Despite the great promise of armchair graphene nanoribbons (aGNRs) as high-performance semiconductors, practical band-gap engineering of aGNRs remains an unmet challenge. Given that width and edge structures are the two key factors for modulating band-gaps of aGNRs, a reliable synthetic method that allows control of both factors would be highly desirable. Here we report a simple modular strategy for efficient preparation of N = 6 aGNR, the narrowest member in the N = 3p (p: natural number) aGNR family, and two unsymmetrically edge-functionalized GNRs that contain benzothiadiazole and benzotriazole moieties. The trend of band-gap transitions among these GNRs parallels those in donor–acceptor alternating conjugated polymers. In addition, post-functionalization of the unsymmetrical heterocyclic edge via C–H borylation permits further band-gap tuning. Therefore, this method opens the door for convenient band-gap engineering of aGNRs through modifying the heteroarenes on the edge.
Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) have recently emerged as attractive organic materials for applications in new generations of electronic devices (Fig. 1a)1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Grouped by their edge structures, zigzag, and armchair GNRs are the two types commonly studied. While zigzag GNRs (zGNRs) possesses intrinsically metallic properties5, 6, armchair GNRs (aGNRs) that are <10 nm wide are considered novel organic semiconductors. They not only have non-zero band-gaps due to quantum confinement but also possess much higher theoretical charge carrier mobility (>100 cm2 V−1 s−1) than regular conjugate polymers7, 8. Thus, aGNRs hold exceptional potential for use in electronic devices, e.g., field-effect transistors1. To date, aGNRs have been prepared via either top-down or bottom-up approaches. While the top-down approaches10, using graphene11, carbon nanotubes12, 13, or graphite14 as the starting materials, are straightforward, it is challenging to prepare narrow GNRs (<10 nm) with structural precision and edge functionalities1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. The bottom-up approaches that employ small molecular precursors and polymerization techniques instead have shown great promise for controlling the width and edge structures of GNRs1. For example, a surface-based protocol has been used to prepare atomically precise N = 515, 16, 717, 18, and N = 1318, 19 aGNRs from organic monomers on Au(111) or Ag(111) single crystals; nevertheless, this metal-surface-based strategy requires high-reaction temperatures (>300 °C), which is generally not suitable for preparing GNRs with various functional groups or on a large scale4. Alternatively, the solution-phase bottom-up synthesis of GNRs features high scalability, improved processability, and flexibility for introducing different functional groups20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27. Seminal work by Müllen and co-workers first demonstrated the feasibility of solution-phase synthesis of N = 920 and N = 1821 aGNRs, though the use of complex monomers in these syntheses limits the lengths and practicality of the materials. Recently, we disclosed a triaryl-monomer-based strategy for the synthesis of N = 9 aGNRs with improved molecular weights via an AB-type polymerization28. Concurrently, an elegant approach involving alkyne benzannulation was reported by Chalifoux and co-workers, which provides an innovative path to generate soluble N = 5 aGNRs with high efficiency29. More recently, the Wu group reported the synthesis of oligomeric rylene ribbons with interesting diradical characters30.
Since width (the N-value) and edge structures are two key factors for band-gap engineering of aGNR materials, a flexible method that enables control of both factors would be highly desirable. Here we describe the development of a modular approach for the preparation of the narrower N = 6 aGNRs and their edge conjugately functionalized analogues, namely benzothiadiazole and benzotriazole-derived ribbons, via alternating co-polymerization of a triaryl monomer and a 1,4-diborated aryl monomer (Fig. 1b). As the narrowest member within the N = 3p aGNR family (p: natural number, N = 3 aGNR is a typical conjugated polymer of poly(para-phenylene)), N = 6 aGNR is predicted to exhibit significantly different charge density distribution from the N = 9 one; moreover, neither pristine nor doped N = 6 aGNR materials have been selectively produced via surface or solution-based methods. Hence, first, this work offers a convenient access to these novel nanomaterials. Second, benzothiadiazole31 and benzotriazole moieties32 are commonly used as electron-withdrawing units33 in donor–acceptor conjugate polymers to modulate band structures; however, GNRs derived from these important heteroarenes were previously unknown. Thus, this work demonstrates a distinct way to engineer the band-gap of aGNRs through modifying the heteroarenes on the edge. Third, the strategy developed here has addressed an unmet challenge for preparing GNRs with unsymmetrical edges, which not only leads to new materials with unsymmetrical electron-density distribution but also provides an opportunity for further bandgap tuning via post-functionalizations.
Synthesis of model nanographenes G1–G3
Regarding the synthesis of N = 6 aGNRs (Fig. 1b), when a single-aryl co-monomer (e.g., 1,4-diborated benzene) is used, controlling the orientation of the aryl groups during the cyclodehydrogenation step becomes a key concern as the phenylene moieties can almost rotate freely. Thus, preparation of the corresponding nanographenes was carried out as a model study (Fig. 2). Precursor 1, a defined segment of the polymer precursor for N = 6 aGNRs, was conveniently prepared via Suzuki coupling from commercially available 1,4-phenyldiboronic acid pinacol ester (M1) and the triaryl mono bromide (Supplementary Methods). Due to the free rotation of the axial C–C bonds, either the ribbon-like compound G1 or the bis-diamond-like compound G1′ could potentially be formed. To our delight, slow addition of TfOH into a solution of 1 and DDQ in DCM at 0 °C led to the formation of ribbon G1 in a high yield (Fig. 2a). While similar observation has been made in other simpler systems25, 34, 35, the exact reason for such high regioselectivity remains unclear. It is noteworthy that possible side products, such as OTf-substituted or oxidative aryl–aryl coupling products, were not detected in the crude reaction mixture (Supplementary Fig. 1). In addition, the benzothiadiazole- and benzotriazole-derived analogues (G2 and G3) were efficiently prepared by a similar route (Fig. 2b). All the model nanographenes were unambiguously characterized via 1H/13C NMR, FTIR spectroscopy, MALDI-TOF MS, and X-ray crystallography.
Synthesis of GNR G4–G6
Encouraged by the model study, synthesis of N = 6 aGNR polymer precursors was pursued (Table 1). Using Pd(PtBu3)2/K3PO4 as the catalyst-based combination28, Suzuki polymerizations between bispinacol borate M1, M2, or M3 and triaryl dibromide M4 provided the desired poly(para-phenylenes) P1–P3 in excellent yields and relatively high-molecular weights (entries 1, 3, and 5). Shorter polymers were prepared using a higher concentration of the base and/or a shorter reaction time (entries 2, 4, and 6). These materials were all successfully characterized by SEC and MALDI-TOF MS analysis due to their excellent solubility. The end groups were found to be mainly phenyl groups for P1 and P2, and hydrogens for P3 (Supplementary Fig. 5-7).
To obtain aGNRs with similar lengths, polymer precursors P1–P3 with close molecular weights (prepared from entries 2, 4, and 6, respectively, after Soxhlet extraction) were cyclodehydrogenated using a similar DDQ/TfOH protocol (Fig. 3). (Note that longer polymer precursors can also be cyclodehydrogenated to aGNRs (over 86 nm) via the same protocols.) The N = 6 pristine (G4), benzothiadiazole-derived (G5) and benzotriazole-derived aGNRs (G6) were isolated as black powders after Soxhlet extraction. While they are only marginally soluble in common organic solvents, G4–G6 can be well dispersed in THF, chlorobenzene, and o-dichlorobenzene. Thus, they have been characterized by FTIR/Raman/UV–Vis–NIR spectroscopy, XPS, MALDI-TOF MS, atomic force microscopy (AFM), and scanning tunneling microscopy (STM).
Characterization of GNR G4–G6
FTIR analysis on G4–G6 showed that, compared to their polymer precursors, the weak signals from free rotation of phenyl groups around 4052 cm−1 and a triad of peaks (3082, 3052, 3025 cm−1 for P1; 3083, 3049, 3025 cm−1 for P2; 3083, 3051, 3026 cm−1 for P3) from the aryl C–H stretching vibrations were diminished (Supplementary Fig. 9), indicating successful cyclodehydrogenation. Raman spectroscopy of G4–G6 showed two intense peaks around 1340 and 1600 cm−1, assigned to D and G bands of graphitic materials, respectively (Fig. 4a). Edge-functionalized G5 and G6 exhibited ratios of the D band intensity to G band intensity (ID/IG) that were larger than observed for G4, likely due to their extended edge areas (Supplementary Fig. 10)36. Three second-order bands (2D, D + G and 2 G) were also detected for all aGNRs. The bimodal D band and the significantly broadened 2D band in G4 (as compared with the N = 9 aGNR prepared previously28) suggested stronger aggregation via a π–π stacking interaction, probably owing to the alkyl chains unsymmetrically placed on one side edge (vide infra)37. A weak but sharp peak at 870 cm−1 was observed for G5, which is attributed to the N–S bond vibrations in the benzothiadiazole moiety38, 39.
UV–Vis–NIR spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry were used to measure band-gaps (Egaps) of these nanographenes and GNRs (G1–G6). Nanographenes, G1–G3, only absorbed light in the UV and visible regions showing optical band-gaps of 2.73, 2.11, and 2.46 eV, respectively (Fig. 4b), which is consistent with the electrochemical band-gaps (2.77, 2.12, and 2.74 eV, respectively) measured by the cyclic voltammetry (Supplementary Fig. 14 and Supplementary Table 2). Not surprisingly, a narrower band-gap was observed with benzothiadiazole-derived G2, as benzothiadiazole is known to be a better electron acceptor than benzotriazole33. In contrast, polymeric GNRs G4–G6 exhibit broad absorptions in the UV, visible, and even near IR (NIR) regions with blunt absorption onsets (Fig. 4c). Using the Tauc Method40, the optical band-gap of G4 was determined as 1.21 eV (Supplementary Fig. 12a), which matches reasonably well with the theoretical value (1.11 eV)5. The benzotriazole-derived G6 slightly reduced the band-gap to 1.09 eV, and the benzothiadiazole-derived G5 shows a narrower optical band-gap at 1.03 eV (Supplementary Fig. 12), suggesting that the benzothiadiazole moiety was more effective in narrowing the band-gaps of GNRs. The electrochemical band-gaps of G4–G6 are 1.46, 1.25, and 1.31 eV, respectively (Supplementary Table 2), following the same order as their optical band-gaps. Notably, the trend of band-gap transitions among these GNRs (G4–G6) parallels those in donor–acceptor alternating conjugated polymers (see Supplementary Fig. 13 as an example)31,32,33, which is expected to provide important implications for band-gap engineering of GNRs.
Detailed information on the structure of these GNRs was obtained by AFM. Figure 4d shows an AFM image of G5 deposited on highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG). GNRs self-assembled into small 2D domains consisting of highly ordered stripes. The average periodicity of these stripes is 4.8 ± 0.4 nm (±: the standard deviation, the number of replicates (r) = 27), as shown by a line profile (Fig. 4e) across the domain in the zoom-in AFM image. The interstripe distance is approximately twice the width of G5, indicating the formation of a head-to-head, tail-to-tail sub-structure as depicted in Fig. 4h. Formation of such a dimeric sub-structure is reasonable, as the aliphatic chains are only located on one side of the ribbon. Similarly, G6 forms highly ordered stripes with the average periodicity of 5.5 ± 0.4 nm (r = 33) on HOPG as shown in Fig. 4f, g. The slightly larger average periodicity of G6 is presumably due to the butyl side-chains on the benzotriazole moieties. Note that the AFM images show that aGNRs line up along the same stripe, therefore the apparent length of each stripe can extend to a few hundred nanometers. To estimate the lengths of these aGNRs, we measured the lengths of individual GNRs with distinct ends. The statistical results obtained from AFM images are 34 ± 14 nm (r = 111) for G5 and 48 ± 11 nm (r = 69) for G6, which are slightly higher than the estimated values from M n s of the corresponding polymer precursors (22 nm for G5 and 27 nm for G6, respectively). These values also match with the lengths estimated from the STM images (~26 nm for G4, 26–38 nm G5, 20–47 nm for G6, respectively, Supplementary Fig. 18).
In order to reduce undesired aggregations and increase solubility of the pristine N = 6 aGNR G4, a short polymer precursor (M n = 6.5 kDa, Đ = 1.32) with much bulkier side chains (nonyltetradecyl groups) was employed to prepare aGNR G4′ (Supplementary Fig. 16b) in a similar fashion as G4—the AFM image of the pristine aGNR G4 suggests strong aggregation of the ribbons (Supplementary Fig. 15), which makes it difficult to obtain detailed structural information. Interestingly, Raman spectrum of G4′ contains two additional low-frequency peaks at 300 and 463 cm−1 (Supplementary Fig. 10a), which were not detected in the spectrum of G4. We attribute the strong peak at 463 cm−1 to the radial breathing-like mode (RBLM)41,42,43, in excellent agreement with the theoretically calculated value of 465.7 cm−1 for the pristine N = 6 aGNR41. In addition, compared with G4, G4′ shows a sharper D band and much higher solubility, indicating that pristine aGNR G4′ is less aggregated due to bulkier side chains37. An AFM image of aGNR G4′ on HOPG shown in Supplementary Fig. 16a illustrates a similar structure with striped domains. A line profile across the boundary shows a height of 0.35 nm and an interstripe separation of 5.3 ± 0.3 nm (r = 37) (Supplementary Fig. 16c). The height is in good agreement with the interlayer distance of graphite, indicating the formation of organized monolayers. The periodicity of stripes is about twice as long as the width of G4′ (Supplementary Fig. 16d), suggesting a similar head-to-head, tail-to-tail pattern as G5 and G6.
Unique features about the unsymmetrical heterocyclic edges
To better understand the electronic properties of the edge-functionalized GNRs in comparison with pristine ones, the electron density (ground-state geometries) of model oligomeric G4–G6 were calculated by density functional theory (DFT) using the B3LYP functional and 6–31 G(d) basis set (Fig. 5)44. As expected, the electron-density distribution of the pristine G4-model shares a typical pattern with regular GNRs that exhibit high-electron density along the inner part of the polymer15,16,17,18,19. In contrast, the π-electron density of the G5- and G6-models significantly polarizes the molecules away from the polymer backbone and is largely located on the peripheral edge that contains heteroarenes, which is likely caused by the unsymmetrical edges of the doped ribbons, as well as the strong electron-withdrawing property of the benzothiadiazole and benzotriazole moieties.
One distinct merit of the GNRs with unsymmetrical edges arises from the Lewis basicity of the heteroarenes, which offers a unique way to manipulate the band-gap and energy level of the frontier molecular orbitals of the material. For example, the sp2-hybrized nitrogen in benzothiadiazole is known to direct electrophilic C–H borylation at an adjacent arene45, 46. We envisaged that such an approach could be employed to enable post-functionalization of benzothiadiazole-containing G2 and G5 through additional “boron-doping”, which should consequently reduce the band-gap and LUMO energy of the material. Indeed, C–H borylation of nanographene G2 was successful upon simple treatment with BCl3; subsequently addition of ZnPh2 afforded more stable G2BPh 2 (Fig. 6a), which was fully characterized by 1H/13C NMR, FTIR spectroscopy, X-ray crystallography and MALDI MS (Supplementary Fig. 4c). In contrast, G1, the nanographene without heterocyclic edges, only formed an intermolecular charge transfer complex with BCl3, and this non-covalently bonded complex easily dissociated under vacuo or in the presence of a Lewis base (Supplementary Fig. 19). Similarly, borylation of GNR G5 was conducted with a similar protocol (Fig. 6b). ICP-MS showed that the boron/sulfur (B:S) ratio in the resulting product [G5(BPh 2 ) n ] was 0.38:1.00, indicating that the borylation efficacy was about 38% (B:S = 1:1 when 100%). Unsurprisingly, the Raman spectrum of G5(BPh 2 ) 0.38 exhibited higher ID/IG than G5 (Supplementary Fig. 10), supporting the presence of enlarged edge regions caused by the formation of boracycles36.
UV–vis–NIR analysis on G2BPh 2 shows a significantly red-shifted absorption onset compared to G2, because the electron-deficient boron moiety further enlarged conjugation width and intramolecular charge transfer (Fig. 6c). The optical and electrochemical band-gap of G2BPh 2 was 1.68 eV and 1.81 eV, respectively (Supplementary Table 2). Likewise, G5(BPh 2 ) 0.38 possessed an optical band-gap of 0.95 eV (via the Tauc plot) and an electrochemical band-gap of 0.80 eV, which is narrower than those of G5 (Fig. 6d and Supplementary Fig. 12). This result illustrates that the unsymmetrical edge enables convenient post-functionalization, thereby allowing further band-gap engineering.
In summary, a modular approach to solution-phase synthesis of N = 6 aGNRs has been developed, offering an efficient and practical entry to both pristine and edge-functionalized materials. The strategy holds the advantage of flexibility of choosing monomer components, as well as the simple, predictable and reliable synthetic routes. It is expected that a diverse range of edge-functionalized aGNR analogues would be rapidly prepared using this modular approach, which should ease band-gap engineering of aGNR-type materials. In addition, the unsymmetrical heterocycle edges of these GNRs open the door for additional band-gap engineering via simple post-functionalization, e.g., directed C–H borylation. It can be envisioned that by changing the electronic properties of the aryl groups on the boron, additional fine-tuning of bandgaps would become possible. The work on this topic is underway in our laboratories.
Experimental details and characterization data (1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS, etc.) for all molecules can be found in Supplementary Methods.
Characterization and imaging of nanographenes and graphene nanoribbons
Experimental details for spectroscopic analyses and microscopic tools can be found in Supplementary Methods.
Crystallographic data in this study were deposited at the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre with the accession code (CCDC 1524981 (G1), 1524982 (G2), 1530954 (G3), and 1822453 (G2BPh 2 )). The authors declare that all other data supporting the findings of this study are available from the article and its Supplementary Information files or available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Narita, A., Wang, X.-Y., Feng, X. & Müllen, K. New advances in nanographene chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 6616–6643 (2015).
Müllen, K. Evolution of graphene molecules: structural and functional complexity as driving forces behind nanoscience. ACS Nano 8, 6531–6541 (2014).
Narita, A., Feng, X. & Müllen, K. Bottom-up synthesis of chemically precise graphene nanoribbons. Chem. Rec. 15, 295–309 (2015).
Segawa, Y., Ito, H. & Itami, K. Structurally uniform and atomically precise carbon nanostructures. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 15002 (2016).
Son, Y.-W., Cohen, M. L. & Louis, S. G. Energy gaps in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 216803 (2006).
Raza, H. & Kan, E. C. Armchair graphene nanoribbons: electronic structure and electric field modulation. Phys. Rev. B 77, 245434 (2008).
Obradovic, B. et al. Analysis of graphene nanoribbons as a channel material for field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 142102 (2006).
Wang, J., Zhao, R., Yang, M., Liu, Z. & Liu, Z. Inverse relationship between carrier mobility and bandgap in graphene. J. Chem. Phys. 138, 084701 (2013).
da Cunha, W. F., Acioli, P. H., Neto, P. H. de O., Gargano, R. & e Silva, G. M. Polaron properties in armchair graphene nanoribbons. J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 4893–4900 (2016).
Sun, Z., James, D. K. & Tour, J. M. Graphene chemistry: synthesis and manipulation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2, 2425–2432 (2011).
Chen, Z., Lin, Y.-M., Rooks, M. J. & Avouris, P. Graphene nano-ribbon electronics. Phys. E 40, 228–232 (2007).
Kosynkin, D. V. et al. Longitudinal unzipping of carbon nanotubes to form graphene nanoribbons. Nature 458, 872–876 (2009).
Jiao, L., Zhang, L., Wang, X., Diankov, G. & Dai, H. Narrow graphene nanoribbons from carbon nanotubes. Nature 458, 877–880 (2009).
Li, X., Wang, X., Zhang, L., Lee, S. & Dai, H. Chemically derived, ultrasmooth graphene nanoribbons semiconductors. Science 319, 1229–1232 (2008).
Kimouche, A. et al. Ultra-narrow metallic armchair graphene nanoribbons. Nat. Commun. 6, 10177 (2015).
Zhang, H. et al. On-surface synthesis of rylene-type graphene nanoribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4022–4025 (2015).
Cai, J. et al. Atomically precise bottom-up fabrication of graphene nanoribbons. Nature 466, 470–473 (2010).
Chen, Y.-C. et al. Molecular bandgap engineering of bottom-up synthesized graphene nanoribbons heterojunctions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 156–160 (2015).
Chen, Y.-C. et al. Tuning the band gap of graphene nanoribbons synthesized from molecular precursors. ACS Nano 7, 6123–6128 (2013).
Yang, X. et al. Two-dimensional graphene nanoribbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 4216–4217 (2008).
Gemayel, M. E. et al. Graphene nanoribbon blends with P3HT for organic electronics. Nanoscale 6, 6301–6314 (2014).
Huang, Y. et al. Poly(ethylene oxide) functionalized graphene nanoribbons with excellent solution processability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10136–10139 (2016).
Narita, A. et al. Synthesis of structurally well-defined and liquid-phase-processable graphene nanoribbons. Nat. Chem. 6, 126–132 (2014).
Vo, T. H. et al. Large-scale solution synthesis of narrow graphene nanoribbons. Nat. Commun. 5, 3189 (2014).
Dössel, L., Gherghel, L., Feng, X. & Müllen, K. Graphene nanoribbons by chemists: nanometer-sized soluble, and defect-free. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 2540–2543 (2011).
Kim, K. T., Lee, J. W. & Jo, W. H. Charge-transport tuning of solution-processable graphene nanoribbons by substitutional nitrogen doping. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 214, 2768–2773 (2013).
Daigle, M., Miao, D., Lucotti, A., Tommasini, M. & Morin, J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 6213–6217 (2017).
Li, G., Yoon, K.-Y., Zhong, X., Zhu, X.-Y. & Dong, G. Efficient bottom-up preparation of graphene nanoribbons by mild Suzuki-miyaura polymerization of simple triaryl monomers. Chem. Eur. J. 22, 9116–9120 (2016).
Yang, W., Lucotti, A., Tommasini, M. & Chalifoux, W. A. Bottom-up synthesis of soluble and narrow graphene nanoribbons using alkyne benzannulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 9137–9144 (2016).
Zeng, W. et al. Rylene ribbons with unusual diradical character. Chem 2, 81–92 (2017).
Wang, Y. & Michinobu, T. Benzothiadiazole and its π-extended, heteroannulated derivatives: useful acceptor building blocks for high-performance donor-acceptor polymers in organic electronics. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 6200–6214 (2016).
Balan, A., Baran, D. & Toppare, L. Benzotriazole containing conjugated polymers for multipurpose organic electronic applications. Polym. Chem. 2, 1029–1043 (2011).
Patel, D. G. et al. It takes more than an imine: the role of the central atom on the electron-accepting ability of benzotriazole and benzothiadiazole oligomers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 2599–2612 (2012).
Danz, M., Tonner, R. & Hilt, G. Understanding the regioselectivity in Scholl reactions for the synthesis of oligoarenes. Chem. Commun. 48, 377–379 (2012).
Pradhan, A., Dechambenoit, P., Bock, H. & Durola, F. Highly twisted arenes by Scholl cyclizations with unexpected regioselectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 12582–12585 (2011).
Beams, R., Cançado, L. G. & Novotny, L. Low temperature Raman study oft he electron coherence length near graphene edges. Nano Lett. 11, 1177–1181 (2011).
Malard, L. M., Pimenta, M. A., Dresselhaus, G. & Dresselhaus, M. S. Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep. 473, 51–87 (2009).
Zibarev, A. V. et al. Cyclic aryleneazachalcogens: synthesis, vibrational spectra, and π-electron structures. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 26, 941–949 (1990).
Fugaeva, O. M., Zibarev, A. V., Korobeinicheva, I. K. & Furin, G. G. On the “selenation” method of assignment of organic sulphur compounds vibrational spectra. J. Mol. Struct. 218, 169–173 (1990).
Sakaguchi, H. et al. Width-controlled sub-nanometer graphene nanoribbons films synthesized by radical-polymerized chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Mater. 26, 4134–4138 (2014).
Zhou, J. & Dong, J. Vibrational property and Raman spectrum of carbon nanoribbons. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 173108 (2007).
Gillen, R., Mohr, M. & Maultzsch, J. Symmetry properties of vibrational modes in graphene nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. B 81, 205426 (2010).
Verzhbitskiy, I. A. et al. Raman fingerprints of atomically precise graphene nanoribbons. Nano Lett. 16, 3442–3447 (2016).
Gierschner, J., Cornil, J. & Egelhaaf, H.-J. Optical bandgaps of π-conjugated organic materials at the polymer limit: experiment and theory. Adv. Mater. 19, 173–191 (2007).
Crossley, D. L. et al. Enhancing electron affinity and tuning band gap in donor-acceptor organic semiconductors by benzothiadiazole directed C–H borylation. Chem. Sci. 6, 5144–5151 (2015).
Crossley, D. L. et al. Borylated arylamine–benzothiadiazole donor–acceptor materials as low-LUMO, low-band-gap chromophores. Organometallics 36, 2597–2604 (2017).
We thank NSF (CHE 1707399) and the Welch (F 1781) for research grants. X.-Y.Z. acknowledges support by NSF DMR 1420634 (Materials Research Science and Engineering Center) for the AFM imaging experiments. The AFM experiment utilizes facilities of the Share Materials Characterization Laboratory at Columbia Unviersity. G.D. acknowledges the MRSEC Shared User Facilities at the University of Chicago (NSF DMR-1420709). Use of the Center for Nanoscale Materials, an Office of Science user facility, was supported by the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357. We thank Luping Yu’s group (University of Chicago) for sharing CV instrument. Dr. Qing He in Sessler group (UT Austin), Kaiyuan Ni in Wenbin Lin’s group (University of Chicago) and Dr. V. Lynch (UT Austin) are acknowledged for UV, ICP-MS, and the X-ray, respectively. Prof. Jiwoong Park (University of Chicago) is thanked for helpful suggestions.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, G., Yoon, K., Zhong, X. et al. A modular synthetic approach for band-gap engineering of armchair graphene nanoribbons. Nat Commun 9, 1687 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03747-2
Journal of the American Chemical Society (2020)
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces (2020)
Materials Chemistry Frontiers (2020)
The Journal of Organic Chemistry (2020)
Journal of the American Chemical Society (2019)