Abstract

Recordings of magnetic fields, thought to be crucial to our solar system’s rapid accretion, are potentially retained in unaltered nanometric low-Ni kamacite (~ metallic Fe) grains encased within dusty olivine crystals, found in the chondrules of unequilibrated chondrites. However, most of these kamacite grains are magnetically non-uniform, so their ability to retain four-billion-year-old magnetic recordings cannot be estimated by previous theories, which assume only uniform magnetization. Here, we demonstrate that non-uniformly magnetized nanometric kamacite grains are stable over solar system timescales and likely the primary carrier of remanence in dusty olivine. By performing in-situ temperature-dependent nanometric magnetic measurements using off-axis electron holography, we demonstrate the thermal stability of multi-vortex kamacite grains from the chondritic Bishunpur meteorite. Combined with numerical micromagnetic modeling, we determine the stability of the magnetization of these grains. Our study shows that dusty olivine kamacite grains are capable of retaining magnetic recordings from the accreting solar system.

Introduction

Unaltered meteorites originating from our own protoplanetary disk acquired a thermoremanent magnetization (TRM) during formation and present an excellent opportunity to understand the extent of the early solar system magnetic field. The most likely material to have retained this field information is dusty olivine: assemblages of nanometric low-Ni kamacite grains protected from alteration by their host olivine crystal, found in the chondrules of unequilibrated primitive chondrites1,2. A recent estimate of the ancient magnetic field intensity (paleointensity) from dusty olivine in Semarkona3 has provided an upper bound of 54 ± 21 μT for the magnetic field present in the chondrule-forming region (2.5 astronomical units (au)) of the protoplanetary disk during its first two to three million years4,5. This estimate is widely used in models for chondrule formation6,7 and for the accretionary dynamics of the protoplanetary disk8,9.

The magnetization carriers in dusty olivine are dominantly kamacite grains that have sizes greater than 25 nm and support non-uniform vortex magnetization states10,11. Retention of magnetic remanence over geological timescales, which is the underpinning hypothesis that enables paleomagnetism, is only predicted for uniformly magnetized grains by Néel’s single domain (SD) theory12. Non-uniformly magnetized grains such as magnetic vortex states are not described by Néel’s SD theory. Despite efforts to understand magnetic vortex states13,14, it is unknown whether non-uniformly magnetized kamacite grains can retain their TRM for solar system timescales, i.e., 4.6 Ga. It is therefore of great importance to establish which magnetization states occur in the natural remanence carriers, and whether these non-uniform magnetization states can retain a magnetic remanence imparted by magnetic fields that were present in the protoplanetary disk billions of years ago12,15.

Here we study chondrules from the unequilibrated ordinary chondrite Bishunpur (LL3.1) using the advanced transmission electron microscope (TEM) technique of in-situ temperature-dependent off-axis electron holography16 (nanometric magnetic imaging) and numerical micromagnetic modeling17 to determine whether dusty olivine can retain a record of the magnetic field from the early solar system.

Results

Room-temperature off-axis electron holography

We recorded room-temperature magnetic induction maps from 19 kamacite grains (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figure 1) using off-axis electron holography (hereafter holography) (see Methods) from the meteorite Bishunpur (LL3.1). Scanning TEM (STEM) energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis was used to establish that the kamacite grains are almost pure Fe and are encased in forsteritic olivine (see Supplementary Figure 2). The average axial ratio (AR; length/width) of the dusty olivine kamacite grains is 1.5, they are ~ 150–600 nm in size (average 353 ± 137 nm × 250 ± 106 nm), and are typically found to have well-defined single vortex (SV) magnetization states with their vortex cores aligned out-of-plane and with little external stray magnetic fields (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figure 1). Our findings are in accordance with previous holography analyses of dusty olivine10,11.

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Magnetic induction map of a Bishunpur kamacite grain. Magnetic induction map of a kamacite grain in dusty olivine reconstructed from electron holograms acquired at room temperature. The contour spacing is π radians. The direction of the projected in-plane magnetic induction is indicated by the arrows and the color wheel. Scale bar: 200 nm

Temperature-dependent off-axis electron holography

We recorded in-situ temperature-dependent holographic magnetic induction maps (see Methods) of four kamacite grains and present the heating sequence for one of them in Fig. 2. The representative kamacite grain shown in Fig. 2 was focused ion beam (FIB) milled from its original morphology until it was electron transparent for in-situ TEM experiments, likely affecting its AR. Its saturated remanent magnetization state, which was induced at room temperature, resembles that of a uniformly magnetized grain or an in-plane vortex-core magnetization (Fig. 2b). This remanent state was maintained when the grain was heated to 500 °C, with little change in its direction or intensity (Fig. 2b–g). At 600 °C, the grain underwent chemical alteration (Supplementary Figure 3), likely through a reaction with the surrounding olivine, as the TEM operates in high vacuum. Chemical alteration prevents accurate determination of the magnetization state beyond 600 °C, due to the difficulty of removing the mean inner potential contribution to the phase recorded from the new mineralization.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Visualizing the magnetization of a Bishunpur kamacite grain during in-situ heating. a Electron hologram of a Bishunpur dusty olivine kamacite grain before heating. The fringes due to electron beam interference are used to determine the phase shift of the electron beam passing through the sample. bg Magnetic induction maps reconstructed from holograms of the kamacite grain heated in-situ from 20 to 500 °C (the grain underwent chemical alteration above 500 °C). h Micromagnetic model of a minimum energy state magnetization distribution at 300 °C for a Fe tetrahedral mesh modeled after the grain in ag. Curie temperature for Fe is 760 °C and peak temperature of Bishunpur is ~ 300 °C21. The regions of high helicity (red) are highlighted by a contour plot to display the vortex cores in the modeled kamacite grain. i Electron holography-style magnetic induction map simulated from the micromagnetic solution in h. The contour spacing for bg is 1.57 radians. The direction of the projected in-plane magnetic induction in bg is indicated by the arrows and the color wheel. Scale bar: 50 nm

High-temperature micromagnetic modeling of a large grain

In order to determine whether the 458 × 98 × 60 nm grain was in a uniform or a vortex state, we used a finite element method (FEM) micromagnetic algorithm17 (MERRILL, see Methods) to model the three-dimensional magnetization states compatible with the grain’s shape and mineralogy. We found that the grain was in a multi-vortex state with its magnetization aligned with the long axis (also the saturation axis) (Fig. 2h, i). Using a nudged elastic band (NEB) numerical algorithm17,18,19,20, we then calculated the energy barriers related to changes of the magnetization state. The thermal relaxation time across these barriers at 300 °C, the highest temperature reached by Bishunpur chondrules since formation 4.6 Ga21, are many orders of magnitudes longer than the age of the solar system (see Supplementary Note 13 and Supplementary Figures 49).

Micromagnetic modeling of Fe parallelepipeds

In order to determine the stability of dusty olivine kamacite grains in more general cases, we used the MERRILL path minimization algorithm17,18,19,20,22 to calculate the thermal relaxation times as a function of size and AR for Fe cubes and cuboids. Initially, we found local-energy minimum (LEM) magnetization states for the Fe cubes and cuboids by performing 100 energy minimizations for randomized magnetization directions for each morphology (Fig. 3). For the smaller grain sizes (below 23 nm), the LEM states correspond to uniform magnetization states that are aligned with the easy magnetocrystalline axis for equidimensional grains and with the long axis for elongated grains (Fig. 3a). As the grain size increases toward 23 nm, there is increased “flowering”23,24 (Fig. 3a). In equidimensional Fe grains that have sizes above 23 nm, magnetic vortex states with their cores aligned along the hard magnetocrystalline axis are the LEM state (Fig. 3b), whereas for sizes above 27 nm the core aligns with the easy magnetocrystalline axis (Fig. 3c). In elongated Fe grains, the core aligns with the short axis.

Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Representative magnetization states for Fe cubes. Global energy minimum (GEM) magnetization states for cubes of Fe determined using a finite element method (FEM) micromagnetic algorithm. a 20 nm cube in a uniform magnetization state along the easy axis; b 25 nm cube in non-uniform hard axis magnetization state; c 30 nm cube in a non-uniform easy axis magnetization state. Helicity was determined by calculating m · ( × m), where m is the magnetization vector. Regions of high (±) helicity are highlighted by a contour plot to display vortex cores, e.g., in b and c

Transition paths between vortex LEM states were found to be structure-coherent rotations22 of the vortex core from one LEM state to another (see Supplementary Movie 1), in agreement with previous observations of magnetite22. Although the individual moments do not rotate coherently, the rotation of the vortex core itself is similar to the coherent rotation of magnetization vectors that we observe in uniform LEM states. The energy barriers between uniform states (Fig. 4) are very low for equidimensional Fe grains (Fig. 3a). Equidimensional grains that have sizes below 29 nm are unstable on solar system timescales, as all uniform SD magnetization states in equidimensional grains are unstable over this timescale, although different reversal modes are active at different grain sizes13. Astonishingly, for equidimensional cubes only vortex states with their cores aligned along easy axes in grains with sizes above 29 nm are capable of retaining magnetizations over solar system timescales. We found that these states are stable up to at least grain sizes of 50 nm, which was the largest SV modeled.

Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Relaxation times for Fe cubes and cuboids at room temperature. ad Graph displaying the relaxation time, i.e., stability for different values of axial ratio (AR) and size of Fe cuboids calculated using the nudged elastic band (NEB) method for global energy minimum (GEM) magnetization states determined using a finite element method (FEM) numerical algorithm. The size describes the volume of the equivalent cube (i.e., the volume of a 20 nm cuboid with a 1.1, 1.2, or 1.5 AR is equivalent to the volume of a 20 nm cube). Horizontal lines mark relaxation times of 100 s, 1 Ma, and the age of the solar system (4.6 Ga). Solid versus dashed curves indicate whether the GEM state is a uniform or vortex magnetization state. Incoherent rotation of uniform states, which proceeds via intermediate vortex states results in a reduction in stability. When the GEM assumes a non-uniform vortex state (dashed curves) through <100>, its stability increases with increasing grain size. Observed chondrule dusty olivine kamacite grains have an average AR of 1.5, which according to the above data are stable over solar system timescales irrespective of magnetization state for all of the sizes tested (10–50 nm)

Elongation of the grain increases the stability of the magnetization state and increases the uniform to non-uniform transition size (Fig. 4)25. Uniform magnetization states increase in energy barrier with increasing size, whereby a flowering of the magnetization vectors at the grain edges further increases the structural stability up to a peak close to 20 nm (Fig. 4). Beyond this peak, a vortex is formed during the magnetization reversal, which leads to an intermediate decrease in the energy barrier with increasing grain size13 up to a trough at 25–35 nm (Fig. 4). For larger grain sizes, the easy axis vortex state is the LEM, increasing in stability with increasing grain size (Fig. 4). The kamacite grains that are found in chondrules from Semarkona11 and Bishunpur (this study) have ARs of ~ 1.5. At such elongations for all grain sizes modeled (10–50 nm) the magnetizations are stable for timescales greater than the age of the solar system, independent of their uniform or non-uniform states (Fig. 4d). The lower temperatures that are experienced in space only slightly change the Fe material parameters, but significantly decrease thermal activation, and thus increase the calculated relaxation times. Therefore, micromagnetic modeling strongly indicates that the kamacite TRM imparted during dusty olivine formation in the protoplanetary disk remains stable to the present day (Fig. 4).

Furthermore, the remanence imparted during dusty olivine formation would have survived the heating that Bishunpur is predicted to have experienced since its accretion (~ 300 °C)21. Temperature-dependent electron holography reveals for the first time the high-temperature stability of non-uniform remanent magnetization states in low-Ni kamacite directly observed up to 500 °C and the obtained thermal relaxation times at 300 °C are longer than the age of the solar system (Fig. 2b–g and Supplementary Notes 13). This confirms that even multi-vortex states can carry a primary remanent magnetization from the protoplanetary disk.

Discussion

Paleomagnetic data are some of the only sources of evidence of early solar system conditions that constrain mechanisms of heating and momentum transport in the protoplanetary disk6,7,8,9,26,27. Our observations and calculations show that SV or multi-vortex magnetization state Fe grains in dusty olivine will carry magnetic remanence originating from the early solar system. Most current paleointensity protocols implicitly assume that the magnetization carriers behave like uniform SD magnetization states, as the protocols are based on Néel’s theory of SD grains12. Non-uniform magnetization states are the most abundant state of magnetization present in rocks and meteorites, however their thermal and temporal stabilities are poorly understood and they have previously been considered to be poor magnetic recorders. This study presents a step change in our understanding of non-uniform magnetic states. It is now clear that a more comprehensive understanding of the thermomagnetic characteristics of magnetic vortex states will facilitate more sophisticated and sample-specific paleointensity estimates, which will further our understanding of how the protoplanetary disk evolved into our present-day planetary system.

Methods

Sample preparation for electron microscopy

Samples for the advanced TEM technique of off-axis electron holography (hereafter holography) were prepared using FIB milling from a polished section of the Bishunpur meteorite and either attached to a Cu Omniprobe grid for room temperature analysis or placed on the windows of a silicon nitride EMheaterchip for in-situ heating in a DENSSolutions double tilt TEM specimen holder. FIB milling, (S)TEM imaging, chemical analysis, and holography experiments were conducted at the Ernst-Ruska Centre for Microscopy and Spectroscopy with Electrons, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany.


Off-axis electron holography

Electron holograms were acquired using an FEI Titan 80–300 TEM operated in Lorentz mode at 300 kV using a charge-coupled device camera and an electron biprism typically at 50 V. Magnetic induction maps were recorded after tilting the sample to ± 70° and applying a vertical magnetic field of > 1.5 T using the conventional microscope objective lens, in order to acquire images before and after reversing the direction of magnetization in the sample. Evaluation of half of the difference between phase images recorded with opposite magnetization directions in the sample was used to remove the mean inner potential contribution to the phase. The mean inner potential was subtracted from the unwrapped total phase shift in order to construct magnetic induction maps that were representative of the magnetic remanence28.


Temperature-dependent electron holography

In order to determine the change in magnetic induction during heating, the sample was magnetized and images were recorded at room temperature, at 100 °C, and then at temperatures up to 800 °C in 100 °C intervals. The same procedure was followed during cooling. The ramp during heating was 50 °C min−1 and each temperature interval was maintained for 10 min, to allow sufficient time for imaging. The mean inner potential was subtracted from the unwrapped total phase shift acquired at each temperature interval, to allow the construction of magnetic induction maps representative of the magnetic remanence, as shown previously29.


Micromagnetic modeling

Magnetic domain stability is highly grain-size-dependent. At very small grain sizes, uniform magnetization is typically unstable due to thermal fluctuations. As the grain size increases, a non-uniform magnetization state becomes the most energetically favorable state23,25. We determined the magnetization states associated with different grain sizes of Fe using FEM micromagnetic simulations17. Tetrahedral meshes were generated for this using MRshRRILL and FEM models were performed using MERRILL17. The magnetic free energy was determined for each of the tetrahedra and summed over all tetrahedra to determine Etot, which the FEM discretized for the minimization of an initial state, m, where the magnetization at each node of each element was given a random direction for the grain in question, Ω, according to the expression

E tot = Ω A m + K 1 m x 2 m y 2 + m x 2 m z 2 + m y 2 m z 2 - M s H z m - M s 2 H d m dV,
(1)

where the material is defined by the following temperature-dependent parameters: A, the exchange constant; K1, the magnetocrystalline anisotropy; and Ms, the saturation magnetization. H z and Hd are external and self-demagnetizing fields, respectively. The material parameter constants used for room temperature Fe25: A = 2 × 10−11 Jm−1, K1 = 4.8 × 104 Jm−3, and Ms = 1.72 × 106 Am−1. The material parameter constants used for Fe at 300 °C: A = 1.52 × 10−11 Jm−1, K1 = 2.2 × 104 Jm−3, and Ms = 1.61 × 106 Am−1.

LEM magnetization states are found by minimizing Etot using a modified conjugate gradient method18. For each grain geometry and size for which the relaxation time was evaluated, 100 minimizations were performed to calculate the most favorable LEM states. Two different magnetization states, L1 and L2, with lowest energy were then selected as the start and end configurations of an initial path of 100 magnetization states transforming L1 into L2. MERRILL’s combined NEB and action minimization method was used to determine the nearest minimum-action path connecting L1 and L2, which also defines the corresponding thermal energy barrier17,18. For non-uniform vortex states, L1 and L2 were required to have the same helical sense of vortex core rotation (helicity), as unwinding of the core requires much more energy than retaining the same helicity. Helicity was determined by calculating m · ( × m), where m is the magnetization vector. The relaxation time (τ) is related to the energy barrier (ΔE) by the Néel–Arrhenius equation12

τ= 1 C e Δ E k B T
(2)

where C is the atomic switching frequency (10−9 s), kB is Boltzmann’s constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin, and ΔE = ES − E(L1) is the energy difference between the highest saddle point and the LEM L1 determined by the NEB method. The relaxation time directly determines whether dusty olivine can theoretically retain its magnetization over solar system timescales.


Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Leroux, H., Libourel, G. & Lemelle, L. Experimental study and TEM characterization of dusty olivines in chondrites: evidence for formation by in situ reduction. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 38, 81–94 (2003).

  2. 2.

    Uehara, M. & Nakamura, N. Experimental constraints on magnetic stability of chondrules and the paleomagnetic significance of dusty olivines. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 250, 292–305 (2006).

  3. 3.

    Fu, R. R. et al. Solar nebula magnetic fields recorded in the Semarkona meteorite. Science 346, 1089–1092 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Kita, N. T., Nagahara, H., Togashi, S. & Morishita, Y. A short duration of chondrule formation in the solar nebula: evidence from 26Al in Semarkona ferromagnesian chondrules. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 64, 3913–3922 (2000).

  5. 5.

    Nyquist, L. et al. Manganese-chromium formation intervals for chondrules from the Bishunpur and Chainpur meteorites. Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 36, 911–938 (2001).

  6. 6.

    Hasegawa, Y. et al. Forming chondrites in a Solar Nebula with magnetically induced turbulence. Astrophys. J. 820, L12 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Wakita, S., Matsumoto, Y., Oshino, S. & Hasegawa, Y. Planetesimal collisions as a chondrule forming event. Astrophys. J. 834, 125 (2017).

  8. 8.

    Gressel, O., Turner, N. J., Nelson, R. P. & McNally, C. P. Global simulations of protoplanetary disks with ohmic resistivity and ambipolar diffusion. Astrophys. J. 801, 84 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Bai, X.-N., Ye, J., Goodman, J. & Yuan, F. Magneto-thermal disk winds from protoplanetary disks. Astrophys. J. 818, 152 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Lappe, S. et al. Mineral magnetism of dusty olivine: a credible recorder of pre‐accretionary remanence. Geochem. Geophys. 12, 12 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Einsle, J. F. et al. Multi-scale three-dimensional characterization of iron particles in dusty olivine: implications for paleomagnetism of chondritic meteorites. Am. Mineral. 101, 2070–2084 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Néel, L. Théorie du traînage magnétique des ferromagnétiques en grains fins avec application aux terres cuites. Ann. Geophys. 5, 99–136 (1949).

  13. 13.

    Winklhofer, M., Fabian, K. & Heider, F. Magnetic blocking temperatures of magnetite calculated with a three-dimensional micromagnetic model. J. Geophys. Res. 102, 22695–22709 (1997).

  14. 14.

    Muxworthy, A. R., Dunlop, D. J. & Williams, W. High-temperature magnetic stability of small magnetite particles. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 7602 (2003).

  15. 15.

    Garrick-Bethell, I. & Weiss, B. P. Kamacite blocking temperatures and applications to lunar magnetism. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 294, 1–7 (2010).

  16. 16.

    Almeida, T. P. et al. Direct visualization of the thermomagnetic behavior of pseudo-single-domain magnetite particles. Sci. Adv. 2, e1501801 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Conbhuí, P. Ó. et al. MERRILL: Micromagnetic Earth Related Robust Interpreted Language. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GC007279 (2018).

  18. 18.

    Fabian, K. & Shcherbakov, V. P. Energy barriers in three-dimensional micromagnetic models and the physics of thermo-viscous magnetization in multidomain particles. arXiv preprint 1702.00070 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Berkov, D. V. Numerical calculation of the energy barrier distribution in disordered many-particle systems: the path integral method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 186, 199–213 (1998).

  20. 20.

    Dittrich, R. et al. A path method for finding energy barriers and minimum energy paths in complex micromagnetic systems. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 250, 12–19 (2002).

  21. 21.

    Rambaldi, E. R. & Wasson, J. T. Metal and associated phases in Bishunpur, a highly unequilibrated ordinary chondrite. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 45, 1001–1015 (1981).

  22. 22.

    Nagy, L. et al. Stability of equidimensional pseudo-single domain magnetite over billion year time-scales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10356–10360 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Schabes, M. E. & Bertram, H. N. Magnetization processes in ferromagnetic cubes. J. Appl. Phys. 64, 1347–1357 (1988).

  24. 24.

    Williams, W. & Dunlop, D. J. Three-dimensional micromagnetic modelling of ferromagnetic domain structure. Nature 337, 634–637 (1989).

  25. 25.

    Muxworthy, A. R. & Williams, W. Critical single-domain grain sizes in elongated iron particles: implications for meteoritic and lunar magnetism. Geophys. J. Int. 202, 578–583 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Hayashi, C. Structure of the Solar Nebula, growth and decay of magnetic fields and effects of magnetic and turbulent viscosities on the Nebula. Progr. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 70, 35–53 (1981).

  27. 27.

    Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. Hydromagnetic flows from accretion discs and the production of radio jets. MNRAS 199, 883–903 (1982).

  28. 28.

    Midgley, P. A. & Dunin Borkowski, R. E. Electron tomography and holography in materials science. Nat. Mater. 8, 271–280 (2009).

  29. 29.

    Almeida, T. P. et al. Observing thermomagnetic stability of nonideal magnetite particles: good paleomagnetic recorders? Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 7041–7047 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank D. Meertens for FIB lamellae preparation. We thank Pádraig Ó Conbhuí for assistance with MERRILL and for writing MEshRILL, which was used to create the meshes used in this study. This work was funded by the STFC (grant number ST/N000803/1). Meteorites were provided by the Natural History Museum, London. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC grant agreement number 320832.

Author information

Author notes

    • Jay Shah

    Present address: Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, UK

Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2BP, UK

    • Jay Shah
    • , Trevor P. Almeida
    • , Adrian R. Muxworthy
    • , Miguel A. Valdez-Grijalva
    •  & Matthew J. Genge
  2. Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK

    • Jay Shah
    •  & Sara S. Russell
  3. School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9XP, UK

    • Wyn Williams
    •  & Lesleis Nagy
  4. School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8SU, UK

    • Trevor P. Almeida
  5. Ernst Ruska-Centre for Microscopy and Spectroscopy with Electrons and Peter Grünberg Institute, Jülich, 52425, Germany

    • András Kovács
    •  & Rafal E. Dunin-Borkowski
  6. Geological Survey of Norway, Trondheim, 7491, Norway

    • Karl Fabian

Authors

  1. Search for Jay Shah in:

  2. Search for Wyn Williams in:

  3. Search for Trevor P. Almeida in:

  4. Search for Lesleis Nagy in:

  5. Search for Adrian R. Muxworthy in:

  6. Search for András Kovács in:

  7. Search for Miguel A. Valdez-Grijalva in:

  8. Search for Karl Fabian in:

  9. Search for Sara S. Russell in:

  10. Search for Matthew J. Genge in:

  11. Search for Rafal E. Dunin-Borkowski in:

Contributions

J.S. conducted the room-temperature and temperature-dependent off-axis electron holography experiments, the micromagnetic simulations of the 10–50 nm Fe grains, wrote the manuscript, and produced Figs. 1–4, Supplementary Figures 1–3, and Supplementary Movie 1. W.W. and L.N. conducted the high-temperature micromagnetic simulations of the Bishunpur kamacite grain. W.W. wrote Supplementary Notes 1–3 and produced Supplementary Figures 4–9. J.S. analyzed the room-temperature electron holography data and T.P.A. analyzed the temperature-dependent electron holography data. T.P.A. and A.K. assisted with electron holography experiments and analysis. M.V.-G. wrote bash scripts that helped to streamline the numerical analysis and assisted with the presentation of the numerical data. W.W. and K.F. wrote the micromagnetic code MERRILL used for numerical analysis. J.S., A.R.M., S.S.R., and M.J.G. discussed the results and the petrology. A.R.M. had the original idea for the study, led the direction of the study, and helped to write the manuscript. All authors discussed and commented on the results and the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay Shah.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03613-1

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.