Abstract
The manipulation of the transition states of a chemical process is essential to achieve the desired selectivity. In particular, transition states of chemical reactions can be significantly modified in a confined environment. We report a catalytic reaction with remarkable amplification of stereochemical information in a confined water cage. Surprisingly, this amplification is significantly dependent on droplet size. This water-induced chirality amplification stems from the hydrophobic hydration effects, which ensures high proximity of the catalyst and substrates presumably at the transition state, leading to higher enantioselectivity. Flow and batch reactors were evaluated to confirm the generality of this water-induced chirality amplification. Our observation on efficient chiral induction in confined water cages might lead to an understanding of the chirality amplification in the prebiotic era, which is a key feature for the chemical evolution of homochirality.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Asymmetric catalysis provides valuable chiral organic molecules by controlling the enantio-determining transient catalyst-substrate complex. The action of chiral catalysts could be tuned by altering their chemical structure, however, reaction conditions also play a significant role1. In principle, an energy difference of ca. 3 kcal mol–1 is sufficient to guide an asymmetric reaction pathway towards absolute selectivity (>99% ee) at ambient temperature. This level of energy is comparable to that of a non-covalent weak intermolecular interaction such as hydrogen bonding, π−π interaction, hydrophobic interaction or physical adsorption1,2. Therefore, the desired enantioselectivity can theoretically be achieved by altering environmental factors such as the confinement effect2, high pressure effect1, and hydrophobic effect3,4 which affect reaction outcome by generating compact transition states.
In nature, water is used not only as a reaction medium but also as a reaction enforcer in enzymatic processes for biosynthetic reactions to sustain life, by inducing hydrophobic interactions between enzymes and substrates5. From the perspective of green chemistry and other scientific efforts to mimic nature, considerable efforts have recently been made to develop asymmetric catalytic reactions in aqueous environments6,7,8,9. In particular, on-water catalysis10,11 has recently received considerable attention from scientific communities, due to its sustainability and effectiveness11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Chemical reactions with negative volumes of activation can be accelerated under on-water conditions due to hydrophobic hydration effects15,16,17 (Fig. 1a). Several research groups independently reported that, even hydrogen-bonding promoted catalysis could also be significantly amplified in aqueous environments by the hydrophobic hydration effect18,19,20,21,22. Very recently, we demonstrated that this hydrophobic amplification achieved under on-water conditions also enabled to discover new catalytic reactions of otherwise completely unreactive substrates22 (Fig. 1b). A somewhat related phenomenon is the substantial rate acceleration seen in aqueous microdroplet chemistry23,24,25. Chemical reactions in micrometer diameter droplets can be orders of magnitude faster than their conventional bulk-phase counterparts (Fig. 1a). Note that the reaction rates in microdroplets are usually inversely proportional to the radius of droplets26. Moreover, aqueous microdroplet conditions often drive even thermodynamically uphill reactions such as the direct condensation reactions of nucleobases with ribose, producing purine and pyrimidine ribonucleosides which are the building blocks of ribonucleic acid (RNA)27.
Considering the above-mentioned potential of water as a reaction enforcer, we were intrigued by the possibility of controlling not only the reaction rate but also the enantioselectivity in a confined space of droplets, in which the reactivities and selectivities would differ from those in bulk solutions. In a confined water cage, a hydrophobic catalyst and non-polar substrates would be brought together in a close proximity, consequently constructing sterically more confined transition states, leading to higher stereoselectivities of asymmetric catalysis.
We report our finding that, under on-water conditions, enantioselectivities of a catalytic reaction can be dramatically amplified in the confined hydrophobic cavities of microdroplets surrounded by hydration shell. The observed chirality amplification was further enhanced by decreasing the size of droplets. The effect of the droplet size on the enantioselectivity was quantified by using the biphasic microfluidic technique. The presented experimental data suggest the role of water, not only as a reaction medium in the prebiotic era but also as a key component in controlling transition states in a chiral fashion.
Results
Initial findings on water-induced chirality amplification
To validate our assumptions, we initially examined the Mannich reaction of N-Boc (tert-butyloxycarbonyl) protected imine 1a with 2,4-pentanedione 2 or dimethyl malonate 4, using 1 mol% of readily available natural (+)-cinchonine (CN-1) as the catalyst at 20 oC as a model reaction (Fig. 1c). Notably, the Schaus group reported that CN-1 catalyzed the asymmetric Mannich reaction of N-Boc imines with 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds28,29. However, to obtain reasonable enantioselectivity, high catalyst loading (10 mol%) and low reaction temperatures (–35 °C) were required. With the reduced catalyst loading (1 mol%) and under room temperature conditions, very poor enantioselectivities were obtained in conventional organic solvents (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Table 1). For example, in CH2Cl2 (Schaus’s condition) only 22% ee and 32% ee were obtained for (R)-3a and (R)-5a, respectively. Other polar solvents such as THF, CH3CN, EtOH, and HCHO gave almost racemic products (1–4% ee). However, the enantioselectivity considerably increased simply by changing the reaction medium from organic solvents to brine in which organic reactants are dispersed, not solubilized (i.e., on-water condition10) (55% ee for 3a and 42% ee for 5a, see Fig. 1c), probably due to the hydrophobic hydration effect. However, these ee values achieved by employing an on-water condition were still low. As shown in entries 8 and 17 of Supplementary Table 1, brine only catalyzes the reaction to give racemic products (0% ee). On brine, full conversion was observed in the absence of the catalyst within 0.5 h. It was postulated that the interfacial hydrogen bonding or a proton transfer process between the aqueous phase and organic reactants can promote this non-enantioselective process under on-water conditions30. Thus, we set out experiments to suppress the water-catalyzed racemic pathway by providing water/oil biphasic conditions or spatial separation31 of water. As expected, the addition of the hydrophobic co-solvents such as toluene and o-xylene yielded significantly enhanced enantioselectivity (up to 87% ee) (Fig. 1c, see also entries 9–11 and 18–20 in Supplementary Table 1). These hydrophobic solvents can sequester the transition states away from water, consequently suppressing the water-catalyzed non-enantioselective pathway32. To verify this, we performed the same reaction with less acidic D2O instead of H2O. No solvent D/H isotope effect on reaction rate and enantioselectivity was observed, strongly indicating that, under our on-water conditions, the interfacial hydrogen bonding or a proton transfer process between the aqueous phase and organic reactants is not involved in the transition state (Fig. 1c, see also entry 21 in Supplementary Table 1). If our on-water catalysis results from the general acid mechanism, then the reaction ought to be slower on less acidic D2O10,33. Evidence for the hydrophobic hydration effects on increased enantioselectivity was also obtained using an anti-hydrophobic agent, lithium perchlorate (LiClO4)34,35. In contrast to the results obtained from the addition of antichaotropic (increasing the hydrophobic effect) salts such as NaCl, the ee value decreased dramatically in aqueous LiClO4 (15% ee for (R)-3a and 10% ee for (R)-5a) (Fig. 1c, see also entries 12 and 22 in Supplementary Table 1).
The strength of hydrophobic interactions can usually be controlled by introducing suitable hydrophobes in substrates and catalysts. Recently, we reported that catalyst hydrophobicity, which can affect hydrophobic interactions between catalysts and substrates, plays a critical role for the reaction rate in some on-water catalytic reactions21,22. Thus, we decided to examine the effect of the hydrophobicity of catalysts on enantioselectivity. Under the on-water reaction condition (entry 10 of Supplementary Table 1), the effect of the substituent at carbon C5 of several cinchonine-derived catalysts (CN-1 to CN-5, Fig. 2a) on reaction rate and enantioselectivity was investigated. Almost no effect of catalyst hydrophobicity on rate acceleration was observed. However, surprisingly, a significant hydrophobic chirality amplification (from 84% ee to 96% ee) derived from the catalyst substituent effect was observed in the catalytic Mannich reactions of 1a with 2 (Fig. 2b). Relatively more hydrophobic catalysts exhibited higher catalytic enantioselectivities than the less hydrophobic catalysts. Thus, among the screened catalysts, CN-5 (Log P = 7.34) gave the best result (96% ee). These trends were also observed using the pseudoenantiomeric cinchonidine-based catalysts (CD-1 to CD-5: from 72% ee to 92% ee). In contrast, in CH2Cl2, regardless of the catalyst structure, much lower enantioselectivities (10–24% ee) were obtained. This result supports the assumption that the substituents at the C5 position of the catalysts only function as hydrophobic tags. Also in the reactions with dimethyl malonate (4), the hydrophobic group tagged CN-2 and CN-3 and their cinchonidine analogs showed slightly higher enantioselectivity than those obtained with other catalysts examined in this study. However, the effect of catalyst hydrophobicity on enantioselectivity was not significant like that observed in the reactions with acetylacetone (2) (see Supplementary Table 2).
Stirring-induced chirality amplification
It is well known that, under on-water conditions, the control of micelles by stirring rate can be critical for the outcome of chemical reactions36,37. Thus, the influence of the stirring rate on the catalytic results of the Mannich reaction of 1a–1c with 2 or 4 was investigated by varying the stirring rate from 200 rpm to 1150 rpm (Fig. 2c). Surprisingly, the dramatic effect of the stirring rate on the enantioselectivity was observed under our on-water reaction condition. The enantioselectivity of the Mannich reaction was increased by increasing the stirring speed. A maximum ee (97% ee for 3a and 91% ee for 5a) was then reached at a stirring speed of 1150 rpm while lower ees were obtained at a lower stirring speed. These results indicate that the sizes of the droplets play a vital role in promoting stereoselectivity in this reaction. With increasing stirring rate, the size of the emulsion or suspension formed decreases; the hydrophobic organic solutes encapsulated inside transient microscopic hydration shell are consequently more strongly pressurized. Therefore, this might lead to an increased local concentration of the hydrophobic reactants, presumably forming a confined transition states. The catalytic-like effect of the stirring rate on enantioselectivity is expected to be of interest for both research and technological applications.
Quantification of the on-water effect on enantioselectivity
Although on-water conditions in this study enabled a dramatic increase in enantioselectivity, precise control of the droplet size was not amenable in a reaction flask due to many different factors38. Moreover, our attempts for in situ measurements of the droplet sizes in the emulsions during the reaction was not successful, preventing any quantitative analysis of the effect of droplet size on the enantioselectivity. Therefore, to quantify the on-water effect on enantioselectivity, and, thus, to better understand the mechanism underlying this water-induced chirality amplification, we employed a biphasic microfluidic system to generate precisely defined monodisperse water and organic phase plugs.
The Mannich reaction of 1a with 4 using 1 mol% of catalyst CN-2 or CD-2 as a model reaction was performed in a biphasic microfluidic system (o-xylene/brine). A biphasic microfluidic system was set using a cross-junction meeting of controlled flows of brine and organic solutions containing the organic reactants and catalyst CN-2 or CD-2. The reaction mixture was injected into the system using a syringe pump, collected at the outlet of the fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP) tubing (inner diameter (ø) = 250, 500, and 1000 μm, length = 15 m) (Fig. 3a). A series of droplets with different sizes was formed in the FEP tubing by adjusting the flow rate ratio (Qw/Qo) between the aqueous and organic phases (Fig. 3b). After the tube was filled with the reaction mixture, the flows of brine and organic solutions were stopped, and the outlet of the tube was then sealed with a plastic paraffin film. The other end of the tube was also sealed with a plastic paraffin film. The static biphasic plugs were then kept inside the FEP tubing for 48 h at 20 oC. Without any stirring, the reaction proceeded smoothly even in the static droplets. Furthermore, as expected, the enantioselectivity was significantly dependent on the droplet size (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Table 3). As the size of the droplet decreased, the ee values increased. When using the same tube, the ee values of the product increased when the Qw/Qo increased. Under the same brine–organic flow ratios (Qw/Qo), the smaller size of the inner diameter of the microtube gave the higher ee values. Furthermore, the employment of a biphasic microfluidic system afforded higher ee values, exceeding the maximum ees obtained under on-water batch conditions (92.5% ee vs. 91% ee using CN-2 catalyst; 92% ee vs. 85% ee using CD-2 catalyst) (Fig. 3c and Fig. 4, see also Supplementary Table 3). However, no chirality amplification was observed when the organic plugs were generated by injecting argon gas instead of water into the chip reactor, regardless of sizes of organic droplets, further confirming the crucial role of water for the chirality amplification. However, interestingly, the droplet size showed almost no effect on the reaction kinetics (see Supplementary Table 4 for the detailed kinetic data).
It is important to note here that, to date, the beneficial confinement effect on enantioselectivity has only been observed when the system is confined at molecular scales (pore size < 2 nm)2. However, in this study, the enantioselectivity could be enhanced by confinement at a microscale, in droplets with diameters in the micrometer range. As mentioned previously, we presume that the water-induced chirality amplification can be ascribed to hydrophobic hydration effect. According to the recent spectroscopic and calculation studies, the origin of hydrophobic hydration is the strengthened water hydrogen bonding near purely hydrophobic solutes4, i.e., in the presence of hydrophobic reactants, the water forms a transient microscopic hydration shell which shows extensive structural ordering resembling that in ice and clathrates. Thus, we presume that this strong H-bond network of water molecules can squeeze out the hydrophobic reactants39. This water-induced confinement effect can consequently enforce proximity of the catalyst and substrates within the confined hydrophobic cavities of micro-droplets and leads to a more compact transition state.
Experiments for mechanism elucidation
It is known that, under high pressure conditions, a more compact transition state (e.g., a negative volume of activation) is operative1,16. Thus, to determine whether water-induced enhancement of enantioselectivity can be ascribed to the hydrophobic hydration effect (i.e., whether water molecules involved in the strengthened hydrogen bonds pressurize the reactants), we first conducted the above-described biphasic microfluidic Mannich reaction of 1a with 4 using 1 mol% of CD-2 under high pressure. The pressure within microfluidic system (ø = 1000 μm, Qw/Qo = 1/20) was controlled using a back pressure regulator. As anticipated, a noticeably higher enantioselectivity was observed even under ca. 5 bar (from 84% ee under 1 bar (Fig. 3c) to 90% ee under ca. 5 bar (Fig. 4a)). Next, we also performed the same reaction in an organic solvent (CH2Cl2) under 2 kbar (see Supplementary Method for the detailed experimental procedure)40. A remarkably higher enantioselectivity was observed under 2 kbar (89% ee for 1a and 94% ee for 1d). However, under atmospheric pressure and at the same reaction temperature, much lower enantioselectivities (55% ee for 1a and 48% ee for 1d) were obtained (Fig. 4b). All the above-mentioned results (i.e., the inceased ee values under high pressure conditions) indicate that in the present reaction, the more enantioselective transition state might be more compact than a less enantioselective transition state. Furthermore, these results concur with those obtained from recent studies, which reported that phenomena occurring only at extremely high pressures in a bulk phase can be observed in a liquid confined within porous materials at significantly lower pressures. This implies that the pressure in such a confined phase is remarkably large41,42.
Generality of water-induced chirality amplification
Flow and batch reactors were evaluated to confirm the generality of water-induced hydrophobic chirality amplification. The scope of the Mannich reaction of the diverse aromatic imines (1a–1i) with dimethyl malonate (4) was investigated using 1 mol% of catalyst CN-2 or CD-2. Regardless of the steric and electronic nature of the aromatic ring, in all substrates tested in this study, a dramatic increase in enantioselectivity was observed under both on-water and biphasic microfluidic conditions (condition b and condition c-1, respectively, of Fig. 5) compared with those obtained in a homogeneous organic solvent (condition a of Fig. 5). For example, in the case of (S)-5a, 91% ee was obtained using a biphasic microfluidic system, while a homogeneous condition (in o-xylene) gave an almost racemic product. Notably, the biphasic microfluidic system always gave higher enantioselectivities than those obtained under on-water conditions, probably due to the smaller sizes of microfluidic droplets than those of on-water droplets. Furthermore, under the biphasic microfluidic condition, this high level of enantioselectivity could be maintained with much lower catalyst loading. Under the biphasic microfluidic condition, the reaction proceeded even with 0.2 mol% of catalyst loading (condition c-2) without any erosion of enantioselectivity (Fig. 5), albeit longer reaction time was required. In contrast to these results, as described previously, 10 mol% of catalyst loading and very low reaction temperature (−35 oC) are usually required to achieve similar level of enantioselectivity in organic solvents.
Discussion
In summary, we demonstrated that water can induce the chirality amplification in a catalytic asymmetric reaction. Under on-water conditions, the enantioselectivity of a catalytic reaction can be significantly enhanced in the confined hydrophobic spaces of organic droplets surrounded by water. More significantly, this chirality amplification can be further increased by decreasing the droplet size. The droplet size effect on the enantioselectivity was quantified by using the biphasic microfluidic technique. Although in-depth mechanistic studies are still needed in order to fully understand the role of water, from all the experimental results obtained in this study, we can conclude that this water-induced chirality amplification can be attributed to the hydrophobically induced confinement effect. This remarkable observation could provide some inspiration for developing new strategies to enhance enantioselectivity and thus has the potential to open a new chapter in the field of asymmetric catalysis. In addition, our discovery that the enantioselectivity can be greatly amplified in the confined cavities of water cages could help unlock secrets of homochirality which is a fundamental component of molecular recognition in biological systems43,44,45,46,47. Considering the aqueous environment of early Earth (mist, clouds, and spray, etc.), this scenario for chirality amplification which led to the present homochiral state, might be plausible. Furthermore, it is likely that the limited diffusion of enantio-enriched products in such droplets might provide a chance to participate in a self-replicating, evolvable system in the prebiotic era.
Methods
Asymmetric Mannich reactions under on-water conditions
Acetylacetone 2 or dimethyl malonate 4 (0.6 mmol) was added to the mixture of N-Boc imine 1 (0.3 mmol), catalyst (0.003 mmol, 1 mol%), toluene or o-xylene (4.5 mmol), and water or brine (2.0 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred vigorously with a magnetic bar at 1150 rpm and the temperature was set at 20 °C. After completion of the reaction (0.5–1 h for 2 and 24–48 h for 4, respectively), the reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel eluting with a hexanes/ethyl acetate mixture, affording the corresponding Mannich product 3 or 5.
Asymmetric Mannich reactions under biphasic microfluidic conditions
The organic solutions (solution 1: dimethyl malonate 4 (69 μL, 0.6 mmol) and catalyst CN-2 or CD-2 (1.1 mg, 0.003 mmol) in o-xylene (0.88 mL), the ultrasonification was used to assist the dissolution of catalyst in o-xylene; solution 2: phenyl N-Boc imine 1a (61.6 mg, 0.3 mmol) in o-xylene (0.88 mL)) and the aqueous solution (brine, 5.13 M) were loaded into separate syringes, then injected onto the microfluidic chip at different flow rates. The brine and organic solutions were brought together on the chip, then coflowed and compartmentalized into droplets by flow focusing of the aqueous phase with an organic phase. After the tube was filled with the reaction mixture, the flows of brine and organic solutions were stopped, and the outlet of the tube was then sealed tightly with a plastic paraffin film. The other end of the tube was also sealed with a plastic paraffin film. The biphasic plugs were kept inside the FEP tubing at 20 oC without any shaking. After 24–48 h, the reaction mixture was collected from the outlet of the tubing by flushing with argon. The organic phase was then purified by chromatography to determine the ee values. The conversions of the reaction mixture were determined using 1H NMR spectroscopy by comparing the product peak integration with the reactant peak integration.
Characterization
The % ee values of the Mannich products 3 and 5 were determined by chiral HPLC.
For NMR spectra of the synthesized compounds in this article, see Supplementary Figures 5−62. For HPLC spectra of the Mannich products 3 and 5, see Supplementary Figures 72−248.
Data availability
The authors declare that all relevant data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and Supplementary Information files, and also are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Kwiatkowski, P., Dudziński, K. & Łyżwa, D. in Comprehensive Enantioselective Organocatalysis: Volume II (ed Dalko, P. I.) Ch. 21, 581–615 (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2013).
Thakur, S. S., Lee, J. E., Lee, S. H., Kim, J. M. & Song, C. E. in Handbook of Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis (eds. Ding, K. & Uozumi, Y.) 25–72 (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008).
Blokzijl, W. & Engberts, J. B. F. N. Hydrophobic effects - opinions and facts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 32, 1545–1579 (1993).
Grdadolnika, J., Merzela, F. & Avbelj, F. Origin of hydrophobicity and enhanced water hydrogen bond strength near purely hydrophobic solutes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 322–327 (2017).
Berne, B. J., Weeks, J. D. & Zhou, R. Dewetting and hydrophobic interaction in physical and biological systems. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 60, 85–103 (2009).
Kobayasi, S. (ed) Science of Synthesis: Water in Organic Synthesis (Thieme, Stuttgart, 2012).
Kitanosono, T., Masuda, K., Xu, P. & Kobayashi, S. Catalytic organic reactions in water toward sustainable society. Chem. Rev. 118, 679–746 (2018).
Jimeno, C. Water in asymmetric organocatalytic systems: a global perspective. Org. Biomol. Chem. 14, 6147–6164 (2016).
Guo, W., Liu, X., Liu, Y. & Li, C. Chiral catalysis at the water/oil interface. ACS Catal. 8, 328–341 (2018).
Narayan, S. et al. “On water”: unique reactivity of organic compounds in aqueous suspension. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3275–3279 (2005).
Lindström, U. M. & Andersson, F. Hydrophobically directed organic synthesis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 548–551 (2006).
Klijn, J. E. & Engberts, J. B. F. N. Fast reactions ‘on water’. Nature 435, 746–747 (2005).
Chanda, A. & Fokin, V. V. Organic synthesis “on water”. Chem. Rev. 109, 725–748 (2009).
Butler, R. N. & Coyne, A. G. Water: nature’s reaction enforcer−comparative effects for organic synthesis “in-water” and “on-water”. Chem. Rev. 110, 6302–6337 (2010).
Breslow, R. Hydrophobic effects on simple organic reactions in water. Acc. Chem. Res. 24, 159–164 (1991).
Pirrung, M. C. & Sarma, K. D. Aqueous medium effects on multi-component reactions. Tetrhedron 61, 11456–11472 (2005).
Pirrung, M. C. Acceleration of organic reactions through aqueous solvent effects. Chem. Eur. J. 12, 1312–1317 (2006).
Kleiner, C. M. & Schreiner, P. R. Hydrophobic amplification of noncovalent organocatalysis. Chem. Commun. 0, 4315–4317 (2006).
Rueping, M. & Theissmann, T. Asymmetric Brønsted acid catalysis in aqueous solution. Chem. Sci. 1, 473–476 (2010).
Bae, H. Y., Some, S., Oh, J. S., Lee, Y. S. & Song, C. E. Hydrogen bonding mediated enantioselective organocatalysis in brine: significant rate acceleration and enhanced stereoselectivity in enantioselective Michael addition reactions of 1,3-dicarbonyls to β-nitroolefins. Chem. Commun. 47, 9621–9623 (2011).
Bae, H. Y. & Song, C. E. Unprecedented hydrophobic amplification in noncovalent organocatalysis “on water”: hydrophobic chiral squaramide catalyzed Michael addition of malonates to nitroalkenes. ACS Catal. 5, 3613–3619 (2015).
Sim, J. H. & Song, C. E. Water-enabled catalytic asymmetric Michael reactions of unreactive nitroalkenes: one-pot synthesis of chiral GABA-analogs with all-carbon quaternary stereogenic centers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 1835–1839 (2017).
Yan, X., Bain, R. M. & Cooks, R. G. Organic reactions in microdroplets: reaction acceleration revealed by mass spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 12960–12972 (2016).
Bain, R. M., Pulliam, C. J., Thery, F. & Cooks, R. G. Accelerated chemical reactions and organic synthesis in leidenfrost droplets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 10478–10482 (2016).
Shang, L., Cheng, Y. & Zhao, Y. Emerging droplet microfluidics. Chem. Rev. 117, 7964–8040 (2017).
Fallah-Araghi, A. et al. Enhanced chemical synthesis at soft interfaces: a universal reaction-adsorption mechanism in microcompartments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 028301 (2014).
Nam, I., Nam, H. G. & Zare, R. N. Abiotic synthesis of purine and pyrimidine ribonucleosides in aqueous microdroplets. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 36–40 (2018).
Lou, S., Taoka, B. M., Ting, A. & Schaus, S. E. Asymmetric Mannich reactions of β-keto esters with acyl imines catalyzed by cinchona alkaloids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 11256–11257 (2005).
Lou, S., Dai, P. & Schaus, S. E. Asymmetric Mannich reaction of dicarbonyl compounds with α-amido sulfones catalyzed by cinchona alkaloids and synthesis of chiral dihydropyrimidones. J. Org. Chem. 72, 9998–10008 (2007).
Jung, Y. & Marcus, R. A. On the theory of organic catalysis “on water”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 5492–5502 (2007).
Mase, N. et al. Organocatalytic direct asymmetric aldol reactions in water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 734–735 (2006).
Zhang, B. et al. The synthesis of chiral isotetronic acids with amphiphilic imidazole/pyrrolidine catalysts assembled in oil-in-water emulsion droplets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 13159–13162 (2012).
Beare, K. D. & McErlean, C. S. P. Revitalizing the aromatic aza-Claisen rearrangement: implications for the mechanism of ‘on-water’ catalysis. Org. Biomol. Chem. 11, 2452–2459 (2013).
Breslow, R. & Guo, T. Diels-Alder reactions in nonaqueous polar solvents. kinetic effects of chaotropic and antichaotropic agents and of β-βcyclodextrin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 5613–5617 (1988).
Breslow, R. & Rizzo, C. J. Chaotropic salt effects in a hydrophobically accelerated Diels-Alder reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113, 4340–4341 (1991).
Pirrung, M. C., Sarma, K. D. & Wang, J. Hydrophobicity and mixing effects on select heterogeneous, water-accelerated synthetic reactions. J. Org. Chem. 73, 8723–8730 (2008).
Beattie, J. K., McErlean, C. S. P. & Phippen, C. B. W. The mechanism of on water catalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 16, 8972–8974 (2010).
Mellouli, S., Bousekkine, L., Theberge, A. B. & Huck, W. T. S. Investigation of “on water” conditions using a biphasic fluidic platform. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 7981–7984 (2012).
Rodnikova, M. N. A new approach to the mechanism of solvophobic interactions. J. Mol. Liq. 136, 211–213 (2007).
Hayashi, Y., Tsuboi, W., Shoji, M. & Suzuki, N. Application of high pressure induced by water-freezing to the direct catalytic asymmetric three-component List−Barbas−Mannich reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 11208–11209 (2003).
Long, Y., Palmer, J. C., Coasne, B., Śliwinska-Bartkowiak, M. & Gubbins, K. E. Pressure enhancement in carbon nanopores: a major confinement effect. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 17163–17170 (2011).
Srivastava, D., Santiso, E. E. & Gubbins, K. E. Pressure enhancement in confined fluids: effect of molecular shape and fluid–wall interactions. Langmuir 33, 11231–11245 (2017).
Blackmond, D. G. Asymmetric autocatalysis and its implications for the origin of homochirality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5732–5736 (2004).
Hein, J. E. & Blackmond, D. G. On the origin of single chirality of amino acids and sugars in biogenesis. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 2045–2054 (2012).
Nanita, S. C. & Cooks, R. G. Serine octamers: cluster formation, reactions, and implications for biomolecule homochirality. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 45, 554–569 (2006).
Soai, K., Shibata, T., Morioka, H. & Choji, K. Asymmetric autocatalysis and amplification of enantiomeric excess of a chiral molecule. Nature 378, 767–768 (1995).
Soai, K., Shibata, T. & Sato, I. Enantioselective automultiplication of chiral molecules by asymmetric autocatalysis. Acc. Chem. Res. 33, 382–390 (2000).
Engineering ToolBox, Water-Melting Points at High Pressure, https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/water-melting-temperature-point-pressure-d_2005.html (2007).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful for the financial support provided by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2016R1A4A1011451 and NRF-2017R1A2A1A05001214). The authors are also grateful to Dr. S. Paladhi (Sungkyunkwan University), Dr. Y.S. Lee (Sungkyunkwan University), Dr. J.H. Sim (Sungkyunkwan University), and Prof. J.W. Lee (University of Kopenhagen) for their assistance in the experiments and for their helpful discussions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.E.S. designed the research. I.-S.H., S.J.P., M.J.J., S.Y.S., H.Y.B. and J.Y.J. performed experiments and carried out the analysis. H.Y.B. and J.Y.J. contributed to the initial studies. S.J.P., I.-S.H., M.J.J. and S.Y.S. performed the optimization studies on reaction conditions. S.J.P. and I.-S.H. contributed to microfluidic studies. S.J.P. and I.-S.H. contributed equally to this work. C.E.S. directed and supervised the project. C.E.S. wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks Richard Zare and the other anonymous reviewer for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Song, C.E., Park, S.J., Hwang, IS. et al. Hydrophobic chirality amplification in confined water cages. Nat Commun 10, 851 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08792-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08792-z
This article is cited by
-
“On-Water” accelerated dearomative cycloaddition via aquaphotocatalysis
Nature Communications (2024)
-
N-PEGylated (L)-Prolinamide: A Homogeneous, Solvent-Free, and Recyclable Catalyst for Scalable Enantioselective Aldol Reaction
Catalysis Letters (2024)
-
Efficient access to general α-tertiary amines via water-accelerated organocatalytic multicomponent allylation
Nature Communications (2022)
-
Unique reactivity of nanoporous cellulosic materials mediated by surface-confined water
Nature Communications (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.