Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Dual pathways of tRNA hydroxylation ensure efficient translation by expanding decoding capability


In bacterial tRNAs, 5-carboxymethoxyuridine (cmo5U) and its derivatives at the first position of the anticodon facilitate non-Watson–Crick base pairing with guanosine and pyrimidines at the third positions of codons, thereby expanding decoding capabilities. However, their biogenesis and physiological roles remained to be investigated. Using reverse genetics and comparative genomics, we identify two factors responsible for 5-hydroxyuridine (ho5U) formation, which is the first step of the cmo5U synthesis: TrhP (formerly known as YegQ), a peptidase U32 family protein, is involved in prephenate-dependent ho5U formation; and TrhO (formerly known as YceA), a rhodanese family protein, catalyzes oxygen-dependent ho5U formation and bypasses cmo5U biogenesis in a subset of tRNAs under aerobic conditions. E. coli strains lacking both trhP and trhO exhibit a temperature-sensitive phenotype, and decode codons ending in G (GCG and UCG) less efficiently than the wild-type strain. These findings confirm that tRNA hydroxylation ensures efficient decoding during protein synthesis.


RNA modifications confer chemical diversity on simple RNA molecules, expanding their functional repertoires. To date, more than 140 species of RNA modifications have been identified in RNA molecules from all domains of life1.

In protein synthesis, tRNA serves as an adapter molecule to connect codons on mRNA with the corresponding amino acids. After they are transcribed, tRNAs undergo chemical modifications mediated by site-specific tRNA-modifying enzymes. These modifications play critical roles in stabilizing tRNA tertiary structure and fine-tuning the decoding process2,3. A wide variety of modifications are present at the first (wobble) position of the anticodon in tRNA (position 34). The wobble modification modulates codon recognition, thereby promoting accurate decoding during protein synthesis3,4.

In the original wobble rule5, guanosine at the wobble position (G34) base-pairs with U and C at the third letter of the codon, likewise, uridine at the wobble position (U34) base-pairs with A and G at the third letter of the codon. In Mycoplasma species and mitochondria6,7,8, however, U34 recognizes any of the four bases in a family box through a mechanism called four-way wobbling3. To decode two codon sets ending in purine (NNR), U34 is frequently modified to 5-methyl-(2-thio)uridine derivatives [xm5(s2)U]: 5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-(2-thio)uridine [cmnm5(s2)U] and 5-methylaminomethyl-(2-thio)uridine [mnm5(s2)U] in bacterial tRNAs, 5-methoxycarbonylmethyl-(2-thio)uridine [mcm5(s2)U] and its derivatives in eukaryotic cytoplasmic tRNAs, and 5-taurinomethyl-(2-thio)uridine [τm5(s2)U] in mitochondrial tRNAs 3. These modifications prevent tRNAs from misreading near-cognate codons ending in pyrimidines (NNY)9. In addition, xm5(s2)U34 plays a critical role in stabilizing U-G wobble pairing at the A-site of the ribosome10,11.

In contrast to xm5(s2)U-type modifications, 5-hydroxyuridine derivatives (xo5U) are present at the wobble positions of tRNAs responsible for NYN family boxes, and serve to expand decoding capacity in most bacterial species (Fig. 1a, b). To date, four species of xo5U modifications have been reported. 5-carboxymethoxyuridine (cmo5U, also called uridine-5-oxy acetic acid) and 5-methoxycarbonylmethoxyuridine (mcmo5U, also called uridine-5-oxy acetic acid methyl ester) are found in Gram-negative bacteria, including Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica2,12. 5-methoxycarbonylmethoxy-2’O-methyluridine (mcmo5Um) was recently detected in E. coli tRNASer as a minor modification13. In addition, 5-methoxyuridine (mo5U) is present in tRNAThr from Gram-positive bacteria, including Bacillus subtilis14. Using mass spectrometry, we revealed that cmo5U34 is present as a major wobble modification in tRNALeu3 and tRNAVal1, whereas mcmo5U34 is primarily present in tRNAAla1, tRNASer1, tRNAPro3, and tRNAThr4 in E. coli13 (Fig. 1b). The xo5U-type modifications facilitate non-Watson–Crick base pairing with guanosine and pyrimidines at the third positions of codons15,16,17,18 (Fig. 1b), thereby contributing to expansion of decoding capability. Moreover, the terminal methylation of mcmo5U contributes to decoding ability, at least in tRNAAla1 13.

Fig. 1

Decoding capacity of tRNAs is expanded by (m)cmo5U. a Secondary structure of E. coli tRNAAla1 with post-transcriptional modifications: 4-thiouridine (s4U), dihydrouridine (D), 2’-O-methyluridine (Um), 5-methoxycarbonylmethoxyuridine (mcmo5U), 7-methylguanosine (m7G), 5-methyluridine (m5U), and pseudouridine (Ψ). A pair of gray triangles indicate the RNase T1 cleavage positions for analysis of RNA fragments containing the wobble position. b Anticodon–codon pairing in six codon boxes decoded by tRNAs bearing cmo5U and mcmo5U. Each of the three tRNA genes in parenthesis was individually deleted. In the family boxes (four codons specify a single amino acid), many codons are redundantly decoded by two or three isoacceptors (tRNAs charging with the same amino acid). For example, CUU codon is decoded by tRNALeu2 with GAG anticodon as well as tRNALeu3 with cmo5UAG anticodon. c Scheme of mcmo5U biosynthesis in E. coli. First, U34 is hydroxylated by reactions involving unknown enzymes and substrates to form ho5U34 in tRNAs responsible for decoding NYN codons. This reaction requires the chorismate biogenesis pathway. CmoA employs prephenate and AdoMet to generate SCM-SAH with the release of phenylpyruvate and water. Then, ho5U34 is carboxymethylated by CmoB using SCM-SAH. Finally, tRNAs responsible for decoding NCN codons are further methylated to generate mcmo5U by CmoM in the presence of AdoMet

A structural study of cmo5U nucleoside in solution revealed that cmo5U adopts the C2’-endo ribose pucker conformation, providing mechanistic insight into base pairing with pyrimidines9. The crystal structures of codon–anticodon interactions at the ribosomal A-site revealed that the O5 atom of cmo5U is involved in an intramolecular hydrogen bond that pre-structures the anticodon loop, enabling cmo5U to pair with pyrimidines at the third position of the codon19. In addition, cmo5U pairs with G in standard Watson–Crick geometry, rather than classical U-G wobble geometry, indicating that keto-to-enol tautomeric conversion of the uracil base is involved in this base pairing interaction19.

Multistep reactions are involved in the biosynthetic pathway of cmo5U and mcmo5U in bacterial tRNAs (Fig. 1c). Three enzymes, CmoA, CmoB, and CmoM, are involved in the second to last step in the pathway. Initially, U34 is hydroxylated to form 5-hydroxyuridine (ho5U) in a reaction catalyzed by unidentified factors. Chorismate, an end product of the shikimate pathway, is involved in this step, but the source of the oxygen atom remains unknown20. On the other hand, the subsequent steps have been elucidated. In the second step, a unique carboxymethyl donor, S-carboxymethyl-S-adenosyl-l-homocysteine (SCM-SAH, also called Cx-SAM) is synthesized from AdoMet and prephenate in a reaction catalyzed by CmoA21,22. CmoB then transfers the carboxymethyl group of SCM-SAH to ho5U34 to form cmo5U34 on tRNA21. In four tRNA species (for Ser1, Pro3, Thr4, and Ala1), cmo5U is further methylated by CmoM to form mcmo5U3413. The terminal methylation of mcmo5U in tRNAPro3 dynamically alters its modification frequency in a growth phase-dependent manner13.

Hydroxylation of RNA molecules is a major post-transcriptional modification that plays roles in multiple biological contexts. In addition to xo5U modification of bacterial tRNAs, RNA hydroxylation is also responsible for the biogenesis and function of eukaryotic RNA modifications. The JmjC domain-containing protein TYW5 is responsible for biogenesis of hydroxywybutosine (OHyW) at position 37 of mammalian tRNAPhe23. ALKBH1 catalyzes tRNA hydroxylation to form 5-hydroxymethyl-2’O-methylcytidine (hm5Cm) and 5-formyl-2’O-methylcytidine (f5Cm) in cytoplasmic tRNALeu, as well as 5-formylcytidine (f5C) in mammalian mitochondrial tRNAMet24. ALKBH1-knockout cells exhibit respiratory defects, indicating that ALKBH1 is required for efficient mitochondrial activity. Recently, we discovered hydroxy-N6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine (ht6A) in echinoderm mitochondrial tRNA;25 this modification alters the genetic code in echinoderm mitochondria. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and 1-methyladenosine (m1A) are demethylated by ALKBH family proteins via hydroxymethyl formation26,27. The Tet protein is responsible for forming 5-hydroxymethylcytidine (hm5C) in Drosophila mRNAs28. All of the hydroxylases, including the JmjC, ALKBH, and Tet families, are Fe(II)- and 2-oxoglutarate (2-OG)-dependent oxygenases that use a molecular oxygen as a substrate for hydroxylation29. Recently, we identified RlhA as a factor responsible RNA hydroxylation to form 5-hydroxycytidine (ho5C) at position 2501 in E. coli 23S rRNA30. RlhA does not have any characteristic motifs conserved among the known RNA oxygenases, but it does belong to a family of proteins bearing the peptidase U32 motif. This finding encouraged us to explore other peptidase U32-containing proteins responsible for hydroxylation of biological molecules.

To search for genes responsible for RNA modifications, we developed a method called ribonucleome analysis to screen knockout strains for uncharacterized genes by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC/MS)31. If a target RNA modification is absent in a certain knockout strain, we can identify the gene dedicated to biogenesis of the target RNA modification via reverse genetics. Using this approach, we have discovered dozens of genes responsible for RNA modifications in tRNAs13,23,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39 and rRNAs30,40,41. In this study, we apply ribonucleome analysis in conjunction with comparative genomics to identify two genes, trhP and trhO, which are responsible for formation of ho5U at the initial step of xo5U biogenesis at the wobble position of bacterial tRNAs. TrhP, a peptidase U32 family protein, is involved in prephenate-dependent ho5U34 formation. TrhO, a rhodanese family protein, catalyzes oxygen-dependent ho5U34 formation under aerobic conditions. These two pathways play redundant roles in ho5U34 formation. Double knockout of both enzymes causes a temperature-sensitive phenotype and decreases the efficiency with which codons ending in G (GCG and UCG) were decoded, indicating that ho5U34 formation ensures efficient decoding during translation.


E. coli yegQ is involved in tRNA hydroxylation

We recently reported that RlhA is responsible for ho5C formation at position 2501 in E. coli 23S rRNA30. RlhA belongs to a family of proteins that contain the peptidase U32 motif. This finding prompted us to speculate that other paralogs of peptidase U32-containing proteins are involved in ho5U34 formation in tRNAs. The E. coli genome contains four paralogs of peptidase U32-containing proteins: rlhA, yegQ, yhbU, and yhbV (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Data 1). We extracted total RNA from each of the respective knockout strains, digested with RNase T1, and subjected the digests to capillary LC-nano-ESI-mass spectrometry (RNA-MS) to detect tRNA fragments containing cmo5U (shotgun analysis). RNA fragments were detected as multiply charged negative ions (Supplementary Table 1). We clearly detected an anticodon-containing RNA fragment of tRNAVal1 from total RNA of wild-type (WT) E. coli cells (Fig. 2a). As reported previously13, cmo5U34 was present as a major wobble modification in this tRNA, whereas little unmodified fragment (U34) was detected. In a knockout strain lacking yegQ (∆yegQ), which encodes a peptidase U32-containing protein, cmo5U34 frequency decreased markedly, to about 30% of the WT level, and a corresponding fragment containing unmodified U34 appeared, indicating that yegQ is partially responsible for the initial step of cmo5U34 formation. We reasoned that other paralogs of peptidase U32-containing proteins might be involved in this process. Accordingly, we constructed a quadruple mutant strain, ∆yegQ/∆yhbU/∆yhbV/∆rlhA, lacking all paralogs of peptidase U32-containing proteins, and analyzed the RNA fragment of tRNAVal1. However, the cmo5U34-containing fragment persisted in this strain (Fig. 2a), clearly indicating that another hydroxylation pathway plays a redundant role in the formation of ho5U34 in tRNAs.

Fig. 2

Identification of trhP responsible for tRNA hydroxylation. a Mass-spectrometric shotgun analysis of total tRNAs in E. coli strains. Extracted ion chromatograms (XICs) show multiply charged negative ions of the anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1 with U34 (upper panels) and cmo5U34 (lower) in total tRNAs from wild-type (left), ∆yegQ (center), and ∆yegQ/∆yhbU/∆yhbV/∆rlhA strains (right). Sequence, m/z value, and charge state of each fragment are shown on the right. Asterisks indicate nonspecific peaks with the same m/z values. b Mass-spectrometric analysis of the wobble modification in E. coli tRNAAla1 isolated from WT (left panels) and ∆yegQ (right) strains. XICs show anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAAla1 with U34 (top panels), cmo5U34 (middle panels), and mcmo5U34 (bottom panels). The cleavage sites of RNase T1 are shown in Fig. 1a. It is assumed that cmo5U detected in this tRNA was generated by artificial hydrolysis of mcmo5U during tRNA isolation13. The black arrowhead indicates a small peak corresponding to the U34-containing fragment detected in the WT. c Modification frequencies of cmo5U derivatives at the wobble position of six tRNA species isolated from WT and ∆yegQ strains. Relative compositions of each modification were calculated from the peak area ratio of mass chromatograms of RNase T1 digest fragments containing mcmo5Um (red), mcmo5U (green), cmo5U (blue), or U (gray) at the wobble position (Supplementary Fig. 2)13. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. d Gene organization of a B. subtilis operon containing yrrM, yrrN, and yrrO. Genomic positions in B. subtilis are indicated. The new name for each gene is shown in parenthesis. e Mass-spectrometric shotgun analysis of total tRNAs in B. subtilis strains. XICs are shown of doubly charged negative ions of the anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1a,b with U34 (top panels), ho5U34 (middle panels), and mo5U34 (bottom panels) in total tRNA from wild-type (leftmost panels), ∆yrrN (left panels), ∆yrrO (middle panels), ∆yrrN/∆yrrO (right panels), and ∆yrrM (rightmost panels) strains

To analyze the modification status of each tRNA species in the ∆yegQ strain, we used the reciprocal circulating chromatography (RCC) method42 to isolate six tRNA species (tRNAAla1, tRNALeu3, tRNAPro3, tRNASer1, tRNAThr4, and tRNAVal1) bearing a cmo5U34 or mcmo5U34 modification from both WT and ∆yegQ strains. Each tRNA was digested by RNase T1 and subjected to RNA-MS to analyze the anticodon-containing fragments (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 2, Supplementary Table 1). Hypomodified fragments were further sequenced by collision-induced dissociation (CID) analysis (Supplementary Fig. 3). In tRNAAla1, mcmo5U34 was present as a major wobble modification in the WT, but its levels were reduced to about 50% (concomitant with appearance of the unmodified fragment) in ∆yegQ (Fig. 2b). Similarly, mcmo5U34 levels were reduced in tRNASer1 and tRNAThr4 from ∆yegQ (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 2). The level of cmo5U34, a major modification in WT tRNAVal1, was also reduced about 50% in ∆yegQ (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 2). By contrast, the levels of cmo5U34 of tRNALeu3 and mcmo5U34 of tRNAPro3 dropped sharply, to less than 5% of WT levels, in the ∆yegQ strain (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 2). These results indicate that yegQ is involved differently in ho5U34 formation in each tRNA. In particular, tRNALeu3 and tRNAPro3 are major targets of YegQ. Accordingly, we renamed yegQ as trhP (tRNA hydroxylation P).

Biogenesis of mo5U34 in Bacillus subtilis

Instead of cmo5U34 or mcmo5U34, B. subtilis uses mo5U34 as an xo5U-type wobble modification. Upon depletion of intracellular AdoMet, mo5U is replaced by ho5U43, indicating that ho5U is the precursor and AdoMet is the methyl donor for mo5U formation. We identified two orthologs of trhP in B. subtilis, yrrN and yrrO (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Data 1), both of which are encoded tandemly in the same operon (Fig. 2d). YrrO has a peptidase U32 motif and a characteristic C-terminal motif also found in E. coli TrhP, whereas YrrN only has a peptidase U32 motif.

We investigated whether these two genes are actually involved in mo5U34 formation by shotgun analysis of total RNAs extracted from B. subtilisyrrN and ∆yrrO strains. Similar to our observation in the E. colitrhP strain (Fig. 2a), mo5U34 frequency in tRNAVal1 decreased, and an RNA fragment containing unmodified U34 appeared, in both ∆yrrN and ∆yrrO strains (Fig. 2e), indicating that both yrrN and yrrO were necessary for hydroxylation of U34 to form ho5U34 in B. subtilis. Accordingly, we renamed yrrO and yrrN as trhP1 and trhP2, respectively. To determine whether these two paralogs act redundantly to form ho5U34, we constructed the double-deletion strain ∆trhP1/∆trhP2 and analyzed the modification status of tRNA. The same level of mo5U34 was detected in this strain as in the single-knockout strains (Fig. 2e), suggesting that both paralogs are involved in synthesizing about 50% of mo5U34 in the cell, and another pathway is required for the remainder, as also observed for formation of cmo5U34 in E. coli.

We then focused on yrrM, which is encoded within the same operon as trhP1 and trhP2 (Fig. 2d). B. subtilis YrrM has high sequence similarity to the AdoMet-dependent catechol O-methyltransferase that catalyzes methylation of the hydroxyl group on the aromatic ring, suggesting that this protein is a methyltransferase responsible for mo5U34 formation. As expected, mo5U34 in tRNAVal1 disappeared and was converted to ho5U34 in a ∆yrrM strain (Fig. 2e). We then generated recombinant YrrM protein and performed in vitro reconstitution of mo5U34 in E. coli tRNAThr4 containing ho5U34, which had been isolated from a ∆cmoB strain. mo5U34 was successfully synthesized in the presence of both YrrM and AdoMet (Supplementary Fig. 4). The product was confirmed by CID analysis (Supplementary Fig. 4). Taken together, these findings indicate that YrrM is an AdoMet-dependent methyltransferase that converts ho5U34 to mo5U34 in B. subtilis. During the preparation of this manuscript, B. subtilis yrrM was demonstrated to be a ho5U34-methyltransferase and renamed trmR44.

Alternative pathway for tRNA hydroxylation

E. coli trhP and B. subtilis trhP1/trhP2 are partially involved in the initial step of cmo5U34 and mo5U34 formation, respectively, indicating the existence of another redundant pathway for ho5U34 formation in both species. To search for the gene(s) responsible for this pathway, we used a comparative genomic approach. In bacteria, we found several organisms with cmoA and cmoB homologs, but no trhP homolog (Fig. 3a). Similarly, some bacteria had a trmR homolog, but no trhP homologs (Fig. 3a). Given that ho5U34 is a common precursor for cmo5U34 synthesis mediated by cmoA and cmoB, and mo5U34 synthesis mediated by trmR, the bacterial species lacking trhP homologs should have another gene responsible for ho5U34 formation independent of the trhP pathway. We identified seven bacterial species with cmoAB or trmR homologs but no trhP or trhP1/trhP2 homologs (Fig. 3a). Among 4746 E. coli ORFs, we selected 141 genes (Fig. 3b) commonly present in all seven species, as well as in B. subtilis. We then narrowed down the list of candidates to seven genes with unknown functions (Fig. 3b). Among them, a yceA homolog was identified as a strong candidate because its genomic locus is close to that of cmoA in cyanobacteria, and yceA is encoded as a fusion protein with trmR in three bacterial species, Phytophthora sojae, Phytophthora ramorum, and Phaeodatylum tricornutum (Fig. 3b). To determine whether yceA is responsible for the second pathway of ho5U34 formation, we isolated tRNAVal1 from E. coli knockout strains of trhP and yceA, and analyzed the status of wobble modifications. The residual cmo5U34 observed in the ΔtrhP strain completely disappeared in the double-deletion strain ΔtrhPyceA (Fig. 3c), indicating that yceA is responsible for the second pathway of ho5U34. Hereafter, we refer to yceA as trhO (tRNA hydroxylation O). However, the amount of unmodified U34-containing fragment increased slightly in the single-deletion strain ΔtrhO (Fig. 3c), indicating that the trhP-mediated pathway plays the predominant role in ho5U34 formation especially in the absence of trhO.

Fig. 3

Identification of trhO responsible for tRNA hydroxylation. a Venn diagram depicts a group of organisms that have cmoAB or trmR homologs but no trhP homologs. Erwinia pyrifoliae, Alcanivorax borkumensis, and Psychrobacter arcticus harbor cmoAB but not trhP; Pontibacter actiniarum, Ehrlichia canis, and Candidatus phytoplasma harbor trmR but not trhP; and Dactylococcopsis salina has both cmoAB and trmR but not trhP. b Comparative genomics approach used to narrow down the candidate gene that bypasses ho5U34 biogenesis. In Phytophthora sojae, Phytophthora ramorum, and Phaeodatylum tricornutum, yceA and trmR are fused as a single gene. c Mass-spectrometric analysis of the wobble modification in E. coli tRNAVal1 isolated from WT (left panels), ∆trhP (middle left panels), ∆yceA (middle right panels), and ∆trhP/∆yceA (right panels) strains. XICs show anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1 with U34 (upper panels) and cmo5U34 (lower panels). Black arrowheads indicate peaks corresponding to U34-containing fragments detected in the WT and ∆yceA. Sequence, m/z value, and charge state of each fragment are shown on the right

B. subtilis ybfQ is an ortholog of E. coli trhO. To determine whether ybfQ is involved in the second pathway for ho5U34 formation in B. subtilis, we constructed a triple-knockout strain, ∆trhP1/∆trhP2/∆ybfQ, and analyzed the status of tRNA wobble modifications. The modified mo5U34 in the ∆trhP1/∆trhP2 strain, which was present at about 50% of the WT level, completely disappeared in the triple-deletion strain (Supplementary Fig. 5). However, as observed in the E. coli ΔtrhO strain, little reduction in the mo5U34 level was observed in the single-deletion strain ∆ybfQ (Supplementary Fig. 5).

Phylogenetic distribution of trhP and trhO

To investigate the phylogenetic distribution of trhP, trhP1, trhP2, and trhO, we generated a phylogenetic tree of organisms possessing or lacking each homolog (Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Data 2). trhO orthologs predominated in bacteria and eukaryotes (40%; 232 of 584), whereas trhP orthologs (yegQ type in Supplementary Fig. 1) and trhP1/trhP2 orthologs (PepU32#5/PepU32#3 in Supplementary Fig. 1) were only present in bacteria, and were less widely distributed [14% (84 of 584) and 5% (32 of 584), respectively] (Supplementary Fig. 6, Supplementary Data 2). trhP orthologs were mainly detected in γ- and β-proteobacteria, in addition to some desulfobacteria in δ-proteobacteria. trhP1/trhP2 orthologs always co-occurred, and were present in phylum Firmicutes and some members of Tenericutes and Cyanobacteria. Given that TrhP1 is a related family with TrhP (Supplementary Fig. 1), TrhP1 might have branched out from TrhP, and evolved to require a paralogous protein TrhP2 that might be generated by gene duplication. Supporting this speculation, trhP1 and trhP2 are tandemly encoded in the same operon in B. subtilis (Fig. 2e). Also, we can explain the reason why trhP orthologs and trhP1/trhP2 orthologs show a mutually exclusive distribution in bacteria (Supplementary Fig. 6). Intriguingly, over half of organisms bearing trhP or trhP1/trhP2 orthologs also harbor trhO orthologs [49 of 84 (58%) organisms bearing trhP, P = 0.0003 (Fisher’s exact test); 22 of 32 (69%) organisms bearing trhP1/trhP2, P = 0.0007 (Fisher’s exact test)] (Supplementary Fig. 7). This significant overlap suggests that harboring both pathways for tRNA hydroxylation might help organisms to adapt to two different environments, i.e., aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Phenotypes of E. coli strains lacking tRNA hydroxylation

We then measured the growth rate of a series of E. coli knockout strains involved in (m)cmo5U34 modifications. No growth reduction was observed in the ∆cmoM strain, as reported previously13 (Fig. 4a), indicating that the terminal methylation of mcmo5U34 has little impact on cell growth. A slight increase of doubling time was observed in the ∆cmoB strain, in which ho5U34 accumulated, indicating that the carboxymethyl group of (m)cmo5U34 contributes to efficient growth of E. coli cells. Notably, the ∆trhP/∆trhO strain grew more slowly than the WT and ∆cmoB strains, providing a clear evidence for the functional importance of 5-hydroxyl group of (m)cmo5U34 in cells. To characterize phenotypic features of the ∆trhP/∆trhO strain, we further knocked out tRNA genes responsible for G-ending codons [serU (tRNASer2) for the UCG codon, thrW (tRNAThr2) for the ACG codon, and proK (tRNAPro1) for the CCG codon], because these codons are redundantly deciphered by the respective tRNA and the isodecoder with the (m)cmo5U34 modification in each codon box. Growth reduction of the ∆trhP/∆trhO strain relative to the ∆cmoB strain was observed upon knockout of serU, thrW, and proK (Fig. 4a), indicating that the 5-hydroxyl group of (m)cmo5U34 plays a critical role in deciphering G-ending codons, especially in the absence of the respective isodecoder.

Fig. 4

Phenotypes of E. coli strains lacking tRNA hydroxylation. a Growth rates of E. coli strains with different wobble modifications. Doubling time of WT (mcmo5U34 for tRNASer1, tRNAThr4, and tRNAPro3), ∆cmoM (cmo5U34), ∆cmoB (ho5U34), and ∆trhP/∆trhO (U34) in the presence (left) or the absence of tRNA isodecoders at 37 °C in liquid LB medium: tRNASer2 (middle left), tRNAThr2 (middle right), or tRNAPro1 (right). Individual data (dot plots) and their means ± SD (bar graph) are presented (n = 4). *P < 0.01; **P < 0.001 between two data series (Student’s t-test, one-sided). b Growth of WT, ∆cmoM, ∆cmoB, ∆trhP/∆trhO, ∆trhP, and ∆trhO strains in the absence of tRNASer2 (∆serU). The expected wobble modification status of each strain is shown on the right. Each strain was serially diluted (1:10), spotted onto LB agar plates, and cultivated for 11 h (30 °C), 8 h (37 °C) or 8 h (42 °C). c Growth of WT, ∆cmoM, ∆cmoB, ∆trhP/∆trhO, ∆trhP, and ∆trhO strains in the absence of tRNAThr2 (∆thrW). The expected wobble modification of each strain is shown on the right. Each strain was serially diluted (1:10), spotted onto M9 minimum agar plates, and cultivated for 31 h (30 °C), 21 h (37 °C), 26 h (40 °C) or 31 h (42 °C). d Schematic of the reporter construct for the dual-luciferase assay, based on the RF2 recoding system. SD, Shine–Dalgarno sequence. Renilla and firefly luciferases were fused with a linker containing the +1 frameshift inductive signal of the RF2 recoding site. The frameshift target site was replaced with a GCG codon for tRNAAla1, a UCG codon for tRNASer1, or GG (zero frame) for the control. e Relative pausing activities at the frameshift site with a GCG codon (left), a UCG codon in the presence (middle left) or absence (middle right) of isodecoder tRNASer2, or zero frame (right) were calculated by normalizing Fluc activity vs. Rluc activity and further normalizing against the WT activity in each graph. Individual data and their means ± SD (n = 4) are presented. *P < 0.01 between two data series (Student’s t-test, two-sided). All source data for Fig. 4 are provided as a Source Data file

Next, we examined the temperature sensitivity of a series of knockout strains involved in (m)cmo5U34 modifications. The ∆trhP/∆trhO/serU strain grew as efficiently as the other strains on LB plates at 30 °C, but slowly at 37˚C and not at all at 42 °C (Fig. 4b). The growth defect of this strain at 42˚C was restored by introduction of plasmid-encoded trhP (Supplementary Fig. 8), indicating that the temperature-sensitive phenotype of this strain can be attributed to hypomodification of tRNASer1. Curiously, the ∆trhP/∆serU strain did not exhibit temperature sensitivity, although the frequency of mcmo5U34 actually decreased in tRNASer1 (Fig. 2c), indicating that trhO-mediated hydroxylation compensates for the growth defect when the trhP-mediated hydroxylation pathway is impaired. This result highlights the importance of redundant hydroxylation pathways for formation of xo5U. Similarly, we observed a severe growth reduction in the ∆trhP/∆trhO/thrW strain cultivated on M9 minimum plates, even at 40 °C (Fig. 4c). At 42 °C, this strain was unable to grow, and ∆cmoB strain exhibited a growth defect. These results clearly demonstrated that the absence of the 5-hydroxyl group of (m)cmo5U34 causes a temperature-sensitive phenotype, especially in the absence of the isodecoder responsible for G-ending codons.

Decoding properties without tRNA hydroxylation

To investigate the functional role of (m)cmo5U34 modification in terms of decoding efficiency, we conducted dual-luciferase reporter assays based on the RF2 recoding system18,45. The reporter constructs consisted of Renilla luciferase (Rluc) fused with firefly luciferase (Fluc) in a +1 frame via a slippery linker derived from the +1 frameshift signal of the RF2 recoding site, so that Fluc expression requires a +1 frameshift at the linker sequence. The UGA codon at the recoding site was substituted with GCG and UCG as test codons to examine their ability to be decoded by tRNAAla1 and tRNASer1, respectively (Fig. 4d). We also prepared a control reporter in which the recoding site was replaced with GG (zero frame). These reporters were introduced to a series of E. coli knockout strains lacking genes involved in (m)cmo5U34 modifications. The decoding ability of tRNAs with different wobble modifications at each test codon of the frameshift site was negatively correlated with the +1 frameshift activity, measured by Fluc activity, because in this system the +1 frameshift activity is promoted by the hungry A-site. The +1 frameshift activity was calculated by normalizing the Fluc signal against the Rluc signal (F/R value). No difference in F/R value in the control construct (zero frame) was observed in any strains (Fig. 4e).

Using this system, we first measured decoding ability of tRNAAla1 with different wobble modifications using the GCG-reporter, because in E. coli the GCG codon is solely deciphered by this tRNA (Fig. 1b). Compared with the WT strain (mcmo5U34), we observed clear stimulation of +1 frameshift activity in ∆cmoM (cmo5U34) and ∆cmoB (ho5U34) strains (Fig. 4e), as reported previously13. We also observed a significant increase in +1 frameshift activity in the ∆trhP/∆trhO (U34) strain relative to the WT strain (mcmo5U34) (Fig. 4e). These results indicate that tRNAAla1 gradually loses its decoding ability in response to side-chain shortening of mcmo5U34. Next, we measured the decoding ability of tRNASer1 with different wobble modifications using the UCG-reporter. In E. coli, UCG codons are redundantly decoded by tRNASer1 with the mcmo5UGA anticodon and tRNASer2 with the CGA anticodon (Fig. 1b). Relative to the WT strain (mcmo5U34), we observed a marked increase in +1 frameshift activity in the ∆cmoB (ho5U34) and ∆trhP/∆trhO (U34) strains (Fig. 4e). Then, we measured the activities of the UCG-reporter in a series of knockout strains in the absence of tRNASer2 (∆serU background). Relative to the ∆serU strain (mcmo5U34), +1 frameshift activity was elevated in both ∆cmoB/∆serU (ho5U34) and ∆trhP/∆trhO/∆serU (U34) strains (Fig. 4e). Notably, ∆trhP/∆trhO/∆serU (U34) had significantly higher +1 frameshift activity than ∆cmoB/∆serU (ho5U34) (Fig. 4e), indicating that the 5-hydroxyl group of ho5U34 on tRNASer1 can decode the UCG codon, especially in the absence of isodecoder tRNASer2.

Characterization of trhP-mediated tRNA hydroxylation

According to our recent study30, the shikimate pathway is associated with rlhA-mediated ho5C2501 formation in 23S rRNA. A series of genetic studies revealed that prephenate is an essential metabolite for the first step of this modification. Given that TrhP belongs to a family of peptidase U32-containing proteins, we asked whether prephenate is also required for trhP-mediated ho5U34 formation. Consistent with this possibility, previous studies reported that the initial step of cmo5U34 formation is associated with chorismate biogenesis in E. coli, B. subtilis, and Salmonella typhimurium20,46. Chorismate is an end product of the shikimate pathway and a common precursor for aromatic amino acids and vitamins in bacteria and plants47. Shotgun analyses of E. coli total RNA revealed that cmo5U34 formation was significantly impaired in an ∆aroC strain, in which no chorismate was produced (Supplementary Fig. 9). However, ho5U34 was still present in this strain because ho5U34 was redundantly synthesized by the trhO-mediated pathway. By contrast, as expected, no ho5U34 was detected in an ∆aroC/∆trhO strain (Supplementary Fig. 10). In E. coli, chorismate is converted into five metabolites: isochorismate (catalyzed by the products of entC and menF), 4-hydroxybenzoate (ubiC), 4-amino-4-deoxychorismate (pabB), anthranilate (trpE), and prephenate (pheA and tyrA) (Fig. 5a). Among these pathways, the ubiC-mediated pathway was excluded because 4-hydroxybenzoate does not restore cmo5U34 formation in SalmonellaaroD strain46. As observed in the ∆aroC strain, cmo5U34 formation was only impaired in the ∆pheA/∆tyrA strain, but not in the ∆entC/∆menF, ∆pabB, and ∆trpE strains (Supplementary Fig. 9), indicating that prephenate or its downstream metabolites are required for ho5U34 formation.

Fig. 5

Characterization of trhP-mediated tRNA hydroxylation. a A shikimate pathway and related metabolism. Chemical structures of metabolites and the responsible genes (italicized) at each step are shown. Two or three genes at each step indicate a redundant pathway [e.g., prephenate is redundantly synthesized from chorismate mediated by pheA(CM) and tyrA]. Black or gray arrows represent pathways indispensable or dispensable for trhP-mediated ho5U34 formation, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 9). White arrows represent pathways not examined in this study. b Genetic complementation of ho5U34 formation. Mass-spectrometric shotgun analysis of total tRNAs obtained from the E. coli ΔpheAtyrAcmoAtrhO strain transformed with a control plasmid (left panels) or pMW-pheA(CM) (right panels). XICs show multiply charged negative ions of anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1 with U34 (upper panels) and ho5U34 (lower panels). Sequence, m/z value, and charge state of each fragment are shown on the right. c Metabolic complementation of ho5U34 formation. Mass-spectrometric shotgun analysis of total tRNAs obtained from the E. coli ΔpheAtyrAcmoAtrhO strain cultured in the absence (left panels) or presence (right panels) of 1 mM prephenate. XICs show multiply charged negative ions of anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1 with U34 (upper panels) and ho5U34 (lower panels). Sequence, m/z value, and charge state of each fragment are shown on the right. d Domain organization of E. coli TrhP, which contains Peptidase_U32 (PF01136) and Peptidase_U32_C (PF16325) domains. Six residues in the Peptidase_U32 domain that are essential for TrhP-mediated hydroxylation are indicated. e Mutation study of trhP. Mass-spectrometric shotgun analysis of total tRNA in the E. colitrhP strain transformed with plasmid-encoded trhP WT or mutants, as indicated. XICs show multiply charged negative ions of the anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1 with U34 (black lines) and cmo5U34 (red lines) in total tRNAs. Sequence, m/z value, and charge state of each fragment are shown on the right

Prephenate is converted to downstream metabolites via three pathways (Fig. 5a). cmo5U34 formation was unchanged in ∆tyrA and ∆tyrB strains (Supplementary Fig. 9). pheA encodes a fusion of chorismate mutase (CM) and prephenate dehydratase (PDT), which synthesize prephenate and phenylpyruvate, respectively (Fig. 5a). To dissect these two enzymatic activities, we constructed a pheA variant possessing only the CM activity [pheA(CM)] by introducing an active-site mutation in the PDT domain48. To determine whether prephenate is responsible for ho5U34 formation, we constructed the quadruple-knockout strain ∆pheA/∆tyrA/∆cmoA/∆trhO, and then introduced plasmid-encoded pheA(CM), resulting in accumulation of prephenate. ho5U34 levels were restored relative to those in a mock transformant (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, when prephenate was directly added to a culture medium of the quadruple-knockout strain, ho5U34 clearly appeared (Fig. 5c). These results demonstrated that prephenate is required for ho5U34 formation.

To characterize the peptidase U32 domain of trhP, we mutated each of six conserved residues in this domain (Fig. 5d, Supplementary Fig. 11) and examined their activities in vivo by complementation of the ∆trhP/∆trhO strain. Shotgun analyses revealed that cmo5U34 was fully restored by WT trhP, but not by any of the mutants examined in this study (Fig. 5e), indicating that the peptidase U32 domain plays a key role in trhP-mediated tRNA hydroxylation.

Characterization of trhO-mediated tRNA hydroxylation

Given that Fe(II)- and 2-OG-dependent oxygenases use O2 as a substrate for hydroxylation, we next asked whether molecular oxygen is involved in ho5U34 formation. cmo5U34 formation is not affected in E. coli cultured under anaerobic conditions20, indicating that molecular oxygen is irrelevant to trhP-mediated ho5U34 formation. To determine whether O2 is involved in trhO-mediated ho5U34 formation, we cultured the E. colitrhP strain under aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and then monitored cmo5U34 formation by shotgun analysis. Very little cmo5U34 was detected in ∆trhP cells cultured under anaerobic conditions (Fig. 6a), whereas no reduction in cmo5U34 was observed in WT cells (Supplementary Fig. 12), implying that O2 is necessary for trhO-mediated ho5U34 formation. We then metabolically labeled ho5U34 using 18O-labeled O2. To accumulate ho5U34, we cultured the E. colitrhP/∆cmoB strain in mixed gas containing 20% 18O2. Total RNA extracted from this culture was digested into nucleosides and subjected to LC/MS. We clearly detected a deprotonated ho5U34 nucleoside with molecular mass (m/z 261) 2 Da greater than that of the naturally occurring nucleoside (Fig. 6b). CID analysis of the nucleoside revealed that the 18O atom was present in the base moiety of ho5U (Supplementary Fig. 13). No oxygens in the uracil base were labeled with 18O under the 18O-air condition (Supplementary Fig. 13), demonstrating that trhO-mediated tRNA hydroxylation utilizes O2 as an oxygen atom donor.

Fig. 6

Characterization of trhO-mediated tRNA hydroxylation. a trhO-mediated cmo5U formation takes place under aerobic conditions. Mass-spectrometric shotgun analysis of total tRNAs obtained from E. coli ΔtrhP strain cultured under anaerobic (left panels) or aerobic (right panels) conditions. XICs show negative ions of the anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1 with U34 (upper panels) and cmo5U34 (lower panels). Arrowheads indicate target peaks, and asterisks indicate unspecific peaks. b Molecular O2 is the metabolic source of the hydroxyl group of ho5U34 generated by trhO. Mass-spectrometric nucleoside analyses of total RNAs obtained from the E. colitrhP/∆cmoB strain cultured in mixed gas with 20% 18O2 (left panels) or in normal air (right panels). UV traces at 254 nm (upper panels) and XICs (lower panels) of deprotonated ho5U extracted from non-labeled (black line) or [18O]-labeled (red line) cells are shown. c TrhO interacts with tRNAAla1 specifically. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) was performed to detect direct interaction between recombinant TrhO and tRNAAla1 (left panels) or tRNALeu3 (right panels) isolated from E. coli. tRNAs and TrhO were stained with SYBR Safe (upper panels) and Coomassie brilliant blue (lower panels), respectively. TrhO–tRNA complexes are indicated by red traces. Arrowheads indicate unbound intact tRNAs and TrhO. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. d In vitro reconstitution of ho5U34 with recombinant TrhO. RNase T1 digests of E. coli tRNASer1 transcripts (10 pmol) incubated with (10 pmol; 1 eq or 100 pmol; 10 eq) or without TrhO are subjected to RNA-MS. XICs show doubly charged negative ions of the anticodon-containing fragments of tRNA transcript with U34 (upper panels) and ho5U34 (lower panels). Frequencies of ho5U34 are indicated. e Domain organization of E. coli TrhO bearing Rhodanese (PF00581) and Rhodanese_C (PF12368) domains. The CXGGXR motif and six residues mutated in this study are indicated. f Mutation study of trhO. Mass-spectrometric shotgun analysis of total tRNAs in the E. coli ΔtrhPtrhO strain transformed with plasmid-encoded trhO WT or mutants, as indicated. XICs show multiply charged negative ions of the anticodon-containing fragments of tRNAVal1 with U34 (black lines) and cmo5U34 (red lines) from total tRNA

Next, we generated recombinant E. coli TrhO and subjected it to biochemical characterization. Electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) revealed that TrhO interacted with tRNAAla1, but not with tRNALeu3 (Fig. 6c). This result is consistent with our observation that cmo5U34 of tRNALeu3 is mainly synthesized via the trhP-mediated pathway, whereas mcmo5U34 of tRNAAla1 is redundantly synthesized by both the trhP- and trhO-mediated pathways. We then attempted to reconstitute ho5U in vitro, and successfully detected ho5U on tRNASer1 in the presence of recombinant TrhO. When TrhO was present in excess, 75% of the tRNA had ho5U (Fig. 6d). CID analysis of the modified fragment confirmed that ho5U was formed at position 34 of the tRNA (Supplementary Fig. 14). This result demonstrated that TrhO is an RNA hydroxylase that can form ho5U34 on tRNA by utilizing O2 as an oxygen donor.

TrhO is a rhodanese family protein characterized by the CXGGXR motif49, with an active-site cysteine in a glycine-rich loop (Fig. 6e, Supplementary Fig. 15). The crystal structure of Legionella pneumophila Lpg2838, a TrhO homolog, was solved by structural genomics (Supplementary Fig. 16)50. In the rhodanese domain, the active-site loop structure with the CTGGIR sequence (positions 200–205 in E. coli numbering) is formed by hydrogen bonds between T201 and R205 (corresponding to T178 and R182 in Supplementary Fig. 16). To characterize this motif, we constructed a series of E. coli trhO mutants in which C200, T201, G202, G203, R205, or C206 was mutated to alanine, and then examined their activities in vivo by complementation of the ∆trhP/∆trhO strain. The level of cmo5U34 in tRNAVal1 was partially restored by WT trhO (Fig. 6f). For the trhO mutants, C200, T201, G203, and R205 were essential for trhO-mediated tRNA hydroxylation, whereas G202 and C206 were not (fig. 6f). In the TrhO structure, a positively charged β-sheet is present near the active-site loop (Supplementary Fig. 16), providing a surface capable of recognizing tRNAs. The trhO mutants K112A and R114A, which lack positively charged residues on the β-sheet surface, hardly rescued or did not rescue cmo5U34 formation, respectively (Fig. 6f), suggesting that this surface is required for trhO-mediated tRNA hydroxylation.


In this study, we identified two independent pathways, mediated by trhP and trhO, involved in tRNA hydroxylation in the early steps of (m)cmo5U34 formation. We confirmed that (m)cmo5U34 was completely converted to unmodified U34 in a ∆trhP/∆trhO strain. This finding enabled us to analyze the physiological roles of (m)cmo5U34. This strain grew more slowly than a ∆cmoB strain, which has ho5U34, confirming the physiological importance of the O5 oxygen atom of (m)cmo5U34. In addition, the ∆trhP/∆trhO strain exhibited severe growth defects and temperature-sensitive phenotypes when each of the tRNA genes (serU, thrW, and proK) responsible for G-ending codons was simultaneously deleted. These genetic interactions strongly indicate that (m)cmo5U34 plays a functional role in efficiently deciphering G-ending codons. The luciferase reporter assay revealed that decoding of UCG was significantly impaired in the ∆trhP/∆trhO strain relative to the ∆cmoB strain in the absence of tRNASer2, suggesting that the ho5UGA anticodon decodes the UCG codon more efficiently than the UGA anticodon. These observations demonstrate the direct involvement of the O5 oxygen of the xo5U34 modification in codon recognition in vivo.

According to the crystal structure of the ribosome 30S subunit in complex with the anticodon-stem loop (ASL) of tRNA, cmo5U-G pairing forms Watson–Crick geometry (Supplementary Fig. 17), which is more stable than U-G wobble geometry due to the stacking interaction with the neighboring base pair (i.e., the second letters of codon and anticodon)19. The O5 oxygen of cmo5U34 makes a hydrogen bond with 2’ OH of U33 to pre-structure the ASL, presumably reducing entropic cost to base pair with any codons. In addition, the O5 oxygen may induce keto-to-enol tautomeric conversion of the uracil base to stabilize cmo5U-G pairing in Watson–Crick geometry. Moreover, because (m)cmo5U34 decodes G-ending codons more efficiently than ho5U3413,18, the carboxymethyl group and terminal methylation of (m)cmo5U34 contribute further to efficient codon recognition. Structural analysis has shown that the carboxymethyl group of cmo5U34 forms a hydrogen bond with the O4 carbonyl oxygen of U in the first letter of the codon, implying that the cmo5U side chain is directly involved in codon recognition19. Because ho5U34 has a phenolic hydrogen, and the pKa value of O5 is 7.7851, ho5U34 is ionized to some extent under neutral pH conditions. Thus, the carboxymethylation of cmo5U34 and methylation of mo5U34 might confer efficient codon recognition by suppressing the ionization of ho5U34.

Our findings reveal that the TrhP-dependent pathway requires prephenate, whereas the TrhO-dependent pathway requires molecular oxygen. Thus, these two pathways are biochemically independent with respect to their requirement for metabolites. The existence of redundant and robust pathways for ho5U formation emphasizes that the xo5U34 modification is essential for bacteria to survive in a harsh environment. This is the unique instance of the RNA modification synthesized by two independent pathways in the same organism. According to phylogenetic distribution analysis in all domains of life (Supplementary Fig. 6), some organisms possess both trhP and trhO genes, whereas other organisms possess just one of them. Considering that anaerobes preceded aerobes in the early evolution on Earth, the trhP pathway might have been established in anaerobic bacteria before the trhO pathway arose, assuming that xo5U34 was present in such ancestral organisms. Presumably, the trhO pathway was acquired by aerobic bacteria after the O2 concentration increased on Earth. The trhP pathway is required for anaerobic bacteria, whereas the trhP and trhO dual pathways are useful for organisms that live in both anaerobic and aerobic environments.

TrhP is a peptidase U32-containing protein. Phylogenetic analysis has shown that peptidase U32-containing proteins can be classified into 12 subfamilies (Supplementary Fig. 1)30. We showed previously that three of these families include the RlhA proteins (RlhA1, RlhA2a, and RlhA2b) responsible for ho5C formation in 23S rRNA30. It is plausible that other subfamilies are also involved in hydroxylation of RNA or other biomolecules. Clostridia species harbor a member of the PepU32#1 family and trmR, but no homologs of trhO or trhP, implying that mo5U34 is present and that PepU32#1 family proteins are functional homologs of trhP in these species. Helicobacter pylori, a representative of the ε-proteobacteria, possesses a PepU32#2 family protein (HP0169), cmoA, and cmoB, but no homologs of trhO or trhP, indicating that cmo5U34 is present and suggesting that HP0169 is responsible for prephenate-dependent ho5U34 formation in this species. Intriguingly, HP0169 is required for gastric colonization by H. pylori52. Similarly, in Salmonella enterica, a trhP ortholog is associated with chicken macrophage infection53. Together, these findings suggest that xo5U34 contributes to bacterial infection and pathogenesis.

We found that prephenate is required for trhP-dependent ho5U34 formation. Given that prephenate is also a substrate for cmo5U34 formation mediated by CmoA and CmoB21, it is a critical metabolite involved in the entire pathway of cmo5U34 biogenesis. Prephenate is generated from chorismate, which in turn is a common precursor of multiple metabolites, including aromatic amino acids, quinones, folate, and siderophores47. Thus, cmo5U34 modification might be tightly associated with the shikimate pathway and biogenesis of aromatic amino acids. The frequency of cmo5U34 might be regulated by the cellular concentration of prephenate under some environmental stress conditions.

TrhP is a paralog of RlhA in the same family of peptidase U32-containing proteins. RlhA is responsible for prephenate-dependent ho5C2501 formation in E. coli 23S rRNA30, strongly implicating the involvement of the peptidase U32 motif in the C5-hydroxylation of pyrimidine base. Here, we showed that three conserved residues (E162, C170, and C177) in the motif of TrhP are essential for ho5U34 formation. Additionally, the corresponding residues (E161, C169, and C176) in RlhA were also required for ho5C2501 formation30, demonstrating that the peptidase U32 motif is directly involved in the hydroxylation of RNA. To date, we have no evidence that TrhP and RlhA directly catalyze the hydroxylation of RNA molecules. Given that RlhA is directly bound to the 50S subunit and its precursor in the cell, RlhA might be the hydroxylase responsible for ho5C2501 formation. By analogy, TrhP might be a hydroxylase for tRNA. Regarding the role of prephenate in ho5U34 formation, several possibilities should be considered. Prephenate might serve as an oxygen donor for ho5U34 formation, or alternatively as a coenzyme for the reaction. Moreover, we cannot exclude the possibility that unknown metabolites derived from prephenate are involved in ho5U34 formation. Further studies are necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying ho5U34 formation mediated by TrhP and prephenate.

trhO homologs are present in many aerobes and facultative anaerobes, but not in obligate anaerobes such as Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Bifidobacterium. trhO homologs are distributed in a wide range of bacteria, including α-, β-, and γ-proteobacteria, Bacilli, actinobacteria, the FCB group, cyanobacteria, and a subset of phylum Tenericutes (Supplementary Fig. 6). Intriguingly, trhO homologs are also widely distributed in vertebrates and other eukaryotes. This finding suggests the presence of an xo5U-type modification in eukaryotes.

We also showed that TrhO directly catalyzes oxygen-dependent ho5U34 formation. TrhO is related to rhodanese, which is involved in persulfide formation during detoxification of cyanide; however, the functions of most rhodanese family proteins remain unclear. In the context of RNA modifications, Tum1p is a rhodanese protein that mediates a persulfide sulfur for 2-thiouridine synthesis in eukaryotes38. Bacterial YbbB (also known as MnmH) is another rhodanese family protein responsible for biogenesis of 2-selenouridine (se2U)54 and geranyl-2-thioudirine (ges2U)55. Mutation study of TrhO revealed that the active-site loop of the rhodanese domain is responsible for ho5U34 formation, suggesting that the rhodanese domain plays a critical role in hydroxylation of uracil base. Future studies should seek to clarify the mechanism by which rhodanese catalyzes this reaction.

We now have a complete picture of xo5U34 formation in bacteria (Fig. 7). In the first step, U34 is redundantly hydroxylated by TrhP and TrhO to form ho5U34 in tRNAs responsible for decoding NYN codons. TrhP requires prephenate as a metabolite for ho5U34 formation, whereas TrhO uses a molecular oxygen for this purpose under aerobic conditions. In E. coli, TrhP is involved in ho5U34 formation of all six tRNA species, but has a preference for tRNALeu3 and tRNAPro3, whereas TrhO mainly hydroxylates the other four species. CmoA employs prephenate and AdoMet to generate SCM-SAH, a metabolite used for carboxymethylation of ho5U34 to yield cmo5U34 catalyzed by CmoB. Four tRNAs (for Ala1, Ser1, Pro3, and Thr4) are further methylated by CmoM to yield mcmo5U34. mcmo5U34 in tRNASer1 is partially methylated by TrmL to yield mcmo5Um34 as a minor modification. In Gram-positive bacteria, including B. subtilis, ho5U34 is methylated by TrmR to yield mo5U34 instead of (m)cmo5U34.

Fig. 7

Biogenesis of mcmo5U34 and derivatives. At the first step, U34 is redundantly hydroxylated by independent pathways mediated by TrhP and TrhO to form ho5U34 in tRNAs responsible for decoding NYN codons. TrhP requires prephenate as a metabolite for ho5U34 formation, whereas TrhO uses O2 to hydroxylate U34 to form ho5U34 under aerobic conditions. CmoA synthesizes SCM-SAH from prephenate and AdoMet. CmoB uses SCM-SAH for carboxymethylation of ho5U34 to yield cmo5U34. Four tRNAs (for Ala1, Ser1, Pro3, and Thr4) are further methylated by CmoM to yield mcmo5U34. In Gram-positive bacteria, including B. subtilis, ho5U34 is methylated by TrmR to yield mo5U34


Strains and media

A series of single-knockout strains of E. coli and their parent strain were obtained from the National BioResource Project (NBRP), National Institute of Genetics (NIG), Japan (Keio collection)56. Other knockout strains were generated by homologous recombination using λ-derived Red recombinase57 with the chloramphenicol-resistance (CmR) or the kanamycin-resistance marker (KanR); all strains were selected with the appropriate antibiotics (20 µg per ml chloramphenicol or 50 µg per ml kanamycin). E. coli strains with multiple gene deletions were constructed by P1 transduction. The KanR marker was removed by pCP20 transformation56. Genotyping of each construct was performed by colony PCR. A series of knockout strains [ΔyrrOtrhP1)::EmR, ΔyrrNtrhP2)::EmR, and ΔybfQtrhO)::EmR] and their parent strain [B. subtilis 168 MGNA-A001 (trpC2)] were obtained from the NBRP, NIG, Japan58. To construct ΔyrrNyrrO, ΔyrrM, and ΔybfQyrrNyrrO strains, the CmR cassette amplified from pDLK2 (courtesy of Akiko Soma, Chiba Univ.) was flanked by the 5’ and 3’ regions (~800 bps) of the target genes by ligation PCR, followed by transformation and selection with 5 µg per ml chloramphenicol. All constructs were confirmed by colony PCR. All primers and strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 3 and Supplementary Table 2, respectively.

M9 minimal medium with 0.4% glucose or LB medium, as well as the corresponding solid media containing 1.5% agar, were used for growth analysis of E. coli. MOPS medium with 20 amino acids (10 mM Ser, 0.8 mM Ala/Gly/Leu, 0.6 mM Gln/Glu/Val, 0.4 mM Arg/Asn/Ile/Lys/Phe/Pro/Thr, 0.2 mM His/Met/Tyr, and 0.1 mM Cys/Trp), five vitamins (0.02 mM thiamine hydrochloride, 0.02 mM calcium pantothenate, 0.02 mM 4-aminobenzoic acid, 0.02 mM 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, 0.02 mM 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid), 0.4% glucose, and appropriate antibiotics, in the presence or the absence of 1 mM prephenate (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), was used to determine the metabolite required for the trhP pathway.

Plasmid construction

For the genetic rescue study, CDSs of trhP, trhO, and pheA with their 200 bp upstream sequences (including native promoter regions) were PCR-amplified from the E. coli BW25113 genome and cloned into pMW118 (Nippon Gene) to yield pMW-trhP, pMW-trhO, and pMW-pheA, respectively. pMW-pheA(CM), which lacks prephenate dehydratase activity due to the T278A mutation48, and a series of point mutants of pMW-trhP and pMW-trhO were constructed by QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis (Agilent Technology). For expression vectors of TrhO (YceA) and TrmR (YrrM), CDSs of trhO and trmR were PCR-amplified from genomic DNAs of E. coli BW25113 and B. subtilis 168, respectively, and cloned into pET21b (Novagen) to yield pET-trhO and pET-trmR. All constructs were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. All primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 3.

RNA extraction and tRNA isolation

Total RNA from each E. coli strain was extracted by phenol under acidic conditions35. The cells suspended in 1 × TE buffer [10 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 1 mM EDTA] was mixed with an equal volume of water-saturated phenol, followed by freeze and thaw twice and vigorous mixing for one hour at room temperature. The aqueous phase was separated by centrifugation, transferred to a new tube, washed with chloroform, and further purified using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and chloroform. RNA was recovered by 2-propanol precipitation. Individual tRNAs were isolated by reciprocal circulating chromatography (RCC)42 using a series of DNA probes13 (Supplementary Data 3). For RNA-MS shotgun analyses13, E. coli strains were cultured overnight, harvested, and resuspended in TE buffer to extract total RNA by TRIzol. The small RNA fraction was obtained as follows13. 50–250 μg of total RNA in 800 μl of 3 M NH4OAc (pH 5.3) was mixed with 640 μl (0.8 volume) of isopropanol at room temperature and centrifuged at 20,400×g for 10 min to precipitate long RNAs including rRNAs. The smaller RNA fraction was precipitated with ethanol from the supernatant. For RNA-MS shotgun analyses of B. subtilis tRNA modifications, the harvested cells were treated with 1 mg per ml lysozyme for 10 min on ice, and then subjected to TRIzol treatment to extract total RNA.

Mass spectrometry of tRNA modifications

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analyses of tRNA modification were conducted as follows13,35. For RNA fragment analyses of individual tRNAs and shotgun analyses, 1.25 pmol of tRNA or 50 ng of the small RNA fraction was digested with 50 units RNase T1 (Thermo Scientific) in 20 mM NH4OAc (pH 5.3), followed by addition of an equal volume of 0.1 M triethylamine acetate (TEAA; pH 7.0). The RNase T1 digests were subjected to the trap column for desalting and chromatographed by HiQ sil C18W-3 nanospray column (C18, 3μm, 120 Å pore size, ID 0.1 × 100 mm, KYA technologies) with solvent system consisted of 0.4 M 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) (pH 7.0) (solvent A) and 0.4 M HFIP (pH 7.0) in 50% methanol (solvent B) at a flow rate of 300 nl per min with a linear gradient of 5–100% B solvent over 35 min with a splitless nano HPLC system (DiNa, KYA Technologies). The eluent was ionized by ESI source and introduced into an ion trap-orbitrap hybrid mass spectrometer (LTQ Orbitrap XL, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Ions were scanned with a negative polarity mode over an m/z range of 600–2000 throughout the separation. XICs were plotted according to the theoretical m/z of each fragment (Supplementary Table 1). LC/MS nucleoside analysis was performed using Q Exactive Hybrid Quadrupole-Orbitrap Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a Dionex UltiMate 3000 LC System (Thermo Fisher Scientific) essentially as described13,59. Twenty micrograms of the small RNA fraction were digested at 37 °C for 3 h in 60 µl of solution containing 20 mM trimethylamine-HCl (TMA-HCl) (pH 7.0), 0.05 U of nuclease P1, and 0.1 U of BAP. The digests mixed with acetonitrile (f.c. 90%) were chromatographed by ZIC-cHILIC column (3 μm particle size, 2.1 × 150 mm, Merck Millipore) with a guard column with the same resin (2.1 × 20 mm, Merck Millipore) using a solvent system consisted of 5 mM NH4OAc (pH 5.3) (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B) at a flow rate of 100 μl min−1 in a multistep linear gradient; 90–40% B from 0 to 30 min, 40% B for 10 min, and then initialized to 90% B. The eluent was directly introduced into the ESI source and analyzed by mass spectrometer. Deprotonated nucleosides were scanned in a negative polarity mode over a m/z range of 110–700 throughout separation. Data were analyzed using Xcalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Basically, in negative mode of ESI, ionization efficiencies of the RNA fragments bearing the same sequence but different modification do not differ largely, because ESI ionization relies mainly on numbers of phosphate groups, not on type of base modifications60. Thus, we relatively quantified modification frequencies of RNA fragments with different chemical structures from their intensities of XICs.

Luciferase reporter assay

The dual-luciferase reporter assay13 was performed as follows: knockout strains were transformed with pBAD-RFlucGCG, pBAD-RFlucUCG, or pBAD-RFlucGG. Each transformant was pre-cultivated at 37 °C in 2 ml LB medium containing 100 µg per ml ampicillin overnight. The preculture (1 ml) was inoculated to 2 ml of LB medium containing 100 µg per ml ampicillin and 100 µM arabinose to induce expression of the reporter. When the OD600 reached to 0.3–0.7, 1 ml aliquot was centrifuged, and the pelleted cells were resuspended in 200 µl of lysis buffer [10 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 7 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 400 µg per ml lysozyme]. Cell lysates were prepared by the freeze–thaw and cleared by centrifugation. The luciferase reporter assay was performed with 5 μl lysate using GloMax™ 96 Microplate Luminometer (Promega). The Fluc luminescence signal was normalized against the Rluc signal.

Anaerobic cultivation

WT and ΔtrhP strains were precultured in a BioShaker G·BR-200 (TAITEC) at 37 °C with rotation at 60 rpm for 24 h in 10 ml of degassed LB medium in a 10 cm dish doubly packed in Ziploc (Asahi-Kasei, Japan) with one bag of AnaeroPack-Anaero (Mitsubishi Gas Chemical, Japan) and an oxygen indicator (OXY-1, JIKCO). The preculture (100 µl) was inoculated into 10 ml of degassed LB medium, sealed with an AnaeroPack-Anaero, incubated at room temperature for 1 h to deoxidize completely, and then cultivated at 37 °C overnight at 60 rpm.

Metabolic labeling analysis using 18O2

18O-containing mixed gas [20% 18O2 (97.5% 18O2, 1% 17O2, 1.5% 16O2), 80% N2] was obtained commercially (Tatsuoka, Japan). The ΔcmoBtrhP stain was precultured at 37˚C overnight in LB medium containing 50 µg per ml kanamycin. The preculture (1 ml) was inoculated into 100 ml of degassed LB medium containing 1 mM uridine and 50 µg/ml kanamycin packed in a PVDF air-sampling bag (As One, Japan). Inside air was carefully removed, and then replaced once with N2 and twice with 18O2 mixed gas. The bag was capped and sealed with Parafilm (Bemis), and then cultured at 37 °C for 24 h at 100 rpm in a BioShaker G·BR-200 (TAITEC). Total RNA was extracted from the culture, digested into nucleosides, and analyzed by LC/MS as described above.

Preparation of recombinant protein

E. coli BL21(DE3) transformed with pET-trhO was cultured at 37 °C until OD600 reached ~0.7, supplemented with 0.4% lactose, and further cultured at 16 °C for 32 h. The E. coli Rosetta(DE3) transformed with pET-trmR was cultured at 37 °C until OD600 reached ~0.7, supplemented with 100 µM IPTG, and further cultivated at 37 °C for 4 h to induce overexpression. Cells were sonicated in lysis buffer for TrhO [50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 300 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.2 mM PMSF] or the lysis buffer for TrmR [50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.2 mM PMSF]. The recombinant proteins TrhO and TrmR were purified using a HisTrap column (GE Healthcare) with a linear gradient of imidazole (0–500 mM for TrhO, 25–500 mM for TrmR). Purified protein was dialyzed in the individual lysis buffer, supplemented with glycerol to a final concentration of 30%, and stored at −20 °C.

In vitro reconstitution of tRNA modification

For in vitro ho5U formation by TrhO, tRNASer1 transcript (10 pmol) and recombinant TrhO (10 or 100 pmol) were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in a reaction mixture (10 µl) containing 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0), 300 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol. The tRNA was extracted with acidic phenol/chloroform and precipitated with ethanol, followed by RNase T1 digestion and RNA-MS analysis as described above.

In vitro methylation of ho5U by TrmR was performed essentially as described13. E. coli tRNAThr4 bearing ho5U34 was isolated from the ΔcmoB strain. The reaction mixture (10 µl) containing 10 pmol of tRNAThr4, 20 pmol of TrmR, 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, and 7 mM 2-mercaptoethanol was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in the presence or absence of 1 mM AdoMet.

Electrophoresis mobility shift assay

EMSA was performed essentially as described34. Recombinant TrhO (0, 10, 20, 40, or 80 pmol) and in vitro transcribed tRNAAla1 or tRNALeu3 (20 pmol each) were incubated at 37 °C for 1 h in 10 µl of reaction mixture [50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 5 mM Mg(OAc)2, 100 mM KCl, 1 mM spermine, 1 mM DTT]. The mixtures were electrophoresed in 6% native polyacrylamide gel with running buffer [50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 5 mM Mg(OAc)2, and 1 mM DTT] in cold room. The gel was first stained with SYBR Safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to detect tRNA and then with Coomassie brilliant blue (Nacalai Tesque) to detect protein.

Comparative genomics

The comparative genomics approach used to identify the trhO (yceA) gene was performed with the IMG database61. The gene occurrence profile was used to select seven organisms in which cmoBA or yrrM homologs were present and trhP (yegQ) or trhP1/trhP2 homologs were absent: Ehrlichia canis str. Jake, Erwinia pyrifoliae DSM12163, Alcanivorax borkumensis SK2, Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris onion yellows OY-M, Pontibacter actiniarum sp. BAB1700, Dactylococcopsis salina PCC 8305, and Psychrobacter arcticus 273–4. Using the phylogenic profiler, 141 E. coli genes that are conserved in these seven organisms and B. subtilis were identified. According to the UniProt gene annotation, seven uncharacterized genes were picked as candidates.

Phylogenetic analysis

The phylogenetic tree of peptidase U32 (Supplementary Fig. 1) was generated as described30. Species names matched to proteins were retrieved from UniProt. The occurrence profiles of trhO, trhP, trhP1, trhP2, cmoA, cmoB, trmR, and cmoM homologs (Supplementary Fig. 6) were retrieved from GTOP62 or the Interpro database63. To generate the phylogenetic tree, 584 organisms that are registered in the databases we used, i.e., species listed in GTOP, phyloT, and Pfam, were selected.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

A reporting summary for this Article is available as a Supplementary Information file. The source data for graphs and gels are provided as a Source Data file. All data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Boccaletto, P. et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways. 2017 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D303–D307 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bjork, G. R. & Hagervall, T. G. Transfer RNA modification: presence, synthesis, and function. EcoSal Plus 6, 1–68, (2014).

  3. 3.

    Suzuki, T. in Fine-Tuning of RNA Functions by Modification and Editing, Vol. 12 (ed. Grosjean, H.) 23–69 (Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG, 2005).

  4. 4.

    Curran, J. F. Modified nucleosides in translation 493–516. (ASM press, Washington, DC, 1998).

  5. 5.

    Crick, F. H. Codon–anticodon pairing: the wobble hypothesis. J. Mol. Biol. 19, 548–555 (1966).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Barrell, B. G. et al. Different pattern of codon recognition by mammalian mitochondrial tRNAs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 77, 3164–3166 (1980).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Inagaki, Y. et al. Translation of synonymous codons in family boxes by Mycoplasma capricolum tRNAs with unmodified uridine or adenosine at the first anticodon position. J. Mol. Biol. 251, 486–492 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Suzuki, T., Nagao, A. & Suzuki, T. Human mitochondrial tRNAs: biogenesis, function, structural aspects, and diseases. Annu Rev. Genet 45, 299–329 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Yokoyama, S. et al. Molecular mechanism of codon recognition by tRNA species with modified uridine in the first position of the anticodon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 4905–4909 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kurata, S. et al. Modified uridines with C5-methylene substituents at the first position of the tRNA anticodon stabilize U.G wobble pairing during decoding. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 18801–18811 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kirino, Y. et al. Codon-specific translational defect caused by a wobble modification deficiency in mutant tRNA from a human mitochondrial disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15070–15075 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Murao, K., Saneyoshi, M., Harada, F. & Nishimura, S. Uridin-5-oxy acetic acid: a new minor constituent from E. coli valine transfer RNA I. Biochem Biophys. Res Commun. 38, 657–662 (1970).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Sakai, Y., Miyauchi, K., Kimura, S. & Suzuki, T. Biogenesis and growth phase-dependent alteration of 5-methoxycarbonylmethoxyuridine in tRNA anticodons. Nucl. Acid Res 44, 509–523 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Murao, K., Hasegawa, T. & Ishikura, H. 5-methoxyuridine: a new minor constituent located in the first position of the anticodon of tRNAAla, tRNAThr, and tRNAVal from Bacillus subtilis. Nucleic Acids Res 3, 2851–2860 (1976).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Takai, K., Takaku, H. & Yokoyama, S. Codon-reading specificity of an unmodified form of Escherichia coli tRNA1Ser in cell-free protein synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 24, 2894–2899 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yokoyama, S. & Nishimura, S. in tRNA: Structure, Biosynthesis, and Function (ed. Soll, D. R., U. L.) 207–224 (American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C., 1995).

  17. 17.

    Samuelsson, T. et al. Aberrations of the classic codon reading scheme during protein synthesis in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 255, 4583–4588 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Nasvall, S. J., Chen, P. & Bjork, G. R. The wobble hypothesis revisited: Uridine-5-oxyacetic acid is critical for reading of G-ending codons. RNA 13, 2151–2164 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Weixlbaumer, A. et al. Mechanism for expanding the decoding capacity of transfer RNAs by modification of uridines. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 498–502 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hagervall, T. G., Jönsson, Y. H., Edmonds, C. G., McCloskey, J. A. & Bjork, G. R. Chorismic acid, a key metabolite in modification of tRNA. J. Bacteriol. 172, 252–259 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim, J. et al. Structure-guided discovery of the metabolite carboxy-SAM that modulates tRNA function. Nature 498, 123–126 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Byrne, R. T., Whelan, F., Aller, P. & Bird, L. E. S-Adenosyl-S-carboxymethyl-L-homocysteine: a novel cofactor found in the putative tRNA-modifying enzyme CmoA. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Biol. Crystallogr. D69, 1090–1098 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Noma, A. et al. Expanding role of the jumonji C domain as an RNA hydroxylase. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 34503–34507 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kawarada, L. et al. ALKBH1 is an RNA dioxygenase responsible for cytoplasmic and mitochondrial tRNA modifications. Nucl. Acid Res 45, 7401–7415 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nagao, A. et al. Hydroxylation of a conserved tRNA modification establishes non-universal genetic code in echinoderm mitochondria. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 778–782 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liu, F. et al. ALKBH1-mediated tRNA demethylation regulates translation. Cell 167, 1897 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zheng, G. et al. ALKBH5 is a mammalian RNA demethylase that impacts RNA metabolism and mouse fertility. Mol. Cell 49, 18–29 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Delatte, B. et al. RNA biochemistry. Transcriptome-wide distribution and function of RNA hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 351, 282–285 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ploumakis, A. & Coleman, M. L. OH, the places you’ll go! hydroxylation, gene expression, and cancer. Mol. Cell 58, 729–741 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kimura, S., Sakai, Y., Ishiguro, K. & Suzuki, T. Biogenesis and iron-dependency of ribosomal RNA hydroxylation. Nucl. Acid Res 45, 1–14 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Suzuki, T., Ikeuchi, Y., Noma, A., Suzuki, T. & Sakaguchi, Y. Mass spectrometric identification and characterization of RNA-modifying enzymes. Meth. Enzym. 425, 211–229 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ikeuchi, Y., Kitahara, K. & Suzuki, T. The RNA acetyltransferase driven by ATP hydrolysis synthesizes N4-acetylcytidine of tRNA anticodon. EMBO J. 27, 2194–2203 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Ikeuchi, Y., Shigi, N., Kato, J., Nishimura, A. & Suzuki, T. Mechanistic insights into sulfur relay by multiple sulfur mediators involved in thiouridine biosynthesis at tRNA wobble positions. Mol. Cell 21, 97–108 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kimura, S. et al. Discovery of the beta-barrel-type RNA methyltransferase responsible for N 6-methylation of N 6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine in tRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 42, 9350–9365 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Miyauchi, K., Kimura, S. & Suzuki, T. A cyclic form of N 6-threonylcarbamoyladenosine as a widely distributed tRNA hypermodification. Nat. Chem. Biol. 9, 105–111 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Noma, A., Kirino, Y., Ikeuchi, Y. & Suzuki, T. Biosynthesis of wybutosine, a hyper-modified nucleoside in eukaryotic phenylalanine tRNA. EMBO J. 25, 2142–2154 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Noma, A. et al. Actin-binding protein ABP140 is a methyltransferase for 3-methylcytidine at position 32 of tRNAs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 17, 1111–1119 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Noma, A., Sakaguchi, Y. & Suzuki, T. Mechanistic characterization of the sulfur-relay system for eukaryotic 2-thiouridine biogenesis at tRNA wobble positions. Nucleic Acids Res 37, 1335–1352 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Soma, A. et al. An RNA-modifying enzyme that governs both the codon and amino acid specificities of isoleucine tRNA. Mol. Cell 12, 689–698 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kimura, S. & Suzuki, T. Fine-tuning of the ribosomal decoding center by conserved methyl-modifications in the Escherichia coli 16S rRNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1341–1352 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Kimura, S. et al. Base methylations in the double-stranded RNA by a fused methyltransferase bearing unwinding activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 4071–4085 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Miyauchi, K., Ohara, T. & Suzuki, T. Automated parallel isolation of multiple species of non-coding RNAs by the reciprocal circulating chromatography method. Nucl. Acid Res 35, e24–e24 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Murao, K., Ishikura, H., Albani, M. & Kersten, H. On the biosynthesis of 5-methoxyuridine and uridine-5-oxyacetic acid in specific procaryotic transfer RNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 5, 1273–1281 (1978).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ryu, H., Grove, T. L., Almo, S. C. & Kim, J. Identification of a novel tRNA wobble uridine modifying activity in the biosynthesis of 5-methoxyuridine. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 9160–9169 (2018).

  45. 45.

    Curran, J. F. Analysis of effects of tRNA:message stability on frameshift frequency at the Escherichia coli RF2 programmed frameshift site. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 1837–1843 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Bjork, G. R. A novel link between the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids and transfer RNA modification in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 140, 391–410 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kanehisa, M. et al. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucl. Acid Res 42, D199–D205 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Zhang, S., Wilson, D. B. & Ganem, B. Probing the catalytic mechanism of prephenate dehydratase by site-directed mutagenesis of the Escherichia coli P-protein dehydratase domain. Biochemistry 39, 4722–4728 (2000).

  49. 49.

    Bordo, D. & Bork, P. The rhodanese/Cdc25 phosphatase superfamily. Sequence-structure-function relations. in EMBO Rep. 3, 741–746 (2002).

  50. 50.

    Kuzin, A. et al. Three dimensional structure of the double mutant of UPF0176 protein lpg2838 from Legionella pneumophila at the resolution 1.8A, Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium (NESG) Target LgR82. (2012).

  51. 51.

    La Francois, C. J., Jang, Y. H., Cagin, T., Goddard, W. A. & Sowers, L. C. Conformation and proton configuration of pyrimidine deoxynucleoside oxidation damage products in water. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 13, 462–470 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kavermann, H. et al. Identification and characterization of Helicobacter pylori genes essential for gastric colonization. J. Exp. Med 197, 813–822 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Zhao, Y. et al. Identification of genes affecting Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis infection of chicken macrophages. Infect. Immun. 70, 5319–5321 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Wolfe, M. D. et al. Functional diversity of the rhodanese homology domain: the Escherichia coli ybbB gene encodes a selenophosphate-dependent tRNA 2-selenouridine synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 1801–1809 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Dumelin, C. E., Chen, Y., Leconte, A. M., Chen, Y. G. & Liu, D. R. Discovery and biological characterization of geranylated RNA in bacteria. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8, 913–919 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Baba, T. et al. Construction of Escherichia coli K-12 in-frame, single-gene knockout mutants: the Keio collection. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2, 0008 (2006). 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6640–6645 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kobayashi, K. et al. Essential Bacillus subtilis genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 4678–4683 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sakaguchi, Y., Miyauchi, K., Kang, B. I. & Suzuki, T. Nucleoside analysis by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Methods Enzym. 560, 19–28 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Lin, H. et al. CO2-sensitive tRNA modification associated with human mitochondrial disease. Nat. Commun. 9, 1875 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Markowitz, V. M. et al. IMG: the Integrated Microbial Genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 40, D115–D122 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kawabata, T. et al. GTOP: a database of protein structures predicted from genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 30, 294–298 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Finn, R. D. et al. InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Res 45, D190–D199 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank members of the Suzuki laboratory, especially Y. Sakaguchi and K. Miyauchi, for technical assistance and many helpful suggestions. This work was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (26113003, 26220205, 18H05272 to T.S.), by a JSPS Fellowship for Japanese Junior Scientists (to Y. S. and S. K.).

Author information




Y.S. and S.K. performed a series of experiments. All authors discussed the results. Y.S. and T.S. wrote this paper. Y.S., S.K., and T.S. designed the research structure. T.S. supervised all the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tsutomu Suzuki.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Lluis Ribas de Pouplana, and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source Data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sakai, Y., Kimura, S. & Suzuki, T. Dual pathways of tRNA hydroxylation ensure efficient translation by expanding decoding capability. Nat Commun 10, 2858 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links