The Hippo pathway is a central regulator of tissue development and homeostasis, and has been reported to have a role during vascular development. Here we develop a bioluminescence-based biosensor that monitors the activity of the Hippo core component LATS kinase. Using this biosensor and a library of small molecule kinase inhibitors, we perform a screen for kinases modulating LATS activity and identify VEGFR as an upstream regulator of the Hippo pathway. We find that VEGFR activation by VEGF triggers PI3K/MAPK signaling, which subsequently inhibits LATS and activates the Hippo effectors YAP and TAZ. We further show that the Hippo pathway is a critical mediator of VEGF-induced angiogenesis and tumor vasculogenic mimicry. Thus, our work offers a biosensor tool for the study of the Hippo pathway and suggests a role for Hippo signaling in regulating blood vessel formation in physiological and pathological settings.
The Hippo pathway was originally identified in Drosophila and later in mammals1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Since its discovery, studies have found that Hippo signaling has important roles in development and disease by controlling organ size, maintaining tissue homeostasis/regeneration, and directing stem cell differentiation/renewal, as well as by promoting tumorigenesis, drug resistance, and metastasis8,9,10,11,12,13. Dysregulation of the Hippo pathway is frequently observed in human cancers14,15. When Hippo signaling is activated by upstream regulators, MST1/2 serine/threonine (S/T) kinases (mammalian homologues of Drosophila Hippo) phosphorylate/activate LATS1/2 kinases, which subsequently phosphorylate/inactivate their downstream effectors, transcriptional co-activator Yes-associated protein (YAP), and its paralogue Transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). S127-phosphorylated YAP (YAP-pS127) or S89-phosphorylated TAZ (TAZ-pS89) bind to cytoplasmic protein 14-3-3 and are prevented from transactivating downstream gene targets in the nucleus (e.g., CTGF, CYR61, FGF1, etc.)13. Although a few regulatory factors/cellular processes acting on the Hippo pathway have been uncovered (actin dynamics, cell matrix stiffness, cell–cell contact, and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA))16, comprehensive regulator screens have been technically limited. Until now, an absence of available tools precluded measuring the dynamics and activity of the Hippo pathway core components in a quantitative, high-throughput, and non-invasive manner. Thus, how the Hippo pathway is regulated by extracellular stimuli remains incompletely understood.
Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are molecules that regulate vasculogenesis during embryogenesis and also angiogenesis in adult tissues during wound healing, inflammation, and tumor growth and metastasis17,18,19. Aberrant signaling from VEGFs and their receptors (VEGFRs) is implicated in human diseases and conditions including cancer, diabetes, hemophilia, miscarriage, atherosclerosis, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD)17,18,20,21,22. Therapeutic strategies targeting VEGF and VEGFR are used to treat multiple diseases17,23,24. There is emerging evidence that the Hippo pathway has a role in vascular cell migration and VEGFR-induced developmental angiogenesis25,26,27. However, the precise signaling underlying this interaction and relative importance of Hippo signaling as a mediator of VEGFR function in disease is largely unknown. Indeed, a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying VEGF/VEGFR signaling is critical to fully appreciate and predictably modify their functions in physiology and pathology.
In order to identify upstream regulators of the Hippo pathway, here we develop a bioluminescence-based biosensor to measure the activity of LATS—the central factor of the Hippo signaling pathway16,28. We demonstrate that our LATS biosensor (LATS-BS) non-invasively monitors LATS activity in vitro and in vivo in real-time with accurate quantification, high sensitivity, and excellent reproducibility29. We perform a screen for upstream kinases that modulate LATS kinase activity using a library of small molecule kinase inhibitors and identify VEGFR signaling as a regulator of the Hippo pathway. We show that signaling between VEGFR, YAP, and TAZ has a critical role in VEGF-induced angiogenesis. Therefore, we have created a new tool to study Hippo pathway function and identify VEGF signaling as a regulator of the Hippo pathway in angiogenesis and vasculogenic mimicry (VM).
Establishment of a LATS-BS
As LATS phosphorylates S127 on YAP and 14-3-3 binds specifically to phosphorylated but not unphosphorylated S127-YAP13, we constructed a biosensor that monitors LATS kinase activity by measuring the interaction between pS127-YAP and 14-3-3. Our LATS-BS consists of a minimal YAP fragment that interacts with 14-3-3 in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. We chose not to use the full-length YAP protein, to avoid confounding signals by posttranslational modifications of YAP (e.g., phosphorylation at other sites and ubiquitination) by other upstream regulators. We tested whether 15 amino acids of YAP (YAP15) surrounding the S127 LATS phosphorylation site (aa. 120–134; Fig. 1a) could interact with 14-3-3 after phosphorylation by LATS2 kinase. Using in vitro glutathione S-transferase (GST)-pulldown assays, we show that similar to full-length YAP-GST, YAP15-GST could directly bind to 14-3-3 after LATS phosphorylation, whereas a phosphorylation-mutant YAP15-S127A-GST could not (Fig. 1b). We then fused YAP15 and 14-3-3 with N-terminal and C-terminal luciferase fragments (Nluc and Cluc), respectively, to create the LATS-BS (Fig. 1c). As depicted in Fig. 1d and demonstrated in Fig. 1e, cells transfected with LATS-BS alone had low luciferase activity and this was correlated with a low degree of Nluc-YAP15-S127 phosphorylation. Co-transfection of LATS-BS with MST2 was associated with increases in both Nluc-YAP-S127 phosphorylation and luciferase activity, and this effect was suppressed with LPA, an inhibitor of the Hippo pathway. LATS-BS co-expression with both MST2 and LATS2 was correlated with further increases in Nluc-YAP15-S127 phosphorylation and luciferase activity. Collectively, these observations are consistent with a model where MST2 activates LATS2, which phosphorylates Nluc-YAP15-S127, leading to binding with Cluc-14-3-3 and reconstitution of active luciferase (Fig. 1e).
To further validate this model, we mutated conserved residues within the LATS consensus phosphorylation motif (HxRxxS/T) on Nluc-YAP15-S127 to alanine (H122A, R124A, and S127A). Each individual mutation completely abolished Nluc-YAP15-S127 phosphorylation and LATS-BS luciferase activity (Fig. 1f). Likewise, the basal LATS-BS signal was reduced by CRISPR-Cas9 knockout of endogenous MST1/2 in HEK293A (50% reduction due to MST-dependent/independent LATS activation) or more dramatically by LATS1/2 knockout (~ 90% reduction) (Fig. 1g)30. Finally, inducible expression of LATS2 in HEK293A cells stably expressing LATS-BS shows that the levels of LATS2 are correlated with the level of endogenous YAP-pS127, Nluc-YAP15-pS127, as well as with LATS-BS activity (Fig. 1h). Therefore, we have constructed a LATS-BS that indeed responds to LATS activity.
Using a similar approach, we further constructed two additional biosensors that may also be used to monitor LATS activity (see Supplementary Fig. 1a–d).
LATS-BS responds to stimuli regulating the Hippo pathway
We next sought to validate the LATS-BS and explore potential applications for its use. As expected, the LATS-BS is activated by LATS in various cell lines (Fig. 2a). Similarly, the LATS-BS responded to numerous signals reported to modulate Hippo pathway activity, including cell confluency (Fig. 2b), drugs activating Hippo signaling (forskolin, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor, phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (PDK) inhibitor, forskolin/3-isobutyl-1-methylxanthine (F-IBMX), and 2-deoxy-glucose)16,31,32,33,34, and Hippo signaling inhibitors (LPA, epidermal frowth factor (EGF), insulin, sphingosine1-phosphophate (S1P), and 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA)) (Fig. 2c–e)16,30,31,32,33. Notably, for each of these experiments we measured biosensor activity in both cell lysates and in live cells using luciferase assay and bioluminescent imaging (BLI), respectively.
Using the LATS-BS, we also were able to visualize and quantify LATS activity at the individual cell level in living cancer cells using the LV200 BLI system (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 2a)35. In these images, the difference in biosensor signal intensity among individual cells represents altered endogenous LATS activity rather than differential LATS-BS expression levels, as only the LATS-phosphorylated fraction of LATS-BS emits bioluminescence. In addition, both the levels and subcellular localization of LATS-BS bioluminescence (cytoplasm where LATS is expressed) and green fluorescent protein (GFP) (control, nucleus/cytoplasm) were different within the same cell (Fig. 2f, g and Supplementary Fig. 2b). This technology also allowed us to compare the heterogeneity of LATS activity among cancer cell lines by assessing the distribution of luciferase activity (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Finally, using biophotonics BLI, we detected LATS-BS activity in mice, suggesting that this system may be useful for in vivo monitoring of LATS activity (Fig. 2h). Collectively, this data illustrates the broad range of potential applications for the LATS-BS in monitoring Hippo pathway activity.
Screen for kinases that modulate LATS activity
We next used our LATS-BS to search for kinases regulating Hippo signaling with a small-scale kinase inhibitor screen (Fig. 3a). Of 80 kinase inhibitors screened, 6 kinase inhibitors activated the biosensor (i.e., inhibitors of VEGFR, MEK, GSK-3, PKB/Akt, EGF receptor (EGFR), and CDK), whereas 6 inhibitors reduced the biosensor signal (i.e., inhibitors of TrkA, Broad, SYK, ATR/ATM, CHK1, and SGK) (Fig. 3b, Table 1). Several candidate LATS regulators identified by our screen were already described in the literature (i.e., EGFR and insulin)34,36,37, whereas others were novel. We confirmed the results of the screen using our LATS-BS and an STBS-luciferase reporter that measures the transactivating function of YAP/TAZ38. Indeed, multiple kinase inhibitors had opposite effects on the LATS-BS and STBS reporter (Fig. 3c,d), suggesting that our screen had identified true regulators of Hippo signaling.
VEGFR regulates the Hippo pathway
In our screen, the VEGFR inhibitor SU4312 showed the most dramatic effect on LATS and YAP/TAZ activities (Fig. 3c,d). Thus, we chose to further confirm the interaction between VEGFR and the Hippo pathway. Multiple VEGFR inhibitors activated LATS and inhibited YAP/TAZ (Fig. 4a, b). The messenger RNA levels of CYR61 and CTGF, two downstream transcriptional targets of YAP/TAZ39, were also significantly reduced after VEGFR inhibitor treatments (Fig. 4c). Overexpression of either VEGFR1 or VEGFR2 alongside YAP in HEK293 cells inhibited S127 phosphorylation on YAP (Fig. 4d). As a control, the LATS-BS showed no evidence of tyrosine phosphorylation by VEGFR2 (Supplementary Fig. 1e).
The relationship between VEGFR and Hippo signaling could also be modulated by stimulation of VEGFR with its ligand. VEGF treatment suppressed LATS-BS activity in MCF10A cells stably overexpressing VEGFR1 or VEGFR2 (Fig. 4e), whereas LATS inhibition is reversed by the VEGFR inhibitor Axitinib (Fig. 4e), a more specific VEGFR inhibitor than SU4312. Accordingly, VEGF treatment enhanced endogenous CYR61 mRNA expression in a VEGFR-dependent manner in MCF10A-VEGFR1/2, MDA-MB231 breast cancer, human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC), an immortalized human endothelial cell line Telo-HEC, and human blood outgrowth endothelial cells (BOEC) (Fig. 4f, g and Supplementary Fig. 4a, b). Finally, as LATS inhibits YAP by phosphorylating and sequestering YAP/TAZ in the cytoplasm3,4, we examined the subcellular localization of YAP or TAZ after VEGF treatment in MCF10A-VEGFR2 (YAP high), MDA-MB231 (TAZ-high), or BOEC (TAZ-high) cells3,4. YAP or TAZ are translocated into the nucleus within 15–30 min of VEGF treatment (Fig. 4h–m and Supplementary Fig. 3a–d), suggesting that VEGF/VEGFR activates YAP/TAZ through enhancement of their nuclear localization by inhibiting LATS.
Previous studies have suggested that VEGFR activates PI3K and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways40. Furthermore, others have shown that PI3K and MAPK signaling regulates the activity of Hippo pathway components34,36,37. Therefore, we next explored whether VEGFR suppresses LATS and activates YAP/TAZ through MAPK and PI3K signaling. We transfected the LATS-BS or STBS reporter alone or together with VEGFR2 into HEK293A cells and treated the cells with inhibitors of VEGFR, PI3K, AKT/PKB, or MEK. Similar to the VEGFR inhibitor, PI3K, AKT, and MEK inhibitors all blocked both VEGFR2-induced inhibition of LATS (Fig. 4n) and activation of YAP/TAZ (Fig. 4o). Furthermore, as previous studies indicate that VEGF activates downstream signaling through PI3K and MAPK, and that PI3K-Akt regulate the Hippo pathway through MST1, we assessed how VEGF treatment affects phosphorylation of each of the components (e.g., VEGFR, PI3K, ERK1/2, and MST1/2) in the signaling between VEGF and LATS. As shown in Fig. 4p, VEGF treatment enhanced phosphorylation of VEGFR, AKT, and ERK. VEGF also reduced phosphorylation of MST1 and LATS1 (at the MST1 phosphorylation site T1079). These changes in phosphorylation could be reversed by the VEGFR inhibitor axitinib. Together, these data provide strong evidence that VEGF/VEGFR may regulate the Hippo pathway by inhibiting MST1/2 through PI3K/MAPK.
YAP/TAZ are critical for VEGF-induced angiogenesis in vivo
VEGF and VEGFR2 are crucial factors in angiogenesis40. Likewise, there is emerging evidence linking LATS2 depletion or YAP overexpression to angiogenesis41,43,43. Therefore, we next investigated whether Hippo signaling contributes to VEGF–VEGFR-mediated angiogenesis. We used short interference RNAs (siRNAs) targeting YAP and/or TAZ to knockdown YAP and/or TAZ in MCF10A-VEGFR2 cells (Fig. 5a). Angiogenesis was assessed using an in vitro tube formation assay after stimulating the cells with VEGF. Although minimal tube formation was observed in wild-type MCF10A cells, overexpression of VEGFR2 increased tube formation in vitro (Fig. 5b) and VEGF treatment further increased this. Notably, knockdown of YAP and/or TAZ completely abolished both basal and VEGF-induced tube formation in MCF10A-VEGFR2 (Fig. 5b, c and Supplementary Fig. 4h). Pharmacological inhibition of YAP/TAZ with a low concentration (100 nM) of verteporfin (VP) achieved the same phenotype as genetic knockdown (Fig. 5b, c). We used the same approach to examine the role of YAP and TAZ during angiogenesis using HUVEC and BOEC cells. In these cells, endogenous YAP expression was barely detectable while TAZ was highly expressed (Fig. 5d, g). Interestingly, TAZ knockdown had a more substantial effect on blocking angiogenesis than YAP knockdown in both HUVEC and BOEC cells (Fig. 5d–i and Supplementary Fig. 4g, j). Importantly, we showed that the reduced angiogenesis caused by YAP/TAZ knockdown or VP treatment is not due to cell death (Supplementary Fig. 4f, 5d).
Mounting evidence suggests that tumor cells can form blood vessel-like structures through VM44. VM has important roles in tumor metastasis and drug resistance, and, similar to physiological angiogenesis, is regulated by VEGFR45,46. Therefore, we used VEGFR-positive MDA-MB231 cells to assess whether the Hippo pathway is involved in VM. MDA-MB231 cells formed tubes when treated with VEGF, whereas knockdown of YAP and/or TAZ significantly decreased VEGF-induced tube formation (Fig. 5j–l and Supplementary Fig. 4i). VP treatment also blocked tube formation by MDA-MB231 (Fig. 5j–l and Supplementary Fig. 4c–e). Therefore, the Hippo pathway contributes to VEGF-induced VM.
Previous reports have proposed YAP regulates angiogenesis by enhancing pro-angiogenic factor ANG-2 expression41. Further, overexpression of the YAP/TAZ downstream target CYR61 promotes angiogenesis47. Therefore, we examined the cellular levels of ANG-2 and CYR61 in our angiogenesis assays to determine how expression of these targets might relate to the angiogenic phenotype. Knockdown of YAP and/or TAZ dramatically reduced expression of ANG-2 and CYR61 in all of the cell lines examined (Fig. 5a, d, g, j). Interestingly, recombinant ANG-2 and CYR61 proteins could partially rescue tube formation by HUVEC cells after transient knockdown of YAP/TAZ or VP treatment, indicating that ANG-2 and CYR61 are critical gene targets regulated by YAP and TAZ in angiogenesis (Fig. 5m, n, and Supplementary Fig. 4k, 5b, c). However, given that these proteins could not fully restore angiogenesis in this model, it is very possible that YAP and TAZ also regulate other genes that contribute to this phenotype.
YAP/TAZ are critical for VEGF-induced angiogenesis in vivo
We next tested the relationship between VEGFR, YAP, TAZ, and angiogenesis in other models. First, we used an ex vivo rat aorta model where endothelial cells from sections of rat aorta form sprouts into Matrigel when stimulated with VEGF. Pharmacological inhibition of YAP and TAZ using VP decreased endothelial cell sprouting area in this model in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6a, b and Supplementary Fig. 5a). We confirmed that the sprouts observed indeed represent endothelial cell growth by staining the aortic sections for an endothelial cell marker, VE-cadherin (Fig. 6c).
Next, we used Matrigel plugs to explore angiogenesis in vivo in mice through two separate experiments. First, we examined angiogenesis by HUVECs grown in Matrigel plugs seeded with VEGF. VEGF stimulated blood vessel formation by HUVECs, whereas genetic knockdown of YAP/TAZ or YAP/TAZ inhibition by VP dramatically reduced VEGF-induced angiogenesis (Fig. 6d). The blood vessels in this model were positive for human CD31, indicating that the new blood vasculature had been established by HUVECs rather than mouse endothelial cells. We further used Matrigel plugs to evaluate whether YAP and TAZ can have a role in angiogenesis by mouse endothelial cells. We assessed blood vessel formation by murine cells in Matrigel plugs seeded with VEGF. Blood vasculature established by mouse endothelial cells were visualized by staining sections for mouse CD31 endothelial cell marker. In this model, systemic administration of VP reduced VEGF-induced blood vessel formation by mouse endothelial cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6e).
Finally, we explored how YAP and TAZ contribute to physiological angiogenesis using a mouse retina model. Mice at postnatal day 3 and 4 were treated with VEGF and/or VP, and retinal blood vasculature was observed at postnatal day 5. VP treatment reduced both the overall blood vessel density of the retina, as well as the number of filopodia at the vascular front (a marker of ongoing or active angiogenesis) (Fig. 6f–h). Therefore, we conclude that the Hippo pathway acts downstream of VEGFR to regulate angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo (Fig. 7).
In this work, we establish the first LATS-BS that can monitor LATS kinase activity and intensity of Hippo signaling in vitro and in vivo. We demonstrate how the LATS-BS can be used to quantify Hippo pathway activity in a wide spectrum of applications ranging from luciferase assays to biophotonics BLI. Although bioluminescence is widely used for reporting promoter activity and imaging tumors in mice, few studies have used it to measure protein function at the cellular level and even fewer studies have examined subcellular protein function using bioluminescence microscopy35. By applying new LV200 BLI technology to our LATS-BS, we were able to detect LATS activity in individual live cells. This system will have exciting applications for evaluating heterogeneous dynamics of LATS activity in cell culture as well as for the real-time monitoring of Hippo signaling responses to various drug treatments. Our in vivo work in mice further illustrates how the LATS-BS could potentially be used to pre-clinically examine the effects of a variety of drugs on LATS activity in mice.
We designed the LATS-BS using 15 amino acids from the YAP sequence so that it preferentially responds to LATS activity and we have confirmed this to be the case in vitro. However, it is possible that the biosensor may provide insights into other molecular mechanisms that regulate the YAP/14-3-3 interaction. For example, we have previously shown that YAP S127 phosphorylation is inhibited after YAP S128 phosphorylation by NEMO-like kinase under osmotic stress48. Thus, the biosensor we have created may have greater utility in determining the activity of additional pathways that affect the YAP/14-3-3 interaction.
In our work, we used the LATS-BS to perform a small-scale screen for regulators of LATS using 80 kinase inhibitors, revealing many kinases acting on the Hippo pathway. We validated VEGFR as a bona fide regulator of the Hippo pathway and established a YAP/TAZ-ANG-2/CYR61 signaling axis that is critical for angiogenesis and VM. Further validation of other candidate regulators of LATS from our screen (e.g., TrkA, SYK, and SGK) may provide insights into Hippo pathway regulation in response to other stimuli and may reveal novel functions for the Hippo signaling. Future large-scale screens using the LATS-BS will undoubtedly identify additional new activators or inhibitors of the Hippo signaling pathway.
We provide evidence that the Hippo pathway is a critical mediator of VEGF/VEGFR-induced angiogenesis and VM. During the revision of our manuscript, additional studies provided evidence that YAP/TAZ are key regulators of vascular cell migration and VEGF-induced developmental angiogenesis25,26,27. Given that VEGF/VEGFR and the Hippo pathway have important roles in cell proliferation and survival, cell migration, as well as stem cell renewal and differentiation8,10,11,12,17,18, and that angiogenesis is critical during embryogenesis, organogenesis, and wound-healing18,40,49, further examination of how these pathways interact in physiological and pathological states is warranted. It will be compelling to further explore how VEGFR-Hippo signaling is involved in these phenomenon.
Plasmid construction and site-directed mutagenesis
All biosensors were made by overlapping PCR using Photinus pyralis firefly luciferase from pGL3 luciferase reporter (Promega) as template. Biosensors were cloned into the BamHI/NotI sites of pcDNA3.1/hygro( + ). Full-length complementary DNAs (cDNAs) of human VEGFR1 (accession number NM_001159920.1) and VEGFR2 (accession number NM_002253.2) were subcloned into pcDNA3.1/hygro( + )-myc vector. Full-length cDNAs of human 14-3-3τ (accession number NM_006826) was subcloned into pcDNA3.1/hygro( + )-3XFLAG vector.
For lentivirus production, Nluc-YAP15, 14-3-3-Cluc, or VEGFR1/2 cDNA were cloned into WPI lentiviral vector. To make GST fusion proteins, oligos coding for YAP15-S127 and YAP15-S127A were annealed and directly cloned into the BamHI/NotI sites of pGEX-4T1. The following primers were used for cloning (restriction enzyme sites underlined):
14-3-3, sense (5′-CTGGATCCATGGAGAAGACTGAGCTGATCC-3′), anti-sense (5′-ATGA AACTGCGGCCGCTTAGTTTTCAGCCCCTTCTGCC-3′); YAP15-S127, sense (5′-GATCCCCACAGCATGTTCGAGCTCATTCC TCTCCAGCTTCTCTGCAGTTGTGAGC-3′), anti-sense (5′- GGCCGCTCACAACTGCAGAGAA GCTGGAGAGGAATGAGCTCGAACATGC TGTGG-3′); YAP-S127A, sense (5′-GATCCCCACAGCATGTTCGAGCTCATGCGTC TC CAGCTTCTCTGCAGTTGTGAGC-3′), anti-sense (5′-GGCCGCTCACAACTGCAGAGAAGC TGGAGACGCATGAGCTCGAACATGCTGTGGG-3′); VEGFR1, sense (5′-TCTGGATC CATGGTCAGCTACTGGGACACC-3′) anti-sense (5′-CTACGCGTCTAGATGGGTGGGG TGGAGTAC-3′); VEGFR2, sense (5′-TCTGGATCCATGCAGAGCAAGGTGCTGCTG-3′) (BamHI partial digestion required) anti-sense (5′-TCTACGCGTTTAAACAGGAGGAGAGCT CAGTGTG -3′); Nluc-YAP15, sense (5′-CTGGATCCGCCGCCACCATGGAAGACGCCAA AAACATAAAG -3′), anti-sense (5′-ATGAAACTGCGGCCGCTTACAACTGCAGAGAAGCTGG AGAGGAATGAGCTCGAACATGCTGTGGGCCTCCAGCTCCTCCTCCA TCCTTGTCAATCAAGGC -3′); 14-3-3-Cluc, sense (5′-CTGGATCCGCCGCCACCATGGAGAAGACTGAGCTGATC-3′), sense (5′-GGTAGTGGAGGAGGAGGTAGTGGTCCTATGATTATGTC C-3′), anti-sense (5′- ACTACCTCCTCCTCCACTACCTCCTCCTCCGTTTTCAGCCCCTTC TGCCGC-3′), anti-sense (5′-ATGAAACTGCGGCCGCTTACACGGCGATCTTTCC-3′); engineered luciferase LATS-BS, anti-sense (5′-ATGAAACTGCGGCCGCTTACAACTGCAGAGAAGCTGGAGAGGAATGAG CTCGAACATGCTGTGGCTTCTTGGCCTTTATGAGGATC -3′); Nluc-YAP15-H122A, anti-sense (5′-ATGAAACTGCGGCCGCTTACAACTGCAGAGAAGCTGGAG AGGAATGAGCTCGAACATGCTGTGGCTTCTTGGCCTTTATGAGGATC -3′); Nluc-YAP15-R124A, anti-sense (5′-ATGAAACTGCGGCCGCTTACAACTGCAGAGAAGCTGGAG AGGAATGAGCGGCAACATGCTGTGGGCCTCCAGCTCCTCCTCCATC -3′); Nluc-YAP15-S127A, anti-sense (5′-ATGAAACTGCGGCCGCTTACAACTGCAGAGAAGCTGGAG AGGCATGAGCTCGAACATGCTGTGG -3′); Nluc-YAP15, sense (5′-AGCTTT GTTTAAACGCCGCCACCATGGAAG ACGCCA AAAACATAAAG-3′), anti-sense (5′-AGCTTTGTTTAAACTTACAACTGCAG AGAAGCTG-3′); 14-3-3-Cluc, anti-sense (5′-TCTACGCGTTTACACGGCGATCTTTCC-3′).
Fusion protein production and GST pull-down assay
pGEX-4T1 constructs were transformed into BL21 cells in 2 × YTA medium. Fusion protein expression was induced with 0.4 mM IPTG (isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside) for 16 h at 20 °C. Bacterial cells then were lysed by sonication. Triton X-100 (20%) was added to a final concentration of 1% and samples were gently mixed on a rotator at 4 °C for 30 min–2 h. GST-fusion proteins were purified with glutathione–sepharose beads. For GST pull-down assays, 100 μg of cell lysate from HEK293 transiently expressing 14-3-3-FLAG was added to 5 μg of GST-fusion proteins and binding was assessed by GST pulldown with protein S-agarose beads and western blotting.
In vitro kinase assay
Five micrograms of GST fusion protein was incubated for 20 min at 30 °C with 100 ng of recombinant active LATS2 kinase (SignalChem#L2-11G) in kinase buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM EDTA, 100 μM sodium vanadate, 5 μM ATP). The proteins were then resolved on a 10% SDS–PAGE gel, transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and subjected to western blotting.
BOEC isolations were performed according to published methods50 with modifications in Dr. James’ lab at Queen’s University. Mononuclear cells were isolated in BD Vacutainer Cell Preparation Tubes (BD Biosciences), washed, and resuspended in EBM-2 (Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin/ streptomycin (P/S), and the EGM-2 bullet kit (complete endothelial cell growth medium (cEGM)-2). Cells (4 × 107) per well were seeded in collagen-coated six-well plates. After 9–21 days, BOEC appeared with characteristic cobblestone morphology. BOEC with passage numbers between 3 and 9 were used for all experiments.
A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma), HEK293 (human embryonic kidney cells), HEK293A, HEK293T were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma D6429) containing 10% FBS, and 1% P/S (Invitrogen). For MDA-MB231 (invasive ductal breast carcinoma), DMEM was supplemented with 10% FBS, 1% P/S, and 1% non-essential amino acids (Sigma M7145). MCF10A (non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cell line) were maintained in DMEM/F12 medium (Sigma D6421) containing 5% Horse Serum (Sigma H1270), 0.25 mM l-glutamine (Sigma G7513), 10 μg ml−1 Insulin (Sigma I6634), 20 ng ml−1 hEGF (Sigma E4269), 100 ng mL−1 Cholera toxin (Sigma C8052), 0.5 μg ml−1 Hydrocortisone (Sigma H4001), and 1% P/S. All cells were kept at 37 °C with 5% CO2. BOEC, Telo-HEC, and HUVEC (Lonza CC-2519 pooled donor) were cultured in cEGM-2 media (Lonza). LATS1/2 and MST1/2 knockout HEK293A cells were established as described30 and cultured in DMEM/10% FBS/1% P/S. For some experiments, cells were stimulated with 100 ng ml−1 VEGF-A (Sino Biological Inc.) after being serum-starved for 16 h.
Lentivirus production, purification, and infection
To produce lentiviruses, 1.5 × 107 HEK293T (passage lower than 10) cells were plated on a 150 mm plate coated with 0.1 mg ml−1 poly-l-lysine hydrobromide (Sigma 7890). The next day, cells were transfected with 8 μg of 14-3-3-Cluc-WPI, or Nluc-YAP15-WPI or VEGFR1/2-WPI alongside 6 μg of psPAX2 (packaging vector) and 2 μg of pMD2.G (envelope vector) using Polyjet transfection reagent (Signagen SL100688) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Twenty-four hours after transfection, media was replaced with DMEM/10% FBS containing 10 mM NaButyrate. Forty-eight hours after transfection, the virus-containing media was collected, passed through a 0.45 μm filter and concentrated using Lenti-X Concentrator (Clontech 631231). To titrate the virus, 3.5 × 104 HEK293 cells were plated into a 24-well plate and were infected with a series of lentivirus dilutions (with 8 μg ml−1 polybrene) the next day. GFP-positive cells were counted under a fluorescent microscope and the percentage of GFP-positive cells was calculated. To stably overexpress VEGFR1/2, LATS-BS, or LATS2-FLAG in cells, MCF10A, HEK293, A549, or MDA-MB231 cells were infected with lentivirus expressing cDNAs of these genes. An appropriate number of cells were plated in a six-well plate so that cells were ~ 40–50% confluent at the time of infection. Lentivirus was added with 8 μg ml−1 polybrene at a multiplicity of infection of 0.3. Two days after infection, cells were selected with 2 μg ml−1 puromycin or 300 μg ml−1 hygromycin B.
siRNA-mediated gene knockdown
siRNA duplexes targeting YAP and TAZ were purchased from IDT. An siRNA with scrambled sequence (siCtrl) was used as a negative control. All cells were transfected with 50 nM of siRNAs using RNAi-Max (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were collected for in vitro angiogenesis assay or were used for protein extraction and western blot analysis.
In vitro luciferase assay/live cells luciferase imaging
Cells were plated in triplicate 24 h before transfection. Cells were transfected with LATS-BS, its mutants, or STBS luciferase reporter using PolyJet transfection reagent. As an internal transfection control, pRL-TK Renilla luciferase control reporter vector was co-transfected alongside the biosensor into each sample. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were collected and luciferase assay was performed using a Luciferase Assay Kit (Promega) and Turner Biosystems 20/20 luminometer. Luciferase fold change was calculated based on the ratio of luciferase activity of LATS-BS or its mutants or STBS-Luc reporter to that of vector control. The data presented is the mean of three independent experiments. For live-cell imaging, LATS-BS or a pGL3-control vector were transfected into HEK293, MDA-MB231, or A549 cells. After 48 h, cells were trypsinized and collected in a black, clear-bottomed, 96-well plate. d-luciferin (150 μg ml−1, d-Luciferin, Potassium Salt, GoldBio UCK-250) in media was added to each well 5–10 min before imaging. Exposure time for images was ~ 3 min per plate. Imaging was performed using a LightTools Research system (Encinitas, CA) dark box and a Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash4.0 V2 digital CMOS camera over the course of 20 min, to establish optimal peak luciferase activity. The bioluminescence of the regions of interest was analyzed for total emission flux using Image Pro Plus software. The following compound treatments were used for in vitro luciferase assay and live-cell imaging: RAF inhibitor (GW5054, Cayman Chemical), ATR inhibitor (CGK733, Cayman Chemical), PI3K inhibitor 1 (GDC0941, Cayman Chemical), PI3K inhibitor 2 (LY294002, Cayman Chemical), PDK inhibitor (GSK2334470, Cayman Chemical)—10 μM for 4 h, EGF-100 ng ml−1 for 1 h; insulin (Sigma 91077 C)—10 μg ml−1 for 1 h; F/IBMX (Forskolin, Cayman Chemical /IBMX, Cayman Chemical)—0.1–10 μM for Forskolin and 100 μM for IBMX for 1 h; L-α–LPA (Sigma L7260)—0.1–10 μM for 1 h, S1P-1 μM for 1 h; TPA (Cell signaling #41745)—5 nM for 1 h; and 2-deoxy glucose (Sigma #D8375)—25 mM for 1 h. For the LV200 imaging, 3.5 mM d-luciferin was added to the media culturing HEK293, A549, or MDA-MB231 cells stably expressing LATS-BS at 5–10 min before imaging. Images were captured using Olympus LV200 Bioluminescence Imager with exposure times ranging from 30 s (HEK293A) to 10 min (MDA-MB231, A549). HEK293A were purchased from Cell Biolab. All other cell lines were purchased from ATCC.
In vivo luciferase imaging
For cell injection studies, 12-week-old female BALB/c mice were anesthetized by exposure to 1–3% isofluorane. HEK293 cells (3 × 106) transfected with LATS-BS alone (LATS –) or together with LATS (LATS +) were suspended in 100 μl of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and injected into the mammary fat pad. Two days after the injection, postsurgery mice received 150 mg kg−1 of d-luciferin (Cedarlane) dissolved in PBS by intraperitoneal injection. Imaging of ventral view was performed using a LightTools Research system (Encinitas, CA) dark box and a Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash4.0 V2 digital CMOS camera over a course of 30 min, to establish optimal peak luciferase activity. Pseudo-colored parametric overlays of BLI with anatomical reference images were dynamically constructed for each individual animal at comparative time points. The bioluminescence (BLI) of the regions of interest was then analyzed for total emission flux using Image Pro Plus software. All procedures were approved by the Queen’s University Animal Care Committee in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines.
Kinase inhibitor screen
LATS-BS was transfected into HEK293A. Cells were passed into a 384-well plate the following day. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were treated with the Tocriscreen Kinase Inhibitor Toolbox (Tocris Bioscience 3514) with each drug administered at 10 μM in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) for 4 h in duplicate. Biosensor activity was then measured by luciferase assay. Fold-change ratios were generated by comparing biosensor activity for each drug with that of DMSO-treated controls.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted using the RNAzol RT reagent (Molecular Research Center, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After extraction, RNA quality was evaluated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gel. SuperScript III Platinum SYBR Green One-Step qRT-PCR Kit (Invitrogen) and 50 ng total RNA from cells was used for quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR). 18 S rRNA was used as internal control. The following primers were used: rRNA, sense (5′-TCCCCATGAACGAGGAATTCC-3′), anti-sense (5′-AACCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGC-3′); CTGF, sense (5′-CCCTCGCGGCTTACCGACTGG-3′), anti-sense (5′-CACAGGTCTTGGAACAGGCGC-3′); CYR61, sense (5′-AATGGAGCCTCGCATCCTATA-3′), anti-sense (5′-TTCTTTCACAAGGCGGCA-3′).
Protein extraction, antibodies, and western blotting
Protein were extracted using RIPA buffer. Approximately 10–20 μg of protein lysate was used to perform WB. Primary antibodies used were as follows: mouse monoclonal anti-TAZ (560235, BD Biosciences, 1 : 1,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-YAP (sc-15407, Santa Cruz H125, 1 : 1,000); mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (A5441, Sigma, 1 : 10,000); rabbit monoclonal anti-cleaved PARP (ab32064, Abcam, 1 : 1,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-CYR61 (sc-13100, Santa Cruz, 1 : 1,000); rabbit monoclonal anti-luciferase (ab185923, Abcam, 1 : 1,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-HA (H6908, Sigma, 1 : 1,000); mouse monoclonal anti-FLAG (F1804, Sigma, 1 : 1,000); mouse monoclonal anti-Myc (9E10) (11667203001, Roche, 1 : 1,000); rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho YAP (S127) (4911, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-LATS1 (3447, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-ERK1/2 (4695, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), mouse monoclonal anti-AKT (2967, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473) (4060, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-ERK (4370, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-MST1 (Ser183) (3681, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-MST1 (3682, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-LATS1 (Thr1079) (8654, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-VEGFR2 (3770, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), rabbit monoclonal anti-VEGFR2 (2479, Cell Signaling, 1 : 1,000), mouse monoclonal anti-phospho-tyrosine 4G10 (no catalog number, Millipore, 1 : 1,000), and polyclonal goat anti-ANG2 (AF623, R&D, 1 : 1,000). Uncropped images of western blottings are available in Supplementary Fig. 6.
Cells were seeded in a 24-well plate with poly-l-lysine and fibronectin-coated coverslips in an appropriate number to achieve 40–50% confluency at the time of immunostaining. Cells were serum-starved for 16 h and untreated or treated with 100 ng ml−1 VEGF-A for 15–60 min. Cells were fixed in 5% formaldehyde for 15 min and were permeabilized in 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS for 2 min. Cells were subsequently incubated with primary and secondary antibodies diluted in PBS with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) and 10% goat serum. The same conditions were used for fixation, permeabilization, and staining of aorta ring. Antibodies used were: rabbit polyclonal anti-YAP (Santa Cruz H125, 1 : 100), mouse monoclonal anti-TAZ (BD Biosciences, 1 : 400), mouse monoclonal anti-VE-cadherin (Santa Cruz F-8, 1 : 100), Alexa Fluor (AF)-555 rabbit anti-mouse IgG and AF-488 goat anti-rabbit IgG. Images were captured with a Nikon TE-2000U (Melville, NY, USA) inverted microscope. Subcellular localization of YAP or TAZ was quantified from three separate experiments in which at least 200 cells were examined from the immunostaining.
Matrigel plugs were embedded in paraffin before cutting into 5 μm sections. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) signals were developed using rabbit monoclonal antibodies against human CD31 (1 : 100, Cell Signaling) or mouse CD31 (1 : 100, Cell Signaling). IHC was performed on a Ventana autostainer Discovery XT platform, using Ventana deparafinization and antigen retrieval protocols. EDTA antigen retrieval, pH 8, was used.
Matrigel tube formation assay
Four hours before angiogenesis assay, cell media was replaced with media containing 1% serum. µ-Slide Angiogenesis plates (Ibidi, 81506) were coated with 10 µl Matrigel and were allowed to polymerize for at least 30 min before use. Cells (1 × 104) (2 × 104 for MDA-MB231) were seeded into each well in triplicate. After 8 and 20 h at 37 °C, cells were imaged at × 4 magnification on a Nikon TE-2000U inverted microscope. In some experiments, 100 ng ml−1 VEGF-A or freshly prepared VP (Sigma, SML0534) were added into the medium. VP-treated samples were protected from light for the duration of the experiment. Tube formation was quantified using ImageJ50,51 and online WimTube software (Wimasis Image Analysis, Ibidi)52.
Aortic ring angiogenesis assay
The thoracic aorta was dissected from Sprague–Dawley rats, cleaned in PBS + 1% penicillin/streptomycin cocktail and cut into 0.5 mm ring segments, washed with PBS plus 1% penicillin/streptomycin cocktail, and embedded in growth factor-reduced Matrigel in a 24-well cell culture plate. Embedded rings were covered in EBM-2 media containing, 1% FBS, 1% P/S cocktail, and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h before treatment with vehicle or VP. VP-treated samples were protected from light throughout the assay. Photographs were taken every 24 h using a phase-contrast microscope (Olympus CKX41) for up to 7 days. Endothelial cell sprouting was quantified using ImagePro50 and online Wimsprout software (Wimasis Image Analysis, Ibidi)53. All procedures were approved by the Queen’s University Animal Care Committee in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines54.
In vivo Matrigel plug assay
In vivo analysis of angiogenesis was evaluated using a Matrigel plug assay. Two different Matrigel plug experiments were performed. First, 5 × 106 HUVEC-siCtrl cells ± VEGF or HUVEC-siYAP/siTAZ cells + VEGF were mixed in 250 µl of Matrigel and injected subcutaneously into the flanks of 12-week-old Rag2−/−; Il2rg−/− mice. One-day post Matrigel injections, mice were divided into groups and treated with vehicle or 100 mg kg−1 VP. Treatments were administered via intraperitoneal injections every other day. Three mice were used for each treatment condition. On day 7, mice were euthanized and Matrigel plugs containing HUVEC cells were collected. In the second experiment, a total of 200 µl of cold growth factor reduced phenol-red free Matrigel ± VEGF (200 ng ml−1) was injected subcutaneously. One-day post Matrigel injections, mice were divided into three treatment groups: control (DMSO), 50 mg kg−1 VP dose, and 100 mg kg−1 high VP. Treatments were administered via intraperitoneal injections every other day. Three mice were used for each treatment condition. On day 14, plugs were collected. All Matrigel plugs were exposed and digitally photographed followed by excision. Plugs were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and paraffin-embedded for sectioning. All procedures were approved by the Queen’s University Animal Care Committee in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines.
Retina whole-mount immunofluorescence
Mice were treated at postnatal day 3 and 4 with 1 mg kg−1 VEGF and/or 100 mg kg−1 VP by intraperitoneal injection. On postnatal day 5, pups were euthanized and eyes were collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (15710-S, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Pennsylvania, USA) for 2 h at room temperature. Retinas were isolated by dissecting away the cornea, sclera, lens, vitreous body, and hyaloid vessels. Retinal vessels were stained with Alexa Flour 594-conjugated Griffonia simplicifolia Isolectin B4 (IB4; I21413, ThermoFisher Scientific, Maine, USA) after 2 h of blocking in PBS (PBS404, BioShop, Burlington, Canada) with 0.2% BSA (ALB006.5, BioShop) and 0.5% Triton-X (TRX506, BioShop), and washing in PBS with 1% Triton-X. Photomicrographs of the retinal vasculature were taken using an Imager Z1m microscope and Axiovision MR3 camera (Zeiss, Toronto, Canada) at × 100 and × 200 magnification. ImageJ and Angiotool55 were used for analysis. Two retinas from a single pup were treated as technical replicates and averaged. All procedures were approved by the Queen’s University Animal Care Committee in accordance with Canadian Council on Animal Care guidelines.
For all graphs, data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical comparisons between groups were performed using a Student’s t-test or analysis of variance.
The authors declare that all data supporting the conclusions of this study are presented within the paper and the supplementary information files and are available from the authors.
Justice, R. W., Zilian, O., Woods, D. F., Noll, M. & Bryant, P. J. The Drosophila tumor suppressor gene warts encodes a homolog of human myotonic dystrophy kinase and is required for the control of cell shape and proliferation. Genes Dev. 9, 534–546 (1995).
Xu, T., Wang, W., Zhang, S., Stewart, R. A. & Yu, W. Identifying tumor suppressors in genetic mosaics: the Drosophila lats gene encodes a putative protein kinase. Development 121, 1053–1063 (1995).
Zhao, B. et al. Inactivation of YAP oncoprotein by the Hippo pathway is involved in cell contact inhibition and tissue growth control. Genes Dev. 21, 2747–2761 (2007).
Hao, Y., Chun, A., Cheung, K., Rashidi, B. & Yang, X. Tumor suppressor LATS1 is a negative regulator of oncogene YAP. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 5496–5509 (2008).
Wu, S., Huang, J., Dong, J. & Pan, D. Hippo encodes a Ste-20 family protein kinase that restricts cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis in conjunction with salvador and warts. Cell 114, 445–456 (2003).
Harvey, K. F., Pfleger, C. M. & Hariharan, I. K. The Drosophila Mst ortholog, hippo, restricts growth and cell proliferation and promotes apoptosis. Cell 114, 457–467 (2003).
Udan, R. S., Kango-Singh, M., Nolo, R., Tao, C. & Halder, G. Hippo promotes proliferation arrest and apoptosis in the Salvador/Warts pathway. Nat. Cell. Biol. 5, 914–920 (2003).
Janse van Rensburg, H. J. & Yang, X. The roles of the Hippo pathway in cancer metastasis. Cell. Signal. 28, 1761–1772 (2016).
Yang, X. & Xu, T. Molecular mechanism of size control in development and human diseases. Cell Res. 21, 715–729 (2011).
Pfleger, C. M. The Hippo pathway: a master regulatory network important in development and dysregulated in disease. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 123, 181–228 (2017).
Moya, I. M. & Halder, G. The Hippo pathway in cellular reprogramming and regeneration of different organs. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 43, 62–68 (2016).
Zhao, Y. & Yang, X. The Hippo pathway in chemotherapeutic drug resistance. Int. J. Cancer 137, 2767–2773 (2015).
Yu, F. X., Zhao, B. & Guan, K. L. Hippo pathway in organ size control, tissue homeostasis, and cancer. Cell 163, 811–828 (2015).
Yeung, B., Yu, J. & Yang, X. Roles of the Hippo pathway in lung development and tumorigenesis. Int. J. Cancer 138, 533–539 (2016).
Plouffe, S. W., Hong, A. W. & Guan, K. L. Disease implications of the Hippo/YAP pathway. Trends Mol. Med. 21, 212–222 (2015).
Meng, Z., Moroishi, T. & Guan, K. L. Mechanisms of Hippo pathway regulation. Genes Dev. 30, 1–17 (2016).
Ferrara, N. & Adamis, A. P. Ten years of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov. 15, 385–403 (2016).
Chung, A. S. & Ferrara, N. Developmental and pathological angiogenesis. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 27, 563–584 (2011).
Guo, S., Colbert, L. S., Fuller, M., Zhang, Y. & Gonzalez-Perez, R. R. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 in breast cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1806, 108–121 (2010).
Bolinger, M. T. & Antonetti, D. A. Moving past anti-VEGF: novel therapies for treating diabetic retinopathy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091498 (2016).
Randi, A. M. & Laffan, M. A. Von Willebrand factor and angiogenesis: basic and applied issues. J. Thromb. Haemost. 15, 13–20 (2017).
Sia, D., Alsinet, C., Newell, P. & Villanueva, A. VEGF signaling in cancer treatment. Curr. Pharm. Des. 20, 2834–2842 (2014).
Bozza, C., Fontanella, C., Buoro, V., Mansutti, M. & Aprile, G. Novel antiangiogenic drugs for the management of breast cancer: new approaches for an old issue? Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 8, 251–265 (2015).
Shibuya, M. VEGF-VEGFR system as a target for suppressing inflammation and other diseases. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug. Targets 15, 135–144 (2015).
Wang, X. et al. YAP/TAZ orchestrate VEGF signaling during developmental angiogenesis. Dev. Cell 42, 462–478.e7 (2017).
Kim, J. et al. YAP/TAZ regulates sprouting angiogenesis and vascular barrier maturation. J. Clin. Invest. 127, 3441–3461 (2017).
Sakabe, M. et al. YAP/TAZ-CDC42 signaling regulates vascular tip cell migration. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10918–10923 (2017).
Visser, S. & Yang, X. LATS tumor suppressor: a new governor of cellular homeostasis. Cell Cycle 9, 3892–3903 (2010).
Azad, T., Tashakor, A. & Hosseinkhani, S. Split-luciferase complementary assay: applications, recent developments, and future perspectives. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406, 5541–5560 (2014).
Meng, Z. et al. MAP4K family kinases act in parallel to MST1/2 to activate LATS1/2 in the Hippo pathway. Nat. Commun. 6, 8357 (2015).
Zhao, B. et al. Cell detachment activates the Hippo pathway via cytoskeleton reorganization to induce anoikis. Genes Dev. 26, 54–68 (2012).
Sun, S. & Irvine, K. D. Cellular organization and cytoskeletal regulation of the Hippo signaling network. Trends Cell. Biol. 26, 694–704 (2016).
Yu, F. X. et al. Regulation of the Hippo-YAP pathway by G-protein-coupled receptor signaling. Cell 150, 780–791 (2012).
Fan, R., Kim, N. G. & Gumbiner, B. M. Regulation of Hippo pathway by mitogenic growth factors via phosphoinositide 3-kinase and phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2569–2574 (2013).
Jain, P. et al. Bioluminescence microscopy as a method to measure single cell androgen receptor activity heterogeneous responses to antiandrogens. Sci. Rep. 6, 33968 (2016).
Reddy, B. V. & Irvine, K. D. Regulation of Hippo signaling by EGFR-MAPK signaling through Ajuba family proteins. Dev. Cell 24, 459–471 (2013).
Strassburger, K., Tiebe, M., Pinna, F., Breuhahn, K. & Teleman, A. A. Insulin/IGF signaling drives cell proliferation in part via Yorkie/YAP. Dev. Biol. 367, 187–196 (2012).
Mohseni, M. et al. A genetic screen identifies an LKB1-MARK signalling axis controlling the Hippo-YAP pathway. Nat. Cell Biol. 16, 108–117 (2014).
Lai, D., Ho, K. C., Hao, Y. & Yang, X. Taxol resistance in breast cancer cells is mediated by the hippo pathway component TAZ and its downstream transcriptional targets Cyr61 and CTGF. Cancer Res. 71, 2728–2738 (2011).
Simons, M., Gordon, E. & Claesson-Welsh, L. Mechanisms and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 611–625 (2016).
David Romano, Lan K. Nguyen, David Matallanas, Melinda Halasz, Carolanne Doherty, Boris N. Kholodenko, Walter Kolch, (2014) Protein interaction switches coordinate Raf-1 and MST2/Hippo signalling. Nature Cell Biology 16 (7):673–684
Choi, H. J. et al. Yes-associated protein regulates endothelial cell contact-mediated expression of angiopoietin-2. Nat. Commun. 6, 6943 (2015).
Fang, L. et al. MiR-93 enhances angiogenesis and metastasis by targeting LATS2. Cell Cycle 11, 4352–4365 (2012).
Dai, X. et al. Phosphorylation of angiomotin by Lats1/2 kinases inhibits F-actin binding, cell migration, and angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 34041–34051 (2013).
Maniotis, A. J. et al. Vascular channel formation by human melanoma cells in vivo and in vitro: vasculogenic mimicry. Am. J. Pathol. 155, 739–752 (1999).
Qiao, L. et al. Advanced research on vasculogenic mimicry in cancer. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 19, 315–326 (2015).
Seftor, R. E. et al. Tumor cell vasculogenic mimicry: from controversy to therapeutic promise. Am. J. Pathol. 181, 1115–1125 (2012).
Babic, A. M., Kireeva, M. L., Kolesnikova, T. V. & Lau, L. F. CYR61, a product of a growth factor-inducible immediate early gene, promotes angiogenesis and tumor growth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6355–6360 (1998).
Hong, A. W. et al. Osmotic stress-induced phosphorylation by NLK at Ser128 activates YAP. EMBO Rep. 18, 72–86 (2017).
Pozarowska, D. & Pozarowski, P. The era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs in ophthalmology, VEGF and anti-VEGF therapy. Cent. Eur. J. Immunol. 41, 311–316 (2016).
Javier Martin-Ramirez, Menno Hofman, Maartje van den Biggelaar, Robert P Hebbel, Jan Voorberg, (2012) Establishment of outgrowth endothelial cells from peripheral blood. Nature Protocols 7 (9):1709–1715.
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Khoo, C. P., Micklem, K. & Watt, S. M. A comparison of methods for quantifying angiogenesis in the Matrigel assay in vitro. Tissue Eng. Part. C Methods 17, 895–906 (2011).
Nicosia, R. F. & Ottinetti, A. Growth of microvessels in serum-free matrix culture of rat aorta. A quantitative assay of angiogenesis in vitro. Lab. Invest. 63, 115–122 (1990).
Zudaire, E., Gambardella, L., Kurcz, C. & Vermeren, S. A computational tool for quantitative analysis of vascular networks. PLoS ONE 6, e27385 (2011).
This work was supported by grants from Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR#119325, 148629), Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (CBCF) to X.Y. This work was also supported by the Roswell Park Cancer Institute and National Cancer Institute (NCI) grant number P30 CA016056, Roswell Park Alliance Foundation, and in part by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) R01 CA207504, the American Cancer Society Research Scholar Grant RSG-14-214-01-TBE to J.Z. T.A. is supported by the Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship and Ontario International Graduate Scholarship. H.J.J.v.R is supported by a Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarship in Science and Technology. We thank Drs David Lillicrap and Paula James for providing the HUVEC, Telo-HEC, and BOEC cells; Alison Michels and Soundarya Selvam for helping in HUVEC and BOEC cell culture and angiogenesis analysis; Mina Ghahremani for help in making some figures; Drs Peter Greer, Kazem Nouri, and Amin Tashakor for reading the manuscript; Dr Javad Hashemi from Queen’s School of Computing for helping with data analysis; Lee Boudreau for performing IHC; Jia Yue Amelia Shi for help with mouse work; as well as Roswell Park Cancer Institute Core Facility for performing the kinase inhibitor screen.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Azad, T., Janse van Rensburg, H.J., Lightbody, E.D. et al. A LATS biosensor screen identifies VEGFR as a regulator of the Hippo pathway in angiogenesis. Nat Commun 9, 1061 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03278-w
Cell Death & Disease (2020)
Molecular Biology Reports (2020)
Retinal blood vessel‐origin yes‐associated protein (YAP) governs astrocytic maturation via leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF)
Cell Proliferation (2020)
New insights into the core Hippo signaling and biological macromolecules interactions in the biology of solid tumors
Downregulation of microRNA-224-3p Hampers Retinoblastoma Progression via Activation of the Hippo-YAP Signaling Pathway by Increasing LATS2
Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science (2020)