Observation of an oxonium ion intermediate in ethanol dehydration to ethene on zeolite


Zeolite-catalyzed dehydration of ethanol offers promising perspectives for the sustainable production of ethene. Complex parallel-consecutive pathways are proposed to be involved in the reaction network of ethanol dehydration on zeolites, where the initial step of ethanol dehydration is still unclear particularly for the favorable production of ethene at lower temperature. Here we report the observation of a triethyloxonium ion (TEO) in the dehydration of ethanol on zeolite H-ZSM-5 by using ex situ and in situ solid-state NMR spectroscopy. TEO is identified as a stable surface species on the working catalyst, which shows high reactivity during reaction. Ethylation of the zeolite by TEO occurs at lower temperature, leading to the formation of surface ethoxy species and then ethene. The TEO-ethoxide pathway is found to be energetically preferable for the dehydration of ethanol to ethene in the initial stage, which is also supported by theoretical calculations.


Ethene is one of the most important commodity chemicals, which is currently produced by cracking processes from petroleum. Due to the large availability of bioethanol from renewable biomass sources and the dwindling of fossil resource1, the conversion of ethanol to ethene and higher hydrocarbons now is receiving increasing attention from both academia and industry2,3. Among of the heterogeneous catalysts studied, zeolites especially ZSM-5 or modified ZSM-5 are the promising catalysts as they can be tuned to exhibit higher activity than the traditional alumina-based catalysts4,5,6,7,8,9: the reaction temperature is lower and a low concentration of ethanol aqueous solution can be used. The formation of ethene is the first step in ethanol dehydration; subsequent polymerization, cracking and aromatization by the secondary reaction of ethene leads to the formation of longer-chain hydrocarbons10, very similar to the formation of hydrocarbons in the conversion of methanol over zeolites11,12. The detailed knowledge of the reaction mechanism of ethene formation in ethanol dehydration is important not only for understanding ethanol dehydration as a model reaction of alcohol conversion but also for the development of improved catalysts for light olefins production.

The formation of ethene in the initial dehydration process has been experimentally13,14,15 and theoretically16,17,18,19 investigated. A parallel-consecutive route was proposed3: dehydration of ethanol to ethene and diethyl ether in parallel and a consecutive decomposition of diethyl ether to ethene. In the unimolecular dehydration of ethanol to ethene, it was proposed that the acidic proton transfers from the zeolite to the OH group on ethanol, which subsequently releases water to form an intermediate such as carbocation or an alkoxide bound to zeolite. Solid-state NMR and infrared spectroscopic studies16,20,21 confirmed the formation of surface-bound ethoxy species as a stable intermediate in ethanol dehydration of on H-ZSM-5 and HY zeolites. Ethene and hydrocarbons are formed by the subsequent decomposition of the surface ethoxy species.

Diethyl ether (DEE) is concurrently produced with ethene, and the kinetic and spectroscopic studies revealed that intermolecular dehydration of ethanol leads to DEE via dimeric ethanol species or reaction of an ethoxy group with undissociated ethanol on zeolites13,22,23. The following cracking of DEE produces ethene, which occurs preferably at lower reaction temperatures as compared to the unimolecular dehydration of ethanol to ethene14,24. Note that the ethoxy species was generally proposed to be the direct precursor to ethene. However, the generation of such species is still not well understood. Thus, although different reaction schemes have been proposed, the detailed mechanism of the initial step of ethanol dehydration remains elusive, particularly for the favorable production of ethene from DEE at lower temperature.

Here we report the observation and identification of reaction intermediates in ethanol dehydration to ethene over zeolite H-ZSM-5. The ex situ and in situ solid-state NMR spectroscopy allows for exploration of the dehydration of ethanol at the initial stage. A triethyloxonium ion (TEO) is observed as a potential active intermediate on the working catalyst. We provide evidence for the involvement of TEO in the formation of surface ethoxy species and then ethene on the zeolite. The elementary reactions leading to the formation of ethene are identified by combining experiments and theoretical calculations, which suggests that a TEO-mediated reaction route is operative for the dehydration of ethanol to ethene.


Observation of TEO

H-ZSM-5 (Si/Al = 11.5, Zeolyst) was used for the dehydration of ethanol. The XRD and 27Al and 29Si solid-state NMR spectra show structure information of the H-ZSM-5 catalyst (Supplementary Fig. 1 and 2). The acidic property was examined by FT-IR and NH3-TPD (Supplementary Fig. 3 and 4). The reactions were conducted in a pulse-quench reactor25, in which ethanol was pulse-injected at temperatures ranging from 160 to 350 °C and allowed to react for 4 s under continuous He carrier gas flow before the reaction was thermally quenched by pulsing liquid nitrogen onto the catalyst bed. The reaction effluent was analyzed by GC (Supplementary Fig. 5). Ethene is the only product at 160–200 °C, indicating that the dehydration of ethanol to ethene is favorable at lower temperature. With increasing reaction temperature, the secondary reaction of ethene leads to the formation of C3+ products including olefins and aromatics.

Figure 1 shows the ex situ 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of trapped products from the dehydration of 13C-1-enriched ethanol (CH313CH2OH, 99% 13C) on H-ZSM-5 at 160–350 °C for 4 s. Ethanol and DEE are observed as reflected by the strong signals at 62.5 and 69.0 ppm respectively, due to the 13C-enriched methylene carbons; the methyl carbons produce the weak signals at 12–17 ppm. The adsorbed species formed at 200 °C were further analyzed by two-dimensional (2D) 1H–13C HETCOR NMR experiment (Supplementary Fig. 6). A weak signal at 72.8 ppm that was seriously overlapped by the ethanol signal (69.0 ppm) in the 1D 13C NMR spectra was clearly discerned in the 2D spectrum, which can be ascribed to the methylene carbon of ethoxy group. The formation of the alkoxy species was well established in methanol and ethanol dehydration on acidic zeolites. Hunger et al.20 reported the surface ethoxy species from ethanol dehydration on HY zeolite, which has a chemical shift of 72.6 ppm.

Fig. 1

13C NMR analysis of the formed surface species on zeolite. 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of trapped species on H-ZSM-5 obtained from reaction of CH313CH2OH for 4 s at different temperatureof 160 °C–350 °C (a-e). Asterisks denote spinning sidebands

Interestingly, a well-resolved signal appears at 85.0 ppm (Fig. 1) and grows up at intermediate temperature. The oligomeric alkoxy species formed by the oligomerization of ethene on acidic zeolites were previously proposed to produce broad signals at 78.0 to 90.0 ppm in the literatures20,26. Since there is no any C3+ species formed at this reaction condition, the oligomerization of ethene did not likely occur in our case. Furthermore, no methylene signals at 20.0 to 40.0 ppm can be observed that are supposed to be oligomerized compounds27. Therefore, the 85.0 ppm signal should not be ascribed to the oligomeric alkoxy species. Instead, we proposed on the basis of its chemical shift the formation of alkyl-substituted oxonium ions. Munson and Haw reported the formation of trimethyloxonium ion (TMO) with a characteristic 13C NMR signal at 80.0 ppm by the reaction of dimethyl ether on H-ZSM-528, and they also confirmed that TMO was not an intermediate in the methanol to hydrocarbons conversion. Since DEE is readily formed and in equilibrium with ethanol (Fig. 1b), we assume that a triethyloxoium ion (TEO) may be formed.

To gain insights into the structure of TEO, a 13C–13C J-based refocused INADEQUATE (Incredible Natural Abundance Double Quantum Transfer Experiment)29 MAS NMR experiment was performed, which provides an unambiguous identification of bond connectivity of carbon species. The INADEQUATE spectrum (Fig. 2) of H-ZSM-5 reacted with 13CH313CH2OH at 200 °C for 4 s exhibits a clear correlation peak pair between the methylene carbon at 85.0 ppm and the methyl carbon at 12.0 ppm, confirming the formation of TEO that is composed of ethyl groups. Two other correlations are identified, showing the connectivity of the methylene carbons of DEE (69.0 ppm) and ethanol (62.5 ppm) to the corresponding methyl carbons at 12.8 and 17.0 ppm, respectively. The structure of TEO was also theoretically optimized in the H-ZSM-5 channel by periodic density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Supplementary Fig. 7). The 13C chemical shift of the methylene carbon of TEO is predicted to be 84.6 ppm, in good agreement with the experimental value. Therefore, our NMR experiments and theoretical calculations provide solid evidence for TEO formation in the ethanol dehydration process.

Fig. 2

Identification of triethyloxoium ion by correlation NMR spectroscopy. 2D 13C–13C INADEQUATE MAS NMR spectrum of trapped species obtained from the reaction of 13CH313CH2OH on H-ZSM-5 at 220 °C for 4 s

For the adsorbed species formed on H-ZSM-5 after reaction at 200 °C for 4 s, the amount of TEO (85.0 ppm), ethoxy (72.8 ppm), DEE (69.0 ppm) and ethanol (62.5 ) was determined by 13C NMR experiment to be 0.34, 0.46, 28.76 and 6.99 mmol/g, respectively. TEO and the ethoxy species are solely formed and located on Brønsted acid sites for charge compensation, while DEE and ethanol are trapped over zeolite via either chemical or physical adsorption. Considering the total Brønsted acid sites (about 1.03 mmol/g) on the catalyst, the amount (less than 0.23 mmol/g) of DEE adsorbed on Brønsted acid sites should be lower than that (0.34 mmol/g) of TEO at this reaction condition. At temperature above 300 °C (Fig. 2d, e), the 85.0 ppm signal is almost unobservable, which can be ascribed to the decomposition of TEO. In the meantime, the secondary reaction of ethene produces the dominating C3+ hydrocarbons, reflected by the strong high-field signals below 30.0 ppm. The signals at 147.3–156.3, 243.6–255.7 and 47.6 ppm are characteristics of the cyclic cations such as dimethylcyclopentenyl and ethylcyclopentenyl ions30,31,32, which are usually involved in the formation of aromatics. This implies that the aromatics-based cycle prevails in a similar route to the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons33,34.

Reactivity and intermediate role of TEO

In order to explore the reactivity of TEO, continuous-flow 13CH313CH2OH conversion over H-ZSM-5 was investigated by in situ 13C NMR spectroscopy (see methods section for details of the in situ NMR experiments). Figure 3 shows the real-time monitoring of formed surface species on H-ZSM-5 in the ethanol dehydration process. At a constant reaction temperature of 220 °C (Fig. 3a), the appearance of 85.0 ppm signal after 200 s points to the formation of TEO. The broad signal centered at 58.5 ppm should come from the adsorbed ethanol, whose methyl group produces a high-field strong signal at 15.0 ppm. Note that the methylene group of DEE (69.0 ppm) is invisible in the in situ experiment. This is probably due to the strong adsorption of DEE on zeolite, leading to large anisotropic interactions (chemical shifts and nuclear dipole-dipole couplings) which cannot be efficiently removed by the low magic spinning speed (2 kHz). However, the formation of DEE is evidenced by the 12.5 ppm signal due to its methyl group featured by high mobility. TEO is observable with increasing the reaction time up to 1200 s (20 min), indicative of its stability at the moderate reaction temperature. The GC analysis of the effluent products obtained from the reaction with time-on-stream shows the formation of ethene and a small amount of higher hydrocarbons (Supplementary Fig. 8). Figure 3b shows the in situ 13C NMR spectra obtained at elevating temperatures. The TEO is observable over a wide temperature range. The formation of hydrocarbons prevails at higher temperatures as reflected by a set of high-filed signals (8.7–32.6 ppm) while the TEO is significantly reduced due to its decomposition, consistent with the ex situ NMR result (Fig. 1). In comparison, the structurally similar species TMO formed on H-ZSM-5 was readily decomposed before the onset of hydrocarbon synthesis35,36.

Fig. 3

Real-time NMR monitoring of ethanol dehydration on zeolite. In situ 13C MAS NMR spectra of 13CH313CH2OH conversion on H-ZSM-5 with time on stream (a) and at elevating temperatures (b). Spectra (a) were recorded at every 30 s from 0 to 1200 s at 220 °C and 30 scans were accumulated for each time slice. Spectra (b) were recorded at every 10 °C from 160–260 °C and 900 scans were accumulated for each temperature slice. The 1D spectra on the top are recorded at 840 s (a) and 250 °C (b), respectively

To confirm the intermediate role of TEO in the formation of ethene, the 13C NMR spectra of trapped species obtained from the pulse-quench reactions of CH313CH2OH were recorded during the reaction course of 4~64 s at 250 °C. Figure 4a shows the expanded spectra and their deconvolutions (see Supplementary Fig. 9 for the whole spectra), in which the formation and evolution of TEO (85.0 ppm) is evident. We know from above experiments that the ethoxy species (72.8 ppm) is simultaneously produced, which is confirmed by 2D 1H–13C HETCOR MAS NMR (Supplementary Fig. 6). Comparison of the integrated 13C signal intensities shows that the ethoxy species keeps a similar evolution trend with TEO (Supplementary Table 1). Thus, the formation of surface ethoxy species is most likely related to TEO. Furthermore, TEO was deliberately prepared by an ion exchange of triethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate with H-ZSM-5. The formation of surface TEO on H-ZSM-5 is confirmed by its characteristic signal at 85.0 ppm in the 13C NMR spectra (Fig. 4b). The concentration of TEO determined by 13C MAS NMR is about 1 mmol/g, comparable to the amount (1.03 mmol/g) of Brønsted acid site. Importantly, the isolation of stable TEO at room temperature allows us to unambiguously trace its reactivity and transformation on the catalyst. After heating, TEO was partially converted into ethoxy species (at 72.8 ppm) and DEE (at 69.0 ppm) at lower temperature of 80 °C, while higher temperature (200 °C) led to its complete conversion. We also obtained the activation energy for the formation of ethoxy species from TEO by measuring the rate constants at different temperatures using 13C MAS NMR spectroscopy (Supplementary Fig. 10). The experimentally determined activation energy is ca.77.3 kJ/mol. It is worth noting that a large quantity of ethene was observed in the effluent product upon the consumption of TEO by GC (Supplementary Fig. 11). These results demonstrate a direct correlation of TEO to ethoxy species and ethene product.

Fig. 4

Evolution of TEO in the formation of ethene. 13C CP MAS NMR spectra of trapped species on H-ZSM-5 obtained from pulse-quench reactions of CH313CH2OH at 250 oC for different time (a) and 13C MAS NMR spectra of TEO-ZSM-5 at room temperature (RT), heated at 80 °C for 5 min, and at 200 °C for 5 min (b). The deconvoluted components are indicated in color

Mechanism of ethene formation via TEO

Our experimental observations indicate a strong potential of TEO serving as an active intermediate in the formation of ethene. A whole reaction network for ethanol dehydration to ethene was proposed (Fig. 5), which includes the previously theoretically predicted unimolecular and bimolecular processes17,19 and our proposed TEO-mediated routes. It consists of three types of mechanisms: direct ethanol dehydration to ethene (route 5, 6, 7 and 8), diethyl ether decomposition to ethene (route 3 and 4) and TEO-mediated ethene formation (route 1 and 2). DFT calculations were performed to explore the most favorable ethene formation route and the optimized transition state structures on the zeolite cluster model (Supplementary Fig. 12) are displayed in Supplementary Fig. 13. Our calculations show that all the kinetic steps of ethanol dehydration are endothermic processes (Supplementary Table 2). The calculated Gibbs free energy barrier (Supplementary Fig. 1418 for the energy diagrams), pre-exponential factor, and rate coefficient at 473 K of the forward and reverse reactions are tabulated in Table 1. The comparison of energy barriers and rate coefficients indicates that the direct dehydration processes (steps 9, 10, 15 and 16) are energetically less favorable for ethene formation, in agreement with the previous work17.

Fig. 5

Proposed catalytic cycle for ethanol dehydration to ethene. The structures of transition states (TS) involved in these reaction steps are depicted in Supplementary Fig. 13. * indicates the adsorbed state

Table 1 Reaction Gibbs free energy barrier (∆Gact, kJ mol−1), pre-exponential factor(A, s−1), and rate coefficient (k, s−1) at 473 K of the forward (f) and reverse reactions (r) for the elementary step associated with the eight ethene production routes

Compared with the direct ethanol dehydration routes (route 5, 6, 7 and 8), the two molecules mediated route 4 including dimer-mediated etherification (∆Gact(f) = 129.0 kJ/mol, kf = 5.54 × 10−2 s−1, step 4) and the following DEE decomposition to ethene (∆Gact(f) = 136.1 kJ mol−1, kf = 9.24 × 10−3 s−1, step 11) is favorable for ethanol dehydration to ethene, in agreement with the previous report that the reaction path via DEE is preferentially involved in ethene formation at temperatures lower than 500 K17. It is reasonable to assume that TEO would be readily formed due to the facile formation of DEE. This is confirmed by a free energy barrier of ca. 94.1 kJ mol−1 for the formation of TEO from DEE (step 6), which is much lower than that of DEE decomposition routes (∆Gact(f) = 136.1 kJ/mol for step 11 in route 4 and ∆Gact(f) = 155.9 kJ mol−1 for step 12 in route 3). We have experimentally observed that the ethoxy species and DEE can be produced from TEO on H-ZSM-5 (Fig. 4). This can be understood by the fact that TEO ethylates the conjugate base site of zeolite to form a framework-bound ethoxy species with the release of a DEE, which shows the characteristic property of trialkyloxonium ions acting as an powerful alkylating agent37. This process is calculated to have an activation energy of 73.6 kJ mol−1 (step 7, Supplementary Table 2), in good agreement with our experimental value (77.3 kJ mol−1), strongly supporting the formation of ethoxy via TEO intermediate. The low free energy barrier of step 8 (107.6 kJ mol−1) suggests the transformation of ethoxy species to ethene can readily occur. Moreover, the calculated electronic energy barrier for the conversion of ethoxy species to ethene (127.6 kJ mol−1, Supplementary Table 2) is similar to the experimentally estimated value (ca. 122 kJ mol−1) for the decomposition of ethoxy species to ethene on H-ZSM-538. The direct decomposition of TEO into ethene (step 13 in route 2) is also considered, which is however characterized by a higher free energy barrier (127.7 kJ mol−1). A full comparison of free energy barriers and rate coefficients of the rate-determination steps in the proposed reaction network indicates that route 1 (steps 4, 6, 7, 8) and route 2 (steps 4, 6, 13) involving TEO intermediate are the most favorable routes. Thus, concerning the overall kinetics during the ethanol dehydration to ethene, the presence of TEO provides an energetically preferable process at lower reaction temperature.


The dehydration of ethanol to ethene over H-ZSM-5 has been investigated by combined experiments and DFT calculations. Our ex situ and in situ solid-state NMR data provide the evidence for the formation of TEO in the dehydration process. Generally, onium ions that are often isolable as salts are well recognized as reaction intermediates37. It was reported that trimethyloxonium can be generated on H-ZSM-5 zeolite. However, mechanistic significance of trimethyloxonium is uncertain since its intermediate role for the initial C–C bond formation in methanol conversion was excluded based on experimental observations27,28. Herein, TEO is formed as a stable surface species on the working catalyst in both continuous-flow and pulse-quench reactions. We calculated the host-guest interaction free energy of TEO confined in the H-ZSM-5 channel, which is as low as −360.2 kJ mol−1 at 473 K, indicating that the zeolite framework can stabilize TEO intermediate effectively.

The implications of the observation of TEO in ethanol dehydration to ethene in present work are manifold. The ethoxy species is often experimentally observed during ethanol dehydration on zeolite, which is generally considered as the precursor to ethene in both processes of unimolecular dehydration of ethanol and bimolecular dehydration of ethanol followed by DEE decomposition. DEE is largely formed in the initial stage of dehydration of ethanol and its coverage on acid sites is estimated to be comparable to TEO at lower temperature (e.g., 473 K). The presence of TEO provides an energetically favorable mechanism to link DEE and ethoxy species, which is viable for the formation of ethene at low temperature. In the onium-ylide mechanism proposed for the C–C bond formation from C1 compound such as methanol and DME on zeolite, Olah et al. predicated the intermediate formation of ethyldimethyloxonium, which could undergo β-elimination to yield ethene and DME39. Analogously, the direct deprotonation and decomposition of TEO could lead to ethene and DEE on zeolites (route 2), which, however, occurs with a relatively higher energy barrier. We have experimentally shown that TEO tends to alkylate basic site (Si–O–Al) of zeolite to form surface ethoxy species, which in nature resembles the alkyloxonium salt featured by strong alkylating ability in organic synthesis. This result indicates the reactivity of alkyloxonium ion could be altered by the zeolite catalyst, which leads to different reaction routes. Although the alkyloxonium ion (i.e., a protonated alcohol) has long been proposed as a key intermediate in the dehydration of alcohol to produce alkenes and ethers particularly in strong liquid acid systems, the detailed characterizations of TEO in the ethanol dehydration process in this work provide an example of uncovering the important role of this kind of intermediate in the formation of ethene on zeolite catalysts, which may open avenues for further experimental and theoretical exploration of the oxonium ions chemistry in alcohol conversion.


X-ray power diffraction (XRD)

The ammonium form ZSM-5 (Si/Al = 11.5, obtaind from Zeolyst) was calcined in air at 823 K for 5 h to obtain the proton form H-ZSM-5. The structure and crystalline nature of H-ZSM-5 zeolites were examined by X-ray diffractometer (X’Pert3 Powder) using a CuKα radiation with a step of 0.02° at a respective voltage of 40 kV and a current of 40 mA.

FT-IR of pyridine adsorption

The FT-IR of pyridine adsorption measurements were performed on a Bruker Tensor 27 spectrometer. The catalysts were first activated at 773 K under high vacuum (<10−5 Pa) for 12 h. After cooling down to 313 K, a background spectrum was collected. Excessive amount of pyridine was then introduced to the infrared cell and held for 2 h to allow equilibrium. The residual pyridine was removed by vaccum. The FT-IR spectra of pyridine-adsorbed samples were measured at 313 K after evacuation at 373, 473, 573, 673 and 773 K, respectively.

Temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (NH3-TPD)

The NH3-TPD measurement was performed using a FINESORB-3010 chemisorption instrument. Typically, 100 mg of sample was pre-treated at 423 K for 1 h under 30 sccm of helium gas. After the sample cooled down to 323 K, NH3 was introduced and held for 1 h. The temperature was then elevated from 323 to 1023 K at a ramping rate of 10 K/min and the desorbed NH3 was detected by a thermal conductivity detector (TCD).

Catalytic testing

The H-ZSM-5 powder was pressed into pellets between 60–80 mesh. The pellets (0.2 g) were activated at 400 °C in flowing helium for 1 h prior to the ethanol dehydration reactions. A pulse-quench reactor was used to quench the reaction by reducing the reaction temperature with liquid nitrogen within a very short period (<1 s)25. Typically, when the reaction proceeded in a pulse-quench reactor for a pre-set period, the reaction was thermally quenched by pulsing liquid nitrogen onto the catalyst bed, which was achieved by using high-speed valves controlled by GC computer. In each case, 10 μl of reactant was pulsed into the reactor (heated at 160–350 °C) containing 0.2 g H-ZSM-5 and allowed to react for different time, before quenching by liquid nitrogen. The trapped surface species were analyzed by 13C solid-state NMR spectroscopy and the effluent products were on line determined by GC-MS analysis. For the continuous flow reaction, ethanol with a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 2 h−1 was reacted over the H-ZSM-5 (0.2 g) pellets in a fixed bed reactor at the temperature range of 140–260 °C.

Gas chromatography

The effluent products drawn from the flowing gas were analyzed quantitatively by online GC-FID chromatograph (Shimadzu GC-2010 plus) which equipped with a flame-ionization detector and a Supelco Supel-QTM PLOT capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 15 μm). The initial temperature programming started at 40 °C (maintained for 2 min), followed by a rate of 5 °C min−1 to 132.5 °C and a rate of 10 °C min−1 to the final temperature of 220 °C. The retained products in the catalyst was directly analyzed by solid-state NMR spectroscopy (see the following).

Preparation of triethyloxoium ion (TEO) on H-ZSM-5

A concentration of 0.2 g of H-ZSM-5 zeolite (Si/Al = 11.5) was dehydrated on a vacuum line (<10−3 Pa) at 400 °C for 12 h. After dehydration, the sample was allowed to cool down to room temperature for subsequent use. A concentration of 0.3 g triethyloxonium tetrafluoroborate (Aldrich) was added into 3 g dry dichloromethane solvent, and then the dehydrated zeolite sample was added into the solution. All the operations were carried out in a glovebox filled with pure N2. After ultrasonic treatment of the mixture in ice water bath at 0 °C for 20 min, the mixtrue was filtrated and evacuated completely and the sample was dried at room tempearture for 5 h by vacuum. The obtianed triethyloxoium ion (TEO) exchanged ZSM-5 zeolite was denoted as TEO-ZSM-5.

Solid-State NMR experiments

After the reaction was quenched, the pulse-quench reactor containing the catalyst was sealed. The sealed reactor was then transferred to a glove box filled with pure N2 and the catalyst was packed into to an NMR rotor for ex situ NMR measurements. To enhance the detection sensitivity, 13C labeled ethanol was used for 13C NMR experiments in both the pulse-quench and the in situ reactions.

All the ex-situ 13C solid-state NMR spectroscopy experiments were carried out at 9.4 T on a Bruker Avance III-400 spectrometer, equipped with a 4 mm probe, with resonance frequencies of 399.33 and 100.42 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. The magic angle spinning rate was set to 10 kHz. For the 1H → 13C CP/MAS NMR experiments, the Hartmann-Hahn condition was achieved using hexamethylbenzene (HMB), with a contact time of 5 ms and a repetition time of 2 s. The hpdec 13C MAS NMR experiments were performed using a 13C 90-degree pulse length of 5 μs and a recycle delay of 5 s. The 13C chemical shifts were referenced to HMB (a second reference to TMS).

The 27Al MAS NMR spectra were also acquired on the same 4 mm probe by small-flip angle technique with a pulse length of 0.3 μs (<π/12) and a recycle delay of 1 s. The magic angle spinning rate was set to 10 kHz. The 27Al chemical shifts were referenced to 1 M Al(NO3)3 aqueous solution (0 ppm). 29Si MAS NMR experiments were carried out at 7.1T on a Varian Infinity plus-300 spectrometer, with resonance frequencies of 299.78 and 70.11 MHz for 1H and 29Si, respectively. Single-pulse 29Si MAS NMR spectra with high power proton decoupling were recorded on a 7.5 mm probe, using a π/2 pulse of 5 μs, a recycle delay of 80 s and a spinning rate of 4 kHz. The 29Si chemical shifts were referenced to kaolinite (−91.5 ppm).

2D 1H –13C CP HETCOR experiment was performed using a Avance III 800 spectrometer operating at a 1H Larmor frequency of 800.36 MHz and a 4 mm HCN E-free probe at a spinning frequency of 12 kHz. The 1H π/2-pulse length was 4.85 μs. 13C magnetization was created using a cross-polarization (CP) ramp of magnitude 80 to 100% with a contacted time of 5 ms. 256 transients were co-added using a recycle delay of 2 s. A total of 256 t1 FIDs were recorded at increments of 3.19 ms using the States-TPPI method to achieve sign discrimination in F1. 1H SPINAL-6440 decoupling was applied during the t2 acquision with a RF-field amplitude of 51.5 kHz.

2D 13C-13C CP J-refocused INADEQUATE29 MAS NMR experiment was carried out using a Avance III 800 spectrometer at a MAS speed of 8 kHz. The 1H π/2-pulse length was 2.75 us. 13C magnetization was created using a cross-polarization (CP) ramp of magnitude 80 to 100% with a contacted time of 7 ms. 13C π/2 and π pulses were 4.8 us and 9.6 µs, respectively. The J-evolution τ periods were rotor synchronized and set to 3.24 ms. 64 transients were co-added using a recycle delay of 3 s. A total of 160 t1 FIDs were recorded at increments of 3.97 ms using the States-TPPI method to achieve sign discrimination in F1. 1H SPINAL-64 decoupling with a RF-field amplitude of 90.91 kHz was employed after CP covering all t1, J-evolution and t2 periods. The two frequency axes in the 2D spectra are used to assign the 13C resonances corresponding to through-bond 13C-13C connectivities, which allows for unambiguous assignment and structure determination of organic compounds.

All the in situ 13C solid-state NMR experiments were performed at 11.7 T on a Bruker Avance III 500 spectrometer, equipped with a 7 mm H/X MASCAT probe (Fig. S19), with resonance frequencies of 500.58 and 125.87 MHz for 1H and 13C, respectively. The magic angle spinning rate was set to 2 kHz. Prior to the in situ NMR experiments, 0.2 g of pre-dehydrated H-ZSM-5 was pressed into a 7 mm NMR rotor. An axial hole of 2.5 mm in diameter was made into the sample with a special tool, by which an uniform annular catalyst bed was formed in the rotor. After inserting the injection tube into the MAS rotor, the rotor was heated at 280 °C for 1 h via the bearing gas, keeping helium (200 ml min−1) injected into the rotor, then cooled down to the reaction temperature. 13C labelled ethanol (13CH313CH2OH, 98% 13C, Sigma-Aldrich) was diluted to 50% (v/v) with ethanol in natural aboundance. The diluted 13C labelled ethanol was fed into the NMR rotor by the helium carrier gas (weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) = 2.2 h−1) through a saturator. The reactants flow inside the rotor via the injection tube and pass through the catalyst from the bottom to the top and leave the rotor via an exhaust tube in the rotor cap. The 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra were recorded with a contant time of 5 ms and a recycle delay of 1 s. 30 and 900 scans were accumulated for each spectrum at different time and temperature respectively. The 13C chemical shifts were referenced to HMB (a second reference to TMS). The in situ 13C MAS NMR spectra in Fig. 3 were generated by the overlay of 1D NMR spectra as a function of reaction time or temperature. The correlation between 13C resonances and the reaction parameters (time and temperature) was followed in the 2D maps, which facilitates the monitoring of the fate of the organic species during the time or temperature evolutions.

The activation energy of the formation of ethoxy species from TEO on H-ZSM-5 was measured as follows. The sealed NMR rotor containing the TEO-ZSM-5 sample was heated at a specific temperature (from 328 to 348 K) for a period of time, and then the reaction was quenched by liquid N2. 13C MAS NMR measurement was performed at room temperature. At such low reaction temperature, only ethoxy species and diethyl ether were produced on the TEO-ZSM-5. The concentration of TEO during the reaction was measured by normalized integrated NMR signal at 85 ppm. Finally, the temperature dependent rate constant was obtained and the activation energy was derived from the Arrhenius equation.

Theoretical calculations

The host-guest interactions between the cations and zeolite framework would result in the 13C chemical shift moving due to the re-distributions of electronic environment invoked by the H-ZSM-5 confined pore. Thus, to unambiguously assign the experimental NMR results, the 13C NMR chemical shifts of the cations are further calculated using the periodic boundary condition.

The geometry optimizations were performed by using the CASTEP program41 with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) proposed by Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) functional. And the ultrasoft pseudo potential, fine plane wave cut-off energy (340 eV) and a default fine level Monkhorst-Pack K-point (1 × 1 × 1) were adopted to sample the Brillouin zone. DFT-D method42 was used in the structure optimization and the NMR calculation to accurately describe the weak interaction in H-ZSM-5. During optimization, the 22T active site atoms and the adsorbed cation were relaxing to their equilibrium positions. All of the NMR shielding calculations were performed by the GIPAW method in the MS CASTEP-NMR code at the GGA/PBE level based on the optimized zeolite structures. All of the 13C chemical shifts (δ 13C) cal were derived using the CASTEP-NMR module available in the Materials Studio package based on the optimized structures of cation accommodation in the H-ZSM-5 zeolite. The fine K-point (1 × 1 × 1) and cut-off energy of 550 eV were employed, combined with core–valance interactions described by ultrasoft pseudo potential generated on-the-fly. The 13C calculated chemical shifts were further converted to (δ 13C) cal values, which were referred to the absolute shielding of TMO, namely 80 ppm for the experimental values.

For the ethene formation pathway calculation, H-ZSM-5 zeolites are represented by a 72T model (HSi71AlO179, 252 atoms), which were extracted from their crystallographic structural data (http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/). The 72T contains the complete double 10-MR intersection pores of H-ZSM-5 zeolite. The terminal Si–H was fixed at a bond length of 1.47 Å, oriented along the direction of the corresponding Si–O bond. The substituted Al atom was placed at the T12 site of the crystallographic position during structural optimization, whereas the proton was located at the O24 site. The previous works have demonstrated that the Si12-O24(H)-Al12 Bronsted acid site located at the channel intersection of H-ZSM-5 zeolite with maximum accessibility for bulky reactants and transition states17,43,44. The 22T active site atoms (HSi21AlO25, 48 atoms) and the adsorbed hydrocarbon complex were treated as the high-layer (See Fig. S12) while the rest of the frameworks were treated as the low-layer. To retain the structural integrities of the modeled zeolite, partial structure optimizations of the 72T cluster were performed by relaxing the atoms in the the high-level layer while keeping the rest of atoms fixed at their crystallographic positions. All the TS structures are found by the QST 3 method in the Gaussian program. Then the IRC (Intrinsic Reaction Coordinate) method was used to determine the structures of the corresponding reactant and product. Then based on the imaginary vibrational model of the optimized TS, we adjusted the positions of the vibrational atoms slightly along the calculated reaction coordinate on the two directions toward the reactant and product, respectively, and finally optimized the resulting structures to the minimum structures. These methods have been widely employed in the previous theoretical work.

A combined theoretical approach, namely ONIOM (ωB97xd/6–31 G(d,p): am1) was used for the geometry optimization of adsorption states and transition states (TS). The ωB97XD hybrid density function was developed to consider long-range-corrected hybrid functional, which implicitly accounted for empirical dispersion and could describe long-range dispersion interactions well with respect to the traditional density functional theory methods42. This functional was also recently found to perform very well for the description of adsorption and reactions on zeolites. All energies report herein were predicted at the ωB97XD/6–31 G(d, p) level based on the optimized structures.

The harmonic frequency calculations employing a partial Hessian vibrational analysis (PHVA)45, including the 22T high layer active acidic sites and organic species were performed to check whether the stationary points found exhibit the proper number of imaginary frequencies. In frequency calculations, besides the atoms in high level and organic fragments, the constraints of the zeolite framework were also kept as the same in geometry optimizations, so one negative frequency would be observed for transition state point and none for the corresponding reactant and product. The Gibbs free energies (G) at 423 K (T) were calculated from harmonic frequencies.

$$G = H - T \times S = \left( {E + \mathrm{ZPVE} + H_{{\mathrm{vib}}} + H_{{\mathrm{trans}}} + H_{{\mathrm{rot}}}} \right) - T \times S.$$

It can be seen that Gibbs free energies (G) include contributions from electronic energies (E), zero-point vibrational energies (ZPVE), vibrational enthalpies (Hvib), translational (Htrans) and rotational enthalpies (Hrot) for reactant molecules and the effect of entropy energy (T × S), which can more accurately describe the mechanism of ethanol dehydration reaction.

And then, the reaction rate constants (k) at 473 K were further obtained by transition state theory (TST):

$$k = A.\exp \left( { - \frac{{\Delta H_{{\mathrm{act}}}}}{{{RT}}}} \right) = \frac{{k_{\mathrm{B}}T}}{h}.\exp \left( {\frac{{\Delta S_{{\mathrm{act}}}}}{R}} \right).\exp \left( { - \frac{{\Delta H_{{\mathrm{act}}}}}{{RT}}} \right) = \frac{{k_{\mathrm{B}}T}}{h}.\exp \left( { - \frac{{\Delta G_{{\mathrm{act}}}}}{{RT}}} \right),$$

where A is pre-exponential factor, kB is Boltzmann’s constant, h is Planck’s constant and T is the reaction temperature. All the geometry optimizations and frequency calculations were performed using the Gaussian 09 package46.

Data availability

All the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its supplementary information file or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Alvira, P., Tomás-Pejó, E., Ballesteros, M. & Negro, M. J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4851–4861 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Sun, J. & Wang, Y. Recent advances in catalytic conversion of ethanol to chemicals. ACS Catal. 4, 1078–1090 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhang, M. & Yu, Y. Dehydration of ethanol to ethylene. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 9505–9514 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Diaz Alvarado, F. A. & Gracia, F. Steam reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production: Thermodynamic analysis including different carbon deposits representation. Chem. Eng. J. 165, 649–657 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bi, J. D., Guo, X. W., Liu, M. & Wang, X. S. High effective dehydration of bio-ethanol into ethylene over nanoscale HZSM-5 zeolite catalysts. Catal. Today 149, 143–147 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Roy, S. et al. Mechanistic study of alcohol dehydration on gamma-Al2O3. ACS Catal. 2, 1846–1853 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Janik, M. J., Macht, J., Iglesia, E. & Neurock, M. Correlating acid properties and catalytic function: a first-principles analysis of alcohol dehydration pathways on polyoxometalates. J. Phys. Chem. C. 113, 1872–1885 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sun, J. et al. Direct conversion of bio-ethanol to isobutene on nanosized ZnxZryOz mixed oxides with balanced acid–base sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 11096–11099 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Phillips, C. B. & Datta, R. Production of ethylene from hydrous ethanol on H-ZSM-5 under mild conditions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 36, 4466–4475 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Van der Borght, K. et al. Insights into the reaction mechanism of ethanol conversion into hydrocarbons on H-ZSM-5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 12817–12821 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Hemelsoet, K., Van der Mynsbrugge, J., De Wispelaere, K., Waroquier, M. & Van Speybroeck, V. Unraveling the reaction mechanisms governing methanol-to-olefins catalysis by theory and experiment. ChemPhysChem 14, 1526–1545 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Olsbye, U. et al. Conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons: how zeolite cavity and pore size controls product selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5810–5831 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Chiang, H. & Bhan, A. Catalytic consequences of hydroxyl group location on the rate and mechanism of parallel dehydration reactions of ethanol over acidic zeolites. J. Catal. 271, 251–261 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Phung, T. K. & Busca, G. Diethyl ether cracking and ethanol dehydration: Acid catalysis and reaction paths. Chem. Eng. J. 272, 92–101 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gayubo, A. G., Tarrío, A. M., Aguayo, A. T., Olazar, M. & Bilbao, J. Kinetic modelling of the transformation of aqueous ethanol into hydrocarbons on a HZSM-5 Zeolite. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40, 3467–3474 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kondo, J. N. et al. Activation energies for the reaction of ethoxy species to ethene over zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. C. 114, 20107–20113 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Alexopoulos, K. et al. DFT-based microkinetic modeling of ethanol dehydration in H-ZSM-5. J. Catal. 339, 173–185 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kim, S., Robichaud, D. J., Beckham, G. T., Paton, R. S. & Nimlos, M. R. Ethanol dehydration in HZSM-5 studied by density functional theory: evidence for a concerted process. J. Phys. Chem. A 119, 3604–3614 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Xin, H. et al. Catalytic dehydration of ethanol over post-treated ZSM-5 zeolites. J. Catal. 312, 204–215 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wang, W., Jiao, J., Jiang, Y. J., Ray, S. S. & Hunger, M. Formation and decomposition of surface ethoxy species on acidic zeolite Y. Chemphyschem 6, 1467–1469 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kondo, J. N., Ito, K., Yoda, E., Wakabayashi, F. & Domen, K. An ethoxy intermediate in ethanol dehydration on bronsted acid sites in zeolite. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 10969–10972 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Zecchina, A. et al. IR spectroscopy of neutral and ionic hydrogen-bonded complexes formed upon interaction of CH3OH, C2H5OH, (CH3)2O, (C2H5)2O and C4H8O with H-Y, H-ZSM-5 and H-mordenite: comparison with analogous adducts formed on the H-Nafion superacidic membrane. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 4863–4875 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lee, C. C., Gorte, R. J. & Farneth, W. E. Calorimetric study of alcohol and nitrile adsorption complexes in H-ZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 3811–3817 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Nguyen, T. M. & Le Van Mao, R. Conversion of ethanol in aqueous solution over ZSM-5 zeolites: Study of the reaction network. Appl. Catal. 58, 119–129 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Goguen, P. W. et al. Pulse-quench catalytic reactor studies reveal a carbon-pool mechanism in methanol-to-gasoline chemistry on zeolite HZSM-5. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 2650–2651 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Stepanov, A. G., Luzgin, M. V., Romannikov, V. N., Sidelnikov, V. N. & Paukshtis, E. A. The Nature, structure, and composition of adsorbed hydrocarbon products of ambient temperature oligomerization of ethylene on acidic zeolite H-ZSM-5. J. Catal. 178, 466–477 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Munson, E. J., Kheir, A. A., Lazo, N. D. & Haw, J. F. In situ solid-state NMR study of methanol-to-gasoline chemistry in zeolite HZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 7740–7746 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Munson, E. J. & Haw, J. F. NMR observation of trimethyloxonium formation from dimethyl ether on zeolite HZSM-5. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 6303–6305 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Lesage, A., Bardet, M. & Emsley, L. Through-bond carbon-carbon connectivities in disordered solids by NMR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 10987–10993 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, C. et al. New insight into the hydrocarbon-pool chemistry of the methanol-to-olefins conversion over zeolite H-ZSM-5 from GC-MS, solid-state nmr spectroscopy, and DFT calculations. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 12432–12443 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wang, C. et al. Experimental evidence on the formation of ethene through carbocations in methanol conversion over H-ZSM-5 zeolite. Chem. Eur. J. 21, 12061–12068 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang, C. et al. Direct detection of supramolecular reaction centers in the methanol-to-olefins conversion over zeolite H-ZSM-5 by 13C-27Al solid-state NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 2507–2511 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Svelle, S. et al. Conversion of methanol into hydrocarbons over zeolite H-ZSM-5: Ethene formation is mechanistically separated from the formation of higher alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 14770–14771 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sun, X. et al. On reaction pathways in the conversion of methanol to hydrocarbons on HZSM-5. J. Catal. 317, 185–197 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Munson, E. J., Kheir, A. A., Lazo, N. D. & Haw, J. F. Insitu solid-state NMR-study of methanol-to-gasoline chemistry in zeolite HZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 7740–7746 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Munson, E. J., Kheir, A. A. & Haw, J. F. An in-situ solid-state NMR-study of the formation and reactivity of trialkylonium ions in zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 7321–7327 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Olah, G. A., Laali, K. K., Wang, Q. & Prakash, G. S. Onium Ions (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1998).

  38. 38.

    Kondo, J. N., Yamazaki, H., Osuga, R., Yokoi, T. & Tatsumi, T. Mechanism of decomposition of surface ethoxy species to ethene and acidic OH groups on H-ZSM-5. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2243–2246 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Olah, G. A. et al. Onium Ylide chemistry. 1. Bifunctional acid-base-catalyzed conversion of heterosubstituted methanes into ethylene and derived hydrocarbons. The onium ylide mechanism of the C1.fwdarw. C2 conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106, 2143–2149 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fung, B. M., Khitrin, A. K. & Ermolaev, K. An Improved broadband decoupling sequence for liquid crystals and solids. J. Magn. Reson. 142, 97–101 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Clark Stewart, J. et al. First principles methods using CASTEP. Z. Krist. Cryst. Mater. 220, 567–570 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Chai, J. D. & Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 6615–6620 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Brändle, M. & Sauer, J. Acidity differences between inorganic solids induced by their framework structure. a combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics ab initio study on zeolites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 1556–1570 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Svelle, S., Tuma, C., Rozanska, X., Kerber, T. & Sauer, J. Quantum chemical modeling of zeolite-catalyzed methylation reactions: toward chemical accuracy for barriers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 816–825 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ghysels, A., Van Neck, D., Van Speybroeck, V., Verstraelen, T. & Waroquier, M. Vibrational modes in partially optimized molecular systems. J. Chem. Phys. 126, 224102 (2007).

  46. 46.

    Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford, CT, 2010.

Download references


This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 21622311, 21473245 and 21603265, 21733013, 21773296), key program for frontier science of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-SLH027) and Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2017CFA032).

Author information




X.Z, C.W, and X.L. Z prepared the samples and carried XRD and catalytic testing. Q.W, G.D.Q, and N.D.F performed and analyzed the ex-situ solid state NMR spectra. Y.Y.C performed the DFT calculations. X. Z, J.X, and F.D collected and analyzed the in situ NMR spectra; X.Z, C.W., Y.Y.C, J.X and F.D. wrote the manuscript, and all authors discussed the experiments and final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jun Xu or Feng Deng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, X., Wang, C., Chu, Y. et al. Observation of an oxonium ion intermediate in ethanol dehydration to ethene on zeolite. Nat Commun 10, 1961 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09956-7

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.