Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Sialyl Lewisx-P-selectin cascade mediates tumor–mesothelial adhesion in ascitic fluid shear flow

Abstract

Organ-specific colonization suggests that specific cell–cell recognition is essential. Yet, very little is known about this particular interaction. Moreover, tumor cell lodgement requires binding under shear stress, but not static, conditions. Here, we successfully isolate the metastatic populations of cancer stem/tumor-initiating cells (M-CSCs). We show that the M-CSCs tether more and roll slower than the non-metastatic (NM)-CSCs, thus resulting in the preferential binding to the peritoneal mesothelium under ascitic fluid shear stress. Mechanistically, this interaction is mediated by P-selectin expressed by the peritoneal mesothelium. Insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 carrying an uncommon non-sulfated sialyl-Lewisx (sLex) epitope serves as a distinct P-selectin binding determinant. Several glycosyltransferases, particularly α1,3-fucosyltransferase with rate-limiting activity for sLex synthesis, are highly expressed in M-CSCs. Tumor xenografts and clinical samples corroborate the relevance of these findings. These data advance our understanding on the molecular regulation of peritoneal metastasis and support the therapeutic potential of targeting the sLex-P-selectin cascade.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer has the lowest 5-year survival rate ( < 25%) among all gynecological malignancies owing to extensive peritoneal metastatic lesions1. Despite not as common as blood-borne metastasis, treatment of peritoneal metastasis is notoriously challenging because of the rapid growth of metastasis in the peritoneal cavity in a positive feed-forward manner2. Current treatment is dissatisfying and little overall clinical benefits for patients have been achieved over the last several decades. Unraveling the underlying molecular mechanisms regulating this process will conceivably benefit the development of effective treatment strategies.

The barriers to metastasis are distinct in different organs, suggesting that specific recognition between cancer cells and peritoneal mesothelium is critical for the peritoneum-specific colonization3. Moreover, tumor cell lodgment in the peritoneum is consistently exposed to shear forces generated by ascitic flow4. However, owing to the difficulty in manipulating the dynamic flow conditions, the role of mechanical force in this adhesion has been largely neglected. Thus, the adhesion molecules and the underlying signaling operating the adhesion of cancer cells under ascitic flow remain a gap in knowledge.

Selectins (E-, P-, and L-selectin) are a family of calcium-dependent glycoproteins that are the prime glycan receptors on shear-resistant interactions as described to date5. Although the structures of the three selectins are highly similar, they have different tissue distribution and binding kinetics, suggesting that they have different roles in various pathophysiological processes, including tumor metastasis. Thus, the selective binding between selectin and its ligand determines the metastatic destination. Tumor cells exploit the selectin-glycan binding for the initial cell–cell interaction, including tethering and rolling, under shear stress that further triggers the molecular signaling that facilitates cellular firm adhesion6. Such interaction has been extensively studied in blood-borne metastasis7,8. In contrast, selectins are expressed on peritoneal mesothelial cells, suggesting that similar receptor/ligand cascade initiated by selectin-mediated interaction may promote tumor cell peritoneal targeting9,10. However, the detailed underlying mechanism governing adhesion for peritoneal metastasis is poorly understood. The difference in the peritoneal shear stress (~ 0.1 dyne cm−2; at least 10-fold lower than that of the vascular shear stress)11 suggests that the biology of peritoneal dissemination is different from that of blood-borne metastasis and probably different molecular mechanisms are involved.

In this study, we reveal a preferential binding of metastatic cancer stem/tumor-initiating cells (M-CSCs) to the peritoneal mesothelium than the non-metastatic (NM)-CSCs. We also provide evidence that P-selectin is a key molecule on the peritoneal mesothelium that mediates the binding through a unique sialyl-Lewisx (sLex) containing insulin-like growth factor receptor-1 (IGF-1R) ligand under ascitic flow-induced shear stress.

Results

Establishment of M-/NM-CSC models

To explore the limiting factors that determine the metastatic success of ovarian cancer, we reasoned that metastatic colonization is a highly inefficent process and is accomplished by only a subset of cancer stem/tumor-initiating cells (CSCs)3. We have previously isolated CSCs12. Using in vivo selection by orthotopic implantation of CSCs into the bursa of the mouse ovary, we further isolated the highly metastatic population of CSCs (M-CSCs) in SKOV-3 (Fig. 1a), which consistently metastasized to the peritoneum, recapitulating the clinical progression of human ovarian cancer, when implanted either by orthotopic or intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection (Fig. 1b–e). Conversely, NM-CSCs, which are equally tumorigenic (Fig. 1d, e), did not metastasize in both models (Fig. 1b–e, Table 1). Similar metastatic abilities were observed in CSCs-enriched cultures generated from primary ovarian cancer samples (Fig. 1f, Table 1). Moreover, M-CSCs had a gene expression profile similar to the metastatic tumors in ovarian cancer patients (Fig. 1g), suggesting that the in vitro M-CSCs could closely reflect the spontaneous metastatic cellular events in patients. We have also derived M- and NM-CSCs from HEYA8 cells, and similar results were obtained (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b).

Fig. 1
figure1

Isolation and characterization of metastatic cancer stem cells. a Isolation of ovarian metastatic cancer stem cells. Blue circle, primary tumor. Red star, metastasis. b, c NOD/SCID mice engrafted with M-CSCs or NM-CSCs via b orthotopic or c i.p. injection. Left: representative bioluminescence image. Right: representative views of metastases in the peritoneal cavity. Arrows, metastases. Scale bar, 1 cm. n = 5 (orthotopic) or three mice (i.p) per group. d, e Representative image d of and H&E staining e of primary tumors from mice orthotopically transplanted with M-CSCs or NM-CSCs. Arrows, tumors. Scale bars = 1 cm d or 50 μm e. f Representative view of metastasis in mice engrafted with M-CSCs of patient samples. Arrows, metastases. Scale bar, 1 cm. n = 7 mice, samples collected from three patients. g Gene expression patterns of M-CSCs and NM-CSCS compared with metastatic (Met.) versus non-metastatic (Non-Met.) tumors from TCGA RNA-seq data of ovarian cancer patients. Left: heat map representing genes in M-CSC and NM-CSCs. Rows represent different genes and column represents each sample. Blue: downregulation; Red: upregulation. Right: Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of differentially upregulated genes in M-CSCs samples against the ranked gene list (from up- to downregulated) in TCGA metastatic ovarian tumors. X axis from left to right: ordered genes from up- to downregulation in TCGA metastatic tumors. Experiments were conducted two af or three g, n = 3 per group) times independently. Results are represented with mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis using unpaired Student’s t test. ns, not significant. **, P < 0.01

Table 1 Comparison of tumorigenic and metastatic abilities

Differential capabilities in tethering, rolling, and adhesion

To evaluate whether the distinct metastatic phenotypes in the two CSCs populations have different abilities in tumor–mesothelial interaction, we have developed a customizable microfluidic platform to overcome the technical limitations of the conventional approaches and to recapitulate peritoneal dissemination in dynamic flow13. CSCs spheroids were perfused to the microfluidic chip coated with primary human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) under well-defined flow rate. As shown, the CSCs were effectively captured to HPMCs at 0.03–0.15 dynes cm−2 (a physiologically relevant range of shear stress of the ascites14) with maximal activity at a shear stress of 0.05 dynes cm−2 (Fig. 2a), consistent with a catch bond that requires a clear threshold shear to initiate rolling15. Strikingly, both the kinetic and mechanical properties that govern tumor–mesothelial interaction were significantly different between the two CSCs populations. Compared with NM-CSC, M-CSCs had a higher tethering frequency (1.8-fold at 0.05 dynes cm−2) (Fig. 2a, Supplementary Fig. 1c) and lower rolling velocity (Fig. 2b, Supplementary Fig. 1d) on HPMCs, resulting in a higher percentage of firm adhesion of M-CSCs to HPMCs (2.3-fold at 0.05 dynes cm−2) (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Fig. 1e). Although HPMCs is sufficient to induce epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in certain contexts16, we showed that these cells retained their epithelial morphology with closely packed colonies of cells (Supplementary Fig. 2a) and N-cadherin and vimentin mRNA levels were similar between the primary culture and the later subculture (Supplementary Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure2

Differential capabilities of M- and NM-CSCs in rolling adhesion on HPMCs. a Percentage of tethering of M-CSCs and NM-CSCs on HPMCs. b CSCs rolling velocities on HPMCs monolayers. Each dot represents individual cancer spheroid. Dash lines: median velocity of two cell lines. c Percentage of adhesion of M-CSCs and NM-CSCs on HPMCs under different shear stress. Results are representative of three independent experiments. Error bars indicate SEM of the mean. n = 44/49 (0.03), 35/43 (0.04), 54/30 (0.05), 52/74 (0.07), 51/28 (0.1), 92/103 (0.15). Statistical analysis using chi-square test a, c and one-tailed unpaired Student’s t test b. ns, not significant. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

P-selectin mediates M-CSC-HPMC interaction under flow

HPMCs clearly showed constitutive cell surface expression of selectins (Fig. 3a, b). We also performed real-time PCR expression to verify the expression of E-, P-, and L-selectin. Like endothelial cells, used as a reference cell population, selectins are expressed on HPMCs, suggesting that their expression outside the vasculature is present, which are consistent with previous observations9,10 (Supplementary Fig. 2c). To determine which selectin on HPMCs plays a major role in capturing M-CSCs under flow, anti-selectin blocking antibodies were used. Treatment with anti-E-, P-, or L-selectin increased the rolling velocities of M-CSCs when compared with that of isotype control (24.8% increase by anti-E-selectin, 63.3% increase by anti-P-selectin, and 22.5% increase by anti-L-selectin in median rolling velocities) (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 3a). Notably, blockade of P-selectin almost completely abrogated (~ 88%) tumor–mesothelial adhesion at 0.05 dynes cm−2, whereas inhibition of E-selectin or L-selectin had partial effects (48% by anti-E-selectin; 28% by anti-L-selectin) (Fig. 3d, Supplementary Fig. 6b, Supplementary Video 1, 2). Consistently, significant adherence to P-selectin-Fc (59%), but not E-selectin- or L-selectin-Fc, was observed with M-CSCs (Fig. 3e, Supplementary Fig. 3,c), confirming a predominant role for P-selectin. In contrast, NM-CSCs did not show similar interactions with selectin-Fcs. We further showed that CSCs in ovarian cancer patients’ ascites utilized P-selectin-dependent binding as observed in M-CSCs, as tumor spheroids isolated from ascites rolled and adhered onto the P-selectin-Fc but not Fc control (Fig. 3f, Supplementary Video 3, 4). The P-selectin-Fc-mediated binding was shear-resistant and Ca2+-dependent. Once the M-CSCs had adhered to the HPMCs, the bonding between M-CSCs and HPMCs was strong that the M-CSCs can only be completely dissociated when a maximal shear stress of 4 dynes cm−2 was applied (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Treatment of M-CSCs with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) inhibited the adhesion of M-CSCs to HPMC (Supplementary Fig. 4b) and could easily detach the adherent M-CSCs from the HMPCs and P-selectin chimera, even at shear stress ~ 1 dynes cm−2 (Supplementary Fig. 4c).

Fig. 3
figure3

P-selectin regulates metastatic progression of M-CSCs. a Cell surface expression of selectins on HPMCs. E-selectin (E-sel), P-selectin (P-sel), L-selectin (L-sel). b Human omentum tissues stained with anti-selectin antibodies. Scale bar, 50 μm. c, d Rolling velocity c, adhesion percentage d of M-CSCs on HPMCs pre-incubated with anti-selectins antibodies or IgG at 0.05 dynes cm−2. n = 59, 45, 83, 48. e Percentage of CSCs adhesion onto selectin recombinant proteins or Fc at 0.05 dynes cm−2. n = 35/39, 46/45, 52/63, 54/52. f Percentage of patient ascites-derived tumors adhesion onto selectins at 0.05 dynes cm−2. n = 100, 131, 160, 247, tumor samples collected from three patients. Data (mean ± SEM) from one of three independent experiments, chi-square test df. g, h P-selectin wild-type (SelpWT) or knockout (Selp−/−) Rag2 deficiency mice orthotopically g or i.p. h inoculated with M-CSCs cells. Arrows: metastases. Scale bar, 1 cm. n = 6 mice (orthotopic) or nine mice (i.p.) from two independent experiments. i, j Representative image i and H&E staining i of primary tumors in the ovary. Arrows, tumors. Scale bars = 1 cm i or 50 μm j. k Fluorescent signal of tumor cells adherent on mouse peritoneum. M-CSCs derived from SKOV-3 (left, n = 3 mice) and patient samples (right, n = 6 mice, tumor samples collected from two patients). Data (mean ± SEM) from two independent experiments, unpaired Student’s t test i, k. ns, not significant. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01

P-selectin is required for peritoneal metastasis in vivo

Next, we took advantage of the Selp−/−Rag2−/− mice to study the requirement of P-selectin in intraperitoneal metastasis of M-CSCs. In mice with wild type P-selectin (SelpWT Rag2−/−), M-CSCs quickly disseminated throughout the peritoneal cavity after orthotopic or i.p. injection (Fig. 3g, h) with visible tumor nodules growing on the omentum, mesenteries and small bowels (Fig. 3g, h) and developed massive ascites (Supplementary Table 4). In contrast, the metastatic progression was markedly reduced in Selp−/− Rag2−/− mice (Fig. 3g, h) with no significant difference in primary tumor growth (Fig. 3i, j). To further confirm the role of P-selectin and to explore whether therapeutic agent against P-selectin is able to eliminate tumor-mesothelium adhesion, we tested KF38789, a selective inhibitor of P-selectin-mediated cell–cell adhesion in vivo. Concurrent with the above results, KF38789 significantly inhibited the extent of tumor metastases on the omentum, mesenteries, and peritoneal wall when treated 1 h prior to the injection of M-CSCs derived from both SKOV-3 and ovarian cancer patients (Fig. 3k), confirming the specific role for P-selectin in mediating M-CSCs adhesion.

sLex on an O-glycoprotein is P-selectin ligand on M-CSCs

Sialylation, fucosylation, and sulfation are the main features of P-selectin ligands17. As shown, the removal of sialic acid with neuraminidase reduced M-CSCs binding to HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc by ~ 50% (Fig. 4a). Notably, almost completely abolished M-CSCs binding to HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc was observed upon the removal of fucose with fucosidase (Fig. 4b), whereas inhibition of sulfation by sodium chlorate did not alter the binding activity (Fig. 4c), indicating that the binding between M-CSCs and HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc is highly fucosylation- and relatively weaker sialyation-, but not sulfation-dependent. We next examined the involvement of fucosylated and sialylated glycans, sLex or sLea, in mediating M-CSCs adhesion. As shown in Fig. 4d, e, preincubation of M-CSCs with anti-sLex-blocking antibody reduced binding of M-CSCs to HPMCs and P-selectin-Fc, whereas anti-sLea-blocking antibody did not affect the interaction. By flow cytometry, whereas M-CSCs, but not NM-CSCs, displayed reactivity of HECA-452 and CSLEX-1, which recognizes sLea/x and sLex, respectively, they showed no difference on anti-sLea (CA19-9) expression (Fig. 4f, Supplementary Fig. 5). We further found that sLex-containing glycan is modified on a protein but not a lipid, as protease (trypsin) treatment on M-CSCs almost completely abolished the adhesion of M-CSCs on both HPMCs and P-selectin-Fc (Fig. 4g), whereas glycolipid synthesis inhibitor (PPMP) treatment had no effect (Fig. 4h). Treatment of O-sialoglycoprotein endopeptidase (OSGE) substantially reduced the adhesion of M-CSCs on both HPMCs and P-selectin-Fc (Fig. 4i), whereas treatment of Peptide:N-glycosidase F (PNGase) for removal of N-glycans had no effect (Fig. 4j).

Fig. 4
figure4

sLex mediates M-CSCs interaction with P-selectin on HPMCs. ae Percentage of M-CSCs adhesion to HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc after treatment. a Neuraminidase treatment. n = 73/35, 46/108. b Fucosidase treatment. n = 98/153, 67/64. c NaClO3 treatment. n = 49/65, 35/89. d Anti-sLex treatment. n = 108/68, 89/71. e Anti-sLea treatment. n = 108/68, 89/71. f Cell surface expression of sLea/x on CSCs. Left: representative images of flow cytometry. Right: relative positive cell plot. n = 3. gj Percentage of M-CSCs adhered to HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc after treatment. g Trypsin treatment. n = 32/36; 28/68. h PPMP treatment. n = 77/37, 54/46. i OSGE treatment. n = 42/109, 54/95. j PNGase treatment. n = 42/31, 54/31. Data (mean ± SEM) from one of three independent experiments, chi-square test ae, gj, or from three biological replicates, unpaired Student t test f. ns, not significant. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01

P-selectin ligand on M-CSCs is mainly conferred by IGF-1R

To identify the protein presenting the sLex on M-CSCs that mediates the P-selectin interaction on HPMCs, we examined a set of inhibitors at effective concentrations that specifically target various cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK), including c-Met, EGFR, FGFR, and IGF-1R, which have been previously implicated in the progression of ovarian cancer18,19,20,21. We found that only genistein (general RTK inhibitor) and AG1024 (IGF-1R inhibitor) led to a marked decrease in the binding of M-CSCs to HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 6). Moreover, blockade of M-CSCs adhesion on HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc binding was observed with the anti-IGF-1R (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, endogenous IGF-1R could be readily detected in the P-selectin-Fc immunoprecipitate (Fig. 5c). Significant amount of sLex was detected in both IGF-1R subunits (Fig. 5d). The levels of phospho-IGF-1R were elevated soon upon P-selectin-Fc binding (Fig. 5e). These experiments were all performed in the absence of IGF-1, suggesting a ligand-independent activation of IGF-1R upon P-selectin binding. The known P-selectin ligands bearing sLex, such as CD24, was detected. However, unlike IGF-1R, there was no differential expression of CD24 between M-CSCs and NM-CSCs (Fig. 5f).

Fig. 5
figure5

The sLex-containing P-selectin ligand is IGF-1R-dependent. a, b Percentage of adherent M-CSCs after treatment with RTK inhibitors on HPMCs. Genistein, general RTK inhibitor; AG1024, IGF-1R inhibitor; AG1478, EGFR inhibitor; K252a, c-Met inhibitor; SU5402, FGF-1R inhibitor. n = 39, 36, 56, 20, 24, 24. b Percentage of M-CSCs adhesion to HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc after anti-IGF-1R treatment. n = 45/71, 70/72. Data (mean ± SEM) from one of three independent experiments, chi-square test a, b. c Presence of IGF-1R in the M-CSCs protein lysate pulled down with P-selectin-Fc. d Detection of HECA-452 antigen on IGF-1R of M-CSCs. e P-selectin binding on M-CSCs activates the phosphorylation of IGF-1R. f mRNA expression of CD24 (left) and IGF-1R (right) in M-CSCs and NM-CSCs. Data (mean ± SEM) from three biological replicates, n = 3, unpaired Student t test. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

FUT5 is critical for ovarian tumor progression

To further define the molecular properties that contribute to P-selectin binding, we examined the expression profile of glycosyltransferases involved in sLex synthesis (Fig. 6a) in M-CSCs and NM-CSCs. We found that several glycogenes, including B4GalT4, ST3Gal3, ST3Gal4, and FUT5, were significantly increased in M-CSCs when compared with NM-CSCs (Fig. 6a, Supplementary Fig. 7a). Similar higher expression of these genes on patients’ derived CSCs was also observed (Fig. 6a). The high mRNA expression of glycosyltransferases correlates with poorer progression-free survival in patients with advanced (stage III, IV) ovarian cancer (Supplementary Fig. 7b). Among these genes, we are particularly interested in FUT5, which encodes a rate-limiting enzyme α1,3-fucosyltransferase catalyzing the addition of fucose residue for sLex synthesis22,23. FUT5 knockdown abolished sLex cell surface expression on M-CSCs (Fig. 6b) and largely reduced the adhesion of M-CSCs to HPMCs and P-selectin-Fc under shear stress (Fig. 6c). Moreover, mice inoculated with orthotopic or i.p. xenograft (Fig. 6d) of M-CSCs carrying FUT5 shRNA had significantly reduced metastatic implants and ascites formation in the peritoneal cavity when compared with mice injected with nonspecific (NS) shRNA M-CSCs (Supplementary Table 5), with no apparent difference in primary tumor growth (Fig. 6e, f). Real-time PCR of tumor samples harvested from mice at the end of the study confirmed successful target gene knockdown of FUT5 (Fig. 6g).

Fig. 6
figure6

FUT5 is critical for ovarian cancer progression. a mRNA expression of glycogenes related with sLex biosynthesis. Left: schematic image indicating sLex biosynthesis. sLex is synthesized by sequential addition of N-acetylglucosamine (GalNAc), galactose (Gal), sialic acid (NeuAc), and fucose (Fuc) to the backbone catalyzed by N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases (GnTs), β1,4-Galactosyltransferase (B4GalT1-4), α 2,3-Sialyltransferases (ST3Gal3, 4, 6) and α 1,3-Fucosyltransferase (FUT3-7, 9). Middle: mRNA expression of glycogenes in M-CSCs and NM-CSCs. n = 3 per group. Right: mRNA expression of glycogenes in normal human ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells and M-CSCs collected from ovarian cancer patients (OvCa). n = 2 patients (OSE) or n = 4 (OvCa). Data represent as mean ± SEM, unpaired Student’s t test. b Detection of HECA-452 antigen on FUT5 knockdown M-CSCs. Data (mean ± SEM) from three biological replicates, n = 3, unpaired Student’s t test. c Percentage of FUT5 knockdown M-CSCs adhered onto HPMCs or P-selectin-Fc. n = 64/55, 67/35. Data (mean ± SEM) from one of three independent experiments, chi-square test. d Metastasis in mice with NS or FUT5 shRNA transduced M-CSCs orthotopic (upper) or i.p. (lower) xenograft model. Arrows: metastases. Scale bar, 1 cm. n = 3 mice (orthotopic) or six mice (i.p.). e, f Representative images e and H&E staining f of primary tumors in mice. Arrows, tumors. Scale bars = 1 cm e or 50 μm f. g FUT5 mRNA expression of in primary tumors. n = 3 mice per group. Data (mean ± SEM) from three biological replicates, n = 3, unpaired Student’s t test. Experiments were conducted two df or three ac, g times independently. ns, not significant. *P < 0.05. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

Discussion

Tumor microenvironment is one of the major factors controlling the metastatic progression; however, the detailed molecular mechanisms that operate the dissemination of ovarian cancer within the peritoneal cavity, particularly under ascitic shear stress, have not been explored. In this study, we have provided evidence that a sLex-bearing glycan on IGF-1R of ovarian M-CSCs interacts with P-selectin on HPMCs controls the tethering, rolling, and subsequent adhesion in peritoneal dissemination under shear stress.

Several lines of evidence suggest that CSCs may be a key player in the metastasis of ovarian cancer. First, ovarian CSCs are enriched in cells that can undergo epithelial–mesenchymal transition, a key process in metastasis24. Second, CSCs have higher tumorigenicity25. Third, ovarian cancer cells possess a stem-like gene signature correlates with poor progression-free and overall survival in cancer patients26. Fourth, the existence of these CSCs at an early stage of ovarian cancer is consistent with the frequent clinical observation of early metastasis2. In recent years, several studies in various cancer types, including breast and colorectal cancer, showed only a subpopulation of CSCs are able to metastasize27,28,29. In this report, we showed that the highly metastatic subpopulation CSCs in ovarian cancer ascites; and more importantly, we provided a detailed molecular understanding on their metastatic ability through a direct interaction with the peritoneal microenvironment, which not been studied in previous metastatic CSC models.

Very little is known about the selectin ligands on ovarian carcinoma cells30. Our present work has uncovered a sLex-bearing P-selectin ligand in ovarian cancer cells, which is distinct from those previously defined P-selectin ligands, in particular the well-known ligand PSGL-1, which bears tyrosine sulfation. Much evidence hinted the casual relationship between sLex and ovarian cancer metastasis. For example, antibodies against sLex epitope have been previously shown to react with human ovarian cancer cells31. Glycosyltransferases that catalyze the synthesis of sLex are significantly elevated in ovarian carcinoma tissues and cell lines32,33. High sLex expression is associated with poor survival of patients with ovarian cancer34. The sLex-bearing glycan present on M-CSCs binds P-selectin in a rigid fucosylation-dependent and relatively loose sialyation-dependent manner, instead of a simple sLex structure that relies equally on fucose and sialic acid moieties35. Such biochemistry is of biological significance, as fucosylation has been shown with increased affinity and bind selectin more efficiently36,37,38. Whereas sulfation is a common feature of P-selectin ligands39,40, our results suggest that the sLex-bearing glycan on M-CSCs does not require sulfation for its binding to P-selectin. There is evidence that sulfated moieties of P-selectin ligands tend to be more resilient to stress for binding under high shear conditions41.

Although consistent with a direct role for P-selectin in mediating the tumor–mesothelial interaction, our findings also appear to differ somewhat from those of a recent work to show the sLex-bearing P-selectin ligand10; however, the use of cells with different genetic backgrounds in this recent work may explain the difference. While CD24 expression is higher in some cell lines, the cell adhesion via P-selectin seems less, suggesting that there is other sLex-containing ligand(s) of P-selectin. Using carefully controlled conditions and in comparison with a non-metastatic counterpart, while we have also shown CD24 expression in M-CSCs and NM-CSCs, there was no differential expression on CD24, unlike IGF-1R, in M-CSCs and NM-CSCs, suggesting the importance of IGF-1R in mediating the adhesion of M-CSCs. Moreover, our findings are in agreement with a large literature that links IGF-1R with tumor progression.

The sLex-bearing P-selectin ligand is presented on IGF-1R, which is frequently overexpressed in ovarian cancer and other peritoneal metastasis models and confers a poor clinical prognosis42,43. Recently, sLex has been identified to be decorated on various unexpected proteins, and functions of the sLex are largely unknown44. IGF-1R, which to the best of our knowledge, has not been shown previously to possess sLex. Although incompletely understood, there is growing appreciation for a role of sLex in modulating protein activity. In gastric cancer cells, increased sLex of c-Met was associated with increased dimerization and phosphorylation, which resulted in increased c-Met-mediated signaling associated with tumor invasiveness45. Although we surmise that IGF-1R is functionally relevant for ovarian cancer progression and metastasis, our work suggests that blocking the sLex mediating IGF-1R will be required to provide a promising effect.

In addition, our findings underscore a critical role for FUT5 during the development and maintenance of the metastasis. Higher incidence of sLex in M-CSCs coincided with higher expression of glycosyltransferases. Ovarian cancer patients with FUT5-overexpressing tumors correlates with poorer survival compared with patients with low or no FUT5-expressing tumors. Importantly, blocking FUT5 expression in M-CSCs serves as an effective strategy for the treatment of peritoneal dissemination. Most of the glycosyltransferases genes involved in sLex synthesis are constitutively expressed to produce sLex direct precursor, whereas, FUTs encoding α1,3-fucosyltransferases catalyzing the last and rate-limiting step of sLex synthesis by adding fucose to the precursor are normally switched off22,23. Moreover, peritoneal colonization of gastric cancer cells was reported to be suppressed by the downregulation of FUT546. These data suggest that it is the context in which the glycan is expressed contributes to organotropism.

In summary, this study provides evidence showing P-selectin as a key molecule on HPMCs and IGF-1R carrying sLex on M-CSCs as a ligand in mediating peritoneal dissemination under ascitic flow-induced shear stress (Fig. 7). This research is not only relevant to ovarian cancer, but also applicable to other tumor types, such as breast and colon cancers, in which peritoneal metastasis is an important pathological process, indicating that sLex-P-selectin could become promising therapeutic targets.

Fig. 7
figure7

Schematic of sLex-P-selectin binding in peritoneal metastasis

Methods

Cells and cell culture

Human ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV-3 and HEYA8 (kind gifts from Dr. N. Auersperg at University of British Columbia and Dr. J. Liu at MD Anderson Cancer Center, respectively) were maintained in Medium 199:MCDB105 containing 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS). CSCs were enriched from luciferase-labeled SKOV-3 and HEYA8 through several generations of serum-free low adherent culture and stem-like properties were characterized as described12. HEK293 cells (CRL-1573, ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium containing 10% FBS. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (CC-2519, Clonetics) were cultured in F12K supplemented with 10% FBS, 20 μg mL−1 endothelial cells growth supplement, 90 U mL−1 heparin and 1% penicillin and streptavidin. Primary tumor samples were obtained from ovarian cancer patients with informed consent and approval by the Taipei Medical University Institutional Review Board and isolated as described25. The use of human tumor surgical specimens and tissue samples was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Board at the University of Hong Kong. Normal human ovarian surface epithelial (OSE) cells were derived from surface scrapings of normal ovaries from women with nonmalignant gynecological diseases. HPMCs isolated from dialysate effluent from peritoneal dialysis from patients with nonmalignant disorders47 were maintained in Medium 199:MCDB105 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% penicillin and streptavidin. HPMCs within three passages were used to ensure genetic stability of the culture.

Isolation of M-CSCs

CSCs (1 × 105) were injected into the ovary of NOD/SCID mouse (female, 6–8 weeks of age) to allow the formation of primary tumor and intraperitoneal dissemination. M-CSCs were collected from the ascites, whereas NM-CSCs were collected from the tumor burden remained in the ovary at 3 weeks’ post inoculation. M-CSCs or NM-CSCs were maintained in serum-free medium in low adherent culture dishes as early described. To further verify the tumorigenesis and metastasis potential of the isolated populations, NM-CSCs, or M-CSCs were orthotopically (1 × 105) or intraperitoneally (5 × 105) injected into NOD/SCID mice. Tumor burden was monitored by bioluminescence imaging and mice were harvested at 3–4 weeks post inoculation. All animal experiment protocols were approved by the Committee on the Use of Live Animals in Teaching and Research at the University of Hong Kong.

Antibodies

The antibodies or recombinant proteins used in the flow cytometry, western blot, immunohistochemistry, or microfluidic perfusion assays are detailed in the Supplementary Table 1.

RNA sequencing and TCGA data analysis

Total RNA extracted from three pairs of M-CSCs and NM-CSCs were sent to Beijing Genomics Institute for RNA sequencing (RNA-seq). Differential gene expression between M-CSCs and NM-CSCs was determined by a moderated t test with limma software. In total, 200 genes were identified upregulated in the M-CSCs compared with NM-CSCs (log2(fold-change) > 1 and P < 0.05), and 216 genes were identified downregulated (log2(fold-change) < −1 and P < 0.05). Hierarchical clustering was conducted on expression profile of 416 differentially expressed genes (DEG) and a high degree of internal consistency was discovered within each sample group. To discover whether M-CSCs could reflect the clinical metastatic process, we computed the fold-change of these genes in metastatic and non-metastatic tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) ovarian cancer RNA-seq data. To quantify the consistence, we conduct the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis of DEG in M-CSCs samples against the ranked gene list (from up- to downregulated) in TCGA ovarian metastatic tumors.

Flow cytometry

Cultured adherent cells or tumor spheroids were detached with 2 mM EDTA PBS, suspended in PBS and counted. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies, selectin-Fc chimeras (5 μg mL−1 in 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, PBS-binding buffer) or isotype control per the manufacturer’s instructions. The primary antibody or recombinant proteins were stained with appropriate Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibodies. Events were collected on FACS AriaIII (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc.) with gating strategy shown in Supplementary Fig. 8.

Microfluidics CSCs perfusion assay

Microfluidic chips were fabricated as described13. To coat microfluidic channels with selectin recombinant proteins, channels were incubated with 1 μg mL−1 selectin-Fc recombinant proteins in PBS at 4 °C overnight. To coat microfluidic channels with HPMCs, channels were incubated with 10 μg mL−1 human fibronectin in serum-free medium overnight at 4 °C. After wash, the channels were introduced with HPMCs suspension (3.5 × 106 mL−1) and cultured overnight under CO2 incubator at 37 °C. To functionally block selectins, HPMCs were incubated with 20 μg mL−1 anti-E-selectin, anti-P-selectin, anti-L-selectin or isotype antibody at room temperature for 1 h before the assays.

CSCs of 70–100 μm diameter were collected with cell strainer, fluorescently labeled with CMFDA Celltracker (2.5 µg mL−1, C7025, Life Technologies) as per manufacturer’s instructions for assays. Fluorescently labeled CSCs resuspended in binding buffer (1500 spheroids mL−1) were perfused into the microfluidic channel through a syringe pump (LongerPump) under desired shear stresses. The viscosity of the binding buffer (0.9 cp) is within the range of viscosity (0.95 ± 0.15 cp) of ascitic fluid in patients with various ascitic etiologies48. The motion of cancer spheroids was observed under fluorescent microscope (Nikon ECLIPSE Ti) and serial time lapse images (1  image  sec−1) were captured for 30 s. More than three randomly chosen areas (× 4 objective) were captured for each treatment.

The motion of cancer spheroids under flow was analyzed offline using Image J (National Institutes of Health) and used for the classification of interactions as described49. In brief, cancer spheroids that tethered to the surface, then detached in the flow were defined as tethering. Cancer spheroids that moved at a velocity below the hydrodynamic velocity for more than one spheroid diameter were defined as rolling. Cancer spheroids that remained stationary for more than one frame during recording were determined as adhesion. Percentage of tethering or adhesion was calculated by dividing the number of tethering or adherent spheroids by the total number of spheroids flew through the field of observation in the 30 s duration.

In some experiments, M-CSCs were incubated with or without neuramidase (100 mU, N2876, Sigma-Aldrich), α1,3/4-fucosidase (150 mU, P0769S, New England BioLabs), OSGE (100 μg mL−1, CLE100, Cedarlane) or PNGase (10 U mL−1, P0704S, New England BioLabs) according to the manufacturer’s instructions for 1 h at 37 °C prior staining. To inhibit sulfation, M-CSCs were incubated with sodium chlorate (25 mM, 403016, Sigma-Aldrich) in serum-free medium for 48 h. To functionally block sLex, sLea or IGF-1R on M-CSCs, M-CSCs were incubated with CSLEX-1 (10 μg mL−1, 551344, BD Biosciences), anti-CA19–9(10 μg mL−1, ab15146, Abcam), anti-IGF-1R (2 μg mL−1, 24–60, Invitrogen) or isotype antibodies for 1 h at 37 °C, respectively. To remove cell surface glycoprotein, M-CSCs were incubated with Trypsin/EDTA solution (0.05%, 25300054, Gibco) for 5 min and neutralized with the complete medium. To inhibit glycolipid synthesis, M-CSCs were cultured with or without DL-PPMP (2.5 μM, sc-205655, Santa Cruz) in serum-free medium for 5 days. To test the involvement of RTKs in mediating CSCs adhesion, M-CSCs were treated with or without small molecule inhibitors as indicated in the Supplementary Table 2 before perfusion. All CSC perfusion experiments were repeated with HPMCs isolated from at least three different patients.

Adhesion of tumor cells to the mouse peritoneum

M-CSCs (1 × 107) derived from SKOV-3 and ovarian cancer patients were fluorescently labeled with CMFDA and i.p. injected into NOD/SCID mice. To inhibit P-selectin, KF38789 (1 mg kg-1, 2748, Tocris) or vehicle control were injected into the peritoneal cavity of mice 1 h prior to cell injection. Mice were killed after 16 h and the peritoneal cavity was washed with PBS to remove non-adherent cells. Fluorescent signal from adherent tumor cells was acquired in the IVIS Spectrum and peritoneum, mesentery, and omentum were lysed with 1% NP-40 and fluorescence was measured with VICTOR (PerkinElmer).

P-selectin knockout Rag2 immunodeficiency mice

C57BL/6 Selp−/− (JAX #002289, The Jackson Laboratory) was crossbred with Rag2−/− (JAX #008449, The Jackson Laboratory) mice to generate Selp+/− Rag2+/− heterozygous offspring. The heterozygous offspring were further crossbred and to generate homozygous P-selectin wild type (SelpWT Rag2−/−) and P-selectin knockout (Selp−/− Rag2−/−) mice that were verified and selected with genotyping in the Jackson Lab. PCR genotyping of the Selp and Rag2 mutant was conducted with primers described in Supplementary Table 3. The homozygous strains were maintained by breeding between the mice with the same genotypes respectively. SKOV-3 M-CSCs were orthotopically inoculated (3 × 106) or i.p. injected (5 × 106) into SelpWT Rag2−/− or Selp−/− Rag2−/− mice (female, 6–8 weeks of age) and tumor metastatic progression was monitored as described.

Western blot

Proteins (20 μg) were resolved on sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gels and transferred to the nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). Target proteins were detected using specific primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibodies were detected with appropriate horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies and visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence (PerkinElmer). Scans of the full blots are shown in Supplementary Fig. 9.

Pull down assay

M-CSCs were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, and 1% Triton X-100, and protease inhibitors cocktail (phosphatase inhibitors 1 mM Na3VO4, 1 mM NaF and protease inhibitors 1 μg mL−1 pepstatin, 2 μg mL−1 leupeptin, 4 μg mL−1 aprotinin, 20  μg mL−1 phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride)). In total, 1 mg of cell lysate was precleared with 40 μL of Protein A/G Agarose beads for 1 h at 4 °C with agitation. Precleared lysate was incubated with 2  μg Fc or P-selectin-Fc chimera and 20 μL per tube Protein A/G agarose beads at 4 °C overnight with agitation. Precipitated beads were collected and washed with ice-cold lysis buffer. The P-selectin-Fc interacting proteins were eluted with elution buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 10 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton, protease inhibitors cocktail) on ice for 5 min. The eluate was collected and denatured by boiling with laemmli sample buffer for 10 min. Interaction of IGF-1R with P-selectin was detected by western blot.

Immunoprecipitation

Extracellular protein was extracted with 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, and protease inhibitor cocktail. Anti-IGF-1R (sc-463, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was immobilized on cyanogen bromide (CNBr)-activated sepharose (GE Healthcare) according to manufacturer’s instruction. CNBr-activated sepharose without coupling antibody was used as a negative control. Cell lysates were precleared with CNBr-activated sepharose for 2 h followed by overnight incubation with anti-IGF-1R or isotype control conjugated beads at 4 °C. The immunoprecipitates were washed with ice-cold lysis buffer and eluted with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and neutralized with 1 M Tris pH 8.8. The modification of sLea/x on IGF-1R was detected via Western blot.

Histological analysis

Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunohistochemistry detection was conducted on 5 μm formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human omentum tissue section collected from patients with nonmalignant disorders. Heat-induced antigen retrieval was conducted in pH 6.0 sodium citrate buffer. Monoclonal mouse anti-E-selectin, anti-P-selectin, and anti-L-selectin antibodies were used at 1:50 dilution. The streptavidin–biotin immunoperoxidase Histostain SP Bulk kit (Invitrogen) and ImmPACT AEC peroxidase substrate kit (Vector Laboratories) were applied for detection and hematoxylin was used as the nuclear counterstain.

RNA extraction, reverse transcription, and PCR

Total RNA was extracted with Trizol and 500 μg of RNA was reverse transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) using the first-stranded cDNA synthesis kit (Invitrogen). Specific genes were amplified and quantitated by real-time PCR using primers described in Supplementary Table 3. Real-time PCR was performed using the StepOnePlus real-time detection system and the Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Fluorescent measurements were recorded during each annealing step. The PCR quality and specificity were verified by melting curve analysis and gel electrophoresis. Relative expression was determined by normalizing to the GAPDH endogenous control. These experiments were carried out in duplicate and independently repeated three times.

FUT5 stable knockdown by shRNA

Lentiviruses carrying shRNA targeting FUT5 (sequence described in the Supplementary Table 3) or NS shRNA were generated by co-transfection of HEK293 cells with the constructs and lentiviral-packaging plasmids (Sigma-Aldrich) per the manufacturer’s instructions. M-CSCs were transduced with the viral particle containing media and cells were selected with 1 μg mL−1 puromycin (Calbiochem) 24 h post transduction for 3 days. The knockdown efficiency was verified by q-PCR.

Statistical analysis

Results represent mean ± SEM. The significance of differences between categorical variables was determined using the chi-square test. Ordinal variables were assessed using the one-tailed Student’s t test.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

The RNA sequencing data have been deposited in the NCBI Trace Archive under the accession code PRJNA530706. All the other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D. & Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics, 2019. CA Cancer J. Clin. 69, 7–34 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Lengyel, E. Ovarian cancer development and metastasis. Am. J. Pathol. 177, 1053–1064 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Massague, J. & Obenauf, A. C. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature 529, 298–306 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kipps, E., Tan, D. S. & Kaye, S. B. Meeting the challenge of ascites in ovarian cancer: new avenues for therapy and research. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 273–282 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    McEver, R. P. & Zhu, C. Rolling cell adhesion. Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26, 363–396 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Laubli, H. & Borsig, L. Selectins promote tumor metastasis. Semin Cancer Biol. 20, 169–177 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Friederichs, J. et al. The CD24/P-selectin binding pathway initiates lung arrest of human A125 adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res. 60, 6714–6722 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Dimitroff, C. J., Lechpammer, M., Long-Woodward, D. & Kutok, J. L. Rolling of human bone-metastatic prostate tumor cells on human bone marrow endothelium under shear flow is mediated by E-selectin. Cancer Res. 64, 5261–5269 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Gebauer, F. et al. Selectin binding is essential for peritoenal carcinomatosis in a xenograft model of human pancreatic adenocarcinoma in pfp-/rag2- mice. Gut 62, 741–750 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Carroll, M. J. et al. Alternatively-activated macrophages upregulate mesothelial expression of P-selectin to enhance adhesion of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Res. 78, 3560–3573 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nagy, J. A., Herzberg, K. T., Dvorak, J. M. & Dvorak, H. F. Pathogenesis of malignant ascites formation: initiating events that lead to fluid accumulation. Cancer Res. 53, 2631–2643 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Chau, W. K., Ip, C. K., Mak, A. S., Lai, H. C. & Wong, A. S. c-Kit mediates chemoresistance and tumor-initiating capacity of ovarian cancer cells through activation of Wnt/beta-catenin-ATP-binding cassette G2 signaling. Oncogene 32, 2767–2781 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ip, C. K. et al. Stemness and chemoresistance in epithelial ovarian carcinoma cells under shear stress. Sci. Rep. 6, 26788 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nagy, J. A. et al. Pathogenesis of ascites tumor growth: vascular permeability factor, vascular hyperpermeability, and ascites fluid accumulation. Cancer Res. 55, 360–368 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lawrence, M. B., Kansas, G. S., Kunkel, E. J. & Ley, K. Threshold levels of fluid shear promote leukocyte adhesion through selectins (CD62L,P,E). J. Cell Biol. 136, 717–727 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Yanez-Mo, M. et al. Peritoneal dialysis and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. N. Engl. J. Med 348, 403–413 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Varki, A. Selectin ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7390–7397 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Steele, I. A. et al. Induction of FGF receptor 2-IIIb expression and response to its ligands in epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncogene 20, 5878–5887 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Brokaw, J. et al. IGF-I in epithelial ovarian cancer and its role in disease progression. Growth Factors 25, 346–354 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Sawada, K. et al. c-Met overexpression is a prognostic factor in ovarian cancer and an effective target for inhibition of peritoneal dissemination and invasion. Cancer Res. 67, 1670–1679 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ellerbroek, S. M. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in epidermal growth factor-stimulated matrix metalloproteinase-9 production and cell surface association. Cancer Res. 61, 1855–1861 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    de Vries, T., Knegtel, R. M., Holmes, E. H. & Macher, B. A. Fucosyltransferases: structure/function studies. Glycobiology 11, 119R–128R (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lofling, J. & Holgersson, J. Core saccharide dependence of sialyl Lewis X biosynthesis. Glycoconj. J. 26, 33–40 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Yin, G. et al. Constitutive proteasomal degradation of TWIST-1 in epithelial-ovarian cancer stem cells impacts differentiation and metastatic potential. Oncogene 32, 39–49 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang, S. et al. Identification and characterization of ovarian cancer-initiating cells from primary human tumors. Cancer Res. 68, 4311–4320 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Vathipadiekal, V. et al. Identification of a potential ovarian cancer stem cell gene expression profile from advanced stage papillary serous ovarian cancer. PloS ONE 7, e29079 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Baccelli, I. et al. Identification of a population of blood circulating tumor cells from breast cancer patients that initiates metastasis in a xenograft assay. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 539–544 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dieter, S. M. et al. Distinct types of tumor-initiating cells form human colon cancer tumors and metastases. Cell Stem Cell 9, 357–365 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Pang, R. et al. A subpopulation of CD26+ cancer stem cells with metastatic capacity in human colorectal cancer. Cell Stem Cell 6, 603–615 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Elmasri, V. M., Casagrande, G., Hoskins, E., Kimm, D. & Kohn, E. C. Cell adhesion in ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat. Res. 149, 297–318 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Inoue, M., Fujita, M., Nakazawa, A., Ogawa, H. & Tanizawa, O. Sialyl-Tn, sialyl-Lewis Xi, CA 19-9, CA 125, carcinoembryonic antigen, and tissue polypeptide antigen in differentiating ovarian cancer from benign tumors. Obstet. Gynecol. 79, 434–440 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Escrevente, C. et al. Different expression levels of alpha3/4 fucosyltransferases and Lewis determinants in ovarian carcinoma tissues and cell lines. Int J. Oncol. 29, 557–566 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Wang, P. H. et al. Altered mRNA expressions of sialyltransferases in ovarian cancers. Gynecol. Oncol. 99, 631–639 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Saldova, R. et al. Ovarian cancer is associated with changes in glycosylation in both acute-phase proteins and IgG. Glycobiology 17, 1344–1356 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhou, Q. et al. The selectin GMP-140 binds to sialylated, fucosylated lactosaminoglycans on both myeloid and nonmyeloid cells. J. Cell Biol. 115, 557–564 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Toppila, S. et al. Enzymatic synthesis of alpha3’sialylated and multiply alpha3fucosylated biantennary polylactosamines. A bivalent [sialyl diLex]-saccharide inhibited lymphocyte-endothelium adhesion organ-selectively. Eur. J. Biochem 261, 208–215 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Phillips, M. L. et al. ELAM-1 mediates cell adhesion by recognition of a carbohydrate ligand, sialyl-Lex. Science 250, 1130–1132 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Listinsky, J. J., Siegal, G. P. & Listinsky, C. M. Alpha-L-fucose: a potentially critical molecule in pathologic processes including neoplasia. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 110, 425–440 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Aruffo, A. et al. CD62/P-selectin recognition of myeloid and tumor cell sulfatides. Cell 67, 35–44 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sako, D. et al. A sulfated peptide segment at the amino terminus of PSGL-1 is critical for P-selectin binding. Cell 83, 323–331 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rodgers, S. D., Camphausen, R. T. & Hammer, D. A. Tyrosine sulfation enhances but is not required for PSGL-1 rolling adhesion on P-selectin. Biophys. J. 81, 2001–2009 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Spentzos, D. et al. IGF axis gene expression patterns are prognostic of survival in epithelial ovarian cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 14, 781–790 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Takahari, D. et al. Relationships of insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor expression to clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncology 76, 42–48 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Varki, A. et al. Essentials of Glycobiology. 2nd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Gomes, C. et al. Expression of ST3GAL4 leads to SLe(x) expression and induces c-Met activation and an invasive phenotype in gastric carcinoma cells. PloS ONE 8, e66737 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Padro, M., Cobler, L., Garrido, M. & de Bolos, C. Down-regulation of FUT3 and FUT5 by shRNA alters Lewis antigens expression and reduces the adhesion capacities of gastric cancer cells. Biochim Biophys. Acta 1810, 1141–1149 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Yung, S., Li, F. K. & Chan, T. M. Peritoneal mesothelial cell culture and biology. Perit. Dial. Int 26, 162–173 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Gokturk, H. S. et al. The role of ascitic fluid viscosity in the differential diagnosis of ascites. Can. J. Gastroenterol. 24, 255–259 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Chen, S., Alon, R., Fuhlbrigge, R. C. & Springer, T. A. Rolling and transient tethering of leukocytes on antibodies reveal specializations of selectins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3172–3177 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grant Council grants 17122014. A.S.T.W. is a recipient of the Croucher Senior Fellowship.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.-S.L. and C.K.M.I. designed and performed the experiments and analyzed the results. M.Y.H.T. fabricated the microfluidic chip. Y.T. and J.W.Z conducted RNA-seq data analysis. A.A.H established FUT5 stable knockdown cell lines. A.S.C.M. isolated M-/NM-CSCs lines. S.Y. and T.M.C provided primary HPMCs and human omentum specimens. P.P.I. and H.-C.L. provided ovarian tumor specimens. C.L.L. and P.C.N.C. advised and assisted characterization of the glycan. T.O.L. guided the development of double knockout mice. M.K.S.T. helped with the tumor xenograft experiments. J.Z., H.C.S., and A.S.T.W. designed and supervised the study. S.-S.L., C.K.M.I., H.C.S., and A.S.T.W. wrote the manuscript and all authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ho Cheung Shum or Alice S. T. Wong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Manuel López-Cabrera, Noriko Gotoh and other anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, SS., Ip, C.K.M., Tang, M.Y.H. et al. Sialyl Lewisx-P-selectin cascade mediates tumor–mesothelial adhesion in ascitic fluid shear flow. Nat Commun 10, 2406 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10334-6

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links