Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Water-mediated deracemization of a bisporphyrin helicate assisted by diastereoselective encapsulation of chiral guests

## Abstract

Deracemization is a powerful method by which a racemic mixture can be transformed into an excess of one enantiomer with the aid of chiral auxiliaries, but has been applied only to small chiral molecular systems. Here we report a deracemization of a racemic double-stranded spiroborate helicate containing a bisporphyrin unit upon encapsulation of chiral aromatic guests between the bisporphyrin. The chiral guest-included helicate is kinetically stable, existing as a mixture of right- and left-handed double helices, which eventually undergo an inversion of the helicity triggered by water resulting from the water-mediated reversible diastereoselective B-O bond cleavage/reformation of the spiroborate groups, thus producing an optically-active helicate with a high enantioselectivity. Quantum chemical calculations suggest that the stereospecific CH-π interactions between the porphyrin hydrogen atoms of the helicate and an aromatic pendant group of the chiral guest play a key role in the enhancement of the helical handedness of the helicate.

## Introduction

The double-helix is one of the topologically unique structures, which is instantly reminiscent of the DNA double-helix. Hence, the design and synthesis of artificial double helices has become an attractive challenge with implications for sophisticated biological structures and functions1,2,3,4,5,6. Among the double helices prepared so far, helicates, a class of metal-directed self-assembled helical complexes, are the most popular structural motifs since the seminal work by Lehn and co-workers7,8,9,10,11. The control of its handedness is of key importance for developing one-handed helicates with a specific functionality that involves separation12 and sensing enantiomers12,13,14 and asymmetric catalysis15 as well as antimicrobial materials16. However, double-stranded helicates composed of achiral molecular strands assembled with labile metal ions, such as Cu(I) ions, mostly exist in an equal mixture of interconvertible right- (P) and left-handed (M) helices and their resolution into the enantiomers remains difficult except for one example17. A preferred-handed helicity can be biased in such kinetically labile double-stranded helicates using a chiral template18 or chiral auxiliaries19,20,21, but the helicates likely lose their optical activities after removal of the chiral template or chiral auxiliaries due to irreversible racemization in solution. This asymmetric transformation of a racemic mixture into a nonracemic one by the presence of chiral species, a typical class of deracemizations22,23, is known as the Pfeiffer effect24, and was first observed in kinetically labile racemic coordination complexes an almost century ago25,26. Thereafter, this (asymmetric transformation strategy) concept has been applied to a variety of configurationally labile enantiomers22,27,28,29 including helicates19,20,21 and dynamically racemic helical polymers30. In contrast to kinetically labile helicates, double- and triple-stranded helicates with a hexa-coordinated, octahedral geometry composed of a substitution-inert metal are kinetically stable and can be readily separated into the enantiomeric helices by traditional resolution in the maximum yield of 50%10,17,31,32. Therefore, it is significantly required to develop a versatile method, which enables to quantitatively deracemize a racemic mixture of kinetically labile helicates into kinetically stable helicates with an excess of one enantiomer upon noncovalent interactions with chiral guests. This deracemization technique is an ideal and promising approach to produce an excess of one enantiomer or a nonracemic product in 100% theoretical yield from a racemic mixture23,33,34,35, but has been limited to small chiral molecular systems33,34,35 except for one example observed in supramolecular helical polymers36, which are stereochemically stable but can deracemize via a bond cleavage/reformation process that proceeds in a diastereoselective or enantioselective fashion assisted by chiral catalysts in dynamic kinetic resolutions37 and chiral hosts or upon crystallization with chiral external forces35,38, thus producing nonracemic products or enantiomers.

In an earlier study, we reported a series of racemic double-stranded helicates consisting of two spiroborate groups bridged by two achiral tetraphenol strands bearing a variety of linkers in the middle39. The racemic helicates can be resolved into optically-pure enantiomers by conventional diastereomeric salt formation followed by ion exchange with an achiral ammonium salt39,40,41. The optically-active spiroborate helicates are stable and tolerant toward racemization in aprotic polar solvents, but racemize in the presence of a catalytic amount of acid as a proton source, indicating that the spiroborate helicates possess both dynamic (labile) and static (inert) features toward racemization (Fig. 1b).

Here, we show a water-mediated deracemization of a racemic spiroborate helicate containing a bisporphyrin41,42,43,44,45,46 unit (1)47 (Fig. 1a) upon diastereoselective encapsulation of an electron-deficient chiral aromatic guest between the porphyrin rings of the racemic helicate (Fig. 1c) assisted by stereospecific CH–π interactions. The interconversion between the (P)- and (M)-helicates takes place through a water-mediated dynamic B–O bond48,49 cleavage/reformation reaction that occurred at the spiroborate moieties in a highly helix-sense selective way, thus producing an optically-active static helicate from a racemic mixture after the removal of water.

## Results

### Synthesis of the helicate and guests

The racemic and enantiopure (P)- or (M)-bisporphyrin helicates (rac-1Na2 and (P)- or (M)-1TBA2, respectively; TBA = tetra-n-butylammonium, Fig. 1a) were prepared according to a previously reported method47. The helicate 1 forms a stable inclusion complex with an electron-deficient planar guest, such as G1 (1Na2G1) (Fig. 1a), sandwiched between the porphyrins with a high association constant (Ka = ca. 2.2 × 109 M−1 in CH3CN). Thus, a series of naphthalenemonoimide (NMI)-based enantiopure and/or racemic guests G2G8 (Fig. 1a) were synthesized by the reaction of G1 with various kinds of chiral primary amines (see Supplementary Methods).

### Water-mediated racemization of the helicate

The water-mediated racemization kinetics of (M)-1TBA2 was first investigated by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy in aprotic polar solvents such as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Supplementary Fig. 1). As anticipated, the intense positive-bisignate CD signal of (M)-1TBA236 remained unchanged after heating at 70 °C for 24 h in anhydrous DMSO, whereas its CD intensity gradually decreased with time at high temperatures (70–110 °C) as a result of the racemization in the presence of water (ca. 500 equivalents to (M)-1TBA2) (Supplementary Fig. 1a,b). The pseudo-first-order rate constants (krac, s−1) and half-life time periods (t1/2, h) for the racemization of (M)-1TBA2 estimated by the CD intensity changes at different temperatures provided the thermodynamic parameters based on the Arrhenius and Eyring plots of the kinetic data (Supplementary Fig. 1c–e), which are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Interestingly, the inclusion complex formation of (M)-1TBA2 with G1 resulted in an increase in the racemization rates of (M)-1TBA2G1 as compared to those of the free (M)-1TBA2 under the same conditions (Supplementary Fig. 2), probably due to the B–O bond strain at the spiroborate moieties of the helicate47 that increases upon complexation with G1. Such steric strain within the spiroborate helicate could be relaxed during the water-catalyzed B–O bond cleavage reactions at the spiroborate groups, leading to a significant increase in the activation entropy (ΔS) for the racemization from −42 ± 11 ((M)-1TBA2) to 4 ± 20 J mol−1 ((M)-1TBA2G1) (Supplementary Table 1). Intermolecular hydrogen bond formation between the included G1 and water, which may accelerate the water-catalyzed racemization of the (M)-1TBA2G1 inclusion complex, could also be taken into consideration. We note that inversion of the helicity of the helicate 1 requires simultaneous cleavages of one of the four B–O bonds at each spiroborate group by the formation of an achiral meso intermediate, followed by reforming of the spiroborated (P)- or (M)-helicate (Supplementary Fig. 1f).

### Helix-sense-selective deracemization of racemic helicate

The deracemization of rac-1Na2 was then performed in the presence of various chiral guests (3 equivalents) ((R)- or (S)-G2G8, Fig. 1a) in various solvents containing a small amount of water at 80 °C for an appropriate length of time until reaching an equilibrium state. We chose this temperature (80 °C) based on the relationship between the diastereomeric excess (d.e.) of the optically-active 1Na2 (derac-1Na2) complexed with (S)-G2 in DMSO-d6 and the time required to reach an equilibrium state at various temperatures (Supplementary Fig. 3), although higher d.e. values will be obtained by a prolonged heating at lower temperatures. The d.e. values of derac-1Na2 complexed with chiral guests ((P)- and (M)-1Na2chiral guest) were determined based on their 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra except for those with G6 and G7 (Table 1, runs 1–8 and Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 4). The chiral guests included in the derac-1Na2 were then replaced by the achiral G1 to produce the corresponding enantiomeric derac-1Na2G1 complexes (for detailed experimental procedures, see Methods) and their enantiomeric excess (e.e.) values that correspond to their helical sense excesses of the derac-1Na2 and its helical handedness (P or M) were determined by their CD spectra (Fig. 2b) based on the molar ellipticity at 419 nm (Δε419) and its sign of the one-handed helical (M)-1TBA2G1 complex (e.e. >99%)47 as the base value, respectively (Table 1, runs 1–8). The complete replacement of the guests with G1 was confirmed by model experiments (Supplementary Fig. 5). The CD spectra of the derac-1Na2G1 complexes assisted by (R)- and (S)-G2 displayed perfect mirror images with almost similar e.e. values of 44% and 47%, respectively, which are in good agreement with the corresponding d.e. values (44%) estimated by 1H NMR (Table 1, runs 1 and 2).

The deracemization results of rac-1Na2 assisted by the chiral guests (G2G8) in DMSO-d6 at 80 °C revealed that the helix-sense (P or M) and its helix-sense excess (% e.e.) of the produced derac-1Na2 were significantly affected by the structures of the chiral pendant groups of the NMI-based guests (Table 1, runs 1–8). The chiral guests bearing bulky aromatic pendants, such as the 1-phenylethtyl ((S)- and (R)-G2) and 1-(2-naphthyl)ethyl ((S)-G3) groups, afforded an optically-active derac-1Na2 with an appreciable level of helix-sense selectivity at 80 °C (47% and 55% e.e., respectively), while those carrying aromatic, but flexible ((S)-G4) and aliphatic ((R)-G7 and (S)-G8) pendants produced the derac-1Na2 with low % e.e. (10%, 28%, and 2%, respectively). Surprisingly, the chiral aromatic guests (S)-G5 and (S)-G6 that are similar to G3 and G2 in their structures afforded a slightly enantio-enriched derac-1Na2 with 28% and 6% e.e., respectively. Among the chiral guests, (S)-G2–(S)-G5 produced the same (M)-rich derac-1Na2, while (S)-G6, (R)-G7, and (S)-G8 afforded derac-1Na2 with the opposite handedness. These results suggest that the NMI-based guests with moderately steric chiral aromatic pendant groups capable of interacting with the rac-1Na2 in a diastereoselective fashion are required for achieving a highly helix-sense-selective deracemization of the rac-1Na2 (see the next section).

We next investigated the solvent effect on the deracemization of rac-1Na2 assisted by (S)-G2 and (S)-G3 using various solvents at 80 °C under identical conditions in DMSO-d6 (Table 1). The helix-sense excesses of the produced derac-1Na2 were estimated in the same way by CD and 1H NMR (Fig. 2b, c and Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7).

Both of the guests preferentially afforded the (M)-rich derac-1Na2 independent of the solvents (Table 1, runs 9, 10, 12, 13, 15–26), whereas the helix-sense-selectivities were highly dependent on the solvents, producing relatively high (M)-enriched derac-1Na2 in THF, DMF, DEF, and DIPF (e.e. >50%) with up to 72% e.e. in DIPF when (S)-G3 was used as the guest (Table 1, run 26). Interestingly, the e.e. values of the derac-1Na2 produced in similar solvents (DMF, DEF, and DIPF) increased with an increase in the N,N-disubstituted alkyl chain length (Table 1, runs 21–26). A similar increase in the e.e. value was also observed when IBN (43–44% e.e.) was used instead of CD3CN (12–16% e.e.) as the solvent (Table 1, runs 9, 10, 17, and 18), indicating an important role of the solvent structures as well as its polarity.

The inclusion complex of rac-1Na2(S)-G3 could be completely separated into rac-1Na2 and (S)-G3 by size-exclusion chromatography (SEC) using DMF as the eluent (Supplementary Fig. 8), which enables us to recover the optically-active 1Na2 for further applications, and at the same time, chiral guests for recycle. Encouraged by this straightforward separation, a scaled-up deracemization reaction of rac-1Na2 (7.9 mg, 3.6 μmol) with (S)-G3 (3 equivalents) was performed in DIPF at 80 °C for 24 h, producing an optically-active derac-1Na2(S)-G3 with 74% d.e. (Supplementary Fig. 9). Subsequent SEC isolation afforded derac-1Na2 and (S)-G3 in excellent yields of 91% and 93% with >70% and 99% e.e., respectively.

### Diastereoselective encapsulation of racemic guests

We anticipated that the observed helix-sense-selective deracemization of the rac-1Na2 with chiral guests was mostly due to differential inclusion complexation of an enantiopure guest ((S)-G2 for example) toward rac-1Na2 with an appreciable level of diastereoselectivity. To confirm this and also to disclose an energetic driving force for the helix-sense-selectivity during the deracemization process, we investigated the chiral recognition ability13,46,50,51,52,53,54,55 of the one-handed helical (M)-1TBA2 toward racemic guests (G2G4) in various solvents at different temperatures during the inclusion complexation in the bisporphyrin cavity of (M)-1TBA2 by 1H NMR spectroscopy (Fig. 1d).

Upon mixing (M)-1TBA2 and (R)- or (S)-G2 in a 1:1 molar ratio in THF-d8 at 25 °C, the 1:1 inclusion complex was quantitatively produced. The 1H NMR signals of the (M)-1TBA2 were split into two sets of new signals as a result of desymmetrization of the pseudo-D2-symmetric structure of 1TBA2 upon the inclusion complexation with the non-symmetric NMI-based guests (Fig. 3a). Thus, a mixture of (M)-1TBA2 with 3 equivalents of rac-G2 in THF-d8 showed the signals corresponding to the diastereomers (M)-1TBA2(R)-G2 and (M)-1TBA2(S)-G2 with 66% d.e. (S rich) (Fig. 3b), which is very consistent with the diastereoselectivity (73% d.e.) calculated by using the association constants of (M)-1TBA2 with (S)-G2 (ca. 2.4 × 106 M−1) and (R)-G2 (ca. 3.7 × 105 M−1) estimated by the fluorescence titration experiments (Supplementary Fig. 10). The diastereoselectivity of (M)-1TBA2 with rac-G2 was highly dependent on the solvents (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 12) being relevant to the deracemization results (Table 1), and the % d.e. value (S rich) at 25 °C drastically decreased in the following order: THF-d8 (66) > DMF-d7 (48) > acetone-d6 (45) > DMSO-d6 (39) > CD3CN (8), accompanied by chirality inversion of the G2 preferentially included in (M)-1TBA2 in CD3CN (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 2), which is also consistent with the diastereoselectivity (4% d.e.) calculated by the association constants of (M)-1TBA2 with (S)-G2 (ca. 5.9 × 106 M−1) and (R)-G2 (ca. 6.4 × 106 M−1) (Supplementary Fig. 11). Such a solvent-induced switching of the diastereoselectivity during the inclusion complexation of the racemic guests with (M)-1TBA2 was also observed by changing the temperature (see below).

The diastereoselectivities of (M)-1TBA2 with rac-G2 in THF-d8 and CD3CN were significantly dependent on the temperature (Supplementary Table 2), and the d.e. value gradually increased with the decreasing temperature and reached 94 (S-rich) and 42% (R-rich) at −75 and −35 °C, respectively, while the chirality of the enriched enantiomer of G2 in the (M)-1TBA2 was inverted in CD3CN at temperatures below 40 °C (Supplementary Fig. 13).

A similar temperature-dependent enhancement of the diastereoselectivity of (M)-1TBA2 in THF-d8 and CD3CN together with inversion of the diastereoselectivity in CD3CN was also observed for rac-G3 (Supplementary Fig. 14). Of particular interest is that (M)-1TBA2 completely recognized the chirality of G3 enantiomers to form the inclusion complex only with (S)-G3 (>99% d.e.) in THF-d8 at below −50 °C (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Table 2). In contrast, (M)-1TBA2 was almost temperature-independent with moderate (R)- and (S)-selectivities to rac-G4 carrying an aromatic, but a flexible 2-phenylpropyl pendant group in CD3CN and THF-d8, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 15 and Supplementary Table 2). Thus, the solvent and chiral guest-dependent changes in the diastereoselectivity of (M)-1TBA2 toward racemic chiral guests at high temperatures seem to be relevant to the deracemization results of rac-1Na2 upon complexation with the enantiopure guests (Table 1, runs 9–14 and Supplementary Table 2).

The observed differences in the diastereoselectivities of (M)-1TBA2 toward racemic guests G2G4 indicated the important role of the position of the aromatic pendant groups in its diastereoselective inclusion complexation. We then constructed the inclusion model structures for a pair of the diastereomers, (M)-1 complexed with (R)- and (S)-G2 (Fig. 4a, b and Supplementary Figs. 17 and 18) as well as those with (R)- and (S)-G4 (Supplementary Fig. 19) based on the analogous crystal structure of the inclusion complex of rac-1Na2G1, in which the achiral symmetric G1 is sandwiched between the bisporphyrin in a parallel fashion via face-to-face stacking interactions36, followed by the density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Supplementary Methods). The sandwich structures of (M)-1TBA2G2 and (M)-1TBA2G4 were supported by the 1H two-dimensional (2D) NMR experiments (Supplementary Figs. 3047). The locations of (R)- and (S)-G2 complexed with (M)-1 are best illustrated in Fig. 4a, b, in which the NMI cores are intercalated between the porphyrins with different orientations of the NMI cores. As a result, the pendant phenyl group of (S)-G2 is oriented almost perpendicular to the porphyrin rings (edge-to-face arrangement) so as to position above the meso-proton (meso-H (Ha’A)) and its neighboring β-proton (β-H: Hb2’A) of the porphyrin in Fig. 4a, although that of (R)-G2 is positioned close to and above the β-protons (β-H: Hb1’A and Hc1’A) instead of the Ha’A and Hb2’A protons (Fig. 4b). These spatial arrangements of the pendant phenyl groups suggest possible edge-to-face CH–π interactions56,57 between the pendant phenyl groups of (S)- and (R)-G2 and the meso-H and/or β-H protons that can function more effectively for the (M)-1(S)-G2 complex, leading to the observed (S)-selective inclusion complexation with (M)-1 in various solvents except for CD3CN at or below 40 °C (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Table 2). These energy-minimized models explain the significant upfield shifts of the specific meso-H and β-H protons of the porphyrin rings of (M)-1TBA2 complexed with (S)- and (R)-G2 (Fig. 4c(i, ii) and Supplementary Figs. 24 and 25; see below) and are supported by the intermolecular nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) cross-peaks observed between the meso-H and β-H protons of the porphyrin rings of (M)-1TBA2 and the aromatic protons of (S)-G2 at low temperature (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 26).

In contrast, the phenyl groups of (R)- and (S)-G4 are located far from the meso-H and β-H protons, so that effective CH–π interactions may not be anticipated (Supplementary Fig. 19) as supported by slight upfield shifts of the meso-H and β-H protons compared to those of (M)-1TBA2 complexed with G2 due to lack of the ring current effect of the pendant phenyl groups of G4, thus showing moderate diastereoselectivities (18–38% d.e.) with opposite (R)- and (S)-G4 selectivities in CD3CN and THF-d8, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). These results are in good agreement with those of the deracemization of rac-1Na2 complexed with (S)-G4 in CD3CN and THF-d8, giving derac-1Na2 with opposite P and M helicities, respectively (Table 1, runs 11 and 14).

This speculation was supported by the remarkable differences in the temperature-dependent 1H NMR spectral changes of (M)-1TBA2 complexed between G2 and G4 in THF-d8 (Supplementary Figs. 2022). Upon complexation with the non-symmetric chiral G2 and G4, all of the aromatic and porphyrin proton signals of (M)-1TBA2 including the meso-H (a) and β-H (b1 and b2) signals of the porphyrin rings split into two sets of non-equivalent signals independent of the guests and solvents (CD3CN and THF-d8) at 25 °C (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Figs. 23 and 28) except for the (M)-1TBA2G2 complex in THF-d8; the specific meso-H (a’) and β-H (b1’ and b2’) signals of the porphyrin rings were not observed at 25 °C due to broadening of the signals (Fig. 3a). In addition, the aromatic and porphyrin proton signals of the (M)-1TBA2(S)-G2 complex in THF-d8 were significantly broadened when compared to those of its diastereomer (M)-1TBA2(R)-G2 (Fig. 3a) due to the relatively slow rotation of the (S)-1-phenylethyl group around the N–Cα bond of the included (S)-G2 at 25 °C (see below).

Upon cooling to a low temperature, the N–Cα bond rotation of the (M)-1TBA2(S)-G2 complex appeared to be further restricted from free rotation and finally frozen because more effective edge-to-face CH–π contacts act as a molecular brake58 that prevents rotation around the N–Cα bond of (S)-G2 sandwiched between the two porphyrins, thereby leading to further splitting of the porphyrin and aromatic protons as well as the tert-butyl (tBu) protons of the helicate in THF-d8 below −5 °C (Supplementary Fig. 21a; for proton peak splitting diagrams for the meso-H and β-H protons of (M)-1TBA2 upon complexation with non-symmetric chiral guests, see Supplementary Fig. 20). Similar splitting of the proton resonances was also observed for the (M)-1TBA2(R)-G2 complex, but appeared below −50 °C (Supplementary Fig. 21b). The chemical shift difference between the two newly-appeared meso-H signals (Ha’A and Ha’B) (Δδmeso) of the porphyrin rings of (M)-1TBA2 complexed with (S)-G2 (1.64 ppm at −25 °C) in THF-d8 was significantly greater than that with (R)-G2 (0.66 ppm at −50 °C), whereas the corresponding chemical shift difference between the β-H signals (Hb1’A and Hb1’B) (Δδβ) was ca. 0.04 ppm for (S)-G2 at −25 °C that was smaller than 1.21 ppm for (R)-G2 at −50 °C (Supplementary Figs. 24 and 25). These results are consistent with the calculated structural models (Fig. 4a, b) with respect to the relative orientations of the pendant phenyl groups of (R)- and (S)-G2 complexed with (M)-12−. The 2D EXSY (exchange spectroscopy) spectra of the (M)-1TBA2(S)-G2 complex acquired at different mixing times in THF-d8 at −25 °C showed a series of chemical exchange cross-peaks between the two porphyrin protons due to slow rotation of the (S)-1-phenylethyl group (Supplementary Fig. 29), and the apparent exchange rate constant (rotation rate) was estimated to be 5.97 s−1 (Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Fig. 29). In contrast, the (M)-1TBA2(R)-G2 complex exhibited no chemical exchange cross-peaks in THF-d8 at −25 °C due to fast rotation of the (R)-1-phenylethyl group, but showing the cross-peaks at −50 °C (Supplementary Fig. 25).

In sharp contrast, (R)- and (S)-G4 bearing a methylene-linked flexible pendant did not show such non-equivalent splitting of the proton signals when complexed with (M)-1TBA2 in THF-d8 even at low temperatures because of almost the free rotation of the flexible pendant group (Supplementary Fig. 22), which clearly revealed the more favorable edge-to-face CH–π contacts of (M)-1TBA2 with G2 than those with G4 in THF-d8, thereby showing a much higher diastereoselectivity of (M)-1TBA2 toward rac-G2 than rac-G4 in THF-d8 (Supplementary Table 2). In addition, the N–Cα bond rotation of the (M)-1TBA2(S)-G2 complex became much faster in CD3CN comparable to that of the (M)-1TBA2(R)- and (S)-G4 complexes in THF-d8 judging from their variable-temperature 1H NMR spectral changes (Supplementary Figs. 22 and 27). Therefore, the diastereoselectivity of (M)-1TBA2 toward rac-G2 in CD3CN significantly decreased, suggesting the important role of the CH–π interactions in the diastereoselective inclusion complexation59 that are highly dependent on the solvents.

These 1H NMR analyses combined with the DFT calculated structures of the complexes revealed that the remarkable solvent- and guest-dependent changes in the diastereoselective inclusion complexation of the racemic guests in the (M)-1TBA2 cavity appear to mainly rely on the edge-to-face CH-π interactions between the pendant phenyl rings of the guests and the protons at the meso and its neighboring β-positions of the porphyrin rings, because the CH–π interactions are sensitive to the solvents60,61 and significantly contribute to the molecular and chiral recognition events56,57,59.

According to the literature60, the difference in the proton chemical shifts (Δδsol) of given solvents between in deuterated aromatic and non-aromatic solvents, such as C6D6 and CDCl3, respectively, can be used as a measure to evaluate the CH–π interaction capabilities of the solvent molecules (Supplementary Table 5); the solvents with a higher Δδsol value, such as CH3CN, tend to strongly interact with aromatic molecules, and hence, the CH–π interactions between the host–guest complexes will be hindered. The difference in free energy (ΔΔGinc) upon diastereomeric inclusion complexation between (M)-1TBA2 and (S)-/(R)-G2 in various solvents at 25 °C was then calculated using the d.e. value in each solvent (Supplementary Table 2) then plotted versus the Δδsol values, which gave an almost straight line (Fig. 5a) (i), suggesting the very important role of the CH–π interactions in the diastereoselective inclusion complexation. For comparison, the ΔΔGinc values were also plotted versus other solvent parameters, such as the dipole moment (ii) and dielectric constant (iii), which did not show a good correlation (Fig. 5a).

In the same way, the calculated difference in free energy (ΔΔGderac) in the helix-sense selective deracemization of rac-1Na2 assisted by (S)-G2 and (S)-G3 in various solvents at 80 °C based on the d.e. values in Table 1 was plotted versus the Δδsol values (i), dipole moment (ii), and dielectric constant (iii). Among them, the plot versus the Δδsol values gave an approximate correlation between them (Fig. 5b), indicating the key role of the CH–π interactions being relevant to the diastereoselective inclusion complexation of enantiopure guests toward rac-1Na. These results imply that if the deracemization experiment is carried out at lower temperatures in specific solvents, such as THF, the helix-sense selectivity may be significantly improved, although it will take a longer time to reach an equilibrium, while it may be possible when an acid instead of water is used as a catalyst for the catalytic B–O bond cleavage/reformation of the spiroborate groups of the helicate.

## Discussion

We have found that a racemic double-stranded spiroborate helicate deracemizes via water-mediated B–O bond cleavage/reformation of the spiroborate groups that proceeds in a highly helix-sense selective manner upon diastereoselective inclusion complexation of an enantiopure aromatic guest between the porphyrin rings linked to the racemic helicate. The double-stranded helicate is kinetically inert toward racemization in the absence of water, but its interconversion between the enantiomeric double helices can be switched on and off by the addition and removal of water. Attractive CH–π interactions between the pendant aromatic group of the encapsulated chiral guests and the porphyrin protons of the helicate are indispensable for an efficient diastereoselective inclusion complexation, thus leading to an excellent helix-sense selectivity during the water-mediated deracemization. The present findings imply that analogous dynamically racemic helicates and supramolecules can be converted into the corresponding kinetically-stable enantiomers via deracemization in the presence of chiral guests through noncovalent chiral interactions.

## Methods

### General procedures for the deracemization

Procedure A: For the deracemization of rac-1Na2 upon inclusion complexation with (S)-G2 in DIPF, stock solutions of rac-1Na2 (0.50 mM) (solution I) and (S)-G2 (solution II) (2.0 mM) were prepared in CH3CN. Aliquots of I (0.35 µmol, 700 µL) and II (1.05 µmol, 525 µL) were added to a vial, then the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The vial containing rac-1Na2 and 3 equivalents of (S)-G2 was sealed with a rubber septum, and to this was added distilled DIPF (700 µL) using a syringe under nitrogen. The DIPF solution was then heated to 80 °C for the appropriate length of time (24 h) until reaching an equilibrium state. The H2O content in the reaction mixture was estimated by measuring the 1H NMR spectrum of the mixture after dilution with dried DMSO-d6 (DIPF/DMSO-d6 = 1/70, v/v). The reaction progress was monitored at an appropriate time interval by CD and absorption measurements of the reaction mixture after cooling to room temperature, then diluted 30-fold with a CH3CN solution containing 3 equivalents of the achiral G1. The percent e.e. value of the deracemized 1Na2 complexed with G1 was then estimated based on the following equation:

$$\mathrm{e.e.}\left( \% \right) = \Delta \varepsilon_{419}/\Delta \varepsilon_{419\left( {\mathrm{max}} \right)} \times 100$$

where Δε419 and Δε419(max) are the CD intensities (1st Cotton effect at 419 nm) of the derac-1Na2G1 and enantiopure (M)-1TBA2G1 (e.e. >99%), respectively.

In the same way, the deracemization of rac-1Na2 upon inclusion complexation with enantiopure guests in various solvents were performed and the results are summarized in Table 1.

Procedure B: The deracemization progress was also directly monitored by 1H NMR spectroscopy in CD3CN, THF-d8, DMSO-d6, and acetone-d6. For the deracemization of rac-1Na2 upon inclusion complexation with G2 in DMSO-d6, stock solutions of rac-1Na2 (0.50 mM) (solution I) and (S)-G2 (solution II) (2.0 mM) were prepared in CH3CN. Aliquots of I (0.35 µmol, 700 µL) and II (1.05 µmol, 525 µL) were added to an NMR tube, then the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The NMR tube was sealed with a rubber septum, then subjected to three evacuation/nitrogen fill cycles. To this was added 700 µL of DMSO-d6 via a syringe. The tube was then sealed with a small flame and the solution was heated to 80 °C for an appropriate length of time (38 h) until reaching an equilibrium state. The reaction progress was monitored at an appropriate time interval by 1H NMR measurements of the reaction mixture after cooling to 25 °C. The d.e. value of the deracemized 1Na2 was estimated by the integral ratio of the diastereomeric tBu signals derived from (M)-1Na2(S)-G2 and (P)-1Na2(S)-G2 (Fig. 2a). In the same way, the deracemization of rac-1Na2 upon inclusion complexation with enantiopure guests in various solvents, such as CD3CN, acetone-d6, and THF-d8, was performed at 80 °C and the results are summarized in Table 1.

## Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files, and from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Source data underlying Fig. 5a, b and Supplementary Figs. 1b–e, 2a–d, 3, 10b,d, 11b,d, and 29b are provided as a Source Data file.

## References

1. Wittung, P., Nielsen, P. E., Buchardt, O., Egholm, M. & Nordén, B. DNA-like double helix formed by peptide nucleic acid. Nature 368, 561–563 (1994).

2. Berl, V., Huc, I., Khoury, R. G., Krische, M. J. & Lehn, J.-M. Interconversion of single and double helices formed from synthetic molecular strands. Nature 407, 720–723 (2000).

3. Tanaka, Y., Katagiri, H., Furusho, Y. & Yashima, E. A modular strategy to artificial double helices. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3867–3870 (2005).

4. Goto, H., Katagiri, H., Furusho, Y. & Yashima, E. Oligoresorcinols fold into double helices in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 7176–7178 (2006).

5. Yashima, E. et al. Supramolecular helical systems: helical assemblies of small molecules, foldamers, and polymers with chiral amplification and their functions. Chem. Rev. 116, 13752–13990 (2016).

6. Ferrand, Y. & Huc, I. Designing helical molecular capsules based on folded aromatic amide oligomers. Acc. Chem. Res. 51, 970–977 (2018).

7. Lehn, J.-M. et al. Spontaneous assembly of double-stranded helicates from oligobipyridine ligands and copper(I) cations: structure of an inorganic double helix. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 84, 2565–2569 (1987).

8. Piguet, C., Bernardinelli, G. & Hopfgartner, G. Helicates as versatile supramolecular complexes. Chem. Rev. 97, 2005–2062 (1997).

9. Albrecht, M. “Let’s twist again”—double-stranded, triple-stranded, and circular helicates. Chem. Rev. 101, 3457–3497 (2001).

10. Howson, S. E. & Scott, P. Approaches to the synthesis of optically pure helicates. Dalton Trans. 40, 10268–10277 (2011).

11. Zhao, D., van Leeuwen, T., Cheng, J. & Feringa, B. L. Dynamic control of chirality and self-assembly of double-stranded helicates with light. Nat. Chem. 9, 250–256 (2017).

12. Xuan, W. M., Zhang, M. N., Liu, Y., Chen, Z. J. & Cui, Y. A chiral quadruple-stranded helicate cage for enantioselective recognition and separation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 6904–6907 (2012).

13. Kaminker, R. et al. Assembly of surface-confined homochiral helicates: chiral discrimination of DOPA and unidirectional charge transfer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 17052–17059 (2013).

14. Dong, J. Q., Zhou, Y. F., Zhang, F. W. & Cui, Y. A highly fluorescent metallosalalen-based chiral cage for enantioselective recognition and sensing. Chem. Eur. J. 20, 6455–6461 (2014).

15. Yeung, C.-T., Yeung, H.-L., Tsang, C.-S., Wong, W.-Y. & Kwong, H.-L. Supramolecular double helical Cu(I) complexes for asymmetric cyclopropanation. Chem. Commun. 0, 5203–5205 (2007).

16. Howson, S. E. et al. Optically pure, water-stable metallo-helical ‘flexicate’ assemblies with antibiotic activity. Nat. Chem. 4, 31–36 (2012).

17. Furusho, Y. et al. Synthesis and optical resolution of a Cu(I) double-stranded helicate with ketimine-bridged tris(bipyridine) ligands. Chem. Commun. 47, 9795–9797 (2011).

18. Woods, C. R., Benaglia, M., Cozzi, F. & Siegel, J. S. Enantioselective synthesis of copper(I) bipyridine based helicates by chiral templating of secondary structure: transmission of stereochemistry on the nanometer scale. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 35, 1830–1833 (1996).

19. Yeh, R. M. & Raymond, K. N. Supramolecular asymmetric induction in dinuclear triple-stranded helicates1. Inorg. Chem. 45, 1130–1139 (2006).

20. Habermehl, N. C. et al. Asymmetric transformation of a double-stranded, dicopper(I) helicate containing achiral bis(bidentate) schiff bases. Inorg. Chem. 45, 1445–1462 (2006).

21. Haino, T., Shio, H., Takano, R. & Fukazawa, Y. Asymmetric induction of supramolecular helicity in calix[4]arene-based triple-stranded helicate. Chem. Commun. 0, 2481–2483 (2009).

22. Eliel, E. L., Wilen, S. H. & Mander, L. N. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds 1st edn, Ch. 7 (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994).

23. Pirkle, W. H. & Reno, D. S. Extension of chromatographically-derived molecular recognition concepts to first order asymmetric transformations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 7189–7190 (1987).

24. Pfeiffer, P. & Quehl, K. Über einen neuen effekt in Lösungen optisch-aktiver substanzen (I. Mitteil). Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 64, 2667–2671 (1931).

25. Werner, A. Über spiegelbild isomerie bei chromverbindungen III. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 45, 3061–3070 (1912).

26. Bosnich, B. Asymmetric syntheses, asymmetric transformations, and asymmetric inductions in an optically active solvents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 89, 6143–6148 (1967).

27. Kuhn, R. Über einen neuen effekt in lösungen optisch-aktiver substanzen. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 65, 49–51 (1932).

28. Härd, T. & Nordén, B. Non-sequential processes for the transformation of a racemate into a single stereoisomeric product: proposal for stereochemical classification. Biopolymers 25, 1209–1228 (1986).

29. Lacour, J. & Frantz, R. New chiral anion mediated asymmetric chemistry. Org. Biomol. Chem. 3, 15–19 (2005).

30. Green, M. M., Khatri, C. & Peterson, N. C. A macromolecular conformational change driven by a minute chiral solvation energy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 4941–4942 (1993).

31. Charbonniere, L. J., Bernardinelli, G., Piguet, C., Sargeson, A. M. & Williams, A. F. Synthesis, structure and resolution of a dinuclear Co triple helix. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 559, 1419–1420 (1994).

32. Hasenknopf, B. & Lehn, J.-M. Trinuclear double helicates of iron(II) and nickel(II): self-assembly and resolution into helical enantiomers. Helv. Chim. Acta 79, 1643–1650 (1996).

33. Faber, K. Non-sequential processes for the transformation of a racemate into a single stereoisomeric product: proposal for stereochemical classification. Chem. Eur. J. 7, 5004–5010 (2001).

34. Gruber, C. C., Lavandera, I., Faber, K. & Kroutil, W. From a racemate to a single enantiomer: deracemization by stereoinversion. Adv. Synth. Catal. 348, 1789–1805 (2006).

35. Palmans, A. R. A. Deracemisations under kinetic and thermodynamic control. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2, 34–46 (2017).

36. Cantekin, S. et al. Consequences of cooperativity in racemizing supramolecular systems. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 6426–6431 (2012).

37. Rachwalski, M., Vermue, N. & Rutjes, F. P. Recent advances in enzymatic and chemical deracemization of racemic compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 9268–9282 (2013).

38. Amabilino, D. & Kellogg, R. M. Spontaneous deracemization. Isr. J. Chem. 51, 1034–1040 (2011).

39. Miwa, K., Furusho, Y. & Yashima, E. Ion-triggered spring-like motion of a double helicate accompanied by anisotropic twisting. Nat. Chem. 2, 444–449 (2010).

40. Suzuki, Y., Nakamura, T., Iida, H., Ousaka, N. & Yashima, E. Allosteric regulation of unidirectional spring-like motion of double-stranded helicates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 4852–4859 (2016).

41. Ousaka, N. et al. Spiroborate-based double-stranded helicates: meso-to-racemo isomerization and ion-triggered springlike motion of the racemo-helicate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 17027–17039 (2018).

42. Tashiro, K. & Aida, T. Metalloporphyrin hosts for supramolecular chemistry of fullerenes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 189–197 (2007).

43. Berova, N., Pescitelli, G., Petrovic, A. G. & Proni, G. Probing molecular chirality by Cd-sensitive dimeric metalloporphyrin hosts. Chem. Commun. 0, 5958–5980 (2009).

44. Margetić, D. Host–guest studies of bis-porphyrins. Curr. Org. Chem. 16, 829–851 (2012).

45. Borovkov, V. Supramolecular chirality in porphyrin chemistry. Symmetry 6, 256–294 (2014).

46. Valderrey, V., Aragay, G. & Ballester, P. Porphyrin tweezer receptors: binding studies, conformational properties and applications. Coord. Chem. Rev. 258–259, 137–156 (2014).

47. Lu, H. & Kobayashi, N. Optically active porphyrin and phthalocyanine systems. Chem. Rev. 116, 6184–6261 (2016).

48. Yamamoto, S., Iida, H. & Yashima, E. Guest-induced unidirectional dual rotary and twisting motions of a spiroborate-based double-stranded helicate containing a bisporphyrin unit. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 6849–6853 (2013).

49. Fujita, N., Shinkai, S. & James, T. D. Boronic acids in molecular self-assembly. Chem. Asian J. 3, 1076–1091 (2008).

50. Nishimura, N., Yoza, K. & Kobayashi, K. Guest-encapsulation properties of a self-assembled capsule by dynamic boronic ester bonds. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 777–790 (2010).

51. Yoon, J. Y. & Cram, D. J. Chiral recognition properties in complexation of two asymmetric hemicarcerands. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 11796–11806 (1997).

52. Nuckolls, C., Hof, F., Martín, T. & Rebek, J. Jr. Chiral microenvironments in self-assembled capsules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 10281–10285 (1999).

53. Fiedler, D., Leung, D. H., Bergman, R. G. & Raymond, K. N. Enantioselective guest binding and dynamic resolution of cationic ruthenium complexes by a chiral metal–ligand assembly. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 3674–3675 (2004).

54. Muraoka, T., Kinbara, K. & Aida, T. Mechanical twisting of a guest by a photoresponsive host. Nature 440, 512–515 (2006).

55. Peng, X. et al. Optically active single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2, 361–365 (2007).

56. Ema, T., Ura, N., Eguchi, K., Ise, Y. & Sakai, T. Chiral porphyrin dimer with a macrocyclic cavity for intercalation of aromatic guests. Chem. Commun. 47, 6090–6092 (2011).

57. Nishio, M., Umezawa, Y., Hirota, M. & Takeuchi, Y. The CH/π interaction: significance in molecular recognition. Tetrahedron 51, 8665–8701 (1995).

58. Salonen, L. M., Ellermann, M. & Diederich, F. Aromatic rings in chemical and biological recognition: energetics and structures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 4808–4842 (2011).

59. Pérez-Estrada, S. et al. Thermodynamic evaluation of aromatic CH/π interactions and rotational entropy in a molecular rotor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 2175–2178 (2015).

60. Carrillo, R., López-Rodríguez, M., Martín, V. S. & Martín, T. Quantification of a CH–π interaction responsible for chiral discrimination and evaluation of its contribution to enantioselectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 7803–7808 (2009).

61. Okawa, H., Numata, Y., Mio, A. & Kida, S. Non-covalent interactions in metal-complexes. II. Induction of asymmetry in cobalt(III) complexes with amino acid-schiff bases. Importance of CH···π-interaction in determining configuration of complexes. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 53, 2248–2251 (1980).

62. Emenike, B. U., Bey, S. N., Bigelowa, B. C. & Chakravartula, S. V. S. Quantitative model for rationalizing solvent effect in noncovalent CH–aryl interactions. Chem. Sci. 7, 1401–1407 (2016).

## Acknowledgements

The authors thank Daisuke Taura, Akio Urushima, and Manabu Itakura (Nagoya University) for their help in the experimental assistance and also Hiroyuki Asanuma and Hiromu Kashida (Nagoya University) for providing advice regarding the fluorescence quenching. This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S), No. 25220804 (E.Y.), Grant-in-Aid for Specially Promoted Research, No. 18H05209 (E.Y.), and Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), No. 17K14470 (N.O.)). S.Y. expresses his thanks for a JSPS Research Fellowship for Young Scientists (No. 9119).

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

E.Y. conceived and directed the project. N.O., H.I., and E.Y. designed the experiments. S.Y. and T.I. performed all of the experiments. S. Ito, Y.H., and S. Irle performed the calculations. N.O. and E.Y. analyzed the data and co-wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and edited the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eiji Yashima.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Ousaka, N., Yamamoto, S., Iida, H. et al. Water-mediated deracemization of a bisporphyrin helicate assisted by diastereoselective encapsulation of chiral guests. Nat Commun 10, 1457 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09443-z

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09443-z

• ### Ru(II)Porphyrinate-based molecular nanoreactor for carbene insertion reactions and quantitative formation of rotaxanes by active-metal-template syntheses

• Liniquer A. Fontana
• Marlon P. Almeida
• Jackson D. Megiatto

Nature Communications (2020)