Abstract
The dual role played by symmetry in manybody physics manifests itself through two fundamental mechanisms: spontaneous symmetry breaking and topological symmetry protection. These two concepts, ubiquitous in both condensed matter and high energy physics, have been applied successfully in the last decades to unravel a plethora of complex phenomena. Their interplay, however, remains largely unexplored. Here we report how, in the presence of strong correlations, symmetry protection emerges from a set of configurations enforced by another broken symmetry. This mechanism spawns different intertwined topological phases, where topological properties coexist with longrange order. Such a singular interplay gives rise to interesting static and dynamical effects, including interactioninduced topological phase transitions constrained by symmetry breaking, as well as a selfadjusted fractional pumping. This work paves the way for further exploration of exotic topological features in stronglycorrelated quantum systems.
Introduction
The notion of symmetry is paramount to unveil the fundamental laws of Nature, while spontaneous symmetry breaking (SSB) is essential to understand Nature’s different guises^{1}. In particular, at long length scales, various phases of matter can be understood by the pattern of SSB and the corresponding local order parameters^{2}. Although different SSB patterns tend to compete with one another, a genuine cooperation can also arise in strongly correlated systems with intertwined orders^{3}. More recently, topology has been recognized as an exotic driving force shaping the texture of Nature, and leading to phases characterized by topological invariants rather than by local order parameters^{4}. It is no longer the breaking of certain symmetries, but actually, their conservation^{5}, which gives rise to novel states of matter, the socalled symmetryprotected topological (SPT) phases^{6}. In the noninteracting limit, topological insulators and superconductors provide wellunderstood examples of this paradigm^{7}, while current research aims at understanding strongcorrelation effects, such as the competition of SPT and SSB phases, due to interactions^{8}.
Alternatively, a cooperation between SPT and SSB may allow for intertwined topological phases that simultaneously display a local order parameter and a topological invariant. For integer and fractional Chern insulators, such intertwined orders have been already identified in the literature^{9,10,11}. Nonetheless, in these cases, the topological phases exist in the absence of any protecting symmetry. In more generic situations, the existence of intertwined topological phases will depend on how the symmetry responsible for the SPT phase can be embedded into the broader symmetrybreaking phenomenon. Arguably, the first instance of this situation is the Peierls instability^{12} in polyacetylene, neatly accounted for via the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger (SSH) model at halffilling^{13}. Here, the instability leads to a dimerized lattice distortion and a bondorder wave (BOW), where electrons are distributed in an alternating sequence of bonding and antibonding orbitals. A closer inspection shows that inversion symmetry is never broken in such a SSB pattern, which leads to a topological quantization of the electronic polarization^{14}, and is ultimately responsible for the protection of the SPT phase.
In this work, we study a hitherto unknown possibility: the occurrence of an intertwined topological phase when the SSB pattern does not generally imply the existence of a protecting inversion symmetry (Fig. 1). Instead, this protecting symmetry emerges from a larger set of configurations allowed by the SSB, such that its interplay with topology and strong correlations endows the system with very interesting, yet mostly unexplored, static and dynamical behavior. We demonstrate this topological mechanism in the \({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model^{15,16}, a microscopic lattice model that displays strongly correlated intertwined topological phases at various fractional fillings. At onethird and twothird filling, and for sufficiently strong interactions, we find a period3 BOW with a threefold degenerate ground state that displays a nonzero topological invariant: the total Berry phase. We show that inversion symmetry emerges from the larger SSB landscape of a bosonic Peierls’ mechanism, protecting the intertwined topological BOW, and making it fundamentally different from other nontopological BOWs. We unveil a rich phase diagram with first and secondorder quantumphase transitions caused by the interplay of this emergent symmetry, topology, and strong correlations. We also identify a dynamical manifestation of the underlying topology that is genuinely rooted in strong correlations and the interplay of the emergent and symmetrybroken symmetries: a selfadjusted fractional pump. As discussed by Thouless et al.^{17,18}, the quantization of adiabatic charge transport in weakly interacting insulators uncovers a profound connection to higherdimensional topological phases, as recently exploited in coldatom experiments^{19,20}. Strong interactions can lead to fractional pumped charges^{21,22}, showing a clear reminiscence to the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE)^{23,24,25,26}. We show that, following a dynamical modulation of the interactions in the \({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model, the system selfadjusts within the landscape of SSB sectors, allowing for a cyclic path that displays a fractional pumped charge 1/3, such that the correlated intertwined topological phase has no freeparticle counterpart.
Results
\({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model
We consider a 1D system of interacting bosons coupled to a dynamical \({\Bbb Z}_2\) field and described by the lattice Hamiltonian
where \(b_i^\dagger\) is the bosonic creation operator at site i, \(n_i = b_i^\dagger b_i\) is the number operator, and \(\sigma _{i,i + 1}^x,\sigma _{i,i + 1}^z\) are the Pauli matrices associated with the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields on the bond (i, i + 1). The bare bosonic Hamiltonian depends on the hopping strength t, and the onsite Hubbard repulsion U > 0. Likewise, the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields have an energy difference between the local configurations Δ, and a transverse field of strength β that is responsible for their quantum fluctuations. The \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields renormalize the bosonic hopping via α. Recent experimental progress^{27,28,29} suggests the possibility of realizing the \({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model experimentally using ultracold atoms in optical lattices.
This model (1) hosts Peierlstype phenomena analogous to the fermionic SSH model^{13}, but remarkably, in the absence of a Fermi surface^{15}. There are, however, important differences: at halffilling and in the slowlattice limit relevant for polyacetylene^{30}, a Peierls’ instability inevitably occurs for arbitrarily small fermionlattice couplings^{12}. In this limit, the fermionic ground state in one of SSB sectors is adiabatically connected to a freefermion SPT phase^{5}. In contrast, our bosonic Peierls phases allow for a genuinely correlated topological bondordered wave (TBOW_{1/2}) protected by bondinversion symmetry, which cannot be adiabatically connected to a freeboson SPT phase^{16}. We remark that the symmetry protecting the TBOW_{1/2} is completely fixed from the SSB pattern of the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields at any energy scale, and is thus not an emergent symmetry.
We now describe a richer situation at filling n = 2/3 (similarly n = 1/3). For \(\Delta \ll t\) and \(\Delta \gg t\) the spins are uniformly polarized in the z direction, \(\langle \sigma _{i,i + 1}^z\rangle = \sigma _0\), with σ_{0} > 0 and σ_{0} < 0, respectively. For intermediate values, a Peierlstype SSB leads to a trimerization of the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields, namely a periodic repetition of a threesite unit cell, with bonds characterized by arbitrary expectation values \(\langle \sigma _{1,2}^z\rangle ,\langle \sigma _{2,3}^z\rangle ,\langle \sigma _{3,4}^z\rangle\). The resulting phase is an insulator, with a gap that increases with the value of the coupling α (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). Note that this trimerization still leaves freedom for various bond configurations that do not necessarily imply a protecting symmetry for the bosons (Fig. 1b). One of the main results of our work is to show how, for certain parameter regimes, such a protecting symmetry becomes effective at low energies, whereas higherenergy excitations of the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields do not necessarily lead to it. Therefore, the inversion symmetry can be understood as an emergent symmetry that is crucial to protect the intertwined TBOW_{2/3} (Fig. 1d). In the following, we set α = 0.5t and Δ = 0.85t.
We first study a system of L = 30 with sites and openboundary conditions using DMRG^{31}, for β = 0.01t and different Hubbard interactions U. For weak interactions (U ⪅ 9t), the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) field is polarized along the same axis (Fig. 1a), and the bosons display a quasisuperfluid behaviour with algebraically decaying offdiagonal correlations. Increasing the interactions leads to a bosonic Peierls transition, whereby translational symmetry is spontaneously broken, leading to a threefold degenerate ground state with ferrimagnetictype ordering \(\langle \sigma _{1,2}^z\rangle = \langle \sigma _{2,3}^z\rangle \, > \, \langle \sigma _{3,4}^z\rangle\), together with a bosonic period3 BOW that displays inversion symmetry with respect to the central intercell bond (see Fig. 2a, b, left panel). The nature of a similar qSFBOW phase transition is analyzed in ref. ^{16} for the \({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model at halffilling. The BOW phase described here exhibits similar properties to the charge density waves in extended Hubbard models^{25,26}, albeit without the need of longerrange interactions. We note that a fermionic counterpart of this phase has been predicted in chargetransfer salts^{32,33}. To characterize its topology, we use the local Berry phase \(\gamma ^\mu = {\mathrm{i}}{\int}_0^{2\pi } {\mathrm{d}} \theta \langle \psi ^\mu (\theta )\partial _\theta \psi ^\mu (\theta )\rangle\), where \(\left {\psi _\theta ^\mu } \right\rangle\) is the μth ground state of Hamiltonian (1) with a single bond twisted according to t → te^{iθ} ^{34}. The left panel of Fig. 2c depicts the local Berry phase for one of the ground states, which clearly vanishes on the intercell bonds relevant for the inversion symmetry of Fig. 1. We note that the three possible ground states become degenerate in the thermodynamic limit, which can be characterized by the total Berry phase \(\gamma = \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_\mu \gamma ^\mu\). In this limit, the value of γ^{μ} for the three degenerate states on a fixed bond coincides, up to permutations, with the value of this quantity on the three bonds of the unit cell for each one of the states. Therefore, the sum gives the same value in both cases. For the present BOW_{2/3}, we find γ = 0, indicating that this phase is topologically trivial.
By further increasing the interactions, a phase with a different SSB pattern \(\langle \sigma _{1,2}^z\rangle = \langle \sigma _{2,3}^z\rangle \, < \, \langle \sigma _{3,4}^z\rangle\) arises (right panels Fig. 2a, b). Although the ferrimagnetic and BOW patterns look rather similar to the previous case, the local Berry phase at the intercell bonds is now quantized to γ_{μ} = π (right panel Fig. 2c). Note again that this phase presents three degenerate ground states in the thermodynamic limit, and we find a total Berry phase γ = π, indicating a nontrivial TBOW_{2/3} phase. This exemplifies the scenario of Fig. 1: from all the trimerized configurations possible a priori, the system chooses one with additional bondcentered inversion symmetry, allowing for a topological crystalline insulator^{5}. In combination with the local order parameters (right panel Fig. 2a, b), this shows that the TBOW_{2/3} is an interactioninduced intertwined topological phase, in which, contrary to halffilling^{15}, the protecting symmetry is emergent and not fixed a priori by the SSB pattern. The ocurrence of this mechanism is a hallmark of our \({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model and does not have an analog in the standard SSH model^{32,33}.
Interactioninduced topological phase transitions
Topological phase transitions delimiting freefermion SPT phases, and those found due to their competition with SSB phases, are typically continuous secondorder phase transitions. In the presence of strong correlations, however, firstorder topological phase transitions may arise^{35,36,37,38}. We now discuss how critical lines of different orders delimit the intertwined TBOW_{2/3} in a strongly interacting region of parameter space, showing that the TBOW_{2/3} cannot be adiabatically connected to a freeboson SPT phase.
In the completely adiabatic regime β = 0, we observe that the transition between trivial BOW_{2/3} and intertwined TBOW_{2/3} is of first order, using an infinite DMRG algorithm^{31}. Figure 3a shows the Ising fields \(\langle \sigma _{k,k + 1}^z\rangle\) within the unit cell, as the Hubbard interaction is increased, while keeping β fixed. For β = 0 (left column), we observe an abrupt transition characterized by a discontinuity in the first derivative of the groundstate energy δE_{g}/δU = (E_{g}(U + ΔU) − E_{g}(U))/ΔU^{36}, signaling a firstorder phase transition (Fig. 3b). Introducing the bond observables, \({\cal{O}}_k = \langle E_{\mathrm{g}}\sigma _{k,k + 1}^z  \sigma _{k + 1,k + 2}^zEs_{\mathrm{g}}\rangle\) with k even or odd, we can characterize the corresponding bondinversion symmetry within the unit cell. The inset of Fig. 3b shows how \({\cal{O}}_1\) displays a discontinuous jump. The total Berry phase, computed here with the help of the entanglement spectrum^{39}, also changes abruptly, as depicted in Fig. 3c. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first topological characterization of a firstorder phase transition in an intertwined topological phase.
The situation changes as one departs from the adiabatic regime. Figure 3 (right panel) shows a continuous secondorder transition both in δE_{g}/δU and in \({\cal{O}}_1\) for β = 0.025t. Remarkably, there is a finite region between the trivial and topological BOW phases, where the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields have different expectation values, breaking the emergent inversion symmetry within the larger Peierls’ trimerization. These results are in accordance with the behavior of the total Berry phase in Fig. 3c, which shows a nonquantized value in this intermediate asymmetrical region. In fact, the appearance of this region originates from a very interesting interplay between the emergent inversion symmetry and the Peierls SSB phenomenon: a direct continuous transition between the trivial and topological BOWs would require a gapclosing point in the bosonic sector, where every bond had the same expectation value and the BOW would disappear. However, this comes with an energy penalty, since the Peierls’ mechanism favors the formation of a threesite unit cell^{15}. Therefore, the system energetically prefers to keep the trimerized unit cell at the expense of breaking the bondinversion symmetry within the unit cell, and continuously setting the emergent inversion symmetry responsible for the quantized Berry phase γ = π of Fig. 3c (see Supplementary Note 1 for details). This nontrivial interplay between symmetry protection and symmetry breaking, driven solely by correlations, is another hallmark of our \({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model, absent at other fillings or in the fermionic SSH model^{32,33}. The intermediate phase could extend up to β = 0, although firstorder transitions are also possible for low enough values of β. An extended numerical analysis would be required to distinguish between these two situations.
Finally, we present the phase diagram as a function of β and U in Fig. 4a by depicting the product of \({\cal{O}}_1{\cal{O}}_2\): it can only attain a nonzero value if the bondinversion symmetry within the unit cell is broken (i.e., if the transition occurs continuously via an intermediate nonsymmetric region). Figure 4b shows the phase diagram in terms of the total Berry phase, quantized to 0 and π in the regions with inversion symmetry and with nonquantized values in the region where the symmetry is broken.
Selfadjusted fractional pump
Topology can also become manifest through dynamical effects, such as the quantized transport of charge in electronic systems evolving under cyclic adiabatic modulations: Thouless pumping^{17}. This topological pumping lies at the heart of our current understanding of freefermion SPT phases^{7}, and can also be generalized to weakly interacting systems^{18}. As advanced in the “Introduction” section, 1D and quasi1D systems at sufficiently strong interactions can exhibit a fractional pumping^{22,40,41,42,43,44} that cannot be accounted for using noninteracting topological pumping.
In this section, we show that adiabatic dynamics traversing through intertwined topological phases allows for a selfadjusted fractional pumping, due to the interplay of the SSB mechanism and other gapopening perturbations. By introducing guiding fields that only act on a subset of the \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields, and raising/lowering the Hubbard interactions, the free \({\Bbb Z}_2\) fields selfadjust dynamically during the adiabatic cycle. As a consequence, the bosonic sector traverses a sequence of ground states that are energetically favorable due to the Peierls’ mechanism. In this way, the system selfadjusts along this adiabatic sequence, allowing for an exotic fractional pumping induced by interactions^{22,40,41,42,43,44}. The details of this selfadjusted topological pumping are explained in Fig. 5.
For finite systems, the pumped charge can be inferred from the center of mass (COM) \(P_L(\tau ) = \frac{1}{L}\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_j {(j  j_0)} \langle \Psi (\tau )\hat n_j\Psi (\tau )\rangle\), where j_{0} is the center of a chain of size L, and ψ(τ〉) is the adiabatically evolved state at time τ. Figure 5c shows the DMRG results describing how the COM changes along the cycle connecting the BOW_{2/3} and TBOW_{2/3} possible ground states for a finite chain of size L = 90. After τ = T, we observe a COM displacement of \({\mathrm{\Delta }}n_{L = 90}^T = P_{L = 90}(T)  P_{L = 90}(0) = 0.316\), reflecting the fractional charge. To obtain precisely the charge, we perform a finitesize scaling analysis and find \({\mathrm{\Delta }}n_\infty ^T = {\mathrm{lim}}_{L \to \infty }{\mathrm{\Delta }}n_L^T = 1/3\) (inset). At τ = 2T, the COM displacement reaches a value consistent with 2/3 in the thermodynamic limit. We note that these fractional values are characteristic of a strongly correlated SPT phase with groundstate degeneracy, and cannot be found for any noninteracting topological phase (see Supplementary Note 2 for details). In our present case, the adiabatic path in parameter space can be understood as a dynamical analog of the spatial interpolation between the different ground states, which leads to topological solitons and fractionally quantized charges bound to them^{32}. During each period T, we interpolate between two such ground states, and a fractional charge is pumped without creating any spatial solitonic profile.
Let us now turn our attention to the discontinuous jump of the pumped charge toward −1/3, as this is related to the presence of manybody edge states for a finite system^{45}, and can be used to define a bulkboundary correspondence for our intertwined TBOW_{2/3}. The transported charge across the bulk, \(\Delta n_L^{3T}\), can be related to the discontinuous jumps during the cycle^{45}, namely \({\mathrm{\Delta }}n_L^{3T} =  \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_i {\mathrm{\Delta }} P_L(\tau _i),\) where \({\mathrm{\Delta }}P_L(\tau _i) = P_L(\tau _i^ + )  P_L(\tau _i^  )\) quantify the discontinuities occurring at instants τ_{i}, and \(\tau _i^ \pm = \tau _i \pm \varepsilon\) with ε → 0. In the thermodynamic limit, it converges to the quantized value of the pumped charge \({\mathrm{\Delta }}n_\infty ^{3T} = {\mathrm{lim}}_{L \to \infty }{\mathrm{\Delta }}n_L^{3T} = 1\) related to the integer Chern number in an extended 2D system^{45}. Since these discontinuities depend on the presence of edge states in a finite system, the centerofmass approach establishes a sort of bulkboundary correspondence that can be explicitly proven via the adiabatic pumping. Moreover, the COM can be measured in coldatomic experiments^{46}, and it has been used to reveal the topological properties of fermionic and bosonic SPT phases^{19,20}.
By estimating the discontinuity, we can extract the transported charge across the bulk during the whole adiabatic evolution that brings the BOW back to itself after τ = 3T, obtaining a nearly quantized value Δn_{L=90} = 0.92. As shown in the inset, a truly quantized charge is recovered in the thermodynamic limit, signaling the topological nature of the system. These results allow us to establish a bulkboundary correspondence in the pumping process^{45}, even though this was not guaranteed a priori, due to the lack of the global symmetries regarding the tenfold classification of topological insulators. In particular, one may understand the edge states of the TBOW_{2/3} as remains of topologically protected conducting edge states of an extended 2D system (see Supplementary Note 2 for details). We note that, even if the topological degeneracy point does not appear in the phase diagram of the model, the quantized transported charge reveals its presence in an effective parameter space, as a nonzero quantized charge can only be obtained when the parameter modulation encircles such a degeneracy point^{47}.
Discussion
We have shown how symmetry protection can emerge through an interplay between symmetry breaking and strong correlations. In the \({\Bbb Z}_2\)Bose–Hubbard model, this mechanism gives rise to an intertwined topological phase for certain fractional fillings. The unique properties of these phases are manifest in the special static and dynamical features discussed in this work. A realistic implementation of the model with cold atoms is suggested by recent experimental results^{27,28}. The proposed selfadjusted pumping protocol, in particular, could be used to reveal the topological properties of the system and its fractional nature. Future research directions include the study of topological defects on top of the intertwined topological phases, where localized states with fractional particle number are expected to appear, signaling deeper connections to the physics of the FQHE.
Methods
Numerical simulations
The numerical calculations have been performed using a density matrix renormalization group algorithm (DMRG)^{31}. For the finitesize calculations, we used a matrix product state (MPS)based algorithm with bond dimension D = 100. To directly access the thermodynamic limit, we used an infinite MPS (iMPS) with a repeating unit cell composed of three sites and D = 150. The Hilbert space of the bosons is truncated to a maximum number of bosons per site of n_{0} = 2. This is justified for low densities and strong interactions.
Data availability
The data supporting the plots within this paper are available from the authors upon reasonable request. The figures have been produced with Python and adapted with Inkscape and Affinity Designer.
Code availability
The DMRG calculations have been performed with the tenpy library^{31}. The Python scripts used to obtain the data in this paper are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References
 1.
Gross, D. J. The role of symmetry in fundamental physics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 14256–14259 (1996).
 2.
Landau, L. Theory of phase transitions. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 19–32 (1937).
 3.
Fradkin, E., Kivelson, S. A. & Tranquada, J. M. Colloquium: theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 457–482 (2015).
 4.
Wen, X.G. Colloquium: Zoo of quantumtopological phases of matter. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 041004 (2017).
 5.
Chiu, C.K., Teo, J. C. Y., Schnyder, A. P. & Ryu, S. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries. Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016).
 6.
Senthil, T. Symmetryprotected topological phases of quantum matter. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 299–324 (2015).
 7.
Qi, X.L. & Zhang, S.C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011).
 8.
Rachel, S. Interacting topological insulators: a review. Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 116501 (2018).
 9.
Raghu, S., Qi, X.L., Honerkamp, C. & Zhang, S.C. Topological mott insulators. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 156401 (2008).
 10.
Sun, K., Yao, H., Fradkin, E. & Kivelson, S. A. Topological insulators and nematic phases from spontaneous symmetry breaking in 2d fermi systems with a quadratic band crossing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 046811 (2009).
 11.
Kourtis, S. & Daghofer, M. Combined topological and landau order from strong correlations in chern bands. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 216404 (2014).
 12.
Peierls, R. Quantum theory of solids. In International Series of Monographs on Physics (Claredon Press ed) (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1955). pp 1–229.
 13.
Heeger, A. J., Kivelson, S., Schrieffer, J. R. & Su, W. P. Solitons in conducting polymers. Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 781–850 (1988).
 14.
Hughes, T. L., Prodan, E. & Bernevig, B. A. Inversionsymmetric topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 83, 245132 (2011).
 15.
GonzálezCuadra, D., Grzybowski, P. R., Dauphin, A. & Lewenstein, M. Strongly correlated bosons on a dynamical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 090402 (2018).
 16.
GonzálezCuadra, D. et al. Symmetrybreaking topological insulators in the ℤ_{2} bosehubbard model. Phys. Rev. B 99, 045139 (2019).
 17.
Thouless, D. J. Quantization of particle transport. Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083–6087 (1983).
 18.
Niu, Q. & Thouless, D. J. Quantised adiabatic charge transport in the presence of substrate disorder and manybody interaction. J. Phys. A. Math. Gen. 17, 2453–2462 (1984).
 19.
Nakajima, S. et al. Topological Thouless pumping of ultracold fermions. Nat. Phys. 12, 296–300 (2016).
 20.
Lohse, M., Schweizer, C., Zilberberg, O., Aidelsburger, M. & Bloch, I. A Thouless quantum pump with ultracold bosonic atoms in an optical superlattice. Nat. Phys. 12, 350–354 (2016).
 21.
Marra, P., Citro, R. & Ortix, C. Fractional quantization of the topological charge pumping in a onedimensional superlattice. Phys. Rev. B 91, 125411 (2015).
 22.
Taddia, L. et al. Topological fractional pumping with alkalineearthlike atoms in synthetic lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 230402 (2017).
 23.
Tao, R. & Thouless, D. J. Fractional quantization of hall conductance. Phys. Rev. B 28, 1142 (1983).
 24.
Bergholtz, E. J. & Karlhede, A. Quantum hall system in taothouless limit. Phys. Rev. B 77, 155308 (2008).
 25.
Guo, H., Shen, S.Q. & Feng, S. Fractional topological phase in onedimensional flat bands with nontrivial topology. Phys. Rev. B 86, 085124 (2012).
 26.
Budich, J. C. & Ardonne, E. Fractional topological phase in onedimensional flat bands with nontrivial topology. Phys. Rev. B 88, 035139 (2013).
 27.
Barbiero, L. et al. Coupling ultracold matter to dynamical gauge fields in optical lattices: from fluxattachment to Z2 lattice gauge theories. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.02777 (2018).
 28.
Schweizer, C. et al. Floquet approach to ℤ_{2} lattice gauge theories with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.07103 (2019).
 29.
Gorg, F. et al. Realisation of densitydependent Peierls phases to couple dynamical gauge fields to matter. Preprint at arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05895 (2018).
 30.
Pouget, J.P. The peierls instability and charge density wave in onedimensional electronic conductors. Comptes Rendus Phys. 17, 332–356 (2016).
 31.
Hauschild, J. & Pollmann, F. Efficient numerical simulations with Tensor Networks: Tensor Network Python (TeNPy). SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes 5 (2018). https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.5.
 32.
Su, W. P. & Schrieffer, J. R. Fractionally charged excitations in chargedensitywave systems with commensurability 3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 738–741 (1981).
 33.
Su, W. P. Fractionally charged kinks in a 1: 3 peierls system. Phys. Rev. B 27, 370–379 (1983).
 34.
Hatsugai, Y. Quantized berry phases as a local order parameter of a quantum liquid. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 123601–123601 (2006).
 35.
Amaricci, A., Budich, J. C., Capone, M., Trauzettel, B. & Sangiovanni, G. Firstorder character and observable signatures of topological quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 185701 (2015).
 36.
Roy, B., Goswami, P. & Sau, J. D. Continuous and discontinuous topological quantum phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B 94, 041101 (2016).
 37.
Juričic, V., Abergel, D. S. L. & Balatsky, A. V. Firstorder quantum phase transition in threedimensional topological band insulators. Phys. Rev. B 95, 161403 (2017).
 38.
Barbarino, S., Sangiovanni, G. & Budich, J. C. Firstorder topological quantum phase transition in a strongly correlated ladder. Phys. Rev. B 99, 075158 (2019).
 39.
Zaletel, M. P., Mong, R. S. K. & Pollmann, F. Flux insertion, entanglement, and quantized responses. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2014, P10007 (2014).
 40.
Grusdt, F. & Höning, M. Realization of fractional chern insulators in the thintorus limit with ultracold bosons. Phys. Rev. A. 90, 053623 (2014).
 41.
Grushin, A. G., Motruk, J., Zaletel, M. P. & Pollmann, F. Characterization and stability of a fermionic v = 1/3 fractional chern insulator. Phys. Rev. B 91, 035136 (2015).
 42.
Zeng, T.S., Wang, C. & Zhai, H. Charge pumping of interacting fermion atoms in the synthetic dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 095302 (2015).
 43.
Zeng, T.S., Zhu, W. & Sheng, D. N. Fractional charge pumping of interacting bosons in onedimensional superlattice. Phys. Rev. B 94, 235139 (2016).
 44.
Li, R. & Fleischhauer, M. Finitesize corrections to quantized particle transport in topological charge pumps. Phys. Rev. B 96, 085444 (2017).
 45.
Hatsugai, Y. & Fukui, T. Bulkedge correspondence in topological pumping. Phys. Rev. B 94, 041102 (2016).
 46.
Wang, L., Troyer, M. & Dai, X. Topological charge pumping in a onedimensional optical lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 026802 (2013).
 47.
Berg, E., Levin, M. & Altman, E. Quantized pumping and topology of the phase diagram for a system of interacting bosons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 110405 (2011).
 48.
Guo, H. & Chen, S. Kaleidoscope of symmetryprotected topological phases in onedimensional periodically modulated lattices. Phys. Rev. B 91, 041402 (2015).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank L. Tagliacozzo for useful discussions. This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministry MINECO (National Plan 15 Grant: FISICATEAMO No. FIS201679508P, SEVERO OCHOA No. SEV20150522, FPI), European Social Fund, Fundació Cellex, Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR Grant No. 2017 SGR 1341 and CERCA/Program), ERC AdG OSYRIS, EU FETPRO QUIC, and the National Science Centre, PolandSymfonia Grant No. 2016/20/W/ST4/00314. D.G.C. is financed by the ICFOstepstonePhD Programme for EarlyStage Researchers in Photonics, funded by the Marie SkłodowskaCurie Cofunding programmes (GA665884) of the European Commission. A.D. is financed by a Juan de la Cierva fellowship (IJCI201733180). A.B. acknowledges support from the Ramón y Cajal program RYC201620066, MINECO project FIS201570856P, and CAM/FEDER Project S2018/TCS4342 (QUITEMADCM).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
D.G.C., A.B., P.R.G., M.L. and A.D. develop the theoretical framework. D.G.C. perform the numerical simulations. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the preparation of the paper. The project was supervised by M.L. and A.D.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Fabian Grusdt and Martin Hohenadler for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
GonzálezCuadra, D., Bermudez, A., Grzybowski, P.R. et al. Intertwined topological phases induced by emergent symmetry protection. Nat Commun 10, 2694 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467019107968
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Confined Phases of OneDimensional Spinless Fermions Coupled to Z2 Gauge Theory
Physical Review Letters (2020)

WeylKondo semimetals in nonsymmorphic systems
Physical Review B (2020)

Confinement and Lack of Thermalization after Quenches in the Bosonic Schwinger Model
Physical Review Letters (2020)

ZN gauge theories coupled to topological fermions: QED2 with a quantum mechanical θ angle
Physical Review B (2019)

Adiabatic almosttopological pumping of fractional charges in noninteracting quantum dots
Physical Review B (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.