. All mantle parameters are constant with depth, except the thermal expansivity coefficient (decreasing by a factor of 3 throughout the mantle), and the viscosity, which varies with temperature T and pressure P as:

$$\eta \left( {z,T} \right) = \eta _0(z).{\kern 1pt} {\mathrm{exp}}\left( {A + \frac{{E_a + {\mathrm{{\Pi}}}(z)V_a}}{{RT}}} \right)$$

where A is a constant so that η = η0 for T = 0.64 (corresponding to 1600 K), which is the a priori temperature at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary, Π(z) the static pressure, R the gas constant and T the temperature. The activation energy is 146 kJ/mol, implying 7 orders of viscosity variations throughout the domain. The activation volume is 13.8 cm3/mol, and we impose a viscosity jump by a factor of 30 at 660 km, consistently with postglacial rebound and geoid modeling57,58. Average temperature and viscosity profiles are shown in Supplementary Fig. 13.

We introduce pseudo-plasticity59 to generate plate-like behaviour (plate boundaries emerge, they are not imposed). After exploration of the parameter space, we choose a yield stress value of 48 MPa for the oceanic lithosphere, so that the dynamic regime produces a plate-like behavior. The surface yield stress is 10 and 20 times higher for the margins and the interior of continental rafts respectively, to avoid their excessive mechanical erosion. The yield stress varies with depth by a factor of 1.8 MPa/km for all materials. The parameters are described in Supplementary Table 1.

We first run the model to reach a thermal statistical steady state. Then, we compute a total evolution of 320 Myr. Such model is at the limit of computation capabilities and required about 7 weeks of computing time on a parallel supercomputer of the National Computational Infrastructure (Australia). In the numerical solution, mantle plumes originate from the CMB where the heat flow is about 5 TW. Internal heat is produced at a rate of about 8.5 × 10−12 W/kg. Surface heat flow reaches 34 TW, and the root-mean square surface velocity is 3.26 cm/yr. Plumes and plate boundaries are emergent structures, not imposed in such models. All plumes can spontaneously move relatively to a no-net rotating surface. After the run, we examine these structures produced in a self-consistent manner by the system of equations.

## Data availability

Source data for Figs. 1a, 2a, b are available in Supplementary Data 1. Source data for Fig. 3 are available in the Open Science Framework repository (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/93MEQ).

## Code availability

The convection code StagYY is the property of Paul Tackley. and Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich. It is available on request from Paul Tackley. (paul.tackley@erdw.ethz.ch).

## References

1. 1.

Morgan, J. P. Deep mantle convection plumes and plate motions. Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull. 56, 203–213 (1972).

2. 2.

Müller, R. D., Royer, J.‐Y., and Lawver, L. A. Revised plate motions relative to the hotspots from combined Atlantic and Indian Ocean hotspot tracks. Geology. 21, 275– 278 (1993).

3. 3.

Konrad, K. et al. On the relative motions of long-lived Pacific mantle plumes. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03277-x (2018).

4. 4.

Tarduno, J. A. et al. The Emperor Seamounts : southward motion of the Hawaiian hotspot plume in Earth’s mantle. Science 301, 1064–1070 (2003).

5. 5.

Vogt, P. R. & Jung, W.-Y.  in Volcanoes of the Azores, Active volcanoes of the World (eds Kuepper, U. & Beier, C.) 27–56 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 2018).

6. 6.

Schilling, J.-G. Fluxes and excess temperatures of mantle plumes inferred from their interaction with migrating mid-oceanic ridges. Nature 352, 397–403 (1991).

7. 7.

Ito, G. & Lin, J. Oceanic spreading center–hotspot interactions: Constraints from along-isochron bathymetric and gravity anomalies. Geology 23, 657–660 (1995).

8. 8.

Vogt, P. R. Plumes subaxial pipe flow, and topography. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 29, 309–325 (1976).

9. 9.

Klein, E. M. & Langmuir, C. H. Global correlations of ocean ridge basalt chemistry with axial depth and crustal thickness. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 8089–8115 (1987).

10. 10.

Wang, T., Lin, J., Tucholke, B. & Chen, Y. J. Crustal thickness anomalies in the North Atlantic ocean basin from gravity analysis. Geochemistry, Geophys., Geosyst. 12, Q0AE02 (2011).

11. 11.

Thibaud, R., Gente, P. & Maia, M. A systematic analysis of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge morphology and gravity between 15°N and 40°N: constraints on the thermal structure. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 24 (1998). 223-24,243.

12. 12.

Dosso, L., Bougault, H., Langmuir, C., Bollinger, C. & Bonnier, O. : The age and distribution of mantle heterogeneity along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge (31–41oN). Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 170, 269–286 (1999).

13. 13.

Silveira, G. et al. Azores hotspot signature in the upper mantle. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 156, 23–34 (2006).

14. 14.

Dalton, C. A., Langmuir, C. H. & Gale, A. Geophysical and geochemical evidence for deep temperature variations beneath mid-ocean ridges. Science 344, 80–83 (2014).

15. 15.

Pilidou, S., Priestley, K. & Debayle, E. Rayleigh wave tomography in the North Atlantic : high resolution images of the Iceland, Azores and Eifel mantle plumes. Lithos 79, 453–474 (2005).

16. 16.

French, S. W. & Romanowicz, B. Broad plumes rooted at the base of the Earth’s mantle beneath major hotspots. Nature 525, 95–99 (2015).

17. 17.

Moreira, M., Doucelance, R., Kurz, M. D., Dupré, B. & Allègre, C. J. Helium and lead isotope geochemistry of the Azores Archipelago. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 169, 189–205 (1999).

18. 18.

Cannat, M. et al. Mid-Atlantic Ridge—Azores hotspot interactions : along-axis migration of a hotspot-derived event of enhanced magmatism 10 to 4 Ma ago. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 173, 257–269 (1999).

19. 19.

Debayle, E., Dubuffet, F. & Durand, S. An automatically updated S -wave model of the upper mantle and the depth extent of azimuthal anisotropy. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL067329.1. Seismic tomography model downloadable at Eric Debayle’s personal website: http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/eric.debayle/ (2016).

20. 20.

Sleep, N. H. Hotspots and mantle plumes: some phenomenology. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 6715–6736 (1990).

21. 21.

Ribe, N. M., Christensen, U. R. & Theiging, J. Dyn. plume-Ridge Interact., 1 : Ridge-Cent. plumes 134, 155–168 (1995).

22. 22.

Ito, G., Shen, Y., Hirth, G. & Wolfe, C. J. Mantle flow, melting, and dehydration of the Iceland mantle plume. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 165, 81–96 (1999).

23. 23.

Albers, M. & Christensen, U. R. Channeling of plume flow beneath mid-ocean ridges. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 187, 207–220 (2001).

24. 24.

Ito, G., Lin, J. & Graham, D. Observational and theoretical studies of the dynamics of mantle plume-mid ocean ridge interaction. Rev. Geophys. 41, 1017 (2003).

25. 25.

McKenzie, D. & Bickle, M. J. The volume and composition of melt generated by extension of the lithosphere. J. Petrol. 29, 625–679 (1988).

26. 26.

Crosby, A. G. & McKenzie, D. An analysis of young ocean depth, gravity and global residual topography. Geophys. J. Int. 178, 1198–1219 (2009).

27. 27.

Shen, Y. & Forsyth, D. W. Geochemical constraints on initial and final depths of melting beneath mid-ocean ridge. J. Geophys. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JB02768 (1995).

28. 28.

Presnall, D. C., Udfinnsson, G. U. H. G. & Walter, M. J. Generation of mid-ocean ridge basalts at pressures from 1 to 7 GPa. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 66, 2073–2090 (2002).

29. 29.

Niu, Y. & O’Hara, M. J. Global correlations of ocean ridge basalt chemistry with axial depth : a new perspective. J. Petrol. 49, 633–664 (2008).

30. 30.

Cottrell, E. & Kelley, K. A. Redox heterogeneity in MORB as a function of mantle source. Science 340, 1314–1317 (2013).

31. 31.

Herzberg, C. et al. Temperatures in ambient mantle and plumes: Constraints from basalts, picrites, and komatiites. Geochemistry Geophys. Geosystems 8, Q02006 (2007).

32. 32.

Ganne, J. & Feng, X. Magmatism : a crustal and geodynamic perspective. J. Struct. Geol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2018.02.002 (2018).

33. 33.

Gale, A., Dalton, C. A., Langmuir, C. H., Su, Y. & Schilling, J.-G. The mean composition of ocean ridge basalts. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 489–518 (2013).

34. 34.

Herzberg, C. Partial crystallization of mid-ocean ridge basalts in the crust and mantle. J. Petrol. 45, 2389–2405 (2004).

35. 35.

Moore, W. B., Schubert, G. & Tackley, P. Three-dimensional simulations of plume-lithosphere interaction at the Hawaiian swell. Science 279, 1008–1012 (1998).

36. 36.

Coltice, N., Larrouturou, G., Debayle, E. & Garnero, E. J. Interactions of scales of convection in the Earth’ s mantle. Tectonophysics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.06.028 (2017).

37. 37.

Gripp, A. E. & Gordon, R. G. Young tracks of hotspots and current plate velocities. Geophys. J. Intl. 150, 321–361 (2002).

38. 38.

Steinberger, B., Sutherland, R. & Connell, R. J. O. Prediction of Emperor-Hawaii seamount locations from a revised model of global plate motion and mantle flow. Nature 430, 167–173 (2004).

39. 39.

Torsvik, T. H., Müller, R. D., Van Der Voo, R., Steinberger, B. & Gaina, C. Global plate motion frames: toward a unified model. Rev. Geophys. 46, RG3004 (2008).

40. 40.

Doubrovine, P. V., Steinberger, B., & Torsvik, T. H. Absolute plate motions in a reference frame defined by moving hot spots in the Pacific, Atlantic, and Indian oceans. J. Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth, 117, 9101 (2012).

41. 41.

O’Neill, C., Müller, D. & Steinberger, B. On the uncertainties in hot spot reconstructions and the significance of moving hot spot reference frames. Geochem., Geophys. Geosyst. 6, Q04003 (2005).

42. 42.

Torsvik, T. H., Steinberger, B., Gurnis, M. & Gaina, C. Plate tectonics and net lithosphere rotation over the past 150 My. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 291, 106–112 (2010).

43. 43.

Duncan, R. A. Hotspots in the southern oceans—an absolute frame of reference for motion of the Gondwana continents. Tectonophysics 74, 29–42 (1981).

44. 44.

Steinberger, B. Plumes in a convecting mantle: models and observations for individual hotspots. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 11127–11152 (2000).

45. 45.

Gente, P., Maia, M. & Goslin, J. Interaction between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the Azores hot spot during the last 85 Myr: emplacement and rifting of the hot spot-derived plateaus. Geochem. Geophys., Geosyst. 4, 8514 (2003).

46. 46.

Wendt, I., Kreuzer, H., Müller, P., Von Rad, U. & Raschka, H. K-Ar age of basalts from Great Meteor and Josephine seamounts (eastern North Atlantic). Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr. 23, 849–862 (1976).

47. 47.

Tucholke, B. E. & Smoot, N. C. Evidence for age and evolution of Corner Seamounts and Great Meteor Seamount Chain from multibeam bathymetry. J. Geophys. Res. 95, 17555–17569 (1990).

48. 48.

Pinto Ribeiro, L., Martins, S., Hildenbrand, A., Madureira, P. & Mata, J. The genetic link between the Azores Archipelago and the Southern Azores Seamount Chain (SASC): the elemental, isotopic and chronological evidences. Lithos 295, 133–146 (2017).

49. 49.

Molnar, P. & Stock, J. Relative motions of hotspots in the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans since late Cretaceous time. Nature 327, 587–591 (1987).

50. 50.

Thorne, M. S. & Garnero, E. J. Inferences on ultralow-velocity zone structure from a global analysis of SPdKS waves. J. Geophys. Res. 109(B08301), 1–22 (2004).

51. 51.

McNamara, A. K. & Zhong, S. The influence of thermochemical convection on the fixity of mantle plumes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 222, 485–500 (2004).

52. 52.

Flament, N., Williams, S., Müller, R. D., Gurnis, M. & Bower, D. J. Origin and evolution of the deep thermochemical structure beneath Eurasia. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14164 (2017).

53. 53.

Ni, S., Tan, E., Gurnis, M. & Helmberger, D. Sharp sides to the African Superplume. Science 296, 1850–1852 (2002).

54. 54.

Herzberg, C. & Asimow, P. D. Petrology of some oceanic island basalts: PRIMELT2.XLS software for primary magma calculation. Geochem., Geophys., Geosystems 9, Q09001 (2008).

55. 55.

Tackley, P. J. Three-dimensional simulations of mantle convection with a thermo-chemical basal boundary layer: D”. Am. Geophys. Union 28, 231–253 (1998).

56. 56.

Arnould, M., Coltice, N., Flament, N., Seigneur, V. & Müller, R. D. On the scales of dynamic topography in whole-mantle convection models. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 19, 3140–3163 (2018).

57. 57.

Ricard, Y. A geodynamic model of mantle density heterogeneity. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 895–909 (1993).

58. 58.

Nakiboglu, S. M. & Lambeck, K. Deglaciation effects on the rotation of the Earth. Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc. 62, 49–58 (1980).

59. 59.

Tackley, P. J. Self-consistent generation of tectonic plates in three-dimensional mantle convection. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 157, 9–22 (1998).

60. 60.

Herzberg, C. & Asimow, P. D. PRIMELT3 MEGA.XLSM software for primary magma calculation: peridotite primary magma MgO contents from the liquidus to the solidus. Geochem. Geophys. Geosystems 16, 563–578 (2015).

61. 61.

Bougault, H. & Treuil, M. Mid-Atlantic Ridge: zero-age geochemical variations between Azores and 22 N. Nature 286, 209 (1980).

62. 62.

Arnould, M., Coltice, N., Ganne, J. & Feng X., Northward drift of the Azores plume in the Earth’s mantle. Open Science Framework. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/93MEQ (2019).

Download references

## Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the IRD, CNRS-INSU, and the European Research Council within the framework of the SP2-Ideas Program ERC-2013-CoG, under ERC grant agreement 617588. Calculations were performed with the assistance of resources from the National Computational Infrastructure (NCI) through the National Computational Merit Allocation Scheme supported by the Australian Government. The perceptually uniform colour map lajolla from Fabio Crameri is used in Figs. 1a and 2b to prevent visual distortion of the data.

## Author information

M.A. and J.G. conceived the study and wrote the paper. N.C. helped to generate the research idea and contributed to the writing and focusing of the paper. J.G. and X.F. contributed to the petrologic analysis and PRIMELT modelling. M.A and N.C. developed the numerical models and the kinematic analysis of the Azores plume motion. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results.

Correspondence to Maëlis Arnould.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

## Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Kevin Konrad and Bernhard Steinberger for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.