Production of eukaryotic ribosomal subunits is a highly dynamic process; pre-ribosomes undergo numerous structural rearrangements that establish the architecture present in mature complexes and serve as key checkpoints, ensuring the fidelity of ribosome assembly. Using in vivo crosslinking, we here identify the pre-ribosomal binding sites of three RNA helicases. Our data support roles for Has1 in triggering release of the U14 snoRNP, a critical event during early 40S maturation, and in driving assembly of domain I of pre-60S complexes. Binding of Mak5 to domain II of pre-60S complexes promotes recruitment of the ribosomal protein Rpl10, which is necessary for subunit joining and ribosome function. Spb4 binds to a molecular hinge at the base of ES27 facilitating binding of the export factor Arx1, thereby promoting pre-60S export competence. Our data provide important insights into the driving forces behind key structural remodelling events during ribosomal subunit assembly.
Ribosomes are essential ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) responsible for the production of all cellular proteins. The biogenesis of eukaryotic ribosomes is a complex process involving the synthesis and maturation of four ribosomal (r)RNAs, and the hierarchical recruitment and assembly of 79 ribosomal proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae1. Ribosome assembly is initiated in the nucleolus by RNA polymerase I-mediated synthesis of a precursor ribosomal RNA (pre-rRNA) containing the sequences of three of the four mature rRNAs flanked by external and internal transcribed spacers (ETS and ITS, respectively). A subset of ribosomal proteins and biogenesis factors are recruited to the nascent pre-rRNA transcript leading to formation of an early 90S pre-ribosomal complex. A central pre-rRNA cleavage event then separates the precursors of the small (SSU; 40S) and large (LSU; 60S) ribosomal subunits, which undergo independent maturation pathways in the nucleolus and nucleoplasm before nuclear export and final maturation steps in the cytoplasm2. Concurrent with protein assembly, the pre-rRNAs undergo a series of endo- and exo-nucleolytic processing events to remove the transcribed spacer regions and generate the mature rRNAs (Fig. 1a)3. During pre-rRNA maturation, the rRNA sequences are extensively modified by multiple small nucleolar RNPs (snoRNPs), which contain a snoRNA that basepairs with the pre-rRNA to direct 2′-O-methylation, pseudouridylation or acetylation of specific nucleotides, as well as by a number of stand-alone modification enzymes4,5.
Recent insights into the timing of ribosomal protein recruitment6, pre-rRNA rearrangements7 and structural analyses of several pre-ribosomal complexes8,9,10,11,12,13,14 reveal ribosome assembly to be highly ordered, with individual structural domains of each subunit formed sequentially. During their biogenesis, pre-ribosomal subunits undergo various structural transitions to achieve the final architecture found in mature ribosomes. For example, key events during pre-60S maturation are the docking of the 5S RNP and its 180° rotation to form the central protuberance11, assembly of the peptidyl transferase centre and polypeptide exit tunnel, and the removal of ITS2 sequences and biogenesis factors from the “foot” region15,16. Such irreversible remodelling steps, which are typically driven by NTP-dependent enzymes including GTPases, AAA-ATPases and RNA helicases, enforce the directionality of the pathway and act as key surveillance checkpoints, ensuring the fidelity of subunit assembly17,18,19,20.
So far, 21 RNA helicases are known to associate with pre-ribosomal complexes in yeast20 and functions have been ascribed to some of these proteins; several RNA helicases are implicated in the release of specific snoRNPs from pre-ribosomal complexes (Prp43, Has1, Rok1, Dhr1)21,22,23,24,25,26, while others are suggested to remodel pre-ribosomes to facilitate access of a pre-rRNA endonuclease (Prp43 and Nob1)22,27, enable rRNA modification (Kre33)28, drive stable incorporation of ribosomal proteins (Has1)29 or promote release of trans-acting biogenesis factors (Rok1)30. Knowledge of the functions and the molecular targets of other helicases remains limited but elucidation of the pre-rRNA sequences bound by the remaining pre-ribosome-associated RNA helicases and determination of their functions is key for uncovering how structural transitions during ribosome assembly are regulated.
Here we identify the pre-ribosomal-binding sites of three essential pre-60S helicases, Has1, Mak5 and Spb4 using a crosslinking-based analysis (CRAC). Our data imply a role for Has1 in unwinding U14 snoRNA-pre-rRNA duplexes and we identify a Has1 binding site on pre-60S complexes that is in line with its proposed role in driving stable incorporation of ribosomal proteins into domain I and its recruitment by a subset of factors such as Erb129. We also discover crosslinking of Mak5 to 25S-H39 and structure probing data indicate that binding of the helicase to this region of the pre-rRNA promotes recruitment of the ribosomal protein Rpl10 (uL16). Finally, we identify two distinct pre-rRNA contact sites for the late-acting helicase Spb4, which may represent a binding platform and a remodelling target. Spb4 binds to the hinge region at the base of a highly flexible arm formed by H63/ES27, which anchors the pre-60S export factor Arx18 and we demonstrate that Spb4 facilitates the association of Arx1 to pre-60S complexes.
RNA helicases are required at different stages of pre-60S biogenesis
The putative RNA helicases Has1, Mak5 and Spb4 are implicated in biogenesis of the LSU29,31,32 and Has1 is also required for maturation of the SSU33. To define the pre-ribosomal complexes that Has1, Mak5 and Spb4 associate with and to demonstrate at which stage of ribosome biogenesis these proteins are required, we first established yeast strains in which each of these essential helicases could be transiently depleted by addition of doxycycline (pTetO7-HA-MAK5) or by growth in the presence of glucose (pGALS-HA-HAS1, pGAL1-HA-SPB4) and pre-rRNAs were analysed by northern blotting to identify processing defects (Fig. 1b–d). In parallel, we isolated Has1-, Mak5- and Spb4-containing particles and investigated their pre-rRNA and protein composition using northern blotting and mass spectrometry respectively (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Table 1). These analyses revealed that Has1 associates with the initial 35S pre-rRNA transcript and 27SB pre-rRNA as well as numerous ribosome biogenesis factors implicated in early SSU and intermediate LSU biogenesis (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Table 1). Lack of Has1 caused accumulation of the initial 35S pre-rRNA transcript and the aberrant 23S pre-rRNA intermediate that is often observed during cellular stress34, and concomitant decreases in the 20S and the 27SA/B pre-rRNAs (Fig. 1b). These findings are consistent with roles for Has1 in the early steps of SSU maturation and the action of this helicase on 27SB pre-rRNA-containing pre-60S complexes during LSU biogenesis. The 35S, 27SA and 27SB pre-rRNAs were enriched in pre-60S complexes isolated via Mak5 (Fig. 1e), suggesting that Mak5 binds upstream of Has1 during pre-60S biogenesis. This is in line with an earlier report showing that Mak5 accumulates on pre-66S complexes upon depletion of Has129. Interestingly, depletion of Mak5 lead to accumulation of the 35S and 23S pre-RNAs, and decreased levels of the 27SB but not 27SA pre-rRNA (Fig. 1c), implying that Mak5 is recruited to early pre-60S particles, but that its presence is required when 27SA is converted to 27SB. In line with the action of Mak5 in 27S pre-rRNA-containing complexes, a plethora of pre-60S biogenesis factors previously shown to act at this stage of LSU biogenesis, were co-precipitated with Mak5 (Supplementary Table 1). The 27SB pre-rRNA was also present in Spb4-containing particles (Fig. 1e) and depletion of Spb4 was accompanied by a significant accumulation of this intermediate (Fig. 1d). This implies that is Spb4 is required for pre-60S biogenesis downstream of the pre-rRNA processing steps to remove ITS1 and that it is predominantly present in later pre-ribosomal particles than Mak5. Consistent with this, the LSU biogenesis factors identified in Spb4-containing particles are typically implicated in later steps in LSU biogenesis than those present in the Mak5 particle (Supplementary Table 1). Although the 35S pre-rRNA accumulated upon depletion of Spb4, this pre-rRNA species was not co-purified together with Spb4, suggesting that its accumulation is the result of a feedback mechanism, and in line with this model, the level of the aberrant 23S pre-rRNA also increased upon depletion of Spb4. Together, these results support a role for Has1 during early SSU biogenesis, and indicate the sequential action of Mak5, Has1 and then Spb4 during pre-60S maturation.
The ATPase activities of Mak5 and Spb4 are required for LSU maturation
It has previously been shown that Has1 hydrolyses ATP in an RNA-dependent manner and that its ATPase activity is required during ribosome biogenesis29,35. However, although both Mak5 and Spb4 possess helicase core domains (Fig. 2a), their action as ATPases has not been demonstrated so far and it remains unknown whether their catalytic activities are required for LSU biogenesis. Recombinant, His10-ZZ-tagged wild-type Mak5 and Spb4, or mutant versions of the helicases carrying amino acid substitutions in their conserved DEAD and SAT motifs, which are implicated in ATP hydrolysis and the coupling of ATP hydrolysis with unwinding activity respectively36, were purified from E. coli (Fig. 2a, b) and used for NADH-coupled ATPase assays. Both wild-type Mak5 and Spb4 efficiently hydrolysed ATP and the rates of ATP turnover increased at higher RNA concentrations, demonstrating that these proteins are indeed RNA-dependent ATPases (Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Table 2). However, mutation of the DEAD motif in either protein or the SAT motif of Mak5 abolished ATPase activity and alteration of the Spb4 SAT motif diminished the ability of the protein to hydrolyse ATP (Fig. 2c, d). To investigate whether the low activity of the mutant helicases arises due to decreased interaction with the RNA substrate or impaired ATP binding/hydrolysis, the affinity of the wild-type helicases and their mutants for RNA was determined using fluorescence anisotropy (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 2). Although wild-type Mak5 displayed lower affinity for RNA than wild-type Spb4, mutation of the DEAD or SAT motifs of either protein did not significantly affect their interactions with RNA, implying that their reduced catalytic activity reflects a lack of ATP binding/hydrolysis.
Having established that Spb4 and Mak5 are RNA-dependent ATPases, we next determined if their catalytic activity is required for their functions in ribosome biogenesis. This is particularly relevant as our data together with previously published work suggests that both helicases may bind to pre-60S complexes prior to the time at which they function. Yeast complementation systems were therefore generated in which pTetO7-HA-MAK5 or pGAL1-HA-SPB4 strains were transformed with low copy, centromeric plasmids for the expression of wild-type or mutant Mak5 or Spb4 from their endogenous promoters or the empty vector. Serial dilution assays showed that all the strains grew equally well in permissive conditions and that growth defects caused by depletion of the endogenous helicases could be rescued by expression of plasmid-derived wild-type Mak5 or Spb4 (Fig. 2e, f). Expression of either Mak5DEAD or Spb4DEAD lead to more significant defects than those observed when the endogenous proteins were lacking (Fig. 2e, f), demonstrating that the ATPase activities of Spb4 and Mak5 are required for their cellular functions and that disruption of their DEAD motifs can have dominant negative effects. Expression of either Mak5SAT or Spb4SAT lead to milder growth defects (Fig. 2e, f) and for Spb4 this is consistent with the fact that this mutant retains some catalytic activity. While mutation of the SAT motif of Mak5 significantly decreased its ATPase activity in vitro, the effect on cellular growth was not as dramatic, suggesting that this mutation may have subtly different effects in vitro and in vivo.
To determine whether the requirement for the catalytic activities of Mak5 and Spb4 for cellular growth reflects their role in ribosome biogenesis, pre-rRNA processing was analysed in the strains expressing wild-type or catalytically inactive Mak5 or Spb4. Consistent with our earlier findings, northern blot analyses of RNAs from cells depleted of Mak5 or Spb4 complemented with an empty vector showed accumulation of the 35S and the 27SA (Mak5) or 27SB (Spb4) pre-rRNAs compared to the non-depleted sample and these defects were rescued by re-expression of the wild-type helicases (Fig. 2g, h). Similar to depletion of the endogenous helicases, expression of Mak5 or Spb4 carrying mutations in the DEAD or SAT motifs lead to accumulations of the 35S and 27SA/27SB pre-rRNAs (Fig. 2g, h), demonstrating that the activity, rather than the presence, of these proteins is necessary for pre-rRNA processing. Taken together, these data show that Mak5 and Spb4 are RNA-dependent ATPases and that their catalytic activity is required for their essential functions during LSU biogenesis.
Has1 and Mak5 and Spb4 bind distinct pre-ribosomal regions
To determine the pre-rRNA targets of Has1, Mak5 and Spb4, we applied the in vivo photoactivatable ribonucleoside-enhanced crosslinking and analysis of cDNA (PAR-CRAC) approach37,38. Yeast strains expressing C-terminally His-TEV protease site-Protein A (HTP)-tagged Has1, Mak5 or Spb4 from their endogenous promoters or wild-type yeast were subjected to in vivo crosslinking and helicase-RNA complexes were purified under native and denaturing conditions. After partial RNase digestion, adaptors were ligated and RNAs were isolated, reverse transcribed and PCR amplified to generate cDNA libraries that were analysed by Illumina deep sequencing. The obtained sequence reads were mapped to the S. cerevisiae genome and reads not containing a specific T to C mutation were discarded39. CRAC experiments were performed at least in duplicate with high reproducibility and a representative dataset is presented. The distributions of the obtained sequence reads mapping to different classes of RNAs were then analysed (Fig. 3a and Supplementary Table 3). The proportions of reads mapping to different RNA types in the control sample reflect the distribution of non-specifically co-purified (i.e. background) RNAs that are carried through the CRAC procedure. Our analysis revealed that compared to the control, the amount of rRNA sequences retrieved with Has1, Mak5 and Spb4 were markedly increased (WT - 36%, Has1 - 76%, Mak5 - 59%, Spb4 - 42%), consistent with their involvement in ribosome assembly. The proportion of sequence reads in the Has1, Mak5 and Spb4 datasets mapping to intergenic regions, or mRNA or tRNA genes, was reduced compared to the control sample, suggesting that these helicases do not act in other aspects of RNA metabolism. Analysis of the distribution of reads mapping to the rDNA sequence encoding the 35S pre-rRNA transcript revealed specific crosslinking sites in the 25S rRNA sequence for each of the helicases as well as crosslinking sites of Has1 in the 18S rRNA sequence (Fig. 3b). The binding of a protein to these pre-rRNA sequences is further supported by the detection of specific mutations, which are introduced at nucleotides crosslinked to amino acids, in the sequence reads (Fig. 3c-f).
Has1 crosslinks to specific sites within the 18S and 25S rRNA sequences
Analysis of the crosslinking sites of Has1 on the secondary structure of the mature 18S rRNA40 revealed Has1 binding to helix (H)6/6a in the 5′ domain and to regions of H30–35 that form a stem structure in the 3′ major domain (Fig. 4a). H6/6a is a known basepairing site of the U14 snoRNA, which both forms long-range interactions within the early pre-ribosome21,41 and also guides 2′-O-methylation of 18S-C414 in H1442. Reads mapping across the 18S-Cm414 site were detected in the Has1 CRAC data but not the control or the CRAC data of Mak5 or Spb4, however, their relatively low number (Fig. 3b) suggests a transient interaction between Has1 and this pre-rRNA sequence. Depletion of Has1 causes accumulation of the U14 snoRNA on pre-ribosomal complexes (Supplementary Fig. 2a)23,25, but it has remained unknown whether the helicase is directly involved in snoRNA release. A direct role for Has1 in mediating U14 release would necessitate helicase-snoRNA interaction and we therefore examined the relative distribution of sequence reads corresponding to each of the 79 snoRNAs present in S. cerevisiae (Fig. 4b), which revealed a > 8-fold increase in the proportion of sequence reads mapping to the U14 snoRNA sequence in the Has1 CRAC data compared to the control, indicating a direct interaction between Has1 and U14. Analysis of the distribution of sequence reads along the U14 snoRNA revealed that the majority mapped to the U14 B domain, which basepairs with the 18S-H13-14 sequence (Fig. 4c), thereby demonstrating that Has1 contacts both the pre-rRNA and snoRNA sequences involved in U14-pre-rRNA interactions. The CRAC data were also mined for chimeric sequence reads, which can be generated if two RNA sequences are simultaneously bound by the same protein and are joined during the adaptor ligation steps, using a crosslinking and analysis of sequence hybrids (CLASH) pipeline43. In the Has1 CRAC data, many chimeric sequence reads composed of the U14 A domain and the 18S-H6/6a sequence were detected as well as numerous chimeras composed of the U14 B domain and the cognate 18S-H13-14 sequence containing the 18S-Cm414 modification (Fig. 4d). These data support a direct role for Has1 in release of the U14 snoRNA from its basepairing sites in the 18S rRNA sequence. Interestingly, we identified an additional Has1 crosslinking site in the 18S-H30–35 sequence, which is spatially distinct in the mature 40S structure (Fig. 4e). While this raises the possibility that Has1 has additional functions in SSU biogenesis, it is more likely that in the early pre-ribosomal complexes to which Has1 binds, the H30–35 region is in closer proximity to the 5′ domain and that U14 snoRNA release represents the primary function of Has1 during SSU biogenesis. Although Has1 was not identified in the recently published cryo-electron microscopy structures of SSU processomes10,44,45, the H30–35 region was reported to be highly flexible, which is consistent with this model.
To gain insight into the role of Has1 in pre-60S biogenesis, the Has1 CRAC data was mapped onto the secondary structure of the 25S rRNA, which highlighted Has1 crosslinks in H21–22 of the 25S rRNA sequence (Fig. 4f). While this manuscript was under review, cryo-electron microscopy (EM) structures of late nucleolar pre-60S particles, which contain density identified as Has1 were published9,13,14. Mapping of the Has1 CRAC data onto these structures (see for example PDB 6COF [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6C0F]13; Fig. 4g) revealed the close proximity of the Has1 crosslinking site in H21–22 to the reported positions of Has1. Interestingly, in these structures, H21–22 lies adjacent to the RecA1 domain of Has1 suggesting that this is likely the region of the protein that is crosslinked to RNA during PAR-CRAC (Fig. 4h). The identification of a Has1 binding site in domain I of the 25S rRNA sequence is in line with a previous report showing that a subset of pre-60S biogenesis factors (Erb1, Nop7, Ytm1, Rlp7, Nop15 and Cic1), which bind to domain I, ITS2 and the 5.8S rRNA sequence, are required for Has1 recruitment into pre-60S particles29. Similarly, the Has1 binding site is consistent with the observation that depletion of Has1, or expression of Has1 carrying mutations predicted to impair its catalytic activity, impedes the stable assembly of the ribosomal proteins Rpl26 (uL24), Rpl35 (uL29) and Rpl37 (eL37) into domain I (Fig. 4g)29.
Mak5 crosslinks to the Rpl10 binding site within the 25S rRNA sequence
The function(s) of Mak5 during pre-60S biogenesis have remained elusive but genetic interactions of Mak5 with a number of pre-60S biogenesis factors (Nsa1, Ebp2, Nop16, Rpf1) and ribosomal proteins (Rpl6 (eL6), Rpl14 (eL14), Rpl16 (uL13)) have been reported46. To visualise the structural context of the newly identified crosslinking sites, the number of sequence reads in the Mak5 CRAC data mapping to each nucleotide of the 25S rRNA sequence was modelled onto the secondary structure of the mature 25S rRNA, which revealed that the Mak5 crosslinking sites are in domain II of the 25S rRNA sequence in H36–37 and H39 (Fig. 5a). Mak5 is not present in any of the currently available cryo-EM structures of pre-60S particles but as the helicase was previously co-purified with Nsa146, the Mak5 CRAC data was mapped onto the tertiary structure of a pre-60S complex isolated via the biogenesis factors Nsa1 and Nop2, which is likely to closely resemble the in vivo substrate of Mak5 (PBD 6CB1 [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6CB1]; Fig. 5b)13. With the exception of the N-terminal region of Rpl6, the proteins reported to genetically interact with Mak5 are somewhat distant to the Mak5 crosslinking site (Fig. 5b), implying that the genetic interactions do not reflect physical interactions but rather that structural changes induced by Mak5 binding to domain II influence the recruitment, function or release of these factors.
Next, as the Mak5-binding sites identified contained the basepairing sites of several snoRNAs (snR5, snR8, snR43, snR51, snR60 and snR82), we analysed the levels of all 79 snoRNAs on pre-ribosomes upon depletion of Mak5 using quantitative PCR. Depletion of Mak5 did not lead to significant changes in the levels of any snoRNAs on pre-ribosomal complexes (Supplementary Fig. 2), indicating that, in contrast to Has1 (Supplementary Fig. 2)23,25, Mak5 does not regulate snoRNP dynamics on pre-ribosomal complexes.
To gain functional insight into the role of Mak5 and the potential changes its action may cause in the pre-rRNA structure, we monitored 25S-H36–39 by dimethyl sulfate (DMS) structure probing upon depletion of the helicase. Treatment of RNA with DMS leads to N3- and N1- methylation of accessible (non-basepaired and non-protein-bound) cytidine and adenosine residues respectively47, which impedes the progress of a reverse transcriptase, allowing changes in nucleotide accessibility to be monitored by primer extension. As the crosslinking sites of Mak5 lie within the sequence of the mature 25S rRNA, analysis of changes in pre-rRNA structure caused by depletion of Mak5 necessitates isolation of pre-60S complexes. Western and northern blotting were used to confirm the presence of Mak5 and the 27SA/B pre-rRNAs it binds in pre-60S particles purified via Nop2 (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b). As Mak5 acts at the 27SA to 27SB transition (Fig. 1c), we further verified that depletion of Mak5 does not significantly affect the amount of these pre-rRNA co-purified with Nop2 (Supplementary Fig. 3c). Then Nop2-containing pre-60S complexes purified from cells expressing or depleted of Mak5 were immobilised on IgG sepharose and either treated with DMS or left untreated. Purified RNAs were used for primer extension reactions using a [32P]-labelled primer hybridising downstream of 25S-H39 and the obtained cDNA fragments were separated by denaturing PAGE alongside a sequencing ladder to enable identification of nucleotides where the reverse transcriptase stalled (Fig. 5c). Comparison of the modification pattern observed in DMS-treated RNAs obtained from cells expressing Mak5 revealed that in the Nop2 particle, 25S-A1129 and 25S-A1130 are readily accessible (Fig. 5c). Upon depletion of Mak5, the methylation of these residues, but not other residues such as 25S-A1120 and 25S-C1141, was significantly reduced, indicating that the presence of Mak5 contributes to the accessibility of these specific residues. This suggests that during early stages of pre-60S biogenesis, these residues may be involved in different basepairing interactions to those observed in the mature 25S rRNA structure or alternatively, that these nucleotides are bound by an early pre-60S biogenesis factor that is released by the binding of Mak5.
To test the hypothesis that the DMS-accessibility of 25S-A1129 and 25S-A1130 is altered during pre-60S biogenesis, we performed affinity purifications using HTP- or TAP-tagged pre-60S biogenesis factors as baits. While this approach leads to the isolation of heterogenous mixtures of particles, the selection of several factors that predominantly enrich different populations of pre-60S complexes, or are known to associate with exclusively early (e.g. Ssf1) or late (e.g. Arx1) pre-60S complexes enabled us to visualise the accessibility of 25S-A1129 and 25S-A1130 along the time course of pre-60S maturation. These particles were either DMS treated or left untreated and primer extension analysis was used to monitor the extent of methylation of 25S-A1129 and 25S-A1130 (Fig. 5d). Consistent with our model, in early pre-60S complexes, DMS-mediated methylation of 25S-A1129 and 25S-A1130 was low, whereas in the intermediate pre-60S complexes, methylation of these residues was significantly increased. The high accessibility of 25S-A1129 and 25S-A1130 observed in the intermediate pre-60S complexes is consistent with the lack of pre-rRNA-pre-rRNA and pre-rRNA–protein interactions formed by these nucleotides in the available pre-ribosome structures of complexes at this stage of pre-60S maturation8,9,11,12,13,14,18. Interestingly, in predominantly cytoplasmic pre-60S particles purified via Rlp24 and in the mature 25S rRNA, the accessibility of 25S-A1129 and 25S-A1130 was markedly reduced again. As these residues are not involved in basepairing interactions in mature ribosomes48, this implies that this pre-rRNA region is ultimately protected by a ribosomal protein or ribosome-associated factor. Indeed, inspection of the interactions formed by these residues in mature 60S subunits revealed that they are directly contacted by Rpl10, a ribosomal protein that is recruited late to cytoplasmic pre-60S complexes (Fig. 5e). As Mak5 and Rpl10 bind to the same pre-rRNA region, to determine whether Mak5 contributes to the recruitment of Rpl10, pre-60S complexes were enriched from cells expressing or depleted of Mak5 via the cytoplasmic biogenesis factor Kre35 and the level of Rpl10-GFP was determined by western blotting. As depletion of Mak5 affects pre-60S maturation, we verified that pre-60S particles could be exported to the cytoplasm when Mak5 is lacking and the amount of Kre35-TAP particles analysed was normalised according to the level of Rpl15 (eL15), which is incorporated during the early steps of pre-60S maturation. This revealed that upon depletion of Mak5, the amount of Rpl10 present on cytoplasmic pre-60S complexes is reduced compared to that detected in cells expressing Mak5 (Supplementary Fig. 4). Our data therefore suggest that binding of Mak5 to 25S-H37–39 of the 25S rRNA sequence during pre-60S biogenesis is required to form a structure that can be bound by Rpl10.
Spb4 binds helix 101 and a hinge region at the base of ES27
Mapping of the Spb4 CRAC data on the secondary structure of the mature 25S rRNA revealed two crosslinking sites on the 25S rRNA sequence in H101 in domain VI and H62–63 in domain IV (Fig. 6a). While visualisation of the Spb4 CRAC data on the tertiary structure of pre-60S complexes purified via Nog212 or a stalled pre-60S intermediate purified via Ytm1E80A9 confirmed that these sites are in relatively close proximity during the intermediate steps of pre-60S biogenesis, these Spb4 crosslinking sites appear to represent distinct contact sites between the helicase and pre-ribosome (Fig. 6b and Supplementary Fig. 5). Although the position of Spb4 in the Ytm1E80A complex was not reported9, unassigned density in this particle was later demonstrated to correspond to Spb413. Importantly, this structural information places Spb4 in close proximity to H101 and H62–63, confirming the crosslinking sites identified by CRAC as bona fide protein binding sites. Notably, no snoRNA-guided rRNA modifications are present within the crosslinking sites of Spb4 and lack of Spb4 did not significantly affect snoRNA levels on pre-ribosomal complexes (Supplementary Fig. 2), which is consistent with the requirement for Spb4 during later stages of pre-60S biogenesis, after the majority of snoRNAs have been released.
To analyse the structure of the pre-rRNA regions crosslinked by Spb4 in the presence and absence of the helicase, DMS structure probing was again employed. Based on the structural analysis described above13, Spb4 is anticipated to be present in pre-60S complexes containing Nop2 (Supplementary Fig. 5a). After verifying this association under our purification conditions (Supplementary Fig. 5b), Nop2-containing pre-60S complexes purified from cells expressing or lacking Spb4 were either treated with DMS or left untreated. Isolated RNAs served as templates for primer extension reactions using [32P]-labelled primers that anneal to the 25S rRNA sequence in H101 or H61 to examine changes in the accessibility of nucleotides within the two Spb4 crosslinking sites. Analysis of the cDNA fragments obtained using the primer annealing downstream of the Spb4 crosslinking site in H101 revealed that 25S-A3336 is more readily modified by DMS when Spb4 is lacking (Fig. 6c). Furthermore, several other nucleotides within this region of the 25S rRNA sequence showed altered DMS-modification patterns upon depletion of Spb4, whereas the extent of modification of nucleotides more distant from this Spb4 crosslinking site remained unaffected, confirming 25S-H101 as a binding site of Spb4 on the 25S rRNA. In contrast, monitoring changes in 25S-H62–63 upon depletion of Spb4 highlighted several nucleotides (A1907, C1926 and A1933), which were less accessible for DMS-mediated modification when Spb4 was lacking (Fig. 6d), implying that Spb4 is involved in structural rearrangements in this region of domain IV. Taken together with the lesser extent of crosslinking of Spb4 to 25S-H62–63 compared to 25S-H101, these data imply that domain VI may serve as a binding platform for the helicase while a transient interaction of Spb4 with 25S-H62–63 of domain IV likely reflects its remodelling activity.
Spb4 is required for recruitment of the pre-60S export factor Arx1
Spb4 is required for assembly of the GTPase Nog2, which acts as a placeholder for the essential export adaptor Nmd3, into pre-60 complexes17,49. Structural analyses show that Nog2 is positioned within domain IV of pre-60S complexes (Fig. 6b), consistent with a model in which structural rearrangements around 25S-H62–63 initiated by Spb4 facilitate recruitment of Nog2 to pre-ribosomal complexes. Interestingly, the crosslinking site of Spb4 in 25S-H62–63 is at the base of eukaryotic expansion segment (ES)27, which, in late nucleoplasmic pre-60S complexes, forms a flexible arm that clamps the export factor Arx1 (Fig. 6e). The relative positions of Spb4 and Arx1 on pre-60S complexes raised the possibility that 25S-H62–63 acts as a molecular hinge and that the action of Spb4 is required for incorporation of Arx1 into pre-60 complexes. To test this hypothesis, late pre-60S complexes were purified via TAP-tagged Tif6, which is co-exported with pre-60S particles, from cells expressing or depleted of Spb4, and Arx1-GFP levels were monitored by western blotting. As lack of Spb4 affects LSU biogenesis, to enable Arx1 levels on pre-60S complexes purified from cells expressing or depleted of Spb4 to be compared, the amounts of particles were first normalised according to the Tif6 bait protein and the ribosomal protein Rpl15, which is incorporated into early pre-60S complexes (Fig. 6f). Arx1-GFP was not retrieved from control cells expressing untagged Tif6, and while Arx1-GFP was abundant in pre-60S complexes purified in the presence of Spb4, depletion of Spb4 markedly reduced the amount of Arx1, demonstrating the requirement for Spb4 for Arx1 recruitment to pre-60S complexes.
The production of ribosomes is an essential, but highly complex and energetically expensive, cellular process. Early proteomic analyses of yeast pre-ribosomal particles provided inventories of >200 ribosome biogenesis factors. A major challenge in the subsequent years has been to dissect the dynamic interactions of these proteins with pre-ribosomal complexes and to elucidate their precise contributions to the maturation pathway. Momentous advances in cryo-EM have recently enabled the first structures of mature ribosomes and pre-ribosomal subunits to be solved8,9,10,11,12,13,14, providing a wealth of information about the architecture of these complexes and the interactions of a subset of ribosome biogenesis factors. Already, these structural views of pre-ribosomal complexes have enabled fundamental aspects of eukaryotic ribosome assembly to be visualised, such as the modular assembly of SSU processome complexes and early pre-ribosomal particles, the sequential compaction and stabilisation of defined domains/regions, and the progressive release of biogenesis factors, concomitant with formation of structural features present in mature ribosomal subunits. They have further highlighted important structural transitions that take place during subunit assembly and understanding how these remodelling events are regulated has emerged as a key question. Due to their well-known functions in structural rearrangements of RNA and RNPs, RNA helicases likely act as important regulators of such pre-ribosomal events20. Here, we have identified the pre-ribosomal binding sites of three RNA helicases, Has1, Mak5 and Spb4. In the case of Has1 and Spb4, our crosslinking data are highly compatible with the positions of these proteins within recently published structures of pre-60S complexes9,13,14. Determining the pre-ribosomal binding sites of these enzymes has provided new insight into their recruitment, the potential targets of their remodelling activity and their functions.
Interestingly, accumulation of the U14 snoRNA on pre-40S complexes has not only been observed upon depletion of Has125, but also in cells lacking another SSU helicase, Dbp426, raising the question of whether these observations reflect direct or indirect effects. Our identification of Has1 crosslinking to both the U14 sequences and the 18S rRNA regions involved in basepairing interactions, together with the abundance of chimeric sequence reads derived from these sequences in the Has1 CRAC data, provides strong evidence for a direct role of Has1 in unwinding U14 snoRNA-pre-rRNA duplexes. In contrast, the U14 snoRNA does not co-precipitate with Dbp450, suggesting that the observed U14 accumulation upon Dpb4 depletion is an indirect effect and that the dynamics of U14 within early pre-ribosomes can be influenced by other aspects of SSU assembly. Consistent with this model, depletion of another non-enzymatic SSU biogenesis factor Efg1 has recently been shown to perturb assembly of the 5′ domain of the 18S rRNA leading to accumulation of the U14 snoRNA on pre-ribosomes51. Notably, the RNA helicases Prp43 and Dhr1, which are implicated in release of a cluster of snoRNAs from pre-60S complexes and dissociation of the U3 snoRNA from its basepairing sites in the central pseudoknot region of the pre-18S rRNA sequence22,24, are both DEAH-box helicases that likely act by ATP-coupled, processive duplex unwinding. In contrast, as a DEAD-box helicase, Has1 performs local strand unwinding, suggesting that alternative molecular mechanisms can be employed to promote disassembly of snoRNP complexes from pre-ribosomes.
The detection of another crosslinking site of Has1 in domain I of the 25S rRNA, is in line with a proposed function in driving assembly of this pre-rRNA region by promoting the stable incorporation of several ribosomal proteins, including Rpl26, Rpl35 and Rpl3729. The newly available atomic resolution models of Has1 bound to pre-60S complexes give insights into its pre-rRNA contacts and provide a platform from which to consider the precise target of the remodelling action of this helicase. Mapping of the Has1 CRAC data onto these structures suggests that the crosslinking site in H21–22 reflects contacts formed by the RecA1 domain, whereas the adjacent H16 protrudes into the cleft between the two RecA-like domains of the helicase. While this suggests that 25S-H16 may be the target of Has1 activity, comparison with a crystal structure of an RNA-bound form of the mitochondrial DEAD-box protein Mms116 indicates that the RNA-protein contacts formed by Has1 and 25S-H16 are different, leading to the suggestion that this position represents a docking conformation rather than an active orientation14. Given the functional evidence for a role of Has1 in domain I assembly29 and as the available cryo-EM structures represent specific snapshots of pre-60S biogenesis, it is likely that only subtle structural rearrangements bring Has1 into its active conformation on the pre-rRNA.
The contribution of the multifunctional RNA helicase Has1 to the maturation of both ribosomal subunits as well as the observation that RNA helicases largely interact with the sugar-phosphate backbone of their substrates rendering their RNA interactions sequence independent, raises the question of how Has1 is specifically recruited to its pre-ribosomal targets. A subset of pre-60S biogenesis factors (Erb1, Nop7, Rlp7, Nop15 and Cic1) that bind in close proximity to Has1 are required for the association of the helicase and Has1 is directly contacted by Erb1 and Cic1. However, it remains unclear whether Has1 recruitment is mediated by protein–protein interactions or whether the assembly of the factors leads to formation of an RNA structure that can be bound by Has1. Interestingly, we also identified a Has1 cross-linking site in 18S-H30–35 that is distinct from its active target site in the 5′ domain of the 18S rRNA sequence; it is unlikely that this reflects two independent Has1 pre-40S binding events, suggesting that contact with 18S-H30–35 is not formed by the catalytic site of Has1 but instead that this pre-rRNA region may represent a binding platform.
CRAC analysis of Spb4 similarly revealed two crosslinking sites in 25S-H63 and 25S-H101, which we suggest may reflect a remodelling site and a binding platform for the helicase respectively. Our data implicate Spb4 in structural rearrangement of 25S-H63 that forms a hinge region at the base of ES27 to enable recruitment of the pre-60S export factor Arx1. Interestingly, Nog2, which binds in close proximity to Spb4 and is also dependent on the helicase for its recruitment49, functions as a placeholder for the essential export adaptor Nmd317,52, implying that Spb4 may contribute to establishing the export competence of pre-60S particles. Interestingly, Spb4 has a highly basic C-terminal region extending beyond the conserved RecA-like domains of the helicase core. In other RNA helicases, such as Mss116, such “basic tails” have been shown to anchor the enzymes in proximity to their target duplexes53, raising the possibility that the crosslinking site of Spb4 in 25S-H101 reflects a pre-rRNA contact of this region of the protein. Although we only identified one crosslinking site for Mak5 in 25S-H36–39, this helicase similarly has a highly basic C-terminal extension, which has previously been shown to be important for Mak5 function and cell viability46. Our data suggest that binding of Mak5 to 25S-H39 during the early stages of pre-60S biogenesis makes this region accessible for the subsequent recruitment of Rpl10 after export of pre-60S complexes to the cytoplasm. Recruitment of Rpl10 is a critical step in LSU maturation as not only does it promote release of the pre-60S export factor Nmd354 but also the presence of Rpl10 in mature 60S subunits is essential for subunit joining and this protein acts as a pivot for ribosome rotations during translation55,56. Taken together, identification of the binding sites of Has1, Mak5 and Spb4 and analysis of their functions highlights the diversity of the roles that RNA helicases can play during assembly of large ribonucleoprotein complexes.
Yeast strains and growth analysis
Yeast strains are based on the BY4741 strain57 and were grown in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% glucose), YPG (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 2% galactose) or synthetic media lacking specific amino acids (ForMedium). The endogenous promoters of HAS1, MAK5 or SPB4 were exchanged for either the pTetO7 promoter (MAK5), the pGAL1 promoter (SPB4) or the pGALS promoter (HAS1) using standard methods (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5)58,59. Insertion of the regulatable promoter was accompanied by integration of a 3xHA-tag to enable detection of the expressed protein using an anti-HA antibody. C-terminal tagging (His10-TEV protease cleavage site-Protein A (HTP); calmodulin-binding peptide-TEV protease cleavage site-Protein A (TAP); green fluorescent protein (GFP)) of other ribosome biogenesis factors was achieved using similar methods (Supplementary Tables 4 and 5). To deplete Mak5, the pTetO7-HA-MAK5 strain was grown in exponential phase in the presence of 10 μg/ml (YPD) or 20 μg/ml (synthetic media) doxycycline for 10 h, whereas depletion of Has1 or Spb4 was achieved by growth of the pGALS-HA-HAS1 or pGAL1-HA-SPB4 in YPD for 12 h. To generate complementation systems, the SPB4 and MAK5 coding sequences with 500 bp upstream and 500 bp downstream of the start and stop codons (to include the endogenous promoters and terminators) were cloned into the pRS415 vector to enable expression of the proteins at their endogenous levels in yeast. Site-directed mutagenesis, using the primers listed in Supplementary Table 5, was performed to alter the coding sequences of MAK5 and SPB4 to introduce glutamate to glutamine substitutions in the conserved DEAD motifs (Spb4 - E173Q (Spb4DEAD); Mak5 - E334Q (Mak5DEAD)) and to convert the SAT motifs to AAA (Spb4 - S203A and T205A (Spb4SAT); Mak5 - S378A andT380A (Mak5SAT)) in the expressed proteins. These plasmids were used to transform the pTetO7-HA-MAK5 and pGAL1-HA-SPB4 strains (Supplementary Table 4). The growth of yeast strains was monitored using serial dilution assays in which an equal number of cells from exponentially growing cultures were serially diluted then spotted onto appropriate media and colony number/size was determined after growth at 30 °C for 72 h.
Analysis of protein levels in yeast
For analysis of protein levels in yeast, cells were pelleted, resuspended in water and lysed by vortexing in the presence of glass beads before precipitation of proteins using 15% trichloroacetic acid (TCA). Protein samples were separated by denaturing (sodium dodecyl sulfate; SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and analysed by western blotting using antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 6.
RNA extraction and northern blotting
Total RNA was isolated from exponentially growing yeast cells using phenol:chloroform extraction60. To detect pre-rRNAs, total RNA was denatured using glyoxal at 55 °C, separated on a 1.2% agarose gel in BPTE (10 mM PIPES, 30 mM Bis-Tris, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0) and then transferred to a nylon membrane. Northern blotting using 5′-[32P]-labelled DNA oligonucleotides (Supplementary Table 5) that hybridise to ITS1 and ITS2 respectively, was performed and pre-rRNAs were visualised using a phosphorimager.
Purification of recombinant proteins
The coding sequences of SPB4 and MAK5 were cloned (see Supplementary Table 5 for primer sequences) into a pQE80-derivative vector for expression of proteins with an N-terminal His10-ZZ tag in Escherichia coli (E. coli). Site-directed mutagenesis was used, as described above, to generate constructs for expression of Spb4DEAD, Spb4SAT, Mak5DEAD and Mak5SAT. The plasmids for recombinant expression of His10-ZZ-tagged wild-type or mutant Spb4 or Mak5 were used to transform BL21 Codon Plus cells and protein expression was induced by addition of 1 mM IPTG at 18 °C overnight. The cells were harvested and lysed by sonication in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM PMSF and 10% glycerol, then centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C to pellet cell debris. To precipitate nucleic acids, polyethyleneimine (PEI) was added to the soluble extract to a final concentration of 0.05% and the sample was incubated for 15 min at 4 °C. Following centrifugation at 33,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, His-tagged proteins were retrieved from the supernatant on cOmplete His-Tag purification resin (Roche). After sequential washing steps with Wash buffer I (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 30 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol), Wash buffer II (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 1 M NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 30 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol) and Wash buffer I, proteins were eluted in 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 500 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 300 mM imidazole, 10% glycerol. Fractions containing protein were pooled, glycerol was added to a final concentration of 20% and the sample was dialysed against 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 120 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 20% glycerol overnight at 4 °C. The concentration of the purified protein was determined using a Bradford assay and proteins were visualised by SDS-PAGE followed by Coomassie staining.
In vitro ATPase assays
ATP hydrolysis by recombinant RNA helicases was monitored using in vitro NADH-coupled ATPase assays61. Reactions were set up containing 45 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 25 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 4 mM ATP, 1 mM phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP), 20 U/ml pyruvate kinase/lactic dehydrogenase, 300 μM NADH, 2 μM helicase, 0–4 μM RNA (32 nt; 5′-GUAAUGAAAGUCCAUGUAAAACAAAACAAAAC-3′) and the absorbance at 340 nm was monitored in a BioTEK Synergy plate reader every 50 sec for 30 min. The rates of ATP hydrolysis were then determined using the Michaelis-Menten equation.
Isolation of pre-ribosomal complexes on IgG sepharose
Yeast strains expressing TAP- or HTP-tagged ribosome biogenesis factors were grown in exponential phase before harvesting. Cells were lysed by grinding in liquid nitrogen in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.8, 150 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% NP-40, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol and protease inhibitors. After centrifugation to pellet cell debris, Protein A-tagged proteins were retrieved on IgG sepharose. Following washing steps, complexes were eluted with TEV protease overnight at 4 °C. RNAs in the eluate were extracted and analysed by northern blotting as described above. Alternatively, proteins in the eluate were precipitated by addition of TCA to a final concentration of 20% and then analysed by western blotting using antibodies listed in Supplementary Table 6.
Chemical structure probing
Pre-ribosomal complexes containing a TAP- or HTP-tagged ribosome biogenesis factor were immobilised on IgG sepharose as described above and dimethyl sulfate (DMS) was added to half of the sample to a final concentration of 0.5% for 2 min at room temperature62. Reactions were quenched by addition of 250 mM β-mercaptoethanol and RNAs were extracted from the IgG sepharose-bound complexes as above. Co-precipitated, DMS-treated or untreated RNAs then served as substrates in primer extension reactions using 5′-[32P]-labelled DNA oligonucleotides (Supplementary Table 5) and Superscript III reverse transcriptase. cDNA products were separated by denaturing (7 M urea) PAGE alongside a sequencing ladder generated by reverse transcription of total RNA in reactions containing trace amount of dideoxynucleotides. Radiolabelled cDNA fragments were detected using a phosphorimager.
Crosslinking and analysis of cDNA (CRAC)
PAR-CRAC21,37,63 was performed using yeast strains expressing HTP-tagged Has1, Mak5 or Spb4 from their genomic loci. Cells were grown from an OD600 of 0.1 to 0.5 in low uracil media (10 mg/L uracil) supplemented with 100 μM 4-thiouracil before addition of 4-thiouracil to a final concentration of 1 mM and growth for a further 4 h38. Cells were then harvested and 4-thiouridine-containing RNAs were crosslinked to associated proteins at 365 nm using two cycles of 600 mJ/cm2. RNA-protein complexes were isolated on IgG sepharose and NiNTA and a partial RNase digest was performed using RNace-IT. After ligation of sequencing adaptors, cDNA libraries prepared by reverse transcription and PCR amplification were subjected to Illumina deep sequencing. The obtained sequence reads were mapped to the S. cerevisiae genome39 and reads not containing a T-C mutation were discarded. Python scripts were used for mapping of the obtained CRAC data onto the secondary structures of the rRNAs40 and tertiary structures of a mature S. cerevisiae ribosome (PDB: 4V88 [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/4V88])48, and various pre-60S complexes (PDB: 3JCT [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/3JCT]12, 5JCS [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5JCS]18, 6ELZ [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6ELZ]9, 6C0F [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6C0F] and 6CB1 [https://www.rcsb.org/structure/6CB1]13). Identification of snoRNA-rRNA hybrids in the CRAC data was achieved using a bioinformatics pipeline developed for crosslinking, ligation and analysis of sequence hybrids (CLASH)43.
The CRAC datasets of Has1, Mak5, Spb4 and the wild-type yeast control are deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/] under the accession code GSE109216. Other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Woolford, J. L. J. & Baserga, S. J. Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 195, 643–681 (2013).
Gerhardy, S., Menet, A. M., Pena, C., Petkowski, J. J. & Panse, V. G. Assembly and nuclear export of pre-ribosomal particles in budding yeast. Chromosoma 123, 327–344 (2014).
Henras, A. K., Plisson-Chastang, C., O’Donohue, M. F., Chakraborty, A. & Gleizes, P. E. An overview of pre-ribosomal RNA processing in eukaryotes. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 6, 225–242 (2015).
Watkins, N. J. & Bohnsack, M. T. The box C/D and H/ACA snoRNPs: key players in the modification, processing and the dynamic folding of ribosomal RNA. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA 3, 397–414 (2012).
Sloan, K. E. et al. Tuning the ribosome: the influence of rRNA modification on eukaryotic ribosome biogenesis and function. RNA Biol. 14, 1138–1152 (2017).
de la Cruz, J., Karbstein, K. & Woolford, J. L. J. Functions of ribosomal proteins in assembly of eukaryotic ribosomes in vivo. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 84, 93–129 (2015).
Burlacu, E. et al. High-throughput RNA structure probing reveals critical folding events during early 60S ribosome assembly in yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 714 (2017).
Bradatsch, B. et al. Structure of the pre-60S ribosomal subunit with nuclear export factor Arx1 bound at the exit tunnel. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1234–1241 (2012).
Kater, L. et al. Visualizing the assembly pathway of nucleolar pre-60S ribosomes. Cell 171, 1599–1610 (2017).
Barandun, J. et al. The complete structure of the small-subunit processome. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 944–953 (2017).
Leidig, C. et al. 60S ribosome biogenesis requires rotation of the 5S ribonucleoprotein particle. Nat. Commun. 5, 3491 (2014).
Wu, S. et al. Diverse roles of assembly factors revealed by structures of late nuclear pre-60S ribosomes. Nature 534, 133–137 (2016).
Sanghai, Z. A. et al. Modular assembly of the nucleolar pre-60S ribosomal subunit. Nature 556, 126–129 (2018).
Zhou, D. et al. Cryo-EM structure of an early precursor of large ribosomal subunit reveals a half-assembled intermediate. Protein Cell. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-018-0526-7 (2018).
Konikkat, S., Biedka, S. & Woolford, J. L. J. The assembly factor Erb1 functions in multiple remodeling events during 60S ribosomal subunit assembly in S. cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 4853–4865 (2017).
Fromm, L. et al. Reconstitution of the complete pathway of ITS2 processing at the pre-ribosome. Nat. Commun. 8, 1787 (2017).
Matsuo, Y. et al. Coupled GTPase and remodelling ATPase activities form a checkpoint for ribosome export. Nature 505, 112–116 (2014).
Barrio-Garcia, C. et al. Architecture of the Rix1-Rea1 checkpoint machinery during pre-60S-ribosome remodeling. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 23, 37–44 (2015).
Bassler, J. et al. The AAA-ATPase Rea1 drives removal of biogenesis factors during multiple stages of 60S ribosome assembly. Mol. Cell 38, 712–721 (2010).
Martin, R., Straub, A. U., Doebele, C. & Bohnsack, M. T. DExD/H-box RNA helicases in ribosome biogenesis. RNA Biol. 10, 4–18 (2013).
Martin, R. et al. A pre-ribosomal RNA interaction network involving snoRNAs and the Rok1 helicase. RNA 20, 1173–1182 (2014).
Bohnsack, M. T. et al. Prp43 Bound at Different Sites on the Pre-rRNA Performs Distinct Functions in Ribosome Synthesis. Mol. Cell 36, 583–592 (2009).
Bohnsack, M. T., Kos, M. & Tollervey, D. Quantitative analysis of snoRNA association with pre-ribosomes and release of snR30 by Rok1 helicase. EMBO Rep. 9, 1230–1236 (2008).
Sardana, R. et al. The DEAH-box helicase Dhr1 dissociates U3 from the pre-rRNA to promote formation of the central pseudoknot. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002083 (2015).
Liang, X.-H. & Fournier, M. J. The helicase Has1p is required for snoRNA release from pre-rRNA. Mol. Cell Biol. 26, 7437–7450 (2006).
Koš, M. & Tollervey, D. The putative RNA helicase Dbp4p is required for release of the U14 snoRNA from preribosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 20, 53–64 (2005).
Pertschy, B. et al. RNA helicase Prp43 and its co-factor Pfa1 promote 20 to 18 S rRNA processing catalyzed by the endonuclease Nob1. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 35079–35091 (2009).
Sharma, S. et al. Yeast Kre33 and human NAT10 are conserved 18S rRNA cytosine acetyltransferases that modify tRNAs assisted by the adaptor Tan1/THUMPD1. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 2242–2258 (2015).
Dembowski, J. A., Kuo, B. & Woolford, J. L. Has1 regulates consecutive maturation and processing steps for assembly of 60S ribosomal subunits. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 7889–7904 (2013).
Khoshnevis, S. et al. The DEAD-box protein Rok1 orchestrates 40s and 60s ribosome assembly by promoting the release of Rrp5 from pre-40S ribosomes to allow for 60S maturation. PLoS Biol. 14, 1–25 (2016).
de la Cruz, J., Kressler, D., Rojo, M., Tollervey, D. & Linder, P. Spb4p, an essential putative RNA helicase, is required for a late step in the assembly of 60S ribosomal subunits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA 4, 1268–1281 (1998).
Zagulski, M., Kressler, D., Bécam, A. M., Rytka, J. & Herbert, C. J. Mak5p, which is required for the maintenance of the M1 dsRNA virus, is encoded by the yeast ORF YBR142w and is involved in the biogenesis of the 60S subunit of the ribosome. Mol. Genet. Genom. 270, 216–224 (2003).
Emery, B., de la Cruz, J., Rocak, S., Deloche, O. & Linder, P. Has1p, a member of the DEAD-box family, is required for 40S ribosomal subunit biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 52, 141–158 (2004).
Kos-Braun, I. C., Jung, I. & Kos, M. Tor1 and CK2 kinases control a switch between alternative ribosome biogenesis pathways in a growth-dependent manner. PLoS Biol. 15, e2000245 (2017).
Rocak, S., Emery, B., Tanner, N. K. & Linder, P. Characterization of the ATPase and unwinding activities of the yeast DEAD-box protein Has1p and the analysis of the roles of the conserved motifs. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 999–1009 (2005).
Linder, P. & Jankowsky, E. From unwinding to clamping - the DEAD box RNA helicase family. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 505–516 (2011).
Bohnsack, M. T., Tollervey, D. & Granneman, S. Identification of RNA helicase target sites by UV cross-linking and analysis of cDNA. Methods Enzymol. 511, 275–288 (2012).
Baejen, C. et al. Transcriptome maps of mRNP biogenesis factors define pre-mRNA recognition. Mol. Cell 55, 745–757 (2014).
Webb, S., Hector, R. D., Kudla, G. & Granneman, S. PAR-CLIP data indicate that Nrd1-Nab3-dependent transcription termination regulates expression of hundreds of protein coding genes in yeast. Genome Biol. 15, R8 (2014).
Petrov, A. S. et al. Secondary structures of rRNAs from all three domains of life. PLoS ONE 9, e88222 (2014).
Li, H. D., Zagorski, J. & Fournier, M. J. Depletion of U14 small nuclear RNA (snR128) disrupts production of 18S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 1145–1152 (1990).
Lowe, T. M. & Eddy, S. R. A computational screen for methylation guide snoRNAs in yeast. Science 283, 1168–1171 (1999).
Kudla, G., Granneman, S., Hahn, D., Beggs, J. D. & Tollervey, D. Cross-linking, ligation, and sequencing of hybrids reveals RNA-RNA interactions in yeast. TL - 108. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10010–10015 (2011).
Chaker-Margot, M., Barandun, J., Hunziker, M. & Klinge, S. Architecture of the yeast small subunit processome. Science 355, eaal1880 (2017).
Cheng, J., Kellner, N., Berninghausen, O., Hurt, E. & Beckmann, R. 3.2-A-resolution structure of the 90S preribosome before A1 pre-rRNA cleavage. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 954–964 (2017).
Pratte, D., Singh, U., Murat, G. & Kressler, D. Mak5 and Ebp2 act together on early pre-60S particles and their reduced functionality bypasses the requirement for the essential pre-60S factor Nsa1. PLoS ONE 8, e82741 (2013).
Lawley, P. D. & Brookes, P. Further studies on the alkylation of nucleic acids and their constituent nucleotides. Biochem. J. 89, 127–138 (1963).
Ben-Shem, A., Jenner, L., Yusupova, G. & Yusupov, M. Crystal structure of the eukaryotic ribosome. Science 330, 1203–1209 (2010).
Talkish, J., Zhang, J., Jakovljevic, J., Horsey, E. W. & Woolford, J. L. J. Hierarchical recruitment into nascent ribosomes of assembly factors required for 27SB pre-rRNA processing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 8646–8661 (2012).
Soltanieh, S. et al. DEAD-box RNA helicase Dbp4 is required for small-subunit processome formation and function. Mol. Cell Biol. 35, 816–830 (2015).
Shu, S. & Ye, K. Structural and functional analysis of ribosome assembly factor Efg1. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 2096–2106 (2018).
Sloan, K. E., Gleizes, P.-E. & Bohnsack, M. T. Nucleocytoplasmic transport of RNAs and RNA-protein complexes. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 2040–2059 (2016).
Mallam, A. L. et al. Solution structures of DEAD-box RNA chaperones reveal conformational changes and nucleic acid tethering by a basic tail. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 12254–12259 (2011).
West, M., Hedges, J. B., Chen, A. & Johnson, A. W. Defining the order in which Nmd3p and Rpl10p load onto nascent 60S ribosomal subunits. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3802–3813 (2005).
Sulima, S. O. et al. Eukaryotic rpL10 drives ribosomal rotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 2049–2063 (2014).
Eisinger, D. P., Dick, F. A. & Trumpower, B. L. Qsr1p, a 60S ribosomal subunit protein, is required for joining of 40S and 60S subunits. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 5136–5145 (1997).
Brachmann, C. B. et al. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14, 115–132 (1998).
Longtine, M. S. et al. Additional modules for versatile and economical PCR-based gene deletion and modification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 14, 953–961 (1998).
Janke, C. et al. A versatile toolbox for PCR-based tagging of yeast genes: New fluorescent proteins, more markers and promoter substitution cassettes. Yeast 21, 947–962 (2004).
Heininger, A. U. et al. Protein cofactor competition regulates the action of a multifunctional RNA helicase in different pathways. RNA Biol. 13, 320–330 (2016).
Memet, I., Doebele, C., Sloan, K. E. & Bohnsack, M. T. The G-patch protein NF-kappaB-repressing factor mediates the recruitment of the exonuclease XRN2 and activation of the RNA helicase DHX15 in human ribosome biogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 5359–5374 (2017).
Swiatkowska, A. et al. Kinetic analysis of pre-ribosome structure in vivo. RNA 18, 2187–2200 (2012).
Jungfleisch, J. et al. A novel translational control mechanism involving RNA structures within coding sequences. Genome Res. 27, 95–106 (2017).
We thank Maike Ruprecht for technical assistance, Agata Swiatkowska for help with structure probing experiments and Sabine König for mass spectrometry. This work was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB860 to M.T.B. and H.U.; SFB1190 to M.T.B. for supporting analysis of pre-export remodelling) and the University Medical Center Göttingen (to M.T.B.).
The Authors declare no Competing Interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Brüning, L., Hackert, P., Martin, R. et al. RNA helicases mediate structural transitions and compositional changes in pre-ribosomal complexes. Nat Commun 9, 5383 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07783-w
This article is cited by
Sequence-specific remodeling of a topologically complex RNP substrate by Spb4
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (2022)
The RNA helicase Dbp7 promotes domain V/VI compaction and stabilization of inter-domain interactions during early 60S assembly
Nature Communications (2021)
Ribosome-bound Get4/5 facilitates the capture of tail-anchored proteins by Sgt2 in yeast
Nature Communications (2021)
Association of snR190 snoRNA chaperone with early pre-60S particles is regulated by the RNA helicase Dbp7 in yeast
Nature Communications (2021)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.