Abstract
Superconducting quantum systems (artificial atoms) have been recently successfully used to demonstrate onchip effects of quantum optics with single atoms in the microwave range. In particular, a wellknown effect of four wave mixing could reveal a series of features beyond classical physics, when a nonlinear medium is scaled down to a single quantum scatterer. Here we demonstrate the phenomenon of quantum wave mixing (QWM) on a single superconducting artificial atom. In the QWM, the spectrum of elastically scattered radiation is a direct map of the interacting superposed and coherent photonic states. Moreover, the artificial atom visualises photonstate statistics, distinguishing coherent, one and twophoton superposed states with the finite (quantised) number of peaks in the quantum regime. Our results may give a new insight into nonlinear quantum effects in microwave optics with artificial atoms.
Introduction
In systems with superconducting quantum circuits—artificial atoms—strongly coupled to harmonic oscillators, many amazing phenomena of onchip quantum optics have been recently demonstrated establishing the direction of circuit quantum electrodynamics^{1,2,3}, particularly, in such systems one is able to resolve photon number states in harmonic oscillators^{4}, manipulate with individual photons^{5,6,7}, generate photon (Fock) states^{8} and arbitrary quantum states of light^{9}, demonstrate the lasing effect from a single artificial atom^{10}, study nonlinear effects^{11, 12}. The artificial atoms can also be coupled to open space^{13}(microwave transmission lines) and also reveal many interesting effects such as resonance fluorescence of continuous waves^{14, 15}, elastic and inelastic scattering of singlefrequency electromagnetic waves^{16, 17}, amplification^{18}, singlephoton reflection and routing^{19}, nonreciprocal transport of microwaves^{20}, coupling of distant artificial atoms by exchanging virtual photons^{21}, superradiance of coupled artificial atoms^{22}. All these effects require strong coupling to propagating waves and therefore are hard to demonstrate in quantum optics with natural atoms due to lowspatial mode matching of propagating light.
In our work, we focus on the effect of wave mixing. Particularly, the four wave mixing is a textbook optical effect manifesting itself in a pair of frequency side peaks from two driving tones on a classical Kerrnonlinearity^{23, 24}. Ultimate scaling down of the nonlinear medium to a single artificial atom, strongly interacting with the incident waves, results in time resolution of instant multiphoton interactions and reveals effects beyond classical physics. Here, we demonstrate the physical phenomenon of quantum wave mixing (QWM) on a superconducting artificial atom in the open onedimensional (1D) space (coplanar transmission line onchip). We show two regimes of QWM comprising different degrees of ‘quantumness’: the first and most remarkable one is QWM with nonclassical superposed states, which are mapped into a finite number of frequency peaks. In another regime, we investigate the different orders of wave mixing of classical coherent waves on the artificial atom. The dynamics of the peaks exhibits a series of Besselfunction Rabi oscillations, different from the usually observed harmonic ones, with orders determined by the number of interacting photons. Therefore, the device utilising QWM visualises photonstate statistics of classical and nonclassical photonic states in the open space. The spectra are fingerprints of interacting photonic states, where the number of peaks due to the atomic emission always exceeds by one the number of absorption peaks. Below, we summarise several specific findings of this work: (1) demonstration of the wave mixing on a single quantum system; (2) in the quantum regime of mixing, the peak pattern and the number of the observed peaks is a map of coherent and superposed photonic states, where the number of peaks N _{peaks} is related to the number of interacting photons N _{ph} as N _{peaks} = 2N _{ph} + 1. Namely, the onephoton state (in twolevel atoms) results in precisely three emission peaks; the twophoton state (in threelevel atoms) results in five emission peaks; and the classical coherent states, consisting of infinite number of photons, produce a spectrum with an infinite number of peaks; (3) Bessel function Rabi oscillations are observed and the order of the Bessel functions depends on the peak position and is determined by the number of interacting photons.
Results
Coherent and zeroone photon superposed state
To evaluate the system, we consider electromagnetic waves propagating in a 1D transmission line with an embedded twolevel artificial atom^{15} (see also Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Fig. 1) shown in Fig. 1a. In this work, we are interested in photon statistics, which will be revealed by QWM, therefore, we will consider our system in the photon basis. The coherent wave in the photon (Fock) basis\(\left N \right\rangle\) is presented as
and consists of an infinite number of photonic states. A twolevel atom with ground and excited states \(\left g \right\rangle\) and \(\left e \right\rangle\) driven by the field can be prepared in superposed state \(\Psi = {\rm{cos}}\frac{\theta }{2}\left g \right\rangle + {\rm{sin}}\frac{\theta }{2}\left e \right\rangle\) and, if coupled to the external photonic modes, transfers the excitation to the mode, creating zeroone photon superposed state
where \(\beta = {\rm{tan}}\frac{\theta }{2}\) (Supplementary Note 1). The superposed state comprises coherence, however \(\left \beta \right\rangle\) state is different from classical coherent state \(\left \alpha \right\rangle\), consisting of an infinite number of Fock states. The energy exchange process is described by the operator \({b^  }{b^ + }\left g \right\rangle \left\langle g \right + {b^ + }\left g \right\rangle \left\langle e \right\), which maps the atomic to photonic states, where \({b^ + } = \left 1 \right\rangle \left\langle 0 \right\) and \({b^  } = \left 0 \right\rangle \left\langle 1 \right\) are creation/annihilation operators of the zeroone photon state. The operator is a result of a halfperiod oscillation in the evolution of the atom coupled to the quantised photonic mode and we keep only relevant for the discussed case (an excited atom and an empty photonic mode) terms (Supplementary Note 1).
We discuss and demonstrate experimentally an elastic scattering of two waves with frequencies ω _{−} = ω _{0} − δω and ω _{+} = ω _{0} + δω, where δω is a small detuning, on a twolevel artificial atom with energy splitting \(\hbar {\omega _0}\). The scattering, taking place on a single artificial atom, allows us to resolve instant multiphoton interactions and statistics of the processes. Dealing with the final photonic states, the system Hamiltonian is convenient to present as the one, which couples the input and output fields
using creation and annihilation operators \(a_ \pm ^\dag\) (a _{±}) of photon states \({\left N \right\rangle _ \pm }\) (N is an integer number) and \(b_ \pm ^ +\) and \(b_ \pm ^ \) are creation/annihilation operators of singlephoton output states at frequencies ω _{±}. Here \(\hbar g\) is the fieldatom coupling energy. Operators \(b_ \pm ^ +\) and \(b_ \pm ^ \) also describe the atomic excitation/relaxation, using substitutions \(b_ \pm ^ + \leftrightarrow {e^{ \mp i\varphi }}\left e \right\rangle \left\langle g \right\) and \(b_ \pm ^  \leftrightarrow {e^{ \pm i\varphi }}\left g \right\rangle \left\langle e \right\), where φ = δωt is a slowly varying phase (Supplementary Note 2). The phase rotation results in the frequency shift according to ω _{±} t = ω _{0} t ± δωt and more generally for \(b_m^ \pm\) (with integer m) the varied phase mδφ results in the frequency shift ω _{ m } = ω _{0} + mδω.
The system evolution over the time interval [t, t′] (t′ = t + Δt and \(\delta \omega \Delta t \ll 1\)) described by the operator U(t, t′) = exp(−iHΔt/\(\hbar\)) can be presented as a series expansion of different order atom–photon interaction processes \(a_ \pm ^\dag b_ \pm ^ \) and \({a_ \pm }b_ \pm ^ +\)—sequential absorptionemission accompanied by atomic excitations/relaxations (Supplementary Note 2). Operators b describe the atomic states (instant interaction of the photons in the atom) and, therefore, satisfy the following identities: \(b_p^  b_m^ + = {\left 0 \right\rangle _{m  p}}\left\langle 0 \right\), \(b_j^ \pm b_p^ \mp b_m^ \pm = b_{j  p + m}^ \pm\), \(b_p^ \pm b_m^ \pm = 0\). The excited atom eventually relaxes producing zeroone superposied photon field \({\left \beta \right\rangle _m}\) at frequency ω _{ m } = ω _{0} + mδω according to \(b_m^ + \left 0 \right\rangle = {\left 1 \right\rangle _m}\). We repeat the evolution and average the emission on the time interval t>δω ^{−1} and observe narrow emission lines. In the general case, the atom in a superposed state generates coherent electromagnetic waves of amplitude
at frequency ω _{ m }, where Γ _{1} is the atomic relaxation rate and μ is the atomic dipole moment^{15, 17}.
Elastic scattering and Bessel function Rabi oscillations
To study QWM, we couple the single artificial atom (a superconducting loop with four Josephson junctions) to a transmission line via a capacitance (Supplementary Methods). The atom relaxes with the photon emission rate found to be Γ _{1}/2π ≈ 20 MHz. The coupling is strong, which means that any nonradiative atom relaxation is suppressed and almost all photons from the atom are emitted into the line. The sample is held in a dilution refrigerator with base temperature 15 mK. We apply periodically two simultaneous microwave pulses with equal amplitudes at frequencies ω _{−} and ω _{+}, length Δt = 2 ns and period T _{r} = 100 ns (much longer than the atomic relaxation time \(\Gamma _1^{  1} \approx 8\) ns). A typical emission power spectrum integrated over many periods (bandwidth is 1 kHz) is shown in Fig. 2a. The pattern is symmetric with many narrow peaks (as narrow as the excitation microwaves), which appeared at frequencies ω _{0} ± (2k + 1)δω, where k ≥ 0 is an integer number. We linearly change driving amplitude (Rabi frequency) Ω, which is defined from the measurement of harmonic Rabi oscillations under singlefrequency excitation. The dynamics of several side peaks versus linearly changed ΩΔt (here we vary Ω, however, equivalently Δt can be varied) is shown on plots of Fig. 2b. Note that the peaks exhibit anharmonic oscillations well fitted by the corresponding 2k + 1order Bessel functions of the first kind. The first maxima are delayed with the peak order, appearing at ΩΔt ∝ k + 1. Note also that detuning δω should be within tens of megahertz (≤Γ_{1}). However, in this work, we use δω/2π = 10 kHz to be able to quickly span over several δω of the spectrum analyser (SA) with the narrow bandwidth.
Figure 1b examplifies the thirdorder process (known as the fourwave mixing in the case of two side peaks), resulting in the creation of the right handside peak at ω _{3} = 2ω _{+} − ω _{−}. The process consists of the absorption of two photons of frequency ω _{+} and the emission of one photon at ω _{−}. More generally, the 2k + 1order peak at frequency ω _{2k+1} = (k + 1)ω _{+} − kω _{−} (≡ω _{0} + (2k + 1)δω) is described by the multiphoton process \({({a_ + }a_  ^\dag )^k}{a_ + }b_{2k + 1}^ +\), which involves the absorption of k + 1 photons from ω _{+} and the emission of k photons at ω _{−}; and the excited atom eventually generates a photon at ω _{2k+1}. The symmetric left handside peaks at ω _{0} − (2k + 1)δω are described by a similar processes with swapped indexes (+ ↔ −). The peak amplitudes from Eq. (4) are described by expectation values of boperators, which at frequency ω _{2k+1} can be written in the form of \(\left\langle {b_{2k + 1}^ + } \right\rangle = {D_{2k + 1}}\langle {{{( {{a_ + }a_  ^\dag } )}^k}{a_ + }} \rangle\). The prefactor D _{2k+1} depends on the driving conditions and can be calculated summing up all virtual photon processes (e.g., \(a_ + ^\dag {a_ + }\), \(a_  ^\dag {a_  }\), etc.) not changing frequencies (Supplementary Note 2). For instance, the creation of a photon at 2ω _{+} − ω _{−} is described by \(\left\langle {b_3^ + } \right\rangle = {D_3}\left\langle {{a_ + }a_  ^\dag {a_ + }} \right\rangle\).
As the number of required photons increases with k, the emission maximum takes longer time to appear (Fig. 2b). To derive the dependence observed in our experiment, we consider the case with initial state \(\Psi = \left 0 \right\rangle \otimes \left( {{{\left \alpha \right\rangle }_  } + {{\left \alpha \right\rangle }_ + }} \right)\) and \(\alpha \gg 1\). We find then that the peaks exhibit Rabi oscillations described by \(\left\langle {{b_{2k + 1}}} \right\rangle = {\left( {  1} \right)^k}/2 \times {J_{2k + 1}}\left( {2 \Omega \Delta t} \right)\) (Supplementary Note 2, Eq. (29)) and the mean number of generated photons per cycle in 2k + 1mode is
The symmetric multipeak pattern in the spectrum is a map of an infinite number of interacting classical coherent states. The dependence from the parameter 2ΩΔt observed in our experiment can also be derived using a semiclassical approach, where the driving field is given by Ω e ^{iδωt} + Ω e ^{−iδωt} = 2Ωcos δωt. As shown in Supplementary Note 2, a classical description can be mathematically more straightforward and leads to the same result, but fails to provide a qualitative picture of QWM discussed below. The Bessel function dependencies have been earlier observed in multiphoton processes, however in frequency domain^{25,26,27}.
QWM and dynamics of nonclassical photonic states
Next, we demonstrate one of the most interesting results: QWM with nonclassical photonic states. We further develop the twopulse technique separating the excitation pulses in time. Breaking timesymmetry in the evolution of the quantum system should result in asymmetric spectra and the observation of series of spectacular quantum phenomena. The upper panel in Fig. 3a demonstrates such a spectrum, when the pulse at frequency ω _{+} is applied after a pulse at ω _{−}. Notably, the spectrum is asymmetric and contains only one side peak at frequency 2ω _{+} − ω _{−}. There is no any signature of other peaks, which is in striking contrast with Fig. 2a. Reversing the pulse sequence mirror reflects the pattern revealing the single side peak at 2ω _{−} − ω _{+} (not shown here).
The quantitative explanation of the process is provided on the left panel of Fig. 1c. The first pulse prepares superposed zeroone photon state \({\left \beta \right\rangle _  }\) in the atom, which contains not more than one photon (N _{ph} = 1). Therefore, only a singlepositive side peak 2ω _{+} − ω _{−} due to the emission of the ω _{−}photon, described by \({a_ + }a_  ^\dag {a_ + }\), is allowed. See Supplementary Note 3 for details.
To prove that there are no signatures of other peaks, except for the observed three peaks, we vary the peak amplitudes and compare the classical and QWM regimes with the same conditions. Figure 3b demonstrates the side peak power dependencies in different mixing regimes: classical (two simultaneous pulses) (left panels) and quantum (two consecutive pulses) (right panels). The two cases reveal a very similar behaviour of the right handside fourwave mixing peak at 2ω _{+} − ω _{−}, however the other peaks appear only in the classical wave mixing, proving the absence of other peaks in the mixing with the quantum state.
The asymmetry of the output mixed signals, in principle, can be demonstrated in purely classical systems. It can be achieved in several ways, e.g., with destructive interference, phasesensitive detection/amplification^{28}, filtering. All these effects are not applicable to our system of two mixed waves on a single pointlike scatterer in the open (wide frequency band) space. What is more important than the asymmetry is that the whole pattern consists of only three peaks without any signature of others.
This demonstrates another remarkable property of our device: it probes photonic states, distinguishing the coherent, \(\left \alpha \right\rangle\), and superposed states with the finite number of the photon states. Moreover, the single peak at ω _{3} shows that the probed state was \(\left \beta \right\rangle\) with N _{ph} = 1. This statement can be generalised for an arbitrary state. According to the picture in Fig. 1c, adding a photon increases the number of peaks from the left and righthand side by one, resulting in the total number of peaks N _{peaks} = 2N _{ph} + 1.
Probing the twophoton superposed state
To have a deeper insight into the statesensing properties and to demonstrate QWM with different photon statistics, we extended our experiment to deal with twophoton states (N _{ph} = 2). The two lowest transitions in our system can be tuned by adjusting external magnetic fields to be equal to \(\hbar\) ω _{0}, though higher transitions are offresonant (\(\ne \hbar {\omega _0}\), See Supplementary Fig. 2). In the threelevel atom, the microwave pulse at ω _{−} creates the superposed twophoton state
where \(C = \sqrt {1 + {{\left {{\gamma _1}} \right}^2} + {{\left {{\gamma _2}} \right}^2}}\). The plot in Fig. 4 shows the modified spectrum. As expected, the spectrum reveals only peaks at frequencies consisting of one or two photons of ω _{−}. The frequencies are ω _{3} = 2ω _{+} − ω _{−}, ω _{−3} = 2ω _{−} − ω _{+}, and ω _{5} = 3ω _{+} − 2ω _{−} corresponding, for instance, to processes \({a_ + }a_  ^\dag {a_ + }c_3^ +\), \({a_  }{a_  }a_ + ^\dag c_{  3}^ +\) and \({a_ + }a_  ^\dag a_  ^\dag {a_ + }{a_ + }c_5^ +\), where \(c_m^ +\) and \(c_m^ \) are creation and annihilation operators defined on the twophoton space (\(\left n \right\rangle\), where n takes 0, 1 or 2). The intuitive picture of the twophoton state mixing is shown on the central and righthand side panels of Fig. 1c. The two photon state (N _{ph} = 2) results in the five peaks. This additionally confirms that the atom resolves the twophoton state. See Supplementary Note 4 for the details.
The QWM can be also understood as a transformation of the quantum states into quantised frequencies similar to the Fourier transformation. The summarised twodimensional plots with N _{ph} are presented in Fig. 5. The mixing with quantum states is particularly revealed in the asymmetry. Note that for arbitrary N _{ph} coherent states, the spectrum asymmetry will remain, giving N _{ph} and N _{ph}−1 peaks at the emission and absorption sides.
According to our understanding, QWM has not been demonstrated in systems other than superconducting quantum ones due to the following reasons. First, the effect requires a single quantum system because individual interaction processes have to be separated in time^{29} and it will be washed out in multiple scattering on an atomic ensemble in matter. Next, although photon counters easily detect single photons, in the visible optical range, it might be more difficult to detect amplitudes and phases of weak power waves^{30, 31}. On the other hand, microwave techniques allow one to amplify and measure weak coherent emission from a single quantum system^{17, 32}, due to strong coupling of the single artificial atom; the confinement of the radiation in the transmission line; and due to an extremely high phase stability of microwave sources. The radiation can be selectively detected by either SAs or vector network analysers with narrow frequency bandwidths, efficiently rejecting the background noise.
In summary, we have demonstrated QWM—an interesting phenomenon of quantum optics. We explore different regimes of QWM and prove that the superposed and coherent states of light are mapped into a quantised spectrum of narrow peaks. The number of peaks is determined by the number of interacting photons. QWM could serve as a powerful tool for building new types of onchip quantum electronics.
Data availability
Relevant data is available from A.Yu.D. upon request.
References
 1.
Clarke, J. & Wilhelm, F. K. Superconducting quantum bits. Nature 453, 1031–1042 (2008).
 2.
Wallraff, A. et al. Strong coupling of a single photon to a superconducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature 431, 162–167 (2004).
 3.
You, J. Q. & Nori, F. Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits. Nature 474, 589597 (2011).
 4.
Schuster, D. I. et al. Resolving photon number states in a superconducting circuit. Nature 445, 515–518 (2007).
 5.
Peng, Z., De Graaf, S., Tsai, J. & Astafiev, O. Tuneable ondemand singlephoton source in the microwave range. Nat. Commun. 7, 12588 (2016).
 6.
Houck, A. A. et al. Generating single microwave photons in a circuit. Nature 449, 328–331 (2007).
 7.
Lang, C. et al. Correlations, indistinguishability and entanglement in HongOuMandel experiments at microwave frequencies. Nat. Phys. 9, 345–348 (2013).
 8.
Hofheinz, M. et al. Generation of Fock states in a superconducting quantum circuit. Nature 454, 310–314 (2008).
 9.
Hofheinz, M. et al. Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator. Nature 459, 546–549 (2009).
 10.
Astafiev, O. et al. Single artificialatom lasing. Nature 449, 588–590 (2007).
 11.
Hoi, I.C. et al. Giant crossKerr effect for propagating microwaves induced by an artificial atom. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 053601 (2013).
 12.
Kirchmair, G. et al. Observation of quantum state collapse and revival due to the singlephoton Kerr effect. Nature 495, 205 (2013).
 13.
Roy, D., Wilson, C. M. & Firstenberg, O. Colloquium: strongly interacting photons in onedimensional continuum. Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 021001 (2017).
 14.
Hoi, I.C. et al. Microwave quantum optics with an artifficial atom in onedimensional open space. New J. Phys. 15, 025011 (2013).
 15.
Astafiev, O. et al. Resonance fluorescence of a single artificial atom. Science 327, 840–843 (2010).
 16.
Toyli, D. M. et al. Resonance fluorescence from an artificial atom in squeezed vacuum. Phys. Rev. X 6, 031004 (2016).
 17.
Abdumalikov, A. A. Jr, Astafiev, O. V., Pashkin, Y. A., Nakamura, Y. & Tsai, J. Dynamics of coherent and incoherent emission from an artificial atom in a 1D space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 043604 (2011).
 18.
Astafiev, O. V. et al. Ultimate onchip quantum amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 183603 (2010).
 19.
Hoi, I.C. et al. Demonstration of a singlephoton router in the microwave regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 073601 (2011).
 20.
Fang, Y.L. L. & Baranger, H. U. Multiple emitters in a waveguide: nonreciprocity and correlated photons at perfect elastic transmission. Phys. Rev. A 96, 013842 (2017).
 21.
van Loo, A. F. et al. Photonmediated interactions between distant artificial atoms. Science 342, 1494–1496 (2013).
 22.
Mlynek, J., Abdumalikov, A. A., Eichler, C. & Wallraff, A. Observation of Dicke superradiance for two artificial atoms in a cavity with high decay rate. Nat. Commun. 5, 5186 (2014).
 23.
Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear Optics (Academic press, New York, 2003).
 24.
Scully, M. O. & Zubairy, M. Quantum Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
 25.
Oliver, W. D. et al. MachZehnder interferometry in a strongly driven superconducting qubit. Science 310, 1653–1657 (2005).
 26.
Sillanpää, M., Lehtinen, T., Paila, A., Makhlin, Y. & Hakonen, P. Continuoustime monitoring of LandauZener interference in a cooperpair box. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 187002 (2006).
 27.
Neilinger, P. et al. LandauZenerStückelbergMajorana lasing in circuit quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev. B 94, 094519 (2016).
 28.
Schackert, F., Roy, A., Hatridge, M., Devoret, M. H. & Stone, A. D. Threewave mixing with three incoming waves: signalidler coherent attenuation and gain enhancement in a parametric amplifier. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 073903 (2013).
 29.
Maser, A., Gmeiner, B., Utikal, T., Götzinger, S. & Sandoghdar, V. Fewphoton coherent nonlinear optics with a single molecule. Nat. Photon. 10, 450–453 (2016).
 30.
Lvovsky, A. I. & Raymer, M. G. Continuousvariable optical quantumstate tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 299–332 (2009).
 31.
Ip, E., Lau, A. P. T., Barros, D. J. & Kahn, J. M. Coherent detection in optical fiber systems. Opt. Express 16, 753–791 (2008).
 32.
Shen, J.T. & Fan, S. Coherent single photon transport in a onedimensional waveguide coupled with superconducting quantum bits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 213001 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge Russian Science Foundation (grant N 161200070) for supporting the work. We thank A. Semenov and E. Ilichev for useful discussions.
Author information
Affiliations
Contributions
O.V.A. planned and designed the experiment, R.S., A.Yu.D. and T.H.D. fabricated the sample and built the setup for measurements. A.Yu.D., R.S. and T.H.D. measured the raw data. A.Yu.D., V.N.A. and O.V.A. made calculations, analysed and processed the data and wrote the manuscript, with important contributions from all the authors.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Dmitriev, A.Y., Shaikhaidarov, R., Antonov, V.N. et al. Quantum wave mixing and visualisation of coherent and superposed photonic states in a waveguide. Nat Commun 8, 1352 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146701701471x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s4146701701471x
Further reading

Amplitude and frequency sensing of microwave fields with a superconducting transmon qudit
npj Quantum Information (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.