Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Label-free detection of conformational changes in switchable DNA nanostructures with microwave microfluidics

## Abstract

Detection of conformational changes in biomolecular assemblies provides critical information into biological and self-assembly processes. State-of-the-art in situ biomolecular conformation detection techniques rely on fluorescent labels or protein-specific binding agents to signal conformational changes. Here, we present an on-chip, label-free technique to detect conformational changes in a DNA nanomechanical tweezer structure with microwave microfluidics. We measure the electromagnetic properties of suspended DNA tweezer solutions from 50 kHz to 110 GHz and directly detect two distinct conformations of the structures. We develop a physical model to describe the electrical properties of the tweezers, and correlate model parameters to conformational changes. The strongest indicator for conformational changes in DNA tweezers are the ionic conductivity, while shifts in the magnitude of the cooperative water relaxation indicate the addition of fuel strands used to open the tweezer. Microwave microfluidic detection of conformational changes is a generalizable, non-destructive technique, making it attractive for high-throughput measurements.

## Introduction

Detecting conformational changes in large biomolecular assemblies, such as proteins, protein complexes, and DNA origami is critical to understanding the function of these systems. Standard characterization methods to detect nanoscale changes in biological systems include cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM)1,2. These techniques, however, require extensive and destructive sample preparation (cryo-TEM, for example), are limited in spatial resolution (AFM, for example), and can be perturbative to the state in situ. They also typically capture the one-end state of the conformational switch, making real-time measurements of intermediate conformations technically challenging and limited to single molecules3.

A common technique to probe biomolecular dynamics in situ is Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET), where the distance between two fluorophore labels is calculated from the energy transfer efficiency between the fluorophores. The limit of FRET-based distance measurements is around 1–10 nm (depending on the dye pair) and requires site-specific modification of the targeted analyte with the two fluorophores4. Site modifications are technically challenging, and the size and hydrophobic nature of the dyes make them potentially perturbative5. To address these limitations, label-free methods to probe conformational changes are an active area of research. These label-free methods also detect protein binding with protein-specific binding agents (e.g., aptamers and antibodies)6. Typically, these protein-specific binding agents are attached to a surface, and the ligand association perturbs a measurement signal. Ligand association detection techniques include impedance spectroscopy, surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), acoustic waves, and calorimetry7,8,9,10,11,12,13. However, both label- and aptamer-based protein detection techniques require prior knowledge of the analyte and the targeted experimental design14.

A label-free, generalizable method of detecting molecular conformation changes in solution will advance high-throughput and real-time biological characterization. Compared with expensive and time-intensive alternatives (e.g., FRET), on-chip, high-throughput methods facilitate quantitative characterization at potentially lower costs. Orthogonal techniques for detecting conformation changes in protein-based systems would also allow for cross-comparisons, for example, to confirm that fluorescent labels do not interfere with biomolecular dynamics in FRET measurements. Fluorescent label interference inhibits progress in “nano-machine” engineering, requiring characterization techniques that do not rely on surfaces or labels to detect conformational changes14,15.

Frequency-dependent dielectric measurements can detect the structure and dynamics of proteins, DNA, and cells in solution without the need for specific binding agents16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Recent advances in microwave metrology and instrumentation allow for on-chip broadband dielectric measurements from DC to 110 GHz25,26,27,28,29. Covering this wide-frequency range allows for measurements of electrical properties of different charge-based phenomena in a system that includes electrical double layers, ionic conductivity, and molecular reorientations26,30,31,32,33. Microwave microfluidics is an emerging field of study that integrates microfluidics with on-chip microwave devices and electrical measurement techniques, allowing for quantitative measurements of nanoliter volumes of fluids, and provides a probe mechanism of aqueous and ionic solutions, particles, cells, and more34,35,36,37,38,39.

Here, we utilize microwave microfluidics to track the conformational changes in DNA “tweezer” nanostructures. In and of itself, the DNA tweezer system provides a wide array of biological detection capabilities, and similar structures have been used to measure protein–protein interactions40,41. By using a nanostructure that is well-defined with controllable binary states, these microwave microfluidics experiments elucidate the relevant electrical properties of the fluid that signal conformational changes. This ability to detect DNA nanostructure changes electrically means that we can use these nanostructures as a model system to study large conformational changes in similar systems. In addition, we can modify tweezers to detect and amplify small conformation changes in complex biological systems. The former application will be useful when FRET dyes or other probes are intractable due to the difficulties with synthesis or excessive perturbation to the complex biological system under test. In the latter application, DNA tweezers can serve as a model system that mimics conformational changes in protein mechanisms42 and DNA origami43,44. The electrical characterization methods developed here could provide a more user-friendly and high-throughput alternative to optically based measurements, such as FRET45.

The microwave microfluidic techniques we develop here are widely applicable to any biological fluid system, opening avenues for high-throughput in situ measurements for use by the biotechnology, molecular biology, and biomanufacturing communities. Microfluidics allow integration with complementary lab-on-a-chip technologies, including optical, thermal, mechanical, and chemical stimuli and measurements, with high throughput and nanoliter sample size46,47. Our devices and calibration protocol cover a six-decade frequency bandwidth from 50 kHz to 110 GHz. This large bandwidth uniquely captures both the low-frequency regime where the electrical-double-layer effects dominate as well as the high-frequency regime where the properties of the solution dominate. We determined the presence of a weak relaxation associated with the ion pairing in solution by fitting the entire frequency regime of the dielectric spectrum on a logarithmic scale. We extracted quantitative model parameters associated with the ion-pairing relaxations, the bulk fluid properties, and the electrical double layer, and correlated these parameters to DNA tweezer conformational changes.

## Results

### DNA tweezers

As a model system for probing conformational changes, we chose a DNA tweezer nanostructure48 consisting of two rigid arms held closed by a hairpin stem–loop and two extended locking strands (Fig. 1a, sequence in Fig. 1; see Supplementary Information). The tweezer can be opened by the addition of two fuel strands: one that binds to the hairpin (FUEL 1) and the other that breaks the locking strands (FUEL 2). FUEL 1 forms a duplex that rapidly forces the arms apart, in a spring-loaded fashion. We can trigger a large conformational change in the tweezer between a closed state (4-nm inter-arm distance) and an open state (16-nm inter-arm distance). The clean transition from closed to open tweezers with addition of fuel strands was confirmed by atomic force microscopy (AFM, Fig. 1b–d) and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE, Fig. 1e). As a control, we added dummy fuel strands (Fig. 1a) that were mismatched to their targets, which resulted in no change in tweezer conformation (Supplementary Figures 2 and 3). We hypothesized that the large difference between the closed and open states of the tweezer would be detectable in the frequency shift of a relaxation associated with the tweezer in solution, a phenomenon that has been reported for DNA and protein suspensions20,33.

### The microwave microfluidics device

We developed a microwave microfluidics device (Fig. 2a) to measure the broadband electrical properties of suspensions of DNA tweezers. The device consisted of microfluidic channels with integrated coplanar waveguides (CPWs) of varying lengths. Each of these devices (top–down view in Fig. 2b) was connected to a vector network analyzer (VNA) via microwave probes to measure the raw scattering parameters (S parameters) as a function of frequency. The S-parameters were calibrated (see the Methods section) and used to extract the distributed circuit parameters of the transmission line R0, L0, Ctot, and Gtot, which correspond to the resistance and inductance associated with the metal conductors in the transmission line, and the capacitance and conductance associated with the materials in the gap (Fig. 2c), respectively. We present calibrated fluid data as Ctot and $$\frac{{G_{{\mathrm{tot}}}}}{\omega }$$ as these quantities can be related to the real and imaginary parts of the fluid permittivity ($$\varepsilon ^\prime$$ and $$\varepsilon ^{\prime \prime }$$), respectively:

$$\varepsilon ^\prime = \left( {C_{{\mathrm{tot}}} - C_{{\mathrm{air}}}} \right)k + \varepsilon _0\,{\mathrm{and}}$$
(1)
$$\varepsilon ^{\prime \prime } = \frac{{G_{{\mathrm{tot}}}}}{\omega }k,$$
(2)

where Cair is the per-unit-length capacitance of an air-filled channel, ε0 is the permittivity of free space, and k is a geometric constant dictated by device structure26. While Eqs. (1) and (2) allow us to convert capacitance Ctot and scaled conductance $$\frac{{G_{{\mathrm{tot}}}}}{\omega }$$ directly to fluid permittivity values, we do not present measured data in terms of permittivity when electrical double layer (EDL) effects are present, because the EDL effects depend on the device geometry and are not directly related to intrinsic fluid properties.

### Fluid measurement and circuit model

We measured the distributed conductance and capacitance of air, deionized water (DI water), tris-acetate-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid with magnesium chloride (TAE-Mg2+) buffer, closed tweezers, and open tweezers (0.5 μM concentration, both suspended in TAE-Mg2+ buffer) (Fig. 3a, b). The capacitance of air remained constant as a function of frequency, while the DI water had a larger capacitance at low frequencies and a relaxation (a peak in the conductance paired with a drop in the capacitance) at ~20 GHz due to the cooperative relaxation of water molecules49. This water loss peak was present in the aqueous solution samples as well. Previous dielectric spectroscopy studies reported weak relaxations for proteins (β- and δ-relaxations) and electrolytes (ion-pairing relaxations) at frequencies in the range of 10 MHz to1 GHz24,50. However, these relaxations were approximately three orders of magnitude smaller than the water relaxation, and required careful fitting treatment to extract quantitative information from dielectric data. At low frequencies (below 107 Hz), we saw a peak in the conductance and a drop in the capacitance for the solutions containing ions, which we attributed to the relaxation of the EDL. To clarify the changes in the broadband electrical properties for DNA tweezers, we plotted the percent deviation in Ctot and Gtot ω−1 from the TAE-Mg2+ buffer as a function of frequency (Fig. 3c, d) for open and closed tweezers, as well as control measurements with dummy strands of DNA, and tweezers with only FUEL 1 or FUEL 2 added (~5 μM concentration), labeled as Lock and Loop, respectively, in Fig. 3c, d. We observed an increase in Ctot and Gtot upon the addition of tweezers, and a reduction upon the addition of single-stranded DNA (fuel strands or dummy fuel strands, Fig. 1a). Open tweezers had values for Ctot and Gtot that were smaller than both the closed tweezer and all the control samples.

To extract physical values from the broadband electrical data, we developed a circuit model to describe total admittance (inverse of impedance) Ytot = Gtot + iωCtot of the suspended DNA tweezers (Fig. 4):

$$\frac{1}{{Y_{{\mathrm{tot}}}}} = \frac{2}{{Y_{{\mathrm{EDL}}}}} + \frac{1}{{Y_{\mathrm{f}}}},$$
(3)

where YEDL and Yf are the admittances of the EDL and fluid, respectively. We describe the effect of the EDL as operating in series with the admittance of the fluid for fluids with dissolved ions. The EDL can be modeled as a Cole–Cole relaxation:26

$$Y_{{\mathrm{EDL}}} = Y_{{\mathrm{CPE}}} + G_{{\mathrm{EDL}}} + i\omega C_{{\mathrm{EDL}}} = Y_{{\mathrm{CPE}}} + i\omega \frac{{C_{{\mathrm{EDL}}}}}{{1 + (i\omega \tau _{{\mathrm{EDL}}})^{1 - \alpha _{{\mathrm{EDL}}}}}},$$
(4)

where CEDL is the capacitance associated with the EDL, αEDL is a shape-broadening parameter, and τEDL is the characteristic relaxation time associated with the formation of the EDL under an electric field. The Cole–Cole relaxation is in parallel with a constant-phase element (CPE, with admittance YCPE):

$$Y_{{\mathrm{CPE}}} = Q\omega ^{ - n}e^{i\frac{\pi }{2}n},$$
(5)

where Q and n are the fitting parameters, and where Q has the units [S m−1 Hzn]. We fixed n = −1 since the concentration of ions in the sample was low, and allowing n to vary did not change the fit parameters.

We described the fluid admittance Yf as four parallelly distributed circuit components:

$${Y_{\mathrm{f}} = Y_{{\mathrm{IP}}} + Y_{\mathrm{w}} + G_{\mathrm{\sigma }} + i\omega C_\infty = i\omega \frac{{C_{{\mathrm{IP}}}}}{{1 + (i\omega \tau _{{\mathrm{IP}}})}} + i\omega \frac{{C_{\mathrm{w}} - C_\infty }}{{1 + (i\omega \tau _{\mathrm{w}})}} + G_{\mathrm{\sigma }} + i\omega C_\infty ,}$$
(6)

where C is the capacitance of the suspension at frequencies far above the relaxation frequency of water, Cw is the dipolar contribution of the water, Gσ is the conductance due to translation of ions and DNA, and CIP is the dipolar contribution of the weak ion/DNA relaxation. The values for Gions and Gw (Fig. 4a) represent the loss (imaginary part) of the Debye relaxations Yw and YIP and are not separate fitting parameters. The time constants τw and τIP correspond to the rotational relaxation times of the water and the ion–counterion pair, respectively. By developing an equivalent circuit model based on Debye-type relaxations, we correlated the changes in charge-based phenomena to the changes in DNA tweezer conformation, using our broadband measurements. Here, we determined statistical significance in the changes in fit using a two-sided z test with unequal variance and applying the Bonferroni criterion for two simultaneous statistical tests within a single dataset51.

### Fitting the fluid data to fluid circuit parameters

To fit these regions with Debye-type models, we performed a nonlinear least-squares fit to extract Ytot. Specifically, we simultaneously fit log(Ctot) and log(Gtot) (Fig. 5a, e) for the whole frequency spectrum, and Cw and Gw + Gσ for the frequency range 5–30 GHz, using fit parameters and functions normalized to have magnitudes approximately equal to one. The inclusion of Cw and Gw + Gσ into the fitting model at high frequency was necessary to address the colinearity between Gσ and CPE effects in the model, which constrained CPE effects to lower frequencies. The full frequency range of the fit was necessary to achieve the uncertainties presented here for all extracted fit parameters. The bulk fluid properties contain the water relaxation Yw as well as the fluid conductance Gσ, and the fit and the corresponding data are presented in Fig. 5b, f. Including the ion relaxation peak (YIP in Fig. 5c, g) was necessary in DNA tweezer suspensions and control measurements of TAE-Mg2+ buffer to produce symmetric (Cole–Cole) relaxations for the EDL, and resulted in overall lower residuals across the high-frequency regime. Residuals for fits for a single Cole–Cole relaxation versus two Debye-type relaxations at high frequency have been reported elsewhere for Mg2+–EDTA buffer, and are included for closed tweezers in Fig. 352.

### Detecting conformational changes

We tracked fit parameters from the Ctot fit for the TAE-Mg2+ buffer, closed tweezers, open tweezers, and a series of control measurements. The controls included closed tweezers with dummy strands that do not open the tweezers, and closed tweezers with FUEL 1 or FUEL 2 added. By extracting quantitative information from our calibrated broadband dielectric measurements, we determined physical parameters that strongly indicate (p< 0.05, two-sided Z test with unequal variance) conformational changes in the tweezer system. The value Cw (Fig. 6a) corresponds to the dipolar contribution of the cooperative water relaxation, and indicates changes in the state of the water. Reduction in the dipolar contribution of water can come from displaced water molecules, water immobilized on the surface of the DNA tweezers (i.e., bound water in hydration layers), changes in the concentration-dependent charge density of DNA, and changes in the charge state of the buffer20,32,53,54. All tweezer samples had smaller Cw values, and there was a statistically significant increase in Cw from both closed and closed-with-dummy-strands to the open configuration (p< 0.05, two-sided Z test with unequal variance). To determine the impact of excess fuel strands, we varied the amount of excess fuel strand in the open tweezer sample from 4.5 to 7.5 μM (see Supplementary Figure 8). The linear relationship between Cw and the concentration of fuel strands suggests that the change in Cw is due to the additional single strands of DNA in the solution, rather than a change in conformation. Notably, the magnitude of Cw increased upon the addition of more single-stranded DNA, meaning that there is less bound water in the system, overall. This counterintuitive result could be due to the changes in the buffer, or the concentration-dependent charge density of the DNA itself53,54.

The relaxation time of the water loss peak τw also shifts when DNA or ions are added to water (Fig. 6b). Shifts in the water relaxation in ionic, protein, and DNA systems have been attributed to disruption of the hydrogen-bonding network and increases in solution viscosity55. An increase in τw occurred for the buffer, and the addition of closed tweezers further increased the relaxation time. Open tweezers and tweezers with dummy strands had a reduced water relaxation time, compared with closed tweezers, demonstrating that single-stranded DNA can cause a reduction in τw similar to what we observe in the open tweezers. However, when we varied the excess FUEL strands in open tweezers, we found that changing the concentration of excess FUEL strands did not affect τw (Supplementary Figure 9). This suggests that τw could be an indicator of conformational changes in the tweezers, and the FUEL strands and dummy have distinct effects on the water relaxation. In addition, studies of globular proteins in water found a linear relationship between Cw and τw. This finding was not the case in the DNA tweezer system, which we attributed to the presence of diverse, complex charged species in solution55.

The bulk ionic conductivity Gσ is a sensitive indicator of both the addition of fuel strands as well as the conformational changes of the tweezers (Fig. 6c). The closed tweezers had a greater ionic conductivity compared with the buffer, consistent with molecular orbital theory and measurements of DNA systems with nanopores and dielectric spectroscopy20,56,57,58,59. The addition of dummy FUEL strands slightly decreased the overall ionic conductivity of the solution, suggesting a lower ionic conductivity for single strands in solution, as compared with tweezer structures. We observed reductions in Gσ beyond the dummy strand control measurements for the addition of the locker and central loop strands (FUEL 1 and FUEL 2, respectively), demonstrating that these binding events are detected on an individual basis. The open tweezer had a lower conductivity than all control measurements, showing the utility of Gσ as a parameter for measuring conformational changes and binding events in DNA-based systems.

Other parameters included in the measurement corresponding to the EDL and the ion-pairing relaxation did not yield statistically significant changes for different tweezer conformations. We attributed ion-pairing relaxation observed in the buffer to the solvent-mediated interactions between different buffer components32,60. The addition of closed DNA tweezers did not shift the relaxation magnitude CIP or time constant τIP within the error of the measurement (Supplementary Figure 6). The electrical double-layer relaxation fit parameters, CEDL and τEDL, represent the accumulation of charged species on the surface of the electrode. CEDL measures the capacitive contribution of the EDL, and τEDL is the recovery time of the EDL after it is perturbed by the electric field26,61,62. These parameters were particularly sensitive to ionic conductivity changes, and adding DNA increases capacitance CEDL and decreases the relaxation time τEDL (Supplementary Figure 5). However, no significant changes were found between any of the tweezer samples. The large time constant τEDL of the EDL relaxation in this system increased the uncertainty in the fit. In future measurements, this uncertainty could be reduced by extending the broadband measurement to lower frequencies. Such an approach could improve the viability of the use of the EDL to probe DNA systems with microwave microfluidics.

## Discussion

While this technique is promising as a method to detect conformational changes in biomolecular systems, several key technical improvements are required to reach its full potential. To realize the promise of this technique and make these measurements accessible to nonspecialist biological laboratories, it is critical to increase the time resolution and develop lower-cost measurements. While lower bandwidth dielectric spectroscopy techniques are commercially available, the broadband nature of these microwave measurements is critical to determining the fitting parameters, including Gσ with high accuracy. Fitting the full range of frequencies allows us to capture the effects of ion pairing and the EDL, whose contributions to the electrical signal overlap with the frequency range used to extract Gσ (1 MHz–1 GHz). Without accounting for these additional signals, the confidence intervals on the extracted fit parameters would not be small enough to distinguish between open and closed tweezers.

Further studies of biomolecular systems will improve our understanding of the relationship between specific hydration and ion interactions, and the changes in broadband electrical properties that we observe. Our results indicate that more studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms that contribute to the changes in the water relaxation in DNA solutions. For future studies of biomolecules, it is also important to note that the EDL and ion-pairing effects that we detect could both have reasonably been indicators of conformational changes, and may prove to be more sensitive to conformation changes in other systems.

In this report, we demonstrated the first label-free electrical detection of conformational changes in DNA tweezer nanostructures by microwave microfluidics. The extremely wide-frequency range of these measurements allowed us to isolate the effects of the EDL, ionic conductivity, ion-pairing relaxation, and solvent relaxation. We quantified the parameters associated with each of these physical mechanisms and found that the conformational change of the DNA tweezers was most readily detected in the ionic conductivity and the frequency dependence of the water relaxation, while the presence of fuel strands was detected in the water loss relaxation. In particular, the label-free detection of conformational changes on-chip offers opportunities to improve biomolecule characterization by integrating stimuli such as temperature, offering further avenues to measure DNA melt curves and temperature-dependent conformational changes with high sensitivity and high-confidence level (concentration sensitivity of ~20 μg mL−1, p< 10−5, two-sided Z test with unequal variance, for Gσ) for nanoliter sample volumes63,64. While the measurement techniques developed here are broadly applicable to biological fluids, further microwave measurements and computational studies are necessary to expand the theoretical foundations beyond model systems to interpret the impact of conformational changes on electrical properties. A combination of label-free conformational testing with DNA nanomachines represents a powerful toolbox for understanding the fundamental biological mechanisms, hastening progress in pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and molecular engineering.

## Methods

### Device fabrication

The device fabrication for the microwave microfluidics devices is described in detail elsewhere25,26,65. Briefly, all devices were co-fabricated on 500-μm-thick fused silica wafers (76.2 -mm diameter). We fabricated two separate types of chips: a test chip containing all microfluidic devices (Fig. 2a) and a reference chip containing bare coplanar waveguide devices for calibration. Metal for coplanar waveguides was deposited by electron-beam evaporation (Ti(5 nm)/Au (500 nm)). All CPW structures were designed and fabricated with 50-μm-wide center conductors, 5-μm-wide gaps, and 200-μm-wide ground planes.

In addition to CPWs of different lengths, we fabricated series resistors, series capacitors, and short-circuit reflects on the reference chip. The series resistor consisted of a 10-μm-wide strip of Ti (1.5 nm)/PdAu (11 nm ± 0.5 nm) resistive material with a measured sheet resistance of ~ 50 Ω. The series capacitor was identical in structure to the series resistor, with the exception that the resistive material was omitted. The short circuit consisted of a region of conductors spanning the ground planes, gaps, and center conductors, connected to a length of transmission lines on either side equal to the length of the thru.

We designed devices with two-layer microfluidic channels consisting of ~50 μm of the SU-8 photoresist, covered with an upper channel layer (~50 μm) of the patterned polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). The SU-8 microfluidic channels were ~80-μm wide, and were patterned to expose the lengths of CPW directly to the fluid channel (0.50, 0.66, 1.32, 1.98, and 3.13 mm). We chose the CPW gap width and SU-8 channel height so that the electromagnetic fields interact with fluids and SU-8 rather than the PDMS layer. An acrylic press bar screwed into an aluminum chuck was used to clamp the PDMS block to the chip.

### Measurements

We measured the CPWs with a VNA on a manual microwave probe station (Fig. 2b). We measured the complex scattering parameters (S parameters) as a function of frequency. We acquired 640 frequency points from 100 kHz to 110 GHz on a log- frequency scale, at an AC power of −20 dBm (where 0 dBm corresponds to a power of 1 mW), and with an intermediate frequency bandwidth of 10 Hz. All measurements were performed on a temperature stage controlled to (25 ± 2) °C. After the measurements were performed on the reference and empty test devices, fluid was injected into the channels and held for at least 2 min at zero-flow rate prior to fluid measurements. Each sample measurement lasted ~20–30 min.

We transformed the measured S parameters to distributed circuit parameters for each transmission line segment we measured using the hybrid calibration scheme26,27,29,66. Specifically, we performed a two-tier calibration consisting of a reference chip and the fluid-loaded chip. For the first-tier calibration, we measured S parameters for seven different bare CPW lengths (0.420, 1.000, 1.735, 3.135, 4.595, 7.615, and 9.970 mm), a series resistor, a series capacitor, and a short-circuit reflect, all located on the reference chip. The calibration structures used in this work had the same geometry, as described in previous calibrations67. We first performed a multiline thru-reflect-line (TRL)29 calibration to determine the propagation constant of the bare-CPW lines (γ0), followed by the series-resistor calibration66 to compute the capacitance per unit length of the bare CPW section (C0). In the second-tier calibration, we measured four transmission lines, as well as a single short-circuit reflect structure loaded with fluid on the test chip. We then performed multiline TRL calibration and series resistor calibrations with a de-embedding procedure to obtain the propagation constant for the microfluidic channels (γtot). The propagation constant for the bare-CPW lines can be written as

$$\gamma _0 = \sqrt {(R_0 + i\omega L_0)(G_0 + i\omega C_0)} ,$$
(7)

where ω is the angular frequency and R0, L0, G0, and C0 are the distributed resistance, inductance, conductance, and capacitance per unit length of the bare-CPW lines, respectively, as a function of frequency. We assumed that the conductivity of fused silica was negligible, and the microfluidics fluids over the CPW devices were nonmagnetic. These assumptions allowed us to derive R0 and L0 from the reference chip, and relate them to the propagation constant of a fluid-loaded line:

$$\gamma _{{\mathrm{tot}}} = \sqrt {(R_0 + i\omega L_0)(G_{{\mathrm{tot}}} + i\omega C_{{\mathrm{tot}}})} .$$
(8)

The multiline TRL calibration on the microfluidic test chip allowed us to relate the propagation constant of the fluid directly to the capacitance Gtot and conductance Gtot for frequencies in the range of 1–110 GHz. For frequencies below 1 GHz, where the on-chip CPWs were not long enough to perform multiline TRL, we utilized the series resistor calibration and de-embedded26,27,28 our raw measurements to the fluid-loaded portion of the line by accounting for the effect of cables, probes, and the CPW sections leading up to the fluid. For every measurement set, we first measured both air and deionized water in the channels to establish baseline levels for Ctot and Gtot for known fluid properties.

### Reporting summary

Further information on experimental design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

## Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

## References

1. Jalili, N. & Laxminarayana, K. A review of atomic force microscopy imaging systems: Application to molecular metrology and biological sciences. Mechatronics 14, 907–945 (2004).

2. Cooper, G. & Hausman, R. The Cell: A Molecular Approach 2nd Edn. (Sinauer Associates, Oxford University Press, 2001 Evans Road, Cary, NC 27513 USA, 2007).

3. Katan, A. J. & Dekker, C. High-speed AFM reveals the dynamics of single biomolecules at the nanometer scale. Cell 147, 979–982 (2011).

4. Jares-Erijman, E. A. & Jovin, T. M. FRET imaging. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1387–1395 (2003).

5. Wallrabe, H. & Periasamy, A. Imaging protein molecules using FRET and FLIM microscopy. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 16, 19–27 (2005).

6. Maehashi, K. et al. Label-free protein biosensor based on aptamer-modified carbon nanotube field-effect transistors. Anal. Chem. 79, 782–787 (2007).

7. Han, X. X., Huang, G. G., Zhao, B. & Ozaki, Y. Label-free highly sensitive detection of proteins in aqueous solutions using surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Anal. Chem. 81, 3329–3333 (2009).

8. Han, X. X. et al. Analytical technique for label-free multi-protein detection based on Western blot and surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Anal. Chem. 80, 2799–2804 (2008).

9. Rodriguez, M. C., Kawde, A.-N. & Wang, J. Aptamer biosensor for label-free impedance spectroscopy detection of proteins based on recognition-induced switching of the surface charge. Chem. Commun. 34, 4267–4269 (2005).

10. Cai, H., Lee, T. M. H. & Hsing, I. M. Label-free protein recognition using an aptamer-based impedance measurement assay. Sens. Actuators, B Chem. 114, 433–437 (2006).

11. Yue, M. et al. Label-free protein recognition two-dimensional array using nanomechanical sensors. Nano. Lett. 8, 520–524 (2008).

12. Gronewold, T. M. A., Glass, S., Quandt, E. & Famulok, M. Monitoring complex formation in the blood-coagulation cascade using aptamer-coated SAW sensors. Biosens. and Bioelectron. 20, 2044–2052 (2005).

13. Recht, M. I. et al. Enthalpy array analysis of enzymatic and binding reactions. Anal. Biochem. 377, 33–39 (2008).

14. Cooper, M. A. Label-free screening of bio-molecular interactions. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 377, 834–842 (2003).

15. Vollmer, F. & Arnold, S. Whispering-gallery-mode biosensing: label-free detection down to single molecules. Nat. Methods 5, 591–596 (2008).

16. Hong, J. et al. A dielectric biosensor using the capacitance change with AC frequency integrated on glass substrates. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 Regul. Pap. Short. Notes Rev. Pap. 43, 5639–5645 (2004).

17. Nandi, N., Bhattacharyya, K. & Bagchi, B. Dielectric relaxation and solvation dynamics of water in complex chemical and biological systems. Chem. Rev. 100, 2013–2046 (2000).

18. Hayashi, Y., Katsumoto, Y., Omori, S., Kishii, N. & Yasuda, A. Liquid structure of the urea-water system studied by dielectric spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 1076–1080 (2007).

19. Tomić, S. et al. Dielectric relaxation of DNA aqueous solutions. Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 75, 021905-1–021905-13 (2007).

20. Ermilova, E., Bier, F. F. & Hölzel, R. Dielectric measurements of aqueous DNA solutions up to 110 GHz. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 11256 (2014).

21. Saif, B., Mohr, R. K., Montrose, C. J. & Litovitz, T. A. On the mechanism of dielectric relaxation in aqueous DNA solutions. Biopolymers 31, 1171–1180 (1991).

22. de Lima, S. V., de Oliveira, H. P., Andrade, C. A. S. & de Melo, C. P. A dielectric study of interpolymer complexes of polyaniline and DNA. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 471, 139–147 (2015).

23. Tros, M. et al. Picosecond orientational dynamics of water in living cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–7 (2017).

24. Wolf, M., Gulich, R., Lunkenheimer, P. & Loidl, A. Relaxation dynamics of a protein solution investigated by dielectric spectroscopy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1824, 723–730 (2012).

25. Liu, S. et al. Hybrid characterization of nanolitre dielectric fluids in a single microfluidic channel up to 110 GHz. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 65, 5063–5073 (2017).

26. Little, C. A. E. et al. Modeling electrical double-layer effects for microfluidic impedance spectroscopy from 100 kHz to 110 GHz. Lab. Chip. 17, 2674–2681 (2017).

27. Booth, J. C. et al. Quantitative permittivity measurements of nanoliter liquid volumes in microfluidic channels to 40 GHz. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 59, 3279–3288 (2010).

28. Mateu, J., Orloff, N., Rinehart, M. & Booth, J. C. Broadband permittivity of liquids extracted from transmission line measurements of microfluidic channels. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig. 523–526 (2007).

29. Marks, R. B. A multiline method of network analyzer calibration. IEEE. Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 39, 1205–1215 (1991).

30. Buchner, R. Interactions and dynamics in electrolyte solutions by dielectric spectroscopy molecular liquids and their. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b906555p.

31. Buchner, R. & Hefter, G. Interactions and dynamics in electrolyte solutions by dielectric spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 8984 (2009).

32. Wachter, W., Kunz, W., Buchner, R. & Hefter, G. Is there an anionic Hofmeister effect on water dynamics? Dielectric spectroscopy of aqueous solutions of NaBr, NaI, NaNO3, NaClO4, and NaSCN. Journ. Phys. Chem. A109, 8675–8683 (2005).

33. Asami, K. Characterization of heterogeneous systems by dielectric spectroscopy. Prog. Polym. Sci. 27, 1617–1659 (2002).

34. Tamra, A., Deburghgraeve, M., Dubuc, D., Rols, M. & Grenier, K. Microwave dielectric spectroscopy for single cell irreversible electroporation monitoring. In IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium (IMS) 2–5 (2016).

35. Grenier, K. et al. Recent advances in microwave-based dielectric spectroscopy at the cellular level for cancer investigations. IEEE. Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 61, 2023–2030 (2013).

36. Sabuncu, A. C., Zhuang, J., Kolb, J. F. & Beskok, A. Microfluidic impedance spectroscopy as a tool for quantitative biology and biotechnology. Biomicrofluidics 6, 034103-1–034103-15 (2012).

37. Leroy, J. et al. Microfluidic biosensors for microwave dielectric spectroscopy. Sens. Actuators, A Phys. 229, 172–181 (2015).

38. Artis, F., Dubuc, D., Fournie, J.-J., Poupot, M. & Grenier, K. Microwave dielectric spectroscopy of cell membrane permeabilization with saponin on human B lymphoma cells. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig. 8–11 (2014).

39. Cui, Y., Li, J., Cao, W. & Wang, P. Highly sensitive RF detection and analysis of DNA solutions. IEEE MTT-S Int. Microw. Symp. Dig. i, 6–9 (2014).

40. Funke, J. J. et al. Uncovering the forces between nucleosomes using DNA origami. Sci. Adv. 2, 1600974-1–1600974-9 (2016).

41. Le, J. V. et al. Probing nucleosome stability with a DNA Origami nanocaliper. ACS Nano 10, 7073–7084 (2016).

42. Ha, J. H. & Loh, S. N. Protein conformational switches: from nature to design. Chem. - A Eur. J. 18, 7984–7999 (2012).

43. Rothemund, P. W. K. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).

44. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).

45. Chien, J.-C. et al. A high-throughput flow cytometry-on-CMOS for microwave-frequencies single-cell dielectric spectroscopy. Lab. Chip.  18, 2065–2076 (2018).

46. Foudeh, A. M., Fatanat Didar, T., Veres, T. & Tabrizian, M. Microfluidic designs and techniques using lab-on-a-chip devices for pathogen detection for point-of-care diagnostics. Lab. Chip. 12, 3249–3266 (2012).

47. Haeberle, S. et al. Microfluidic platforms for lab-on-a-chip applications. Lab. Chip. 7, 1094 (2007).

48. Liu, M. et al. A DNA tweezer-actuated enzyme nanoreactor. Nat. Commun. 4, 1–5 (2013).

49. Chekalin, N. V. & Shakhparonov, M. I. The mechanism of dielectric relaxation in water. J. Struct. Chem. 9, 789–790 (1968).

50. Oleinikova, A., Sasisanker, P. & Weinga, H. What can really be learned from dielectric spectroscopy of protein solutions? A Case Study Ribonuclease A. J. Phys. Chem B. 8720, 8467–8474 (2004).

51. NIST. Engineering Statistics Handbook. Analysis (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-081551447-3.50015-7.

52. Little, C., Stelson, A., Orloff, N., Long, C. and Booth, J. Measurement of ion-pairing interactions in buffer solutions with microwave microfluidics. IEEE Journal of Electromagnetics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology1, 1 (2019).

53. Zhang, Y., Zhou, H. & Ou-Yang, Z. C. Stretching single-stranded DNA: Interplay of electrostatic, base-pairing, and base-pair stacking interactions. Biophys. J. 81, 1133–1143 (2001).

54. Facer, G. R., Notterman, D. A. & Sohn, L. L. Dielectric spectroscopy for bioanalysis: From 40 Hz to 26.5 GHz in a microfabricated wave guide. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 996–998 (2001).

55. Basey-Fisher, T. H. et al. Microwave Debye relaxation analysis of dissolved proteins: Towards free-solution biosensing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 10–13 (2011).

56. Li, C. Y. et al. Ionic conductivity, structural deformation, and programmable anisotropy of DNA origami in electric field. ACS Nano 9, 1420–1433 (2015).

57. Baker-Jarvis, J., Jones, C. A. & Riddle, B. Electrical properties and dielectric relaxation of DNA in solution. NIST Technical Note (1998).

58. Dedachi, K., Natsume, T., Taisuke, N., Ishikawa, Y. & Kurita, N. Charge transfer in single- and double-strand DNAs: Theoretical analysis based on molecular orbital method. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 106, 3270–3277 (2006).

59. Liubysh, O. O., Alekseev, O. M., Tkachov, S. Y. & Perepelytsya, S. M. Effect of ionic ordering in conductivity experiments of DNA aqueous solutions. Ukr. J. Phys. 59, 479–486 (2014).

60. Buchner, R., Samani, F., May, P. M., Sturm, P. & Hefter, G. Hydration and ion pairing in aqueous sodium oxalate solutions. Chemphyschem 4, 373–378 (2003).

61. Bazant, M. Z., Thornton, K. & Ajdari, A. Diffuse-charge dynamics in electrochemical systems. Phys. Rev. E - Stat. Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys. 70, 1–24 (2004).

62. Bazant, M. Z., Kilic, M. S., Storey, B. D. & Ajdari, A. Towards an understanding of induced-charge electrokinetics at large applied voltages in concentrated solutions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 152, 48–88 (2009).

63. Fiche, J. B., Buhot, A., Calemczuk, R. & Livache, T. Temperature effects on DNA chip experiments from surface plasmon resonance imaging: Isotherms and melting curves. Biophys. J. 92, 935–946 (2007).

64. Wick, L. M. et al. On-chip non-equilibrium dissociation curves and dissociation rate constants as methods to assess specificity of oligonucleotide probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, e26-1–e26-10 (2006).

65. Ma, X. et al. A multistate single-connection calibration for microwave microfluidics. IEEE. Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 66, 1099–1107 (2018).

66. Williams, D. F. & Walker, D. K. Series-resistor calibration. In Proc. 50th ARFTG Conference Digest 131–137 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/ARFTG.1997.327267.

67. Orloff, N. D. et al. A compact variable-temperature broadband series-resistor calibration. IEEE. Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 59, 188–195 (2011).

## Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Ami Thakrar, Aaron Hagerstrom, Derek Houtz, Jasper Drisko, and Nina Popovic for their helpful discussion. The authors would like to thank the National Research Council and the NIST-on-a-Chip Initiative for funding. N.S. acknowledges startup funds from the Arizona State University. This material is based upon work supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research under award number FA9550-17-1-0053. N.S. and M.L. would also like to thank Prof. Hao Yan for the use of the AFM. Certain commercial equipment, instruments, or materials are identified in this paper in order to specify the experimental procedure adequately. Such identification is neither intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the materials or equipment identified are necessarily the best available for the purpose. Official contribution of the U.S. government, is not subject to copyright in the U.S.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

A.C.S. made, calibrated, and analyzed microwave microfluidics measurements. M.L. prepared DNA tweezers, performed AFM, and gel characterization. C.A.E.L. fabricated the microwave microfluidic chip. C.J.L., N.D.O., N.S., and J.C.B. contributed to interpretation, analysis, and paper preparation.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nicholas Stephanopoulos or James C. Booth.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks David Dubuc and the other anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Stelson, A.C., Liu, M., Little, C.A.E. et al. Label-free detection of conformational changes in switchable DNA nanostructures with microwave microfluidics. Nat Commun 10, 1174 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09017-z

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09017-z

• ### Microfluidic manipulation by spiral hollow-fibre actuators

• Sitong Li
• Rui Zhang
• Zunfeng Liu

Nature Communications (2022)

• ### Self-assembled microtubular electrodes for on-chip low-voltage electrophoretic manipulation of charged particles and macromolecules

• Apratim Khandelwal
• Nagendra Athreya
• Xiuling Li

Microsystems & Nanoengineering (2022)