Editorial | Open | Published:

The future of plastic

    Nature Communicationsvolume 9, Article number: 2157 (2018) | Download Citation


    Plastic, a highly useful and convenient material, is also one of the world’s greatest environmental problems, yet both industry and society are still heavily reliant on its usage. On World Environment Day, Nature Communications asks: will biodegradable polymers alleviate plastic’s environmental impact?

    From initial conception, plastic was hailed a wondrous material. Following 80 years of innovation involving disciplines spread across industry and academia, mass production of plastic became successful and revolutionised consumerism in a post-World War II generation1. Plastic, although a simple synthetic polymer consisting of small molecules (monomers) linked together in a repetitive formation, is extremely versatile; with properties ranging from, resistance to corrosion, light weight, high strength, transparency, low toxicity to durability. Used by almost every industry in the world, from food packaging to space exploration, plastic is the ultimate commodity of convenience. Household names in the plastic industry include polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC).1


    ““Durability, one of plastic’s greatest assets is now its curse—its robustness means that plastics stay in our environment for hundreds of years.””

    Although the ease of plastic production generates cheap goods, the linear plastic economy adopted sees 90% of products used once and then discarded, thus creating a global environmental crisis. Since the plastic revolution, 6.3 billion tonnes of plastic waste has been produced worldwide2. We store roughly 79% of plastic waste in landfills, which results in up to 2.41 million tonnes of plastic waste entering oceans via rivers every year3,4. Durability, one of plastic’s greatest assets is now its curse–its robustness means that plastics stay in our environment for hundreds of years. Even when degraded, plastic never truly leaves the environment but is present as smaller pieces invisible to the naked eye (microplastics) that are choking marine life and propagating up the food chain5. Alongside a solution to the existing plastic waste problem, a new plastic future is also required.

    Reduce, reuse and recycle have been embraced as the common approach to combat the escalating plastic waste problem. The dream is to create a circular plastic economy where products are 100% recyclable, used for as long as possible, and their waste is minimised3,6. Until recently this strategy has lacked success, but with an increasing number of new initiatives, support from governments and leading manufacturers committing to achievable targets, change is being accomplished6. For now, progress remains slow despite advances in molecular level recycling, which enables different plastics to be recycled together7,8. Recycling is costly, reliant on human behavioural changes and produces lower quality materials, in terms of both thermal and mechanical properties7. Additionally, recycling does not curb our plastic addiction; if we want to maintain our current lifestyles modification to plastic manufacture needs to go hand in hand with effective recycling.

    Recent success in reducing carrier bag (PE) and drinks bottles (PET) waste in Europe suggests lifestyle adjustments are possible, but plastic is ingrained in modern society and a future free from plastic seems unlikely. Complete alteration of human behaviour is difficult to attain, as indicated by the fact that only 9% of plastic waste is recycled3. Therefore in addition to these three solutions to the plastic waste problem (reducing, reusing and recycling), we need a fundamental change in order to make a noticeable impact on the plastic waste seeping into our environment. A new plastic future in which biodegradable polymers replace conventional plastics could be the answer.

    Biodegradable polymers can break down into smaller molecules, such as CO2, CH4 and H2O, by microorganisms under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. Although not always required, abiotic chemical reactions like photodegradation, oxidation and hydrolysis can also aid the degradation process9. There are many examples of biodegradable polymers, some are produced from plants, animals or micro-organisms, others are purely synthetic (man-made). The most commonly known synthetic biodegradable polymers are polylactide (PLA), polyglycolide (PGA), polycaprolactone (PCL), polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA), poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (PBAT)9.

    PLA is considered the most promising candidate to replace current plastics. Unlike other synthetic biodegradable polymers and even conventional plastics, which are produced from petrochemicals, PLA is formed from sustainable resources (lactic acid in corn)9,10. However, if such biodegradable polymers were produced on an industrial scale, competition for land with food crops may become an issue. Good mechanical strength and low toxicity have already led to PLA’s successful implementation in packaging and biomedical applications9. Unfortunately, PLA has one important downside–its poor thermal properties limit its applicability at high temperatures (above 60 °C)11.

    Despite PLA’s shortcomings, interest in this material has not waned due to its faster degradation time compared to current plastics (~12 months), which is believed to prevent its accumulation in our environment if implemented on an industrial scale12. However, specific micro-organisms present in composting plants at slightly elevated temperatures are required for this process; if not available the degradation time can be longer. The small molecules formed during biodegradation do not impact the environment in the same way as microplastics, but there are concerns that they will add to our greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. That said, life cycle analysis has found that less net GHG generation occurs during PLA production compared to current petroleum-based plastics13.

    Although biodegradable polymers and in particular PLA have been the focus of much research and patents over the last decade, their production has still not reached the level of PE, PET and PP due to cost10,11,14. Lactic acid is not as readily available compared to the starting materials used for current plastics (e.g. ethylene for PE). Additionally, lactic acid is converted to lactide before PLA can form and this extra-step adds to the final expenditure11,14.

    Biodegradable polymers along with reducing, reusing and recycling could impact the accumulation of plastics in the environment, but further developments are still required before PLA or other biodegradable polymers can replace existing plastics10,15. Cost is not the only roadblock for such materials. Governments, society and industry have learnt from past mistakes and realise that production of new materials must consider their source and end of life together with the essential criteria of production scalability and material properties. In order to successfully substitute current plastics with biodegradable polymers, we not only need industry and academia to work together but also different disciplines (chemistry, engineering, materials science, biogeochemistry and climate science) to collaborate. Similar to the current plastics we use, this process will take time and key multi-disciplinary developments will be required. We hope Nature Communications provides the interdisciplinary, open-access platform to disseminate this research to all relevant stake-holders. We have begun the journey towards a new plastic future involving biodegradable polymers; we need to persevere together to reach the finish line in order to protect our environment.

    Additional information

    Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


    1. 1.

      Feldman, D. Polymer history. Des. Monomers Polym. 11, 1–15 (2008).

    2. 2.

      The New Plastics Economy: Rethinking the Future of Plastics. https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/the-new-plastics-economy-rethinking-the-future-of-plastics (Ellen MacArthur Foundation, 2016).

    3. 3.

      Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R. & Law, K. L. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700782 (2017).

    4. 4.

      Lebreton, L. C. M. et al. River plastic emissions to the world’s oceans. Nat. Commun. 8, 15611 (2017).

    5. 5.

      Romera-Castillo, C., Pinto, M., Langer, T. M., Álvarez-Salgado, X. A. & Herndl, G. J. Dissolved organic carbon leaching from plastics stimulates microbial activity in the ocean. Nat. Commun. 9, 1430 (2018).

    6. 6.

      A European Strategy for Plastics in a Circular Economy. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1516265440535&uri=COM:2018:28:FIN (European Commission, 2018).

    7. 7.

      Eagan, J. M. et al. Combining polyethylene and polypropylene: enhanced performance with PE/iPP multiblock polymers. Science 355, 814–816 (2017).

    8. 8.

      PET Cradle-to-Cradle solution “..a Game Changer..” http://www.ioniqa.com/pet-recycling/ (2018).

    9. 9.

      Luckachan, G. E. & Pillai, C. K. S. Biodegradable polymers–a review on recent trends and emerging perspectives. J. Polym. Environ. 19, 637–676 (2011).

    10. 10.

      Elvers, D., Song, C. H., Steinbüchel, A. & Leker, J. Technology trends in biodegradable polymers: evidence from patent analysis. Polym. Rev. 56, 584–606 (2016).

    11. 11.

      Jamshidian, M., Tehrany, E. A., Imran, M., Jacquot, M. & Desobry, S. Poly-lactic acid: production, applications, nanocomposites, and release studies. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 9, 552–571 (2010).

    12. 12.

      Song, J. H., Murphy, R. J., Narayan, R. & Davies, G. B. H. Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 364, 2127–2139 (2009).

    13. 13.

      Cosate de Andrade, M. F., Souza, P. M. S., Cavalett, O. & Morales, A. R. Life cycle assessment of Poly(Lactic acid) (pla): comparison between chemical recycling, mechanical recycling and composting. J. Polym. Environ. 24, 372–384 (2016).

    14. 14.

      Dusselier, M., Van Wouwe, P., Dewaele, A., Jacobs, P. A. & Sels, B. F. Shape-selective zeolite catalysis for bioplastics production. Science 349, 78–80 (2015).

    15. 15.

      Shen, L., Worrell, E. & Patel, M. Present and future development in plastics from biomass. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref. 4, 25–40 (2010).

    Download references

    About this article

    Publication history




    Rights and permissions

    Creative Commons BY

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


    By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.