Abstract
Scalable quantum networking requires quantum systems with quantum processing capabilities. Solid state spin systems with reliable spin–optical interfaces are a leading hardware in this regard. However, available systems suffer from large electron–phonon interaction or fast spin dephasing. Here, we demonstrate that the negatively charged siliconvacancy centre in silicon carbide is immune to both drawbacks. Thanks to its ^{4}A_{2} symmetry in ground and excited states, optical resonances are stable with nearFouriertransformlimited linewidths, allowing exploitation of the spin selectivity of the optical transitions. In combination with millisecondlong spin coherence times originating from the highpurity crystal, we demonstrate highfidelity optical initialization and coherent spin control, which we exploit to show coherent coupling to single nuclear spins with ∼1 kHz resolution. The summary of our findings makes this defect a prime candidate for realising memoryassisted quantum network applications using semiconductorbased spintophoton interfaces and coherently coupled nuclear spins.
Introduction
Optically addressable single spins in solids are a promising basis for establishing a scalable quantum information platform^{1,2,3}. Electron spins are naturally suited for nanoscale quantum sensing^{4,5,6,7,8,9}, and for controlling nuclear spins that enable quantum information storage and computation^{10,11,12}. Combined with an efficient spintophoton interface^{13,14}, this enables fast optical spin manipulation^{13,15}, entangling multiple quantum systems over long distances^{16,17}, and the realisation of quantum networks^{1,18}. In this perspective, several pivotal landmark demonstrations have been achieved with the nitrogenvacancy (NV) centre in diamond^{13,16,18,19}, and recently the divacancy centre in silicon carbide (SiC)^{14}. However, implementation of scalable nanophotonics structures in the vicinity of those systems has proven to be detrimental for spin and optical stability and coherence^{20,21}. New systems try to overcome those detrimental interactions through a high degree of symmetry. For example, the negatively charged siliconvacancy centre in diamond shows high optical stability due to inversion symmetry^{22,23}. However, the pronounced spinphonon coupling necessitates millikelvin temperatures for decent spin coherence times^{24}. Among colour centres in SiC, an efficient spintophoton interface has been demonstrated by divacancy spins in SiC^{14}, however, the zerophonon line (ZPL) of divacancies is notoriously sensitive to stray electric fields similarly to that of NV centre in diamond^{25}.
So far, no known quantum system in solids demonstrated all the above specifications simultaneously. We suggest an alternative pathway to solving the abovementioned issues, i.e., we resort to systems with highly symmetric ground and excited state symmetries and little redistribution of electron density between the two states^{26}. The resulting little change in electric dipole moments between the two states effectively decouples the system from electric field fluctuations. Strong optical transitions can still be obtained, provided that ground and excited states wavefunctions have alternating phases. In previous works, we demonstrated that the V_{Si} shows low geometrical relaxation under excitation, leading to very high emission into the zero phonon line^{27}. Additionally, we performed preliminary investigations on coherent spin control and optical readout with limited contrast due to the lack of highfidelity spin initialisation and readout procedures^{27,28}.
In this report, we show that the hexagonal lattice site silicon vacancy (V_{Si}) in the 4H polytype SiC close to ideally matches all criteria. Compared to our previous studies, the robust properties of V_{Si} in the improved host crystal material allows us to observe for the first time narrow and separated optical transitions of a single V_{Si}, which we address to demonstrate a highfidelity spinoptical interface, suitable for quantum networking applications. Our findings prove that good quantum systems do not necessarily require inversion symmetry, which opens the door for new classes of quantum systems in numerous semiconductors and insulators.
Results
Silicon vacancies in silicon carbide
The structure of the 4HSiC crystal results in two nonequivalent sites for a V_{Si}. As shown in Fig. 1a, we investigate the defect centre that is formed by a missing silicon atom at a hexagonal lattice site and negatively charged (V_{1} centre)^{29}. The ground state has a spin quartet manifold (S = 3/2) with weak spinorbit coupling, leading to millisecond spin relaxation time^{27}. To study the centre’s intrinsic optical and electron spin properties, we use a nuclear spin free isotopically purified 4HSiC layer (^{28}Si > 99.85%, ^{12}C > 99.98%), in which we create single centres by electron irradiation (see Methods). The defects are optically addressed by confocal microscopy at cryogenic temperatures (T ∼ 4 K). We employ a 730 nm laser diode for offresonant excitation. A wavelengthtunable diode laser (Toptica DL pro) performs resonant excitation at 861 nm in the ZPL of the lowest optical transition with A_{2} symmetry, known as V1 line. Another energetically higher transition to an electronic state of E symmetry, called V1’ line^{27,29,30}, is not investigated in this work. Fluorescence emission is detected in the redshifted phonon side band (875–890 nm). In addition, ground state spin manipulation is performed with microwaves (MW) that are applied via a 20 μm diameter copper wire. See Supplementary Note 1 for single photon emission characteristics of the identified single silicon vacancies.
Excited state spectroscopy
Figure 1b illustrates the defect’s energy level structure. At zero external magnetic field (B_{0} = 0 G), ground and excited state manifolds show pairwise degenerate spin levels m_{S} = ±1/2 and m_{S} = ±3/2, with zerofield splittings (ZFS) of 2 ⋅ D_{gs} and 2 ⋅ D_{es}, respectively. Previous studies constrained 2 ⋅ D_{gs} < 10 MHz^{27,29,31} and here we determine 2 ⋅ D_{gs} = 4.5 ± 0.1 MHz (see Methods). In order to investigate the excited state structure, we use resonant optical excitation. We apply a strong MW field at ~4.5 MHz to continuously mix the ground state spin population, and wavelengthtune simultaneously the 861 nm laser across the optically allowed transitions. As shown in Fig. 1c, we observe two strong fluorescence peaks, labelled A_{1} and A_{2}. The peak separation of 980 ± 10 MHz corresponds to the difference between the ground and excited state ZFS. As shown in the Supplementary Note 2, we use coherent spin manipulation to infer a positive excited state ZFS, i.e., 2 ⋅ D_{es} = 985 ± 10 MHz, which is in line with the results of firstprinciples density functional theory. To determine optical selection rules, we apply an external magnetic field of B_{0} = 92G precisely aligned along the uniaxial symmetry axis of D_{gs}, which is parallel to the caxis of 4HSiC, such that the ground state Zeeman spinsplitting exceeds the optical excitation linewidth (see Fig. 1b). We observe no shift of the optical resonance lines, corroborating our assignment of A_{1,2} as spinconserving optical transitions between ground and excited states. Further, we observe no spinflip transitions, which would show up as additional peaks in the spectra in Fig. 1c at approximately ±258 MHz (see Supplementary Note 3). However, as we will show later, spinflips can still occur through nonradiative decay channels. Moreover, as the presence of a magnetic field does not alter the peak separation, we confirm that ground and excited state gfactors are identical (see Supplementary Note 3)^{32}. Figure 1d shows repetitively recorded excitation spectra for which we find exceptionally stable lines over an hour timescale.
Stable optical resonance
To underline that the defect’s wavefunction symmetry indeed largely decouples its optical transition energy from stray charges in its local environment, we perform resonant excitation studies on four other defects. As shown in Fig. 1f, the peak separation of all defects is nearly identical within 19 MHz. In addition, all resonant absorption lines are inhomogeneously distributed over only a few hundred MHz, allowing us to identify several defects with overlapping emission. The observed inhomogeneity is likely due to local strain near the surface of the solid immersion lens which is fabricated to improve the photon collection efficiency. We also can observe small additional peaks in a few defects, whose origin is not yet investigated.
Advanced quantum information applications based on spinphoton entanglement require that the quantum system emits transformlimited photons. We measure this via the excitation linewidth of the optical transitions. In Fig. 1e, we show that for excitation intensities below 1 W/cm^{2}, the linewidth approaches 60 MHz. Considering the 5.5 ns excited state lifetime^{27}, this is only twice the Fouriertransform limit, and might be explained by small residual spectral diffusion. For example, previous studies on NV centres in diamond and divacancies in SiC emphasize the impact of the sample quality, especially the impurity concentration, on the linewidth of the resonant optical transitions^{14,33}. We indeed find that a higher defect concentration leads to broader linewidths (see Supplementary Note 4). This suggests that lowdamage defect generation techniques and Fermi level tuning via adapted doping can further enhance the quality of our optical transitions. We also measure the Stark shift tuning coefficient, which is at least one order of magnitude smaller compared to NV centres in diamond (see Supplementary Note 5). As explained in the Supplementary Note 5, this excellent optical stability is intimately linked to the wavefunction symmetry of the V_{Si}. Interestingly, unlike diamond, SiC cannot host defects with inversion symmetry due to noncentrosymmetry. As a consequence, the V_{Si} shows nonzero ground and excited state dipole moments, which directly couple to electric fields. However, for the V_{Si}, those dipole moments are nearly identical, such that the optical transition energy is not altered by electric fields. Note that this does not preclude the existence of a strong dipole transition between ground and excited states, but it restricts the orientation to the symmetry axis of the defect, which is the caxis of the crystal^{26}.
Efficient control of the electron spin states
Realising a spintophoton interface for quantum information applications requires highfidelity spin state initialisation, manipulation and readout^{34}. Previous theoretical models^{35} and ensemblebased measurements^{27} have indicated that continuous offresonant optical excitation of V_{Si} eventually leads to a decay into a metastable state manifold (MS), followed by rather lessselective relaxation into the ground state spin manifold. Here, we use resonant optical excitation to strongly improve spin state selectivity. As shown in Fig. 2a, we apply a magnetic field of B_{0} = 92 G, allowing us to selectively address transitions within the ground state spin manifold via MW excitation. We first excite the system along the A_{2} transition (linking the m_{S} = ±3/2 spin states), which eventually populates the system into the m_{S} = ±1/2 ground state via decays through the MS (see Supplementary Note 6). Then, we perform optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR). For this, we apply narrowband microwave pulses in the range of 245–75 MHz, followed by fluorescence detection during an optical readout pulse on the A_{2} transition. As shown in Fig. 2b, we observe two spin resonances at the magnetic dipole allowed transitions, \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left {  \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) and \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left { + \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) at 253.5 MHz (MW_{1}) and 262.5 MHz (MW_{3}), respectively. To observe the centre resonance at 258.0 MHz (MW_{2}), we need to imbalance the population between \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) and \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\). To this end, we combine the initial resonant laser excitation pulse on A_{2} with MW_{3}. MW_{3} continuously depopulates \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\), such that the system is eventually pumped into \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\). After applying microwaves in the range between 245–275 MHz, the optical readout pulse is also accompanied by MW_{3}, which transfers population from \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) to \(\left { + \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\). This effectively allows us to detect a fluorescence signal from spin population in \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\). As shown in Fig. 2c, we observe the two expected resonances for \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left {  \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) and \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) at 253.5 MHz (MW_{1}) and 258.0 MHz (MW_{2}), respectively. Unless mentioned otherwise, we now always initialise the system into \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) using the abovedescribed procedure and read out the spin state population of the \(\left { \pm \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) levels with a 1 µs long laser pulse resonant with the A_{2} transition.
We first demonstrate coherent spin state control via Rabi oscillations. Figure 3a shows the sequence for Rabi oscillations between \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left {  \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\). After spin state initialisation, we apply MW_{1} for a time τ_{Rabi} to drive population towards \(\left {  \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\), followed by optical readout. To observe oscillations between \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\), the system is initialised, MW_{2} is applied for a time τ_{Rabi}, followed by a population transfer from \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \to \left { + \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) using a πpulse at MW_{3}, and eventual state readout. Figure 3b shows the experimental results from which we deduce Rabi oscillation frequencies of 257.5 kHz and 293.8 kHz. The frequency ratio of \(1.14 \approx \sqrt {4/3}\) is in excellent agreement with the theoretical expectation for a quartet spin system^{36}. In a next step, we proceed to measuring spin coherence times between the ground state levels \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) and \(\left {  \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\). To this end, we perform a free induction decay (FID) measurement in which we replace the Rabi pulse in Fig. 3a by two \(\frac{\pi }{2}\)pulses separated by a waiting time τ_{FID}. The experimental data in Fig. 3c show a dephasing time of \(T_2^ \ast = 30 \pm 2\,{\mathrm{\mu s}}\), which is comparable with stateoftheart results reported for NV centres in isotopically ultrapure diamonds^{37}. To measure the spin coherence time T_{2}, we use a Hahnecho sequence by adding a refocusing πpulse in the middle of two \(\frac{\pi }{2}\)pulses. As shown in Fig. 3d, we measure a spin coherence time of T_{2} = 0.85 ± 0.12 ms, which is longer than T_{2} of a single V_{2} centre, a V_{Si} at another nonequivalent lattice site, in a commercially available SiC wafer measured at room temperature^{28}. This improvement is thanks to the lower impurity concentration in the used CVD grown SiC layer (see Methods and Supplementary Note 7). For an isotopically purified system, like the one used in the present experiment, however, we expect somewhat longer coherence times. As outlined in the Supplementary Note 7, we attribute the origin to be nearby defect clusters created by microscopic cracks induced by the CVD wafer cutting process using a dicing saw. Hence, optimised sample growth, cutting and annealing should increase dephasing times to several tens of milliseconds^{38}. Unambiguous identification of the decoherence source will require systematic investigation by controlling spin bath dynamics^{39,40}.
Coherently coupled nuclear spins
Quite interestingly, the initial part of the spin echo decay of this particular defect shows pronounced oscillations resulting from the hyperfine coupling of the electron spin to nuclear spins. Being initially polarized along the zaxis in the Bloch sphere, and with microwave pulses polarized along the xaxis, the echo sequence measures^{41}
Here, k is the modulation depth parameter \(k = \left( {\frac{{2\omega _{\mathrm{\alpha }}\omega _{\mathrm{\beta }}}}{{A_ \bot \omega _{\mathrm{I}}}}} \right)^2\), with ω_{I} being the nuclear Larmor frequency, and \(\omega _{{\mathrm{\alpha }},{\mathrm{\beta }}} = \left[ {\left( {\omega _{\mathrm{I}} + m_{{\mathrm{\alpha }},{\mathrm{\beta }}}A_\parallel } \right)^2 + \left( {m_{{\mathrm{\alpha }},{\mathrm{\beta }}}A_ \bot } \right)^2} \right]^{\frac{1}{2}}\). Here, \(m_{\mathrm{\alpha }} =  \frac{3}{2}\) and \(m_{\mathrm{\beta }} =  \frac{1}{2}\) are the spin projections of the involved ground states with respect to the zaxis. Further, ω_{±} = ω_{α} ± ω_{β}, and A_{⊥,} are the orthogonal and parallel hyperfine components, respectively. Essentially, S_{y} is modulated because of quantum beats between hyperfine levels, which not only show the nuclear frequencies ω_{α,} but also their sum and difference frequencies ω_{±}. The Fourier transformation reveals strong frequency components at ω_{α}/2π = 77.9 ± 0.1 kHz and \(\omega _{\mathrm{\beta }}/2{\mathrm{\pi }} = 76.0 \, \pm \, 0.1\,{\mathrm{kHz}}.\) This small difference (1.9 kHz) is resolved thanks to the high sensitivity of the quantum probe, the electronic spin with a nearly millisecondlong coherence time. As ω_{+} is quite close to twice the Larmor frequency of a ^{29}Si nuclear spin (ω_{I}/2π ≈ 77.9 kHz), we conclude that the parallel hyperfine coupling A_{} is weak compared to the Larmor frequency. In addition, from the inferred modulation depth parameter (k = 0.15 ± 0.02), we infer that there is a sizeable difference between A_{⊥} and A_{}. Indeed, from the fit to the data, we infer a purely dipolar coupling with strengths of A_{⊥} ≈ 29 kHz and A_{} ≈ 10 kHz, respectively. This allows inferring the relative position of the nuclear spin, using \(A_\parallel = \frac{{\eta _{{\mathrm{Si}}}}}{{r^3}}\left( {3{\mathrm{cos}}^2\theta  1} \right)\) and \(A_ \bot = \frac{{\eta _{{\mathrm{Si}}}}}{{r^3}}\left( {3\,{\mathrm{sin}}\theta {\mathrm{cos}}\theta } \right)\), in which η_{Si} = 15.72 MHz ⋅ Å^{3} is the dipoledipole interaction coefficient^{42}, r is the distance between electron and nuclear spin, and θ is the polar angle between the caxis and the vector connecting the positions of the nuclear spin and electron spin. We obtain r ≈ 11.6 Å and θ ≈ 61°. We emphasize that we did not observe hyperfine coupling in Hahn echo measurements on the other defects, however, an adapted crystal growth with nuclear spins at a percentage concentration should allow to identify multispin clusters that could be used as smallscale quantum computers^{43}.
High fidelity optical initialization
Besides excellent coherence times, a crucial requirement for quantum information applications is highfidelity quantum state initialisation^{34}. To optimise the spin state initialisation procedure, we vary the time interval τ_{init} of the initialising laser (A_{2}) and microwave fields (MW_{3}) and extract the populations in the four ground states via the contrast of Rabi oscillation measurements (for more details, see Methods). Figure 4a shows the experimental sequence. We first equilibrate all four ground state populations to within <1% with a 40 µs long offresonant laser pulse^{27}. Then, we apply the selective spin state initialisation procedure for a time τ_{init}, followed by different Rabi sequences, and eventual state readout along the A_{2} optical transition. Figure 4b shows the development of the extracted ground state populations for τ_{init} ranging from 0 to 80 µs. We achieve initialisation fidelities up to 97.5 ± 2.0%, which is comparable to previous demonstrations with colour centres in diamond^{37} and mark the stateofart value for colour centres in SiC.
Discussion
The silicon vacancy centre in 4HSiC satisfies a number of key requirements for an excellent solidstate quantum spintronics system. The high spectral stability and close to transform limited photon emission as well as large Debye Waller factor (>0.4)^{27} promise good spinphoton entanglement generation rates. We also mention that almost no defect ionisation has been observed, except at high optical excitation powers beyond saturation. This is in stark contrast to NV centres in diamond where charge state verification is required before each experimental sequence^{18}. By removing this requirement, spinphoton entanglement rates can be further speed up. The optical resonance excitation allows for highfidelity spinselective initialisation which result in 97% optical contrast of spin readout. The emission wavelength of 861 nm is favourable for fibre based long distance communication as ultralownoise frequency converters to the telecom range already exist^{44,45}. The measured overall emission rates in the phonon sideband are currently about 20 × 10^{3} counts s^{−1}. Given the limited system detection efficiency of around 0.1%, due to the use of nonoptimised optics and detectors, we estimate an overall photon emission rate of ≈ 10^{7} s^{−1}, limited by nonradiative intersystem crossings. Considering that a large fraction of the photons are emitted in the zero phonon line (>40%), this implies that spinphoton entanglement can be generated at rates of several tens to hundreds of Hz^{18}, currently mainly limited by the nonoptimised light collection efficiency. Implementation into optical resonators^{46,47} could further increase emission rates by reducing the excited state lifetime, and achieving a Purcell factor of 10–20 would already yield sufficient photon rates to accomplish quantum nondemolition readout of the spin state. The defect’s very low strain coupling makes this strategy very promising. We showed also that spin coherence times, as well as readout and initialization fidelities are comparable with other systems, e.g., colour centres in diamond. This allowed us to observe hyperfine coupling, which promises access to longlived quantum memories and quantum registers. The high optical contrast of ground spin state readout will also allow for singleshot readout of coupled nuclear spins^{48}. In this perspective, the relatively small ground state ZFS, which is on the order of the typical hyperfine interaction, may prove to be beneficial for nuclear spin polarisation techniques, potentially leading to applications in highcontrast magnetic resonance imaging^{49,50}. Additionally, excitation to the second excited state^{27,30,35} is predicted to show significantly reduced intersystem crossing rates, thus further enhancing optical spin manipulation capabilities and singleshot readout of electronic spins, similar to protocols based on cold atoms or ions^{51}. The silicon vacancy centre in 4HSiC therefore has a great potential to become a leading contender in a wealth of quantum information applications.
Methods
Sample preparation
The starting material is a 4H^{28}Si^{12}C silicon carbide layer grown by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) on a ntype (0001) 4HSiC substrate. The CVD layer is ~110 μm thick. The isotope purity is estimated to be [^{28}S]i > 99.85% and [^{12}C] > 99.98%, which was confirmed by secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS) for one of the wafers in the series. After chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) of the top layer, the substrate was removed by mechanical polishing and the final isotopically enriched freestanding layer had a thickness of ~100 μm. Currentvoltage measurements at room temperatures show that the layer is ntype with a free carrier concentration of ~6 × 10^{13} cm^{−3}. This value is close to the concentration of shallow nitrogen donors of ~3.5 × 10^{13} cm^{−3}, which was determined by photoluminescence at low temperatures. Deep level transient spectroscopy measurements show that the dominant electron trap in the layer is related to the carbon vacancy with a concentration in the mid 10^{12} cm^{−3} range. Minority carrier lifetime mapping of the carrier shows a homogeneous carrier lifetime of ~0.6 μs. Since the lifetime was measured by an optical method with high injection, the real lifetime is expected to be double, i.e., ~1.2 μs^{52}. Such a high minority carrier lifetime indicates that the density of all electron traps should not be more than mid 10^{13} cm^{−3}^{53}. To generate a low density of silicon vacancy centres, we used room temperature electron beam irradiation at 2 MeV with a fluence of 10^{12} cm^{−2}. The irradiation creates also carbon vacancies, interstitials, antisites and their associated defects, but their concentrations are expected to be below mid 10^{12} cm^{−3}. After irradiation, the sample was annealed at 300 °C for 30 min to remove some interstitialrelated defects. In order to improve light extraction efficiency out of this high refractive index material (n ≈ 2.6), we fabricate solid immersion lenses using a focused ion beam milling machine (Helios NanoLab 650). The sample was cleaned for two hours in peroxymonosulfuric acid to remove surface contaminations^{28}.
Experimental setup
All the experiments were performed at a cryogenic temperature of 4 K in a Montana Instruments Cryostation. A homebuilt confocal microscope^{27} was used for optical excitation and subsequent fluorescence detection of single silicon vacancies. Offresonant optical excitation of single silicon vacancy centres was performed with a 730 nm diode laser. For resonant optical excitation at 861.4 nm towards V1 excited state we used an external cavity tunable diode laser (Toptica DL pro). The used laser power for the resonant excitation was adjustable from 0.5 to 500 nW. Fluorescence was collected in the redshifted phonon sideband (875–890 nm) for which we used a tunable longpass filter (Versa Chrome Edge from Semrock). To detect light, we used a near infrared enhanced singlephoton avalanche photodiode (Excelitas). The used 4HSiC sample was flipped to the side, i.e., by 90° compared to the caxis, such that the polarization of the excitation laser was parallel to the caxis (Ec) which allows to excite the V1 excited state with maximum efficiency^{27,30}. Note that the solid immersion lenses (SILs) were fabricated on this side surface. In order to manipulate ground state spin populations, microwaves are applied through a 20 µm thick copper wire located in close proximity to the investigated V1 defect centres.
Inferring ground state spin initialisation fidelity
Near deterministic ground state spin initialization has been demonstrated via optically pumping assisted by microwave spin manipulation (see Fig. 4a). We first apply the offresonant laser excitation (730 nm) to prepare noninitialized spin states. We then initialize the system into \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) by resonant optical excitation along the A_{2} transition, accompanied by microwaves resonant with the transition \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left { + \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\left( {{\mathrm{MW}}_3} \right)\). To determine the population in each ground state spin level, we perform Rabi oscillations for the three allowed transitions, linking the levels \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left {  \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\left( {{\mathrm{MW}}_1} \right)\), \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\left( {{\mathrm{MW}}_2} \right)\), and \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left { + \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\left( {{\mathrm{MW}}_3} \right)\). Then, we read out the spin population in \(\left { \pm \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) by resonant excitation along the A_{2} transition for 150 ns. Within such a short readout time, we can safely assume that the obtained fluorescence signal is proportional to the population in \(\left { \pm \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\). Note that in order to obtain a signal from Rabi oscillations \(\left {  \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}} \leftrightarrow \left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\), an additional population swap (πpulse at MW_{3}) between \(\left { + \frac{1}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) and \(\left { + \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\) is applied before state readout (see also Fig. 3a). We denote now the populations in all four ground states by p_{i} where \(i = \left\{ {  \frac{3}{2},  \frac{1}{2}, + \frac{1}{2}, + \frac{3}{2}} \right\}\) stands for the spin quantum number of each state. We then measure the fringe visibility of the obtained Rabi oscillation signal in order to infer ground state spin populations. The fringe visibility for Rabi oscillations between sublevels i〉_{gs} and j〉_{gs} with \(i,j = \left\{ {  \frac{3}{2},  \frac{1}{2}, + \frac{1}{2}, + \frac{3}{2}} \right\}\) and i − j = 1 is defined as,
where I_{max} (I_{min}) denotes the maximum (minimum) signal during the Rabi oscillation. Considering that our state readout is only sensitive to spin population in \(\left { \pm \frac{3}{2}} \right\rangle _{{\mathrm{gs}}}\), the three conducted Rabi oscillation experiments lead to the following fringe visibilities:
In addition, the total population of all the ground states must be sum up to unity, i.e.,
As all observed Rabi oscillations start with a local minimum in fluorescence intensity, we can further assume that after initialization, the ground state populations fulfil:
Solving the system of four equations under these constraints allows us to extract all four values of p_{i}, which is shown for the initialization times 0 µs and 80 µs in Fig. 4b.
Magnetic field alignment
In order to allow for selective ground state spin manipulation, level degeneracy has to be lifted. We do so by applying a magnetic field that has to be precisely aligned along the zaxis of the spin system in order to avoid the appearance of new mixed eigenstates. The zaxis of the spin system is parallel to the caxis of the 4HSiC crystal^{31}. We apply a magnetic field of strength B_{0} ~ 92 G with two permanent magnets, placed outside the cryostat chamber. From previous studies, it is already known that the quantization axis of the silicon vacancy centre on a cubic lattice site (usually referred as V2 centre)^{28,29} is parallel to the defect centre studied in this report^{31}. Therefore, we take advantage of an ensemble of V2 centres found at the edge of the solid immersion lens, which was likely created by ion bombardment during the FIB milling. For a perfectly aligned magnetic field, the splitting between two outer spin resonances of the V2 centre is 4D_{gs,V2} = 140.0 MHz for B_{0} > 2 ⋅ D_{gs,V2}^{9,28}. Here, we measure a splitting of 139.93 ± 0.04 MHz, meaning that the magnetic field is aligned within ~1.3 degrees. From ground state spin spectra as in Fig. 2b, c at the aligned magnetic field, we determine the ZFS of the V1 centre ground state, 2 ⋅ D_{gs} = 4.5 ± 0.1 MHz.
Data availability
All data are available upon request from the corresponding authors.
References
Atatüre, M., Englund, D., Vamivakas, N., Lee, S.Y. & Wrachtrup, J. Material platforms for spinbased photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 38–51 (2018).
Castelletto, S., Rosa, L. & Johnson, B. C. in Advanced Silicon Carbide Devices and Processing (eds. Saddow, S. E. & La Via, F.) 221–247 (InTech, 2015).
Melinon, P., Masenelli, B., Tournus, F. & Perez, A. Playing with carbon and silicon at the nanoscale. Nat. Mater. 6, 479–490 (2007).
Aslam, N. et al. Nanoscale nuclear magnetic resonance with chemical resolution. Science 357, 67–71 (2017).
Degen, C. L., Reinhard, F. & Cappellaro, P. Quantum sensing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017).
Casola, F., van der Sar, T. & Yacoby, A. Probing condensed matter physics with magnetometry based on nitrogenvacancy centres in diamond. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 17088 (2018).
Staudacher, T. et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy on a (5nanometer)3 sample volume. Science 339, 561–563 (2013).
Budker, D. & Romalis, M. Optical magnetometry. Nat. Phys. 3, 227–234 (2007).
Niethammer, M. et al. Vector magnetometry using silicon vacancies in 4HSiC under ambient conditions. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 034001 (2016).
Kane, B. E. A siliconbased nuclear spin quantum computer. Nature 393, 133–137 (1998).
Morton, J. J. L. & Lovett, B. W. Hybrid solidstate qubits: the powerful role of electron spins. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 189–212 (2011).
Dobrovitski, V. V., Fuchs, G. D., Falk, A. L., Santori, C. & Awschalom, D. D. Quantum control over single spins in diamond. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 4, 23–50 (2013).
Togan, E. et al. Quantum entanglement between an optical photon and a solidstate spin qubit. Nature 466, 730–734 (2010).
Christle, D. J. et al. Isolated spin qubits in SiC with a highfidelity infrared spintophoton interface. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021046 (2017).
Becker, J. N., Görlitz, J., Arend, C., Markham, M. & Becher, C. Ultrafast alloptical coherent control of single silicon vacancy colour centres in diamond. Nat. Commun. 7, 13512 (2016).
Bernien, H. et al. Heralded entanglement between solidstate qubits separated by three metres. Nature 497, 86–90 (2013).
Hensen, B. et al. Loopholefree Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3 kilometres. Nature 526, 682–686 (2015).
Humphreys, P. C. et al. Deterministic delivery of remote entanglement on a quantum network. Nature 558, 268–273 (2018).
Yang, S. et al. Highfidelity transfer and storage of photon states in a single nuclear spin. Nat. Phot. 10, 507–511 (2016).
Shen, Y., Sweeney, T. M. & Wang, H. Zerophonon linewidth of single nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B 77, 033201 (2008).
Faraon, A., Santori, C., Huang, Z., Acosta, V. M. & Beausoleil, R. G. Coupling of nitrogenvacancy centers to photonic crystal cavities in monocrystalline diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 033604 (2012).
Sipahigil, A. et al. Indistinguishable photons from separated siliconvacancy centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 113602 (2014).
Sipahigil, A. et al. An integrated diamond nanophotonics platform for quantumoptical networks. Science 354, 847–850 (2016).
Sukachev, D. D. et al. Siliconvacancy spin qubit in diamond: a quantum memory exceeding 10 ms with singleshot state readout. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 223602 (2017).
de las Casas, C. F. et al. Stark tuning and electrical charge state control of single divacancies in silicon carbide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 111, 262403 (2017).
Udvarhelyi, P. et al. Spectrally stable defect qubits with no inversion symmetry for robust spintophoton interface. Phys. Rev. Applied 11, 044022 (2019)
Nagy, R. et al. Quantum properties of dichroic silicon vacancies in silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 034022 (2018).
Widmann, M. et al. Coherent control of single spins in silicon carbide at room temperature. Nat. Mater. 14, 164–168 (2015).
Ivády, V. et al. Identification of Sivacancy related room temperature qubits in 4H silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. B 96, 161114(R) (2017).
Janzén, E. et al. The silicon vacancy in SiC. Phys. B Condens. Matter 404, 4354–4358 (2009).
Sörman, E. et al. Silicon vacancy related defect in 4H and 6H SiC. Phys. Rev. B 61, 2613–2620 (2000).
Wagner, M. et al. Zeeman spectroscopy of the neutral silicon vacancy in 6H and 4H SiC. Phys. B Condens. Matter 273–274, 663–666 (1999).
Tamarat, P. et al. Stark shift control of single optical centers in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 083002 (2006).
DiVincenzo, D. P. The physical implementation of quantum computation. Fortschr. der Phys. 48, 771–783 (2000).
Soykal, Ö. O., Dev, P. & Economou, S. E. Silicon vacancy center in 4HSiC: electronic structure and spinphoton interfaces. Phys. Rev. B 93, 081207 (2016).
Mizuochi, N. et al. Continuouswave and pulsed EPR study of the negatively charged silicon vacancy with S = 3/2 and C3v symmetry in ntype 4HSiC. Phys. Rev. B 66, 235202 (2002).
Balasubramanian, G. et al. Ultralong spin coherence time in isotopically engineered diamond. Nat. Mater. 8, 383–387 (2009).
Simin, D. et al. Locking of electron spin coherence above 20 ms in natural silicon carbide. Phys. Rev. B 95, 161201 (2017).
Seo, H. et al. Quantum decoherence dynamics of divacancy spins in silicon carbide. Nat. Commun. 7, 12935 (2016).
de Lange, G., Wang, Z. H., Ristè, D., Dobrovitski, V. V. & Hanson, R. Universal dynamical decoupling of a single solidstate spin from a spin bath. Science 330, 60–63 (2010).
Rowan, L. G., Hahn, E. L. & Mims, W. B. Electronspinecho envelope modulation. Phys. Rev. 137, A61–A71 (1965).
Carter, S. G., Soykal, Ö. O., Dev, P., Economou, S. E. & Glaser, E. R. Spin coherence and echo modulation of the silicon vacancy in 4HSiC at room temperature. Phys. Rev. B 92, 161202(R) (2015).
Abobeih, M. H. et al. Onesecond coherence for a single electron spin coupled to a multiqubit nuclearspin environment. Nat. Commun. 9, 2552 (2018).
Bock, M. et al. Highfidelity entanglement between a trapped ion and a telecom photon via quantum frequency conversion. Nat. Commun. 9, 1998 (2018).
Dréau, A. et al. Quantum frequency conversion of single photons from a nitrogenvacancy center in diamond to telecommunication wavelengths. Phys. Rev. Appl. 9, 064031 (2018).
Bracher, D. O., Zhang, X. & Hu, E. L. Selective Purcell enhancement of two closely linked zerophonon transitions of a silicon carbide color center. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4060–4065 (2017).
Song, B.S. et al. HighQfactor nanobeam photonic crystal cavities in bulk silicon carbide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 231106 (2018).
Neumann, P. et al. Singleshot readout of a single nuclear spin. Science 329, 542–544 (2010).
Wang, H.J. et al. Sensitive magnetic control of ensemble nuclear spin hyperpolarization in diamond. Nat. Commun. 4, 1940 (2013).
Shagieva, F. et al. Microwaveassisted crosspolarization of nuclear spin ensembles from optically pumped nitrogenvacancy centers in diamond. Nano. Lett. 18, 3731–3737 (2018).
Robledo, L. et al. Highfidelity projective readout of a solidstate spin quantum register. Nature 477, 574–578 (2011).
Kimoto, T. & Cooper, J. A. Fundamentals of Silicon Carbide Technology: Growth, Characterization, Devices and Applications. (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).
Danno, K., Nakamura, D. & Kimoto, T. Investigation of carrier lifetime in 4HSiC epilayers and lifetime control by electron irradiation. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 202109 (2007).
Acknowledgements
We would like to warmly thank Sébastien Tanzilli, Sina Burk, Rainer Stöhr, Roman Kolesov, Philipp Neumann, Sebastian Zeiser, Matthias Pfender, Thomas Öckinghaus, Charles Babin, Durga Dasari, Ilja Gerhardt and Stephan Hirschmann for technical help and fruitful discussions. R.N. acknowledges support by the CarlZeissStiftung. R.N., M.M., M.W., YC.C., F.K. and J.W. acknowledge support by the European Research Council (ERC) grant SMel, the European Commission Marie Curie ETN “QuSCo” (GA No 765267), the Max Planck Society, the Humboldt Foundation, and the German Science Foundation (SPP 1601). SY.L. acknowledges support by the KIST institutional program (2E29580), C.B. acknowledges support by the EPSRC (Grant No. EP/P019803/1), and the Royal Society. N.T.S. received support from the Swedish Research Council (VR 201604068 and VR 201605362), the Carl Trygger Stiftelse för Vetenskaplig Forskning (CTS 15:339), the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2018.0071), and the Swedish Energy Agency (436111). T.O. acknowledges support from JSPS KAKENHI 17H01056; A.G. acknowledges the Hungarian NKFIH grants No. NN118161 of the EU QuantERA Nanospin project as well as the National Quantum Technology Program (Grant No. 20171.2.1NKP201700001). A.G. and J.W. acknowledge the EUFET Flagship on Quantum Technologies through the project ASTERIQS. F.K. and J.W. acknowledge the EUFET Flagship on Quantum Technologies through the project QIA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R.N., SY.L., F.K. and J.W. conceived and designed the experiment; R.N., and F.K. performed the experiment; R.N., P.U., C.B., J.M., O.S., A.G., SY.L., F.K., and J.W. analysed the data; J.U.H., R.K., I.G.I., and N.T.S. prepared and characterised materials; T.O. contributed to electron beam irradiation; R.N. fabricated solid immersion lenses; M.N. developed software for data acquisition and experimental control; M.N., M.W., and YC.C. provided experimental assistance; P.U., J.M., O.S., A.G. and J.W. provided theoretical support; R.N., N.T.S., O.S., A.G., SY.L., F.K., and J.W. discussed and wrote the paper. All authors provided helpful comments during the writing process.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nagy, R., Niethammer, M., Widmann, M. et al. Highfidelity spin and optical control of single siliconvacancy centres in silicon carbide. Nat Commun 10, 1954 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467019098739
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467019098739
Further reading

Inverted fine structure of a 6HSiC qubit enabling robust spinphoton interface
npj Quantum Information (2022)

Fabrication and nanophotonic waveguide integration of silicon carbide colour centres with preserved spinoptical coherence
Nature Materials (2022)

Silicon carbide incorporates quantum gates
Nature Materials (2022)

Wide field imaging of van der Waals ferromagnet Fe3GeTe2 by spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride
Nature Communications (2022)

TR12 centers in diamond as a room temperature atomic scale vector magnetometer
npj Quantum Information (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.