Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bias induced up to 100% spin-injection and detection polarizations in ferromagnet/bilayer-hBN/graphene/hBN heterostructures


We study spin transport in a fully hBN encapsulated monolayer-graphene van der Waals heterostructure at room temperature. A top-layer of bilayer-hBN is used as a tunnel barrier for spin-injection and detection in graphene with ferromagnetic cobalt electrodes. We report surprisingly large and bias-induced (differential) spin-injection (detection) polarizations up to 50% (135%) at a positive voltage bias of + 0.6 V, as well as sign inverted polarizations up to −70% (−60%) at a reverse bias of −0.4 V. This demonstrates the potential of bilayer-hBN tunnel barriers for practical graphene spintronics applications. With such enhanced spin-injection and detection polarizations, we report a record two-terminal (inverted) spin-valve signals up to 800 Ω with a magnetoresistance ratio of 2.7%, and achieve spin accumulations up to 4.1 meV. We propose how these numbers can be increased further, for future technologically relevant graphene based spintronic devices.


Recent progress in the exploration of various two-dimensional materials has led to special attention for van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures for advanced graphene spintronics devices. For graphene spin-valve devices, an effective injection and detection of spin-polarized currents with a ferromagnetic (FM) metal via efficient tunnel barriers is crucial1, 2. The promising nature of crystalline hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) layers as pin-hole free tunnel barriers3 for spin injection into graphene4,5,6,7,8 has been recently demonstrated. However, due to the relatively low interface resistance-area product of monolayer-hBN barriers, there is a need to use a higher number of hBN layers for non-invasive spin injection and detection9. Theoretically, large spin-injection polarizations have been predicted in FM/hBN/graphene systems as a function of bias with increasing number of hBN layers10.

Kamalakar et al.11 reported an inversion of the spin-injection polarization for different thicknesses of chemical vapour deposited (CVD)-hBN tunnel barriers, as well as an asymmetric bias dependence of the polarization using multilayer CVD-hBN/FM tunnel contacts. The observed behavior was attributed to spin-filtering processes across the graphene/multilayer-hBN/FM tunnel contacts.

In order to explore the potential of hBN tunnel barriers for graphene spin valve devices, one can study the role of current/voltage bias for spin-injection and detection with FM electrodes. Application of a bias across the FM/hBN/graphene tunneling contacts (a) allows to widen the energy window up to ~1 eV for additional spin polarized states in the FM and graphene to participate in the tunneling spin-injection and detection processes, (b) induces a large electric-field between the FM and graphene, which can modify the tunneling processes, (c) provides electrostatic gating for the graphene, which could change the carrier density between electrons and holes, and (d) is predicted to induce magnetic proximity exchange splitting in graphene of up to 20 meV12, 13.

Here we show that bilayer(2L)-hBN tunnel barriers are unique for spin-injection and detection in graphene, with (differential) polarizations unexpectedly reaching values close to ±100% as a function of the applied DC bias at room temperature. Furthermore, we demonstrate a two-terminal (inverted) spin-valve with a record magnitude of the spin signal reaching 800 Ω with magnetoresistance ratio of 2.7%.


Four-terminal non-local spin transport

We study the spin transport in fully hBN-encapsulated graphene, prepared via dry pick-up and transfer method14 to obtain clean and polymer free graphene-hBN interfaces4 (see “Methods” section for device fabrication details). We use a four-terminal non-local measurement geometry to separate the spin current path from the charge current path (Fig. 1a). An AC current (i) is applied between two Co/2L-hBN/graphene contacts to inject a spin-polarized current in graphene. The injected spin accumulation in graphene diffuses and is detected non-locally (v) between the detector contacts using a low-frequency (f = 10–20 Hz) lock-in technique. For the spin-valve measurements, the magnetization of all the contacts is first aligned by applying a magnetic field B y along their easy axes. Then B y is swept in the opposite direction. The magnetization reversal of each electrode at their respective coercive fields appears as an abrupt change in the non-local differential resistance R nl (=v/i). Along with a fixed amplitude i of 1–3 μA, we source a DC current (I in) to vary the bias applied across the injector contacts. In this way, we can obtain the differential spin-injection polarization of a contact, defined as \({p_{{\rm{in}}}} = \frac{{{i_{\rm{s}}}}}{i} = \frac{{{\rm{d}}{I_{\rm{s}}}}}{{{\rm{d}}I}}\), where I s (i s) are the DC (AC) spin currents, and study in detail how p in of the contacts depends on the applied bias. We observe with bilayer-hBN tunnel barrier that the magnitude of the differential spin signal ΔR nl at a fixed AC injection current increases with the DC bias applied across the injector (Fig. 2a, c). Moreover, a continuous change in the magnitude of ΔR nl between −4.5 and 2.5 Ω as a function of DC current bias across the injector, and its sign reversal close to zero bias can be clearly observed (Fig. 3a). A similar behavior is also observed for different injection contacts.

Fig. 1

Device layout and measurement scheme. a A layer-by-layer schematic of the vdW heterostructure of the 2L-hBN/graphene/thick-hBN stack with FM cobalt electrodes. A measurement scheme is shown for the non-local spin transport measurements with a DC current bias I in and AC current i, applied across the injector contacts and a non-local differential (AC) spin signal v is measured using a lock-in detection technique. A DC current bias I d can also be applied in order to bias the detector contact. b An optical microscopic picture of the vdW heterostructure. Scale bar, 5 μm. The black-dashed line outlines the hBN tunnel barrier flake. The red-dashed line outlines the monolayer region of the hBN tunnel barrier flake (see Supplementary Note 1 for the optical microscopic picture of the tunnel barrier). A schematic of the deposited cobalt electrodes is shown as orange bars and the Co/hBN/graphene contacts are denoted by numbers 1, 2, .., and 13. The orange-dashed lines represent the unused contacts. Cobalt electrodes from 2 to 5 are either fully or partially deposited on top of the monolayer region of the tunnel-barrier flake, while the electrodes from 6 to 12 are exclusively deposited on the bilayer region. The width of the cobalt electrodes (2–12) is varied between 0.15 and 0.4 μm

Fig. 2

Non-local spin-valve and Hanle measurements at different DC bias across the injector. a, c: Non-local differential spin-valve signal R nl (=v/i) as a function of the magnetic field B y applied along the easy axes of the Co electrodes, for a short (L = 1 μm) a, and a long (L = 6.5 μm) c spin transport channel. An offset at zero field is subtracted from each curve for a clear representation of the data. The vertical dashed lines correspond to the switching of the electrodes at their respective coercive fields. The switch of the outer detector 13 is not detectable as it is located far (>2λ s) from the nearest injector. The legend shows the applied injection DC current bias I in values. The up (↑) and down (↓) arrows represent the relative orientation of the electrode magnetizations. The three arrows in a correspond to the contacts 7, 8, and 9, and the two arrows in c correspond to the contacts 7 and 11, from left to right. The insets in a and c show the measurements schematics, injection AC current (i) and the DC current bias (I in), the respective contacts used for the spin current injection, and non-local differential voltage (v) detection. The differential spin signal in a due to spin injection through 8 is \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{8}} - {\rm{9}}} = \left( {R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow } - R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \downarrow \uparrow }} \right){\rm{/}}2\), and in c due to spin injection through 7 is \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{7}} - {\rm{11}}} = \left( {R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow } - R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \downarrow }} \right){\rm{/}}2\). b, d Non-local (differential) Hanle signal ΔR nl(B z) as a function of the magnetic field B z. b, d shows ΔR nl measured for the short(long) channel, corresponding to the spin injector contact 8(7) and measured with the detector contact 9(11). The measured data are represented in circles and the solid lines represent the fits to the data. Hanle signals in b at different injection bias values \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{8}} - {\rm{9}}}\left( {{{\bf{B}}_{\rm{z}}}} \right) = \left( {R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow }\left( {{{\bf{B}}_{\rm{z}}}} \right) - R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \downarrow \uparrow }\left( {{{\bf{B}}_{\rm{z}}}} \right)} \right){\rm{/}}2\). The two vertical dashed lines in d correspond to the fields where the Hanle signals cross zero

Fig. 3

Bias enhanced non-local differential spin signal and large differential spin-injection polarization at room temperature. a Non-local spin signal \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{8}} - {\rm{9}}}\)(I in) corresponding to the spin current injected through contact 8 and detected via contact 9, as a function of the DC current bias (I in) applied across the injector. The solid line represents the spin signal \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{8}} - {\rm{9}}}\)(I in) for a continuous sweeping of the I in bias, while the dots are extracted from the Hanle signals \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{8}} - {\rm{9}}}\)(B z) at B z  = 0, measured at different bias (from Fig. 2b). b Differential spin-injection polarization of the injector contact 8, \(p_{{\rm{in}}}^{\rm{8}}\) as a function of I in, calculated from the \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{8}} - {\rm{9}}}\)(I in) (Eq. (3)) data plotted in a

In Hanle spin-precession measurements, where the magnetic field B z is swept perpendicular to the plane of spin injection, the injected spins precess around the applied field and dephase while diffusing towards the detectors. We obtain the spin transport parameters such as spin-relaxation time τ s and spin-diffusion constant D s by fitting the non-local Hanle signal ΔR nl(B z) with the stationary solutions to the steady state Bloch equation in the diffusion regime; D s 2 μ s − μ s/τ s + γB z × μ s = 0. Here, the net spin accumulation μ s is the splitting of spin chemical potentials spin-up μ and spin-down μ , i.e., (μ  − μ )/2, and γ is the gyromagnetic ratio. In order to obtain reliable fitting parameters, we probe the Hanle signals for a long spin transport channel of length L = 6.5 μm. We measure the Hanle signals for different DC current bias and obtain the fitting parameters τ s ~ 0.9 ns, D s ~ 0.04 m2 s−1, and λ s ~ 5.8 μm. We estimate the carrier density \(n \simeq 5 \times {10^{12}}\) cm−2 from the Einstein relation and the carrier mobility μ ~ 3000 cm2 V−1 s−1 form the Drude’s formula, by assuming D s = D c 15, where D c is the charge-diffusion constant. Both the mobility and spin relaxation time are relatively low, which could be due to the ineffective screening of the very thin (~0.7 nm) top-layer of bilayer-hBN from the contamination on the top surface. Due to non-functioning backgate of the device, we could not measure the carrier density dependence of these parameters. For the calculation of mobility, see Supplementary Note 8.

Spin-injection polarization

Since λ s does not change due to the bias applied between the injector contacts, the bias dependence of the non-local differential spin signal ΔR nl in Figs. 2, 3a is due to the change in spin-injection polarization. From ΔR nl in Fig. 3a, we can obtain the differential spin-injection polarization of the injector contact 8, \(p_{{\rm{in}}}^8\) from ref. 16.

$$\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{8 - 9} = \frac{{{R_{{\rm{sq}}}}{\lambda _{\rm{s}}}}}{{2W}}\left[ {p_{{\rm{in}}}^8p_{\rm{d}}^9{e^{\frac{{ - L}}{{{\lambda _{\rm{s}}}}}}}} \right],$$

using a known unbiased detection polarization of detector 9, \(p_{\rm{d}}^9\) (see Supplementary Note 3 for the analysis and calculation of \(p_{\rm{d}}^9\)), the length between contacts 8 and 9, L 8−9 = 1 μm, the square resistance R sq ~ 400 Ω, and the width W = 3 μm of graphene. The non-local spin signal as a function of bias due to the spin injection through 8 is obtained from \(\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{8}} - {\rm{9}}}\left( {{I_{{\rm{in}}}}} \right) = \left( {R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow }\left( {{I_{{\rm{in}}}}} \right) - R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \downarrow \uparrow }\left( {{I_{{\rm{in}}}}} \right)} \right){\rm{/}}2\), where \(R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow \uparrow }\left( {{I_{{\rm{in}}}}} \right)\) is the non-local signal measured as a function of I in when the magnetization of contacts 7, 8, and 9 are aligned in ↑, ↑, and ↑ configuration, respectively. We find that \(p_{{\rm{in}}}^8\) changes from −1.2% at zero bias to +40% at +25 μA and −70% at −25 μA (Fig. 3b). It shows a sign inversion, which occurs close to zero bias. The absolute sign of p cannot be obtained from the spin transport measurements and we define it to be positive for the majority of the unbiased contacts (Supplementary Note 3).

The observed behavior of the (differential) polarization is dramatically different from what has been observed so far for spin-injection in graphene, or in any other non-magnetic material. For spin-injection/detection with conventional FM tunnel contacts, the polarization does not change its sign close to zero bias. It can be modified at high bias17. However, in our case, we start with a very low polarization at zero bias which can be enhanced dramatically in positive and negative directions.

The above analysis is repeated for other bilayer-hBN tunnel barrier contacts with different interface resistances. Figure 4a shows p in for four contacts plotted as a function of the voltage bias obtained from the respective ΔR nl(I in). All contacts show similar behaviour, where the magnitude of p in increases with bias and changes sign close to zero bias. For the same range of the applied voltage bias, contacts with either 1L-hBN or TiO2 tunnel barriers do not show a significant change in the spin polarization (Supplementary Notes 6, 10). This behavior implies that the observed tunneling spin-injection polarization as a function of the bias is unique to bilayer-hBN tunneling contacts.

Fig. 4

Differential spin-injection (p in) and detection (p d) polarizations of the cobalt/bilayer-hBN/graphene contacts. a Differential spin-injection polarization p in of four contacts with 2L-hBN tunnel barrier, as a function of the DC voltage bias V. Top axis represents the corresponding electric-field (=V/t hBN, t hBN ≈7 Å, the thickness of 2L-hBN barrier) induced across the Co/2L-hBN/graphene contacts. Note that the ΔR nl used to calculate \(p_{{\rm{in}}}^8\) in Fig. 3b is obtained from a different data set. b Differential spin-detection polarization p d of contacts 8 and 9 as a function of DC voltage bias V applied across the detector, while the injector bias is fixed at I in = + 20 μA. The insets in a and b show p in and p d of contacts at zero bias, respectively. The top x axis in a and b indicates the electric field corresponding to the applied bias across the contacts

Spin-detection polarization

We now study the effect of the bias on spin-detection. The (differential) spin detection polarization p d of a contact is defined as the voltage change (ΔV) measured at the detector due to a change in the spin accumulation underneath (Δμ s) (see Supplementary Note 2 for the derivation and details),

$${p_{\rm{d}}} = \frac{{\Delta V}}{{\Delta {\mu _{\rm{s}}}{\rm{/}}e}}$$

where \(\Delta V = i\left[ {\Delta R_{{\rm{nl}}}^{{\rm{in}} - {\rm d}}}\left( {{I_{{\rm d}}}} \right) \right]\) is measured as a function of the detector bias I d, and \(\Delta {\mu _{\rm{s}}}{\rm{/}}e = \frac{{i{R_{{\rm{sq}}}}{\lambda _{\rm{s}}}}}{{2W}}{p_{{\rm{in}}}}{{\rm e}^{ - L/{\lambda _{\rm{s}}}}}\). In a linear response regime at low bias, p d should resemble p in because of reciprocity. However, in the non-linear regime at higher bias, they can be different. A comparison between Fig. 4a and b shows that the bias dependence of p in and p d is similar (see Supplementary Note 4 for determining p d as a function of bias). However, we find that p d of contact 9 can reach more than 100% above +0.4 V (corresponding electric field is +0.06 V Å−1). We note that the presence of a non-zero DC current in the graphene spin transport channel between injector and detector could modify λ s due to carrier drift, and consequently the calculated polarizations have a typical uncertainty of about 10% (Supplementary Note 9). Although there is no fundamental reason that the biased detection polarizations p d cannot exceed 100% (Supplementary Note 2), it could be that our observation of over 100% polarization is due to effect of the drift which is expected to have a bigger effect on the accurate determination of p d(I) as compared to p in(I) (Fig. 1a). Due to heating effect at the injector, there is also a possibility of thermal spin injection, which might result in an enhanced contact polarization. We make a rough estimate for this effect and find that the thermal effects due to large values of DC current are negligible on the spin transport as explained in Supplementary Note 7. We also verify the consistency of our approach from the calculation of DC spin injection polarization as shown in Supplementary Note 5.

Concluding, we have obtained a dramatic bias-induced increase in both the differential spin-injection and detection polarizations, reaching values close to ±100% as a function of applied bias across the cobalt/bilayer-hBN/graphene contacts.

Two-terminal local spin transport

A four-terminal non-local spin-valve scheme is ideal for proof of concept studies, but it is not suitable for practical applications where a two-terminal local geometry is technologically more relevant. In a typical two-terminal spin-valve measurement configuration, the spin signal is superimposed on a (large) spin-independent background. Since we have found that the injection and detection polarizations of the contacts can be enhanced with DC bias, the two-terminal spin signal can now be large enough to be of practical use. For the two-terminal spin-valve measurements, a current bias (i + I) is sourced between contacts 8 and 9, and a spin signal (differential, v and DC, V) is measured across the same pair of contacts as a function of B y (inset, Fig. 5a). Figure 5a, c shows the two-terminal differential resistance R 2t (=v/i) and the two-terminal DC voltage V 2t , respectively, measured as a function of B y. As a result of the two-terminal circuit, both the contacts are biased with same I but with opposite polarity, resulting in opposite sign for the injection and detection polarizations. Therefore, we measure an inverted two-terminal differential spin-valve signal R 2t with minimum resistance in anti-parallel configuration. We observe a maximum magnitude of change in the two-terminal differential (DC) signal ΔR 2tV 2t ) of about 800 Ω (7 mV) at I = +20 μA, where \(\Delta {R_{2{\rm{t}}}}\left( I \right) = R_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow }\left( I \right) - R_{2{\rm{t}}}^{ \downarrow \uparrow }\left( I \right)\) and \(\Delta {V_{2{\rm{t}}}}\left( I \right) = V_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow }\left( I \right) - V_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \downarrow \uparrow }\left( I \right)\) represent the difference in the two-terminal signals when the magnetization configuration of contacts 8 and 9 changes between parallel(↑↑) and anti-parallel (↓↑). A continuous change in ΔR 2t and ΔV 2t can be observed as a function of DC current bias (Fig. 5b, d).

Fig. 5

Large inverted two-terminal spin-valve effect at room temperature. a Two-terminal differential spin-valve signal R 2t(=v/i) and c two-terminal DC spin-valve signal V 2t, as a function of B y at two different DC current bias values. The inset in a illustrates the two-terminal spin-valve measurement configuration. The arrows ↑↑ (↓↑) represent the parallel (anti-parallel) orientation of the magnetization of contacts 8 and 9, respectively, from left to right. The vertical dashed lines represent the coercive fields of contacts 8 and 9. b Two-terminal differential spin signal ΔR 2t(I), and d two-terminal DC spin signal ΔV 2t(I), as a function of the DC current bias I. The calculated two-terminal spin signals from the individual spin-injection and detection polarizations of contacts 8 and 9 are also shown in b and d

The magnetoresistance (MR) ratio of the two-terminal differential spin signal is a measure of the local spin-valve effect, and is defined as \(\left( {R_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \downarrow \uparrow } - R_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow }} \right){\rm{/}}R_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow }\), where \(R_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \uparrow \downarrow }\) \(\left( {R_{{\rm{2t}}}^{ \uparrow \uparrow }} \right)\) is the two-terminal differential resistance measured in the anti-parallel (parallel) magnetization orientation of the contacts. From the spin-valve signal, we calculate the maximum MR ratio of −2.7% at I = +20 μA.

Since we have already obtained the differential spin-injection and detection polarizations of both the contacts 8 and 9 as a function of bias (Fig. 4), we can calculate the two-terminal differential spin signal from

$$\Delta {R_{2{\rm{t}}}}(I) = \left[ {p_{{\rm{in}}}^9\left( {{I_{{\rm{in}}}}} \right)p_{\rm{d}}^8\left( { - {I_{\rm{d}}}} \right) + p_{{\rm{in}}}^8\left( { - {I_{{\rm{in}}}}} \right)p_{\rm{d}}^9\left( {{I_{\rm{d}}}} \right)} \right]\frac{{{R_{{\rm{sq}}}}{\lambda _{\rm{s}}}}}{W}{e^{ - \frac{L}{{{\lambda _{\rm{s}}}}}}}$$

The calculated differential signal ΔR 2t(I) is plotted in Fig. 5b. A similar analysis can be done for the two-terminal DC spin signal ΔV 2t(I) (Supplementary Note 2) and is plotted in Fig. 5d. Even though there is an uncertainty in the calculation of p d due to a possible effect of carrier drift between the injector and detector, we get a close agreement between the measured and calculated signals in different (local and non-local) geometries. This confirms the accurate determination of the individual spin-injection and detection polarizations of the contacts.

Furthermore, we can now calculate the total spin accumulation in graphene, underneath each contact in the two-terminal biased scheme, due to spin-valve effect. The results are summarized in Table 1. The maximum spin accumulation, beneath contact 9, due to spin-injection/extraction from contacts 8 and 9 reaches up to 4.1 meV for an applied bias of I = +20 μA. It is noteworthy that such a large magnitude of spin accumulation in graphene at room temperature has not been reported before.

Table 1 Large spin accumulation underneath the contacts


Recent first-principles calculations of the proximity exchange coupling induced in graphene by Zollner et al.12 have predicted that an applied electric field in Co/hBN/graphene system can reverse the sign of the proximity-effect-induced equilibrium spin polarization in graphene (shown specifically for the case of 2L-hBN). Although this study is related to our experimental geometry, the exchange interactions are not relevant for the current discussion because we do not observe any signature of (bias-induced) exchange coupling on the shape of the Hanle signals (such as, as observed by Leutenantsmeyer et al.18 and Singh et al.19) except for the magnitude of the spin signals. Another study by Lazić et al.13 on the tunable proximity effects in Co/hBN/graphene has predicted that the system can be effectively gated, and both the magnitude and the sign of the equilibrium spin polarization of the density of states at the Fermi level can be changed due to transverse electric field. However, the spin polarization of the injected current is not calculated. Although these results are relevant to our study, further research is required to understand the results.

According to the first-principles transport calculations10, the bias-dependent spin-current injection efficiency from Ni into graphene increases up to 100% with the number of hBN tunnel barrier layers. However, these calculations do not show any sign inversion of the spin injection efficiency and do not predict any special role of bilayer-hBN. Therefore, we will not speculate further here on possible explanations of our fully unconventional observations. We note, however, that further research will require the detailed study of the injection/detection processes as a function of graphene carrier density, in particular, the interaction between contact bias induced and backgate induced carrier density. Via these measurements, one could also search for possible signatures of the recently proposed magnetic proximity exchange splitting in graphene with an insulator spacer, hBN12, 13.

In conclusion, by employing bilayer-hBN as a tunnel barrier in a fully hBN-encapsulated graphene vdW heterostructure, we observe a unique sign inversion and bias induced spin-injection (detection) polarizations between 50% (135%) at +0.6 V and −70% (−60%) at −0.4 V at room temperature. This resulted in a large change in the magnitude of the non-local differential spin signal with the applied DC bias across the Co/2L-hBN/graphene contacts and the inversion of its sign around zero bias. Such a large injection and detection polarizations of the contacts at high bias made it possible to observe the two-terminal differential and DC spin signals reaching up to 800 Ω, and magnetoresistance ratio up to 2.7% even at room temperature. Moreover, we obtain a very large spin accumulation of about 4.1 meV underneath the contacts in a two-terminal spin-valve measurement.

Note that we have been conservative in biasing the contacts to prevent breakdown of the 2L-hBN barriers. By increasing the bias to the maximum theoretical limit of ~±0.8 V20, we expect that we can increase the polarizations even further. Also, one can increase the width of the contacts by a factor of 5 to about 1 μm (yet far below λ s), which will reduce the background resistance of two-terminal spin-valve signal by the same factor, and allow to apply a maximum current bias up to 100 μA21. This could result in two-terminal spin signal above 50 mV and MR ratio beyond 20%. The corresponding change in spin accumulation could reach up to 40 meV underneath the contacts, exceeding the room temperature thermal energy (k B T ~ 25 meV). Such high values of spin accumulation will open up an entirely new regime for studying spin transport in graphene and for applications of graphene based spintronic devices2.


Sample preparation

A fully encapsulated hBN/graphene/hBN heterostructure is prepared via a dry pickup transfer method developed in our group14. The graphene flake is exfoliated from a bulk HOPG (highly oriented pyrolytic graphite) ZYA grade crystal (SPI) onto a pre-cleaned SiO2/Si substrate (\({t_{{\rm{Si}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}\) = 300 nm). A single layer is identified via the optical contrast analysis. Boron nitride flakes (supplier: HQ Graphene) are exfoliated onto a different SiO2/Si substrate (\({t_{{\rm{Si}}{{\rm{O}}_{\rm{2}}}}}\) = 90 nm) from small hBN crystals (~1 mm). The thickness of the desired hBN flake is characterized via the Atomic Force Microscopy. For the stack preparation, a bilayer-hBN (2L-hBN) flake on a SiO2/Si is brought in contact with a viscoelastic PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane) stamp which has a polycarbonate (PC) film attached to it in a transfer stage arrangement. When the sticky PC film comes in a contact with a 2L-hBN flake, the flake is picked up by the PC film. A single layer graphene (Gr) flake, exfoliated onto a different SiO2/Si substrate is aligned with respect to the already picked up 2L-hBN flake in the transfer stage. When the graphene flake is brought in contact with the 2L-hBN flake on the PC film, it is picked up by the 2L-hBN flake due to vdW force between the flakes. In the last step, the 2L-hBN/Gr assembly is aligned on top of a 10 nm thick-hBN flake on another SiO2/Si substrate and brought in contact with the flake. The whole assembly is heated at an elevated temperature ~150 °C and the PC film with the 2L-hBN/Gr is released onto the thick-hBN flake. The PC film is dissolved by putting the stack in a chloroform solution for 3 h at room temperature. Then the stack is annealed at 350 °C for 5 h in an Ar-H2 environment for removing the polymer residues.

Device fabrication

The electrodes are patterned via the electron beam lithography on the PMMA (poly(methyl methacrylate))-coated 2L-hBN/Gr/hBN stack. Following the development procedure, which selectively removes the PMMA exposed to the electron beam, 65 nm thick FM cobalt electrodes are deposited on top of the 2L-hBN tunnel barrier for the spin polarized electrodes via electron-beam evaporation. Vacuum pressure is maintained at 1 × 10−7 mbar during the deposition. To prevent the oxidation of the cobalt, the ferromagnetic electrodes are covered with a 3 nm thick aluminum layer. The material on top of the unexposed polymer is removed via the lift-off process in hot acetone solution at 50 °C, leaving only the contacts in the desired area.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon request.


  1. 1.

    Roche, S. et al. Graphene spintronics: the European flagship perspective. 2D Mater. 2, 030202 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wen, H. et al. Experimental demonstration of xor operation in graphene magnetologic gates at room temperature. Phys. Rev. Appl. 5, 044003 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Britnell, L. et al. Field-effect tunneling transistor based on vertical graphene heterostructures. Science 335, 947–950 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gurram, M. et al. Spin transport in fully hexagonal boron nitride encapsulated graphene. Phys. Rev. B 93, 115441 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yamaguchi, T. et al. Electrical spin injection into graphene through monolayer hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Express 6, 073001 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Singh, S. et al. Nanosecond spin relaxation times in single layer graphene spin valves with hexagonal boron nitride tunnel barriers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 122411 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kamalakar, M. V., Dankert, A., Bergsten, J., Ive, T. & Dash, S. P. Enhanced tunnel spin injection into graphene using chemical vapor deposited hexagonal boron nitride. Sci. Rep. 4, 6146 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Fu, W., Makk, P., Maurand, R., Bruninger, M. & Schnenberger, C. Large-scale fabrication of bn tunnel barriers for graphene spintronics. J. Appl. Phys. 116, 074306 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Maassen, T., Vera-Marun, I. J., Guimarães, M. H. D. & van Wees, B. J. Contact-induced spin relaxation in hanle spin precession measurements. Phys. Rev. B 86, 235408 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Wu, Q. et al. Efficient spin injection into graphene through a tunnel barrier: overcoming the spin-conductance mismatch. Phys. Rev. Appl. 2, 044008 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kamalakar, M. V., Dankert, A., Kelly, P. J. & Dash, S. P. Inversion of spin signal and spin filtering in ferromagnet—hexagonal boron nitride-graphene van der waals heterostructures. Sci. Rep. 6, 21168 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Zollner, K., Gmitra, M., Frank, T. & Fabian, J. Theory of proximity-induced exchange coupling in graphene on hbn/(co, ni). Phys. Rev. B 94, 155441 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lazić, P., Belashchenko, K. D. & Žutić, I. Effective gating and tunable magnetic proximity effects in two-dimensional heterostructures. Phys. Rev. B 93, 241401 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zomer, P. J., Guimares, M. H. D., Brant, J. C., Tombros, N. & Wees, B. J. v. Fast pick up technique for high quality heterostructures of bilayer graphene and hexagonal boron nitride. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 013101 (2014).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Weber, C. P. et al. Observation of spin Coulomb drag in a two-dimensional electron gas. Nature 437, 1330–1333 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tombros, N., Jozsa, C., Popinciuc, M., Jonkman, H. T. & van Wees, B. J. Electronic spin transport and spin precession in single graphene layers at room temperature. Nature 448, 571–574 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Valenzuela, S. O., Monsma, D. J., Marcus, C. M., Narayanamurti, V. & Tinkham, M. Spin polarized tunneling at finite bias. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 196601 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Leutenantsmeyer, J. C., Kaverzin, A. A., Wojtaszek, M. & van Wees, B. J. Proximity induced room temperature ferromagnetism in graphene probed with spin currents. 2D Mater. 4, 014001 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Singh, S. et al. Strong modulation of spin currents in bilayer graphene by static and fluctuating proximity exchange fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 187201 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hattori, Y., Taniguchi, T., Watanabe, K. & Nagashio, K. Layer-by-layer dielectric breakdown of hexagonal boron nitride. ACS Nano. 9, 916–921 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Ingla-Aynés, J., Meijerink, R. J. & van Wees, B. J. Eighty-eight percent directional guiding of spin currents with 9 μm relaxation length in bilayer graphene using carrier drift. Nano. Lett. 16, 4825–4830 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


We kindly acknowledge J.G. Holstein, H.M. de Roosz, H. Adema and T.J. Schouten for the technical assistance. We thank Professor T. Banerjee for useful discussions and J. Ingla-Aynés for providing the device with TiO2 barrier. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European-Union Graphene Flagship (grant no. 696656) and supported by the Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials and Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk (NWO, the Netherlands).

Author information




M.G., S.O., and B.J.v.W. conceived the experiments. M.G. carried out the sample fabrication and measurements. M.G., S.O., and B.J.v.W. carried out the analysis and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. Gurram or S. Omar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gurram, M., Omar, S. & Wees, B.J. Bias induced up to 100% spin-injection and detection polarizations in ferromagnet/bilayer-hBN/graphene/hBN heterostructures. Nat Commun 8, 248 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing