Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The K219T-Lamin mutation induces conduction defects through epigenetic inhibition of SCN5A in human cardiac laminopathy

Abstract

Mutations in LMNA, which encodes the nuclear proteins Lamin A/C, can cause cardiomyopathy and conduction disorders. Here, we employ induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) generated from human cells carrying heterozygous K219T mutation on LMNA to develop a disease model. Cardiomyocytes differentiated from these iPSCs, and which thus carry K219T-LMNA, have altered action potential, reduced peak sodium current and diminished conduction velocity. Moreover, they have significantly downregulated Nav1.5 channel expression and increased binding of Lamin A/C to the promoter of SCN5A, the channel’s gene. Coherently, binding of the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) protein SUZ12 and deposition of the repressive histone mark H3K27me3 are increased at SCN5A. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated correction of the mutation re-establishes sodium current density and SCN5A expression. Thus, K219T-LMNA cooperates with PRC2 in downregulating SCN5A, leading to decreased sodium current density and slower conduction velocity. This mechanism may underlie the conduction abnormalities associated with LMNA-cardiomyopathy.

Introduction

Cardiomyopathy (CMP) is the most prevalent phenotype of laminopathies, a group of diseases caused by mutations of the nuclear lamina proteins Lamin A and C (Lamin A/C), which are encoded by LMNA. Lamin A/C are main components of the nuclear lamina, and play a key role in maintaining the structural integrity of the nucleus and in processes such as DNA replication, transcription and chromatin organization1,2,3,4. More than 200 heterozygous mutations on LMNA are known to cause over 20 phenotypes in which either tissues and organs are selectively affected—mainly bone, cartilage, skeletal muscle, and the heart—or multiple organ systems are involved, causing accelerated ageing (progeria)5. Cardiac defects eventually occur in all symptomatic patients, manifesting either as an isolated phenotype or in association with a variety of skeletal muscular dystrophies, such as Emery Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, limb girdle muscular dystrophy, and lipodystrophies6.

At the clinical level, LMNA-dependent CMP (LMNA-CMP) is characterized by chamber dilatation, typically preceded by conduction defects and arrhythmic events, which may occur before any detectable dysfunction7,8. Notably, fatal arrhythmias and consequential sudden cardiac death occur in almost 50% of LMNA-CMP patients9,10. Although age at disease onset is variable, almost all affected patients become symptomatic by the sixth decade and eventually progress onto heart failure necessitating transplantation11,12.

In vivo studies on Lmna knock-in and knock-out murine models have been fundamental in elucidating the effects of Lamin A/C deficiency or mutations on cardiac function. They reproduce the main clinical features of the human disease (i.e., dilated CMP and atrio-ventricular block), providing important pathophysiological insights13,14,15,16. However, while murine models are necessary for functional studies on whole heart, rodent and human cardiac physiologies differ significantly. Thus, mechanisms specific to the human species may be missed. Unfortunately, studies on human cells carrying LMNA mutations have been mostly limited to fibroblasts, skeletal muscle cells and adipocytes, while those on isolated cardiomyocytes (CMs) are scarce17,18,19.

CMs differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have been used to understand the mechanisms and pathophysiology of many cardiac diseases and provide a reliable tool for drug screening applications20,21,22. To date, very few studies investigating CMs derived from patient-specific iPSC lines carrying a mutation in LMNA (i.e., the R225X nonsense and R190W missense mutations) have been published: results indicated an effect on cellular senescence and apoptosis dependent on the ERK1/2 pathway in the presence of the nonsense mutation;23,24 abnormal activation of ERK1/2 signaling and sarcomeric disorganization were reported in iPSC-CMs carrying the R190W mutation25. Nevertheless, our understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms in LMNA-CMP remains incomplete, particularly with regard to conduction defects.

For the present study, we integrated functional and molecular investigations on CMs generated through iPSC technology to determine the effect of the K219T LMNA mutation26 on the electrophysiological properties of CMs. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene-editing and ex-vivo analyses on heart specimens from patients with the K219T mutation were also employed. We found that this mutation specifically affects expression of the sodium channel Nav1.5 via an epigenetic mechanism involving interplay with Polycomb Group proteins and targeting of the expression of the gene encoding this channel, SCN5A. Thus, we identify a cause–effect link between a Lamin A/C mutation, altered Nav1.5 expression and CM action potential changes, which might explain the arrhythmogenic conduction defects in these patients.

Results

Generation of an iPSC-based model of LMNA-CMP

We generated a model of cardiac laminopathy from iPSCs obtained from fibroblasts harvested from three members of a large family affected by the disease. The family, previously identified by us to carry the K219T mutation on LMNA26, presented with dilated cardiomyopathy associated with arrhythmogenic conduction disorders. Detailed clinical information is provided in Supplementary Table 1, Supplementary Fig. 1, and Supplementary Extended Methods. Control iPSC lines were generated from two healthy family members not carrying the mutation.

Following characterization of pluripotent status and genomic stability (Supplementary Figs. 2, 3), patient-derived and control iPSC lines (two clones per individual) were differentiated towards the cardiac lineage (iPSC-CMs) with a standard protocol27 that reproducibly generates >80% pure CMs (Supplementary Fig. 4A). iPSC-CMs had spontaneous depolarizations and contractions (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Movies 1, 2), and expressed the cardiac-specific marker α-sarcomeric actinin (Supplementary Fig. 4A, B), which was, however, abnormally distributed in CMs differentiated from K219T-LMNA-iPSC lines (K219T-CMs): the staining was punctuated and fragmented, suggestive of the presence of disorganized myofilament structures (Supplementary Fig. 4B). This phenotype was observed in 50% of K219T-CMs, but in <15% control cells (CNTR-CMs; Supplementary Fig. 4C). Furthermore, measuring passive CM properties by patch clamp revealed a higher membrane capacity in K219T-CMs, indicating increased cell size (Supplementary Fig. 4D). Surprisingly, in contrast with previous observations by us and others on primary cells and mature adult CMs from affected patients5,26,28, morphological analyses of K219T-CMs did not reveal any sign of the nuclear defects typical of laminopathic cells, such as nuclear blebbing and invagination (Supplementary Fig. 4E), characteristics which probably develop in adult CMs after long-term stress.

Fig. 1
figure1

Electrophysiological properties of single iPSC-CMs. a Examples of spontaneous action potentials recorded in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs (scale bar, 1 sec). b Dot plot with maximal diastolic potential (MDP) data recorded from CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs, relative to all iPSC-CMs (quiescent and spontaneously active cells: −61.3 ± 7.4 mV vs. −56.8 ± 9.6 mV—left panel) or to the spontaneously active cell population only (right panel), showing a significant depolarization of K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs in the first condition. CNTR-CMs: n = 45; K219T-CMs: n = 46. c, d Patch clamp analysis of AP properties in spontaneously active iPSC-CMs. (CNTR: n = 33; K219T: n = 24). Dot plots for the main excitability features measured from spontaneous action potentials: maximal upstroke velocity (dV/dtmax), overshoot (OV), action potential amplitude (APA) and action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) are shown in c. Representative spontaneous action potentials (left; scale bar, 100 ms) and dV/dt (right; scale bar, 1 ms) in d (CNTR: dV/dtmax = 18.4 ± 9.7 Vs−1, n = 33; overshoot = 22.6 ± 11.2 mV, n = 33; APA = 86.4 ± 15.2 mV, n = 33. K219T-CMs: dV/dtmax = 11.8 ± 9.2 V s−1, n = 24; overshoot = 12.3 ± 11.6 mV, n = 24; APA = 74.2 ± 16.1 mV, n = 24). e, f Patch clamp analysis of AP properties in iPSC-CMs electrically adjusted to −82 mV (evoked APs-CNTR: n = 45; K219T: n = 46). Dot plots for the main excitability features measured from evoked action potentials: maximal upstroke velocity (dV/dtmax), overshoot (OV), action potential amplitude (APA) and action potential duration at 90% repolarization (APD90) are shown in e. Representative evoked action potentials (left; scale bar, 100 ms) and dV/dt (right; scale bar, 2 ms) in f. Measurements highlighted with blue symbols in c and e were obtained from action potentials shown in d and f. All values are reported as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005 (unpaired t-test). Data are relative to CMs differentiated from 2 lines from each subjects (2 CNTR and 3 K219T-LMNA)

Thus, CMs generated from K219T-LMNA-iPSCs recapitulate some of the fundamental defects observed in LMNA-CMP, including dilatation and sarcomeric disorganization, and provide a suitable platform for investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying the disease.

K219T-LMNA alters the action potential properties of CMs

We then investigated how K219T-LMNA affects the functionality of CMs through comprehensive electrophysiological analysis of the action potential (AP) properties of iPSC-CMs with conventional patch-clamp methods.

We found that maximal diastolic potential (MDP) and maximal upstroke velocity (dV/dtmax), together with the related AP properties peak voltage (overshoot) and AP amplitude (APA), were significantly altered in K219T-CMs. Indeed, MDPs were significantly more depolarized in K219T-CM vs. CNTR-CMs (Fig. 1b—left panel, Supplementary Fig. 5). As a consequence of the observed depolarized MDP values, 73% of the analysed CNTR-CMs (33 cells out of 45) and 52% of K219T-CMs (24 out of 46 cells) exhibited spontaneous APs (Fig. 1a), which are never observed in healthy human adult ventricular CMs29.

While AP duration was not changed in spontaneously active K219T-CMs, all the other analysed AP parameters—specifically dV/dtmax, overshoot and APA—were significantly decreased in K219T-CMs (Fig. 1c, d, Supplementary Table 2). In particular, dV/dtmax, which reflects the peak Na+ current (INa) during the upstroke30, was reduced by 36.1% in K219T-CMs. Of note, dV/dtmax and its related AP properties (overshoot and APA) are a function of the electrical excitability of a CM and depend on the sarcolemmal fast voltage-dependent Na+ channel (Nav1.5) repertoire and its functional expression31.

Since changes in MDP influence Na+ channel availability, with the majority of channels in their inactivated state being at a more positive potential, we also studied the decreased excitability by recording AP parameters in CMs in which the MDP was adjusted to a physiological resting cardiac membrane potential range (i.e., ~−80mV) by electrical injection of a constant hyperpolarizing current—referred to here as evoked APs. This condition better resembles that of human adult ventricular CMs32 and bypasses both the inactivation of Na+ channels and mechanisms of spontaneous membrane depolarization33. As expected, we found higher values of dV/dtmax and APA in iPSC-derived CMs with evoked APs vs spontaneously active CMs; again, AP properties related to excitability were significantly decreased in such electrically conditioned K219T-CMs (Fig. 1e, f, Supplementary Table 2, Supplementary Fig. 6).

Those data were confirmed when AP parameters were recorded in working-like CMs, selected on the basis of their AP characteristics21. These additional evaluations were included in the first set of analyses to exclude potential underestimation of INa due to contamination with pacemaker cells, which are more depolarized and devoid of Nav1.5. Indeed, differentiation of iPSCs into CMs is known to give rise to a mixed population of atrial-like, ventricular-like, and pacemaker-like CMs, with the majority presenting the ventricular phenotype:21,34 these different populations are typified by distinct AP parameters that reflect on AP morphology and determine specific functional outcomes35. In line with the results obtained in spontaneously active iPSC-CMs and in those electrically adjusted to −82mV, AP parameters were significantly decreased in working-like K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs (Supplementary Table 3), with a decrement in dV/dtmax of 29.8% (Supplementary Fig. 6).

Collectively, these results indicate that K219T is associated with MDP depolarization and alterations in the electrical excitability profile, which were linked to a decrease in the fast INa during the upstroke.

K219T-CMs have reduced sodium current density

To corroborate the previous findings and quantify the effects of K219T on INa density in iPSC-CMs, we measured peak INa density of fast voltage-dependent sodium channels (Nav1.5) by whole-cell patch clamp, using specific voltage protocols and external ionic solutions. We found that average peak INa density was significantly lower in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs (Fig. 2a), with a reduction of 41.3% at the membrane potential of −30 mV (Fig. 2b). Furthermore, no significant differences in voltage dependence of activation and inactivation parameters (half-maximal voltage [V1/2] and slope factor [k]) were detected between the two (Fig. 2c, Supplementary Table 4).

Fig. 2
figure2

Voltage-gated sodium currents in CMs from K219T-iPSC lines. a Left panel: examples of Na+ current (INa) traces recorded in CNTR- (top) and K219T- (bottom) CMs (Scale bar, 2 ms, 50 pA/pF). Right panel: I-V curves constructed from average peak sodium current density as a function of voltage command measured in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs, showing a significant reduction in the latter. CNTR-CMs: n = 23; K219T-CMs: n = 22. b INa density, measured at −30 mV, in K219T-CMs (91.58 ± 30.69 pA/pF) relative to CNTR-CMs (156.12 ± 33.73 pA/pF), expressed as a percentage. c Voltage dependences: steady state activation (CNTR-CMs: n = 23; K219T-CMs: n = 22)/inactivation curves (CNTR-CMs: n = 18; K219T-CMs: n = 17). All values are reported as mean ± SD. **p < 0.005 (unpaired t-test). Data are relative to CMs differentiated from 2 independent lines from 2 CNTR and 3 K219T-LMNA subjects

Of note, Nav1.5 currents and their voltage dependencies measured in CNTR-CMs were in line with published values obtained in control human iPSC-CMs36,37, further proving the validity of our experimental setting and results.

Taken together, these results indicated a profound impairment of INa in CMs carrying the K219T mutation, linked to the lower dV/dtmax described above.

In addition, R190W—another heterozygous mutation on exon 3 of the gene, and also located in the rod domain of the protein (Supplementary Fig. 7A)—affected INa in a similar manner to K219T (Supplementary Fig. 7B–D), indicating that the phenotype observed in K219T-CMs is not restricted to this specific mutation and suggesting a more general mechanism through which missense LMNA mutations may alter AP properties in affected CMs.

K219T-Lamin A/C blunts cardiac impulse propagation

Since INa and MDP are both responsible for sustaining physiological cardiac impulse propagation across the myocardium38, we next determined the consequences of the biophysical changes described above on cardiac conduction velocity. We thus measured optical AP propagation in a confluent multi-cellular culture setting consisting of 80-µm wide strands of electrically coupled iPSC-CMs stained with the voltage-sensitive dye DI-8-ANEPPS (Fig. 3a). K219T-CM strands failed to respond to increasing electrical stimulation (1 and 2 Hz), resulting in a 2:1, 3:1 or complete block of impulse propagation, possibly due to the prolonged absolute refractory period secondary to the reduced INa (Fig. 3b, c)39. Furthermore, conduction velocities (CVs) in K219T-CM strands were significantly decreased (46.1%) (Fig. 3d), further supporting the notion of an impairment of impulse propagation in laminopathic cells.

Fig. 3
figure3

Generation and propagation of optical action potentials in K219T-CMs. a Representative images of a monolayer of iPSC-CMs in geometrically defined strands (80-µm wide, 1-cm long). Top: example of phase contrast image of a portion of a strand observed from the field of view; Bottom: same strand after complete activation following electrical stimulation. Strands were stimulated from the left-hand side. b Stimulated optical action potentials in a monolayer of CNTR- (top, black) and K219T- (bottom, red) CMs, showing that the latter fail to respond to a stimulation of 2 Hz. c Percentage of propagated action potentials at 1 and 2 Hz stimulation. Black: CNTR-CMs; Red: K219T-CMs. d Conduction velocities recorded in cell strands consisting of CNTR- (black bar) and K219T- (red bar) CMs (95.9 ± 48.5 mm s−1, n = 47 vs. 51.7 ± 34.7 mm s−1, n = 40). All values are reported as mean ± SD. **p < 0.005 (unpaired t-test). Data are relative to CMs differentiated from 2 independent lines from 2 CNTR and 3 K219T-LMNA subjects

Ablation of conduction, induced by the selective blockage of Nav1.5 with tetrodotoxin (TTX), confirmed that the conduction defects observed in our cardiac laminopathy model are specifically driven by Nav1.5 (Supplementary Fig. 8).

Reduced Na+ current is caused by downregulation of SCN5A

Regulation of transcription and chromatin organization are among the diverse roles attributed to Lamin A/C proteins18,40,41,42,43,44. We therefore hypothesized that mutation of Lamin A/C could interfere with the transcriptional program in K219T-CMs by perturbing the correct expression of Nav1.5, leading to the conduction defects in our cellular model of laminopathy.

To prove this, we first analysed the expression of the Nav1.5 encoding gene, SCN5A, with RT-qPCR. We found that the level of its transcript was significantly lower in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs (Fig. 4a). Assessment of protein expression (through Western blot and immunofluorescence analyses) confirmed reduced expression of Nav1.5 in K219T-CMs (Fig. 4b–d). Similarly, we found a reduced level of SCN5A mRNA also in CMs carrying the R190W mutation (Supplementary Fig. 7E). These findings support the hypothesis that reduction of Na+ currents in these cells is due to an effect on transcription by the Lamin A/C mutation.

Fig. 4
figure4

Reduced sodium current density is dependent upon reduction of SCN5A expression. a RT-qPCR showing reduced expression of SCN5A gene in CMs generated from K219T-LMNA-iPSCs vs those differentiated from CNTR lines. Data are represented relative to CNTR-CMs and normalized for expression of the housekeeping genes 18S and HGPRT. Data are relative to CMs differentiated from 2 independent lines from 2 CNTR and 3 K219T-LMNA subjects. b Left: Representative Western blot showing reduced Nav1.5 channel expression in K219T-CMs. Data are representative of one cell line per subject. Right: Nav1.5 expression quantification in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs, calculated as densitometric Nav1.5 /β-actin ratio (the diagram represents the mean of three independent experiments). c Representative immunofluorescence images for Nav1.5 (green) and α-sarcomeric actinin (red) in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs; nuclei are stained with DAPI (Scale bars: 13 μm). A decrease in the expression of Nav1.5 in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs is evident. All values are reported as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test)

Epigenetic modulation of SCN5A expression by Lamin A/C

To determine how the mutated Lamin A/C affects expression of SCN5A, we performed chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) experiments to assess the occupancy of Lamin A/C on the gene’s promoter. Binding of Lamin A/C to the SCN5A promoter was increased in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs (Fig. 5a); no enrichment was detected at the promoter of JUN (AP-1 Transcription factor subunit), used as a control, demonstrating the specificity of Lamin A/C immunoprecipitation. Instead Lamin A/C was equally enriched in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs at the transcription start sites of SCN10A, DEFA3, and DEFA4 (Fig. 5a), known gene targets of Lamin A/C18. This finding excluded the possibility of an increased affinity of the antibody for K219T-Lamin A/C, strengthening our conclusion that the mutated protein is involved in regulating expression of SCN5A gene.

Fig. 5
figure5

Epigenetic modulation of SCN5A gene expression. a, b ChIP analyses in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs with antibodies against Lamin A/C (a) and H3K27me3 (b) targeting the SCN5A genomic region. Data are presented as a percentage of input chromatin precipitated and relative to 2 independent iPSC clones from each subject. ChIP for Lamin A/C, indicating increased binding of Lamin A/C to the promoter region of the SCN5A gene in K219T-CMs; no enrichment was detectable for JUN, used as a negative control region for the ChIP experiment; SCN10A, DEFA3, and DEFA4 were used as positive control regions for the ChIP experiments, and they show comparable enrichment of Lamin A/C in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs (a). ChIP for the histone modification H3K27me3, showing an enrichment of the repressive histone mark at the SCN5A gene promoter in K219T-CMs, supporting the reduced expression of the gene detected in these cells; NEURO D was used as positive control region for the antibody (b). c ChIP against Lamin A/C, showing the dynamics of Lamin A/C enrichment at the transcription start site (TSS) of SCN5A during cardiac differentiation (from days 0 to 12). The graph is relative to one representative experiment (out of three). For this analysis, two-way ANOVA was used for the statistic test. **p < 0.01. d 3D-FISH for Lamin A/C (green) and SCN5A (magenta) conducted with an antibody and a DNA probe, respectively. Left: representative images of nuclei from CNTR and K219T-CM preparations (Scale bar: 9 μm). Magnified box shows the colocalization of the SCN5A probe at the nuclear lamina. Right: Analysis of the distance from the nuclear lamina, showing preferential localization of the SCN5A probe (magenta) at the nuclear periphery in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR. Quantification was carried out using a specific plug-in of the ImageJ software (CNTR-CMs: n = 72 cells; K219T-CMs: n = 82 cells; p < 0.0001). All values are reported as means ± SD, if not differently specified. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01, ns, not significant (unpaired t-test)

To further corroborate the specificity of Lamin A/C for SCN5A, we determined the expression of other genes encoding proteins playing key roles in cardiac conduction (i.e., CX40, CX43, TBX3 and TBX5) and assessed Lamin A/C binding at their promoters. There were no significant changes in the expression of those genes in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs, and no differences in Lamin A/C enrichment at their promoters (Supplementary Fig. 9A, B), further confirming the major contribution of SCN5A regulation by Lamin A/C in determining the conduction phenotype.

To correlate the presence of Lamin A/C with the epigenetic landscape at the SCN5A locus in K219T-CMs, we performed a ChIP analysis of two histone marks indicative of transcriptional repression—tri-methylated lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3) and tri-methylated lysine 9 on histone 3 (H3K9me3)—and one mark of transcriptional activation—tri-methylated lysine 4 on histone 3 (H3K4me3). The two repressive marks were enriched at the locus in K219T-CMs (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 10A); in contrast, H3K4me3 was enriched in CNTR-CMs (Supplementary Fig. 10B). These results support the hypothesis that diminished INa density in K219T-CMs is due to reduced SCN5A expression which, in turn, is mediated by enrichment on its promoter of Lamin A/C and the two repressive histone marks H3K9me3 and, particularly, H3K27me3.

Nuclear lamins are also implicated in tethering chromatin to the nuclear lamina45; these interactions occur through large Lamin-Associated Domains (LADs) in chromatin and are predominantly associated with transcriptional silencing42,46. LADs are mostly cell-specific and may be distinguished into constitutive (cLADs) and variable (vLADs) types, the latter corresponding to LAD borders; these have been shown to be enriched in H3K27me3 and to dynamically shift to and from the nuclear periphery during development, determining distinct gene expression outcomes44,47. Of note, impairment of this dynamic reorganization of the genome has been shown during terminal differentiation of skeletal myoblasts from Emery Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy patients, in human adipose stem cells and during differentiation of iPSCs towards the endothelial lineage in the presence of the lypodystrophy-causing R482W LMNA mutation43,48,49. Here we found that, in CNTR-CMs, Lamin A/C interacted with the SCN5A locus at early stages of cardiac differentiation, but that binding was lost from day 12. In contrast, in K219T-CMs such binding was maintained throughout differentiation (Fig. 5c) and later in terminally differentiated CMs (Fig. 5a). The finding is coherent with the hypothesis that SCN5A may be included in a LAD that shifts from the nuclear periphery towards the nuclear interior during differentiation, but whole-genomic data from Lamin A/C ChIP-sequencing would be necessary to prove that SCN5A is truly located in a LAD domain. Nevertheless, this is consistent with ChIP-seq data on other cell types18.

In addition, 3D-FISH (Fluorescence In-Situ Hybridization)47,50 mapping of the position of SCN5A within the nucleus revealed a preferential positioning of the locus at the nuclear periphery in K219T-CMs vs CNTR-CMs (Fig. 5d).

To provide evidence on the role played by Lamin A/C in vivo, we used immunofluorescence microscopy and pathology tissue-chromatin immunoprecipitation (PAT-ChIP) to assess SCN5A gene regulation on paraffin-embedded sections of heart tissue obtained from the patients carrying the K219T Lamin A/C mutation. Coherently with our in vitro evidence, there was reduced expression of Nav1.5 in adult CMs from K219T-LMNA patients (Fig. 6a, b). This was associated with an increased binding of Lamin A/C at the SCN5A promoter region (Fig. 6c). These findings further support the hypothesis that K219T-mutated Lamin A/C more strongly associates to the SCN5A promoter, causing repression of its transcription.

Fig. 6
figure6

Lamin A/C-mediated reduction of Nav1.5 expression is confirmed in heart sections. a Immunostaining of paraffin-embedded heart sections from patients carrying the K219T mutation on Lamin A/C (bottom panels) and from two control subjects (top panels) targeting the Nav1.5 sodium channel (red); nuclei were stained with DAPI (scale bars: 10 μm). b Histogram showing the quantification of the red fluorescent signal shown in a, corresponding to the Nav1.5 protein, confirming reduced expression also in K219T-LMNA patient hearts. (a.u. is for arbitrary units). Data are relative to heart sections from three healthy controls (n = 11) and four mutant samples (n = 12). c PAT-ChIP analysis of heart sections from patients carrying the K219T mutation on LMNA (red bar) and from two control subjects (black bar), showing increased binding of Lamin A/C at the SCN5A promoter region in K219T-CMs. Chromatin was immunoprecipitated with an antibody against Lamin A/C and the resulting DNA was analysed by realtime PCR and presented as a percentage of input chromatin precipitated for the indicated region. All values are reported as means ± SD. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.0001 (unpaired t-test)

K219T-Lamin A/C cooperates with PRC2 in repressing SCN5A

To deepen understanding of the molecular mechanism by which K219T-Lamin A/C affects transcriptional regulation of SCN5A, we next determined if the gene’s expression was modulated by cross-talk between Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins and Lamin A/C. PcG proteins are epigenetic repressors that control the expression of a large number of genes during development, differentiation and disease. Interaction of PcG proteins with Lamin A/C is required for correct compartmentalization and assembly of the former40,51. Indeed, deficiency in Lamin A/C leads to disassembly and dispersion of PcG proteins and is associated with an impaired myogenic transcriptional program40,51.

Here, we focused on Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2), since it specifically catalyzes the methylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 (H3K27me3), the repressive mark we found enriched at the SCN5A promoter in K219T-CMs (see Fig. 5b). We thus evaluated the binding of PcG proteins to the SCN5A promoter by ChIP for Suz12, a component of PRC2. We found increased binding of Suz12 in K219T-CMs (Fig. 7a), further supporting the notion of cooperation between Lamin A/C and PcG proteins in modulating transcriptional regulation in CMs.

Fig. 7
figure7

Lamin A/C–PRC2 interplay in the regulation of SCN5A transcription. a ChIP against Suz12, showing enrichment at the SCN5A promoter region in K219T-CMs. No significant differences were detectable at the NEURO D promoter, used as positive control for the antibody. Data are presented as percentage of input chromatin precipitated and relative to 2 independent iPSC lines per subject. (**p < 0.01, unpaired t-test). b Co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) of LaminA/C and Ezh2 (PRC2 subunit) in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs, showing a higher binding affinity of mutant LaminA/C for Ezh2. An unrelated IgG antibody was used as negative control. One representative (out of three) experiment is shown. c 3D-STED super-resolution microscopy for Lamin A/C and Suz12. Left: representative image of a nucleus stained for the two proteins. The inset shows co-localization of the two proteins (yellow spots). Right: bar graph indicating the quantification of voxels of colocalization and showing higher levels of interaction in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs. (n = 16 cells for each condition). (*p < 0.05, unpaired t-test). d Distribution profile of the PRC2–Lamin A/C colocalization channel from 3D-STED microscopy acquisitions. For the analysis, the distance transformation function of Imaris software was applied to the z-stack images. Left: Strategy to determine the distance of the PRC2–Lamin A/C colocalization signal from the nuclear periphery. Top left: representative images of CNTR-CM and K219T-CM nuclei (scale bar 2 μm). Gray spots indicate Lamin A/C fluorescent signal: this was selected as the outside ring and served as the nuclear edge. The colored bar is indicative of the relative position of the spots to the nuclear edge: farthest positions in violet, closest in red. Bottom left: strategy of data representation: distances were scored into three zones: (1) periphery (from 0 to 2.15 μm, white); (2) middle (from 2.15 to 4.3 μm, light gray); and (3) central zone (from 4.3 to 6.45 μm, dark gray). The distance of every single colocalization spot was calculated from the nuclear edge. Right: box plot graphs representing PRC2–Lamin A/C distribution in the three selected zones. For each box plot, bottom and top of the boxes respectively indicate the lower and upper quartiles of the data set and whiskers represent the highest and the lowest values. Center line is the median value. Values are referred to median ± SD (n = 5 cells per condition, obtained from 5 independent iPSC clones). (***p < 0.0001; **p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA)

In addition, immunoprecipitation (IP) experiments confirmed this view and revealed that K219T-Lamin A/C is more bound to Ezh2 (Enhancer of zeste homolog 2, the catalytic subunit of PRC2) than is wild-type Lamin A/C (Fig. 7b). This finding supports the hypothesis that the two proteins interact with higher affinity in the presence of K219T.

The observation was corroborated by super-resolution microscopy experiments, which revealed more-abundant co-localization of the Lamin A/C and Suz12 in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs (Fig. 7c). Of note, PRC2, alone or bound to Lamin A/C, was differentially distributed in CNTR-CMs and K219T-CMs, indicative of different protein dynamics in the two conditions (Fig. 7d, Supplementary Fig. 11). In detail, a proportion of the PRC2–LaminA/C complex was in closer proximity to the nuclear periphery in K219T-CMs vs. CNTR-CMs (Fig. 7d), a finding fitting well with results from 3D-FISH experiments, which locate SCN5A preferentially at the nuclear periphery in K219T-CMs, and sustains the notion that PRC2 and Lamin A/C cooperate to regulate SCN5A transcription by simultaneously binding to its promoter at the nuclear periphery. Moreover, a subpopulation of the complex significantly relocated to the nuclear interior in K219T-CMs (Fig. 7d, Supplementary Fig. 11), further supporting the notion that global rearrangement of the two proteins is likely to alter global transcription in the presence of LMNA mutations.

K219T-Lamin A/C transduction mimics the K219T-CM phenotype

To further prove that mutant Lamin A/C exerts a repressive activity on INa density by downregulating SCN5A expression, we overexpressed K219T-LMNA in CMs derived from the RUES2 human embryonic stem cell line and assessed phenotype at the functional and molecular levels. To this end, we generated a Lamin A/C-EGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) C-terminal fusion lentiviral construct carrying the K219T mutation (Fig. 8a), and transduced RUES2-derived CMs. Transduction was carried out at day 5–6 of cardiac differentiation induction, a time-point at which Lamin A/C starts to become expressed in these cells (Supplementary Fig. 12A). When we compared Nav1.5 current density in GFPpos (expressing the mutation) and GFPneg (wild-type) CMs, we found significantly decreased INa in the former (at −30mV holding potential, 29.8% decrease vs GFPneg; Fig. 8b, c), with no changes of the voltage dependence of activation and inactivation parameters (half-maximal voltage [V1/2] and slope factor [k]) between the two conditions (Fig. 8d, Supplementary Table 4). Coherently, expression of SCN5A was significantly lower in GFPpos CMs (Fig. 8e).

Fig. 8
figure8

K219T-LMNA overexpression in RUES2-CMs reproduces phenotypes of K219T-CMs. a Lentiviral vector expressing the C-terminal GFP-tagged K219T-Lamin A/C used for lentiviral particle production. b Analysis of sodium current (INa) densities in CMs differentiated from the human embryonic stem cell line RUES2 and transduced with lentiviral particles expressing K219T-LaminA/C-GFP. Left column: examples of INa traces recorded in GFPneg (top) and GFPpos CMs (bottom) (Scale bar, 2 ms, 50 pA/pF). Right panel: I-V curves constructed from average peak sodium current density as a function of voltage command measured in GFPneg and GFPpos CMs. (GFPneg: n = 14; GFPpos: n = 21), showing significant Na+ current reductions in GFPpos cells. c INa density, measured at −30 mV, in GFPpos (115.20 ± 43.35 pA/pF) vs. GFPneg (164.02 ± 43.18 pA/pF) CMs, expressed as a percentage. d Voltage dependences: steady state activation (GFPneg: n = 14; GFPpos: n = 21)/inactivation (GFPneg: n = 11; GFPpos: n = 17) curves. e RT-qPCR comparing SCN5A expression in GFPneg and GFPpos CMs isolated through FACS sorting. Data are represented relative to GFPneg samples and normalized to expression of HGPRT and 18S housekeeping genes. Top: gating strategy and cell populations selected for the sorting are shown (sequential sorting strategy is provided in the Supplementary Fig. 15). All values are reported as mean ± SD. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.005 (unpaired t-test)

By contrast, overexpression of either an empty GFP vector or a vector encoding wild-type LMNA did not produce any effect on Nav1.5 current density in RUES2-CMs (Supplementary Fig. 12, Supplementary Table 4), further indicating that the observed phenotype is causally linked to K219T on LMNA.

SCN5A overexpression rescues the functionality of LMNA-CMs

To corroborate the hypothesis that the effect on INa is directly mediated by downregulation of SCN5A, we overexpressed C-terminus GFP-tagged wild-type SCN5A in LMNA-CMs carrying either K219T or R190W (Supplementary Fig. 13A), and measured INa density by patch-clamp. We found that overexpression of SCN5A in the presence of either of the two mutations was sufficient to significantly increase INa density to a level that was even higher than that in controls (Supplementary Fig. 13B–D, Supplementary Table 4). Of note, Nav1.5-dependent AP properties were also restored by SCN5A overexpression (Supplementary Fig. 13E, Supplementary Table 5).

K219T correction rescues functional and molecular defects

To unequivocally establish the direct link between the mutation and the phenotype described above, we generated isogenic lines in which the point mutation was specifically corrected (here referred to as K219T-corrected), using a CRISPR-Cas9-mediated strategy (Fig. 9a, b and Supplementary Fig. 14)52,53.

Fig. 9
figure9

Correction of K219T mutation rescues Na+ current phenotype and SCN5A expression. a Gene editing strategy used for the correction of the mutation. b Representative electropherograms from DNA sequencing of exon 4 of the LMNA gene showing the correction of the alanine-to-cytosine transversion at position 656 (c.656A<C) in the generated isogenic K219T-corrected iPSC lines (the reverse sequence is shown in the figure; the T<C mutation is indicated by the arrow). The nucleotide mutation corresponds to the amino acid change p.K219T. The electropherogram from the parental K219T-LMNA iPSC line is shown on the top panel as reference. c Left panel: examples of Na+ current (INa) traces recorded in CNTR- (top), K219T-corrected (top) and K219T- (bottom) CMs (Scale bar, 2 ms, 50 pA/pF). Right panel: I-V curves constructed from average peak sodium current density as a function of voltage command measured in the three conditions described above (CNTR: n = 23; K219T-corrected: n = 14; K219T: n = 22), showing significant sodium current increases in K219T-corrected cells with respect to the parental mutant CMs. *adj.p < 0.05; **adj.p < 0.005 (two-way ANOVA). d INa density, measured at −30 mV, in K219T-corrected CMs (176.94 ± 61.05 pA/pF) relative to K219T-CMs (91.58 ± 30.69 pA/pF) and CNTR-CMs (156.12 ± 33.73 pA/pF) expressed as a percentage. e Voltage dependences: steady state activation (CNTR: n = 23; K219T-corrected: n = 14; K219T: n = 22)/inactivation (CNTR: n = 18; K219T-corrected: n = 12; K219T: n = 17) curves. f RT-qPCR showing that SCN5A gene expression is restored to control levels in CMs generated from K219T-corrected-iPSCs. Data are represented relative to CNTR-CMs and normalized to expression of the housekeeping genes 18S and HGPRT. g ChIP against Lamin A/C, showing loss of Lamin A/C binding at the SCN5A promoter region in K219T-corrected CMs vs mutant K219T-CMs. Levels of Lamin A/C binding are instead indistinguishable from those detected in CMs differentiated from control cells. All values are reported as means ± SD. *adj.p < 0.05; **adj.p < 0.005 (one-way ANOVA), unless otherwise specified

Comparative functional and molecular analyses of CMs differentiated from K219T-corrected LMNA-iPSCs demonstrated that correction of the mutation is sufficient to restore INa density and SCN5A expression to levels indistinguishable from those in CNTR-CMs (Fig. 9c, d and Supplementary Table 4). Of note, restoration of functional and molecular phenotypes was coupled with decreased binding of Lamin A/C to the SCN5A promoter (Fig. 9e), strongly supporting the hypothesis that dysregulation of SCN5A and the consequential effect on INa is caused by the mutation.

Taken together, these findings support a mechanistic model in which mutated Lamin A/C perturbs SCN5A expression by favouring the binding of PRC2 to its promoter, leading to decreased peak INa and slower conduction velocity (Fig. 10).

Fig. 10
figure10

Proposed pathogenic mechanism of action of K219T-Lamin A/C in CMs. Left: healthy CMs. The SCN5A genomic region is localized in the nuclear interior and actively transcribed; the Nav1.5 sodium channel density at the plasma membrane is sufficient to assure proper impulse propagation. Right: Laminopathic CMs. Mutant Lamin A/C and PRC2 bind each other with high affinity and are enriched at the SCN5A promoter region, where the H3K27me3 (catalyzed by PRC2) and H3K9me3 repressive histone marks are also present. In this repressive environment, this genomic region is preferentially sequestered at the nuclear periphery. As a result, SCN5A gene transcription is repressed, leading to reduced expression of the Nav1.5 sodium channel at the plasma membrane, which, in turn, has an effect on reducing conduction velocity. This regulatory mechanism may be at the basis of the onset of the conduction defects in patients with LMNA-CMP

Discussion

Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying the electrophysiological defects in LMNA-CMP is essential for improving current therapeutic decisions. Patients who develop left ventricular dysfunctions are currently treated with the standard medical therapy for chronic heart failure, typically β-blockers and inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system, which are usually not sufficient to prevent heart transplantation. Moreover, most patients eventually require a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator to prevent fatal arrhythmias.

For this study, we developed a patient-specific model of cardiac laminopathy to determine how the heterozygous K219T mutation on Lamin A/C contributes to the pathogenesis of the clinical phenotypes associated to LMNA-CMP. Through comprehensive electrophysiological characterization of mutant iPSC-derived CMs, we identified a series of consequential functional defects affecting excitability and cardiac impulse propagation that were caused by Lamin A/C-driven repression of SCN5A expression, leading to reduced peak Nav1.5 density. The major electrical phenotype that emerged consisted in a reduced dV/dtmax, which we found to be linked to a profound impairment of INa density. Importantly, the decreased cellular excitability seen in LMNA-CMs is coherent with the different AP characteristics and the biophysical parameters of all analysed cell populations (i.e., spontaneously active, electrically adjusted and working-like iPSC-CMs), further validating the use of this cellular model to study Nav1.5 current and conduction in LMNA-CMP.

While previous studies in other cellular systems have already linked Lamin A/C mutations to Nav1.5 regulation, results have been contradictory. Indeed, Liu and colleagues reported that R644C and R190W exerted an inhibitory effect on Nav1.5 when overexpressed in HEK293T cells54; a more recent study carried out on ventricular CMs from homozygousN195K/N195K mice produced opposite results, with increased peak INa and prolongation of AP duration55. Our findings clarify these discrepancies and provide evidence for the phenotype in a relevant human pathophysiological context, namely CMs derived from an iPSC-based model of laminopathy.

It is well established that the density of voltage-gated Na+ current and inactivation of Na+ channels at depolarized MDPs are at the basis of CM excitability and are a major determinant of impulse propagation across the myocardium38. Many mutations on SCN5A affecting expression or function of the Nav1.5 channel have been found in patients with various forms of inherited arrhythmias;56 moreover, conduction defects and sudden death also represent phenotypic hallmarks of LMNA-CMP4. These notions strongly support a pathogenic role for downregulated Na+ channel expression in the onset of conduction disturbances seen in K219T-CMs.

Along this line, conduction velocities (CVs) were significantly decreased in confluent strands of K219T-CMs. As expected, most likely because of the fetal-like maturation stage of CMs differentiated from iPSCs34, CVs in CNTR multicellular strands (~100 mm/s) were found to be slower than the physiological CVs of neonatal CMs cultured on the same strands (~450 mm/s) or on anisotropic intact myocardial tissue (~600 mm/s); nonetheless, CVs recorded in our experiments were faster than those reported by others in multicellular preparations of stem cell-derived CMs (~50 mm/s)33,57. These differences are most likely due to different cellular excitabilities, the particular electrical coupling among the cells and the patterned geometry used for culturing confluent cells.

Impulse propagation across the myocardium depends not only on CM excitability but is also determined by intercellular conductance38,58; previous studies have linked LMNA-dependent conduction defects to misexpression or mislocalization of Connexin-43, a gap junctional protein that, in the heart, is localized at the intercalated disks (end-to-end coupling) of CMs and is critical for establishing intercellular conductance and driving impulse propagation14,38,58,59. Even though we did not observe altered Connexin-43 expression in our model, we cannot exclude the possibility that reduced gap junctional coupling due to mislocalization or internalization of the connexons may be involved in determining the observed conduction defects. In support of this assumption, we found that the slowing of CVs in K219T-CMs was more profound than the reductions in dV/dtmax and INa density in single-cell preparations. The stronger effect on CV than on excitability parameters may be supported by an additive effect of the two impulse propagation pathways (excitability and intercellular conductance).

At the molecular level, we found an epigenetically-mediated regulatory effect on SCN5A that affected the expression of the Nav1.5 channel, leading to diminished INa density and impaired impulse propagation. Besides a role in maintaining the structural stability of the nucleus, Lamin A/C may have key regulatory roles on gene transcription, either by direct interaction with DNA and chromatin or through the binding to chromatin complexes or transcription factors40,47,50,60,61. Genome–Lamin A/C interaction occurs through large chromatin domains and in spatially restricted regions on gene promoters, modulating gene expression18,41. LMNA missense mutants have been found aberrantly associated with specific portions of the genome, leading to transcriptional defects, rearrangement of LADs and Lamin–chromatin associations occurring at the nuclear interior43,62. It was therefore suggested that changes in gene expression observed in cells from patients carrying different types of Lamin A/C mutation (i.e., progeroid disorder, lipodystrophies, and muscle dystrophy) were linked to gain/loss of LADs, affecting genome architecture43,48,49,62,63. Even though genome-wide investigations are necessary to identify lamin associated domains and firmly establish their remodeling, our findings well suit this regulatory circuit, providing a new piece of evidence for Lamin A/C-dependent modulation of the expression of a key gene in cardiac electrophysiology, SCN5A, as a determinant of the disease.

In the mechanism we propose here, mutant Lamin A/C proteins form a repressive complex with PRC2, which binds to the SCN5A promoter and catalyzes the deposition of H3K27me3. In this conformation, SCN5A is preferentially located at the nuclear periphery. This further contributes to a repressive environment, resulting in the downregulation of targeted-gene transcription and leading to the diminished INa and impaired propagation registered in LMNA-mutant cells.

ChIP and 3D-FISH experiments demonstrated selective and dynamic binding of Lamin A/C to the SCN5A promoter in CMs and throughout cardiac differentiation. However, we cannot exclude that additional layers of chromatin regulation may be involved. Indeed, since the nuclear lamina operates as a docking platform for the binding of transcription factors and proteins involved in transcriptional regulation, it is possible that other factors (e.g., lamin-binding proteins, other chromatin regulators, lncRNAs) may further regulate SCN5A expression.

Results from super-resolution STED microscopy further support the view that a regulatory circuit involving Lamin A/C and PRC2 is acting on SCN5A at the nuclear periphery, indicating a more abundant peripheral distribution of PRC2, by itself or bound to Lamin A/C, in K219T-CMs. More generally, the distribution profiles of the PRC2–Lamin A/C complex indicated that dynamics significantly differ in wild-type and K219T CMs and distinguish two conditions, one in which PRC2–Lamin A/C is closer to the nuclear periphery and another in which there is a tendency to relocate towards the interior. These findings are consistent with the previously described link between Lamin A/C and the intra-nuclear localization of PcG proteins and with their nuclear compartmentalization reported in cells lacking Lamin A/C51. The concept that PRC2 and Lamin A/C may interact also at the nuclear periphery is instead novel; although further investigations are required, it is possible that the higher affinity of Lamin A/C for PRC2 in the presence of the mutation results in persistent binding of the two proteins together regardless of nuclear localization, and that, in this form, they relocate through the nucleus to exert their repressive effect. In addition, results from 3D-STED are also indicative of different dynamics for mutant Lamin A/C and the wild-type protein; this is in agreement with a recent study describing the different dynamics of diverse mutated LMNAs64.

As a result of this global rearrangement, an effect on other disease-relevant genes cannot be ruled out: transcriptional reprogramming is likely to occur at a global level in differentiating cardiac progenitors and CMs in the presence of mutated Lamin A/C, leading to misregulation of genes involved in other disease-relevant processes, such as contractility and cell metabolism.

Besides this speculative view, our findings improve the understanding of the pathogenesis of LMNA-CMP-related conduction defects and indicate a new pharmacological target. Indeed, it is conceivable that clinically relevant results could be had by either selectively activating the Nav1.5 channel through specific modulators or inducing SCN5A expression (e.g., with epigenetic drugs or nucleic acid mimics). Normalization of the electrophysiological phenotype of mutated CMs through overexpression of SCN5A together with the evidence that this gene is positively modulated in isogenic K219T-corrected CMs point to SCN5A as a potential gene-therapy target for LMNA-CMP.

In conclusion, we describe a new pathogenic mechanism for the conduction defects associated with LMNA-CMPs, dependent upon transcriptional changes driven by mutant Lamin A/C. Whether the effect on the SCN5A is selective for certain mutations affecting specific protein domains or is more broadly linked to altered Lamin A/C conformation is still unclear and needs further investigation.

Methods

iPSC lines generation and maintenance

iPSCs were generated from skin fibroblasts of three LMNA patients carrying the K219T mutation and two healthy family members (without the mutation) using the STEMCCA polycistronic lentiviral vector65. Reprogrammed cells were selected by their morphology and tested for their actual pluripotency21,66. Details on generation, characterization and maintenance of the lines are provided in the Supplementary Extended Methods.

Generation of isogenic control iPSC lines

The heterozygous K129T mutation in the LMNA gene was corrected back to the wild-type allele using a CRISPR/Cas9-facilitated gene editing strategy based on a previously described method53,67,68.

The results described were obtained from line LMNA#1_2. Briefly, we developed a two-step approach to change a single nucleotide in the absence of any other genetic “scarring” (Fig. 8a and Supplementary Fig. 14A). First, we corrected the mutation by homozygous insertion of a plasmid-based targeting cassette carrying the wild-type sequence. This was obtained via homologous directed repair followed by positive selection of gene-targeted clones based on a puromycin resistance gene carried within by a piggyBac element. Secondly, we excised such piggyBac cassette using transposase, leaving behind only a “TTAA” remnant sequence. For this, corrected clones were enriched by a negative drug selection strategy based on the human herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene also carried by the piggBac. After each gene-targeting step, multiple clonal lines were isolated and genotyped using a combination of genomic PCR assays. Uncropped gels are provided in the Source Data file. Positive clones were further characterized by targeted Sanger sequencing and karyotyped to confirm their genomic stability.

A more detailed description of this procedure is provided in the Extended Methods of the Supplementary Information.

Cardiac differentiation

Differentiation into CMs was achieved using a chemically-defined serum free protocol, which is based on Wnt pathway modulation in RPMI medium27,66. In brief, 95–100% confluent iPSCs were induced with the Wnt activator CHIR99021 for 24 h and then, at day 3, exposed to IWR-1, which inhibits the Wnt pathway, for 48 h. At day 10 of induction, medium is supplemented with insulin. Spontaneous contracting activity usually appears around day 8–10 of the differentiation process. Efficiency of the differentiation was determined for all lines through the detection of the cardiac-specific marker α-sarcomeric actinin by FACS. CMs were used for the experiments 20–25 days after contraction started. Data presented are average of values obtained in CMs from 2 CNTR and 3 LMNA subjects; two iPSC lines per subject were used.

Electrophysiological analyses

Maximal diastolic potential (MDP), action potential (AP) properties, and whole-cell Na+ current (INa) recordings were performed in low-density cell cultures using a Multiclamp 700B patch-clamp amplifier (Molecular Devices) and analysed with dedicated software (ClampFit 9.2). Whole cell currents were normalized to cell capacitance and are reported as pA/pF. Single iPSC-CMs were identified on the basis of their typical morphology21. Spontaneously active iPSC-CMs and iPSC-CMs in which the MDP was adjusted to physiological resting cardiac membrane potentials by a constant hyperpolarizing current injection were selected for measurement of AP characteristics.

Impulse propagation characteristics along 80-μm wide strand preparations were assessed optically by a fast resolution camera (Ultima, Scimedia, USA). Preparations were surperfused at 36 °C using the voltage-sensitive dye di-8-ANEPPS. Conduction velocity was computed by linear regression of activation times recorded along the preparation. Optical action potential propagation derived from two strands was acquired for each field of view at 1 KHz sample resolution for 4 s recording. Magnification 10×, n.a. 0.5. n = 47 for CTRL-CMs, n = 40 for K219T-CMs.

In all electrophysiological experiments, preparations were superfused at 1.5 ml min−1 with HBSS containing 10 mmol l−1 of HEPES (pH 7.40) (Sigma Aldrich) (pH 7.40). For INa recordings, a low Na+ solution was used that contained (in mmol l−1): NaCl 70, CaCl2 1.8, CsCl 90, MgCl2 1.2, glucose 10, HEPES 10, and nifedipine 0.001 (pH 7.4 with CsOH).

Protein analyses

Protein expression was analysed by Western blotting and immunofluorescence. For the Western blotting, 30 μg of lysate was used. Primary antibodies (Nav1.5 1:1000, anti-rabbit Cell Signaling D9J7S, β-actin 1:2000, anti-goat Santa Cruz sc1615) were incubated overnight. For detection, HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies and the Millipore Chemiluminescent HRP substrate kit were used. Co-IP experiments were performed as previously51. Detailed protocol is available in the Supplementary Methods. Uncropped blots from Western Blot experiments are provided in the Source Data File.

For immunofluorescence, iPSC-CMs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, blocked with 3% serum and permeabilized with 0.1% Triton. Stainings were performed using the following antibodies: anti-Nav1.5 channel protein (Alomone #ASC005), anti-α-sarcomeric actinin protein (Abcam EA-53- ab9465), anti-Lamin A/C (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, N18 sc6215). For detection, we used Alexa-Fluor 488-conjugated and 555-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes from Thermo Scientific) raised in the appropriate species for the experiments. Images were acquired on an FV1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope (Olympus) and analysed using ImageJ software.

Binding of Lamin A/C and Suz12 was assessed by STimulated Emission Depletion (STED) super-resolution microscopy. Cells were incubated overnight at +4 °C with the primary antibodies against Lamin A/C (anti-mouse, from Santa Cruz 7292-X, 1:250) and Suz12 (anti-rabbit, from Cell Signaling #3737, 1:250). For detection, we used Abberior STAR RED-conjugated and STAR 580-conjugated secondary antibodies. Images were acquired on a Leica TCS SP8 STED 3× microscope and analysed using Imaris software. PRC2-Lamin A/C distribution profiles ware determined using the “Distance transformation” Xtension of Imaris Bitplane. Details of all experimental procedures and analyses are available in the Extended Methods of the Supplementary Information.

Gene expression

Gene expression studies were performed on cDNA synthesized from total RNA using SuperScript Vilo cDNA synthesis kit (ThermoFischer Scientific). Comparative gene expression was determined by realtime PCR using Sybr Green (ThermoFisher Scientific) and specific primers. A list of the primers used for the experiments is provided in the Supplementary Information files (Supplementary Table 6). The relative expression was calculated as 2-ΔΔCt using the comparative Ct method and 18S or HGPRT as housekeeping control as detailed in the respective figure legends.

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation

Two wells (of a 12-well plate) of confluent CMs were fixed in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min and then quenched with 0.125 M of glycine for 5 min. Chromatin was sonicated with Bioruptor Diagenode Sonicator and immunoprecipitated overnight at 4 °C with 4 μg of Lamin A/C antibody (anti Lamin A/C (636), Santa Cruz sc-7292×) or 5 μg of antibodies against the analysed histone modifications (anti-H3K4me3, Active Motif 39159; anti-H3K27me3, Abcam ab6002; anti-H3K9me3, Abcam ab8898; anti-Suz12, Cell Signaling, #3737).

The pathology tissue chromatin-immunoprecipitation (PAT-ChIP) procedure was carried out as previously described69. In brief, paraffin was removed with fresh Histolemon solution (Carlo Erba), chromatin extracted, sonicated and immunoprecipitated. For the immunoprecipitation step 3 µg of ChIP-grade antibody was added to 0.5–2.5 µg of tissue chromatin.

Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicate using SYBR Select Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific). Ct values were calculated using ViiaTM 7 software and relative enrichment was calculated as ChIP/input ratio. Primer sequences are listed in the Supplementary Table 6.

3D-FISH

In-situ hybridization was essentially as previously described, with minor modifications70,71. Slides were scored under an Olympus FV-1000 confocal laser-scanning microscope with a ×100 oil immersion objective using a ×2 optical zoom with a z-step of 0.3 μm between optical slices as previously described47.

Statistics

Statistical significance was determined with GraphPad Prism 6.0 software using unpaired two-tailed t-test (homoscedastic or heteroscedastic where appropriate) for the analysis of two groups or ANOVA for experiments with two between-subjects factors (two-way). Bonferroni’s highly significant difference (HSD) post hoc analysis was used for multiple pairwise comparison. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least 3 independent experiments, unless otherwise noted. Differences between data sets were considered significant at p < 0.05. NS represents no significant difference. Statistical parameters are reported in the respective figures and figure legends.

For electrophysiological analyses, the number of samples refers to independent experiments. Assessment of normality of the data was calculated with Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test.

Human studies

All human samples were collected after written informed consent by the patients and the study was approved by the review boards of three clinical entities: Humanitas Research Hospital (ID:1215), Verona AOUI University Hospital (ID:765cesc), and Ospedali Riuniti di Trieste (ID: 74/2015).

Animal studies

Animal experiments were limited to the teratoma formation assay to assess pluripotency of the generated iPSC lines and were performed in compliance with the national and EU guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. For the teratoma formation assay, six-week-old NOD:SCID mice (Charles River Laboratories) were used. The procedure was approved by the Italian Ministry of Health (137/2012-B).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Data availability

All data that support the findings described in this study are available within the manuscript and the related supplementary information, and from the corresponding authors upon request. The source data underlying Figs. 1a–f, 2a–c, 3d, 4b, 7b and 7d, 8b–d, 9c-e and Supplementary Figs. 4D, 6, 7B–D, 12C–E and 13B–E are provided as a Source Data file.

References

  1. 1.

    Cattin, M. E., Muchir, A. & Bonne, G. ‘State-of-the-heart’ of cardiac laminopathies. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 28, 297–304 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dechat, T. et al. Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin. Genes Dev. 22, 832–853 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hershberger, R. E., Hedges, D. J. & Morales, A. Dilated cardiomyopathy: the complexity of a diverse genetic architecture. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 10, 531–547 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Rankin, J. & Ellard, S. The laminopathies: a clinical review. Clin. Genet. 70, 261–274 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Worman, H. J. & Bonne, G. “Laminopathies”: a wide spectrum of human diseases. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 2121–2133 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Lu, J. T., Muchir, A., Nagy, P. L. & Worman, H. J. LMNA cardiomyopathy: cell biology and genetics meet clinical medicine. Dis. Models Mech. 4, 562–568 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Arbustini, E. et al. Autosomal dominant dilated cardiomyopathy with atrioventricular block: a lamin A/C defect-related disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 39, 981–990 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Brodt, C. et al. Temporal relationship of conduction system disease and ventricular dysfunction in LMNA cardiomyopathy. J. Card. Fail. 19, 233–239 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kumar, S. et al. Long-term arrhythmic and nonarrhythmic outcomes of lamin A/C mutation carriers. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 68, 2299–2307 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    van Berlo, J. H. et al. Meta-analysis of clinical characteristics of 299 carriers of LMNA gene mutations: do lamin A/C mutations portend a high risk of sudden death? J. Mol. Med. 83, 79–83 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Pasotti, M. et al. Long-term outcome and risk stratification in dilated cardiolaminopathies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 52, 1250–1260 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Taylor, M. R. et al. Natural history of dilated cardiomyopathy due to lamin A/C gene mutations. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 41, 771–780 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Arimura, T. et al. Mouse model carrying H222P-Lmna mutation develops muscular dystrophy and dilated cardiomyopathy similar to human striated muscle laminopathies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 155–169 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Mounkes, L. C., Kozlov, S. V., Rottman, J. N. & Stewart, C. L. Expression of an LMNA-N195K variant of A-type lamins results in cardiac conduction defects and death in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 2167–2180 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Schreiber, K. H. & Kennedy, B. K. When lamins go bad: nuclear structure and disease. Cell 152, 1365–1375 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang, H., Kieckhaefer, J. E. & Cao, K. Mouse models of laminopathies. Aging cell 12, 2–10 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ho, J. C. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cell lines from 3 distinct laminopathies bearing heterogeneous mutations in lamin A/C. Aging 3, 380–390 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Lund, E. et al. Lamin A/C-promoter interactions specify chromatin state-dependent transcription outcomes. Genome Res. 23, 1580–1589 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Steele-Stallard, H. B. et al. Modeling skeletal muscle laminopathies using human induced pluripotent stem cells carrying pathogenic LMNA mutations. Front. Physiol. 9, 1332 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen, I. Y., Matsa, E. & Wu, J. C. Induced pluripotent stem cells: at the heart of cardiovascular precision medicine. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 13, 333–349 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Di Pasquale, E. et al. CaMKII inhibition rectifies arrhythmic phenotype in a patient-specific model of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Cell Death Dis. 4, e843 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Moretti, A. et al. Patient-specific induced pluripotent stem-cell models for long-QT syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 363, 1397–1409 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Siu, C. W. et al. Modeling of lamin A/C mutation premature cardiac aging using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells. Aging 4, 803–822 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lee, Y. K. et al. Modeling treatment response for lamin A/C related dilated cardiomyopathy in human induced pluripotent stem Cells. J. Am. Heart Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.005677 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Chatzifrangkeskou, M. et al. Cofilin-1 phosphorylation catalyzed by ERK1/2 alters cardiac actin dynamics in dilated cardiomyopathy caused by lamin A/C gene mutation. Hum. Mol. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy215 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Roncarati, R. et al. Doubly heterozygous LMNA and TTN mutations revealed by exome sequencing in a severe form of dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 21, 1105–1111 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Nakahama, H. & Di Pasquale, E. Generation of cardiomyocytes from pluripotent stem cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 1353, 181–190 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Raharjo, W. H., Enarson, P., Sullivan, T., Stewart, C. L. & Burke, B. Nuclear envelope defects associated with LMNA mutations cause dilated cardiomyopathy and Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4447–4457 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Koumi, S., Backer, C. L. & Arentzen, C. E. Characterization of inwardly rectifying K+ channel in human cardiac myocytes. Alterations in channel behavior in myocytes isolated from patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Circulation 92, 164–174 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cohen, C. J., Bean, B. P. & Tsien, R. W. Maximal upstroke velocity as an index of available sodium conductance. Comparison of maximal upstroke velocity and voltage clamp measurements of sodium current in rabbit Purkinje fibers. Circ. Res. 54, 636–651 (1984).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Song, L. S. et al. Electrophysiological effects of protopine in cardiac myocytes: inhibition of multiple cation channel currents. Br. J. Pharmacol. 129, 893–900 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Bett, G. C. et al. Electronic “expression” of the inward rectifier in cardiocytes derived from human-induced pluripotent stem cells. Heart Rhythm 10, 1903–1910 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Satin, J. et al. Mechanism of spontaneous excitability in human embryonic stem cell derived cardiomyocytes. J. Physiol. 559, 479–496 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Robertson, C., Tran, D. D. & George, S. C. Concise review: maturation phases of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Stem Cells 31, 829–837 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhang, J. et al. Functional cardiomyocytes derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Circ. Res. 104, e30–e41 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Davis, R. P. et al. Cardiomyocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells recapitulate electrophysiological characteristics of an overlap syndrome of cardiac sodium channel disease. Circulation 125, 3079–3091 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Ma, J. et al. High purity human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes: electrophysiological properties of action potentials and ionic currents. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 301, H2006–H2017 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Kleber, A. G. & Rudy, Y. Basic mechanisms of cardiac impulse propagation and associated arrhythmias. Physiol. Rev. 84, 431–488 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Starmer, C. F., Grant, A. O. & Colatsky, T. J. What happens when cardiac Na channel function is compromised? 2. Numerical studies of the vulnerable period in tissue altered by drugs. Cardiovasc. Res. 57, 1062–1071 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Cesarini, E. et al. Lamin A/C sustains PcG protein architecture, maintaining transcriptional repression at target genes. J. Cell Biol. 211, 533–551 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Collas, P., Lund, E. G. & Oldenburg, A. R. Closing the (nuclear) envelope on the genome: how nuclear lamins interact with promoters and modulate gene expression. Bioessays 36, 75–83 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948–951 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Perovanovic, J. et al. Laminopathies disrupt epigenomic developmental programs and cell fate. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 335ra358 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    van Steensel, B. & Belmont, A. S. Lamina-associated domains: links with chromosome architecture, heterochromatin, and gene repression. Cell 169, 780–791 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Deniaud, E. & Bickmore, W. A. Transcription and the nuclear periphery: edge of darkness?. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19, 187–191 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Luperchio, T. R., Wong, X. & Reddy, K. L. Genome regulation at the peripheral zone: lamina associated domains in development and disease. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 25, 50–61 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Harr, J. C. et al. Directed targeting of chromatin to the nuclear lamina is mediated by chromatin state and A-type lamins. J. Cell Biol. 208, 33–52 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Oldenburg, A. et al. A lipodystrophy-causing lamin A mutant alters conformation and epigenetic regulation of the anti-adipogenic MIR335 locus. J. Cell Biol. 216, 2731–2743 (2017).

  49. 49.

    Briand, N. et al. The lipodystrophic hotspot lamin A p.R482W mutation deregulates the mesodermal inducer T/Brachyury and early vascular differentiation gene networks. Hum. Mol. Genet. 27, 1447–1459 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Reddy, K. L., Zullo, J. M., Bertolino, E. & Singh, H. Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature 452, 243–247 (2008).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Marullo, F. et al. Nucleoplasmic lamin A/C and polycomb group of proteins: an evolutionarily conserved interplay. Nucleus 7, 103–111 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Ran, F. A. et al. Genome engineering using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2281–2308 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bertero, A. et al. Chromatin compartment dynamics in a haploinsufficient model of cardiac laminopathy. bioRxiv, 555250, https://doi.org/10.1101/555250 (2019).

  54. 54.

    Liu, Z. et al. A novel lamin A/C gene missense mutation (445 V>E) in immunoglobulin-like fold associated with left ventricular non-compaction. Europace 18, 617–622 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Markandeya, Y. S. et al. Inhibition of late sodium current attenuates ionic arrhythmia mechanism in ventricular myocytes expressing LaminA-N195K mutation. Heart Rhythm 13, 2228–2236 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kovach, J. R. & Benson, D. W. Conduction disorders and Nav1.5. Card. Electrophysiol. Clin. 6, 723–731 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Kucera, J. P., Prudat, Y., Marcu, I. C., Azzarito, M. & Ullrich, N. D. Slow conduction in mixed cultured strands of primary ventricular cells and stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 3, 58 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Veeraraghavan, R., Gourdie, R. G. & Poelzing, S. Mechanisms of cardiac conduction: a history of revisions. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 306, H619–H627 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Macquart, C. et al. Microtubule cytoskeleton regulates connexin 43 localization and cardiac conduction in cardiomyopathy caused by mutation in A-type lamins gene. Hum. Mol. Genet. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddy227 (2018).

  60. 60.

    Andres, V. & Gonzalez, J. M. Role of A-type lamins in signaling, transcription, and chromatin organization. J. Cell Biol. 187, 945–957 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Zuleger, N., Robson, M. I. & Schirmer, E. C. The nuclear envelope as a chromatin organizer. Nucleus 2, 339–349 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Paulsen, J. et al. Chrom3D: three-dimensional genome modeling from Hi-C and nuclear lamin-genome contacts. Genome Biol. 18, 21 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Briand, N. & Collas, P. Laminopathy-causing lamin A mutations reconfigure lamina-associated domains and local spatial chromatin conformation. Nucleus 9, 216–226 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Serebryannyy, L. A., Ball, D. A., Karpova, T. S. & Misteli, T. Single molecule analysis of lamin dynamics. Methods. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2018.08.009 (2018).

  65. 65.

    Sommer, C. A. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell generation using a single lentiviral stem cell cassette. Stem Cells 27, 543–549 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Lodola, F. et al. Adeno-associated virus-mediated CASQ2 delivery rescues phenotypic alterations in a patient-specific model of recessive catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Cell Death Dis. 7, e2393 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Yusa, K. Seamless genome editing in human pluripotent stem cells using custom endonuclease-based gene targeting and the piggyBac transposon. Nat. Protoc. 8, 2061–2078 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Yusa, K. et al. Targeted gene correction of alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 478, 391–394 (2011).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Fanelli, M. et al. Pathology tissue-chromatin immunoprecipitation, coupled with high-throughput sequencing, allows the epigenetic profiling of patient samples. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21535–21540 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Paulis, M. et al. A pre-screening FISH-based method to detect CRISPR/Cas9 off-targets in mouse embryonic stem cells. Sci. Rep. 5, 12327 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Paulis, M. et al. Chromosome transplantation as a novel approach for correcting complex genomic disorders. Oncotarget 6, 35218–35230 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. G. Mostoslawsky (Boston University School of Medicine, USA) for providing the STEMCCA vectors for the reprogramming, Dr. Stephan Rohr (University of Bern) for the 22 mm coverslips with patterned growth strands used in the conduction velocity experiments and Dr. A. Brivanlou (Rockefeller University, NY, USA) for the RUES2 cell line. We are also grateful to Dr. D. Morone, Dr. Erreni and the Humanitas Imaging Unit for the assistance in the acquisition and analyses of the 3D-FISH and STED microscopy experiments; Drs. A. Anselmo and F.S. Colombo of the Flow Cytometry Core for the assistance with FACS; Roman Medvedev for the help in the conduction velocity experiments; Dr. P. Carullo for the teratoma formation assay; Drs. H. Nakahama and L. Rutigliano for the maintenance of the iPSC lines; and Dr. M. Rabino for generating the pLenti-LMNA-WT-GFP vector. This work was supported by the following grants: Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2011–02347743), Interomics Flagship Project of the CNR and “IO MERITO” Project of the Humanitas Research Center to E.D.P.; an EMBO Long-Term Fellowship (ALTF 448–2017) to A.B.; European Research Council Advanced Grant (CardioEpigen, # 294609), Italian Ministry of Health (PE-2013–02356818) and the CARIPLO Foundation (2015–0573) to G.C.; PNR-CNR Aging Program and Italian Ministry of Health (to PE-2011–02347329) to P.V.; Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (2015583WMX) to G.C. and E.D.P.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.S. and S.C. performed most of the experiments, analysed data and wrote the manuscript. S.C. also contributed to generation of the isogenic control lines. M.M. contributed to functional experiments, analysed the data and contributed to writing the manuscript. A.B. designed the gene-editing strategy, generated isogenic control lines and contributed to the writing. M.P. performed the 3D-FISH experiments, analysed the data and contributed to writing. P.K. helped with the strategy for the chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments and the analyses. S.S. contributed to the protein distribution analysis of the 3D-STED experiments and assisted with the statistical analyses. A.F., C.L., G.S., M.D.F. and G.F. contributed to patients’ samples collection and clinical evaluation. V.L. carried out the FACS analyses. P.V. contributed to the supervision of the 3D-FISH experiments and critically read the manuscript. C.E.M. supervised the generation of the gene-edited lines. N.S., S.C. and E.D.P. prepared the figures. G.C. contributed to interpretation of the results and wrote the manuscript. E.D.P. was responsible for forming the hypothesis, project development, data coordination, and writing, finalizing, and submitting the manuscript. All authors discussed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Gianluigi Condorelli or Elisa Di Pasquale.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salvarani, N., Crasto, S., Miragoli, M. et al. The K219T-Lamin mutation induces conduction defects through epigenetic inhibition of SCN5A in human cardiac laminopathy. Nat Commun 10, 2267 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09929-w

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing