Abstract
Electric generation of spin current via spin Hall effect is of great interest as it allows an efficient manipulation of magnetization in spintronic devices. Theoretically, pure spin current can be also created by a temperature gradient, which is known as spin Nernst effect. Here, we report spin Nernst effectinduced transverse magnetoresistance in ferromagnet/nonmagnetic heavy metal bilayers. We observe that the magnitude of transverse magnetoresistance in the bilayers is significantly modified by heavy metal and its thickness. This strong dependence of transverse magnetoresistance on heavy metal evidences the generation of thermally induced pure spin current in heavy metal. Our analysis shows that spin Nernst angles of W and Pt have the opposite sign to their spin Hall angles. Moreover, our estimate implies that the magnitude of spin Nernst angle would be comparable to that of spin Hall angle, suggesting an efficient generation of spin current by the spin Nernst effect.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
A central theme of spintronics field is the electrical generation of a spin current as the spin current allows for an efficient magnetization switching and a high speed domain wall motion in magnetic nanostructures^{1,2,3,4,5,6}. In ferromagnet (FM)/nonmagnetic heavy metal (HM) bilayers, a longitudinal charge current creates a transverse spin current via spin Hall effect (SHE)^{7, 8}. The spin current induces spin accumulation at the FM/HM interface, which exerts a torque on the FM and controls the magnetization direction^{1, 2}. On the other hand, the spin current is partially reflected from the FM/HM interface depending on its spin orientation with respect to the magnetization direction of the FM layer. This reflected spin current is then converted to a charge current via inverse SHE (ISHE), resulting in the variation of the longitudinal resistance of the FM/HM bilayers, i.e., spin Hall magnetoresistance (SMR)^{9,10,11}. As the SMR originates from the SHEinduced spin current and the ISHE of the reflected spin current, its magnitude depends on the square of the spin Hall angle (θ _{SH}), chargetospin conversion efficiency.
Spin current is also generated by a temperature gradient, for instance, the spin (dependent) Seebeck effect in FM/nonmagnetic bilayer structures where thermally induced spin current is injected from the FM into the nonmagnetic layer^{12,13,14,15,16,17}. Theories have predicted that a pure spin current is thermally generated in nonmagnetic materials by their spin–orbit coupling effects^{18,19,20,21}, a thermal analog to the SHE, i.e., spin Nernst effect (SNE) (Fig. 1a). However, there has been no experimental observation yet on the thermally induced pure spin current or SNE.
In this work, we demonstrate the SNE by investigating the Hall resistance variation of the FM/HM bilayers under a temperature gradient. Similar to the SMR originating from combined effects of SHE (chargetospin conversion) and ISHE (spintocharge conversion), the SNE could also cause a resistance variation of the bilayer. This thermally induced magnetoresistance in a FM/HM bilayer, which can be called spin Nernst magnetoresistance (SNMR), originates from combined effects of two processes: (i) SNEinduced spin current in HM, of which efficiency is described by spin Nernst angle (θ _{SN}), heattospin conversion efficiency, and (ii) subsequent reflection of a spin current at the FM/HM interface and conversion to a charge current via ISHE, of which efficiency is described by θ _{SH} (Fig. 1b). As a result, the magnitude of SNMR is determined by the product of θ _{SN} and θ _{SH}. In analogous to a modification of the planar Hall effect signal (i.e., transverse SMR) by the SHE^{11, 22}, the SNE modifies the planar Nernst effect signal (i.e., transverse SNMR). Therefore, a systematic investigation of transverse SNMR in FM/HM bilayers allows us to identify the SNE, which we have done in this work. We find that θ _{SN} has a comparable magnitude to θ _{SH} for W and Pt, suggesting that the SNE can efficiently create a spin current as much as the SHE can do.
Results
Spin Nernst magnetoresistance model
The SNMR in a FM/HM bilayer can be described by replacing SHEinduced spin current with thermal pure spin current, \({J_{s,T}} =  {\theta _{{\rm{SN}}}}{\sigma _{{\rm{HM}}}}{S_{{\rm{HM}}}}\frac{{\partial T}}{{\partial x}}\), in the SMR model^{9,10,11}, where σ _{HM} and S _{HM} are the electrical conductivity and the Seebeck coefficient of the HM, respectively. The longitudinal \((\Delta {V_{xx}})\) and transverse \((\Delta {V_{xy}})\) thermoelectric voltages caused by the longitudinal and transverse SNMRs are respectively expressed as,
where L _{T(V)} is the effective length for temperature gradient (thermal voltage generation), m _{ x } , m _{ y }, and m _{ z } are the x, y, and z component of the magnetization, respectively, \(\Delta {T_x}\) is the temperature difference along the xaxis induced from localized thermal excitation, and
and S _{0} is the ordinary Seebeck coefficient in the bilayer structure. Here, ΔS _{1}, ΔS _{2}, and ΔS _{3} are additional Seebeck coefficients induced by SNE, where d _{HM} and λ are the thickness and spin diffusion length of the HM, respectively, and G is the spin mixing conductance of the FM/HM interface. Note that SNE in FM layer and inverse SNE in HM are ignored and the shunting effect of FM layer is taken into consideration using a geometric factor, χ _{HM} = ((σ _{HM} d _{HM})/(σ _{HM} d _{HM} + σ _{FM} d _{FM})), where σ _{FM} and d _{FM} are the electrical conductivity and thickness of the FM layer, respectively. The ΔV _{ xx } depends on the magnetization direction relative to the spin orientation (y) of SNEinduced spin current, and it is thus proportional to \(m_y^2\) while its magnitude is determined by the ΔS _{2}. As our samples have inplane magnetization (m _{ z } ≈ 0), the ΔV _{ xy } (∝ m _{ x } m _{ y }) has the same magnitude (ΔS _{2}) as that of the ΔV _{ xx }, so that the investigation of ΔV _{ xy } corresponding to the transverse SNMR (or planar Nernst effect (PNE) signal) allows us to explore the SNE. Note that the sign of the SNMR is determined by the sign of the product of θ _{SH}, θ _{SN}, and S _{HM} of the HM, which is distinct from the fact that the sign of the SMR is independent of the sign of θ _{SH}.
Transverse spin Nernst magnetoresistance in W/CoFeB
We first examine the transverse SNMR in W(3 nm)/Co_{32}Fe_{48}B_{20}(CoFeB, 2 nm) sample, in which a thermal gradient is generated by a focused laser (55 mW) of ~5 μm diameter. Figure 2a schematically illustrates the experiment setup where thermoelectric Hall voltage is measured as a function of inplane magnetic field angle θ with respect to the xaxis under a temperature gradient. The magnetization is aligned parallel to the applied magnetic field of 100 mT. Depending on the laser position in the sample structure, a vertical (ΔT _{ z }) and/or lateral (ΔT _{ x }) temperature differences in the sample are created accordingly (Supplementary Note 1). Upon illumination with a laser spot at the center of the sample (Fig. 2a, b), generating only ΔT _{ z } while ΔT _{ x } cancels out, the thermoelectric signal of W/CoFeB sample shows a clear cos θ dependence (∝ m _{ x }); the largest value (zero) for θ = 0 (θ = ±90), where the magnetization is aligned to the xaxis (yaxis). This reveals that the signal originates from the longitudinal spin Seebeck effect and anomalous Nernst effect^{23}. On the other hand, as the laser spot moves toward the edge of the sample, the laser illumination generates nonzero ΔT _{ x } and as a result, an additional angledependent thermoelectric Hall signal appears, which is proportional to m _{ x } m _{ y } or sin 2θ. The sin 2θ signal reverses its sign upon the change in the direction of ΔT _{ x } while the cos θ signal remains the same sign, which is demonstrated in the Fig. 2c where two angledependent signals are decomposed. The sin 2θ signal eventually dominates the total signal when the laser spot moves further away, where ΔT _{ z } induced in the sample is negligible. (see the Fig. 2d), confirming that it originates from ΔT _{ x }. Note that the thermoelectric signals are almost independent of the magnetic field when it is large enough to saturate the magnetization (Supplementary Note 2), and the laser position along the yaxis (Supplementary Note 3). The latter is due to the local excitation by the laser heating (diameter ~5 μm) in the elongated sample structure: 10 μm × 1 mm in which the ΔT _{ y } between the two ends of the sample is not significantly generated by the laser illumination.
The signal induced by ΔT _{ x } (∝ m _{ x } m _{ y }) has the same symmetry as PNE, but the magnitude is noticeably large in the W/CoFeB sample as compared to that in the control sample of a single CoFeB (2 nm) layer (see the decomposed dotted lines in the Fig. 2f). As the ΔT _{ x } in a single CoFeB is comparable to that of W/CoFeB layer (Supplementary Note 1), the large enhancement in PNE indicates that there is a significant contribution from the W layer to the sin 2θ thermoelectric signal, which we attribute to the consequence of transverse SNMR caused by a thermal generation of pure spin current in W and subsequent reflection of the spin current at the W/CoFeB interface depending on the magnetization direction. Note that the enhanced PNE signal is due to the transverse component of the SNMR as the planar Hall effect in the same W/CoFeB sample is strongly modified by the transverse SMR (Supplementary Note 4). As the transverse SNMR depends on SNEinduced spin current and its conversion into charge voltage via the ISHE, the sign of the transverse SNMR and equivalently the sign of the PNE corresponding to the SNE are determined by the product of the θ _{SH} and θ _{SN}. For W, it is known as θ _{SH} < 0^{11} ^{,} ^{22} ^{,} ^{24} and S _{HM} > 0^{25}, thus the positive transverse SNMR for ΔT _{ x } > 0 indicates that a positive θ _{SN} for W, which is the opposite sign to its θ _{SH}. We note that this sign difference is not impossible because θ _{SH} is determined by the density of states at the Fermi energy while θ _{SN} is determined by the energy derivative of density of states^{20}.
Material dependence of spin Nernst magnetoresistance
We also investigate the transverse SNMR for different nonmagnetic materials such as Pt and Cu. Note that Pt has a positive θ _{SH} ^{9, 12, 24, 26}, the opposite sign to that of W, while Cu has a negligible θ _{SH} ^{9, 24}. Figure 2h, k show that under the central heating, both samples exhibit cos θ angular dependence as the W/CoFeB or CoFeB sample does (see the Fig. 2b, e). When a sizable ΔT _{ x } is applied, on the other hand, the sin 2θ thermoelectric signal exhibits a strong material dependence; an opposite sign for the Pt/CoFeB sample (Fig. 2i, j) and negligibly small for the Cu/CoFeB sample (Fig. 2l, m) as compared to that of the W/CoFeB sample. As the same thickness of CoFeB is used and a similar ΔT _{ x } is induced for all samples (Supplementary Note 1), these results again confirm that the sin 2θ thermoelectric signal is dominated by the SNEinduced spin current in HM through its spin–orbit coupling effects.
Estimation of spin Nernst angle
We next estimate the heattospin conversion coefficient θ _{SN} using the HM layer thickness dependence of the transverse SNMR in HM/CoFeB samples. We note that the accuracy of this estimation substantially depends on the accuracy of ΔT _{ x } and ΔT _{ z }. As it is hard to experimentally determine ΔT _{ x } and ΔT _{ z }, we estimate the temperature distribution of the sample under the laser illumination by solving the heat transfer module of the COMSOL software (Supplementary Note 1) and a control sample (Supplementary Fig. 5). As a result, we do not argue that our estimation of θ _{SN} is quantitatively accurate, but we believe that it is still meaningful to estimate θ _{SN} even approximately.
We performed the same measurement shown in Fig. 2 while varying the laser positions from the center to the edge of the samples, and then separated the cos θ and sin 2θ components (V _{ θ }, V _{2θ }). The latter corresponds to the transverse SNMR which is summarized in Fig. 3a, b for W/CoFeB and Pt/CoFeB samples, respectively (see Supplementary Note 5 for more details). The V _{2θ } shows the peak values when the laser is located at the edge of the sample (x ~ 5 μm), where ΔT _{ x } is maximized. Figure 3c show the V _{2θ } of W/CoFeB samples for the edge illumination as a function of W thickness, demonstrating that the V _{2θ } becomes the largest at 4 nm of W and decreases with a further increase in W thickness. This is the same trend as the W thickness dependence of the SMR in similar W/CoFeB structures (ref. ^{22} and Supplementary Note 4), indicating that the spin transport in W dominantly governs the transverse SNMR of our samples. A similar thickness dependence of the transverse SNMR is also observed for the Pt/CoFeB samples, which is shown in Fig. 3d. In order to estimate θ _{SN}, we fit the thickness dependence of the transverse SNMR to Eq. (2) using material parameters (Table 1) and the calculated ΔT _{ x } that is obtained to be ~24 K for W/CoFeB and Pt/CoFeB samples, and ~17 K for CoFeB sample when the laser of 55 mW illuminates at the edge of the sample (Supplementary Fig. 4). Note that the variation of resistivity in W with its thickness has been taken into account (Supplementary Note 6). From the fitting, we obtained θ _{SN} values of 0.22–0.42 for W and −0.12 to −0.24 for Pt, and λ values of (2.0 ± 0.1)nm for W, and (1.0 ± 0.1)nm for Pt. The purple bands in Fig. 3c, d indicate error ranges which possibly originates from uncertainties (±30%) of the literature values of S _{HM}, G, and θ _{SH}. Note that the Seebeck coefficient of Pt is negative (S _{HM} < 0)^{25}, which is an opposite sign to that of W. This fitting result demonstrates that θ _{SN} has a comparable magnitude to θ _{SH} but has an opposite sign to θ _{SH} for both W and Pt (Table 1). The comparable magnitude between θ _{SN} and θ _{SH} implies that the SNE in HM layer can create a spin current as much as the SHE can if a thermal gradient is efficiently generated.
Discussion
We demonstrate the transverse SNMR in HM/FM bilayers which signifies an efficient thermal generation of spin current by SNE. Our estimation of the heattospin conversion efficiency θ _{SN} of W or Pt implies that the magnitude of θ _{SN} could be comparable to that of the chargetospin conversion efficiency θ _{SH}. This suggests that the SNEinduced spin current could create a considerable spin torque to adjacent FM layer, or thermal spin–orbit torques that can manipulate the magnetization direction of the FM as electrical spin–orbit torques do. Moreover, thermal spin–orbit torque can be combined with electrical spin–orbit torque by applying both a charge current and a thermal gradient to bilayers, which allows for the reduction in the critical current for magnetization switching. These results open up an alternative way to generate the spin current and/or to control the magnetization direction in spintronic devices.
We would like to note that while we were preparing the manuscript, we became aware that similar work has been done by other groups^{27, 28}.
Methods
Sample preparation
All samples of W/Co_{32}Fe_{48}B_{20}(CoFeB), Pt/CoFeB, and CoFeB were prepared by magnetron sputtering on thermally oxidized Si substrates with a base pressure of less than 4.0 × 10^{−6} Pa (3.0 × 10^{−8} Torr) at room temperature. All samples were covered by MgO (1 nm)/Ta (1 nm) capping layer to prevent oxidation. The barshaped structures of 10 μm × 1 mm dimension for SNMR measurement are patterned using photolithography and Ar ion milling. The resistivities are measured to be 320 × 10^{−8} Ω m^{−1} for CoFeB, 30 × 10^{−8} Ω m^{−1} for Pt, while that of W is 112 × 10^{−8} Ω m^{−1} when W is thinner than 4 nm and it gradually decreases with its thickness greater than 4 nm.
Transverse spin Nernst magnetoresistance measurements
The thermoelectric Hall voltage along the yaxis was measured under the temperature gradients (∇T _{ x },∇T _{ z })in the sample, which were generated by laser illumination of 55 mW, while rotating a magnetic field of 100 mT in the x–y plane which is larger than inplane anisotropy field of CoFeB layer. The measurements were repeated at each laser position varying from center to edge of the sample, which was monitored by its reflectance of the laser. All measurements were carried out at room temperature and each measurement was repeated more than three times; data are reproducible.
Data availability
Authors can confirm that all relevant data are included in the paper and/or its supplementary information files and data are available on request.
Change history
05 January 2018
The original version of this Article contained an error in ref. 27, which was incorrectly given with the wrong journal name as:
References
Miron, I. M. et al. Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by inplane current injection. Nature 476, 189–193 (2011).
Liu, L. et al. Spintorque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum. Science 336, 555–558 (2012).
Ryu, K.S., Thomas, L., Yang, S.H. & Parkin, S. Chiral spin torque at magnetic domain walls. Nat. Nanotech. 8, 527–533 (2013).
Emori, S., Bauer, U., Ahn, S.M., Martinez, E. & Beach, G. S. D. Currentdriven dynamics of chiral ferromagnetic domain walls. Nat. Mater. 12, 611–616 (2013).
Fukami, S., Anekawa, T., Zhang, C. & Ohno, H. A spinorbit torque switching scheme with collinear magnetic easy axis and current configuration. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 621–625 (2016).
Oh, Y.W. et al. Fieldfree switching of perpendicular magnetization through spinorbit torque in antiferromagnet/ferromagnet/oxide structures. Nat. Nanotech. 11, 878–884 (2016).
Dyakonov, M. I. & Perel, V. I. Currentinduced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors. Phys. Lett. A 35A, 459–460 (1971).
Sinova, J., Valenzuela, S. O., Wunderlich, J., Back, C. H. & Jungwirth, T. Spin Hall effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 1213–1259 (2015).
Nakayama, H. et al. Spin Hall magnetoresistance induced by a nonequilibrium proximity effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 206601 (2013).
Chen, Y.T. et al. Theory of spin Hall magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. B 87, 144411 (2013).
Kim, J., Sheng, P., Takahashi, S., Mitani, S. & Hayashi, M. Spin Hall magnetoresistance in metallic bilayers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 097201 (2016).
Uchida, K. et al. Observation of the spin Seebeck effect. Nature 455, 778–781 (2008).
Bauer, G. E. W., Saitoh, E. & van Wees, B. J. Spin caloritronics. Nat. Mater. 11, 391–399 (2012).
Slachter, A., Bakker, F. L., Adam, J. P. & van Wees, B. J. Thermally driven spin injection from a ferromagnet into a nonmagnetic metal. Nat. Phys. 6, 879–882 (2010).
Le Breton, J.C., Sharma, S., Saito, H., Yuasa, S. & Jansen, R. Thermal spin current from a ferromagnet to silicon by Seebeck spin tunneling. Nature 475, 82–85 (2011).
Choi, G. M., Moon, C. H., Min, B. C., Lee, K. J. & Cahill, D. G. Thermal spintransfer torque driven by the spindependent Seebeck effect in metallic spinvalves. Nat. Phys. 11, 576–581 (2015).
Qu, D., Huang, S. Y., Hu, J., Wu, R. & Chien, C. L. Intrinsic spin Seebeck effect in Au/YIG. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067206 (2013).
Cheng, S., Xing, Y., Sun, Q. & Xie, X. C. Spin Nernst effect and Nernst effect in twodimensional electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 78, 045302 (2008).
Liu, X. & Xie, X. Spin Nernst effect in the absence of a magnetic field. Solid State Commun. 150, 471–474 (2010).
Tauber, K., Gradhand, M., Fedorov, D. V. & Mertig, I. Extrinsic spin Nernst effect from first principles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 026601 (2012).
Wimmer, S., Ködderitzsch, D., Chadova, K. & Ebert, H. Firstprinciples linear response description of the spin Nernst effect. Phys. Rev. B 88, 201108(R) (2013).
Cho, S., Beak, S.C., Lee, K.D., Jo, Y. & Park, B.G. Large spin Hall magnetoresistance and its correlation to the spinorbit torque in W/CoFeB/MgO structures. Sci. Rep. 5, 14668 (2015).
Lee, K.D. et al. Thermoelectric signal enhancement by reconciling the spin Seebeck and anomalous Nernst effects in ferromagnet/nonmagnet multilayers. Sci. Rep. 5, 10249 (2015).
Wang, H. L. et al. Scaling of spin Hall angle in 3d, 4d, and 5d metals from Y_{3}Fe_{5}O_{12}/metal spin pumping. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 197201 (2014).
Abadlia, L., Gasser, F., Khalouk, K., Mayoufi, M. & Gasser, J. G. New experimental methodology, setup and LabView program for accurate absolute thermoelectric power and electrical resistivity measurements between 25 and 1600 K: application to pure copper, platinum, tungsten, and nickel at very high temperatures. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 095121 (2014).
Rezende, S. M. et al. Enhanced spin pumping damping in yttrium iron garnet/Pt bilayers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 012402 (2013).
Meyer, S. et al. Observation of the spin Nernst effect. Nat. Mater. 16, 977–981 (2017).
Sheng, P., Sakuraba, Y., Takahashi, S., Mitani, S. & Hayashi, M. Signatures of the spin Nernst effect in Tungsten. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/1607.06594 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF2015M3D1A1070465, 2014R1A2A1A11051344, and 2016R1A2B4012847 and 2017R1A2B2006119) and the DGIST R&D Program of the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (17BT02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
B.G.P. planned and supervised the study. D.J.K. and C.Y.J. fabricated devices. D.J.K., C.Y.J., J.G.C. and J.W.L. performed spin thermoelectric and transport measurement. S.S. and J.R.J. simulated the temperature distribution. D.J.K., K.J.L. and B.G.P. analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Change history: A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this paper.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
A correction to this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467017023038.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, DJ., Jeon, CY., Choi, JG. et al. Observation of transverse spin Nernst magnetoresistance induced by thermal spin current in ferromagnet/nonmagnet bilayers. Nat Commun 8, 1400 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467017014935
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467017014935
This article is cited by

Quantum spin mixing in Dirac materials
Communications Physics (2021)

SOS: symmetryoperational similarity
npj Quantum Materials (2019)

Precise Determination of the Temperature Gradients in Laserirradiated Ultrathin Magnetic Layers for the Analysis of Thermal Spin Current
Scientific Reports (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.