Article | Open | Published:

# Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes in CsPbBr3 perovskite crystals

## Abstract

The lead halide perovskites demonstrate huge potential for optoelectronic applications, high energy radiation detectors, light emitting devices and solar energy harvesting. Those materials exhibit strong spin-orbit coupling enabling efficient optical orientation of carrier spins in perovskite-based devices with performance controlled by a magnetic field. Here we show that elaborated time-resolved spectroscopy involving strong magnetic fields can be successfully used for perovskites. We perform a comprehensive study of high-quality lead halide perovskite CsPbBr3 crystals by measuring the exciton and charge carrier g-factors, spin relaxation times and hyperfine interaction of carrier and nuclear spins by means of coherent spin dynamics. Owing to their ‘inverted’ band structure, perovskites represent appealing model systems for semiconductor spintronics exploiting the valence band hole spins, while in conventional semiconductors the conduction band electrons are considered for spin functionality.

## Introduction

Semiconductor spintronics is an intense research field covering the whole variety of spin-dependent phenomena and numerous experimental techniques, which allow one to study the spin structure and spin dynamics in different materials and their nanostructures. Optical techniques with time- and polarization resolution and application of magnetic field are widely used for that. Despite the great recent interest to various perovskite materials1,2,3,4, including two-dimensional perovskites and colloidal nanocrystals, spin studies are at the very beginning here, while substantial bulk and structure inversion asymmetry5,6,7 make perovskites promising for spintronics8,9. It has been demonstrated, however, that experimental approaches like optical orientation10, spin polarization induced by magnetic field11,12, pump–probe Faraday rotation13,14, and single dot spectroscopy in magnetic field15,16,17 are working well for perovskites and their nanostructures. The fine structure of neutral and charged excitons has been addressed, including their spin dynamics. Recently, it has been shown that the combination of spin–orbit and exchange interactions in perovskite nanocrystals may result in an unusual ordering of the exciton fine structure levels with an optically active ground state18.

Here, we report spin-dependent phenomena in CsPbBr3 perovskite crystals of high structural and optical quality, as confirmed by sharp exciton resonances in reflectivity and emission spectra. We focus on the coherent spin dynamics in external magnetic fields at cryogenic temperatures studied by optical techniques based on the pump–probe time-resolved Kerr rotation. We measure the transverse and longitudinal spin relaxation times of electrons and holes and their dependencies on magnetic field and temperature. We evaluate the exciton, electron and hole g-factors including their signs and spread. Polarizing the nuclear spins dynamically via optically oriented carriers, we address hyperfine interaction effects and find the dominant role of the holes in them, which is in agreement with our model considerations.

## Results

### Optical characterization

We start with optical characterization of the CsPbBr3 perovskite crystal at a low temperature of 10 K. The reflectivity spectrum shown in Fig. 1a by the blue line demonstrates a strong exciton–polariton resonance with transverse and longitudinal energies of ET = 2.3220 eV and EL = 2.3274 eV (Methods). In a longitudinal magnetic field of BF = 10 T the reflectivity spectra measured in the two opposite circular polarizations show an exciton Zeeman splitting of ΔEZ = 1.32 meV (Fig. 1b), which corresponds to the exciton g-factor gX = ΔEZ/(μBBF) = 2.35, where μB is the Bohr magneton. In the photoluminescence (PL) spectrum (the green line in Fig. 1a) the narrow exciton peak at 2.318 eV has a small Stokes shift of 4 meV from ET. The PL and reflectivity spectra are in agreement with previous studies for this material19. The exciton has a lifetime of 0.9 ns measured by differential reflection ΔR/R dynamics, which is very close to the decay time of time-resolved PL of 0.7 ns (Fig. 1c). The PL band at the lower energy side of the exciton line presumably arises due to bound excitons, its PL dynamics is presented in the Supplementary Note 6 and is not much longer than the exciton PL dynamics.

### Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and holes

The coherent spin dynamics of carriers is measured by the time-resolved pump–probe Kerr rotation. Figure 2a shows the spin dynamics at different magnetic fields BV applied perpendicular to the pump and probe beams (Voigt geometry). The oscillating signals result from the Larmor precession of the carrier spin polarization about the magnetic field with frequency ωL,e(h) = |ge(h)|μBBV/ħ20,21. Here, ge and gh are the electron and hole g-factors, respectively. The signal precession is seemingly aperiodic, which is due to the presence of two frequencies, as evidenced from two peaks in the fast Fourier transform (FFT) spectra of the spin dynamics (Fig. 2b). The two frequencies increase linearly with magnetic field (Fig. 2c) and correspond to g-factors of |ge| = 1.96 and |gh| = 0.75. This assignment of the g-factors to electrons and holes is based on the following arguments. First, the exciton contribution is excluded as it should be characterized by a g-factor of gX = 2.35 extracted directly from the Zeeman splitting in reflectivity. Second, both ωL(BV) dependencies can be extrapolated to zero frequency for vanishing field, i.e., no contribution of an exciton exchange splitting is seen17. Also, the spin dephasing times are longer than the 0.9 ns exciton lifetime. In the perovskites gX = ge + gh (Supplementary Note 4) and we found experimentally that gX > 0 and |ge|, |gh| < gX. Therefore, we conclude that in the studied material ge > 0 and gh > 0. A specifics of the perovskite band structure, compared to common II–VI and III–V semiconductors, is the strong renormalization of the hole g-factor compared to the electron one8. This allows us to assign the 1.96 g-factor to the electron, and the smaller g-factor to the hole. Note, that the g-factor depends on the band parameters, in particular, on the band gap. Due to substantial variation between the band gaps of various perovskite materials, the magnitude and sign of g-factor differ for them.

The electron and hole spin signals are maximal for laser energies close to the exciton–polariton resonance (Fig. 1d) due to efficient spin initialization and detection in resonance. The dephasing time of the spin precession, $$T_2^ \ast$$, shortens with increasing BV (Fig. 2d), which is related to the spread of g-factor values, Δg. It can be described by $$1{\mathrm{/}}T_2^ \ast = 1{\mathrm{/}}\tau _{\mathrm{s}} + {\mathrm{\Delta }}g\mu _{\mathrm{B}}B_{\mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{/}}\hbar$$, where τs is the spin lifetime at zero field. A fit with this equation gives Δge = 0.04, τs,e = 2 ns, Δgh = 0.05, and τs,h = 1 ns.

We suggest that the spin dynamics is contributed by resident electrons and holes localized in CsPbBr3 at spatially separated locations. The resident carriers can be provided by unintentional doping in solution-grown crystals22 or by photogeneration, which is in line with the remarkable photovoltaic properties of perovskites. The lifetime of these carriers is significantly longer than the laser repetition period of 13.1 ns1,23. Therefore, the spin polarization can be accumulated from many subsequent pump pulses21. The mechanism of spin coherence generation for resident carriers is the same as in semiconductor quantum wells and quantum dots, see Supplementary Note 2 and refs. 20,21. As we show below, the established experimental approaches for spin dynamics studies in conventional semiconductor nanostructures are also suitable for the perovskites.

In the studied CsPbBr3 crystal the relative amplitudes of the electron and hole signals vary with laser spot position (Fig. 3a). This evidences the inhomogeneous spatial distribution of the resident carriers and confirms their localization. Note that the hole spin dephasing time at weak magnetic fields $$( {T_{2,{\mathrm{h}}}^ {\ast} \approx \tau _{{\mathrm{s}},{\mathrm{h}}} \approx 1\,{\mathrm{ns}}} )$$ is not very sensitive to the spot position. By contrast, the electron dephasing time $$T_{2,{\mathrm{e}}}^ \ast$$ has a stronger dependence on the spot position reaching up to 5.2 ns, which exceeds by almost an order of magnitude the lifetime of excitons (0.9 ns) and bound excitons (0.9 ns, see Supplementary Note 6). The dependence of $$T_{2,{\mathrm{e}}}^ \ast$$ on the spot position can be related to dependence of the strength of hyperfine interaction (see Supplementary Note 3) on the localization length. Moreover, the spin-flip mechanisms for localized charge carriers involving an interplay of the spin–orbit interaction and electron–phonon coupling are also strongly dependent on the parameters of localization24.

The electron and hole spin dephasing times are almost constant at temperatures less than 15 K. At higher temperatures the electron spin precession is not detectable due to the abrupt shortening of $$T_{2,{\mathrm{e}}}^ \ast$$. Hole spin dynamics can be measured up to 100 K and $$T_{2,{\mathrm{h}}}^ \ast$$ smoothly decreases with increasing temperature (Fig. 2e). This behavior can be described by an activation-type dependence: $$1{\mathrm{/}}T_2^ \ast (T) = 1{\mathrm{/}}T_2^ \ast (0) + w\,{\mathrm{exp}}( - {\mathrm{\Delta }}E{\mathrm{/}}k_{\mathrm{B}}T)$$. Here, $$T_2^ \ast (0)$$ is the spin dephasing time at zero temperature, w is a phenomenological prefactor, and kB is the Boltzmann constant. The activation energy ΔE = 14 meV and w = 160 ns1 are evaluated from the fit. This behavior can be related to either hole delocalization or to a spin-flip process mediated by LO phonons, whose energy in CsPbBr3 is about 18 meV19.

### Interaction of charge carriers with nuclear spins

In semiconductors the spin dynamics of localized carriers is mainly controlled by the carrier hyperfine interaction with the nuclear spins25, as the quenching of the orbital motion suppresses the spin–orbit coupling effects24,25. The nuclear spins experience the Knight field from the spin-polarized carriers and, in turn, the carriers experience the Overhauser field induced by the polarized nuclei. To examine nuclear effects, we intentionally polarize the nuclear spins by setting the circular polarization of the pump beam and tilting it by an angle of 15° from the normal to the sample surface. This provides a nonzero projection of the charge carrier spin polarization onto the magnetic field. Flip-flop hyperfine processes transfer the carrier spin polarization to the nuclear spin system. This gains a dynamical nuclear polarization I (Supplementary Note 3) and induces an Overhauser field BN,e(h) = Ae(h)I/(ge(h)μB), that adds up to the external field. It changes the frequency of the carrier spin precession. The direction of the Overhauser field is determined by the pump helicity.

Figure 3b shows that the spin beats for opposite pump polarizations acquire a small but detectable relative phase shift, which increases with delay time, evidencing a difference in the spin precession frequencies. An accurate fit of the experimental data shows that the Overhauser field acting on the holes |BN,h| = 3.1 ± 0.5 mT is three times larger than that on the electrons |BN,e| = 1.0 ± 0.8 mT. This result may seem surprising compared with the widely studied III–V and II–VI semiconductors where the hyperfine coupling is dominated by the conduction band electrons26,27. Our theoretical analysis demonstrates that the stronger hyperfine coupling for the valence band holes compared to the conduction band electrons is a particular feature of perovskites such as CsPbBr3 (Supplementary Note 3). We estimate that the hole hyperfine coupling by the Fermi contact interaction with the 207Pb isotopes with I = 1/2 amounts to Ah = 20 μeV. The somewhat weaker dipole–dipole interaction of the conduction band electron with the 79Br and 81Br isotopes with I = 3/2 gives Ae = 7 μeV. These estimates demonstrate that the dynamical nuclear polarization is far from 100%, most probably due to spin relaxation processes unrelated to the hyperfine coupling, see Supplementary Note 3 for details.

At low temperatures and weak magnetic fields the spin dephasing time $$T_2^ \ast$$ of localized charge carriers is mainly contributed by the static fluctuations of the nuclear Overhauser field. Application of a longitudinal magnetic field BF (Faraday geometry) parallel to the initial spin polarization suppresses the transverse fluctuations and stabilizes carrier spins against the influence of random nuclear fields. Insight into the effect can be obtained from polarization recovery curves (PRC)28 (Fig. 3c). The polarization recovery for alternating optical orientation allows us also to evaluate the longitudinal spin relaxation time T1 of the charge carriers via the spin inertia method28 (Methods). Typical PRC show an increase of the spin polarization with increasing magnetic field exhibiting a half width at half maximum of 30 mT and saturation with growing BF (Fig. 3c). The saturation level decreases with increasing the pump modulation frequency f from 1 to 10 MHz. Fitting of the dependence of the PRC amplitude on f with Eq. (2) (Methods) gives T1 = 53 ± 9 ns (Fig. 3d). The measurement of the frequency dependence of the phase retardation, ϕ, of the spin polarization signal with respect to that of the pump modulation allows us to evaluate T1 = 32 ± 2 ns using tan ϕ = 2πfT1 (Fig. 3e). The different T1 values evidence a nonmonoexponential decay of the spin polarization (Methods). We also find that T1 is constant for a temperature increase from 2 to 10 K, and then strongly decreases to a few ns for temperatures exceeding 20 K, presumably due to the same activation process as relevant for $$T_{{\mathrm{2,h}}}^ \ast$$ (Fig. 2e). The analysis of the PRC and spin inertia signals provides an estimate of the nuclear field fluctuations δBN = 6.6 mT and the hole correlation time at the localization site τc = 2.1 ns (Supplementary Note 5).

## Discussion

In summary, we have demonstrated that spin phenomena show up as prominent features in the optical properties of perovskites, even though they have remained largely unexplored so far. Fortunately, the methodology established for other semiconductors can be transferred to the perovskites. In particular we have elaborated the importance of the nuclear spins in these phenomena, which may be used as additional resource, for example, for establishing a long-lived spin memory. Based on our results, one may seek also for spin–orbit effects in spin relaxation and decoherence and for coherent spin control in perovskites.

## Methods

### Growth of CsPbBr3 samples

Single crystals of CsPbBr3 were grown as reported elsewhere with slight modifications22. First, CsBr and PbBr2 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide at concentrations of 0.5 and 1 M, respectively, and the resulting solution (2 mL) was filtered through polytetrafluoroethylene filter (0.2 μm). Totally, 2 mL of the cyclohexanol solution in N,N-dimethylformamide (5.1 g in 9.1 g, respectively) were added and the resulting mixture was heated in an oil bath to 70 °C and then slowly (about 0.05–0.1 °C min−1) to 105 °C. After about 12 h of growth, the obtained crystals were taken out of the solution and quickly loaded into a vessel with hot (100 °C) N,N-dimethylformamide. This vessel was slowly (about 25 °C h−1) cooled down to about 50 °C. After that the crystals were isolated, wiped with filter paper and dried. The obtained rectangular CsPbBr3 is crystallized in the orthorhombic modification. The crystals have a one selected (long) direction along the c-axis [001] and two nearly identical directions along the [$${\bar{1}}10$$] and [110] axes.

### Reflectivity and photoluminescence characterization

For optical experiments the CsPbBr3 sample was placed in a liquid-helium-cooled cryostat, where the sample temperature, T, was varied from 2 up to 100 K. The cryostat was equipped with a superconducting split-coil solenoid generating external magnetic fields up to 10 T, which were applied either parallel to the light wave vector in the Faraday geometry (BF), or perpendicular to it in the Voigt geometry (BV). The optical signals were dispersed with an 0.5-m spectrometer and detected by a liquid-nitrogen-cooled charge coupled device detector.

Reflectivity spectra were measured using a halogen lamp in back-reflected geometry. The exciton–polariton resonance was modeled by the approach of ref. 29 (details will be published elsewhere), from which the following parameters were evaluated: transverse exciton energy ET = 2.3220 eV, longitudinal exciton energy EL = 2.3274 eV, longitudinal-transverse splitting ħωLT = 5.4 meV, and exciton damping ħΓ = 6.7 meV. The exciton g-factor of gX = 2.35 was measured from the Zeeman splitting of oppositely circularly polarized reflectivity spectra in magnetic fields up to 10 T.

The photoluminescence (PL) was excited by a continuous-wave laser with a photon energy of 2.376 eV. Low-excitation densities not exceeding 10 W/cm2 were used.

### Time-resolved PL

The exciton recombination dynamics was measured from time-resolved PL excited with 1 ps laser pulses at 3.263 eV photon energy and detected with a streak-camera attached to an 0.5-m spectrometer. The overall time resolution was 20 ps.

### Pump–probe time-resolved Kerr rotation

A polarization-sensitive pump–probe Kerr rotation technique21 was employed to study the spin dynamics of carriers, for which magnetic fields up to BV = 4 T were applied in the Voigt geometry, i.e., perpendicular to the sample normal and to the light propagation direction. The used laser system was composed of a pulsed Ti:Sapphire laser which pumps an optical parametric oscillator with intracavity second harmonics generation providing wavelength-tunable emission in the range of 500–800 nm with a spectral width of about 1 nm and a pulse duration of 1 ps. The pulse repetition rate was 76 MHz (repetition period TR = 13.1 ns).

The output of the laser system was split into the pump and probe beams. The circularly polarized pump pulses create spin polarization of the carriers in the sample. The spin polarization was then analyzed by measuring the Kerr rotation of the linearly polarized probe pulses reflected from the sample. Varying the time delay between the pump and probe pulses by means of a mechanical delay line gave access to the time dependence of the spin polarization. The polarization of the pump beam was modulated between σ+ and σ by a photo-elastic modulator operated at a frequency of 84 kHz for synchronous detection. In finite magnetic field, the Kerr rotation amplitude oscillates in time reflecting the Larmor spin precession of the carriers and decays at longer time delays. When both electrons and holes contribute to the Kerr rotation signal, as is the case for the studied CsPbBr3 sample, the signal can be described with a superposition of two decaying oscillatory functions: AKR = $$S_{\mathrm{e}}\,{\mathrm{cos}}(\omega _{\mathrm{e}}t){\mathrm{exp}}( - t{\mathrm{/}}T_{2,{\mathrm{e}}}^ \ast )$$ + $$S_{\mathrm{h}}{\mathrm{cos}}(\omega _{\mathrm{h}}t){\mathrm{exp}}( - t{\mathrm{/}}T_{2,{\mathrm{h}}}^ \ast )$$.

### Pump–probe time-resolved differential reflection

The exciton recombination dynamics under resonant exciton excitation at 2.328 eV was obtained by measuring the dynamics of differential reflection ΔR/R of the probe beam after excitation with the pump beam. This technique is similar to the above-described pump–probe Kerr rotation with the distinction that we registered changes in probe intensity, while the pump was linearly polarized (not orienting spins) and its intensity was modulated for synchronous detection.

### Polarization recovery measurements

Here, the pump–probe Kerr rotation was measured as well (see above), but the magnetic field BF was applied in the Faraday geometry, i.e., parallel to the sample normal and light propagation direction. In order to detect spin dynamics of the resident carriers only and to avoid the contribution of excitons, the signal was detected at a time delay of 13 ns, i.e., shortly before the arrival of the next pump laser pulse28. The photogenerated carrier spin polarization is stabilized by the longitudinal magnetic field, which results in an increase of the Kerr rotation amplitude with growing magnetic field. Typical PRC saturates with increasing magnetic field (Fig. 3c). The difference between the saturated Kerr rotation signal and its value at zero field is the PRC amplitude. The width of the PRC provides information on the spin relaxation mechanisms and/or on the local magnetic fields, e.g., resulting from the nuclear spin fluctuations.

### Spin inertia method

The longitudinal spin relaxation time of the carriers, T1, was measured by the spin inertia method, which is based on the pump–probe Kerr rotation technique28. For that, the intensity of the circularly polarized pump was modulated with frequency f. When the modulation period 1/f exceeds T1, the carrier spin polarization follows the change of pump polarization. As the modulation frequency is increased, so that 1/f becomes comparable to T1, the spin polarization cannot follow the pump polarization and the Kerr rotation modulation amplitude decreases. Additionally, a phase retardation, ϕ, appears between the oscillations of the pump and carrier spin polarizations. One can show that for pumping with modulated polarization in the form R(t) = R0[1 + cos(2πft)], the carrier polarization takes the form

$$S(t) = R_0T_1 + S_{{\mathrm{ac}}}\,{\mathrm{cos}}(2\pi ft - \phi ),$$
(1)

where

$$S_{{\mathrm{ac}}} = \frac{{R_0T_1}}{{\sqrt {1 + \left( {2\pi T_1f} \right)^2} }},$$
(2)

and

$${\mathrm{tan}}\,\phi = 2\pi T_1f.$$
(3)

Equation (2) was derived in refs. 28,30, while Equation (3) was worked out in ref. 31. One can see, that T1 can be evaluated independently from the experimental dependences of Sac(f) and of ϕ(f). In case of a nonexponential spin dynamics the T1 values determined from Equations (2) and (3) will differ from each other, as the amplitude is more sensitive to the slower component, while the phase is dominated by the faster one. Note that by using the synchronous detection technique, in our experiments we detect only Sac, while the time-independent component of the spin polarization [first term in the right hand side of Equation (1)] is eliminated.

## Data availability

The data that support the plots within this paper and other findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. The source data underlying Figs. 13 and Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 are provided as a Source Data file.

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Change history

• ### 15 April 2019

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 2c, in which the numbers on the y-axis were given in the wrong order: ‘800’ at the bottom through to ‘0’ at the top. This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

## References

1. 1.

Stoumpos, C. et al. Crystal growth of the perovskite semiconductor CsPbBr3: a new material for high energy radiation detection. Cryst. Growth Des. 13, 2722–2727 (2013).

2. 2.

Manser, J. S., Christians, J. A. & Kamat, P. V. Intriguing optoelectronic properties of metal halide perovskites. Chem. Rev. 116, 12956–13008 (2016).

3. 3.

Li, G. et al. Highly efficient perovskite nanocrystal light-emitting diodes enabled by a universal crosslinking method. Adv. Mater. 28, 3528–3534 (2016).

4. 4.

Dursun, I. et al. Perovskite nanocrystals as a color converter for visible light communication. ACS Photonics 3, 1150–1156 (2016).

5. 5.

Kim, M., Im, J., Freeman, A. J., Ihm, J. & Jin, H. Switchable S = 1/2 and J = 1/2 Rashba bands in ferroelectric halide perovskites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6900–6904 (2014).

6. 6.

Kepenekian, M. et al. Rashba and Dresselhaus effects in hybrid organic–inorganic perovskites: from basics to devices. ACS Nano 9, 11557–11567 (2015).

7. 7.

Niesner, D. et al. Giant Rashba splitting in CH3NH3PbBr3 organic–inorganic perovskite. Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 126401 (2016).

8. 8.

Yu, Z. G. Effective-mass model and magneto-optical properties in hybrid perovskites. Sci. Rep. 6, 28576 (2016).

9. 9.

Sun, D. et al. Spintronics of organometal trihalide perovskites. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00993 (2016).

10. 10.

Nestoklon, M. O. et al. Optical orientation and alignment of excitons in ensembles of inorganic perovskite nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. B 97, 235304 (2018).

11. 11.

Zhang, C. et al. Magnetic field effects in hybrid perovskite devices. Nat. Phys. 11, 427–434 (2015).

12. 12.

Canneson, D. et al. Negatively charged and dark excitons in CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystals revealed by high magnetic fields. Nano. Lett. 17, 6177–6183 (2017).

13. 13.

Giovanni, D. et al. Highly spin-polarized carrier dynamics and ultralarge photoinduced magnetization in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin films. Nano Lett. 15, 1553–1558 (2015).

14. 14.

Odenthal, P. et al. Spin-polarized exciton quantum beating in hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites. Nat. Phys. 13, 894–899 (2017).

15. 15.

Fu, M. et al. Neutral and charged exciton fine structure in single lead halide perovskite nanocrystals revealed by magneto-optical spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 17, 2895–2901 (2017).

16. 16.

Isarov, M. et al. Rashba effect in a single colloidal CsPbBr3 perovskite nanocrystal detected by magneto-optical measurements. Nano Lett. 17, 5020–5026 (2017).

17. 17.

Ramade, J. et al. Fine structure of excitons and electron-hole exchange energy in polymorphic CsPbBr3 single nanocrystals. Nanoscale 10, 6393–6401 (2018).

18. 18.

Becker, M. A. et al. Bright triplet excitons in caesium lead halide perovskites. Nature 553, 189–193 (2018).

19. 19.

Pashuk, I. P., Pidzyrailo, N. S. & Matsko, M. G. Exciton absorption, luminescence, and resonance Raman scattering of light in CsPbCl3 and CsPbBr3 crystals at low temperature. Sov. Phys. Solid State 23, 1263–1265 (1981).

20. 20.

Glazov, M. M. Coherent spin dynamics of electrons and excitons in nanostructures (a review). Phys. Solid State 54, 1–27 (2012).

21. 21.

Yakovlev, D. R. & Bayer, M. in Spin Physics in Semiconductors (ed. Dyakonov, M. I.) 155–206 (Springer International Publishing AG, 2017).

22. 22.

Dirin, D. N., Cherniukh, I., Yakunin, S., Shynkarenko, Y. & Kovalenko, M. V. Solution-grown CsPbBr3 perovskite single crystals for photon detection. Chem. Mater. 28, 8470–8474 (2016).

23. 23.

He, Y. et al. High spectral resolution of gamma-rays at room temperature by perovskite CsPbBr3 single crystals. Nat. Commun. 9, 1609 (2016).

24. 24.

Glazov, M. M. Electron and Nuclear Spin Dynamics in Semiconductor Nanostructures (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2018).

25. 25.

Meier, F. & Zakharchenya, B. P. Optical Orientation (Horth-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984).

26. 26.

Gryncharova, E. I. & Perel’, V. I. Relaxation of nuclear spins interacting with holes in semiconductors. Sov. Phys. Semicond. 11, 997 (1977).

27. 27.

Chekhovich, E. A. et al. Element-sensitive measurement of the hole-nuclear spin interaction in quantum dots. Nat. Phys. 9, 74–78 (2013).

28. 28.

Heisterkamp, F. et al. Longitudinal and transverse spin dynamics of donor-bound electrons in fluorine-doped ZnSe: Spin inertia versus Hanle effect. Phys. Rev. B 91, 235432 (2015).

29. 29.

Hopfield, J. J. & Thomas, D. G. Theoretical and experimental effects of spatial dispersion on the optical properties of crystals. Phys. Rev. 132, 563–572 (1963).

30. 30.

Smirnov, D. S. et al. Theory of spin inertia in singly-charged quantum dots. Phys. Rev. B 98, 125306 (2018).

31. 31.

Mikhailov, A. V. et al. Electron and hole spin relaxation in InP-based self-assembled quantum dots emitting at telecom wavelengths. Phys. Rev. B 98, 205306 (2018).

## Acknowledgements

V.V.B., D.R.Y., P.S.G., J.R. and M.B. acknowledge support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through the International Collaborative Research Centre TRR 160 (projects A1 and B2) and Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project No. 19-52-12059). The stay of M.H. in Dortmund was supported by the DAAD (project EXCIPLAS, headed by Arshad Bhatti on the Pakistani side). P.S.G. acknowledges the Saint-Petersburg State University for a grant 11.34.2.2012 (ID 28874264). M.M.G. was partially supported by RFBR project No. 19-52-12038. M.M.G. and M.B. were also supported by RF Government Grant No. 14.Z50.31.0021. We thank M.A. Semina for providing results of exciton–polariton modeling.

## Author information

V.V.B., P.S.G., M.H., and J.R. performed the measurements under the guidance of D.R.Y. and M.B. M.M.G. developed the theoretical models. V.V.B., P.S.G., J.R., D.R.Y., and M.M.G. analyzed and interpreted the data. D.N.D. and M.V.K. synthesized the perovskite crystals. V.V.B., D.R.Y., and M.M.G. wrote the manuscript in close consultation with M.B.

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Vasilii V. Belykh or Dmitri R. Yakovlev.