Insufficient water availability for crop production is a mounting barrier to achieving the 70% increase in food production that will be needed by 2050. One solution is to develop crops that require less water per unit mass of production. Water vapor transpires from leaves through stomata, which also facilitate the influx of CO2 during photosynthetic assimilation. Here, we hypothesize that Photosystem II Subunit S (PsbS) expression affects a chloroplast-derived signal for stomatal opening in response to light, which can be used to improve water-use efficiency. Transgenic tobacco plants with a range of PsbS expression, from undetectable to 3.7 times wild-type are generated. Plants with increased PsbS expression show less stomatal opening in response to light, resulting in a 25% reduction in water loss per CO2 assimilated under field conditions. Since the role of PsbS is universal across higher plants, this manipulation should be effective across all crops.
Demand for primary foodstuffs, that is, grains and seeds of our major crops, may increase by 70–100% by 20501,2. One major barrier to meeting this large demand will be availability of water for crop production. Crop productivity strongly depends on having a sufficient supply of freshwater, and agriculture consumes 90% of total global freshwater3. A large proportion of global food crops depend on irrigation, which is depleting global groundwater, and putting the sustainability of global food production at risk4. To capture atmospheric CO2 during photosynthesis, stomatal pores need to stay open to allow CO2 diffusion into the leaf. However, stomatal opening causes most of the water absorbed by plant roots to be lost via transpiration. Transpiration is proportional to the water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) from leaf to air, which represents the gradient between the humidity in leaf internal airspaces and drier air surrounding the leaf. With the global rise in air and surface temperatures, VPD has been increasing, thus increasing demand for irrigation5,6.
Because stomatal opening controls both the CO2 influx and the water vapor efflux, stomata have to respond to many different cues to balance the fluxes7. Progress has been made in unraveling the molecular basis of the response of stomata to intercellular CO2 concentration8 and blue light9, but much less is known about stomatal response to light quantity. Stomatal opening in response to light is typically much less pronounced in detached epidermal layers, but can be restored when the connection with mesophyll cells is restored10,11,12. Therefore, although some control resides in the guard cells, stomatal responses to light intensity seem to rely strongly on a signal derived from the underlying mesophyll tissue. The rate of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation at high light intensity is usually limited by the restriction of CO2 influx imposed by stomata. Thus, control of stomatal opening by a signal derived directly from photosynthesis could provide a feedback loop to match the light energy processed by the photosynthetic light-dependent reactions with sufficient supply of CO2. However, several mutants deficient in specific components of the photosynthetic light-dependent or carbon reactions typically show vast decreases in the rate of CO2 assimilation without corresponding changes in stomatal conductance. For example, in tobacco plants containing reduced amounts of cytochrome b 6 /f13, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco)13,14, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase15, or sedoheptulose-bisphosphatase16 net assimilation rate was substantially reduced, but stomatal conductance often remained relatively unaltered compared to the wild-type (WT). These results show clearly that the stomatal opening signal does not scale directly with the rate of CO2 uptake. However, the interpretation of these results is severely complicated by the strong decrease of net CO2 assimilation rate associated with these transgenic alterations, which greatly increases the CO2 concentration in the intercellular airspaces within the leaf (Ci), providing a potent signal for stomatal closing8.
A recent analysis suggested the redox state of chloroplastic quinone A (QA) as an early signal for stomatal opening in response to light17, with a more reduced QA pool corresponding to increased stomatal opening. QA is the primary electron acceptor downstream of photosystem II and its oxidation state reflects the balance between excitation energy at photosystem II and the rate of the Calvin–Benson cycle. This predicts that decreasing the excitation pressure at photosystem II should directly affect stomatal opening in response to light by keeping QA more oxidized. This prediction is tested here by altering expression of Photosystem II Subunit S (PsbS). PsbS expression directly affects the rate at which excitation energy absorbed by the antenna complex of photosystem II is used to reduce QA, because of its role in non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). NPQ protects the photosynthetic machinery under excessive light conditions via controlled dissipation of absorbed light energy as heat18,19. PsbS expression strongly stimulates NPQ and promotes photoprotection under high light or rapidly fluctuating conditions20, but typically does not affect steady-state rates of net CO2 assimilation21, thus keeping control of stomatal movements via Ci relatively unaltered. Manipulation of PsbS expression thus provides an ideal test case to verify if QA redox state is indeed an early signal for light-induced stomatal opening. Since PsbS stimulates the thermal dissipation of excitation energy, we predicted that increased expression of this protein would keep the redox state of QA more oxidized, decrease stomatal opening in response to light, and decrease water loss at the leaf level. To test this hypothesis, Nicotiana tabacum lines with both increased and decreased PsbS expression were generated and analyzed under controlled and field conditions. N. tabacum cv “Petite Havana” was transformed with the coding sequence of N. benthamiana PsbS fused to the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter for constitutive strong expression (Supplementary Fig. 1). Four independent, single-copy transformation events with increased NPQ amplitude (PSBS-28, PSBS-34, PSBS-43, and PSBS-46) were selected and selfed to obtain progeny homozygous for the transgene. Additionally, two events exhibiting spontaneous partial silencing of PsbS expression (psbs-4 and psbs-50) were selected for further analysis. Our results show that the light response of stomatal conductance is clearly affected by PsbS expression. Plants overexpressing PsbS show an average 25% reduction in water loss per CO2 assimilated under field conditions.
PsbS expression under controlled conditions
PSBS-28, PSBS-43, psbs-4, and WT N. tabacum plants were grown in a controlled-environment cabinet and PsbS transcript and protein levels were measured in samples from the youngest fully expanded leaves. PSBS-28 and PSBS-43 samples showed 4.2-fold and 3.5-fold increases in total (transgenic and native) PsbS transcript relative to WT (Fig. 1a), whereas transcript levels in psbs-4 were 10-fold less than WT. PsbS protein expression, normalized to the large subunit of the oxygen-evolving complex (PsbO) as a relative measure for the abundance of photosystem II, was 2.7-fold higher in PSBS-43 and 3.5-fold higher in PSBS-28 relative to WT while virtually absent in psbs-4 (Fig. 1b, c).
PsbS expression affects intrinsic water-use efficiency
Net CO2 uptake (An) increased in response to light intensity until approximately 800 μmol m−2 s−1 and was not significantly affected by PsbS expression (P = 0.6, analysis of variance (ANOVA); Fig. 1d). The maximum capacity for carboxylation of ribulose-bisphosphate (Vcmax) and the maximum rate of whole-chain electron transport (Jmax) showed weak positive trends with PsbS content (Supplementary Fig. 2a–d). Rubisco content was similar between lines (Supplementary Fig. 2e), but Rubisco activation state was slightly lower in psbs-4 (85%), compared to WT (95%), whereas the overexpressing lines were similar to wild-type (PSBS-28, 93%) or slightly higher (PSBS-43, 102%; Supplementary Fig. 2f). Stomatal limitation to net CO2 assimilation also significantly differed with PsbS content (Supplementary Fig. 2g); however, the aforementioned changes in photosynthetic capacity and Rubisco biochemistry counteracted these differences, leaving An unchanged between all lines.
As expected, differences in PsbS protein expression led to pronounced differences in NPQ (Fig. 1e). At high light, NPQ was significantly higher in PSBS-28 and PSBS-43 relative to WT (P ≤ 0.05, Dunnett’s two-way test) and significantly lower in psbs-4 (P ≤ 0.02, Dunnett’s two-way test). In concert with these differences, the redox state of QA was significantly more oxidized in PSBS-28 and PSBS-43 relative to WT (P ≤ 0.02, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 1f) and more reduced in psbs-4 (P ≤ 0.002, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 1f). These differences in QA redox state at high light were reflected in differences in stomatal conductance (gs; Fig. 1g). The change in gs was consistent with altered regulation of stomatal opening rather than any changes in stomatal or epidermal anatomy, that is, pore dimensions or stomatal density. Stomatal density was 21% (abaxial) to 23% (adaxial) lower in psbs-4 and 18% (abaxial) lower in PSBS-43, relative to WT (P = 0.006 for abaxial and P = 0.02 for adaxial, ANOVA; Supplementary Fig. 3a), but unchanged in PSBS-28. Stomatal pore dimensions on both abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces were very similar between all lines (Supplementary Fig. 3b–d). In addition, all measurements of QA redox state and gs in all lines could be described by a single highly significant positive correlation (P < 0.0001, ANOVA; Fig. 1h), consistent with a role for QA redox state as an early determinant for stomatal opening in response to light intensity17. Furthermore, the differences in gs associated with PsbS expression in combination with unchanged An resulted in a strong correlation between intrinsic water-use efficiency (An/gs, WUEi) and PsbS expression (R2 = 0.92, P = 0.03, ANOVA; Fig. 1i).
WUE and productivity under field conditions
The differences in WUEi observed under controlled conditions were subsequently tested under field conditions. A field experiment was conducted with transformants with both increased (PSBS-28, PSBS-34, PSBS-43, and PSBS-46) and decreased PsbS expression (psbs-4 and psbs-50) in an incomplete block design (Supplementary Fig. 4). Western blotting confirmed differences in PsbS expression in the youngest fully expanded leaf for each genotype at 34, 37, 41, and 45 days after emergence (DAE) (Fig. 2a–h). As predicted, transformants showed a broad range of PsbS expression from almost none to 3.7-fold higher than WT, which were directly reflected in levels of NPQ measured on leaf discs (Fig. 2i). Critically, as under controlled conditions, net CO2 assimilation rate did not differ among the transformants and WT (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 5a), but gs correlated negatively to PsbS expression (P = 0.0001, ANOVA; Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 5b). The reduction in gs due to PsbS overexpression varied between 4 and 30%, whereas gs was increased by 46% due to decreased PsbS expression (Fig. 3b). Once again, WUEi was significantly affected by genotype (P = 0.007, ANOVA; Fig. 3c and Supplementary Fig. 5d) and correlated positively with PsbS expression (R2 = 0.94, P = 0.004, ANOVA; Fig. 3d). Increased PsbS expression resulted in 25–33% increased WUEi, whereas decreased PsbS expression led to 14% reduction in WUEi. Final size and dry weight were determined at the end of the field experiment. All biomass productivity traits were significantly affected by PsbS expression (P ≤ 0.008, ANOVA; Fig. 3e–g). Decreased PsbS expression significantly reduced dry weight (22%, P ≤ 0.002, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 3e, Supplementary Fig. 6), leaf area (15%, significant only in psbs-50, P = 0.03, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 3f) and plant height (15%, P < 0.0001, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 3g). The productivity measures in transformants with increased PsbS expression did not show a consistent response. PSBS-28 showed significant decreases in dry weight (−18%, P = 0.008, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 3e), leaf area (−19%, P = 0.005, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 3f), and plant height was also significantly smaller in PSBS-28 and PSBS-34 (−9 and −8%, P ≤ 0.01, Dunnett’s two-way test; Fig. 3g), whereas the same productivity measures were not significantly affected in PSBS-43 and PSBS-46, relative to WT.
Our results provide direct proof, through genetic manipulation, that increasing PsbS expression suppresses stomatal opening with little effect on CO2 uptake and so increases WUE. We showed a strong dependence of gs on PsbS expression (Figs. 1g, 3b) and that overexpression of PsbS significantly improved WUEi (Fig. 3c), representing a strong decrease (averaging 25%) in the amount of water used for each molecule of CO2 assimilated at leaf level by an irrigated field crop. Novel bioengineering strategies to improve crop WUE such as exemplified here are urgently needed, especially considering the long timelines for developing new crop varieties22. Although this test of concept was performed on tobacco, the role of PsbS in NPQ is universal across higher plants23, so this manipulation can be expected to be effective across all crops.
Here a large improvement of leaf level WUEi is shown (Figs. 1i, 3c), which can be expected to conserve soil moisture and may result in increased productivity if the crop becomes water-limited. However, many feedbacks could lessen this improvement at the whole crop level. Open-air elevation of CO2 has provided a direct test of the significance of such feedbacks. When stomatal conductance in a mature soybean canopy was reduced by 10% due to open-air elevation of [CO2], this led to a corresponding decrease in the measured ecosystem evapotranspiration by 8.6%24.
Our data for the first time show that modulation of QA redox state via PsbS expression affects stomatal conductance and leaf WUE. Interestingly, manipulation of PsbS expression did not directly impact steady-state photosynthesis, which is consistent with previous findings21 and thus allowed for specific targeting of the putative QA-redox signal without strongly affecting the CO2 control over stomatal conductance via Ci (Fig. 4a). Although Ci was still somewhat affected (Supplementary Fig. 5c), there was a strong linear correlation of QA redox state with gs (Fig. 1h), in contrast to several previous manipulations, where blockage of electron transfer components downstream of QA13,25 or impairment of Calvin–Benson cycle function14,15,16,26,27 strongly affected stomatal control by both QA redox state and Ci in opposing ways, resulting in ambiguous effects on stomatal conductance. Furthermore, when electron transfer is blocked upstream of QA, both Ci and QA-redox signals stimulate stomatal closure, which matches observations of stomatal conductance in plants with reduced levels of PsbO28 or treated with DCMU (3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea)29. Thus, when the stomatal control by QA redox and Ci are both accounted for, as shown by the schematic in Fig. 4b, our results complement previous observations and for the first time show experimental evidence for molecular regulation of stomatal response to light intensity. Although a constitutive promoter was used here, and thus guard cell expression of PsbS was also affected, it seems most likely that the QA-redox signal to open stomata in response to light is perceived in the mesophyll, especially considering that the fluorescence signal used to estimate QA-redox state is primarily originating from the chloroplast-rich mesophyll tissue, consistent with several previous investigations7.
Since water supply was not limiting for growth in our field experiment, the increased WUE associated with PsbS overexpression was not advantageous for biomass productivity, but instead led to slight decreases in final plant size and dry weight (Fig. 3e–g and Supplementary Fig. 6). We hypothesize that the increase in PsbS and associated increased levels of NPQ may have adversely affected the light-use efficiency of CO2 assimilation under fluctuating light as previously shown in rice30. We have previously demonstrated that this efficiency is an important determinant of biomass productivity of tobacco under similar field conditions31 and therefore may explain these findings.
Since gs directly affects the supply of CO2 to photosynthesis, decreases in gs often result in decreased An32. Interestingly, the effects of PsbS on stomatal conductance did not translate into differences in An, even though CO2 supply to photosynthesis was slightly affected (Supplementary Fig. 2g). Instead, maximum RuBP carboxylation capacity (Vcmax) and the maximal rate of linear electron transport (Jmax) showed weak positive relationships with the amount of PsbS (Supplementary Fig. 2c, d), consistent with previous findings in rice with altered PsbS levels30 and Rubisco activation state also showed a weak positive trend with PsbS content (Supplementary Fig. 2f). These results indicate that plants may be able to compensate for the effects of a decrease in stomatal conductance on CO2 uptake by increasing photosynthetic capacity, thereby limiting the negative feedback on biomass productivity.
WT N. tabacum cv. “Petit Havana” seeds carrying TMV resistance (NN) were a gift from Professor Spencer Whitney. Lines exhibiting increased or reduced expression of PsbS were generated within this study as described below.
Recombinant DNA and transformation
The N. benthamiana PsbS gene coding sequence (www.uniprot.org, Q2LAH0_NICBE) was cloned in between the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S and octopine synthase terminator in the pEARLYGATE 100 binary vector. The resulting binary vector pEG100-NbPsbS conferred microbial resistance to kanamycin and bialaphos resistance in planta (Supplementary Fig. 1). Nicotiana tabacum cv. “Petite Havana” was transformed with pEG100-NbPsbS using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated protocol33. Copy number and homozygosity were assessed using digital droplet PCR34. Results shown are for homozygous offspring unless otherwise described.
Transcription and protein expression
Five leaf discs (total 2.9 cm2) were from the youngest fully expanded leaf of five plants per genotype (controlled conditions) or four plants per genotype (field). Samples were taken 2 h after the start of the photoperiod. Protein and mRNA were extracted from the same leaf sample (NucleoSpin RNA/Protein kit, REF740933, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co., Düren, Germany). Extracted mRNA was treated by DNase (Turbo DNA-free kit; AM1907, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and transcribed to cDNA using Superscript III First-Strand Synthesis System for RT-PCR (18089-051, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to quantify PsbS transcripts (5′-GGCACAGCTGAATCTTGAAAC-3′ and 5′-CAGGGACAGGGTCATCAATAAA-3′) relative to NtActin (5′-CCTCACAGAAGCTCCTCTTAATC-3′ and 5′-ACAGCCTGAATGGCGATATAC-3′) and NtTubulin (5′-GTACATGGCCTGTTGTTTGATG-3′ and 5′-CTGGATGGTCCTCTTTGTCTTT-3′).
Total protein concentration was quantified using a protein quantification assay (ref. 740967.50, Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co., Düren, Germany). Samples containing 1 µg total protein were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis electrophoresis, blotted to membrane (Immobilon-P, IPVH00010, Millipore, Tullagreen, Carrigtwohill, Ireland) using semi-dry blotting (Trans-Blot SD, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and sequentially immuno-labeled with primary antibodies raised against AtPsbS (1:2,000 dilution; AS09533, Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden) and AtPsbO (1:20,000 dilution; AS06142-33, Agrisera, Vännäs, Sweden) followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (1:2,500 dilution; W401B, Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The sequential use of the two primary antibodies was verified empirically against blots where only one antibody was used and dilution series were used to establish the quantifiable range. Chemiluminescence was detected using a scanner (ImageQuant LAS-4010, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). A protein ladder (Precision Plus Protein Kaleidoscope Prestained Protein Standards, #1610375, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used as a size indicator on each gel. Protein bands were quantified using densitometry with ImageQuant TL software (version 7.0 GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (Data Set 2 and 11 in Data Repository; https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/nsbjps9rkg/draft?a = 10508d31-685a-4a62-8f96-cb591c569e97). PsbS expression was normalized based on PsbO bands.
Photosynthetic gas exchange under controlled conditions
Seedlings of psbs-4, PSBS-43, PSBS-28, and WT were germinated on growing medium (LC1 Sunshine mix, Sun Gro Horticulture, Agawam, MA, USA) in a controlled-environment walk-in growing chamber (Environmental Growth Chambers, Chagrin Falls, OH, USA) with photoperiod set to 12 h and temperature controlled at 23/18 °C (day/night). Five days after germination, psbs-4 seedlings with low NPQ were identified through chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and together with PSBS-28, PSBS-43, and WT seedlings transplanted to 3.8-L pots and randomly positioned in a controlled-environment chamber (PGC20, Conviron, Winnipeg, MB, Canada) with photoperiod set to 16 h and air temperature controlled at 20/25 °C (night/day). Light intensity at leaf-level was controlled at 500 µmol m−2 s−1. Plants were watered and plant positions were repositioned at random every 2 days until the fifth leaf was fully expanded. Gas exchange measurements were performed using an open gas exchange system (LI6400XT, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) equipped with a 2-cm2 leaf chamber and integrated modulated fluorometer. All chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were performed using the multiphase flash routine35. To determine the light response of An and whole-chain photosynthetic electron transport, gas exchange and pulse amplitude-modulated chlorophyll fluorescence were measured at a range of light intensities. Block temperature was controlled at 25 °C, [CO2] inside the cuvette was maintained at 380 µmol mol−1 and leaf-to-air water VPD was controlled to 1.1–1.4 kPa. Leaves were clamped in the leaf cuvette and dark-adapted for 1 h, after which minimal (Fo) and maximal fluorescence (Fm) were measured to determine maximal efficiency of whole-chain electron transport36 (Fv/Fm, Eq. 1)
Subsequently, light intensity (100% red LEDs, λpeak 630 nm) was slowly increased from 0 to 50, 80, 110, 140, 170, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 800, 1,000, 1,500, and 2,000 µmol m−2 s−1. When steady state was reached, An, gs, and Ci were logged, and F′ and Fm′ were measured to estimate the operating efficiency of whole-chain electron transport36 (Fq′/Fm′, Eq. 2). Since stomatal movements can include very long-term diurnal components37,38, our routine was aimed at measuring only relatively short-term stomatal responses to changes in light intensity, and steady-state waiting times were kept between 10 and 20 min per step. NPQ of chlorophyll fluorescence was determined according to Eq. 3 assuming a Stern–Volmer quenching model39. Minimal fluorescence without dark adaptation (Fo′) was also determined (using a short far-red pulse to fully oxidize QA). The fluorescence parameter qL (Eq. 4) was used to estimate the fraction of QA in its oxidized state (and correspondingly, QA redox state as 1 – qL). The derivation of this parameter is assuming a “lake” model for photosynthetic antenna complexes (i.e., antennae are shared between reaction centers)40:
To evaluate the CO2 response of An, leaves were allowed to reach steady state at a light intensity of 2,000 µmol m−2 s−1 (100% red LEDs, λpeak = 630 nm), with block temperature controlled at 25 °C and [CO2] in the airstream set to 400 µmol mol−1. Subsequently, [CO2] was varied from 400 to 300, 200, 100, 75, 400, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 1,000, 1,200, and 1,500 µmol mol−1. When steady state was attained, An, gs, and Ci were logged. Vcmax was determined from the response of An to chloroplastic CO2 concentration (Cc) by fitting a biochemical model41 with temperature corrections42 to measurements. Cc required an estimate of mesophyll conductance to CO2 transfer (gm). This was estimated independently for each point in the CO2 response curve from parallel chlorophyll fluorescence measurements according to the variable J method43. Jmax was determined by fitting a non-rectangular hyperbola to light response curves of linear electron transport estimated from chlorophyll fluorescence44. Stomatal limitation of An was computed using measurements at ambient CO2 (Ca = 380 μmol mol−1) and saturating light intensity, and predicted values of An when stomata are not limiting (i.e., Ci would equal Ca)44.
Rubisco activation state and content
Plants were grown under controlled conditions as described above. Youngest fully expanded leaves were clamped in the cuvette of an open gas exchange system (LI6400XT with 2 × 3 LED light source), with light intensity set to 1800 μmol m−2 s−1, CO2 concentration set to 400 μmol mol−1, and block temperature set to 25 °C. After steady-state gas exchange was reached, leaves were rapidly removed and a disc of 0.55 cm2 from the center of the portion of the leaf that had been enclosed in the cuvette was snap frozen in liquid N. Rubisco activity was determined by the incorporation of 14CO2 into acid-stable products at 25 °C following an existing protocol45. Samples were ground in tenbroek glass homogenizers with ~2 mL cm−2 CO2-free extraction buffer containing 100 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.5), 2 mM Na2ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 20 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), 5 mg mL−1 polyvinyl pyrrolidine, 15 mM amino-n-caproic acid and 3.5 mM benzamidine, and 5% v/v protease inhibitor cocktail (P9599, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Within 30 s of extraction, samples were assayed for initial Rubisco activity in a buffer containing 100 mM Bicine-NaOH (pH 8.2), 1 mM Na2EDTA, 20 mM MgCl2, 5 mM DTT, 1 mM ATP, 0.5 mM ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate, and 12.8 mM NaH14CO3 (15 Bq nmol−1, Vitrax, Placentia, CA, USA). Assays were run for 30 s and terminated with the addition of 300 μL 5 N formic acid. The radioactivity of acid-stable products was determined by liquid scintillation counting (Packard Tri-Carb 1900 TR, Canberra Packard Instruments Co., Downers Grove, IL, USA). After determining initial activity, the extract was incubated with 10 mM NaHCO3 and 20 mM MgCl2 for 20 min at room temperature, and the total activity of the extract was assayed as above. Unless stated otherwise, all other reagents were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Purified RuBP was used in both initial and total activity assays to avoid underestimating the activation state46. The activation state of Rubisco is determined by the ratio of initial to total activity. Rubisco content was determined from carbamylated samples extracted as above using a [14C]carboxy-arabinitol bisphosphate-binding assay47 with a specific activity of 583 Bq nmol−1 Rubisco, assuming eight binding sites per Rubisco45.
Stomatal density and stomatal complex dimension
Plants were grown under controlled conditions as described above. Fresh leaf samples were taken from the youngest fully expanded leaf and mounted onto a microscope slide using double-sided tape. Topographies of the adaxial and abaxial surfaces were measured using a μsurf explorer optical topometer (Nanofocus, Oberhausen, Germany). The 20×/0.60 objective lens (image size 0.8 × 0.8 mm2) and the 50×/0.80 objective lens (image size 0.32 × 0.32 mm2) were used, respectively, for stomatal density quantification and measurements of stomatal complex dimensions. Based on a prior bootstrap analysis, 8 and 10 images were analyzed for each of four biological replicates for stomatal density quantification and measurements of stomatal complex dimensions, respectively. For stomatal density quantification, raw images were first optimized for light contrast in μsoft analysis software (Nanofocus, Oberhausen, Germany) and then exported into TIF format. Each stoma was labeled and counted manually using multi-point function in ImageJ (ImageJ 1.51k, NIH, Rockville, MD, USA). Stomatal density was derived by dividing the number of stomata in each image by the image size (0.64 mm2). To measure the length and width of the stomatal complex, the distance measurement function in μsoft analysis software was applied on each stoma which could be completely observed in the image. Lines were drawn manually from end to end of the stomatal complex ellipse to measure stomatal length and width.
Seedling propagation for field experiment
Homozygous T2 (psbs-50 and PSBS-28) or T3 (PSBS-34, PSBS-43, and PSBS-46) seeds as well as segregating T1 seed from psbs-4 and WT seed from the same harvest date were sown in the greenhouse on May 16, 2016. Five days after germination, seedlings exhibiting severely reduced NPQ were identified by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of the psbs-4 T1 progeny. These low NPQ seedlings as well as seedlings from all other lines and WT were propagated hydroponically for 2 weeks in floating trays (Transplant Tray GP009 6 × 12 cells, Speedling Inc., Ruskin, FL, USA) filled with specialized growing medium for hydroponics (Pro-mix PGX, Premier Tech, Quakertown, PA, USA). The concentration of total dissolved solids in the solution was measured every 2 days with a handheld TDS meter (COM-100, HM Digital Inc., Culver City, CA, USA) and adjusted to 100 ppm by the addition of 20-10-20 water-soluble fertilizer (Jack’s Professional, JR Peters Inc., Allentown, PA, USA). Five days after the transplant to trays, Etridiazole fungicide (Terramaster 4EC to a final concentration of 78 μl L−1, Crompton Manufacturing Company Inc., Middlebury, CT, USA) was added to the solution to protect the plants against root fungus disease in the field. Two applications of Mancozeb (Dithane Rainshield Fungicide at 1 g L−1, Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada) were applied 6 and 9 days after transplant to prevent foliar fungus disease. On the same days, seedlings were sprayed with fermentation solids and solubles from Bacillus thuringiensis, subsp israelensis, strain AM65-52 (Gnatrol WDG Biological larvicide at 1 mL L−1, Valent Biosciences Corp., Libertyville, IL, USA) to reduce the greenhouse population of fungus gnats.
Field experimental design
Seedlings were transplanted to an experimental field site at the University of Illinois Energy Farm (40.11°N, 88.21°W) on June 9, 2016. The field was prepared 2 weeks prior to transplant by rototilling, cultivation, and harrowing. At this time, chlorpyrifos (1.5 g m−2 Lorsban 15 G Insecticide, Dow AgroSciences Canada Inc., Calgary, AB, Canada) was worked into the soil to suppress cutworm damage, sulfentrazone (29 μL m−2 Spartan 4 F preemergence herbicide, FMC Agricultural Solutions, Philadelphia, PA, USA) was applied to reduce the emergence of weeds and slow-release fertilizer (30.8 g m−2 ESN Smart Nitrogen, Agrium US Inc., Denver, CO, USA) was put down. After transplant, all seedlings were sprayed with thiamethoxam (7 mg/plant Platinum 75 SG insecticide, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Greensboro, NC, USA) to prevent damage from insect herbivory, and 12 days after the field transplant, all plants were sprayed with fermentation solids, spores, and insecticidal toxins from Bacillus thuringiensis, subsp. kurstaki, strain ABTS-351 (2.6 mL L−1 DiPel Pro dry flowable biological insecticide, Valent Biosciences Corp.) to suppress tobacco hornworm. The field experiment was set up as an incomplete randomized block design with 12 blocks of 6 × 6 plants spaced 30 cm apart (Supplementary Fig. 4). Each block contained four rows of four plants per genotype in north–south (N–S) orientation, surrounded by one border row of WT. WT was present in all blocks (n = 12), whereas the four PSBS overexpression and two psbs knock-down lines were randomly assigned to six blocks (n = 6). The blocks were positioned in a 3 (N–S) × 4 (E–W) rectangle with 75 cm spacing between blocks. The entire experiment was surrounded by two border rows of WT.
Light intensity (LI-190R quantum sensor, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and air temperature (Model 109 temperature probe, Campbell Scientific, USA) were measured nearby on the same field site and half-hourly averages were logged using a datalogger (CR1000, Campbell Scientific, USA). Precipitation was measured at two locations close to the field using precipitation gauges (NOAH IV Precipitation Gauge, ETI Instrument Systems Inc., Fort Collins, CO, USA) (Supplementary Fig. 7). Watering to restore field capacity was provided daily when needed through parallel drip irrigation lines with emitters every 30 cm (17 mm PC Drip Line #DL077, The Drip Store, Vista, CA, USA) spanning the whole experiment in E–W orientation and spaced 30 cm apart in N–S direction. To improve soil drainage after watering and precipitation events, two trenches with a depth of approximately 10 cm were dug in N–S direction between the blocks and connected on the south side of the experiment to a 15 cm deep E–W trench. Photosynthesis measurements were performed on the youngest fully expanded leaf 22 days after transplanting. Plants were harvested on July 7, 2016. At final harvest, stem length and the number of leaves were determined, and leaf area was measured with a conveyor-belt scanner (LI-3100C Area meter, LI-COR, Lincoln NE, USA). Leaf, stem, and root fractions were dried to constant weight at 60 °C in a custom-built drying oven equipped with condenser to further dry the recirculated air, after which the dry weights were determined.
Non-photochemical quenching in field-grown plants
Leaf discs were sampled pre-dawn from field-grown plants of psbs-4, psbs-50, PSBS-28, PSBS-34, PSBS-43, PSBS-46, and WT control and stored in darkness in glass vials for up to 4 h until measurement. Humidity in the vials was maintained fully saturated by placing a piece of wet filter paper in each vial. Dark-adapted leaf discs were positioned on a piece of wet filter paper in a chlorophyll fluorescence imager (CFimager, Technologica, Colchester, UK) to determine maximal fluorescence (Fm). Subsequently, leaf discs were exposed to 15 min of 1000 µmol m−2 s−1, after which maximal fluorescence without dark adaptation was determined (Fm'). NPQ was then determined according to Eq. 3.
Photosynthetic gas exchange in field
The response of photosynthetic gas exchange to light intensity was measured on the youngest fully expanded leaf of four plants of psbs-4, PSBS-28, PSBS-34, PSBS-43, and WT control in the S–W blocks. Measurements were performed in four complete sets to account for random effects of N–S position of plants, and time of day. Leaves were clamped in the cuvette of an open gas exchange system (LI6400XT, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) and allowed to reach steady-state gas exchange at saturating light intensity of 2000 µmol m−2 s−1, with block temperature set to 30 °C and [CO2] in the airstream controlled to 400 µmol mol−1 and vapor pressure deficit between air and leaf kept below 1.5 kPa. Subsequently, light intensity was varied from 2,000 to 1,500, 1,000, 800, 600, 400, 300, 200, 170, 140, 110, 80, and 50 µmol m2 s−1. Due to the limited window suitable for measuring gas exchange in field trials, waiting time for steady state was kept between 5 and 10 min for these measurements. When steady state was reached, net assimilation rate, stomatal conductance, and intercellular [CO2] were logged. After gas exchange measurements were performed, leaf absorptance was determined using an integrating sphere (LI1800, LI-COR, Lincoln, NE, USA) connected to a spectrometer (USB-2000, Ocean Optics Inc., Dunedin, FL, USA).
All statistical analysis was performed with SAS (version 9.3, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Data were tested with the Brown–Forsythe test for homogeneity of variance and the Shapiro–Wilk test for normality. One-way analysis of variance was applied to transcription levels, protein expression, gas exchange data, Rubisco content and activation state, stomatal density, and dimension data. Measurement set was included as a random effect in analysis of the field gas exchange data to account for variation caused by N–S plant position and time of day. Biomass, leaf area, and plant height data were analyzed with a linear mixed model accounting for block and genotype effects with Welch–Satterthwaite adjustment of degrees of freedom to account for the different replication rate of WT (PROC MIXED). Significant genotype effects in ANOVA (α = 0.05) were followed by testing of genotype means against WT control (α = 0.05), using Dunnett’s multiple comparison correction. Correlations between QA redox state with gs and protein levels and with An/gs were evaluated using Pearson’s correlation coefficient.
All relevant data and plant materials are available from the authors upon request. Raw data corresponding to the figures and results described in this manuscript have been deposited at: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/nsbjps9rkg/draft?a=10508d31-685a-4a62-8f96-cb591c569e97.
Long, S.P., Marshall-Colon, A. & Zhu, X.G. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell 161, 56–66 (2015).
Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J. & Befort, B. L. Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 20260–20264 (2011).
Scanlon, B. R. et al. Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9320–9325 (2012).
Dalin, C., Wada, Y., Kastner, T. & Puma, M. J. Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nat. Commun. 543, 700–704 (2017).
Lobell, D. B. et al. Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the U.S. Midwest. Science 344, 516–519 (2014).
Ort, D. R. & Long, S. P. Limits on yields in the corn belt. Science 344, 484–485 (2014).
Lawson, T., Simkin, A. J., Kelly, G. & Granot, D. Mesophyll photosynthesis and guard cell metabolism impacts on stomatal behaviour. New Phytol. 203, 1064–1081 (2014).
Hu, H. et al. Carbonic anhydrases are upstream regulators in guard cells of CO2-controlled stomatal movements. Nat. Cell Biol. 12, 87–118 (2010).
Shimazaki, K.-i, Doi, M., Assmann, S. M. & Kinoshita, T. Light regulation of stomatal movement. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 58, 219–247 (2007).
Lee, J.-S. & Bowling, D. J. F. Influence of the mesophyll on stomatal opening. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 22, 357–363 (1995).
Lawson, T. Guard cell photosynthesis and stomatal function. New Phytol. 181, 13–34 (2009).
Mott, E. A. Guard cell photosynthesis and stomatal function. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 1479–1486 (2009).
Baroli, I., Price, G.D., Badger, M.R. & von Caemmerer, S. The contribution of photosynthesis to the red light response of stomatal conductance. Plant Physiol. 146, 737–747 (2008).
von Caemmerer, S. et al. Stomatal conductance does not correlate with photosynthetic capacity in transgenic tobacco with reduced amounts of Rubisco. J. Exp. Bot. 55, 1157–1166 (2004).
Price, G. D., Evans, J. R., von Caemmerer, S., Yu, J.-W. & Badger, M. R. Specific reduction of chloroplast glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase activity by antisense RNA reduces CO2 assimilation via a reduction in ribulose bisphosphate regeneration in transgenic tobacco plants. Planta 195, 369–378 (1995).
Lawson, T., Lefebvre, S., Baker, N. R., Morison, J. I. L. & Raines, C. A. Reductions in mesophyll and guard cell photosynthesis impact on the control of stomatal responses to light and CO2. J. Exp. Bot. 59, 3609–3619 (2008).
Busch, F. A. Opinion: the red-light response of stomatal movement is sensed by the redox state of the photosynthetic electron transport chain. Photosynth. Res. 119, 131–140 (2014).
Müller, P., Li, X.-P. & Niyogi, K. K. Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy. Plant Physiol. 125, 1558–1566 (2001).
Ruban, A. V. Nonphotochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching: mechanism and effectiveness in protecting plants from photodamage. Plant Physiol. 170, 1903–1916 (2016).
Li, X.-P., Müller-Moule, P., Gilmore, A. M. & Niyogi, K. K. PsbS-dependent enhancement of feedback de-excitation protects photosystem II from photoinhibition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 15222–15227 (2002).
Logan, B. A., Terry, S. G. & Niyogiy, K. K. Arabidopsis genotypes with differing levels of PsbS expression differ in photosystem II quantum yield, xanthophyll cycle pool size, and aboveground growth. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169, 597–604 (2008).
Kromdijk, J. & Long, S. P. One crop breeding cycle from starvation? How engineering crop photosynthesis for rising CO2 and temperature could be one important route to alleviation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B 283, 1–8 (2016).
Brooks, M., Jansson, S. & Niyogi, K. in Non-Photochemical Quenching and Energy Dissipation in Plants, Algae and Cyanobacteria Advances in Photosynthesis and Respiration Vol. 40 (eds Govindjee & Sharkey, T. D.) 297–314 (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
Bernacchi, C. J., Kimball, B. A., Quarles, D. R., Long, S. P. & Ort, D. R. Decreases in stomatal conductance of soybean under open-air elevation of [CO2] are closely coupled with decreases in ecosystem evapotranspiration. Plant Physiol. 143, 134–144 (2007).
Hajirezaei, M.-R. et al. Small chanages in the activity of chloroplastic NADP+-dependent ferredoxin oxidoreductase lead to impaired plant growth and restrict photosynthetic activity of transgenic tabacco plants. Plant J. 29, 281–293 (2002).
Haake, V., Zrenner, R., Sonnewald, U. & Stitt, M. A moderate decrease of plastid aldolase activity inhibits photosynthesis, alters the levels of sugars and starch, and inhibits growth of potato plants. Plant J. 14, 147–157 (1998).
Paul, M. J. et al. Reduction in phosphoribulokinase activity by antisense RNA in transgenic tobacco: effect on CO2 assimilation and growth in low irradiance. Plant J. 7, 535–542 (1995).
Dwyer, S. A. et al. Antisense reductions in the PsbO protein of photosystem II leads to decreased quantum yield but similar maximal photosynthetic rates. J. Exp. Bot. 63, 4781–4795 (2012).
Messinger, S., Buckley, T. & Mott, K. Evidence for involvement of photosynthetic processes in the stomatal response to CO2. Plant Physiol. 140, 771–778 (2006).
Hubbart, S., Ajigboye, O. O., Horton, P. & Murchie, E. H. The photoprotective protein PsbS exerts control over CO2 assimilation rate in fluctuating light in rice. Plant J. 71, 402–412 (2012).
Kromdijk, J. et al. Improving photosynthesis and crop productivity by accelerating recovery from photoprotection. Science 354, 857–861 (2016).
Farquhar, D. & Sharkey, T. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 33, 317–345 (1982).
Clemente, T. in Agrobacterium Protocols Vol. 343 Methods in Molecular Biology (ed. Wang, K.) Ch. 12, 143–154 (Humana Press, Totowa, 2006).
Głowacka, K. et al. An evaluation of new and established methods to determine T-DNA copy number and homozygosity in transgenic plants. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 908–917 (2016).
Loriaux, S. D. et al. Closing in on maximum yield of chlorophyll fluorescence using a single multiphase flash of sub-saturating intensity. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1755–1770 (2013).
Genty, B., Briantais, J.-M. & Baker, N. R. The relationship between quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990, 87–92 (1989).
Vialet-Chabrand, S., Dreyer, E. & Brendel, O. Performance of a new dynamic model for predicting diurnal time courses of stomatal conductance at the leaf level. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1529–1546 (2013).
Matthews, J. S. A., Vialet-Chabrand, S. & Lawson, T. Diurnal variation in gas exchange: the balance between carbon fixation and water loss. Plant Physiol. 174, 614–623 (2017).
Bilger, W. & Björkman, O. Relationships among violaxanthin deepoxidation, thylakoid membrane conformation, and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Planta 193, 238–246 (1994).
Kramer, D. M., Johnson, G., Kiirats, O. & Edwards, G. E. New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation energy fluxes. Photosynth. Res. 79, 209–218 (2004).
Farquhar, G. D., Von Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).
Sharkey, T. D., Bernacchi, C. J., Farquhar, G. D. & Singsaas, E. L. Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1035–1040 (2007).
Harley, P., Thomas, R., Reynolds, J. & Strain, B. Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 271–282 (1992).
Long, S. P. & Bernacchi, C. J. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 2393–2401 (2003).
Kubien, D., Brown, C. & Kane, H. in Quantifying the Amount and Activity of Rubisco in Leaves Vol. 684 Methods in Molecular Biology (ed. Carpentier, R.) Ch. 27, 349–362 (Springer Science+Business Media, Berlin, 2011).
Sharwood, R. E., Sonawane, B. V., Ghannoum, O. & Whitney, S. M. Improved analysis of C4 and C3 photosynthesis via refined in vitro assays of their carbon fixation biochemistry. J. Exp. Bot. 67, 3137–3148 (2016).
Ruuska, S. et al. The interplay between limiting processes in C3 photosynthesis studied by rapid-response gas exchange using transgenic tobacco impaired in photosynthesis. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 25, 859–870 (1998).
We thank David Drag and Ben Harbaugh for plant management in greenhouse and field studies, Madeline Steiner and Sydney Gillespie for general assistance during lab work and fieldwork. This research was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1060461] titled “RIPE—Realizing Increased Photosynthetic Efficiency for Sustainable Increases in Crop Yield”. K.K.N. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (through Grant GBMF3070). A.D.B.L. was supported by the National Science Foundation Directorate of Biological Sciences (through Grant PGR–1238030).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Głowacka, K., Kromdijk, J., Kucera, K. et al. Photosystem II Subunit S overexpression increases the efficiency of water use in a field-grown crop. Nat Commun 9, 868 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03231-x
Nature Communications (2021)
Nature Plants (2021)
Transgenic Research (2021)
Transgenic Research (2021)
Scientific Reports (2020)