Circular DNA elements of chromosomal origin are common in healthy human somatic tissue


The human genome is generally organized into stable chromosomes, and only tumor cells are known to accumulate kilobase (kb)-sized extrachromosomal circular DNA elements (eccDNAs). However, it must be expected that kb eccDNAs exist in normal cells as a result of mutations. Here, we purify and sequence eccDNAs from muscle and blood samples from 16 healthy men, detecting ~100,000 unique eccDNA types from 16 million nuclei. Half of these structures carry genes or gene fragments and the majority are smaller than 25 kb. Transcription from eccDNAs suggests that eccDNAs reside in nuclei and recurrence of certain eccDNAs in several individuals implies DNA circularization hotspots. Gene-rich chromosomes contribute to more eccDNAs per megabase and the most transcribed protein-coding gene in muscle, TTN (titin), provides the most eccDNAs per gene. Thus, somatic genomes are rich in chromosome-derived eccDNAs that may influence phenotypes through altered gene copy numbers and transcription of full-length or truncated genes.


The human genome contains 22 linear autosome pairs and a pair of sex-determining chromosomes. This genome structure was previously thought to be highly stable, with minimal divergence between cells1,2. Genome-scale sequencing has revealed that insertions, deletions, and amplifications are common in humans3,4,5 and even single cells from healthy somatic tissues contain large structural variations6.

However, the fate of the deleted chromosomal DNA in human somatic cells is unknown. Deleted acentric DNA may be removed from cells by targeted degradation or exclusion from replication. We hypothesized that deleted DNA as well as by-products of damaged DNA can circularize and co-exist in genomes as semi-stable extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA; see Supplementary Note 1 for review of abbreviations for circular DNA). Evidence of eccDNA in humans has existed for more than half a century since double minutes were discovered in tumor specimens from children7. EccDNA was later shown to be common in many types of cancers, forming from chromosomal genes and promoting oncogenesis8,9,10,11. In addition to oncogenes, 5 S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and repetitive DNA have been found on eccDNA in human cell lines12,13,14, showing that a fraction of the genome can exist as eccDNA, at least under certain conditions.

Circular DNA structures of megabase (Mb) sizes are also known as ring chromosomes and can be visualized microscopically by staining metaphase DNA15,16. Identification of smaller circular DNA has been by achieved by density separation of DNA by cesium-chloride ultracentrifugation, followed by electron microscopy17. EccDNA has also been isolated using linear DNA-specific exonucleases18,19 or targeted probes for specific eccDNA types and imaging after two-dimensional gel electrophoresis12 or fluorescence in situ hybridization10. Advances in sequencing technologies have allowed for genome-scale identification and mapping of eccDNAs that range in size from 0.1 kilobase (kb) to 2 kb (named microDNA) from human cell lines and mice20,21. These <2 kb eccDNAs were shown to derive primarily from genic regions in which exons and 5’-untranslated regions (UTRs) were particularly overrepresented20. Moreover, recent screens of blood from cancer patients revealed that <2 kb eccDNA can also be found in plasma22. The discovery of <2 kb eccDNAs in healthy lung tissue of lung cancer patients suggest that eccDNA either migrates from the malignant tissue or forms in the healthy tissue22. In addition, the Wang group recently characterized eccDNAs of up to 20 kb in blood plasma from healthy donors23. We hypothesize that the healthy tissue also contains larger eccDNAs of sufficient size to include one or several full-length genes, because (1) eccDNAs larger than 100 kb are found in human tumors9,10,24, most likely arising by random mutational processes that would be expected to form eccDNAs from all parts of the genome; (2) deletions are known to produce eccDNAs in yeast25 and in cattle26; and (3) deletions in somatic cells can be up to Mb in size6.

Here, we investigate if eccDNAs are common in somatic tissues from healthy humans (muscle and leukocytes), employing enzymatic removal of linear DNA and sequencing of DNase-resistant eccDNA27,28. We detect a large catalog of different eccDNAs formed from chromosomal breakpoints between 0.05 kb and up to 999.8 kb apart. EccDNAs derive from every human chromosome with sequences from all known types of genomic structures, including genes, intergenic, and repetitive regions, revealing that eccDNAs are common mutational elements in human soma. Our discovery suggests that products of deletions are maintained in somatic cells, leading to novel questions regarding their cellular influence and potential biological roles.


Genome-wide detection of eccDNAs from soma in healthy men

To obtain knowledge about eccDNAs in human soma, we adapted the Circle-Seq method27,28, which detects eccDNAs on a genomic scale, for human tissue (Fig. 1). EccDNAs were purified from skeletal muscle biopsies and blood leukocytes from two groups of healthy men (mean age 62.4 ± 2.4 years). One group (n = 8) had exercised throughout their life (physically active) and the second group (n = 8) had lived a lifelong sedentary lifestyle (physically inactive, Supplementary Table 1). We chose to compare these two groups of men because they have very different lifespan expectancies29. Exercise training is reported to protect against oxidative stress and may, therefore, reduce DNA damage, as reported for sperm nuclear DNA from patients with varicocele30, which ultimately could lead to group differences in eccDNA formation. Our biochemical data confirmed that the oxidative stress levels were significantly higher in muscle tissue from physically inactive men than men with an active lifestyle (protein carbonylation, Supplementary Table 1).

Fig. 1

Circle-Seq method for mapping of eccDNA. a Leukocyte and muscle samples from 16 healthy subjects (T1–T16, n = 16). b Purification of eccDNA through column separation, exonuclease treatment, and rolling-circle amplification. c Detection of eccDNA based on structural-read variants and coverage (soft-clipped, split, red; concordant, gray; and discordant reads, blue). d Read coverage display (log-scale) at the titin gene, TTN, from muscle samples. e EccDNA from T5 and T6 illustrated (black boxes, exons), outward PCR validation (blue arrows), inward PCR (black arrows), and gel-image of T5 and T6 PCR products next to controls: GD, human genomic DNA; φ, phi29-amplified eccDNA sample without detected [TTNcircle]. f Sequence of [TTNcircle exon 44-52] T6 PCR product at junction

Purification, enrichment, and detection of eccDNAs from somatic samples were performed in four steps (Fig. 1a–c): 1) gentle DNA isolation by column separation, 2) removal of remaining linear DNA by exonuclease, 3) rolling-circle amplification, and 4) sequencing and mapping of paired-end reads to the human genome to identify structural variation resulting from DNA circularization. We confirmed that linear DNA was completely removed after exonuclease treatment using quantitative PCR (qPCR) on a gene absent from eccDNA as a marker (COX5B, Supplementary Fig. 1a, b). Each detected circular DNA structure was supported by a minimum of two independent structural-read variants that identified the chromosomal breakpoint coordinates that were joined on the eccDNA (e.g., one split-read and one discordant-read pair, Fig. 1c). In addition, detected eccDNAs were hierarchically ranked based on read coverage by comparison to adjacent upstream and downstream regions. We assigned high confidence (hconf) support to eccDNAs with read coverage >95% and more than two-fold higher mean coverage relative to the summed coverage of adjacent regions of equivalent lengths (Fig. 1c). EccDNAs ranked with confidence (conf) had >95% read coverage, but less than two-fold higher read coverage relative to outside sequences, and finally, eccDNAs with coverage <95% were annotated solely based on the structural-read variants (low quality, lowq) (Fig. 1c, d). In total, we detected 43,960 hconf eccDNAs, 81,066 conf eccDNAs, and 13,655 lowq eccDNAs from muscle samples (average: 2,748 hconf, 5,067 conf, and 853 lowq per sample of 106 nuclei). In leukocytes, we detected 6,253 hconf eccDNAs, 3,191 conf eccDNAs, and 784 lowq eccDNAs (average: 391 hconf, 199 conf, and 49 lowq per sample of 104 nuclei) (Supplementary Table 2). We found saturation tendency in detection of eccDNAs relative to the number of sequenced reads, suggesting that the majority of eccDNAs were recorded by our analysis (Supplementary Fig. 2). Possible false-positive detection was assessed on full-genome human sequence data, the NA12878 Platinum genome data set31. When testing the bioinformatics pipeline on NA12878, we found 0 eccDNAs supported by split reads (partial reads mapping to both sides of a junction) and just 54 eccDNAs (0.75 %) supported by soft-clipped reads (partial reads mapping to one side of a junction) (Supplementary Table 2). As 62,763 (45%) and 2,799 (27%) of all detected eccDNAs in muscle tissue and leukocytes were supported by split reads and 53,890 (39%) and 2,325 (23%) eccDNAs were supported by soft-clipped reads, we are confident that the majority of all detections represented true eccDNAs (with an estimated false-positive rate of about 0.75%). In addition, we cannot exclude that some of the signals interpreted as false-positives in the NA12878 genome data set were actually derived from eccDNA in the whole-genome data. Hence, the rate of false-positives might be lower.

As an example, 130 eccDNAs were mapped to the 0.3-Mb titin gene, TTN (Fig. 1d). Two representative examples of TTN eccDNAs were 24 kb and 35 kb in size, covering exons 44–52 and 43–66 (Fig. 1e). These two structures were confirmed by outward PCR and Sanger sequencing (Fig. 1e, f) and named [TTNcircle exon 43-66] and [TTNcircle exon 44-52] to indicate their genic origin and non-Mendelian, circular character. We apply this nomenclature to all eccDNAs. EccDNAs are also referred to by their chromosomal origin such as [TTNcircle 179,592-179,627kb] and [TTNcircle 179,598-179,621kb] to accommodate non-genic eccDNA and genic eccDNA without exons (see Supplementary Note 1 for acronyms and nomenclature).

EccDNAs are common in human soma

More than 100,000 different eccDNAs (n = 138,027) were identified from 16 muscle samples (Supplementary Data 1, Supplementary Fig. 1c-e). All chromosomes were represented in eccDNA sequences, which had a combined length of 12.6% (389.5 Mb) of the human genome. EccDNAs ranked with hconf ranged in size from 0.05 kb up to 57.8 kb with two distinctive peaks at 0.1 kb and 5 kb (Fig. 2a, b). Structures ranked with lower support derived from breakpoints in chromosomes up to 887.9 kb (conf) or 999.8 kb (lowq) apart (Supplementary Data 1), suggesting existence of eccDNAs up to 1 Mb. Although there were individual variations within and between muscle samples from the two groups, the frequency of all eccDNA types showed no significant differences between physically active (median 8,469 different eccDNAs/106 nuclei, range 464–19,702) and inactive men (median 9,255 different eccDNA/106 nuclei, range 3,425–14,498) based on a Wilcoxon rank sum test (p-value = 0.95, 95% conf interval, [−7,137; 6,074]). Nevertheless, given the wide conf interval, significant differences between eccDNA counts from inactive and active men might have been missed with the current sample size (Fig. 2a, b). EccDNA from the 16 leukocyte samples, each from ~104 nuclei (Supplementary Fig. 1f), showed comparable eccDNA frequencies and size distributions (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b, Supplementary Data 2) between physically active (median 356, range 284–919) and inactive men (median 528, range 218–2,347) with no significant differences based on Wilcoxon rank sum tests (p-value = 0.43, 95% conf interval, [−783; 136]). When comparing eccDNA frequencies from both types of examined soma, we detected 3.5–5.6 different eccDNAs per 100 nuclei of leukocytes compared to 0.85–0.93 different eccDNAs per 100 nuclei in muscle tissue.

Fig. 2

EccDNA sizes, read distribution on plasmids and repetitive elements. Number of eccDNAs relative to size in kb for 1 × 106 muscle nuclei from each individual. a Physically inactive men (n = 8); b active men (n = 8). EccDNA kb sizes are in bins of 0.1 log-fold intervals. c Percent mapped reads per sample for plasmids added to muscle samples at indicated copy numbers (median, white circles). Repetitive regions from total mapped reads for each muscle-derived eccDNA sample (T1–T16); median, white circles (n = 16)

The sensitivity of Circle-Seq was measured using internal plasmid controls added to muscle and blood samples prior to eccDNA purification. Plasmids were recaptured in all samples supporting a detection level of one plasmid per 10,000 nuclei (pSH63, 7 kb, Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 3c). Plasmids larger than 10 kb were also detected, although with fewer mapped reads (e.g., 26-kb YGMP3k20, Fig. 2c). Using plasmid controls, we estimated that Circle-Seq detected ~1–250 eccDNAs per nucleus in the 4-kb range and detected eccDNAs with short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs) in a broad range of 16–1700 per nucleus. This result is in line with previous reports on HeLa cells with 1600 microDNAs per nucleus in sizes smaller than 400 bp20 and 50–200 eccDNAs per cell (ref. 32 for review).

A large fraction of eccDNA reads map to repetitive regions

Repetitive satellite elements32 and 5 S rDNA12 are known to form eccDNAs in human cells. Moreover, repetitive telomeric circles can lead to human cell immortalization through telomerase-independent elongation of telomeres33,34. We found that 0.8% of reads mapped to telomeres, suggesting that [TELcircles] are also present in healthy benign tissue. A substantial number of reads also mapped to SINEs (3.1%), long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) (3.5%), retroviruses (1.4%), satellites (1.2%), centromeres (2.0%), long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons (0.3%), and rDNA repeats (8.1%) (Fig. 2d; blood Supplementary Fig. 3d), supporting the existence of eccDNAs from all tested types of repetitive elements in the human genome.

Genic eccDNAs are common

The majority of eccDNAs (99%) were smaller than 25 kb (Fig. 2a, b, Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 3a, b; Supplementary Fig. 4), while the remaining 1% derived from breakpoints more than 25 kb apart (Fig. 3b). More than half of all eccDNAs came from genic or pseudogenic regions (blood 55%, tissue 52%). For example, the 11.1-kb [S100A3-S100A4circle 153,512-153,523kb] in sample T8 included the complete genes of S100A3 and S100A4 and parts of S100A5. S100A4 encodes a protein known to have a causal role in the metastatic spread of tumor cells35.

Fig. 3

Genomic distribution of eccDNA breakpoints. Distribution of detected chromosomal breakpoints across the human genome with read support for circular DNA, in sizes of ≤25 kb (total 147,186) and b >25 kb apart (total 1,014) in muscle (T1–T16, n = 16) and leukocyte (B1–B16, n = 16) samples. EccDNA detected once, black lines; eccDNA detected repeatedly in several individuals with ≥90% overlap, circles

Verification of eccDNAs as large as 35 kb

We verified 85% of all tested eccDNAs (17 out of 20) by Sanger sequencing of outward PCR products (Fig. 4a, Fig. 1d, f, Supplementary Fig. 4, Supplementary Table 3). Tested unique eccDNAs came both from intergenic and genic loci. For instance, we confirmed the [ERBB2circle exon 1-7], which included the first seven introns and exons of ERBB2 (Fig. 4a). This gene encodes the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 that is associated with cancer when deleted or amplified8,36,37.

Fig. 4

EccDNA validation and DNA deletion. a Gel images for a validated subset (n = 9) of eccDNAs by outward PCR (blue arrows), inward PCR (black arrows), gel electrophoresis, and Sanger sequencing. EccDNAs are named according to gene content; black boxes, exons. Template: T1–T16, muscle B1–B16 leukocyte, phi29 (φ) amplified eccDNA, GD genomic DNA, NTC nontemplate control. Sequenced PCR products are in boxes and alignment of resultant sequence are red and blue lines. b Confirmed verification of DAZ4exon 18 deletion and c [DAZ4circle exon 18] at identical coordinates within the DAZ4 locus by inward and outward PCR (oligos arrows, inward red, outward, blue)

Deletions correspond to eccDNA

The discovery of [ERBB2circle exon 1-7] and other eccDNAs with parts of genes suggested that these entities could contribute to the generation of truncated chromosomal and extrachromosomal genes. In one case, we confirmed that a muscle-derived eccDNA also showed evidence of a chromosomal deletion. At the DAZ4 gene, a DNA deletion was found at the precise site where the [DAZ4circle exon 18] formed (Fig. 4b, c). We also detected eccDNAs from loci reported to frequently undergo gross DNA deletions, such as HLA (5 Mb, 6p21.32–p22.1), KIR (1 Mb, 19q13.42), and SERF1A_SMN2 (2.5 Mb, 5q13.2)38,39 in both blood and muscle (Fig. 3b; Supplementary Data 3). These findings indicated that large deletions can lead to eccDNA in healthy human soma.

Recurrent breakpoints flank full-length genes

More than 1000 conf and lowq eccDNAs were derived from chromosomal breakpoints that were more than 25 kb apart (Fig. 3b). With an average gene size of 27 kb in the human genome40 many of these potential eccDNAs could be large enough to contain full genes. The majority of breakpoints >25 kb apart flanked genic loci (74%), and the largest was [PRRC2B-SETXcircle 134213-135213kb] at 1 Mb (Supplementary Data 3). Notably, several breakpoints >25 kb apart from nearly identical genic or intergenic regions were found in two or more individuals (Fig. 3b). For instance, the 941-kb [HLA-E_HLA-Ccircle 30,372-31,314kb] came from precursor genes of the major histocompatibility complex (class I, E, and C) and was identified in participants B6 and B14. [SERF1A_SMN2 circle 68,904-69,760kb] was detected by junction reads that mapped to two identical noncoding RNA genes, 838 kb apart, in participants B3, B5, and B9 (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Data 4). Recurrent eccDNAs are known in yeast, where paralogous genes and repetitive sequences recombine to form identical eccDNAs in independent cell lines25,27,41. This phenomenon also appeared to occur in humans as breakpoints in blocks of paralogous genes were found repeatedly in two or more participants. For instance, we found recurrent breakpoints >25 kb apart that flanked genes in the preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma family (PRAMEF), the histone cluster 2, defensin betas, the C-C motif chemokine ligands, and killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Data 3 and 4). Although the potential large eccDNAs had fewer sequence reads assigned to them, the joint probability of finding similar breakpoints by chance in two participants is <10−12, using an overlap of 95%. These results suggested that chromosomal breakpoints in loci up to several 100,000 bp apart could lead to eccDNA and some loci were hotspots for DNA circularization.

Co-occurrence between eccDNAs and structural variants

We further tested the co-occurrence between coordinates of common structural variants in the human genome42 and eccDNA breakpoints >25 kb apart. We found 22 hits with a reciprocal overlap of 99%. The hits included, among others, common deletions of genes from PRAMEF14/15/17/19/20 (220 kb, 1p36.21), DNAH14 (115 kb, 1q42.12), PSG4/5/9/10 (191 kb, 19q13.31), as well as repeats from satellites (1p11.2 and 5q11.1) and regions with LINE/SINE/LTR elements (131 kb, 1q12-1q21.1; 35 kb, 15q11.2). We also detected overlap between the 54-kb [APOL1_APOL4circle] and a common inversion of the same apolipoprotein genes. Missense variants of the APOL1 gene are reported to be associated with a 15% increased risk of kidney disease43. Finally, a common deletion of the immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (281 kb, 22q12.3) overlapped an eccDNA detected in sample T6: [abPartscircle chr2: 89,161,023-89,441,956].

Highest frequency of eccDNAs from gene-rich chromosomes

The genomic distribution of eccDNAs revealed that the gene-rich chromosomes 17 and 19 contributed to a, respective, 1.7-fold and 2.9-fold higher average frequency of eccDNAs per Mb than other chromosomes (Fig. 5a, Supplementary Fig. 5a). We found positive correlation between the ratios of eccDNA/Mb and coding genes/Mb (Fig. 5b, Supplementary Fig. 5b, ρ = 0.78), while pseudogenes, short variants, and long, short, or miscellaneous types of noncoding genes correlated less well with eccDNA frequency (ρ ≤ 0.69, Supplementary Fig. 5c-g). This result suggested that transcription or other characteristics of coding genes affected the frequency of eccDNA formation. We measured the global mRNA level in all obtained muscle samples to examine whether transcription could explain eccDNA frequencies. Although some of the most highly expressed genes gave rise to many eccDNAs, in particular the TTN-AS1 and TTN genes of the physically active group, with >100 eccDNAs (Fig. 5c, Supplementary Data 5), we found no general correlation between the numbers of eccDNAs per gene and transcript level.

Fig. 5

EccDNA frequency relative to chromosome, gene density and transcription. Muscle-derived eccDNA counts per Mb from physically active (x, n = 8) and inactive men (o, n = 8) per: a chromosome and b coding genes per Mb (chromosome Y, 17 and 19 are marked). c EccDNA counts per gene relative to average transcription level of muscle sample (two sets, each group n = 8)

Transcription of eccDNA

To investigate whether eccDNAs were transcribed, we screened mRNA sequences from muscle tissue that could match transcription events across the junction of detected eccDNA. We identified junction transcripts from 25 different eccDNAs in muscle samples from eight participants (Supplementary Table 4, p < 0.001, Monte Carlo simulation). The sampled eccDNA transcripts confirmed the existence of eccDNA. For example, in five participants, we detected split-transcript reads from the TTN gene that matched detected [TTNcircle] coordinates, one of which had a detected size of 612,228 bp. We detected, with hconf, a perfect overlap between eccDNA coordinates of the 18-kb [HIP1circle exon 1] in participant 8 (T8) and mRNA transcription of the first exon of Huntington-interacting protein 1 from T8 (Fig. 6). The transcript data suggested that at least a fraction of the eccDNAs was present in nuclei and not sequestered in transcriptionally inactive compartments of the tissue. The eccDNA transcripts further excluded the possibility that detected eccDNAs were merely by-products of apoptosis-driven fragmentation, as suggested for <2-kb eccDNA (microDNA)44, or were produced during eccDNA purification.

Fig. 6

EccDNA transcript from the [HIP1circle exon 1]. Display of chromosome 7 at the HIP1 gene and detected [HIP1circle exon 1]. The two sequenced RNA reads (black and orange text) from participant T8 overlap perfectly to the two sequenced DNA reads from participant T8 (black and bold text font)

EccDNA variation between cells in the same individual

To determine the diversity of eccDNAs in cells from the same individual, we isolated and sequenced eccDNA from triplicate leukocyte samples from two individuals (3 × 104) cells per sample (n = 3 for each participant, Supplementary Fig. 6) along with a control for endonuclease digestion of mitochondrial DNA (Supplementary Fig. 6g, h). Samples contained similar numbers and size distributions of eccDNAs (median 2,169 ± 429 and median 3,155 ± 453; Supplementary Fig. 7, Supplementary Data 6). However, the genetic content of eccDNA was very different between leukocytes from the same individual. From the three samples from participant 6, only 12 eccDNAs had overlapping sequences and only 13 from participant 14 overlapped (Supplementary Fig. 8). We reasoned that the small overlap might result from the constant turnover of leukocytes from the billions of hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid/lymphoid progenitor cells in the human body. Different DNA circularization events in these stem cells would explain a large individual variation between otherwise genetically identical cells.


EccDNA has long been known to form from proto-oncogenes and repeats in the human genome9,10,32,45,46. However, the diversity of eccDNA identified in this study supports a model in which any part of the human genome can contribute to eccDNA. Our model implies that deleted DNA is not immediately lost or degraded, but persists in the nucleus as eccDNA, formed through various circularization paths that are likely mediated by the repair machinery for DNA damage, such as nonhomologous end-joining20,23,24, nonallelic homologous recombination34, or microhomology-mediated end-joining20,23. EccDNAs are common in yeast27 and plants47,48, suggesting that the propensity for genomes to form and retain eccDNA is conserved among eukaryotes. Our data further reveal that large parts of the human genome can be found on eccDNA. Although this finding suggests that eccDNAs are formed through random mutational processes, we also found hotspots for eccDNA formation in the human genome. We found that gene-rich chromosomes, repetitive sequences, and tandem paralogous genes had a higher tendency to circularize and form eccDNA, in agreement with previous data from human germline and yeast25,27,49,50. Recombination between tandem paralogous sequences lead both to eccDNA and a corresponding deletion in yeast25. We also found recurrent eccDNA, and corresponding deletions (Fig. 4c), supporting the hypothesis that certain loci in human somatic tissue have a high propensity to circularize and form chromosomal deletions.

EccDNAs mapped more frequently to gene-rich chromosomes indicating that genic regions generally mutate at higher rates. This result supports previous findings of overrepresented 5´UTRs, exons20 and 3´UTRs23 on eccDNA. Of particular interest in this context is that the most highly transcribed gene, TTN (encoding titin), also produced the highest number of eccDNAs (n = 130, physically active group, Fig. 5). We confirmed the 35.4-kb [TTNcircle exon 43-66] and 23.9-kb [TTNcircle exon 44-52] and also found support for [TTNcircle] transcription in five participants (Supplementary Table 4). Titin is expressed in muscle, where it provides elasticity in the resting state. It is the most abundant protein in the human body with an approximate mass of 0.5 kg in an adult human51. Loss of titin leads to myopathies52, making it plausible that the formation of many [TTNcircles] represents a mutational load that reflects high transcriptional activity of TTN in the muscle. However, how eccDNA formation frequencies are connected to genic DNA is still unclear. Direct repeat recombination is found to increase upon transcription53 and transcription itself could provide the basis for DNA damage through R-loops that consist of a DNA:RNA hybrid, exposing single-stranded DNA. R-loops form naturally during transcription, but can have deleterious effects on DNA integrity54, which is why they could be a link between transcriptionally active DNA and eccDNA formation. EccDNAs themselves were also transcribed. We found 25 transcripts across eccDNA junctions, suggesting that at least a fraction of eccDNAs resides inside the nucleus. The number of identified eccDNA transcripts is likely an underestimation of the true number, because tissue for eccDNA mapping and mRNA isolation was sampled from different sections of the same biopsies and only eccDNA or mRNA that was present in larger parts of the muscle would be expected to be found in both samples. Gene products from eccDNA transcripts could potentially contribute to the phenotype of somatic cells and tissue as reported in yeast25,55,56, where for instance, eccDNA with an amino acid transporter gene was selected in cells grown under amino acid limitation25. In human cells, eccDNAs with copies of proto-oncogenes, such as cMYC and EGFR, affect phenotypes by inducing tumorigenesis via increased eccDNA copy numbers, leading to elevated transcript levels10,57,58.

In the present study, nearly all eccDNAs were acentric and could be expected to segregate nonfaithfully upon replication in mitosis, as previously shown for double minutes in tumors45. This phenomenon provides the basis for cell-to-cell variation in both protein expression and protein isoforms. EccDNA might further alter traits if they integrate back into chromosomes as reported in tumor xenografts11, cattle26, and wine yeast59.

We detected more than a thousand different breakpoints more than 25 kb apart. Each of these putative circular DNA structures was detected on the basis of two independent pairs of structural-read variants (Fig. 1c) that both supported the existence of a potential large eccDNA. Investigation of three-dimensional contact domains in the human genome supported the existence of large loop structures from 40 kb to 3 Mb (median size 185 kb), bringing together regions that are far apart60, and, thus, making circularization plausible. Humans can live with Mb-sized ring chromosomes in their somatic cells15,16. In human tumors, double minutes with proto-oncogenes are reported up to 330 kb9,46, and 28-µm-long eccDNAs (~100 kb) are reported in mouse thymocytes61. In this study, some breakpoints >25 kb apart were detected multiple times. However, these breakpoints were not all supported by high internal coverage, presumably because of low abundance and because the phi29 amplification step in the Circle-Seq method is biased for small and more abundant eccDNAs62. Moreover, distant breakpoints could resemble more complex structures, as observed for eccDNA in tumor cells45,63,64. EccDNAs have also been shown to gradually enlarge through assembly from smaller circular elements9,45 and perhaps diminish in size over time through internal deletions. Our current eccDNA mapping pipeline does not distinguish between eccDNA derived from a single DNA or several DNA fragments. Therefore, we cannot exclude that some detected eccDNAs resembled complex structures.

In agreement with previous studies20,22,32, we detected abundant <2 kb eccDNAs (microDNAs), most 100–200 bp. MicroDNAs are suggested to be products of microdeletions20 and to form through the mismatch repair pathway21. In contrast, a recent study implies that many of these DNA fragments are products of apoptosis44, requiring further investigation. We cannot rule out that some of the eccDNAs recorded in this study were also products of apoptosis. However, our detection of eccDNA transcripts and multiple recurrent eccDNAs in both blood and tissue samples suggest that eccDNAs are present in living tissue.

In summary, we conclude that eccDNAs are common in healthy human tissue and blood in sizes large enough to carry one or several complete genes. We find that eccDNAs are transcriptionally active and we suggest that eccDNA contribute to phenotypic variation through expression of full-length and/or truncated genes. Replicating and transcribed acentric eccDNAs are especially expected to have cellular impact, as missegregation in mitosis is expected to yield variable eccDNA copy numbers.


Healthy human subjects

Two groups of healthy male participants, physically inactive and physically active, were selected based on questionnaires. The inactive group (n = 8, age 62.8 ± 1.3 years, weight 82.9 ± 14 kg) had a lifelong sedentary lifestyle with physical activity once per week at most throughout their life. The physically active group (n = 8, age 62.1 ± 1.4 years, weight 82.3 ± 12 kg) had exercised more than three times per week throughout their life. Ethical approval was granted by the Committee of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg communities, reference number H-7-2014-001 and the research was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of The Declaration of Helsinki. All participants gave their written consent to take part in this study after being informed of the experimental procedures and associated risks. Physiological measurements of percent body fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanning confirmed group differences (30.5 ± 7.9 and 21.9 ± 4.2% in the physically inactive and active groups, respectively). An incremental ergometer cycling challenge consisted of cycling at 120 watts for 5 min, increasing by 20 watts every other minute to perceived exertion of 18 on the Borg scale65, after which participants continued until exhaustion. The cycling test showed differences in exercise performance between groups, while no significant differences were documented for age, height, weight, cholesterol, testosterone, inflammation, and number of leukocytes (see Supplementary Table 1). Lower protein carbonylation in skeletal muscle from active participants, measured by the OxiSelect ELISA-kit (Cell Biolabs), confirmed a significant lower oxidative stress level in this group compared to inactive participants (Supplementary Table 1).


All plasmids were maintained in Escherichia coli and purified with a standard plasmid miniprep kit (GeneJet, Thermo Scientific). Plasmid controls were pBR322 (4,361 bp; New England Biolabs), pUC19_yEGFP3 (3,397 bp), pUG72 (3,988 bp; originally pJJH726, EUROSCARF), pSH63 (6,998 bp), and YGPM3k20_pGP564_chrV (26305 bp; Open Biosystems).

Human samples from healthy human muscle tissue (T1–T16)

Under local anesthesia, muscle biopsies from vastus lateralis were collected (Bergström needle), quickly transferred into liquid nitrogen, and later stored at –80 °C. Tissues were fractionated at −20 °C and aliquots of 50–100 mg were sliced into thin pieces with a sterile scalpel and air-dried at room temperature for 1 h before weighing 6 mg tissue (Extended Data Fig. 1a) on an analytical scale (Mettler Toledo). Samples were denoted T1–T16. Odd numbers were used for tissues from the physically inactive group and even numbers for tissues from the physically active group.

Human leukocytes (B1–B16, B6A–C, B6D; B14A–C, B14D)

Blood (40 mL) was collected from arm veins and centrifuged at 2.6× g for 15 min at 4 °C (Eppendorf 5702 R). To match cell concentrations, the middle buffy coat layer (leukocytes) was collected and nuclei were counted (NucleoCounter NC-3000, Chemometec). Samples of ~105 leukocytes were lysed for 10 min on ice with 1 × buffer C (Qiagen) and 3 × volume ultraclean water and centrifuged at 1,565× g for 15 min at 4 °C. Nuclear pellets were stored at −80 °C until eccDNA purification. The samples were denoted B1–B16. Triplicate aliquots were taken from blood samples of two donors and denoted B6A–C; B14A–C, with two extra samples serving as controls to test potential differences between endonuclease NotI (B6D and B14D) and MssI (B6A–C; B14A–C).


Purification of eukaryotic eccDNA from human somatic tissue was optimized based on the Circle-Seq eccDNA method for budding yeast28, consisting of multiple steps as described below.

Cell lysis for Circle-Seq

In brief, samples of 6 mg tissue (106 ± 3 × 105 genomes) or leukocyte pellets (104 ± 7 × 103 genomes) were resuspended in 0.63 mL L1 solution (Plasmid Mini AX; A&A Biotechnology) and supplemented with 15 µl Proteinase K (>0.1 U/µl, Life Technologies) before incubation overnight at 50 °C with agitation at 700 rpm (Eppendorf Thermomixer). After cell lysis, a control mixture of plasmids of different sizes and concentrations was added to each sample: 100 copies pSH63, 100 copies pUC19_yEGFP3, 10,000 copies YGPM3k20_pGP564_chrV, 20,000 copies pBR322, and 50,000 copies pUG72. At this point, 30 µl was sampled to assess the input DNA concentration by qPCR.

Extrachromosomal circular DNA enrichment for Circle-Seq

Samples were alkaline treated to separate chromosomal DNA, lipids, and protein from eccDNAs by rapid DNA denaturing–renaturing, followed by column chromatography on an ion exchange membrane column (Plasmid Mini AX; A&A Biotechnology). DNA precipitation was achieved by 45-min incubation at -20 °C (after column elution) and extended centrifugation at 9,788× g for 30 min at 2 °C. Precipitated DNA was dissolved in 50 µl water for total DNA 40–419 ng (tissue, T1–T16), 10–224 ng (blood, B1–B16), 22–33 ng (B6A–D) and 36–53 ng (B14A–D) by Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity assay.

Removal of linear and mitochondrial DNA for Circle-Seq

Remaining linear DNA was removed by exonuclease (Plasmid-Safe ATP-dependent DNase, Epicentre), assisted by rare-cutting endonuclease MssI that digested mitochondrial circular DNA (mtDNA, 16 kb) and made additional accessible DNA ends for exonuclease. DNA was treated with two FastDigest Units MssI (GTTT^AAAC) (Thermo Scientific) and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. The NotI (GC^GGCCGC) site is absent in human mtDNA and NotI (Thermo Scientific) was used in B6D and B14D blood samples to evaluate use of different endonucleases. Prior to the exonuclease step, endonucleases were thermally inactivated at 65 °C for 10 min (MssI) or at 80 °C for 5 min (NotI). Enzymatic reactions with linear-specific exonucleases were at 37 °C in a heating block and chromosomal DNA digestion was carried out continuously for 1 week (144 h tissue, 168 h, blood), adding additional ATP and DNase every 24 h (30 units per day) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Plasmid-Safe ATP-dependent DNase, Epicentre). Finally, the exonuclease was heat inactivated at 70 °C for 30 min. Complete removal of linear DNA was confirmed by qPCR of the COX5B gene.

Rolling-circle amplification of eccDNA for Circle-Seq

Sample volumes were reduced to 50% under vacuum for 15–20 min (MAXI dry Iyo). Approximately 10% (10 µL) of the total volume of eccDNA-enriched samples was used as template for phi29 polymerase reactions (REPLI-g Midi Kit) amplifying DNA at 30 °C for 2 days (46–48 h).

EccDNA sequencing from T1–16 and B1–16 for Circle-Seq

Phi29-amplified DNA was cleaned (QIAquick kits) and sheared by sonication (Bioruptor) to average insert sizes of 430 ± 30 nucleotides for tissue and 400 ± 25 nucleotides for blood (Bioanalyser). Libraries were prepared by standard methods from ~200 ng purified fragmented DNA, adding adapters and using double indexes (P5 and P7), each with 6-base nucleotide barcodes. The 32 samples were multiplexed in four sets of eight and each set was sequenced as 2 × 100-nucleotide paired-end reads on 2 lanes (Illumina HiSeq 2000), collecting up to 200 million paired-end reads/sample (tissue, T1–T16; blood, B1–B16).

EccDNA sequencing from blood replicates for Circle-Seq

Each phi29-amplified DNA sample was sheared by sonication to mean fragment size 300 nucleotides (Covaris LE220). The DNA was purified by beads (Ampure bead) and the size distribution of fragments was analyzed (Bioanalyzer QC). The DNA was adjusted to 20 ng/µL, loading 300 ng fragmented DNA for each library preparation (Wafergen’s PrepX ILM DNA Library Kit) onto a robotic Apollo 324 system (IntegenX), adding adapters and barcode index labels (6-base oligos). Eight samples (B6A–D, B14A–D) were multiplexed and sequenced as 2 × 75-nucleotide paired-end reads on two lanes (Illumina HiSeq 2000 Rapid flowcell) obtaining 30.5–42.5 million paired-end reads per sample for B6A–D and 39.7-50.1 million paired-end reads per sample for B14A–D.

Deep sequencing of samples T2 and T7 for Circle-Seq

A pool of two tissue samples (T2 + T7) was resequenced as 2 × 75-nucleotide paired-end reads on two lanes (Illumina HiSeq 2500 Rapid) obtaining 650.4 and 255.6 million reads, denoted T2deep and T7deep, respectively.

Uniquely mapped eccDNA pipeline for Circle-Seq data

Sequence reads were mapped to a human reference genome to record the origin of chromosomal-derived eccDNAs. The mapping pipeline used aligned structural-read variants to detect eccDNAs and assigned a level of conf to each. Pipeline steps were: 1) Multiplexed datasets were generated by splitting index barcodes, allowing zero mismatches. 2) Adapter sequences and low-quality bases (Q < 10) were trimmed using Cutadapt66. 3) To improve eccDNA detection, overlapping sequences in read pairs were merged by SeqPrep ( with default settings to obtain longer singleton contigs. Small eccDNAs with a fragmented DNA insert of <400–500 bp were expected to have substantial overlap between read pairs. 4) The Burrows–Wheeler aligner with maximal exact matches (BWA-MEM)67 was used to align paired-end reads, singleton contigs, and singleton reads (without a mate) against the GRCh37 human reference assembly. Read alignments were sorted and indexed using samtools68. 5) EccDNAs were detected by first annotating chromosomal positions with at least two overlapping structural-read variants (i–iii), i.e., (i) discordant paired-end reads mapped to the opposite orientation (reverse-forward) of the reference genome as opposed to normal concordant mates (forward–reverse), yielding approximate chromosomal coordinates of candidate eccDNAs; (ii) Soft-clipped reads had partially mapped reads (at least 50 soft-clipped bases) at genomic coordinates of potential eccDNA junctions (starts or ends); and (iii) Split reads had both start and end coordinates of putative eccDNA junctions at base-pair resolution (Fig. 1c). Split reads were obtained by remapping nonmapped fragments of soft-clipped reads using BWA-MEM. If read fragments aligned in the same orientation and to the same chromosome as soft-clipped reads, the chromosomal position was annotated. This mapping used only eccDNAs ≤1 Mb. 6) Next, read coverage of candidate eccDNA-derived regions was assessed by listing mean coverage value with annotations of coverage of adjacent upstream and downstream of regions in the same length as the mapped eccDNA. 7) conf levels of eccDNA recordings were assigned as lowq if they had at least two overlapping structural-read variants aligned to a specific genomic location, conf if they also had read coverage of the region of more than 95% and hconf if they satisfied those criteria and mean read coverage was more than twice as high as adjacent regions with equivalent lengths (sum of coverage). 8) EccDNAs that occurred in overlapping regions, but had different sizes were assessed. Although such reads could stem from the same eccDNA molecule, no merging was performed if the reciprocal overlap was less than 50%, as the eccDNA could have derived multiple times from the same locus in close proximity. 9) Final lists of recorded eccDNAs were combined (Supplementary Figure 1, tissue 1-16; Supplementary Fig. 2, blood 1-16; Supplementary Fig. 6, B6A–D + B14A–D), including in all entries details of read support, mean coverage, annotated eccDNA coordinates, and intersections of human genes.

EccDNA detection as function of mapped reads

To verify that additional sequencing would lead to saturation in total number of eccDNA detections, we sequenced samples T2 and T7 in depth, obtaining 6.4 × 108 and 2.5 × 108 mapped reads in total. Compared to all 16 samples from tissue and leukocytes (Supplementary Fig. 2a-d), deeply sequenced T2 and T7 samples showed a clear tendency to saturation after detection of additional 6,549 and 5,464 eccDNAs, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2e, f)

Endonuclease effects on eccDNA counts

MssI has a single site in mtDNA. To evaluate its endonuclease specificity on triplicate blood samples (B6A–C and B14A–C) and potential influence on eccDNA counts and sizes, blood samples from the same donors were also treated with NotI (GC^GGCCGC, sample B6D and B14D). MtDNA detection by Circle-Seq and by qPCR was significantly higher in both D samples compared to A–C samples, supporting that MssI treatment substantially reduced mtDNA abundance without major impact on eccDNA counts or size distributions (Supplementary Fig. 6g, h).

Non-unique eccDNA

Mapping of plasmids and nonunique reads from transposons, centromeres, telomeres, rDNA, satellites, and mtDNA was assessed by mapping all eccDNA-derived reads to a custom genome. The custom genome was based on all consensus sequences from all repeat classes of Homo sapiens (583 loci, Repbase, Genetic Information Research Institute) and published sequences from telomeres, centromeres69, the complete sequence of the human rDNA repeating unit (43 kb, locus HSU13369, accession U13369, PRI 12-MAR-2010), mtDNA (16.57 kb, chrM_GRCh37-hg19), and spiked-in plasmids.

Quantification of eccDNA based on internal controls

The number of eccDNAs per nucleus was calculated based on fractions of reads mapped to 4-kb spike-in plasmid controls (pUG72 and pBR322, Fig. 2c). Added to each muscle sample was 50,000 pUG72 and 20,000 pBR322 plasmids. Using the lowest and highest percent read values of pUG72 (0.0015% and 0.2596%) and pBR322 (0.0002% and 0.0905%), we estimated around 1–250 eccDNAs of 4 kb per nucleus. Using percent reads for SINE elements (1.676% and 8.432%) relative to percent reads for pUG72 or pBR322 per nucleus, we estimated [SINEcircles] of 16–1700 per nucleus with sizes of ~400 bp. These calculations are rough estimates because rolling-circle amplification of eccDNAs with phi29 polymerase is biased toward abundant and small eccDNAs62.

Assessment of eccDNA sequencing saturation

The number of eccDNAs per million reads was determined at different sequence levels by decimation of read amounts at 10% intervals to generate decimation curves (Supplementary Fig. 2).

EccDNA genomic coverage

Total coverage of eccDNAs for all samples was found by concatenation and merging of all eccDNAs to calculate the combined length of the genome from which the eccDNA was derived.

EccDNA per Mb relative to genomic features

The number of coding genes, noncoding genes, pseudogenes, and short variants per chromosome was obtained from GRCh38.p10 (Ensembl release 88 - Mar 2017 EMBL-EBI) to calculate chromosomal features per Mb relative to the recorded number of eccDNAs per Mb. Correlation tests were calculated using Spearman’s rank in R-studio70.

Genomic plots

All intersection operations between eccDNA intervals were set for a reciprocal overlap of at least 90%, using Bedops71. Intersection profiles and merged tracks were plotted into a genome map using a modified source code of w4Cseq72.

Intersection with common genomic variants

Breakpoint coordinates of eccDNAs larger than 25 kb were intersected against the database of genomic variants42 with BedTools (v2.26.0-148-gd1953b6), using a reciprocal overlap of 99%.

Quantification of genomes per sample

The number of genomes per sample was quantified by qPCR at the cytochrome C oxidase subunit Vb gene locus (COX5B, 2q11.2). To estimate input DNA, 30-µl aliquots, sampled after 18 h of Proteinase K digestion, were used as templates for qPCR after DNA cleaning (magnetic beads, Agencourt). To estimate the remaining linear DNA, 1 week exonuclease-treated DNA was used as template for qPCR. Oligos for qPCR at the human COX5B locus were 5’ GGGCACCATTTTCCTTGATCAT 3’ and 5’ AGTCGCCTGCTCTTCATCAG 3’; at the human mtDNA Cytochrome C oxidase 1 (MT-CO1) gene locus 5’ GCCCACTTCCACTATGTCCT 3’ and 5’ GATTTTGGCGTAGGTTTGGTCT 3’. All reactions were run in quadruplicate in a Quant Studio 7 Flex qPCR machine (Applied Biosystems) in 10-µL reactions with 2 µL template (exonuclease-treated samples), 60 nM primers, and 5 µL SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Reaction conditions were 10 min at 95 °C followed by 40 cycles of 15 sec at 95 °C and 60 sec at 60 °C. To verify reaction specificity, the melting curves were generated and the length of PCR products verified by conventional agarose gel electrophoresis. Purified human genomic DNA in eight serial dilutions was used to produce standard curves for each run. Copy numbers were calculated, assuming two copies of COX5B per genome, a molar mass per base pair of 650 g mol−1, a genome length of 3.14 × 109 bp, and 6.77 × 10−3 ng DNA per diploid cell. A minimum of two independent qPCR experiments was used for standard deviation calculations. Concentrations of standards were measured using the Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity assay (Life Technologies).

Validation of eccDNA recordings

Outward directing PCR oligos were designed in Primer3web (version 4.0) and devised to yield products across junctions of 20 detected circular DNA structures (Supplementary Table 6). Each 50-µl PCR reaction typically included 120 ng phi29-amplified template (4 µl) or 1 week exonuclease-treated template (4 µL), 200–320 nM primer, dNTP, buffer, and DreamTaq polymerase, and PCR was for 35 cycles in a PCR cycler (Techne PrimeG) under standard PCR conditions. All reactions were performed with controls of human genomic DNA (100–200 ng) and 120 ng from a phi29-amplified sample lacking the eccDNA and nontemplate control. Inward designed oligos (Supplementary Table 6) were positive controls for PCR reactions with circular and linear DNA templates. Size-separation of PCR products on agarose (0.6–1.5%) gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing of PCR products confirmed the circular structure of 17 of 20 selected eccDNAs (Fig. 3c, Supplementary Fig. 4). Three eccDNAs missed final Sanger sequencing validation (HDAC1, EGFR, and SLC12A8) and had less coverage and support from structural variation reads than other eccDNAs, indicating they might be rare. In addition to validation of 17 recorded eccDNAs, we validated mitochondrial circular DNA (16 kb) by outward PCR as well as two internal plasmids (pBR322 and pUG72), spiked into prior eccDNA purifications.

Recording of DAZ4 deletions

5′ TGCCTGAAAAGAAAGGTTCCAG 3′ and 5′ GTCTTAGTGGAACCTTATCACCAG 3′ oligos were designed to detect the DAZ4 deletion in close proximity to the detected coordinates of [DAZ4circle], expecting a 310-bp deletion product when using purified genomic DNA as template from participants with [DAZ4circle].

Whole transcriptome sequencing

For gene expression analyses, total RNA from muscle tissue was extracted using the RNeasy Tissue Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (QIAGEN). RNA libraries were constructed using the TruSeq Stranded total RNA LT Sample Prep Kit (Illumina) with 500 ng total RNA, according to manufacturer’s instructions. RNA-seq libraries were sequenced using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 instrument following manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was up to 2 × 101 cycles. Image analyses and base callings used the standard Illumina pipeline. The TopHat2 package73 was used to align reads to the hg19 reference genome, followed by DESEQ2 for RNA expression analysis74.

EccDNA transcription detection

The Segemehl aligner (v0.2.0-418)75 was used in split-read mode, without realignment, to detect RNA-sequenced split-transcript reads, defined as reads in which the left part aligned to the downstream 3’-end and the right part to the upstream 5’-end. Aligner output was processed with custom Python scripts. Reads aligned to the mitochondrial genome were excluded from downstream analysis. Split-transcript read intervals (similar to “backspliced” reads on circular RNA76) that overlapped 100% to detected eccDNA coordinates were collected, discarding split-transcript reads with more than 20-nucleotide deviations from chromosomal start coordinates of detected eccDNAs to eliminate false-positives caused by transsplicing events. Hence, the recording of split-transcript reads was highly restricted to eccDNAs detected with soft-clipped and/or split reads.

Detected eccDNA transcripts in the RNA sequence data were ranked based on the mapping quality of the number of RNA split-transcript reads. Hconf transcribed eccDNA had a perfect match between start and end coordinates with a sequence that was unique in the genome. Conf was similar to hconf, except the transcript sequence was not unique in the genome. Lowq transcribed eccDNA meant the start or end eccDNA coordinate overlapped the detected transcript and the split-read mapped to multiple positions in the genome.

Monte Carlo simulations

The likelihood of detected overlaps between RNA split-transcripts and eccDNA coordinates was assessed by Monte Carlo simulations, using pybedtools77. EccDNA coordinates and RNA split-transcript intervals were randomized on the human genome 1,000 times and an empirical p-value was computed based on the number of random intersections relative to the actual detected overlaps between eccDNA and RNA split-transcripts.

Statistical analyses

Average and standard deviations were calculated for all data, where Gaussian distribution could be assumed. Median values were used to describe data relating to size, number, and content of eccDNA, as the underlying data distribution was unknown.

Code availability

The pipeline for mapping Circle-Seq data was written in Python and the Python package is provided on request for easy installation. It uses multiple CPU cores to ensure fast processing and intermediate files in the pipeline are well annotated to allow detailed analysis of the resulting output. The code is available from Marghoob Mohiyuddin on request.

Data availability

Sequence data from Circle-Seq and RNA-Seq experiments have been deposited in the Sequence Read Archive. BioSample accession IDs for DNA Circle-Seq: SAMN08054900 to SAMN08054941. Bioproject ID for RNA-seq PRJNA392413.


  1. 1.

    Parshad, R., Sanford, K. K. & Jones, G. M. Chromosomal radiosensitivity during the G2 cell-cycle period of skin fibroblasts from individuals with familial cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 5400–5403 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wright, J. A. et al. DNA amplification is rare in normal human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 1791–1795 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Iafrate, A. J. et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat. Genet 36, 949–951 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Redon, R. et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444, 444–454 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Besenbacher, S. et al. Novel variation and de novo mutation rates in population-wide de novo assembled Danish trios. Nat. Commun. 6, 5969 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Knouse, K. A., Wu, J. & Amon, A. Assessment of megabase-scale somatic copy number variation using single-cell sequencing. Genome Res. 26, 376–384 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cox, D., Yuncken, C. & Spriggs, A. I. Minute chromatin bodies in malignant tumours of childhood. Lancet 1, 55–58 (1965).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Turner, K. M. et al. Extrachromosomal oncogene amplification drives tumour evolution and genetic heterogeneity. Nature 543, 122–125 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Storlazzi, C. T. et al. Gene amplification as double minutes or homogeneously staining regions in solid tumors: origin and structure. Genome Res. 20, 1198–1206 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    von Hoff, D. D. et al. Elimination of extrachromosomally amplified MYC genes from human tumor cells reduces their tumorigenicity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 8165–8169 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Vogt, N. et al. Amplicon rearrangements during the extrachromosomal and intrachromosomal amplification process in a glioma. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 13194–13205 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cohen, S., Agmon, N., Sobol, O. & Segal, D. Extrachromosomal circles of satellite repeats and 5S ribosomal DNA in human cells. Mob. DNA 1, 11–11 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Paulson, K. E. et al. A transposon-like element in human DNA. Nature 316, 359–361 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ohki, R., Oishi, M. & Kiyama, R. Preference of the recombination sites involved in the formation of extrachromosomal copies of the human alphoid Sau3A repeat family. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4971–4977 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tümer, Z. et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of ring chromosome 15 in three unrelated patients. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 130A, 340–344 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Guilherme, R. S. et al. Mechanisms of ring chromosome formation, ring instability and clinical consequences. BMC Med. Genet. 12, 171 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Smith, C. A. & Vinograd, J. Small polydisperse circular DNA of HeLa cells. J. Mol. Biol. 69, 163–178 (1972).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Yamagishi, H. et al. Purification of small polydisperse circular DNA of eukaryotic cells by use of ATP-dependent deoxyribonuclease. Gene 26, 317–321 (1983).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Gaubatz, J. W. & Flores, S. C. Tissue-specific and age-related variations in repetitive sequences of mouse extrachromosomal circular DNAs. Mutat. Res. 237, 29–36 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Shibata, Y. et al. Extrachromosomal microDNAs and chromosomal microdeletions in normal tissues. Science 336, 82–86 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Dillon, L. W. et al. Production of extrachromosomal microDNAs is linked to mismatch repair pathways and transcriptional activity. Cell Rep. 11, 1749–1759 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Kumar, P. et al. Normal and cancerous tissues release extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA) into the circulation. Mol. Cancer Res 15, 1197–1205 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Zhu, J. et al. Molecular characterization of cell-free eccDNAs in human plasma. Sci. Rep. 7, 10968 (2017).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Vogt, N. et al. Molecular structure of double-minute chromosomes bearing amplified copies of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene in gliomas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11368–11373 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Gresham, D. et al. Adaptation to diverse nitrogen-limited environments by deletion or extrachromosomal element formation of the GAP1 locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18551–18556 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Durkin, K. et al. Serial translocation by means of circular intermediates underlies colour sidedness in cattle. Nature 482, 81–84 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Møller, H. D., Parsons, L., Jørgensen, T. S., Botstein, D. & Regenberg, B. Extrachromosomal circular DNA is common in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E3114–E3122 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Møller, H. D. et al. Genome-wide purification of extrachromosomal circular DNA from eukaryotic cells. J. Vis. Exp. 110, e54239 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Heir, T., Erikssen, J. & Sandvik, L. Life style and longevity among initially healthy middle-aged men: prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 13, 831 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Smith, R. et al. Increased sperm DNA damage in patients with varicocele: relationship with seminal oxidative stress. Hum. Reprod. 21, 986–993 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Eberle, M. A. et al. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree. Genome Res. 27, 157–164 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gaubatz, J. W. Extrachromosomal circular DNAs and genomic sequence plasticity in eukaryotic cells. Mutat. Res. 237, 271–292 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Cesare, A. J. & Griffith, J. D. Telomeric DNA in ALT cells is characterized by free telomeric circles and heterogeneous t-Loops. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 9948–9957 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Wang, R. C., Smogorzewska, A. & de Lange, T. Homologous recombination generates T-loop-sized deletions at human telomeres. Cell 119, 355–368 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Forst, B. et al. Metastasis-inducing S100A4 and RANTES cooperate in promoting tumor progression in mice. PLoS ONE 5, e10374–11 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Slamon, D. J. et al. Studies of the HER-2/neu proto-oncogene in human breast and ovarian cancer. Science 244, 707–712 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pedersen, K. et al. A naturally occurring HER2 carboxy-terminal fragment promotes mammary tumor growth and metastasis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 3319–3331 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    García-Chequer, A. J. et al. Overview of recurrent chromosomal losses in retinoblastoma detected by low coverage next generation sequencing. Cancer Genet. 209, 57–69 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Girirajan, S., Campbell, C. D. & Eichler, E. E. Human copy number variation and complex genetic disease. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 203–226 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Libuda, D. E. & Winston, F. Amplification of histone genes by circular chromosome formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 443, 1003–1007 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    MacDonald, J. R., Ziman, R., Yuen, R. K. C., Feuk, L. & Scherer, S. W. The database of genomic variants: a curated collection of structural variation in the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D986–92 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dummer, P. D. et al. APOL1 kidney disease risk variants: an evolving landscape. Semin. Nephrol. 35, 222–236 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mehanna, P. et al. Characterization of the microDNA through the response to chemotherapeutics in lymphoblastoid cell lines. PLoS ONE 12, e0184365 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Carroll, S. M. et al. Double minute chromosomes can be produced from precursors derived from a chromosomal deletion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8, 1525–1533 (1988).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Albertson, D. G. Gene amplification in cancer. Trends Genet. 22, 447–455 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Navrátilová, A., Koblížková, A. & Macas, J. Survey of extrachromosomal circular DNA derived from plant satellite repeats. BMC Plant Biol. 8, 90 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Lanciano, S. et al. Sequencing the extrachromosomal circular mobilome reveals retrotransposon activity in plants. PLoS Genet 13, e1006630–20 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Turner, D. J. et al. Germline rates of de novo meiotic deletions and duplications causing several genomic disorders. Nat. Genet 40, 90–95 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Møller, H. D. et al. Formation of extrachromosomal circular DNA from long terminal repeats of retrotransposons in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. G3 6, 453–462 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Labeit, S., Kolmerer, B. & Linke, W. A. The giant protein titin. Emerging roles in physiology and pathophysiology. Circ. Res. 80, 290–294 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Carmignac, V. et al. C-terminal titin deletions cause a novel early-onset myopathy with fatal cardiomyopathy. Ann. Neurol. 61, 340–351 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Thomas, B. J. & Rothstein, R. Elevated recombination rates in transcriptionally active DNA. Cell 56, 619–630 (1989).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Skourti-Stathaki, K. & Proudfoot, N. J. A double-edged sword: R loops as threats to genome integrity and powerful regulators of gene expression. Genes & Dev. 28, 1384–1396 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Hull, R. M., Cruz, C., Jack, C. V. & Houseley, J. Environmental change drives accelerated adaptation through stimulated copy number variation. PLoS Biol. 15, e2001333–31 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Demeke, M. M., Foulquié-Moreno, M. R., Dumortier, F. & Thevelein, J. M. Rapid evolution of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae for Xylose fermentation through formation of extra-chromosomal circular DNA. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005010–21 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Mitsuda, S.-H. & Shimizu, N. Epigenetic repeat-induced gene silencing in the chromosomal and extrachromosomal contexts in human cells. PLoS ONE 11, e0161288–16 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Nathanson, D. A. et al. Targeted therapy resistance mediated by dynamic regulation of extrachromosomal mutant EGFR DNA. Science 343, 72–76 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Galeote, V. et al. Amplification of a Zygosaccharomyces bailii DNA segment in wine yeast genomes by extrachromosomal circular DNA formation. PLoS ONE 6, e17872–10 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Yamagishi, H. et al. Emergence of the extrachromosomal circular DNA complexes as one of the earliest signals of cellular differentiation in the early development of mouse embryo. Dev. Growth Differ. 25, 563–569 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Norman, A. et al. An improved method for including upper size range plasmids in metamobilomes. PLoS ONE 9, e104405 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zhu, J. et al. De novo-generated small palindromes are characteristic of amplicon boundary junction of double minutes. Int. J. Cancer 133, 797–806 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Shimizu, N., Shingaki, K., Kaneko-Sasaguri, Y., Hashizume, T. & Kanda, T. When, where and how the bridge breaks: anaphase bridge breakage plays a crucial role in gene amplification and HSR generation. Exp. Cell Res. 302, 233–243 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Borg, G. A. V. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 14, 377–381 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17.1, 10–12 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at (2013).

  68. 68.

    Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Chaisson, M. J. P. et al. Resolving the complexity of the human genome using single-molecule sequencing. Nature 517, 608–611 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Team, R. S. RStudio: integrated development for R. (RStudio, Boston, 2015).

  71. 71.

    Neph, S. et al. BEDOPS: high-performance genomic feature operations. Bioinformatics 28, 1919–1920 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Cai, M., Gao, F., Lu, W. & Wang, K. w4CSeq: software and web application to analyze 4C-seq data. Bioinformatics 32, 3333–3335 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Kim, D. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biology 14, R36 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Hoffmann, S. et al. A multi-split mapping algorithm for circular RNA, splicing, trans-splicing and fusion detection. Genome Biol. 15, R34 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Szabo, L. & Salzman, J. Detecting circular RNAs: bioinformatic and experimental challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet 17, 679–692 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Dale, R. K., Pedersen, B. S. & Quinlan, A. R. Pybedtools: a flexible Python library for manipulating genomic datasets and annotations. Bioinformatics 27, 3423–3424 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This research was supported by a research grant (VKR023513) from the Villum Foundation, the Danish Council for Independent Research (FNU 6108-00171B), and the Danish Diabetes Academy. The Centre for Physical Activity Research (CFAS) was supported by TrygFonden. The Centre of Inflammation and Metabolism (CIM) was supported by the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF55). We would like to thank M. Lisby for large plasmids. Thanks to members of the Regenberg laboratory, J. Ramos Madrigal, T. Gilbert, A. Krogh, L. Parsons, and T. Mourier for fruitful discussions.

Author information




H.D.M. performed experiments with assistance from J.F.H., P.P., B.R., and H.P. M.M built the pipeline for detection of eccDNAs. M.M. and I.P.L. executed bioinformatics analyses with assistance from R.S., L.M., and H.D.M. B.R. and H.D.M. further analyzed the data. H.D.M., H.Y.K.L., H.P., A.J.H., M.P.S., and B.R. designed experiments and the pipeline. H.D.M. and B.R. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Henrik Devitt Møller or Birgitte Regenberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Møller, H.D., Mohiyuddin, M., Prada-Luengo, I. et al. Circular DNA elements of chromosomal origin are common in healthy human somatic tissue. Nat Commun 9, 1069 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing