Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Ultra-fast photodetectors based on high-mobility indium gallium antimonide nanowires


Because of tunable bandgap and high carrier mobility, ternary III-V nanowires (NWs) have demonstrated enormous potential for advanced applications. However, the synthesis of large-scale and highly-crystalline InxGa1−xSb NWs is still a challenge. Here, we achieve high-density and crystalline stoichiometric InxGa1−xSb (0.09 < x < 0.28) NWs on amorphous substrates with the uniform phase-purity and <110 >-orientation via chemical vapor deposition. The as-prepared NWs show excellent electrical and optoelectronic characteristics, including the high hole mobility (i.e. 463 cm2 V−1 s−1 for In0.09Ga0.91Sb NWs) as well as broadband and ultrafast photoresponse over the visible and infrared optical communication region (1550 nm). Specifically, the In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW device yields efficient rise and decay times down to 38 and 53 μs, respectively, along with the responsivity of 6000 A W−1 and external quantum efficiency of 4.8 × 106 % towards 1550 nm regime. High-performance NW parallel-arrayed devices can also be fabricated to illustrate their large-scale device integrability for next-generation, ultrafast, high-responsivity and broadband photodetectors.


Due to the extraordinarily high carrier mobility, III−V compound semiconductors are widely considered as promising candidates to replace Si for the next-generation electronics1. Especially, III-V nanomaterials, such as nanowires (NWs), have been evidently demonstrated with intriguing physical and chemical properties originating from their one-dimensional configuration2. In this regard, various methods have therefore been explored for the synthesis of high-quality III-V NWs, including chemical vapor deposition (CVD)3,4,5, metal-organic CVD6,7, laser ablation8 and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE)9, etc. Among many III−V materials, ternary compounds (e.g. InGaSb and InGaAs) have been always reported to yield the more superior electrical properties as compared to their binary counterparts1,10,11,12. For example, InGaSb gives the higher hole mobility than GaSb and InSb12. However, it is still a substantial technological challenge to achieve large-scale and highly crystalline ternary III−V NWs in a controllable and low-cost manner13,14,15.

At the same time, III−V NW materials are often illustrated with excellent optoelectronic characteristics2,13,16,17, which can be employed as active materials for photodetectors18,19, lasers20, and light emitting diodes21. Because of the tunable composition and tailorable bandgap, ternary III−V NWs are particularly advantageous as photosensing elements for broadband photodetectors22,23,24. In specific, InGaSb, which can stoichiometrically be expressed as InxGa1−xSb, has a bandgap spanning from 0.17 eV (x = 1) to 0.72 eV (x = 0)25, is an ideal alloy for tunable infrared (IR) detection. More importantly, since the NW geometry can yield enhanced photon absorption as well as provide efficient charge separation and carrier collection with marginal recombination loss, III-V NWs have always been shown with the impressive photodetection performance16. For instance, Liu et al. reported that InAs NW photodetectors showed excellent photodetection performance with high responsivity (4.4 × 103 A W−1), high external quantum efficiency (EQE, 1.03 × 106%), and high detectivity (2.6 × 1011 Jones)26. InGaAs NW photodetectors were also fabricated to give excellent performance with broadband response, high responsivity (6.5 × 103 A W−1) and large EQE (5.04 × 105%)27. Nevertheless, to date, there is still very limited investigation on the photodetection behavior of InGaSb NWs owing to the lack of high-quality InGaSb NWs.

Herein, based on our previously developed enhanced CVD synthesis of ternary InxGa1−xAs NWs28,29, we report the successful growth of high-quality InxGa1−xSb NWs with high hole mobility and efficient photosensing characteristics in both visible and short-wave (SW) IR regimes. Crystalline, high-mobility and <110>-oriented InxGa1−xSb NWs with the uniform controllable In concentration, x, up to 28 at.%, can be readily achieved. Interestingly, a high hole mobility of 463 cm2 V−1 s−1 is realized for In0.09Ga0.91Sb NWs, indicating the high quality of the ternary NWs. Furthermore, the ternary NWs show sensitive photodetection performance in the IR optical communication region (1550 nm). For the optimized In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW devices, they show broadband photodetection performance at room temperature, with a responsivity of 6000 A W−1, specific detectivity of 3 × 109 Jones, external quantum efficiency (EQE) of 4.8 × 106% and response time of 38 μs under IR illumination (1550 nm) at a bias voltage of 2 V. This efficient response in the tens of microsecond range represents one of the fastest responses among all NW IR photodetectors reported in the literature. Importantly, these NWs can as well be fabricated into NW parallel arrays-based devices, demonstrating their technological potential as active materials for next-generation, ultrafast and efficient room-temperature photodetectors.


Growth and characterization of InxGa1−xSb nanowires

InxGa1−xSb NWs are synthesized by the two-step solid-source CVD method28. In order to synthesize InxGa1−xSb NWs with different chemical stoichiometry of In and Ga, InSb and GaSb powders in various mixture ratios (e.g. 10:1, 20:1, 30:1 and 40:1 in wt.%) are used as the precursor source. The chemical composition of the obtained NWs could then be evaluated by using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), where they are found to be In0.15Ga0.85Sb, In0.22Ga0.78Sb, In0.09Ga0.91Sb, and In0.28Ga0.72Sb for the source mixture ratio (InSb:GaSb in wt.%) of 10:1, 20:1, 30:1, and 40:1, respectively (details can be seen in Supplementary Tables 1, 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1). This slender variation of the NW composition indicates the robustness of the present CVD method in controlling the NW chemical stoichiometry, which is beneficial for assessing the NW composition-dependent properties. Furthermore, as shown in the scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of typical In0.28Ga0.72Sb NWs (Fig. 1a), smooth and clean NWs with a length greater than 10 μm are grown on the amorphous SiO2/Si substrate. When the In concentration of the NWs is increased, the NW morphology is maintained, but there is a slight change on their growth density due to the increasing amount of InSb powder in the precursor source mixture (Supplementary Fig. 2). Based on the transmission electron microscope (TEM) characterization, the average diameter of In0.15Ga0.85Sb, In0.22Ga0.78Sb, In0.09Ga0.91Sb, and In0.28Ga0.72Sb NWs are found to be very similar, with the values of 60 ± 10, 45 ± 10, 60 ± 5, and 57 ± 10 nm, accordingly, extracted from the statistics of more than 20 NWs for each sample group. Evidently, there is not any significant effect on the NW morphology and diameter when the In concentration of NWs is varied. Simultaneously, elemental mapping of the NW is also performed as presented in Fig. 1b−f. It can be seen that the chemical constituents of In, Ga and Sb are distributed uniformly along both axial and radial directions of the NW, indicating the excellent NW composition homogeneity obtained in this simple growth. Notably, Au is only detected in the spherical tip region of the NW, which further confirms the catalytic vapor−liquid−solid mechanism employed here.

Fig. 1

Morphology and chemical composition of InxGa1−xSb nanowires. a Scanning electron microscopy image of In0.28Ga0.72Sb nanowires (NWs) prepared by using the precursor powder mixing ratio of InSb:GaSb = 40:1 (wt.) and 0.1-nm-thick Au films as the catalyst. b Transmission electron microscopy image and (cf) energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapping of a typical In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW. The gray scales denote the measured intensity. The color scales stand for the normalized concentration of Au, In, Ga and Sb measured, while the value of 1 represents the maximum concentration of each element detected, being 74.6 atomic % of Au for the NW tip, 14.2 atomic % of In, 38.7 atomic % of Ga and 47.1 atomic % of Sb for the NW body, respectively

In addition, the morphology and growth orientation of the NWs could also be assessed by detailed TEM studies. As depicted in the TEM image of a typical In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW in Fig. 2a, the NW body has a uniform diameter along the entire length of NW without any noticeable tapering behavior. Based on the corresponding selected area electron diffraction pattern (Fig. 2a inset), the distinctive and sharp diffraction spots clearly suggest the excellent crystallinity of the NW with the zinc blende (ZB) structure and growth direction of <110>. This particular growth orientation is as well observed for the rest of other NWs, being independent of the NW diameter and NW composition (Fig. 2b and Supplementary Fig. 3), which is in perfect agreement with other III−V NW materials reported since their <110> growth direction always consists of the relatively low surface energy planes for the effective NW nucleation and formation4,30. Almost all of the obtained NWs exhibit a substantial tapering effect right next to their catalytic tips, where the NW diameters increase gradually from the tip to the NW body along the neck-bending region with a length of 10−50 nm (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Figs. 46). It is also noted that all the catalytic tips consist of the typical hexagonal Au10In3 structure (PDF Card: 42-0821) with a lattice spacing of 0.22 nm along the {04\(\bar 4\)0} planes (Supplementary Fig. 7, Supplementary Table 3), while all catalyst/NW interface orientations are identified as Au10In3 (04\(\bar 4\)0)| InxGa1−xSb (110) for the NWs growing along the <110> direction (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Figs. 46, 8). It is still controversial whether the epitaxial relation between the NW and the catalyst particle is caused by a quasi-vapor−solid−solid process or vapor−liquid−solid (VLS) process31. Nevertheless, since the In concentration is only varied in a relatively small range (0 to 28 at.%), all NWs consist of the similar lattice spacing of 0.22 nm along {110} planes without any noticeable defects existed in the NW bodies (Fig. 2e, f and Supplementary Figs. 46, 9, 10). All these results indicate the uniform phase- and orientation-purity as well as the excellent crystallinity of our InxGa1−xSb NWs for further device utilizations. Furthermore, reflectance spectra were taken to evaluate the optical properties of the NWs (Supplementary Fig. 11). As anticipated, the bandgap of the NWs is found to decrease with the increasing In content (Supplementary Fig. 12), indicating the effective incorporation of In into the GaSb lattice as well as the good composition uniformity of the NWs.

Fig. 2

Growth orientations and crystallinity of In0.28Ga0.72Sb nanowires. a Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of a representative nanowire (NW). Inset shows the corresponding selected area electron diffraction pattern and growth orientation of the NW. b Statistics of the NW growth direction as a function of the diameter. c High-resolution TEM image of the tip region of the NW imaged in panel (a). d Lattice fringes of the tip region of the NW. Inset displays the corresponding fast Fourier transform (FFT) pattern. e Lattice fringes of the neck-bending region of the NW. Inset shows the corresponding FFT pattern. f High-resolution TEM image of the body region of the NW imaged in panel (a). g Lattice fringes of the body region of the NW. Inset displays the corresponding FFT pattern. The gray scales denote the measured intensity

Growth mechanism of InxGa1−xSb nanowires

In order to shed light onto the NW growth mechanism, especially investigating the formation of NW neck-bending regions, TEM and EDS line scan are carefully performed on the tip region of a typical In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW along its axial direction (Fig. 3a, b). It is found that catalytic tip is mainly composed of the elements of In and Au, which is perfectly consistent with the observation of Au10In3 seed in the above discussion. Notably, there is no Ga and Sb elements witnessed in the tip; the Ga and Sb concentration start to be detected at the tip/NW interface. Both Ga and Sb concentration are gradually increased along the length of the NW neck, and eventually saturated at the NW body when the neck region ends. Based on these observations, the growth mechanism of InxGa1−xSb NWs can be proposed as depicted in Fig. 3c: Firstly, during the growth, Au droplets are first formed as catalysts on the substrate. Secondly, when the growth proceeds and the precursor vapor arrives at the substrate, AuIn alloy seeds would be established by the diffusion of In atoms into the Au catalyst droplets. Since the affinity of In in Au nanoparticles (NPs) is much higher as compared with the one of Ga, binary AuIn alloy seeds are formed here instead of the ternary AuInGa ones31. Next, with the continuous feeding of In species, In will be saturated in the AuIn droplets, leading to the deposition of In metal. In the end, the deposited In will then react with Ga and Sb species, forming InxGa1−xSb NWs. With the continuous feeding of Ga and Sb species, the Ga and Sb will reach a stabilized value. In this case, for the continuous deposition of In from AuIn droplets, the section (i.e. neck-bending region) adjacent to the catalyst droplets would become In rich with a tapered morphology due to the difference between reaction kinetics and constituent diffusion of Ga and Sb with In, which leads to gradient distribution of Ga and Sb along the axial direction32. The qualitative understanding of the growth steps can not only help to assess the formation mechanism of this ternary InxGa1−xSb NW material system, which is notoriously difficult to obtain, but also potentially guide us to further control the growth of NW with enhanced crystallinity and property. It should also be pointed out that the growth of ternary InxGa1−xSb NWs is different from the one of GaSb NWs as reported in our previous work5, where AuGa alloy droplets were employed as the catalyst. Furthermore, the ternary NWs show a smaller diameter as compared with typical GaSb NWs. The addition of In can affect the NW growth dynamics while the uncontrolled radical NW growth may be constrained.

Fig. 3

Proposed growth mechanism of InxGa1−xSb nanowires. a Transmission electron microscopy image of the tip region of a typical In0.28Ga0.72Sb nanowire (NW). The gray scale denotes the measured intensity. b Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy line scan across the NW tip, neck and body in the axial direction. The location of the line scan is indicated by the blue colored line in panel (a). c Illustrative schematics of four different proposed growth steps involved during the NW growth. They are: (i) formation of the gold (Au) nanoparticle, (ii) formation of the AuIn alloy, (iii) In precipitation from the AuIn alloy, (iv) formation of InxGa1−xSb neck with the increasing Ga concentration, and (v) growth of InxGa1−xSb NW with the steady Ga concentration

Electrical properties of InxGa1−xSb nanowires

Apart from the NW formation mechanism, it is also essential to evaluate the electrical properties of the obtained InxGa1−xSb NWs. In this case, global back-gated NW field-effect transistors (FETs) were fabricated with Ni as the source-drain electrodes. From the transfer (IdsVgs) and output (IdsVds) characteristic curves (Fig. 4a–c) of a representative single In0.09Ga0.91Sb NW FET, respectively, it is clear that the drain-source current (Ids) decreases with the increase of gate voltage (Vgs), indicating the typical p-type conducting behavior of the NW. In order to evaluate the contact quality of NW devices, their contact resistance were measured by fabricating single NW devices with the multiple channel length (Supplementary Fig. 13). It can be seen that the contact resistance of the In0.09Ga0.91Sb NW device is found to be 11.3 kΩ, which is ten times smaller than the resistance of the NW body. Combined with the linear relationship as observed in their output characteristics, the Ohmic-like contact between the NWs and the electrodes can be inferred. This relatively small contact resistance means that there is only a small voltage drop across the electrical contact. In this case, the mobility estimated from the transfer characteristics can indeed represent the actual mobility values of the NW devices. Importantly, the device also exhibits an impressive ON/OFF current ratio of 105 for Vds = 0.4 V (Fig. 4b). The field-effect hole mobility (μ) can be then extracted from the transfer curves utilizing the following equations33:

$$\mu = g_{\mathrm{m}} \cdot \frac{{L^2}}{{C_{{\mathrm{ox}}}}} \cdot \frac{1}{{V_{{\mathrm{ds}}}}},$$

where gm is the transconductance, defined as ∂Ids/∂Vgs, Cox is the gate capacitance and L is the channel length. Cox can be obtained from the finite element method by using COMSOL MultiPhysics software (Supplementary Fig. 14). For a typical In0.09Ga0.91Sb NW transistor, when L is 4.2 μm, NW diameter is 41 nm, gate capacitance is determined to be 0.26 fF for 50 nm SiO2 dielectric layer from COMSOL and peak transconductance is found to be 7 × 10−8 S for Vds = 0.1 V (Supplementary Fig. 15), then the peak μ of the NW device can be calculated as high as 463 cm2 V−1 s−1 (Fig. 4d). This mobility value is higher than the one of pure GaSb NWs4, indicating the superior electrical properties of ternary III−V NWs, consistent with the behavior observed in bulk materials1,10,11,12. Furthermore, the hole mobility is close to metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) based on MBE synthesized epitaxial InGaSb film (~510 cm2 V−1 s−1)10, further confirming the high quality of the NWs. As shown in the Fig. 4e, this hole mobility value is also compared and contrasted with other maximum mobility values reported for III−V NWs in the literature. In order to further assess the mobility distribution of InxGa1−xSb NWs with different In concentration, more than 40 NW devices were measured for each In concentration and the corresponding statistics of the extracted mobility is presented in Fig. 4f. Explicitly, the mobility distribution can be well fitted by Gauss function, while the average mobility decreases with the increase of In concentration. The change of band structure and increased carrier scattering by random distribution of In in the lattice may be the reason for the reduced hole mobility with the increase of In concentration25. The slight variation of both In and Ga concentration (Supplementary Table 2) in each NW sample groups would give the additional variation to the corresponding mobility values, contributing to the wider mobility distribution as compared to pure GaSb NW devices. To further exclude any effect of surface modification (e.g. adsorbents and passivation) on the NW device mobility, the typical In0.09Ga0.91Sb NW device was measured under different conditions, including vacuum and surface passivation with (NH4)2S, in which the results suggest that high device mobility values here are indeed attributed to the intrinsic NW properties, instead of relating to any other extrinsic effects (e.g. surface modification, Supplementary Figs. 17 and 18). Based on both Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 15c, it is demonstrated that the mobility values of our In0.09Ga0.91Sb NW devices, regardless of the maximum and average values, are the highest among many others of III−V NW devices reported to date. For comparison, GaSb NWs were also synthesized with the similar method here and their corresponding mobility values were measured with an average value of only 26 cm2 V−1 s−1. This relatively low mobility value could be attributed to the lattice defects, such as stacking faults and inversion domains, observed in the GaSb NW (Supplementary Fig. 16), which is in a distinct contrast to the high crystallinity of InxGa1−xSb NWs (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figs. 46). The introduction of In in GaSb NWs not only reduces the defect concentration but also leads to the favorable changes in their electrical device performance. The device mobility values of InxGa1−xSb NWs are therefore much improved as compared to the pure GaSb NW ones with the NW channel grown by the similar technique. Also, this variation trend of the mobility as a function of In content is consistent with the previous literature that the hole mobility first increases with the introduction of In, and then decreases after it reaches the peak value12. In any case, the high hole mobility of those NWs makes them suitable for many advanced electronic applications.

Fig. 4

Electrical characterization of InxGa1−xSb nanowire transistors. ac) Transfer and output characteristics of a representative nanowire (NW) field-effect transistor (FET) made of single In0.09Ga0.91Sb NW channel. Inset shows the scanning electron microscopy image of the back-gated NW FET with Ni metal contacts. d Mobility assessment of the NW FET under source-drain bias of 0.1 V. e Hole mobility of different semiconductor NW FETs. The maximum hole mobility of InAs, InSb, C-doped InSb, Zn-doped GaAs, GaSb, and Zn-doped GaSb is adapted from refs. 4,43,44,45,46,47. Their average hole mobility values are also compiled in Supplementary Fig. 15c. f Statistics of the extracted mobility of ~40 NW FETs with different NW stoichiometries as the device channel

Photodetection performance in the visible regime

As III−V materials are excellent optoelectronic materials, it is interesting to explore the photodetection properties of InxGa1−xSb NWs. As shown in the output curves of the In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW device with different light intensities of 532 nm (Fig. 5a), it is clear that the illuminated output current increases with the increase of light intensity under a constant source-drain bias (Vds = 2 V) and a zero gate bias (Vgs = 0 V). This illuminated current is typically known as the photocurrent (Iph), which is defined as the current difference between the illuminated state and the dark state. The photocurrent is as well compiled as a function of the light intensity (Fig. 5b), in which the dependence can be fitted by the following sub-linear relationship:

$$I_{{\mathrm{ph}}} = A{\it{\Phi }}^\alpha,$$
Fig. 5

Photodetection of single In0.28Ga0.72Sb nanowire (532 nm laser). a Current–voltage curves under the illumination intensities of 0.5 and 1.6 mW mm−2, respectively. b Photocurrent and responsivity as a function of the incident illumination intensity. c Photoresponse of the nanowire photodetector under the illumination intensity of 1.6 mW mm−2. The chopped frequency is 0.1 Hz. d A high-resolution transient photoresponse of the device to illustrate the rise time and decay time constants. In panels (bd), the gate bias is 0 V and the source-drain bias is 2 V

where A and α are the fitting parameters and Φ is the light intensity. Through fitting, we can obtain the value of α as 0.6. Notably, this sublinear relationship between photocurrent and light intensity is always observed in NW-based photodetectors, which originates from the complex processes of electron-hole generation, trapping and recombination in the NW34,35,36. On the other hand, photoresponsivity is another important parameter to assess the photodetector performance, which can be expressed as:

$$R = \frac{{I_{{\mathrm{ph}}}}}{{{\it{\Phi }}S}},$$

where S is the active area of the photodetector. According to Eqs. (2) and (3), R should be proportional to \({\mathrm{\Phi }}^{\alpha - 1}\), which is shown in Fig. 5b. The device shows a very large responsivity (more than 8000 A W−1) when the light intensity is set to 0.02 mW mm−2, illustrating the good sensitivity of the NW detector. Meanwhile, the response speed and stability of the photodetector under modulated light intensity are also critical for practical utilization. The time-resolved photoresponse measurements were performed by periodically modulating the illumination (i.e. chopping on and off) as given in Fig. 5c, d. The efficient switching characteristics indicate the admirable periodicity and stability of the NW detector. The rise and decay time constants, defined as the time interval for the current rise from 10 to 90 % of the peak value and vice versa37, can be determined from the high-resolution photoresponse measurement (Fig. 5d). This way, the rise and decay time constants are found to be 39 and 46 μs, respectively, indicating the fast response of the device. More importantly, the In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW photodetectors likewise yield the similar photoresponse against the illumination of both 405 and 635 nm (Supplementary Figs. 19 and 20), in which all these results strongly designate their remarkable broadband detection and spectral response in the visible regime. Photodetection performance of the NWs with other In contents were also measured and the results are shown in Supplementary Fig. 21 and Supplementary Table 4. It can be seen that there is not any significant difference in their performances among different NW compositions. Typically, the photocurrent is proportional to the product of carrier mobility and carrier life-time (Iphμτ)38; however, the density of different types of recombination centers can drastically change the value of carrier lifetimes here38. As a result, it is anticipated that those NWs would exhibit the similar photodetection performance although their carrier mobilities are different.

Photodetection performance in the infrared regime

At the same time, the cost-effective and efficient IR photodetection at room temperature is still technological challenging due to the lack of appropriate active photosensing materials. Here, our InxGa1−xSb NW photodetectors are demonstrated with the efficient photoresponse characteristics towards the short-wave IR regime (i.e. optical communication region at 1550 nm). As shown in the typical output characteristic with different illumination intensities of 1550 nm in Fig. 6a, the single In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW photodetector exhibits the increase of photocurrent with the increase of the illumination intensity at Vds = 2 V and Vgs = 0 V. Figure 6a inset even shows the excellent switching behavior of the device with various incident intensities. It is observed that the IR response of those NW devices would enhance substantially when the In concentration of the NW device channel is increased accordingly, which can probably be attributed to the reduced bandgap as well as the enhanced absorption coefficient towards 1550 nm irradiation (Supplementary Figs. 11, 22 and Supplementary Table 5)27. To further understand the photosensing characteristic of these NW detectors, the dependence of device photocurrent on different illumination intensities is measured and depicted in Fig. 6b. Similarly, all the measured data can be well fitted by the Eqs. (2) and (3) for the determination of α and responsivity values. The α value is found to be 0.7 for all biases. Based on these dependences, several other key performance parameters, such as external quantum efficiency (EQE) and specific detectivity (D*), of the NW device can also be assessed. Generally, these parameters can be defined as:

$${\mathrm{{EQE}}} = R\frac{{hc}}{{e\lambda }},$$
$$D \ast = R \cdot \sqrt {\frac{S}{{2eI_{{\mathrm{dark}}}}}},$$
Fig. 6

Photodetection of single In0.28Ga0.72Sb nanowire (1550 nm laser). a Current–voltage curves under the illumination intensity of 3.1, 1.5, and 0.5 mW mm−2, respectively. Inset shows their corresponding photoresponse under different illumination intensities. b Photocurrent and responsivity as a function of the incident illumination intensity. c Photoresponse of the nanowire photodetector under the illumination intensity of 3.1 mW mm−2. The chopped frequency is 0.1 Hz. d A high-resolution transient photoresponse of the device to illustrate the rise time and decay time constants. In panel (a) inset, (bd), the gate bias is 0 V and the source-drain bias is 2 V

where h is the Planck’s constant, c is the velocity of light, e is the absolute charge of an electron, λ is the wavelength of incident light and Idark is the dark current. In this case, at a low incident intensity of 0.05 mW mm−2 and Vds = 2 V, the values of R, EQE and D* are determined to be 6000 A W−1, 4.8 × 106% and 3.7 × 109 Jones, respectively. These measured performance parameters are already comparable to those of the state-of-the-art III−V NW photodetectors as shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Performance metrics of single nanowire photodetectors

In addition, the good repeatability and fast response time are also two important requirements for advanced photodetectors. Figure 6c gives the photocurrent response of the single In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW photodetector under the light intensity of 3.1 mW mm−2 with a chopping frequency of 0.1 Hz. It can be seen that the device on- and off-state can be effectively modulated by the chopped illumination, indicating the robustness and excellent stability of the device. The device on- and off-state currents for each of ten cycles shown here vary within 300 ± 50 and 25 ± 20 nA, respectively, within the noise level, which suggests stable optical reversibility over the measured time interval. The possible origins of the observed fluctuations could be due to the absorption/desorption of surface molecules. The photocurrent values reveal that no pumping or priming effects need to be taken into account for the explored time scale. A high-resolution transient curve is measured to precisely determine the rise and decay time constants of the studied device (Fig. 6d). Here, the rise and decay time constants can be identified as 38 and 53 μs, accordingly. This efficient response in the tens of microsecond range represents one of the fastest responses among all NW IR photodetectors reported in the literature (Table 1). Further reduction of the surface trap concentration by surface passivation with (NH4)2S can decrease the response time down to 24 μs as shown in Supplementary Fig. 23. Since there are abundant surface states in nanostructured materials, these surface states are typically first saturated by photo-induced carriers to yield the slow response times. In this case, the small changes of the response times (i.e. with and without any surface passivation) observed can infer the relatively high crystal quality of NWs. This sensitive photodetection performance of InxGa1−xSb NW devices can be attributed to their enhanced surface-to-volume ratio of the one-dimensional NW channel, homogenous NW composition and crystallinity as well as appropriate controllable bandgap, etc.39

In order to further demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing these NW photodetectors for the large-scale device integration, we employ the well-established NW contact printing and the same device fabrication procedure to achieve InxGa1−xSb NW parallel array FETs with efficient photoresponse characteristics in the 1550 nm regime. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 24, at a low incident light intensity of 0.05 mW mm−2 and Vds = 2 V, the values of R and D* are found to be about 4500 A W−1 and 5 × 108 Jones, respectively. As compared with the single NW photodetector, these R and D* values give a slight reduction, which is probably due to the improper alignment of the NW arrays, NW-to-NW variations, breakage of NWs as well as nonoptimized electrical contact between NWs and electrodes40. Anyway, ultrafast response times, ranging between 30 and 50 μs, are still observed for these NW parallel array devices. In the future, the photodetector performance can be further improved through the optimization of the NW parallel array density, alignment and channel length scaling, etc.


High density and crystalline InxGa1−xSb NWs on amorphous substrates with <110>-orientation are successfully synthesized via two-step CVD method. The high quality of those NWs is confirmed by the high hole mobility of the fabricated NW devices. Specifically, In0.09Ga0.91Sb NWs show a peak mobility of 463 cm2 V−1 s−1, which is one of the highest values among all III−V NWs and comparable to InGaSb MOSFET, suggesting the potential of these NWs for advanced electronics applications. Furthermore, when configured into photoconductive detectors, the InGaSb NWs show the sensitive photodetection performance in both visible and IR regime. In particular, the single In0.28Ga0.72Sb NW photodetector can yield the excellent responsivity of 6000 A W−1, EQE of 4.8 × 106% and specific detectivity of 3.7 × 109 Jones at 1550 nm, together with the ultrafast response time down to 38 μs. Notably, the gain of a photoconductor can be expressed as:

$$G = \tau /t_{\mathrm{r}},$$

where τ is the life-time of photo-generated free carriers and tr is the transit time of carriers between two electrodes. Due to the large surface-to-volume ratio, NWs exhibit a high density of surface states. Therefore, the Fermi energy of NWs is typically pinned at the surface forming a depletion layer, which results in the effective electrons and holes separation and thus longer life-time of photo-generated free carriers41. Owing to the high carrier mobility of InGaSb NWs, the transit time is also observed to be short. This way, the photoconductors made from InGaSb NWs would have a high gain. On the other hand, the response time (τo) is dominantly determined by the life-time of photo-generated free carriers, and is expressed as τo = (1 + pt/p)τ, where pt is the trapped carrier density, p is photo-generated free carrier density38. As the responsivity is expressed as:

$$R = e \cdot \frac{{\eta \lambda }}{{hc}} \cdot G,$$
( 7)

where η is the quantum efficiency (the fraction of the incident optical power that contributes to electron−hole pair generation, which is widely used in photoconductive detectors)42. The life-time of photo-generated free carriers can be estimated from Eqs. (6) and (7), where it can be rewritten as \(\tau = R\frac{{hc}}{{\eta \lambda }} \cdot \frac{1}{e} \cdot t_{\mathrm{r}}\). In this work, the transit time is found to be ~5 × 10−11 s, while the photo-generated free carrier life-time can be determined as 0.24/η μs by taking all the known values into Eqs. (6) and (7) at 1550 nm. If the quantum efficiency is 1 without any traps, the life-time should be 0.24 μs, which is contradictory to our observed response times. However, the quantum efficiency is known to be far smaller than 1 because of the reflectance of light, insufficient absorption of light attributable to the finite thickness of NW and anisotropic absorption of light arising from the one-dimensional geometry, etc. Also, there are many carrier traps for NWs due to the large surface-to-volume ratio of NWs. As a result, it is reasonable to obtain the response time on the order of tens of microseconds here. Furthermore, high-performance and large-scale NW parallel array devices have also been fabricated to further illustrate the technological potential for industrialization. All these results evidently reveal these InxGa1−xSb NWs having enormous potential for the next-generation, ultrafast, high-responsivity and broadband photodetectors over visible and short-wave IR regions.


Synthesis of InxGa1−xSb NWs

The InxGa1−xSb NWs were synthesized by a two-step solid-source CVD method in a two-heating-zone horizontal furnace. To get InxGa1−xSb NWs with different chemical stoichiometry, InSb and GaSb mixture powders with different weight ratios (10:1, 20:1, 30:1, and 40:1 in wt.%) were used as the solid-source. For the NW growth, 1 g of the source powder was first loaded in a boron nitride crucible, which was placed in the center of the quartz tube in the upstream zone. Then, Si/SiO2 (50-nm-thick thermally grown oxide) wafer pieces coated with 0.1 nm (nominal thickness) Au film as the catalyst was used as the growth substrate, which was placed in the center of the quartz tube in the downstream zone. The subsequent growth temperatures, both at upstream and downstream zones, as well as the flow rate of hydrogen carrier gas, were next carefully adjusted in order to control the properties of NWs. For example, under a weight ratio of 40:1, the pressure inside the quartz tube was evacuated down to a base pressure of 1.5 × 10−3 Torr by a mechanical pump. After that, 100 sccm H2 gas was introduced into the quartz tube for 20 min. Then, both upstream and downstream zones were heated to 750 and 510 °C, respectively, in 10 min, which were kept for a duration of 180 min. Eventually, the furnace was cooled naturally to room temperature. During the synthesis, the pressure in the quartz tube was kept at 2.1 Torr. The detailed growth parameters of all components are also shown in Supplementary Table 1.

Material characterization

The morphologies of the as-grown NWs were examined with a field emission SEM (XL30, Philips, Netherlands) and a TEM (CM-20 Philips, Netherlands). Crystal structures of the NWs were determined by HRTEM imaging (JEOL 2100F and JEM-3000F FEGTEM, 300 kV, JEOL Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Elemental mappings were performed using EDS detectors attached to the JEOL 2100F and FEI Tecnai G2 F30 to measure all the chemical composition of the as-grown NWs. The chemical state of the as-prepared NWs was examined by XPS (model 5802, ULVAC-PHI, Inc., Japan). For the TEM and elemental mappings, the NWs were first suspended in anhydrous ethanol solution by ultra-sonication and drop-casted onto the TEM grid for the corresponding characterization.

NW FET and photodetector fabrication and measurement

NW FETs and photodetectors were fabricated by drop-casting the NW suspension onto degenerately boron-doped p-type Si substrates with a 50-nm-thick thermally grown silicon dioxide layer. Photolithography was utilized to define the source and drain regions, and 50-nm-thick Ni film was thermally deposited as the contact electrodes followed by a lift-off process. The electrical performance of the fabricated back-gated FETs was then characterized with a standard electrical probe station and an Agilent 4155C semiconductor analyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). For photodetector characterizations, the 405, 532, 635 and 1550 nm lasers were used as the light sources. A power meter (PM400, Thorlabs, USA) was used to calibrate the power of the incident light. For the 405, 532 and 635 nm lasers, a home-made mechanical chopper and an attenuator was used to modulate the light and tune the power of the light, respectively. The modulator (AFG 2005, Arbitrary Function Generator, Good Will Instrument Co. Ltd) attached to the 1550 nm laser was used to modulate and tune the power of the IR irradiation. For determining the response time of the photodetector, a low noise current amplifier (SR570, Stanford Research Systems, USA) combined with a digital oscillator (TBS 1102B EDU, Tektronix, USA) was used to get high-resolution current versus time curves.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Del Alamo, J. A. Nanometre-scale electronics with III–V compound semiconductors. Nature 479, 317–323 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    LaPierre, R. R., Robson, M., Azizur-Rahman, K. M. & Kuyanov, P. A review of III–V nanowire infrared photodetectors and sensors. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50, 123001 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yang, Z.-x et al. Complementary metal oxide semiconductor-compatible, high-mobility, 〈111〉-oriented GaSb nanowires enabled by vapor–solid–solid chemical vapor deposition. ACS Nano 11, 4237–4246 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yang, Z.-x et al. Approaching the hole mobility limit of GaSb nanowires. ACS Nano 9, 9268–9275 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yang, Z.-x et al. Surfactant-assisted chemical vapour deposition of high-performance small-diameter GaSb nanowires. Nat. Commun. 5, 5249 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jing, Y. et al. Catalyst-free heteroepitaxial MOCVD growth of InAs nanowires on Si substrates. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 1696–1705 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li, B., Yan, X., Zhang, X. & Ren, X. Self-catalyzed growth of InAs nanowires on InP substrate. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12, 34 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shi, W. S., Zheng, Y. F., Wang, N., Lee, C. S. & Lee, S. T. Synthesis and microstructure of gallium phosphide nanowires. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 19, 1115–1118 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Dubrovskii, V. G. et al. Role of nonlinear effects in nanowire growth and crystal phase. Phys. Rev. B 80, 205305 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Yuan, Z. et al. Antimonide-based heterostructure p-channel MOSFETs with Ni-alloy source/drain. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 34, 1367–1369 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Guo, L. W., Lu, W., Bennett, B. R., Boos, J. B. & Del Alamo, J. A. Ultralow Resistance Ohmic contacts for p-channel InGaSb field-effect transistors. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 36, 546–548 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nainani, A., Bennett, B. R., Brad Boos, J., Ancona, M. G. & Saraswat, K. C. Enhancing hole mobility in III-V semiconductors. J. Appl. Phys. 111, 103706 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Joyce, H. J. et al. III–V semiconductor nanowires for optoelectronic device applications. Prog. Quantum Electron. 35, 23–75 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Conesa-Boj, Sn et al. Gold-free ternary III–V antimonide nanowire arrays on silicon: twin-free down to the first bilayer. Nano Lett. 14, 326–332 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ghalamestani, S. G. et al. Morphology and composition controlled GaxIn1-xSb nanowires: understanding ternary antimonide growth. Nanoscale 6, 1086–1092 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Zhang, Y., Wu, J., Aagesen, M. & Liu, H. III–V nanowires and nanowire optoelectronic devices. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 48, 463001 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Shen, L., Pun, E. Y. & Ho, J. C. Recent developments in III–V semiconducting nanowires for high-performance photodetectors. Mater. Chem. Front. 1, 630–645 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Guo, N. et al. Anomalous and highly efficient InAs nanowire phototransistors based on majority carrier transport at room temperature. Adv. Mater. 26, 8203–8209 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Luo, T. et al. Single-GaSb-nanowire-based room temperature photodetectors with broad spectral response. Sci. Bull. 60, 101–108 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chin, A. et al. Near-infrared semiconductor subwavelength-wire lasers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 163115 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Svensson, C. P. T. et al. Monolithic GaAs/InGaP nanowire light emitting diodes on silicon. Nanotechnology 19, 305201 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Ren, P. et al. Band-selective infrared photodetectors with complete-composition-range InAsxP1-x alloy nanowires. Adv. Mater. 26, 7444–7449 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Svensson, J., Anttu, N., Vainorius, N., Borg, B. M. & Wernersson, L.-E. Diameter-dependent photocurrent in InAsSb nanowire infrared photodetectors. Nano. Lett. 13, 1380–1385 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Li, Z. et al. Room temperature GaAsSb single nanowire infrared photodetectors. Nanotechnology. 26, 445202 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Vurgaftman, I., Meyer, J. & Ram-Mohan, L. Band parameters for III–V compound semiconductors and their alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 89, 5815–5875 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Liu, Z. et al. High-detectivity InAs nanowire photodetectors with spectral response from ultraviolet to near-infrared. Nano Res. 6, 775–783 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tan, H. et al. Single-crystalline InGaAs nanowires for room-temperature high-performance near-infrared photodetectors. Nano-Micro Lett. 8, 29–35 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hou, J. J. et al. Stoichiometric effect on electrical, optical, and structural properties of composition-tunable InxGa1–xAs nanowires. ACS Nano 6, 9320–9325 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Hou, J. J. et al. Diameter dependence of electron mobility in InGaAs nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 093112 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chou, Y.-C. et al. Atomic-scale variability and control of III-V nanowire growth kinetics. Science 343, 281–284 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Han, N. et al. Controllable III–V nanowire growth via catalyst epitaxy. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 4393–4399 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Guo, Y.-N. et al. Phase separation induced by Au catalysts in ternary InGaAs nanowires. Nano Lett. 13, 643–650 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Han, N. et al. Tunable electronic transport properties of metal-cluster-decorated III-V nanowire transistors. Adv. Mater. 25, 4445–4451 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lan, C. et al. Large-scale synthesis of freestanding layer-structured PbI2 and MAPbI3 nanosheets for high-performance photodetection. Adv. Mater. 29, 1702759 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lan, C. et al. Highly responsive and broadband photodetectors based on WS2–graphene van der Waals epitaxial heterostructures. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 1494–1500 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lan, C., Li, C., Yin, Y., Guo, H. & Wang, S. Synthesis of single-crystalline GeS nanoribbons for high sensitivity visible-light photodetectors. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 8074–8079 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Saran, R. & Curry, R. J. Lead sulphide nanocrystal photodetector technologies. Nat. Photon. 10, 81–92 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Rose, A. Concepts in Photoconductivity and Allied Problems (Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co., New York, 1978).

  39. 39.

    Kuo, C. H., Wu, J. M., Lin, S. J. & Chang, W. C. High sensitivity of middle-wavelength infrared photodetectors based on an individual InSb nanowire. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 327 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Han, N. et al. Crystal orientation controlled photovoltaic properties of multilayer GaAs nanowire arrays. ACS Nano 10, 6283–6290 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Soci, C. et al. Nanowire photodetectors. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 10, 1430–1449 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Saleh, B. E. A. & Teich, M. C. Fundamentals of Photonics (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991). .

  43. 43.

    Ford, A. C. et al. Patterned p-doping of InAs nanowires by gas-phase surface diffusion of Zn. Nano Lett. 10, 509–513 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Khan, M. I. et al. Electrochemical growth of InSb nanowires and report of a single nanowire field effect transistor. J. Nanoelectron. Optoelectron. 3, 199–202 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Yang, Z.-x et al. Carbon doping of InSb nanowires for high-performance p-channel field-effect-transistors. Nanoscale 5, 9671–9676 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Gutsche, C. et al. Controllable p-type doping of GaAs nanowires during vapor-liquid-solid growth. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 024305 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Babadi, A. S., Svensson, J., Lind, E. & Wernersson, L.-E. Impact of doping and diameter on the electrical properties of GaSb nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 053502 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Yan, X., Li, B., Wu, Y., Zhang, X. & Ren, X. A single crystalline InP nanowire photodetector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 053109 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Li, J., Yan, X., Sun, F., Zhang, X. & Ren, X. Anomalous photoconductive behavior of a single InAs nanowire photodetector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 263103 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Maharjan, A. et al. Room temperature photocurrent spectroscopy of single zincblende and wurtzite InP nanowires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 193115 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Wang, H. High gain single GaAs nanowire photodetector. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 093101 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Miao, J. S. et al. Single InAs nanowire room-temperature near-infrared photodetectors. ACS Nano 8, 3628–3635 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Trägårdh, J., Persson, A. I., Wagner, J. B., Hessman, D. & Samuelson, L. Measurements of the band gap of wurtzite InAs1−xPx nanowires using photocurrent spectroscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 101, 123701 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Li, Z. et al. Room temperature GaAsSb single nanowire infrared photodetectors. Nanotechnology. 26, 445202 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Ma, L. et al. Bandgap-engineered GaAsSb alloy nanowires for near-infrared photodetection at 1.31 μm. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 30, 105033 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was financially supported by the General Research Fund (CityU 11204614) and the Theme-based Research Scheme (T42-103/16-N) of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR, China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51672229 and 61605024), the Science Technology and Innovation Committee of Shenzhen Municipality (Grant JCYJ20170818095520778) and a grant from Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong.

Author information




J.C.H. and N.H. conceived the project. J.C.H, N.H., D.L. and C.L. prepared the manuscript. D.L. and S.P.Y. grew the NWs. S.P.Y. implemented the XRD measurement. Z.Z. and X.L. performed the SEM while A.M. and Y.-L.C. carried out the TEM characterization and analysis. D.L. and L.S. fabricated all the NW devices. D.L., C.L and Z.Z. performed all the electrical measurements and data analyses. All authors examined and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ning Han or Johnny C. Ho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Source data

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, D., Lan, C., Manikandan, A. et al. Ultra-fast photodetectors based on high-mobility indium gallium antimonide nanowires. Nat Commun 10, 1664 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links