Article | Open | Published:

# Unraveling substituent effects on the glass transition temperatures of biorenewable polyesters

## Abstract

Converting biomass-based feedstocks into polymers not only reduces our reliance on fossil fuels, but also furnishes multiple opportunities to design biorenewable polymers with targeted properties and functionalities. Here we report a series of high glass transition temperature (Tg up to 184 °C) polyesters derived from sugar-based furan derivatives as well as a joint experimental and theoretical study of substituent effects on their thermal properties. Surprisingly, we find that polymers with moderate steric hindrance exhibit the highest Tg values. Through a detailed Ramachandran-type analysis of the rotational flexibility of the polymer backbone, we find that additional steric hindrance does not necessarily increase chain stiffness in these polyesters. We attribute this interesting structure-property relationship to a complex interplay between methyl-induced steric strain and the concerted rotations along the polymer backbone. We believe that our findings provide key insight into the relationship between structure and thermal properties across a range of synthetic polymers.

## Introduction

As the drive for sustainability continues, petroleum-derived plastics are steadily being replaced by alternative bio-based polymers1,2. In this regard, the conversion of biorenewable feedstocks into aliphatic polyesters has become an especially desirable path forward as aliphatic polyesters are in general both biodegradable and biocompatible3. During the past decade, there has been growing interest in developing synthetic strategies for copolymerizing epoxides and cyclic anhydrides to make such aliphatic polyesters4,5. In addition to providing numerous opportunities for incorporating biorenewable content into polymers, these distinct monomer sets also allow us to tune a myriad of polymer properties and functionalities for different applications. For example, we recently found that bulky terpene-based anhydrides can be employed to make aliphatic polyesters with glass transition temperatures (Tg) up to 184 °C, thereby positioning them for use in a number of high-temperature applications6,7. Inspired by this finding, we decided to explore even more abundant biorenewable feedstocks as building blocks for high-Tg materials.

Polymers with high Tg values often have rigid backbones, which inhibit rotational flexibility in these polymer chains8,9. Hence, one of the most effective ways to increase chain rigidity is by the introduction of non-flexible ring structures into the polymer backbone, thereby hindering (or even eliminating in some cases) rotational flexibility8. As such, aromatic and aliphatic rings are often found as components of high-Tg polymers such as aromatic polycarbonates, polynorbornenes, and polyimides8. Another common way to increase Tg is by introducing substituents along/near the polymer backbone to hinder main-chain rotations through steric interactions8,10. Notable examples of such polymers include poly(α-methylstyrene), poly(2-methylstyrene), and poly(2,6-dimethylstyrene), all of which are characterized by Tg values that are significantly higher than their less substituted analogs11.

Following these design principles, we report herein several biorenewable polyesters with ring structures derived from furan, 2-methylfuran, and 2,5-dimethylfuran, all of which can be readily synthesized from pentoses and hexoses12,13,14. In doing so, we observe a quite unexpected structure-property relationship in this class of polymers, namely that the introduction of methyl substituents along the polymer backbone does not always increase Tg and an intermediate number of methyl substituents actually yields polymers with the highest Tg values. By performing a detailed theoretical analysis of the conformational flexibility in these polyesters, we provide key chemical and physical insight into the critical role played by methyl-induced steric strain in governing concerted rotations along the polymer chain. In particular, we demonstrate that methyl-induced strain can be leveraged to control chain flexibility in this class of polyesters by selectively destabilizing the relevant minimum-energy conformations across the rotational potential energy landscape. On the basis of these findings, we propose several simple and intuitive design principles for how methyl substitution can be used to rationalize and tune Tg trends across a range of synthetic polymers.

## Results

### Monomer synthesis

Acid-catalyzed dehydration of pentoses (such as xylose) to furfural, and hexoses (such as glucose and fructose) to hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), represent promising pathways for the utilization of carbohydrates (Fig. 1a)12,13,14. Although many biomass transformations require fermentation, this dehydration protocol proceeds without the use of enzymes, allowing it to be competitive in both cost and productivity13,14. As a result, the transformation of furfural and HMF into other value-added products and commodities has been the subject of extensive study13,14. For example, the hydrogenation of furfural and HMF yields 2-methylfuran and 2,5-dimethylfuran, respectively, both of which are regarded as potential biofuels (Fig. 1a)12,13,14.

In order to incorporate these sugar-derived biorenewable feedstocks into polymers, we investigated the Diels-Alder (D-A) reactions of a number of furan derivatives with maleic anhydride. As previously observed with furfural and maleimide, both furfural and HMF also do not readily undergo a D-A reaction with maleic anhydride, and we attribute this low reactivity to the presence of the electron-withdrawing aldehyde group and associated higher resonance stabilization in these compounds15. In contrast, 2-methylfuran and 2,5-dimethylfuran readily react with maleic anhydride to yield thermally labile unsaturated D-A adducts, which can then be hydrogenated or dehydrated to make tricyclic or phthalic anhydrides, respectively, with a targeted number of methyl substituents (Fig. 1b)16,17,18.

### Polymer synthesis and characterization

We then systematically investigated the copolymerization of these anhydrides using propylene oxide (PO), 1-butene oxide (BO), and cyclohexene oxide (CHO) in the presence of an aluminum catalyst19 (abbreviated as [FSalph]AlCl) and bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium chloride ([PPN]Cl), as shown in Fig. 2a (see Methods section). Their unsubstituted analogs (1a, 1d) were also included in this study for comparative purposes, and it is worth noting that the copolymerization of 1d with various epoxides has been extensively reported in the literature20,21,22,23,24. Under appropriate ratios of monomer to catalyst, 18 polyesters (Fig. 2) were prepared with well-controlled molecular weights (Mn ~20 kDa for PO and BO copolymers, Mn ~10 kDa for CHO copolymers) and narrow dispersities (Supplementary Tables 12). No evidence of ether linkage formation was observed by NMR spectroscopy (spectra of polymers are provided in Supplementary Figures 623). Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) was used to measure the Tg values of all polymers (see Methods section), which are shown in Fig. 2b. It is worth noting that the Tg values of the PO/anhydride polymers remain almost unchanged with increased molecular weight (Supplementary Table 1), confirming the hypothesis that the observed differences in Tg values are due to structural variation between the polymers instead of molecular weight discrepancies between samples.

Due to their bulky tricyclic nature, polymers made from 1a–1c are generally characterized by higher Tg values than those made from 1d1f with the same number of methyl substituents (Fig. 2b). When the epoxide was varied, we observed that the BO-based polymers have lower Tg values than the PO-based polymers and attribute this to the fact that longer alkyl groups often hinder polymer chains from densely packing25,26. Furthermore, the CHO-based polymers have substantially higher Tg values relative to both the PO- and BO-based analogs due to the decreased chain flexibility imposed by the cyclohexyl ring8. Quite interestingly, we also found that the addition of methyl substituents to the anhydride comonomers has a non-linear influence over the observed Tg values, despite the widely accepted notion that Tg values increase upon methyl substitution due to the additional steric hindrance near the polymer backbone8,10. In particular, we found that polyesters made from monomethyl-substituted anhydrides exhibited higher Tg values than those made from the corresponding unsubstituted as well as dimethyl-substituted anhydrides. In other words, polymers with an intermediate number of methyl substituents exhibited the highest Tg values in each series. Given the ubiquity of methyl substitution in polymer structures, we now turn to a detailed analysis of the backbone rotational flexibility in these polymers accompanied by a discussion of the key chemical and physical insights that we have gained into this unexpected structure-property relationship. We believe that these findings will aid in the rational design of synthetic polymers with a wide range of targeted thermal properties.

### Chain flexibility and glass transition temperature

In general, Tg values are governed by the overall cooperative segmental mobility27,28 of the polymer, which in turn is determined by its intrinsic chain (or backbone) flexibility and the non-bonded intermolecular interactions present in the system8,29. Since the polymers considered in this work do not exhibit strong secondary forces (e.g., there are no directional hydrogen bonding motifs like one would find in polyamides, for instance) and only differ (within a given series) by the presence of one or two methyl groups along the backbone (which will not provide substantive differences in the non-bonded dispersion interactions), we can eliminate non-bonded intermolecular interactions as being the primary driving forces responsible for this aforementioned structure-property relationship. We therefore hypothesize that intrinsic chain flexibility is predominantly responsible for the fact that the monomethyl-substituted polyesters exhibited the highest Tg values in each series. To support this claim, we present both experimental and theoretical evidence that intrinsic chain flexibility is indeed the primary difference between theses systems and that the monomethyl-substituted polymers have the lowest chain flexibility within their respective series.

To provide experimental support that the addition of a single methyl substituent leads to a substantial decrease in polymer mobility, the average molecular hole volumes (Vh)30,31,32 associated with all six PO-based polyesters considered in this study were measured via positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS)33,34 (Supplementary Methods), as glassy polymers with lower chain flexibility are generally accompanied with larger Vh35,36,37. In doing so, we found that the monomethyl-substituted polyesters in both the tricyclic and phthalic series indeed have the largest respective Vh (Supplementary Table 3). Since the monomethyl-substituted polyesters have both larger Vh and larger Tg values (when compared with their unsubstituted and dimethyl-substituted counterparts), these findings provide a direct correlation between intrinsic chain flexibility and the anomalous Tg relationship observed in these polyesters.

### Theoretical analysis

To further investigate the intrinsic chain flexibility in these methyl-substituted polyesters, we employed dispersion-inclusive hybrid density functional theory, an ab initio quantum mechanical approach that simultaneously ameliorates self-interaction error38,39 and accounts for nonlocal correlation effects such as dispersion (or van der Waals) interactions40,41. As such, this approach is able to furnish an accurate and reliable description of the rotational barriers along the polymer backbone (see Methods section, Supplementary Discussion, and Supplementary Tables 45). In particular, we focused our computational efforts on determining the rotational flexibility associated with the bonds between the carbonyl carbons and their respective α-carbons, which are defined by the θ and φ angles in Fig. 3a, due to their proximity to the methyl substituents introduced on the anhydride-derived repeat units (Fig. 2a). As illustrated in Fig. 2b, the non-linear influence exhibited by methyl substitution on Tg is effectively independent of the choice for the epoxide comonomer (Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Figure 32), which further justifies our focus on these select rotational degrees of freedom as well as the computationally tractable model systems (2a2f) employed throughout this study (Fig. 3a).

Since the two ester groups are vicinally substituted on the rings of these polyesters, there should be significant coupling between the θ and φ rotational degrees of freedom. Hence, instead of obtaining one-dimensional (1D) scans42,43,44 of the potential energy surfaces (PES) corresponding to independent dihedral rotations around θ and φ, we performed full two-dimensional (2D) scans of the rotational PES for each polyester model compound (see Methods section). This approach is analogous to the Ramachandran plots used to study the rotational flexibility of the peptide backbone in proteins45,46 and allows us to investigate the collective nature of these dihedral rotations. In doing so, we can provide a more detailed and comprehensive characterization of the local backbone flexibility, which we believe to be primarily responsible for the overall backbone flexibility in this class of polymers and hence the Tg trends observed herein.

Detailed Ramachandran-type plots of the 2D rotational PES for systems 2a2f are presented in Fig. 3c (with representative conformations described in Fig. 3b). Since all of these plots are diagonally dominant (i.e., the location of the minima and most accessible transition states (TS) are located along the diagonal direction), one can first conclude that dihedral rotations around θ and φ are indeed strongly coupled. In this regard, the presence of such collective rotational degrees of freedom in these polyesters is in stark contrast to the simple 1D plots that are adequate to describe internal rotations in simple molecules such as ethane, butane, or other polyesters such as polyethylene terephthalate (vide infra). In fact, independent rotations of either θ or φ are significantly hindered in all cases (as evidenced by the largest energetic barriers located along the horizontal and vertical directions in these Ramachandran-type plots) and the primary mechanism governing rotational flexibility in this class of polymers is therefore best described as collective and disrotatory motions of the vicinal ester groups.

Upon the addition of methyl substituents, the rotational landscapes of both the tricyclic and phthalic series are significantly modified, showing non-linear changes in the relative chain flexibilities in these polymers. For one, the introduction of a single methyl group breaks the left-right reflection symmetry in these systems, which lifts the degeneracies across the diagonal as well as the near-degeneracies along the diagonal. The presence of this methyl substituent also results in a reduction in the overall number of (local) minima and TS on the rotational PES corresponding to 2b and 2e. In fact, this addition can also lead to a completely different global minimum conformation, as observed in the phthalic anhydride series (see 2e in Fig. 3c and Supplementary Discussion). Of particular importance is the fact that the rotational barriers are noticeably higher in the Ramachandran-type plots corresponding to both 2b and 2e, which is clear evidence that rotational flexibility is hindered in the monomethyl-substituted compounds. Since left-right reflection symmetry is restored upon addition of the second methyl group, such deleterious effects of symmetry breaking are completely ameliorated in the rotational PES corresponding to 2c and 2f, which are characterized with rotational barriers that are only slightly increased with respect to their completely unsubstituted counterparts. Although symmetry breaking (and its subsequent restoration) is the underlying reason behind these observed trends in chain flexibility, a detailed analysis of these rotational PES allows us to procure key insight into how substituent effects influence chain flexibility in these polyesters (vide infra).

The modifications to the rotational landscape upon methyl substitution also lead to substantial changes in the equilibrium (thermal) population of the relevant energy minima on these PES, as well as the connectivity and energetic barriers between such stationary points. Looking again at the Ramachandran-type plots in Fig. 3c, one immediately notices that large swaths of the rotational PES are less accessible in the monomethyl-substituted polymers (2b, 2e) when compared with their unsubstituted and dimethyl-substituted counterparts. As shown in Fig. 4, we quantitatively assessed this measure of rotational flexibility by plotting the fractional area of each 2D rotational PES that is accessible from the corresponding global minimum conformation as a function of the thermal energy (Erel) available for traversing potential rotational barriers (Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Figure 33). In the tricyclic series, the accessible fractional area is considerably smaller in 2b (when compared against 2a and 2c) across all values of Erel, which indicates that 2b is the least flexible among these three structures with respect to θ and φ dihedral rotations. In the phthalic series, we also notice that the accessible fractional area is smaller in 2e in the relevant low- and intermediate-energy sectors. In this case, the slightly larger accessible fractional area of 2e for Erel values in the range of 0.0–2.0 kcal/mol is inconsequential to the overall rotational flexibility of this polymer because this area corresponds to local (frustrated) rotational motion confined to the energetic basin of the global minimum (Fig. 3c and Supplementary Discussion). Quite interestingly, the relatively wide valley surrounding the global minimum in 2e is a direct consequence of the symmetry breaking caused by the addition of a single methyl group in this polymer series (vide supra), in which the three distinct minima present in 2d (or 2f) are effectively merged into two wide and fairly shallow minima. We have also devised an alternative statistical mechanical measure of the rotational flexibility in these polymers that accounts for the thermal population of all points on the rotational PES, which we denote as the thermal flexibility index ($$\hat F$$, see Methods section). At 25 °C, we find $$\hat F$$ values of 11.7 (2a), 2.7 (2b), 8.2 (2c) and 9.9 (2d), 3.8 (2e), 6.2 (2f), again clearly indicating that the monomethyl-substituted cases are indeed the least flexible in both series. We note in passing that the same trend is also observed at 100 °C, which is a more relevant temperature for discussing high-Tg polymer applications. Taken together, both of these measures of rotational flexibility are consistent with our hypothesis that backbone flexibility is primarily responsible for the experimental observation that the polyesters with an intermediate number of methyl substituents exhibit the highest Tg values.

In order to pinpoint the underlying cause of the substantially increased flexibility observed with the introduction of a second methyl group in compounds 2c and 2f, we also analyzed the structures and relative energetics associated with a representative minimum (across each series) as well as its neighboring and most accessible TS conformations (Fig. 5). The locations of these stationary points on the Ramachandran-type plots are highlighted in Fig. 3c, from which one can see that the paths connecting any one of these minima and its corresponding TS conformations involves concerted rotations along θ and φ. This again stresses the collective nature of these rotational degrees of freedom and the utility of the Ramachandran-type analysis performed herein. In both the tricyclic and phthalic series, the relative energetics corresponding to the TS structures in Fig. 5 again confirm that all rotational barriers are indeed lower in the dimethyl-substituted compounds, which provides additional support to our hypothesis that the addition of a second methyl group leads to increased rotational flexibility in these polymers.

What is not immediately clear from the energetics in Fig. 5 is that this trend is not due to relative stabilization of the TS conformations in 2c (or 2f) and instead results from relative destabilization of the dimethyl-substituted minima. In this regard, we note that both the representative minimum and the TS have very similar conformations when going from 2b to 2c (and 2e to 2f), yet the addition of a second methyl group introduces significant additional strain into the system from the perspective of the minima, as depicted in Fig. 5. This observation indicates that steric interactions between the vicinal ester groups are the predominant source of strain in these systems, a key finding that is also supported by the significant coupling found between these rotational degrees of freedom even in the absence of methyl substituents (2a and 2d in Fig. 3c). In each representative minimum, we believe that the steric strain between the vicinal ester groups is ameliorated by the favorable Bürgi-Dunitz angle47 between the left alkoxy oxygen donor and the right carbonyl carbon acceptor, which allows for favorable orbital overlap. Upon the introduction of either one or two methyl groups, the system must minimize the steric interactions between the strongly coupled vicinal ester groups, whose motions are now further constrained by the presence of methyl-induced strain. Hence, the system adopts the optimal rotational configuration for the ester groups in the minimum energy conformations in 2b and 2c (2e and 2f), despite the additional methyl-induced strain present in the dimethyl-substituted compounds. In the corresponding TS conformations, the fact that the ester groups are specifically not in their optimal rotational configuration essentially governs their relative energetic profiles and overshadows any potentially unfavorable steric interactions with the methyl groups. These findings are further supported by a detailed analysis of a series of intramolecular symmetry-adapted perturbation theory48,49,50 calculations that were used to further investigate this complex interplay between ester–ester steric interactions and methyl-induced strain (Supplementary Discussion, Supplementary Table 7, and Supplementary Figure 34). Since the additional methyl-induced strain that is present in the dimethyl-substituted compounds has a significantly larger impact on the relative stabilities of the minima rather than the TS conformations, the net effect is a relative destabilization of the minimum energy conformations in 2c and 2f. This results in the lower apparent rotational barrier heights seen in Figs. 3c and 5, which in turn correspond to significant relative increases in the flexibility of these polymer chains with the introduction of a second methyl substituent.

## Discussion

From this work, one sees clear experimental evidence that selective methyl substitution can be leveraged to tune the observed Tg values in polyesters with strongly coupled vicinal ester groups. Since none of these polyesters are subject to strong secondary forces and only differ by the presence of one or two methyl groups along the backbone within a given series, we eliminate non-bonded intermolecular interactions as being the primary driving forces responsible for this aforementioned structure–property relationship. This claim is further supported experimentally by the fact that the monomethyl-substituted polyesters in both the tricyclic and phthalic series indeed have the largest respective Vh within a given series, thereby providing a direct correlation between chain flexibility and the anomalous Tg relationship observed in these polyesters.

These experimental findings are also accompanied by a detailed theoretical analysis of the nonlinear influence of these methyl substituents on the backbone rotational flexibility of these polyesters. In doing so, we demonstrate that the underlying quantum mechanical mechanism responsible for this trend is the compromise made by the system in optimizing the rotational configuration of the strongly coupled vicinal ester groups (which are the primary source of strain in these systems) in the presence of methyl-induced strain. A key finding uncovered here is that this results in a relative destabilization of the minimum energy conformations in the dimethyl-substituted cases, which in turn lead to lower apparent rotational barriers and (by extension) increased chain flexibility. As such, the analysis presented herein provides key chemical and physical insight into how substituent effects influence intrinsic polymer chain flexibility, and takes us one step closer to the rational (and even computational51) design of high-Tg polymers.

Quite interestingly, these findings are not only limited to the class of polyesters with strongly coupled vicinal ester groups, and can be used rather straightforwardly to rationalize the reported52 Tg differences between poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene methyl-terephthalate), in which the rotational motions of the quite distant ester groups are completely independent (Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Figure 35). This example is strongly indicative that our findings are robust and will provide key insight into the relationship between structure and thermal properties across a range of synthetic polymers.

## Methods

### General experimental details

All manipulations of air- and water-sensitive compounds were carried out under nitrogen in a MBraun Labmaster glovebox or by using standard Schlenk line techniques. Epoxides were purchased from Aldrich and distilled from calcium hydride. Bis(triphenylphosphine)iminium chloride ([PPN]Cl) was also purchased from Aldrich and recrystallized by layering a saturated methylene chloride solution with diethyl ether. Phthalic anhydride was purchased from Aldrich and recrystallized from hot chloroform. The synthesis of all other anhydrides and the [FSalph]AlCl catalyst is detailed in Supplementary Methods and NMR spectra of these anhydrides are provided in Supplementary Figures 15.

### Copolymerization procedure

In a glovebox, the appropriate amount of [FSalph]AlCl catalyst (1.1–4.3 µmol, depending on the anhydride to catalyst ratio) and [PPN]Cl (1.0–3.9 µmol, 0.9 equivalents relative to the catalyst) were placed in an oven-dried 4-mL vial equipped with a magnetic stir bar. Cyclic anhydride (1.3 mmol) was added, followed by the addition of a predetermined amount of epoxide (and solvent) depending on the epoxide choice (Supplementary Methods). The vial was sealed with a Teflon-lined cap, removed from the glovebox, and placed in an aluminum heating block preheated to 60 °C. After the appropriate amount of time, an aliquot was taken for 1H NMR spectroscopic analysis to determine conversion of the cyclic anhydride. The reaction mixture was then diluted with ~0.5 mL methylene chloride and precipitated into 10 mL of methanol with vigorous stirring, after which the methanol was decanted. Polymers made from 1a1c were precipitated into hexanes due to their higher solubility in methanol. Precipitation was repeated as necessary to remove excess monomer and catalyst. The polymer was then dried under vacuum at 60 °C for 3 days and used for physical measurements. Synthetic and characterization details are provided in Supplementary Tables 12 and NMR spectra of all polymers are provided in Supplementary Figures 623.

### DSC measurements

DSC measurements of the polymer samples were performed on a Mettler-Toledo Polymer DSC instrument equipped with a chiller and an autosampler. Samples were prepared in aluminum pans. All polyesters were analyzed using the following temperature program: −70 to 200 °C at 10 °C/min, 200 to −70 °C at 10 °C/min, and then −70 to 200 °C at 10 °C/min. Data were processed using the StarE software. All reported Tg values were observed on the second heating cycle. All DSC thermograms are provided in Supplementary Figures 2431.

### Computational details

Each of the Ramachandran-type plots in Fig. 3c was constructed from the energies corresponding to 72 × 72 constrained geometry optimizations (for a total of 5184 calculations per model compound, taken in increments of 5° along the collective variable coordinates defined by θ and φ). The accompanying periodic surface plots (heat maps) were created using bilinear interpolation of the data with an in-house script written in the Matlab 2017b program. All geometry optimizations were performed (using the corresponding default convergence thresholds) with the Q-Chem (version 5.0) software package53. Unless otherwise specified, all calculations employed the B3LYP hybrid exchange-correlation functional54,55,56 in conjunction with the D3(op) dispersion correction57,58 and the 6–311++ G(d,p) basis set. This level of theory was selectively tested against higher-level quantum chemical methods (such as CCSD) with excellent performance reported for characterizing internal bond rotations in the systems considered in this work (Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Tables 45). The optimized geometries and harmonic vibrational frequencies for all stationary points reported in Fig. 5 were obtained using the tightest convergence thresholds available in Q-Chem to accurately reflect the structures and energetics of the true stationary points on the global PES. For a select set of stationary point structures, intramolecular symmetry-adapted perturbation theory50 (SAPT) calculations were performed at the density-fitted SAPT0 (DF-SAPT0) level using the PSI4 (version 1.1) software package59, with the jun-cc-pVDZ basis set and the corresponding JKFIT and MP2FIT auxiliary basis sets. All core orbitals were frozen during the SAPT calculations.

### Thermal flexibility index

In order to introduce the thermal flexibility index ($$\hat F$$), we first define the thermal flexibility (F), which is an ensemble average over all conformational transitions on the rotational PES in Fig. 3c, as follows:

$$F = {\int} {{\mathrm{d\alpha }}{\int} {{\mathrm{d\beta }}\rho ^ \ast \left( {\mathrm{\beta }} \right){\mathrm{e}}^{ - E^ \ne \left( {{\mathrm{\alpha }} \leftarrow {\mathrm{\beta }}} \right)/k_BT} \approx \frac{A}{N}\mathop {\sum}\limits_\alpha {\mathop {\sum}\limits_\beta {\frac{{{\mathrm{e}}^{ - E_\beta /k_BT}}}{{\mathop {\sum}\nolimits_\gamma {{\mathrm{e}}^{ - E_\gamma /k_BT}} }}{\mathrm{e}}^{ - E^ \ne \left( {{\mathrm{\alpha }} \leftarrow {\mathrm{\beta }}} \right)/k_BT}} .} } }$$
(1)

In this expression, ρ(β) denotes the probability density associated with conformation β (given by a Boltzmann distribution at temperature T), $$E^ \ne \left( {{\mathrm{\alpha }} \leftarrow {\mathrm{\beta }}} \right)$$ represents the maximum barrier height along the minimum energy path connecting conformations α and β, and A is the total area of the rotational PES (that has been discretized by N points). In other words, F is the Boltzmann factor from transition state theory applied to the barriers encountered during conformational transitions, which has been thermally averaged and summed over all possible transitions. In this work, a modified version of the Floyd-Warshall algorithm60,61,62 was employed to compute $$E^ \ne \left( {{\mathrm{\alpha }} \leftarrow {\mathrm{\beta }}} \right)$$ between any two conformations on a given rotational PES. In particular, instead of evaluating the length of a combined path by addition of two subpath lengths (as was done in the original Floyd-Warshall algorithm), we evaluate $$E^ \ne \left( {{\mathrm{\alpha }} \leftarrow {\mathrm{\beta }}} \right)$$ for the combined path by choosing the higher maximum barrier of the two subpaths. Since the thermal flexibility is maximized for a (fictitious) completely flat rotational PES, in which the probability density is uniform and $$E^ \ne \left( {{\mathrm{\alpha }} \leftarrow {\mathrm{\beta }}} \right) = 0$$ for any two conformations, we use this quantity ($$F_0 = {\int} {{\mathrm{d\alpha }} = A}$$) as a reference for defining $$\hat F$$. In doing so, the $$\hat F$$ corresponding to a given PES is defined as the ratio $$\hat F = F/F_0 \times 100$$ (such that $$\hat F$$ is always between 0 and 100), which allows for direct comparison of thermal flexibility indices corresponding to different PES.

### Data availability

All data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Hillmyer, M. A. The promise of plastics from plants. Science 358, 868–870 (2017).

2. 2.

Zhu, Y. Q., Romain, C. & Williams, C. K. Sustainable polymers from renewable resources. Nature 540, 354–362 (2016).

3. 3.

Hillmyer, M. A. & Tolman, W. B. Aliphatic polyester block polymers: renewable, degradable, and sustainable. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 2390–2396 (2014).

4. 4.

Paul, S. et al. Ring-opening copolymerization (ROCOP): synthesis and properties of polyesters and polycarbonates. Chem. Commun. 51, 6459–6479 (2015).

5. 5.

Longo, J. M., Sanford, M. J. & Coates, G. W. Ring-opening copolymerization of epoxides and cyclic anhydrides with discrete metal complexes: structure-property relationships. Chem. Rev. 116, 15167–15197 (2016).

6. 6.

Van Zee, N. J. & Coates, G. W. Alternating copolymerization of propylene oxide with biorenewable terpene-based cyclic anhydrides: a sustainable route to aliphatic polyesters with high glass transition temperatures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 2665–2668 (2015).

7. 7.

Sanford, M. J., Peña Carrodeguas, L., Van Zee, N. J., Kleij, A. W. & Coates, G. W. Alternating copolymerization of propylene oxide and cyclohexene oxide with tricyclic anhydrides: access to partially renewable aliphatic polyesters with high glass transition temperatures. Macromolecules 49, 6394–6400 (2016).

8. 8.

Odian, G. Principles of Polymerization 4th edn, (John Wiley & Sons Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2004).

9. 9.

Privalko, V. P. & Lipatov, Y. S. Glass transition and chain flexibility of linear polymers. J. Macromol. Sci. B 9, 551–564 (1974).

10. 10.

Xu, Z., Hadjichristidis, N., Fetters, L. J. & Mays, J. W. Physical Properties of Polymers. (Springer, Heidelberg, 1995).

11. 11.

Barb, W. G. Effect of chemical structure on the softening point of substituted polystyrenes and related materials. J. Poly. Sci. 37, 515–532 (1959).

12. 12.

Corma, A., Iborra, S. & Velty, A. Chemical routes for the transformation of biomass into chemicals. Chem. Rev. 107, 2411–2502 (2007).

13. 13.

Lange, J. P., van der Heide, E., van Buijtenen, J. & Price, R. Furfural: a promising platform for lignocellulosic biofuels. ChemSusChem 5, 150–166 (2012).

14. 14.

van Putten, R. J. et al. Hydroxymethylfurfural, a versatile platform chemical made from renewable resources. Chem. Rev. 113, 1499–1597 (2013).

15. 15.

Boutelle, R. C. & Northrop, B. H. Substituent effects on the reversibility of furan-maleimide cycloadditions. J. Org. Chem. 76, 7994–8002 (2011).

16. 16.

Mahmoud, E., Watson, D. A. & Lobo, R. F. Renewable production of phthalic anhydride from biomass-derived furan and maleic anhydride. Green Chem. 16, 167–175 (2014).

17. 17.

Thiyagarajan, S. et al. Substituted phthalic anhydrides from biobased furanics: a new approach to renewable aromatics. ChemSusChem 8, 3052–3056 (2015).

18. 18.

Thiyagarajan, S. et al. A facile solid-phase route to renewable aromatic chemicals from biobased furanics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 1368–1371 (2016).

19. 19.

Van Zee, N. J., Sanford, M. J. & Coates, G. W. Electronic effects of aluminum complexes in the copolymerization of propylene oxide with tricyclic anhydrides: access to well-defined, functionalizable aliphatic polyesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 2755–2761 (2016).

20. 20.

Darensbourg, D. J., Poland, R. R. & Escobedo, C. Kinetic studies of the alternating copolymerization of cyclic acid anhydrides and epoxides, and the terpolymerization of cyclic acid anhydrides, epoxides, and CO2 catalyzed by (salen)CrIIICl. Macromolecules 45, 2242–2248 (2012).

21. 21.

Hosseini Nejad, E., van Melis, C. G. W., Vermeer, T. J., Koning, C. E. & Duchateau, R. Alternating ring-opening polymerization of cyclohexene oxide and anhydrides: effect of catalyst, cocatalyst, and anhydride structure. Macromolecules 45, 1770–1776 (2012).

22. 22.

Saini, P. K., Romain, C., Zhu, Y. & Williams, C. K. Di-magnesium and zinc catalysts for the copolymerization of phthalic anhydride and cyclohexene oxide. Polym. Chem. 5, 6068–6075 (2014).

23. 23.

Li, J., Liu, Y., Ren, W.-M. & Lu, X.-B. Asymmetric alternating copolymerization of meso-epoxides and cyclic anhydrides: efficient access to enantiopure polyesters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 11493–11496 (2016).

24. 24.

Peña Carrodeguas, L., Martin, C. & Kleij, A. W. Semiaromatic polyesters derived from renewable terpene oxides with high glass transitions. Macromolecules 50, 5337–5345 (2017).

25. 25.

Dlubek, G. et al. Free volume, glass transition, and degree of branching in metallocene-based propylene/alpha-olefin copolymers: positron lifetime, density, and differential scanning calorimetric studies. J. Polym. Sci. B. 40, 434–453 (2002).

26. 26.

Kilburn, D., Dlubek, G., Pionteck, J. & Alam, M. A. Free volume in poly (n-alkyl methacrylate)s from positron lifetime and PVT experiments and its relation to the structural relaxation. Polymer (Guildf.) 47, 7774–7785 (2006).

27. 27.

Bueche, F. Segmental mobility of polymers near their glass temperature. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1850–1855 (1953).

28. 28.

Solunova, C. A. Cooperative molecular dynamics and strong/fragile bahavior of polymers. Eur. Polym. J. 35, 1543–1556 (1999).

29. 29.

Chee, K. K. Dependence of glass transition temperature on chain flexibility and intermolecular interactions in polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 43, 1205–1208 (1991).

30. 30.

White, R. P. & Lipson, J. E. G. Free volume in the melt and how it correlates with experimental glass transition temperatures: results for a large set of polymers. ACS Macro Lett. 4, 588–592 (2015).

31. 31.

White, R. P. & Lipson, J. E. G. Polymer free volume and its connection to the glass transition. Macromolecules 49, 3987–4007 (2016).

32. 32.

Budd, P. M., McKeown, N. B. & Fritsch, D. Free volume and intrinsic microporosity in polymers. J. Mater. Chem. 15, 1977–1986 (2005).

33. 33.

Tao, S. J. Positronium annihilation in molecular substances. J. Chem. Phys. 56, 5499–5510 (1972).

34. 34.

Kirkegaard, P., Eldrup, M., Mogensen, O. E. & Pedersen, N. J. Program system for analyzing positron lifetime spectra and angular-correlation curves. Comput. Phys. Commun. 23, 307–335 (1981).

35. 35.

Paul, D. R. & Yampolskii, Y. Polymeric Gas Separation Membranes. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1994).

36. 36.

Yampolskii, Y. & Shantarovich, V. Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation. (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester, 2006).

37. 37.

Finkelshtein, E. S. et al. Addition-type polynorbornenes with Si(CH3)3 side groups: synthesis, gas permeability, and free volume. Macromolecules 39, 7022–7029 (2006).

38. 38.

Johnson, B. G., Gonzales, C. A., Gill, P. M. W. & Pople, J. A. A density functional study of the simplest hydrogen abstraction reaction. Effect of self-interaction correction. Chem. Phys. Lett. 221, 100–108 (1994).

39. 39.

Perdew, J. P. & Zunger, A. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 23, 5048–5079 (1981).

40. 40.

Hermann, J., DiStasio Jr., R. A. & Tkatchenko, A. First-principles models for van der Waals interactions in molecules and materials: concepts, theory, and applications. Chem. Rev. 117, 4714–4758 (2017).

41. 41.

Grimme, S., Hansen, A., Brandenburg, J. G. & Bannwarth, C. Dispersion-corrected mean-field electronic structure methods. Chem. Rev. 116, 5105–5154 (2016).

42. 42.

Jaeger, R., Lagowski, J. B., Manners, I. & Vancso, G. J. Ab-initio studies on the structure, conformation, and chain flexibility of halogenated poly(thionylphosphazenes). Macromolecules 28, 539–546 (1995).

43. 43.

Nelson, M. R. & Borkman, R. F. Internal rotation barriers: ab initio calculations on substituted ethyl benzoates and benzoic acids as models for polyester flexibility. J. Mol. Struc. (Theochem) 432, 247–255 (1998).

44. 44.

Navarro, A. et al. A quantum mechanical study on polymer flexibility: extended model from monomer to tetramer of 2- and 4-bromostyrenes. Polymer (Guildf.) 50, 317–327 (2009).

45. 45.

Ramachandran, G. N., Ramakrishnan, C. & Sasisekharan, V. Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. J. Mol. Biol. 7, 95–99 (1963).

46. 46.

Butterfoss, G. L., Renfrew, P. D., Kuhlman, B., Kirshenbaum, K. & Bonneau, R. A preliminary survey of the peptoid folding landscape. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 16798–16807 (2009).

47. 47.

Bürgi, H. B., Dunitz, J. D., Lehn, J. M. & Wipff, G. Stereochemistry of reaction paths at carbonyl centres. Tetrahedron 30, 1563–1572 (1974).

48. 48.

Parrish, R. M., Parker, T. M. & Sherrill, C. D. Chemical assignment of symmetry-adapted perturbation theory interaction energy components: the functional-group SAPT partition. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 4417–4431 (2014).

49. 49.

Pastorczak, E., Prlj, A., Gonthier, J. F. & Corminboeuf, C. Intramolecular symmetry-adapted perturbation theory with a single-determinant wavefunction. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 224107/1-11 (2015).

50. 50.

Parrish, R. M., Gonthier, J. F., Corminboeuf, C. & Sherrill, C. D. Communication: practical intramolecular symmetry adapted perturbation theory via Hartree-Fock embedding. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 051103/1-5 (2015).

51. 51.

Webb, M. A. et al. Systematic computational and experimental investigation of lithium-ion transport mechanisms in polyester-based polymer electrolytes. ACS Cent. Sci. 1, 198–205 (2015).

52. 52.

Spiby, P., O’Neill, M. A., Duckett, R. A. & Ward, I. M. An infrared study of conformational-changes occurring during the drawing of PEMT, PET and PEMT/PET copolymer. Polymer (Guildf.) 33, 4479–4485 (1992).

53. 53.

Shao, Y. et al. Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package. Mol. Phys. 113, 184–215 (2015).

54. 54.

Lee, C., Yang, W. & Parr, R. G. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 37, 785–789 (1988).

55. 55.

Becke, A. D. Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648–5652 (1993).

56. 56.

Stephens, P. J., Devlin, F. J., Chabalowski, C. F. & Frisch, M. J. Ab initio calculation of vibrational absorption and circular dichroism spectra using density functional force fields. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 11623–11627 (1994).

57. 57.

Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104/1-19 (2010).

58. 58.

Witte, J., Mardirossian, N., Neaton, J. B. & Head-Gordon, M. Assessing DFT-D3 damping functions across widely used density functionals: can we do better? J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 2043–2052 (2017).

59. 59.

Parrish, R. M. et al. PSI4 1.1: an open-source electronic structure program emphasizing automation, advanced libraries, and interoperability. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 3185–3197 (2017).

60. 60.

Floyd, R. W. Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun. ACM 5, 345 (1962).

61. 61.

Warshall, S. A theorem on boolean matrices. J. ACM 9, 11–12 (1962).

62. 62.

Cormen, T. H., Leiserson, C. E., Rivest, R. L. & Stein, C. Introduction to Algorithms 3rd edn (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009).

## Acknowledgements

Funding for this project was provided by the Center for Sustainable Polymers, a National Science Foundation (NSF) Center for Chemical Innovation (CHE-1413862). J.J., K.U.L. and R.A.D. acknowledge partial support from Cornell University through start-up funding. This research used resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center, which is supported by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. This work also made use of the NMR Facility at Cornell University, which is supported, in part, by the NSF under award number CHE-1531632.

## Author information

### Author notes

1. These authors contributed equally: Xiaopeng Yu, Junteng Jia.

### Affiliations

1. #### Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA

• Xiaopeng Yu
• , Junteng Jia
• , Ka Un Lao
• , Maria J. Sanford
• , Geoffrey W. Coates
•  & Robert A. DiStasio Jr.
2. #### Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA

• Shu Xu
•  & Thomas R. Hoye
3. #### School of Polymers and High Performance Materials, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, 39402, USA

• Ramesh K. Ramakrishnan
•  & Sergei I. Nazarenko

### Contributions

G.W.C., T.R.H. and R.A.D. conceived the project. X.Y. and M.J.S. conducted the experiments and polymer characterizations. J.J. and K.U.L. conducted the theoretical simulations. S.X. and T.R.H. conducted anhydride synthesis. R.R. and S.I.N. performed the PALS measurements. X.Y., J.J., K.U.L., G.W.C. and R.A.D. analyzed the experimental and theoretical data. X.Y., J.J., K.U.L., G.W.C. and R.A.D. wrote the manuscript.

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Geoffrey W. Coates or Robert A. DiStasio Jr..