Article | Open | Published:

Inhibition of glucose metabolism selectively targets autoreactive follicular helper T cells

Abstract

Follicular helper T (TFH) cells are expanded in systemic lupus erythematosus, where they are required to produce high affinity autoantibodies. Eliminating TFH cells would, however compromise the production of protective antibodies against viral and bacterial pathogens. Here we show that inhibiting glucose metabolism results in a drastic reduction of the frequency and number of TFH cells in lupus-prone mice. However, this inhibition has little effect on the production of T-cell-dependent antibodies following immunization with an exogenous antigen or on the frequency of virus-specific TFH cells induced by infection with influenza. In contrast, glutaminolysis inhibition reduces both immunization-induced and autoimmune TFH cells and humoral responses. Solute transporter gene signature suggests different glucose and amino acid fluxes between autoimmune TFH cells and exogenous antigen-specific TFH cells. Thus, blocking glucose metabolism may provide an effective therapeutic approach to treat systemic autoimmunity by eliminating autoreactive TFH cells while preserving protective immunity against pathogens.

Introduction

The germinal center (GC) is the primary site of clonal expansion and affinity maturation for B cells through survival and selection signals provided by follicular helper CD4+ T (TFH) cells. GC-derived plasma cells produce high-affinity antibodies against pathogens or autoantigens1. Controlling TFH cell numbers is essential for the optimal affinity maturation in GC response: an insufficient TFH generation underlies impaired humoral immune responses in primary immunodeficiencies, while excessive generation of TFH cells allows the survival of low-affinity self-reactive clones, resulting in the production of autoantibodies2. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is characterized by class-switched high-affinity autoantibodies, indicating GC involvement3. The frequency of TFH cells is expanded in all spontaneous mouse models of lupus and a high frequency of circulating TFH cells has been reported in multiple cohorts of SLE patients, which often correlated with disease severity4. Accordingly, interrupting TFH cell differentiation by blocking CD40-CD40L interactions5,6 or IL-217,8,9,10 signaling, or by delivering miR-146a11, improved disease outcomes in lupus-prone mice. Moreover, several drugs that have promising results in SLE patients reduce the number of circulating TFH cells12,13,14,15.

The cytokines and transcription factors that regulate T cell differentiation reprogram the metabolism of naive CD4+ T cells into effector subset-specific metabolic profiles, which provide regulatory checkpoints to fine-tune T cell differentiation and function16. CD4+ T cells of lupus patients17 and mouse models of lupus18 present metabolic alterations, which include high mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) activity, glycolysis and oxidative metabolism. In the B6.Sle1.Sle2.Sle3 (TC for triple congenic) model of lupus that shares more than 95% of its genome with the congenic C57BL/6 (B6) controls19, inhibiting glycolysis with 2-deoxyglucose (2DG) and the mitochondrial electron transport chain with metformin normalizes T cell metabolism and reverses autoimmune pathology20. These findings were confirmed in NZB/W F1 and B6.lpr mice, two other models of lupus20,21. Importantly, the frequency and number of TFH cells as well as GC B cells were normalized by this dual treatment, suggesting the autoreactive expansion of TFH cells was dependent on either glycolysis or mitochondrial metabolism, or a combination of the two.

The understanding of the metabolic requirements of TFH cells has been lagging comparatively to other CD4+ T cell effector subsets. TFH cells induced by LCMV Armstrong viral infection are metabolically quiescent as compared to TH1 cells22, with a low PI3K-AKT-mTORC1 activation and an overall decreased mitochondrial and glucose metabolisms. These results are consistent with the findings that Bcl623 and PD-124, both highly expressed by TFH cells, independently inhibit cellular metabolism including glycolysis in vitro. However, gene targeting showed that mTOR activation is required for homeostatic and immunization-induced TFH differentiation in vivo25,26 by enhancing glycolysis26. Moreover, mTORC1 activation is associated to autoreactive TFH cell expansion by promoting the translation of Bcl6, the master regulator of TFH cell gene expression, in the Def6tr/trSwap70−/− DKO mice27. In the framework of these results obtained in different models with different approaches, the specific metabolic requirements of spontaneous lupus TFH cells to expand have not been characterized, and it is unclear whether they are similar to the metabolic requirements of TFH cells that are induced by exogenous antigens.

Here, we show that the inhibition of glycolysis reduces the expansion of autoreactive TFH cells in four lupus-prone models, but it has little effect on the production of T-dependent (TD) antigen (ag)-specific antibodies, or the production of influenza-specific TFH cells in either non-autoimmune B6 or lupus-prone TC mice. In addition, spontaneous lupus TFH but not virus-specific TFH cells express low levels of amino acid transporters as compared to B6 TFH cells. Accordingly, glutaminolysis inhibition with the glutamine analog 6-Diazo-5-oxo-l-norleucine (DON) prevents the production of TD Ag-specific antibodies, and impairs spontaneous GCs. Overall, this study showed that high glucose utilization is a unique requirement of autoreactive TFH cells, whereas glutamine metabolism is used by all TFH cells. These opposite metabolic programs suggest that autoreactive and Ag-specific TFH cells are driven by different mechanisms, and imply that inhibiting glycolysis can uniquely target pathogenic autoreactive TFH cells while preserving protective immunity against pathogens.

Results

Expanded spontaneous TFH population in lupus mice

CD4+ T cells from anti-dsDNA IgG-producing lupus-prone TC mice showed an increased expression of the early activation marker CD69, as well as an accumulation of effector memory T (TEM) and TFH cells (Fig. 1a–c) as compared to B6 controls. Lupus mice also showed a decreased frequency of CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+Foxp3+ TFR relative to TFH cells (Fig. 1c). Similar results were obtained in young TC mice before the production of anti-dsDNA IgG (Supplementary Fig. 1a-d), indicating that CD4+ T cell activation and the expansion of TEM and TFH CD4+ T cells precedes the manifestation of autoimmunity. mTORC1 activity measured by phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (pS6) was increased in total TC CD4+ T cells20. Here, pS6 expression was increased in naive CD4+ T cells (TN, CD4+CD44) and TFH (CD4+CD44+PD-1hiPSGL-1lo) cells from autoantibody producing and pre-autoimmune TC as compared with B6 mice (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1e). The increased mTORC1 activation in CD44-negative CD4+ T cells in TC mice may be due a small but significant increased frequency of cells that have lost CD62L and/or gained CD69 expression, presumably indicating a pre-activation status (Supplementary Fig. 1f). High mTOR expression by TC TFH cells was confirmed by histology (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 1g): TC CD4+ T cells inside GCs showed abundant mTOR staining as compared to B6 CD4+ T cells, which expressed mTOR in the T cell zone. STAT3 activation induces Bcl6 expression and STAT3 deficiency impaired TFH cell differentiation28,29,30. However, IL-21-mediated STAT3 phosphorylation was significantly decreased in CD4+ T cells from SLE patients31. Both young and aged TC mice showed a reduced pSTAT3 expression level in CD4+CD44+ TAct and TFH cells, but an increased frequency of the small population of pSTAT3+ in CD44 TN cells (Supplementary Fig. 1h, i). TC and B6 mice showed a similar frequency of proliferating TAct and TFH cells, but the frequency of proliferating CD44 TN cells was higher in TC mice (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 1i). Consistent with the higher number of CD4+ T cells in lupus mice, the number of proliferating cells was higher for all three subsets in TC mice (Fig. 1f and Supplementary Fig. 1j). Finally, the expression of Bcl2 at the protein (Fig. 1g) and transcript (Fig. 1h) levels was increased in TC TFH cells. In sum, lupus TC mice show an expansion of TFH cells that precedes the production of autoantibodies, and that is associated with increased mTORC1 activity and Bcl2 expression, as well as decreased STAT3 activation. This suggests that the number of TFH cells expands by resistance to apoptosis, and possibly by an increased differentiation from CD44-negative-derived precursors following an increased proliferation and STAT3 signaling.

Fig. 1
figure1

Increased mTORC1 activity and survival in TC TFH cells. ac Frequency and cell number of CD69+ (a), CD4+CD44+CD62L TEM cells (b), and CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+Foxp3 TFH (c) in CD4+ T cells, with the relative distribution of TFH and Foxp3+ TFR cells in CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+ cells. d Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of phospho-S6 in TN cells (CD4+CD44), TAct cells (CD4+CD44+), and TFH cells (CD4+CD44+PD-1hiPSGL-1lo). e Representative mTOR staining (green) in the GC (plain line) and T cell zone (dashed line) relative to non-GC B cells (IgD+ red) and CD4+ T cells (purple). Arrows point to examples of mTOR staining. Scale bars: 200 μM for 10× and 10 μM for 20×. f Frequency and number of Ki-67+ proliferating TN, TAct, and TFH cells. g Bcl2 MFI in CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+ TFH and CD4+CXCXR5PD1 non-TFH cells, with representative FACS plots on the left. h Bcl2 mRNA expression in TFH and non-TFH cells as determined with a Nanostring custom panel. Spleens from 9-month-old B6 and TC mice, mean + s.e.m. of N = 3–8 mice per group compared with t tests. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001

Glycolysis inhibition normalizes lupus TFH cells

The dual inhibition of glycolysis and mitochondrial metabolism by the combination of 2DG and metformin reverses disease pathogenesis in TC, NZB/W F120, and B6.lpr21 lupus-prone mice. This treatment significantly reduced anti-dsDNA IgG production, as well as the frequency of TFH and GC B cells in these three strains, as well as in a fourth model of lupus, the BXSB. Yaa mice, to levels equivalent to that of B6 controls (Supplementary Fig. 2a). The 2DG plus metformin combination also reduced Bcl6 and PD-1 expression in total CD4+ T cells from these lupus strains (Supplementary Fig. 2b). Although treatment with the combination of these two metabolic inhibitors is required to suppress clinical disease in older mice, 2DG alone is sufficient to prevent disease development and autoantibody production21. To compare lupus-prone strains that have a different timing of autoimmune activation, we treated all mice starting at around 5 months of age when they were anti-dsDNA IgG positive but without clinical disease. After 8 weeks of treatment, 2DG reduced the production of anti-dsDNA IgG, as well as the frequency and number of TFH and GC B cells in these four lupus strains (Fig. 2a, b). 2DG also reduced Bcl6 expression in both B6 and TC TFH cells (Fig. 2c) and normalized the TFH/TFR ratio in TC mice (Fig. 2d). The addition of metformin did not further reduce the frequency of TFH cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c), while 2DG alone has little effect on the frequency of TEM cells and CD69 expression in TC mice (Supplementary Fig. 2d, e). 2DG reduced the number of total splenic CD4+ T cells in all four lupus-prone strains, but not in B6 mice (Supplementary Fig. 2f), which is consistent with CD4+ T cells from lupus mice being glycolitic20,21. 2DG had a variable effect on CD4+ T cell activation, decreasing the frequency of CD44+CD4+ T cells only in NZB/W F1 and BXSB.Yaa mice, but decreasing their number in all strains 2DG, except B6.lpr mice (Supplementary Fig. 2g). These results indicate that spontaneous lupus TFH cells are uniformly sensitive to the inhibition of glycolysis comparatively to other activated T cells that show a more variable response among strains. CD4+ T cell effector differentiation depends on an increased glycolysis and mTORC1 activity32. Accordingly, 2DG reduced mTORC1 activation in both TC and B6 TAct and spontaneous TFH cells, as well as in TC TN cells (Fig. 2e). In addition, 2DG markedly decreased the number of proliferating CD4+ T cells in TC mice, including TFH cells (Fig. 2f). These results demonstrate that the expansion of spontaneous TFH and GC B cells and the resulting production of autoantibodies in lupus mice depend on glycolysis and mTORC1 activation.

Fig. 2
figure2

Autoreactive TFH cells are sensitive to glycolysis inhibition. Frequency (a) and cell number (b) of TFH cells (left, CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+Foxp3) in CD4+ T cells and GC B cells (middle, B220+GL7+FAS+) in B cells, as well as serum anti-dsDNA IgG (right) in four strains of lupus-prone mice treated with 2DG for 8 weeks starting at 5–6 months of age, as compared to untreated age-matched controls. Contemporaneous untreated B6 mice are shown as reference. Mean + s.e.m. of N = 3–28 mice per group. cf 3–4-month-old B6 and TC mice were treated 2DG or not for 1 month. MFI of Bcl6 in TFH cells (c) and the ratio of TFH (CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+Foxp3) to TFR (CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+Foxp3+) cells (d). Phospho-S6 (e) as well as frequency and number of Ki-67+ (f) cells in TN cells (CD4+ CD44), TAct cells (CD4+CD44+), and TFH cells (CD4+CD44+PD-1hiPSGL-1lo). Mean + s.e.m. of N = 4–9 spleens per group compared with t tests. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001

The TD humoral response does not require glycolysis

To determine whether inhibiting glycolysis affects humoral immune responses to a TD exogenous antigen, mice were immunized with 4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (NP-KLH). We used young mice because aged TC mice respond poorly to TD immunization33. 2DG treatment started 2 weeks before immunization and continued for the duration of the experiment. The primary response was analyzed 10 d after immunization and the memory response 7 weeks after the first immunization and NP-KLH boosts at weeks 2 and 6. 2DG reduced the frequency and number of total TC GC B cells in both primary and memory responses (Fig. 3a). However, 2DG had no effect on the high frequency and number of TC plasma cells (Fig. 3b), but it reduced anti-dsDNA IgG levels in TC mice tested for the memory response (Fig. 3c). As previously reported33, the frequency and number of NP-specific GC B cells was decreased in TC mice as compared with B6 controls in the primary response (Fig. 3d). More importantly, 2DG did not decrease the frequency and number of these NP-specific GC B cells (Fig. 3d). As for total plasma cells, the frequency and number of NP+ plasma cell was similar between 2DG-treated and control TC and B6 mice (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, 2DG has no effect on the number of NP-specific IgG producing cells in memory-immunized TC mice (Fig. 3f). The levels of serum NP-specific IgG1, which is the main isotype produced in this TD immunization, mirrored the cellular results, even with an increase of low-affinity NP-specific memory IgG1 (Fig. 3g). 2DG tended to decrease the level of TH1-driven NP-specific IgG2a, only observed in the TC memory response (Fig. 3g). Overall, these results suggest that autoreactive GCs, but not GCs induced by exogenous Ag, are sensitive to glycolysis inhibition. The frequency and number of total TFH cells and the ratio of TFH to TFR cells were decreased in 2DG-treated TC mice in the primary, but not in the memory response (Fig. 3h, i), when the frequency of NP-KLH-specific TFH relative to spontaneous TFH cells is likely much higher than in the primary response. Importantly, B6 TFH cells, which contain only a small frequency of autoreactive cells, were not affected by 2DG, suggesting that glycolysis is not necessary for the differentiation of exogenous Ag-specific TFH cells.

Fig. 3
figure3

Glycolysis inhibition does not affect the TD-humoral response. After pre-treatment with 2DG for 2 weeks, 8–10-week-old B6 and TC mice were immunized with NP-KLH in alum and maintained under 2DG treatment until sacrifice. Mice were analyzed 10 d after immunization (primary), or 7 weeks after the first immunization following 2 boosts with same antigen 2 and 6 weeks after the primary immunization (memory). Frequency and number of total (a, b) or NP-specific (d, e) GC B cells and plasma cells (gating shown in supplementary Fig. 3). Serum anti-dsDNA IgG (c) and NP-specific IgG antibody-forming cells (f) in TC mice in the memory response. g Serum levels of high-affinity anti-NP4 and low-affinity anti-NP25 IgG1 and IgG2a in the primary (left) and memory (right) responses. Frequency and number of splenic TFH cells (h) and TFH/TFR cell ratio (i) in the primary and memory responses. All cell analyses were performed with splenocytes. Mean + s.e.m. of N = 5 mice per group compared with t tests. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001. For simplification, statistical differences between strains are not shown

Exogenous Ag-specific TFH cells do not require glycolysis

We tested the effect of 2DG on Ag-specific TFH cells induced by a non-lethal dose of influenza virus A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 H1N1 (PR8). Virus-specific CD4+ T cells were detected with the MHC class II tetramer recognizing the nucleoprotein (NP) immunodominant viral epitope NP311-325 (NP-Tet)34,35 10 d after infection. Weight loss, a clinical indicator of influenza infection, was observed in B6 mice and was enhanced by 2DG, while neither 2DG-treated nor control TC mice lost weight (Supplementary Fig. 4a). 2DG did not affect the frequency of virus-specific CD4+ T cells (Fig. 4a), and TFH cells (Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 4b) in either strain, but the number of virus-specific TFH cells was lower in 2DG-treated TC mice than in controls (Fig. 4b), corresponding to a global effect of 2DG on lymphoid expansion21. Both the frequency and number of total TC TFH cells, which contain both spontaneous and virus-specific cells, were however decreased by 2DG (Fig. 4c), as we observed with non-immunized (Fig. 2a) and NP-KLH-immunized mice (Fig. 3h). Furthermore, the 2DG treatment did not decrease the amount of 3 isotypes of NP-specific IgG 4 weeks after infection (Fig. 4d), whereas it reduced anti-dsDNA IgG production in the same TC mice (Fig. 4e). A similar pS6 expression was observed in NP-Tetpos TFH cells between B6 and TC mice 10 d after infection (Supplementary Fig. 4c). Unexpectedly, glycolysis inhibition increased pS6 expression in NP-Tetneg TFH cells and there was a similar trend for NP-Tetpos TFH cells in TC mice. This result suggests that glycolysis is not the main pathway of mTORC1 activation during exogenous Ag-specific TFH cell differentiation. In addition, 2DG had no effect on STAT3 activation and proliferation in TFH cells (Supplementary Fig. 4d, e), except for a small increase in the proliferation of NP-Tetneg TC TFH cells (Supplementary Fig. 4e). Thus, these results strongly suggest that glycolysis is not necessary for exogenous Ag-specific TFH cell differentiation.

Fig. 4
figure4

Glycolysis inhibition does not impair the humoral response to influenza immunization. 8–10-week-old B6 and TC mice were infected with PR8 influenza virus. 2DG treatment was initiated 2 weeks before infection and maintained until termination. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were analyzed 10 d after infection. a Representative FACS plot (left) and percentage (right) of splenic influenza virus-specific CD4+ T cells (CD4+CD44+NP-Tetpos). b, c Frequency and number of CD4+CD44+PD-1hiPSGL-1lo TFH cells in PR8 virus-specific NP-TetposCD4+ T cells (b) and in total CD4+ T cells (c). Serum levels of PR8 NP-specific IgG1, IgG2b and IgG2c (d), and anti-dsDNA IgG (e) 30 d after low dose infection. f, g Frequency and number of IFNγ+ in total CD4+ T cells (f) and PR8 virus-specific NP-TetposCD4+ T cells (g) in the lung. h, i Analysis of NP-TetposCD8+ T cells in the lung: representative FACS plots (h), total number (i), frequency and number of SLEC (j) and MPEC (k) among these NP-TetposCD8+ T cells, and SLEC/MPEC ratio (l). Mean + s.e.m. of N = 3–8 mice per group compared with t tests. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01

We also examined the effect of 2DG on IFNγ-producing CD4+ T cells, as well as virus-specific CD8+ T cells in the lung, both of which being critical for protection36. The number and frequency of either total IFNγ+ or virus specific NP-TetposIFNγ+ CD4+ T cells were similar in the lung (Fig. 4f, g) and spleen (Supplementary Fig. 4f, g) between 2DG-treated and control TC mice. This confirms earlier results showing that metformin but not 2DG normalizes IFNγ production in TC mice21. Similarly, 2DG did not affect the number of NP-TetposCD8+ T cells in the lung (Fig. 4h, i) and spleen (Supplementary Fig. 4h) of either B6 or TC mice. Interestingly, 2DG had opposite outcomes on the type of virus-specific effector CD8+ T cells: 2DG expanded short-lived effector cells (SLEC, KLRG1+CD127-NP-TetposCD8+) in TC mice while it expanded memory precursor effector cells (MPEC, KLRG1CD127+NP-TetposCD8+) in B6 mice (Fig. 4i–k and Supplementary Fig. 4i, j) leading to opposite SLEC/MPEC ratios between the two strains in the lung (Fig. 4l) and a similar trend in the spleen (Supplementary Fig. 4k). These results suggest that the inhibition of glycolysis does not prevent the differentiation of virus-specific protective CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, but modulates the type of effector cells it produces. Virus-induced differentiation of SLEC is favored by inflammatory signals such as CpG and IL-1237, both of which have been associated with lupus. How this process is enhanced by the inhibition of glycolysis needs to be further explored.

Differential expression of solute transporters in TC TFH cells

Based on the observation that TFH cells were more sensitive to glycolysis inhibition than other types of activated CD4+ T cells in TC mice (Supplementary Fig. 2c‒e), we compared the expression of Hif1a and Mct4, two key genes in the glycolytic pathway, between total CD4+ T cells and spontaneous TFH cells (CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+) sorted from 8-10 month old TC mice (Supplementary Fig. 5a). TC TFH cells showed a 3–5 fold increased expression of Hif1a and Mct4 (Fig. 5a), and an increased Hif1α protein expression (Fig. 5b) as compared to total CD4+ T cells. Moreover, the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), a measure of glycolysis, was higher in TC TFH than B6 TFH cells, while CD44CD4+ T cells were similar between the two strains (Fig. 5c, d). Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was similar between B6 and TC TFH cells, (Supplementary Fig. 5b). These results confirm that autoreactive TFH cells have a high metabolic demand fueled through glycolysis. Glucose uptake was similar between B6 and TC TFH cells (Fig. 5e) as we have previously shown for total CD4+ T cells20, suggesting that glucose utilization rather than uptake distinguishes spontaneous lupus TFH cells. We next compared gene expression between TC and B6 spontaneous TFH cells. Among ~1100 differently expressed genes (Supplementary Fig. 5c, d), the differentially expressed pathways confirmed the immunophenotyping results, with greater mTOR activation, proliferation and reduced oxidative phosphorylation in TC TFH cells (Supplementary Fig. 5e). Although pSTAT3 levels were decreased in TC TFH cells (Supplementary Fig. 1h, i), the IL-6_JAK_STAT3 signaling pathway was overexpressed in TC TFH cells, suggesting that it contributes to their expansion. Finally, the KRAS pathway was also overexpressed in TC TFH cells. Interestingly, monogenic mutations in this pathway are associated with SLE38, and KRAS is involved in CD4+ T cell activation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis39. Among the top 10 differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Fig. 5f), we noticed three members of the solute carrier family, including the neutral amino acid transporter Slc1a5 (Asct2), a crucial mediator of TCR-stimulated glutamine uptake in CD4+ T cells40, that is necessary for TH1 and TH17 cell differentiation41. A striking signature of 31 solute transporter genes characterized spontaneous lupus TFH cells (Fig. 5f and Supplementary Table 1). qRT-PCR analysis confirmed an increased expression of two glycolytic genes, Slc2a6 (Glut6) and Slc37a2 encoding for glucose-6-phosphate transporter in TC TFH cells (Fig. 5g). We also confirmed the elevated expression of two amino acid transporters Slc1a4 (Asct1) and Slc16a10 (Mct10), and the reduced expression of the amino acid transporter Slc7a10 (Asc-1) in TC TFH cells (Fig. 5g). Slc3a2 (CD98) heterodimerizes with Slc7a5 (Lat1), Slc7a6, Slc7a7, or Slc7a8 (Lat2) to transport hydrophobic large neutral amino acids42,43 and kynurenine44. TC TFH cells showed a reduced expression of CD98 (Fig. 5h), although the gene expression of neither Slc3a2 nor Slc7a5 showed a difference in the microarray analysis. Taken together, these results suggest that autoreactive TFH cells have different metabolic requirements for amino acids and in the glucose pathway.

Fig. 5
figure5

Spontaneous TC TFH cells are glycolytic and show an altered expression of solute transporters. a Hif1a and Mct4 gene expression was compared between total CD4+ T cells and TFH cells (CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+) from TC mice using qRT-PCR and normalized to Ppia. b Hif1α protein expression (as determined by MFI using flow cytometry) in total CD4+ T cells and TFH cells from B6 and TC mice. cd ECAR during a mitochondrial stress test conducted on TFH (CD4+CD44+PD-1hiPSGL-1lo) and CD44 CD4+ T cells from B6 and TC mice. c Time-course with the arrows indicating the addition of oligomycin (Olig), trifluoromethoxy carbonylcyanide phenylhydrazone (FCCP), and actimycin A and rotenone (Act & Rot). The horizontal gray bar indicates the three time-point measurements of basal ECAR, and the white bar indicates maximum ECAR. The TC and B6 TFH cells plots were significantly different (two-way ANOVA, P < 0.001). d Basal and max ECAR averages in B6 and TC TFH cells. e 2NDBG uptake by B6 and TC TN cells (CD4+CD44), TAct cells (CD4+CD44+), and TFH cells (CD4+CD44+PD-1hiPSGL-1lo). f Microarray heat-map and scatter plot of solute transporter genes differentially expressed between B6 and TC TFH cells. Heatmap coloring is mean centered (white), standard deviation normalized to 1 with red indicating above average expression and blue for below average expression. Dotplot coloring is based on signal intensity RMA normalized values, blue is lowest expression and red is highest expression. Selected genes are labeled and only the range 3–9 is shown on dotplot. g Expression of solute transporter genes in TFH cells was analyzed using qRT-PCR, and normalized to Hmbs. h Representative FACS plot (left) and MFI (right) of CD98 expression on TC and B6 TFH cells. All T cells were isolated from spleens from 7–8 month-old mice. Mean + s.e.m. of N = 4–7 per strain, compared with t tests (a, b, d, e, g, h), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001

Spontaneous and Ag-specific TFH cells require glutamine

To further compare gene expression between TC and B6 TFH cells, we selected a NanoString panel of 100 genes related to TFH cell differentiation, CD4+ T cell function and metabolism (Supplementary Table 2) to probe a new set of spontaneous TC and B6 TFH cells. We identified a signature of 10 genes that differentiated TC from B6 spontaneous TFH cells in both the microarray and Nanostring results (Fig. 6a). Slc1a5 expression was reduced in TC spontaneous TFH cells (Fig. 6a, b) and NP-Tetneg TC TFH cells (Fig. 6c). Importantly, B6 and TC influenza virus-specific NP-Tet+ TFH cells showed a similar level of Slc1a5 expression (Fig. 6c). CD98 expression was also similar in NP-Tetpos TC and B6 TFH cells, but lower in TC than B6 NP-Tetneg TFH cells (Fig. 6d). Slc1a5 is the major glutamine transporter, and CD98 also acts as a glutamine transporter in TCR-stimulated CD4+ T cells. Since Slc7a5 deletion in CD4+ T cells results in a defective TD-response33, we hypothesized that exogenous Ag-induced TFH cells require glutamine metabolism. We thus tested whether blocking glutaminolysis with DON inhibited the humoral response to NP-KLH primary immunization (Fig. 7a). DON had no effect on the frequency and number of total CD4+ T cells in immunized B6 and TC mice (Supplementary Fig. 6a). However, DON reduced the frequency of TEM cells in immunized mice from both strains, and the frequency of CD69+CD4+ T cells in immunized TC mice (Supplementary Fig. 6b, c). Neither the frequency or number of TFH cells, or the TFH/TFR ratio were affected by DON treatment (Fig. 7b, c). However, the expression of Bcl6, CD40L and ICOS was decreased in the TFH cells of DON-treated mice in both strains (Fig. 7d). This suggests that glutaminolysis is required for optimal Tfh cell function and interaction with GC B cells. In addition, DON reduced the frequency of TH17 and TH1 cells but not the frequency of IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells in immunized TC and B6 mice (Supplementary Fig. 6d), which is consistent with results obtained with Sle1a5-deficient T cells43. DON treatment of immunized mice had little effect on total B cells (Supplementary Fig. 6e), but it decreased the frequency and number of GC B cells (Supplementary Fig. 6f), as well as the size of GCs and their GL7 expression (Fig. 7e and Supplementary Fig. 6g). The few GCs found in the spleens of DON-treated mice were very small with very few B cells. Accordingly, the frequency and number of Ag-specific GC B cells (Fig. 7f), although not plasma cells (Fig. 7g), were severely reduced by DON treatment. Accordingly, levels of NP-specific IgG1 and IgM were lower in DON-treated B6 and TC mice (Fig. 7h). The frequency of total plasma cells was reduced by DON only in TD-immunized TC mice (Supplementary Fig. 6h). Furthermore, DON reduced the level of total serum IgM in TD-immunized mice from both strains, but reduced the level of total IgG only in TD-immunized B6 mice (Fig. 7i). The serum of TD-immunized TC mice contains a mixture of autoantibodies and NP-KLH-induced IgG, while the serum of B6-immunized mice contains a greater relative amount of anti-NP-KLH antibodies. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that exogenous Ag-specific GC responses require glutamine metabolism.

Fig. 6
figure6

Spontaneous but not virus-specific TC TFH cells expressed lower levels of glutamine transporters. a Gene signature of spontaneous CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+ TFH cells using microarray (left) and Nanostring (right) on two independent cohorts of TC and B6 mice. b, c Slc1a5 expression was analyzed with the Nanostring panel in spontaneous TFH cells (b), as well as in influenza virus-specific NP+ TFH cells (CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+NP-Tetpos, right) versus non-specific TFH cells (CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+NP-Tet, left) (c). d Representative FACS plot (left) and MFI (right) of CD98 expression on influenza virus-specific NP-Tetpos TFH cells (CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+NP-Tetpos) and non-specific TFH cells (CD4+CXCR5+PD-1+NP-Tetneg), as well as non-TFH (CD4+CXCXR5PD1) cells. All T cells were isolated from spleens. Mean + s.e.m. of N = 3–9 mice per group compared with t tests, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001

Fig. 7
figure7

Glutamine metabolism is required for both induced and spontaneous antibody responses. a Experimental design for immunization with NP-KLH in alum in 8–10-week-old B6 and TC mice treated or not with glutamine antagonist DON. Frequency and cell number of TFH cells (b), and ratio of TFH to TFR cells (CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+FOXP3− and CD4+CXCXR5+PD1+Bcl6+FOXP3+) (c). d MFI of Bcl6, CD40L and ICOS in TFH cells. e Representative spleen sections with GCs shown in the dotted lines. The first rows show composite images and the second rows show GL7-staining only. All images are 10× amplification (scale bar: 200 μM). f, g Frequency and number of NP-specific GC B cells (f) and number of NP-specific plasma cells (g). Serum levels of high-affinity anti-NP4, low-affinity anti-NP25 IgG1, and anti-NP25 IgM NP-specific antibodies (h), and total IgG and IgM (i). All cell analyses were performed with splenocytes. Mean + s.e.m. of N = 4–12 mice per group compared with t tests, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001

GCs form 4–5 d after antigen activation and GC maturation is fully achieved at 7 d45. Therefore, we treated B6 and TC mice with DON at 5 and 7 d after NP-KLH immunization (Supplementary Fig. 7a) to test the proximal effect of glutaminolysis inhibition on GC development. DON reduced the frequency but not the number of total B cells in immunized mice from both strains; however, the frequency and number of total and Ag-specific GC B cells or plasma cells were not affected by the treatment (Supplementary Fig. 7b-e). Similar results were obtained with total CD4+ T cells and TFH cells (Supplementary Fig. 7f, g). As with the continuous DON treatment during immunization (Fig. 7d), Bcl6 expression was decreased in TFH cells in DON-treated B6 mice and there was a trend for TC mice (Supplementary Fig. 7h). Despite this modest effect, if any, of targeted DON treatment on either GC B cells or TFH cells, the production of NP-specific IgG1 and IgM (Supplementary Fig. 7i) was markedly decreased in DON-treated mice from both strains.

Finally, we investigated the effect of a 2-week-long DON treatment on spontaneous GCs formation and anti-dsDNA IgG secretion in 7–8-month-old B6 and TC mice. DON reduced the frequency and number of TC B cells and GC B cells in both strains (Fig. 8a, b), but it did not affect splenic plasma cells (Fig. 8c). The size, number and GL7-staining intensity of GCs were greatly reduced by DON in both stains (Fig. 8d, e). DON treatment also normalized the size of the follicles in TC mice (Fig. 8d, f), which corresponds to a combined decreased number of B cells (Fig. 8a) and CD4+ T cells (Fig. 8g). The frequency TFH cells was not affected by DON, but the number of TFH cells was reduced to B6 levels in DON treated TC mice (Fig. 8h), and they expressed a lower level of Bcl6 (Fig. 8i). Finally, the production of anti-dsDNA IgG was reduced in both strains (Fig. 8j), although from a much lower level in B6 mice. The potential therapeutic effect of DON on renal pathology could not be examined due to the short duration of the treatment. Taken together, these results indicate that both Ag-specific and spontaneous GC formation as well as the resulting antigen-specific Ab and autoantibodies are sensitive to the inhibition of glutamine metabolism. Similarly, both antigen-specific and spontaneous GC B cells and TFH cells require glutamine, although to a lesser extend for TFH cells.

Fig. 8
figure8

Effect of DON treatment on spontaneous GC formation. ac B6 and TC mice were treated with DON 3 times a week for 2 weeks starting at 7–8 months of age. Frequency and number of total B cells (a), GC B cells (b) and plasma cells (c). d Representative spleen sections stained with B220-PE (red), CD4-APC (purple) and GL7-FITC (green). The first rows show composite images and the second rows show GL7-staining only. GCs are shown in the dotted lines. All images are 10× amplification (scale bar: 200 μM). e, f GC (e) and follicle (f) surface area as measured by GL7+ pixels (e, left) and GL7 intensity in these areas (f, right), and by B220+ pixels in 3–5 high power fields from 2 mice per group. gi Frequency and number of total CD4+ T cells (g), TFH cells (h), and MFI of Bcl6 in TFH cells (i). j Serum anti-dsDNA IgG represented as percent change from pre-treatment value. Statistical comparisons were made between terminal samples. All cell analyses were performed with splenocytes. Mean + s.e.m. N = 6 mice per group compared with t tests, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001

Discussion

We show here that the expansion of TFH cells reported in SLE patients and in lupus-prone mice4 occurs early before disease manifestation. The frequency of TFH cells is twice higher in pre-autoimmune TC mice as compared to B6 mice, further supporting a causative role. Therapeutic targeting of TFH cells has been proposed for SLE patients46,47. In addition to their direct effect on autoantibody production, IL-21 impairs human Treg cells from SLE patients in association with mTOR activation48. Therefore reducing the number of lupus TFH cells may have the added benefit of enhancing Treg number and functions. The mechanisms responsible for the expansion of TFH cells in lupus are poorly understood46. We show here that the expansion of TFH cells in lupus-prone TC mice is associated with an increased expression of Bcl2. Proliferation and STAT3 signaling were similar between TC and B6 TFH cells, but increased in naive TC CD4+ T cells, in which glycolysis is also higher than in naive B6 CD4+ T cells20. These findings suggest a model in which the accumulation of TFH cells in TC mice results from the combination of an accelerated induction in proliferating glycolytic naive CD4+ T cells in which STAT3 is activated, possibly in response to the high level of IL-6 present in these mice49,50,51, and a resistance to apoptosis.

Immune cells, and T cells in particular, are functionally regulated by their metabolic substrate utilization52, and alterations in the metabolism of immune cells have been reported in lupus17,18. A combination of two metabolic inhibitors, metformin, which targets mitochondrial respiration, and 2DG, an inhibitory glucose analog, has therapeutic effects in vivo in mice and in vitro with human SLE CD4+ T cells20,21. In this study focused on Tfh cells instead of clinical outcomes, we show that inhibiting glycolysis is sufficient to reverse the expansion of TFH cells in four different models of lupus, with a concomitant reduction of GC B cell expansion and anti-dsDNA IgG production. Glucose inhibition reduces mTORC1 activation, which may be responsible for the reduction in Bcl6 levels in these TFH cells. The dramatic response of lupus TFH cells to 2DG while reducing the frequency of TEM cells requires the combination of 2DG and metformin (21 and this study) indicate that lupus TFH cells have a greater glucose requirement than other activated effector CD4+ T cells. A recently completed clinical trial for sirolimus in SLE patients showed that mTOR inhibition decreased the frequency of peripheral CD8+ TEM cells in responsive patients53. Since mTOR activation and glycolysis are tightly linked, it is likely that glycolysis contributes at least in part to the expansion of these CD8+ TEM cells, and their novel predictive value warrants further examination in lupus mice.

An effective and safe therapy in SLE should target the TFH cells that drive the production of pathogenic autoantibodies without affecting TFH cells responding to pathogens. We used two different models to address the impact of glucose inhibition on TFH cells induced by exogenous antigens. NP-KLH immunization does not address directly the glucose requirements of Ag-specific TFH cells, but class-switched high affinity NP-antibodies are clearly TFH-dependent. In both primary and memory responses, glucose inhibition does not impair the generation of NP-specific GC B cells and anti-NP IgG, while it eliminates anti-dsDNA IgG in the same mice. The influenza virus infection model confirms that the induction of Ag-specific TFH cells is not impaired by 2DG, and that 2DG-treated TFH cells fully support the production of flu-specific antibodies, while again, in the same mice, anti-dsDNA IgG levels are reduced. Therefore, these results suggest that glucose inhibition can eliminate autoreactive TFH cells while preserving the ability to mount a protective response to pathogens. Selective targeting of pathogenic autoreactive immune cells has been an elusive goal in lupus and other autoimmune diseases. Our results suggest that this could be achieved though the targeting of T cell metabolism.

We propose a model in which all TFH cells, especially those induced by exogenous antigens, require glutamine and spontaneous autoreactive TFH cells are uniquely glycolytic (Supplementary Fig. 8). This model is supported by the differential expression of solute transporters favoring amino acid flux in spontaneous B6 TFH cells and glucose flux in TC TFH cells. Moreover, the expression of amino acid transporters Slc1a5 and CD98 is reduced in spontaneous TC TFH cells but not in virus-specific TFH cells. Finally, the glutamine inhibitor DON prevents the production of NP-specific IgG, but maintains total IgG levels in TC mice, suggesting a preferential requirement for glutamine in Ag-induced TFH cells. In addition to being an effective T cell inhibitor in alloreactive responses54, we show here that DON inhibits Ag-specific TFH cells. mTORC1 is activated in T cells either by TCR/PI3K/AKT signaling or amino acid uptake55, specifically through CD9833. The low CD98 expression in spontaneous TC TFH cells suggests that their high mTORC1 activation is fueled by the PI3K/AKT axis, which in turn enhances glycolysis. On the other hand, our results suggest that CD98 mediated mTORC1 activation is required for the induction of Ag-specific TFH cells. mTORC1 activation is necessary in TFH cells25,26, and it promotes Bcl6 translation in autoreactive TFH cells27, which is consistent with high mTORC1 activation in spontaneous lupus TFH cells. PR8 virus-induced TFH cells present however a similar level of mTORC1 between lupus and control mice, which is consistent with the relatively low level of mTORC1 activation that was reported in LCMV-induced TFH cells22. The elucidation of the mechanisms of mTORC1 activation in autoreactive spontaneous vs. Ag-induced TFH cells will be critical to understand in their function.

The different metabolic requirements of spontaneous autoreactive and Ag-induced TFH cells imply that these two types of TFH cells are qualitatively different, either in their differentiation or function. Spontaneous GC B cells have unique intrinsic requirements for IFNγ and IL-6 signaling in two different autoreactive models56,57. The differential response of spontaneous and Ag-induced GC B cells to 2DG mirrored the response of the corresponding TFH cells in TC mice. Both spontaneous and induced GC B cells were however sensitive to glutamine inhibition. The development and maintenance of TFH and GC B cells are tightly linked and the treatment with 2DG could affect directly both cell types. Very little is known on GC B cell metabolism, except that, as TFH cells, GC B cells induced upon immunization require intrinsic mTORC1 activation58,59. In addition, treatment with rapamycin during influenza infection alters affinity maturation of virus-specific antibodies60. mTORC1 is also necessary for optimal antibody synthesis in long-lived plasma cells suggesting diverse roles of mTOR in humoral immunity61. Our results suggest either that autoreactive or Ag-induced GC B cells have different metabolic requirements, or that their differential response to 2DG and DON is a consequence of the effect that these inhibitors have on TFH cells. An expansion of circulating TFH cells has been reported in multiple autoimmune diseases besides SLE62. Further investigation of the metabolic requirements of TFH and GC B cells in these autoimmune conditions relative to pathogen exposure should advance the quest for targeted therapeutics in autoantibody-mediated autoimmune diseases as well as our understanding of the mechanisms by which autoreactive GCs are generated and maintained.

Methods

Mice and treatment of metabolic inhibitors

C57BL/6J (B6), NZB/W F1, B6.MRL-Faslpr/J (B6.lpr) and BXSB.Yaa mice were originally obtained from the Jackson Laboratory. B6.NZM-Sle1NZM2410/AegSle2NZM2410/AegSle3NZM2410/Aeg/LmoJ (TC) congenic mice have been previously described19. All mice were bred and maintained at the University of Florida and Jackson Laboratories (BXSB.Yaa) in specific pathogen-free conditions. For in vivo metabolic inhibitor treatments, 2DG (Sigma, 6 mg/ml) or metformin (Sigma, 3 mg/ml) were dissolved in drinking water, and mice received 2DG alone or the combination of the two drugs for the duration indicated for each study. Age-matched control mice receiving plain drinking water were used as controls. DON (1.6 mg/kg) was administered intra-peritoneally every other day for a maximum of 2 weeks. For spontaneous GC formation, lupus-prone mice were first screened for serum anti-dsDNA IgG levels between 5 and 6 months of age. Anti-dsDNA IgG-positive mice (i.e., >+2 SD than the average for age-matched B6 controls) were assigned to treated or control groups to distribute equally the autoantibody levels. Only female mice at the age indicated for each experiment were used in this study under protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees of the University of Florida and the Jackson Laboratory.

Flow cytometry and immufluorescence staining

Single-cell suspensions were prepared from spleens using standard procedures. Lungs from PR8-virus infected mice were processed with LiberaseTL (Sigma)63. After red blood cell lysis, cells were blocked with anti-CD16/32 Ab (2.4G2), and stained in FACS staining buffer (2.5% FBS, 0.05% sodium azide in PBS). Fluorochrome-conjugated Abs used for FASC are listed in Supplementary Table 3. Follicular T cells were stained in a three-step process using purified CXCR5 (2G8) followed by biotinylated anti-rat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratory) then PerCP-labeled streptavidin in FACS staining buffer on ice. For the intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized with Foxp3 stating buffer (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 4-Hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl (NP)-Phycoerythrin was purchased from Biosearch Technology. Dead cells were excluded with fixable viability dye (eFluor780; Thermo Fisher). Data were collected on LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (Tree Star). To measure glucose uptake, splenocytes were stained with subset-specific antibodies, then resuspended in PBS with 1 μM 2-deoxy-2-[(7-nitro-2,1,3-benzoxadiazol-4-yl)amino]-d-glucose (2NBDG; Life Technologies) for 15 min. After twice washing, cells were analyzed for 2NDBG uptake using flow cytometry. Immunofluorescence staining of spleen frozen sections was performed with an mTOR polyclonal antibody (PA5-34663, 1:1000 dilution) followed by an Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG (A-2107, 1:200 dilution), both from Thermo-Fisher. GCs were stained with anti-GL7-FITC (LY-77; 1:25), B cells with anti-IgDb-PE (217-170, 1:50) and CD4+ T cells with anti-CD4-APC (RM4-5, 1:100), all from BD Bioscience.

TD Immunization, ELISA, and ELISPOT

For NP-KLH immunization, 8–10-week-old mice were pretreated 2DG for 2 weeks before receiving an intra-peritoneal injection of a 100 μg NP(31)-KLH (Biosearch Technology) in alum. The primary response was analyzed 10 d after immunization, and the recall response was analyzed 7 weeks after the first immunization after boosting with same Ag at weeks 2 and 6. To analyze glutamine metabolism in the primary TD response, DON (1.6 mg/kg, Sigma-Aldrich) was administered intra-peritoneally every other day starting on the day of immunization with NP-KLH, or at days 5 and 7. Serum NP-specific antibodies were measured by ELISA using plates coated with NP(4)- or NP(25)-BSA (high or low affinity, respectively) (Biosearch Technology), followed by incubation with 1:1000 diluted serum samples, and developed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (1071-04, 1:1000) or IgG2a (1071-04, 1:1000), both from Southern Biotech. All samples were run in duplicate. Anti-dsDNA IgG were measured in sera diluted 1:100 in plates coated with 50 ug/ml dsDNA. Bound IgG was detected using alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse IgG (115-055-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch) diluted 1:1000. Relative units were standardized using serial dilutions of a positive serum from TC mice, setting the 1:100 dilution reactivity to 100 U64. Spleen antibody-secreting cells were quantified by an NP-specific IgG ELISPOT assay on serially diluted splenocytes using 96-well mixed cellulose esters membrane plates (Millipore) coated with 50 μg/ml NP(25)-BSA35. Bound cells were detected with HRP‐conjugated‐anti‐IgG (1036-05, Southern Biotech) at 1:1000 dilution, and developed by 3‐amino‐9‐ethylcarbazole (Sigma‐Aldrich). Antibody-secreting cells were then counted and measured using a Bioreader 4000 Pro‐x (Bio‐Sys). Germinal center imaging was performed on frozen sections from spleens collected 10 d after immunization.

Influenza virus infection

Influenza A virus strain A/Puerto Rico/8/1934 H1N1 (PR8) was kindly provided by Paul G. Thomas (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital). Infection with PR8 virus was carried out on 8–10 week old 2two weeks after treatment with 2DG started. A volume of 30 μl of HBSS containing 1 × 102 PFU (immunization low dose) or 1 × 106 PFU (challenge high dose) of PR8 virus were inoculated intranasally (i.n.) in mice anesthetized with isoflurane. To detect virus-specific CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, fluorescence-conjugated MHC-II and MHC-I peptide tetramers, respectively, were obtained from the National Institutes of Health Tetramer Core facility (Emory University, Atlanta, GA). After single cell suspensions (5 × 106 cells) were stained with CD4+ T cell antibodies, then incubated with 30 μg/ml of influenza A nucleoprotein (NP) peptide (311-325, QVYSLIRPNENPAHK) I-Ab tetramers for 2 h at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Virus specific CD8+ T cells were detected with NP peptide (366–374, ASNENMETM) H-2Db tetramers. To test the protective effect of serum from immunized mice, cohorts of B6 and TC mice were treated or not with 2DG. Two weeks later, all mice were infected i.n. with a low dose of PR8 virus. 3 weeks later, mice were sacrificed, immune sera were collected. 150 μl of 2DG serum or control serum was transferred intra-peritoneally into naive B6 recipients. One day after transfer, mice were infected i.n. with a high dose of PR8 virus. Naive mice that did not receive serum were used as negative controls for protection and mice that were originally immunized intra-nasally were used as positive controls for protection. Animals were weighed daily and mean percent of initial body weight was calculated for each group. Influenza A NP-specific antibodies were measured in serum collected 30 d after low dose immunization by ELISA. Plates were coated with 100 μl of recombinant NP at 1 μg/ml (Novus Biologicals), followed by incubation with serial dilutions of serum samples (50, 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600) and developed with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG1 (1071-04), IgG2b (1091-04), and IgG2c (1078-04, all from Southern Biotech) each at 1:1000 dilution. The optimal serum dilution to show differences between groups was determined to be 1:200. All samples were run in duplicate.

Gene expression

TFH cells (CD4+PD-1+CXCR5+) sorted from 8–10-month-old mice were pooled to generate 5 TC and 3 B6 samples. Total RNA was extracted with RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). 200 ng of total RNA per sample was used to generate labeled cDNA fragments with GeneChipTM WT cDNA Labeling Kit (Thermo Fisher) that were hybridized to Affymetrix MTA 1.0 microarrays (Thermo Fisher) with Thermo Fisher reagents. Microarrays were processed with the GeneChip 3000 7G scanner and GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 (Thermo Fisher). Raw CEL files were normalized by the RMA algorithm with Partek Genomic Suite 6.6 (Partek). SYBR green (Biorad)-based qPCR was performed on cDNA synthesized from sorted T cell subsets with primer sequences shown in Supplementary Table 4. Normalization to housekeeping genes Hmbs or Ppia was carried out with the 2ΔΔCt method. A custom nCounter Gene Expression CodeSet panel (Supplementary Table 2) was generated by NanoString Technology. Using 50 ng of total RNA per sample, cartridge preparation and scanning was carried out according to manufacturer’s instructions using the NanoString Prep Station and nCounter Digital Analyzer. Data was analyzed with nSolver Analysis software, version 2.5 with normalization utilizing positive and negative control probes as well as housekeeping genes.

Statistical analysis

Differences between groups were evaluated by two-tailed statistics: unpaired t tests or Mann–Whitney U tests depending on whether the data were normally distributed, and two-way ANOVA tests for time-course experiments. Unless specified, graphs show means and standard error of the mean (s.e.m.).

Data availability

Microarray data shown in this study have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database with accession GSE106455. The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its Supplementary Information files.

References

  1. 1.

    Nutt, S. L. & Tarlinton, D. M. Germinal center B and follicular helper T cells: siblings, cousins or just good friends? Nat. Immunol. 12, 472–477 (2011).

  2. 2.

    Pratama, A. & Vinuesa, C. G. Control of TFH cell numbers: why and how? Immunol. Cell Biol. 92, 40–48 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Radic, M. Z. & Weigert, M. Genetic and structural evidence for antigen selection of anti-DNA antibodies. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12, 487–520 (1994).

  4. 4.

    Kim, S. J., Lee, K. & Diamond, B. Follicular helper T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus. Front. Immunol. 9, 1793 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Daikh, D. I., Finck, B. K., Linsley, P. S., Hollenbaugh, D. & Wofsy, D. Long-term inhibition of murine lupus by brief simultaneous blockade of the B7/CD28 and CD40/gp39 costimulation pathways. J. Immunol. 159, 3104–3108 (1997).

  6. 6.

    Ma, J. et al. Autoimmune lpr/lpr mice deficient in CD40 ligand: spontaneous Ig class switching with dichotomy of autoantibody responses. J. Immunol. 157, 417–426 (1996).

  7. 7.

    Bubier, J. A. et al. A critical role for IL-21 receptor signaling in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus in BXSB-Yaa mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 1518–1523 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Herber, D. et al. IL-21 has a pathogenic role in a lupus-prone mouse model and its blockade with IL-21R.Fc reduces disease progression. J. Immunol. 178, 3822–3830 (2007).

  9. 9.

    Vugmeyster, Y. et al. In vitro potency, pharmacokinetic profiles, and pharmacological activity of optimized anti-IL-21R antibodies in a mouse model of lupus. MAbs 2, 335–346 (2010).

  10. 10.

    Zhang, M. et al. Interleukin-21 receptor blockade inhibits secondary humoral responses and halts the progression of preestablished disease in the (NZB x NZW)F1 systemic lupus erythematosus model. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67, 2723–2731 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Pan, Y. et al. MS2 VLP-based delivery of microRNA-146a inhibits autoantibody production in lupus-prone mice. Int. J. Nanomed. 7, 5957–5967 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Chavele, K. M., Merry, E. & Ehrenstein, M. R. Cutting edge: circulating plasmablasts induce the differentiation of human T follicular helper cells via IL-6 production. J. Immunol. 194, 2482–2485 (2015).

  13. 13.

    Illei, G. G. et al. Tocilizumab in systemic lupus erythematosus: data on safety, preliminary efficacy, and impact on circulating plasma cells from an open-label phase I dosage-escalation study. Arthritis Rheum. 62, 542–552 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Navarra, S. V. et al. Efficacy and safety of belimumab in patients with active systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 377, 721–731 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Sawaf, M., Dumortier, H. & Monneaux, F. follicular helper T cells in systemic lupus erythematosus: why should they be considered as interesting therapeutic targets? J. Immunol. Res. 2016, 5767106 (2016).

  16. 16.

    Man, K. & Kallies, A. Synchronizing transcriptional control of T cell metabolism and function. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 574–584 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Perl, A. Review: metabolic control of immune system activation in rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheumatol. 69, 2259–2270 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Morel, L. Immunometabolism in systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 13, 280–290 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Morel, L. et al. Genetic reconstitution of systemic lupus erythematosus immunopathology with polycongenic murine strains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6670–6675 (2000).

  20. 20.

    Yin, Y. et al. Normalization of CD4+T cell metabolism reverses lupus. Sci. Transl. Med. 7, 274ra218 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Yin, Y. et al. Glucose oxidation is critical for CD4+T cell activation in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Immunol. 196, 80–90 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Ray, J. P. et al. The interleukin-2-mTORc1 kinase axis defines the signaling, differentiation, and metabolism of T helper 1 and follicular B helper T cells. Immunity 43, 690–702 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Oestreich, K. J. et al. Bcl-6 directly represses the gene program of the glycolysis pathway. Nat. Immunol. 15, 957–964 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Patsoukis, N. et al. PD-1 alters T-cell metabolic reprogramming by inhibiting glycolysis and promoting lipolysis and fatty acid oxidation. Nat. Commun. 6, 6692 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Yang, J. et al. Critical roles of mTOR Complex 1 and 2 for T follicular helper cell differentiation and germinal center responses. eL ife 5, e17936 (2016).

  26. 26.

    Zeng, H. et al. mTORC1 and mTORC2 kinase signaling and glucose metabolism drive follicular helper T cell differentiation. Immunity 45, 540–554 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Yi, W. et al. The mTORC1-4E-BP-eIF4E axis controls de novo Bcl6 protein synthesis in T cells and systemic autoimmunity. Nat. Commun. 8, 254 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Ray, J. P. et al. Transcription factor STAT3 and type I interferons are corepressive insulators for differentiation of follicular helper and T helper 1 cells. Immunity 40, 367–377 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Wu, H. et al. An inhibitory role for the transcription factor Stat3 in controlling IL-4 and Bcl6 expression in follicular helper T cells. J. Immunol. 195, 2080–2089 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Read, K. A. et al. Integrated STAT3 and Ikaros zinc finger transcription factor activities regulate Bcl-6 expression in CD4(+) Th Cells. J. Immunol. 199, 2377–2387 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Rasmussen, T. K. et al. Overexpression of microRNA-155 increases IL-21 mediated STAT3 signaling and IL-21 production in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res. Ther. 17, 154 (2015).

  32. 32.

    Waickman, A. T. & Powell, J. D. mTOR, metabolism, and the regulation of T-cell differentiation and function. Immunol. Rev. 249, 43–58 (2012).

  33. 33.

    Niu, H., Sobel, E. S. & Morel, L. Defective B-cell response to T-dependent immunization in lupus-prone mice. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 3028–3040 (2008).

  34. 34.

    Ballesteros-Tato, A. et al. Interleukin-2 inhibits germinal center formation by limiting T follicular helper cell differentiation. Immunity 36, 847–856 (2012).

  35. 35.

    Plumb, A. W. et al. Interleukin-7, but not thymic stromal lymphopoietin, plays a key role in the T cell response to influenza A virus. PLoS ONE 7, e50199 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Abboud, G. et al. Tissue-specific programming of memory CD8 T cell subsets impacts protection against lethal respiratory virus infection. J. Exp. Med. 213, 2897–2911 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Joshi, N. S. et al. Inflammation directs memory precursor and short-lived effector CD8(+) T cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor. Immunity 27, 281–295 (2007).

  38. 38.

    Bader-Meunier, B. et al. Are RASopathies new monogenic predisposing conditions to the development of systemic lupus erythematosus? Case report and systematic review of the literature. Semin. Arthritis Rheum. 43, 217–219 (2013).

  39. 39.

    Singh, K. et al. K-RAS GTPase- and B-RAF kinase-mediated T-cell tolerance defects in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1629–E1637 (2012).

  40. 40.

    Utsunomiya-Tate, N., Endou, H. & Kanai, Y. Cloning and functional characterization of a system ASC-like Na+-dependent neutral amino acid transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 14883–14890 (1996).

  41. 41.

    Nakaya, M. et al. Inflammatory T cell responses rely on amino acid transporter ASCT2 facilitation of glutamine uptake and mTORC1 kinase activation. Immunity 40, 692–705 (2014).

  42. 42.

    Cantor, J. M. & Ginsberg, M. H. CD98 at the crossroads of adaptive immunity and cancer. J. Cell. Sci. 125, 1373–1382 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Sinclair, L. V. et al. Control of amino-acid transport by antigen receptors coordinates the metabolic reprogramming essential for T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 14, 500–508 (2013).

  44. 44.

    Sinclair, L. V., Neyens, D., Ramsay, G., Taylor, P. M. & Cantrell, D. A. Single cell analysis of kynurenine and System L amino acid transport in T cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 1981 (2018).

  45. 45.

    Maceiras, A. R., Fonseca, V. R., Agua-Doce, A. & Graca, L. T follicular regulatory cells in mice and men. Immunology 152, 25–35 (2017).

  46. 46.

    Blanco, P., Ueno, H. & Schmitt, N. T follicular helper (Tfh) cells in lupus: Activation and involvement in SLE pathogenesis. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 281–290 (2016).

  47. 47.

    Comte, D., Karampetsou, M. P. & Tsokos, G. C. T cells as a therapeutic target in SLE. Lupus 24, 351–363 (2015).

  48. 48.

    Kato, H. & Perl, A. Blockade of Treg cell differentiation and function by the interleukin-21-mechanistic target of rapamycin axis via suppression of autophagy in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 70, 427–438 (2018).

  49. 49.

    Choi, S. C. & Morel, L. B cell contribution of the CD4(+) T cell inflammatory phenotypes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Autoimmunity 50, 37–41 (2017).

  50. 50.

    Sang, A. et al. Dysregulated cytokine production by dendritic cells modulates B cell responses in the NZM2410 mouse model of lupus. PLoS ONE 9, e102151 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Wan, S., Xia, C. & Morel, L. IL-6 produced by dendritic cells from lupus-prone mice inhibits CD4+CD25+T cell regulatory functions. J. Immunol. 178, 271–279 (2007).

  52. 52.

    Buck, M. D., Sowell, R. T., Kaech, S. M. & Pearce, E. L. Metabolic instruction of immunity. Cell 169, 570–586 (2017).

  53. 53.

    Lai, Z. W. et al. Sirolimus in patients with clinically active systemic lupus erythematosus resistant to, or intolerant of, conventional medications: a single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial. Lancet 391, 1186–1196 (2018).

  54. 54.

    Lee, C. F. et al. Preventing allograft rejection by targeting immune metabolism. Cell Rep. 13, 760–770 (2015).

  55. 55.

    Pollizzi, K. N. & Powell, J. D. Regulation of T cells by mTOR: the known knowns and the known unknowns. Trends Immunol. 36, 13–20 (2015).

  56. 56.

    Arkatkar, T. et al. B cell-derived IL-6 initiates spontaneous germinal center formation during systemic autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 214, 3207–3217 (2017).

  57. 57.

    Domeier, P. P. et al. IFN-gamma receptor and STAT1 signaling in B cells are central to spontaneous germinal center formation and autoimmunity. J. Exp. Med. 213, 715–732 (2016).

  58. 58.

    Ersching, J. et al. Germinal center selection and affinity maturation require dynamic regulation of mTORC1 kinase. Immunity 46, 1045–1058 (2017).

  59. 59.

    Li, B. et al. Mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 signalling is essential for germinal centre reaction. Immunology 152, 276–286 (2017).

  60. 60.

    Keating, R. et al. The kinase mTOR modulates the antibody response to provide cross-protective immunity to lethal infection with influenza virus. Nat. Immunol. 14, 1266–1276 (2013).

  61. 61.

    Jones, D. D. et al. mTOR has distinct functions in generating versus sustaining humoral immunity. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 4250–4261 (2016).

  62. 62.

    Ueno, H. T follicular helper cells in human autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 43, 24–31 (2016).

  63. 63.

    Abboud, G. et al. Natural killer cells and innate interferon gamma participate in the host defense against respiratory vaccinia virus infection. J. Virol. 90, 129–141 (2015).

  64. 64.

    Mohan, C., Alas, E., Morel, L., Yang, P. & Wakeland, E. K. Genetic dissection of SLE pathogenesis. Sle1 on murine chromosome 1 leads to a selective loss of tolerance to H2A/H2B/DNA subnucleosomes. J. Clin. Invest. 101, 1362–1372 (1998).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Henry Baker (University of Florida) for his help with gene array analysis; and Leilani Zeumer-Spataro, Nathalie Kanda for outstanding technical help. This study is supported by grants from the NIH (R01AI045050 and R01 AI128901) and from the Alliance for Lupus Research (TIL-416522) to L.M.

Author information

S.-C.C., G.A. and L.M. conceived and designed the experiments; S.-C.C., A.A.T., G.A. and H.R.S. performed the experiments; S.-C.C., A.A.T., G.A., T.M.B., D.C.R., S.S.-A., and L.M. analyzed the data; and S.-C.C. and L.M. wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Laurence Morel.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.