Article | Open | Published:

Mössbauer spectroscopy of a monolayer of single molecule magnets


The use of single molecule magnets (SMMs) as cornerstone elements in spintronics and quantum computing applications demands that magnetic bistability is retained when molecules are interfaced with solid conducting surfaces. Here, we employ synchrotron Mössbauer spectroscopy to investigate a monolayer of a tetrairon(III) (Fe4) SMM chemically grafted on a gold substrate. At low temperature and zero magnetic field, we observe the magnetic pattern of the Fe4 molecule, indicating slow spin fluctuations compared to the Mössbauer timescale. Significant structural deformations of the magnetic core, induced by the interaction with the substrate, as predicted by ab initio molecular dynamics, are also observed. However, the effects of the modifications occurring at the individual iron sites partially compensate each other, so that slow magnetic relaxation is retained on the surface. Interestingly, these deformations escaped detection by conventional synchrotron-based techniques, like X-ray magnetic circular dichroism, thus highlighting the power of synchrotron Mössbauer spectroscopy for the investigation of hybrid interfaces.


Single molecule magnets (SMMs) are a very appealing class of nanomagnetic objects with potential application for spintronics1,2,3 and quantum computing4,5,6. Their properties depend on the combination of a large molecular spin and an easy-axis magnetic anisotropy, which results in a double well energy potential, that opposes to the reversal of the magnetization7. Organization of these molecules on surfaces was the focus of considerable effort as a prerequisite to single molecule addressing8,9,10. In such studies, it was demonstrated that magnetic bistability persists and can even be enhanced on a surface11, 12. Especially efficient in boosting the memory effect of both molecules13 and individual atoms14 is deposition on thin insulating layers (e.g., MgO) rather than directly on the metal surface. Despite these remarkable results, the factors controlling magnetic bistability on surfaces remain still unclear. This is in part due to the limited number of experimental techniques that are sensitive enough to detect the magnetic properties of a monolayer (or less) of magnetic molecules. Most investigations rely on the use of X-ray absorption and magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD)15 with synchrotron radiation, which has exceptional surface sensitivity and selectivity to the magnetism of the probed elements. In silico methods can also be of considerable aid in predicting the fine evolution of geometrical and magnetic structure of SMMs on a surface16. In such a framework, Mössbauer spectroscopy, beyond having an outstanding sensitivity to the coordination environment of the probed atom, is able to investigate the spin dynamics over timescales (1–1000 ns) much shorter than those accessible by XMCD. The technique was previously adopted to study the relaxation behavior of many SMM materials containing 57Fe as Mössbauer active nucleus17, 18. However, the standard use of radioactive sources limits the application domain of Mössbauer spectroscopy to bulk samples19.

This limitation was overcome by the use of time-domain nuclear resonant scattering of synchrotron radiation at grazing angle: an example was the study of monolayers of metallic 57Fe grown on W(100) or embedded in layered systems20,21,22. However, with this technique complex spectra are expected for samples containing inequivalent iron sites and characterized by several electronic levels. Moreover, the radiation intensity customarily used in time-domain spectroscopy may damage molecular or biological compounds. Here, we show how energy-domain Mössbauer spectroscopy based on the high brilliance of synchrotron light can be used to probe the magnetism of a molecular monolayer, providing an unprecedentedly detailed picture of molecule-surface interaction effects on structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of the adsorbed SMMs.

Our study focused on the tetrairon(III) (Fe4) SMMs, whose propeller-like molecular structure is sufficiently robust to withstand chemisorption on surfaces, processing by thermal sublimation23, and the construction of single-molecule devices24. Indeed, Fe4 complexes were the first SMMs to show magnetic hysteresis when deposited as a monolayer on a gold surface11, 23. They have a ground state with a total spin S = 5, while the first excited states are two S = 4 manifolds, which lie about 60 K higher in energy and are degenerate in case of perfect three-fold symmetry. A moderate easy-axis magnetic anisotropy, directed perpendicular to the plane of the four Fe3+ ions, splits the ground spin manifold of about 15 K, which also corresponds to the height of the energy barrier for the reversal of the magnetization.

Here a monolayer of Fe4 SMMs tethered to a polycrystalline gold substrate was investigated by synchrotron-based Mössbauer spectroscopy, which revealed magnetic features in zero field typical of SMM behavior. Thanks to the outstanding sensitivity of this spectroscopy to the coordination environment of the probed atom, we have also evidenced that molecules on surface undergo significant structural deformations, which are undetectable by X-ray absorption techniques and scanning probe methods25. As predicted by ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) calculations26, these modifications affect differently the four iron atoms. However, such local distortions partially compensate each other and the molecules retain on the surface an S = 5 ground state and a slow spin dynamics comparable to that of the bulk phase, thus justifying the magnetic robustness of this class of SMMs.


Synchrotron Mössbauer Spectroscopy of Fe4 SMMs

In this work, we studied a Au-supported self-assembled monolayer of the same Fe4 derivative (see Fig. 1) previously employed in XMCD investigations27. Its complete formula is [Fe4(L)2(dpm)6], where Hdpm is dipivaloylmethane and H3L is 7-(acetylthio)-2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)heptan-1-ol, a thioacetyl-functionalized tripodal ligand that promotes chemisorption on gold substrates (see Fig. 1). The compound was characterized elsewhere27 and was here prepared as a 95% 57Fe-enriched sample (see Methods section and Supplementary Methods). A monolayer deposit was obtained by chemisorption using a wet chemistry protocol (see Methods section) that guarantees the formation of a dense monolayer with no physisorbed material28. As a bulk-phase reference, a dropcast sample of the same compound, with an inhomogeneous thickness of about 100 ± 50 nm, was prepared.

Fig. 1

Structure of the investigated systems and experimental setup. a Structure of Fe4 SMM in the crystalline phase (color code: Fe atoms in green and violet, O in red, S in yellow, C as pale gray sticks, H atoms omitted for clarity); b scheme of the magnetic core, where the dominating antiferromagnetic interactions (in red) lead to an S = 5 ground state; c view of the structure of the Fe4 SMM tethered to Au(111) through the deprotected thioacetyl termination, as obtained by ab initio molecular dynamics calculations26. Hydrogen atoms and tert-butyl groups on dpm ligands have been omitted for clarity; d scheme of the experimental setup of the Synchrotron Mössbauer Source at the ID18 beamline of ESRF

The Synchrotron Mössbauer Source (SMS) available at ID18, the nuclear resonance beamline29 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), was used to record Mössbauer spectra of both dropcast and monolayer Fe4 samples. The characteristic device of the SMS is an iron borate (57FeBO3) crystal, kept at a temperature close to its Néel temperature (see Fig. 1d). By means of a pure nuclear reflection by the crystal, the synchrotron light coming out from the monochromators is filtered into an 57Fe-resonant narrow single line30, 31. In contrast to common radioactive sources, the radiation generated by the SMS is a needle-like collimated beam with small (~mm) size, which can be further focused to spot sizes of micrometric lateral dimensions31. This allows working in grazing incidence geometry to achieve the necessary sensitivity to investigate ultra-thin films. Furthermore, the radiation is fully polarized and recoilless, and sufficiently high photon fluxes can be obtained (see Supplementary Methods for details).

Mössbauer spectra were recorded by collecting the scattered radiation resulting from the reflection on the sample surface at a grazing incidence (see Fig. 1d). Due to the structure of our samples (low-Z film on a high-Z substrate, Z being the atomic number), the grazing incidence reflection occurs from the surface of the substrate, and the molecular layer produces absorption lines. In the case of small grazing angles, the spectra can be treated as those obtained in a standard setup in transmission geometry, provided that the effective thickness of the samples is multiplied by a factor 2/(sinθ), where θ is the grazing angle between the surface of the sample and the direction of the incoming radiation. In our experimental conditions, working at θ 0.1° provides a 1100-fold amplification factor, which is essential for studying molecular monolayers by SMS.

Mössbauer spectra of the dropcast and monolayer samples were recorded in the temperature ranges 2.2–40 and 2.2–11 K, respectively, and are shown in Fig. 2. At the lowest explored temperature, the spectrum of the dropcast sample (Fig. 2a) exhibits a six-line pattern, as expected for a Fe-containing sample experiencing slow spin fluctuations compared to the Mössbauer timescale. However, the lines towards the extremes of the spectrum are further split, indicating that inequivalent iron sites are present in the structure; this is in line with previous reports on standard Mössbauer characterization of unfunctionalized Fe4 clusters in the bulk phase18.

Fig. 2

Mössbauer spectra of the dropcast and monolayer samples for various temperatures. a Experimental spectra (black lines) of the Fe4 dropcast sample and best fit curves (red lines). b Experimental spectra (black lines) of the Fe4 monolayer sample and best fit curves (red lines). The velocity axis values are relative to the α-Fe standard

With increasing temperature, distortions of the spectrum become evident. Increased thermal fluctuations and the population of excited spin levels cause a progressive collapse of the spectrum into a single central structure at 40 K.

The monolayer’s spectra are qualitatively similar, though about two orders of magnitude less intense (Fig. 2b), in agreement with the reduced number of 57Fe4 molecules probed by the radiation, (see Supplementary Figs.14 for a direct comparison between selected spectra of the two samples).

Fitting of the Mössbauer spectra

Given that the Fe4 molecule has total spin state S = 5, we expect each iron atom to contribute to the spectra with six hyperfine-split lines per |±M S 〉 doublet (M S  = 1, 2, … 5) plus two quadrupole-split lines arising from the |M S  = 0〉 state, thus yielding 4 (6 × 5 + 2) = 128 lines. Some of these transitions may coincide because of the molecular symmetry. In particular, while the central ion (Fe1) experiences a quite distinct coordination environment, the other iron atoms reside in approximately the same coordination environment. Despite this idealized three-fold symmetry, Fe4 derivatives in the solid state often possess a binary symmetry axis lying along two iron atoms. Therefore, for a quantitative analysis of the dropcast sample spectra we considered that the Mössbauer absorption cross-section is given by the superposition of the contributions coming from three inequivalent iron ions, with intensity ratio 1:1:2. Each contribution was evaluated as described in earlier Mössbauer bulk-phase experiments17, 18 and characterized by a number of parameters (see Methods and Supplementary Note 1). These include hyperfine interactions for each iron site (the isomer shift with respect to α-Fe, the quadrupole shift, and the hyperfine fields due to the iron electronic spin), magnetic anisotropy and magnetic exchange interactions governing the transition rates between different spin sublevels of the system, as well as sample-specific parameters, like thickness and texture. The latter is a parameter quantifying a possible macroscopic orientation of the molecules on the surface. In particular, the possibility to sense a texture, which has a signature in the relative intensities of the lines, is based on the orientation of the quantization axis of the molecule with respect to the γ-ray polarization.

For the dropcast sample, the agreement between the experimental and calculated data (Fig. 2a) is reasonably good in the whole temperature range. In Fig. 3a, the cross-section contributions of each Fe3+ site to the spectrum taken at 2.2 K are shown, with best fit parameters reported in Table 1 (the values obtained from the fits of higher temperature spectra are reported in Supplementary Tables 13, while residuals are shown in Supplementary Figs. 5 and 6).

Fig. 3

Deconvolution of Mössbauer spectra in individual Fe3+ contributions. a Mössbauer spectrum at 2.2 K of the dropcast sample (black line) and best fit curve (red line); the cross-sections of the three inequivalent Fe3+ sites expected in a twofold-symmetric molecule are shown in green, magenta, and blue and were calculated with the parameters listed in Table 1 (columns from left to right, respectively). b Mössbauer spectrum at 2.2 K of the monolayer sample (black line) and best fit curve (red line); the cross-sections of the four inequivalent Fe3+ sites (green, orange and blue/magenta) were calculated with the parameters listed in Table 1 (columns from left to right, respectively)

Table 1 Mössbauer parameters extracted from the fitting of the spectra at T = 2.2 K and from ab initio calculations

As expected, the Mössbauer parameters associated to three out of the four Fe3+ ions are very similar to each other and their contributions overlap extensively, in agreement with an almost ideal three-fold symmetry of the cluster. The contribution with a significantly different quadrupole interaction and a smaller hyperfine field can be thus safely assigned to the central Fe3+ ion on the basis of its different coordination environment.

In general, the hyperfine field values are proportional to the number of unpaired 3d electrons for each iron ion (i = 1–4) and thus to the spin projection along the local direction of the quantization axis. However, exchange interactions introduce spin fluctuations at frequencies higher than the top limit of the Mössbauer time window, so that the measured hyperfine fields are proportional to the time average of the spin projections, \(\left\langle {s_z^i} \right\rangle\). The latter are affected by both magnetic exchange interactions and magnetic anisotropies, as most simply described by the spin Hamiltonian:

$$H = \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i,j = 1,4}^{i < j} {J_{ij}} {\mathbf{s}}_i \cdot {\mathbf{s}}_j + \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i,j = 1,4}^{i < j} {{\mathbf{s}}_i} \cdot \overline {d_{ij}} \cdot {\mathbf{s}}_j + \mathop {\sum}\nolimits_{i = 1,4} {{\mathbf{s}}_i} \cdot \overline {D_i} \cdot {\mathbf{s}}_i$$

The first term represents the isotropic exchange interaction, the second one contains the anisotropic part of intramolecular interactions, which are mainly of dipolar origin in assemblies of high spin 3d5 ions, while the third one takes into account single ion magnetic anisotropy. Nearest-neighbour antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between the central (i = 1) and peripheral (i = 2, 3, and 4) ions provide the leading term responsible for the ground S = 5 molecular state. This state features a ferrimagnetic-like arrangement of the spins, with the central and peripheral spins pointing in opposite directions (Fig. 1b). Because of magnetic anisotropy, the total spin vector in the ground state lies preferably collinear to the idealized three-fold molecular axis and the S = 5 multiplet is thus split approximately according to the giant-spin Hamiltonian7:

$$H_{S = 5} = D\left[ {S_z^2 - \frac{1}{3}S\left( {S + 1} \right)} \right] + E\left( {S_x^2 - S_y^2} \right)$$

where D < 0 and E are the second-order axial and transverse magnetic anisotropy parameters, respectively. Assuming three-fold symmetry, i.e. = 0, the spin projection values within the ground M S  = ±5 doublet are \(\left\langle {s_z^1} \right\rangle = \mp 2.0833\) and \(\left\langle {s_z^2} \right\rangle = \left\langle {s_z^3} \right\rangle = \left\langle {s_z^4} \right\rangle = \pm 2.3611\) (in ħ units). The experimental hyperfine fields for the central and peripheral ions in the dropcast sample (Table 1) are in good agreement with the so-called 22\(\left\langle {s_z^i} \right\rangle\)rule for the Fermi contact field32 (Supplementary Fig. 7). This indicates that the Mössbauer spectrum at 2.2 K probes intact Fe4 complexes in their M S  = ±5 ground doublet.

Moreover, below 40 K, the thermal evolution of the spectra (Fig. 2a) likely reflects the contribution of excited states within the S = 5 manifold as determined by two main, and somehow distinguishable, mechanisms. Indeed, on increasing temperature, the thermal population of states with |M S | < 5 increases the number of thermally accessible transitions with a corresponding change in the overall intensity of the lines. On the contrary, the increased transition rate between different states causes changes in shape and shifts the lines towards the center of the spectrum, as illustrated in Supplementary Note 2. Inspection of Fig. 2a shows that the thermal evolution of the spectra is dominated by the population of excited spin states below 11 K (slow relaxation regime), and by the increased transition rates above 11 K (intermediate relaxation regime). The latter is evident from the collapse of the spectrum towards a central line superimposed to a V-shaped baseline (see Supplementary Note 2 and Supplementary Fig. 8 in which the two different behaviors are simulated at 11 K). As a consequence of this, the physical parameters describing both effects could be extracted from the fit of the spectra. The best fit values, D = −0.605(7) K and E = 0.003(1) K, well agree with those resulting from magnetic data for the bulk crystalline phase27.

The transition rates among the spin states of the S = 5 manifold are determined both by the E term, promoting the tunnelling between the two potential wells, and by the interaction of the molecular spin with the thermal bath. To take this last interaction into account, a spin–bath interaction term H sb has to be included in Eq. 2:

$$H_{sb} = F_bQ_S(S_x,S_y,S_z)$$

H sb is expressed as the product of two operators (Q S and F b ), which act on the molecular spin and lattice states, respectively. More details on these two operators can be found in Supplementary Notes 3 and 4. Considering that the matrix elements of Q S between two given spin states do not depend on temperature, the thermal dependence of the matrix elements of H sb is linked only to the thermal dependence of the matrix elements of F b and thus to the physical features of the thermal bath and to the specific interaction scheme17. In particular, the parameters determining the thermal dependence of the spectra are proportional to the Fourier transform of the correlation function of F b evaluated at the transition frequencies. This quantity can be evaluated at zero frequency in the usual approximation where the linewidth of bath states is larger than the energy separation between the electronic spin states. More details are provided in Supplementary Note 4, where both direct (single-phonon) and indirect (multi-phonon) processes are considered.

In the approximation introduced above the spin dynamics depends on the transition rates between the electronic spin states of the molecule. To analyse the spin dynamics as a function of temperature, the transition rate W5−4 between M S  = ±5 and M S  = ±4 states was chosen as a fit parameter. All other transition rates between two generic i and j states were derived according to the relations Wji = W5−4|i|Q S |j|2/|5|Q S |4|2 and Wij = Wjiexp((E i  − E j )/(k B T)).

In Fig. 4, we present the temperature dependence of W5−4, together with a fit of the data up to 11 K with a function of the form:

$$W_{5 - 4} = A/(\exp \left( {B/k_BT} \right) - 1),$$

which is representative of a direct process. This analysis of low temperature transition rates yields B= 6.8(4) K and A= 2.8(3) × 106 Hz. For temperatures >11 K, the increase of W5-4 is more rapid than predicted by Eq. (4) suggesting two-phonons processes. These can be taken into account using the expression:

$$W_{5 - 4} = A\exp \left( {B/k_BT} \right)/(\exp \left( {B/k_BT} \right) - 1)^2$$

that describes a Raman process due to optical modes. Equation (5) coincides with Eq. (4) for T  B, while for T > B it gives a T2 dependence (see Supplementary Note 4)19. The fit, shown in Fig. 4, was performed keeping the B parameter fixed at the value extracted from low temperature data. Equation (5) is qualitatively in agreement with the experimental data in a wide range of temperatures, suggesting that the spin dynamics is related to an optical mode with an energy of about 7 K (or, equivalently, a frequency of about 0.1 THz). A rapid increase of the transition rate is observed at the highest investigated temperature (40 K) where other total spins states start to be significantly populated.

Fig. 4

Spin dynamics in the dropcast and monolayer samples. Transition rate W5−4 between the states M S  = ±5 and M S  = ±4 extracted from the fits of the Mössbauer spectra of the dropcast sample (red squares) and of the monolayer sample (black dots) as a function of temperature. The magenta line represents the fit of the data for the dropcast sample at T ≤ 11 K assuming a direct process as in Eq. (4), while the cyan line corresponds to the more general function reported in Eq. (5)

Passing to the monolayer sample, the analysis of the spectra has been performed following the same strategy used for the dropcast sample. From the fitting of the monolayer spectrum taken at the lowest temperature, a surface density of 3 57Fe ions per nm2 was estimated. This value agrees, within the experimental uncertainty of the technique, with the one evaluated by an STM study of Fe4 molecules evaporated on a gold single crystal (2 57Fe ions per nm2)23. Therefore, our study represents the first successful investigation of a monolayer of molecules by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy.

The best fit calculated curves are shown in Fig. 2b for each sampled temperature, while residuals are presented in Supplementary Figs. 9 and 10. The individual Fe3+ cross-section contributions to the spectrum taken at 2.2 K are shown in Fig. 3b, with best fit parameters reported in Table 1. To comply with a possible reduction of symmetry of the cluster four non-equivalent Fe sites were considered. However, two contributions are identical within error (blue and magenta lines in Fig. 3b) and only three non-equivalent Fe sites are thus reported in Table 1. The parameters in Table 1 were kept fixed in the analysis of the spectra acquired at higher temperatures, while the transition rate (W5–4) and the D parameter were let free to vary.

The texture value extracted from each spectrum revealed no preferential orientation of the molecules on the substrate. In fact, imposing the same oriented grafting as detected by X-ray absorption experiments on Au(111)27 fails to satisfactorily reproduce the data (see Supplementary Note 5 and Supplementary Fig. 11). This discrepancy is however not unexpected, since a reconstructed, atomically flat Au(111) surface, known to promote the preferential orientation detected by X-ray natural linear dichroism27, could not be used for the Mössbauer experiments (see Methods section).

As a distinctive feature of the monolayer’s spectra, all the lines of each sextet are characterized by approximately the same linewidth, although larger than found in the dropcast sample. Two mechanisms can be responsible for the observed line broadening. Faster transition rates between spin levels broaden the lines, but, at the same time, promote a collapse towards the center of the spectrum, which is not experimentally observed in the 2.2 K spectrum. Moreover, to reproduce the temperature dependence of the spectra an unphysical decrease of transition rates upon increasing temperature would be required. An alternative source of broadening is the presence of an inhomogeneous distribution of electric parameters (quadrupole shift and/or isomer shift). A significant distribution in hyperfine fields can be safely ruled out as it would affect the external lines approximatively six times more than the internal ones (see Supplementary Note 2 for details).

The presence of inhomogeneous broadening in the electric parameters was thus taken into account by assuming Gaussian lines with standard deviation of the order of 0.2–0.3 mm s−1, as estimated from the lowest temperature spectrum, which is less affected by spin dynamics. If the observed broadening is ascribed to a distribution of the ligand contributions to the quadrupole interaction, the ligand donor atoms must undergo displacements of the order of 0.04 Å from their average positions. Furthermore, all the magnetic hyperfine field values are significantly smaller than those found in the dropcast sample.

As a final point, the spin dynamics of the grafted Fe4 molecules was addressed by investigating the temperature evolution of the spectra (see Fig. 2b). Despite the much worse signal-to-noise ratio, it is evident that, on increasing the temperature, the external lines lose intensity faster than in the dropcast sample. This suggests that the |D| value is reduced upon grafting, as directly confirmed by fitting the Mössbauer spectrum recorded at the lowest temperature (D = −0.49(6) K, with the E/D ratio held fixed at the value found in the dropcast sample to avoid overparametrization in the fitting of poorly resolved spectra). At the same time the transition rate W5−4 extracted from the fit of the spectra (see Fig. 4) is comparable with that found for the dropcast sample. Thus, Mössbauer data of the monolayer sample indicate that the deposition on a surface does not significantly modify the spin dynamics, as suggested by previous XMCD evidences27.

Ab initio calculations

Qualitative and quantitative analyses of the recorded Mössbauer spectra point to significant alterations induced by the chemical grafting on the surface. AIMD calculations, recently performed by some of us on the same molecule grafted on the Au(111) surface26, can provide a valuable insight into the observed differences. Indeed, the picture emerging from the AIMD investigation was that van der Waals interactions between the gold substrate and the aliphatic tether of the tripodal ligand cause significant distortions of the magnetic core. Such interactions induce several accessible energy minima in the potential energy surface of the system. The predicted scenario closely matches that emerging from the Mössbauer spectra of the monolayer sample. Remarkably, the standard deviation of Fe–O bond lengths, estimated over eight different AIMD trajectories or walkers (see Supplementary Table 4), has the order of magnitude (10−2 Å) required to account for the observed line broadening through a distribution of quadrupole shifts.

A pronounced variation of Fe–O bond lengths among the different walkers is observed for the central site (Fe1) and for the Fe atom closer to the aliphatic chain tethered to the gold substrate, namely Fe3 in Fig. 1c. Moreover, AIMD calculations showed that both single ion magnetic anisotropies and exchange interactions are affected by the grafting process (see Supplementary Table 5 and ref. 26). However, these modifications partially compensate each other so that the molecule retains an S = 5 ground state and an easy axis magnetic anisotropy.

Focusing now on the hyperfine field experienced by the 57Fe nuclei, the process of chemical grafting on the gold surface can affect both the individual \(\left\langle {s_z^i} \right\rangle\) values, by altering intramolecular exchange interactions in Eq. (1), and the extent of electron delocalization on the nuclei. For the eight investigated AIMD trajectories26 the local z components in the M S  = ±5 doublet are on average smaller in absolute value than in the bulk phase (Supplementary Fig. 7). The difference is more clearly visible on the central site Fe1 (2.087 vs. 2.137 ħ) than on peripheral sites (2.361 vs. 2.378 ħ). Furthermore, Fe3 shows the largest spread of \(\left\langle {s_z^i} \right\rangle\)values (±5%) over the eight walkers. In order to assign the observed hyperfine fields to specific Fe3+ ions, we assumed that the hyperfine field is an increasing function of \(\left| {\left\langle {s_z^i} \right\rangle } \right|\) averaged over the eight walkers. A linear trend was obtained (Supplementary Fig. 7), the slope of which is similar to that of the bulk sample, further indicating that Fe4 complexes retain their magnetic features on surface. However, all values seem to be shifted on average by 6  T towards smaller fields.

To shed some light on this aspect, further ab initio calculations of the isotropic hyperfine magnetic fields were here performed. We considered the optimized geometry in the crystalline phase and two of the geometries obtained by AIMD trajectories after extrapolating the Fe4 complex from the underlying gold surface. The computed hyperfine magnetic fields, reported in Table 1, are dominated by the Fermi contact term. The time-demanding relativistic spin orbit coupling (SOC) contributions were not computed as they are expected to be negligible for high spin Fe3+. In agreement with Mössbauer spectra, the lowest hyperfine magnetic field is computed for the central iron in both bulk-phase and on-surface molecules (see Table 1), primarily as a consequence of the different \(\left\langle {s_z^i} \right\rangle\). The hyperfine fields are on average reduced upon grafting. The strongest reduction (−2.5 T) is calculated for the central iron atom, but is much smaller than found experimentally.

The above described ab initio calculations only include surface-induced structural deformations, but neglect electronic effects of the metal surface. Their inclusion is not possible with the same accuracy, therefore the local spin densities were computed by pseudo-potential Gaussian Plane Waves (GPW-DFT) calculations by considering both the Fe4 molecule and 314 gold atoms of the underlying slab.

To avoid spurious effect due to the use of pseudopotentials, these spin densities were compared to the ones obtained, at the same level of calculation, on molecules with the same geometry, but removing the gold slab—also referred to as extrapolated geometry. The results, averaged over the eight investigated AIMD trajectories, are reported in Supplementary Table 6 (for the individual values see Supplementary Table 7). They indicate that a small, but sizable reduction of the spin density occurs due to a purely electronic effect of the gold substrate, thereby hinting to a decreased polarization of core s orbitals of iron ions. The expected reduction of hyperfine fields, reported in Table 1, is of the order of 2 T for Fe1 and significantly smaller for the remaining ions. Though a similar investigation considering all-electron basis is not affordable, the observed reduction of hyperfine magnetic fields on the surface can be ascribed to both geometrical and electronic perturbations induced by the grafting process.


Synchrotron Mössbauer spectroscopy applied here to a monolayer of molecules has provided unprecedented insights in the process of chemical absorption of a complex molecule on a surface. This has been achieved thanks to the largely increased sensitivity—without significant loss in spectral resolution—that characterizes the SMS as compared with a conventional Mössbauer setup. The resulting scenario is that significant deformations of the magnetic core are induced by the interaction with the substrate, even in the relatively well-protected and rigid Fe4 structure. These deformations emerge clearly from state-of-the-art ab initio molecular dynamics modelling, but are undetectable by conventional synchrotron based magneto-optical techniques, such as XMCD, as well as by more local probes, like scanning probe techniques. In the latter case, in fact, the tip of the microscope mechanically induces deformation, thus altering the molecular structure25. In surface-supported Fe4 complexes, SMM behavior is retained with comparable magnetization dynamics to the bulk phase. This observation can be reconciled with the evidences of surface-induced structural modifications because local distortions at different iron sites are calculated to partially compensate each other. This makes the Fe4 class of molecules particularly well suited for organization on surface and insertion in single molecule devices. In this sense, synchrotron Mössbauer spectroscopy could be employed in the investigation of other types of molecules assembled in monolayer architectures in view of the rational design of hybrid interfaces33 and single molecule spintronic devices.


Sample preparation

The synthesis of [57Fe4(L)2(dpm)6] was based on the previously reported27 preparation of [Fe4(L)2(dpm)6] and is described in detail in Supplementary Methods, while the mass spectra of 57Fe enriched vs. natural samples are reported in Supplementary Fig. 12. For the preparation of the monolayer sample a 20 nm thick polycrystalline gold film evaporated on silicon with a 5 nm Ti decoupling layer (SSENS, Enschede, NL) was immersed in a 2 mM solution of [57Fe4(L)2(dpm)6] in dichloromethane and incubated under controlled atmosphere for 20 h. This type of substrate, selected for its flatness and rigidity, is not compatible with hydrogen flame annealing, used to promote the surface reconstruction of Au(111) and the consequent preferential orientation of the Fe4 molecules in the monolayer27. After incubation the slide was washed with pure dichloromethane in order to remove any physisorbed overlayers, dried under argon atmosphere and directly mounted on the SMS sample holder. No XAS/XMCD data are available for a monolayer assembled on the substrates employed here. However, we recall that Fe4 molecules chemisorbed on well reconstructed Au(111) surfaces or tethered to Au nanoparticles34 both give XAS/XMCD spectra that do not differ appreciably from those recorded in the bulk phase.

The dropcast film was prepared starting from the same kind of substrate and a freshly prepared 2 mM solution of [57Fe4(L)2(dpm)6].

Mössbauer experiments

Mössbauer spectra were measured at ID18, the nuclear resonance beamline29 of the European Synchrotron radiation facility (ESRF), taking advantage of the Synchrotron Mössbauer Source (SMS)30, 31. For the present study an acceptable compromise between linewidth and acquisition time was achieved by setting the linewidth at half maximum (FWHM) at a value approximately three times larger than for a radioactive source. In these conditions, an intensity of about 1.5 × 104 photons per second was obtained on the 14.4 keV γ-line. The FWHM was evaluated by taking a Mössbauer spectrum of a single-line absorber (K2Mg57Fe(CN)6) of known thickness before and after each Mössbauer measurement of the samples. Moreover, the isomer shift of the SMS line, as measured from the single-line spectra, was of 0.709 mm s−1 with respect to conventional α-Fe. Mössbauer spectra were recorded by collecting the radiation reflected by the sample surface in a grazing incidence geometry. For both samples an incidence angle θ 0.1° (with a spot size of ca 18 μm in both dimensions) was chosen, after measuring the reflectivity of the samples as a function of θ. Mössbauer spectra were measured at different temperatures in the range 2.2–40 K and 2.2–11 K for the dropcast and the monolayer samples, respectively, using the superconducting He-exchange gas cryo-magnetic system. Mössbauer spectra were recorded without applying any external magnetic field. The contribution of Fe impurities in beryllium collimating lenses of the beamline, as detected in an empty-can Mössbauer spectrum, i.e., with no mounted sample (see Supplementary Fig. 13), was subtracted from the experimental spectra.

Fitting method

The fitting of Mössbauer spectra required the determination of the absorption cross-section of the samples (further details are provided in Supplementary Note 1). In general, the total cross-section is the superposition of a number of contributions equal to the number of inequivalent Fe sites; however, symmetry considerations can reduce the number of distinct contributions and consequently change their relative intensities; for example, for the Fe4 dropcast sample three contributions were used, with relative intensities in the ratio 1:1:2. The hyperfine Hamiltonians acting on the inequivalent iron nuclear sites are characterized by different static components (i.e., magnetic fields, electric quadrupole tensors, and isomer shifts), but share the same dynamical parameters, which reflect the interaction of the molecular total spin states with the thermal bath.

When the molecular spin undergoes transitions between its states, the spins at the individual iron ions change their z-components simultaneously; consequently, the iron nuclei are subjected to stochastic changes in the hyperfine field magnitude, though the ratios between the hyperfine fields at the different iron sites remain unchanged. To evaluate the various contributions to the Mössbauer cross-section, Liouville super-operators associated with the spin and the spin-thermal bath Hamiltonians acting on all the possible transitions between the hyperfine states, were introduced (further details are provided in Supplementary Notes 2 and 3). The procedure required the evaluation of the eigenvectors and left and right eigenvalues of a set of non-Hermitian matrices of order 88. Moreover, broadenings of the cross-section contributions were introduced to describe inhomogeneous Gaussian distributions of hyperfine electric parameters.

The resulting total cross-section as a function of the energy expressed in mm s1 (σ(ω)) was then inserted into the transmission integral function in order to take into account the dependence of the Mössbauer spectra on the sample effective thickness. The complete expression used to fit the spectra was

$$Y\left( v \right) = N_b(v)\left\{ {1 - {\int}_{\!\!\!\! - \infty }^\infty {L_2^S} (\omega - v,{{\varGamma }}_S)\left[ {1 - {\mathrm{exp}}( - t_a^{\mathrm{SMS}}\sigma (\omega ))} \right]\mathrm{d}\omega } \right\}$$

where v and N b (v) are the transducer velocity and the spectrum baseline, respectively35. Moreover \(L_2^S(\omega - v,{ {\varGamma }}_S)\) is the squared Lorentzian distribution31, centered at v and having Γ S as FWHM, used to describe the source line shape. Finally, \(t_a^{\mathrm{SMS}}\) is the effective thickness of the sample, obtained multiplying the sample effective thickness in a conventional Mössbauer setup by the factor 2/(sinθ), where θ is the grazing angle between the surface of the sample and the direction of the incoming radiation. The correctness of the procedure was checked by evaluating the number of iron ions per cm2 in the dropcast sample. Considering the mean superficial density of the molecule23, a sample thickness of the order of 100 nm was calculated in agreement with the nominal thickness of the dropcast sample. It is worth noting that, because the sensed Mössbauer thickness is the result of the multiplication by the above-mentioned factor, only synchrotron light at grazing incidence could succeed in detecting Mössbauer spectra not only of the monolayer but also of such a thin dropcast sample.

A rather good agreement between experimental and best-fit data was found in the whole temperature range for the dropcast sample (χ2 values are comprised between 472 and 3908 for the 512 points); in spite of the worse signal-to-noise ratio, a quite good agreement was found for the monolayer sample too (χ2 values are comprised between 502 and 586 for the 512 points).

Ab initio calculations

The ORCA 3.0.3 program package was used to calculate the hyperfine tensors at the 57Fe nuclei. Calculations were made on one of the four crystallographically-independent molecules contained in the unit cell of the optimized structure of Fe4 and on the final geometry of two out of eight AIMD trajectories (walkers 1 and 3) considered in a previous work26. The optimized geometries were obtained for the M S  = 5 Broken Symmetry state. We have limited the calculations to only two walkers because of the demanding computation time for such a large number of atoms (270). However, to avoid any loss of generality, we have chosen walkers 1 and 3 because they present very similar exchange parameters, but a different sign of the single-ion D value for Fe1. The gradient-corrected (GGA) exchange-correlation functional PBE36 was used with def2-TZVP basis set for all the elements and the RI approximation for the Coulomb operator integral evaluation employing the def2-TZVP/J auxiliary basis set37. It is known that the use of pure Gaussian atomic basis leads to an inaccurate descriptions of the electron density at the 57Fe nucleus38. For such a reason we used the core-polarized CP(PPP)39, 40 basis function for the iron atoms. Relativistic effects were not included in the computations, since it was shown that they do not improve the quality of the computed Mössbauer parameters40. The integral accuracy parameter was increased to 7.0 at the Fe center in order to provide more accurate core properties. The computed isotropic hyperfine fields were scaled by a factor of 1.81 as suggested for B3LYP in 40. In support to this choice, we have observed that an empiric factor 1.79 (hence very close to the B3LYP one) is needed to minimize the differences between the experimental and computed hyperfine fields for the central iron ion, chosen as reference. The Mulliken population analysis was performed on optimized structures obtained by AIMD (see ref. 26) using molecular optimized basis sets (DZVP-MOLOPT-SR-GTH) along with Goedecker–Teter–Hutter pseudopotentials. The TPSS functional together with Grimme’s D3 corrections was used to account for the dispersion forces. The auxiliary plane wave basis set was needed for the representation of the electronic density in the reciprocal space and the efficient solution of Poisson’s equation. We truncated the plane wave basis set at 400Ry.

Data availability

All relevant data, including ASCII files of the recorded Mössbauer spectra, are available from the authors on request.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Sanvito, S. Molecular spintronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 3336–3355 (2011).

  2. 2.

    Bogani, L. & Wernsdorfer, W. Molecular spintronics using single-molecule magnets. Nat. Mater. 7, 179–186 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Urdampilleta, M., Klyatskaya, S., Cleuziou, J. P., Ruben, M. & Wernsdorfer, W. Supramolecular spin valves. Nat. Mater. 10, 502–506 (2011).

  4. 4.

    Leuenberger, M. N. & Loss, D. Quantum computing in molecular magnets. Nature 410, 789–793 (2001).

  5. 5.

    Thiele, S. et al. Electrically driven nuclear spin resonance in single-molecule magnets. Science 344, 1135–1138 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Shiddiq, M. et al. Enhancing coherence in molecular spin qubits via atomic clock transitions. Nature 531, 348–351 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Gatteschi, D., Sessoli, R. & Villain, J. Molecular Nanomagnets. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).

  8. 8.

    Cornia, A. & Mannini, M. Molecular Nanomagnets and Related Phenomena (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2014).

  9. 9.

    Dreiser, J. Molecular lanthanide single-ion magnets: from bulk to submonolayers. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 183203 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Holmberg, R. J. & Murugesu, M. Adhering magnetic molecules to surfaces. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 11986–11998 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Mannini, M. et al. Magnetic memory of a single-molecule quantum magnet wired to a gold surface. Nat. Mater. 8, 194–197 (2009).

  12. 12.

    Mannini, M. et al. Magnetic behaviour of TbPc2 single-molecule magnets chemically grafted on silicon surface. Nat. Commun. 5, 4582 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Wäckerlin, C. et al. Giant hysteresis of single-molecule magnets adsorbed on a nonmagnetic insulator. Adv. Mater. 28, 5195–5199 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Natterer, F. D. et al. Reading and writing single-atom magnets. Nature 543, 226–228 (2017).

  15. 15.

    van der Laan, G. & Figueroa, A. I. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism-A versatile tool to study magnetism. Coord. Chem. Rev. 277, 95–129 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Caneschi, A., Gatteschi, D. & Totti, F. Molecular magnets and surfaces: a promising marriage. A DFT insight. Coord. Chem. Rev. 289–290, 357–378 (2015).

  17. 17.

    Caneschi, A. et al. Study of the spin dynamics in an iron cluster nanomagnet by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 11, 3395–3403 (1999).

  18. 18.

    Cianchi, L., Del Giallo, F., Spina, G., Reiff, W. & Caneschi, A. Spin dynamics study of magnetic molecular clusters by means of Mössbauer spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 65, 64415 (2002).

  19. 19.

    Gutlich, P., Eckhard, B. & Trautwein, A. X. Mössbauer spectroscopy and transition metal chemistry: fundamentals and applications. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011).

  20. 20.

    Rohlsberger, R. et al. Nanoscale magnetism probed by nuclear resonant scattering of synchrotron radiation. Phys. Rev. B 67, 245412 (2003).

  21. 21.

    Rohlsberger, R., Klein, T., Schlage, K., Leupold, O. & Ruffer, R. Coherent X-ray scattering from ultrathin probe layers. Phys. Rev. B 69, 235412 (2004).

  22. 22.

    Slezak, M. et al. Perpendicular magnetic anisotropy and noncollinear magnetic structure in ultrathin Fe films on W(110). Phys. Rev. B 87, 134411 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Malavolti, L. et al. Magnetic bistability in a submonolayer of sublimated Fe4 single-molecule magnets. Nano Lett. 15, 535–541 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Zyazin, A. S. S. et al. Electric field controlled magnetic anisotropy in a single molecule. Nano Lett. 10, 3307–3311 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Burgess, J. A. J. et al. Magnetic fingerprint of individual Fe4 molecular magnets under compression by a scanning tunnelling microscope. Nat. Commun. 6, 8216 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Lunghi, A., Iannuzzi, M., Sessoli, R. & Totti, F. Single molecule magnets grafted on gold: magnetic properties from ab initio molecular dynamics. J. Mater. Chem. C 3, 7294–7304 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Mannini, M. et al. Quantum tunnelling of the magnetization in a monolayer of oriented single-molecule magnets. Nature 468, 417–421 (2010).

  28. 28.

    Totaro, P. et al. Tetrairon(III) single-molecule magnet monolayers on gold: insights from ToF-SIMS and Isotopic Labeling. Langmuir 30, 8645–8649 (2014).

  29. 29.

    Rüffer, R. & Chumakov, A. I. Nuclear resonance beamline at ESRF. Hyperfine Interact. 97–98, 589–604 (1996).

  30. 30.

    Smirnov, G. V., van Bürck, U., Chumakov, A. I., Baron, A. Q. R. & Rüffer, R. Synchrotron Mössbauer source. Phys. Rev. B 55, 5811–5815 (1997).

  31. 31.

    Potapkin, V. et al. The 57Fe synchrotron Mössbauer source at the ESRF. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 19, 559–569 (2012).

  32. 32.

    Greenwood, N. N. & Gibb, T. C. Mössbauer spectroscopy. (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1971).

  33. 33.

    Cinchetti, M., Dediu, V. A. & Hueso, L. E. Activating the molecular spinterface. Nat. Mater. 16, 507–515 (2017).

  34. 34.

    Perfetti, M. et al. Grafting single molecule magnets on gold nanoparticles. Small 10, 323–329 (2014).

  35. 35.

    Chen, L. & De-Ping, Y. Mössbauer effect in lattice dynamics: experimental techniques and applications. (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, 2007).

  36. 36.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

  37. 37.

    Weigend, F. Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 8, 1057–1065 (2006).

  38. 38.

    Römelt, M., Ye, S. & Neese, F. Calibration of modern density functional theory methods for the prediction of 57Fe Mössbauer isomer shifts: meta-GGA and double-hybrid functionals. Inorg. Chem. 48, 784–785 (2009).

  39. 39.

    Neese, F. Prediction and interpretation of the 57Fe isomer shift in Mössbauer spectra by density functional theory. Inorg. Chim. Acta 337, 181–192 (2002).

  40. 40.

    Sinnecker, S., Slep, L. D., Bill, E. & Neese, F. Performance of nonrelativistic and quasi-relativistic hybrid DFT for the prediction of electric and magnetic hyperfine parameters in 57Fe Mössbauer spectra. Inorg. Chem. 44, 2245–2254 (2005).

Download references


This work was in part supported by the European Research Council through the Advanced Grant MolNanoMaS (no. 267746) and by European Union’s Horizon2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No. 737709 (FEMTOTERABYTE, MF is grateful for financial support by ECRF (no. 2014.0708). We thank Dr. Alessandro Lunghi for fruitful discussion.

Author information

A.Co., M.M., and R.S. planned the investigation. A.Co. synthesized the material while molecular films were prepared by M.M. A.Ci., A.Co., and M.M. performed the experiments with the assistance of A.Ch. and R.R. Mössbauer data were analysed by A.Ci., M.F., and G.S. with the support of A.Co. and R.S.; F.T. performed the ab initio studies. All authors contributed to the discussion and to the drafting of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Correspondence to Gabriele Spina or Andrea Cornia or Roberta Sessoli.

Electronic supplementary material

  1. Supplementary Information

  2. Peer Review File

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.