NOTCH signaling is required for the arterial specification and formation of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and lympho-myeloid progenitors in the embryonic aorta-gonad-mesonephros region and extraembryonic vasculature from a distinct lineage of vascular endothelial cells with hemogenic potential. However, the role of NOTCH signaling in hemogenic endothelium (HE) specification from human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) has not been studied. Here, using a chemically defined hPSC differentiation system combined with the use of DLL1-Fc and DAPT to manipulate NOTCH, we discover that NOTCH activation in hPSC-derived immature HE progenitors leads to formation of CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+Runx1 + 23-GFP+ arterial-type HE, which requires NOTCH signaling to undergo endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition and produce definitive lympho-myeloid and erythroid cells. These findings demonstrate that NOTCH-mediated arterialization of HE is an essential prerequisite for establishing definitive lympho-myeloid program and suggest that exploring molecular pathways that lead to arterial specification may aid in vitro approaches to enhance definitive hematopoiesis from hPSCs.


Generating autologous hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that can be precisely genetically modified with designer endonucleases, and subsequently clonally selected, represents a promising approach for patient-specific gene therapies. Although multiple studies were able to generate hematopoietic progenitors (HPs) with a HSC phenotype and limited engraftment potential from pluripotent stem cells (PSCs)1,2,3, the robust and consistent engraftment with recapitulation of the full spectrum of terminally differentiated hematopoietic cells, including lymphoid cells, has not been achieved. Thus, identifying key cellular and molecular programs required for proper HSC specification in vitro is essential to overcome the current roadblocks.

During in vivo development, HSCs emerge by budding from hemogenic endothelium (HE) lining arterial vessels, primarily from the ventral wall of the dorsal aorta4,5. NOTCH signaling is essential for arterial specification and generation of HSCs6,7. Notch1−/−, Dll4−/− and Rbpjk−/− mice, which are embryonic lethal, have severe impairment in arterial vasculogenesis, fail to develop the dorsal artery6,8,9, and lack intra-embryonic hematopoiesis. NOTCH signaling is also required for the acquisition of arterial identity in extraembryonic vessels, including the yolk sac vasculature10,11 and the specification of Flk-1+c-Kit+CD31+CD45 hemogenic progenitors within yolk sac12. Notably, definitive HPs with lymphoid potential in the yolk sac, umbilical cord and vitelline vessels only emerge within the arterial vasculature13,14. In contrast, the primitive extraembryonic wave of erythropoiesis and the first wave of definitive yolk sac erythro-myelopoiesis (EMP), which lack lymphoid potential, are not NOTCH-depend or specific to the arterial vessels6,9,13,15. The lack of venous contribution to HSCs along with the shared requirements of Notch, VEGF, and Hedgehog signaling for both arterial fate acquisition and HSC development16,17,18,19 led to the hypothesis that arterial specification could be a critical prerequisite for HSC formation. However, a direct progenitor-progeny link between arterial specification and definitive hematopoiesis has never been demonstrated. Moreover, demonstration in recent studies showing that HE represents a distinct CD73 lineage of endothelial cells20,21 and that hematopoietic specification is initiated at the HE stage22,23,24 raises the question whether NOTCH signaling at arterial sites creates a permissive environment for HSC development following endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition (EHT), or that arterial specification per se is required for HE to become HSCs. Although, recent studies have demonstrated that NOTCH activation induces arterialization of CD73+ non-HE21, and that NOTCH inhibition with DAPT reduces production of CD45+ cells from CD34+CD43CD73 HE progenitors21,25, the effect of NOTCH signaling on HE specification has never been explored. Here, using a chemically defined human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC) differentiation system combined with the use of DLL1-Fc and the small molecule DAPT to manipulate NOTCH signaling following the emergence of the well-defined CD144+CD43CD73 population of HE during EHT, we discover that NOTCH activation leads to the formation of arterial-type CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ HE (AHE) that expresses arterial markers and possesses definitive lympho-myeloid and erythroid potentials. Using a transgenic reporter WA01, human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) in which the Runx1 + 23 enhancer mediates eGFP expression, we find that only DLL4+, and not DLL4, HE cells, demonstrate enhancer activity that is typically found in HE at sites of definitive hematopoiesis in mouse and zebra fish embryos26,27,28. Hematopoiesis from CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ AHE requires stroma and is strictly dependent on NOTCH activation. In contrast, NOTCH modulation has limited effect on EHT from the HE fraction that remains DLL4− following NOTCH activation, indicating that definitive hematopoietic activity segregates to AHE. Together, these studies establish a direct progenitor-progeny link between arterialization of HE and embryonic definitive hematopoiesis and reveal that NOTCH-mediated induction of AHE is an important prerequisite for establishing the definitive hematopoietic program from hPSCs.


DLL1-Fc increases hematopoiesis and NOTCH signaling in HE

In order to determine the direct effect of NOTCH signaling on hematoendothelial differentiation from hPSCs, we utilized a modified version of the serum- and feeder-free differentiation system described previously29, where we identified developmental stage equivalencies to in vivo development that can be identified by cell-surface antigens and functional assays on specific days of differentiation; Day 2–3 APLNR+PDGFRα+ Primitive Mesoderm (D2 or D3 PM), Day 4 KDRhiPDGFRαlow/−CD31− Hematovascular Mesoderm Precursors (D4 HVMP), Day 4 and 5 CD144+CD43CD73 Hemogenic Endothelial Cells (D4 or D5 HE), and Day 8 CD34+CD43+ HPs (D8 HP)20,29. During differentiation, we found that the NOTCH1 receptor is first highly expressed on D4 HE cells while the NOTCH ligand, DLL4, is first expressed on D5 within the CD144+ (VE-Cadherin) population (Fig. 1a), suggesting that NOTCH signaling in hPSC cultures is established at the time of HE formation.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

NOTCH activation increases hematopoiesis from D4 HE. a NOTCH1 receptor expression is first detected on D4 CD144+ cells. DLL4 expression is first detected on D5 CD144+ endothelial cells. b Schematic diagram of experiments. Cells were differentiated for 4 days on collagen IV, D4 CD144+CD43CD73 HE cells were purified using CD31 microbeads and plated in 3 different NOTCH conditions. c Western blot of D4 HE cultured for 24 h (D4 + 1) in presence of DAPT or DLL1-Fc shows a decrease in the activated cleaved form of NOTCH1 in DAPT-treated cells, and an increase in the activated cleaved form of NOTCH1 in cells plated on DLL1-Fc. d qPCR analysis shows decreased HES1 mRNA expression in D4 HE cultured for 12 h (D4 + 0.5) with DAPT, while HES1 mRNA expression is increased in cells plated on DLL1-Fc. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, ***p < 0.01. e Flow cytometry on each day from D4 + 1 to D4 + 4 shows decreased CD43+ HPs in the cultures treated with DAPT, and increased HPs in the cultures plated on DLL1-Fc. Representative contour plots from three independent experiments are shown. f Total numbers of CD43+ HPs and CD144+CD43 endothelial cells in cultures plated on DLL1-Fc. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, ***p < 0.001

Following the establishment of optimal conditions for EHT culture in defined feeder- and serum-free conditions, we isolated D4 HE by magnetic enrichment of CD31+ cells, since at this stage (Fig. 1a), the CD31+ population is entirely CD144+CD43CD73DLL4 20,29 (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Isolated D4 HE cells were cultured either in control conditions, with the small molecule gamma-secretase inhibitor, DAPT, to inhibit NOTCH signaling, or were plated onto the immobilized NOTCH ligand DLL1-Fc to activate NOTCH signaling30,31 (Fig. 1b). As we confirmed by western blot analysis of the active form of NOTCH1, NOTCH:ICD, and qPCR analysis of the downstream NOTCH1 target gene, HES1, by qPCR, these respective conditions efficiently inhibited and activated NOTCH signaling (Fig. 1c, d). Kinetic analysis of CD144 (endothelial marker) and CD43 (hematopoietic marker) from D4 + 1 to D4 + 4 reveals a significant increase in hematopoiesis in the NOTCH activation condition and a significant decrease in hematopoiesis in the NOTCH inhibition condition, compared to control (Fig. 1e). These results were consistent with other hESC and hiPSC lines (Supplementary Fig. 1b). In addition, similar results were obtained when D4 HE cells are cultured in serum-containing medium on wild-type OP9 stromal cells or OP9 cells transduced with human DLL4 (OP9-DLL4; Supplementary Fig. 1c). We also observe a significant increase in the total hematopoietic cell number in the NOTCH activation condition (Fig. 1f, two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc test). The effect of DLL1-Fc on hematopoiesis increased as the concentration of immobilized DLL1-Fc and cell density increased (Supplementary Fig. 1e). In contrast, culture of D4 HE on immobilized JAG1-Fc or OP9-JAG1 minimally affected hematopoiesis as compared to controls (Supplementary Fig. 1d, f), thereby suggesting suboptimal activation of NOTCH signaling by JAG1.

NOTCH activation facilitates EHT in HE

The increase in hematopoiesis due to increased NOTCH signaling can be attributed to three reasons: (1) increased EHT, (2) increased hematopoietic expansion, or (3) increased survival post-EHT. To evaluate these possibilities, we isolated D4 HE cells and cultured them with DAPT for either 1 day during initiation of EHT (from D4 to D4 + 1), or throughout the entire culture (D4 to D4 + 4), followed by kinetic analysis of CD43 and CD144 expression on each day of the culture period (Fig. 2a). Following culture in defined conditions, HE weakly upregulate CD43 expression on D4 + 1, but retain flat endothelial morphology. Round CD43hi cells that have completed EHT appear after D4 + 232. As shown in Fig. 2b, c, HE treated for 24-hours with DAPT from D4 to D4 + 1 weakly express CD43 along with CD144 on D4 + 1, but fail to complete EHT efficiently, as evidenced by a significant drop in CD43hiCD144 cells on D4 + 2 through D4 + 4, although DAPT treatment throughout (D4 to D4 + 4) more profoundly decreased hematopoiesis (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc test).

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Increased NOTCH activation facilitates EHT. a Schematic diagram of experiments. D4 HE cultured in presence of DAPT for 4 days (D4 + 4) or 1 day (D4 + 1), or DMSO (control). CD144+ endothelial and CD43+ blood cells were analyzed following 4 days of culture. b Flow cytometric analysis demonstrates that NOTCH activation facilitates EHT as evidenced by the decrease in hematopoietic activity when DAPT is added only from D4 to D4 + 1. Representative contour plots from three independent experiments are shown. c Frequencies of endothelial and blood cells in HE cultures treated with DAPT or DMSO (control). Results are mean ± s.e.m. for at least three independent experiments; two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. d Single D4 HE cells were FACS-sorted into 96-well plate with OP9, OP9 + DAPT, and OP9-DLL4. Colonies were scored based on CD43 and CD144 expression on D4 + 10 by immunofluorescence and counted by eye. Scale bar represents 100 μm. e Representative flow cytometric cell proliferation analysis and f bar graph conducted with CellTracer shows an increase in the first generation (Gen1) CD43+ cells on D4 + 1 and a proportional decrease in Gen1 CD144+ endothelial cells, suggesting that the increase in blood cells is due to an increase in EHT and not just proliferating HPs. g Line graph depicting the percent of each generation within the CD43+ population on D4 + 4 in each of the NOTCH treatment conditions. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001. No significant change of each generation between conditions suggesting that NOTCH does not affect proliferation of HPs. Generation gates in f, g were determined by concatenating D4 to D4 + 4 results and utilizing FlowJo’s proliferation assay

To further verify that NOTCH activation affects EHT, we also performed a single-cell deposition assay of the D4 HE using the OP9 stromal cells and serum-containing medium that support hematoendothelial development from single cells. Using a DOX-inducible DLL4 OP9 cell line (OP9-iDLL4), we deposited D4 HE onto 96-well plates of three different conditions; OP9-iDLL4 with DAPT without DOX-pretreatment (NOTCH inhibition condition), OP9-iDLL4 with DMSO without DOX-pretreatment (control condition), and OP9-iDLL4 with DMSO with pretreatment of DOX (NOTCH activation condition). We found that D4 HE in the NOTCH inhibition condition had a markedly decreased ratio of hematopoietic/endothelial colonies compared to D4 HE cells in the control condition. In contrast, the D4 HE in the NOTCH activation condition had substantially increased ratio of hematopoietic colonies compared to D4 HE in the NOTCH inhibition condition, and a slight increase compared to D4 HE in the control condition (Fig. 2d). Due to the well-recognized fragility of hPSC-derived HE and survival after single-cell sorting1,21, we found that less than 20% of single cells form endothelial or hematopoietic colonies. Nevertheless, the total number of colonies was consistent across each of the three NOTCH conditions, indicating that the sorting experiments were not affected by differences in cell viability.

We also stained the purified D4 HE before plating with CellTracer to track cell proliferation. When we analyzed the cells in each of the three NOTCH conditions on D4 + 1, we found that there was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of CD144+CD43+ to CD144+CD43 cells within the first generation of cells in the NOTCH activation condition (+DLL-Fc), when compared to the NOTCH inhibition (+DAPT) condition (two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc test). This result, in combination with the absence of a second generation on D4 + 1, suggests that the activation of NOTCH signaling at HE stage potentiate EHT initiation, but not proliferation (Fig. 2e, f). Assessment of cell proliferation on D4 + 4 with CellTracer in cultures treated with DAPT through D4 + 4 revealed no significant shift in distribution of CD43+ cells within each generation (Fig. 2g and Supplementary Fig. 2a), consistent with the lack of NOTCH effect of post-EHT expansion. In addition, analysis of cell cycle in these cultures using EdU, demonstrated no differences in cycling CD43+ cells in the different NOTCH conditions (Supplementary Fig. 2b, c).

To evaluate whether NOTCH signaling affects apoptosis, we performed Annexin V flow cytometric analysis of HE cultured with DAPT, DMSO, or on DLL1-Fc on D4 + 4. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 3a, b, none of the conditions affected apoptosis of blood cells post-transition, suggesting that the difference in hematopoiesis from HE following manipulation of NOTCH signaling is not attributed to the NOTCH effect on cell survival.

Together, these results suggest that NOTCH activation at the HE stage facilitates EHT, but has minimal effect on expansion or survival of blood cells at the post-EHT stage.

NOTCH activation increases definitive hematopoiesis from HE

Next, we determine whether NOTCH has an effect on HPs emerging through EHT. Although NOTCH1 expression decreases among the CD144+ endothelial population from D4 + 1 to D4 + 4, CD144CD43+ blood cells increase and maintain expression of NOTCH1 post-transition from D4 + 2 to D4 + 4, notably among the CD34+ subpopulation (Supplementary Fig. 4a,b), thereby indicating that emerging blood cells are equipped to respond to NOTCH signaling. To determine how NOTCH affects post-EHT hematopoietic differentiation, we collected cells from D4 + 4 HE cultures from the 3 different NOTCH conditions (DAPT, DMSO, or DLL1-Fc) and plated them in methylcellulose to measure their colony forming potential. The total number of colonies was significantly lower in the DAPT-treated NOTCH inhibition condition, while there was no significant change in the total number of colonies between the control condition and the NOTCH activation condition. Critically, however, there was a statistically significant increase in multipotent GEMM-CFCs and GM-CFCs, as well as in E-CFCs among the HP cells from the HE cultured in NOTCH activation condition compared to control (Fig. 3a, two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc test). These results suggest that NOTCH activation maintains multilineage potential of emerging HPs.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

NOTCH activation at HE stage increases definitive hematopoiesis. a D4 HE were cultured with DAPT or in the presence of DLL1-Fc (see Fig. 1b schematic diagram). Cells were collected after 4 days of differentiation (D4 + 4) and used to determine frequencies of hematopoietic progenitors in CFU assay. Increase in multipotential GEMM and GM colonies in the DLL1-Fc culture condition suggests that NOTCH activation supports expansion of the most immature HPs. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, ***p < 0.001 b Flow cytometric analysis of Runx1 + 23-eGFP transgene expression in D4 HEPs cultured with DAPT or on DLL1-Fc. Runx1 + 23 enhancer activity increases in the cultures plated on DLL1-Fc and decreases in the DAPT-treated cultures. Representative contour plots from three independent experiments are shown. c T-cell potential of HP collected after 4 days of culture D4 HEs in presence of DAPT or DLL1-Fc. Bars show mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. d Ratio of α/ζ, β/γ, and β/ε globin chain expression in erythroid cultures generated from D4 HE in presence of DAPT or DLL1-Fc. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, ***p < 0.001

Next, we determined whether increased NOTCH activation increases definitive-type hematopoiesis. Previously, the Runx1 + 23 enhancer was found to be active in all HPs, including yolk sac. HE found in regions where definitive hematopoiesis emerges have also been found to activate Runx1 + 23, including the para-aortic splanchnopleura, AGM region, vitelline, and umbilical arteries26,27,28,33,34. We generated a hESC reporter line with Runx1 + 23 enhancer driving eGFP expression knocked into the AAVS1 locus (Supplementary Fig. 5a, b). We differentiated the Runx1 + 23 cell line, purified the D4 HE cells, and plated them in each of the 3 NOTCH conditions. Critically, there was significantly higher eGFP expression from D4 + 1 to D4 + 4 that emerge from the CD144+ population in the NOTCH activation condition compared to the control. In contrast, cells treated with DAPT (NOTCH inhibition) had less eGFP expression compared to the control (Fig. 3b).

T-cell potential is another hallmark of definitive hematopoiesis35. Comparative analysis of T-cell potential of the D4 + 4 CD43+ cells from DAPT, DLL1-Fc, and control conditions revealed that HPs from the NOTCH inhibition condition had no T-cell potential, while HPs from the NOTCH activation condition had significantly increased T-cell potential compared to HPs from the control condition (Fig. 3c, one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test). In a separate assay, we collected floating HPs on D4 + 4 and continued culture in a modified erythrocyte expansion condition36. After 10 days, we collected the cells and isolated mRNA to analyze their globin expression. We found that erythrocytes generated from HPs from the NOTCH activation condition have significantly increased ratios of adult-type β-globin expression to embryonic ε-globin and fetal γ-globin expression, and the ratio of adult-type α-globin expression to embryonic ζ-globin expression, when compared to the erythrocytes generated from HPs from both the NOTCH inhibition condition and the control condition (Fig. 3d, one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test). Overall, these findings suggest that NOTCH signaling is required for definitive hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell specification.

NOTCH activation induces DLL4+ HE with arterial identity

Previously, we identified CD73 expression to demark the loss of hemogenic potential within the D5 CD144+ endothelial population20. As we demonstrated above, D4 HE cells lacked the expression of the arterial marker, DLL4. However, when we analyze CD73 and DLL4 expression within the D4 + 1 and D4 + 2 CD144+ populations in each of the three NOTCH conditions, we found a significant increase in a unique transient population of CD73DLL4+ endothelial cells in the NOTCH activation condition, and a delayed upregulation of CD73 expression on DLL4+ endothelial cells compared to the NOTCH inhibition and control conditions (Fig. 4a, b, two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test). In addition, when we analyze the CD144+ population of the Runx1 + 23 cell line on D4 + 1, we found that all eGFP+ cells are within the CD144+CD73DLL4+ population (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 5c). Since DLL4 is expressed by HE underlying intra-aortic hematopoietic clusters in the AGM37, our results suggest that the DLL4+ population may resemble arterial-type definitive HE found in arterial vasculature. To corroborate this hypothesis, we evaluated the expression of arterial, venous, and definitive hematopoietic markers by real-time qPCR analysis of sorted D4 CD144+CD43CD73HE that are DLL4 by default (D4 HE) and D5 CD144+ endothelial subpopulations CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ (D5 HE:DLL4+), CD144+CD43CD73DLL4 (D5 HE:DLL4), and CD144+CD43CD73+DLL4 (D5 nonHE:DLL4), (Fig. 4d). This analysis reveals that the D5 HE:DLL4+ and nonHE:DLL4+ populations have increased expression of NOTCH1, DLL4, EFNB2, HEY2, SOX17, and CXCR4 genes associated with arterial endothelium, and decreased expression of NR2F2 associated with venous endothelium, when compared to D5 DLL4HE and nonHE populations. In contrast, D5 HE:DLL4 demonstrated an increased expression of NR2F2 venous marker. Importantly, genes associated with definitive hematopoiesis, MYB and GATA2, were expressed significantly higher in the D5 HE:DLL4+ population compared to the D5 HE:DLL4 population and D5 nonHE:DLL4+ populations (Fig. 4e, one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test). We also revealed that emerging D4 HE cells that are lacking DLL4 expression were different from D5 HE:DLL4 and D5 HE:DLL4+ cells. D4 HE did not express significant levels of arterial and venous markers, but retained expression of HAND1, which is expressed in extraembryonic and lateral plate mesoderm38, suggesting that D4 HE may represent immature HE cells.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

NOTCH activation induces formation of arterial-type HE cells. a Flow cytometric analysis of DLL4 and CD73 expression following culture of D4 HE for 1 or 2 days in the presence of DAPT or DLL1-Fc. NOTCH activation on D4 HE specifically increases the CD144+CD73DLL4+ population. b Frequencies of DLL4+ cells in hemogenic (CD73) and non-hemogenic fractions of endothelium following 1 and 2 days of culture of D4 HE in the presence of DAPT or DLL1-Fc. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. c Flow cytometric analysis of Runx1 + 23 enhancer activity following 1 day of culture of D4 HE in presence of DAPT or DLL1-Fc. Runx1 + 23 enhancer activity is limited to the CD144+CD73DLL4+ population. Representative contour plots from two independent experiments are shown. d Schematic diagram of FACS isolation of endothelial subpopulations formed on D5 of differentiation. e qPCR analysis of arterial (NOTCH1, DLL4, EFNB2, HEY2, SOX17, CXCR4), venous (NR2F2), hematopoietic (MYB, GATA2), and mesodermal (HAND1) genes in D4 HE and D5 endothelial subpopulations. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments; one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Definitive HPs emerge from arterial-type HE

To determine the hematopoietic potential of endothelium with arterial identity, we continued differentiation of hPSCs to D5, and then sorted the D5 CD144+CD43CD73DLL4 (HE:DLL4) and D5 CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ (HE:DLL4+) endothelial subpopulations (Fig. 5a). Although we did not detect any CD43+ blood cells from D5 HE:DLL4+ on D5 + 4 in serum- and feeder-free conditions with or without DLL1-Fc, these cells did produce blood when plated on OP9-DLL4 (Fig. 5b). In contrast, D5 HE:DLL4 cells undergo EHT and develop HPs on D5 + 4 on both OP9 and OP9-DLL4. However, unlike previously, when we used D4 HE cells before they bifurcate into D5 HE:DLL4+ and D5 HE:DLL4, there was no significant difference in blood production between the D5 HE:DLL4 cells plated on OP9 vs. OP9-DLL4 (Fig. 5b, c, two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test). The results were consistent across different iPSC lines as well (Supplementary Fig. 6). In addition, DAPT treatment from D5 to D5 + 2, D5 + 2 to D5 + 4, and from D5 to D5 + 4 significantly inhibited hematopoietic activity of the HE:DLL4+ population, while DAPT treatment of HE:DLL4 cultures had no effect on hematopoietic activity (Fig. 5d, two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test), suggesting that hematopoiesis from D5 HE:DLL4+, in contrast to D5 HE:DLL4, is NOTCH dependent.

Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Arterial-type HE undergoes EHT under high NOTCH activation and produce definitive-type HPs. a Schematic diagram of subsequent experiments. D5 CD144+CD43CD73 were sorted based on DLL4 expression (D5 HE:DLL4+/−) using FACS and cultured on either OP9 or OP9-DLL4 for 4 days (D5 + 4). b, c Flow cytometric analysis of CD43+ hematopoietic and CD144+ endothelial cells following culture of D5 HE:DLL4+ and D5 HE:DLL4 on either OP9 or OP9-DLL4. Bars in c are mean ± s.e.m. for at least three independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, *p < 0.05. d The effect of NOTCH inhibition with DAPT on blood production from D5 DLL4+ and DLL4 HE. No significant differences were found when HE:DLL4 cells were treated with DAPT. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments. Two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, ***p < 0.001. e CFC potential of hematopoietic cells generated from D5 DLL4+ and DLL4 HE following 5 days culture on OP9-DLL4. Results are mean ± s.e.m. for at least three independent experiments; two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. CFC-GEMMs are significantly increased in DLL4+ cultures on OP9-DLL4. f Ratio of α/ζ, β/γ, and β/ε globin chain expression in erythroid cultures generated form hematopoietic cells collected from D5 DLL4+ and DLL4 HE cultured on OP9-DLL4 (D5 + 4 cells). Results are mean ± s.e.m. for three independent experiments. one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. g Limiting dilution assay to determine the frequency of T-cell progenitors within the D5 + 5 HPs generated from HE:DLL4 on OP9, HE:DLL4 on OP9-DLL4, and HE:DLL4+ on OP9-DLL4

Next, we determined whether the HPs from each of the D5 HE subsets have differential definitive hematopoietic potential. When the HPs from the D5 HE subpopulations were plated in colony forming medium, the HPs that emerged from the HE:DLL4+ subpopulation cultured on OP9-DLL4 had increased colony forming cells, particularly of GEMM-CFCs compared to the HPs from D5 HE:DLL4 on OP9 and OP9-DLL4 (Fig. 5e, two-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test).

When we collected the floating HPs derived from D5 HE:DLL4 on OP9 and OP9-DLL4, and HPs derived from D5 HE:DLL4+ on OP9-DLL4, and continued to grow them in the aforementioned erythrocyte expansion and maturation culture36, we found that erythrocytes generated from HPs derived from the D5 HE:DLL4+ on OP9-DLL4 have significantly increased ratios of β-globin expression to ε-globin and γ-globin expression, and an increased ratio of α-globin expression to ζ-globin expression, when compared to the erythrocytes generated from HPs derived from D5 HE:DLL4 on OP9 and OP9-DLL4 (Fig. 5f, one-way ANOVA Bonferroni post-hoc test).

We also conducted a limiting dilution assay (LDA) for lymphoid potential, and found that 1 in 14 HPs derived from D5 HE:DLL4+ on OP9-DLL4 have T-cell potential, while 1 in 44 HPs derived from D5 HE:DLL4 on OP9-DLL4 have lymphoid potential. Crucially, HPs derived from D5 HE:DLL4 on OP9 and D5 HE:DLL4 on OP9 with DAPT had only 1 in 10,706 and 1 in 10,895 had T-cell potential, respectively (Fig. 5g), thereby suggesting that D5 HE:DLL4+ phenotype enriches for HE that can produce HPs with T lymphoid potential.

In order to determine whether there are any molecular differences between HPs derived from HE:DLL4+ and HE:DLL4 cells, we performed RNA-seq analysis of CD235a/CD41aCD34+CD43+CD45+ cells generated from these two different hemogenic endothelial cells following tertiary culture on either OP9 or OP9-DLL4 (Fig. 6a). As a basis for the analysis, genes that were differentially expressed in a three-way Bayesian model involving HPs from HE:DLL4 on OP9 (condition 1), HE:DLL4 on OP9-DLL4 (condition 2), and HE:DLL4+ on OP9-DLL4 (condition 3) were used with focus specifically on genes upregulated in HE:DLL4+ vs. HE:DLL4-derived HPs obtained from OP9-DLL4 cocultures. Among 131 differentially expressed genes in this category (Supplementary Dataset 1), we identified two cell-surface markers of HSCs in AGM, ACE, and TEK, and the following nine transcription factors: MECOM, GFI1B, and ERG, essential for AGM and fetal liver hematopoiesis; ARID5B, BCOR, and KDM6B, control lymphoid development39,40,41; ZNF93, highly expressed in T-cells42; and RUNX1T1 and HOXB8, regulate expansion of blood progenitors43,44 (Fig. 6b). Using the known transcription-target relationships obtained by combining largely complementary data from HTRIdb45 and CellNet46, 163 regulatory interactions involving 110 transcription factors upstream of the nine differentially expressed transcription factor-encoding genes were pulled to construct a regulatory network in HPs derived from HE:DLL4+ cells on OP9-DLL4 (Fig. 6c). The database-derived structure of the network has been confirmed by our RNA-Seq data: transcription factors that are active according to our regulon analysis (red nodes) are apparently responsible for the upregulation of mRNA level of the target genes (large nodes). Three out of nine target genes (MECOM, RUNX1T1, and GFI1B) have also an evidence of their protein-level activity (reddish color on the graph) detected as enrichment of their known targets among the differentially expressed genes. Importantly, GATA2, SOX17, SOX18, MYB, PBX1, PRDM14, DACH1, KLF4, HOXA5, HOXA7, and NOTCH1 were identified as upstream regulators of these genes, thereby suggesting that the molecular program in HPs derived from the arterial-type HE:DLL4+ is driven by transcriptional regulators implicated in arterial development and definitive hematopoiesis.

Fig. 6
Fig. 6

HPs derived from DLL4+ HE cells activate definitive hematopoietic program. a Experimental strategy for generating and characterizing HE:DLL4+/− -derived HPs. D4 HE cells where cultured on DLL1-Fc for 24 h, followed by purification of D4 + 1 HE:DLL4+ and HE:DLL4 and subsequent culture on OP9 or OP9-DLL4. Five days later (D4 + 1 + 5), CD34+CD43+CD45+CD235a/41a population was FACSorted from each condition and RNA was extracted for RNA-seq. b A heatmap of differentially expressed transcription factor genes in HPs derived from indicated cell populations. The expression is shown as a log ratio of gene expression relative to HPs generated from HE:DLL4 cells on OP9-DLL4. c Transcriptional regulatory network reconstructed with the nine transcription factor-encoding genes (the nodes with incoming interactions) differentially expressed in HPs derived from HE:DLL4+. Size of the nodes represents relative abundance of mRNA of the respective gene, computed as log2(fold change) in DLL4+ vs. DLL4(see circle size scale below). Statistically insignificant changes in mRNA abundance (examples: GATA1, GATA2) were set to zero. Upregulation effects are mapped onto the node size as indicated. The color density represents enrichment of known targets of that transcription factor (regulon members) among the differentially expressed genes (see −log10(FDR) color scale below). Network visualization was performed using Cytoscape ver. 3.4.074. d Schematic diagram of NOTCH regulation on HE specification and EHT. The most immature hPSC-derived CD144+CD43CD73 HE cells expressing NOTCH1 but lacking arterial and venous identity arise on day 4 of differentiation. NOTCH activation induces specification of immature HE into DLL4+ arterial-type HE, first detectable on day 5 of differentiation. Hematopoiesis from arterial-type HE:DLL4+ is NOTCH dependent and produces definitive hematopoietic progenitors. Day 4 HE cells that are not DLL4+ by day 5 of differentiation undergo EHT independent of NOTCH activation and produce NOTCH-independent hematopoietic progenitors with primitive potential

To further verify the link between arterialization and definitive hematopoiesis, we assessed whether lymphoid development was affected by arterial gene SOX17, which is indispensable for acquisition and maintenance of arterial identity in the embryo47. For this purpose, we transfected hESC differentiation cultures with SOX17 siRNA at initiation of HE formation to achieve up to 50% reduction of SOX17 mRNA expression 48 h after treatment (Supplementary Fig. 7a). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 7b, c, siRNA-mediated SOX17 knockdown markedly reduced percentages and absolute numbers of T-cells produced from hESC-derived HPs, thereby providing direct evidence that arterial gene SOX17 is required for establishing definitive hematopoiesis.

RNAseq analysis of NOTCH ligands, receptors, and their downstream targets in D5 DLL4+ and DLL4− HE, and HPs obtained from these populations, revealed D5 DLL4+ AHE express greater levels of NOTCH1, NOTCH4, DLL4, and JAG2 as compared to DLL4− HE. However, expression of NOTCH-associated molecules and SOX17 was substantially lower in HPs, including HPs generated from DLL4+ AHE on OP9-DLL4, suggesting a downregulation of NOTCH signaling and arterial program following EHT (Supplementary Fig. 8). These findings are consistent with observations in the mouse system which demonstrated that downregulation of NOTCH1 and SOX17 is essential for EHT48. The exact mechanism of NOTCH downregulation at EHT stage remains unknown. Although NOTCH receptors are activated by cell-surface ligands in neighboring cells (trans-activation of NOTCH), NOTCH ligands expressed by the same cell typically inactivate NOTCH signaling (cis-inhibition of NOTCH)49. Although the response to trans-Delta is graded, cis-Delta response is abrupt and occurs at fixed threshold50. Thus, it is likely that in response to trans-DLL4 signaling from OP9-DLL4, AHE upregulates DLL4 expression to the threshold level required for cis-inhibition of NOTCH signaling in its own NOTCH1-expressing AHE cells, thereby allowing for EHT to proceed. This interpretation is consistent with studies in the mouse system, which have demonstrated that expression of NOTCH ligands, including DLL1 and DLL4, in the AGM vascular niche with co-expression of DLL4 and NOTCH1 on emerging hematopoietic cells is critical for HE to undergo EHT and subsequent HSC amplification through limiting NOTCH1 receptor activation by cis-inhibition30,51. However, despite downregulation of SOX17 and NOTCH1 expression following transition from DLL4+ HE, we observed an enrichment of their known target genes (regulon members) in linCD34+CD45+ progenitors at post-EHT stage in OP9-DLL4 cultures (Fig. 6c). These finding suggest that following EHT, the expression of arterial genes decreases, but downstream program activated by these genes in the presence of NOTCH ligands remains active.

Together, these results imply that arterial-type CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ HE represents the precursor of definitive NOTCH-dependent hematopoiesis with broad lympho-myeloid and definitive erythroid potential, while the CD144+CD43CD73DLL4− phenotype is associated with emerging immature HE endothelium (D4) or HE that has primitive NOTCH-independent hematopoietic potential (D5).


In the current study, we revealed that NOTCH signaling is essential for specification of definitive lympho-myeloid hematopoiesis by eliciting arterial specification of HE from hPSCs. We demonstrated that NOTCH activation promotes formation of transient CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ HE population with high expression of arterial genes and active Runx1 + 23 enhancer that mark arterial-type HE in AGM, umbilical, and vitelline arteries26,27,33,34,37. Although CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ AHE have lower hemogenic capacity compared to DLL4 HE, the hematopoietic potential of AHE is strictly NOTCH dependent. AHE is specified from CD144+CD43CD73DLL4 immature HE cells emerging on D4 of differentiation in a NOTCH-dependent manner following acquisition of an arterial CD144+CD43CD73DLL4+ phenotype, while CD144+CD43CD73DLL4 HE cells that failed to undergo arterial specification on day 5 of differentiation retained mostly primitive hematopoietic potential and were minimally affected by NOTCH activation (Fig. 6d). Demonstrating that definitive hematopoietic potential is highly enriched in arterial-type HE is in concordance with in vivo studies that established the restriction of lymphoid cell and HSC formation to the arterial vasculature in the yolk sac and embryo proper5,13,14, enrichment of HSC precursors in DLL4+ HE in AGM region51, and selective impairment of AGM hematopoiesis in Efnb2−/− mice52. Notably, DLL4+ HE produced blood cells only on OP9-DLL4, but failed to undergo EHT in DLL1-Fc cultures in defined serum- and stroma-free conditions, suggesting that AHE, in contrast to non-AHE, requires some additional signaling factor, either soluble factors in serum, matrix proteins or a paracrine signaling between the OP9-DLL4 and AHE, that are necessary for EHT, but have yet to be determined.

Previous studies have found that NOTCH pathways are active during hematopoietic differentiation of mouse and hPSCs. The transient NOTCH activation increased the generation of CD45+ HPs25,53,54 and NOTCH inhibition with DAPT decreased the percentage of CD45+ cells in cultures of hPSC-derived CD34+CD73CD43 progenitors21. NOTCH activation in hPSC cultures is predominantly mediated through the NOTCH ligand, DLL4, expressed by endothelial cells25. However, since prior studies demonstrated that NOTCH signaling also contributes to expansion of embryonic and fetal HSPCs30,31 and affects HSPC survival55, it remains unclear whether DAPT treatment effects observed in prior PSC studies could be attributed to the NOTCH effect on EHT, post-EHT expansion or HP survival. It is also unknown, whether NOTCH signaling affects HE specification. In the present study, we provided evidence that NOTCH has several effects on hematopoiesis from HE. First, we demonstrated that NOTCH signaling is important for the specification of arterial-type HE cells with definitive hematopoietic program. In addition, NOTCH activation also potentiates the EHT from these cells, while having little effect on expansion and survival of blood cells at post-EHT stage.

Overall, our studies indicate that regulation of NOTCH signaling would be important to mimic the arterial HE, definitive lympho-myeloid hematopoiesis and HSC specification in hPSC culture. Nevertheless, we failed to achieve engraftment from NOTCH-activated cultures in our pilot studies. As previous studies have shown, the timing56 and strength57 of NOTCH signaling is tightly regulated during EHT and post-EHT. In mouse embryo, NOTCH signaling is especially critical for pre-HSC type I (VE-Cad+CD45CD41+CD43+) development and their transition into pre-HSC type II (Ve-Cad+CD45+CD41+CD43+) in the AGM, however later stages of HSC development are less dependent on NOTCH58. Thus, NOTCH signaling may need to be fine-tuned in hPSC cultures to establish long-term engrafting HSCs. It is also likely that acquisition of arterial features by HE is a necessary but not a sufficient prerequisite for HSC formation from hPSCs. In yolk sac, arterial vessels in contrast to venous vessels and capillaries produce lymphoid cells13, yet arterial specification at extraembryonic sites is not associated with establishing HSC program. Several signaling pathways, including those uncoupled from aortic specification such as HOXA1,59,60, TGFβ61, retinoic acid59,62, inflammation63,64, hormone65,66, and blood-flow-induced shear stress67,68, have all been shown to serve roles during HSC development and may be affected in in vitro generated cells. The investigation of the cross-talk among all of these different signaling pathways and manipulating them together is probably necessary to recapitulate embryonic definitive hematopoietic development and generate HSCs with robust and sustainable multilineage engraftment potential de novo.


hPSC maintenance and differentiation

hPSCs, H1 and H9 hESC lines, DF19-9-7T fibroblast-hiPSC line, IISH2i-BM9 bone marrow-iPSC line, and IISH3i-CB6 cord blood-iPSC line (all from WiCell) were maintained and passaged in chemically defined conditions using vitronectin and E8 media and tested every 6 months for mycoplasma contamination. The hPSCs were differentiated into hematoendothelial lineages using a chemically defined conditions29. On Day −1, hPSCs were singularized and plated on collagen IV-coated plates (0.5 μg/cm2) at a cell density of 7500 cells/cm2 in E8 media supplemented with 10 uM Rock inhibitor (Y-27632, Cayman Chemicals). On Day 0, the media was changed to IF9S media supplemented with BMP4, FGF2 (50 ng ml−1), Activin A (15 ng ml−1, Peprotech), LiCl (2 mM, Sigma), and ROCK inhibitor (0.5 μM, Cayman Chemicals) and cultured in hypoxia (5% O2, 5% CO2). On day 2, the media was changed to IF9S media supplemented with FGF2, VEGF (50 ng ml−1, Peprotech), and 2.5 μM TGFβ inhibitor (SB-431542, Cayman Chemicals). On day 4, cell cultures were singularized and stained with anti-CD31 microbeads (Miltenyi) for 15 min. The cells were washed and HE were purified using CD31 antibody and MACS LS columns (Miltenyi). Purified CD31+ HE were then plated at a density of 20,000 to 30,000 cells/cm2 on collagen IV-coated plates (1 μg/cm2) that were either co-coated with IgG-Fc fragments or human DLL1-Fc (made in-house), in IF9S media supplemented with FGF2, VEGF, EGF, IGF-I, IGF-II, TPO, IL-6 (50 ng ml−1), SCF (20 ng ml−1), IL-3, FLT3L (10 ng ml−1, Peprotech), and ROCK inhibitor (5 μM, Cayman Chemicals), and where specified, DMSO (1:1000, Fisher Scientific) or DAPT (10 μM, Cayman Chemicals), and cultured in normoxia (20% O2, 5% CO2). In some experiments, HE was cultured on plates co-coated with human JAG1-Fc (R&D Systems). A sample of the purified cells was analyzed by flow cytometry, and experiments were continued only if the purity of the HE was over 95% CD144+. On Day 4 + 1, the media was replaced with fresh media containing the same supplements without ROCK inhibitor. On day 4 + 3, extra media with the same supplements was added to the culture.

OP9 maintenance and co-culture

Mouse OP9 stromal cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Toru Nakano (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan). OP9, OP9-DLL4, and the inducible OP9-iDLL4 (made in-house) cell lines were maintained in αMEM with 20% FBS (GE) on gelatin-coated plates in normoxia. Using TrypLE (Thermo), OP9 were passaged at a 1:8 ratio every 3–4 days when they were 80% confluent. One day before co-culture with differentiated human HE cells, OP9 lines were treated with mitomycin C (1 mg ml−1) for 2 h and then plated at a density of 12,500 cells/cm2. D4 HE cells or D5 CD144+ subsets were plated onto OP9 lines at a density between 1000 and 2000 cells/cm2 in media containing αMEM with 10% FBS (GE), TPO, SCF, IL-6 (50 ng/ml), IL-3, and FLT3L (10 ng/ml). Media was changed after 24 h, and extra media added 2 days later. Experiments conducted with DAPT were treated with 20 μM, while corresponding control conditions had DMSO added at a 1:500 dilution.

Generation of OP9-DLL4, OP9-JAG1, and DOX-inducible OP9-iDLL4

Human DLL4 gene fragment was amplified by PCR from a vector previously used to establish the OP9-DLL4 cell line, and the JAG1 gene was amplified by PCR from cDNA of D5 differentiation cultures that were treated with Sonic Hedgehog from D2–5, which has been found to increase Jag1 expression. The DLL4 and JAG1 gene fragment was subsequently cloned into a pSIN-EF1a-DLL4IRES-Puro and pSIN-EF1a-JAG1-IRES-Puro lentiviral expression vector for the constitutively expressed OP9- DLL4 and JAG1 lines, respectively. Virus production and concentration was carried out by calcium phosphate transfection of Lenti-X 293T-cells (Clonetech, Mountain View, CA). After 12 h, virus-containing medium was replaced with fresh OP9 culture medium. After 3 days, the cells were treated with Puromycin for 2 weeks. For dox-inducible OP9-DLL4, the DLL4 gene fragment was subsequently cloned into a pPB-TRE-DLL4P2A-Venus-EF1α-Zeo||EF1a-M2rtTA-T2A-Puro PiggyBac vector made in-house. OP9 cells were then transfected with pPB vector. Three days later the transfected OP9 cells were treated with Puromycin/Zeocin for 2 weeks. Samples of the OP9-iDLL4 cells were treated with doxycycline for 24 h, then DLL4 and Venus expression were confirmed by flow cytometry.

Single-cell deposition assay for EHT

One day before single-cell deposition, the OP9-iDLL4 cell line was treated with mitomycin C as described above, and passaged into 96-well plates at a density of 12,500 cells/cm2. OP9-iDLL4 used for the NOTCH activation condition was incubated with doxycycline for 24 h after passaging into 96-well plates. On the day of single-cell sorting, OP9-iDLL4 media was changed to αMEM with 10% FBS (GE), TPO, SCF, IL-6 (50 ng ml−1), IL-3, FLT3L (10 ng ml−1), and DMSO (1:500) for the control, and NOTCH activation conditions, or DAPT (20 μM) for the NOTCH inhibition condition. Day 4 differentiated hPSCs were singularized, stained for CD309-PE and CD144-APC (Miltenyi Biotech), and was single-cell sorted into individual wells of the 96-well plates using a FACS Aria II. To exclude possibility of doublets, we used a low density (less than 1 million cells/ml) cells suspension, sorting speed less than 1000 cellular events/per second and stringent gating on single cells using both FSC-A vs. FSC-H and SSC-A vs. SSC-H. One day after sorting, the media was changed to fresh media without DMSO or DAPT, and extra media was added every 3 days. Seven days later, the plates were fixed and stained for immunofluorescent staining with anti-CD144 (rabbit, eBiosceince) and anti-CD43 (mouse, BD Biosciences) primary antibodies and anti-rabbit AlexaFluor488 and anti-mouse AlexaFluor594 secondary antibodies (Jackson Immunology) in order to score the hematopoietic/endothelial colonies.

CellTracer proliferation assay and cell-cycle analysis

D4 CD31+ HE cells were incubated in PBS with CellTracer (1 μg ml−1, Thermo) for 20 min at 37 °C. After washing, the cells were plated on collagen IV-coated plates with either Fc-IgG or DLL1-Fc and the modified Day 4 media, as described above, at a higher density of 30,000–40,000 cells/cm2 due to toxicity from the CellTracer. Aliquots of the purified cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the purity of the MACS cells and establish the Generation 0 peak for the proliferation assay. Secondary cultures were collected every day after plating for flow cytometry analysis, and calibration beads were used to generate compatible CellTracer results. After D4 + 4, FlowJo Analysis software was used to concatenate the data from each day. The average number of cell divisions was calculated based on the number of cells on each day (Fig. 1f) and applied to the proliferation platform algorithm in Flowjo to determine the specific generation gates. Those peaks were re-applied to individual sets of data to determine the percentage of each generation within the hematoendothelial populations. Apoptosis was detected used annexin V flow cytometry. Fluorescent reagents used for analysis, cell viability, apoptosis, and proliferation are listed in Supplementary Table 1. For cell-cycle analysis, D4 + 4 cells were incubated in culture media with EdU (10 μM, Thermo Fisher) for 2 h and stained with CD43 and CD144 antibodies for 20 min. For EdU detection, the Click-IT EdU Alexa Flour 647 kit (Thermo Fisher) with DAPI (4 μg ml−1, Sigma) was used.

T-Cell differentiation and T-cell LDA

Total D4 + 4 cultures were singularized, strained, and cultured in T-cell differentiation conditions on OP9-DLL4 for 3 weeks29. For D5 + 4 cultures, only the floating hematopoietic cells were collected and cultured in T-cell differentiation conditions. LDAs were conducted with the floating cells collected from D5 + 4 cultures (HE:DLL4 on OP9 + DAPT, OP9 + DMSO, and OP9-DLL4, and HE:DLL4+ on OP9-DLL4). Row A of a 96-well plate received 500 cells/well, and each subsequent row afterwards had half the previous row (Row B contained 250, Row C contained 125… Row H contained 3–4 cells). The wells were scored 2 weeks later by eye and flow-cytometry for CD5+CD7+ containing cells. Positive threshold was set at 167 CD5+CD7+ cells/well. Extreme limiting dilution analysis was conducted using the previously established algorithm69.

Red blood cell differentiation and maturation

In order to assess the definitive erythropoietic potential of HP cells, we adopted our previously describe red blood cell differentiation protocol36 to become chemically defined and feeder- and serum-free. Floating cells were collected, washed, and plated back into their respective cultures for D4 + 5 cells, or plated onto collagen IV-coated plates for D5 + 4 cells, with IF9S supplemented with dexamethasone (10 μM), EPO (2 U ml−1), SCF, FLT3L, TPO, IL-6 (100 ng ml−1), and IL-3 (10 ng ml−1). Extra media with the same supplements was added 2 days later. An additional 2 days later, the cultures were treated with half-media changes every 2 days with IF9S supplemented with dexamethasone (10 μM), SCF (100 ng ml−1), and EPO (2 U ml−1). The floating cells were collected 10 days later to analyze by flow cytometry and RNA isolated for qPCR analysis.

Generating Runx1 + 23 enhancer reporter hESC line

Runx1 + 23 enhancer fragment27 was amplified by PCR and subsequently cloned into the AAVS1-SA-2A-PURO vector (gift from Gadue Lab, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia). Human ESCs were transfected with zinc-finger nuclease vectors and later puromycin-resistant individual cells were clonally expanded and on-targeted clones were selected. Southern Blot (SB) analysis was performed by DIG-labeling hybridization (Roche). Briefly, 10 μg genomic DNA was digested using a EcoRV restriction enzyme for overnight, separated on a 0.7% agarose gel for 6 h, transferred to a nylon membrane (Amersham), and incubated with DIG-labeling probes. The external probe is a DIG-labeled 600 nucleotide fragment that binds to the EcoRV-digested fragment of the 5′ external region. The internal probe is a DIG-labled 700 nucleotide fragment that binds to the EcoRV-digested fragment of the of the eGFP region.

SOX17 knockdown in differentiation cultures using siRNA

hESCs were transfected with 50 nM SOX17 siRNA SMARTpool (Dharmacon, GE) or 50 nM scramble negative control siRNA (Dharmacon) on D3 of differentiation using Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen). To confirm SOX17 knockdown, SOX17 mRNA levels were assessed 48 h after transfection with qPCR. HPs from control and SOX17 siRNA treated cultures were collected on day 8 of differentiation and assessed for T-cell potential as described above.

Hematopoietic colony forming unit assay

Hematopoietic colony forming unit assay was conducted in serum-containing H4436 Methocult (Stem Cell Technologies) according to manufacturer instruction.

Flow cytometry and FACS-sorting

Flow cytometry was conducted using the MACSQuant Analyzer 10 (Miltenyi Biotech). FACS-sorting was conducted on a FACS Aria II (BD). Antibodies used for flow cytometic analysis and cell sorting are listed in Supplementary Table 2.

Western blot

Cell extracts were prepared by adding IP Lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). Cell lysates (10 μg) were separated by 6% SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane, and were stained with Notch1, Notch1-ICD antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), or Actin (Santa Cruz). Immunoblots were visualized using the ECL PLUS detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia). Quantitative analysis of protein expression was performed using Image Lab software version 5.2 (Bio-Rad). Antibody dilutions are presented in Supplementary Table 2. All uncropped western blots can be found in Supplementary Fig. 9.

qPCR analysis

Cells were differentiated for the respective days and sorted on a FACS Aria II. RNA was collected using RNA MiniPrep Plus (Invitrogen) and quantified on a NanoDrop (GE Healthcare). Equal amounts of RNA were used for cDNA synthesis using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Life Technologies). qPCR was conducted using Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix (Life Technologies). The reactions were run on a Mastercycler RealPlex Thermal Cycler (Eppendorf) and the expression levels were calculated by minimal cycle threshold values (Ct) normalized to the reference expression of RPL13a. The qPCR products were run on an agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide to confirm specificity of the primers. Primer sequences can be found in Supplementary Table 3.

RNA-Seq data processing and analysis

Total RNA was isolated from the D4 HE, D5 HE:DLL4+ and HE:DLL4 and CD235a/CD41aCD34+CD45+ derived from HE:DLL4+ and HE:DLL4 cells using the RNeasy mini Plus Kit (Qiagen). RNA purity and integrity was evaluated by capillary electrophoresis on the Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). One hundred nanograms of total RNA was used to prepare sequencing libraries using the TruSeq RNA Sample Preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Final cDNA libraries were quantitated with the Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and multiplexed with eighteen total indexed libraries per lane. Sequencing was performed using the HiSeq 3000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) with a single read of 64 bp and index read of 7 bp.

Base-calling and demultiplexing were completed with the Illumina Genome Analyzer Casava Software, version 1.8.2. Following quality assessment and filtering for adapter molecules and other sequencing artifacts, the remaining sequencing reads were aligned to transcript sequences corresponding to hg19 human genome annotation. Bowtie v 1.1.2 was used, allowing two mismatches in a 25 bp seed, and excluding reads with more than 200 alignments70. RSEM v 1.3.0 was used to estimate isoform or gene relative expression levels in units of 'transcripts per million' (tpm), as well as posterior mean estimate of the 'expected counts' (the non-normalized absolute number of reads assigned by RSEM to each isoform/gene)71. R statistical environment (R core team, 2014) was used at all of the stages of downstream data analysis. The entire set of libraries was pre-normalized as a pool using median normalization routine from EBSeq package72. EBSeq with 10 iterations was applied to call for differential expression. The EBSeq’s default procedure of filtering low-expressed genes was suppressed by setting the QtrmCut parameter to zero. Genes with assigned value of Posterior Probability of Differential Expression above 0.95 were preliminary selected. Subsequently, only genes demonstrating the Critical Coefficent73 value above 1.5 were retained as differentially expressed.

Statistical analysis

Sample sizes were determined by the nature of the experiment and variability of the output, not by a statistical method. The experiments were not randomized and the investigators were not blinded to allocation during experiments and outcome assessment. Statistical analysis was performed in PRISM software. Data obtained from multiple experiments were reported as mean ±standard error. Where appropriate, either a one-way ANOVA or two-way ANOVA were utilized with a Bonferroni post-hoc test. Differences were considered significant when *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, or ***p < 0.001.

Data availability

The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information Files or from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. RNAseq data have been deposited in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under accession codes GSE95028 and GSE96815.



Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Sugimura, R. et al. Haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature 545, 432–438 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Ledran, M. H. et al. Efficient hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells on stromal cells derived from hematopoietic niches. Cell Stem Cell 3, 85–98 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Wang, L. et al. Generation of hematopoietic repopulating cells from human embryonic stem cells independent of ectopic HOXB4 expression. J. Exp. Med. 201, 1603–1614 (2005).

  4. 4.

    Bertrand, J. Y. et al. Haematopoietic stem cells derive directly from aortic endothelium during development. Nature 464, 108–111 (2010).

  5. 5.

    de Bruijn, M. F., Speck, N. A., Peeters, M. C. & Dzierzak, E. Definitive hematopoietic stem cells first develop within the major arterial regions of the mouse embryo. Embo. J. 19, 2465–2474 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Kumano, K. et al. Notch1 but not Notch2 is essential for generating hematopoietic stem cells from endothelial cells. Immunity 18, 699–711 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Burns, C. E., Traver, D., Mayhall, E., Shepard, J. L. & Zon, L. I. Hematopoietic stem cell fate is established by the Notch-Runx pathway. Genes Dev. 19, 2331–2342 (2005).

  8. 8.

    Robert-Moreno, A. et al. Impaired embryonic haematopoiesis yet normal arterial development in the absence of the Notch ligand Jagged1. EMBO J. 27, 1886–1895 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Robert-Moreno, A., Espinosa, L., de la Pompa, J. L. & Bigas, A. RBPjkappa-dependent Notch function regulates Gata2 and is essential for the formation of intra-embryonic hematopoietic cells. Development 132, 1117–1126 (2005).

  10. 10.

    Duarte, A. et al. Dosage-sensitive requirement for mouse Dll4 in artery development. Genes Dev. 18, 2474–2478 (2004).

  11. 11.

    Deng, Y. et al. Endothelial RAF1/ERK activation regulates arterial morphogenesis. Blood 121, 3988–3996 (2013). S3981-3989.

  12. 12.

    Marcelo, K. L. et al. Hemogenic endothelial cell specification requires c-Kit, Notch signaling, and p27-mediated cell-cycle control. Dev. Cell 27, 504–515 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Yzaguirre, A. D. & Speck, N. A. Insights into blood cell formation from hemogenic endothelium in lesser-known anatomic sites. Dev. Dyn. 245, 1011–1028 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Gordon-Keylock, S., Sobiesiak, M., Rybtsov, S., Moore, K. & Medvinsky, A. Mouse extraembryonic arterial vessels harbor precursors capable of maturing into definitive HSCs. Blood 122, 2338–2345 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Hadland, B. K. et al. A requirement for Notch1 distinguishes 2 phases of definitive hematopoiesis during development. Blood 104, 3097–3105 (2004).

  16. 16.

    Lawson, N. D., Vogel, A. M. & Weinstein, B. M. sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor act upstream of the Notch pathway during arterial endothelial differentiation. Dev. Cell 3, 127–136 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Lawson, N. D. et al. Notch signaling is required for arterial-venous differentiation during embryonic vascular development. Development 128, 3675–3683 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Gering, M. & Patient, R. Hedgehog signaling is required for adult blood stem cell formation in zebrafish embryos. Dev. Cell 8, 389–400 (2005).

  19. 19.

    Burns, C. E. et al. A genetic screen in zebrafish defines a hierarchical network of pathways required for hematopoietic stem cell emergence. Blood 113, 5776–5782 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Choi, K.-D. et al. Identification of the hemogenic endothelial progenitor and its direct precursor in human pluripotent stem cell differentiation cultures. Cell Rep. 2, 553–567 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Ditadi, A. et al. Human definitive haemogenic endothelium and arterial vascular endothelium represent distinct lineages. Nat. Cell Biol. 17, 580–591 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Elcheva, I. et al. Direct induction of haematoendothelial programs in human pluripotent stem cells by transcriptional regulators. Nat. Commun. 5, 4372 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Slukvin, I. I. Generating human hematopoietic stem cells in vitro -exploring endothelial to hematopoietic transition as a portal for stemness acquisition. FEBS Lett. 590, 4126–4143 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Guibentif, C. et al. Single-cell analysis identifies distinct stages of human endothelial-to-hematopoietic transition. Cell Rep. 19, 10–19 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Ayllon, V. et al. The Notch ligand DLL4 specifically marks human hematoendothelial progenitors and regulates their hematopoietic fate. Leukemia 29, 1741–1753 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Swiers, G. et al. Early dynamic fate changes in haemogenic endothelium characterized at the single-cell level. Nat. Commun. 4, 2924 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Tamplin, O. J. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell arrival triggers dynamic remodeling of the perivascular niche. Cell 160, 241–252 (2015).

  28. 28.

    Nottingham, W. T. et al. Runx1-mediated hematopoietic stem-cell emergence is controlled by a Gata/Ets/SCL-regulated enhancer. Blood 110, 4188–4197 (2007).

  29. 29.

    Uenishi, G. et al. Tenascin C promotes hematoendothelial development and T lymphoid commitment from human pluripotent stem cells in chemically defined conditions. Stem Cell Rep. 3, 1073–1084 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Hadland, B. K. et al. Endothelium and NOTCH specify and amplify aorta-gonad-mesonephros-derived hematopoietic stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 125, 2032–2045 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Ohishi, K., Varnum-Finney, B. & Bernstein, I. D. Delta-1 enhances marrow and thymus repopulating ability of human CD34(+)CD38(-) cord blood cells. J. Clin. Invest. 110, 1165–1174 (2002).

  32. 32.

    Jung, H. S. et al. A human VE-cadherin-tdTomato and CD43−green fluorescent protein dual reporter cell line for study endothelial to hematopoietic transition. Stem Cell Res. 17, 401–405 (2016).

  33. 33.

    Ng, C. E. et al. A Runx1 intronic enhancer marks hemogenic endothelial cells and hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cells 28, 1869–1881 (2010).

  34. 34.

    Bee, T. et al. The mouse Runx1+ 23 hematopoietic stem cell enhancer confers hematopoietic specificity to both Runx1 promoters. Blood 113, 5121–5124 (2009).

  35. 35.

    Kennedy, M. et al. T lymphocyte potential marks the emergence of definitive hematopoietic progenitors in human pluripotent stem cell differentiation cultures. Cell Rep. 2, 1722–1735 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Dias, J. et al. Generation of red blood cells from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev. 20, 1639–1647 (2011).

  37. 37.

    Richard, C. et al. Endothelio-mesenchymal interaction controls runx1 expression and modulates the notch pathway to initiate aortic hematopoiesis. Dev. Cell. 24, 600–611 (2013).

  38. 38.

    Barnes, R. M., Firulli, B. A., Conway, S. J., Vincentz, J. W. & Firulli, A. B. Analysis of the Hand1 cell lineage reveals novel contributions to cardiovascular, neural crest, extra-embryonic, and lateral mesoderm derivatives. Dev. Dyn. 239, 3086–3097 (2010).

  39. 39.

    Manna, S. et al. Histone H3 Lysine 27 demethylases Jmjd3 and Utx are required for T-cell differentiation. Nat. Commun. 6, 8152 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Lahoud, M. H. et al. Gene targeting of Desrt, a novel ARID class DNA-binding protein, causes growth retardation and abnormal development of reproductive organs. Genome Res. 11, 1327–1334 (2001).

  41. 41.

    Beguelin, W. et al. EZH2 and BCL6 Cooperate to Assemble CBX8-BCOR complex to repress bivalent promoters, mediate germinal center formation and lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell. 30, 197–213 (2016).

  42. 42.

    Bellefroid, E. J. et al. Clustered organization of homologous KRAB zinc-finger genes with enhanced expression in human T lymphoid cells. EMBO J. 12, 1363–1374 (1993).

  43. 43.

    Basecke, J. et al. AML1/ETO promotes the maintenance of early hematopoietic progenitors in NOD/SCID mice but does not abrogate their lineage specific differentiation. Leuk. Lymphoma 46, 265–272 (2005).

  44. 44.

    Redecke, V. et al. Hematopoietic progenitor cell lines with myeloid and lymphoid potential. Nat. Methods 10, 795–803 (2013).

  45. 45.

    Bovolenta, L. A., Acencio, M. L. & Lemke, N. HTRIdb: an open-access database for experimentally verified human transcriptional regulation interactions. BMC Genom. 13, 405 (2012).

  46. 46.

    Cahan, P. et al. CellNet: network biology applied to stem cell engineering. Cell 158, 903–915 (2014).

  47. 47.

    Corada, M. et al. Sox17 is indispensable for acquisition and maintenance of arterial identity. Nat. Commun. 4, 2609 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Lizama, C. O. et al. Repression of arterial genes in hemogenic endothelium is sufficient for haematopoietic fate acquisition. Nat. Commun. 6, 7739 (2015).

  49. 49.

    del Alamo, D., Rouault, H. & Schweisguth, F. Mechanism and significance of cis-inhibition in Notch signalling. Curr. Biol. 21, R40–R47 (2011).

  50. 50.

    Sprinzak, D. et al. Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature 465, 86–90 (2010).

  51. 51.

    Hadland, B. K. et al. A common origin for B-1a and B-2 lymphocytes in clonal pre-hematopoietic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep. 8, 1563–1572 (2017).

  52. 52.

    Chen, I. I. et al. EphrinB2 regulates the emergence of a hemogenic endothelium from the aorta. Sci. Rep. 6, 27195 (2016).

  53. 53.

    Jang, I. H. et al. Notch1 acts via Foxc2 to promote definitive hematopoiesis via effects on hemogenic endothelium. Blood 125, 1418–1426 (2015).

  54. 54.

    Lee, J. B. et al. Notch-HES1 signaling axis controls hemato-endothelial fate decisions of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Blood 122, 1162–1173 (2013).

  55. 55.

    Gerhardt, D. M. et al. The Notch1 transcriptional activation domain is required for development and reveals a novel role for Notch1 signaling in fetal hematopoietic stem cells. Genes Dev. 28, 576–593 (2014).

  56. 56.

    Guiu, J. et al. Hes repressors are essential regulators of hematopoietic stem cell development downstream of Notch signaling. J. Exp. Med. 210, 71–84 (2013).

  57. 57.

    Gama-Norton, L. et al. Notch signal strength controls cell fate in the haemogenic endothelium. Nat. Commun. 6, 8510 (2015).

  58. 58.

    Souilhol, C. et al. Inductive interactions mediated by interplay of asymmetric signalling underlie development of adult haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 10784 (2016).

  59. 59.

    Dou, D. R. et al. Medial HOXA genes demarcate haematopoietic stem cell fate during human development. Nat. Cell. Biol. 18, 595–606 (2016).

  60. 60.

    Ng, E. S. et al. Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to HOXA(+) hemogenic vasculature that resembles the aorta-gonad-mesonephros. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1168–1179 (2016).

  61. 61.

    Monteiro, R. et al. Transforming growth factor beta drives hemogenic endothelium programming and the transition to hematopoietic stem cells. Dev. Cell. 38, 358–370 (2016).

  62. 62.

    Chanda, B., Ditadi, A., Iscove, N. N. & Keller, G. Retinoic acid signaling is essential for embryonic hematopoietic stem cell development. Cell 155, 215–227 (2013).

  63. 63.

    He, Q. et al. Inflammatory signaling regulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell emergence in vertebrates. Blood 125, 1098–1106 (2015).

  64. 64.

    Li, Y. et al. Inflammatory signaling regulates embryonic hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell production. Genes Dev. 28, 2597–2612 (2014).

  65. 65.

    Heo, H. R. et al. Hormonal regulation of hematopoietic stem cells and their niche: a focus on estrogen. Int. J. Stem Cells 8, 18–23 (2015).

  66. 66.

    Kim, H. R. et al. Improved hematopoietic differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells via estrogen receptor signaling pathway. Cell Biosci. 6, 50 (2016).

  67. 67.

    Kim, P. G. et al. Flow-induced protein kinase A-CREB pathway acts via BMP signaling to promote HSC emergence. J. Exp. Med. 212, 633–648 (2015).

  68. 68.

    North, T. E. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell development is dependent on blood flow. Cell 137, 736–748 (2009).

  69. 69.

    Hu, Y. & Smyth, G. K. ELDA: extreme limiting dilution analysis for comparing depleted and enriched populations in stem cell and other assays. J. Immunol. Methods 347, 70–78 (2009).

  70. 70.

    Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10, R25 (2009).

  71. 71.

    Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinforma. 12, 323 (2011).

  72. 72.

    Leng, N. et al. EBSeq: an empirical Bayes hierarchical model for inference in RNA-seq experiments. Bioinformatics 29, 1035–1043 (2013).

  73. 73.

    Moskvin, O. V., McIlwain, S. & Ong, I. M. CAMDA 2014: Making sense of RNA-Seq data: from low-level processing to functional analysis. Syst. Biomed. 2, 31–40 (2014).

  74. 74.

    Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 (2003).

Download references


We thank Dr. Toru Nakano (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) for providing OP9 cells and Dr. Paul Gadue (Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA) for providing AAVS1 targeting construct. This work was supported by funds from the National Institute of Health (R01HL116221, U01HL099773, P51 RR000167, U01HL10001, and UO1 HL100395) and The Charlotte Geyer Foundation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. These authors contributed equally: Gene I. Uenishi, Ho Sun Jung.


  1. Wisconsin National Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, 53715, USA

    • Gene I. Uenishi
    • , Ho Sun Jung
    • , Akhilesh Kumar
    • , Mi Ae Park
    • , Ethan McLeod
    • , Matthew Raymond
    • , Oleg Moskvin
    • , Catherine E. Zimmerman
    • , Derek J. Theisen
    •  & Igor I. Slukvin
  2. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53792, USA

    • Gene I. Uenishi
    •  & Igor I. Slukvin
  3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA

    • Brandon K. Hadland
    •  & Irwin D. Bernstein
  4. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA

    • Brandon K. Hadland
    •  & Irwin D. Bernstein
  5. Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    • Matthew Raymond
  6. Morgridge Institute for Research, Madison, WI, 53715, USA

    • Scott Swanson
    •  & James A. Thomson
  7. Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA

    • Owen J. Tamplin
  8. Stem Cell Program and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

    • Leonard I. Zon
  9. Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, 53707, USA

    • James A. Thomson
    •  & Igor I. Slukvin
  10. Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA

    • James A. Thomson


  1. Search for Gene I. Uenishi in:

  2. Search for Ho Sun Jung in:

  3. Search for Akhilesh Kumar in:

  4. Search for Mi Ae Park in:

  5. Search for Brandon K. Hadland in:

  6. Search for Ethan McLeod in:

  7. Search for Matthew Raymond in:

  8. Search for Oleg Moskvin in:

  9. Search for Catherine E. Zimmerman in:

  10. Search for Derek J. Theisen in:

  11. Search for Scott Swanson in:

  12. Search for Owen J. Tamplin in:

  13. Search for Leonard I. Zon in:

  14. Search for James A. Thomson in:

  15. Search for Irwin D. Bernstein in:

  16. Search for Igor I. Slukvin in:


G.I.U. designed, conducted, and analyzed experiments; interpreted experimental data; made figures; and contributed to the concept and wrote manuscript. H.S.J. designed, conducted, and analyzed experiments; interpreted experimental data; made figures; generated and characterized the Runx1 + 23 WA01 hESC line; and contributed to writing of the paper. A.K. performed lymphoid differentiation assay. M.A.P. generated the inducible OP9-iDLL4 cell line. B.K.H. provided the DLL1-Fc ligand and advised on experimental design. C.E.Z. and D.J.T. generated the OP9-JAG1 cell line and conducted OP9-JAG1 experiments. E.M. and M.R. conducted and analyzed experiments. O.M. and S.S. performed bioinformatics analysis of RNA-seq studies. O.J.T. and L.Z. provided Runx1 + 23 reporter construct and advised on experimental design. J.A.T. directed the RNA-seq studies. I.D.B. provided DLL1-Fc ligand and advised on experimental design. I.I.S. developed the concept, led and supervised the studies, analyzed and interpreted data, and wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor I. Slukvin.

Electronic supplementary material


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.