# A coastal coccolithophore maintains pH homeostasis and switches carbon sources in response to ocean acidification

## Abstract

Ocean acidification will potentially inhibit calcification by marine organisms; however, the response of the most prolific ocean calcifiers, coccolithophores, to this perturbation remains under characterized. Here we report novel chemical constraints on the response of the widespread coccolithophore species Ochrosphaera neapolitana (O. neapolitana) to changing-CO2 conditions. We cultured this algae under three pCO2-controlled seawater pH conditions (8.05, 8.22, and 8.33). Boron isotopes within the algae’s extracellular calcite plates show that this species maintains a constant pH at the calcification site, regardless of CO2-induced changes in pH of the surrounding seawater. Carbon and oxygen isotopes in the algae’s calcite plates and carbon isotopes in the algae’s organic matter suggest that O. neapolitana utilize carbon from a single internal dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) pool for both calcification and photosynthesis, and that a greater proportion of dissolved CO2 relative to HCO3 enters the internal DIC pool under acidified conditions. These two observations may explain how O. neapolitana continues calcifying and photosynthesizing at a constant rate under different atmospheric-pCO2 conditions.

## Introduction

CO2-induced ocean acidification (OA) is reducing the calcium carbonate saturation state of seawater, potentially making it harder for calcifying marine organisms to build their shells and skeletons1,2,3. However, controlled laboratory experiments suggest that organisms have extremely varied calcification responses to CO2-induced OA, with some species exhibiting resilience or even showing positive calcification responses to high-CO2 conditions4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. It has been hypothesized that such diverse responses to CO2-induced OA may result from differing capacities of marine calcifying organisms to actively remove protons, H+, from their calcifying medium, thereby raising the carbonate ion concentration, [CO32−], and calcium carbonate saturation state of the calcifying medium relative to seawater12,13,14,15.

In addition to regulating calcification site pH via proton pumping, organisms that perform both photosynthesis and calcification may also influence carbonate chemistry at the site of calcification via photosynthetic drawdown of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), DIC release via respiration, and/or proton release via calcification (i.e., Ca2+ + HCO3 → H+ + CaCO3).

Coccolithophores are unicellular flagellate algae with the ability to produce calcite plates (coccoliths) within vesicles that they assemble in an interlocking fashion on the exterior surface of their cell wall. Coccolithophores inhabit tropical to subpolar environments throughout the ocean16,17. They are the most prolific producers of CaCO3 in the ocean, accounting for nearly half of global production18,19. Therefore, the coccolithophore response to elevated pCO2 is important from both ecological and global biogeochemical perspectives.

A recent study suggested that, on geological timescales, the combination of elevated dissolved CO2 and elevated total alkalinity (TA) supports the production of thicker coccoliths20. However, controlled laboratory experiments suggest that the coccolithophore calcification and photosynthesis response to elevated pCO2 is variable and complex, with disparate results observed amongst different species and even different strains of the same species5,9,21,22. It is possible that species- and strain-specific differences in coccolithophores’ ability to regulate pH and carbonate chemistry at their site of calcification contributes to the variability in their responses to OA. However, few measurements of pH at the site of calcification within coccolithophores have been reported23, with none addressing the impact of elevated pCO2 on calcification site pH.

Boron isotope ratios (δ11B) in biogenic carbonates are used as a proxy for seawater pH, based on the observation that seawater pH controls the δ11B composition of dissolved borate, which is assumed to be the primary boron species incorporated into abiogenic and biogenic carbonates24. However, discrepancies observed between carbonate δ11B-derived pH and known seawater pH indicate that δ11B compositions of biogenic carbonates may represent pH at the site of calcification, which may reflect biological control of pH at the site of calcification in some species, or seawater pH in other species, or some combination of seawater pH and biological control. This use of δ11B as a proxy of calcification site pH has been most widely applied to scleractinian corals12,13,15,25,26, with only one study to date applying this approach to a species of coccolithophore (Emiliania huxleyi)27.

Previous studies have used fluorescent dyes to estimate cytosolic and coccolith vesicle pH, and their sensitivity to changes in external seawater pH23,28. However, our approach adds new information because the coccolith δ11B should reflect the pH of the coccolith-forming vesicle at the precise time and location of coccolith formation, rather than vesicle pH at the time of dye injection and imaging. Here, we also consider stable carbon isotope data from inorganic and organic portions of coccolithophores to gain insight into how coccolithophores utilize different species of DIC for both photosynthesis and calcification, since elevated atmospheric-pCO2 will change the distribution of DIC species in seawater.

Ochrosphaera neapolitana (O. neapolitana) is a mostly non-motile coccolithophore species that is widely distributed along the coastal zone of the North Atlantic and Indian Oceans, Mediterranean Sea, and Japanese Current region29,30,31. This species has a unique mechanism for producing coccoliths, wherein the coccolith vesicle is formed at the periphery of the cell instead of adjacent to the nuclear membrane, as for Emiliania huxleyi (E. huxleyi), or between the nucleus and plasma membrane, as for Pleurochrysis carterae29. Unlike the coccolithophore species E. huxleyi and genera Gephyrocapsa, Coccolithus, and Calcidiscus, which produce highly calcified placoliths, i.e., lith-structures with two or more well-developed shields, O. neapolitana produces more lightly calcified muroliths, i.e., lith-structures without well-developed shields29,32,33. The production of less calcified liths by O. neapolitana could be linked to a different strategy for allocating dissolved inorganic carbon resources under different environmental conditions.

Furthermore, it has been shown that O. neapolitana precipitates high-magnesium calcite, while the well-studied coccolithophore genera Emiliania and Gephyrocapsa produce low-magnesium calcite liths, providing further evidence that O. neapolitana calcifies in a different manner than other species of coccolithophores34. However, few studies have explored the allocation of dissolved inorganic carbon resources between photosynthesis and calcification within O. neapolitana (e.g., ref.35). For these reasons, along with the logistical need to culture large volumes of coccolithophores for measuring isotope ratios of low-abundance elements such as boron, the relatively fast-growing species O. neapolitana was used to develop our combined δ11B and δ13C approach for constraining the response of calcifying fluid chemistry in coccolithophores to OA.

Here, we report on controlled laboratory experiments investigating the impact of CO2-induced OA on the calcifying fluid dynamics and utilization of DIC within the coastal coccolithophore species O. neapolitana. The effective pCO2 range examined spans 226 ± 11 µatm (glacial) to 521 ± 19 µatm (year 2070). We make inferences about this speciesʼ (1) ability to regulate calcifying fluid pH using boron isotopes as a proxy of calcifying fluid pH, (2) utilization of carbon species in calcification and photosynthesis, using stable isotopes of carbon and oxygen, and (3) photosynthetic and calcification responses to CO2-induced OA, using their PIC/POC ratio. Our results suggest that O. neapolitana maintains a constant pH at the site of calcification and can maintain relatively constant calcification-to-photosynthesis ratios across a range of seawater pH conditions by utilizing higher proportions of CO2 compared to HCO3 as seawater pH decreases.

## Results and Discussion

### Uptake of dissolved boron species by coccolithophores

The coccolith δ11B values, fractionated from the culture medium δ11B of 0.64‰, range from −15‰ to −25‰ (Fig. 1). Although boron isotopic compositions of marine carbonates, such as corals and foraminifera, have been widely studied and applied as proxies for seawater or calcification site pH (e.g., refs.12,15,25,36,37), the δ11B composition of coccolithophore calcite has not been well-constrained. Non-charged boric acid has been shown to travel across the cell membranes of plants via diffusion, a process that discriminates against the positively charged borate ion38,39. Therefore, Stoll et al.40 hypothesized that boric acid enters coccolithophore cells exclusively through a similar mechanism, given the relatively high concentration of boron in seawater compared to freshwater. In contrast, the boron isotopic composition of many marine biogenic carbonate archives has been found to reflect calcification site pH12,13,15,25,26, supporting the hypothesis that δ11B of total boron within the parent fluids of calcification is identical to that of seawater, and that only borate ion is incorporated in these carbonates. Because questions remain as to the source(s) and pathway(s) of inorganic boron into coccolithophores, we discuss the compatibility of the results of the present study with three potential boron-uptake scenarios: (1) only boric acid can penetrate the coccolithophore cell membrane to the calcification site, yielding total boron δ11B at the calcification site highly enriched relative to ambient seawater; (2) boric acid and borate penetrate the cell membrane in proportions equivalent to their abundance in seawater, yielding total boron δ11B at the calcification site identical to ambient seawater; and (3) an intermediate scenario in which both seawater boric acid and borate ion penetrate the cell membrane to the site of calcification, but with higher boric acid:borate ratios than in the ambient seawater—thereby yielding total boron δ11B at the calcification site slightly enriched relative to ambient seawater.

In the first scenario, if only boric acid enters the coccolithophore cell, δ11B of total B at the calcification site will be about 5–10‰ higher than that of the culture seawater across the range of pH investigated in this study. Thus, assuming that no further fractionation of boron isotopes occurs throughout the calcification process and only borate ion is incorporated into coccolith calcite, the coccolith δ11B value should also be about 5–10‰ higher than the theoretical borate curve for seawater (Fig. 1, gray dash line). In the second scenario, where boric acid and borate penetrate the cell membrane in proportions equivalent to their relative abundance in seawater, coccolith δ11B value should follow the gray solid line in Fig. 1. Finally, for the third scenario (e.g., Fig. 1, gray dash-dot line and gray dash-double dots line), coccolith δ11B value should fall between the gray dashed line and gray solid line in Fig. 1.

In the first scenario, the predicted borate δ11B values (Fig. 1, gray dash line) are higher than most coccolith δ11B measurements. If this was driven purely by calcification site pH, the values could be explained by O. neapolitana downregulating their calcification site pH to <7.9, which would reduce the calcite saturation state and be relatively unfavorable for calcification.

In the second scenario, the predicted borate δ11B values closely match the coccolith δ11B measurements, especially for pH above 8.15. Only under lower pH (pH = 8.05) do the coccolith δ11B values deviate positively from the predicted borate δ11B values (Fig. 2, gray solid line). This positive deviation can be explained by the maintenance of a constant and elevated pH in the calcification vesicle relative to seawater pH, which has been observed in many other marine calcifying organisms (e.g., refs.15,41,42). This scenario has been widely adopted by researchers using δ11B of biogenic carbonates as a proxy for calcification site pH in marine calcifying organisms12,13,15,25,26.

Alternatively, both boric acid and borate may be transported into the coccolith vesicle (scenario 3) but with the boric acid:borate ratio elevated compared to seawater. This latter scenario should be considered the least likely as the authors are aware of no mechanism for the partial discrimination against borate during boron uptake to the site of calcification and, if accurate, would constitute a hitherto unrecognized mechanism for boron transport in coccolithophores (see further discussion in Supplementary Note 1).

The scenario wherein the total boron δ11B in the coccolith vesicle is equivalent to the total boron δ11B in seawater (scenario 2) is most compatible with the results of the present study. This suggests that the active biological elevation of coccolith vesicle pH drives the offset in coccolith δ11B from the theoretical borate δ11B-pH curve, which is apparent in the lowest pH treatment.

### Coccolith δ11B as an indicator of calcifying vesicle pH

Coccolith δ11B was measured as a proxy for calcifying vesicle fluid pH in cultures bubbled with CO2-gas mixtures formulated at 280, 400, and 750 p.p.m., which resulted in average seawater pH values of 8.33, 8.22, and 8.05 in cultures. Based on calculations using the instrumental measurement of DIC and total alkalinity in the experimental treatments, the algal cultures were subjected to pCO2 levels of 226, 339, and 521 µatm for the three treatments, with the difference between the nominal and effective pCO2 arising from incomplete mixing between the introduced gases and culture solutions and drawdown of aqueous CO2 by the coccolithophores. The average δ11B of the total dissolved boron in the synthetic culture medium from individual tanks was 0.64 ± 1.30‰ (1σ, n = 9), about 39‰ lower than natural seawater. Notably, the δ11B of both boric acid (B(OH)3), dominating at low pH, and borate ion (B(OH)4), dominating at high pH, are fractionated relative to δ11B of total seawater boron as a function of solution pH24, with δ11B of dissolved B(OH)4 increasing with increasing seawater pH. Because only the B(OH)4 form of boron is thought to be incorporated into the calcite lattice (see discussion above)24,40, δ11B of coccolith calcite should represent δ11B of dissolved B(OH)4 in the calcifying vesicle fluid. Assuming that δ11B of total boron in the calcifying vesicle is inherited from the culture solution, then calcifying vesicle fluid pH can be estimated from the fractionation between δ11B of total boron in the culture medium and δ11B of coccolith calcite.

The observed difference in δ11B between coccolith calcite, ranging from −15‰ to −25‰, and culture medium, 0.64‰, yields a calcifying vesicle fluid pH between 7.7 and 8.5, with a mean pH of 8.2, based on calculations using the most widely applied boron fractionation factor43 (Fig. 2a, b).

In a previous study, Anning et al.23 used pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes to detect coccolith vesicle pH. They observed a bimodal distribution of calcifying vesicle pH within the population of cultured cells: one spanning pH 6.8–7.2 and the other spanning pH 7.6–8.323. Although our study examines a different species of coccolithophore, the higher pH mode in the previous study23 is consistent with vesicle pH estimated from δ11B data in the present study. Thus, the higher pH mode reported in the pH-sensitive dye study, which is consistent with vesicle fluid pH estimated in the present study from coccolith δ11B and thus representative of vesicle pH at the precise time and location of lith formation, may represent pH of vesicles that are actively engaged in lith production. In contrast, the lower pH mode may reflect pH of vesicles that are not actively forming liths.

Notably, no statistically significant (p > 0.05) correlation was observed between coccolith δ11B and ambient seawater pH, which is consistent with δ11B-based observations of calcifying vesicle pH for the coccolithophore E. huxleyi27. Instead, a significant negative trend was observed in the present study between seawater pH (pHsw) and the offset (∆pH) between vesicle pH (pHvesicle) and pHsw (R2 = 0.46, p < 0.05) (Fig. 2c). Together, these analyses suggest that vesicle pH is insensitive to changing pHsw, and that increasing ∆pH with decreasing pHsw reflects the algae’s compensatory response to OA, which maintains vesicle pH and carbonate chemistry favorable for coccolith formation even under increasingly acidic conditions. This response is distinct from the many types of calcifying marine organisms, including corals, foraminifera, and coralline algae, which show a clear decline in calcification site pH with decreasing seawater pH12,13,14,41,44. Therefore, these results suggest that this species of coccolithophore exerts an unusual degree of control over its calcification site pH.

It has been suggested that photosynthesis can benefit calcification in several ways, including providing energy for proton pumping or other enzyme-driven ion exchange and generating hydroxyl ions that neutralize protons released via calcification45, thereby increasing calcium carbonate saturation state at the site of calcification. These mechanisms may assist coccolithophores in maintaining constant calcification site pH as ambient seawater pH declines, but only with commensurate increases in rates of photosynthesis, which is potentially supported by higher seawater DIC levels associated with elevated pCO25.

Alternatively, calcification can also benefit photosynthesis by generating protons that increase seawater concentrations of aqueous CO2 and bicarbonate ion. Thus, elevated rates of calcification associated with constant pH, inferred from coccolith δ11B, and elevated DIC, due to increased pCO2, at the site of calcification could also drive elevated rates of photosynthesis and result in constant PIC/POC ratios, i.e., constant rates of calcification relative to organic matter production, across pCO2 treatments.

### Stable carbon and oxygen isotopes within O. neapolitana

The δ13CPIC and δ13CPOC range from −20‰ to 5‰ and from −45‰ to −20‰, respectively. The introduction of different mixtures of compressed air and isotopically light compressed CO2 to the experimental treatments resulted in seawater DIC δ13C (δ13CDIC) being relatively depleted in the 226 and 521 µatm treatment. Therefore, stable carbon isotope analyses were normalized to δ13CDIC, such that δ13CPIC − δ13CDIC = ∆13CPIC and δ13CPOC − δ13CDIC = ∆13CPOC (see Methods for details).

The normalized ∆13CPIC and ∆13CPOC range from 7‰ to 13‰ and from −18‰ to −9‰, respectively, with ∆13CPIC consistently heavier than ∆13CPOC by about 24‰, and with ∆13CPIC and ∆13CPOC exhibiting positive correlation (R2 = 0.56, p = 0.02; Fig. 3a). Both ∆13CPIC (R2 = 0.47, p = 0.04) and ∆13CPOC (R2= 0.51, p = 0.03) are also positively correlated with seawater pH (Fig. 3c, d). Coccolith δ18O (δ18OPIC) range from −3.5‰ to −0.5‰. After normalizing to culture solution δ18O (δ18Osw), ∆18OPIC (∆18OPIC = δ18OPIC − δ18Osw; VPDB (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite)) ranges from 29.7 to 31.9‰, with no statistically significant correlation between ∆18OPIC and ∆13CPIC, Fig. 3b.

Stable isotope results for both seawater and coccoliths were normalized to the VPDB scale, therefore, the reported ∆18OPIC values are about 30‰ higher than previously published analyses of coccolithophores normalized to SMOW (e.g., refs.10,46,47,48,49) (Fig. 4). Values of ∆13CPOC and ∆13CPIC in the present study are also slightly higher than previously reported values for cultured coccolithophores, particularly for ∆13CPIC, which is about 5–10‰ higher than previously published values10,48,49,50. This observed offset could be explained by differences in the experimental setup and/or species-and/or strain-specific carbon isotope fractionation.

Earlier work by Rickaby et al.10 and Hermoso et al.49 used HCl and NaHCO3 addition to manipulate seawater carbonate chemistry, while maintaining constant seawater pH in all treatments. Rost et al.51 and Hermoso48 used the acid–base addition method to recreate various seawater pH conditions, but with constant DIC. A ca. 3‰ variation in carbon isotope composition of coccolith calcite was observed for E. huxleyi cultured under similar pCO2 conditions, which Hermoso et al.49 attributed to different carbonate system parameters of the culture solutions arising from different modes of acidification, i.e., acid–base addition vs. CO2-bubbling, and other differences in experimental configuration. However, these factors should only account for 30–50% of the offset relative to prior studies in carbon isotopic compositions observed in the present study, suggesting that other factors are involved.

Species-specific differences in carbon isotope fractionation might also contribute to the differences observed between the present and past studies10,48,49. McClelland et al.52 proposed a model for evaluating potential sources of inorganic carbon for coccolithophores, as illustrated in Fig. 5b. The model predicts that coccolithophore species with lower PIC/POC ratios, such as P. placolithoides, will have a higher stable carbon isotopic composition in coccolith calcite under lower aqueous CO2 conditions due to increased flux of isotopically heavy carbon leaking from the chloroplast that is utilized in calcification and photosynthesis (Fig. 5c). This effect is predicted to decrease at higher-CO2 levels, which is consistent with the convergence between O. neapolitana δ13C and δ13C of other species cultured under higher-CO2 conditions. Although there are currently no published carbon isotope data for coccolithophores cultured at pCO2 <500 µatm, the McClelland model predicts a ∆13CPIC for P. placolithoides as high as 3‰ under [CO2(aq)] of ~5 µM. In summary, coccolithophores with different PIC/POC ratios should show species-specific carbon isotopic fractionation within the same [CO2(aq)] range. Therefore, this model at least partially explains the larger carbon isotope fractionation observed in the present study.

Differences in acidification methods used in published experiments, i.e., acid–base addition vs. CO2-bubbling, which results in differential DIC speciation may also explain the differing carbon isotope fractionation by coccolithophores shown in this study compared to prior studies. The present study acidified seawater in experimental treatments by sparging treatments with mixed gases formulated at different pCO2, which yielded a fixed TA, elevated DIC, and reduced pH. In contrast, acidifying the seawater treatments via acid addition decreases TA, DIC, and pH. Thus, the two approaches yield different concentrations of total DIC and DIC speciation for equivalent seawater pH treatments. For the lowest pH treatments, the CO2-gas sparging method for acidification yields up to 50% higher concentrations of DIC than the acid-addition method of acidification. For the highest pH treatments, the CO2-gas sparging method of acidification maintains lower concentrations of HCO3 than the acid-base addition method. Therefore, the differential speciation of DIC between equivalent experimental treatments acidified using different methods combined with differences in the stable carbon isotopic composition of different DIC species could yield differences in coccolithophore ∆13C between the different experiments. Although this is unlikely to fully explain the 5–10‰ higher stable carbon isotopic compositions in both organic and inorganic portions of O. neapolitana, the combination of these effects with species-level differences in carbon isotope fractionation may account for the observed discrepancies in ∆13C between the present and prior studies (e.g., refs.51,53).

The positive correlation between ∆13CPIC and ∆13CPOC (Fig. 3a) suggests that the carbon sources for calcification and photosynthesis are primarily derived from the same internal DIC pool, and/or that the carbon sources for both processes exhibit the same response to changing seawater pH. Both ∆13CPIC and ∆13CPOC become about 6–10‰ lighter with the prescribed decrease in seawater pH and increase in seawater DIC. Hermoso et al.49 suggest that under elevated DIC, photosynthesis-driven Rayleigh fractionation of carbon isotopes may be diluted by the larger carbon pool, resulting in lower δ13C for E. huxleyi calcite. However, a decrease in δ13C with decreasing seawater pH was also observed for the organic portions of coccolithophores in the present study, and this cannot be explained by an increased DIC pool. It is therefore likely that other mechanisms control stable carbon isotopic fractionation within this species, at least for the organic portion of the algae.

Recent studies suggest that E. huxleyi has different CO2 and HCO3 influxes under different seawater pH conditions54,55. Although a different species was investigated in the present study, one explanation for the observed correlation between seawater pH and both ∆13CPIC and ∆13CPOC is that the carbon sources for calcification and photosynthesis changed under acidified conditions, potentially because more CO2 was transported across the cell membrane compared with HCO3. When pH decreases from 8.5 to 7.9, δ13C of different DIC species will be 1‰ lighter due to the re-partitioning of species in the DIC system56. Additionally, assuming equilibrium isotope fractionation, δ13C of CO2(aq) is about 9‰ lower than that of HCO3 for the same δ13CDIC at 25 °C and 35 PSU56. The CO2 gradient across the coccolithophore cell membrane increases as pCO2 increases. Therefore, when a greater portion of CO2, compared with HCO3, is transported across the cell membrane, the δ13C of the coccolithophore internal DIC pool will decrease. Thus, the observed correlation between seawater pH and both ∆13CPIC and ∆13CPOC is consistent with the hypothesis that substantially more CO2 is taken into the internal DIC pool of O. neapolitana, which supplies carbon for both its calcification and photosynthesis, at lower seawater pH.

Instead of (or in addition to) increasing CO2 influx, the observed depletion in 13C with decreasing seawater pH can also be explained by reduced uptake of HCO3 in a higher DIC environment. In either case, more 13C-depleted inorganic carbon is incorporated into the internal DIC pool of O. neapolitana for calcification and photosynthesis, resulting in positive correlations between ∆13CPIC and pHsw, between ∆13CPOC and pHsw, and therefore between ∆13CPIC and ∆13CPOC. These carbon species are then redistributed in the algae’s 13C-depleted internal medium and utilized for both calcification and photosynthesis. Assuming the two processes use DIC from the same internal pool, the inorganic and organic carbon isotopic compositions would fractionate relative to the same δ13CDIC. However, a greater difference in ∆13CPOC (ca. 8‰) was observed between the two end-member pCO2 treatments (226 and 521 µatm) compared to the end-member differences in ∆13CPIC (6‰), suggesting that additional fractionation occurs within chloroplasts and/or calcification vesicles.

McClelland et al.52 hypothesized in a recent study that the δ13C composition of coccolith calcite is influenced by the δ13C composition of carbon entering the cell, leakage of carbon from chloroplasts, and Rayleigh-type fractionation of carbon isotopes in the calcifying vesicle. They proposed that the δ13C compositions of the carbon influx and carbon leakage from chloroplasts have stronger effects in coccolithophore species with lower PIC/POC ratios. One explanation for the different magnitudes of pH-induced offsets in ∆13C between the organic and inorganic portions of coccolithophores is that isotopically heavier carbon leaked from the chloroplast may partially compensate for the decline in δ13C resulting from the increasing CO2 influx. Otherwise, the 1:1 slope of the regression between ∆13CPOC and ∆13CPIC (slope = 1.01) indicates that the pattern resulted from the change in δ13C composition of a single DIC pool that supplies carbon for both calcification and photosynthesis within the algae.

A carbonate ion effect on CaCO3 δ18O has been both hypothesized and observed in biominerals, such that CaCO3 δ18O will decrease with increasing pH because of the resulting increase in concentration of CO32−, which has a more depleted δ18O composition57. This effect has been observed in foraminifera, corals58, and coccolithophores47. However, the opposite trend, albeit weak (p > 0.05), was observed between δ18O of O. neapolitana coccolith calcite and culture seawater pH in the present study, with coccolith δ18O increasing by ca. 2‰ as pH increased from 8.0 to 8.3. This may indicate that although inorganic carbon uptake changes under the different pCO2 treatments, the relative abundance of DIC species at the site of calcification is not significantly different due to active biological control of carbonate chemistry within the calcifying vesicle. Alternatively, the conditions of calcification within this species may not preserve isotopic fractionation that arises from DIC speciation in its calcifying fluid if, for example, mineral precipitation is too slow59 or if there is additional unconstrained biological fractionation affecting oxygen isotope compositions.

### No PIC/POC changes in response to elevated pCO2

The particulate organic carbon (POC) and particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) content range from 11% to 34% and from 5% to 17%, respectively, of the coccolithophore total particulate matter (TPM) weight (Fig. 6a). The PIC/POC ratios range from 0.18 to 0.80 (mean ± 1σ = 0.46 ± 0.21; n = 6). No statistically significant trend was observed between pH and either PIC (p = 0.80) or POC (p = 0.29) content, or the PIC/POC ratio (p = 0.70) (Fig. 6b).

The lack of correlation between ambient pHsw and PIC, POC, or PIC/POC suggests that O. neapolitana does not change the proportions of DIC allocated for calcification and photosynthesis with increasing pCO2. Although there are no previously published PIC/POC ratios for O. neapolitana, this result has been observed in the coccolithophore species Pleurochrysis carterae, which also precipitates high-Mg calcite6,34. Casareto et al.6 observed increases in both PIC and POC in cultures at 1200 µatm pCO2 and at ambient pCO2 after 7 days of growth. However, higher production of POC than PIC yields PIC/POC ratios that are lower than the PIC/POC ratio in the beginning of the experiment for both pCO2 treatments, but no significant difference between the two pCO2 treatments. The similar PIC/POC trends when pH deceases in the two high Mg/Ca coccolith species suggest that coccolithophores with high Mg/Ca ratios may have different mechanisms for controlling the allocation of inorganic carbon for photosynthesis and calcification from other low-Mg coccolithophore species. For instance, it was previously hypothesized that coccolithophore species producing high-Mg calcite (mMg/Ca >0.4) in modern seawater with elevated Mg/Ca ratio (mMg/Ca = 5.2), which favors the abiotic precipitation of high-Mg calcite over low-Mg calcite (mMg/Ca <0.4), have less control over the ionic composition of their calcifying medium than coccolithophores that produce low-Mg calcite in seawater favoring the precipitation of high-Mg calcite60.

Strontium isotope ratios of coccoliths (Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1) also show no variation across pH treatments. Stevenson et al.61 identified a correlation between coccolithophore growth rate (co-varying with temperature) and coccolith δ88/86Sr for the species E. huxleyi, Coccolithus pelagicus spp. braarudii, and Gephyrocapsa oceanica. The lack of a statistically significant difference in δ88/86Sr between pH treatments in the present experiment on O. neapolitana is consistent with the observation that PIC/POC ratios are invariant across pH treatments.

### Scanning electron microscopy images of coccoliths

Imaging of coccoliths via scanning electron microscopy (SEM) does not reveal any gross changes in diameter or thickness of the individual coccoliths or of the diameter of the coccolithophore sphere as a whole (Fig. 7). Coccolithophore spheres are about 6–8 µm in all treatments, which is consistent with size ranges previously reported for these species29. The consistent size of coccoliths observed via SEM, the constant PIC/POC ratios, and the boron isotope results support the assertion that calcification, relative to organic matter production, within O. neapolitana is unimpeded by elevated pCO2 due to maintenance of pH homeostasis at the alga’s site of calcification.

### Mechanisms for O. neapolitana adaptation to increasing pCO2

The results of the present study suggest that calcification and photosynthesis within the coccolithophore O. neapolitana utilize carbon from the same internal DIC pool (Fig. 5a). The preferential uptake of light isotopes by the rubisco enzyme during photosynthesis results in ca. 25‰ offset between δ13CPIC and δ13CPOC in this species. When seawater DIC increases as a result of increasing atmospheric-pCO2, 13C becomes depleted in the internal DIC pool either through increased uptake of dissolved CO2 and/or decreased uptake of HCO3, thereby decreasing both δ13CPIC and δ13CPOC. The observation that coccolith δ11B remains constant across a range of seawater pH suggests that O. neapolitana maintains a fixed pH at the site of calcification across this range of seawater pH. This enables the coccolithophores to continue producing coccoliths under lower pH and higher DIC conditions. Additionally, PIC, POC, and PIC/POC ratio were statistically invariant under all pCO2 conditions, indicating that O. neapolitana maintained similar rates of calcification, relative to rates of photosynthesis, irrespective of pCO2 treatment, even though the energetic cost of calcification is likely increasing with declining seawater pH. Furthermore, SEM imaging reveals that coccoliths formed under the high-pCO2 treatments were similar in size and shape to coccoliths formed in the control and low-pCO2 treatments. These results are consistent with prior studies showing that some species of coccolithophores are able to maintain relatively constant ratios of calcification-to-photosynthesis under conditions of elevated pCO25,9,62. The present study shows that some species of coccolithophores achieve this by maintaining pH homeostasis at the site of calcification and by utilizing a greater proportion of the isotopically lighter CO2 species of DIC for both photosynthesis and calcification.

## Methods

### Culture conditions and seawater carbonate chemistry

The coccolithophore O. neapolitana was cultured in a synthetic seawater medium made from a commercial sea salt mixture (Instant Ocean Sea Salt63) enriched with nutrients following the F/2 recipe64 from 11 January 2012 to 30 January 2012 at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Algal cultures were divided between three pCO2 treatments in triplicate aquaria, equilibrated with air-CO2 mixtures of 280, 400, and 750 p.p.m., selected to mimic levels before the industrial revolution, current atmospheric conditions, and levels predicted for year 2100 AD, resulting in seawater pH (±SE) of 8.05 ± 0.01, 8.22 ± 0.01, and 8.33 ± 0.01 and effective pCO2 (±SE), calculated from measured DIC and TA, of 226 ± 11, 339 ± 10, and 521 ± 19. The nominal 280 µatm pCO2 gas was formulated by mixing compressed CO2 gas and compressed CO2-free air, the nominal 400 µatm pCO2 gas was compressed ambient air, and the nominal 750 µatm pCO2 gas was formulated by mixing compressed CO2 gas and compressed ambient air. Gases were mixed with Aalborg solenoid-valve-based mass flow controllers. The cultures were maintained at constant temperature (25 °C) and salinity (35 PSU) on a 16–8 h light–dark cycle in 38 l glass aquaria with the same initial dose of coccolithophore cells (~400 ± 40 cell per l). The level and duration of the diurnal lighting cycle was based on Langer et al.9, Rickaby et al.10, Riebesell et al.21, Langer et al.62, Krug et al.65, and Zondervan et al.66 Temperature and salinity were based on the natural conditions of the source cultures. Nutrients in the experimental cultures were formulated pursuant to the f/2-si media, based upon Langer et al.9, Langer et al.62, Guillard and Ryther64, Krug et al.65, Zondervan et al.66, and Guillard67. Cultures were extremely dilute and collected at cell concentrations <100,000 cell per ml, which places culture growth well below the stationary phase34.

Temperature, salinity, and pH were measured every other day in the experimental tanks. For temperature measurements, a NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology)-calibrated partial-immersion organic-filled glass thermometer (precision ± 0.3%, accuracy ± 0.4%) was used. A YSI 3200 conductivity meter with a YSI 3440 cell (K = 10) calibrated with seawater standards (A. Dickson, Scripps Institute of Oceanography) was used for salinity. Seawater pH was measured with an Orion 9156BNWP pH probe. The instrument was calibrated with two Orion NBS buffers (7.00 and 10.01) traceable to NIST standard reference material (for slope of the calibration curve) and with seawater standards of known pH (A. Dickson, Scripps Institute of Oceanography; for y-intercept of the calibration curve). Seawater DIC and TA were measured every week via coulometry (UIC 5400) and via closed-cell potentiometric Gran titration calibrated with certified Dickson TA/DIC standards, respectively (see Supplementary Table 1 for seawater chemistry data). The certified reference materials (CRMs) were monitored during the measurements and the experimental seawater DIC and TA measurements were all corrected to the certified values of CRMs.

To determine seawater pCO2, pH, carbonate ion concentration, [CO32−], bicarbonate ion concentration, [HCO3], and aqueous CO2, the program CO2SYS68 was used with the inputs of weekly DIC and TA measurements and weekly average of temperature and salinity. The K1 and K2 carbonic acid constants from Roy et al.69, the stoichiometric aragonite solubility product from Mucci70, and an atmospheric pressure of 1.015 atm were applied in the program for the full seawater chemistry calculations (Supplementary Table 1).

Although a short-term rise in pH was observed in all treatments during the last week of culturing (see Supplementary Note 3 and Supplementary Fig. 2 for carbonate chemistry of the culture media), all isotopic and PIC/POC data are compared to the experiment-long average of the calculated values of seawater pH (pHsw), which were stable throughout most of the experiment.

Coccolithophores were collected after 2 weeks of culturing, which yielded 10–15 generations of coccolithophores and ensured acclimation to the treatment conditions. The coccolithophores were filtered from the seawater, rinsed with 95% ethanol (95% ethanol and 5% deionized water), and stored in 95% ethanol to prevent organic decay or dissolution. Additional culturing methods are provided in the supplementary materials.

### Chemical pretreatments

Samples were cleaned and prepared for chemical analysis under class 10 laminar flow hoods in a class 10,000 clean room in the Glaciochemistry and Isotope Geochemistry Laboratory at the University of Michigan’s Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences. About 10 µl of the coccolith-ethanol mixture was set aside for SEM examination. Cleaning protocols and chemical pretreatments for isotopic analysis followed the methods of Barker et al.71 and Liu et al.72 Coccolithophore samples were rinsed three times with Super-Q (SQ) water (Millipore, >18.2 MΩ•cm) and then split three ways: 1.0–1.5 mg of dry sample was allocated for total carbon (TC); 0.5–1.0 mg of dry sample was allocated for total organic carbon; and at least 2 mg of dry sample was allocated for carbon, oxygen, boron, and strontium stable isotope analysis. Samples for TC and total organic carbon analysis were treated overnight with 2% HCl to remove calcium carbonate and then were rinsed three times with SQ water. Samples for inorganic elemental and isotopic analysis were treated overnight with 10% H2O2 buffered with NaOH. After centrifugation and decanting of the solution, samples were rinsed with SQ water, 0.001 N HNO3, and SQ water again to prevent recoil of organics or dust onto the samples. About 30–100 µg of clean sample was prepared for inorganic δ13C and δ18O analyses. At least 1 mg of cleaned sample was dissolved into 1.7 N HCl for a target [B] of ca. 750 p.p.b.

### Analysis of carbon and oxygen isotopes

TC was analyzed using a Costech ECS 4010 elemental analyzer in the Oceanography and Marine Geology Laboratory at the University of Michigan’s Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences. Samples were weighed and wrapped in tin foil capsules for combustion. An acetanilide standard was used to calibrate carbon detection with respect to sample weight. Reproducibility in weight percent was 70.83 ± 1.08% (1σ, n = 6).

Total organic carbon content and δ13C were analyzed at University of Michigan’s Stable Isotope Laboratory on a Costech ECS 4010 elemental analyzer coupled to the inlet of a Finnigan Delta V Plus mass spectrometer operating in continuous flow mode. About 200–600 µg of organic coccolithophore sample was weighed in tin foil capsules. An acetanilide standard was used to calibrate organic carbon weight percent, and additional IAEA 600 caffeine and IAEA-CJ-6 sucrose standards were used to calibrate the organic δ13C analyses. The acetanilide standard measured 71.26% with a reproducibility of 0.95% (n = 11). The organic δ13C for the acetanilide, IAEA 600 caffeine and IAEA-CJ-6 sucrose standards were measured as −33.75 ± 0.07‰, −27.77 ± 0.06‰, and −10.45 ± 0.05‰, respectively.

The δ13C and δ18O of coccolith calcite were analyzed with a Finnigan MAT Kiel IV carbonate preparation device coupled directly to the inlet of a Finnigan MAT 253 triple collector isotope ratio mass spectrometer in the Stable Isotope Laboratory at University of Michigan’s Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences. The precisions of measurements were monitored with NBS 19 limestone standard (δ13C = 1.96 ± 0.07‰ and δ18O = −2.24 ± 0.07‰; 1σ, n = 10). The δ18O of culture seawater was analyzed with a Picarro L2120-i Cavity Ringdown Spectrometer equipped with the A0211 high-precision vaporizer, autosampler, and ChemCorrect software at the University of Michigan Water Isotopes Lab. No water samples were preserved onsite for stable carbon analysis. The δ13CDIC values used for ∆13CPOC and ∆13CPIC were based on measurements of seawater solutions that were formulated similarly to those used in the culture experiment. The δ13CDIC of seawater bubbled with compressed ambient air was −5.90‰ (450 µatm at 30 °C) and −6.67‰ (540 µatm at 20 °C). The δ13CDIC of seawater bubbled with mixtures of compressed ambient air and compressed CO2 was −13.83‰ (750 µatm at 30 °C) and −15.69‰ (830 µatm at 20 °C). The δ13CDIC of the compressed CO2 gas was calculated from the above results using mass balance equations, and resulted in an average δ13CDIC of −29.09‰ for the compressed CO2 gas. The average δ13CDIC of the 20 and 30 °C seawaters bubbled with compressed ambient air (−6.29‰) and the average δ13CDIC of compressed CO2 gas (−29.09‰) were then calibrated to 25 °C and the pH of each treatment following the method described in Zeebe and Wolf-Gladrow56. The seawater δ13CDIC values used in this study were calculated as −28.98‰, −6.29‰, and −14.42‰ for water treated with mixture of compressed CO2 and compressed CO2-free air (low-pCO2 condition), compressed ambient air (present-day pCO2 condition), and mixture of compressed CO2 and compressed ambient air (high-pCO2 condition). Although this approach to estimating seawater δ13CDIC may yield results that deviate slightly from direct measurements of seawater δ13CDIC, it should not materially alter the trends in the carbon isotopic data, nor their interpretation. The seawater δ18O values were calibrated to VSMOW/VSLAP using three internal laboratory standards, with analytical precision (1σ) better than 0.1‰. To calculate ∆18OPIC (∆18OPIC = δ18OPIC − δ18Osw), seawater δ18O was converted to VPDB scale with the relationship: δ18OVPDB = 0.97001 × δ18OVSMOW − 29.99 (‰)73,74.

All coccolith δ13C and δ18O results are reported relative to the VPDB standard:

$${\mathrm{\delta }}^{13}{\mathrm{C}} = \left[ {\frac{{\left( {\,^{13}{\mathrm{C}}{/}^{12}{\mathrm{C}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{sample}}}}}{{\left( {\,^{13}{\mathrm{C}}{/}^{12}{\mathrm{C}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{VPDB}}}}} - 1} \right] \times 1000\left( {{ \textperthousand }} \right)$$
(1)
$${\mathrm{\delta }}^{18}{\mathrm{O}} = \left[ {\frac{{\left( {\,^{18}{\mathrm{O}}{/}^{16}{\mathrm{O}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{sample}}}}}{{\left( {\,^{18}{\mathrm{O}}{/}^{16}{\mathrm{O}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{VPDB}}}}} - 1} \right] \times 1000({{ \textperthousand }})$$
(2)

### PIC/POC

Measurements and calculations of PIC and POC were made using standard procedures (e.g., refs.75,76). Coccolithophore samples from each treatment were dehydrated and weighed to determine their TPM weight. The particulate inorganic matter (PIM), i.e., CaCO3, in each sample was dissolved by addition of 2% HCl. Each sample was then re-weighed after removing the PIM, yielding the particulate organic matter (POM) weight. TC (%) of the non-acidified samples and POC (%) of the acidified samples were measured with a Costech Elemental Analyzer attached to an IRMS (the latter was used for carbon isotope measurements described in the carbon isotope methods section). Carbon-loss measurements were verified with acetanilide (C = 71.26 wt%) and atropine standards (C = 70.83 wt%). Each TC weight was calculated by multiplying TC (wt%) by the TPM weight, and POC weight was calculated by multiplying the (wt%) carbon in POM by the POM weight. PIC weight was then calculated as the difference between TC weight and POC weight. POC (wt%) and PIC (wt%) were then calculated by, respectively, dividing the POC and PIC weights by the TPM weight. The PIC/POC ratio was calculated by dividing PIC (wt%) by POC (wt%). Three of the calculated PICs (wt%) were eliminated due to weak signal-to-noise ratios of their TC (wt%) measurements.

### Boron isotopes

The boron isotopic composition of both culture solution and coccolith samples were measured following the method of Liu et al.72 Briefly, samples were dissolved in 1.7 N HCl to achieve a [B] = ca. 750 p.p.b. The microsublimation technique was used to separate boron from its matrix, which exploits boron’s high volatility compared to other elements and organic compounds. About 50 μl of dissolved sample solution was loaded onto the cap of a conical bottom Savillex® 5 ml vial. The vial was then closed and placed up-side down on a 65–70 °C patented extraction plate77 for 12 h. Boron isotopic analyses were conducted using a Thermo Fisher Triton PLUS multicollector thermal ionization mass spectrometer operating in negative ion mode for boron isotope analysis in the Glaciochemistry and Isotope Geochemistry Lab (GIGL) at the University of Michigan’s Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences. Purified sample solution, 1 μl, was loaded onto an outgassed refilament after loading 1 μl of boron-free seawater. Boron analyses were conducted using the total evaporation method78. Boron isotopic composition in seawater and coccolith samples were reported as δ11B, where

$${\mathrm{\delta }}^{11}B = \left[ {\frac{{\left( {\,^{11}{\mathrm{B}}/^{10}{\mathrm{B}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{sample}}}}}{{\left( {\,^{11}{\mathrm{B}}/^{10}{\mathrm{B}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{SRM}}\;951{\mathrm{a}}}}} - 1} \right] \times 1000( \textperthousand )$$
(3)

with 11B/10B for the boric acid standard SRM 951a is 4.0345 ± 0.0084‰ (2σ, n = 24). The reproducibility (2σ) of δ11B in seawater and carbonate samples were 1.13 and 1.83‰, respectively79. A δ11B-pH transfer equation was used to calculate coccolith vesicle pH:

$${\mathrm{pH}} = {{pK}}_{\mathrm{b}} - {\mathrm{log}}\left( {\frac{{{\mathrm{\delta }}^{11}{\mathrm{B}}_{{\mathrm{sw}}} - {\mathrm{\delta }}^{11}{\mathrm{B}}_{{\mathrm{carbonate}}}}}{{\alpha {\mathrm{\delta }}^{11}{\mathrm{B}}_{{\mathrm{carbonate}}} - {\mathrm{\delta }}^{11}{\mathrm{B}}_{{\mathrm{sw}}} + 1000\left( {\alpha - 1} \right)}}} \right),$$
(4)

where pKb and α are the boron equilibrium constant and boron fractionation factor, respectively. The pKb of each sample was calculated from average temperature and salinity of each replicate tank following the equation described by the US Department of Energy80, using an α of 1.027243. Temperature, salinity, and total seawater boron δ11B of each replicate tank were used to calculate calcifying vesicle pH in the different treatments.

The reproducibility of δ11B in carbonate samples is about 1.8‰, which can be converted to about 0.18 pH unit. Although this means that the δ11B analyses cannot resolve pH variations within 0.18 units, it is sufficient to detect the potential change in coccolith δ11B if coccolith δ11B was simply responding to the prescribed 0.3 unit difference in seawater pH across the experimental treatments.

### Scanning electron microscopy

SEM images of coccolithophores from different treatments were obtained with a Hitachi S3200N Scanning Electron Microscope at the University of Michigan’s Electron Microbeam Analysis Laboratory and a Phenom G2 pro Scanning Electron Microscope at Roscoff Marine Station. For images obtained at the University of Michigan, dry coccolith pellets were mounted with carbon tape and coated with gold for at least 120 s to prevent static charging of their surface. A 15 kV beam was applied to the samples with an 8 mm working distance. For images obtained at Roscoff Marine Station, samples were filtered on a membrane, which was then cut and mounted on the sample holder with carbon tape and imaged with a 10 kV beam. SEM images were obtained with a resolution better than 1024 × 800.

### Radiogenic and stable Sr isotopes

Analyses of radiogenic and stable Sr isotopic followed the procedure described in Liu et al.79 Briefly, the residuals of coccolith samples after boron microsublimation were re-dissolved in 7 N nitric acid. A 87Sr–84Sr double spike (spike:sample ratio = 1:1) was used to determine the stable strontium isotope composition of the culture medium and coccoliths. Sr was separated from other matrices by passing both unspiked and spiked samples through a 50–100 μm Sr-spec resin (Eichrom). About 100–200 ng and 200–250 ng of Sr in unspiked and spiked sample, respectively, were loaded on outgassed Re-single filament for Sr isotope analyses conducted on Thermo Fisher Triton PLUS multicollector thermal ionization mass spectrometer at the Glaciochemistry and Isotope Geochemistry Lab (GIGL) at the Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan. To determine the Sr isotopic ratios and achieve within-run precision better than 10 p.p.m. (2 SE), a total of 400 cycles of data were collected for each measurement. The reproducibility of Sr isotopic standard SRM987 is 0.710246 ± 13 (2σ, n = 42). For direct comparisons to literature, all 87Sr/86Sr data reported in this study were normalized to SRM987 = 0.710250. The stable Sr data were reported as δ88/86Sr, defined as:

$${\mathrm{\delta }}^{88/86}{\mathrm{Sr}} = \left[ {\frac{{\left( {{1}^{88}{\mathrm{Sr}}{/}^{86}{\mathrm{Sr}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{sample}}}}}{{\left( {{1}{88}{\mathrm{Sr}}{/}^{86}{\mathrm{Sr}}} \right)_{{\mathrm{SRM}}\;987}}} - 1} \right] \times 1000({{11111}})$$
(5)

The reproducibility of δ88/86Sr values in the seawater standard IAPSO is 0.365 ± 73‰ (2σ, n = 4) and in the inter-laboratory carbonate standard JCp-1 is 0.195 ± 21‰ (2σ, n = 4).

### Data availability

All results of the culture experiment and isotopic analyses are presented in the manuscript and Supplementary Table 1. The data is also available upon request from the corresponding authors.

## References

1. 1.

Bednarsek, N. et al. Extensive dissolution of live pteropods in the Southern Ocean. Nat. Geosci. 5, 881–885 (2012).

2. 2.

Talmage, S. C. & Gobler, C. J. Effects of past, present, and future ocean carbon dioxide concentrations on the growth and survival of larval shellfish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17246–17251 (2010).

3. 3.

Anthony, K. R. N., Kline, D. I., Diaz-Pulido, G., Dove, S. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Ocean acidification causes bleaching and productivity loss in coral reef builders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17442–17446 (2008).

4. 4.

Ries, J. B., Cohen, A. L. & McCorkle, D. C. Marine calcifiers exhibit mixed responses to CO2-induced ocean acidification. Geology 37, 1131–1134 (2009).

5. 5.

Iglesias-Rodriguez, M. D. et al. Phytoplankton calcification in a high-CO2 world. Science 320, 336–340 (2008).

6. 6.

Casareto, B. E., Niraula, M. P., Fujimura, H. & Suzuki, Y. Effects of carbon dioxide on the coccolithophorid Pleurochrysis carterae in incubation experiments. Aquat. Biol. 7, 59–70 (2009).

7. 7.

Fitzer, S. C., Phoenix, V. R., Cusack, M. & Kamenos, N. A. Ocean acidification impacts mussel control on biomineralisation. Sci. Rep. 4, 6218 (2014).

8. 8.

Castillo, K. D., Ries, J. B., Bruno, J. F. & Westfield, I. T. The reef-building coral Siderastrea siderea exhibits parabolic responses to ocean acidification and warming. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 281, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1856 (2014).

9. 9.

Langer, G., Nehrke, G., Probert, I., Ly, J. & Ziveri, P. Strain-specific responses of Emiliania huxleyi to changing seawater carbonate chemistry. Biogeosciences 6, 2637–2646 (2009).

10. 10.

Rickaby, R. E. M., Henderiks, J. & Young, J. N. Perturbing phytoplankton: response and isotopic fractionation with changing carbonate chemistry in two coccolithophore species. Clim. Past 6, 771–785 (2010).

11. 11.

Fiorini, S., Middelburg, J. J. & Gattuso, J.-P. Testing the effects of elevated pCO2 on coccolithophores (Prymnesiophyceae): comparison between haploid and diploid life stages. J. Phycol. 47, 1281–1291 (2011).

12. 12.

Trotter, J. et al. Quantifying the pH ‘vital effect’ in the temperate zooxanthellate coral Cladocora caespitosa: validation of the boron seawater pH proxy. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 303, 163–173 (2011).

13. 13.

Allison, N., Cohen, I., Finch, A. A., Erez, J. & Tudhope, A. W. Corals concentrate dissolved inorganic carbon to facilitate calcification. Nat. Commun. 5, 5741 (2014).

14. 14.

Ries, J. B. A physicochemical framework for interpreting the biological calcification response to CO2-induced ocean acidification. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 75, 4053–4064 (2011).

15. 15.

Allison, N. & Finch, A. A. δ11B, Sr, Mg and B in a modern Porites coral: the relationship between calcification site pH and skeletal chemistry. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 1790–1800 (2010).

16. 16.

Balestra, B., Ziveri, P., Monechi, S. & Simon, T. Coccolithophorids from the Southeast Greenland Margin (Northern North Atlantic): production, ecology and the surface sediment record. Micropaleontology 50, 23–34 (2004).

17. 17.

Winter, A., Jordan, R. W. & Roth, P. H. in Coccolithophores (eds Amos, W. & William G. S.) 161–177 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994).

18. 18.

Moheimani, N. R., Webb, J. P. & Borowitzka, M. A. Bioremediation and other potential applications of coccolithophorid algae: a review. Algal Res. 1, 120–133 (2012).

19. 19.

Westbroek, P., Young, J. R. & Linschooten, K. Coccolith production (biomineralization) in the marine alga Emiliania huxleyi. J. Protozool. 36, 368–373 (1989).

20. 20.

Bolton, C. T. et al. Decrease in coccolithophore calcification and CO2 since the middle Miocene. Nat. Commun. 7, 10284 (2016).

21. 21.

Riebesell, U. et al. Reduced calcification of marine plankton in response to increased atmospheric CO2. Nature 407, 364–367 (2000).

22. 22.

Aloisi, G. Covariation of metabolic rates and cell size in coccolithophores. Biogeosciences 12, 4665–4692 (2015).

23. 23.

Anning, T., Nimer, N., Merrett, M. J. & Brownlee, C. Costs and benefits of calcification in coccolithophorids. J. Mar. Syst. 9, 45–56 (1996).

24. 24.

Hemming, N. G. & Hanson, G. N. Boron isotopic composition and concentration in modern marine carbonates. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 56, 537–543 (1992).

25. 25.

Rollion-Bard, C., Chaussidon, M. & France-Lanord, C. Biological control of internal pH in scleractinian corals: implications on paleo-pH and paleo-temperature reconstructions. C. R. Geosci. 343, 397–405 (2011).

26. 26.

Krief, S. et al. Physiological and isotopic responses of scleractinian corals to ocean acidification. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 74, 4988–5001 (2010).

27. 27.

Henehan, M. J. Ground-truthing the Boron-based Proxies. PhD thesis, University of Southampton (2015).

28. 28.

Suffrian, K., Schulz, K. G., Gutowska, M. A., Riebesell, U. & Bleich, M. Cellular pH measurements in Emiliania huxleyi reveal pronounced membrane proton permeability. New Phytol. 190, 595–608 (2011).

29. 29.

Fresnel, J. & Probert, I. The ultrastructure and life cycle of the coastal coccolithophorid Ochrosphaera neapolitana (Prymnesiophyceae). Eur. J. Phycol. 40, 105–122 (2005).

30. 30.

Inouye, I. (ed.) in Biological System of Mangroves: A report of east Indonesian mangrove expedition 35–43 (Japan, 1988).

31. 31.

Young, J. et al. A Guide to Extant Coccolithophore Taxonomy (International Nannoplankton Association, Germany, 2003).

32. 32.

Young, J. R., Davis, S. A., Bown, P. R. & Mann, S. Coccolith ultrastructure and biomineralisation. J. Struct. Biol. 126, 195–215 (1999).

33. 33.

Marsh, M. E. Regulation of CaCO3 formation in coccolithophores. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B 136, 743–754 (2003).

34. 34.

Stanley, S. M., Ries, J. B. & Hardie, L. A. Seawater chemistry, coccolithophore population growth, and the origin of cretaceous chalk. Geology 33, 593–596 (2005).

35. 35.

Huertas, I. E., Bhatti, S. & Colman, B. Inorganic carbon acquisition in two species of marine prymnesiophytes. Eur. J. Phycol. 38, 181–189 (2003).

36. 36.

Yu, J., Thornalley, D. J. R., Rae, J. W. B. & McCave, N. I. Calibration and application of B/Ca, Cd/Ca, and δ11B in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (sinistral) to constrain CO2 uptake in the subpolar North Atlantic during the last deglaciation. Paleoceanography 28, 237–252 (2013).

37. 37.

Foster, G. L. & Rae, J. W. B. Reconstructing ocean pH with boron isotopes in Foraminifera. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 44, 207–237 (2016).

38. 38.

Tanaka, M. & Fujiwara, T. Physiological roles and transport mechanisms of boron: perspectives from plants. Pflüg. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 456, 671–677 (2008).

39. 39.

Dordas, C. & Brown, P. H. Permeability of boric acid across lipid bilayers and factors affecting it. J. Membr. Biol. 175, 95–105 (2000).

40. 40.

Stoll, H., Langer, G., Shimizu, N. & Kanamaru, K. B/Ca in coccoliths and relationship to calcification vesicle pH and dissolved inorganic carbon concentrations. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 80, 143–157 (2012).

41. 41.

Cornwall, C. E., Comeau, S. & McCulloch, M. T. Coralline algae elevate pH at the site of calcification under ocean acidification. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 4245–4256 (2017).

42. 42.

Sutton, J. N. et al. δ11B as monitor of calcification site pH in divergent marine calcifying organisms. Biogeosciences 15, 1447–1467 (2018).

43. 43.

Klochko, K., Kaufman, A. J., Yao, W., Byrne, R. H. & Tossell, J. A. Experimental measurement of boron isotope fractionation in seawater. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 248, 276–285 (2006).

44. 44.

Henehan, M. J. et al. Calibration of the boron isotope proxy in the planktonic Foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber for use in palaeo-CO2 reconstruction. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 364, 111–122 (2013).

45. 45.

Allemand, D. et al. Biomineralisation in reef-building corals: from molecular mechanisms to environmental control. C. R. Palevol 3, 453–467 (2004).

46. 46.

Hermoso, M. et al. An explanation for the 18O excess in Noelaerhabdaceae coccolith calcite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 189, 132–142 (2016).

47. 47.

Ziveri, P., Thoms, S., Probert, I., Geisen, M. & Langer, G. A universal carbonate ion effect on stable oxygen isotope ratios in unicellular planktonic calcifying organisms. Biogeosciences 9, 1025–1032 (2012).

48. 48.

Hermoso, M. Control of ambient pH on growth and stable isotopes in phytoplanktonic calcifying algae. Paleoceanography 30, 2015PA002844 (2015).

49. 49.

Hermoso, M., Chan, I. Z. X., McClelland, H. L. O., Heureux, A. M. C. & Rickaby, R. E. M. Vanishing coccolith vital effects with alleviated carbon limitation. Biogeosciences 13, 301–312 (2016).

50. 50.

Moolna, A. & Rickaby, R. E. M. Interaction of the coccolithophore Gephyrocapsa oceanica with its carbon environment: response to a recreated high‐CO2 geological past. Geobiology 10, 72–81 (2012).

51. 51.

Rost, B., Zondervan, I. & Riebesell, U. Light-dependent carbon isotope fractionation in the coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 120–128 (2002).

52. 52.

McClelland, H. L. O., Bruggeman, J., Hermoso, M. & Rickaby, R. E. M. The origin of carbon isotope vital effects in coccolith calcite. Nat. Commun. 8, 14511 (2017).

53. 53.

Hermoso, M., Candelier, Y., Browning, T. J. & Minoletti, F. Environmental control of the isotopic composition of subfossil coccolith calcite: are laboratory culture data transferable to the natural environment? GeoResJ 7, 35–42 (2015).

54. 54.

Kottmeier, D., Rokitta, S., Tortell, P. & Rost, B. Strong shift from HCO3 − to CO2 uptake in Emiliania huxleyi with acidification: new approach unravels acclimation versus short-term pH effects. Photosynth. Res. 121, 265–275 (2014).

55. 55.

Bach, L. T. et al. Dissecting the impact of CO2 and pH on the mechanisms of photosynthesis and calcification in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi. New Phytol. 199, 121–134 (2013).

56. 56.

Zeebe, R. E. & Wolf-Gladrow, D. A. CO 2 in Seawater: Equilibrium, Kinetics, Isotopes. Vol. 65 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001).

57. 57.

Zeebe, R. E. An expression for the overall oxygen isotope fractionation between the sum of dissolved inorganic carbon and water oxygen isotopes. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 8, G3 (2007).

58. 58.

Spero, H. J., Bijma, J., Lea, D. W. & Bemis, B. E. Effect of seawater carbonate concentration on foraminiferal carbon and oxygen isotopes. Nature 390, 497–500 (1997).

59. 59.

Tripati, A. K. et al. Beyond temperature: clumped isotope signatures in dissolved inorganic carbon species and the influence of solution chemistry on carbonate mineral composition. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 166, 344–371 (2015).

60. 60.

Ries, J. B. Review: geological and experimental evidence for secular variation in seawater Mg/Ca (calcite-aragonite seas) and its effects on marine biological calcification. Biogeosciences 7, 2795–2849 (2010).

61. 61.

Stevenson, E. I. et al. Controls on stable strontium isotope fractionation in coccolithophores with implications for the marine Sr cycle. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 128, 225–235 (2014).

62. 62.

Langer, G. et al. Species-specific responses of calcifying algae to changing seawater carbonate chemistry responses of calcifying algae. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7, Q09006 (2006).

63. 63.

Atkinson, M. Elemental composition of commercial seasalts. J. Aquariculture Aquat. Sci. 8, 39 (1999).

64. 64.

Guillard, R. R. L. & Ryther, J. H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 8, 229–239 (1962).

65. 65.

Krug, S. A., Schulz, K. G. & Riebesell, U. Effects of changes in carbonate chemistry speciation on Coccolithus braarudii: a discussion of coccolithophorid sensitivities. Biogeosciences 8, 771–777 (2011).

66. 66.

Zondervan, I., Rost, B. & Riebesell, U. Effect of CO2 concentration on the PIC/POC ratio in the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi grown under light-limiting conditions and different daylengths. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 272, 55–70 (2002).

67. 67.

Guillard, R. R. L. in Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals: Proc. — 1st Conference on Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals Greenport (eds Walter, L. S. & Matoira, H. C.) 29–60 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1975).

68. 68.

Program developed for CO2 system calculations. ORNL/CDIAC-105 (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, 1998).

69. 69.

Roy, R. N. et al. The dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at salinities 5 to 45 and temperatures 0 to 45 °C. Mar. Chem. 44, 249–267 (1993).

70. 70.

Mucci, A. The solubility of calcite and aragonite in seawater at various salinities, temperatures, and one atmosphere total pressure. Am. J. Sci. 283, 780–799 (1983).

71. 71.

Barker, S., Greaves, M. & Elderfield, H. A study of cleaning procedures used for foraminiferal Mg/Ca paleothermometry. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 4, 8407 (2003).

72. 72.

Liu, Y.-W., Aciego, S. M., Wanamaker, A. D. & Sell, B. K. A high-throughput system for boron microsublimation and isotope analysis by total evaporation thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 27, 1705–1714 (2013).

73. 73.

Brand, W. A., Coplen, T. B., Vogl, J., Rosner, M. & Prohaska, T. Assessment of international reference materials for isotope-ratio analysis (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl. Chem. 86, 425 (2014).

74. 74.

Coplen, T. B. et al. Compilation of minimum and maximum isotope ratios of selected elements in naturally occurring terrestrial materials and reagents. Report No. 01-4222 (Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations, 2002).

75. 75.

Gerecht, A. C., Šupraha, L., Edvardsen, B., Probert, I. & Henderiks, J. High temperature decreases the PIC/POC ratio and increases phosphorus requirements in Coccolithus pelagicus (Haptophyta). Biogeosciences 11, 3531–3545 (2014).

76. 76.

Hendy, I. L., Napier, T. J. & Schimmelmann, A. From extreme rainfall to drought: 250 years of annually resolved sediment deposition in Santa Barbara Basin, California. Quat. Int. 387, 3–12 (2015).

77. 77.

Aciego, S. M. & Sell, B. K. Devices for separating boron from carbonate. US patent no. US9556036 B2 (2017).

78. 78.

Foster, G. L., Ni, Y., Haley, B. & Elliott, T. Accurate and precise isotopic measurement of sub-nanogram sized samples of foraminiferal hosted boron by total evaporation NTIMS. Chem. Geol. 230, 161–174 (2006).

79. 79.

Liu, Y.-W., Aciego, S. M. & Wanamaker, A. D. Jr. Environmental controls on the boron and strontium isotopic composition of aragonite shell material of cultured Arctica islandica. Biogeosciences 12, 3351–3368 (2015).

80. 80.

DOE. Handbook of Methods for the Analysis of the Various Parameters of the Carbon Dioxide System in Sea Water. Version 2. ORNL/CDIAC-74 (Carbon Dioxide Information and Analysis Center, Oak Ridge, 1994).

## Acknowledgements

We thank J. Sutton and A. Tripati for making helpful edits to the manuscript and I. Westfield for analyzing the carbonate chemistry of the experimental seawater treatments. We also thank I. Probert for assisting with SEM imaging at Roscoff Marine Station. This project was funded by a Packard Fellowship to S.M.A. and National Science Foundation grants OCE-1437166 to R.A.E., and OCE-1437371 and OCE-1357665 to J.B.R. R.A.E. is also funded by LabEx International Research Chair that is co-funded by the “Laboratoire d’Excellence” LabexMER (ANR-10-LABX-19) and a grant from the French government under the programme “Investissements d’Avenir.”

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

R.A.E. and J.B.R. conceived the original study. R.A.E., S.M.A., Y.-W.L., R.E.G. and J.B.R. designed the research. R.E.G. and J.B.R. performed the culture experiment. Y.-W.L. performed the isotope, PIC/POC and SEM analyses, analyzed the data and drafted the original manuscript with inputs from S.M.A., R.A.E. and J.B.R. All authors contributed to revising the manuscript.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yi-Wei Liu or Robert A. Eagle.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Liu, YW., Eagle, R.A., Aciego, S.M. et al. A coastal coccolithophore maintains pH homeostasis and switches carbon sources in response to ocean acidification. Nat Commun 9, 2857 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04463-7

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### An isotope label method for empirical detection of carbonic anhydrase in the calcification pathway of the coccolithophore Emiliania huxleyi

• Hongrui Zhang
• , Sonia Blanco-Ameijeiras
• , Brian M. Hopkinson
• , Stefano M. Bernasconi
• , Luz Maria Mejia
• , Chuanlian Liu
•  & Heather Stoll

Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta (2021)

• ### Coccolithophore calcification: Changing paradigms in changing oceans

• Colin Brownlee
• , Gerald Langer
•  & Glen L. Wheeler

Acta Biomaterialia (2021)

• ### Ocean acidification as a multiple driver: how interactions between changing seawater carbonate parameters affect marine life

• Catriona L. Hurd
• , John Beardall
• , Steeve Comeau
• , Christopher E. Cornwall
• , Jonathan N Havenhand
• , Philip L. Munday
• , Laura M. Parker
• , John A. Raven
•  & Christina M. McGraw

Marine and Freshwater Research (2020)

• ### Regulation of calcification site pH is a polyphyletic but not always governing response to ocean acidification

• Yi-Wei Liu
• , Jill N. Sutton
• , Justin B. Ries
•  & Robert A. Eagle

• ### Oxygen isotope composition of waters recorded in carbonates in strong clumped and oxygen isotopic disequilibrium

• Caroline Thaler
• , Amandine Katz
• , Magali Bonifacie
• , Bénédicte Ménez

Biogeosciences (2020)