Abstract

High quality records of stratospheric volcanic eruptions, required to model past climate variability, have been constructed by identifying synchronous (bipolar) volcanic sulfate horizons in Greenland and Antarctic ice cores. Here we present a new 2600-year chronology of stratospheric volcanic events using an independent approach that relies on isotopic signatures (Δ33S and in some cases Δ17O) of ice core sulfate from five closely-located ice cores from Dome C, Antarctica. The Dome C stratospheric reconstruction provides independent validation of prior reconstructions. The isotopic approach documents several high-latitude stratospheric events that are not bipolar, but climatically-relevant, and diverges deeper in the record revealing tropospheric signals for some previously assigned bipolar events. Our record also displays a collapse of the Δ17O anomaly of sulfate for the largest volcanic eruptions, showing a further change in atmospheric chemistry induced by large emissions. Thus, the refinement added by considering both isotopic and bipolar correlation methods provides additional levels of insight for climate-volcano connections and improves ice core volcanic reconstructions.

Introduction

The strong impact1 of volcanic eruptions on global climate has led to numerous volcanic reconstructions that mostly rely on ice-core records2,3,4,5,6,7, where peaks of sulfate concentration are measurable volcanic footprints8,9. These reconstructions are used to identify which volcanic events were associated with significant changes in radiative forcing that result when sulfurous gases (mainly sulfur dioxide, SO2) are injected above the tropopause (i.e., above 9 to 17 km from polar to tropical regions, respectively).

Sulfurous gases are rapidly oxidized to sulfuric acid aerosols upon entering the stratosphere10, and once formed, product aerosols can persist for 1–4 years and spread around one or both hemispheres depending on whether injection occurred at high or low latitude. Such aerosols reduce available solar radiation in the lower atmosphere and at ground level, leading to global cooling. Injections of sulfurous gases into the troposphere also yield sulfuric acid layer in the atmosphere, but these aerosols sediment out of the atmosphere within a few weeks by an efficient combination of turbulence, precipitation, and vertical transport.

Correspondence between volcanic reconstructions5,11 and sudden cooling recorded in tree rings12,13,14 support the idea that the largest eruptions identified have a significant climatic impact, however other aspects of volcanic eruption dynamics, such as height of injection, season, and place of the eruption may also have a part in climatic response. An important element for volcanic reconstructions and their impact on climate is, therefore, distinguishing which volcanic events were the large stratospheric events and which were tropospheric. A second needed element of these studies is to devise approaches that allow identification of the largest magnitude, stratospheric eruptions because they may result in greater climate effects, maybe connecting with longer term decennial climate variability15, and possibly with millennium-scale cooling of ocean water16.

The most commonly applied method for volcanic reconstructions relies on identifying synchronous peaks in sulfate concentration in ice cores from on both polar ice sheets17. Such records are based on the inference that bipolar signals uniquely link volcanic sulfate to low latitude stratospheric eruptions. This method does not present any fundamental analytical challenge, is simple to implement, and requires little ice. Its validity rests with the quality of match between cores from opposite sides of the globe, and it cannot identify high-latitude stratospheric eruptions unless their aerosol burden crossed the equator. The method may also falsely assign a stratospheric signature if high-latitude eruptions occur in opposite hemispheres in the same year, or if ice-core chronologies are imperfect. Our best records of volcanic eruption chronology using these methods are presented in two papers from Sigl et al.5,11 (cited as Sigl13 and Sigl15 in the following), but continued efforts and approaches to improve these, especially for the earliest parts of the record, are warranted.

A new independent isotopic approach has recently emerged that allows identification of stratospheric eruption in ice cores18,19,20. This approach relies on identification of a characteristic signal in sulfur isotopes of stratospheric oxidation reactions. In terrestrial samples, the isotopic ratios δ33S, δ34S, and δ36S are generally connected through a mass-dependent relationship. Exceptions to the rule exist, and the quantities Δ33S and Δ36S are used to quantify this deviation from the mass-dependent relationship (additional details are given in the Method section).

The isotopic method is based on the principle that SO2 emitted by a point volcanic source starts with a mass-dependent composition (Δ33S = 0)21 and acquires a mass-independent composition (Δ33S ≠ 0, hereafter referred to as sulfur isotope anomaly) if subject to (photo)oxidation (SO2 to sulfate) by shortwave UV radiation that is present only in and above stratospheric ozone22,23, but carries a mass-dependent composition if oxidized below this ozone layer (whose concentration is maximum at 16 to 25 km from polar to tropical regions, respectively)24. Thus, the trigger for significant Δ33S in a volcanic sulfate layer is only present when sulfur gases are injected deep into the stratosphere.

The first studies of Δ33S in volcanic ice-core sulfate reveal that during deposition of sulfate from a stratospheric event, Δ33S displays a rise to positive values19,25, followed by a drop to negative values. In principle, if mass balance were fully preserved and such a signal were reintegrated, a bulk sample could yield a nil signal, but the practice of subsampling circumvents this possibility18,19. The first multiple isotope analyses used to study volcanic ice-core sulfate were conducted using chemical conversion of sulfate to SF6 for IRMS (isotope ratio mass spectrometry) and called for strategies to obtain relatively large sample sizes (at least 1 μmol of sulfate) such as those used here (more details are given in the Method). Gathering enough sulfate from a low concentrated source like polar ice is a critical aspect of the isotopic tool and has limited its use so far, but more recently, approaches to analyze sulfate directly using a new ICMPS technique26 (refinement of prior ICP-MS methods27,28) allow a 1000-fold decrease in sample requirements. This facilitates fine-time resolution sampling that allows for optimal application of the approach. Our smallest samples were analyzed with this technique.

Here, we apply the isotopic approach to reconstruct a record of stratospheric volcanic eruptions occurring in the last 2600 years, recorded at Dome C, Antarctica. We evaluate this record in the context of published bipolar profiles (Sigl13 and Sigl15) and find that the isotopic approach reveals that some events in the bipolar record were not stratospheric events but were instead synchronous hemispheric events, and several high-latitude Southern Hemisphere stratospheric events that were not bipolar. We also explore a second isotopic proxy of atmospheric chemistry provided by sulfate premised on oxygen isotope fingerprints18,19,20. The oxygen isotope data provide key additional information about oxidation pathways that depend on eruption significance (in term of sulfur loading)24, where unusually low Δ17O anomalies are associated with strong volcanic events (like the Samalas eruption, VEI (Volcanic Explosivity Index) = 7).

Results and Discussion

Dome C stratospheric record through sulfur isotopes

The Dome C volcanic index includes 11 tropospheric eruptions and 49 stratospheric events (Fig. 1). Four other events show no clear mass-independent signal and are also attributed a tropospheric origin. A preponderance of stratospheric volcanic signals as seen for the Dome C volcanic index is not surprising given the isolated location of Dome C which is away from most volcanic sources (except Antarctic and surrounding island volcanoes) compared to other coastal sites and Greenland where ice cores commonly record low altitude eruptions29. Because Dome C is a low accumulation site, it is possible that some eruptions, even stratospheric ones, will not be properly recorded, and this may explain why 31 events inventoried by the latest Sigl15 bipolar record are not detected in the Dome C volcanic index. Further work using the Δ33S proxy at a high accumulation Antarctic site would allow to test this possibility.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Time series of volcanic sulfate deposition at Dome C, Antarctica. a Sulfate deposition for volcanic events recorded in Dome C (Dome C volcanic index). Red colored symbols are stratospheric eruptions identified based on Δ33S proxy. Blue colored symbols are eruptions that do not display any sulfur isotope anomalies, and therefore are presumed to be tropospheric eruptions. Empty dots are uncertain events because the isotopic signal falls in the uncertainty of the method. Round shape illustrates the eruptions found to be bipolar signals in Sigl15, while square shapes represent the eruptions found to be unipolar (Southern Hemisphere eruptions) in Sigl15. Consequently, blue round dots and red squares are eruptions for which the isotopic and the bipolar method display different results. The isotopic records of Pinatubo and Agung are added from a prior study by Baroni et al.18,19. The flux is the volcanic sulfate deposition flux (cumulative sum integrated over each event), corrected from background, calculated from concentrations measured in this study. Dating is provided by Sigl et al.11. b Maximum sulfur anomaly for volcanic events recorded in Dome C. Color and shape code is the same as a. Values below 0.1‰ (in the gray area) fall within the variability obtained on background samples. They were therefore not corrected from background, to avoid false stratospheric signal (Δ33S > 0.1‰) due to correction, and are considered tropospheric or uncertain, if close to 0.1. Data are available in Supplementary Table 1. Error bars are 1 standard deviation (s.d.)

Bipolar events in Sigl15 and stratospheric events identified in this study are in good agreement especially at shallower depth (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1), highlighting the capacity of both independent methods of reconstructing these records and supporting the suitability of time markers used in ice-core chronologies. The sulfur isotope method also demonstrates a clear stratospheric signature in bipolar events described in Sigl15 (e.g., 426 BCE, 540 CE, 574 CE, and 682 CE) that caused large-scale climate disruptions with strong impacts on early human societies, through radiative changes that impacted the global energy budget30,31,32.

Some differences between the two records are related to the assignment of tropospheric eruptions. Seven of the thirteen Dome C Southern Hemisphere signals matching Sigl15 display a clear stratospheric signal (33S-excess) (events dated, respectively, at 1374, 1040, 960, 820, 125, −7, −103 CE), leaving only 6 as tropospheric (no 33S-excess) (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). While it is important to recognize that high-latitude stratospheric eruptions may not be bipolar, the possibility of a stratospheric hemispheric event would still have a strong dynamical and radiative impact, that might have a global effect through other types of climate connections33. The stratospheric origin of these eruptions can be identified only by the isotopic method, but a bipolar comparison is needed to assess their unipolar nature.

Furthermore, in the deepest part of our record, Sigl15 identify five bipolar events (dated in 42 BCE, 348 BCE, 469 BCE, 476 BCE, and 484 BCE) that exhibit no evidence for 33S-excess in our analysis. The possible explanations for this observation include: (i) an error of synchronization between the records used in this study and Sigl15 record in the deepest part (the hardest to synchronize), (ii) simultaneous eruptions in both hemispheres or (iii) low-elevation stratospheric eruptions (below the ozone layer), displaying no 33S-excess while being technically stratospheric events and somehow imparting a bipolar signal. Thus, these events would not have had as significant impact on climate as those with clear evidence for stratospheric sulfate production (33S-excess). The only alternate possibility is that our record missed five stratospheric events that were closely timed relative to these five events, but this seems unlikely. Continued effort should thus be focused on finding the reason for this difference between the two records, but we suggest that none of these five volcanic signals should be used as tie-point to synchronize ice-core records or to link climate variability to volcanic eruptions. The Dome C record we have assembled is thus presented as a record of validated stratospheric eruptions that complements the Sigl15 record and provides a stronger basis for making connections between dated volcanic events and climate.

The case of the tropospheric event dated in 42 BCE is particularly surprising, as it corresponds to the large volcanic event dated in 44 BCE by Sigl15, as suggested by the large sulfate flux deposited in northern areas. Based on the isotopic footprint, and on observations made by Sigl15 on Northern Hemisphere records, we suggest that the climatic anomaly detected by Sigl15 around 44 BCE is not due to a major tropical eruption, but instead reflects a high-latitude stratospheric eruption in the Northern Hemisphere. The climatic impact of Northern Hemisphere eruptions can be significant; such eruptions are understood to be especially efficient to cause summer monsoon reductions and Nile failures which have occurred following the high-latitude eruptions of, e.g., Katmai 1912, Laki 1783, Katla 939, and in the 44 BCE time period34,35. The climatic signal observed by Sigl15 is undetectable in Southern Hemisphere tree ring reconstructions from Tasmania36, but this finding is not surprising as volcanic cooling signatures are hardly detectable in temperature reconstructions from the Southern Hemisphere for any major volcanic eruptions37. The 42 BCE example thus illustrates a strength of a combined isotopic/bipolar synchronization approach to detect stratospheric high-latitude eruptions.

The isotopic method has an advantage of distinguishing stratospheric from tropospheric eruptions and provides a way to check bipolar tie-points used in that dating framework. On the other side, it does not distinguish bipolar from hemispheric events. Thus, it makes sense that in the long run, the bipolar and isotopic methods be combined to resolve stratospheric from tropospheric as well as those that are global from those that are hemispheric and to generate the finest reconstructions of stratospheric volcanic eruption history. Such reconstructions will ultimately be needed to decipher the full fabric of the connections between eruptions and climate.

Oxygen isotopes reveal particularly powerful eruptions

We note that while the Δ33S signal has been diagnostic stratospheric versus tropospheric character of eruptions, we see no evidence that the characteristics of this signal change with eruption magnitude and dynamics, both of which would provide further links to climate. We thus shift our focus to information provided by oxygen isotopes (16O, 17O, 18O) and more precisely by the oxygen anomaly Δ17O (or 17O-excess) used to quantify a deviation from the mass-dependent relationship linking ratios δ17O and δ18O. For those eruptions identified as stratospheric, information from oxygen isotopes appears to provide a way to identify particularly violent stratospheric injections of sulfur which is explored below.

In the troposphere, SO2 oxidation by ozone occurs in aqueous phase and can generate significant non-zero Δ17O of H2SO438,39. In the stratosphere, lack of liquid water limits such chemistry and reaction with OH radicals becomes the main oxidation pathway for SO2. The OH radicals control Δ17O of stratospherically-produced H2SO4, and deliver an oxygen anomaly of approximately 4‰ to stratospheric sulfates formed in usual conditions.

Figure 2 shows Δ17O of 14 studied stratospheric events (Supplementary Table 2). Most display oxygen isotope anomalies between 2 and 5‰, consistent with the OH-oxidation pathway and similar to tropospheric observations24,40, but three stratospheric volcanic events (1259 CE Samalas, with an estimated SO2 injection up to 40 km41, 575 CE, and 426 BCE) yield sulfate with very low Δ17O (below 1.5‰), which is also lower than typical atmospheric aerosol background42. Sigl15 links each of these three eruptions to a significant global climatic impact, and we suggest the diminished Δ17O is reflective of the way that sulfurous gas is injected into the stratosphere and diagnostic of large eruptions with potentially significant climate impact. Our observation for Salamas (Δ17O = 0.76‰) confirms a previous determination24 that reports a negligible excess (Δ17O = 0.8 ± 0.2‰). The 426 BCE eruption is newly identified as a low Δ17O event that also may be large.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Δ17O on 14 stratospheric events. All blue dots refer to Δ17O values, in per mil. The three light blue dots, standing below the Δ17O = 1.5 dotted line, display particularly low 17O-excess. If two samples were measured for a same event, the smallest anomaly is displayed on the graph. Data are not corrected from background oxygen isotopic composition (see Methods for further explanations). Error bars are 1 s.d.

Next, we examined more closely the 575 CE and 426 BCE events through analysis of subsamples (Fig. 3), to gain insight into evolution of Δ17O during a large volcanic sulfate deposition event. These data reveal a sharp and significant decrease of Δ17O at the time of maximum sulfate deposition, further supporting the notion that the low Δ17O is a feature of these large eruptions and may link to a shutdown of the OH-oxidation pathway. Such a link has been proposed for large eruptions by Savarino et al.24 who argue that a shutdown of the OH-oxidation pathway and the emergence of new oxidation pathways associated with lower (or nil) Δ17O follow the injection of a large amount of SO2 into the stratosphere. An alternatively possibility is that the reduced signal reflects a change of Δ17O(OH) with altitude such as predicted by Zahn et al.43

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Anomalies evolution during sulfate deposition after large volcanic eruptions. Δ17O (blue line), Δ33S (red line) and sulfate concentration evolution (gray shade) as function of time, for two large events: 426 BCE (a) and 575 CE (b). In both cases, a sharp decrease of Δ17O is observed in the volcanic sulfate peak. Dating is provided by Sigl et al.11

The shutdown of the OH-oxidation pathway after large stratospheric injections, as previously considered24 could result from more than one process. As suggested from models, very large sulfur loading, and subsequent massive gas phase oxidation of SO2, can cause severe OH depletion44. Another process involves halogen chemistry associated with large volcanic eruption plumes45,46 that would cause severe ozone depletion47 and shutdown the OH-oxidation channel. Both possibilities would yield variable Δ17O of volcanogenic sulfate in the stratosphere following eruptions that injected significant sulfur high into the stratosphere. Both cases would also require opening new and unknown oxidation pathways with the consequence of lowering Δ17O.

For context on what these pathways might be, we focus on processes occurring in the troposphere, where three main pathways of oxidation are OH-oxidation in the gas phase, and O3 and H2O2 oxidation in the liquid phase, where the two latter pathways are responsible for the consistent positive Δ17O38. Indeed, OH and H2O are constantly exchanging atoms in the atmosphere. Any 17O-excess inherited from O3 by OH is erased by these multiple exchanges (H2O possesses no 17O-excess) if kinetics of exchange is much faster than the total sink of OH radicals48. This situation is almost always true in the troposphere given the high H2O concentration usually found in the lower atmosphere. Exceptions exist in the dryness of polar atmospheres, which prevents a complete isotope equilibrium between OH and H2O49. As a result, in the troposphere, the 17O-excess observed in sulfate mainly reflects the proportion between these different oxidation pathways.

In the stratosphere, exchange of oxygen isotopes between OH and H2O is limited due to extremely dry conditions ([H2O] ≈ 2 ppmv). In addition, H2O is 17O enriched in the stratosphere, because of its chemical pathways of production43. OH radicals, partly formed from H2O and O(1D) (itself formed during ozone photolysis), thus display a non-zero Δ17O that changes with altitude43, increasing from ≈20 to ≈35‰ between 20 and 30 km altitude. Above 30 km Δ17O οf OH decreases again, reaching ≈ 5‰ above 40 km. This decrease of Δ17O results from isotopic exchange between OH and the NOx family43 (Supplementary Figure 1).

Assuming that OH radicals remain the main SO2 oxidant in the upper atmosphere even under heavy load of SO2, the 17O-excess of OH is potentially transmitted to SO2 during its oxidation into sulfuric acid in the stratosphere. The oxidation mechanism (see Supplementary Figure 2) of H2SO4 requires at least 1 oxygen-atom from OH, the additional ones are from initial SO2, H2O, or O238. Assuming, to a first approximation, that only OH carries a 17O-excess, Δ17O (H2SO4) in the stratosphere should equal ¼ of Δ17O (OH). Given Δ17O values predicted for OH43, this brings Δ17O(H2SO4) between ≈6‰ for H2SO4 produced between 20 and 40 km and ≈1% above, a range broadly consistent with the observed range from volcanic events. These values could increase slightly if H2O also carries mass- independently fractionated oxygen, which is predicted by Zahn’s model (Supplementary Figure 1). We argue, however, that the contribution from mass-independent H2O will be minor because even if Δ17O of H2O varies with altitude, following the same relationship as the Δ17O of OH, its variance will be of much lower amplitude. The link we establish between volcanic sulfates Δ17O and altitude requires that deposited sulfate of a given eruption are not formed at the same altitude. Otherwise they would display similar O-excess during the entire sulfate peak, instead of a sharp decrease during deposition. The collapse of the isotopic signal further supports the argument that Δ17O is a second valuable characteristic of volcanogenic ice-core sulfate that can inform understanding of the connection to climate.

Here, we have presented a systematic sulfur and oxygen isotope characterization of volcanic sulfate from Dome C, Antarctica; we discriminate stratospheric and tropospheric pathways of oxidation of SO2 for identified volcanic events and highlight a potential signal to identify the largest events. The approach was used to construct a Dome C volcanic index of stratospheric events. The Dome C volcanic index is in good general agreement with other recent reconstructions that identify hemispheric and global events such as Sigl15, but reveals several high (southern) latitude stratospheric events that should be considered in climate reconstructions, but are not bipolar events. The Dome C volcanic index also reveals several events deep in the record that are not stratospheric but had previously been assigned bipolar correlations. The ability to diagnose stratospheric events thus provides another tool that can be used to strengthen deep bipolar correlations. A next target for this approach should be a site with a higher accumulation rate, to decrease the probability of missing events. Recent developments in isotopic characterization will allow application of the method to single ice cores, which greatly simplifies field logistics. Analysis of a Greenland ice core will also greatly improve the reconstruction of past volcanic history. The volcanic signals of clear stratospheric origin (non-zero Δ33S) can also be useful as time markers for ice-core chronology. The Δ17O of volcanic sulfate, and its evolution during the deposition event, are proposed to the two most violent volcanic eruptions of our record (Samalas and −426 BCE) and is therefore suggested to reflect their higher altitude of injection, or alternatively, ozone depletion caused by halogen chemistry in the volcanic plume that shutdown the OH-oxidation channel. The latter would also call for opening new and unknown oxidation pathways, with different isotopic signatures, should the ozone layer being depleted by volcanogenic halogen compounds.

Methods

Sample processing

The study location was Dome C, 75°06′S, 123°21′E, Antarctica. The study was originally conceived to be done using a sample intensive SF6 IRMS technique (see below) and for this, 1 μmol per sample was required. Multiple cores were used to generate a time-resolved isotopic analysis with the necessary amount of sulfate needed for the isotopic analysis, and to circumvent biases a single core can have due to variations in sulfate deposition arising from heterogeneous deposition, drifting snow and surface roughness. Five 100-m cores, covering ca. 2600 years of accumulation history, were drilled and processed as described in Gautier et al.50 Dome C ice cores have been synchronized to WD201411. The annual-layer counted WD2014 chronology in Sigl15 ended in 394 BCE and was extrapolated onto the B40 ice core before that11. All volcanic eruptions dates in the following correspond to the date of the sulfate deposition in the ice. Volcanic sulfate mass deposition rate (henceforth flux in kg km−2 year−1) is deduced from sulfate concentration and snow accumulation and is presented for individual events as cumulative flux (in Figs. 1 and 3). Density of the snow was measured in the field.

The five sulfate profiles were processed with an algorithm for peak detection. The algorithm allowed us to identify a total of 91 sulfate peaks above the sulfate background, from five core records (see details in Gautier et al.50). Through manual sorting, taking into account the peak shape, the occurrence of the peak in the records (peaks were considered to be relevant if detected in at least two ice cores), and the mass deposited, we established an inventory of 65 peaks considered as being relevant to build a stratospheric index. The Agung (1963) and the Pinatubo (1991) events have been identified on a single core analyzed from bottom to top (5 first meters were not analyzed on the four others), but were not sampled for isotopic analyzing due to the fragility of the core at small depth. Isotopic results concerning these two events are taken from Baroni’s work19 and are added to the 64 results obtained in the frame of this work (one of the 65 event could not be analyzed because the peak sample was lost during the process).

Cores containing volcanic events detected in the field were transferred back to Grenoble and further processed at IGE (Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement, former Laboratoire de Glaciologie et de Géophysique de l’Environnement), Grenoble, France. Due to the positive and negative oscillation of the 33S mass-independent signal (Δ33S)19,25, any eruption analyzed as a bulk sample can end up as a nil signal, if mass balance is preserved19. To avoid such sample bias and assess the atmospheric compartment reached by the volcanic ejecta, each volcanic peak was subsampled in order to dissociate the different stages of the deposition. Typically, we took two background samples before and after each volcanic peaks revealed by the sulfate record, and split the remaining (volcanic) section in at least three subsamples of roughly 1.5 year resolution.

The first and last sections sampled were used to evaluate and correct the background surrounding each event (background composition of volcanic events are given in Supplementary Table 3). The peak itself was divided into a minimum of three parts. The choice of subsampling meets three needs. Firstly, a quantitative and isotopic characterization of the samples surrounding the events allows for the correction of the volcanic peak isotopic composition from its background contribution. Secondly, the peak splitting allows following the isotopic signal time-evolution of a given event25. Thirdly, it eliminates the risk of a false nil signal. Each event present in each of the five cores has followed the same treatment. In order to obtain enough sulfate (above 1 μmol) for one of the isotopic analysis methods, corresponding ice samples of each five cores were grouped together in a sealed container and melted. Each grouped sample (1 to 2 l) resulting from ice melting was run on a ion chromatography Metrohm IC (Professional 850), used in a semi preparative configuration producing concentrated and purified H2SO4 in 10 ml of pure water solution. Samples with enough H2SO4 (above 3 μmol) were split in two parts for separate oxygen and sulfur isotopes analysis (1 μmol was saved for oxygen analysis, the rest of the sample used for sulfur analysis). Samples with insufficient H2SO4 were given priority to sulfur isotopic analysis. As a result, oxygen analysis was conducted on 18 volcanic peaks, 14 of them being stratospheric.

Isotopic analysis

Oxygen isotopes (16O, 17O, 18O) were analyzed using the standard Ag2SO4 procedure51 at the Tokyo Institute of Technology according to Ishino et al.42, whereas sulfur isotopes were processed at the University of Maryland using the classic SF6 standard methods52,53,54. Sulfur isotope measurements were performed on ThermoFinnigan Mat 253 mass spectrometer. For a subset of samples, sulfate was insufficient for the SF6 method and was processed using the ICP-MS (ThermoFisher Neptune) method developed at ENS-Lyon26, which provides only Δ33S (not Δ36S), but only needs nmol range of sample.

Isotopic ratios are expressed using the conventional δ scale:

$$\delta ^{\mathrm{A}}\mathrm{X} = \left[ {\,^{\mathrm{A}}R_{{\mathrm{sample}}}/\,^{\mathrm{A}}R_{{\mathrm{STD}}} - 1} \right]$$
(1)

where AR denotes the ratio of the heavy to the light isotope (e.g., 34S/32S or 17O/16O, etc) and Rsample and RSTD are the ratios in the sample and the standard (VCDT (Vienna Cañon Diablo troilite) for sulfur and SMOW (Standard Mean Ocean Water) for oxygen), respectively. The mass-independent nature of a sample, quantified with the Δ notation, compares two different isotope ratios of the same system using the power definition:

$${\mathit{\Delta}}^{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{X}} = \delta^{\mathrm{A}}{\mathrm{X}} - \left[ \left( 1 + \delta ^{\mathrm{ref}} {\mathrm{X}} \right)^{\theta _{\mathrm{A}}} - 1 \right]$$
(2)

where δrefX being either δ34S or δ18O according to the system used and θA is the mass-dependent fractionation exponent, set to 0.515, 1.9 and 0.52 for θ33, θ36, and θ17, respectively.

Because the samples are composed of a background fraction (fbg = m(SO42−bg) /m(SO42−tot)) and a volcanic fraction (fv = 1 − fbg), for accurate interpretation of the volcanic signal, sulfur data were background corrected using the classical mass balance equation (in the trace abundance approximation):

$$\delta _{\mathrm{v}} = (\delta _{{\mathrm{meas}}} - {f}_{{\mathrm{bg}}} \times \delta _{{\mathrm{bg}}})/{f}_{\mathrm{v}}$$
(3)

Where δv is the isotopic value of the volcanic sulfate formed in the atmosphere, δmeas is the measured isotopic value of our sample, and δbg is the average isotopic composition of the background surrounding the event. The error assigned to uncorrected isotopic data is at maximum 0.6‰, 0.02‰, and 0.1‰ (1σ) for δ34S, Δ33S, Δ36S, respectively. For corrected values, the error depends on the background amount in the sample, and error is calculated through error propagation Monte Carlo routine (Supplementary Table 4). To avoid isotopic aberrations and false stratospheric signal in corrected results, only sulfur data with a volcanic fraction higher than 20% and a Δ33S higher than the variability observed in background samples (0.1‰, Supplementary Table 3) were corrected from background sulfate. The uncorrected sulfur results are specified with a (R) in Supplementary Table 1.

Oxygen isotopic data were not corrected because background samples were too small to be split, and they were used for sulfur only. They are given with a 1σ-uncertainty of 0.3‰42.

Data availability

The ice core and isotopic data that support the findings of this study are available in PANGAEA55.

Additional information

Journal peer review information: Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Rampino, M. R. & Self, S. Historic eruptions of Tambora (1815), Krakatau (1883), and Agung (1963), their stratospheric aerosols, and climatic impact. Quat. Res. 18, 127–143 (1982).

  2. 2.

    Crowley, T. J. & Unterman, M. B. Technical details concerning development of a 1200-yr proxy index for global volcanism. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 5, 1–28 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Gao, C., Oman, L., Robock, A. & Stenchikov, G. L. Atmospheric volcanic loading derived from bipolar ice cores: Accounting for the spatial distribution of volcanic deposition. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D09109 (2007).

  4. 4.

    Gao, C., Robock, A. & Ammann, C. Volcanic forcing of climate over the past 1500 years: An improved ice core-based index for climate models. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D23111 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Sigl, M. et al. A new bipolar ice core record of volcanism from WAIS Divide and NEEM and implications for climate forcing of the last 2000 years. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 1151–1169 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Sigl, M. et al. Insights from Antarctica on volcanic forcing during the Common Era. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 693–697 (2014).

  7. 7.

    Zielinski, G. A. Stratospheric loading and optical depth estimates of explosive volcanism over the last 2100 years derived from the Greenland-Ice-Sheet-Project-2 ice core. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 20937–20955 (1995).

  8. 8.

    Delmas, R. J., Legrand, M., Aristarain, A. J. & Zanoli, F. Volcanic deposits in Antarctic snow and ice. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 901–912 (1985). 920.

  9. 9.

    Hammer, C. U., Clausen, H. B. & Dansgaard, W. Past volcanism and climate revealed by Greenland ice cores. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 11, 3–10 (1981).

  10. 10.

    Bluth, G. J. S., Doiron, S. D., Schnetzler, C. C., Krueger, A. J. & Walter, L. S. Global tracking of the SO2 clouds from the June, 1991 Mont Pinatubo eruptions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 151–154 (1992).

  11. 11.

    Sigl, M. et al. Timing and climate forcing of volcanic eruptions for the past 2,500 years. Nature 523, 543–549 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Baillie, M. G. L. & McAneney, J. Tree ring effects and ice core acidities clarify the volcanic record of the first millennium. Clim. Past. 11, 105–114 (2015).

  13. 13.

    D’Arrigo, R., Wilson, R. & Anchukaitis, K. J. Volcanic cooling signal in tree ring temperature records for the past millennium. J. Geophys. Res. 118, 9000–9010 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Schneider, L., Smerdon, J. E., Pretis, F., Hartl-Meier, C. & Esper, J. A new archive of large volcanic events over the past millennium derived from reconstructed summer temperatures. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 094005 (2017).

  15. 15.

    Swingedouw, D. et al. Bidecadal North Atlantic ocean circulation variability controlled by timing of volcanic eruptions. Nat. Commun. 6, 6545 (2015).

  16. 16.

    McGregor, H. V. et al. Robust global ocean cooling trend for the pre-industrial Common Era. Nat. Geosci. 8, 671–677 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Langway, C. C., Osada, K., Clausen, H. B., Hammer, C. U. & Shoji, H. A 10-Century comparison of prominent bipolar volcanic events in ice cores. J. Geophys. Res. 100, 16241–16247 (1995).

  18. 18.

    Baroni, M., Savarino, J., Cole-Dai, J., Rai, V. K. & Thiemens, M. H. Anomalous sulfur isotope compositions of volcanic sulfate over the last millennium in Antarctic ice cores. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D20112 (2008).

  19. 19.

    Baroni, M., Thiemens, M. H., Delmas, R. J. & Savarino, J. Mass-independent sulfur isotopic compositions in stratospheric volcanic eruptions. Science 315, 84–87 (2007).

  20. 20.

    Savarino, J., Romero, A., Cole-Dai, J., Bekki, S. & Thiemens, M. H. UV induced mass-independent sulfur isotope fractionation in stratospheric volcanic sulfate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2131 (2003).

  21. 21.

    Mather, T. A. et al. Oxygen and sulfur isotopic composition of volcanic sulfate aerosol at the point of emission. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D18205 (2006).

  22. 22.

    Farquhar, J., Bao, H. M. & Thiemens, M. Atmospheric influence of Earth’s earliest sulfur cycle. Science 289, 756–758 (2000).

  23. 23.

    Thiemens, M. H. Mass-independent isotope effects in planetary atmospheres and the solar system. Science 283, 341–345 (1999).

  24. 24.

    Savarino, J., Bekki, S., Cole-Dai, J. & Thiemens, M. H. Evidence from sulfate mass independent oxygen isotopic compositions of dramatic changes in atmospheric oxidation following massive volcanic eruptions. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4671 (2003).

  25. 25.

    Gautier, E., Savarino, J., Erbland, J. & Farquhar, J. SO2 oxidation kinetics leave a consistent isotopic imprint on volcanic ice core sulfate. J. Geophys. Res. 123, 9801–9812 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Albalat, E. et al. Sulfur isotope analysis by MC-ICP-MS and application to small medical samples. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 31, 1002–1011 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Craddock, P. R., Rouxel, O. J., Ball, L. A. & Bach, W. Sulfur isotope measurement of sulfate and sulfide by high-resolution MC-ICP-MS. Chem. Geol. 253, 102–113 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Paris, G., Sessions, A. L., Subhas, A. V. & Adkins, J. F. MC-ICP-MS measurement of δ34S and Δ33S in small amounts of dissolved sulfate. Chem. Geol. 345, 50–61 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Zielinski, G. A. et al. Record of volcanism since 7000-BC from the GISP2 Greenland ice core and implications for the volcano-climate system. Science 264, 948–952 (1994).

  30. 30.

    Büntgen, U. et al. Cooling and societal change during the Late Antique Little Ice Age from 536 to around 660 AD. Nat. Geosci. 9, 231 (2016).

  31. 31.

    Gao, C., Ludlow, F., Amir, O. & Kostick, C. Reconciling multiple ice-core volcanic histories: The potential of tree-ring and documentary evidence, 670–730CE. Quant. Int. 394, 180–193 (2016).

  32. 32.

    Toohey, M., Krüger, K., Sigl, M., Stordal, F. & Svensen, H. Climatic and societal impacts of a volcanic double event at the dawn of the Middle Ages. Clim. Change 136, 401–412 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Oman, L., Robock, A., Stenchikov, G. L., Schmidt, G. A. & Ruedy, R. Climatic response to high-latitude volcanic eruptions. J. Geophys. Res. 110, D13103 (2005).

  34. 34.

    Manning, J. G. et al. Volcanic suppression of Nile summer flooding triggers revolt and constrains interstate conflict in ancient Egypt. Nat. Commun. 8, 900 (2017).

  35. 35.

    Oman, L. et al. Modeling the distribution of the volcanic aerosol cloud from the 1783–1784 Laki eruption. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D12209 (2006).

  36. 36.

    Cook, E. R. et al. Millennia-long tree-ring records from Tasmania and New Zealand: a basis for modelling climate variability and forcing, past, present and future. J. Quat. Sci. 21, 689–699 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Neukom, R. et al. Inter-hemispheric temperature variability over the past millennium. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 362 (2014).

  38. 38.

    Savarino, J., Lee, C. W. & Thiemens, M. H. Laboratory oxygen isotopic study of sulfur (IV) oxidation: Origin of the mass independent oxygen isotopic anomaly in atmospheric sulfates and other sulfate mineral deposits. J. Geophys. Res. 15, 079–029,089 (2000).

  39. 39.

    Savarino, J. & Thiemens, M. H. Analytical procedure to determine both δ18O and δ17O of H2O2 in natural water and first measurements. Atmos. Environ. 33, 3683–3690 (1999).

  40. 40.

    Alexander, B., Savarino, J., Barkov, N. I., Delmas, R. J. & Thiemens, M. H. Climate driven changes in the oxidation pathways of atmospheric sulfur. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29, 1685 (2002).

  41. 41.

    Vidal, C. M. et al. The 1257 Samalas eruption (Lombok, Indonesia): the single greatest stratospheric gas release of the Common Era. Sci. Rep. 6, 34868 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Ishino, S. et al. Seasonal variations of triple oxygen isotopic compositions of atmospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ozone at Dumont d’Urville, coastal Antarctica. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 17, 3713–3727 (2017).

  43. 43.

    Zahn, A., Franz, P., Bechtel, C., Grooß, J.-U. & Röckmann, T. Modelling the budget of middle atmospheric water vapour isotopes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 2073–2090 (2006).

  44. 44.

    Bekki, S. Oxidation of volcanic SO2 - a sink for stratospheric OH and H2O. Geophys. Res. Lett. 22, 913–916 (1995).

  45. 45.

    Cadoux, A., Scaillet, B., Bekki, S., Oppenheimer, C. & Druitt, T. H. Stratospheric ozone destruction by the Bronze-Age Minoan eruption (Santorini Volcano, Greece). Sci. Rep. 5, 12243 (2015).

  46. 46.

    von Glasow, R. Atmospheric chemistry in volcanic plumes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6594–6599 (2010).

  47. 47.

    McConnell, J. R. et al. Synchronous volcanic eruptions and abrupt climate change approximately 17.7 ka plausibly linked by stratospheric ozone depletion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10035–10040 (2017).

  48. 48.

    Morin, S., Sander, R. & Savarino, J. Simulation of the diurnal variations of the oxygen isotope anomaly (∆17O) of reactive atmospheric species. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 3653–3671 (2011).

  49. 49.

    Morin, S., Savarino, J., Bekki, S., Gong, S. & Bottenheim, J. W. Signature of Arctic surface ozone depletion events in the isotope anomaly (Δ17O) of atmospheric nitrate. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 1451–1469 (2007).

  50. 50.

    Gautier, E., Savarino, J., Erbland, J., Lanciki, A. & Possenti, P. Variability of sulfate signal in ice core records based on five replicate cores. Clim. Past. 12, 103–113 (2016).

  51. 51.

    Geng, L. et al. Analysis of oxygen-17 excess of nitrate and sulfate at sub-micromole levels using the pyrolysis method. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 27, 2411–2419 (2013).

  52. 52.

    Farquhar, J., Savarino, J., Airieau, S. & Thiemens, M. H. Observation of wavelength-sensitive mass-independent sulfur isotope effects during SO2 photolysis: application to the early atmosphere. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 829–832,840 (2001).

  53. 53.

    Harris, E., Sinha, B. R., Hoppe, P. & Ono, S. High-precision measurements of 33S and 34S fractionation during SO2 oxidation reveal causes of seasonality in SO2 and sulfate isotopic composition. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 12174–12183 (2013).

  54. 54.

    Johnston, D. T. et al. Evolution of the oceanic sulfur cycle at the end of the Paleoproterozoic. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 70, 5723–5739 (2006).

  55. 55.

    Gautier, E., Savarino, J. & Farquhar, J. 2600 years of stratospheric volcanism reconstruction through sulfate isotopes for Antarctic ice cores. PANGAEA, https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.896238 (2018).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Michael Sigl for kindly dating our core 1, allowing us to establish a robust comparison between the bipolar records already established and our own results. Part of this work would not have been possible without the technical support from the C2FN (French National Center for Coring and Drilling, handled by INSU). Financial supports were provided by LEFE-IMAGO, a scientific program of the Institut National des Sciences de l’Univers (INSU/CNRS), the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) via contract NT09-431976- VOLSOL and by a grant from Labex OSUG@2020 (Investissements d’avenir—ANR10 LABX56). E.G. deeply thanks the Fulbright commission for providing the PhD Fulbright fellowship and the region Rhône-Alpes. We wish to thank the Fondation BNP-Paribas for their financial support under the EAIIST project. The Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) supported the research and polar logistics through the program SUNITEDC No. 1011. The University of Maryland is acknowledged for hosting Elsa Gautier as a visiting Fulbright graduate student. This work is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Numbers 16H05884, 18H05050 (S.H.), 25887025, and 17H06105 (N.Y.). S.H. appreciates support for this project from JSPS and CNRS under the JSPS–CNRS Joint Research Program. We would also like to thank all the field team members present during the VOLSOL campaign and who greatly help us.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, Institut des Géosciences de l’Environnement (IGE), 54 rue Molière, 38058, Grenoble Cedex 9, France

    • E. Gautier
    • , J. Savarino
    • , J. Erbland
    •  & N. Caillon
  2. Department of Geology and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center (ESSIC), University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, USA

    • J. Hoek
    •  & J. Farquhar
  3. Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, School of Materials and Chemical Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, G1-17, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 226-8502, Japan

    • S. Hattori
    •  & N. Yoshida
  4. Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1-IE-1 Ookayama, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, 152-8550, Japan

    • N. Yoshida
  5. Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, CNRS and University of Lyon, 9 rue du Vercors, 69364, Lyon Cedex 7, France

    • E. Albalat
    •  & F. Albarede

Authors

  1. Search for E. Gautier in:

  2. Search for J. Savarino in:

  3. Search for J. Hoek in:

  4. Search for J. Erbland in:

  5. Search for N. Caillon in:

  6. Search for S. Hattori in:

  7. Search for N. Yoshida in:

  8. Search for E. Albalat in:

  9. Search for F. Albarede in:

  10. Search for J. Farquhar in:

Contributions

The manuscript was mostly written by E.G., helped by J.S., and J.F., who both directed this work, and with input from all other co-authors; ice-core analysis was performed by J.E. for concentration profiles, by E.G., J.H., E.A., and F.A. for sulfur isotopic data, and by N.C., S.H., and N.Y. for oxygen isotopic data.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to E. Gautier or J. Savarino.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08357-0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.