Article | Open

# Forest productivity in southwestern Europe is controlled by coupled North Atlantic and Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillations

• Nature Communicationsvolume 8, Article number: 2222 (2017)
• doi:10.1038/s41467-017-02319-0
Accepted:
Published:

## Abstract

The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) depicts annual and decadal oscillatory modes of variability responsible for dry spells over the European continent. The NAO therefore holds a great potential to evaluate the role, as carbon sinks, of water-limited forests under climate change. However, uncertainties related to inconsistent responses of long-term forest productivity to NAO have so far hampered firm conclusions on its impacts. We hypothesize that, in part, such inconsistencies might have their origin in periodical sea surface temperature anomalies in the Atlantic Ocean (i.e., Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, AMO). Here we show strong empirical evidence in support of this hypothesis using 120 years of periodical inventory data from Iberian pine forests. Our results point to AMO+ NAO+ and AMONAO phases as being critical for forest productivity, likely due to decreased winter water balance and abnormally low winter temperatures, respectively. Our findings could be essential for the evaluation of ecosystem functioning vulnerabilities associated with increased climatic anomalies under unprecedented warming conditions in the Mediterranean.

## Introduction

Forest productivity represents a major component of the forest carbon sink, which has been estimated to be as much as 30% of anthropogenic carbon emissions (2 Pg C per year) over the past few decades1. Water-limited forests in the Mediterranean Basin are not an exception in this regard, and have indeed been shown to contribute moderately to carbon sequestration, despite the existence of intrinsic local environmental variability2. Recent findings, however, suggest that increased intensity and frequency of drought anomalies might expose water-limited forests to unprecedented vulnerabilities, which in turn might jeopardize or even reverse their global role as carbon sinks3,4. Developing adaptive strategies to preserve the carbon sink role of water-limited forests in the long term requires an in-depth understanding of how forest productivity responds to drought variability5.

Over the last decades, research on the global climate system has bridged global atmospheric phenomena to oscillatory modes of climatic variability6. The North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) is one such phenomenon directly related to drought anomalies in North America and Europe7,8,9,10,11,12,13. The NAO emerges from the dipole of atmospheric masses at the sea surface level between the Azores and Iceland acting as a latitudinal switch of oceanic influences14. A weakened dipole (i.e., negative NAO) allows moist westerly winds to reach southwestern European latitudes, and thus, facilitates the arrival of abundant rainfall and moderate temperatures. By contrast, the strengthening of the dipole (e.g., a positive NAO phase) favors the occurrence of anticyclonic weather conditions in the region as well as increased frequency of drought anomalies, nocturnal frosts, and extreme daytime heat15. Two contrasting response patterns to NAO have been reported from north to south in Western Europe;—positive responses in northern boreal/temperate forests16 and negative ones in the western Mediterranean Basin17. In southern European forests, ecological responses to NAO have been related to plant phenology18, fruit production19, seed masting20, tree growth2,17,21,23,23, and pest occurrence24. All these processes are directly or indirectly associated with soil water recharges during winter, needed to support forest functions when available energy becomes large enough to maintain carboxylation and xylogenesis21. The signature of NAO phases on tree growth, however, has been shown to vary over longer timescales25, and this, has given rise to the formulation of new hypotheses where NAO teleconnections (i.e., linkages between distant climatic anomalies due to North Atlantic sea surface level pressure changes) are coupled to other atmospheric/oceanic influences and/or modes26,27. Understanding teleconnections associated with coupling of NAO to other climate modes of variability thus represent a promising research line toward more accurate assessments of the carbon sink role of forests in the long term.

The Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) might be such a major climate mode associated with periodical anomalies of sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in northern, extratropical latitudes. In North America, Europe, and the Sahel region, relationships between the AMO and seasonal weather anomalies have been described28,30,30, as has the subsequent signature in long-living organisms such as corals31 or trees32. AMO+ phases (i.e., positive anomalies of SST) have been linked to heat waves and squall formation over the European continent33. More recently, the AMO has also been related to non-stationary patterns of precipitation and temperature in both North America and Western Europe28,34. Thus, it might be hypothesized that forest productivity in southwestern Europe is controlled by anomalies in the winter water balance emerging from coupled patterns of NAO and AMO. The AMO could be acting as a SST-based forcing of the oceanic moisture advection, whereas the NAO acts as the latitudinal switch for the income of such oceanic influences over the continent. Moreover, AMO and NAO are known to affect the probability of cold and heat extremes, which can also affect tree growth via other teleconnections. For instance, during phases with abnormally cold SSTs (i.e., AMO phase), the induced cooling might instead exceed the predominant role of water thus reversing forest growth responses to the NAO. Surprisingly, empirical evidence of such influence induced by a coupling of NAO and AMO is lacking, probably because most of the available biological records barely cover a full AMO cycle, which is in the order of 70–80 years.

Here we demonstrate that the coupling of NAO and AMO substantially influences long-term volume increment (VI), a surrogate of forest productivity, at the landscape scale in southwestern Europe. The study is based on detailed historical forest inventory data consisting of periodic wood volume measurements since the end of the 19th century in a number of forest spatial units (hereafter forest units) comprising hundreds of hectares and thousands of trees within five representative forest landscapes of the Iberian Peninsula. The five forest landscapes considered cover a total extension of >33,000 ha and include three different ecosystems dominated by contrasted and widespread pine species in Europe (Pinus sylvestris L., P. pinaster Aiton, and P. nigra Arn.). First, VI was regressed against the interactive effects of the NAO and AMO, and accounts for thinning (Th), tree density (TD), mean tree size (MTS), and calendar year (as a predictor variable for productivity responses linked to global changes35). Second, structural equation modeling (SEM36) allowed us to test the hypothesis that, over the last 120 years, the AMO coupled to the NAO has affected VI indirectly through a direct influence on winter water balance (i.e., precipitation-potential evapotranspiration, P-PET), which is critical for soil water recharge in Mediterranean ecosystems; thus tree growth and ecosystem functioning are sensitive to fluctuations in the balance between precipitation and evapotranspiration during winter21. Finally, empirical support to a direct relationship between NAO and AMO coupling and winter water balance is provided using available local climate data from representative nearby meteorological stations.

## Results

### North Atlantic Oscillations as forest productivity drivers

A first mixed-effects model was designed to unravel the simultaneous effects of North Atlantic climate modes, last-century global changes, and forest factors on VI. Model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) supported a negative effect of MTS (see Supplementary Table 1 and sign of parameter estimate in Supplementary Table 2). A positive last-century linear trend of VI was also supported, whereas TD and species did not receive enough support to be included in the final model, indicating a limited effect of both variables on VI (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Table 2). Finally, model selection strongly supported the interactive effect of NAO and AMO driving VI (Supplementary Table 1). The supported model showed high goodness of fit as shown by both the observed vs. predicted plot (Supplementary Fig. 1, and the high conditional R 2 (i.e., 0.78)). The most negative effect of NAO and AMO coupling was especially noticeable during NAOAMO phases. For these periods, the model points to reductions in as much as 60% of mean VI, provided that the other predictor variables are kept at average values (Fig. 1a). Slighter reductions of up to 30% of mean VI were also observed during AMO+ and NAO+ phases (Fig. 1c). By contrast, whereas VI almost doubled during AMO+NAO phases (Fig. 1d), the model only suggests moderate impacts of AMONAO+ phases on VI (Fig. 1b).

### Long-term mechanistic evidence via winter water balance

To better understand whether the apparent correlation between NAO/AMO variability and forest productivity is mechanistically plausible, we evaluated the hypothesis that coupled NAO and AMO indirectly affect VI through their influence on climatic variability using SEM. We thus considered two separate models. First, VI as a function of winter P-PET, calendar year as well as the forest factor with significant influence in the previous growth model (i.e., MTS). Second, winter P-PET as function of NAO, AMO, and the calendar year. After inclusion of a missing direct path between NAO and VI (standardized coefficient = 0.15) in the initial hypothesis (Fig. 2), the entire structured model resulted in an adequate goodness of fit based on Fisher’s C statistic (C (df  = 6) = 5.31, P = 0.257). Our results show how NAO and AMO indirectly affect VI through the modification of winter P-PET (standardized coefficients −0.14 and 0.21, respectively), which in turn had a notable direct effect on VI (standardized coefficient = 0.34, Fig. 2). Our analysis also shows a direct positive global change trend in VI (standardized coefficient = 0.15) and a positive indirect influence of global change through the modification of P-PET (standardized coefficient = 0.13).

### North Atlantic modes as drivers of local climatic records

The interactive effects between the NAO and AMO on local climate were analyzed separately at annual resolution (see Supplementary Table 3 for further information of meteorological stations considered). The supported models were all coherent with previous findings (Fig. 1) on the relationship between VI and long-term climate at decadal timescales (Fig. 2). Our results supported a significant effect of NAO × AMO on winter precipitation on the one hand (Fig. 3a), and winter P-PET on the other hand (Fig. 3c). In both cases, winter water availability increased toward NAO (see parameter estimates in Supplementary Table 4) and, on the contrary, minimum winter water balance during coupled NAO+ and AMO+ phases. During NAO and AMO phases, our results point to the highest winter water balance, mostly due to a strong significant decrease in winter temperatures (Fig. 3b), and thus to reduced potential evapotranspiration.

## Discussion

Last-century VI in Iberian pinelands strongly resembles coupled patterns of NAO and AMO phases and thus confirms that the impact of a NAO signature on VI is subsidiary of the low-frequency SST anomalies described by the AMO index. Moreover, our results point to significant relationships between North Atlantic climate modes coupling and local climate, and thus strongly support the hypothesized control of NAO and AMO on VI through climate. Large-scale simulations of net primary productivity and remote sensing evidence have recently provided support to this hypothesis27, albeit with a reduced time scope that precluded the detection of important low-frequency modes of climate variability such as the AMO. Our results, by contrast, are supported by a number of decadal field measurements over the 20th century in Iberian forests. As the data set comprises comprehensive historical information such as TD, MTS, Th, and global change trends, we add strong evidence to the initial hypothesis postulating the existence of important teleconnections and a coupling of climate modes over the North Atlantic. Indeed, we demonstrate that this coupling becomes apparent in the form of rank reversals of VI responses to NAO following changes in AMO: i.e., the well-known negative response of tree growth to NAO is manifested only during neutral-positive SST anomalies identified with AMO+ phases. On the contrary, a slightly positive response to NAO can emerge during the AMO antiphase (AMO), when SSTs are below the long-term mean. These findings will have profound implications on our understanding of forest carbon fluxes, and for the development of accurate estimations of forest carbon sinks and vulnerability to increasing aridity.

The control exerted by NAO and AMO coupled patterns on VI is driven by anomalies in the winter water balance. The SST increase in subtropical areas during AMO+ phases results in a greater moisture-holding capacity of the atmosphere37,38, with a likely influence of the Atlantic SST on circulation regimes in the extra-tropics and the occurrence of extreme drought conditions39, as well as other drought-induced weather anomalies28 over Europe, namely anticyclonic and blocking conditions38. In addition, the location of high-low pressure systems over the North Atlantic Ocean (i.e., NAO index) also exerts major control on the storm paths and on winter weather regimes in Europe40,41,42,43. In this context, AMO+ and NAO+ phases match with notable reductions in VI, which in turn are linked to extremely negative winter water balances (reflected in extremely dry conditions during the 1940s and 1990s on the Iberian Peninsula44). By contrast, the combination of AMO+ and NAO phases obviously coincides with abundant winter precipitation (as observed during the late 1930s and in the 1950s45,46,47,48) and thereby lead to increases in VI. Analyses on seasonality trends clearly point to a significant relationship between NAO-like modes and the frequency of wet and dry conditions48, and are thus in agreement with the concept of the interactive effects of NAO and AMO-like modes presented here on weather regimes over the Iberian Peninsula.

The coupling of NAO and AMO indeed is crucial as it not only integrates water constraints, but also temperature limitations on VI. The combination of AMO and NAO+ phases corresponds with slight increments in VI and a moderate winter water balance, whereas AMOand NAO phases match with the strongest reductions in VI and paradoxically the highest winter water balance. This strong decrease in VI, coupled to the wettest conditions and low temperatures, suggests increased energy limitations in agreement with temperature anomalies during AMO34 and NAO49 phases. Temperature is an important driver of tree growth in elevated inland regions of southern Europe50,51, as low temperatures reduce photosynthetic activity through limitations on RUBISCO, carboxylation, and xylogenesis52. Thus, low temperatures will strongly limit tree growth in pine species in southwestern Europe as recently shown for Iberian populations of P. sylvestris 53. Thus, slight increments in temperature motivated by anticyclonic conditions associated to NAO+ might determine, as hypothesized, positive responses in forest productivity during AMO phases.

It is important to note that, although winter water balance is decisive for the recharge of available water for plants in Mediterranean biomes54, climatic variability during the remainder of the year may also play a role in driving forest productivity. For example, temperature and precipitation during early spring have been successfully correlated to tree growth in the studied and similar forests55. Thus, a further broadening of the scope of climatic indices or even an inclusion of other, new climatic phenomena might enhance our understanding of forest-climate relationships further. This will, however, be an arduous task since climatic patterns remain, in general, only poorly understood, and since even less is known about their teleconnections with local climate on the continents. The connection between global modes and local climate as well as their effects on forest performance will likely become a major research topic at the interface between climatology and ecology in the future. It will improve our ability to evaluate accurately potential climatic impacts on forest functions and services, especially in vulnerable areas such as the western Mediterranean Basin.

Our findings imply that a large proportion of forest productivity at the regional or potentially even at the hemispheric scales could be explained by large-scale, multidecadal internal climate-ocean variability. We provide strong physical evidence of the impact of the coupled low-frequency, ocean-atmosphere variability mode described herein on southern Europe pine forest functioning in terms of VI. These results have direct implications for the assessment of terrestrial carbon sink vulnerability under climate change. The combination NAO+ and AMO+ have been shown to result in reduced winter water balance, which added to the growing vapor pressure deficit associated with enhanced atmospheric water demands due to climate warming, may exacerbate drought impacts on forest ecosystems. Besides reductions in VI, global change-type drought (or amplified drought by global warming) can result in increased tree mortality and reduced regeneration, thereby limiting the ability of forest ecosystems to act as carbon sinks and favoring vegetation shifts from forests to treeless communities56. Furthermore, a more persistent NAO+ phase under climate change57 could aggravate the deleterious effects of the interaction between the NAO and the AMO, particularly in multidecadal periods of prevailing AMO+, through longer, and more intense, dry periods. Up until now, however, calendar year trends had a direct and indirect positive effect on VI. On the one hand, a slight positive trend in winter P-PET has presumably contributed to enhance forest productivity until the beginning of the 21st century. On the other hand, a positive last-century trend in forest productivity reveals the existence of other factors likely associated to global change trends such as increments in temperature, changes in precipitation patterns, growing atmospheric CO2 concentration58, and/or nitrogen depositions59,60. Although a linking of calendar year to global change trends is commonly done in literature35, further research is needed to clarify actual variables and mechanisms, climatic and non-climatic, underpinning forest productivity trends in the long term, since factors like age-related trends in radial growth or soil moisture due to cumulative effects of water balance (P-PET + runoff)) could affect forest productivity trends as well.

Understanding the underlying causes of net primary productivity responses to climatic variability is critical to predict and establish realistic long-term mitigation targets for each region as well as to implement flexible adaptation and management measures61. Thinning is one of the most effective and applied adaptation measures in water-limited forests, as it promotes forest resilience to drought impacts62,63. The oscillatory nature of the NAO and the AMO can allow detection of periods with high drought risk and thus allow for the development of anticipatory adaptation measures such as selective Th, adjustment of regeneration, cutting age cycles, and stand species diversification. Anticipatory measures are key for optimizing management effectiveness and efficiency as the positive effects of Th decrease with increasing time since the last application62,63. Advancement of drought risk periods can thus enhance forest resilience64 by allowing us to adjust forest structure and regeneration periods to more realistic and flexible climate scenarios. The achievement of forest resilience is particularly critical given the high risk of irreversible ecosystem degradation and aridification under climate warming in this region.

## Methods

### Forest management projects

The study was conducted using historical forest inventory data recorded in five extensive pine forest landscapes in central-southern Spain (i.e., c. 33,000 hectares). Location and primary environmental data can be found in Supplementary Table 5 and Supplementary Fig. 2. The five forest landscapes considered in this study exhibit public ownership and have similar management prescriptions following shelterwoods with progressive Th to facilitate tree regeneration by keeping a protective adult tree cover. Prior to the application of management practices, the foresters divided forest landscapes into a number of forest units (53 forest units distributed in the five forest landscapes, see Supplementary Table 5) that can be recognized as pseudoreplicates of a whole forest landscape because each one includes a representative chronosequence of the rotation period. The area of forest units, with an average value of ~550 ha, depends on the size of the particular forest landscape.

The forest landscapes studied are representative of the most abundant pine tree species in southwestern Europe (Supplementary Table 5): P. pinaster, P. sylvestris, and P. nigra. P. pinaster is an abundant well-adapted tree species to water scarcity, whereas the other species, P. sylvestris and P. nigra, are mountain pine species in the Mediterranean with Eurosiberian and supra-Mediterranean distribution ranges, respectively65. The different species tend to occupy different lithologies: while P. pinaster and P. sylvestris grow in acidic soils on sandy dunes and granite lithologies, respectively, P. nigra grow in neutral-basic soils in limestone. In all cases, soils are generally poorly developed, with thin organic horizons and low nutrient contents. Furthermore, P. sylvestris is distributed in mountain systems covering an altitudinal range of 1000–1900 m.a.s.l., and, therefore slopes and climatic conditions can vary locally. In the case of P. pinaster and P. nigra, forests generally occupy flat areas where local environmental variation is lower. In general, these forests are monospecific, yet other tree and shrub species appear to occupy a secondary role in marginal areas and ecotones.

### Biotic information

Volume increment, as a surrogate of forest productivity, was computed using available information on decadal wood volume stocks and management practices recorded periodically since the turn of the 19th century (or the beginning of the 20th century) in the studied forest landscapes. Wood volume stocks were assessed as the sum of every individual tree wood volume in each forest unit. It was therefore necessary to estimate first individual tree wood volume through the most basic trunk dimensions: i.e., diameter at breast height (i.e., DBH) and height. In these management plans, a set of trees that were representative of different diameter classes were periodically (approximately every decade) collected and measured to accurately set the relationship between DBH and height and tree wood volume. After felling, tree bark was removed and the DBH and height were measured. With this simple information, volume can be assessed by applying a cylinder equation, which includes diameter and height as the only parameters. Nonetheless, tree trunks are not perfect cylinders given the progressive reduction of diameter upwards. To correct this deviation from the perfect cylinder, tree trunks were then divided into smaller pieces of 1.5–2 m long. Volumes of each piece were then closer to resembling a cylindrical shape so applying a cylinder equation might then be a good method to estimate volume. Then, volumes of independent trunk pieces were summed up and compared to the first volume estimation obtained from the single tree trunk. The ratio between summed volume assessments using pieces vs. volume on a single trunk was the taper coefficient and thereafter was applied to correct every simple measure of tree volume calculated as a unique cylinder using DBH and height. Taper coefficients were derived to four different diameter classes, which directly contribute to an improved assessment of volume stocks at the forest unit level. It is important to note that DBH and height of every individual tree >20 cm DBH were conveniently measured across all the forest units in every inventory in the five forest landscapes considered. In other words, volume stocks at the forest unit level were assessed as a summation of volumes of all the individual trees. This exhaustive work was possible thanks to the coordination of forest agents of the regional councils and a number of workers who were periodically hired in the nearby localities. Therefore, volume assessments at the unit level represent genuine and highly accurate estimations of volume stocks sampled approximately every decade and covering more than a century. The high quality of this information is a direct legacy of the necessity to accurately arrange forest products and services as pervasive economic resources in these populations since the turn of the 19th century. Nowadays, this information allows us to address important research questions in the fields of ecology and forest science66,68,68.

We used forest-unit-level VIs as a surrogate of replicated forest aboveground productivity comparing wood stocks of consecutive inventories and discounting volume of collected trees, as follows:

$VI= V 2 - V 1 + V Th ,$
(1)

where V 2 is volume in the later inventory, V 1 is volume in the previous inventory, and V Th is Th. VI was divided by the area of the corresponding forest unit and then was converted into an annual rate dividing VI per hectare by the number of years between consecutive inventories. This process was necessary since not all of the forest units included in this study have a similar area, and time between consecutive inventories can slightly depart from decadal periods.

We also used other biotic information available in the historical archives as predictor variables of VI: TD (number of trees per hectare) as a simple competition index, MTS (average wood volume of individual trees calculated dividing total wood volume by the number of trees in a forest unit) as a maturity index, and Th as the wood volume collected between consecutive inventories. For both TD and MTS, we considered the initial year of every decadal period. In summary, VI in the studied forests ranged from 0 to 15 m3 ha−1 per year over the past 120 years (Supplementary Fig. 3b) with maximum rates reaching 15 m3 ha−1 per year at the mildest site of the Spanish central range (i.e., the Valsaín forest, dominated by P. sylvestris). Mean tree size is 0.51 m3 (±0.28 m3), mean TD 187.5 trees per ha (±111.01 trees per ha), and mean collected wood volume 1.42 m3 ha−1 per year (±1.42 m3 ha−1 per year; see last-century patterns in Supplementary Fig. 4).

### Climate information

The smoothed Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO) index was retrieved from https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/data/correlation/amon.sm.long.data and it was calculated based on the area weighted average SST from Kaplan SST V2 over the N Atlantic, from 0 to 70°N. The Normalized North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) index defined as the difference of pressure between Iceland and Gibraltar has been retrieved from https://crudata.uea.ac.uk/cru/data/nao/nao.dat. We used monthly NAO and AMO indices and calculated winter NAO and AMO from January to March. These winter indices were subsequently averaged at decadal time periods to adapt climate modes at the timescales of periodical VI values (Supplementary Fig. 3a).

Long-term monthly temperature and precipitation data were obtained from the 20CRV2c reanalysis data set69 provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL PSD, Boulder, Colorado, USA, from their web site at http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/. Additionally, we used available monthly precipitation and temperature data recorded in the closest meteorological station to each forest site to assess winter precipitation, winter mean temperature, potential evapotranspiration (PET70), and the climatic winter water balance: i.e., precipitation-evapotranspiration (P-PET). We used winter climatic data (i.e., January–March) since winter water balance is critical for soil water recharges and thus trees are responsive to winter climate in such Mediterranean forest ecosystems21. Further information on geographical coordinates and periods of available data can be seen in Supplementary Table 3. Local climate data were all accessed in the Agencia Española de Meteorología (AEMET).

### Statistical analyses

First, we analyzed decadal forest unit VI as function of MTS, TD, wood Th, the calendar years, and the interaction NAO × AMO using general linear mixed-effect models. To account for the spatial arrangement of the data, forest units nested in forest landscapes were included as a random term and derived as variance random components in the model (i.e., landscapes/units). We selected the predictor variables in the fixed term of the model by applying the AIC corrected for small sample sizes (AICc) using a backward selection procedure. Firstly, we defined a full model according to our general VI hypothesis. Secondly, we created as many nested models as predictors in the fixed term and we evaluated their contribution as explicative variables using delta AICc (i.e., AICc of each model minus AICc of the full model). We included a predictor only if its elimination from the full model determines an increment of at least 4 units of AICc71. To test the interaction NAO × AMO, we compared the full model vs. a nested model with only the main effects of each variable (i.e., NAO + AMO). Model assumptions of homogeneity of variance and normality were checked using graphical analyses of residuals. We log-transformed the response variable to meet the normality assumptions. All the predictor variables were standardized before model fitting and multicollinearity was evaluated using the variance inflation factor (e.g., VIF). Goodness of fit was evaluated in a two-way procedure: graphical analysis of predicted vs. observed VI values, and, conditional R 272.

Second, we applied a structural equation model36 (SEM) to unravel the simultaneous indirect and direct effects of North Atlantic climatic modes (AMO and NAO), forest factors (MTS), climatic variability (winter water balance computed using winter precipitation and temperature in 20CRV2c reanalysis data set), and the calendar year as a surrogate of global change trends on decadal VI over the last century. We used SEM in an exploratory mode to obtain hypothesized causal relationships based on simultaneous mixed-effects models. On the one hand, we hypothesized that winter water balance (P-PET) can be modeled as function of North Atlantic climatic modes and the calendar year35. Analogously, VI can be expressed as a function of P-PET, the calendar year (i.e., carbon fertilization and enhanced water use efficiency due to rising atmospheric CO2 and N deposition59,60), and significant forest factors obtained in the previous mixed-effect model (i.e., MTS). The spatial arrangement of data imposes random terms with the form of forest landscapes and forest units nested in forest landscapes, respectively, for climatic and VI measurements. Independent claims (i.e., missing paths) and goodness of fit were assessed with a χ 2-test on the Fisher’s C statistic73. Models’ R 2 values derived from the variance of both fixed and random effects were calculated72. SEM analyses were conducted in R using the piecewiseSEM package73.

Third, we performed three separate mixed models to fit local climatic data at annual timescale resolution (i.e., winter total precipitation, mean temperature, and water balance obtained in five nearby meteorological stations) to interactive effects of NAO and AMO. We included the meteorological station as a random term affecting the intercept parameter and tested the fixed terms using a backward selection procedure. We used linear mixed models with normal error distribution when errors distribute normally and generalized mixed models with gamma distribution and log link function, otherwise. All models were conducted using the lme function of nlme package in the R environment74.

### Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author and from Mrs. Maria Bragado Jambrina (BraJamMa@jcyl.es) at the public institution Delegación Territorial de Medio Ambiente in Segovia, Spain.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

1. 1.

Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).

2. 2.

Piovesan, G. & Adams, J. M. Carbon balance gradient in European forests: interpreting EUROFLUX. J. Veg. Sci. 11, 923–926 (2000).

3. 3.

Ruiz-Benito, P. et al. Stand structure and recent climate change constrain stand basal area change in European forests: a comparison across boreal, temperate, and Mediterranean biomes. Ecosystems 17, 1439–1454 (2014).

4. 4.

Guada, G., Camarero, J. J., Sánchez-Salguero, R. & Cerrillo, R. M. N. Limited growth recovery after drought-induced forest dieback in very defoliated trees of two pine species. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 418 (2016).

5. 5.

Wharton, S. & Falk, M. Climate indices strongly influence old-growth forest carbon exchange. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 044016 (2016).

6. 6.

Hertig, E., Beck, C., Wanner, H. & Jacobeit, J. A review of non-stationarities in climate variability of the last century with focus on the North Atlantic–European sector. Earth Sci. Rev. 147, 1–17 (2015).

7. 7.

Hurrell, J. W. Influence of variations in extratropical wintertime teleconnections on Northern Hemisphere temperature. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23, 665–668 (1996).

8. 8.

Meehl, G. A., Zwiers, F., Evans, J. & Knutson, T. Trends in extreme weather and climate events: issues related to modeling extremes in projections of future climate change. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 81, 427 (2000).

9. 9.

Mares, I., Mares, C. & Mihailescu, M. NAO impact on the summer moisture variability across Europe. Phys. Chem. Earth 27, 1013–1017 (2002).

10. 10.

Hurrell, J. W., Kushnir, Y. & Ottersen, G. An overview of the North Atlantic Oscillation. In: Hurrell, J. W., Kushnir, Y., Ottersen, G., Visbeck, M., & Visbeck, M. H. (eds) The North Atlantic Oscillation: Climatic Significance and Environmental Impact. Vol. 134, 1–35 (American Geophysical Union, 2003).

11. 11.

Yiou, P. & Nogaj, M. Extreme climatic events and weather regimes over the North Atlantic: when and where? Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L07202 (2004).

12. 12.

Pinto, J. G., Zacharias, S., Fink, A. H., Leckebusch, G. C. & Ulbrich, U. Factors contributing to the development of extreme North Atlantic cyclones and their relationship with the NAO. Clim. Dynam. 32, 711–737 (2009).

13. 13.

Bladé, I., Fortuny, D., Oldenborgh, G. J. & Liebmann, B. The summer North Atlantic Oscillation in CMIP3 models and related uncertainties in projected summer drying in Europe. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D16 (2012).

14. 14.

Vinther, B. M., Andersen, K. K., Hansen, A. W., Schmith, T. & Jones, P. D. Improving the Gibraltar/Reykjavik NAO index. Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 2222 (2003).

15. 15.

Trigo, R. M., Osborn, T. J. & Corte-Real, J. M. The North Atlantic Oscillation influence on Europe: climate impacts and associated physical mechanisms. Clim. Res. 20, 9–17 (2002).

16. 16.

Lindholm, M. et al. Growth indices of north European Scots pine record the seasonal North Atlantic Oscillation. Boreal Environ. Res. 6, 275–284 (2001).

17. 17.

Rozas, V., Lamas, S. & García-González, I. Differential tree-growth responses to local and large-scale climatic variation in two Pinus and two Quercus species in Northwest Spain. Ecoscience 16, 299–310 (2009).

18. 18.

Maignan, F., Bréon, F. M., Bacour, C., Demarty, J. & Poirson, A. Interannual vegetation phenology estimates from global AVHRR measurements: comparison with in situ data and applications. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 496–505 (2008).

19. 19.

Fernández-Martínez, M., Vicca, S., Janssens, I. A., Espelta, J. M. & Peñuelas, J. The North Atlantic Oscillation synchronises fruit production in western European forests. Ecography 7, 864–874 (2016).

20. 20.

Gordo, O. & Sanz, J. J. Impact of climate change on plant phenology in Mediterranean ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1082–1106 (2010).

21. 21.

Camarero, J. J. Direct and indirect effects of the North Atlantic Oscillation on tree growth and forest decline in Northeastern Spain. In: Vicente-Serrano, S. M. & Trigo, R. M. (eds) Hydrological, Socioeconomic and Ecological Impacts of the North Atlantic Oscillation in the Mediterranean Region, vol. 46. 129–152 (Springer, The Netherlands, 2011).

22. 22.

Piraino, S. & Roig-Juñent, F. A. North Atlantic Oscillation influences on radial growth of Pinus pinea on the Italian mid-Tyrrhenian coast. Plant Biosyst. 148, 279–287 (2014).

23. 23.

Camisón, Á., Silla, F. & Camarero, J. J. Influences of the atmospheric patterns on unstable climate-growth associations of western Mediterranean forests. Dendrochronologia 40, 130–142 (2016).

24. 24.

Hódar, J. A., Zamora, R. & Cayuela, L. Climate change and the incidence of a forest pest in Mediterranean ecosystems: can the North Atlantic Oscillation be used as a predictor? Clim. Change 113, 699–711 (2012).

25. 25.

Roig, F. A., Barriopedro, D., García Herrera, R., Patón Dominguez, D. & Monge, S. North Atlantic Oscillation signatures in Western Iberian tree-rings. Geogr. Ann. A 91, 141–157 (2009).

26. 26.

Camarero, J. J., Manzanedo, R., Sánchez-Salguero, R. & Navarro-Cerrillo, R. Growth response to climate and drought change along an aridity gradient in the southernmost Pinus nigra relict forests. Ann. For. Sci. 70, 769–780 (2013).

27. 27.

Bastos, A. et al. European land CO2 sink influenced by NAO and East-Atlantic pattern coupling. Nat. Commun. 7, 10315 (2016).

28. 28.

Sutton, R. T. & Hodson, D. L. Atlantic ocean forcing of North American and European summer climate. Science 309, 115–118 (2005).

29. 29.

Zhang, R. & Delworth, T. L. Impact of Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillations on India/Sahel rainfall and Atlantic hurricanes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L17712 (2006).

30. 30.

Knight, J. R., Folland, C. K. & Scaife, A. A. Climate impacts of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L17706 (2006).

31. 31.

Hetzinger, S. et al. Caribbean coral tracks Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation and past hurricane activity. Geology 36, 11–14 (2008).

32. 32.

Gray, S. T., Graumlich, L. J., Betancourt, J. L. & Pederson, G. T. A tree-ring based reconstruction of the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation since 1567 AD. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L12205 (2004).

33. 33.

Trenberth, K. E. & Shea, D. J. Atlantic hurricanes and natural variability in 2005. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L12704 (2006).

34. 34.

Steinman, B., Mann, M. & Miller, S. K. Atlantic and Pacific multidecadal oscillations and Northern Hemisphere temperatures. Science 347, 988–989 (2015).

35. 35.

Pretzsch, H., Biber, P., Schütze, G., Uhl, E. & Rötzer, T. Forest stand growth dynamics in Central Europe have accelerated since 1870. Nat. Commun. 5, 4967 (2014).

36. 36.

Shipley, B. Cause and Correlation in Biology: A User’s Guide to Path Analysis, Structural Equations and Causal Inference with R (Cambridge University Press, 2016).

37. 37.

Dai, A. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 52–58 (2013).

38. 38.

Krichak, S. O. et al. Discussing the role of tropical and subtropical moisture sources in extreme precipitation events in the Mediterranean region from a climate change perspective. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 3, 3983–4005 (2015).

39. 39.

Cassou, C., Terray, L. & Phillips, A. S. Tropical Atlantic influence on European heat waves. J. Clim. 18, 2805–2811 (2005).

40. 40.

Garcia-Herrera, R. et al. The outstanding 2004/05 drought in the Iberian Peninsula: associated atmospheric circulation. J. Hydrometeorol. 8, 483–498 (2007).

41. 41.

Zorita, E., Kharin, V. & von Storch, H. The atmospheric circulation and sea surface temperature in the North Atlantic area in winter: their interaction and relevance for Iberian precipitation. J. Clim. 5, 1097–1108 (1992).

42. 42.

Trigo, R. M. et al. North Atlantic Oscillation influence on precipitation, river flow and water resources in the Iberian Peninsula. Int. J. Clim. 24, 925–944 (2004).

43. 43.

Ortega, P. et al. A model-tested North Atlantic Oscillation reconstruction for the past millennium. Nature 523, 71–74 (2015).

44. 44.

Vicente-Serrano, S. M. Spatial and temporal analysis of droughts in the Iberian Peninsula (1910–2000). Hydrol. Sci. J. 51, 83–97 (2006).

45. 45.

Muñoz-Díaz, D. & Rodrigo, F. S. Impacts of the North Atlantic Oscillation on the probability of dry and wet winters in Spain. Clim. Res. 27, 33–43 (2004).

46. 46.

Gallego, M. C., García, J. A. & Vaquero, J. M. The NAO signal in daily rainfall series over the Iberian Peninsula. Clim. Res. 29, 103–109 (2005).

47. 47.

Ballesteros-Cánovas, J. A. et al. Unrevealing past flash flood activity in a forested mountain catchment of the Spanish Central System. J. Hydrol. 529, 468–479 (2015).

48. 48.

Casanueva Vicente, A., Rodríguez Puebla, C., Frías Domínguez, M. D. & González Reviriego, N. Variability of extreme precipitation over Europe and its relationships with teleconnection patterns. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 18, 709–725 (2014).

49. 49.

Osborn, T. J., Briffa, K. R., Tett, S. F., Jones, P. D. & Trigo, R. M. Evaluation of the North Atlantic Oscillation as simulated by a coupled climate model. Clim. Dynam. 15, 685–702 (1999).

50. 50.

Martín-Benito, D., Del Río, M. & Cañellas, I. Black pine (Pinus nigra Arn.) growth divergence along a latitudinal gradient in Western Mediterranean mountains. Ann. For. Sci. 67, 401 (2010).

51. 51.

Martin-Benito, D., Beeckman, H. & Canellas, I. Influence of drought on tree rings and tracheid features of Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris in a mesic Mediterranean forest. Eur. J. For. Res. 132, 33–45 (2013).

52. 52.

Bernacchi, C. J., Singsaas, E. L., Pimentel, C., Portis, A. R. Jr. & Long, S. P. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 24, 253–259 (2001).

53. 53.

Sánchez-Salguero, R. et al. What drives growth of Scots pine in continental Mediterranean climates: drought, low temperatures or both? Agr. For. Meteorol. 206, 151–162 (2015).

54. 54.

Brooks, J. R., Barnard, H. R., Coulombe, R. & McDonnell, J. J. Ecohydrologic separation of water between trees and streams in a Mediterranean climate. Nat. Geosci. 3, 100–104 (2010).

55. 55.

Bogino, S. M. & Bravo, F. Growth response of Pinus pinaster Ait. to climatic variables in central Spanish forests. Ann. Sci. 65, 1 (2008).

56. 56.

Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D. & McDowel, N. G. On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere 6, 1–55 (2015).

57. 57.

Delworth, T. L. et al. The North Atlantic Oscillation as a driver of rapid climate change in the Northern Hemisphere. Nat. Geosci. 9, 509–512 (2016).

58. 58.

IPCC. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 2013).

59. 59.

Jia, Y. et al. Global inorganic nitrogen dry deposition inferred from ground- and space-based measurements. Sci. Rep. 6, 19810 (2015).

60. 60.

Sutton, M. A. et al. Too much of a good thing. Nature 472, 159–161 (2011).

61. 61.

Tebaldi, C. & Wehner, M. F. Benefits of mitigation for future heat extremes under RCP4.5 compared to RCP8.5. Clim. Change 134, 1–13 (2016).

62. 62.

Sohn, J. A., Hartig, F., Kohler, M., Huss, J. & Bauhus, J. Heavy and frequent thinning promotes drought adaptation in Pinus sylvestris forests. Ecol. Appl. 26, 2190–2205 (2016).

63. 63.

Sohn, J. A., Saha, S. & Bauhus, J. Potential of forest thinning to mitigate drought stress: a meta-analysis. For. Ecol. Manag. 380, 261–273 (2016).

64. 64.

Lloret, F., Keeling, E. G. & Sala, A. Components of tree resilience: effects of successive low-growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests. Oikos 120, 1909–1920 (2011).

65. 65.

Barberó, M., Loisel, R., Quézel, P., Richardson, D. M. & Romane, F. in Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus (ed. Richardson D. M.) Pines of the Mediterranean basin (Cambridge University Press, 1998).

66. 66.

Madrigal-González, J. & Zavala, M. A. Competition and tree age modulated last century pine growth responses to high frequency of dry years in a water limited forest ecosystem. Agr. For. Meteorol. 192, 18–26 (2014).

67. 67.

Madrigal-González, J. et al. Long-term wood production in water-limited forests: evaluating potential CO2 fertilization along with historical confounding factors. Ecosystems 18, 1043–1055 (2015).

68. 68.

Madrigal-González, J., Herrero, A., Ruiz-Benito, P. & Zavala, M. A. Resilience to drought in a dry forest: insights from demographic rates. For. Ecol. Manag. 389, 167–175 (2017).

69. 69.

Compo, G. P. et al. The twentieth century reanalysis project. Q. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc. 137, 1–28 (2011).

70. 70.

Thornthwaite, C. W. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 38, 55–94 (1948).

71. 71.

Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Huyvaert, K. P. AIC model selection and multimodel inference in behavioral ecology: some background, observations, and comparisons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 23–35 (2011).

72. 72.

Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. A. General and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 133–142 (2013).

73. 73.

Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2015).

74. 74.

Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-131, available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (2017).

## Acknowledgements

This study has been funded by the Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competition of Spain (MINECO grants VULPINECLIM, CGL2013-44553-R, and FUNDIVER, CGL2015-69186-C2-2-R; P.I. MAZ). Access to forest data was facilitated by Maria Bragado Jambrina and José Ignacio Quintanilla Rubio (Delegación Territorial de Medio Ambiente at Segovia, Spain). J.M.-G. was funded by a post-doctoral fellow at the Universidad de Alcalá in 2016–2017. J.A.B.-C. and M.S. acknowledge financial support from the Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva. A.H. was supported by the Basque Country Government Post-doctoral Grants (Research Personnel Improvement Programmes: POS-2014-1-88, POS-2015-2-0025, and POS-2016-2-0044) and Basque Country Government funding support to FisioClimaCO2 (IT1022-16) research group. P.R.-B. was supported by the TALENTO Fellow Programme (Comunidad de Madrid, 2016-T2/AMB-1665). M.E.L.-B. was funded by the Castilla la Mancha University and The Albacete council (project code: 01110AB019). E.A. was supported by the post-doctoral grants “Ayudas para contratos para la formación postdoctoral” (FPDI-2013-15573) from the Ministry of Economy of the Spanish Government. Kristen Grinager (official translation service of the Universidad de Alcalá) edited the English language throughout the manuscript.

## Author information

### Affiliations

1. #### Forest Ecology and Restoration Group, Department of Life Sciences, Universidad de Alcalá, 28805, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain

• , Paloma Ruiz-Benito
• , Enrique Andivia
•  & Miguel A. Zavala
2. #### Climate Change Impacts and Risks in the Anthropocene (C-CIA), Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Geneva, Boulevard Carl-Vogt 66, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland

• , Juan A. Ballesteros-Cánovas
•  & Markus Stoffel
3. #### Department of Earth Sciences, Dendrolab, University of Geneva, Rue des Maraîchers 13, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland

• Juan A. Ballesteros-Cánovas
•  & Markus Stoffel
4. #### School of Forestry, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA

• Asier Herrero
5. #### Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Basque Country, 48940, Leioa, Basque Country, Spain

• Asier Herrero
6. #### Department F.-A. Forel for Environmental and Aquatic Sciences, University of Geneva, Boulevard Carl-Vogt 66, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland

• Markus Stoffel
7. #### Department of Agricultural Technology and Science and Genetics, ETSIAM, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Campus Universitario s/n, 02071, Albacete, Spain

• Manuel E. Lucas-Borja
8. #### Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Valladolid, Avenida del Valle Esgueva 6, 47011, Valladolid, Spain

• Cesar Sancho-García

### Contributions

J.M.-G. conceived the study, conducted the model analysis, and led the manuscript writing. J.A.B.-C. and M.S. provided advice on climatic data that shaped the main hypothesis of the study. A.H. and P.R.-B. provided advice in model analyses. M.E.L.-B. provided long-term data from the “Palancares y Agregados” forest. E.A. provided advice in the development of the SEM statistics. C.S.-G. helped with data digitalization from Valsaín and Navafria forests. M.A.Z. supervised the research. All the co-authors provided intellectual input and contributed to manuscript development and revisions.

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.