Selective production of phase-separable product from a mixture of biomass-derived aqueous oxygenates


Selective conversion of an aqueous solution of mixed oxygenates produced by biomass fermentation to a value-added single product is pivotal for commercially viable biomass utilization. However, the efficiency and selectivity of the transformation remains a great challenge. Herein, we present a strategy capable of transforming ~70% of carbon in an aqueous fermentation mixture (ABE: acetone–butanol–ethanol–water) to 4-heptanone (4-HPO), catalyzed by tin-doped ceria (Sn-ceria), with a selectivity as high as 86%. Water (up to 27 wt%), detrimental to the reported catalysts for ABE conversion, was beneficial for producing 4-HPO, highlighting the feasibility of the current reaction system. In a 300 h continuous reaction over 2 wt% Sn-ceria catalyst, the average 4-HPO selectivity is maintained at 85% with 50% conversion and > 90% carbon balance. This strategy offers a route for highly efficient organic-carbon utilization, which can potentially integrate biological and chemical catalysis platforms for the robust and highly selective production of value-added chemicals.


With the development of sustainable energy and chemicals, interest in fermentation processes is reviving, because they can transform non-edible biomass feedstock to low-molecular-weight oxygenates, such as acetone, n-butanol, and ethanol in the acetone–butanol–ethanol–water (ABE) fermentation broth1,2. The crude fermentation broth contains low concentrations of oxygenates, which can be enriched by specific techniques such as pervaporation, gas stripping, and adsorption. However, the complexity/cost of the purification process limits its widespread practical applications. Thus, finding a method to directly and selectively convert crude aqueous oxygenate mixture to value-added chemicals, especially water-immiscible ones, thus allowing easy separation after reaction, is of great importance.

The efficiency and selectivity of the transformation process for biomass-derived intermediates remains a major techno-economic challenge3. Significantly, carbon–carbon coupling enables the conversion of small intermediate molecules to larger ones, which is critical for fuel production4,5,6,7. However, carbon–carbon cross-coupling between oxygenates is complicated. For homogeneous catalysts, although high yield can be achieved, the separation of the catalyst after reaction is difficult8,9. For heterogeneous catalysts, the selectivities for certain reactions are rather low10 and both types of catalysts demand high purity of feedstock11, which is a major obstacle to industrialization of biomass conversion. In ABE fermentation broth conversion, deprotonation of the C–H group at the α-positions of the primary products, including acetone, acetaldehyde, and butanal is not selective. Enolate intermediates generated in the process react with aldehyde or ketone to produce a randomly distributed ketone mixture with carbon number ranging from 5 to 11, which is ideal for fuel production but not enough for single chemical fabrication. Moreover, the presence of large amount of water deactivates the reported catalytic system in aqueous ABE solution12. It is pivotal to develop a highly efficient water-resistant catalyst for the direct conversion of crude aqueous oxygenate mixture.

Herein we report a simple reaction for the conversion of aqueous ABE fermentation broth, containing acetone, n-butanol, ethanol, acetic acid, and butyric acid to a water-immiscible product efficiently and selectively. Catalyzed by Sn-ceria catalyst, the biomass-derived oxygenates mixture was transformed to 4-heptanone (4-HPO) (a flexible precursor for the synthesis of various value-added chemicals or fuels (Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1)) with selectivity as high as 86%. A series of characterizations verified the importance of highly dispersed tin oxide and oxygen vacancies in the selective production of 4-HPO from the ABE mixture. A biomass conversion route to transform low-quality biomass fermentation broth to easily separable value-added product was constructed using this strategy, thereby greatly reducing process complexity.

Results and Discussion

Catalytic results

First, a mixture of acetone, n-butanol, ethanol, and water in a f 9:51:1:22 ratio (by weight) was fed into a vertical fixed-bed reactor loaded with a ceria catalyst, which was prepared by a precipitation method13. Liquid products were collected using a cold-trap. Carbon balance, conversion, yield, and selectivity were calculated based on carbon number of each molecule, as per the following equations (see Supplementary Figure 2 and Supplementary Table 2).

$${\mathrm{Carbon}}\,{\mathrm{balance}}\,\left( {\mathrm{\% }} \right){\mathrm{ = }}\frac{{{{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{gas}}} + {{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{liquid}}}}}{{{{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{feed}}}}}{\mathrm{ \times 100\% }}$$
$$\begin{array}{l}{\mathrm{Conversion}}\,\left( {\mathrm{\% }} \right) = \\ \frac{{{{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{feed}}} - n\left(\mathrm{c}\right)_{{\mathrm{liquid,}}\,{\mathrm{butanol}}} - n\left(\mathrm{c} \right)_{{\mathrm{liquid,}}\,{\mathrm{ethanol}}} -{n}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{liquid,}}\,{\mathrm{acetone}}}}}{{{n}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{feed}}}}}{\mathrm{ \times 100\% }}\end{array}$$
$${\mathrm{Yield}}\,\left( {\mathrm{\% }} \right) = \frac{{n\left( \mathrm{c} \right)_{{\mathrm{4 - HPO}}}}}{{{{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{feed}}}}} \times {\mathrm{100\% }}$$
$$\begin{array}{l}{\mathrm{Selectivity}}\,\left( {{\mathrm{4 - HPO}}} \right)\left( {\mathrm{\% }} \right) = \\ \frac{{{{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{4 - HPO}}}}}{{{{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{gas}}} + {{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{liquid}}} - n\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{liquid,}}\,{\mathrm{butanol}}} - n\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{liquid,}}\,{\mathrm{ethanol}}} - {{n}}\left( {\mathrm{c}} \right)_{{\mathrm{liquid,}}\,{\mathrm{acetone}}}}} \times {\mathrm{100\% }}\end{array}$$

where n(c)4-HPO is the number of moles of carbon atoms in 4-HPO, n(c)feed is the number of moles of carbon atoms in the feedstock, and n(c)liquid is the number of moles of carbon atoms in the liquid trapped in the tank, including products and unreacted feedstock. The terms n(c)liquid, butanol, n(c)liquid, acetone, and n(c)liquid, ethanol represent the number of moles of carbon atoms of n-butanol, acetone, and ethanol, respectively, trapped in the liquid. The terms n(c)gas is the number of moles of carbon atoms in gaseous products.

When the reaction was conducted at 400–420 °C over ceria catalyst, the liquid-phase product naturally separates into two layers: the light-yellow upper layer is the oil phase and the colorless bottom layer is the aqueous phase. The oil phase was found to consist of 78% 4-HPO and 15% 2-pentanone, whereas in the aqueous phase mainly unreacted acetone and water were detected. In the gas phase, < 4% CO2 was detected, demonstrating that most of the converted reactants have been fixed into liquid products. For comparison, no product was obtained in the uncatalyzed reaction (Table 1).

Table 1 Conversion of aqueous ABE solution over various catalysts[a]

Reaction pathways

The reaction with pure oxygenate mixture without water was studied. Interestingly, the selectivity of 4-HPO decreased from 84% to 31% together with a decrease of conversion from 22% to 10%, suggesting that water is critical for the highly selective synthesis of 4-HPO in this system. (Fig. 1(a, b)). This also holds when using pure n-butanol or n-butanol/water as the feed (Supplementary Figure 3). Significantly, with n-butanol/water as the feed, 4-HPO was proposed to be produced by the following steps (Supplementary Figure 4): (i) dehydrogenation of n-butanol to butanal and hydrogen, (ii) esterification of butanol and butanal to butyl butyrate and hydrogen, (iii) reduction of ceria by hydrogen to produce oxygen vacancies, (iv) water dissociation on the oxygen vacancies to produce active oxygen (O*) and hydrogen, (v) aldol condensation of butanal to hydroxyaldehyde, (vi) reaction of hydroxyaldehyde with O* to form surface-adsorbed carboxylate, and finally, (vii) dehydrogenation and decarboxylation of the carboxylate to obtain 4-HPO14. In order to confirm the role of water in the oxygenate conversion process, isotope labeling experiments were conducted over ceria at 400 °C. Upon injecting D2O to the pretreated ceria in H2 at 400 °C, hydrogen deuteride and deuterium (HD and D2) are observed (Supplementary Figure 5), indicating that the water dissociates at the oxygen vacancies on the ceria surface to produce hydrogen and heal the defects15,16. When a mixture of n-butanol and D2O (5 mL and 1 mL, respectively) was injected and carried to the catalyst bed by Ar gas, the formation of H2 (m/z = 2), HD (m/z = 3), D2 (m/z = 4), and CO2 (m/z = 44) was immediately detected by on-line mass spectrometry, which confirms the role of water in the transformation of n-butanol. In all of the conducted five pulses, HD and D2 were detected (Fig. 1(c)).

Fig. 1

The catalytic function of water in ABE aqueous solution conversion reaction and proposed reaction pathways. a ABE as feedstock (A:B:E weight ratio is 9:51:1). b ABE with water as feedstock (A:B:E:H2O weight ratio is 9:51:1:22). Reaction conditions: ceria (16.0 g, 14–25 mesh), N2 as carrier gas (flow rate = 33 mL min−1), 400 °C, WHSV = 0.5 h−1. c Pulse reaction of a mixture of n-butanol and D2O (detected by on-line mass spectrometry). Ceria (1.0 g, 14–25 mesh), 10 μL per injection of n-butanol and D2O mixture, Ar as carrier gas (flow rate = 30 mL min−1), 400 °C. The fluctuation of each pulse is due to non-uniform sampling of butanol for each injection (from butanol/D2O emulsion mixture). d Proposed reaction pathways leading to 4-HPO in a fixed-bed reactor with acetone, n-butanol, ethanol, and water as feedstock over ceria-based catalyst

To elucidate the reaction pathways for forming 4-HPO, ceria-catalyzed reactions with different mixed oxygenate substrates were conducted. For the substrate without n-butanol, condensation of acetone and ethanol can produce 4-HPO over ceria. The feed containing only ethanol generated 38% acetone, 31% 2-pentanone, 20% 2-pentanol, and 11% n-butanol in the liquid17. The condensation of 2-pentanone and ethanol selectively generated 4-HPO, confirmed by co-feeding 2-pentanone, and ethanol (Supplementary Figure 6). In addition, the feed containing only acetone resulted in self-condensation products of acetone, including 15% mesityl oxide, 7% isophorone, and the further isomerized (6% 4-methylpent-4-en-2-one) or hydrogenated products (5% 4-methylpentan-2-one). 3, 5-Dimethylphenol (26%), formed via demethanation of isophorone, and its derivative (13% 2, 4, 6-trimethylphenol), were also observed in the liquid phase18,19,20. However, this complex product distribution was not observed for ABE mixture conversion, suggesting that under our reaction condition, the condensation of acetone with ethanol is more favorable than the self-condensation of acetone. Acetone is a product of acetic acid ketonization reaction over acid-base catalysts21.

Interestingly, although ceria is a versatile catalyst for dehydrogenation, alcohol Guerbet reaction, condensation, and esterification reactions, all these reactions generate 4-HPO with high selectivity. Figure 1(d) illustrates the complicated reaction network with the feedstock of acetone, n-butanol, ethanol, and water, which could be summarized as follows:

(1) n-Butanol can be dehydrogenated to butanal, which reacts with water on reduced ceria catalyst to form 4-HPO, as confirmed by the result of co-feeding of butanal and water (Supplementary Figure 7).

(2) Besides acting as reactant, n-butanol is also a product generated via ethanol Guerbet reaction, from which 4-HPO was produced via route (1).

(3) n-Butanol can be dehydrogenated to butanal, and then to butyl butyrate via esterification of n-butanol and butanal. The reaction of butyl butyrate and water generates 4-HPO, experimentally confirmed by the co-feeding of butyl butyrate and water (Supplementary Figure 8).

(4) Dehydrogenation of ethanol produces acetaldehyde, which then condenses with acetone to give 2-pentanone, whose further condensation with ethanol produces 4-HPO.

Catalyst synthesis and characterization

From the above discussion, it is noteworthy that aldehydes produced by the dehydrogenation of ethanol and n-butanol are important precursors for selective 4-HPO generation. Promoters were introduced to ceria, to further enhance the dehydrogenation ability, including a series of metal oxides such as MgO, ZnO, Fe2O3, and SnO2. In the n-butanol dehydrogenation reaction (Supplementary Figure 9 (a)), butanal, which is a key intermediate for 4-HPO generation, was the major product obtained over these metal oxide catalysts, among which SnO2 offers the best selectivity toward butanal (over 99%). We then prepared a series of Sn-modified ceria catalysts with different approaches (marked A, B, C, and D) and employed them in aqueous ABE conversion (Supplementary Figure 9 (b)). Among these catalysts, the Sn-doped ceria catalyst (marked as Sn-ceria) prepared by co-precipitation (style D), showed the highest selectivity toward 4-HPO and the best catalytic stability (Supplementary Figure 9 (c)), the optimal loading for Sn being 2 wt% (Supplementary Figure 10). For comparison, 2 wt% In-, Fe-, and Zn-doped ceria catalyts were also prepared with the similar method. All of them showed less efficient catalytic performances with either moderate conversion or lower selectivity of 4-HPO (Table 1). Ceria can provide redox sites especially oxygen vacancies, for the condensation, esterification, and Guerbet reactions, whereas tin is proposed to promote catalytic hydrogen removal. We conducted X-ray diffraction (XRD), inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis, N2 adsorption–desorption, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) experiments to characterize the best Sn-ceria catalysts (Fig. 2, Supplementary Figure 11-13, Supplementary Table 3-5). From the XRD profile, only the cubic phase of ceria is observed with Sn loading ≤ 5 wt% (please note the 5 wt% means that the weight loading of Sn added to the ceria catalyst is 5 wt%, whereas the loading amounts of the corresponding catalysts, determined by ICP, can be found in Supplementary Table 3). In contrast, the SnO2 phase appeared when 10 wt% and 20 wt% Sn was doped into the ceria catalysts (Fig. 2(a)). This indicates that when the loading of Sn is not too high, the tin species are highly dispersed over the ceria surface. The highly dispersed state of the tin species on 2 wt% Sn-ceria catalyst is further confirmed by TEM observations and energy dispersive spectroscopic elemental mappings, which show that the tin species are almost homogeneously distributed over the ceria surface and no aggregation or sintering of Sn is identified (Fig. 2(d)). This highly dispersed tin species may accelerate the dehydrogenation of the complex reaction network of ABE mixture transformation and drive the reaction towards 4-HPO. Furthermore, UV-Raman spectra are found to be dominated by the strong F2g mode of the ceria fluorite phase at 462 cm−1 and a band at 592 cm1 due to the defect-induced (D) mode for both ceria and 2 wt% Sn-ceria (Fig. 2(b)). The relative intensity ratio of ID/IF2g (concentration of oxygen vacancy) is about 0.86 for 2 wt% Sn-ceria, which is a little higher than that for ceria (0.81), indicating that Sn addition promoted the formation of oxygen vacancies, as confirmed by the higher concentration of Ce(III) in 2 wt% Sn-ceria than pristine ceria (32.8% vs. 23.3%, Fig. 2(c)). Both the highly dispersed tin species and oxygen vacancies are critical for the good catalytic performance obtained.

Fig. 2

Characterizations of ceria and Sn-ceria catalysts. a XRD patterns (using Cu Kα radiation) of ceria and Sn-ceria catalysts with various Sn loading ranging from 1 wt% to 20 wt%. b UV-Raman spectra of ceria (green line) and 2 wt% Sn-Ceria (orange line). c XPS spectra for Ce 3d core level of pristine ceria and 2 wt% Sn-ceria. d TEM and EDS elemental mapping images (Ce and Sn) of 1 wt%, 2 wt%, and 5 wt% Sn-ceria catalysts. Scale bar, 10 nm

Effects of feedstock

Different bacteria and fermentation technologies generate ABE solutions with different concentrations and compositions1. Thus, it is imperative to know the effect of water content on this reaction process. We conducted the reaction using three artificial aqueous ABE solutions with different water contents (623 g L−1, 707 g L−1, and 783 g L−1), selected based on the representative water content that can be obtained by current separation techniques reported in literature (Supplementary Figure 14). In all the cases, the selectivity towards 4-HPO is higher than 80%. Apart from substrate concentration, the ratio of different oxygenates might also have an impact on the reaction. We tested an aqueous ABE solution with different reactant ratios (e.g.: A:B:E mass ratio = 3:6:1, water content: ~20 wt%, to simulate fermentation by Clostridium acetobutylicum) and observed that 4-HPO selectivity of ~68% and yield of ~55% can be obtained, suggesting the pervasiveness of the current method (Table 1). In addition, organic acids, mainly acetic acid and butyric acid, are usually produced during ABE fermentation2,22. Here, the addition of acetic acid and butyric acid (1.7 wt% and 1.5 wt%, respectively) increased 4-HPO selectivity from 84% to 90% (Supplementary Figure 15).

Catalytic stability

To test the catalyst stability, we performed a continuous reaction by using 2 wt% Sn-ceria (Fig. 3(a)). Initially, 4-HPO was produced with ~70% conversion and ~86% selectivity. After about 300 h, the average 4-HPO selectivity was maintained at 85% with 50% conversion and > 90% carbon balance. The cold-trapped liquid phase naturally separates into two layers (Fig. 3(b)), easily separable in a separatory funnel. Phase (A) contains 4-HPO, 2-pentanone, unreacted acetone, and n-butanol, while phase (B) mainly contains unreacted acetone and water (Supplementary Figure Figure 16). High purity of 4-HPO ( > 95%) can be obtained by fractional distillation of phase (A), showing the power of current process (Supplementary Figure 17). After 300 h of reaction, extensive shrinkage was observed in the catalyst surface area, possibly due to carbonaceous deposition, which are the main reasons for the slight deactivation of the catalyst (Supplementary Figure 18-20). Developing highly stable tin–ceria-based catalyst system is the next goal of this biomass transformation process.

Fig. 3

Stability test of 2 wt% Sn-ceria catalyst in aqueous ABE solution conversion reaction. a Catalytic stability test result. Catalyst (3.2 g, 40–60 mesh), N2 as carrier gas (10 mL min−1), 420 °C, WHSV = 0.5 h−1. ABE solution as feedstock with A:B:E:water ratio of 9:51:1:22 (by weight). b Images of ABE feedstock (left) and trapped liquid products (right)

In summary, herein we have developed a strategy for the catalytic conversion of aqueous ABE solutions to phase-separable 4-HPO with ~86% selectivity and ~70% conversion over Sn-ceria catalyst. The presence of water was critical for this highly selective catalytic system. Sn-modified ceria serves as a versatile catalyst for the complicated catalytic reaction network and all the catalyzed reactions yield 4-HPO with high selectivity. This system paves a path for effective biomass conversion to obtain value-added products.

Data availability

All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Tashiro, Y., Yoshida, T., Noguchi, T. & Sonomoto, K. Recent advances and future prospects for increased butanol production by acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation. Eng. Life Sci. 13, 432–445 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kujawska, A., Kujawski, J., Bryjak, M. & Kujawski, W. ABE fermentation products recovery methods-a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 48, 648–661 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alamillo, R., Crisci, A. J., Gallo, J. M. R., Scott, S. L. & Dumesic, J. A. A tailored microenvironment for catalytic biomass conversion in inorganic-organic nanoreactors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 10349–10351 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Orozco, L. M., Renz, M. & Corma, A. Carbon-carbon bond formation and hydrogen production in the ketonization of aldehydes. ChemSusChem 9, 2430–2442 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sacia, E. R. et al. Highly selective condensation of biomass-derived methyl ketones as a source of aviation fuel. ChemSusChem 8, 1726–1736 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Huber, G. W., Chheda, J. N., Barrett, C. J. & Dumesic, J. A. Production of liquid alkanes by aqueous-phase processing of biomass-derived carbohydrates. Science 308, 1446–1450 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kunkes, E. L. et al. Catalytic conversion of biomass to monofunctional hydrocarbons and targeted liquid-fuel classes. Science 322, 417–421 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Liu, D. J., Zhang, Y. T. & Chen, E. Y. X. Organocatalytic upgrading of the key biorefining building block by a catalytic ionic liquid and N-heterocyclic carbenes. Green. Chem. 14, 2738–2746 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wilson, J. & Chen, E. Y. X. Organocatalytic cross-coupling of biofuranics to multifunctional difuranic C-11 building blocks. Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4, 4927–4936 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Harvey, B. G. et al. Renewable thermosetting resins and thermoplastics from vanillin. Green. Chem. 17, 1249–1258 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Zang, H. J. et al. Catalytic coupling of biomass-derived aldehydes into intermediates for biofuels and materials. Catal. Sci. Technol. 8, 1777–1798 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Anbarasan, P. et al. Integration of chemical catalysis with extractive fermentation to produce fuels. Nature 491, 235–239 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Wang, Y. H. et al. Heterogeneous ceria catalyst with water-tolerant Lewis acidic sites for one-pot synthesis of 1,3-diols via Prins condensation and hydrolysis reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 1506–1515 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nishiguchi, T. et al. Catalytic steam reforming of ethanol to produce hydrogen and acetone. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 279, 273–277 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rodriguez, J. A. et al. Activity of CeOx and TiOx nanoparticles grown on Au(111) in the water-gas shift reaction. Science 318, 1757–1760 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Montini, T., Melchionna, M., Monai, M. & Fornasiero, P. Fundamentals and catalytic applications of CeO2-based materials. Chem. Rev. 116, 5987–6041 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Moore, C. M. et al. Acetaldehyde as an ethanol derived bio-building block: an alternative to Guerbet chemistry. Green. Chem. 19, 169–174 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Faba, L., Diaz, E. & Ordonez, S. Gas phase acetone self-condensation over unsupported and supported Mg-Zr mixed-oxides catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 142, 387–395 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Quesada, J. et al. Role of surface intermediates in the deactivation of Mg-Zr mixed oxides in acetone self-condensation: a combined DRIFT and ex situ characterization approach. J. Catal. 329, 1–9 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Moore, C. M. et al. Synthesis of acetone-derived C-6, C-9, and C-12 carbon scaffolds for chemical and fuel applications. Chemsuschem 9, 3382–3386 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Gliński, M., Kijeński, J. & Jakubowski, A. Ketones from monocarboxylic acids: catalytic ketonization over oxide systems. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 128, 209–217 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Thang, V. H., Kanda, K. & Kobayashi, G. Production of acetone-butanol-ethanol (ABE) in direct fermentation of cassava by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 161, 157–170 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work received financial support from the “Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences” (XDB17000000, XDB17020300), the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0602200), and the Natural Science Foundation of China (21721004, 21690080, 21711530020, 21725301, 91645115, 21473003, 21673273, 21872163, and 21821004).

Author information




F.W. and D.M. designed the study. Y.W., J.Z. and Z.Z. performed most of the reactions. Y.W., M.P. and J.A. did the data analysis. Y.W., M.P., D.M. and F.W. wrote the paper. S.D., H.A., F.F., and X.L. conducted the experiments of XPS, Raman, and TEM. P.Z. provided reagents and revised the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ding Ma or Feng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Peng, M., Zhang, J. et al. Selective production of phase-separable product from a mixture of biomass-derived aqueous oxygenates. Nat Commun 9, 5183 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.