Piwi-interacting RNAs are small regulatory RNAs with key roles in transposon silencing and regulation of gametogenesis. The production of mature piwi-interacting RNAs requires a critical step of trimming piwi-interacting RNA intermediates to achieve optimally sized piwi-interacting RNAs. The poly(A)-specific ribonuclease family deadenylase PNLDC1 is implicated in piwi-interacting RNA trimming in silkworms. The physiological function of PNLDC1 in mammals remains unknown. Using Pnldc1-deficient mice, here we show that PNLDC1 is required for piwi-interacting RNA biogenesis, transposon silencing, and spermatogenesis. Pnldc1 mutation in mice inhibits piwi-interacting RNA trimming and causes accumulation of untrimmed piwi-interacting RNA intermediates with 3′ end extension, leading to severe reduction of mature piwi-interacting RNAs in the testis. Pnldc1 mutant mice exhibit disrupted LINE1 retrotransposon silencing and defect in spermiogenesis. Together, these results define PNLDC1 as a mammalian piwi-interacting RNA biogenesis factor that protects the germline genome and ensures normal sperm production in mice.
Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are a class of germline-expressed small non-coding RNAs essential for germ cell genome integrity, development, and fertility1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Associated with piRNAs, the evolutionarily conserved PIWI family proteins direct piRNA-guided transcriptional and posttranscriptional gene silencing8, 9. Mature piRNAs (24–32 nt in length) are processed from long single-stranded piRNA precursor transcripts through a series of cleavage events by specific endonucleases and exonucleases to generate mature piRNAs, which are bound to PIWI proteins6, 9, 10.
Before the formation of mature piRNAs, cleaved piRNA intermediates (we refer to as pre-piRNAs) bound to PIWI proteins undergo a critical 3′–5′ trimming step to generate optimally sized piRNAs11,12,13,14,15,16. TDRKH/Papi was the first piRNA trimming factor identified in primary piRNA biogenesis, as its depletion results in the accumulation of pre-piRNAs 3–10 nt longer than mature piRNAs15, 16. However, TDRKH/Papi itself does not harbor any nuclease domain, and therefore is unlikely to be the exonucleolytic trimming enzyme “trimmer”13, 15. Two recent reports elegantly demonstrate that two poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) family proteins are the trimmers for piRNA 3′ end maturation12, 13. PARN-1 is required for piRNA 3′ end trimming in Caenorhabditis elegans 12. The related protein, poly(A)-specific ribonuclease-like domain containing 1 (PNLDC1), identified as a TDRKH/Papi interacting protein, is the trimmer for pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming in silkworm13. PNLDC1 deficiency in silkworm leads to piRNA 3′ end extension, impaired target cleavage, and reduced piRNA stability13, and its function in mammals is not known.
Here we demonstrate the physiological function of PNLDC1 in mice. We show that PNLDC1 is required for mammalian piRNA 3′ trimming in vivo and is essential for transposon silencing and spermatogenesis in mice. Pnldc1 mutation causes piRNA 3′ extension and great reduction of mature piRNAs. In addition, by analyzing the accumulated pre-piRNAs in Pnldc1 mutant mice, we report the existence of previously speculated phased piRNA biogenesis in mouse pachytene piRNAs. These findings underscore the importance of the piRNA length maturation in mammalian germline genome defense and development.
Pnldc1 is essential for spermiogenesis
To investigate the physiological function of mammalian PNLDC1 and its potential role in piRNA biogenesis, we generated Pnldc1-deficient mice using CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing technology (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Methods section). We designed two guide RNAs (gRNAs) to target exon1 and exon9 of Pnldc1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 1a). We electroporated both gRNAs together with Cas9 protein into C57BL/6J zygotes and derived the first-generation (F0) Pnldc1 mutant (Pnldc1 Mut) mice with indels or deletions on both Pnldc1 alleles (Supplementary Fig. 1b–e). Genotyping PCR and reverse transcription PCR confirmed successful targeting of Pnldc1 (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2).
We examined five male Pnldc1 Mut mice with distinct mutations on Pnldc1 alleles (we refer to as Mut-1, Mut-2, Mut-3, Mut-4, and Mut-5) and found all are viable and grow normally but exhibit smaller testes, ~70% of wild-type control by weight (Fig. 1a). Histological analysis of Pnldc1 Mut testes indicated no obvious changes in germ cell types and cellularity (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. 3a). Pnldc1 Mut seminiferous tubules contained spermatogonia, spermatocytes, round spermatids, and elongating spermatids, but lacked normal spermatozoa (Fig. 1b). At stage VIII, Pnldc1 Mut elongated spermatids showed heavily condensed chromatin, but excess cytoplasm (Fig. 1b, right). Abnormally formed heads of elongated spermatids were frequently observed, sometimes surrounded by excess cytoplasm. This represents a late spermiogenic defect at the elongated spermatid stage in the testis (Fig. 1b). In Pnldc1 Mut epididymides, germ cell numbers were drastically reduced and no normal spermatozoa were present; instead, sloughed spermatids and a number of residual cytoplasm were observed (Fig. 1c). This spermiogenic defect is consistent among all Pnldc1 Mut animals examined (n = 4) (Supplementary Fig. 3). We also established a stable Pnldc1 mutant mouse line carrying an exon1–exon9 deletion (Supplementary Fig. 1f, g) from a female F0 founder. Male mice homozygous for this allele (we refer to as Pnldc1 KO) showed the same spermiogenic arrest seen in all F0 Pnldc1 Mut males (Supplementary Fig. 3b).
As additional evidence of defective spermatogenesis in Pnldc1 Mut males, staining for CRISP2, a marker of cytoplasm of step 15 and 16 elongated spermatids17, showed abnormal residue body formation and delayed cytoplasm removal, confirming the lack of normally staged seminiferous tubules throughout spermatogenesis in Pnldc1 Mut testes (Fig. 1e). This spermiogenic defect contrasts with the testicular defect of Tdrkh knockout (Tdrkh KO) mice, which shows complete meiotic arrest at the zygotene spermatocyte stage15 (Fig. 1d, f). The spermatid morphological defect in Pnldc1 Mut testes also differs from reported knockouts of other piRNA biogenesis factors with spermiogenic defect, which mostly show germ cell arrest at the round spermatid stage18,19,20,21,22,23,24. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that Pnldc1 is indispensable for spermiogenesis in mice.
Pnldc1 is required for LINE1 retrotransposon silencing
The piRNA pathway plays pivotal roles in transposon silencing and germline genome protection1, 5, 9, 10, 25. LINE1, the most studied active retrotransposon in the mouse genome, is activated in knockout mice of almost all piRNA biogenesis factors26, 27. We examined the expression of LINE1 messenger RNA (mRNA) in adult Pnldc1 Mut testes. In situ hybridization with a probe against LINE1 open reading frame1 (ORF1) mRNA revealed a significantly elevated LINE1 mRNA expression in Pnldc1 Mut spermatocytes (Fig. 2a). To examine the LINE1 protein levels, we generated LINE1 ORF1 specific antisera (see Methods section). Western blot analysis confirmed the elevated LINE1 protein level in Pnldc1 Mut testes (Supplementary Fig. 4). Consistent with in situ hybridization results, LINE1 ORF1 protein expression dramatically increased in Pnldc1 Mut pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 2b). LINE1 ORF1 protein could be first detected in Pnldc1 Mut zygotene spermatocytes and peaked at the mid-pachytene stage. LINE1 ORF1 was not detected in Pnldc1 Mut spermatogonia, preleptotene/leptotene spermatocytes or round spermatids (Fig. 2c). As a positive control, LINE1 ORF1 was upregulated in Tdrkh −/− testes15; the positive cells were leptotene or zygotene spermatocytes because of the early meiotic arrest (Supplementary Fig. 5). These data indicate that PNLDC1 is essential for transposon repression in mammalian male germ cells.
Mislocalization of piRNA pathway factors in Pnldc1 Mut testes
We next examined the expression levels and localization patterns of several piRNA pathway factors in Pnldc1 Mut testes. Western blotting showed similar expression levels for TDRKH, MILI, GASZ, and MVH between mutant and control testes. MIWI protein level was decreased in Pnldc1 Mut testes (Fig. 3a). Although the expression level of TDRKH was similar to that of wild type (Fig. 3a), its localization was polarized to large perinuclear granules in Pnldc1 Mut pachytene spermatocytes (Fig. 3b), which may correspond to mitochondrial clusters observed in other piRNA biogenesis factor knockouts22, 28, 29. MILI, MIWI, and GASZ staining also showed the same polarized pattern in Pnldc1 Mut testes (Fig. 3b). We confirmed that the large granules consisted of clustered mitochondria by staining with a mitochondrial marker AIF (Fig. 3c). MVH, which is also essential for piRNA biogenesis but has a wider distribution throughout the cytoplasm, showed a normal distribution in Pnldc1 Muttestes (Fig. 3b). Because piRNA biogenesis factors are normally localized to the intermitochondrial cement of pachytene spermatocytes where piRNA biogenesis is believed to occur, the polarization of TDRKH, MILI, GASZ, and MIWI in a mitochondria congregation zone in Pnldc1 Mut testes suggests PNLDC1 deficiency may disrupt piRNA biogenesis.
Pachytene piRNA biogenesis is impaired in Pnldc1 Mut testes
To explore a role of PNLDC1 in piRNA biogenesis, we examined the size and abundance of small RNA populations from adult wild-type and Pnldc1 Mut testes. Radiolabeling of total RNA showed a normal wild-type piRNA population at around 30 nt in length (Fig. 4a). Strikingly, this population was absent in Pnldc1 Mut testes; instead, an abnormally longer small RNA population of 30–40 nt in length was observed (Fig. 4a). The absence of normal piRNA population and the presence of longer small RNA population are consistent among all Pnldc1 Mut animals examined (Supplementary Fig. 6). To test whether this population of longer small RNAs is piRNAs associated with PIWI proteins, we immunoprecipitated MILI and MIWI, and labeled the associated RNAs. Small RNAs with extended length were observed in Pnldc1 Mut MILI and MIWI immunoprecipitates, indicating that these small RNAs are most likely aberrantly processed piRNA intermediates (pre-piRNAs) (Fig. 4b, c). Next, we sequenced small RNA libraries constructed from total RNA, MILI-bound RNAs, or MIWI-bound RNAs from adult wild-type and Pnldc1 Mut testes. Sequencing results revealed that the amount of total piRNAs was dramatically decreased in Pnldc1 Mut testes as normalized by the microRNA reads (Fig. 4d). In addition, the small RNA population in Pnldc1 Mut testes showed extended lengths of 24–44 nt, as compared to 24–32 nt in the wild type (Fig. 4d). The peak of MILI-bound piRNAs (MILI-piRNAs) likewise shifted from 27 nt in the wild type to 32 nt in Pnldc1 Mut samples (Fig. 4e), and the peak of MIWI-bound piRNAs (MIWI-piRNAs) shifted from 30 to 34 nt (Fig. 4f). These data indicate that PNLDC1 is required for production of normal mature piRNAs and may facilitate the proper processing of pre-piRNAs.
PNLDC1 is required for pachytene pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming
To examine the characteristics of extended piRNA species in Pnldc1 Mut mice, we mapped 24–48 nt reads from both wild-type and Pnldc1 Mut small RNA libraries to the mouse genome. Similar to wild-type piRNAs, the longer piRNAs in Pnldc1 Mut mice were primarily mapped to piRNA clusters (~80%) (Fig. 5a). We observed the same results for MILI-piRNAs and MIWI-piRNAs, indicating that the longer small RNAs in Pnldc1 Mut are from the correct genomic source and therefore are true pre-piRNAs (Fig. 5a). We next measured the composition of the first nucleotide of Pnldc1 Mut pre-piRNAs. piRNAs from both the 24–32 nt reads and 33–40 nt reads of the Pnldc1 Mut library had a strong U bias at the first nucleotide position (Fig. 5b). Examination of MILI-piRNAs and MIWI-piRNAs from Pnldc1 Mut testes revealed the same strong U bias at the first nucleotide (Fig. 5b). These data indicate that the formation of the Pnldc1 Mut piRNA 5′ end was normal, suggesting that the extended length of Pnldc1 Mut piRNAs likely resulted from defective 3′ end trimming. To test this hypothesis, we extracted the 24–32 nt reads from wild-type total piRNA library and 33–40 nt reads from Pnldc1 Mut total piRNA library, and performed 5′ end match analysis26. We obtained 3,827,727 unique wild-type library reads from the 24–32 nt population and 2,104,602 unique Pnldc1 Mut library reads from the 33–40 nt population. After measuring the overlap between these two populations, we identified 1,604,365 unique reads of 33–40 nt piRNAs from the Pnldc1 Mut library that could perfectly match to at least one 24–32 nt read from the wild-type library. Within these matching pairs, 70% could perfectly match at the 5′ end, leaving an extended 3′ end tail (Fig. 5c). We further mapped Pnldc1 Mut pre-piRNAs to the most highly expressed piRNA clusters and compared piRNA 5′ end and 3′ end positions between wild-type and Pnldc1 Mut piRNAs. The 5′ end positions had similar start nucleotides between wild-type and Pnldc1 Mut, while the 3′ end positions showed an obvious extended variety (Fig. 5d). These results indicate that accumulated Pnldc1 Mut pre-piRNAs are the bona fide piRNA precursors with untrimmed 3′ end extensions. Therefore, PNLDC1 is required for pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming in mice. Consistent with recently demonstrated in vitro 3′–5′ exonuclease activity13, 30, PNLDC1 is likely the trimmer for mammalian adult piRNA 3′ end maturation.
Pachytene piRNA biogenesis is phased in mice
In flies and mouse pre-pachytene stages, Zucchini/MitoPLD-mediated cleavage acts both in the 3′ end formation of upstream piRNA and in the 5′ end formation of downstream piRNA, consecutively generating “phased” piRNAs31, 32. It is unknown whether the production of meiotic pachytene piRNAs, the most abundant piRNA population in mammalian germ cells, is phased due to lack of animal models. The accumulation of pachytene piRNA intermediates in Pnldc1 Mut mice allowed us to explore the pachytene piRNA precursor cleavage mechanism prior to the piRNA trimming step. We analyzed untrimmed pachytene pre-piRNAs in Pnldc1 Mut mice to detect the existence of phased piRNA biogenesis in adult testes using methods described31, 32. We mapped the 24–48 nt reads from wild-type and Pnldc1 Mut small RNA libraries to the most highly expressed pachytene piRNA clusters and analyzed the 5′ end and 3′ end sequences from mapped piRNAs. A strong 5′ end U bias appeared in both wild-type and Pnldc1 Mut piRNAs, confirming the normal 5′ end formation in Pnldc1 Mut piRNA intermediates (Fig. 6a). As expected, at the 10th nt position, there was no obvious adenine (A) residue bias, indicating that the secondary piRNA biogenesis (ping-pong) pathway was not aberrantly activated in Pnldc1 Mut mice. Analysis of the piRNA 3′ end downstream sequences mapped to piRNA clusters revealed that U residues are enriched at the first position immediately downstream of Pnldc1 Mut piRNA 3′ end (+1 position) (Fig. 6a; Supplementary Fig. 7). This specifies a signature of phased piRNA processing. The 3′ end +1 U signature is likely generated by MitoPLD cleavage, which is known to produce phased pre-pachytene piRNAs by generating simultaneously the 3′ end of current piRNA and the 5′ end of immediate next piRNA. We also observed this +1 position U enrichment in Pnldc1 Mut MILI-piRNAs and MIWI-piRNAs (Fig. 6b; Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9). To confirm the phased pachytene piRNA biogenesis in adult testes, we performed 3′–5′ coupling analysis as described31, 32. We mapped piRNA reads to the 10 most highly expressed piRNA clusters and extracted the top 1000 most abundant distinct piRNAs of each cluster as references. We then measured the distance from the 3′ end of each reference piRNA (position 0) to the 5′ end of all the mapped downstream piRNAs within the window of −10 to +50 nt surrounding reference piRNA 3′ end. In wild-type mice, piRNA 5′ ends distribute randomly around the upstream piRNA 3′ ends (Fig. 6c). In contrast, when we analyzed the untrimmed Pnldc1 Mut pre-piRNAs, the neighboring piRNA 5′ ends were enriched at positions immediately downstream of the piRNA 3′ ends (+1), indicating that a single cleavage event produces the 3′ end of one piRNA and the 5′ end of the next downstream piRNA (Fig. 6c; Supplementary Fig. 10). Together, these data demonstrate that phased piRNA biogenesis contributes to mammalian pachytene piRNA production.
PNLDC1 is required for pre-pachytene piRNA trimming
To investigate whether PNLDC1 plays a role in pre-pachytene piRNA biogenesis, we analyzed neonatal (P0) control Pnldc1 heterozygous (HET) and Pnldc1 homozygous (KO) mutant mice carrying an exon 1–exon 9 deletion. MILI localization was not altered in Pnldc1 KO testes (Fig. 7a). However, MIWI2 in Pnldc1 KO germ cells was mislocalized partially to cytoplasm as compared to control (Fig. 7b). This contrasts with the MIWI2 localization pattern in Tdrkh KO testes in which vast majority of MIWI2 was mislocalized to cytoplasm (Fig. 7c). The mislocalization of MIWI2 in Pnldc1 KO mice suggests defective piRNA biogenesis and function. We immunoprecipitated MILI from Pnldc1 HET and KO testes and examined piRNA length distribution (Fig. 7d). Pnldc1 KO piRNAs bound to MILI showed an extended length (~33 nt) as compared to control (~27 nt), indicating a piRNA trimming defect. Mapping of extended Pnldc1 KO piRNAs to a representative pre-pachytene piRNA cluster revealed a 3′ end extension indicative of defect in pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming (Fig. 7e). To examine the effect of defective piRNA trimming on LINE1 expression in neonatal Pnldc1 KO germ cells, we performed immunostaining of LINE1. Interestingly, no obviously LINE1 upregulation was observed (n = 4) (Supplementary Fig. 11). This indicates that the piRNA pathway in PNLDC1-deficient neonatal male germ cells is still at least functional for LINE1 silencing despite defective piRNA trimming and partial MIWI2 mislocalization.
We reveal here the physiological function of PNLDC1 in mice. PNLDC1 functions as a mammalian piRNA biogenesis factor essential for piRNA maturation, transposon silencing, and spermatogenesis. PNLDC1 is required for the 3′ end trimming of both pre-pachytene and pachytene pre-piRNAs. The analysis of untrimmed pre-piRNAs in adult Pnldc1 Mut mice confirms a previously speculated phased piRNA production for mouse pachytene piRNAs, a meiotic piRNA population unique to mammals.
The PARN group exonucleases, including PNLDC1 and PARN, belong to a family of deadenylases that are responsible for the removal of the 3′ poly(A) tails of mRNAs to control mRNA decay30, 33,34,35. Both PNLDC1 and PARN exhibit poly(A) mRNA deadenylase activity in vitro30. Recently, two elegant studies demonstrate a novel function of the 3′–5′ exonuclease activity of PNLDC1 and PARN in piRNA trimming, a function beyond poly(A) mRNA turnover12, 13. Specifically, PNLDC1, but not PARN, functions as a pre-piRNA trimmer in silkworms13, while PARN-1 is responsible for pre-piRNA 3′ end trimming in C. elegans 12. In the mammalian system, both PNLDC1 and PARN are expressed in the testis13, 30 and thus potentially participate in piRNA biogenesis. Consistent with silkworm data, our results indicate that PNLDC1 is responsible for the trimming of vast majority of pachytene pre-piRNAs in mice. This is supported by the evidence that the majority of piRNAs in Pnldc1 Mut showed 3′ extensions and substantial reduction of normal sized piRNAs. Even Pnldc1 Mut piRNAs within the normal length range (24–33 nt) contained apparently untrimmed pre-piRNAs that showed a downstream U signature at the +1 position (Supplementary Fig. 12). This crucial function in piRNA trimming coincides with the preferential expression of PNLDC1 in the testis13, 30 (Supplementary Fig. 13) and interaction with piRNA trimming factor TDRKH13. Although a role for PARN in mammalian piRNA trimming cannot be excluded, our finding of the requirement of PNLDC1 in both pre-pachytene and pachytene piRNA 3′ end trimming suggests that PNLDC1 is the key PARN family nucleases involved in mammalian piRNA biogenesis. Since PNLDC1 shows in vitro exonuclease activity specific for poly(A) RNA substrates30, we cannot rule out that PNLDC1 may also participate in germ cell poly(A) RNA regulation and mRNA decay in addition to piRNA biogenesis.
Our data demonstrate that Pnldc1 mutation does not phenocopy Tdrkh mutation in mice, although both genes are indispensable for piRNA trimming. Pnldc1 Mut mice display a late postmeiotic germ cell defect during spermiogenesis (Fig. 1a–c; Supplementary Fig. 3). This contrasts with Tdrkh KO mice, which exhibit a complete meiotic arrest before the pachytene stage15 (Fig. 1d). The difference in spermatogenic phenotype suggests that PNLDC1 and TDRKH have non-overlapping functions during spermatogenesis. This may result from their differential impact on piRNA biogenesis, which can be observed as early as in fetal/neonatal germ cells during pre-pachytene piRNA biogenesis. In Tdrkh KO neonatal germ cells, MIWI2 is almost completely shuffled from nucleus to cytoplasm, suggesting the lack of piRNA-bound MIWI2 and a failure in piRNA-mediated transcriptional silencing. In contrast, in Pnldc1 KO neonatal germ cells, MIWI2 localization shifted from the nucleus partially to the cytoplasm. The partial retention of MIWI2 in the nucleus suggests that nuclear MIWI2 is still loaded with piRNAs and could still be functional in piRNA-mediated gene silencing. Indeed, we observed differences in LINE1 silencing in neonatal PNLDC1 and TDRKH mutant germ cells (Supplementary Fig. 11). Thus, the difference in MIWI2 mislocalization may in turn impact piRNA-mediated gene silencing, leading to distinct spermatogenic phenotype between PNLDC1 and TDRKH deficiency. TDRKH is proposed as a piRNA trimming cofactor that bridges PIWI–piRNA and the trimmer13. Conceivably, unlike PNLDC1 whose simple function lies in enzymatically trimming piRNA 3′ ends, TDRKH may have additional functions beyond recruiting trimmer and piRNA trimming. By directly interacting with PIWI proteins by its Tudor domain15, 36 and potentially interacting with piRNAs using its KH domains13, TDRKH could modulate PIWI function and pre-piRNA loading. These potential molecular functions of TDRKH could affect the piRNA pathway in a more profound way than simply increasing the accessibility of PNLDC1 for piRNA trimming and therefore could account for the phenotypic differences between Tdrkh and Pnldc1 mutant mice.
In summary, we show that PNLDC1 is essential for mammalian piRNA 3′ end trimming. Defective pre-piRNA trimming results in compromised piRNA production and function, which contributes to transposon upregulation and block in spermatogenesis. We envision that targeting the mammalian piRNA trimming machinery, especially the enzymatic activity of PNLDC1, could serve as a novel method for development of small-molecule inhibitors for animal sterilization and human male contraception.
All the animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Michigan State University (AUF 10/16-173-00). All experiments with mice were conducted ethically according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and institutional guidelines.
Generation of Pnldc1 Mut mice
CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing was used to generate Pnldc1 mutant mice. Wild-type NLS-Cas9 protein, synthetic tracrRNA, and crRNA (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.) were used. Protospacer and PAM sequences corresponding to crRNAs were 5′-ACTCCTGCAGGAGCTTGTCG-CGG-3′ for Pnldc1 exon1, and 5′-ACAGCTGACTTGGTCACAAG-AGG-3′ for Pnldc1 exon9. Briefly, tracrRNA and crRNA were incubated at 95 °C for 5 min and allowed to cool down in order to form RNA hybrids, which were then incubated with Cas9 protein for 5 min at 37 °C to pre-form ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes. RNPs were introduced into C57BL/6J mouse zygotes by electroporation as described previously37. Embryos were allowed to recover and implanted into pseudo-pregnant foster females according to standard procedures. Mutant analysis of offspring was performed using PCR, T7 Endonuclease I assay, and sequencing. For genotyping, tail biopsies were lysed with proteinase K to release genomic DNA for PCR analysis. Sequences of primers used for PCR genotyping are listed in Supplementary Table 1. Sanger sequencing was employed to detect exon 1–exon 9 deletion (Supplementary Fig. 1). A total of five first-generation (F0) Pnldc1 mutant male mice were identified and used for analyses after reaching adulthood. A stable mutant mouse line harboring an exon 1–exon 9 deletion was established by breeding a female Pnldc1 mutant founder mouse with a wild-type C57BL/6J male. Subsequent intercrossing generated homozygous Pnldc1 mutant mice with exon 1–exon 9 deletions. Neonatal and adult mutant male mice and their respective littermate controls were used for analyses.
Tdrkh mutant (Tdrkh tm1b(KOMP)Wtsi) mice were purchased from Jackson laboratory.
Mouse testes and epididymides were fixed in 4% PFA or Bouin’s fixative in PBS at 4 °C overnight and embedded in paraffin. About 5 μm sections were cut. For the histological and morphological analysis, sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin after dewaxing and rehydration.
LINE1 ORF1 antisera generation
Complimentary DNA corresponding to LINE1 ORF1 222–357 aa (L1Md-A2, GenBank: M13002.1) was cloned into pET-28a (His-tag) vectors. His-tagged recombinant protein was used as an antigen to generate rabbit anti-ORF1 polyclonal antisera (Pacific Immunology).
Testes were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS overnight at 4 °C and embedded in paraffin. About 5 μm sections were cut, dewaxed, and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed by microwaving the sections in 0.01 M sodium citrate buffer (pH 6.0). After rinsing with PBS, tissue sections were blocked in 5% normal goat serum (NGS) for 30 min. Testis sections were then incubated with anti-MIWI (1:50; 2079, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MILI (1:100; PM044, MBL), anti-TDRKH (1:100; 13528-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-AIF (1:100; 5318, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-CRISP2 (1:100; 19066-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-MVH (1:100; ab13840, Abcam), anti-GASZ (1:50; 21550-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-LINE1 ORF1 (1:800), anti-MIWI2 (1:50; ab21869, Abcam), or FITC-conjugated mouse anti-γH2AX (1:500; 16–202A, Millipore) in 5% NGS at 37 °C for 2 h. After washing with PBS, sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 555 goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:500; A21429, Life Technologies) for 1 h and mounted using Vectorshield mounting media with DAPI (H1200, Vector Laboratories) after washing. Fluorescence microscopy was performed using Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, Japan).
In situ hybridization
Testes were fixed in 4% PFA in PBS overnight at 4 °C, after immersed in 30% sucrose, testes were embedded in O.C.T compound, and 7 μm sections were cut. Sense and antisense DIG-labeled RNA probes were transcribed using DIG RNA Labeling Kit (Roche) from a linearized plasmid containing a full length of LINE1 ORF1 (nucleotides 1741–2814, GenBank: M13002.1). After denaturing the probes for 10 min in hybridization cocktail solution (Amresco), the probes were added to the sections and incubated overnight at 65 °C. After washing and blocking, sections were incubated with alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-DIG Fab fragments (Roche) overnight. The positive signal was visualized by adding BM Purple (Roche).
Mouse testes were collected and homogenized using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, 1% NP-40, 0.5% Na deoxycholate, 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 1 mM EDTA, and 150 mM NaCl). Protein lysates were separated by 4–20% SDS–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad). The membranes were blocked in 5% non-fat milk and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. Membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000; 1706515, Bio-Rad) or goat anti-mouse IgG (1:5000; 1706516, Bio-Rad) for 1 h before chemiluminescent detection. The primary antibodies used were: anti-MILI (1:2000; PM044, MBL), anti-MIWI (1:1000; 2079, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-MVH (1:5000; ab13840, Abcam), anti-GASZ (1:5000; 21550-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-TDRKH (1:4000; 13528-1-AP, Proteintech), anti-LINE1 ORF1 (1:10,000), and HRP-conjugated mouse anti-β-actin (1:10,000; A3854, Sigma). Uncropped versions of all blots are included in Supplementary Fig. 14.
Total RNA was extracted from mouse tissues using Trizol reagent (Thermo Scientific). For complimentary DNA (cDNA) synthesis, 1 μg of RNA was treated with DNase I (M0303S, NEB) and reverse transcribed with iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). RT-PCR was performed using primers shown in Supplementary Table 1.
Immunoprecipitation of piRNAs
Mouse testes were collected and homogenized using lysis buffer (20 mM HEPES pH 7.3, 150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2% NP-40, and 1 mM DTT) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific) and RNase inhibitor (Promega). After sonication, testis lysates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatants were pre-cleared using protein-A agarose beads (Roche) for 2 h. Anti-MILI (1:500; PM044, MBL) or anti-MIWI (1:100; ab12337, Abcam) antibodies together with protein-A agarose beads were added to the lysates and incubated for 4 h. The beads were washed in lysis buffer for five times. Immunoprecipitated RNAs were isolated from the beads using Trizol reagent (Thermo Scientific) for piRNA labeling or small RNA library construction. For protein detection, immunoprecipitated beads were boiled in protein loading buffer for 5 min. Western blotting of MILI or MIWI was performed as described above.
Detection of piRNAs
Total RNA was extracted from mouse testes using Trizol reagent (Thermo Scientific). Total RNA (1 μg) or immunoprecipitated RNA (MILI or MIWI) was de-phosphorylated with Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase (NEB) and end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase (NEB) and [γ-32P] ATP. 32P labeled RNA was separated on a 15% Urea-PAGE gel, and signals were detected by exposing the gel on phosphorimager screen followed by scanning on Typhoon scanner (GE Healthcare).
Small RNA libraries and bioinformatics
Small RNA libraries from immunoprecipitated RNAs or total RNA were prepared using NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep Kit (E7300, NEB) following manufacturer’s instructions. Multiple libraries with different barcodes were pooled and sequenced with the Illumina HiSeq 2500 platform (MSU Genomic Core Facility). The list of small RNA libraries is shown in Supplementary Table 2.
Sequenced reads were processed with fastx_clipper (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html) to clip the sequencing adapter read-through. Clipped reads were filtered by length (24–48 nt, unless otherwise indicated) and aligned to the following sets of sequences: (1) 214 piRNA clusters38, (2) coding RNAs (RefSeq coding gene mRNAs), (3) non-coding RNAs (Refseq non-coding gene mRNAs), (4) Repeats (LINE, SINE, LTR, DNA, Low_complexity, Satellite, Simple_repeat), (5) Intron (Genic regions for RefSeq genes). Reads not mapping to the above five sets of sequences were classified as “other”. Alignments were performed with Bowtie (one base mismatch allowed) in indicated order described above. For alignment to each sequence set, only those reads that were not aligned to any of the previous sets were included. Repeats included classes of repeats as defined by RepeatMasker (ftp://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/goldenPath/mm10/database/rmsk.txt.gz).
To further characterize the extension of piRNA species in Pnldc1 Mut mice, 33–40 nt reads from Pnldc1 Mut total piRNA libraries were mapped to 24–32 nt reads from wild-type total piRNA libraries using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) software. The number of unique 33–40 nt Pnldc1 Mut piRNA reads that perfectly match with at least one wild-type piRNA was calculated.
For the generation of sequence logos, processed reads from wild-type or Pnldc1 Mut small RNA libraries were separately mapped to the 10 most abundantly expressed mouse pachytene piRNA clusters using BWA software. One mismatch was allowed. About 24–48 nt mapped reads were further used and sequence logos were generated using WebLogo 3 (http://weblogo.threeplusone.com/).
3′–5′ coupling analysis of piRNAs
3′–5′ coupling analysis of piRNAs were performed as described31, 32. Briefly, 24–48 nt reads from wild-type or Pnldc1 Mut small RNA libraries were separately mapped to the 10 most abundantly expressed mouse pachytene piRNA clusters using BWA software. One mismatch was allowed. The top 1000 distinctively mapped piRNA species from each cluster were extracted and their 3′ ends were used as position references (position 0) for the 3′–5′ coupling analysis. For each 3′ end reference position, the density of downstream piRNA 5′ ends in a window of 60 nt (−10 nt→ +50 nt) was measured. Frequency of piRNA 5′ ends starting in the vicinity of previous piRNA 3′ end was plotted. Z-scores at position +1 (Z1) were calculated using Z1 = (P1−A)/S. P1 is the value at position +1; A and S are the mean and standard deviation of values of positions −10 → 0 and +2 → +50.
All sequencing data are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive of NCBI under the accession number SRP095532. All other data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
We thank K. Latham and X. Cheng for critical reading of the manuscript, G. Smith and J. Ireland for sharing equipment. This study was technically supported by the Research Technology Support Facility and Transgenic and Genome Editing Facility of Michigan State University. U.M. was supported by a grant R24 OD-012221 from the Office of the Director, Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, Division of Comparative Medicine Grants, National Institutes of Health (NIH). This study was supported in part by Michigan State University funds and a grant R01HD084494 from the NIH to C.C. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.