Abstract
With their broad range of properties, ABO_{3} transition metal perovskite oxides have long served as a platform for device applications and as a testing bed for different condensed matter theories. Their insulating character and structural distortions are often ascribed to dynamical electronic correlations within a universal, symmetryconserving paradigm. This view restricts predictive theory to complex computational schemes, going beyond density functional theory (DFT). Here, we show that, if one allows symmetrybreaking energylowering crystal symmetry reductions and electronic instabilities within DFT, one successfully and systematically recovers the trends in the observed band gaps, magnetic moments, type of magnetic and crystallographic ground state, bond disproportionation and ligand hole effects, Mott vs. charge transfer insulator behaviors, and the amplitude of structural deformation modes including JahnTeller in low temperature spinordered and high temperature disordered paramagnetic phases. We then provide a classification of the four mechanisms of gap formation and establish DFT as a reliable base platform to study the ground state properties in complex oxides.
Introduction
The striking range of experimentally observed lowtemperature (LT) and hightemperature (HT) magnetic, electronic, and structural properties across the 3d ABO_{3} perovskites family have held the condensed matter physics community in constant fascination for many years^{1,2,3,4}. Regarding magnetism, the LT phases are generally spinordered, either ferromagnetic (FM) (e.g., YTiO_{3}^{5}) or antiferromagnetic (AFM) (e.g., LaVO_{3}^{6}, CaMnO_{3}^{7}, LaMnO_{3}^{8}, CaFeO_{3}^{9}, LaFeO_{3}^{8}, or YNiO_{3}^{10}), whereas the HT phases exhibit spindisordered paramagnetism (PM). Regarding the electronic metal vs. insulator bandgap characteristics, these compounds show three modalities: (i) most LT and HT phases are insulating, except (ii) CaVO_{3} and SrVO_{3} that are PM metals at all temperatures^{11}, whereas (iii) CaFeO_{3}^{9} or YNiO_{3}^{10,12} display both PM metal and PM insulator HT phases. Regarding structural aspects, these perovskites show a range of crystal structure types (cubic, monoclinic, and orthorhombic) as well as structural distortions within such space groups (including octahedral rotations, antipolar displacements), as well as Jahn–Teller (LaVO_{3}, LaMnO_{3}) or breathing distortion (CaFeO_{3} and YNiO_{3}) types (see Supplementary Fig. 1). The HT PM phases usually inherit the LT structure, although they can also transform to their own, distinct structure type (as in LaVO_{3}, CaFeO_{3}, and YNiO_{3}).
The enormous number of publications in this field typically focus on one or just few selected ABO_{3} compound(s) and one or two of the effects noted above. This makes it difficult to assess the key question: what is the minimal physical description needed to capture the basic magnetic, transport, and structural groundstate properties, and can one define a single, overarching theoretical framework that works essentially across the board? This question is highly consequential because the ABO_{3} system of compounds is in constant demand for theoretical support in the areas of applications that depend on gapping, such as catalysis, water splitting, transparent conductors, thermoelectricity, piezoelectricity, ferroelectricity, and heterostructures showing twodimensional electron gases (2DEG)^{13}.
The question of the origin of Mott bandgaps is central to this field: Perhaps the most celebrated issue in this regard, raised by Peierls and Mott^{3,4}, concerns the way in which a bandgap can form in the presence of an odd number of electrons, when the Fermi energy E_{F} would intersect what in basic band theory would appear to be a partially occupied, gapless band^{3}. The classic Mott–Hubbard “strongly correlated” symmetryconserving view has formed a central paradigm to resolve this apparent inconsistency and for teaching and explaining the known phenomenology^{14,15,16}. This viewpoint was motivated by the fact that in the extreme ionic limit (where the 3d ion carries all of the active electrons, while O^{2−} is a rigid, closed shell), the energy levels near E_{F} are degenerate with partial occupancy (such as the triply degenerate t_{2g} occupied by just two electrons, or the doubly degenerate e_{g} occupied by just a single electron). The question that arose was whether lifting such degeneracies, as needed for gapping, would require specialized correlated methodologies that go beyond what band theory would accommodate. The Mott–Hubbard mechanism for gap formation and magnetism in such delectron oxides (Fig. 1a) envisions electrons moving across the lattice, forming atomiclike states on certain 3d atomic sites with doubly occupied d orbitals (“upper Hubbard band”) and empty d orbitals on other sites (“lower Hubbard band”). In this picture, the bandgap of the AFM and PM phases of these oxides therefore emerges due to this correlationinduced electron–electron repulsion (Fig. 1b top panel), without spatial symmetry breaking (such as structural distortions or magnetic order that would lower the symmetry of the degenerate states). In this view, symmetry can break afterward, but is nonessential for gapping. From this point of view, the minimal theoretical description needed would entail multideterminant dynamically correlated methodologies capable of treating openshell degenerate configurations. Band theory (depicted schematically in the lower part of Fig. 1b) was imagined to fail in producing the observed gaps and structures. Note that in most dynamically correlated calculations, the crystal structure and its subtle distortions were not predicted from the underlying electronic structure (with the exception of the works of Marianetti et al.^{17} and Leonov et al.^{18} for instance) but rather copied from experimentally observed structures. Thus, these simulations are not a proof of the dominant role of dynamical electron correlations over structural symmetry breaking modes for the gap opening. This question is open.
However, the failure of naive DFT models does not disqualify DFT. The question is: what type of band theory fails so dramatically to describe gapping in 3d compounds (lower part of Fig. 1b). A natural adoption of this symmetryconserving principle within band theory for PM phases is to assume a structure where all 3d ions are symmetryequivalent, having identical local environments (a monomorphous representation). However, since the total magnetic moment in the PM phase must be zero, such a nonmagnetic description forces zero moment on an atombyatom basis. This is bound to produce zero gap in a bandtheoretic description for systems with an odd number of electrons, in stark contrast with experiments for most AFM and PM phases (Fig. 2).
A commonsense examination of the reasonableness of this approach, apparently missed earlier, is to compare the total energy of this nonmagnetic (NM) approximation with the total energy of the same DFT, but using a proper spinpolarized ground state. We find that the naive DFT has a higher total energy of 452, 1167, 935, 4313, and 1925 meV/f.u for YTiO_{3}, LaVO_{3}, CaMnO_{3}, LaMnO_{3}, and CaFeO_{3}, respectively (see Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 2 for further details). In other words, the ansatz of a NM state is a highly unlikely scenario.
Even though naive DFT approximations correspond to extremely highenergy solutions, they were often used in the literature to suggest that DFT band theory fails to explain gapping of Mott insulators, the latter being argued to require instead an explicitly correlated approach^{18,19,20,21,22}. In the specific case of rareearth nickelates, it was stated that “Standard DFT and DFT + U methods fail to describe the phase diagram, with DFT predicting that all compounds remain metallic and undisproportionated…. These results establish that strong electronic correlations are crucial to structural phase stability and methods beyond DFT and DFT + U are required to properly describe them” in ref. ^{23}, “spin polarized DFT shows metallic behaviour with neither magnetism nor bond disproportionation…: This qualitative structural error ….signals the importance of correlations” in ref. ^{17}, or “While density functional band theory (DFT) is the workhorse of materials science, it does not capture the physics of the Mott/chargetransfer insulator transition” in ref. ^{19}. Moreover, gapping (and the related structural distortions) in the paramagnetic phases of oxides is often claimed to be unreachable by DFT simulations: “However, these methods (i.e., LDA, GGA, and LDA + U) usually fail to describe the correct electronic and structural properties of electronically correlated paramagnetic materials” and “Therefore, LDA + U cannot describe the properties of LaMnO_{3} at T > T_{N} and, in particular, at room temperature, where LaMnO_{3} is a correlated paramagnetic insulator with a robust JT distortion” in ref. ^{18} or “Although they cannot represent the paramagnetic insulating state, static meanfield theories such as DFT, DFT + U, and hybrid functional approaches may capture some of the physics of the AFM insulating ground state” in ref. ^{17}. Many similar claims about the failure of DFT abound in the correlated literature.
However, naive DFT does not represent what DFT can do. There are certainly a number of papers over the years that have shown gapping in 3d oxides using appropriate DFT and taking into account the structural, electronic, and magnetic degrees of freedom appearing in oxides (i.e., allowing spin polarization, lower energy phase searches for instance)^{24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33}. With the exception of ref. ^{25}, many of these studies focused on the lowtemperature spinordered phase, even though the gapping usually appears in the paramagnetic (PM) spindisordered phase. In ref. ^{25}, Trimarchi et al. have proposed a strategy to model PM phases of simple binary oxides, identifying mechanisms to explain gapping in binaries such as MnO and NiO. This paper focuses on ternary compounds such as ABO_{3} that possess strongly entangled structural, electronic, and magnetic degrees of freedom, yielding far more complex physical behavior and a large range of functionalities encompassing ferroelectricity, magnetism, and thermoelectricity for instance. So far, DFT studies have neither addressed the PM phases of 3d transition metal ABO_{3} materials, nor elaborate the specific modalities of DFT required to produce gapping, nor have they systematically described the “Periodic Table of gapping” by considering the whole range of trends for the chemical series ABO_{3} with different A and B atoms. The continuing impression is that DFT itself is failing. It thus seems that the question of what is the minimal theory that describes the basic groundstate phenomenology across the ABO_{3} series—symmetry broken or symmetry conserving, statically (meanfield treatment of electron–electron repulsion as in DFT) or dynamically correlated—is still unsettled.
Following the standard E. Wigner definition^{34}, correlations are considered to be all physical effects beyond meanfield Hartree–Fock methods^{35}. An often voiced popular (but incomplete) analogous view applied to DFT is that correlation is everything that DFT does not get right. According to this paradigm, the success of (a more general) DFT in describing the trends in the properties of ABO_{3} delectron perovskites, described in this paper, would suggest that whereas ABO_{3} oxides may be complicated, they are not necessarily strongly correlated. In fact, DFT is an exact formal theory for the groundstate properties for the exact exchangecorrelation energy functional^{36}, so there is no reason in principle why the properties noted above could not be captured by an ultimate DFT. The paradigm that correlation is what DFT does not get right is, therefore, most likely, a diminishing domain.
In this paper, we show that minimizing the total energy of the AFM and PM phases in supercell representations that allow symmetry breaking, produces atomic displacements and other symmetrylowering modes that closely follow experiments, and that the same symmetrybreaking modes also predict the correct trends in bandgaps and moments. This is achieved in a singledeterminant, meanfieldlike band structure approach. This suggests that dynamic correlations outside current DFT implementations and the view that symmetryconserving physics applies across the board for all AB(d)O_{3} delectron systems are not forced upon us by the data, as suggested in previous literature, but represent instead a viewpoint of that literature. We find therefore that the groundstate properties of 3d ABO_{3} oxides are not good examples of the failure of DFT or the need for special effects outside current DFT. Achieving this requires (a) allowing sufficient structural flexibility (a polymorphous description) in the description of the various phases, so that symmetry breaking reduced crystal symmetries that could lift degeneracies (octahedral rotations, Jahn–Teller, and bond disproportionation effects) and electronic instabilities could occur, should they lower the total energy, and (b) using an exchangecorrelation functional in the KohnSham DFT (KSDFT) that distinguishes occupied from unoccupied states (such as DFT + U; selfinteraction corrected functionals) and minimizes the delocalization error^{37}. We are neither claiming that all current and future d or felectron compounds can be fully explained by DFT with currently known exchangecorrelation (XC) functionals, nor that properties other than the basic trends in gapping, moments, and structural displacements can be always predicted. These questions are left for future research. Such failures, if and when found, would provide legitimate challenges for explicitly correlated methodologies to explain. This is a consequential result because it suggests that a rather simple tool such as DFT (requiring a low computational effort with respect to heavier machineries treating dynamical correlations) offers a single platform to study reliably and with sufficient precision not only bandgap formation, structure, and magnetism in ABO_{3}, but also—in the future—other groundstate issues such as doping, defect physics, and interface effects.
Results
The DFT format used
The dual input to this (or other) theories is: (a) a framework for interelectronic interaction (DFT exchange and correlation functional) and (b) a representation of the structural/geometrical degrees of freedom that could be optimized in seeking minimum total energy. Previously, technical shortcomings in (b) within a naive DFT approach (summarized in Supplementary Note 2) were often attributed to theoretical failures in describing the underlying interelectronic interactions (a).
The DFT features that are needed beyond the NDFT are: (a) functionals that distinguish occupied from unoccupied states. Since we are interested in determining what are the minimum theoretical ingredients needed to explain the groundstate properties observed in the ABO_{3} series, we deliberately adopt for (a) a meanfield, singledeterminant, Bloch periodic band structure approach, with an electrongasbased description of exchange and correlation. XC functional represents a hierarchy of approximations^{38,39} (“rungs”). The first three rungs correspond to an XC potential depending on the local density (LDA) and its first (GGA) and second derivative (meta GGA), being local or semilocal functionals of the noninteracting density matrix, with no distinction between occupied and unoccupied levels. The first rung that distinguishes occupied from unoccupied states is rung 4 being a nonlocal functional of the noninteracting density matrix. While ideally this would be a fully selfinteraction corrected functional, this functional does not exist as yet, so we use a simple approximation to it in the form of the DFT + U method.
A number of calculations have used this “DFT + U” approach, where DFT is amended by an onsite potential that removes part of the spurious selfinteraction error and thereby creates a distinction between occupied and empty states producing at times gapped states^{25,27,28,29,30,32,40,41,42}. DFT + U successfully obtained gapping in simple binary oxides such as MnO, FeO, CoO, or NiO^{25}, dioxides such as UO_{2}^{26}, and in the spinordered phases of the much more complex 3d transition metal ABO_{3} compounds^{27,28,29,30,31,32,41,43,44}. These successes have, in part, propagated the view that it is the interelectronic repulsion akin to the Hubbard Hamiltonian that produces gapping in DFT + U. In fact, the role of the onsite potential U in DFT + U, where U is a onebody onsite potential shifting the d orbital to deeper energies, is distinct from the Hubbard Hamiltonian, where it truly represents interelectronic repulsion. Furthermore, U in DFT is actually not required to produce gapping, as illustrated by Ufree calculations for the spinordered state of several ABO_{3} compounds^{28,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52} as well as for other complex oxides such as VO_{2}^{24} and La_{2}CuO_{4}^{53} for instance. Further details on the DFT calculations and on the choice of U parameters are provided in Supplementary Note 3.
(b) The polymorphous representation of structural degrees of freedom: A primitive unit cell containing a single formula unit of ABO_{3} cannot break the symmetry in band theory, as there is but a single 3d atom in the crystal. In order to provide a real test to the ability of the DFT XC functional to describe the basic trio of properties—spin arrangement, gapping, and structure—it is necessary to provide in (b) sufficient electronic and structural generality and flexibility in the way the system is represented, so that symmetrybreaking events requiring such flexibility could be captured insofar as they lower the total energy. Here, instead of restricting the unit cell representation of PM (and for AFM) magnetic structures to a single, primitive cell having but a single, symmetryunique BO_{6} motif (monomorphous representation), we allow supercells that can develop a set of symmetryindependent BO_{6} motifs (polymorphous representation), subject to the constraint that the total supercell represents the macroscopic crystal and spin structures (e.g., zero moment in the PM). We use the Special Quasi Random (SQS)^{54} construct that selects supercells of a given crystalline space group symmetry, such that the occupation of sites by spins follows a random pair and multibody correlation functions (appropriate to the HT limit) with a total moment of zero. The method is described in detail in refs. ^{25,54}. We have tested the convergence of the results with respect to energy, magnetic moment, and bandgaps on two “limit” compounds (namely YTiO_{3}, i.e., d^{1}, and YNiO_{3}, i.e., d^{7}). We have found that a 160atom unit cell is sufficiently large to produce converged results (see Supplementary Note 4 for details on SQS and the generated supercells). This polymorphous representation^{25} provides an opportunity to break spatial symmetry, should the total energy be lowered in doing so.
To explore the opportunities for symmetry breaking allowed, in principle, by the polymorphous approach, one has to exercise a few symmetrybreaking “nudges”:

(1)
Allowing different local environments for the various chemically identical 3d atoms in the lattice. Specifically, a different number of spinup vs. spindown sites can exist around each 3d site subject to the SQS constraint that all pair interactions are purely random (i.e., no shortrange order) and the total spin is zero.

(2)
Occupation number fluctuations whereby atomic sites with partial occupation of initially degenerate levels can have different assignments of the electrons to the degenerate partners [such as (1, 0, 1) for two electrons in the three partners of t_{2g}, rather than using fractional and equal occupation such as (2/3, 2/3, 2/3)]^{55}. The problem of finding the site occupations that lead to minimum energy is, in general, a nontrivial optimization problem^{26}, especially when done for the artificial case of (i) a high symmetry unit cell and (ii) a rigid lattice. However, here we (i) use a supercell that already has a low symmetry (3d atoms have their own local environment) and (ii) allow the lattice to respond to site fluctuations in occupation numbers. In addition, as we will show below, most of the structural distortions (O_{6} rotations and antipolar motions of ions) appearing in the ABO_{3} perovskites mix the “cubic” orbitals removing orbital degeneracies present in the initial cubic phase. Thus, the existence of metastable phases in the cubic cell is not so crucial for our study and these orbital broken symmetries are there to probe the mechanism yielding the bandgap (Jahn–Teller motion or disproportionation for instance). We have tested few initial guesses and only the most stable phase reached after the selfconsistency is kept. Finally, for disproportionating materials (e.g., YNiO_{3} or CaFeO_{3}), different types of initial nudging were performed, such as (1, 0) e_{g} partner occupancies on all B sites or (1, 1) and (0, 0) e_{g} partner occupancies between neighboring B sites.

(3)
Displacement fluctuations (i.e., atomic relaxation requiring cells larger than the primitive cell), including local Jahn–Teller distortions as well as octahedral mode deformations, such as breathing, tilting, rotation, and antipolar displacements described in detail in Supplementary Note 1.
Predictions for lowtemperature magnetically ordered AFM/FM phases
Figure 2 summarizes our results for the lowest energy phase considering spinordered phases (energy differences between all tested magnetic configurations and initial symmetries are given in Supplementary Table 6). Consistent with experiments and previous DFT theoretical literature^{27,28,29,30,32,40,41,56}, for all explored compounds, we find (i) the correct low T crystal structure— orthorhombic for CaVO_{3}, CaMnO_{3}, LaMnO_{3}, and LaFeO_{3}; monoclinic for LaVO_{3}, CaFeO_{3}, and YNiO_{3}; cubic for SrVO_{3}; (ii) the correct low T spinordered phase, including AFM (for YTiO_{3}, LaVO_{3}, CaMnO_{3}, LaMnO_{3}, LaFeO_{3}, and YNiO_{3}) or FM (for YTiO_{3}) (except for CaFeO_{3} that exhibits an incommensurate antiferromagnetic spin spiral order at low temperature^{9} not included in our modeling); (iii) all compounds adopting a spinordered ground state (YTiO_{3}, LaVO_{3}, CaMnO_{3}, LaMnO_{3}, CaFeO_{3}, LaFeO_{3}, and YNiO_{3}) are predicted insulating. Furthermore, (iv) the key cellinternal lattice distortions (O_{6} group rotations, Jahn–Teller distortions, and bond disproportionation) observed experimentally, are reproduced by theory with mode amplitudes in excellent agreement with experiments (see Supplementary Table 7).
Predictions for highT paramagnetic phases
Predicted structure types and sublattice distortions: Using the polymorphous representation, the DFT + SQS reproduces the experimentally observed structure for PM phases (YTiO_{3}, CaVO_{3}, SrVO_{3}, LaVO_{3}, CaMnO_{3}, LaMnO_{3}, CaFeO_{3}, LaFeO_{3}, and YNiO_{3}) as summarized in Fig. 2. Interestingly, the relaxed HT structures share key similarities with the LT phases (O_{6} rotations, bond disproportionation), as inferred by our symmetryadapted mode analysis (Supplementary Table 7), i.e., the LT phases generally inherit the properties of the PM phases. Only LaVO_{3} exhibits a PM phase that undergoes an alternative Jahn–Teller motion pattern with respect to the LT phase, yielding an orthorhombic symmetry instead of a monoclinic symmetry (Supplementary Table 7 and Supplementary Fig. 1).
Predicted metal versus insulating characteristics: The present approach correctly reproduces the experimentally observed insulating or metallic behaviors for all materials (Fig. 2). We note, however, that just as is the case in the highly uncorrelated compounds Si and GaAs, DFT often does not give accurate absolute bandgaps (and hence, effective masses), and a GW correction is needed^{57}. The 3d oxides of ABO_{3} are no exception; we expect that more quantitative gap values and (renormalized) masses will be available as GW is applied to our SQS–DFT.
Surprisingly, the approach also correctly reproduces the two experimentally observed paramagnetic phases of CaFeO_{3} and YNiO_{3}, with an insulating phase slightly more stable than the metallic phase (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table 6). Finally, we note that ABO_{3} with early 3d elements B = Ti, V shows band edges that are dlike (upper Hubbard and lower Hubbard bands (c.f. Fig. 1b, top), whereas those with later 3d elements (B = Mn, Fe, and Ni) display oxygenlike band edges (see Figs. 3–6).
Gapping mechanisms
Having now established that the methodology used correctly captures the basic physical properties observed experimentally for the different compounds presented in Fig. 2, we next study the triggering mechanism of the gap formation, i.e., the factors causing gapping, providing a classification of gapping mechanisms for the different ABO_{3} perovskites.
The methodology used to identify the leading gapping mechanism is to start from an assumed highsymmetry cubic perovskite phase (Pm3m symmetry), and slightly “nudge” (in the linear response sense) this structure with respect to potential symmetry breaking modes, looking for energy lowering and gap formation. The perturbing modes are (a) allowing different local environments, (b) occupation number fluctuation, and (c) displacement fluctuations, including local Jahn–Teller distortions as well as octahedral mode deformations, such as breathing, tilting, rotation, and antipolar displacements. Once the leading symmetry breaking mechanism is found (with respect to cubic), we proceed to perform the complete gapping and magnetism calculation using the actual crystal structure (orthorhombic, cubic, and monoclinic) looking for minimum energy. We group the ABO_{3} compounds into four categories in terms of the gapping mechanisms.
Gapping mechanism 1: compounds forming closed subshells by octahedral breaking of atomic symmetry
The free ions Mn^{4+} (d^{3}) and Fe^{3+} (d^{5}) with an odd number of electrons would simplistically lead to partially filled degenerate states and hence candidate for ungapped “metallic bands”. But the solidstate octahedral symmetry breaks the continuous rotational atomic d symmetry: starting from an assumed cubic phase, CaMnO_{3} and LaFeO_{3} are already found to be insulators with bandgaps of 0.10 eV (CaMnO_{3}, t_{2g}^{3}) and 0.85 eV (LaFeO_{3}, t_{2g}^{3}e_{g}^{2}) and sizable magnetic moments of 2.46 µ_{B} and 4.20 µ_{B}, respectively (Fig. 3a, b). Consequently, in this group, the bandgap originates from lowering the atomic symmetry by the octahedral field and Hund’s rule, driving halffilling of the degenerate partners and an ensuing gap already at the cubic level (such an observation was already raised for CaMnO_{3}^{31}). Because of the relative AtoB atomic size mismatch in ABO_{3} (as reflected by the 1926 Goldschmidt tolerance factor t^{58} reported in Fig. 2, being less than 1), these compounds do not prefer the ideal cubic structure and could distort by O_{6} rotations, as indeed obtained by DFT energy minimization. This additional symmetry lowering produces energy gains of 315 and 378 meV/f.u in CaMnO_{3} and LaFeO_{3}, respectively, further increasing their bandgaps to 0.64 and 1.31 eV without altering the B cation magnetic moment (Fig. 2).
Gapping mechanism 2: compounds lifting electronic degeneracies due to octahedral rotations and those retaining electronic degeneracies due to small or absent octahedral rotations
Unlike CaMnO_{3} and LaFeO_{3}, the cubic symmetry alone does not create halffilling in CaVO_{3}, SrVO_{3}, YTiO_{3} (d^{1}), and LaMnO_{3} (d^{4}) that continues to exhibit electronic degeneracies of either t_{2g} or e_{g} levels. CaVO_{3} and SrVO_{3} are metals, whereas YTiO_{3} and LaMnO_{3} are insulators in both PM and LT phases. These can be classified in terms of the strength of the octahedral tilting effects.
YTiO_{3} and LaMnO_{3} are gapped insulators due to octahedral rotation in the absence of electronic instability: We first probed the d^{1} orbital degeneracy of Ti^{3+} in YTiO_{3} and of d^{4} of Mn^{3+} in LaMnO_{3} by nudging the occupancy to a specific degenerate partner within the cubic phase (e.g., occupation of the t_{2g} triplet by (1, 0, 0) rather than (1/3, 1/3, 1/3)). We find that the imposed orbital broken symmetry (OBS) is unstable and decays back to a metallic solution with equal occupations of degenerate partners. Thus, in the ideal cubic symmetry, these compounds do not develop any electronic instability that would break the d orbital degeneracy, thereby leading to gap formation.
Permitting the next noncubic symmetry breaking reveals the gapping mechanism here. Due to a large AtoB cation size mismatch in ABO_{3}, reflected by their tolerance factor (Fig. 2), YTiO_{3} and LaMnO_{3} are expected to be unstable in their cubic structures and to develop O_{6} rotations, lowering the symmetry from cubic Pm3m to orthorhombic Pbnm, as indeed found in DFT energy minimization. This results in large total energy lowering (∆E = −1898 and −632 meV/f.u in YTiO_{3} and LaMnO_{3}, respectively) and in insulating phases with a bandgap created between d levels (Fig. 4a, c). Due to the symmetry lowering, the point group symmetry is reduced from O_{h} to D_{2h} and a new basis of d orbitals is produced locally on each of the transition metal sites. In YTiO_{3}, it results in a splitoff d band below the Fermi level (Fig. 4a) and the Ti d electron is localized in an orbital corresponding to a linear combination of the “cubict_{2g}” levels (Fig. 4b) of the form αd_{xy} + βd_{xz} + γd_{yz} (α^{2} + β^{2} + γ^{2} =1), whose coefficients α, β, and γ are triggered by combinations of octahedra rotations and A cations antipolar motions^{27} (no Jahn–Teller (JT) motions are observed in the structure on the basis of our symmetryadapted modes presented in Supplementary Table 7). This results in “orbital ordering” that is clearly a DFT band structure effect triggered by lowering the site symmetry, not a dynamical correlation effect. The characteristic shape of the orbital (reflected in the chargedensity map of Fig. 4b) then drives the FM interactions at low temperature^{27}.
A similar mechanism applies for LaMnO_{3}, although the material displays a large inphase JT distortion (Supplementary Table 7). This produces a gap located between e_{g} levels (Fig. 4c). To settle the importance of the additional JT motion with respect to YTiO_{3}, we calculate the very same Pbnm phase but remove the JT mode. We observe that the material is already an insulator and the averaged Mn^{3+} magnetic moments are mostly unaltered (Fig. 4d) (even though relying on standard LDA calculations, rotations were previously shown to open pseudo gaps, irrespective of the presence of a Jahn–Teller motion in ref. ^{59}). Therefore, O_{6} rotations are sufficiently large to split the new basis of e_{g} levels and the Mn^{3+} electrons are localized in an orbital pointing either along x or y directions on Mn neighboring sites in the (ab) plane (Fig. 4e). These orbitals correspond to linear combinations of the “cubic e_{g}” levels of the form \(\xi d_{z^2} + \eta d_{x^2  y^2}\) (ξ^{ 2}+η^{2} = 1, \(\left \xi \right \approx \left \eta \right\)). The specific orbital pattern stabilizes an AFMA order at low temperature, without changing substantially the bandgap and the averaged magnetic moments (Fig. 2).
CaVO_{3} and SrVO_{3} are metals because of insufficiently large O_{6} rotations: because of their closerto1 tolerance factor (Fig. 2), CaVO_{3} and SrVO_{3} are not developing large O_{6} rotations (Supplementary Table 7), as found in DFT energy minimization, and thus the orbitals are not sufficiently split to render an insulating phase. Note that the metallic state is not due to some strongly correlated effect but rather due to a trivial, semiclassical mechanism captured by the 1926 Goldschmidt tolerance factor^{58}. The mechanism was validated by artificially imposing the YTiO_{3}type O_{6} rotations onto CaVO_{3}, finding in our variational selfconsistency, an insulator with a bandgap of 0.14 eV. In agreement with this result, Pavarini et al. noted in their dynamical meanfield theory (DMFT) simulations^{21,60,61} on YTiO_{3} and LaMnO_{3} that orthorhombic distortions (rotations, Acation motions) can produce a sufficiently large crystal field splitting localizing electrons, irrespective of Jahn–Teller distortions.
It is often thought that SrVO_{3} is a good example of failure of meanfieldlike theories, and that SrVO_{3} shows a correlated behavior beyond Hartree–Fock descriptions, i.e., formation of Hubbard bands and a coherent peak at the Fermi level E_{F} due to the electronic correlation in the ground state, revealed by photoemission experiments. This viewpoint classifies SrVO_{3} into a strongly correlated metal category and dynamical correction in the groundstate description is surely necessary to describe the basic property of the correlated perovskites. We emphasize that the metallic nature of SrVO_{3} is a simple consequence of the cubic structure being the lowest total energy phase. We note that the SQSPM approach that is deliberately restricted to a single determinant mean field gives a clear upper Hubbard band and this bandwidth W associated with t_{2g} is 1.6 eV (SQSPM DFT), matching well the angleresolved photoemission spectoscopy^{62} (ARPES) that gives W_{t2g} = 1.3 eV and DMFT^{63,64,65} in which W_{t2g} is estimated to 0.9, 1.2, or 1.35 eV depending on the DMFT parameters. In contrast, NDFT using a single monomorphous unit cell gives a bandwidth W_{t2g} of 2.6 eV as cited by ref. ^{65}.
Gapping mechanism 3: compounds with two electrons in t_{2g} levels
Although a metallic behavior would be expected for LaVO_{3} (t_{2g}^{2}e_{g}^{0}) with its two electrons distributed in three t_{2g} partners, it is experimentally found to be insulating at all temperatures and no metal–insulator phase transition has been reported in its bulk form^{6}.
In order to understand the mechanism for gapping in this group, we initially break orbital occupancies by nudging two electrons in two out of three t_{2g} orbitals on the V^{3+} site in the assumed highsymmetry cubic phase (e.g., (1, 1, 0) t_{2g} occupancies). Following variational selfconsistency, LaVO_{3} reaches a lower total energy (∆E = −321 meV/f.u with respect to the (2/3, 2/3, 2/3) degenerate cubic phase) with an insulating electronic structure having a bandgap located between two occupied and one unoccupied formerly t_{2g} levels (Fig. 5a). From this imposed orbital broken symmetry, we conclude that the electronic structure is unstable in the high symmetry cubic phase of rareearth vanadates and that these materials should therefore have a secondary contribution to the bandgap due to a Jahn–Teller distortion.
This can be verified by allowing LaVO_{3} to lower its energy within the PM spin order, by letting it develop O_{6} rotations and antipolar motions, resulting in an orthorhombic symmetry. This structure develops a sizable inphase Jahn–Teller motion similar to that displayed by LaMnO_{3}, albeit smaller (Supplementary Table 7), and is insulating with a large bandgap of 1.60 eV located between t_{2g} levels (Fig. 5c). Again, the JT distortion is but secondary for the gap opening, as evidenced by the fact that a Pbnm distorted structure in which we artificially eliminated the JT distortion already exhibits similar characteristics in terms of magnetic moments and bandgap value (Fig. 5b). Rotations driven by pure steric effects, showing energy gain around 700 meV/f.u with respect to the degenerate cubic phase (compared with the 321 meV/f.u produced by the intrinsic electronic instability), are again sufficient to alleviate orbital degeneracies.
At low temperatures, LaVO_{3} transforms to an AFMC insulator. This LT phase develops an alternative and sizable Jahn–Teller motion (Supplementary Table 7), for the octahedral distortion is in antiphase along the c axis, while it is inphase for the JT motion appearing in Pbnm phases (Supplementary Fig. 1). This alternative JT motion lowers the symmetry from Pbnm to P2_{1}/b and produces a specific orbital pattern, different from that appearing in Pbnm phases (Fig. 5d; Supplementary Fig. 3). The extra d electron with respect to YTiO_{3} is localized in a rocksalt pattern of an orbital corresponding to either a ad_{xy} + βd_{xz} or a ad_{xy} + βd_{yz} (α^{2} + β^{2} = 1) combination. The orbital pattern favors an AFMC order through the Kugel–Khomskii mechanism^{66} without significantly changing the bandgap and magnetic moments (Fig. 2).
We see that due to pure steric effects, the O_{6} rotations are sufficiently large to produce a new basis of orbitals, rendering a localized state in the Pbnm symmetry. The JT motion appearing in the LT phase is reminiscent of the native electronic instability of these materials^{29} and of the “orbitalorder” phase transition reported experimentally^{6}. Finally, the observation of the insulating phase in the orthorhombic symmetry without Jahn–Teller motion is again compatible with DMFT simulations of Pavarini et al. on YVO_{3} and LaVO_{3}^{20}.
Gapping mechanism 4: compounds with unstable single local electronic occupation patterns disproportionating into a double local environment
Although CaFeO_{3} and YNiO_{3} develop an electronic degeneracy similar to that of LaMnO_{3} with a single e_{g} electron, we note that CaFeO_{3} and YNiO_{3} are metallic within the orthorhombic Pbnm PM phase, and become insulating in a lower symmetry space group—the P2_{1}/n monoclinic structure. We present here details for YNiO_{3}; the very same conclusions are drawn for CaFeO_{3} in Supplementary Note 8.
We start from an ideal Pm3m cubic phase and artificially offer breaking of the degeneracy of the Ni^{3+} t_{2g}^{6}e_{g}^{1} levels by forcing a specific e_{g} partner occupancy (e.g., (1, 0) instead of (0.5, 0.5)). However, the imposed orbital broken symmetry does not survive the variational selfconsistency and the e_{g} electron spreads equally on the two orbitals. We offer an additional symmetrybreaking route by breaking of the degeneracy of the Ni^{3+} levels via forcing e_{g}level occupancies on two different Ni sites to be (1, 1) and (0, 0) respectively. This yields a rocksalt pattern of Ni sites with halffilled and empty e_{g} levels, respectively, i.e., mimicking Ni sites with 2 + and 4 + formal oxidation states (FOS). Following variational selfconsistency, YNiO_{3} is trapped in such a state that proves to be of lower energy by 15 meV/f.u compared with the degenerate cubic phase, still with degenerate e_{g} levels on each Ni site and no gap (Fig. 6a). In this OBS, we detect slightly different electronic structures between neighboring transition metal sites (labeled Ni_{L} and Ni_{S}), yielding different e_{g}level occupancies and magnetic moments (Fig. 6c). We determine from this probing of the linear response of the system to orbital nudging that the electronic structure is latently unstable and prone therefore to yield distortions in order to produce two types of B environments, one with halffilled (Ni^{2+}) and one with empty (Ni^{4+}) e_{g} states.
Building on our determination of the role of electronic instability, we can now perform the structural relaxation starting from the cubic phase with or without the OBS. Without OBS, YNiO_{3} relaxes to an orthorhombic Pbnm symmetry (∆E = −921 meV/f.u energy lowering with respect to the cubic phase without OBS) that is metallic. This phase is characterized by the usual O_{6} rotations and by a single local environment (SLE) for B cations. With OBS, we find that the material relaxes to a P2_{1}/n monoclinic phase that is insulating with a gap of 0.50 eV (Fig. 6b) and more stable than the Pbnm symmetry (∆E = −23 meV/f.u with respect to the Pbnm phase, Fig. 6f). Along with the usual Pbnm structural distortions, this phase develops a striking feature: there is a bond disproportionation of two O_{6} groups, producing a rocksalt pattern of collapsed and extended octahedral (for which Ni cations sitting at their center are labeled Ni_{S} and Ni_{L}, respectively) due to a sizable breathing mode (Supplementary Table 7), resulting in a double local environment (DLE) for B cations, each having very different B–O bonds. Consistently with the electronic instability identified in the cubic cell, the DLE results in different electronic structures for Ni_{L} and Ni_{S} ions, characterized by two magnetic moments, the former larger than 1 and the latter approaching 0 (Fig. 6b, d). This is also reflected by the partial chargedensity maps (Fig. 6e) obtained from electronic states located between −1 eV and the Fermi level, showing that electrons prefer to occupy e_{g} levels on Ni_{L} sites. Thus, YNiO_{3} reaches insulation through disproportionation effects transforming the 3 + unstable formal oxidation state (FOS) of Ni ions, to its more stable 2 + /4 + stable FOS in the insulating phase^{67}.
Remarkably, although the observation of 2 + /4 + FOS in the insulating phase is consistent with the Wannier analysis discussed in ref. ^{28}, the physical charge density \(\rho (\vec r)\) around Ni_{S} and Ni_{L} cations is nearly indistinguishable—and similar to that extracted in the metallic Pbnm or cubic phases—as clearly seen in Fig. 3 in ref. ^{68} owing to a charge selfregulation mechanism^{68,69,70}, whereby the ligands resupply the 3d site with charge lost. This result has sometimes been interpreted in terms of a “ligandhole” language in refs. ^{17,28,71} Thus, there is no apparent “physical charge ordering”, in agreement with previous DMFT^{17} or DFT + U^{28} studies. That the extent of charge transfer, the lack of physical charge ordering, and the magnitude of disproportionation are reasonably depicted by DFT can be judged by examining the ensuing calculated bond lengths vs. experiment: Supplementary Table 7 shows that the predicted amplitude associated with the bond disproportionation distortion is in excellent agreement with experimental quantities in CaFeO_{3} and YNiO_{3.}
We can finally check the relative role of the amplitude associated with rotations with respect to the disproportionation effects (we recall that, alone, the latter does not open a gap in YNiO_{3}). To that end, we have performed calculations for other RNiO_{3} members (R = Gd, Sm, Nd, and Pr) in which O_{6} rotations progressively decrease (Supplementary Note 9). Surprisingly, we find that only R = Gd and R = Sm are relaxing to a monoclinic phase with a DLE, while R = Nd and Pr are more stable within the orthorhombic symmetry and a SLE (Fig. 6f). Moreover, only R = Y, Sm, and Gd become insulating, while the other two compounds remain metallic (Fig. 6g). We conclude that the O_{6} rotation amplitudes are controlling the ability to disproportionate to an insulating PM phase in nickelates.
However, we find that all the considered nickelates exhibit an AFMS order, based on ↑↑↓↓ spin chains of Ni cations in the (ab) plane with different stackings along the c axis^{72}, in their ground state. It thus produces a monoclinic P2_{1}/n symmetry that is insulating. We observe that the AFMS phase shares all the key features of the monoclinic P2_{1}/n PM phase, except the fact that the magnetic moment associated with Ni_{S} cations becomes exactly null. The complex AFMS order, which is compatible with the symmetry of the breathing mode, is therefore crucial to open the bandgap via forcing disproportionation effects when materials develop small O_{6} rotations.
Compounds with an unstable electronic configuration in a SLE structure therefore reach insulation through several sequential factors: (i) they possess an electronic instability, yielding disproportionation effects already in the highsymmetry cubic phase to get rid of the B cation unstable electronic configuration originating from an unstable formal oxidation state; (ii) the disproportionation is strongly linked to the amplitude of the octahedral rotations, appearing first due to steric effects; (iii) antiferromagnetic interactions force the disproportionation when O_{6} rotations are weak. Our results reconcile the experimental phase diagram of rareearth nickelates, and most notably, the PM metal to PM insulator or PM metal to AFMinsulator as a function of the rareearth ionic radius^{12}. Moreover, we unify the different models proposed to explain the metal–insulator phase transition (MIT) with (i) the existence of an electronic instability in rareearth nickelates (DMFT^{73,74} and DFT with AFM order^{30}) and (ii) a structurally triggered Peierls MIT in RNiO_{3} and AFeO_{3} (A = Ca, Sr) compounds, although the DFT calculations were restricted to simple spinordered states^{30,40}.
Finally, the disproportionation effect was described in terms of a “novel correlation effect”^{17}, but as seen here, and in refs. ^{28,68}, it is predictable by the static meanfield DFT. The very recent DMFT simulations of RNiO_{3} compounds performed by Hampel et al.^{74} closely match our DFT + U results presented in Fig. 6f, g.
Discussion
Our DFT calculations of both LT magnetically ordered and HT spindisordered PM phases reveal the minimal theoretical ingredients required to explain the trends in metal–nonmetal behavior in oxide perovskites, and the associated trends in forms of magnetism and structural selectivity. This includes spin polarization, magnetic interactions, and lower energy phase search through the polymorphous representation—allowing large enough (super) cells, so that various modalities of structural and electronic symmetry breaking can exercise their ability to lower the total energy. This leads one to identify four generic mechanisms opening a bandgap in oxide perovskites. Two mechanisms are related to purely structural symmetry breaking, such as natural octahedral symmetry and its associated symmetrylowering distortions, such as octahedral tilting and rotations, due to steric effects. The two other mechanisms are related to intrinsic electronic instabilities of transition metals, originating either from spontaneous orbital symmetry breaking, i.e., Jahn–Teller effect or an unstable formal oxidation state of transition metals (disproportionation effect), both manifested by dedicated structural distortions.
Previous statements that DFT fails in describing gapping trends in Mott insulators were premature and often based on a naive application of DFT without properly exploring channels of energylowering symmetry breaking, rather than on the failure of the description of interelectronic interactions underlying the density functional theory itself. Indeed, the sequential steps of offering to the system symmetrybreaking modes appear to explain gapping, the nature of the magnetic order, and both the space group symmetries and sublattice distortions (Jahn–Teller and octahedral rotations) in both low temperature and high temperature phases of all ABO_{3} perovskites with B = 3d. This approach does not require explicit dynamical correlations, or the Mott picture of electron localization on atomic sites with the ensuing formation of upper and lower Hubbard bands (Fig. 1). The basic interactions of crystal field splitting, lattice distortions, and spin polarizations are sufficient to produce insulation in these compounds, and the celebrated Mott–Hubbard mechanism for gap opening (Fig. 1a) may not apply so generally to perovskite oxides. Thus, although these oxides are certainly complicated, they are not obviously strongly dynamically correlated materials and are not good examples where DFT with current exchangecorrelation functionals fails.
Data availability
All data are available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.
References
 1.
Goodenough, J. B. Perspective on engineering transitionmetal oxides. Chem. Mater. 26, 820–829 (2014).
 2.
Khomskii, D. I. Transition Metal Compounds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
 3.
Mott, N. F. & Zinamon, Z. The metalnonmetal transition. Rep. Prog. Phys. 33, 881–940 (1970).
 4.
Mott, N. Metalinsulator Transitions. (CRC Press, London, 1990).
 5.
Komarek, A. C. et al. Magnetoelastic coupling in RTiO_{3} (R = La, Nd, Sm, Gd, Y) investigated with diffraction techniques and thermal expansion measurements. Phys. Rev. B 75, 224402 (2007).
 6.
Miyasaka, S., Okimoto, Y., Iwama, M. & Tokura, Y. Spinorbital phase diagram of perovskitetype RVO_{3} (R = rareearth ion or Y). Phys. Rev. B 68, 100406 (2003).
 7.
Yudin, V. M., Gavrilishina, A. I., Artem’eva, M. V. & Bryzhina, M. F. Weak ferromagnetism of CaMnO_{3}. Fiz. tverdogo Tela 7 (1965) 2292. Sov. Phys. Solid State 7, 1856 (1966).
 8.
Koehler, W. C. & Wollan, E. O. Neutrondiffraction study of the magnetic properties of perovskitelike compounds LaBO_{3}. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2, 100–106 (1957).
 9.
Woodward, P., Cox, D., Moshopoulou, E., Sleight, A. & Morimoto, S. Structural studies of charge disproportionation and magnetic order in CaFeO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 62, 844–855 (2000).
 10.
Alonso, J. A. et al. Charge disproportionation in RNiO3 perovskites: simultaneous metalinsulator and structural transition in YNiO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3871–3874 (1999).
 11.
Chamberland, B. L. & Danielson, P. S. Alkalineearth vanadium (IV) oxides having the AVO_{3} composition. J. Solid State Chem. 3, 243–247 (1971).
 12.
Catalano, S. et al. Rareearth nickelates RNiO_{3}: thin films and heterostructures. Reports Prog. Phys. 81, 046501 (2018).
 13.
Zubko, P., Gariglio, S., Gabay, M., Ghosez, P. & Triscone, J.M. Interface physics in complex oxide heterostructures. Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 141–165 (2011).
 14.
Ashcroft, N. W. & Mermin, N. D. Solid State Physics. (Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia, 1976).
 15.
Hubbard, J. Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 276, 238–257 (1963).
 16.
Hubbard, J. Electron correlations in narrow energy bands III. An improved solution. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 283, 401–419 (1964).
 17.
Park, H., Millis, A. J. & Marianetti, C. A. Siteselective Mott transition in rareearthelement nickelates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 156402 (2012).
 18.
Leonov, I., Korotin, D., Binggeli, N., Anisimov, V. I. & Vollhardt, D. Computation of correlationinduced atomic displacements and structural transformations in paramagnetic KCuF_{3} and LaMnO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 81, 075109 (2010).
 19.
Wang, X. et al. Covalency, doublecounting, and the metalinsulator phase diagram in transition metal oxides. Phys. Rev. B 86, 195136 (2012).
 20.
De Raychaudhury, M., Pavarini, E. & Andersen, O. K. Orbital fluctuations in the different phases of LaVO_{3} and YVO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 126402 (2007).
 21.
Pavarini, E. et al. Mott transition and suppression of orbital fluctuations in orthorhombic 3d^{1} perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 176403 (2004).
 22.
Ren, X. et al. LDA + DMFT computation of the electronic spectrum of NiO. Phys. Rev. B 74, 195114 (2006).
 23.
Park, H., Millis, A. J. & Marianetti, C. A. Total energy calculations using DFT + DMFT: Computing the pressure phase diagram of the rare earth nickelates. Phys. Rev. B 89, 245133 (2014).
 24.
Xu, S., Shen, X., Hallman, K. A., Haglund, R. F. & Pantelides, S. T. Unified bandtheoretic description of structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of vanadium dioxide phases. Phys. Rev. B 95, 125105 (2017).
 25.
Trimarchi, G., Wang, Z. & Zunger, A. Polymorphous band structure model of gapping in the antiferromagnetic and paramagnetic phases of the Mott insulators MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO. Phys. Rev. B 97, 035107 (2018).
 26.
Meredig, B., Thompson, A., Hansen, H. A., Wolverton, C. & Van De Walle, A. Method for locating lowenergy solutions within DFT + U. Phys. Rev. B 82, 195128 (2010).
 27.
Varignon, J., Grisolia, M. N., Preziosi, D., Ghosez, P. & Bibes, M. Origin of the orbital and spin ordering in rareearth titanates. Phys. Rev. B 96, 235106 (2017).
 28.
Varignon, J., Grisolia, M. N., Íñiguez, J., Barthélémy, A. & Bibes, M. Complete phase diagram of rareearth nickelates from firstprinciples. npj Quantum Mater. 2, 21 (2017).
 29.
Varignon, J., Bristowe, N. C., Bousquet, E. & Ghosez, P. Coupling and electrical control of structural, orbital and magnetic orders in perovskites. Sci. Rep. 5, 15364 (2015).
 30.
Mercy, A., Bieder, J., Íñiguez, J. & Ghosez, P. Structurally triggered metalinsulator transition in rareearth nickelates. Nat. Commun. 8, 1677 (2017).
 31.
Lee, J. H., Delaney, K. T., Bousquet, E., Spaldin, N. A. & Rabe, K. M. Strong coupling of JahnTeller distortion to oxygenoctahedron rotation and functional properties in epitaxially strained orthorhombic LaMnO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 88, 174426 (2013).
 32.
Cammarata, A. & Rondinelli, J. M. Spinassisted covalent bond mechanism in ‘chargeordering’ perovskite oxides. Phys. Rev. B 86, 195144 (2012).
 33.
Sarma, D. D. et al. Band theory for groundstate properties and excitation spectra of perovskite LaMO_{3} (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni). Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1126–1129 (1995).
 34.
Wigner, E. On the interaction of electrons in metals. Phys. Rev. 46, 1002 (1934).
 35.
Löwdin, P. O. Quantum theory of manyparticle systems. III. Extension of the HartreeFock scheme to include degenerate systems and correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 97, 1509–1520 (1955).
 36.
Martin, R. M. Electronic Structure: Basic Theory and Practical Methods. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
 37.
MoriSánchez, P., Cohen, A. J. & Yang, W. Localization and delocalization errors in density functional theory and implications for bandgap prediction. Phys. Rev. B 100, 146401 (2007).
 38.
Car, R. Density functional theory: fixing Jacob’s ladder. Nat. Chem. 8, 820 (2016).
 39.
Sun, J., Ruzsinszky, A. & Perdew, J. Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 036402 (2015).
 40.
Zhang, Y., Schmitt, M. M., Mercy, A., Wang, J. & Ghosez, P. From charge to orbitalordered metalinsulator transition in alkalineearth ferrites. Phys. Rev. B 98, 081108(R) (2018).
 41.
Zanolli, Z., Wojdeł, J. C., Íñiguez, J. & Ghosez, P. Electric control of the magnetization in BiFeO_{3}/LaFeO_{3} superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 88, 060102(R) (2013).
 42.
Mellan, T. A. et al. Importance of anisotropic Coulomb interaction in LaMnO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 92, 085151 (2015).
 43.
Sawada, H. & Terakura, K. Orbital and magnetic orderings in localized t_{2g} systems,YTiO_{3} and YVO_{3}: Comparison with a more itinerant e_{g} system LaMnO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 58, 6831–6836 (1998).
 44.
Fang, Z. & Nagaosa, N. Quantum versus JahnTeller orbital physics in YVO_{3} and LaVO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 176404 (2004).
 45.
Bristowe, N. C., Varignon, J., Fontaine, D., Bousquet, E. & Ghosez, P. Ferromagnetism induced by entangled charge and orbital orderings in ferroelectric titanate perovskites. Nat. Commun. 6, 6677 (2015).
 46.
Hong, J. et al. Spinphonon coupling effects in transitionmetal perovskites: A DFT + U and hybridfunctional. Phys. Rev. B 85, 054417 (2012).
 47.
Goffinet, M., Hermet, P., Bilc, D. I. & Ghosez, P. Hybrid functional study of prototypical multiferroic bismuth ferrite. Phys. Rev. B 79, 014403 (2009).
 48.
Bjaalie, L., Janotti, A., Krishnaswamy, K. & Van De Walle, C. G. Point defects, impurities, and small hole polarons in GdTiO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 93, 115316 (2016).
 49.
Bhattacharjee, S., Bousquet, E. & Ghosez, P. Engineering multiferroism in CaMnO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 117602 (2009).
 50.
He, J. & Franchini, C. Screened hybrid functional applied to 3d^{0} → 3d^{8} transitionmetal perovskites LaMO_{3} (M = ScCu): Influence of the exchange mixing parameter on the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties. Phys. Rev. B 86, 235117 (2012).
 51.
Bruno, F. Y. et al. Rationalizing strain engineering effects in rareearth nickelates. Phys. Rev. B 88, 195108 (2013).
 52.
Rivero, P., Meunier, V. & Shelton, W. Electronic, structural, and magnetic properties of LaMnO_{3} phase transition at high temperature. Phys. Rev. B 93, 024111 (2016).
 53.
Furness, J. W. et al. An accurate firstprinciples treatment of dopingdependent electronic structure of hightemperature cuprate superconductors. Commun. Phys. 1, 11 (2018).
 54.
Zunger, A., Wei, S.H., Ferreira, L. G. & Bernard, J. E. Special quasirandom structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 353–356 (1990).
 55.
Allen, J. P. & Watson, G. W. Occupation matrix control of d and felectron localisations using DFT + U. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 21016–21031 (2014).
 56.
Bousquet, E. & Spaldin, N. Induced magnetoelectric response in Pnma perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 197603 (2011).
 57.
Giustino, F. Electronphonon interactions from first principles. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015003 (2017).
 58.
Goldschmidt, V. M. Die gesetze der krystallochemie. Naturwissenschaften. 14, 477–485 (1926).
 59.
Singh, D. & Pickett, W. Pseudogaps, JahnTeller distortions, and magnetic order in manganite perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 57, 88–91 (1998).
 60.
Pavarini, E., Yamasaki, A., Nuss, J. & Andersen, O. K. How chemistry controls electron localization in 3d^{1} perovskites: a Wannierfunction study. New J. Phys. 7, 188 (2005).
 61.
Pavarini, E. & Koch, E. Origin of jahnteller distortion and orbital order in LaMnO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 086402 (2010).
 62.
Takizawa, M. et al. Coherent and incoherent d band dispersions in SrVO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 80, 235104 (2009).
 63.
Nekrasov, I. A. et al. Momentumresolved spectral functions of SrVO_{3} calculated by LDA + DMFT. Phys. Rev. B 73, 155112 (2006).
 64.
Taranto, C. et al. Comparing quasiparticle GW + DMFT and LDA + DMFT for the test bed material SrVO_{3}. Phys. Rev. B 88, 165119 (2013).
 65.
Sakuma, R., Werner, P. & Aryasetiawan, F. Electronic structure of SrVO_{3} within GW + DMFT. Phys. Rev. B 88, 235110 (2013).
 66.
Kugel, K. I. & Khomskii, D. I. Crystalstructure and magnetic properties of substances with orbital degeneracy. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz 64, 1429–1439 (1973).
 67.
Mazin, I. I. et al. Charge ordering as alternative to JahnTeller distortion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 176406 (2007).
 68.
Dalpian, G. M., Liu, Q., Varignon, J., Bibes, M. & Zunger, A. Bond disproportionation, charge selfregulation, and ligand holes in s p and in delectron ABX_{3} perovskites by density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 98, 075135 (2018).
 69.
Raebiger, H., Lany, S. & Zunger, A. Charge selfregulation upon changing the oxidation state of transition metals in insulators. Nature 453, 763–766 (2008).
 70.
Zunger, A. & Lindefelt, U. Substitutional 3d impurities in silicon: a selfregulating system. Solid State Commun. 45, 343–346 (1983).
 71.
Johnston, S., Mukherjee, A., Elfimov, I., Berciu, M. & Sawatzky, G. A. Charge disproportionation without charge transfer in the rareearthelement nickelates as a possible mechanism for the metalinsulator transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 106404 (2014).
 72.
Giovannetti, G., Kumar, S., Khomskii, D., Picozzi, S. & Van Den Brink, J. Multiferroicity in rareearth nickelates RNiO_{3}. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 156401 (2009).
 73.
Peil, O. E. & Georges, A. Lowenergy description of the metalinsulator transition in the rareearth nickelates. Phys. Rev. B 91, 075128 (2015).
 74.
Hampel, A., Liu, P., Franchini, C. & Ederer, C. Energetics of the coupled electronic structural transition in the rareearth nickelates. npj Quantum. Materials 4, 5 (2019).
Acknowledgements
This work of J.V. has been supported by the European Research Council (ERC) Consolidator grant MINT under contract no. 615759. Calculations took advantages of the Occigen machines through the DARI project EPOC A0020910084 and of the DECI resource FIONN in Ireland at ICHEC through the PRACE project FiPSCO. The work of A.Z. was supported by the Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Science, MSE division under grant no. DEFG02–13ER46959 to CU Boulder. We acknowledge discussions with G. Trimarchi and Zhi Wang and technical support from A. Ralph at ICHEC supercomputers.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
J.V. did all calculations and analysis and participated in writing of the paper. A.Z. suggested the problem, did the analysis of the results, and directed the writing of the text with contributions from J.V. and M.B. M.B. provided experimental feedback and assisted in the writing of the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Varignon, J., Bibes, M. & Zunger, A. Origin of band gaps in 3d perovskite oxides. Nat Commun 10, 1658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467019096986
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Straininduced magnetic transition in CaMnO3 ultrathin films
Physical Review B (2020)

Topotactic Hydrogen in Nickelate Superconductors and Akin InfiniteLayer Oxides ABO2
Physical Review Letters (2020)

Symmetrybreaking polymorphous descriptions for correlated materials without interelectronic U
Physical Review B (2020)

Emergence of quantum critical charge and spinstate fluctuations near the pressureinduced Mott transition in MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO
Physical Review B (2020)

Hole antidoping of oxides
Physical Review B (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.