Article | Open | Published:

Cold deep subduction recorded by remnants of a Paleoproterozoic carbonated slab

Nature Communicationsvolume 9, Article number: 2790 (2018) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

The absence of low-thermal gradients in old metamorphic rocks (<350 °C GPa−1) has been used to argue for a fundamental change in the style of plate tectonics during the Neoproterozoic Era. Here, we report data from an eclogite xenolith in Paleoproterozoic carbonatite in the North China craton that argues for cold subduction as early as 1.8 Ga. The carbonatite has a sediment-derived C isotope signature and enriched initial Sr–Nd isotope composition, indicative of ocean-crust components in the source. The eclogite records peak metamorphic pressures of 2.5–2.8 GPa at 650–670 °C, indicating a cold thermal gradient, 250(±15) °C GPa−1. Our data, combined with old low-temperature events in the West African and North American cratons, reveal a global pattern that modern-style subduction may have been established during the Paleoproterozoic Era. Paleoproterozoic carbonatites are closely associated with granulites and eclogites in orogens worldwide, playing a critical role in the Columbia supercontinent amalgamation and deep carbon cycle through time.

Introduction

Plate tectonics has reshaped the distribution of the Earth’s continental and oceanic lithosphere through time. However, when modern-style plate tectonics started is still debated, with proposals ranging from the Neoproterozoic Era to the Archean Eon1,2,3,4,5,6,7. The absence from the geological record of high-pressure and low-temperature metamorphism, including blueschists and ophiolites before the Neoproterozoic Era, presents a challenge to understanding early subduction. Archean mantle is about 300 K hotter than the present mantle and high mantle temperature would have significant effects on the viability and style of the subduction process8. As a result, early ocean plates may have been more buoyant and richer in MgO but weaker than modern ocean lithosphere. The Mg-rich composition of the Archean oceanic crusts may preclude blueschist formation9. Popular models10,11 for early plate tectonics involve shallow flat subduction and delamination of thick crust, precluding low thermal gradient deep subduction. This interpretation is supported by thermodynamic modeling of metamorphic mineral assemblages that the Archean tonalitic–trondhjemitic–granodioritic (TTG) compositions may be formed by shallow subduction of thick oceanic crust12. The petrological record also shows that the trace element signatures in TTG magmas can only be produced when melts separate from a garnet amphibolite residue, not an eclogite residue13. However, low Paleoproterozoic thermal gradients are recorded in blueschist facies metamorphism (~350 °C GPa−1) in West Africa3 and retrograded amphibolitized eclogite boudins (~300 °C GPa−1) in North America6. These recent findings challenge the timing of onset of modern-style subduction.

A global record of low geothermal gradients in the Paleoproterozoic is a prerequisite to demonstrate a change of plate tectonic processes that dates back to that time. During the Paleoproterozoic Era, there were global-scale continent and mountain building events from West Africa to North America and to North China, leading to Columbia, the first coherent supercontinent in the Earth history14,15. The North China craton (NCC, Fig. 1a) is one of the fundamental Precambrian nuclei of Asia and one of the oldest cratonic blocks in the world (~3.8 Ga)16. It preserves a record of a long and complex crustal evolution, but evidence of a thick mantle keel beneath Archean-aged crust is absent17. The Eastern and Western blocks evolved independently during the Archean and collided along the Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO, Fig. 1b) during the Paleoproterozoic (~1.85 Ga) to form the NCC16. The appearance of Paleoproterozoic carbonatites in the NCC offers an opportunity to evaluate subduction–accretion collision tectonics during the Paleoproterozoic Era. Here, we report pressure–temperature (PT) conditions retrieved from an eclogite xenolith in a Paleoproterozoic carbonatite that provides direct petrological evidence of cold oceanic subduction during the Paleoproterozoic Era.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Schematic geological map of the North China craton (NCC) with the location of the eclogite xenoliths. The maps are after Zhao et al.16. a The NCC is separated from Yangtze craton by Qinling orogen16. b The Eastern and Western blocks in the NCC were amalgamated by the Paleoproterozoic Trans-North China Orogen (TNCO)16. The Paleoproterozoic carbonatite and its associated eclogite xenoliths and high-pressure granulites17 occur in the TNCO. The scale bar is 800 and 400 km in a and b, respectively

Results

Geological background

The carbonatites are associated with pyroxenites, pyroxene syenites, and occasionally with granulites (Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). They occur as dykes and were emplaced in the Fengzhen and Huai’an areas at the crossing between the Khondalite belt and TNCO (Fig. 1b). These orogens are Paleoproterozoic collisional belts formed by the amalgamation of the Western and Eastern blocks and before that the Ordos and Yinshan blocks, respectively16. The Khondalite belt is composed of Paleoproterozoic sillimanite–garnet and garnet–biotite gneisses. In the TNCO, late Archean crust is dominated by TTG gneisses. Paleoproterozoic mafic granulites are widely distributed (Fig. 1b). Their PT paths are mostly clockwise, related to collision/exhumation processes, and some of them evolved through eclogite facies17. The granulites, occurring as lenses and tabular bodies associated with the carbonatites, consist of plagioclase, clinopyroxene, orthopyroxene, amphibole, garnet, and quartz. They are characterized by augen structures consisting of plagioclase and orthopyroxene enveloped by porphyroblastic garnet, indicating rapid exhumation (Supplementary Fig. 1c). Guo et al.18 obtained an age of ~1.82 Ga from the Huai’an granulite, with peak PT conditions of 750–850 °C and 1.1–1.5 GPa.

Mineralogy and geochronology

The carbonatite is mainly composed of calcite (70–80%), with minor amounts of diopside, apatite, phlogopite, olivine, and spinel (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). Apatite occurs as well-developed elongate prismatic crystals (typically ~5 mm in length). In-situ LA-ICPMS U–Pb dating of apatite yields weighted U–Pb ages of 1681(±61) Ma (Fengzhen area) and 1765(±35) Ma (Huai’an area) (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 2).

Within the Paleoproterozoic carbonatites, there are rare but well-preserved cm-sized eclogite xenoliths (Supplementary Fig. 1d). The eclogite is composed of euhedral garnet porphyroblast up to 1 cm in diameter (~37 vol%), omphacite (~36 vol%), kyanite (~9 vol%), quartz (~9 vol%), zoisite (~7 vol%), and phengite (~2 vol%), with accessory amphibole, biotite, and rutile (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Table 3). The mineral proportions were obtained from a SEM–EDS area-scan of one eclogite mount (Fig. 2a). Garnet has elevated Si (3.019 ± 0.005 pfu on the base of 12 oxygen atoms) and compositional traverses reveal prograde concentric zoning with a homogeneous core overgrown by a rim of increasing pyrope but decreasing almandine, showing a Mg/(Mg + Fe) ratio increasing from the core to the rim (Supplementary Fig. 4). The garnet core traps abundant mineral inclusions, including kyanite, quartz, zoisite, omphacite, Ca–Na amphibole, Na amphibole, paragonite, and rutile, whereas the rim is relatively free of inclusions (Fig. 2a). The jadeite content of omphacite in the matrix and inclusions is 23(±1) and 27(±3) mol%, respectively. Zoisite is poor in Fe3+. Subparallel zoisite grains in the matrix define a foliation that is characteristic of orogenic eclogite (Fig. 2a). Phengite has high Si contents (3.40–3.44 pfu). Large matrix phengite is texturally equilibrated with garnet and omphacite, and contains omphacite and kyanite inclusions, interpreted as peak metamorphic minerals. Minor magnesiohornblende occurs in the matrix, and has higher MgO (~20 wt%) and lower Na2O (~1.5 wt%) contents than inclusions in the garnet core. The Ca–Na amphibole in garnet is barroisite with elevated Na (NaB = 0.5–0.7 pfu) and is rarely associated with paragonite. Rare sodic amphibole in garnet contains high Mg and Na, and low Ca (~4.1, 1.2, and 0.01 pfu, respectively). Minor monazite occurs in association with calcite veinlets that crosscut the garnets and primary minerals in the garnet cores. In-situ electron microprobe dating of two groups of monazites (primary and late-stage growth) yields different weighted U–Th–Pb ages of 1839(±26) and 1766(±7) Ma (Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 4). These ages constrain the eclogite metamorphism to the Paleoproterozoic Era, similar to the Huai’an granulite age in the TNCO18.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Mineral mapping of the fresh eclogite xenolith and PT phase diagram. a The eclogite contains typical minerals of garnet (Grt) and omphacite (Omp), which do not show any retrogressed feature. The coarse-grained garnets are rimmed by quartz (Q) and phengite (Phen), indicating a relatively high pressure and low temperature metamorphism. Ky kyanite, Zo zoisite, Bt biotite, Rt rutile. The scale bar is 5 mm. b PT diagram is calculated in the NCKFMASH system27 according to the effective bulk-rock composition obtained from a. The peak pressure and temperature (labeled as MP1) are calculated using the Zr-in-rutile and mineral-pair thermobarometer (Supplementary Table 7). The peak metamorphic pressure and temperature, labeled as MP2, are independently constrained by the jadeite and Si contents of omphacite and phengite (purple dash line), respectively. The standard deviation (±1.4 kbar) in pressure is adopted on the basis of a Monte Carlo assessment on the phase equilibrium modeling53. Combining MP1 and MP2 data gives a thermal gradient of 250(±15) °C GPa−1. Lws lawsonite, Ep epidote, Grt garnet, Jd jadeite, CPX clinopyroxene, Phen phengite, EC eclogite, PYT pyroxenite, BS blueschist, AMP amphibolite, HBL hornblendite

Peak metamorphic P and T conditions of eclogites

We derived the bulk rock composition of the eclogite xenolith by integrating the mineral compositions from electron microprobe analysis and the modes acquired by the SEM–EDS area-scan (Supplementary Table 5). The eclogite has a similar composition to oceanic gabbro (Supplementary Fig. 6), but is different from the eclogite xenoliths in kimberlites19. The latter contains inclusion-free garnet and clinopyroxene, and no quartz. Based on in-situ mineral trace element analyses in the eclogite xenolith (Supplementary Table 6), the garnets have a strong depletion in the light rare earth elements (LREEs) relative to the heavy (H)REEs, and show a nearly flat chondrite-normalized (cn) HREE pattern with Y/Ybcn of ~1 (Supplementary Fig. 7). In contrast, zoisite contains high LREE contents with a La/Ybcn of ~266, and is characterized by a positive Eu anomaly. According to these mineral compositions and modal mass, the reconstructed whole-rock shows slightly depleted LREEs (La/Ybcn = 0.7), flat HREE (Y/Ybcn = 1), and positive Eu anomaly. The main hosts for the incompatible trace elements are zoisite [LREEs, Sr (3574–3988 ppm), Th (2–10 ppm), U (1–2 ppm), Pb (10–11 ppm)], garnet [Y (13–31 ppm), HREEs], and phengite [Rb (183–201 ppm), Ba (2428–2564 ppm)]. It is suggested that these trace-element budgets in eclogites are controlled by newly formed minerals such as zoisite, garnet, and phengite, during prograde metamorphism in subduction zones20.

To estimate the peak metamorphic conditions, we first use the Zr-in-rutile thermometer to determine the peak temperature. The Zr concentration in the matrix rutile ranges from 150 to 174 ppm (Supplementary Table 7). The Zr-in-rutile thermometer21 yields temperatures of 650 and 670 °C for the minimum and maximum Zr concentrations, respectively (Supplementary Table 8). For the temperatures of 650 and 670 °C, the garnet–clinopyroxene–phengite (Grt–Cpx–Phen) barometer22 gives peak pressures of 2.49 and 2.46 GPa, respectively (Supplementary Table 8). The Grt–Cpx–Phen barometer of ref. 22 is preferred because of the low jadeite content (<0.5) of omphacite in the mineral assemblage23. Using the pressure-dependent Zr-in-rutile thermometer24, the calculated temperature is 658 and 669 °C at 2.5 GPa for the minimum and maximum Zr concentrations, respectively (Supplementary Table 8), consistent with the result from the Grt–Cpx–Phen barometer. Further confirmation of the temperature determination comes from the garnet–clinopyroxene (Grt–Cpx) thermometer. Because grossular in the eclogitic garnet is less than 0.35, we use the formula of Powell25 as suggested by ref. 26. The compositions of garnet rim and omphacite in the matrix yield a mean temperature of 670 °C at 2.5 GPa.

Multiple thermobarometers give consistent estimates of peak pressures (2.5 GPa) and temperatures (650–670 °C). For comparison, Fig. 2b shows a PT phase diagram calculated for the eclogite in the simplified system Na2O–CaO–K2O–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O (NCKFMASH) with excess water, using the program THERMOCALC27. The peak assemblage of garnet + omphacite + kyanite is stable in the PT range of 2.6–2.8 GPa and 650–670 °C (Fig. 2b), based on isopleths of jadeite content in omphacite (22–24) and Si content in phengite (3.40–3.44). This is consistent with the thermobarometric estimates summarized above. These peak conditions correspond to a low apparent thermal gradient of 250(±15) °C GPa−1 (Fig. 3). This is among the coldest subduction recorded in the Paleoproterozoic Era and akin to many Phanerozoic blueschist terranes exhumed from oceanic subduction zones (<350 °C GPa−1)[2] (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Peak pressure–temperature condition of this study compared to a global compilation of metamorphic belts. The PTt data of these metamorphic belts are indicated by different symbols (see legend) and grouped into three types of metamorphism2: high- and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism (<350 °C GPa−1); eclogite and high-pressure granulite metamorphism (<750 °C GPa−1); and granulite and ultrahigh-temperature metamorphism (>750 °C GPa−1). A Paleoproterozoic thermal gradient of <350 °C GPa−1 was recorded in the high-pressure metamorphism from North China (NC), West Africa (WA)3, and North America (NA)6 cratons

Isotope geochemistry of carbonatites

To understand the sources of carbon, we measured the oxygen and carbon isotopic compositions of the carbonatites (Supplementary Table 9). The δ18OV-SMOW and δ13CV-PDB values (9.4–15.8‰ and −5.7 to −1.6‰, respectively) are higher, compared to those of normal mantle rocks (5–8‰ and −7 to −5‰, respectively) and typical mantle-derived primary carbonatites (6–10‰ and −8 to −4‰, respectively28) (Fig. 4a). While the oxygen isotopic values may be readily modified, the carbon isotopic values are much less susceptible to later processes like fluid infiltration and wall–rock assimilation. The high δ13C values recorded in the carbonatites potentially can be accounted for by fractional crystallization, or assimilation of sediments or subducted oceanic crust28. Fractional crystallization is unlikely to have been the cause for the high δ13C values because there is no defined trend between the δ13CV-PDB and δ18OV-SMOW values. Similarly, only minimal wall–rock assimilation is possible based on a negative Pb anomaly documented in the whole rocks29. In contrast, heavy-C enrichment in the carbonatites can be easily explained by the involvement of recycled oceanic carbonates, with typical δ13CV-PDB values of 0(±1.5)‰30 (Fig. 4a), associated with subducted oceanic crust.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Isotopic compositions of the carbonatites. a The carbonatite samples from Fengzhen and Huai’an show higher oxygen and carbon isotopes compared to normal mantle-derived rocks (box with dashed line) and typical primary carbonatites (gray box with black line) worldwide. The values of the Paleoproterozoic sedimentary carbonates30 are also shown to illustrate that heavy-C enrichment in the carbonatites is consistent with the involvement of recycled oceanic carbonates. b The initial 143Nd/144Nd and 87Rb/86Sr ratios of the carbonatites and apatites are compared to the values of the Archean to Proterozoic lithospheric mantle (LM)31 and the late Archean lower crust in central NCC (LC)32 with 700-Ma radiogenic addition. The Sr–Nd isotopic variations for the sources of the carbonatites and apatites can be successfully modeled by mixing a 2.5-Ga oceanic crust (OC) with various amounts of 2.5-Ga marine sediments (MS) (Supplementary Table 11). With a single-stage evolution model54, the isotopic compositions of the two end-members are calculated as (87Rb/86Sr)OC = 0.053 and (147Sm/144Nd)OC = 0.214, and (87Rb/86Sr)MS = 0.186 and (147Sm/144Nd)MS = 0.183, respectively. The initial Sr–Nd isotopic compositions of the LC in the central NCC, and those for the bulk Earth (BE) and chondritic uniform reservoir (CHUR) are calculated for 1.8 Ga

The isotopic characteristics of Sr and Nd in carbonatites are generally inherited from their source regions28. In this case, the carbonatites and their apatites show very unusual negative εNd(t) values (−5.8 to −7.8) (Supplementary Table 10), indicating the involvement of a substantial amount of ocean crustal materials in the source. The initial Sr and Nd isotopes of the Archean to Proterozoic lithospheric mantle31 and TTG crust in the central NCC32 are very depleted, so that a 700-Ma radiogenic addition cannot produce such an enriched Sr–Nd isotopic signature for the carbonatites. One way to produce the unusually enriched isotopic characteristics of the carbonatites is to add oceanic crust-derived carbonates to a subducted Late Archean (2.5 Ga) basaltic oceanic crust, with a residence time of ~700 Mys. Figure 4b shows the change of the isotopic compositions of carbonatites by mixing a Late Archean oceanic crust with marine sediment. The isotopic composition with an addition of 10% oceanic crust-derived carbonates matches well with our observed values (Fig. 4b), providing further evidence for the involvement of the oceanic crust in the genesis of the carbonatites.

Discussion

On the basis of U–Th–Pb dating, compositions of the coexisting minerals in the eclogite xenolith, and isotopic compositions of C, O, Sr, and Nd, we have established that cold deep subduction of ocean crust occurred during the Paleoproterozoic Era in the NCC. The cold subduction environment is also consistent with the preservation of the Fe3+-rich majorite inclusion in a websterite-derived garnet in the same carbonatites27. The estimated equilibrium temperatures of the host garnet are in the range of 670–1000 °C for depths of 100–200 km, using the garnet–clinopyroxene Fe–Mg-geothermometer33. The high Fe3+ content (Fe3+/∑Fe > 0.8) of the majorite inclusion is likely a product of a redox reaction involving deep carbonatitic magmas, implying that the Paleoproterozoic subduction in the NCC could have been active for an extended period of time. Reduction of carbonate associated with earlier subduction could have provided an environment in which oxidized Fe3+-rich majorite formed.

From the regional geology, the low-temperature and high-pressure metamorphism of the carbonated eclogite is the result of the cold Paleoproterozoic oceanic subduction, related to the amalgamation of the Yinshan and Orodos blocks16. The 1.91–1.88 Ga Halaqin volcanic belt in Yinshan block, located 100-km to the northwestward of the carbonatite outcrop, includes basalts, andesites, and rhyolites with typical geochemical features of an arc sequence34. A recent study also showed that a Paleoproterozoic garnet websterite in the Yinshan block underwent peak metamorphism at ~1.90 Ga when it was subducted to eclogite facies, and then exhumed back to granulite facies at ~1.82 Ga35. On a global scale, a semi-continuous record of global kimberlite volcanism starts at ~2 Ga, with a notable increase in kimberlite magmatic activity at 1.2–1.1 Ga36. This implies that the cooling ambient mantle directly beneath thermally maturing continental keels could have developed into sites of sustained kimberlite melt generation from 2 Ga. Moreover, low thermal gradient Paleoproterozoic subduction has been recently reported in West African and North American cratons3,6. Our work directly links Paleoproterozoic carbonatites to cold slab subduction in the NCC. Figure 5 shows the distribution of Paleoproterozoic carbonatites and Paleoproterozoic granulites and eclogites in orogens worldwide. Multiple experimental studies show that melting of a carbonated slab at pressures greater than 2.5 GPa can form carbonate melt37,38. There is a clear association between carbonatites39 and high-pressure metamorphic rocks in Paleoproterozoic orogens15.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Distribution of Paleoproterozoic carbonatites, granulites, and eclogites worldwide. The majority of carbonatite occurrences39 are associated with high-pressure metamorphism (Supplementary Table 12) in Paleoproterozoic orogens15

Although only a few locations of Paleoproterozoic low thermal gradient metamorphism have been reported so far, it is likely that evidence for cold deep subduction in the Paleoproterozoic Era will continue to emerge with expanded exploration to metamorphic terrains, which are intrinsically linked to orogenesis. High-Mg oceanic crust derived from a hotter Archean mantle is less likely to stabilize blueschist-facies mineral assemblages9. Moreover, the low-temperature records may be easily overprinted by the followed inter-continental collisions with high-temperature metamorphism worldwide. Therefore, we suggest a common occurrence of modern-style plate tectonics back to at least the Paleoproterozoic Era. The early global-scale subduction could be also associated with the formation of Columbia supercontinent15.

Global-scale Paleoproterozoic subduction would provide an efficient pathway for surface sediments to enter the ancient deep Earth. Isotopic and trace element geochemical studies of the ocean island basalts have for many years been used to infer the presence of long-lived (1–2 Ga) compositional heterogeneities in the deep mantle related to recycled oceanic crust together with different types of marine sediments via subduction40. However, it is still doubted because of the lack of petrological evidence for ancient deep subduction. Our work not only provides a direct record of deep Paleoproterozoic subduction, but also implies that the recycled carbonates may be played a critical role in the change of local redox state of the deep mantle, including the formation of the Fe3+-rich majorite33 related to the subducted sediments. Melting of the recycled carbonates can also produce melt with enriched trace element and isotope compositions, which are important mantle metasomatic agents that interact with peridotite lithologies41.

The Paleoproterozoic carbonatites in the Fengzhen and Huai’an areas of the NCC occur in an orogen setting. The eclogite xenoliths hosted by the carbonatites provide a rare window into the ancient deep-subducted slab, showing the first cold subduction in the NCC during the Paleoproterozoic Era and also recording the deepest Fe3+-rich majorite inclusion in a cold subduction environment33. The characteristics of the Paleoproterozoic slab supports that modern-style plate tectonics has operated since at least the Paleoproterozoic Era. The association of Paleoproterozoic carbonatites with high-pressure metamorphic rocks in Paleoproterozoic orogens worldwide (Fig. 5) argues for sustained, large-scale deep carbon cycle over a long geological period of time, influencing the evolution of mantle oxidation state and compositional heterogeneities in the deep mantle.

Methods

Mineral mapping

The polished eclogite xenolith sample was analyzed using a Tescan Integrated Mineral Analyzer (TIMA) mineralogy system at the Tescan Orsay Holding Lab, Czech Republic. The TIMA comprises a Tescan Mira Schottky field emission scanning electron microscope with four silicon drift energy dispersive (EDS) detectors arranged at 90° intervals around the chamber. The measurements were performed with the dot-mapping mode, and the BSE image was obtained to determine individual particles and boundaries between distinct preliminary phases. A rectangular mesh of measurements on every distinct phase was obtained with X-ray spectra. The spectroscopic data were matched to mineral definition files, allowing for mineral identification and mapping. The volume and mass ratios of all mineral phases were automatically calculated. The TIMA measurements were performed at 25 kV using a spot size of ~50 nm, a working distance of 15 mm, and a field size set at 1500 μm.

Apatite dating

The ages of apatites from the carbonatites were determined by the U–Th–Pb method using a laser (Geolas) ICPMS (Agilent 7500a) at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). The apatites, separated from the carbonatite samples, were casted into resin mounts together with grains of NIST 610, apatite reference materials NW-1 (1160 Ma), and LAP (474 Ma). The beam diameter of the laser is 30 μm with a repetition rate of 8 Hz. The background of Pb and 202Hg is less than 100 cps. The fractionation correction and results were calculated using the program GLITTER 4.0. The 207Pb method was applied for common Pb corrections using the upper intercept obtained from a Tera–Wasserburg diagram42. The 207Pb correction method yields more precise and accurate ages than the Tera–Wasserburg Concordia ages because of a small spread in the U/total Pb ratios42. The U–Pb analyses of the apatite standards also show that the method of laser ablation can effectively date this mineral without significant matrix effects43.

Monazite dating

The chemical Th–U–total Pb ages of monazite were determined with a wavelength-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (WDS) using a Cameca SX100 electron microprobe at the Masaryk University. Uranium was determined on the U Mβ line (counting time 60 s, detection limit 270 ppm), Thorium on the Th Mα line (counting time 40 s, detection limit 250 ppm), and lead on the Pb Mα line (counting time 240 s, detection limit 130 ppm). Synthetic and natural phases were used as standards, including metallic U for U, PbSe for Pb, CaTh(PO4)2 for Th, synthetic end-member phosphates (XPO4) for REE, Y, sanidine for Si, apatite for Ca, and topaz for F. Data were reduced using the PAP matrix correction routine. Overlapping of peaks and background positions were examined and chosen based on WDS angle scans on natural and synthetic REE-phases. The microprobe was operated at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and a beam current of 160 nA, with an electron beam defocused to a 2-μm spot to avoid devolatilization, ionic diffusion, and other forms of beam damage on the sample. The monazite age was calculated using the method of refs. 44,45.

Major element analysis

The chemical compositions of minerals were obtained with a Cameca SX100 electron microprobe at the Masaryk University, and a JEOL field-emission electron microprobe (JEOL JXA 8530F) at the Geophysical Laboratory of the Carnegie Institution of Washington. The microprobes were operated at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV and a beam current of 30 nA. For each mineral or a group of minerals, we chose appropriate matrix-specific standards (both natural and synthetic) and optimal instrument conditions (beam settings, detector type, and counting statistics).

In-situ trace element analysis

In-situ laser-ablation ICPMS analyses of minerals in the eclogite xenoliths were performed at the School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University. The diameter of the ablation spot is 44 μm. NIST 610, 612, and 614 glasses were used as calibration standards for all the samples. The elements used for the internal standards include Ca and Si, expressed as CaO and SiO2 for garnet, omphacite, zoisite, kyanite, and phengite. Analytical error is ≤5% at the ppm level. In-run signal intensity for indicative trace elements was monitored during analysis to make sure that the laser beam stayed within the selected phase and did not penetrate inclusions.

Trace and major element analysis of rutile

We used electron probe microanalyzer (CAMECA SXFive) to analyze eight elements (Si, Fe, Cr, Zr, V, Nb, Ta, and Ti) in rutile at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS. The microprobe was operated at an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and a beam current of 170 nA. Counting time on the peak of Si, Fe, Cr, Zr, V, Nb, Ta, and Ti is 120, 120, 120, 100, 120, 240, and 10 s, respectively. The rutile R10 was used as standard. The detection limits for the above elements are 23, 35, 32, 35, 12, 54, 69, and 137 ppm, respectively. The eight elements in the standard rutile R10 have been well analyzed by the same electron microprobe46.

Isotope analysis

Carbon and oxygen isotopic compositions of calcite from the carbonatites were measured at the Institute of Geochemistry, CAS, using a continuous-flow isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IsoPrime), with reproducibility of ±0.15‰ and ±0.2‰ for carbon and oxygen, respectively. The results are expressed as per mil (‰) variation relative to PDB for carbon and SMOW for oxygen.

In-situ Sr–Nd isotopes of apatite from the carbonatites were determined by a Neptune LA-MC-ICPMS at the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, CAS. The laser was focused at a height of 60–120 µm above the sample surface and fired using a repetition rate of 6–8 Hz and an energy density of 10 J/cm2. The AP1 and AP2 standard apatites were used as external calibrations. Normalized Sr and Nd isotopic ratios were calculated using the exponential law47.

Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of the carbonatites were analyzed by a MC-ICPMS (VG AXIOM) at Peking University. Mass fractionation corrections for the Sr and Nd isotopic ratios were normalized to 86Sr/88Sr = 0.1194 and 146Nd/144Nd = 0.7219, respectively. Repeated measurements for the Nd standard JNdi and Sr standard NBS987 yielded 143Nd/144Nd = 0.512120 ± 11 (2σ) and 87Sr/86Sr = 0.710250 ± 11 (2σ), respectively. To calculate the initial Sr–Nd isotope values, we analyzed the whole-rock Rb, Sr, Sm, and Nd concentrations by solution ICPMS (Thermo Fisher Scientific X-Series II). The data processing procedure includes linear drift correction, internal (matrix) correction, REE and Ba interference corrections, blank subtraction, calibration with international standards, and a dilution correction. Repeat analyses (including well-characterized standards) indicate that the accuracy of trace element measurements is better than 10%.

PT pseudosections

The PT phase diagram was calculated using THERMOCALC v. 3.3327 with an internally consistent thermodynamic data set 5.548 (November 2003 upgrade) in the NCKFMASH system. The effective bulk-rock composition is provided in Supplementary Table 5. Water was treated in saturation because of the widespread presence of hydrous phases (such as zoisite and phengite). All Fe was assumed as Fe2+. Ti was omitted in the calculations, as rutile is the only Ti-rich phase. Following mineral solid solutions are adopted: garnet49, clinopyroxene50, amphibole51, white mica52, and chlorite48.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Stern, R. J. Evidence from ophiolites, blueschists, and ultrahigh-pressure metamorphic terranes that the modern episode of subduction tectonics began in Neoproterozoic time. Geology 33, 557–560 (2005).

  2. 2.

    Brown, M. A duality of metamorphic styles is the hallmark of plate tectonics. Geology 34, 961–964 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Ganne, J. Modern-style plate subduction preserved in the Paleoproterozoic West African craton. Nat. Geosci. 5, 60–65 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Korenaga, J. Initiation and evolution of plate tectonics on Earth: theories and observations. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 41, 117–151 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Brown, M. The contribution of metamorphic petrology to understanding lithosphere evolution and geodynamics. Geosci. Front. 5, 553–569 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Weller, O. M. & St-Onge, M. R. Record of modern-style plate tectonics in the Paleoproterozoic Trans-Hudson orogen. Nat. Geosci. 10, 305–311 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Brown, M. & Johnson, T. Secular change in metamorphism and the onset of global plate tectonics. Am. Mineral. 103, 181–196 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Fischer, R. & Gerya, T. Regimes of subduction and lithospheric dynamics in the Precambrian: 3D thermomechanical modelling. Gondwana Res. 37, 53–70 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Palin, R. M. & White, R. W. Emergence of blueschists on Earth linked to secular changes in oceanic crust composition. Nat. Geosci. 9, 60–64 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Johnson, T. E., Brown, M., Kaus, B. J. P. & Van Tongeren, J. A. Delamination and recycling of Archean crust caused by gravitational instabilities. Nat. Geosci. 7, 47–52 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Foley, S., Buhre, S. & Jacob, D. E. Evolution of the Archean crust by delamination and shallow subduction. Nature 421, 249–252 (2003).

  12. 12.

    Palin, R. M., White, R. W. & Green, E. C. Partial melting of metabasic rocks and the generation of tonalitic–trondhjemitic–granodioritic (TTG) crust in the Archaean: constraints from phase equilibrium modelling. Precambrian Res. 287, 73–90 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Moyen, J. F. & Martin, H. Forty years of TTG research. Lithos 148, 312–336 (2012).

  14. 14.

    Hoffman, F. P. Speculations on Laurentia’s first gigayear (2.0 to 1.0 Ga). Geology 17, 135–138 (1989).

  15. 15.

    Zhao, G. C., Cawood, P. A., Wilde, S. A. & Sun, M. Review of global 2.1–1.8 Ga orogens: implications for a pre-Rodinia supercontinent. Earth Sci. Rev. 59, 125–162 (2002).

  16. 16.

    Zhao, G. C., Sun, M., Wilde, S. & Li, S. Z. Late Archean to Paleoproterozoic evolution of the North China Craton: key issues revisited. Precambrian Res. 136, 177–202 (2005).

  17. 17.

    Zhao, G. C., Cawood, P. A., Wilde, S. A. & Lu, L. Z. High pressure granulites (retrograded eclogites) from the Hengshan Complex. J. Petrol. 42, 1141–1170 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Guo, J. H., Sun, M. & Zhai, M. G. Sm–Nd and SHRIMP U–Pb zircon geochronology of high-pressure granulites in the Sanggan area, North China Craton: timing of Paleoproterozoic continental collision. J. Asian Earth Sci. 24, 629–642 (2005).

  19. 19.

    Jacob, D. E. Nature and origin of eclogite xenoliths from kimberlites. Lithos 77, 295–316 (2004).

  20. 20.

    Korh, A. L., Schmidt, S. T., Ulianov, A. & Potel, S. Trace element partitioning in HP-LT metamorphic assemblages during subduction-related metamorphism, Ile de Groix, France: a detailed LA-ICPMS Study. J. Petrol. 50, 1107–1148 (2009).

  21. 21.

    Zack, T., Moraes, R. & Kronz, A. Temperature dependence of Zr in rutile: empirical calibration of a rutile thermometer. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 148, 471–488 (2004).

  22. 22.

    Waters, D. J. & Martin, H. N. Geobarometry of phengite-bearing eclogites. Terra Abstr. 5, 410–411 (1993).

  23. 23.

    Chen, Y., Ye, K. & Wu, C. M. Reviews on applying common-used geothermobarometers for eclogites. Acta Petrol. Sin. 21, 1067–1080 (2005).

  24. 24.

    Tomkins, H. S., Powell, R. & Ellis, D. J. The pressure dependence of the zirconium-in-rutile thermometer. J. Metamorph. Geol. 25, 703–713 (2007).

  25. 25.

    Powell, R. Regression diagnostics and robust regression in geothermometer/geobarometer calibration: the garnet–clinopyroxene geothermometer revisited. J. Metamorph. Geol. 3, 231–243 (1985).

  26. 26.

    Carswell, D. A., O’Brien, P. J., Wilson, R. N. & Zhai, M. Thermobarometry of phengite-bearing eclogites in the Dabie Mountains of central China. J. Metamorph. Geol. 15, 239–252 (1997).

  27. 27.

    Powell, R., Holland, T. J. B. & Worley, B. Calculating phase diagrams involving solid solutions via non-linear equations, with examples using THERMOCALC. J. Metamorph. Geol. 6, 173–204 (1998).

  28. 28.

    Xu, C. et al. Origin of carbonatites in the South Qinlingorogen: implications for crustal recycling and timing of collision between the South and North China Blocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 143, 189–206 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Feng, M., Xu, C., Kynický, J., Zeng, L. & Song, W. L. REE mineralization in carbonatites from North China block: evidence from fluorapatite metasomatism. Int. Geol. Rev. 58, 1940–1950 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Veizer, J., Clayton, R. N. & Hinton, R. W. Geochemistry of Precambrian carbonates: IV. Early Paleoproterozoic (2.25 ± 0.25 Ga) seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 875–885 (1992).

  31. 31.

    Rudnick, R. L., Gao, S., Ling, R., Liu, Y. & McDonough, W. F. Petrology and geochemistry of spinel peridotite xenoliths from Hannuoba and Qixia, North China craton. Lithos 77, 609–637 (2004).

  32. 32.

    Guo, J. et al. Early Precambrian Manjinggou high-pressure granulite mélange belt on the south edge of the Huai’an complex, North China craton: geological features, petrology and isotopic geochronology. Acta Petrol. Sin. 9, 329–341 (1993).

  33. 33.

    Xu, C. et al. Recovery of an oxidized majorite inclusion from Earth’s deep asthenosphere. Sci. Adv. 3, e1601589 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Peng, P., Guo, J.-H., Windley, B. F. & Li, X. H. Halaqin volcano-sedimentary succession in the central–northern margin of the North China Craton: products of Late Paleoproterozoic ridge subduction. Precambrian Res. 187, 165–180 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Wan, B., Windley, B. F., Xiao, W., Feng, J. & Zhang, J. Paleoproterozoic high-pressure metamorphism in the northern North China Craton and implications for the Nuna supercontinent. Nat. Commun. 6, 8344 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Tappe, S., Smart, K., Torsvik, T., Massuyeau, M. & de Witt, M. Geodynamics of kimberlites on a cooling Earth: clues to plate tectonic evolution and deep volatile cycles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 484, 1–14 (2018).

  37. 37.

    Yaxley, G. M. & Brey, G. P. Phase relations of carbonate-bearing eclogite assemblages from 2.5 to 5.5 GPa: implications for petrogenesis of carbonatites. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. 146, 606–619 (2004).

  38. 38.

    Thomson, A. R., Walter, M. J., Kohn, S. C. & Brooker, R. A. Slab melting as a barrier to deep carbon subduction. Nature 529, 76–79 (2016).

  39. 39.

    Woolley, A. R. & Kjarsgaard, B. A. Carbonatite Occurrences of the World: Map and Database. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 5796 (2008).

  40. 40.

    Hofmann, A. W. Mantle geochemistry: the message from oceanic volcanism. Nature 385, 219–229 (1997).

  41. 41.

    Hauri, E. H., Shimizu, N., Dieu, J. J. & Hart, S. R. Evidence for hotspot-related carbonatite metasomatism in the oceanic upper mantle. Nature 365, 221–227 (1993).

  42. 42.

    Chew, D. M., Sylvester, P. J. & Tubrett, M. N. U–Pb and Th–Pb dating of apatite by LA-ICPMS. Chem. Geol. 280, 200–216 (2011).

  43. 43.

    Zhou, Q. In-situ U–Pb Isotopic Dating of Accessory Minerals in Meteorites. PhD thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (2013).

  44. 44.

    Suzuki, K. & Adachi, M. Precambrian provenance and Silurian metamorphism of the Tsubonosawa paragneiss in the South Kitakami terrane, Northeast Japan, revealed by the chemical Th–U total Pbisochron ages of monazite, zircon and xenotime. Geochem. J. 25, 357–376 (1991).

  45. 45.

    Suzuki, K., Adachi, M. & Kajizuka, I. Electron microprobe observations of diffusion in metamorphosed detrital monazites. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 128, 391–405 (1994).

  46. 46.

    Wang, J. et al. Electron microprobe trace element analysis of rutile. Acta Petrol. Sin. 33, 1934–1946 (2017).

  47. 47.

    Yang, Y. H. et al. Sr and Nd isotopic compositions of apatite reference materials used in U–Th–Pb geochronology. Chem. Geol. 385, 35–55 (2014).

  48. 48.

    Holland, T. J. B., Baker, J. & Powell, R. Mixing properties and activity composition relationships of chlorites in the system MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O. Eur. J. Mineral. 10, 395–406 (1998).

  49. 49.

    White, R. W., Powell, R. & Holland, T. J. B. Progress relating to calculation of partial melting equilibria formetapelites and felsic gneisses. J. Metamorph. Geol. 25, 511–527 (2007).

  50. 50.

    Green, E. C. R., Holland, T. J. B. & Powell, R. An order disorder model for omphacitic pyroxenes in the system jadeite–diopside–hedenbergite–acmite, with applications to eclogitic rocks. Am. Mineral. 92, 1181–1189 (2007).

  51. 51.

    Diener, J. F. A., Powell, R., White, R. W. & Holland, T. J. B. A new thermodynamic model for clino- and ortho-amphiboles in the system Na2O–CaO–FeO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–H2O–O. J. Metamorph. Geol. 25, 631–656 (2007).

  52. 52.

    Coggon, R. & Holland, T. J. B. Mixing properties of phengitic micas and revised garnet–phengite thermobarometers. J. Metamorph. Geol. 20, 683–696 (2002).

  53. 53.

    Palin, R. M., Weller, O. M., Waters, D. J. & Dyck, B. Quantifying geological uncertainty in metamorphic phase equilibria modeling; a Monte Carlo assessment and implications for tectonic interpretations. Geosci. Front. 7, 591–607 (2016).

  54. 54.

    Rehkämper, M. & Hofmann, A. W. Recycled ocean crust and sediment in Indian Ocean MORB. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 147, 93–106 (1997).

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Antonin Kopřiva and Y. Chen for helping with chemical analysis. We also thank Michael Brown for discussion and suggestions to improve the manuscript. This research was financially supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation (41773022, 41688103, 41520104004), Czechic CEITEC 2020 (LQ1601), and National Science Foundation Geochemistry grant (EAR-1447311) to Y.F.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China

    • Cheng Xu
    • , Renbiao Tao
    • , Zeng Lü
    • , Yunxiu Li
    • , Lifei Zhang
    •  & Yingwei Fei
  2. Department of Geology and Pedology, Mendel University, Brno, 61300, Czech Republic

    • Jindřich Kynický
    • , Wenlei Song
    • , Miroslav Pohanka
    •  & Michaela V. Galiova
  3. Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Brno, 61600, Czech Republic

    • Jindřich Kynický
    • , Wenlei Song
    • , Miroslav Pohanka
    •  & Michaela V. Galiova
  4. Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road NW, Washington, DC, 20015, USA

    • Renbiao Tao
    •  & Yingwei Fei
  5. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China

    • Yueheng Yang

Authors

  1. Search for Cheng Xu in:

  2. Search for Jindřich Kynický in:

  3. Search for Wenlei Song in:

  4. Search for Renbiao Tao in:

  5. Search for Zeng Lü in:

  6. Search for Yunxiu Li in:

  7. Search for Yueheng Yang in:

  8. Search for Miroslav Pohanka in:

  9. Search for Michaela V. Galiova in:

  10. Search for Lifei Zhang in:

  11. Search for Yingwei Fei in:

Contributions

C.X., J.K., W.S., and Y.L. were responsible for sample collection. C.X., J.K., Y.F., L.Z., Z.L., M.P., and M.V.G were responsible for mineralogy and petrology. W.S., R.T., Y.Y., and Y.L. performed dating and geochemical analysis. C.X. and Y.F wrote the manuscript with inputs from co-authors.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Cheng Xu or Lifei Zhang or Yingwei Fei.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05140-5

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.