Abstract
The recently proposed digital coding metasurfaces make it possible to control electromagnetic (EM) waves in real time, and allow the implementation of many different functionalities in a programmable way. However, current configurations are only spaceencoded, and do not exploit the temporal dimension. Here, we propose a general theory of spacetime modulated digital coding metasurfaces to obtain simultaneous manipulations of EM waves in both space and frequency domains, i.e., to control the propagation direction and harmonic power distribution simultaneously. As proofofprinciple application examples, we consider harmonic beam steering, beam shaping, and scatteringsignature control. For validation, we realize a prototype controlled by a fieldprogrammable gate array, which implements the harmonic beam steering via an optimized spacetime coding sequence. Numerical and experimental results, in good agreement, demonstrate good performance of the proposed approach, with potential applications to diverse fields such as wireless communications, cognitive radars, adaptive beamforming, holographic imaging.
Introduction
During the past decades, electromagnetic (EM) metamaterials have experienced exponential developments due to their unique, finely tailorable properties that are not necessarily available in nature. Metamaterials are artificially engineered structures which have been widely used to manipulate EM waves in unconventional ways, leading to many exciting phenomena and novel devices^{1}. Metasurfaces, as the twodimensional (2D) equivalence of metamaterials, are attracting a steadily growing interest from researchers in both science and engineering communities, owing to their capability to provide abrupt phase shift, amplitude modulation (AM), and polarization conversion of EM waves^{2,3,4}. Compared with threedimensional (3D) bulk metamaterials, metasurfaces exhibit a negligible electrical thickness, thereby providing much better integrability and lower insertion losses. In 2011, Yu et al. put forward the idea of generalized Snell’s laws of reflection and refraction^{2}, by designing a metasurface capable of impressing an abrupt phase shift, resulting in phase discontinuities that could be used to control (e.g., steer and focus) the light wavefronts. Since then, metasurfaces have experienced a fastpaced development, leading to many interesting devices capable of manipulating microwaves, terahertz waves, and visible light^{5,6,7,8,9,10}. However, metasurfaces governed by the generalized Snell’s laws exhibit only spacegradient phase discontinuities on the interfaces, and are inherently constrained by Lorentz reciprocity and timereversal symmetry. In 2015, Hadad et al. proposed the concept of spacetime gradient metasurfaces^{11,12}, by applying time modulation to the electronic properties of the surface impedance, thereby attaining spacetime modulation of the EM waves and breaking the timereversal symmetry. In the same year, Shaltout et al. proposed timevarying metasurfaces by introducing a timegradient phase discontinuity^{13}, which can break Lorentz reciprocity and bring about a new degree of freedom in controlling EM waves. The reader is also referred to refs. ^{14,15,16,17} for more recent examples of applications and modeling of spacetimemodulated metasurfaces. It is worth stressing that most of the above studies deal with theoretical and numerical investigations, whereas experimental realizations remain quite limited.
On the other hand, digital coding and programmable metasurfaces have rapidly evolved since they were initially proposed in 2014^{18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33}. These structures were originally put forward to digitally control EM waves, by designing two distinct coding elements with opposite reflection phases (e.g., 0° and 180°) as the digital bits “0” and “1” (binary case)^{18}. This concept can be extended from binary (1bit) to multibit configurations. For example, a 2bit coding metasurface is constructed by a sequence of four coding elements “00”, “01”, “10”, and “11”, exhibiting 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° phase responses, respectively. Digital coding metasurfaces could greatly simplify the design and optimization procedures since the phase of the reflection (or transmission) coefficient is digitally discretized in the unitcell and system designs, thereby substantially reducing the parameter search space. By arranging the coding elements on a 2D plane with predesigned coding sequences, such metasurfaces can be used to manipulate EM waves in a simple and effective way. It is worth noting that the application range of coding metasurfaces is not limited to microwave frequencies, but it has also been extended to the terahertz band^{19,20,21,22,31}, as well as to acoustic scenarios^{23}.
Remarkably, digital coding metasurfaces have built a bridge between the physical and digital worlds, making it possible to revisit metamaterials from the perspective of information science^{29,30,31}. Most importantly, the digital description of coding metasurfaces is naturally suited to the integration with active elements, such as positiveintrinsicnegative (PIN) diodes, varactors, and microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). Therefore, all coding elements of a digital coding metasurface can be independently controlled by a fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA). By changing the coding sequences stored in the FPGA, many different functionalities can be switched in real time, thereby leading to programmable metasurfaces. Digital coding and programmable metasurfaces have been employed successfully to generate vortex beams^{32,33}, reprogrammable holograms^{26}, reflect/transmit arrays^{20,21,22,24,25}, diffuse scattering^{19,27,28}, etc.
In the above described digital programmable architectures, however, only space coding has hitherto been considered, whereas the time dimension has not been exploited. In other words, the coding sequences are generally fixed in time, and are changed by the control system only to switch the functionalities whenever needed. As previously mentioned, time modulation of metasurfaces has been suggested in refs. ^{11,12,13}, but these theoretical approaches were based on analog modulations, which are very difficult to realize in practice. As an alternative viable route, we introduce the concept of spacetimecoding to extend the arsenal of metasurfacebased wave manipulations.
Accordingly, in this paper, we consider spacetimecoding digital metasurfaces based on the time modulation of the reflection coefficient. Specifically, a set of coding sequences are switched cyclically in a predesigned time period, leading to the desired harmonic scatteredpower distributions in the frequency domain. To some extent, our approach combines the concept of digital coding metasurfaces with that of “phaseswitched screens”^{34} and “timemodulated arrays”^{35}. Firstly, we outline the fundamental theory of timevarying coding metasurfaces based on the Fourier transform method. Subsequently, we present several illustrative examples to demonstrate the potential of our approach in manipulating the spectral powers. The first example deals with attaining harmonic beam steering by exploiting a binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO) algorithm to design the spacetimecoding sequences. The second and third examples are focused on beam steering and shaping at the central frequency, and the remaining examples are aimed at reducing the scattering by suitably redistributing the power across the frequency spectrum. Finally, an 8 × 8 spacetime coding and programmable metasurface loaded with PIN diodes is fabricated and experimentally tested. The proposed approach is expected to broaden the applications of digital coding metasurfaces significantly, and promises important advantages in scenarios such as wireless communication^{36,37} and radar systems^{38}.
Results
Theory
We consider a spacetimecoding digital metasurface that contains a 2D array of M × N elements loaded with PINdiodes, as shown in Fig. 1. By applying a control voltage to a PIN diode, the reflection coefficient of the element can be dynamically controlled with discrete phase or amplitude states. For the 1bit case, the reflection phase or amplitude of each coding element can be periodically switched according to the digital “0/1” spacetimecoding matrix in the bottomright corner of Fig. 1, in which the red and green dots represent the “1” and “0” digits, respectively. The spacetimecoding strategy enables simultaneous control of EM waves in both spatial propagation and harmonic power distribution.
By assuming the timemodulation speed much smaller than the EMwave frequency, and based on physicalopticstype approximations, we can adiabatically extend the approximate modeling that was originally introduced for spacecoding metasurfaces^{18}. Accordingly, under normal incidence of plane waves with suppressed timeharmonic dependence exp(j2πf_{c}t_{c}), the timedomain farfield pattern scattered by the spacetimecoding digital metasurface can be expressed approximately as
where E_{pq}(θ,φ) is the farfield pattern pertaining to the (p, q)th coding element computed at the central frequency f_{c}, θ and φ are the elevation and azimuth angles, respectively, d_{x} and d_{y} are the element periods along the x and y directions, respectively, and λ_{c} is the central operational wavelength. According to the timeswitched array theory^{34,35}, Γ_{pq}(t) is the timemodulated reflection coefficient of the (p, q)th element, which is assumed as a periodic function of time and defined over one period as a linear combination of shifted pulse functions:
where U^{n}_{pq}(t) is a periodic pulse function with modulation period T_{0}. In each period, we have
where τ = T_{0}/L is the pulse width of U^{n}_{pq}(t), L is a positive integer representing the length of the timecoding sequence, and Γ^{n}_{pq} = A^{n}_{pq}exp(jφ^{n}_{pq}) is the reflection coefficient of the (p, q)th coding element during the interval (n − 1)τ ≤ t ≤ nτ at the central frequency, with A^{n}_{pq} and φ^{n}_{pq} denoting the amplitude and phase, respectively.
Next, we decompose U^{n}_{pq}(t) into a Fourier series
where f_{0} = 1/T_{0}, and the Fourier coefficients \(c_{pq}^{mn}\) are given by
Thus, the Fourier series coefficients \(a_{pq}^{\mathrm{m}}\) of the periodic function \(\Gamma _{pq}\left( t \right)\) can be represented as (see Supplementary Note 1 for detailed derivations)
Finally, the farfield scattering pattern of the spacetimecoding digital metasurface at the mth harmonic frequency f_{c} + mf_{0} is written as
In the approximate modeling, the mutual coupling between coding elements is ignored. Hence, for an arbitrary 3D spacetimecoding sequence (see Supplementary Note 2 for details), we can calculate the scattering pattern of the coding metasurface at any harmonic frequencies via Eq. (7). Throughout the paper, for simplicity, we assume isotropic coding elements (E_{pq} = 1). By controlling the timecoding sequences of the individual elements, a set of complex reflection coefficients \(a_{pq}^m\) is synthesized to control their scattering properties. More specifically, via Eq. (6), we can synthesize the equivalent amplitude and phase excitations of all elements at a specific harmonic frequency, as shown in Supplementary Figure 1.
In this study, we assume that the reflection amplitude \(A_{pq}^n\) of each element is uniform, whereas the phase \(\varphi _{pq}^n\) is a periodic function of time, whose values are either 0° or 180°, according to the digits “0” and “1” in the coding sequence. Henceforth, we shall refer to this scheme as “phase modulation” (PM). The coding sequence in the spacetimecoding digital metasurface can be arbitrary, and is represented by a 3D matrix with dimensions (M, N, L). For instance, Supplementary Figure 1a displays a random 3D spacetimecoding matrix with dimensions (8, 8, 8), representing a coding metasurface composed of 8 × 8 elements, with an 8interval periodic time modulation (see also Supplementary Figure 1f). All coding elements are periodically switched according to the 3D matrix shown in Supplementary Figure 1a. Each element has its own independent timecoding sequence, which results in different equivalent amplitudes and phases at the various harmonic frequencies. For instance, with reference to the +2nd harmonic frequency, the equivalent amplitude and phase distributions are shown in Supplementary Figures 1b, c, respectively. The corresponding 3D and 2D scattering patterns in the uvplane (u = sin θ cosφ, v = sin θ sin φ) are shown in Supplementary Figures 1d, e, respectively. The reader is referred to Supplementary Figures 2 and 3 for additional results.
As a key aspect of the proposed approach, we highlight that, although the physical coding elements exhibit only binary reflection phases (0° or 180°), the equivalent excitation [via Eq. (6)] can attain almost 360° phase coverage by suitably designing the timecoding sequences, as shown in Supplementary Figures 1c. In this way, a single 1bit (or 2bit) programmable metasurface periodically timeswitched can be used to effectively synthesize multibit programmable metasurfaces (see Supplementary Note 3), which can open up a plethora of interesting applications.
Harmonic beam steering
With the aid of the above theoretical analysis, we can successfully attain precise control of the scattering patterns at any harmonic frequencies. As a first illustrative example, we address the design of a spacetimecoding matrix for harmonic beam steering in one plane. Traditional timeswitched arrays considered in previous studies^{39,40} can realize harmonic beam steering by using timegradient sequences, as illustrated in Fig. 2a, b. However, these methods are based on AM, in which only one element of the array scatters at a given time, thereby resulting in significant gain reductions. Conversely, if we use the same time sequences, but considering the proposed PM scheme instead, the scattered powers can be significantly enhanced. The equivalent amplitudes and phases of the coding elements under AM and PM are shown in Fig. 2c, d, respectively. We clearly observe that the equivalent amplitudes pertaining to AM are almost constant, and significantly smaller than the PM ones, which confirms our intuition above. Moreover, it can also be observed that some equivalent phase gradients emerge at positive and negative harmonic frequencies (see white arrows), which are instrumental to steer the harmonic beams. The harmonic beam steering can be better understood by introducing a time shift in the Fourier transform. The timecoding sequences of the Yelements from 1st to 8th in Fig. 2b can be considered as the periodic function Γ_{pq}(t) with a time shift t_{q}, whence \(\Gamma _{pq}(t  t_q)\mathop{\longleftrightarrow}\limits^{{FS}}a_{pq}^m\exp \left( {  j2\pi mf_0t_q} \right)\). Accordingly, the time shift brings an additional space phase shift \( 2\pi mf_0t_q\) with unchanged amplitudes at the mth harmonic frequency, which clearly explains the phase gradients in Fig. 2c, d (see Supplementary Note 4 for more details). Figure 2e shows the normalized scattering patterns pertaining to AM at different harmonic frequencies, while Fig. 2f shows the PM ones (normalized with respect to those in Fig. 2e). The scattering peaks pertaining to PM are 15.56, 5.78, 5.11, and 3.90 dB higher than the AM ones at f_{c}, f_{c} ± f_{0}, f_{c} ± 2f_{0}, and f_{c} ± 3f_{0}, respectively. However, the power levels in the PM case are markedly unbalanced, as the power at the central frequency is much larger than those at other harmonic frequencies.
For better equalization of the power levels, we exploit a BPSO algorithm to optimize the timecoding sequence of each coding element (see Supplementary Note 5 for more details). As a result, we obtain an optimized 2D spacetime coding matrix, as shown in Fig. 3a. The equivalent amplitude and phase of this coding matrix are shown in Supplementary Figures 5a and 5b, respectively (see Supplementary Note 6 for details). The corresponding harmonic scattering patterns are shown in Fig. 3b, from which we observe that the power levels at different harmonic frequencies are now uniform and about 7.6 dB higher than those pertaining to AM (cf. Fig. 2e). The 2D and 3D scattering patterns are displayed in Fig. 3c, d, respectively. It can be observed that the main beams at different harmonic frequencies point to different directions, thereby realizing the desired harmonic beam steering.
It is worth pointing out that the harmonic scattering patterns can also be calculated via the inverse fast Fourier transform (IFFT) technique^{31}, which can greatly reduce the computational complexity of the optimization, especially for electrically large metasurfaces.
Beam steering and shaping at the central frequency
In the above designed 1bit spacetimecoding metasurface, only the beams at harmonic frequencies are steered towards other directions, whereas the beam at the central frequency always points at broadside. This limitation essentially stems from the equivalent phase at the central frequency (see Fig. 2c, d and Supplementary Figure 4a). As anticipated, we could use physical coding elements with 2bit phase responses to obtain 3bit equivalent space coding at the central frequency. The spacetimecoding strategy provides a new way of designing multibit programmable metasurface (even with arbitrary phases), which does not require a complicated layout and control system, and enables a more precise control of EM waves in space and frequency domains.
More specifically, we consider a coding metasurface with 8 × 8 elements and timecoding sequences with a length of 8. First, we address the beamsteering design in one plane at the central frequency. Hence, we only need to study timecoding sequences of eight elements, and each column of elements has the same digital code. Figure 4a, b shows the 2bit spacetimecoding matrix, in which the red, yellow, green, and blue dots represent “0”, “1”, “2”, and “3” digits, representing 0°, 90°, 180°, and 270° phase responses, respectively (the criterion for selecting those eight sets of timecoding sequences is detailed in Supplementary Note 7). The equivalent amplitudes and phases of those eight coding elements at different harmonic frequencies are shown in Fig. 4c, d, respectively. We can clearly observe that the designed spacetimecoding matrix effectively results in equivalent 3bit responses, “0^{′}” (−135°), “1^{′}” (−90°), “2^{′}” (−45°), “3^{′}” (0°), “4^{′}” (45°), “5^{′}” (90°), “6^{′}” (135°), and “7^{′}” (180°), and an equivalent phase gradient at the central frequency. According to the generalized Snell’s law^{2}, this phase discontinuity will steer a normally incident wave by an angle of 14.5°. The corresponding 2D scattering pattern at the central frequency and the scattering patterns at different harmonic frequencies are displayed in Fig. 4e, f. It can be seen that the main beam at the central frequency points at θ = −14.5°, and the scattered powers at the harmonic frequencies are much smaller, which provides good sideband suppression. Moreover, we compare the beamsteering performance of the original 2bit coding “00112233” with the equivalent 3bit coding “0^{′}1^{′}2^{′}3^{′}4^{′}5^{′}6^{′}7^{′}”, as shown in Fig. 4g. It is observed that the former scheme could realize a steering angle of 14.5°, but accompanied by high sidelobes, while the latter scheme attains the steering with much lower sidelobes and only a little gain reduction attributable to the sideband power losses. Similar examples of equivalent 3bit coding for largeangle beam steering are illustrated in Supplementary Figures 6c and 6d.
As a further illustrative example, we exploit the eight sets of timecoding sequences in Fig. 4b to generate a vortex beam carrying orbitalangularmomentum (OAM) at the central frequency. The coding metasurface is spatially divided into eight sectors with rotated distribution of timecoding sequences, and each sector has the same timecoding sequence. The final spacetimecoding configuration is displayed in Supplementary Figure 7a, while the corresponding equivalent amplitudes and phases at the central frequency are shown in Fig. 4h, i, respectively. The equivalent 3bit spacecoding in Fig. 4i exhibits a spirallike phase profile, and can generate a vortex beam with OAM mode l = 1^{2,32}. The corresponding 2D and 3D scattering patterns at the central frequency are shown in Fig. 4j, k. Consistently with the characteristics of the desired vortex beam, a typical intensity profile with a hollow center can been clearly observed.
It is worth highlighting that the above examples, dealing with radiation scenarios of practical interest for highperformance antennas and wireless communication systems, could not be readily addressed via the simpler strategies (phaseswitched screens or timemodulated arrays) in refs. ^{34,35}.
Scattering control for radarcrosssection reduction
In radar and stealth technologies, reducing the scattering from a target, i.e., reducing its radar cross section (RCS), represents a pivotal issue. Conventional radar absorbing materials can absorb the incident EM power, whereas lowscattering metasurfaces based on the principle of phase cancellation can redirect the incident wave to other directions^{18,19,27,28,41}. The phaseswitched screen proposed in ref. ^{34} exploits temporalcoding (via a simple timeswitching sequence “01”) for redistributing the scattered power to odd harmonics. Against this background, our proposed spacetimecoding digital metasurfaces can redistribute the scattered power in both space and frequency domains, leading to a mechanism for RCS reductions that completely differs from the conventional strategies.
For example, Fig. 5a illustrates a metasurface featuring a uniform reflectionphase distribution, which essentially behaves like a metallic plate. By assuming normally incident planewave illumination, from the normalized 2D scattering pattern shown in Fig. 5f, we observe a scattered power peaked at broadside. By changing the uniform phase distribution to a chessboardlike pattern as shown in Fig. 5b^{18,41}, the backscattered power is strongly reduced, but there are still strong scattering peaks at other directions, as it can be observed in Fig. 5g. We now apply to the chessboardlike pattern a spacecoding matrix varying with the time sequence “10” in a modulation period, as illustrated in Fig. 5c. In this case, the incident power is redistributed in both space and frequency domains. The scattering patterns pertaining to the center frequency and the first five positive harmonic frequencies are displayed in Fig. 5h. Note that this timecoding results in the generation of odd harmonics only, as shown in Supplementary Figure 8a. We clearly observe that the beam shapes are the same as those in Fig. 5g, but the backscattered powers spread to odd sidebands only. This active coding metasurface modulated by the spacetimecoding matrix in Fig. 5c could yield zero backscattered power at the central frequency. Moreover, the maximum of backscattered powers at different harmonic frequencies is also reduced by ~9.55 dB by comparison with Fig. 5f, and by ~3.92 dB by comparison with the chessboardlike space coding in Fig. 5g.
If we now consider the BPSOoptimized spacecoding shown in Fig. 5d, the backscattered power would be distributed uniformly in all possible directions^{18,19,28}, as it can be observed in Fig. 5i. This optimized spacecoding results in a more uniform scattering pattern, and decreases the maximum of backscattered power of 7.07 dB by comparison with the chessboardlike spacecoding. On this basis, we apply a random timecoding sequence “10011010” to the optimized spacecoding, as displayed in Fig. 5e. In this case, the incident power is redistributed in both space and frequency domains more uniformly. The scattering patterns pertaining to the first five positive harmonic frequencies are displayed in Fig. 5j. The beam shapes are also the same as those in Fig. 5i, but the backscattered powers are now significantly reduced in the whole upper space, and spread to almost all sidebands (see Supplementary Figure 8b). This spacetimecoding matrix could also yield zero backscattered power at the central frequency. Moreover, the maximum of backscattered energies at different harmonic frequencies are reduced by ~21.52 dB by comparison with Fig. 5f, and by ~8.82 dB by comparison with Fig. 5i. Generally, the backscattered powers can be perfectly suppressed in both space and frequency domains, by introducing proper time modulation on spacecoding metasurfaces, which ensures the effective and robust RCS reduction.
Experimental verification
To validate the aboveillustrated concepts and designs, we realize a coding metasurface composed of 8 × 8 elements pertaining to the harmonicbeamsteering example (see Fig. 3). As shown in Fig. 6a, each column (composed of eight coding elements) is connected by biasing lines with a width of 0.2 mm and shares a common control voltage. Each coding element consists of a rectangular metal patch printed on a grounded F4B substrate with dielectric constant of 2.65, loss tangent of 0.001, and thickness of 2 mm. A PINdiode (M/ACOM MADP000907–14020x) is employed to connect the patch with ground through a metal stub and via^{42}, as shown in Fig. 6b. The size of the coding element is 15 mm × 15 mm, which corresponds to half wavelength at the central frequency of 10 GHz. The dimensions of the stub and patch are determined to attain a 180° reflectionphase change when the PIN diode switches between “ON” and “OFF” states (see Supplementary Figure 9 for more details). As the diode is “ON” (or “OFF”) with a biasing voltage of 1.33 V (or 0 V), the corresponding coding state is “1” (or “0”). The equivalent circuit model of the PIN diode is illustrated in Fig. 6c, with R = 7.8 Ω, C = 28 pF, and L = 30 pH for fullwave analysis around 10 GHz. Fullwave simulation results are obtained by using the commercial software package, CST Microwave Studio 2014 (https://www.cst.com/products/cstmws). In the simulations of the coding elements, periodic boundaries are applied to the x and y directions, and two Floquet ports are used along the ±z directions. A linearly polarized planewave illumination (with xdirected electric field) is assumed to calculate the reflection coefficient pertaining to the coding elements. The phase and amplitude of the reflection coefficient pertaining to the “ON” and “OFF” states of the PIN diode are shown in Fig. 6f, g, respectively. We observe that the phase difference is 180° around the frequency of 10 GHz, and the corresponding amplitude is nearly unit (above 0.95).
Based on this design, we fabricate a prototype of the proposed coding metasurface, as shown in Fig. 6e. The structure consists of eight columns with eight connected elements, and has an overall size of 120 mm × 120 mm (4λ_{c} × 4λ_{c}). The experiments are carried out in a standard microwave anechoic chamber, with the measurement setup illustrated in Fig. 6d. A linearly polarized horn antenna working from 8 to 12 GHz serves as the excitation source and is connected to a microwave signal generator (Keysight E8267D), which provides the excitation signal at a fixed frequency. Both the spacetimecoding digital metasurface and feeding antenna are mounted on a turntable, which can automatically rotate by 360° in the horizontal plane. Another horn antenna is used to receive the harmonic scattered signals via a spectrum analyzer (Keysight E4447A). An FPGA hardware control board (ALTERA Cyclone IV) is exploited to provide dynamic biasing voltages for the coding metasurface, in which each column shares a control voltage. The adopted FPGA is a lowcost system with a clock speed of 50 MHz, in which a code is preloaded to generate eight control voltages according to the timecoding sequences in Fig. 3a. The modulation period T_{0} of the timecoding sequences is 2 μs and the pulse width τ is 0.2 μs, which correspond to a system modulation frequency f_{0} = 0.5 MHz, and diode switching speed of 5 MHz, respectively. It is worth pointing out that the relatively fast switching speed is attributable to the parallelized design of PINdiodes in each column in Fig. 6a, e.
Figure 6h, i shows the measured 2D scattering patterns pertaining to the first three positive and negative harmonics, assuming center frequencies of 9.8 and 10.0 GHz, respectively. Due to the blockage effect of the illuminating horn antenna, the scattering patterns at the center frequencies are not shown. The scattering patterns are normalized with respect to the scattered peak power measured from a copper plate with the same size as the metasurface. We clearly observe that the harmonic beam steering is obtained, as an effect of the spacetimecoding metasurface. The steering angles of the harmonic beams are in good agreement with the theoretical predictions (see Supplementary Table 1 for more details), thereby validating the effectiveness of the proposed approach. We also observe that the results at the central frequency of 10.0 GHz are moderately worse than those at 9.8 GHz, which is likely attributable to a shift of the 180° phasedifference condition due to fabrication tolerances as well as the various approximations and parameter uncertainties in our modeling. Nevertheless, the measured results at 10.0 GHz still exhibit the general hallmarks of the harmonic beam steering, as shown in Fig. 6i. The proposed spacetimecoding metasurface can in principle operate as a broadband system, provided that the design of the coding elements is likewise broadband, which is promising for multiinput and multioutput (MIMO) wireless communications. For instance, at different directions, the scattered power spectra are different for the various harmonic frequencies, and can be precisely controlled. Therefore, we can envision the possibility to encode information in the frequency spectra for multipoint communications, which can find intriguing applications in MIMO scenarios.
Discussion
In summary, we have proposed a strategy based on timemodulation to design spacetimecoding digital metasurfaces, in which each coding element has a set of timecoding sequences switched cyclically in a modulation period. Together with spatial modulation, the proposed time modulation on digital coding can control both spatial (propagation direction) and spectral (frequency distribution) characteristics of the scattered EM power. As a proof of principle, by means of a BPSObased design of timecoding sequence, we demonstrated beamscanning patterns at different harmonic frequencies. An FPGAcontrolled prototype was fabricated and experimental characterized to validate the proposed method, indicating good agreement with the theoretical predictions. We also proposed other intriguing application scenarios to beam shaping and reduction of the scattered power, via proper design of the 3D spacetimecoding matrix.
By comparison with the “phaseswitched screens”^{34}, our approach is considerably more general and flexible, owing to the judicious combination between the wavemanipulation capabilities enabled by metasurfaces and suitable temporal modulation. This enables more precise and effective control of the scattering and radiation, for both even/odd harmonics and central frequency.
In general, our proposed theory and design of spacetimecoding digital metasurfaces substantially expand the application scope of digital metamaterials, and may find important applications to wireless communications, cognitive radars, MIMO systems, OAM beam generation, adaptive beamforming, and holographic imaging. The proposed concept can be extended to the terahertz and optical ranges, as well as to acoustic waves, and can be further generalized to control the transmitted waves by suitably modulating the phase or amplitude of the transmission coefficient. Planned future investigations also include the exploration of spacetime coding to engineer nonreciprocal effects.
Code availability
The custom computer codes utilized during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.
References
 1.
Zheludev, N. I. & Kivshar, Y. S. From metamaterials to metadevices. Nat. Mater. 11, 917–924 (2012).
 2.
Yu, N. F. et al. Light propagation with phase discontinuities: generalized laws of reflection and refraction. Science 334, 333–337 (2011).
 3.
Cui, T. J. Microwave metamaterials. Natl Sci. Rev. 5, 134–136 (2018).
 4.
Kildishev, A. V., Boltasseva, A. & Shalaev, V. M. Planar photonics with metasurfaces. Science 339, 1232009 (2013).
 5.
Huang, L. et al. Dispersionless phase discontinuities for controlling light propagation. Nano Lett. 12, 5750–5755 (2012).
 6.
Li, Z. et al. Controlling propagation and coupling of waveguide modes using phasegradient metasurfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 675–683 (2017).
 7.
Grady, N. K. et al. Terahertz metamaterials for linear polarization conversion and anomalous refraction. Science 340, 1304–1307 (2013).
 8.
Zhang, X. et al. Broadband terahertz wave deflection based on Cshape complex metamaterials with phase discontinuities. Adv. Mater. 25, 4567–4572 (2013).
 9.
Jia, S. L., Wan, X., Bao, D., Zhao, Y. J. & Cui, T. J. Independent controls of orthogonally polarized transmitted waves using a Huygens metasurface. Laser Photonics Rev. 9, 545–553 (2015).
 10.
Estakhri, N. M. & Alù, A. Recent progress in gradient metasurfaces. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 33, A21 (2015).
 11.
Hadad, Y., Sounas, D. L. & Alù, A. Spacetime gradient metasurfaces. Phys. Rev. B 92, 100304(R) (2015).
 12.
Hadad, Y., Soric, J. C. & Alù, A. Breaking temporal symmetries for emission and absorption. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 113, 3471–3475 (2016).
 13.
Shaltout, A., Kildishev, A. & Shalaev, V. Timevarying metasurfaces and Lorentz nonreciprocity. Opt. Mater. Express 5, 2459 (2015).
 14.
Stewart, S. A., Smy, T. J. & Gupta, S. Finitedifference timedomain modeling of space–timemodulated metasurfaces. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66, 281–292 (2018).
 15.
Vahabzadeh, Y., Chamanara, N. & Caloz, C. Generalized sheet transition condition FDTD simulation of metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 66, 271–280 (2018).
 16.
Shi, Y. & Fan, S. Dynamic nonreciprocal metasurfaces with arbitrary phase reconfigurability based on photonic transition in metaatoms. Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 021110 (2016).
 17.
Sounas, D. L. & Alù, A. Nonreciprocal photonics based on time modulation. Nat. Photonics 11, 774–783 (2017).
 18.
Cui, T. J., Qi, M. Q., Wan, X., Zhao, J. & Cheng, Q. Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials and programmable metamaterials. Light Sci. Appl. 3, e218 (2014).
 19.
Gao, L. H. et al. Broadband diffusion of terahertz waves by multibit coding metasurfaces. Light Sci. Appl. 4, e324 (2015).
 20.
Liu, S. et al. Frequencydependent dualfunctional coding metasurfaces at terahertz frequencies. Adv. Opt. Mater. 4, 1965–1973 (2016).
 21.
Liu, S. et al. Fullstate controls of terahertz waves using tensor coding metasurfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 21503–21514 (2017).
 22.
Liu, S. et al. Anomalous refraction and nondiffractive Besselbeam generation of terahertz waves through transmissiontype coding metasurfaces. ACS Photonics 3, 1968–1977 (2016).
 23.
Xie, B. et al. Coding acoustic metasurfaces. Adv. Mater. 29, 1603507 (2017).
 24.
Huang, C. et al. Dynamical beam manipulation based on 2bit digitallycontrolled coding metasurface. Sci. Rep. 7, 42302 (2017).
 25.
Yang, H. et al. A programmable metasurface with dynamic polarization, scattering and focusing control. Sci. Rep. 6, 35692 (2016).
 26.
Li, L. et al. Electromagnetic reprogrammable codingmetasurface holograms. Nat. Commun. 8, 197 (2017).
 27.
Zhang, L. et al. Realization of low scattering for a highgain Fabry–Perot antenna using coding metasurface. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 65, 3374–3383 (2017).
 28.
Moccia, M. et al. Coding metasurfaces for diffuse scattering: scaling laws, bounds, and suboptimal design. Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1700455 (2017).
 29.
Cui, T. J., Liu, S. & Li, L. L. Information entropy of coding metasurface. Light Sci. Appl. 5, e16172 (2016).
 30.
Cui, T. J., Liu, S. & Zhang, L. Information metamaterials and metasurfaces. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 3644–3668 (2017).
 31.
Liu, S. et al. Convolution operations on coding metasurface to reach flexible and continuous controls of terahertz beams. Adv. Sci. 3, 1600156 (2016).
 32.
Zhang, L., Liu, S., Li, L. & Cui, T. J. Spincontrolled multiple pencil beams and vortex beams with different polarizations generated by Pancharatnam–Berry coding metasurfaces. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 36447–36455 (2017).
 33.
Ma, Q. et al. Beamediting coding metasurfaces based on polarization bit and orbitalangularmomentummode bit. Adv. Opt. Mater. 5, 1700548 (2017).
 34.
Tennant, A. & Chambers, B. Timeswitched array analysis of phaseswitched screens. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 57, 808–812 (2009).
 35.
Kummer, W., Villeneuve, A., Fong, T. & Terrio, F. Ultralow sidelobes from timemodulated arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 11, 633–639 (1963).
 36.
Zhu, Q., Yang, S., Yao, R. & Nie, Z. Directional modulation based on 4D antenna arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62, 621–628 (2014).
 37.
Zhao, J. et al. Controlling spectral energies of all harmonics in programmable way using timedomain digital coding metasurface. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.04414 (2018).
 38.
Nusenu, S. Y., Wang, W. Q. & Basit, A. Timemodulated FDMIMO array for integrated radar and communication systems. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 17, 1015–1019 (2018).
 39.
Tong, Y., Tennant, A. & Langley, R.J. Beam steering techniques for timeswitched arrays. In Proc. 2009 Loughborough Antennas & Propagation Conference, 233–236 (2009).
 40.
Wang, Y. & Tennant, A. Experimental timemodulated reflector array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 62, 6533–6536 (2014).
 41.
Paquay, M., Iriarte, J. C., Ederra, I., Gonzalo, R. & de Maagt, P. Thin AMC structure for radar crosssection reduction. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 55, 3630–3638 (2007).
 42.
Kamoda, H., Iwasaki, T., Tsumochi, J., Kuki, T. & Hashimoto, O. 60GHz electronically reconfigurable large reflectarray using singlebit phase shifters. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 59, 2524–2531 (2011).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant Nos. 2017YFA0700201, 2017YFA0700202, and 2017YFA0700203), in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61631007, 61571117, 61501112, 61501117, 61522106, 61731010, 61735010, 61722106, 61701107, and 61701108), in part by the 111 Project (Grant No. 111205), and in part by the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX18_0097).
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
T.J.C. suggested the designs, planned and supervised the work, in consultation with G.C., V.G., Q.C. and L.Z. conceived the idea, carried out the analytical modeling and numerical simulations. L.Z., X.Q.C., S.L. and Q.Z. fabricated the prototype and performed the theoretical analysis. L.Z., X.Q.C., J.Z., J.Y.D., G.D.B. and X.W. performed the measurements and data analysis. L.Z., T.J.C. and V.G. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the theoretical aspects and numerical simulations, interpreted the results, and reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, L., Chen, X.Q., Liu, S. et al. Spacetimecoding digital metasurfaces. Nat Commun 9, 4334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467018068020
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Further reading

Wireless Communications With Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface: Path Loss Modeling and Experimental Measurement
IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications (2021)

Joint Multi‐Frequency Beam Shaping and Steering via Space–Time‐Coding Digital Metasurfaces
Advanced Functional Materials (2021)

Smart metasurface shaft for vibration source identification with a single sensor
Journal of Sound and Vibration (2021)

High Efficiency Polarization‐Encoded Holograms with Ultrathin Bilayer Spin‐Decoupled Information Metasurfaces
Advanced Optical Materials (2021)

Multifunctional Vortex Beam Generation by a Dynamic Reflective Metasurface
Advanced Optical Materials (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.