The switch between quiescence and proliferation is central for neurogenesis and its alteration is linked to neurodevelopmental disorders such as microcephaly. However, intrinsic mechanisms that reactivate Drosophila larval neural stem cells (NSCs) to exit from quiescence are not well established. Here we show that the spindle matrix complex containing Chromator (Chro) functions as a key intrinsic regulator of NSC reactivation downstream of extrinsic insulin/insulin-like growth factor signalling. Chro also prevents NSCs from re-entering quiescence at later stages. NSC-specific in vivo profiling has identified many downstream targets of Chro, including a temporal transcription factor Grainy head (Grh) and a neural stem cell quiescence-inducing factor Prospero (Pros). We show that spindle matrix proteins promote the expression of Grh and repress that of Pros in NSCs to govern their reactivation. Our data demonstrate that nuclear Chro critically regulates gene expression in NSCs at the transition from quiescence to proliferation.
The balance between neural stem cell (NSC) proliferation and quiescence is essential for neurogenesis. Its alteration is linked to neurodevelopmental disorders such as microcephaly. In the mammalian adult brain, the majority of NSCs are in a mitotic inactive, quiescent state1. However, they can exit quiescence and resume proliferation in response to extrinsic stimuli2. Understanding mechanisms controlling the quiescence and reactivation of NSCs is essential to decipher stem cell behaviours in the developing brain.
Drosophila larval brains NSCs, neuroblasts, also undergo the reversible transition between quiescence and reactivation. At the end of embryogenesis, NSCs enter into quiescence, depending on the Hox proteins, the temporal transcription factors and a homoeodomain transcription factor Prospero (Pros)3,4,5. NSCs are quiescent for ~24 h between embryonic and larval stages6,7,8,9,10 and are reactivated in early larval stages in response to feeding6, 7. Dietary amino acids are sensed by the fat body, a functional equivalent vertebrate liver and adipose tissue11, 12. The fat body triggers the production of insulin-like peptides by blood-brain barrier glial cells, activating the insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway in underlying NSCs and stimulating their reactivation13,14,15. The role of mammalian IGF-1 in NSC division16 and the association of human IGF1R mutations with microcephaly17 suggest a conserved mechanism underlying NSC proliferation. However, intrinsic mechanisms that reactivate Drosophila NSCs are not well established.
A unique group of mitotic regulators, termed spindle matrix proteins, functions in spindle assembly in both Drosophila and mammalian cells18, 19. In Drosophila, spindle matrix proteins contain at least four nuclear proteins—Chromator/Chriz (Chro), Megator (Mtor), Skeletor and enhanced adult sensory threshold (East)20,21,22. These spindle matrix proteins have intriguing cell cycle-dependent subcellular localization: they are localized to nucleus during interphase, and translocate to the mitotic spindle during mitosis23. While their roles during spindle assembly are well established, their nuclear function remains elusive.
Here we show that the spindle matrix complex, including Chro, Mtor and EAST, has a novel nuclear function in reactivation of Drosophila NSCs. Upon depletion of chro, Mtor or east, NSCs exhibit cellular extensions, a hallmark for quiescent NSCs, with a failure of 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU) incorporation, indicating that these NSCs were in a quiescent state. We further demonstrate that Chro is not only critical for NSC reactivation, but also essential for preventing re-entry into quiescence. Our genetic experiments show that Chro functions downstream of extrinsic insulin/IGF pathway. NSC-specific in vivo profiling has identified many potential targets of Chro including a temporal transcription factor Grainy head (grh) and a NSC quiescence-inducing factor Pros. We show that Chro activates grh expression while represses pros in NSCs at the transition of quiescence and proliferation. Our study demonstrates a critical cell-intrinsic mechanism by which Chro functions as a critical nuclear factor to control gene expression during NSC reactivation.
Chro functions intrinsically to reactivate NSCs
We uncovered chromator (chro), a spindle matrix component, as a novel intrinsic player that reactivates NSCs, from an RNA interference (RNAi) screen (Wei X. and Wang H., unpublished data). Spindle matrix proteins are a unique group of mitotic regulators that are localized to the spindle matrix in both Drosophila and mammalian cells18. All wild-type central brain NSCs lose their cellular processes and exit quiescence by 96 hours after larval hatching (h ALH) (Fig. 1a, b; n = 1324). However, at 96 h ALH upon chro RNAi knockdown under a NSC-specific driver insc-Gal4, 27% (n = 475) of Miranda (Mira)-positive NSCs, still extended their cellular processes and only 1% (n = 416) of Deadpan (Dpn)-positive NSCs were incorporated with EdU (Fig. 1b, c). Twenty-six per cent (n = 522) of chro 71/612 (henceforth referred to as chro −) NSCs, retained cellular extensions and only 24% (n = 515) of NSCs in chro − were incorporated with EdU (Fig. 1b, c). In addition, the number of mitotic cells, which are positive for Phospho-Histone H3 (PH3), was drastically reduced in chro − compared with the control (Fig. 1d, e). Likewise, hemizygous chro 612/Df(3L)ED231, trans-heterozygous chro 17a/chro 71 and trans-heterozygous chro 8c/chro 71 all displayed NSC reactivation defects (Fig. 1f, g). A genomic DNA encompassing wild-type chro gene region fully rescued the lethality, NSC quiescence and Chro expression in chro mutants (Fig. 1h and Supplementary Fig. 1a–c). chro RNAi knockdown in glial cells did not result in any delay in NSC reactivation, neither did its depletion in NSCs affect the specification, identity or death of NSCs (Supplementary Fig. 1d, e).
We analysed Chro expression in wild-type quiescent vs. active NSCs in a time-course experiment from 8 h ALH to 96 h ALH. At 8 h ALH, the expression levels of Chro in quiescent NSCs are comparable to those in active NSCs (Fig. 1l). At later stages, Chro was expressed in the nucleus of active NSCs. In addition, we examined the total protein levels of Chro by western blotting at 12 h ALH and 96 h ALH. The protein levels of Chro at both stages were similar to each other (Supplementary Fig. 2).
Similar to central brain NSCs, NSCs in the thoracic ventral nerve cord (tVNC) are reactivated in early larval stages13 (Fig. 1i, j). Chro is also critical for NSC reactivation in tVNC, as many tVNC Mira+ NSCs displayed cellular extensions at 72 h ALH and the number of EdU+ cycling NSCs in chro RNAi or chro − mutants was dramatically reduced (Fig. 1i, j). Intriguingly, the diameter of tVNC (Supplementary Fig. 1f) or central brain NSCs (Fig. 1b) from chro − mutant or chro RNAi is similar to that of control cycling NSCs (Fig. 1k). These observations suggest that cell growth and cell cycle control can be uncoupled when chro is depleted.
Mushroom body (MB) neuroblasts in Drosophila larval central brains are known to divide throughout larval stages in the absence of dietary amino acids and do not enter or exit from quiescence.7 chro RNAi knockdown under a MB-specific driver OK107-Gal4 resulted in the formation of shorter mitotic spindle (Supplementary Fig. 3a, b; 50%, n = 20), consistent with a previously known function for Chro in mitosis20. However, none of the MB neuroblasts (n = 108) displayed Mira+ cellular extensions and all of the MB neuroblasts were incorporated with EdU (n = 124) upon knockdown of chro under OK107-Gal4, similar to those in control MB neuroblasts (Supplementary Fig. 3c, d). These results suggest that the chro depletion causes a failure of NSCs to exit quiescence rather than a cell cycle arrest due to mitotic defects. Next, we directly analysed MB neuroblasts in chro RNAi under insc-Gal4 driver. At 12 h ALH, Mira+ MB neuroblasts from both wild type (n = 144) and chro RNAi under insc-Gal4 (n = 168), surrounded by Dachshund (Dac)-positive MB neurons, were incorporated with EdU (Supplementary Fig. 3g). Moreover, none of MB neuroblasts in control (n = 160) or chro RNAi driven by insc-Gal4 (n = 176) displayed cellular extensions (Supplementary Fig. 3g). By contrast, in the same samples, at 12 h ALH, 14% control non-MB neuroblasts (n = 636) were quiescent without EdU incorporation, while 45% of non-MB neuroblasts in chro RNAi under insc-Gal4 (n = 780) were quiescent without EdU incorporation (Supplementary Fig. 3h). These data suggest that chro depletion under insc-Gal4 causes reactivation defects of non-MB neuroblasts without affecting proliferation of MB neuroblasts. Finally, at 36 h ALH at 29 °C, similar to control (n = 112), MB neuroblasts from chro RNAi under insc-Gal4 (n = 120) continued to proliferate in the absence of dietary amino acids (Supplementary Fig. 3i). This result suggests that proliferation of MB neuroblasts is unaffected at either normal or nutrient restriction conditions upon chro RNAi knockdown under insc-Gal4. Taken together, our data explicitly support the role of Chro in regulating reactivation of NSCs.
In wild type, 97% (n = 96) of NSCs possess two Asterless (Asl)-positive centrioles throughout the cell cycle, due to a very short G1 in the cell cycle of Drosophila NSCs. However, knocking down of chro by RNAi by insc-Gal4 resulted in only 47% (Supplementary Fig. 3e; n = 116) of NSCs displayed two Asl-positive centrioles, suggesting that significant portion of these NSCs were in G0 or early G1. By contrast, all MB neuroblasts (Supplementary Fig. 3f; n = 100) with chro RNAi knockdown contained two Asl-positive centrioles, similar to the control MB neuroblasts. Overexpression of cyclin B (CycB), a mitotic cyclin, or cyclin E (Cyc E), a G1 cyclin, failed to rescue cellular extension phenotype observed in NSCs upon chro RNAi knockdown under insc-Gal4. Control chro knockdown had 26% of NSCs (n = 467) with cellular extensions (Supplementary Fig. 3j). Similarly, 26% (n = 576) and 27% (n = 507) of NSCs upon overexpression of CycB or CycE in chro RNAi displayed cellular process phenotype, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 3j). JIL-1 kinase (JIL-1), a known binding partner of Chro, which regulates spindle morphology20, appears to be dispensable for reactivation of NSCs (Supplementary Fig. 3k). These observations indicate that spindle/mitotic defect alone is insufficient to cause a failure in reactivation of NSCs.
The cellular extension of wild type or chro mutant quiescent NSCs is both actin- and microtubule-rich, as indicated by α-tubulin, disc large (Dlg) or phalloidin (Supplementary Fig. 1g, h). The thick protuberances in chro mutant quiescent NSCs mimic the structure of primary cilium. Acetylated-α-tubulin (Ace-Tub on lysine 40), a posttranslational modification that stabilizes microtubules observed in cilia, was strongly enriched in the cell cortex as well as the cellular protrusions in chro − mutant or chro RNAi NSCs (Supplementary Fig. 1i). Pericentriolar material protein γ-tubulin was strongly diminished in 95% (n = 155) of chro − mutant NSCs (Supplementary Fig. 1j), suggesting that centrosome maturation does not occur in these quiescent cells. Interestingly, majority of NSCs with Mira+ cellular extensions contained an Asl-positive centriole within or in close proximity to the cellular protrusions in chro − mutant and chro RNAi (Supplementary Fig. 1j). This property is similar to centriole position in primary cilia.
We performed time-course experiments to monitor the requirement of Chro for NSC reactivation. In wild type, vast majority of NSCs are incorporated with EdU and only 10% (n = 106) of NSCs showed cellular extensions at 24 h ALH; all NSCs lost cellular extensions and were incorporated with EdU at 48 and 72 h ALH (Supplementary Fig. 4a–d). However, significant portion of chro − NSCs still extended cellular processes and vast majority of NSCs failed to incorporate EdU from 24 to 72 h ALH (Supplementary Fig. 4a–c). Nutrition is dispensable for bulk NSC proliferation at later larval stages7, 12, 24. We wondered if Chro function is still required for NSC proliferation in late larval stages. When chro RNAi was induced at 29 °C for 2 days only after all NSCs had already reactivated, 87% (n = 635) of NSCs failed to incorporate with EdU and 22% of NSCs (n = 575) showed cellular processes (Supplementary Fig. 4e–i). Thus, chro depletion can result in re-entry of NSC quiescence during late larval stages. This observation suggests that Chro function is critically required for both initiation and maintenance of the proliferation status of NSCs throughout larval stages. However, overexpression of Chro did not lead to the reactivation of NSCs on amino-acid depleted condition (Supplementary Fig. 4j), suggesting that Chro is necessary but not sufficient for NSCs to exit from quiescence.
Chro functions downstream of insulin/PI3K pathway in NSCs
The spindle matrix complex in Drosophila contains at least four nuclear proteins, Chro, Megator (Mtor), Skeletor and enhanced adult sensory threshold (East)20,21,22, 25. Next, we ascertained the role of two other spindle matrix proteins, Mtor and East, during NSC reactivation. At 96 h ALH, in the mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) clones of a loss-of-function allele Mtor k03905, 40% (n = 85) of NSCs displayed a cellular extension, in contrast to complete reactivation of wild-type NSCs (n = 66, Fig. 2a). Moreover, only 7% (n = 72) of NSCs in Mtor k03905 MARCM clones were cycling with EdU labelling (Fig. 2b). Likewise, 15% (n = 242) of east RNAi NSCs retained a cellular extension at 72 h ALH and 94% (n = 577) of NSCs in east RNAi failed to incorporate EdU (Fig. 2c). Consistently, it also led to the quiescence of tVNC NSCs (Fig. 2d, e). These data indicate that the spindle matrix complex plays a critical intrinsic role in controlling NSC reactivation.
chro RNAi by fat-body drivers Cg-Gal4 and Lsp2-Gal4 did not cause any defects in NSC reactivation (Supplementary Fig. 5a), implying that Chro does not activate PI3K/TOR pathway in fat body. We then ascertained whether Chro functions downstream of PI3K/Akt signalling. Overexpression of an active form of insulin-like receptor (InRCA) is capable of driving NSC reactivation in the absence of dietary amino acids13, 14 (Fig. 2f–i); There were 58 ± 15 (n = 20) EdU+ cells per brain hemisphere at 72 h ALH, and only 4% of NSCs showed a cellular process. Overexpression of the TOR activator Ras homologue enriched in brain (RHEB) resulted in 50 ± 15 (n = 20) EdU+ cells per brain hemisphere, with 8% of NSCs displaying a cellular extension at 72 h ALH13, 14 (Fig. 2f–i). However, when InRCA or RHEB was overexpressed in NSCs with chro RNAi in amino-acid depleted food at 72 h ALH, the number of EdU+ cells decreased to 21 ± 7 (n = 21) and 31 ± 10 (n = 22) per brain hemisphere, respectively; 21% of NSCs displayed a Mira+ cellular protrusion in both genotypes (Fig. 2f–i). At 24 h ALH, the effect of InRCA overexpression was similarly suppressed by chro RNAi in amino-acid depleted food (Fig. 2j, k). Furthermore, chro RNAi significantly suppressed the effect caused by overexpression of PI3KCAAX, an active form of PI3K. When PI3KCAAX was overexpressed in NSCs from larvae raised in amino-acid depleted food, there were 33 ± 10 EdU+ cells per brain lobe (n = 20). By contrast, when PI3KCAAX was overexpressed with chro RNAi knockdown, the number of EdU+ cells decreased dramatically to 17 ± 4 per brain hemisphere (Fig. 2l; n = 18). Therefore, Chro regulates NSC reactivation downstream of PI3K/TOR pathway.
In vivo profiling of Chro identified Grh as a target in NSCs
To identify the targets of Chro in NSCs, we carried out targeted DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) identification (TaDa)-based in vivo profiling, a recently developed technique that allows cell-type-specific in vivo profiling of transcriptome and chromatin binding26. Dam-methylated DNA fragments were isolated and amplified from larval brains expressing Dam-Chro or Dam-control, followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bioinformatics analysis (Fig. 3a). In total, we found 2269 putative Chro-binding sites with high peak scores (>100) in the whole genome (Supplementary Data 1). Five randomly selected candidate genes, namely CG30158, CR42836, Vsx1, IM3 and CR34702, were all validated by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis in S2 cells (Fig. 3b), supporting the reliability of our TaDa data. Although we cannot formally exclude the possibility that Chro binds indirectly to these targets through other chromatin-binding proteins, it was shown that N terminus of Chro interacts with histone H127, suggesting that Chro directly binds to chromatin.
We found that 24% of peaks predicted were within promoter region (±1000 bp from TSS, transcriptional start sites) in our Dam-ID list, while 76% of peaks were in distal region of the genes (Supplementary Data 1). These data suggested that Chro was capable of binding to both promoter and enhancer regions of targets genes. Interestingly, Putzig (Pzg/Z4), a known chromatin insulator that interacts directly with Chro28, 29, is required for reactivation of NSCs. Remarkably, in the larval brains from a null allele pzg 66 at 96 h ALH, 23% of NSCs extended cellular protrusion (n = 267), and none of the NSCs were incorporated with EdU (Supplementary Fig. 5b; n = 714). Consistent with the above finding, knocking down of Pzg by RNAi also resulted in a failure of EdU incorporation in 73% of NSCs (n = 547) and cellular extension phenotype (7%, n = 607), compared to control NSCs with all of them incorporated with EdU (n = 1123) without cellular extension (Supplementary Fig. 5b; n = 822). These data suggest that Pzg also plays an intrinsic role in controlling NSC reactivation. Interestingly, Chro and Pzg were both associated with promoter-associated enhancers in Drosophila S2 cells19, supporting a potential role for both Chro and Pzg as nuclear architectural proteins regulating NSC reactivation.
Our Dam-Chro profiling data predicted that Chro binds to regulatory regions of temporal factors including Kruppel (Kr), pdm1 and grh (Supplementary Data 1). These temporal factors control NSC proliferation or mitotic exit with obscure mechanisms3, 30,31,32. Strikingly, Chro could bind to the predicted binding sites or promoter regions of Kr, pdm1 and grh by ChIP-qPCR (Fig. 3b). The expression of Kr or Pdm1 was unaffected in larval brains with chro RNAi (Supplementary Fig. 5c). At 8 h ALH, Grh is detected in the nucleus of wild-type quiescent NSCs with cellular extensions (Supplementary Fig. 5d). However, remarkably, we found that Grh expression was dramatically reduced in chro RNAi NSCs (98%, n = 920; Fig. 3c). Likewise, 61% (n = 526) or 74% (n = 1072) of interphase NSCs in chro − or chro 612/Df(3L)ED231 mutant showed weak or undetectable Grh expression (Fig. 3c). Furthermore, Grh levels were dramatically decreased upon East knockdown by RNAi (Fig. 3c; 66%, n = 236) or Mtor depletion (Fig. 3d; 84%, n = 56). These data indicate that the spindle matrix complex promotes grh expression in larval NSCs. Grh is reported to maintain NSC proliferation31 but whether its depletion results in quiescence was unknown. In a time-course experiment, we synchronized the larvae from wild type, grh 370 and grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB and examined the Mira+ process phenotype in the NSCs from 12 h ALH to 72 h ALH. At 12 h ALH, 15% (n = 224) of wild-type NSCs displayed cellular extensions and 85% (n = 501) of NSCs were incorporated with EdU. However, at the same time point, 28% (n = 315) of grh 370 NSCs showed cellular protrusions and only 69% (n = 305) of grh 370 NSCs were incorporated with EdU. Similarly, in grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB, 30% (n = 206) of NSCs showed cellular process and only 55% (n = 291) of NSCs were incorporated with EdU at 12 h ALH (Supplementary Fig. 5e). At 24 h ALH, 11% (n = 581) of NSCs in wild type displayed cellular extensions, while 16% (n = 345) and 18% (n = 564) of NSCs in grh 370 and grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB showed cellular process, respectively. At 48 and 72 h ALH, none of NSCs in wild type showed cellular extensions. By contrast, NSCs with cellular process phenotype were observed in grh 370 and grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB at both time points (48 h ALH: grh 370, 14%, n = 450; grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB, 18%, n = 531; 72 h ALH: grh 370, 14%, n = 419; grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB, 13%, n = 401) (Supplementary Fig. 5e). These data suggest that Grh is important at early larval stage for NSC reactivation. Consistent with these observations, at 96 h ALH in the hemizygous grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB mutant, 11% (n = 672) of NSCs showed cellular protrusions and 32% (n = 831) of NSC failed to incorporate EdU (Fig. 3e, f). Similarly, we also observed NSCs with cellular extensions in grh 370 NSCs (Fig. 3e). These observations indicate that Grh has a role in central brain NSC reactivation similar to spindle matrix proteins.
Drosophila grh gene spans over 40 kb in the genome and has eight transcripts, namely grh-RL, grh-RP, grh-RJ, grh-RI, grh-RH, grh-RK, grh-RN and grh-RO. In our Dam-Chro profiling data, we found a predicted peak localized at the regulatory region of grh (isoforms I, J, H, P or L). To explore whether Chro could regulate grh transcription, we performed ChIP-qPCR and identified a 423 bp regulatory region of grh, which was significantly enriched (Fig. 3b). These observations support the conclusion that Chro regulates the expression of Grh. Next, we ascertained whether overexpression of Grh was able to suppress the defects in the exit from quiescence in NSCs of chro − mutant brains. Grh has eight isoforms due to alternative splicing and we overexpressed Grh O, the NSC-specific isoform of Grh in chro − (chro 71/612) mutant background. While 26% (n = 755) of NSCs showed cellular processes in chro − mutant, only 15% of NSCs (n = 1098) displayed cellular extensions when Grh O was overexpressed in chro − mutant. Moreover, EdU incorporation was increased from 24% (n = 584) of NSCs to 36% (n = 523) of NSCs upon overexpression of Grh O (Supplementary Fig. 7d–f). The incomplete suppression was likely due to the fact that Grh is one of many targets of Chro in NSCs and that overall expression of Grh in chro − NSCs was weak, with 26% of them (n = 500) showed very weak Grh expression (Supplementary Fig. 7g). This result further supports our conclusion that Chro promotes the expression of Grh in NSCs during reactivation.
Chro represses pros to promote NSC reactivation
The differentiation factor Pros was detected in the nucleus of NSCs when they enter quiescence and transient expression of Pros in nucleus at low level can induce NSC quiescence5. Intriguingly, our Dam-Chro profiling data also predicted a Chro-binding site in pros regulatory region that was far from its TSS (Supplementary Data 1). To assess whether Chro could also bind to the promoter region of pros gene, we performed ChIP-qPCR assay. Strikingly, a 2.5 kb regulatory region near to the TSS of pros was dramatically enriched, compared to the control (Fig. 4a, b), suggesting that Chro binds to the promoter region of pros.
We wondered whether Chro suppresses premature nuclear Pros in proliferating NSCs. In wild-type larval brains, nuclear Pros was never observed in NSCs from 48 to 96 h ALH (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 6a). Remarkably, from 48 to 96 h ALH, majority of chro − NSCs displayed nuclear Pros localization (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 6a). Similarly, weak nuclear Pros was observed in vast majority of NSCs in chro RNAi, chro 612/Df(3L)ED231, chro 17a/71 and chro 8c/71 mutants (Fig. 4c, d). Ectopic Pros expression in NSCs for extended period of time results in premature differentiation into ganglion mother cells (GMCs) and depletion of larval NSCs33. However, NSCs from chro − or chro RNAi did not undergo premature differentiation, because these NSCs expressed Klumpfuss (Supplementary Fig. 6b), a transcription factor that distinguishes NSCs from GMCs34, 35. Importantly, NSCs were not depleted in chro − mutants and chro − NSCs were absent for a neuronal marker embryonic lethal abnormal vision (Elav) (Supplementary Fig. 6c, d). Furthermore, 91% (n = 773) of NSCs in east RNAi and 30% (n = 61) of Mtor MARCM clones displayed nuclear localization of Pros in NSCs (Fig. 4e and Supplementary Fig. 6e). In the tVNC, Grh maintains mitotic activity of NSCs by inhibiting premature nuclear Pros30. Similarly, central brain NSCs retained weak nuclear Pros in grh 370 or grh 370/Df(2R)PcLB (Fig. 4d). Taken together, the spindle matrix complex and Grh prevent low level of nuclear Pros in NSCs.
Next, we tested whether Chro regulated NSC reactivation through preventing expression of nuclear Pros in NSCs. To reduce pros levels, we introduced a heterozygous pros 17/+ mutation in chro mutant background, because a strong depletion of pros would result in NSC overgrowth and would interfere our analysis36,37,38,39. Remarkably, lack of EdU incorporation observed in chro − mutants was significantly suppressed by heterozygous pros 17/+ (Fig. 4f, g). Likewise, NSCs with cellular extensions or nuclear Pros localization phenotypes were significantly suppressed by heterozygous pros 17 in chro −, chro 17a/71 or chro 8c/71 mutant (Fig. 4h, i and Supplementary Fig. 7a–c). In addition, notable suppression of NSC reactivation defects was observed in Mtor k03905, pros 17/+ mutant (Fig. 4j, k). These observations indicate that the spindle matrix complex regulates Pros expression to maintain NSC proliferation. Previously, Mira degradation releases Pros from cell cortex and enter nucleus in GMCs40, 41. Our conclusion that Chro represses pros expression in NSCs may reflect two different mechanisms underlying pros expression within NSCs and GMCs, respectively. Next, we ascertained the genetic interaction among chro, grh and pros. We found that overexpression of Grh further rescued the chro depletion-induced NSC quiescence in pros heterozygotes. When Grh O was overexpressed in chro − pros 17/+ background, 6% (n = 1140) of NSCs displayed Mira+ cellular extensions and 54% (n = 1336) of NSCs were incorporated with EdU (Supplementary Fig. 7d–f). The NSC quiescent phenotype observed in Grh O; chro − pros 17/+ were much weaker compared to Grh O; chro − (NSC process: 15%; NSC EdU incorporation: 36%; Supplementary Fig. 7d–f) or chro − pros 17/+ (NSC process: 9%; NSC EdU incorporation: 45%; Fig. 4f–i) background. This result greatly supports our model that Chro regulates the expression of both grh and pros to govern NSC reactivation.
Here we demonstrated that the spindle matrix complex represented by Chro functions downstream of InR/PI3K/TOR signalling pathway and regulates the expression of a temporal transcription factor Grh and a quiescence-inducing transcription factor Pros to permit NSC reactivation (Fig. 5). This provides a previously missing link between extrinsic relay of signalling from blood-brain-barrier glia and subsequent activation of InR/PI3K/TOR signalling in NSCs to intrinsic transcription factors Grh and Pros that regulate reactivation or quiescence of NSCs. Recently, a role for hippo pathway in regulating NSC quiescence was reported42, 43. It remains to be determined whether or how Hippo pathway relates to InR/PI3K/TOR pathway and spindle matrix proteins during reactivation. Interestingly, Chro is not only essential for NSCs to exit quiescence, but also critical to prevent NSCs re-entry into quiescence at later stages when NSC growth is largely independent of nutritional requirement.
We have multiple lines of evidence to indicate that the new role of spindle matrix proteins in NSC reactivation uncovered here is distinct from their known role in mitotic spindle assembly. First, chro depletion in MB neuroblasts that do not enter quiescence resulted in spindle assembly defect, without causing a cell cycle arrest. Second, NSCs with chro depletion under insc-Gal4, but none of the MB neuroblasts upon chro depletion, appear to be in G0/G1 stage of the cell cycle. Third, overexpression of mitotic cyclin CycB or G1/S cyclin CycE was unable to rescue the quiescence phenotype of NSCs with chro depletion under insc-Gal4. Fourth, JIL-1 kinase that interacts with Chro and is required for spindle assembly in Drosophila S2 cells, is dispensable for NSCs to exit from quiescence. Thus, spindle matrix proteins play a novel role in regulating reactivation of NSCs independent of their known mitotic function.
The recent advances on understanding molecular signatures of mammalian quiescent stem cells, including NSCs, has largely dependent on the traditional cell isolation, sorting and profiling44, 45. How well these in vitro profiling data faithfully represent in vivo quiescent NSCs is difficult to assess. Our NSC-specific in vivo profiling of Dam-Chro in Drosophila NSCs was the first attempt of its kind towards understanding of intrinsic mechanisms of NSC reactivation and, therefore, is particularly timely. Spindle matrix proteins are speculated to play important roles in regulating genomic organization, but the mechanism remains elusive20, 21, 23. Our data also demonstrate, for the first time, that Drosophila spindle matrix protein Chro likely functions as a nuclear architectural protein in NSCs during their reactivation. First, Chro binds to thousands of sites on the genome in NSCs during their reactivation. Second, Chro is capable of both activating grh and repressing pros expression in NSCs. Third, our Dam-ID data suggested that Chro potentially binds to both promoter and enhancer regions of numerous genes in NSCs. Fourth, Pzg, a chromatin insulator protein that interacts directly with Chro, is also required for NSC reactivation. All these features of Chro resemble those of nuclear architectural proteins46. Taken together, Chro likely mediates long-range DNA interactions by either facilitating promoter-enhancer interaction or bringing silencers to promoters to turn off genes in NSCs during their reactivation. Our model is also supported by a recent report that Chro mediates long-range DNA interactions and is also part of an insulator complex in Drosophila S2 cells47.
Interestingly, an analogous spindle matrix with several conserved proteins is also found to be important for mitosis in mammalian cells19. The spindle matrix in mammalian cells is assembled by Ran GTPase, stimulating the assembly of both microtubules and Lamin B-containing matrix48. A recent report showed that alterations of Lamin B1 function led to cell cycle arrest and senescence in human dermal fibroblasts and keratinocytes49. Consistent with our finding that Chro regulates Pros in NSCs, Drosophila Bj1, the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor for Ran GTPase, also promotes Pros nuclear export and NSC self-renewal50. Ran has a well-established role in nuclear transport51. Interestingly, translocated promoter region (Tpr), the mammalian homologue of Drosophila Mtor, is a component of the nuclear pore complex and may directly regulate cell cycle genes in nucleoplasm52. Therefore, spindle matrix proteins may have an evolutionarily conserved intrinsic function to regulate NSC reactivation/proliferation.
Fly stocks and genetics
Fly stocks used in this study were: chro 8c (Wasser, M); chro 17a (Wasser, M); chro 71 (Wasser, M); chro 612 (Wasser, M); UAS-Chro (Wasser, M); pros 17 (Doe, C.Q); UAS-Grh O (Bray SJ); grh 370 (Bray SJ); pzg 66 (Nagel, A.C.); UAS-CycB (Lehner C.); UAS-CycE (Richardson H.); OK107-Gal4 (L. Luo); Jil-1 Z2 (K.M. Johansen). The following fly stocks were obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (BDSC): UAS-InR.A1325D (InRCA: InR constitutively active, BDSC8440); UAS-Rheb (BDSC9689); UAS-PI3KCAAX (BDSC25908); chro deficiency (Df(3L)ED231; BDSC8090); grh deficiency (Df(2R)Pcl7B; BDSC3064); east RNAi (BDSC33879). chro RNAi (v101663) and pzg RNAi (v25542) were obtained from Vienna Drosophila Resource Center (VDRC). Mtor k03905 was obtained from Kyoto Drosophila genetic resource center (DGRC 111163). To induce RNAi knockdown of various genotypes, Drosophila larvae were kept at 29 °C by insc-Gal4 unless otherwise stated. To generate transgenic fly stocks containing genomic DNA encompassing wild-type chro and its promoter region, a P(acman) BAC clone, CH322-159M1 was integrated into BDSC9736 (y1 w1118; PBac7VK00018) genome53.
To deprive larvae of dietary amino acids, larvae hatching within a 2-h window were transferred into amino acids-free medium (5% sucrose, 1% agar in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)) and raised at 29 °C for 3 days before larval brains were dissected.
Drosophila larvae were dissected in PBS, and larval brains were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde with PBS + 0.3% Triton-100 (PBT) for 15 min. The samples were processed for immunostaining as previously described54. Confocal images were taken from LSM710 and brightness and contrast were adjusted by Photoshop CS5.1. Primary antibodies used in this paper were guinea pig anti-Dpn (1:1000; J. Skeath), mouse anti-Mira (1:50, F. Matsuzaki), rabbit anti-Mira (1:500, W. Chia), mouse anti-Grh (1:10, AH Brand), rat anti-CD8 (1:250, Invitrogen, Cat#: MCD0800), rabbit anti-GFP (1:500, Molecular Probes, Cat#: A21311), rat anti-Elav (1:10, DSHB, Cat#: Rat-Elav-7E8A10), mouse anti-Pros (1:10, DSHB, Cat#: Prospero (MR1A)), mouse anti-Dac (1:5, DSHB, Cat#: mAbdac2-3), mouse anti-α-tubulin (1:200, Sigma, Cat#: T6199), guinea pig anti-Asl (1:200, G Rogers), mouse anti-γ-Tub (1:200, Sigma, Cat#: T5326), mouse Acetylated-Tub (1:100, Sigma, Cat#: T7451), rat anti-Kr (1:100, EADC, Cat#: 574), rabbit anti-Pdm1 (1:500, W. Chia & X. Yang), rabbit anti-PH3 (1:200, Sigma, Cat#: 06‐570), mouse anti-Dlg (1:200, DSHB, Cat#: 4F3 anti-discs large), rabbit anti-Klumpfuss (1:200, X. Yang) and guinea pig anti-Chro-C (1:500, this study). DNA was labelled by ToPro-3 (1:5000, Invitrogen, Cat#: T3605).
To generate NSC MARCM clones55, Drosophila larvae were heat shocked at 37 °C for 90 min at 24 h ALH. The larvae were heat shocked one more time after 10–16 h from the first heat shock and then aged for 3 days at 25 °C prior to dissection.
Drosophila larvae were fed with standard food supplemented with EdU with a concentration of 0.2 mM for 4 h. Larval brains were dissected in PBS and fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in PBT (PBS + 0.3% Triton-100) for 15 min. The brains were washed twice in PBT for 10 min, followed by 45 min blocking in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBT. Incorporated EdU was then detected according to the Click-iT EdU protocol (Invitrogen). After EdU labelling, larval brains were rinsed twice by PBT, blocked by 3% BSA in PBT for 30 min and followed by standard immunohistochemistry.
Quantification of cellular extensions and EdU incorporation
Drosophila larval brains from various genotypes were placed dorsal side up on confocal slides. The confocal z-stacks were taken from the surface to the deep layers of the larval brains (12–15 slides per z-stack with 6 µm intervals). For each genotype, at least 15 brain lobes were imaged for z-stacks and ImageJ or Zen software were used for quantifications.
The C-terminal coding sequence (encoding 345–926 amino acids) of Chro (Chro-C) was amplified by PCR and subcloned into the vector pMAL-c2X (In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit, Clontech). The expression of MBP-Chro-C was induced by isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside and purified by amylose resin (NEB). MBP-Chro-C was then injected into one guinea pig, and Chro-C antibodies were generated and purified by GenScript (Hong Kong). Oligos used for Chro-C cloning are:
MBP-Chro-345F (5′-AGGATTTCAGAATTCGGATCCTCCTCGCCTTCCTCG-3′) and MBP-Chro-926R (5′-TTGCCTGCAGGTCGATTACGTTGGGATGTTGAGCGT-3′).
Approximately 50 brains at 96 h ALH or 100 brains at 24 h ALH from wild type were homogenized with RIPA buffer (1% NP-40; 0.1% deoxycholate; 0.1% SDS; 150 mM NaCl and 50 mM, pH 8.0, Tris-Cl) with proteases inhibitors. The protein extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and probed with guinea pig anti-Chro-C (1:1000, this study) and mouse anti-α-tubulin (1:10,000, Sigma, Cat#: T6199). Two replica of experiments were used for quantification in ImageJ.
TaDa in vivo profiling
To identify in vivo Chro-bound DNA fragments, full-length of Chro was cloned into pUASTattB-LT3-NDam (Brand AH) vector using In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit. UAS-Dam-Chro (pUASTattB-LT3-NDam-Chro) or UAS-Dam control (pUASTattB-LT3-NDam) was expressed under the control of insc-Gal4, tub-Gal80ts driver. Embryos were collected in a 4-h period and raised at 25 °C for 22 h. Hatched larvae were transferred into 18 °C (restrictive temperature) for 4–5 days and then shifted into 29 °C for 24 h before dissection. Genomic DNA of Dam-Chro or Dam control was extracted and amplified as previously described, except that 800 larval brains per sample were dissected26. Libraries were constructed from the amplified DNA samples using the illumina TruSeq DNA PCR-free library preparation kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol and sequenced on the illumina MiSeq equipment. Paired reads (2 × 250 bp) were sequenced from Dam-Chro or Dam-Control library and were aligned on Drosophila melanogaster (dm6) reference genome using Bowtie 256. The peaks were called by MACS method57, and the nearest gene was annotated using HOMER58. Two biological replicates were performed for the profiling and analysis, and 2269 overlapping peaks (peak scores >100) from two replicates were recorded in Supplementary Data 1.
The ChIP assay was performed using Drosophila S2 cells according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Millipore). To pull down the chromatin, 2 µl of guinea pig anti-Chro-C or IgG (Millipore, as a control) was used, and 1% of the precipitated DNA was used for real-time qPCR per reaction. To validate predicted Dam-Chro-binding fragments, primers for ChIP-qPCR are designed nearby the predicted region (Pdm1, grh, IM3, CG30158, CR34702 and Vsx1). For those genes that have predicted Chro-binding regions far from the transcription start site, the primers are designed nearby the promoter region of the genes (Kr, CR42836 and pros). The primers used in ChIP-qPCR were listed in Supplementary Table 1.
Statistical analysis among different groups was performed by the Student’s t-test, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered as statistical significant. All the data are shown as mean ± SD. In this work, * indicates P < 0.05 and *** indicates P < 0.001.
The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Morshead, C. M. et al. Neural stem cells in the adult mammalian forebrain: a relatively quiescent subpopulation of subependymal cells. Neuron 13, 1071–1082 (1994).
Ahn, S. & Joyner, A. L. In vivo analysis of quiescent adult neural stem cells responding to Sonic hedgehog. Nature 437, 894–897 (2005).
Tsuji, T., Hasegawa, E. & Isshiki, T. Neuroblast entry into quiescence is regulated intrinsically by the combined action of spatial Hox proteins and temporal identity factors. Development 135, 3859–3869 (2008).
Isshiki, T., Pearson, B., Holbrook, S. & Doe, C. Q. Drosophila neuroblasts sequentially express transcription factors which specify the temporal identity of their neuronal progeny. Cell 106, 511–521 (2001).
Lai, S. L. & Doe, C. Q. Transient nuclear Prospero induces neural progenitor quiescence. Elife 3, e03363 (2014).
Truman, J. W. & Bate, M. Spatial and temporal patterns of neurogenesis in the central nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 125, 145–157 (1988).
Britton, J. S. & Edgar, B. A. Environmental control of the cell cycle in Drosophila: nutrition activates mitotic and endoreplicative cells by distinct mechanisms. Development 125, 2149–2158 (1998).
Hartenstein, V., Rudloff, E. & Camposortega, J. A. The pattern of proliferation of the neuroblasts in the wild-type embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Rouxs Arch. Dev. Biol. 196, 473–485 (1987).
Ito, K. & Hotta, Y. Proliferation pattern of postembryonic neuroblasts in the brain of Drosophila melanogaster. Dev. Biol. 149, 134–148 (1992).
Prokop, A., Bray, S., Harrison, E. & Technau, G. M. Homeotic regulation of segment-specific differences in neuroblast numbers and proliferation in the Drosophila central nervous system. Mech. Dev. 74, 99–110 (1998).
Andersen, D. S., Colombani, J. & Leopold, P. Coordination of organ growth: principles and outstanding questions from the world of insects. Trends Cell Biol. 23, 336–344 (2013).
Colombani, J. et al. A nutrient sensor mechanism controls Drosophila growth. Cell 114, 739–749 (2003).
Chell, J. M. & Brand, A. H. Nutrition-responsive glia control exit of neural stem cells from quiescence. Cell 143, 1161–1173 (2010).
Sousa-Nunes, R., Yee, L. L. & Gould, A. P. Fat cells reactivate quiescent neuroblasts via TOR and glial insulin relays in Drosophila. Nature 471, 508–512 (2011).
Speder, P. & Brand, A. H. Gap junction proteins in the blood-brain barrier control nutrient-dependent reactivation of Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev. Cell 30, 309–321 (2014).
Mairet-Coello, G., Tury, A. & DiCicco-Bloom, E. Insulin-like growth factor-1 promotes G(1)/S cell cycle progression through bidirectional regulation of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors via the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway in developing rat cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 29, 775–788 (2009).
Juanes, M. et al. Three novel IGF1R mutations in microcephalic patients with prenatal and postnatal growth impairment. Clin. Endocrinol. 82, 704–711 (2015).
Zheng, Y. A membranous spindle matrix orchestrates cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 529–535 (2010).
Schweizer, N., Weiss, M. & Maiato, H. The dynamic spindle matrix. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 28, 1–7 (2014).
Ding, Y. et al. Chromator is required for proper microtubule spindle formation and mitosis in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 334, 253–263 (2009).
Qi, H. et al. EAST interacts with Megator and localizes to the putative spindle matrix during mitosis in Drosophila. J. Cell. Biochem. 95, 1284–1291 (2005).
Walker, D. L. et al. Skeletor, a novel chromosomal protein that redistributes during mitosis provides evidence for the formation of a spindle matrix. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1401–1412 (2000).
Rath, U. et al. Chromator, a novel and essential chromodomain protein interacts directly with the putative spindle matrix protein skeletor. J. Cell. Biochem. 93, 1033–1047 (2004).
Cheng, L. Y. et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase spares organ growth during nutrient restriction in Drosophila. Cell 146, 435–447 (2011).
Yao, C. et al. The chromodomain-containing NH(2)-terminus of chromator interacts with histone H1 and is required for correct targeting to chromatin. Chromosoma 121, 209–220 (2012).
Southall, T. D. et al. Cell-type-specific profiling of gene expression and chromatin binding without cell isolation: assaying RNA Pol II occupancy in neural stem cells. Dev. Cell 26, 101–112 (2013).
Yao, C. et al. A nuclear-derived proteinaceous matrix embeds the microtubule spindle apparatus during mitosis. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 3532–3541 (2012).
Gan, M., Moebus, S., Eggert, H. & Saumweber, H. The Chriz-Z4 complex recruits JIL-1 to polytene chromosomes, a requirement for interband-specific phosphorylation of H3S10. J. Biosci. 36, 425–438 (2011).
Cubenas-Potts, C. et al. Different enhancer classes in Drosophila bind distinct architectural proteins and mediate unique chromatin interactions and 3D architecture. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 1714–1730 (2016).
Maurange, C., Cheng, L. & Gould, A. P. Temporal transcription factors and their targets schedule the end of neural proliferation in Drosophila. Cell 133, 891–902 (2008).
Cenci, C. & Gould, A. P. Drosophila grainyhead specifies late programmes of neural proliferation by regulating the mitotic activity and Hox-dependent apoptosis of neuroblasts. Development 132, 3835–3845 (2005).
Pearson, B. J. & Doe, C. Q. Regulation of neuroblast competence in Drosophila. Nature 425, 624–628 (2003).
Cabernard, C. & Doe, C. Q. Apical/basal spindle orientation is required for neuroblast homeostasis and neuronal differentiation in Drosophila. Dev. Cell 17, 134–141 (2009).
Xiao, Q., Komori, H. & Lee, C. Y. klumpfuss distinguishes stem cells from progenitor cells during asymmetric neuroblast division. Development 139, 2670–2680 (2012).
Berger, C. et al. FACS purification and transcriptome analysis of Drosophila neural stem cells reveals a role for Klumpfuss in self-renewal. Cell Rep. 2, 407–418 (2012).
Lee, C. Y., Wilkinson, B. D., Siegrist, S. E., Wharton, R. P. & Doe, C. Q. Brat is a Miranda cargo protein that promotes neuronal differentiation and inhibits neuroblast self-renewal. Dev. Cell 10, 441–449 (2006).
Betschinger, J., Mechtler, K. & Knoblich, J. A. Asymmetric segregation of the tumor suppressor brat regulates self-renewal in Drosophila neural stem cells. Cell 124, 1241–1253 (2006).
Choksi, S. P. et al. Prospero acts as a binary switch between self-renewal and differentiation in Drosophila neural stem cells. Dev. Cell 11, 775–789 (2006).
Bello, B., Reichert, H. & Hirth, F. The brain tumor gene negatively regulates neural progenitor cell proliferation in the larval central brain of Drosophila. Development 133, 2639–2648 (2006).
Hirata, J., Nakagoshi, H., Nabeshima, Y. & Matsuzaki, F. Asymmetric segregation of the homeodomain protein Prospero during Drosophila development. Nature 377, 627–630 (1995).
Ikeshima-Kataoka, H., Skeath, J. B., Nabeshima, Y., Doe, C. Q. & Matsuzaki, F. Miranda directs Prospero to a daughter cell during Drosophila asymmetric divisions. Nature 390, 625–629 (1997).
Poon, C. L., Mitchell, K. A., Kondo, S., Cheng, L. Y. & Harvey, K. F. The hippo pathway regulates neuroblasts and brain size in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 26, 1034–1042 (2016).
Ding, R., Weynans, K., Bossing, T., Barros, C. S. & Berger, C. The hippo signalling pathway maintains quiescence in Drosophila neural stem cells. Nat. Commun. 7, 10510 (2016).
Codega, P. et al. Prospective identification and purification of quiescent adult neural stem cells from their in vivo niche. Neuron 82, 545–559 (2014).
Cheung, T. H. & Rando, T. A. Molecular regulation of stem cell quiescence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 329–340 (2013).
Xu, C. & Corces, V. G. Towards a predictive model of chromatin 3D organization. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 57, 24–30 (2016).
Vogelmann, J. et al. Chromatin insulator factors involved in long-range DNA interactions and their role in the folding of the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004544 (2014).
Tsai, M. Y. et al. A mitotic lamin B matrix induced by RanGTP required for spindle assembly. Science 311, 1887–1893 (2006).
Dreesen, O. et al. Lamin B1 fluctuations have differential effects on cellular proliferation and senescence. J. Cell Biol. 200, 605–617 (2013).
Joy, T., Hirono, K. & Doe, C. Q. The RanGEF Bj1 promotes Prospero nuclear export and neuroblast self-renewal. Dev. Neurobiol. 75, 485–493 (2015).
Smith, A. E., Slepchenko, B. M., Schaff, J. C., Loew, L. M. & Macara, I. G. Systems analysis of ran transport. Science 295, 488–491 (2002).
Kalverda, B., Pickersgill, H., Shloma, V. V. & Fornerod, M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140, 360–371 (2010).
Venken, K. J. et al. Versatile P[acman] BAC libraries for transgenesis studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat. Methods 6, 431–434 (2009).
Koe, C. T. et al. The Brm-HDAC3-Erm repressor complex suppresses dedifferentiation in Drosophila type II neuroblast lineages. Elife 3, e01906 (2014).
Lee, T. & Luo, L. Mosaic analysis with a repressible cell marker (MARCM) for Drosophila neural development. Trends Neurosci. 24, 251–254 (2001).
Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).
Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).
We thank M. Wasser, A.H. Brand, C. Doe, F. Matsuzaki, S.J. Bray, J. Johansen, K.M. Johansen, A.C. Nagel, G. Rogers, W. Chia, X. Yang, the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Centre, Vienna Drosophila Resource Centre, Drosophila Genomics Resource Center, Asian Distribution Centre for providing antibodies and the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank for fly stocks and antibodies. We thank X. Wei for isolation of chro RNAi, W.L. Yong for technical assistance. We thank C.T. Ong and F. Yu for stimulating discussion and critical reading of this manuscript. This work is supported by Singapore National Medical Research Council (NMRC/CBRG/0082/2015 (H.W.)) and Khoo Postdoctoral Fellowship Award (Duke-NUS-KPFA/2015/0002 (S.L.)).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Change History: A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML version of this article.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
An erratum to this article is available at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01017-1.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, S., Koe, C.T., Tay, S.T. et al. An intrinsic mechanism controls reactivation of neural stem cells by spindle matrix proteins. Nat Commun 8, 122 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00172-9
Trends in Neurosciences (2020)
Waking up quiescent neural stem cells: Molecular mechanisms and implications in neurodevelopmental disorders
PLOS Genetics (2020)
The Integrator Complex Prevents Dedifferentiation of Intermediate Neural Progenitors back into Neural Stem Cells
Cell Reports (2019)
STRIPAK Members Orchestrate Hippo and Insulin Receptor Signaling to Promote Neural Stem Cell Reactivation
Cell Reports (2019)
Annual Review of Entomology (2019)